Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
58 Phil 866
-
-
Woman files for action for damages for breach of
promise and recognition of the child.
HELD: Promise to marry not satisfactorily proved so the trial court was right in refusing to grant De
Jesus’ prayer. Also, action for breach of promise to marry has no standing for civil law, apart from
the right to recover money or property advanced by the plaintiff upon the faith of such promise. This
case exhibits none of the features necessary to maintain such action.
- Antonia de Jesus only entitled to the support of the first child because of Cesar’s prior recognition.
No support for the second child because no proof of paternity or recognition presented.