Apendices PDF

REFERENCES
Adebiyi, AO, Uchendu, OC, Bamgboye, E, Ibitoye, O, Omotola, B. Perceived

effectiveness of graphic health warnings as a deterrent for smoking initiation
among adolescents in selected schools in southwest Nigeria. Tob Induc
Dis. 2016;14:7. Google Scholar
Awaisu, A, Hagi, A, Ashour, MA, Kheir, N. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette

packages in Qatar: preimplementation awareness and perceptions of ever-
smokers versus never-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:1765–1772. Google
Scholar
Bangladesh: findings from an experimental study. Tob Control. 2015;25:437–

443. Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco
Control Programs—2014. Atlanta, GA: Office on Smoking and Health, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion; 2014. Google Scholar
Dillard, JP, Weber, KM, Vail, RG. The relationship between the perceived and actual
effectiveness of persuasive messages: a meta-analysis with implications for
formative campaign research. J Commun. 2007;57:613–631. Google Scholar, ISI
Hammond, D, Fong, GT, McDonald, P, Cameron, R, Brown, SK. Impact of the graphic
Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control. 2003;12:391–
395. Google Scholar
Hammond, D, Reid, JL. Health warnings on tobacco products: international practices.

Salud Publica Mex. 2012;54:270–280. Google Scholar
Hammond, D, Reid, JL, Driezen, P, Boudreau, C. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette

packs in the United States: an experimental evaluation of the proposed FDA
warnings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(1):93–102. Google Scholar
Hammond, D, Thrasher, J, Reid, JL, Driezen, P, Boudreau, C, Santillán, EA. Perceived

effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a
population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities.
Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:57–67. Google Scholar
Hammond, D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob

Control. 2011;20:327–337. Google Scholar, ISI
Kline, P. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London,

England: Routledge; 1999. Google Scholar
Kollath-Cattano, C, Osman, A, Thrasher, JF. Evaluating the perceived effectiveness of
pregnancy-related cigarette package health warning labels among different
gender/age groups. Addict Behav. 2017;66:33–40. Google Scholar
Levy, DT, Mays, D, Yuan, Z, Hammond, D, Thrasher, JF. Public health benefits from
pictorial health warnings on US cigarette packs: a SimSmoke simulation. Tob
Control. 2016;2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053087. Accessed November
2, 2016. Google Scholar
Mutti, S, Reid, JL, Gupta, PC. Perceived effectiveness of text and pictorial health
warnings for smokeless tobacco packages in Navi Mumbai, India, and Dhaka,
Miller, CL, Hill, DJ, Quester, PG, Hiller, JE. Impact on the Australian Quitline of new
graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tob
Control. 2009;18:228–234. Google Scholar
Ng, M, Freeman, MK, Fleming, TD. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in
187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:183–192. Google Scholar, ISI
Noar, SM, Hall, MG, Francis, DB, Ribisl, KM, Pepper, JK, Brewer, NT. Pictorial cigarette
pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob
Control. 2016;25:341–354. Google Scholar
Rahman, MM, Arif, MT, Abd, RM. Effectiveness of pictorial health warning on cigarette
packages: a cross-sectional study in Sarawak, Malaysia. Malays Fam
Physician. 2015;10:19–26. Google Scholar
Singh, A, Owusu-Dabo, E, Britton, J, Munafò, MR, Jones, LL. Pictures don’t lie, seeing is
believing: exploring attitudes to the introduction of pictorial warnings on cigarette
packs in Ghana. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16:1613–1619. Google Scholar
Sychareun, V, Hansana, V, Phengsavanh, A, Chaleunvong, K, Tomson, T. Perceptions

and acceptability of pictorial health warning labels vs text only—a cross-sectional
study in Lao PDR. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1094. Google Scholar
Stead, LF, Perera, R, Lancaster, T. A systematic review of interventions for smokers

who contact quitlines. Tob Control. 2007;16:i3–i8. Google Scholar
Stead, LF, Hartmann-Boyce, J, Perera, R, Lancaster, T. Telephone counselling for

smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19:CD002850. Google
Scholar
Thrasher, JF, Villalobos, V, Szklo, A. Assessing the impact of cigarette package health
warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay, and Mexico.
Salud Publica Mex. 2010;52:S206–S215. Google Scholar
Thrasher, JF, Rousu, MC, Hammond, D, Navarro, A, Corrigan, JR. Estimating the
impact of pictorial health warnings and “plain” cigarette packaging: evidence from
experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health
Policy. 2011;102:41–48. Google Scholar
Tobacco Labelling Resource Center. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/countries/gulf-

cooperation-council/. Accessed October 29, 2015. Google Scholar
Tomson, T, Helgason, AR, Gilljam, H. Quitline in smoking cessation: a cost-

effectiveness analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:469–
474. Google Scholar, ISI
Thrasher, JF, Osman, A, Moodie, C. Promoting cessation resources through cigarette

package warning labels: a longitudinal survey with adult smokers in Canada,
Australia and Mexico. Tob Control. 2015;24:e23–e31. Google Scholar
Vardavas, CI, Connolly, G, Karamanolis, K, Kafatos, A. Adolescents perceived

effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels. Eur J
Public Health. 2009;19:212–217. Google Scholar
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic. Warning about the dangers of
tobacco. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44616/1/9789240687813_eng.p
df. Updated 2011. Accessed December 22, 2015. Google Scholar
White, V, Williams, T, Wakefield, M. Has the introduction of plain packaging with larger
graphic health warnings changed adolescents’ perceptions of cigarette packs
and brands?Tob Control. 2015;24:ii42-ii49. Google Scholar
WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco

smoking. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/156262/1/9789241564922_eng.
pdf. Updated 2015. Accessed December 21, 2016. Google Scholar
Willemsen, MC, Simons, C, Zeeman, G. Impact of the new EU health warnings on the
Dutch quit line. Tob Control. 2002;11:381–382. Google Scholar, ISI
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Guidelines for implementation Article

5.3; Article 8; Articles 9 and 10; Article 11; Article 12; Article 13; Article
14. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/80510/1/9789241505185_eng.pdf.
Updated 2013. Accessed May 22, 2016. Google Scholar
Appendices
Appendix A
Survey
Questionnaire
Department of Education
Region IV A-CALABARZON
Division of Santa Rosa
LABAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Survey Questionnaire for

Cigarette Retailer Respondents
Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effects on Cigarette
Consumption as Perceived by the Selected Cigarette Users and
Retailers in Barangay Pooc, Santa Rosa, Laguna
Answer in full honesty. Rest assured that all information gathered will be
kept in full confidentiality. Thank you very much and God bless!
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Part I. (Retailer Respondents Profile)
Name (optional): _______________________ Sex: _________________

Address: ______________________________ Age: _________________
Years as Cigarette user retailers: __________________
Part II.
Directions: Answer the following questions honestly. Put check (/) on your
corresponding responses.
4- Strongly Agree
3- Moderately Agree
2 –Moderately Disagree
1- Strongly Disagree
Retailers to their Profit

