Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/12726792
CITATIONS READS
24 74
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Huiman Barnhart on 06 January 2014.
ABSTRACT Data on fertility milestones were collected in 1994 and linked to information collected in a trial
conducted in eastern Guatemala between 1969 and 1977, to examine whether early childhood nutrition was
associated with the timing of fertility milestones. In the original trial, two pairs of villages were randomly allocated
to receive either a high energy, high protein supplement (Atole) or a low energy, no-protein supplement (Fresco).
Mean age at follow-up was 23.47 y (n 5 240). About 62% of women had experienced first birth (median age at first
birth 5 19.83 y). The median intervals from menarche to first intercourse and from first intercourse to first birth were
5.67 and 0.95 y; they were 1.68 and 0.06 y shorter, respectively, for the Atole group than for the Fresco group.
Women who had received Atole in utero and/or during early childhood experienced earlier milestones even after
adjusting for socioeconomic status (SES), education and age at the prior event. Median age at first birth was 1.17 y
earlier for the Atole group. Better growth during early childhood (not severely stunted) led to earlier milestones
KEY WORDS: ● childhood stunting ● improved growth ● education ● fertility ● food supplements
● Guatemala
The improvement of childhood nutrition is viewed by 1969). This has been attributed to improvements in the stan-
many developing countries and international agencies, such as dard of living, including nutrition (Ostersehlt and Danker
the World Bank and UNICEF, as an important strategy for Hopfe 1991, Prado 1986, Veronesi and Gueresi, 1994, Wolan-
enhancing human capital and promoting economic growth ski, 1985). Conversely, Chowdhury et al. (1978) reported
(Martorell 1996). One argument made against investments in delays in the age at menarche in famine/war situations involv-
early childhood nutrition is that they may lead to increased ing acute food shortages. In a study of a rural Indian popula-
fertility and population growth (Bongaarts 1980), a major tion in Guatemala, Delgado et al. (1985) found that taller and
problem in many developing countries with limited resources. heavier girls were more likely to experience earlier menarche
Specifically, improved childhood nutrition could lead to an and, more importantly, that an early age at menarche was
earlier occurrence of key fertility milestones, such as age at associated with earlier marriage. A major limitation of most
menarche, first intercourse, first pregnancy and first birth. The studies to date, however, is their cross-sectional study design,
earlier occurrence of first pregnancy and first birth would then which does not permit inferences of causality (Chowdhury et
be expected to result in higher total fertility rates (Balakrish- al. 1978, Delgado et al. 1985 Frisch 1972, Frisch and
nan et al. 1988, Freedman et al. 1981). A counterargument is McArthur 1974, Hillman et al. 1971, Tanner 1975, Zacharias
that improved maternal nutritional status results in improved et al. 1976). The only prospective study about menarche is our
birth outcomes, such as higher birth weight and reduced infant own from Guatemala. Girls who were severely stunted at 3 y of
mortality (Martorell et al. 1981, Rivera et al., 1996), and age, defined as height-for-age Z-score (HAZ)3 , 23 based on
women whose children survive are more likely to participate in the international National Center for Health Statistics
family planning (Rahman 1998). (NCHS)/WHO reference (WHO 1986), attained menarche
Studies about nutrition and fertility milestones are limited ;7 mo later (P , 0.05) than girls who were not stunted (HAZ
mainly to menarche. In North America and Europe, age at . 22) (Khan et al. 1996). On the other hand, nutritional
menarche has declined by ;3 y since the beginning of this supplementation was not associated with age at menarche
century (Tanner 1968 and 1975, Zacharias and Wurtman (Khan et al. 1995).
1 3
Supported by grants from UNICEF, Thrasher Research Fund and the Na- Abbreviations used: AHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HAZ,
tional Institutes of Health (HD-22240, HD-22297, HD-33468, HD-34531). height-for-age Z-score; INCAP, Instituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá;
2
To whom correspondence should be addressed. NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics; SES, socioeconomic status.
2196
FERTILITY MILESTONES AND EARLY CHILDHOOD NUTRITION 2197
TABLE 1
Selected characteristics of study women, by village and nutritional supplement1
Village
Measured at follow-up
Age, y 23.1 6 2.9 23.7 6 3.1 23.4 6 2.6 23.6 6 2.7
Socioeconomic status2 0.57 6 0.88 0.04 6 0.83 20.34 6 0.83 20.10 6 0.81
Not completed primary school,2 % 51.8 78.6 45.6 63.2
Measured in early childhood
Socioeconomic status2 0.43 6 0.92 20.23 6 0.98 20.55 6 0.87 20.08 6 0.75
Paternal illiteracy,2 % 42.9 50.0 19.3 35.1
Severely stunted,2,3 % 44.6 18.6 59.6 21.1
exactly 3 y, the next best measurement between 24 and 48 mo of age were significant differences among villages in SES, education
was selected, following an algorithm that has been used in previous and nutritional status, both at the time of the original inter-
TABLE 2
Median values for various fertility milestones by education, severe stunting, village and type of supplement1
First Menarche
Age at Menarche to first intercourse to to first Age at first
Independent variable menarche, y intercourse, y first birth, y birth, y birth, y
Type of Supplement
Atole 13.58 (127) 4.67 (127)* 0.91 (59)* 5.73 (127)* 19.46(127)*
Fresco 13.50 (113) 6.35 (113) 0.97 (97) 7.13 (113) 20.63(113)
Village
Large Fresco 13.42 (56) 6.92 (56)* 0.88 (35) 7.79 (56)* 21.57 (56)*
Large Atole 13.92 (70) 4.67 (70) 0.98 (57) 5.54 (70) 19.11 (70)
Small Fresco 13.58 (57) NA (57)2 0.93 (24) NA (57)2 NA (57)2
Small Atole 13.58 (57) 4.67 (57) 0.97 (40) 6.11 (57) 19.72 (57)
Early childhood nutritional status
Not severely stunted 13.50 (156) 5.50 (156) 0.97 (105) 6.98 (156) 20.30 (156)
Severely stunted 13.75 (84) 6.00 (84) 0.94 (51) 7.45 (84) 21.34 (84)
Paternal literacy
Illiterate father 13.33 (90) 4.56 (90)* 1.02 (72)* 5.87 (90) 19.40 (90)*
Literate father 13.67 (150) 6.67 (150) 0.89 (84) 7.91 (150) 21.67 (150)
Schooling
Not completed primary school 13.75 (146) 4.25 (146)* 0.99 (113) 5.47 (146)* 19.35 (146)*
Completed primary school 13.42 (94) 10.42 (94) 0.87 (43) 11.18 (94) 23.62 (94)
, 0.05) among women with literate fathers compared with 1.10, 1.23), adjusting for the concurrent covariates. The ad-
those with illiterate fathers, but time from menarche to first justed hazard ratios (AHR) for the cumulative time intervals
birth and age at first birth were delayed by ;2 y among those (time from menarche to first birth and age at first birth) were
with literate fathers. The effects of schooling were greater. The similar to those reported for the time from menarche to first
median time from menarche to first intercourse was 6.17 y intercourse. There were no significant interactions between
greater for women who had completed primary school com- type of supplement and education.
pared with those who had not (Table 2); the median age at In the adjusted models, paternal illiteracy was significantly
first intercourse was 20.75 and 18.13 y, respectively (P associated with shorter time from menarche to first inter-
5 0.007). Schooling had no effect on time from first inter- course, but longer time intervals from first intercourse to first
course to first birth. Overall, there was evidence of a strong birth. The AHR for schooling indicated that not completing
effect of education, especially for completing primary school, primary school was significantly associated with earlier out-
in delaying the occurrence of first birth. comes in all models except for the time interval from first
After adjusting for concurrent covariates (current SES and intercourse to first birth. SES was not significantly associated
completion of primary schooling), the hazard ratio for Atole with the attainment of milestones.
