North America

and Canada’s
Oil Sands
Ports-to-Plains Energy Summit
Dan Ouimet,
Director Government Affairs
ConocoPhillips Canada
April 7, 2011

Slide 1
 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS
OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

The following presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. You can identify our
forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements relating to ConocoPhillips’ operations are based on management’s expectations, estimates and projections about
ConocoPhillips and the petroleum industry in general on the date these presentations were given. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based
upon assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is
expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially include, but are not limited to, crude oil and natural gas prices; refining and marketing
margins; potential failure to achieve, and potential delays in achieving expected reserves or production levels from existing and future oil and gas
development projects due to operating hazards, drilling risks, and the inherent uncertainties in interpreting engineering data relating to underground
accumulations of oil and gas; unsuccessful exploratory drilling activities; lack of exploration success; potential disruption or unexpected technical
difficulties in developing new products and manufacturing processes; potential failure of new products to achieve acceptance in the market; unexpected
cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing or modifying company manufacturing or refining facilities; unexpected difficulties in manufacturing,
transporting or refining synthetic crude oil; international monetary conditions and exchange controls; potential liability for remedial actions under existing
or future environmental regulations; potential liability resulting from pending or future litigation; general domestic and international economic and political
conditions, as well as changes in tax and other laws applicable to ConocoPhillips’ business; limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital
related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those described in the forward-looking statements include other economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors affecting ConocoPhillips’
business generally as set forth in ConocoPhillips’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2008. ConocoPhillips is under no obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) to update or alter its forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to
disclose only proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusive formation tests to be economically and legally
producible under existing economic and operating conditions. We may use certain terms in this presentation such as “oil/gas resources,” “Syncrude,”
and/or “Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) proved reserves” that the SEC’s guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. U.S.
investors are urged to consider closely the oil and gas disclosures in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Slide 2
Today’s Presentation

• Safety Moment
• The Context
• About the Oil Sands
• COP’s Position
• The Surmont Project
• Oil Sands Technology
• The Transportation Corridor
• A Secure Energy Future

Slide 3
Safety Moment – Transportation Safety
• Traffic safety is large
focus in Ft McMurray
Area
• Coalition for a Safer 63 &
881 launched in
April 2010
• Now has 16 members
cross-industry

Slide 4
 Global Energy Demand
Forecast
400
50% Growth
350

300 wa bles
e
Ren clear
Nu
250
MMBOED

Coal
200

150 Natural Gas

100

50 Liquids

0
1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035
Fossil fuels projected to meet 80% of energy demand in 2035  
Source:  U.S. Department of Energy, International Energy Outlook & BP Statistical Review.
Slide 5
 Global Crude Oil Reserves by Country
ls
a rr e World Oil
n b s
300 o e
i l li e rv Reserves Accessible
264 0 b re s
7 s Oil Reserves
e s 1 and
s
250
c l u d oi l
I n of State owned
or controlled Canada’s
Oil Sands 53%
200 175
billion barrels

Accessible
Other
136
Other
Other
Other 47%
150 Accessible
Accessible
Accessible
Accessible
Reserves
Reserves
115 Reserves
Reserves
102 99
92
100
60
44 36
50 30
21

0
Saudi Arabia Canada Iran Iraq Kuwait Venezuela Abu Dhabi Russia Libya Nigeria Kazhakhstan United
States
Source: Oil & Gas Journal Dec. 2008

Slide 6
Significant Source of US Supply

Slide 7
Western Canada Oil Production

Slide 8
 The
Oil Sands Extraction Options
Opportunity

• There are 1.7 trillion barrels of oil in the Canadian Oil Sands

• Only 20% can be mined – the rest (1.4 trillion barrels) is too deep

Slide 9
The Opportunity
• Only 20% can be
mined – the rest, 1.7
trillion barrels, is too
‫٭‬Ft McMurray
deep

• Extraction methods:
–Open Pit
–In-Situ

Slide 10
The Opportunity Kearl
Fort Hills
Lake
Horizon Northern
Lights
Joslyn Creek
Muskeg River
Syncrude Albian

Dover Firebag

Peace River Suncor Jackpine

MacKay River Fort
Seal McMurray

Surmont
Peace River Hangingstone

Christina Lake
Long Lake (ECA)

White Sands Jackfish

Cold Lake
Foster Hilda Lake
Creek

Wolf Lake/Primrose Cold Lake

In Situ Projects Tucker Lake

Mining Projects

Slide 11
The Land and Boreal Forest

Slide 12
 The Challenge: Viscosity
10,000,000

Bitumen at virgin reservoir conditions

1,000,000

Peanut Butter
100,000
Ketchup
Viscosity (cP)

10,000

Maple Syrup
1,000

100 Olive Oil Bitumen under

SAGD
10 Cream

Water Typical oil in the ground

1
0 50 100 150 200 250
Temperature (deg C)

Slide 13
SAGD In-Situ Process
• Minimal surface footprint from
well pads.
• Two horizontal wells.
• Top well injects steam into
the reservoir, heating up the
bitumen - reducing viscosity.
• Heated bitumen flows back to
surface through bottom well.
• High water recycle rate from
steam production.

Slide 14
ConocoPhillips Canada

Slide 15
ConocoPhillips Oil Sands Interests
• Leading land position in the
oil sands
• >1 million net acres
• Producing 63,000 bbls/day
• Focused on in-situ
development

Slide 16
Asset Overview: Surmont
• 50/50 joint venture with TOTAL E&P
Canada
• SAGD recovery process
• Phase 1 first steam June 2007,
Currently producing 23,000 bbls/day
• Phase 2 multi-billion dollar mega-
project under construction
• Combined Phase 1&2 plateau of
110,000 bbls/day production
• Future phases could bring peak
production to 400,000 bbls/day

Slide 17
Surmont Phase 2 Update
• Clearing and grubbing completed in 2010.
• In 2011, we will:
• Finish the first phase of the 1,000 bed construction camp
• Complete the majority of the piling and foundation work
• Install our first pipe rack module
• First production for Phase 2 is currently slated for 2015.

For illustration
purposes only

Slide 18
Oil Sands Technology
Greenhouse Gas Production
• Water
by Oil Sands Segment •Use less water
•Recycle more water
Transportation •Use higher salinity water

• Land
Refining
•Disturb less land
•Use land more efficiently
Production •Reclaim land

End User • GHGs

Emissions •Less steam/bbl of oil
•Fewer GHGs/bbl of steam
•Facilitate CCS

Data source: CERA, 2009

Slide 19
Oil Sands Leadership Initiative (OSLI)
ƒ Five like-minded companies working together to create a step-
change in performance in these key areas:
ƒ Technology Breakthrough
ƒ Water Management
ƒ Land Stewardship
ƒ Sustainable Communities
ƒ Vision: Achieving world-class environmental, social and economic
performance in developing this world-scale oil sands resource.
ƒ 2011 Budget: $23.4 million

Slide 20
Technology Example - VIT
• Vacuumed insulated tubing (VIT):
– Consists of concentric inner and outer
standard oil field tubing welded at each end
– A vacuum is applied to the annular space
– Further insulated with a covering

• Benefits:
– Heat retention in SAGD operations,
resulting in reduced steam-oil ratio (SOR)
– Lower SOR means less natural gas burned
and less water used

• Currently being piloted at Surmont

Slide 21
Transportation Corridors

Slide 22
Canada’s Oil Sands & Economic Impact on US

National Impacts 2010 2015 2020 2025

U.S. Gross
Domestic
Product 11.5 34.0 40.4 42.2
($US Billions)

National Impacts
2009- 2011- 2016- 2021-
2010 2015 2020 2025
U.S Employment
(Thousand 172 343 88 22
Person Years)

Source: CERI Study, Oct 2009

Slide 23
A Secure Energy Future
• Oil sands part of the North American energy mix and
can be developed sustainably.
• A conducive policy environment will lead to
Opportunities for all of North America.
• Investing in technology to minimize the impacts
associated with development.
• Opportunities for energy security that include
transportation.

Slide 24
North America
and Canada’s
Oil Sands
Ports-to-Plains Energy Summit
Dan Ouimet,
Director, Government Relations
ConocoPhillips Canada
April 9, 2010

Slide 25