Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Research Article
Current State Value Stream Map. Data collection for the material flow started
• Identification of Wastes and Looking out at the shipping department, and worked
for the methods to eliminate these wastes. backward all the way to the upset and
forging process, gathering snapshot data
• Construction of Future State Value Stream
such as inventory levels before each
Map and Implementation of the proposed
process, process cycle times (C/T), number
concept.
of workers, and changeover (C/O) times,
• Analysis of economical benefits associated
materials handling system etc., for the
with proposed concept.
current state mapping.The Value Stream
3. CHOOSING A PRODUCT OR
Mapping for the passenger car engine
PRODUCT FAMILY
valve manufacturing line has been drawn.
It would be highly creditable to implement
By analyzing the Value Stream Mapping,
the concept of lean manufacturing in an
the following activities are found as the
organization which has smaller more flexible
wastes.
machines that are typically organized into
work cells devoted to production of a family
JERS/Vol. I/Issue I/July-Sept. 2010/138-151
Journal of Engineering Research and Studies
and unloading activities are done at each product. This above wastes indicates the
station and therefore it needs one operator improvement opportunities from current
at every station and it also leads to line. By going through these wastes, the
operator fatigue. Most of the machines methods to eliminate or reduce these wastes
have its own inspection stations even are to be found. Then the Future State Map
though the inspection does not add value to be drawn considering with the improved
to the products. Moreover the machining methods. Then the two maps are to be
process is stopped when the inspection is analyzed to compare the economical
done. The operators are idle, in most of the benefits Future state over current state.
stations, while the machine process the
Table 1 : Current State for Passenger Car Engine Valve Manufacturing Line
Process Cycle Value Change NO. WIP Loading Unloading NO. of Method
Time Added Over of m/c per of
in sec Time Time in opera- operator Trans-
in sec tor ferring
sec
Rough 13 11 600 1 200 Manual Auto 1 Manual
grinding
Head 18 15 300 1 0 Auto Auto 1 Manual
diaturning
Grooving 10 8 300 1 500 Auto Auto 1 Manual
and
chamfering
Finish 5 3 300 1 1500 Auto Auto 1 Manual
tappet
end I
Intermediate 14 11 900 1 1500 Manual Auto 1 Manual
grinding
Finish 14 12 900 1 0 Manu Auto 1 Manual
grinding al
Flame 15 13 0 1 1000 Manual Manual 1 Manual
Hardening
The technique that makes the JIT principles • Once in 3 months raw material inspection
practical is called KANBAN. KANBAN is report must be submitted.
Kanban is a signal to replace what has been • Any process change must be approved by
used. If the authorization is present, one can customer.
The kanban system is based on use of cards it affects more, the cost of production. We
called ‘Kanbans’. The card is put in a can call this production as a ‘Push
rectangular vinyl slack. The following three Production’ as the machine stations in the
kinds of cards are normally used: manufacturing line produces the valves based
manufacturing processes are designated as the quantity which the preceding process
preceding process (PP) and subsequent should produce. These cards circulate within
process (SP). The Withdrawal Kanban (WK) the factory (Pre-machining section).
Where, the bottle neck (2 hour round trip) that can be in a batch to do the heat treatment
process or station is Heat Treatment in our process is 500.
