PTE Essays with Solution.

Pros and Cons of extreme/adventure sports.

OR
Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you
support them or not.

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, popularity of extreme sports has continued to grow over the
last decade. People would like to do some dangerous sports like scuba diving, bungee
jumping, bull fighting,etc in many countries. I am inclined to believe that these sports
are in fact dangerous and they should not be promoted (my opinion in intro). This essay
will discuss some advantages and disadvantages of adventure sports before giving
appropriate conclusion.

Agree (In favor) Disagree(Not in Favor)

On one hand, people who are in favor
of adventurous sports claim, the risk-
taking sports help in the development
of self-confidence and independence
of a person. For instance, by
successfully facing up the challenges
of adventurous sports like rock-climbing,
young people overcome with their
fears. Specifically, going through a
dangerous experience gives them the
courage to face the hurdles of their daily
life (explaining example). Furthermore,
there is a lot of fame and money
involved in these sports. Performers
get attention by doing stunts on
motorcycles and jumping from tall
buildings. In addition, playing such
sports may considered as the symbol
of manpower and something of gaining
prestige in society.
On the other hand, opponents of extreme
sports say that, being a extreme sportsmen
is very risky and dangerous. If a rope breaks
while bungee jumping, for example, a
participant will be seriously injured or even
die. Also, equipment needed for these
sports are very expensive, many people
cannot purchase them which eventually
increases the chance of the tragedy. Above
all, youngsters who gravitate towards
these types of sports could not concentrate
on their studies, due to which, they were not
able to complete their studies and hence not
able to get lucrative jobs.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, we can say that
adventure sports have many impressive benefits including problem-solving, self-
confidence and teamwork. However, it is recommended that these sports should be
tried under proper guidance and supervision. The government should provide adequate
knowledge about these sports to athletes so that they can protect themselves from its
dangers.
Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you
support them or not.

Originally Posted by maxngo

I wrote this as a “Take side” essay:

Extreme sports such as parachuting, bungee-jumping and scuba-diving have

burgeoned ( increase rapidly) to become popular activities today. Some people think
that they are good sports for a stronger personality, while others argue they are very
dangerous and harmful. I am inclined to believe that these sports are in fact
dangerous and they should not be promoted(taking side in intro). The following
paragraphs will analyze their inevitable (unavoidable) dangers and suggest other better
sports for people to participate.
First of all, extreme sports are dangerous and risky (main point 1). These forms of
sports generate high levels of risks and there are always chances of unfortunate events
that will happen (describing point 1). For example, there have been a number of
youngsters who died from participating in scuba-diving in Texas. (example for point 1).
Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2014 has found nearly
4000 cases of injuries from extreme sports in the USA alone.(support example 1)
Second of all, there are a variety of other forms of sports that are just as exhilarating
and interesting as extreme sports for people to play (main point 2). They not only are
safer but also bring to players a feeling of relaxation and entertainment (describing point
2). As an example, sports such as tennis, football and horse-racing are tremendously
fun to play and also safe (example for point 2).
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that extreme sports are
indeed dangerous and there are many other safer types of sports that people should
participate in instead. It is expected that people take cognizance of this fact and further,
the governments must establish guidelines to educate people about the
aforementioned.

Pros and Cons of extreme/adventure sports.

OR
Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you
support them or not.
Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, the popularity of extreme sports have continually increasing
from last few decades. These days in many countries people like to play skydiving,
bungee jumping, bull fighting, and etc rather than going for traditional sports.
Considering this, some analyst argue that people should not play these sports, while
others opine it helps people to increase their confidence. This essay will discuss some
advantages and disadvantages of adventure sports before giving an appropriate
conclusion.

Agree (In favor) Disagree(Not in Favor)

To begin, most people are keen to play On the other hand, opponents of extreme
extreme sports for many reasons. sports say that, these sports are very
Perhaps the fundamental reason is that, dangerous which may cause life-
people want to overcome fear against threatening threat. For instance, if a rope
certain things. For example, bungee tears while bungee jumping, a participant will
jumping, a sport which people leap off be seriously injured or even die. In addition,
from several hundred metres high with equipment needed for these sports are very
just a rope tied to their feet, requires a expensive, sometimes a person cannot
great deal of courage. Another purchase them which increases the chance
important reason is that, these sports of tragedy. Furthermore, youngsters who
tend to be highly stimulating. It is often a gravitate toward these types of sports do not
good way to relieve anxiety and concentrate on their studies, due to which
tension which come from various they are not able to get lucrative jobs.
aspects. Furthermore, a lot of fame and
money is involved in these sports.
Players easily come in the limelight by
doing stunts on motorcycles and
jumping from tall buildings which
eventually make celebrities. Above all,
playing these games person becomes
physically and mentally fit due to
which he or she can live his or her life in
a healthy way.

Conclusion:
To sum up, we can say that adventure sports have many impressive benefits including
problem solving, self-confidence and team-work. However, it is recommended that
these sports should be tried under proper guidance and supervision of a guard.
Government must take appropriate steps to educate people so that tragedies can be
decreased.
Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change
can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree.
(Written by someone)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Climate has been changing since past many years owing to innumerable reasons(intro
line). Some people are thinking that the governments should make changes at the
upper level to protect atmosphere, while others argue that individuals are responsible to
take initiative towards environment change and their impact. I am inclined to believe that
both government and individual are equally have to take part in order to stop polluting
environment (opinion in intro). The following paragraphs will analyse the impact and
reason, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

First of all, people are making huge amount of carbon dioxide emission every days
(main point 1). Thus, individual have to understand the ramifications are arising in many
forms( explaining point 1). For example, because of tremendous amount carbon
dioxide emission, temperature is increasing day by day, melting polar ice and rising
sea level, which will draw to drastic consequences in the globe (example for point 1). As
a result, individuals should establish strategies, and have to work in direction to control
environmental pollution.

Second of all, the governments are in high command, and they can build phenomenon
to diminish pollution issue, which is rising since past era. Environment pollution has
sparked the controversy over the potential effect of this trend on marketing, advertising
and fossil fuel in the recent time just because of governments are lagging behind to
sustain environment. As an example, studies shown that Indian population rising, and
pollution also ameliorating, though, government has taken only 45 corrective decisions
in last three decades.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propound the view that every person is equally
responsible as government, and both have to work together to develop pollution free
society for the generation. It is expected that people take cognisance of education and
further, the government should establish the guidelines to reduce pollution.

Environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems? Who do u

think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the government's, organization or
each individual?
Intro:
An essential problem of the 21st century is world pollution which isincreasing at an
alarming rate which leads to a moot question “who is responsible for this?”. Some
people argue that, it is the prime responsibility of the government and big organizations,
while others opine it is an individual responsibility. I personally believe that, both higher
authority and each citizen have to take part equally to protect the environment. The
following paragraphs will analyse the impact and reason, and thus will lead to a logical
conclusion.

Government/ Organization Role Individual Role

On one hand, the government could
certainly(surely) make more efforts to
reduce air pollution(Main Point 1). Higher
administration can introduce stringent laws
on factories and public, so that gas
emissions from factories and vehicles which
lead to global warming can be reduced.
Furthermore, the government could also
impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline
companies (suggestion 2). Moreover,
corporate houses should start inventing
technology which does not cause pollution
to our environment.
For example, in Japan, manufacturing
plants are encouraged to use solar, wind or
water power.
On the other hand, individuals can also
contribute to reducing the carbon
contents from the air (Main Point 2) by
many ways. Firstly, people can prefer
public transportation rather than using
their own private vehicle. For instance,
people can use trains or buses to
commute. This not only helps to save our
fossil fuel but also helps to reduce the
surface temperature of the earth. In
addition, individuals should be
encouraged to stop the use of plastic
bags and prefer paper bags. As a result,
individuals should establish strategies,
and have to work in the direction to
control environmental pollution.

Environment and pollution (Written by Someone)

No one can overlay the fact that the planet we live on is a serious threat. Humans
are responsible for a variety of environmental problems, but we can also take
steps to reduce the damage that we are causing to the planet. This essay will
discuss environmental problems and the measures that governments and
individuals can take to address these problems.
The environment is afflicted by two main reasons, i.e. air pollution and waste.
Firstly, rapid industrialization has led to massive deforestation. Secondly
urbanization of rural areas to support industries has augmented the emission of
CO2 leading to Global Warming, which may have devastating effect on planet in
future. As human population increases, we are also producing ever greater
quantities of waste which contaminates the earth and pollutes rivers and oceans.
Government, corporations and individuals should work in close proximity to
reduce the impact of this issue. Government can design and implement strict laws
against air polluters. Companies should produce recyclable and eco-friendly
products. As an individual, we should move towards adapting organic lifestyle.
In a nutshell, we are the reason for this mess and we need to take measures
collectively to live in harmony with nature. Hence governments and individuals
must play their part in looking after the environment.

Climate change and about the roles that Government, Corporate and Individuals
can play to improve it. (Written by someone)

The global climate has been changing drastically since past decades owing to
numerous reasons and human activities. Some activists believe that environment
change is occurring due to global warming, while others says that lack of the
governments and individuals concentration leads to various atmospheric changes. I am
inclined to believe that both the government and individuals are equally responsible for
causes and their control. The following paragraphs will analyse the potential causes,
underlying responsible authorities, and their measures.

Firstly, global warming is a prime reasons for the environment change. Also, the
global warming leads to rise in temperature, melting polar ice, and thus, increasing sea
levels. This is happening because of the arduous human activities; for example,
people are driving their personal car every day for commuting, which emitting lots of
carbon dioxide in the environment, and using fossil fuel.

Second, the governments and individuals have to take care of the climate in which they
are living in. The governments should run campaigns, and individual have to follow
and promote these adverts awareness into the societies. As an example, the USA
government, organising “green seminars” every six month in order to think, research
and provide optimal solutions to save environment, and US citizens are actively
becoming members of this seminar clubs.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, global warming is a
major concern for the nations for the climate change. Thus, both states and folks both
have to participate actively in this movement of environment change. It is expected that
cognisance of this education and further, the governments should establish climate
change guidelines to educate people.

Packaged Food

Intro:
Over-packaging of food products has become a trend in today's competitive world.
Producers are trying to attract consumers with an attractive packaging of their
products. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that
consumers should avoid over packaged products, while others consider consumers
should buy over packaged products. This essay will give assertion(opinion) on both
sides of the contention(dispute) before delivering plausible conclusion.
Packaging should be done Should not be done
On one hand, there are reasonable On the other hand, people who are
arguments in favor of over-packaging from against to over-packaging claims, the
manufacturer. They say, it helps them cost of the material use to pack an
increase the durability, safety and freshness item is actually added to the product.
of products. For instance, the shelf life of For instance, pills and tablets are
products increase significantly when they are found to be packed in much bigger and
packed in several layers aluminium foil and colorful strips than needed which
superior plastic. Specifically, this prevent an eventually increases the drug cost.
item from microbes and other dust particles Moreover, the manufacturers often use
while transiting the products. Furthermore, non-disposable wrappers like plastic
attractive packaging could be a significant which are harmful for our
factor for selling of the product more in the environmental. In addition, small
competitive market. Thus, the manufacturer's amount of real products are often
reason for over packing products seems presented in a large container or
liable. packet and the customers are being
deceived(cheat) by the packet size.
Lastly, the chemical used for packing
can be at bad ailment for health.
Conclusion:

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, extra packaging of products has a

detrimental effect on our environment. I personally believe that, consumers,
producers, and sellers have a collective role to avoid over-packaged products to
solve the negative effects. It is also recommended that a government should spread
the awareness among the users about the drawbacks of over packaging.
 Do you think that place where person grew has an influence on his
accomplishments? Explain with example. Region affects successful people?

Intro:

It is conspicuous that, the environment where a person grew has a significant impact on
his or her mind. Considering this, some people argue that success of an individual
depends upon the environment in which he has grown up, while others opine
surroundings doesn’t affect . However, in my opinion, native place’s environment is only
one factor and a person’s attitude, capability and determination also play a pivotal role
in achieving a success. The following paragraph will discuss both sides and offer an
appropriate conclusion.

Regions affect successful person Regions do not affect successful

person

On one hand, environment plays an
important role in inculcating many traits
in a person. An individual learns many
qualities such aslanguage development,
leadership, and social skills from his or her
surroundings. For instance, Mahatma
Gandhi a famous Indian leader received
most of his leadership skills from people
with whom he spent his childhood time. In
addition, individuals who acquired good
guidance from their family and school
teachers in their young age, easily
accomplish their goals and target more
easily in the later part of their life.
On the other hand, other factors also play
a significant role in influence a person. An
individual who has a strong
determination and focussed mind can
overcome problems in the path of his or
her goal. For instance, Amitabh Bachhan,
a famous Indian actor who was rejected
when he gave his first audition proved
himself because of his strong willpower.
Furthermore, there are many people in our
society who took birth in a very poor family
but because of their hard work they able to
change their situation and become rich.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, only native environment may not be
behind an individual’s success. There are a lot of other factors that take an
individual towards success.

Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness
and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion?
Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, television is one of the most important inventions of the 21st
century. It helps us to see events that take place hundreds and thousands of kilometers
away from us. Some people argue that TV becomes an indispensable part of our life,
while other analysts think opposite to this. I intent to believe that, television has a pivotal
role in our life. Following paragraphs will assert both sides and deliver appropriate
conclusion.

Advantages of TV Disadvantages of TV

To begin, television helps us to make our
life more creative. It provides a wide
range of channels like tourism, travel,
foods, lifestyle, news, and many more, the
information broadcasted in these channels
is so useful that it helps people to
increase their mental horizon.
Moreover, news and discovery
programmes can help to make young
people more aware of surroundings. For
instance, by watching discovery channel
students could learn lots of things which
may help them in their studies. Also,
retired persons who are mostly free can
pass their time by watching television.
Thus, television helps every age group in
different ways.
On the other hand, television has some
disadvantages too. Firstly, staring at
television’s screen for a long period can be
harmful to the eyes and the nerves.
Moreover, children who watch action
serials or movies are more aggressive and
start losing their control from themselves.
For instance, in 2010 in America, around
20% of juvenile crime made by those
children who watch regularly fighting
movies or programmes. Lastly, students
waste their time in front of a television for
hours and that really affects on their
academic results.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, TV is a great medium of getting knowledge and
to enhance our mental horizon. But, it should be noted that excess of every thing is bad.
I believe, we should use this device properly to reduce its side-effects. Government
must take initiative to educate people about its drawbacks.

Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to
take any decisions. Discuss

Intro:

Innovations and new ideas are very important for companies to be able to remain as a
part of the competition. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion
that employees suggestions should be considered in companies, while other opines it is
the sole responsibility of the management team. I am inclined to believe that employees
suggestions must be considered by organizations. Both sides will be critiqued before
the reasoned conclusion is found.

Should TAKE suggestions Should NOT TAKE suggestions.

On the one hand, higher authorities should On the other hand, people who advocate
consider employees suggestions. It is a that only management should take
fact that people working in the particular decisions claims, employees may give
area know the ins and outs of the advice in which they have their personal
processes more deeply than others. For benefit, which could be harmful to the
example, a person who operates company. For instance, workers can give
machines in production plant knows better advice to the management to reduce the
how the efficiency of the company can be working hours. In addition, taking
increased effectively. Furthermore, suggestions from everyone would only
involving employees also saves money lead to chaos. If selected people are in
and time of the organisation. Specifically, the board of decision they can easily
companies who involve their employees in reach to the solution without any dilemma.
taking decisions do not depend on
experts or outsourcing which eventually
save company’s resources. Moreover, the
engagement of employees in decision
making creates a very positive impression
and inspires them to work better. The
employees start feeling as part of the
company and their output significantly
increases.

Conclusion:

To sum up, I pen down by saying that, an organization can only flourish well where its
employees are given the freedom to innovate and rewarded for the same. Top level
management should be smart enough to judge its plausibility of implementation, as
the final decision has to be taken by them.

Celebrities (Written by someone)

Today, many youngsters follow celebrities like sports stars and film stars as
their role models. This can be seen all over social media. It is disagreed to
follow them and this will be considered by taking into account immoral acts
of sports personalities and derogatory roles played by film stars.
To begin with, recently many cases have been published of athletes using
illegal power boosters like drugs or steroids. This impacts negatively on
the minds of his/her follower. For an instance, Lance Armstrong, winner of
several Tour de France races, was found guilty of using performance
enhancing drugs. Hence, youngsters should be discouraged to follow such
sports star.
Secondly, film stars only show their facade to public and not their real life. It
is also seen glamorous film stars playing derogatory roles in movies. For an
instance, Sanjay Dutt, an Indian actor has played roles of mafia or villain,
taking drugs, robbing banks and living a lavish lifestyle. This sets a bad
example for adolescents. Also, he has been found guilty in the court of law,
for some illegal activity. This exemplifies that such film stars should not be
a role model. Youngsters admiration of these personalities should not be
supported.
On the other hand, we also see celebrities doing charity and have
inspirational talent to showcase. This analysis proves that all successful
celebrities may not be role models.
In a nutshell, youngsters should not follow this jazzy personality blindly. It is
recommended to teach youth to follow virtuous characters.

Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u
support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)

Intro:
Today, many youngsters follow celebrities like sports stars and film stars as their role
models.
or
It is irrefutable to say that, professional sports stars and film stars, nowadays,
have become famous public figures to millions of people around the world, especially
the young people. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that
these stars should become a role model for young people, while others consider that
they should not be. I am inclined to believe that, following a good role model will be
beneficial for adolescents. This essay will assert both sides of the statement and
deliver reasonable conclusion.

Agree (Follow them) Disagree (do not follow them)

To begin, there are many benefits of
making celebrities as a role model.
Firstly, there are many sports
personalities who are actively
participating in social activities like
helping poor children to study and
creating awareness on protecting
national heritage. These things definitely
stand as motivation to the young
generation. Secondly, some famous
entertainment stars deliver very
meaningful movies which involve lots of
creativity, this helps children to think like
them. For instance, Aamir Khan, an
Indian actor, acted various roles in
movies which can motivate children to
become like him.
Conclusion:
In summary, the entertainment industry caters different types of celebrities that could
set out negative or positive effects to young people. I believe, if adolescent follows
On the contrary, seeing stars as role
models also have a number of downsides.
First of all, youngsters start getting
inspired from their negative roles and
imitating the same act at home or in
streets can have a severe impact on the
society. Moreover, celebrities are often
found in smoking advertisements,
charged with drugs and other criminal
activities, youth following their path can
result in the destruction of ethical values
of a society. For instance, Sanjay Dutt,
Bollywood Actor is well known for his roles
as a villain, his terrorist acts in different
movies have given rise to violence and
crime in streets of Mumbai. All these were
committed by adolescents for thrill and
adventure.
On the other hand, seeing sports stars as
role models also has a number of
downsides.First of all, regardless of the
role of performing in matches and games,
athletes have no moral sparks or
admirable lifestyles for children to
follow. For instance, some popular sports
stars may have money, fame and appear
prominently on covers of numerous
magazines but this doesn’t mean that the
youth should worship them as a hero
outside the stadiums, so if you are
particularly keen on their moral guidance
and a perfect way of studying, you are
amazingly mistaken. Secondly,
relationship between athletes and kids
are just similar as celebrities with fans,
their appearance in public and in front of
reporters is usually just an outer shell in
order to blur away many scandals and bad
sides. However, these cannot be
compared to its good sides.
well- mannered celebrity it would helpful for him to become more successful in his
life.

Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's

performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a
satisfactory way to do this.

The examination system has long been a serious bone of contention in our society.
Many opine that this can be done only by continual assessment of their assignments
and project work. On the other hand, people are in favojr of formal examination. The
following paragraphs will analyse the inevitable reasons and examples, and thus, will
lead to a logical conclusion.

Agree (Formal Examination) Disagree (Formal Examination)/ Assessment

To start, there are two main benefits of
formal examination. Firstly, in this
system, all students get an equal
opportunity to show their caliber. In
this system, all students get the same
amount of time to give an exam, which
eventually helps teachers to filter
bright students from average children.
Secondly, the examination that are
taken in educational institutes are
conducted in the presence of an
invigilator. This will help to check the
grasping power of the student. For
instance, students have to give answers
without any help of books or a person,
because of this, the memory of
students can be tested on real time
basis.
On the other hand, continual assessment
helps to judge those students who are slow
in studies and do not give their best output
in time constrained exam. For example,
lower age group children under 8 years get
normally confused and not able to perform
well when their exam is conducted under
restricted time.
(In addition, the outcome depends on various
factors such as whether the examination is
conducted in a conducive atmosphere,
whether the student is healthy during the
time of the examination and also the
student’s mood.)Furthermore, a single
examination may not cover the scope of
the subject completely especially in broad
subjects such as medicine and law.
On the other hand, this assessment style is
vulnerable to cheating, fraud and human
error. Students' use variety of methods to
cheat and they may move above their peers.
Furthermore, often exams get rescheduled
because of paper leak. Many students' send
their papers to re-check and bribe the
examiners if they are not happy with the
mark.

Conclude:
To conclude, I pen down saying that, it is evident that both continual assessment and
formal examinations are effective in different ways, but they also have some
weaknesses. I believe, depending on student ability, the evaluation procedure should be
selected. Faculty of institutes and schools must be well trained so that, they can apply
holistic approach for students development.

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. you opinion. good or
bad?(Written by someone)
————————————————————————————————--------------
---
A consumerism trend is growing drastically, and popularity of shopping
malls is increasing because of ample of convenient and comfortable
reasons. Some people believe that this boosting fever of shopping mall
ruining the sales of small retailers in the open market while others argue
that shopping malls are advance great development. The following
paragraphs will analyse the inevitable reasons and examples, and thus, will
lead to a logical conclusion.

Firstly, the conspicuous reason is that shopping malls are collection of

small retailersat one place with having all facilities such as restaurants,
entertainments, variety of item options available. Also, shopping malls are
easy to access because it has huge free or minimal fee parking
available, which makes customer or visitor visit far easy. For example,
Westfield is a very popular shopping mall in all around Australia, which
convey all these facilities at minimal effort and price as compared other
shops.

Secondly, Shopping malls are located near to the central district in

every suburb, which provides great option visit place. As an example,
people are tend to visit shopping malls for fun, get together, entertainments
and more. Thus, shopping malls are becoming very popular in terms of
meeting place for innumerable reasons. In addition, many shopping malls
always having huge discount sales every end of the month, which
attract many customers those are going to local market and paying high
price for the same item.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, shopping

malls are extremely convenient, easy to access, and providing large set of
item ranges to buy for consumers. Thus, it can be said that shopping malls
are great development into today’s era.
Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss
with appropriate examples.

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, world has become a global village. A great number of
international shopping malls are opening their branches in almost all cities of the world.
Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opine that large shopping malls
are replacing small shops, while others argue that malls are vital for economic
development. The following paragraphs will describe both sides of the statement before
deducing a reasonable conclusion.

In Favour of Malls Against Malls

To begin, there are many reasons for
people to believe that large shopping
malls are important for society. Firstly,
these giant malls offer various kinds
of shops at one place. Due to which,
people can easily purchase things
under one roof. Secondly, these
shopping malls are monitored by
security guards, hence visitors feel
comfortable when they walk around the
malls. For example, security cameras
are placed at different angles and at
different locations for tight
surveillance.
On the other hand, these shopping malls
have some drawbacks also. These days
more and more people choose to go to large
shopping malls, due to which the sales of
small shops are going down. As a
consequence, many of these shops owners
have to close their business or have to
reduce the number of employees. In
addition, heavy discounts are offered by
malls in festival seasons which also gravitate
more buyers and divert their attention towards
traditional and small shops. For instance,
around 50% discounts are given to customers
during christmas time. Thus, people mostly
prefer to buy things from malls not from local
shops.

Conclude:
To recapitulate, I personally believe that, the existence of shopping malls will boost the
economic growth of the city. But, many people still depend on small shops for their
livelihood. So it is the government task to make some strict regulations about this issue.

Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others
feel that creates new problems that threaten the quality of life. Discuss both these
views and suggest your opinion?
or
Talk about the pros/ cons of this era as is full of daily inventions.

Intro:
Science and technology have great influence on human life since their inception
(establishment). A lot of technological advancements have been taking place day by
day, and which are conspicuously affecting people's life. Considering this, some
analysts argue that technology is improving our life, while, others think it is creating
problems. This essay focuses on some pros and cons of technological advancements
and asserts the appropriate conclusion.

Pros of technology in this Era Cons

To begin, technology has made our life
very comfortable. It is clear that
computers these days are so efficient
and easy to use for people that they
become a part of their life. People can do
everything on computers which save
their time and effort. Furthermore, with
the advent of electronic
communication world has become a
global village. For instance, VOIP
technology helps people to do face-to-
face conversation with their kin and kith
anytime. Moreover, technology
enhances the students’ interest and
intimacy towards their studies. They
can watch recorded video tutorials to
clear their concepts in any field. Also,
medical discoveries occur at a much
more rapid rate; thanks to machines and
computers that aid in the research
process and allow for more intense
educational research into medical
matters.
On the other hand, technology also brings
some threats to people. Firstly, the
inventions of weapons especially nuclear
war gadgets are extremely dangerous for
the existence of the entire life forms on
the Earth. Secondly, an increased use of
motor vehicles causes the contamination
of the environment which eventually causes
certain problems such as rise in a
surface temperature and global warming.
Lastly, companies that depend heavily on
computer systems to conduct business can
come to a virtual standstill if the system
breaks down.

