Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.

com>

HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880 - YOUR TIMELY

RESPONSE IS REQUESTED
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 10:50 AM
To: maura.healey@state.ma.us, jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us
Cc: governor.schedule@state.ma.us, "Constituent.services@state.ma.us"
<constituent.services@massmail.state.ma.us>, elizabeth warren
<elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>, sydney levin-epstein <sydney_levin-
epstein@markey.senate.gov>, ayanna pressley <ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov>, lori trahan
<lori.trahan@mail.house.gov>, theresa watson3 <theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov>, andrew lelling
<andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, mary murrane <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, christina sterling
<christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>, igo-fightfraud@state.ma.us, ma-igo-general-mail@state.ma.us,
"Comerford, Sean M. (DOR)" <comerfords@dor.state.ma.us>, Nairoby Gabriel
<Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>, Nora Keefe <Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov>,
chairmanoffice@sec.gov, CommissionerStein@sec.gov, CommissionerJackson@sec.gov,
CommissionerPeirce@sec.gov, david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>, "Jeffrey B. Loeb"
<JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>, Kevin Polansky <kevin.polansky@nelsonmullins.com>, "Murphy, Matthew
T." <mmurphy@casneredwards.com>, kmchugh@harmonlaw.com

Dear Attorney General Healey and Asst. Attorney General Boodoo,

As the Plaintiff in the above-referenced Federal complaint, I respectfully preface this email by
reminding you that I am a Pro Se litigant with no legal experience who has been forced to
represent himself for nearly a decade - seeking damages related to an ILLEGAL foreclosure
associated with the 2008 US Foreclosure Crisis AND which was identified as illegal by: (1) The
US Department of Justice (DOJ); (2) Federal Bank Regulators; and (3) Defendant - Commonwealth
of Massachusetts.

Since it becomes necessary to begin the next phase of addressing the corruptive behavior associated
with this litigation, you are respectfully informed of the following:

1. MISPRISION OF TREASON claims under 18 U.S. CODE § 2382 – As DEFENDANTS in the

litigation referenced above: (1) the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (2) Former AG Martha
Coakley; and (3) representing counsel - Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq., have ALL personally witnessed a
recused judicial officer who has consciously decided to issue a 9th (VOID) order [Ref. ECF No. 163]
without jurisdiction – clear and irrefutable violations to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 –
JUDICIAL TREASON. Based on your collective silence/nonfeasance, it appears that you have made
a decision to follow the direction of a recused judge as if she (US District Court Judge - the Hon.
Allison Dale Burroughs) still has jurisdiction over this (or any other related) docket when clearly – as
a matter of record, she DOES NOT. You are aware that by doing so, you have personally violated
your oath as officers of the Court - and along with the Commonwealth have committed incremental
criminal violations that warrant amending the original complaint and updating Federal Prosecutors.
The collective decision NOT to report evidenced crimes of TREASON (at minimum) shows cause to
now bring incremental Misprision claims under 18 U.S. CODE § 2382 against you personally and
against the Defendants - Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Martha Coakley, Esq. via
amendment to the existing complaint (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880);

2. RICO violations under 18 U.S. Code § 1964 – by consciously deciding to collude with a
recused judicial officer (as well as with the other named the Defendants and their retained counsel) to
commit these crimes, there is now cause for the Plaintiff to either amend or bring new claims against
you, the Commonwealth and Ms. Coakley under the RICO ACT;

3. Fraud on the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) - by consciously deciding to collude with a
recused judicial officer (as well as with the other named the Defendants and their retained counsel), it
appears that your intentions (including the intentions of the Defendant Commonwealth of
Massachusetts and Ms. Coakley) are to continue deceiving the court in order to arrive at a corrupt
and pre-determined outcome. Therefore, it becomes necessary for the Plaintiff to amend existing
claims against all referenced parties under Federal Rule 60;

4. Economic Espionage under 18 U.S. Code § 1831 (Economic Espionage Act) - by

consciously deciding to collude with a recused judicial officer, it appears that collectively your
intentions are to continue damaging the Plaintiff’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret - that was
designed to assist The United States with Economic Growth/Recovery from damages suffered during
the 2008 US Foreclosure/Financial Crisis (Ref. The HARIHAR FCS Model ©). Therefore, it
becomes necessary for the Plaintiff to amend existing claims against all referenced parties under the
Economic Espionage Act. This includes Conspiracy to Defraud The United States under 18 U.S.C.
§ 371.

