Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Related terms:
Corona Treatment
Joanna Izdebska, in Printing on Polymers, 2016
8.1.1 Treatment
Devices used in corona treatment are called activators (Figure 8.1). They consist of
generator, transformer, and a set of electrodes: high-voltage electrode and ground-
ed electrode (Figure 8.2). The grounded electrode is covered with polyesters, ce-
ramic, vulcanized silicone rubber, epoxy coating, hardened composition of polyester
resin, and glass fiber (Chan, 1999; Żenkiewicz & Lutomirski, 2001).
Figure 8.1. Corona activator.
Figure 20.14. (A) A linear array of electrodes to create a curtain of corona discharges.
(B) Typical corona treatment station.
The effectiveness of the corona treatment depends on the specific material being
used. Different plastic-film materials have different characteristics and different
amounts of slip and additives, which will determine the effect of the corona treat-
ment. There are no limits with regard to the materials that can be corona treated.
However, the required intensity of the treatment (corona dose in W/min per m2)
may vary significantly. The treatment level can be calculated by using the following
formula:
Power (W) = T × S × W × M
P = Total power (W) required
T = Number of sides to treat (single/double sided)
S = Line speed (m/min)
W = Film width (m)
M = Material factor (required W/min per m2)
The exact value is best determined by testing a sample of the actual film that is used
for a specific application.
Tantec, headquartered in Denmark [84], has developed several corona treaters for
surface activation of various plastic parts. One example is the RotoTEC-X system,
which is used for in-line corona treatment of injection molded parts prior to coating,
printing, gluing, and painting for optimization of the adhesion properties of a given
substrate, mostly polypropylene and PE (Fig. 20.16).
Figure 20.16. RotoTEC-X system with rotating electrode elements from Tantec for
corona treatment of 3D plastic parts.
This universal system developed by Tantec operates with patented rotating elec-
trode elements resulting in complete and uniform treatment of parts. These
self-contained units can be installed within existing production lines or used as an
off-line treating process. The system includes a high-frequency generator, high-volt-
age transformer, rotary electrodes, ozone filter, and customized stand-alone or
bench-top treating station. Both standard and customized RotoTEC-X stations are
available for both single- and dual sided treatment.
Other types of plastic parts that can be treated include, pipes, syringes, cables,
extruded profiles, needle hubs, and containers. Fig. 20.17 shows a spot treater and
treatment of a plastic container and extruded pipes before printing [84].
Surface Treatment
Michael Niaounakis, in Biopolymers: Processing and Products, 2015
8.3.2.3 Corona Treatment
Corona treatment is a surface modification technique that uses a low temperature
corona discharge plasma to impart changes in the properties of a surface. Corona
treatment has been used to either improve the print fastness of a polymer film or
to perforate the film (see Section 8.2.2: Roughening). Corona treatment is used to
increase the surface energy of a biopolymer to as much as 50 dyn/cm. Inks that are
typically more difficult to apply onto paper coatings, like water-based inks, may be
applied directly to corona-treated PLA.
Example
PLA (PLA 6200 D grade, Cargill-Dow, LLC) was formed into a spunbond fabric
using conventional spunbond apparatus. The spunbond fabric had filaments of an
average denier of 1.6 dpf (1.8 dtex) and a basis weight of 0.5 osy (about 17 gsm).
A portion of the fabric was left untreated for control purposes, and a portion was
exposed to a corona glow discharge under ambient conditions. The field strength
was 20 W/ft2/min (1.33 J/cm2). Immediately following the corona treatment, the
fabric was dipped into one of three aqueous solutions containing 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 wt%
of ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (Bermocol® E481, Akzo Nobel), forming fabrics A,
B, and C. After the complete saturation of the fabric, as indicated by a change in
color from white to translucent, the fabric was nipped between two rubber rollers
at 10 lbs (about 4.5 kg) nip pressure. The coated fabric was then dried in an oven
at 60 °C for about 30 min. The fabric was then tested for wettability using the test
method in accordance with ISO-903. The treated and the untreated samples (5 g)
were placed in 25 °C water and the sink time was measured. The sink times (seconds)
for the test/control fabric samples A, B, and C were found to be 3.6/59.3, 3/59.3, and
3.0/59.3, respectively; i.e., the treated fabric has faster sink times as compared to the
untreated fabric.
Flame treatment is easiest to understand and visualize. It is exactly what one would
expect from its name. The substrate is exposed to an oxygen-rich flame. It is mainly
used to improve adhesion, but it can be beneficial in other ways. Because high tem-
peratures are generated with flame treating, it can burn off dust, fibers, and residual
organic matter, thus cleaning the surface for coating. The oxygen-rich portion of the
flame promotes oxidation of the substrate generating reactive groups. The reactive
groups provide higher surface energy for better wetting and the opportunity for
chemical interaction with the coating. Table 11.8 shows the effectiveness of flame
treatment on adhesive strength.
Table 11.8. Effect of Flame Treatment on the Adhesion Bond Strength by using Lap
Shear Test using An Epoxide Adhesive with Several Fluoropolymers15
Plasma treatment is very similar to corona treatment, except gases are injected into
the corona discharge to modify the chemical composition of the corona plasma and
so changes the reaction with the substrate. Plasma treatment is a dry process that
does not utilize solvents and generates little waste compared to sodium etching. It
is a more expensive process due to equipment requirements and vacuum operation.