for time from menarche to first intercourse was 1.98 [95% There was a significant interaction between education and
confidence interval (CI):1.38, 2.84]. Adjustment for anteced- severe stunting during early childhood for time from menarche
ent covariates (parental literacy and SES during early child- to first intercourse but not for time from first intercourse to first
hood) yielded similar estimates (Table 3). The hazard ratio for birth. Better growth, i.e., not being severely stunted at or
the time from first intercourse to first birth was 1.12 (95% CI: around 3 y of age, led to earlier milestones only among women
TABLE 3
Effects of supplementation and severe stunting during early childhood on fertility milestones1
1. Type of supplement 1.98 (1.38, 2.84)* 1.16 (1.07, 1.24)* 2.03 (1.46, 2.82)* 1.95 (1.35, 2.82)*
Paternal illiteracy 1.65 (1.06, 2.55)* 0.68 (0.54, 0.85)* 1.46 (0.88, 2.43) 1.48 (0.89, 2.46)
2. Type of supplement 1.80 (1.37, 2.38)* 1.12 (1.01, 1.23)* 1.85 (1.39, 2.46)* 1.76 (1.30, 2.39)*
No primary school 2.29 (1.30, 4.04)* 1.00 (0.90, 1.10) 2.43 (1.54, 3.84)* 2.50 (1.49, 4.19)*
3. Severe stunting 0.85 (0.67, 1.06) 0.77 (0.57, 1.05) 0.83 (0.70, 0.99)* 0.86 (0.69, 1.07)
Paternal illiteracy 1.74 (1.11, 2.73)* 0.65 (0.53, 0.79)* 1.56 (0.90, 2.70) 1.57 (0.90, 2.73)
4. Severe stunting 0.79 (0.58, 1.08) 0.83 (0.55, 1.27) 0.77 (0.63, 0.95)* 0.80 (0.62, 1.05)
No primary school 2.58 (1.33, 5.02)* 1.06 (0.92, 1.22) 2.75 (1.55, 4.89)* 2.82 (1.51, 5.28)*
1 Values are adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses for type of supplement (Atole 5 1; Fresco 5 0) or severe stunting
(Yes 5 1; No 5 0); *denotes P , 0.05.
2 Models incorporate adjustments for socioeconomic status, village and age at menarche (n 5 240).
3 Models incorporate adjustments for socioeconomic status, village and age at first intercourse (n 5 156).
2200 RAMAKRISHNAN ET AL.
TABLE 4
Joint effects of severe stunting and education on time from menarche to first intercourse, time from menarche
to first birth and age at first birth1
Model n Median, y AHR (95% CI) Median, y AHR (95% CI) Median, y AHR (95% CI)
1 All models incorporate adjustment for socioeconomic status, village and age at menarche (n 5 240); *denotes P , 0.05 for the overall interaction
term between stunting and paternal illiteracy in Model 1 and between stunting and schooling in Model 2 for all 3 outcomes.
2 Median values are not available because fewer than 50% of subjects reached the milestone.
AHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
fact that we compared two groups, i.e., severely stunted or not, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
instead of three groups as in Khan et al. (1996).
Our results demonstrate the importance of social determi- This study would not have been possible without the strong
institutional support and role of INCAP in coordinating and orga-
nants, especially education, in delaying fertility milestones. nizing data collection and entry over the years. The participation of
Paternal literacy was associated with a longer time from men- the women and families in the study villages is gratefully acknowl-
arche to first intercourse, but was not associated with earlier edged. The contributions of Joan Herold, Associate Professor, De-
first birth after adjusting for other covariates. Completion of partment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education at the Rollins
primary school had a larger effect and significantly delayed the School of Public Health in designing and providing oversight for data
timing of first intercourse and first birth, even after adjusting collection and management for the 1994 fertility survey and the
for socioeconomic status and age at menarche. It should be assistance of Clark Denny and Morgen Hughes in data management
noted, however, that schooling delayed only the time to first and analysis are gratefully acknowledged. Finally, the valuable con-
tributions and recommendations made by the anonymous reviewers
intercourse from menarche, but not the time to first birth from are recognized.
first intercourse. Contraceptive use was extremely low in this
population, which may explain the lack of effect of schooling
on the second interval. The other reason may be related to the LITERATURE CITED
accuracy of recall of age at first intercourse. The interval from Ann, T. B., Othman, R., Butz, W. P. & DaVanzo, J. (1983) Age at menarche in
first intercourse to first birth is short, suggesting that women peninsular Malaysia: time, ethnic differentials and association with ages at
may have reported age at first intercourse based on the timing marriage and at first birth. Malays, J. Reprod. Health 1: 91–108.