5. Incremental Hardships to the Plaintiff – The conscious decision to collude with a recused
judicial officer is causing incremental (and unnecessary) financial hardships to the Plaintiff. The most
pressing of these hardships pertain to housing AND DOCUMENTED THREATS by the MA DOR
(Department of Revenue) to refuse granting Hardship status that has been consistently validated by
EVERY MA State and Federal Court, including the US Supreme Court. Therefore, the Plaintiff
shows cause to amend his complaint, including the damages sought against all referenced parties.

Respectfully, let me be very clear - criminal claims that (in part) involve Treason, Fraud, RICO,
Economic Espionage and Conspiracy against The United States have been evidenced against
you, the Commonwealth and former AG Coakley. That evidence has necessarily been placed in
full view of the American Public - and the entire Nation is watching. You are aware that as a matter
of record, any assumed safety net of: (1) Sovereign Immunity; (2) Judicial Immunity; or (3)
Litigation privilege was waived long ago with the evidenced (and unopposed) Fraud on the
Court claim(s) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3).

As representing counsel, you and Attorney General Healey are respectfully being given this
opportunity to enter into a mutual agreement discussion (on the civil portions of the complaint only)
as a sign of my continued GOOD FAITH - despite the severe damages you continue to cause to
me personally and the evidenced (perceived) threat you pose to this Nation by collectively
maintaining your current position. It brings me no pleasure in having to pursue criminal and
professional penalties in addition to civil damages. But I can assure you - if collectively your legal
position remains unchanged, my pursuit of legal accountability against ALL parties will continue, even
if it takes another 20 years. That includes the pursuit of disbarment/licensure revocation(s) and a
criminal sentence(s) to be served in a Federal prison for these evidenced violations of record. Keep in
mind that with just the Misprision claims alone, there are now NINE (9) counts evidenced against
you, Defendant - Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Defendant - Martha Coakley, Esq. - and
that only pertains to the evidenced claims involving RECUSED US District Court Judge - Hon.
Allison Dale Burroughs.
Assistant AG Boodoo - the purpose for now including Attorney General Healey directly (along with
copying Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA), US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), US Senator Ed
Markey (D-MA) and other legislative leaders) is to ensure that they are fully aware and informed of
the evidenced legal risk to the Commonwealth. At this stage it is unclear as to whether or not
your deceptive conduct and evidenced criminal behavior has come with the full support of AG
Healey or Governor Baker. If that is found to be the case, there will (at minimum) be cause to: (1)
amend the original complaint; and (2) update Federal/State Prosecutors, members of Congress and
The White House.

Finally, in the event that you collectively choose to maintain your current legal position, please
be advised that this email communication(s) now serves as documented proof that you were FIRST
respectfully given the opportunity to legally resolve these serious issues and elected NOT to do so.
Because of the severity of evidenced criminal claims associated with this litigation, this email
communication will now be made available to Federal/State Prosecutors, members of Congress,
the White House (via www.whitehouse.gov), the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission)
as well as to the Public, for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for my personal
safety and security. I sincerely hope that collectively you will reconsider your position and decide to
engage in a settlement discussion that is mutually beneficial - and which ultimately contributes to
the greater good of this Commonwealth and to our great Nation. Either way, my legal path
moving forward remains clear. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your timely
response no later than 5pm Friday, November 8, 2019.

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff