Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

Every year, earthquakes cause massive devastation and thousands of deaths, and

yet we are still a long way from being able to predict when they will occur. Recent
quakes in central Italy are another reminder of how suddenly and unexpectedly
they can strike.

It’s not just predicting whether an earthquake will happen that is important, but
where its epicentre will be, and how severe it is likely to be.

By their nature, earthquakes are a sudden phenomenon, so the science of predicting


them is a complex one. For years, scientists have been working on devising
methods for analysing earthquakes in the quest to minimize their damage.

Here are just a few of the techniques that geologists use to predict when and how
disaster might strike.

Data mapping

Scientists constantly monitor tremors all over the globe to build up a picture of
earthquakes. (The map below gives a snapshot of earthquakes recorded on May 16
2016 of a magnitude of 2.5 or over.)

Image: US Geological Survey (USGS)

This, combined with historical data and the area’s geological make-up, can give
scientists an estimate of where an earthquake is most likely to occur.
Whilst this information is useful, the estimates are a long way off giving us a time
span that is less than years or even decades.

Radon gas

Other methods are focusing on more up-to-the-minute predictions.

Radon gas is constantly emitted through cracks in the Earth. On certain occasions,
spikes in the emission of radon gas have been observed as an immediate precursor
to an earthquake.

Some scientists remain sceptical that the two are directly correlated, but enough
correlation remains for this to be a continued source of study.

Georges Charpak, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist, spent the last years of his life
developing a radon detector for this very reason.

Early tremors

In 2009, a 6.3-magnitude earthquake hit the town of L’Aquila in Italy. For some
months previously, the area had experienced a series of small- and medium-sized
tremors. Some scientists believed that this was a warning sign that a much bigger
quake was to come. However, others disagreed, and the committee convened in the
town to monitor the tremors reassured residents that no major earthquake was
imminent. Having got their prediction badly wrong, the scientists were convicted
of manslaughter for failing to predict the deadly earthquake (later quashed on
appeal, however).

More recently, researchers in Japan have been monitoring tremors below the ocean
using ocean-bottom seismometers, and think that these tremors may herald a clue
as to when the next big earthquake in Japan may strike.

Around 90% of all natural earthquakes occur underwater, so being able to predict
these would help avoid the devastation seen in the wake of the Boxing Day
tsunami in 2004.

Can animals predict an earthquake?

Monitoring animal activity may well signal the possibility of an upcoming


earthquake.
An unrelated toad survey taking place 70km from the earthquake that hit L’Aquila
observed that five days before the earthquake struck almost all the toads suddenly
disappeared.

“Our study is one of the first to document animal behaviour before, during and
after an earthquake. Our findings suggest that toads are able to detect pre-seismic
cues such as the release of gases and charged particles, and use these as a form of
earthquake early warning system,” said lead author Dr Rachel Grant.

Precisely what it is that animals sense or fear is not known. Theories suggest that
they feel the earth tremors before we do, or can feel significant changes in the
atmosphere.

What can we do to save more lives?

The only way to minimize the effect of an earthquake is to construct buildings,


bridges and infrastructure to withstand the onslaught of the biggest of shocks.

In addition, investment is being ploughed into early warning mechanisms like


ShakeAlert.
Image: USGS

Vibrations caused by an earthquake are measured as either P or S waves. P stands


for Primary, because these are the ones that reach the seismometers first. By
measuring the distance between these P waves, and the S waves that follow,
scientists can build a picture of where the epicentre of the earthquake will be, thus
giving residents valuable seconds and minutes to prepare.

Having time to leave a building before the quake arrives could save thousands of
lives.

Potrebbero piacerti anche