case because the optimum number of parts
A trial had taken for the Kanban movement with time for a part of a shift starting at 6:00
JERS/Vol. I/Issue I/July-Sept. 2010/138-151
Journal of Engineering Research and Studies
6:00 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 8
6:01 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 8
6:05 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 8
6:10 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 8
6:15 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 8
6:20 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 8
6:25 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 8
6:35 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 8
6:40 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 8
8:00 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 8
SS – Safety Stock , WKP – Withdrawal Kanban Post, UP – Under Processing ,FGS – Finished Goods Store
POKP – Production Ordering Kanban Post
6.3 Waste Elimination and Layout up stage grinding operation. The diameter will be
gradation in Machining Section equal to (5.95-0.375). Hence the inventory
In the machining shop there are three stages gets reduced. The second waste which we
for grinding the stem. The purpose is to reduce can eliminate is by using a single cutting
the diameter from 5.95 to 5.469. The tool. Turning of head diameter, valve seat,
amount of material removal in each stage is chamfering at head and tappet grooving,
0.375, 0.092, and 0.014mm. Since the finish facing and chamfering are done at two
grinding is required the operation is stations even though they are consecutive
mandatory but we can eliminate the operations. Since these operations involve
intermediate grinding operation by purchasing lathe, this can be combined and done in a
the bar of the size which comes after the first single station. The third waste which we can
JERS/Vol. I/Issue I/July-Sept. 2010/138-151
Journal of Engineering Research and Studies
No. of operators in 9 5
machining
Productivity per operator 222 400
This operation can be performed by the this effectively reduces time and manpower.
grinding operation without changing any In the second stage of operation seat turning
alternate machinery or setup. Hence the is one of the operations. Instead of doing
required length can be obtained. The fourth this operation if forging operation is
item which we can eliminate or reduce is performed to an extend that the seat parameter
the inspection as it will not add any value to is brought to a level of what it will be after
the product. Since one engine valve is being the seat turning operation then seat turning
inspected for about four minutes involving operation can be eliminated. Hence we can
three members this can be modified by directly perform the seat grinding operation
adopting a simple but effective method. We thus reducing the time needed for the
can adopt the multi gauging system based on particular seat turning operation.
machine vision system. This system takes just 7. CONCLUSION
about 10 seconds to inspect the valve. Hence Thus, the value stream maps for the current
JERS/Vol. I/Issue I/July-Sept. 2010/138-151
Journal of Engineering Research and Studies
state and future state for both pre machining Manuacturing, Macmillan India ltd., India.
8.William A Sandreas Jr. (2000), Just in Time:
and machining sections have been drawn. The making it happen, John Wiley and sons Inc.
future state map is drawn after the elimination 9.Paul Zipkin (1991), Does Manufacturing Need A
JIT Revolution? , Harvard Business Review.
and or reducing of wastes which were found 10.James P. Womack (1990), The Machine that
changed the world, Harper Perennial, New York,
from the current state map. The necessary US.
kaizens were implemented in the process to 11.J.T. Black and Kavit. R. Antani (1991),
Cellular Manufacturing Insight in Lean
reduce the wastes. The future state map was Production System, Journal Manufacturing
System, SAE Transaction.
developed for the system with lean tools 12.S. Grewal (2004), Development Model for Lean
applied to it, which will improve productivity Improvement – A case study in automobile
industry.
to a greater extent. The elimination and or
reducing of wastes is by making the
process improvements in the current
manufacturing line by adopting some lean
tools like JIT, set up time reduction, WIP
reduction etc.
9. REFERENCES
1. Fawaz A. Abdulmalek and Jayant Rajagopal
(2007) ‘Analyzing the Benafits of Lean
Manufacturing and lue Stream Mapping via
Simulation: A Process Case Study’. Int. J.
Production Economics Vol, pp.223-226.
2. Rother M. and Shook J. (1999), Learning to
see: ‘Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and
Eliminate Muda’. Lean Enterprise Institute,
Brookline, MA.
3. Wagner C. and Abdulmula A. (2001) ‘Design
and Evaluation of Lean Manufacturing Cells: A
Simulation Model’. IIE Annual Conference.
4. William G. Sullivan et al., (2007) ‘Equipment
replacement decisions and Lean Manufacturing’.
Robotics and Computer Integerated Manufacuring
Vol 18 pp.255-265.
5. James B. Dilworth (1993), Production and
operation management, McGraw-hill Inc., New
York, US.
6.Ohno. Taiichi (1998), Just-In-Time for Today
and Tomorrow, Productivity Press.
7.Korgaonkar M G (1992), Just In Time