Balakrishnan, T. R, Rao, K. V., Krotki, K. J. & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (1988) Age
of first pregnancy and/or birth. Age at menarche was not at first birth and lifetime fertility. J. Biosoc. Sci. 20: 167–174.
associated with completion of primary school, which suggests Bergeron, G. (1993) Social and economic development in four Ladino com-
that it is unlikely that early maturers dropped out of school munities of eastern Guatemala. A comparative description. Food Nutr. Bull.
14: 221–236.
earlier; rather, we hypothesize that either better school per-
study of neoplasia and steroid contraceptives. International variability in ages at SAS Institute Inc. (1997) SAS/STAT Software: Change and Enhancements
menarche, first livebirth and menopause. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148: 1195–1205. through Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Nath, D. C., Land, K. C. & Goswami, G. (1999) Effects of the status of women Schroeder, D. G., Martorell, R., Rivera, J., Ruel, M. & Habicht, J.-P. (1995) Age
on the first-birth interval in Indian urban society. J. Biosoc. Sci. 31: 55– 69. differences in the impact of nutritional supplementation on growth. J. Nutr.
Nguyen, L., Nguyen, M. T., Swenson, I. & Pham, B. S. (1993) Selected 125: 1051S–1067S.
determinants of fertility in Vietnam: age at marriage, marriage to first birth Stein, A. D. & Kline, J. (1991) Pre-pregnant body size and spontaneous
interval and age at first birth. J. Biosoc. Sci. 25: 303–310. abortion of known karyotype. Early Hum. Dev. 25: 173–180.
Ostersehlt, D. & Danker Hopfe, H. (1991) Changes in age at menarche in Tanner, J. M. (1968) Earlier maturation in man. Sci. Am. 218: 21–27.
Germany: evidence for a continuing decline. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 3: 647– 654. Tanner, J. M. (1975) Age at menarche. Evidence of the rate of human matu-
Pollitt, E., Gorman, K. S., Engle, P. L., Rivera, J. A. & Martorell, R. (1995) ration, unpublished paper presented at a meeting of the British Society for
Nutrition in early life and the fulfillment of intellectual potential. J. Nutr. 125: Population Studies, London School of Economics, England.
1111S–1118S.
United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (1990) Strategy for
Prado, C. (1986) Secular change and genetic influence in the menarcheal age.
improved nutrition of children and women in developing countries. UNICEF,
Acta Med. Auxol. (Milan) 18: 117–121.
New York, NY.
Rahman, M. (1998) The effect of child mortality on fertility regulation in rural
Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plann. 29: 268 –281. Veronesi, F. M. & Gueresi, P. (1994) Trend in menarcheal age and socioeco-
Rivera, J., Flores, M., Martorell, R., Ramakrishnan, U. & Melgar, P. (1996) nomic influence in Bologna (Northern Italy). Ann. Hum. Biol. 21: 187–196.
Generational effects of supplementary feeding during early childhood. In: 5th Wolanski, N. (1985) Secular trend, secular changes or long-term adaptational
International Workshop on Maternal and Extrauterine Nutritional Factors. fluctuations? Acta Med. Auxol. (Milan) 17: 7–19.
Their Influence on Fetal and Infant Growth, Universidad de Salamanca, Spain World Health Organization (1986) Use and interpretation of anthropometric
(Battaglia, F., Falkner, F., Garza, C., Salle, B. & Rey, J. eds.), pp. 197–204. indicators of nutritional status, WHO Working Group. Bull. WHO 64: 929 –
Ediciones Ergon, Madrid, Spain. 941.
Rivera, J., Martorell, R., Ruel, M., Habicht, J.-P. & Haas, J. D. (1995) Nutritional Zacharias, L. W., Rand, W. M. & Wurtman, R. (1976) A prospective study of
supplementation during the preschool years influences body size and com- sexual development and growth in American girls: the statistics of menarche.
position of Guatemalan adolescents. J. Nutr. 125: 1078S–1089S. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 31: 325–337.
Rubin, D. B. (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. John Zacharias, L. W. & Wurtman, R. (1969) Age at menarche: genetic and envi-
Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. ronmental influences. N. Engl. J. Med. 280: 868 – 875.