Conclusion:
In a conclusion, I pen down saying that, the advantages of technologies outweigh
disadvantages. However, as every garden has some weeds, higher authorities must
take appropriate steps to reduce its negative effects.

Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society
in general.
or
In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes and
computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why? Greatest invention in
the last 100 years, medicine, science or technology?
Intro:
Science and technology have great influence in human life since their inception
(establishment). A lot of technological advancements have been taken place till now,
but in this century, computers are considered as the most revolutionary invention for
the development of human beings. This essay will talk about some of the advantages
and disadvantages of computers before delivering plausible conclusion.

Benefits Drawbacks

To begin, there are many aspects of
computers. Firstly, these days computers
are very efficient and easy to use that
they become a part of everyone’s life.
People can do everything on computers
which save their time and effort.
Secondly, information technology has
made our world as a global village. For
instance, skype, the computer application
helps people to do face to face
conversation with their kin and kith
anytime. Thirdly, it enhances the
students’ interestand intimacy towards
their studies. They can watch recorded
video tutorials to clear their concepts in
any field. Lastly, the computer helps us to
manipulate stored information, due to
which we do not need to rewrite whole
paper because of any mistake.
On the other hand, it is argued that due to
more dependency on computers nowadays,
life has become more complicated.
Overuse of computer not only causes
strain on eyes which lead to poor
eyesight but also affects people's health
and causes several diseases. For instance,
according to the recent research, around
40% of American children are suffering
from obesity and the root cause of this is
they spend on an average 4 hours per day
in front of the computer. In addition,
children are too much addicted to
computer games that they are becoming
more introvert.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, computer is the most wonderful gift of our life. It
made our life more easy and comfortable. Government must take initiatives to educate
people about its negative effects so that everyone can get maximum benefit from these
inventions.

Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had
some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
or
Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and
cons impacts.

Intro:
Information technology has brought the world closer together and made it a global
village. Now, we can not only share an information quickly and efficiently, but we can
also bring down barriers of linguistic and geographic boundaries. This essay will discuss
pros and cons of mass communication on individual lives before delivering conclusion.

In favour Not In Favour

To begin, technology has drastically
changed the way of mass communication.
Now, with the help of smartphones, we can
communicate with anyone around the globe
by simply sending a text message or
sending them an email. In addition, we
can do face-to-face communication with
our kin and kith with the help of video
conferencing. For instance, skype, the
computer application helps us to do video
conferencing with the help of internet. Also,
students can take online coaching
regarding their subjects by sitting at home.
This eventually could save their travelling
time.
On the other hand, some people believe
that an information revolution has
decreased the privacy of individuals.
From cell phone’s signals to email
hacking, people are worried about their
private information, which could be
stolen and misused. Furthermore,
traditional culture of many countries is
now changing.To exemplify, youngsters
in Third World countries who watch
Hollywood movies try tocopy lifestyle of
people of developed countries, hence,
they stop giving respect to their culture.
Lastly, as information on the internet is in
English language, many other
languages are losing their importance.

Conclude:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, mass communication has tremendous
benefits for all of us. But, we should keep in our mind that every garden has some
weeds, so government should create some laws to handle negative side of mass
communication.

It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a
good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, professional life and married life both have a pivotal role in
our life. An individual cannot live peacefully if there is no synchronization between
these two lives. Considering this, some people argue that getting married prior to
settlement of career is good, while others opine people must complete their academic
path first. This essay will assert both sides of the argument before delivering a
reasonable conclusion.

Agree Disagree
To begin, if a person marries in an early
age then he or she has more time to
spend with their loved ones before
they die. Moreover, in developed
countries, mostly parents force their
children to live separately. Specifically,
if these youngsters get married earlier
they get a partner to help them.
Furthermore, girls have many
restrictions in their parents house. But
when they marry they get more freedom
to go out with her husband and enjoy
the life more.
On the other hand, there are many
disadvantages if a person marries before
30 years. Firstly, individuals have to take
more responsibilitiestoward their family,
due to which, they do not get enough time
to study and most of them leave their
study. Secondly, women have to sacrifice
their professional life because of caring
their children and they have to depend on
their husband. Thirdly, marrying at an early
age also increases the population. For
instance, according to India's 2014
population statistics, it is proved that people
who married in early age have greater
number of children as compared to those
who married in late in their life. Lastly, as
maturity level is low in youngsters chances
of divorce increases.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, marrying late is a better option
than marrying in early age. This makes a person a more responsible and
mature before taking this crucial step.

Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree?

Intro:
Laws have a vital role in our society. They are laid by the government and required to
keep the society and country in an order and harmony. Considering this, some people
believe that laws can change human behavior, while others think laws only give
direction to humans so that chaos in society can be prevented. This essay focuses on
both sides of the argument and asserts the appropriate conclusion.

Agree Disagree
To begin, laws play an essential role
in development of the society. It
helps in smooth functioning of the
nation by governing the behavior of
people. For instance, traffic lights helps
people to travel easily without creating
any chaos.
However, enforcing laws can place limits on
the behavior of people, it really never can
change the human nature which is immutable.
This seems to be a very
plausible(reasonable) point
l
On the other hand, imposing laws has created
a sense of fear among people of getting
punished. For instance, damaging the
historical monuments, books or another form
of art is considered a crime and is punishable
under vandalism law. It infuses a fear in the
public that if they do some illegal activity, they
will be punished. If this fear will not be there,
then the instances of terrorism and crimes will
increase that will make the life of the members
of society unstable and disturbed. Laws make
our lives comfortable.

In conclusion, we can say that rules and regulations can help in controlling the
behaviour that is dangerous. Laws not only help in checking the reckless nature of
people but are necessary for the development of society.

Some people believe that law can change human behavior. Do you
agree / disgree?(Written by someone)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
Human behavior is bound with their natural instinct and feelings to others. However,
some people think that human behavior can amend by imposing ample of laws and
regimes,while others argue that behavior cannot be changed using limited laws and
regulations. I am inclined to believe thatlaw only helps to prevent crime and culprit
activities in the human hood, but it is agreed to say that it cannot change human
thinking and behavior at certain times. The following paragraphs will analyse the
inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

First of all, laws are assisting/help in preventing criminal activities in every facet of
human community. Also, law bonds to/ encourage citizens of a country to act in certain
ways by providing a specific list of the rule of codes. For example, a person cannot
murder someone because of criminal act 190, in which he has to face death sentence
by the power of law. As a result, individuals stop pursuing activities which lead to
major and minor offenses, but it cannot change their thoughts.

Second of all, human nature and behavior are inborn qualities, these cannot be
changed at any stage of life span, but indeed, it can be controlled using various
regulations. For example, Darwin has proved by research that humans have been
evolving since past many centuries just only because of their acting, behavior and
feelings. Thus, it is certainly true that none of law can stop acting individuals according
to their desire into the society.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, human behavior has
strict relation with predefined laws into the society, though; it does not change their way
of behavior and thinking according to their beliefs.

Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your
opinion? Support it with personal examples.

It is irrefutable to say that, violence by juveniles has increased in recent years at an

alarming rate in our society. Children are involving themselves in crime and making
our society jeopardize. Considering this, some people opine that parents should be
responsible for their young one’s fault, while others argue parents should not be
punished. The following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable reasons, and thus will
lead to a plausible conclusion.

Disagree Agree
On one hand, parents should not be
blamed for their children’s fault as the
decision to commit the crime is
entirely made by the children. There
are many parents who have done
their best part in the upbringing of
their children so that their child
cannot commit any offence, yet, their
offspring still succeed in committing
the same. Moreover, mass media is
playing crucial role in making
adolescents aggressive. For example,
currently, there are many violent
games and movies that are being
released in the market. This makes a
child’s more violent which could be
one of the reasons for committing the
crime.
On the other hand, parents should be held
accountable(responsible) for their children’s
crimes because parents are the first people
that a child gets to know after he or she is born.
It is believed that parents start shaping the
child’s moral compass and character from a
very young age. In addition, most of the
children do offense because they were
violently abused by their parents when they
were young. For instance, according to 2013
statistics, in America, most offense were made
by juvenile belongs to a criminal family.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, parents should not be solely blamed and
punished for their children’s actions. Other factors should be taken into account when
deciding on whom to blame. The government must take some prudent steps to educate
children in their schools, so that they do not commit crime.

Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts,
and in what ways this can impact on their reputation.

Intro:
It is conspicuous that, shopping culture has been changed from the last one decade.
More and more companies these days offering lucrative dealsto gravitate more
customers toward themselves. Considering this, some people believe that offering
discounts by companies decrease company's brand value, while others opine it helps to
increase organization’s revenue. The following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable
reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

Disagree Agree

To begin, people who claim discounting
degrades brand value claim that, the profit
margin in the stores will decline as the
goods are sold at reduced prices.
Sometimes, these prices may even be below
than market value. Furthermore,
On the other hand, offering discounts
increases the customer base of the
organizations. People prefer to do more
shopping during a sale, discounts
encourage people to spend more.
Moreover, many businesses have
givingdiscounts to customers may
encourage them to ask for it all the time and
if the marketer does not give a best deal,
they may get discouraged and look at other
places for the same. Above all, discounting
can actually hurt organization’s business in
the long run. For instance, if a company is
giving discounts on time to time basis it
shows that it has a lack of confidence on its
products and customer may think that the
product is not trustworthiness.
monthly, quarterly or yearly sales
goals. For instance, if a business is in
danger of missing these goals, offering
discounts can help the business to
meet their sales figures. Additionally,
discounting items enable you to free up
room in stores, clearing last season's
stock, or out-dated models. For
instance, Reebok, the clothing
company, offers discount up to 60%
during Christmas days. It helps the
company to clear the last year stock so
that new items come on store shelves.

Conclusion:

To sum up, I would like to say, although discounts decreases the margin of the
company, but it helps customers to buy branded things at reasonable price. Thus,
giving discounts do not decrease brand value of the company but increase customer
base.

Illiterate of 21stcentury (Written by someone)

The advancement of the contemporary era has literally changed the definition of
literacy. With rapid technological changes, it has become imperative to adapt new skills
and dump the obsolete. It is agreed that to stay relevant to the constantly changing
environment one must not only know how to read and write, but also need to know how
to learn, unlearn and relearn. This essay will discuss compelling reasons to accord the
rubric.
Firstly, innovative inventions is changing the way we do things. For an instance,
computer's Operating System’s started with DOS and recently an upgraded version -
Windows 10 has been released. It was mandatory for an individual to unlearn DOS
and learn and relearn the upgraded versions to stay afloat in the Sea of Changes.
Moreover, to stay relevant with the technology, it has become essential to keep on
learning constantly. The latest innovation in telecom sector - smartphones with
advanced cameras and multi-tasking featureslured people to buy it and imposed
them to learn and relearn the new features of the new phones. This exemplifies that
to be known as literate in this century, one must repeatedly update the learning
process.
This analysis proves that to be relevant of this era of regular inventions, embracing the
changes is the mantra of life. In a nutshell, those open to learn, unlearn, and relearn will
be the new literates and it is expected to persist in upcoming decades.
Illiterate of the future would not be one who does not know to read, but people
who do not know how to learn.
or
The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but
those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree?

Intro:
Learning is an indispensable part of our life. From birth till death, a person grasp new
things and use them in his or her daily life. Considering this, some people argue that a
person who do not know the art of learn, unlearn, and relearn is an illiterate in 21st
century, while others opine this is not mandatory to survive. The following paragraphs
will analyze some inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

Agree

First of all, learning is very important for us to survive in this contemporary era.
Technology is evolving rapidly in many industries and reducing labour drudgery
work. For instance, in manufacturing and agriculture business, labour work is almost
obsoleted and replaced by robots and artificial intelligence. So, a person who has
an urge to grasp new things and not resistant to metamorphosis can survive
easily. In addition, learning also improves person’s creativity and imagination. As
a result, this helps a person to invent new things which can help our society to live
properly.

Second of all, many academic researcher

Conclusion:

In conclusion, I would like to say that,

Nowadays, people spend too much time at work, to the extent that, they hardly
have time for their personal life. Discuss.

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, these days jobs are becoming slavemasters. People are
spending a mammoth part of their day in their offices to meet the cut-throat
competition and neglecting their personal and family life. Considering this, some
analyst opine that this trend is good for our society, while others argue opposite to it. I
am inclined to believe that, work-life balance should be present in an individual’s life.
The following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a
logical conclusion.