What are the effects of Graphic Health Warnings on Profit as perceived by
the retailers?
4 3 2 1
1) My profit raised when Graphic Health Warnings Law was
enacted.
2) My Customer on Cigarette increased when Graphic Health
Warnings law enacted.
3) My minimum profit from cigarettes are no longer sustained.
4) My capital has increased when Graphic Health Warnings are
labelled on the cigarettes.
5) The amount of cigarette bought increased when the Graphic
Health Warning law was enacted.
Retailers to their Sold Cigarettes
What are the effects of Graphic Health Warnings on Sold cigarettes as
perceived by the retailers?
4 3 2 1
1) The number of sold cigarettes stays the same before and after
the Graphic Health Warnings Law enacted.
2) Selling cigarettes is much easier when there is no Graphic
Health warnings.
3) The consumer bought more cigarettes than usual when the
Graphic Health Warnings Law was implemented.
4) The consumer did not mind the Graphic Health Warning when
purchasing cigarettes.
5) I have been observed the decreased in sales of cigarettes
because of the Graphic Health Warnings.
Retailers on the Feedback of the Customers

What are the effects of Graphic Health Warnings on the feedback of the
customers as perceived by the retailers?
4 3 2 1
1) My customer have admitted that they felt anxious concern after
noticing Graphic Health Warnings.
2) My customer asked me reasons of having Graphic Health
Warnings on cigarette packs.
3) My customer raise questions about the diseases that cigarette
consumption can bring.
4) My customer do not buy cigarettes anymore because of the
threat on health due to Cigarrete consumption.
5) My costumers did not mind the Graphic Health Warnings.
Survey Questionnaire for

Cigarette User Respondents
Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effects on Cigarette
Consumption as Perceived by the Selected Cigarette Users and
Retailers in Barangay Pooc, Santa Rosa, Laguna
Answer in full honesty. Rest assured that all information gathered will be
kept in full confidentiality. Thank you very much and God bless!
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Part I. (User Respondents Profile)
Name (optional): _______________________ Sex: _________________

Work Status: __________________________ Age: _________________
Years as Cigarette user: __________________ Civil status: ___________
Part II.
Directions: Answer the following questions honestly. Put check (/) on your
corresponding responses.
4- Strongly Agree
3- Moderately Agree
2 –Moderately Disagree
1- Strongly Disagree
Cigarette users on their Expenses on Cigarettes

What are the effects of Graphic Health Warnings on the expenses of
Cigarette users as perceived by the Cigarette users?
4 3 2 1
1) I had budget/fund for my cigarette expenses.
2) I inhibit smoking as I notice/read the Graphic Health Warnings.
3) The Graphic Health Warnings makes me realize to value my
health.
4) I have allotted more budget for my necessities after Graphic
Health Warnings was enacted.
5) Graphic Health Warnings helps me to gradually reduce my
expenses on cigarettes.
Cigarette users’ frequency on smoking
What are the effects of Graphic Health Warnings on the frequency of
smoking as perceived by the Cigarette users?
4 3 2 1
1) Graphic Health Warnings dented the prevalence of my
daily consumption in cigarettes.
2) Since Cigarette packs has Graphic Health Warnings, I stop
consuming cigarettes.
3) Graphic Health Warnings helps me to control my cigarette
consumption.
4) My Cigarrete consumption lessened after Graphic Health
Warnings was enacted.
5) Graphic Health Warnings create an impact in relation to
my cigarette usage.
Cigarette users on their Change of Lifestyle

What are the effects of Graphic Health Warnings on lifestyle as perceived by
the Cigarette users?
4 3 2 1
1) I started to be more health conscious and stop cigarette
consumption when Graphic health Warnings was enacted.
2) I give more time in doing some recreational activities when
Graphic Health Warnings was enacted.
3) When the Graphic Health Law was enacted I become more
concern of my physical health.
4) I became more productive in my daily work since I have less
time in smoking.
5) Graphic Health Warnings lead me to become an advocate of
change to my co-cigarette users to stop from smoking.
Appendix B
Letters
Republic of the Philippines
August 29, 2018
HON. ALVIN CARTAÑO

Chairman
Barangay Pooc
Dear Sir:
Warm greetings!
We, the HUMSS students from Labas Senior High School, are conducting a research
titled, “Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effects on Cigarette
Consumption as Perceived by the Selected Cigarette Users and Retailers in
Barangay Pooc, Santa Rosa, Laguna”.
In line with this, we would like to ask for your approval to distribute our survey
questionnaire randomly in your barangay.
These data gathering will be used in the course of the study. We are looking forward that
our request would merit your approval. Thank you and more power.
Respectfully yours,
KIAN JOSEPH B. HERMOSA

Group Representative
Noted by:
KERR R. ZAMORA
Thesis Adviser
JOCELYN B. REYES
Principal II
Division of City School
City of Santa Rosa
LABAS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – STAND ALONE
August 24, 2018
MARGIE T. MONDERIN
Teacher III
Labas Senior High School
City of Sta. Rosa, Laguna
Dear Ma’am:
Greetings!
We, the students from HUMSS 12 - Humility, are conducting a research titled, “Graphic
health warnings on cigarette packs: Its effects on cigarette consumption as
perceived by the selected cigarette users and retailers in Barangay Pooc, Santa
Rosa, Laguna”. With your expertise, we are humbly asking for your permission to validate
our research instruments. Please use the attached evaluation sheet to your comments.
These instruments will be used in the course of the study. We are looking forward that our
request would merit your positive response.
Thank you and more power.
Respectfully yours,

Noted by:
KERR R. ZAMORA
Thesis Adviser
City of Santa Rosa
August 24, 2018
MARK ANTHONY P. LAGUMEN

Teacher III
Dear Ma’am:
Respectfully yours,

Noted by:
KERR R. ZAMORA
Thesis Adviser
City of Santa Rosa
August 24, 2018
JEFFEREY E. INIWAN
Teacher III
Dear Ma’am:
Respectfully yours,

Noted by:
KERR R. ZAMORA
Thesis Adviser
Appendix C
Certificate of
Proofreading
CERTIFICATION OF PROOFREADING
This is to certify that the research prepared by Hermosa, Kian Joseph B.,
Agasang Jethro Jr. B., Batallia Abegail, and Alcantara Rocky A., entitled “Graphic
Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effect on Cigarette Consumption as
Perceived by the Selected Cigarette Users And Retailers in Barangay Pooc, Santa
Rosa, Laguna” was examined and proofread by the undersigned person in accordance
with the basic mechanics and accepted sentence structures in English. That he is
academically and professionally rightful to examine both the substance and the surface
on this paper.
Mr. KERR R. ZAMORA

Thesis Adviser
Appendix D
Certificate of
Statistician
CERTIFICATE OF STATISTICIAN
This is to certify that the statistical computations of research prepared by
Hermosa, Kian Joseph B., Agasang Jethro Jr. B., Batallia Abegail, and Alcantara
Rocky A., entitled “Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effect on
Cigarette Consumption as Perceived by the Selected Cigarette Users And Retailers
in Barangay Pooc, Santa Rosa, Laguna” was examined and monitored by the
undersigned person.
Ms. JASMINE S. VELASCO

Researchers’ statistician
Appendix E
Validation Sheet
VALIDATION SHEET
This is to certify that the main instrument in the study entitled “Graphic Health
Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effect on Cigarette Consumption as Perceived by
the Selected Cigarette Users And Retailers in Barangay Pooc, Santa Rosa, Laguna”
has been validated by the following:
Ms. MARGIE T. MONDERIN

English Instructor
Mr. JEFFREY E. INIWAN

English Instructor
Mr. MARK ANTHONY P. LAGUMEN

English Instructor
Ms. JASMINE S. VELASCO

Statistician
Mr. KERR R. ZAMORA

Thesis Adviser
Appendix F
Computation for
ANOVA
Retailers to Retailers to Retailers on Total
their Profit their Sold the Feedback
Cigarettes of the
Customers
17-26 3.3 2.8 1.2 7.3
27-36 2.89 2.69 1.49 7.07
37-46 2.95 2.8 1.2 6.95
47-56 2.99 2.71 1.37 7.07
57-66 2.9 2.8 1.1 6.8
Total 15.03 13.8 6.36 35.19
SST = (3.3)2 + (2.89)2 + (2.95)2 + (2.99)2 + (2.9)2 + (2.8)2 + (2.69)2 +

(2.8)2 + (2.71)2 + (2.8)2 + (1.2)2 + (1.49)2 + (1.2)2 + (1.37)2 +
(𝟑𝟓.𝟏𝟗)𝟐
(1.1)2 − 𝟏𝟓
= 91.5819 – 82.5557
= 9.0262
(𝟏𝟓.𝟎𝟑)𝟐 (𝟏𝟑.𝟖)𝟐 (𝟔.𝟑𝟔)𝟐

SSBET = 𝟓
+ 𝟓
+ 𝟓
− 𝟖𝟐. 𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟕
= (45.1802 + 38.088 + 8.0899) − 82.5557
= 𝟖. 𝟖𝟎𝟐𝟒
SSWWITHIN = 9.0262 − 8.8024
= 0.2238
FC = 8.8024 − 0.2238
= 8.5786
∞ = 0.05
Difference Tabular Computed Decision
Value Value
The significant difference between the

Cigarrete consumption of the Cigarrete
10.58 8.58 Significant
Retailers when they are grouped according to
their age.
∞=0.05 F>0.05 Accept

Ho
8
Cigarettes of the
Customers
8-9 3.2 2.8 1.2 7.2
6-7 3.47 2.8 1.2 7.47
4-5 3.25 2.78 1.23 7.26
2-3 3.2 2.76 1.21 7.2
0-1 3.1 2.8 1.3 7.2
Total 16.22 13.94 6.14 36.3
SST = (3.2)2 + (3.47)2 + (3.25)2 + (3.2)2 + (3.1)2 + (2.8)2 + (2.8)2 +

(2.78)2 + (2.76)2 + (2.8)2 + (1.2)2 + (1.2)2 + (1.23)2 + (1.21)2 +
(𝟑𝟔.𝟑)𝟐
(1.3)2 − 𝟏𝟓
= 106.8348 – 87.846
= 18.9888
(𝟏𝟔.𝟐𝟐)𝟐 (𝟏𝟑.𝟗𝟒)𝟐 (𝟔.𝟏𝟒)𝟐

SSBET = 𝟓
+ 𝟓
+ 𝟓
− 87.864
= (52.6177 + 38.8647 + 7.5399) − 82.5557
= 𝟏𝟏. 𝟏𝟓𝟖𝟑
SSWWITHIN = 18.9888 − 11.1583
= 7.8305
FC = 11.1583 − 7.8305
= 3.3278
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 15 – 3 =12
Cigarettes of the
Customers
Male 3.2 2.81 1.27 7.28
Female 3.25 2.75 1.47 7.47
Total 6.45 5.56 2.74 14.75
(𝟏𝟒.𝟕𝟓)𝟐
SST = (3.2)2 + (3.25)2 + (2.81)2 + (2.75)2 + (1.27)2 + (1.47)2 − 𝟔
= 40.0349 − 36.2604
= 3.7745
(𝟔.𝟒𝟓)𝟐 (𝟓.𝟓𝟔)𝟐 (𝟐.𝟒𝟕)𝟐

SSBET = + + − 𝟑𝟔. 𝟐𝟔𝟎𝟒
𝟐 𝟐 𝟐
= (20.8013 + 15.54 + 3.7538) − 36.2604
= 𝟑. 𝟕𝟓𝟏𝟓
SSWWITHIN = 3.7745 − 3.7515
= 0.023
FC = 3.7515 − 0.023
= 3.7285
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 6 --2 =4
Cigarette Cigarette Cigarette Total
users' on their users’ users’ on their
Expenses on frequency on Change of
Cigarettes smoking Lifestyle
57-66 1.7 1.5 1.6 4.8
47-56 1.8 1.6 1.6 5
37-46 2 1.6 1.7 5.3
27-36 2.06 1.72 1.97 5.75
17-26 2.03 1.74 1.87 5.64
Total 9.59 8.16 8.74 26.49
SST = (1.7)2 + (1.8)2 + (2)2 + (2.06)2 + (2.03)2 + (1.5)2 + (1.6)2 + (1.6)2 +

(1.72)2 + (1.74)2 + (1.6)2 + (1.6)2 + (1.7)2 + (1.97)2 + (1.87)2 −
(𝟐𝟔.𝟒𝟗)𝟐
𝟏𝟓
= 47.2383 − 46.7813
= 0.457
(𝟗.𝟓𝟗)𝟐 (𝟖.𝟏𝟔)𝟐 (𝟖.𝟕𝟒)𝟐

SSBET = 𝟓
+ 𝟓
+ 𝟓
− 𝟒𝟔. 𝟕𝟖𝟏𝟑
= (18.3936 + 13.3171 + 15.2775) − 46.7813
= 𝟎. 𝟐𝟎𝟕
SSWWITHIN = 0.457 − 0.207
= 0.25
FC = 0.207 − 0.25
= -0.043
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 15 – 3 =12
7-8 1.76 1.64 1.72 5.12
5-6 2.08 1.96 1.93 5.97
3-4 1.98 1.78 1.96 5.72
1-2 2.2 1.55 1.93 5.68
Total 8.02 6.93 7.54 22.49
SST = (1.76)2 + (2.08)2 + (1.98)2 + (2.2)2 + (1.64)2 + (1.96)2 + (1.78)2 +

(𝟐𝟐.𝟒𝟗)𝟐
(1.55)2 + (1.72)2 + (1.93)2 + (1.96)2 + (1.93)2 − 𝟏𝟐
= 42.5363 − 42.15
= 0.3863
(𝟖.𝟎𝟐)𝟐 (𝟔.𝟗𝟑)𝟐 (𝟕.𝟓𝟒)𝟐

SSBET = 𝟒
+ 𝟒
+ 𝟒
− 42.15
= (16.0801 + 12.0062 + 14.2129) − 42.15
= 𝟎. 𝟏𝟒𝟗𝟐
SSWWITHIN = 0.3863 − 0.1492
= 0.2371
FC = 0.2371 − 0.1492
= 0.0879
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 12 – 3 =9
Male 1.98 1.82 1.83 5.63
Female 2.2 1.7 2.03 5.93
Total 4.18 3.52 3.86 11.56
(𝟏𝟏.𝟓𝟔)𝟐
SST = (1.98)2 + (2.2)2 + (1.82)2 + (1.7)2 + (1.83)2 + (2.03)2 − 𝟔
= 22.4326 − 22.2723
= 0.1603
(𝟒.𝟏𝟖)𝟐 (𝟑.𝟓𝟐)𝟐 (𝟑.𝟖𝟔)𝟐

SSBET = + + − 𝟐𝟐. 𝟐𝟕𝟐𝟑
𝟐 𝟐 𝟐
= (8.7362 + 6.1952 + 7.4498) − 22.2723
= 𝟎. 𝟏𝟎𝟖𝟗
SSWWITHIN = 0.1603 − 0.1089
= 0.0514
FC = 0.1089 − 0.0514
= 0.0575
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 6 --2 =4
users' on their users’ users’ on
Expenses on frequency on their Change
Cigarettes smoking of Lifestyle
Employed 2.15 1.83 1.83 5.81
Unemployed 2.07 1.65 1.65 5.37
Total 4.22 3.48 3.48 11.18
(𝟏𝟏.𝟏𝟖)𝟐
SST = (2.15)2 + (2.07)2 + (1.83)2 + (1.65)2 + (1.83)2 + (1.65)2 −
𝟔
= 21.0502 − 20.8321
= 0.2181
(𝟒.𝟐𝟐)𝟐 (𝟑.𝟒𝟖)𝟐 (𝟑.𝟒𝟖)𝟐

SSBET = + + − 𝟐𝟎. 𝟖𝟑𝟐𝟏
𝟐 𝟐 𝟐
= (8.9042 + 6.0552 + 6.0522) − 20.8321
= 𝟎. 𝟏𝟖𝟐𝟓
SSWWITHIN = 0.2181 − 0.1825
= 0.0356
FC = 0.1825 − 0.0356
= 0.1496
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 6 - 2 =4
Married 2.11 1.67 1.82 5.6
Single 2.17 1.85 2.05 6.07
Total 4.28 3.52 3.87 11.67
(𝟏𝟏.𝟔𝟕)𝟐
SST = (2.11)2 + (2.17)2 + (1.67)2 + (1.85)2 + (1.82)2 + (2.05)2 − 𝟔
= 22.8873 − 22.6982
= 0.1892
(𝟒.𝟐𝟖)𝟐 (𝟑.𝟓𝟐)𝟐 (𝟑.𝟖𝟕)𝟐

SSBET = + + − 𝟐𝟐. 𝟔𝟗𝟖𝟐
𝟐 𝟐 𝟐
= (9.1592 + 6.1952 + 7.4885) − 22.6982
= 𝟎. 𝟏𝟒𝟒𝟕
SSWWITHIN = 0.1892 − 0.1447
= 0.0445
FC = 0.1447 − 0.0445
= 0.1002
∞ = 0.05
DF = 3-1 = 2
DF = 6 - 2 =4
Appendix G
Computation for
Mean
Cigarette-Retailers Respondents According to their
Question 57-66 Age Bracket

No.
4 3 2 1 Total
1 0 1 1 0 2.5
2 1 1 0 0 3.5
3 2 0 0 0 4
4 1 1 0 0 3.5
5 0 2 0 0 3
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+1(2)+0(1)
2
=2.5
Item 2:
1(4) + 1(3) + 0(2) + 0(1)

= 3.5
2
Item 3:
2(4) + 0(3) + 0(2) + 0(1)

=4
2
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 5:
0(4) + 2(3) + 0(2) + 0(1)

=3
2
Age bracket (47-56) cigarette retailers respondents according to their profit
Item 1:
2(4) + 7(3) + 0(2) + 0(1)

= 3.222
9
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+5(2)+3(1)
9
=1.778
Item 3:
6(4)+2(3)+1(2)+0(1)
9
=3.555
Item 4:
1(4)+6(3)1(2)+1(1)
9
=2.177
Item 5:
2(4)+6(3)+1(2)+0(1)
9
=3.111
Item 1:
1(4)+3(3)+0(2)+0(1)
4
=3.25
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+2(2)+0(1)
=2.5
4
Item 3:
0(4)+2(3)+1(2)+1(1)
4
=2.25
Item 4:
2(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.5
4
Item 5:
1(4)+3(3)+0(2)+0(1)
4
=3.25
Item 1:
2(4)+9(3)+1(2)+1(1)
13
=2.923
Item 2:
1(4)+10(3)+1(2)+1(1)
13
=2.846
Item 3:
12(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
13
=3.923
Item 4:
1(4)+2(3)+8(2)+2(1)
=2.154
13
Item 5:
4(4)+7(3)+1(2)+1(1)
13
=3.077
Item 1:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.5
2
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 4:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Age bracket (57-66) cigarette retailers responds according to their sold cigarettes
Item 1:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 3:
2(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=4
Item 5:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=1.5
Age bracket (47-66) cigarette retailers respondents according to their sold

cigarettes
Item 1:
8(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.888
9
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+6(2)+2(1)
9
=1.888
Item 3:
2(4)+5(3)+1(2)+1(1)
9
=2.888
Item 4:
6(4)+2(3)+1(2)+0(1)
9
=3.555
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+7(1)
9
=1.222

cigarettes
Item 1:
4(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
4
=4
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+3(2)+0(1)
=2.25
4
Item 3:
1(4)+2(3)+1(2)+0(1)
4
=3
Item 4:
3(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
4
=3.75
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+4(1)
4
=1

cigarettes
Item 1:
12(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
13
=3.923
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+9(2)+3(1)
13
=1.846
Item 3:
2(4)+11(3)+0(2)+0(1)
13
=3.154
Item 4:
8(4)+2(3)+2(2)+1(1)
=3.308
13
Item 5:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+10(1)
13
=1.308

cigarettes
Item 1:
2(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=4
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 4:
2(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=4
2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Age bracket (57-66) cigarette retailers respondents according to the feedback of

the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Item 2:
0(4) + 0(3) + 2(2) + 0(1)
=2
2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1

the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+6(1)
= 1.444
9
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+6(2)+2(1)
9
=1.888
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+8(1)
=1.111
9
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+3(2)+5(1)
9
=1.555
Item 5:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+6(1)
9
=1.444
the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+3(1)
4
=1.25
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+2(1)
4
=1.5
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+3(1)
4
=1.25
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+4(1)
4
=1
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+4(1)
4
=1

the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+12(1)
=1.076
13
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+10(2)+2(1)
=2.692
13
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+12(1)
13
=1.076
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+2(2)+9(1)
13
=1.538
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+3(2)+10(1)
13
=1.230

the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Year bracket (8-9) cigarette retailers respondents according to their profit
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
1
=3
Item 2:
0(4) + 1(3) + 0(2) + 0(1)

=3
1
Item 3:
1(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
1
=4
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
1
=3
Item 5:
0(4) + 1(3) + 0(2) + 0(1)

=3
1
Item 1:
1(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
3
=3.333
Item 2:
1(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
3
=3.333
Item 3:
3(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
3
=4
Item 4:
1(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.333
3
Item 5
1(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
3
=3.333
Item 1:
1(4)+6(3)+1(2)+0(1)
8
=3
Item 2:
1(4)+6(3)+1(2)+0(1)
8
=3
Item 3:
8(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
8
=4
Item 4:
1(4)+7(3)+0(2)+0(1)
8
=3.125
Item 5:
1(4)+7(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.125
8
Item 1:
3(4)+12(3)+1(2)+0(1)
16
=3.1875
Item 2:
2(4)+13(3)+1(2)+0(1)
=1.1875
16
Item 3:
13(4)+2(3)+1(2)+0(1)
16
=3.75
Item 4:
1(4)+14(3)+1(2)+0(1)
16
=3
Item 5
1(4)+15(3)+0(2)+0(1)
16
=3.0625
Item 1:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3
2
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 4:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3
Item 5:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3
Year bracket (8-9) cigarette retailers respondents according to their sold

cigarettes
Item 1:
1(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
1
=4
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+0(1)
1
=2
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
1
=3
Item 4:
1(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
1
=4
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+1(1)
=1
1

cigarettes
Item 1:
3(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
3
=4
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+1(1)
3
=1.666
Item 3:
1(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
3
=3.333
Item 4:
3(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=4
3
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+3(1)
3
=1

cigarettes
Item 1:
8(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=4
8
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+5(2)+3(1)
8
=6.25
Item 3:
2(4)+6(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.25
8
Item 4:
7(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.875
8
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+7(1)
8
=1.125

cigarettes
Item 1:
14(4)+1(3)+1(2)+0(1)
16
=3.813
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+12(2)+2(1)
16
=2
Item 3:
5(4)+8(3)+3(2)+0(1)
=3.125
16
Item 4:
14(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
16
=3.875
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+16(1)
16
=2

cigarettes
Item 1:
2(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=4
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 4:
2(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=4
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Year bracket (8-9) cigarette retailers respondents according to the feedback of the
customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+1(1)
1
=1
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+(1)
1
=2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+1(1)
=1
1
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+1(1)
1
=1
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+1(1)
=1
1
customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+2(1)
3
=1.667
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+1(1)
3
=1.333
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+3(1)
3
=1
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+3(1)
3
=1
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+3(1)
3
=1
customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+8(1)
=1
8
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+7(2)+1(1)
8
=1.875
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+7(1)
8
=1.125
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+7(1)
=1.125
8
Item 5
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+8(1)
8
=1
customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+14(1)
16
=1.125
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+12(2)+3(1)
16
=1.875
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+15(1)
16
=1.0625
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+16(1)
16
=1
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+16(1)
=1
16
customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
=1.25
2
Sex bracket (male) cigarette retailers respondents according to their profit
Item 1:
2(4) + 15(3) + 1(2) + 0(1)

=4
18
Item 2:
2(4)+14(3)+1(2)+1(1)
18
=1.778
Item 3:
17(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
18
=3.111
Item 4:
1(4)+16(3)+1(2)+0(1)
=3.778
18
Item 5:
1(4)+17(3)+0(2)+0(1)
18
=1.111
Sex bracket (female) cigarette retailers respondents according to their profit
Item 1:
1(4)+10(3)+1(2)+0(1)
=2.5
12
Item 2:
2(4)+9(3)+1(2)+0(1)
12
=1.278
Item 3:
12(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=2.278
12
Item 4:
1(4)+11(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=1.417
12
Item 5:
1(4)+11(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=1
12
Sex bracket (male) cigarette retailers respondents according to their sold

cigarettes
Item 1:
18(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
18
=1.111
Item 2:
1(4)+1(3)+14(2)+2(1)
18
=1.944
Item 3:
3(4)+14(3)+1(2)+0(1)
18
=1.056
Item 4:
15(4)+2(3)+1(2)+0(1)
=1.222
18
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+16(1)
18
=1
Sex bracket (female) cigarette retailers respondents according to their sold

cigarettes
Item 1:
10(4)+1(3)+1(2)+0(1)
=1.25
12
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+9(2)+2(1)
12
=1.917
Item 3:
1(4)+11(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=1.75
12
Item 4:
12(4)+0(3)+0(2)+0(1)
12
=1.417
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+12(1)
12
=1
Sex bracket (male) cigarette retailers respondents according to the feedback of

the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+16(1)
18
=3.056
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+15(2)+2(1)
18
=2.944
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+17(1)
=3.944
18
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+18(1)
18
=3.056
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+18(1)
18
=3.056
Sex bracket (female) cigarette retailers respondents according to the feedback of

the customers
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+1(2)+10(1)
12
=3.25
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+9(2)+2(1)
12
=3.083
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+9(2)+3(1)
12
=4
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+3(2)+8(1)
=3.083
12
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+12(1)
12
=3.083
Age bracket (55-64) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses on

cigarettes
Item 1:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=3.5
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1.5
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
=2
2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1

cigarettes
Item 1:
1(4)+1(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=2
2
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1.5
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=1
2

cigarettes
Item 1:
0(4)+2(3)+0(2)+0(1)
2
=1.087
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1.8
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=2
2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1.629

cigarettes
Item 1:
14(4)+17(3)+3(2)+1(1)
=3.034
35
Item 2:
4(4)+1(3)+14(2)+16(1)
=1.8
35
Item 3:
3(4)+1(3)+27(2)+4(1)
35
=2.086
Item 4:
2(4)+3(3)+23(2)+7(1)
35
=1.429
Item 5:
0(4)+1(3)+3(2)+31(1)
35
=1.143
Age bracket (15-24) cigarette users’ responds according to their expenses on

cigarettes
Item 1:
4(4)+23(3)+1(2)+1(1)
29
=2.690
Item 2:
2(4)+2(3)+6(2)+19(1)
29
=1.552
Item 3:
3(4)+2(3)+19(2)+5(1)
29
=2.103
Item 4:
1(4)+2(3)+24(2)+2(1)
29
=2.069
Item 5:
1(4)+1(3)+6(2)+21(1)
29
=1.379
Age bracket (55-64) cigarette users’ respondents according to the frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=1
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=2
2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=1
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
=2
2
smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=1.5
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
=2
2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=1.5
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1.5