Agree Disagree

To begin, there are many reasons why
people do overtime work. Firstly, due to
globalization, employees are facing
competition all around the world,
which instigate(encourage) them to give
their best. Secondly, companies are
creating project deadlines too small
which eventually pressurize employees to
deliver their work in a short time. For
example, multinational companies for their
own profit put more pressure on their
employee for their own profit.
On the other hand, long working hours
could affect person’s health and
personal relations. To exemplify,
American Health Associates (AHA), finds
that grey matter of software engineers
who sit in front of computers for longer
than 11 hours daily decreases and
causesmemory related problems.
Furthermore, another problem with this
set up is the effect it has on a person’s
family and social life. When people
spend long hours in the office, they get a
little time to spend with their dear
ones, because of it, children are
deprived of the attention they deserve
from their parents.

Conclusion:

To recapitulate, proper work-life balance is essential to lead a contented life. It is

hoped that, companies arrange their working hours in such a way that employees
also get some time for themselves.

Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive
for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree?

In the globalized world, studying a foreign language is very helpful to communicate with
other nation’s people. It is irrefutable to say that, to succeed in the highly competitive
world, a person must be bilingual or multilingual. Some analysts claim that primary
school is the best place for learning another language, while others claim children
should not be forced to learn. The following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable
reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

Benefits (Should learn) Drawbacks (Should not learn)

To begin, studying a foreign language in an
early age has many advantages. Firstly,
learning a foreign language is helpful for
the growth of a child’s brain. A study by
United Nations, for instance, has proved
that learning any language other than the
native’s mother tongue, activates various
parts of the brain, which eventually make
a child intelligent. Secondly, by studying
foreign language, a child can easily
communicate with Alien Land people
and can understand their culture and
lifestyle. Thirdly, knowing a foreign
language will help a child to express
things more clearly as they have a wider
range of vocabulary than those who start
late.
On the other hand, putting excess
pressure on kindergarten pupils to learn
a foreign language have downsides also.
It, indirectly, increases the burden of a
primary school students, due to which,
they will not able to understand
important subjects such as Science and
Mathematics, fundamentally. Moreover,
children may get confused because of
learning many languages at the same time
and this could have a negative impact on
their personality development. For
example, it is claimed that bilingual
children develop the ability to talk more
slowly than monolingual kids.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the benefits of learning a foreign language in early age are apparently
outweigh the drawbacks. I believe, a person equipped with more languages definitely
help the society to make it more prosperous and flourished.

In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the

opposite as well.

Intro:
It is conspicuous that tourist industry has grown enormously over the last five decades
and people are travelling from one country to another for many reasons. Considering
this, some people opine that tourism has tremendous benefits to the developing
countries that host it, while others argue it has lots of drawbacks. The following
paragraphs will analyze the inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical
conclusion.

Agree Disagree
To begin, there are significant benefits
that tourism brings to a country. Firstly, a
thriving(flourishing) tourist industry implies
an increasing need for a variety of
services such as hotels, transport,
restaurants, and entertainment. This
eventually results in increase in a number
of jobs being created for people who lack
a college education. Secondly, tourism
also helps to understand the foreign
culture more deeply. For instance, many
tourists go to India and live there for
many years and get first-hand
experience of its culture. Moreover,
tourism is a "Green Industry” and
generates a low level of pollution.
On the other hand, there are some harmful
aspects of tourism. A country may suffer
from the loss of their traditional culture.
For instance, youngsters in Third World
nations try to copy a lifestyle, customs,
and language of tourists. This may vanish
their traditional culture radically.
Furthermore, to gravitate more tourists and
profits, the government are doing
deforestation and building attractive
places, because of it, carbon contents
are increasing and causing much health
related problems. In addition, countries
spent major budget to attract tourist
which could be used in other problems like
in research, poverty etcetera.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, a nation should seek to develop its tourism
industry because it boosts its economy and improves relationship with other countries.
However, proper rules and regulations must be created by higher authorities to protect
nation’s environment.

The only thing that interfere with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean
by that? And do you think he is correct?

Education plays a pivotal role in everyone’s life by building personality, improving

knowledge and skills. In the traditional education system, the content of syllabus was
very confined and related to only religion, philosophy, metaphysics and scriptural
subjects. This is the reason why Einstein considered education to be the biggest
barrier to his learning. This essay will assert both sides of this statement before
delivering plausible conclusion.

Drawbacks of Education Benefits of Education

According to Einstein, students who learn
through a formally designed education
system are restricted to their thought
process and they not able to think out
of box. In addition, there are some rigid
rules like age of admission, content and
duration of course which are designed by
government or designated agency such as
school.
On the other hand, schooling is very
important for children as it helps to
enhance their mentality and
creativity. In addition, in contemporary
world education is aided with a variety
of technology which helps students to
understand things fundamentally. For
instance, the internet provides a vast
information which helps learners to
improve their knowledge. Moreover,
these days cut-throat competition is at
its peak, having an adequate
education helps a person to get a
lucrative job.

To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, having appropriate
education has number of benefits. The government and administration must take
some prudent steps to enlighten adolescents about importance of education.

Value added by travel in Education. Is travel a necessary component of education

or not? Will scholar sitting at home have more knowledge?

Education plays a pivotal role in everyone’s life by building personality, improving

knowledge and skills. …..
The following paragraphs will discuss some inevitable reasons before delivering
plausible conclusion.

On the one hand, travelling helps students in many way. Visiting new places not only
help in broadening scholars mentality butalso helps them to understand things
more practically. In addition, reading books or theoretical lectures deliver half
knowledge to students, but travelling clears their doubt and help them to understand
things radically and fundamentally. To exemplify, students are taught in their
classrooms about hills, valleys, lakes, and animals, but travelling provide them vivid
picture of these subjects. Hence, travelling is very important for learners.

On the other hand, with the advent of information and technology, scholars can visit
any place in fraction of second virtually. This not only save their precious time but also
their efforts. For instance, Google maps, an online website has three dimensional
pictures of various places and it is so simple to use that even an adolescent can access
it efficiently. Furthermore, videos of different places are also available on the internet
and scholars can get a feeling that they are actually present there. Thus, with the help
of technology, travelling is not the only option to get a first hand knowledge.

To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, ….

Travel to study is over rated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is
travel really required for higher studies? (foreign study)

It is irrefutable to say that, these days more and more students try to get an admission
in foreign universities. Considering this, …., while others opine …. I am inclined to
believe that, travelling to study has both advantages and disadvantages. The following
paragraphs discuss some inevitable reasons before delivering plausible conclusion.