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
=1.087
2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=1.8
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1.087

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+32(2)+2(1)
35
=2
Item 2:
2(4)+4(3)+8(2)+21(1)
35
=1.943
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+16(2)+18(1)
=1.971
35
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+32(2)+2(1)
35
=1.971
Item 5:
2(4)+3(3)+5(2)+25(1)
=2
35
Age bracket (15-24) cigarette users’ responds according to the frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+27(2)+2(1)
29
=1.966
Item 2:
2(4)+5(3)+5(2)+17(1)
29
=1.793
Item 3:
2(4)+3(3)+8(2)+16(1)
29
=1.931
Item 4:
0(4)+2(3)+24(2)+3(1)
29
=1.759
Item 5:
1(4)+2(3)+4(2)+22(1)
29
=1.759
Age bracket (55-64) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change on their
lifestyle
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
=2
2
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Age bracket (45-54) cigarette users’ responds according to the change on their
lifestyle
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+0(2)+2(1)
2
=1
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
lifestyle
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+0(1)
2
=2
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+2(2)+(1)
=2
2
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+1(1)
2
=1.5
lifestyle
Item 1:
2(4)+2(3)+25(2)+6(1)
35
=2.000
Item 2:
1(4)+4(3)+22(2)+8(1)
35
=1.943
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+32(2)+2(1)
35
=1.971
Item 4:
0(4)+2(3)+29(2)+4(1)
=1.943
35
Item 5:
1(4)+3(3)+26(2)+5(1)
35
=2.000
lifestyle
Item 1:
1(4)+2(3)+21(2)+5(1)
29
=1.966
Item 2:
1(4)+1(3)+18(2)+9(1)
=1.793
29
Item 3:
0(4)+6(3)+15(2)+8(1)
=1.931
29
Item 4:
0(4)+2(3)+18(2)+9(1)
=1.759
29
Item 5:
0(4) + 2(3) + 22(2) + 5(1)

= 1.897
29
Year bracket (7-8) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses on

cigarettes
Item 1:
1(4)+3(3)+1(2)+0(1)
=3.000
5
Item 2:
0(4) + 0(3) + 1(2) + 4(1)

= 1.200
5
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+3(2)+2(1)
5
=1.600
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+2(1)
5
=1.800
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+4(1)
5
=1.200

cigarettes
Item 1:
5(4)+11(3)+0(2)+0(1)
=3.313
16
Item 2:
0(4)+3(3)+4(2)+9(1)
16
=1.625
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+12(2)+3(1)
=1.875
16
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+9(2)+5(1)
=1.875
16
Item 5:
0(4)+2(3)+7(2)+7(1)
16
=1.688

cigarettes
Item 1:
5(4)+26(3)+1(2)+0(1)
32
=3.125
Item 2:
1(4)+4(3)+6(2)+21(1)
32
=1.531
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+23(2)+9(1)
=1.719
32
Item 4:
2(4)+4(3)+21(2)+5(1)
32
=2.094
Item 5:
1(4)+2(3)+7(2)+22(1)
32
=1.438

cigarettes
Item 1:
6(4)+11(3)+0(2)+0(1)
17
=3.353
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+6(2)+9(1)
17
=1.588
Item 3:
1(4)+2(3)+9(2)+5(1)
17
=1.941
Item 4:
2(4)+2(3)+8(2)+5(1)
17
=2.059
Item 5:
2(4)+3(3)+6(2)+6(1)
17
=2.059
Year bracket (7-8) cigarette users’ respondents according to their frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+3(2)+1(1)
5
=2
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+1(2)+4(1)
=1.2
5
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+1(2)+3(1)
5
=1.6
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+2(1)
5
=1.8
Item 5:
0(4)+1(3)+1(2)+3(1)
5
=1.6

smoking
Item 1:
1(4)+13(3)+1(2)+1(1)
16
=2.875
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+1(2)+14(1)
16
=1.1875
Item 3:
1(4)+3(3)+9(2)+3(1)
=2.125
16
Item 4:
0(4)+2(3)+12(2)+2(1)
16
=2
Item 5:
0(4)+3(3)+4(2)+9(1)
=1.625
16
smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+3(3)+24(2)+5(1)
32
=1.938
Item 2:
3(4)+3(3)+8(2)+18(1)
32
=1.719
Item 3:
2(4)+3(3)+10(2)+17(1)
=1.686
32
Item 4:
1(4)+4(3)+19(2)+8(1)
=1.938
32
Item 5:
1(4)+3(3)+11(2)+17(1)
32
=1.625

smoking
Item 1:
1(4)+3(3)+6(2)+7(1)
17
=1.706
Item 2:
3(4)+2(3)+4(2)+8(1)
17
=1.471
Item 3:
2(4)+2(3)+3(2)+10(1)
=1.412
17
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+9(2)+8(1)
17
=1.529
Item 5:
2(4)+3(3)+5(2)+7(1)
17
=1.647
Year bracket (7-8) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change of their
life style
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+2(1)
=1.8
5
Item 2:
0(4)+0(3)+4(2)+1(1)
5
=1.8
Item 3:
0(4)+0(3)+3(2)+2(1)
=1.6
5
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+3(2)+2(1)
17
=1.6
Item 5:
0(4)+0(3)+4(2)+1(1)
=1.8
5
life style
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+14(2)+1(1)
=2.000
16
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+12(2)+3(1)
16
=1.875
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+10(2)+4(1)
16
=1.938
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+11(2)+4(1)
16
=1.813
Item 5:
0(4)+1(3)+14(2)+1(1)
=2.000
16
life style
Item 1:
1(4)+1(3)+23(2)+7(1)
=1.875
32
Item 2:
4(4)+1(3)+19(2)+8(1)
=2.031
32
Item 3:
1(4)+2(3)+20(2)+9(1)
32
=1.844
Item 4:
2(4)+5(3)+17(2)+8(1)
32
=2.031
Item 5:
0(4)+7(3)+18(2)+7(1)
5
=2.000
life style
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+11(2)+5(1)
17
=1.765
Item 2:
2(4)+2(3)+8(2)+5(1)
17
=2.059
Item 3:
0(4)+4(3)+9(2)+4(1)
17
=2.000
Item 4:
0(4)+3(3)+10(2)+4(1)
17
=1.941
Item 5:
0(4)+1(3)+13(2)+3(1)
=1.882
17
Sex bracket (male) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses on

cigarettes
Item 1:
11(4)+45(3)+4(2)+2(1)
62
=3.048
Item 2:
3(4)+4(3)+17(2)+38(1)
=1.548
62
Item 3:
2(4)+3(3)+44(2)+13(1)
62
=1.903
Item 4:
4(4)+5(3)+29(2)+24(1)
62
=1.823
Item 5:
3(4)+7(3)+14(2)+38(1)
62
=1.597
Sex bracket (female) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses on

cigarettes
Item 1:
3(4)+5(3)+0(2)+0(1)
8
=3.375
Item 2:
1(4)+1(3)+2(2)+4(1)
=1.875
8
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+6(2)+1(1)
8
=2.000
Item 4:
0(4)+1(3)+5(2)+2(1)
8
=1.875
Item 5:
1(4)+1(3)+2(2)+4(1)
8
=1.875
Sex bracket (male) cigarette users’ respondents according to their frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
2(4)+5(3)+24(2)+21(1)
62
=1.806
Item 2:
4(4)+5(3)+25(2)+28(1)
62
=1.758
Item 3:
2(4)+9(3)+17(2)+34(1)
62
=1.661
Item 4:
6(4)+8(3)+36(2)+12(1)
=2.129
62
Item 5:
3(4)+5(3)+26(2)+28(1)
=1.726
62
Sex bracket (female) cigarette users’ respondents according to their frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+1(3)+5(2)+2(1)
8
=1.875
Item 2:
0(4)+1(3)+1(2)+6(1)
8
=1.375
Item 3:
0(4)+1(3)+2(2)+5(1)
8
=1.500
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+3(2)+3(1)
8
=2.000
Item 5:
0(4)+2(3)+2(2)+4(1)
8
=1.750
Sex bracket (male) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change on their
lifestyle
Item 1:
9(4)+9(3)+23(2)+21(1)
=2.097
62
Item 2:
1(4)+4(3)+32(2)+25(1)
=1.694
62
Item 3:
2(4)+2(3)+35+23(1)
62
=1.726
Item 4:
2(4)+4(3)+37(2)+19(1)
62
=1.823
Item 5:
3(4)+5(3)+32(2)+22(1)
62
=1.823
Sex bracket (female) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change on
their lifestyle
Item 1:
0(4)+0(3)+6(2)+2(1)
8
=1.750
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+4(2)+2(1)
=2.000
8
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+5(2)+1(1)
=2.250
8
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+3(2)+1(1)
8
=2.000
Item 5:
1(4)+1(3)+4(2)+2(1)
8
=2.125
Work status (employed) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses

on cigarettes
Item 1:
2(4)+19(3)+1(2)+0(1)
22
=3.045
Item 2:
1(4)+1(3)+7(2)+13(1)
22
=1.545
Item 3:
2(4)+2(3)+9(2)+9(1)
=1.863
22
Item 4:
3(4)+5(3)+10(2)+4(1)
22
=2.318
Item 5:
2(4)+4(3)+7(2)+9(1)
22
=1.955
Work status (unemployed) cigarette users’ respondents according to their

expenses on cigarettes
Item 1:
14(4)+21(3)+8(2)+5(1)
48
=2.917
Item 2:
3(4)+0(3)+7(2)+32(1)
=1.583
48
Item 3:
6(4)+8(3)+19(2)+15(1)
48
=2.104
Item 4:
3(4)+7(3)+22(2)+16(1)
48
=1.938
Item 5:
3(4)+9(3)+15(2)+18(1)
48
=1.813
Work status (employed) cigarette users’ respondents according to their frequency

on smoking
Item 1:
1(4)+3(3)+9(2)+9(1)
22
=1.818
Item 2:
0(4)+5(3)+6(2)+11(1)
22
=1.727
Item 3:
2(4)+5(3)+5(2)+10(1)
22
=1.955
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+11(2)+9(1)
22
=1.727
Item 5:
2(4)+5(3)+4(2)+11(1)
=1.909
22
Work status (unemployed) cigarette users’ respondents according to their

frequency
on cigarettes
Item 1:
1(4)+2(3)+24(2)+21(1)
48
=1.646
Item 2:
2(4)+9(3)+11(2)+26(1)
48
=1.729
Item 3:
2(4)+6(3)+19(2)+21(1)
=1.771
48
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+26(2)+22(1)
=1.542
48
Item 5:
1(4)+3(3)+19(2)+25(1)
48
=1.583
Work status (employed) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change of

their lifestyle
Item 1:
1(4)+3(3)+9(2)+9(1)
22
=1.818
Item 2:
0(4)+5(3)+6(2)+11(1)
22
=1.727
Item 3:
2(4)+5(3)+5(2)+10(1)
22
=1.955
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+11(2)+9(1)
22
=1.727
Item 5:
2(4)+5(3)+4(2)+11(1)
22
=1.909
Work status (unemployed) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change

of their lifestyle
Item 1:
1(4)+2(3)+24(2)+21(1)
48
=1.646
Item 2:
2(4)+9(3)+11(2)+26(1)
48
=1.729
Item 3:
2(4)+6(3)+19(2)+21(1)
48
=1.771
Item 4:
0(4)+0(3)+26(2)+22(1)
48
=1.542
Item 5:
1(4)+3(3)+19(2)+25(1)
48
=1.583
Civil status (married) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses on
cigarette
Item 1:
7(4)+8(3)+3(2)+1(1)
19
=3.105
Item 2:
2(4)+2(3)+6(2)+9(1)
=1.842
19
Item 3:
2(4)+2(3)+11(2)+4(1)
19
=2.105
Item 4:
1(4)+3(3)+9(2)+6(1)
19
=1.947
Item 5:
1(4)+1(3)+5(2)+12(1)
19
=1.526
Civil status (single) cigarette users’ respondents according to their expenses on

cigarette
Item 1:
18(4)+24(3)+5(2)+4(1)
=3.098
51
Item 2:
7(4)+8(3)+9(2)+27(1)
=1.902
51
Item 3:
2(4)+9(3)+21(2)+19(1)
51
=1.882
Item 4:
11(4)+9(3)+19(2)+16(1)
51
=2.137
Item 5:
5(4)+6(3)+14(2)+26(1)
51
=1.804
Civil status (married) cigarette users’ respondents according to their frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
0(4)+2(3)+9(2)+8(1)
19
=1.684
Item 2:
1(4)+1(3)+2(2)+15(1)
19
=1.368
Item 3:
1(4)+2(3)+4(2)+12(1)
19
=1.579
Item 4:
2(4)+2(3)+10(2)+5(1)
19
=2.053
Item 5:
1(4)+1(3)+8(2)+9(1)
19
=1.684
Civil status (single) cigarette users’ respondents according to their frequency on

smoking
Item 1:
2(4)+5(3)+29(2)+15(1)
51
=1.882
Item 2:
1(4)+7(3)+21(2)+22(1)
51
=1.745
Item 3:
3(4)+8(3)+13(2)+27(1)
51
=1.745
Item 4:
3(4)+9(3)+22(2)+17(1)
51
=1.961
Item 5:
3(4)+11(3)+16(2)+21(1)
51
=1.922
Civil status (married) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change of

their lifestyle
Item 1:
1(4)+1(3)+12(2)+5(1)
=1.895
19
Item 2:
0(4)+2(3)+9(2)+8(1)
19
=1.684
Item 3:
1(4)+1(3)+13(2)+4(1)
19
=1.947
Item 4:
1(4)+1(3)+11(2)+6(1)
19
=1.842
Item 5:
1(4)+0(3)+11(2)+7(1)
=1.737
19
Civil status (single) cigarette users’ respondents according to the change of their
lifestyle
Item 1:
7(4)+9(3)+19(2)+16(1)
51
=2.137
Item 2:
4(4)+12(3)+21(2)+14(1)
51
=2.118
Item 3:
4(4)+6(3)+25(2)+16(1)
51
=1.961
Item 4:
3(4)+7(3)+29(2)+12(1)
51
=2.020
Item 5:
2(4)+7(3)+31(2)+11(1)
51
=2.000
Curriculum Vitae
BATALLA ABEGAIL
Blk4 Lot1E, Anros subd. Brgy. Tagapo City of Santa Rosa Laguna
09067965010
abigealbatalla@yahoo.com
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT:
Senior High School Labas Senior High School – Stand Alone