Agree Disagree

To begin, studying abroad has many
benefits. Firstly, thequality of education
in foreign countries is excellent. These
institutions offer a wide range of
subjects that are not available in Third
World nations. In addition, studying in
these reputed institutions almost
guarantees a job for the students when
they complete their studies. Moreover,
studying in foreign countries also gives a
chance to study and
understanddifferent cultures which
help students to increase their mental
horizon.
On the other hand, studying abroad also
has some downsides. Foreign education
costs to people a lot of money, because of
this, many families have to take out all of
their savings or loans to support their
children to go abroad. Furthermore, some
students cannot resist the new
environment, due to this, they either have
to quit their studies or come back to their
respective countries. Also, some students
may lose their focus from their studies
and start gravitating towards earning
more money, which eventually distract
them complete their studies.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, in the globalized world, studying abroad will
help a students to climb the leader of their career more efficiently, but as we know that
every garden has some weeds, a student must be mature to handle changes which
are connected to this.
The space travel is fantastic these day and they are very fascinate towards its but
there are many environmental problems in our planet we should resolve the
problems or travel space and spend a lot of money.
or
Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by human?

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, these days many countries are spending a huge amount of
budget in space exploration. Nations are sending robots and satellites to alien planets
to discover their geographical features. Considering this, there are some people who
advocate that the governments should spend as much money as possible in space
exploration, while others opine this money should be used for some basic needs of
Earth. This essay will put light on both sides of the argument and deliver appropriate
conclusion.

Favour(Do space research) Against (Invest on Earth)

To begin, there are few reasons for
continuing to search the outer space. Firstly,
Asteroid mining helps us to fulfill the needs
of various minerals which are very scarce
on our planet. Secondly, there are some
possibilities that we come in contact
withextraterrestrial species which may be
far advance than us in technology and
medicine. For instance, it may possible that
they know the treatment of AIDS which we
do not know presently. Lastly, as a
population of our planet is increasing at
alarming rate, space for living is becoming
lesser, finding an extra space outside Earth
will help us to cater to this requirement.
On the other hand, the governments
should spend their budget to support
people of Third World nations.
People of these nations are dying
because they do not have to eat
proper diet. For example, in Africa in a
year 2010, around 45% of children
death only occurred due to
malnutrition. Furthermore, as carbon
contents are increasing in our
environment on a daily basis,
administration must use their
resources to find some alternative
fuels which are eco-friendly and help
to save our environment and fossil
fuels.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, many societal problems could be resolved if
the budget amount is use towards the critical problems of Earth.

“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a
group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and
examples.

It is conspicuous(clearly visible) that, throughout history,the thinking of a group of

people is impacting the lives of thousands of civilians. Whether it is considered on a
political or social level, a set of decisions of a group explains how a society should
work. I completely agreed that, in the conflict of interest between different countries or
different groups, it is the innocent people who sacrifice their lives.

To begin with, if ones have different ideas and beliefs regarding religion,culture, and
politics than others, it may result in clashes or conflicts. In addition, the situation
becomes more problematic and dangerous when this is between two larger groups
rather than individuals; it refers to as a war of ideas.

First of all, during World War II, a group of countries namely US, UK and China
attacked Japan with explosive atomic bombs destroying the cities of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, killing more than one lakh civilians. This is a clear example of the decision
laid by a few countries against Japan to surrender to its allies. Though, these
countries achieved victory in their mission but Japanese people are still suffering from
the radioactive radiation effect which resulted in blindness and mental disorders.
Thus, we can say that political ideologies(a system of ideas and ideals) of a group can
drastically harm society.

In addition, September 11 attacks on US by a group of 19 militants, associated with

Islamic extremist group, hijacked four airplanes and killed around 3,000 people by
colliding airplanes into symbolic US landmark. This example clearly shows how the
decision and planning of these terrorist activists took lives of thousands of innocent
people.

To conclude,I restate that conflicts of ideas are inevitable(unavoidable) so individuals

should respect the ideas of others so that this world can be more peaceful and
prosperous.

Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?

It is irrefutable to say that, these days English is becoming a common language in every
part of the world. It has become an intermediate language between various countries.
Considering this, some people argue that, it will remain a global language, while other
opine it will be replaced by an another language. This essay will give assertion(opinion)
on both sides of the contention(dispute) before deducing reasonable conclusion.
Agree Disagree

To begin with, in today’s international On the other hand, with globalization other
business market, English plays a pivotal languages also trying to grip the world.
role to make the business links with For instance, country like China always
other international companies. In addition, promote its mother tongue chinese and
this language also provides a sharp edge sell its products with chinese instructions
to companies in a hard competitive world on it. This represents that they are
to survive. Moreover, English plays a condemning English language and
significant role in technology. This is promoting their own language. Thus, in
because most of the scientist prefer to coming years we can say other languages
write their research papers in English. can overtake English.
For instance, almost all computer
languages like C, C++, Java, and C# are
first written in English language only.
Furthermore, English language helps
students in making their successful
academic career. Students who have a
knowledge of this language can access
information from internet, magazines, and
books which eventually help them to
increase their mentality . Last but not least,
as social networking isincreasing at
alarming rate, people who know English
language can easily communicate with
human beings of foreign land and share
information with them.

To recapitulate, I would like to say that, although lots of languages are emerging in this
world but I believe, English will remain the most preferred language in coming years.

Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for

public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children
by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which
position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support
your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or
reading.
INTRO:
It is irrefutable to say that, advertising has become an indispensable part of any
corporate businesses. It helps to attract potential customers to expand company’s
business. Considering this, many people argue that advertisements should be placed in
schools whereas others opine juvenile mind is certainly not a good idea to promote
commercial business.

AGREE DISAGREE

To begin, advertisements are good source
of funding for the public schools who
always find themselves hard to manage
their financial cash flow. Furthermore,
advertisements targeted to kids such as
toothpaste and shower gel are helpful to
bring awareness to children. For
instance, children may enlighten about the
importance of hygiene and keep
precautions in their mind before eating
something.
On the other hand, placing advertisements
in schools will distract juveniles who do
not have controlling power on
themselves. School children might less
concentrate on their studies and more
focus on colourful advertisements
because of which their future will be
uncertain as they will not be able to
pass their course easily. For example, a
child who is in the habit of involving in
various advertising campaigns since
childhood, lacks behind on his or her
studies. In the same way, young pupils will
be obsessed with money and if there is
a shortage of money in any stage of their
life while growing, they might indulge in
an illegal act to achieve money.

Conclude:
To recapitulate, advertisements are efficient and effortless source of money for the
public schools, however, as every garden has some weeds, schools management must
act prudently to monitor continuously students’ behaviour and choose suitable
advertisements to put inside schools.