Brgy. Labas, Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017-present
Junior High School Balibago National High School

Kabesang Moldes st. Balibago, Sta. Rosa City, Laguna
2015-2016
Primary Dita Elementary School

Brgy. Dita, Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2010-2011
SKILLS:
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Date of Birth: September 30, 2000

Place of Birth: Dita Santa Rosa Laguna
Religion: Aglipayan
Status: Single
Sex: Female
Age: 17
Citizenship: Flipino
REFERENCES:
Arlene Catarroja
Subject Teacher
Labas Senior High School- Stand Alone
09429633316
Ariz Fidel
Class Adviser
09097562943
I hereby certify that the above information are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
ABEGAIL BATALLA
Student Signature
B4 L 25, Mercedes Homes IV, Sta. Rosa, Laguna
09306866166
kianhermosa@yahoo.com.ph
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT:
Senior High School Labas Senior High School – Stand Alone

Brgy. Labas, Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017-present
Junior High School Aplaya National High School (ANNEX)

Brgy. Market Area, Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2015-2016
Primary Santa Rosa Special Science Central III

Brgy. Tagapo, Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2010-2011
AWARDS AND CITATION:
 Division Schools Press Conference (Journalism)

Radio Broadcasting Champion
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2015
 Regional School Press Conference

Radio Broadcasting Participant
Tanza, Cavite
2015
 Supreme Student Government (SSG)

SSG Public Information Officer
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2016
 Moving up Ceremony
Club Organizational Award (SSG)
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017
Leadership award
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017

Radio Broadcasting Champion
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017

2nd best info-mercial in Radio Broadcasting
2017
Leadership award
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017
SKILLS:
Can communicate either English or Filipino

Computer Literate (Basic)
SEMINARS:
 Ruralian Cup (Journalism)

Calamba, Laguna
2017
 Leadership Training
Mataas na Kahoy, Batangas City
2015
 Red Cross Seminar

Science and Technology High School
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2017
 Investigatory Project
Santa Rosa Special Science – Central III
Sta. Rosa, Laguna
2011
 Journalism
Radio Broadcasting
City Hall
2013
 Journalism
TV Broadcasting
Gabaldon Hall
2017
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Date of Birth: June 10, 2001

Place of Birth: Tiaong, Quezon
Religion: Roman Catholic
Status: Single
Sex: Male
Age: 17
Citizenship: Filipino
REFERENCES:
Arlene Catarroja
Subject Teacher
09429633316
Margie T. Monderin
Thesis Adviser
09
I hereby certify that the above information are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.

Student Signature

Apendices PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Apendices PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

REFERENCES

Adebiyi, AO, Uchendu, OC, Bamgboye, E, Ibitoye, O, Omotola, B. Perceived

Awaisu, A, Hagi, A, Ashour, MA, Kheir, N. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette

Bangladesh: findings from an experimental study. Tob Control. 2015;25:437–

Hammond, D, Reid, JL. Health warnings on tobacco products: international practices.

Hammond, D, Reid, JL, Driezen, P, Boudreau, C. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette

Hammond, D, Thrasher, J, Reid, JL, Driezen, P, Boudreau, C, Santillán, EA. Perceived

Hammond, D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob

Kline, P. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. London,

Sychareun, V, Hansana, V, Phengsavanh, A, Chaleunvong, K, Tomson, T. Perceptions

Stead, LF, Perera, R, Lancaster, T. A systematic review of interventions for smokers

Stead, LF, Hartmann-Boyce, J, Perera, R, Lancaster, T. Telephone counselling for

Tobacco Labelling Resource Center. http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/countries/gulf-

Tomson, T, Helgason, AR, Gilljam, H. Quitline in smoking cessation: a cost-

Thrasher, JF, Osman, A, Moodie, C. Promoting cessation resources through cigarette

Vardavas, CI, Connolly, G, Karamanolis, K, Kafatos, A. Adolescents perceived

WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco

WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Guidelines for implementation Article

Survey Questionnaire for

Name (optional): _______________________ Sex: _________________

Retailers to their Profit

Retailers on the Feedback of the Customers

Survey Questionnaire for

Name (optional): _______________________ Sex: _________________

Cigarette users on their Expenses on Cigarettes

Cigarette users on their Change of Lifestyle

August 29, 2018

HON. ALVIN CARTAÑO

KIAN JOSEPH B. HERMOSA

August 24, 2018

Thank you and more power.

KIAN JOSEPH B. HERMOSA

August 24, 2018

MARK ANTHONY P. LAGUMEN

Thank you and more power.

KIAN JOSEPH B. HERMOSA

August 24, 2018

Thank you and more power.

KIAN JOSEPH B. HERMOSA

Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effect on Cigarette Consumption as

Mr. KERR R. ZAMORA

Cigarette Consumption as Perceived by the Selected Cigarette Users And Retailers

Ms. JASMINE S. VELASCO

Warnings on Cigarette Packs: Its Effect on Cigarette Consumption as Perceived by

has been validated by the following:

Ms. MARGIE T. MONDERIN

Mr. JEFFREY E. INIWAN

Mr. MARK ANTHONY P. LAGUMEN

Ms. JASMINE S. VELASCO

Mr. KERR R. ZAMORA

17-26 3.3 2.8 1.2 7.3

27-36 2.89 2.69 1.49 7.07

37-46 2.95 2.8 1.2 6.95

47-56 2.99 2.71 1.37 7.07

57-66 2.9 2.8 1.1 6.8

Total 15.03 13.8 6.36 35.19

SST = (3.3)2 + (2.89)2 + (2.95)2 + (2.99)2 + (2.9)2 + (2.8)2 + (2.69)2 +

(𝟏𝟓.𝟎𝟑)𝟐 (𝟏𝟑.𝟖)𝟐 (𝟔.𝟑𝟔)𝟐

= (45.1802 + 38.088 + 8.0899) − 82.5557

SSWWITHIN = 9.0262 − 8.8024

The significant difference between the

∞=0.05 F>0.05 Accept

Name (optional): _______ Sex: _

Name (optional): _______ Sex: _