It also does not impart a sufficiently strong adhesive bond to PTFE, the most com-
mon perfluoropolymer. In the 1990s, progress was made in the plasma treatment
technology for surface modification of PTFE.17–19 Nevertheless, the bond strength
of plasma-treated PTFE is, at best, 60% of that obtained by sodium etching.
An alternative plasma treatment technique is the glow discharge method that can
be done at atmospheric pressure. To generate the glow discharge, a pair of insula-
tion-coated electrodes is placed at a predetermined distance apart inside a chamber
connected to a gas inlet tube. The object being treated is moved between the
electrodes, one of which is connected to a power source, while the other electrode is
grounded. For example, several fluoropolymer films were treated by glow discharge
in helium atmosphere.20 Strips of the treated and untreated films were bonded
to 0.2-mm-thick aluminum foils using a urethane adhesive cured at 100°C for
15 min. The treatment conditions and bond strengths of the samples are given in
Table 11.10.
A plasma or corona treatment is often used for coating continuous web types of
materials, such as plastics and foils. Hand units have become common, however,
and are now being used in some paint shops.
The surface adhesion and wettability of the polymer surface is increased due to
the rise of the number of OH and COOH groups, related to the abovementioned
increase in the surface polarity. Since the 1950s, corona is being used commercially
for treating polymeric substrates, so as to render them printable, with improved
wetting and adhesion properties. However, corona treatment can be detrimental
if “overtreatment” occurs: if the reagent gas, like ambient air, contains oxygen,
low-molecular-weight oxidized materials form on the surface, and these can give rise
to a weak boundary layer on the surface region and surface ablation. In order to avoid
thermal damage of the polymer surface to an unacceptable degree, corona treatment
units were quite recently elaborated which could modify the material several times
using such a discharge unit energy that would not damage that material; results on
polyester fibers were reported by Brzeziński et al. (2009). Corona treatment, however,
is difficult to use on three-dimensional objects. This limitation applies not only
to 3-D shaped products, but also to fibrous materials, particularly in the form of
woven fabrics or strands. The awareness of the existence of these limitations has
highlighted the need for alternative, more 3-D “compliant” surface modification
techniques such as ozone and/or ultraviolet radiation (e.g., UV) light.
A 3D corona discharge head has a dielectric enclosure with two small electrodes
made of medium thickness, bare aluminum or stainless steel wire, and connected
to a high-voltage power supply and fan [25]. When a high voltage exceeds the air
breakdown value (30 kV/cm), an electrical arc forms. This high-current arc is blown
out from the enclosure by the airstream and is usually several centimeters long and
one millimeter in diameter.
When the arc strikes a solid object (Figure 3.6), it travels across the surface and
returns back into the enclosure [25]. The treatment is achieved by moving the object
under the discharge head or by moving the head over the object. The arc is essentially
a 1D object (like a wire), and a treatment of 3D surfaces requires at least two heads.
It is difficult to treat objects with complicated geometry, especially with internal
cavities or channel structures, including tubing. The average power required for one
head operation is about 500 W. The effective power dissipated in the arc could be as
low as 50 W. Most of the ions and electrons travel between the two electrodes along
the arc trajectory where the main transfer of energy occurs.
Figure 3.6. 3D treatment of a plastic bottle.
The plasma effect on the material strongly depends on the exposure time because
each material requires a minimum exposure time to activate its surface. The required
level of surface modification depends on the application (e.g., printing, bonding, and
coating) as well as on the applied ink, adhesives, coatings, and curing process.
Occasionally, there is not a sufficient window for the necessary exposure time
and thermally safe material handling for 3D corona treaters. This is especially true
of tough-to-treat materials (plasmaphobic) in which the surface gets burned rather
than modified. This is also the case for heat-sensitive materials, thin wall plastic
objects, wires with thin insulation, fiber optics, thin coating layers, etc. This problem
is partly solved by installation of several discharge heads along the process line. If
the problem is not solved, other techniques are used to avoid burning.
3D corona treaters also generate ozone. To reduce high ozone concentration, special
filters are required to comply with clean room environment regulations for the med-
ical and semiconductor industries. A high-voltage signal applied to the electrodes
usually has an audible frequency (60 Hz and upwards). Electrical breakdown takes
place during each half-period of the cycle and produces a small shock wave with a
distinctive sound. This may generate significant amounts of noise in multiple head
discharge systems, requiring noise abatement and hearing protection.
When the arc strikes a solid object (Fig. 6.12), it travels across the surface and returns
back into the enclosure [26]. The treatment is achieved by moving the object under
the discharge head or by moving the head over the object. The arc is essentially a
one-dimensional object (like a wire), and a treatment of 3D surfaces requires at least
two heads. It is difficult to treat objects with complicated geometry, especially with
internal cavities or channel structures, including tubing. The average power required
for one head operation is about 500 W. The effective power dissipated in the arc could
be as low as 50 W. Most of the ions and electrons travel between the two electrodes
along the arc trajectory where the main transfer of energy occurs.
Figure 6.12. Three dimensional treatment of a plastic bottle.
Although the fan cools the arc continuously, it still has a fairly high core temperature.
The air stream created by the fan is usually unstable. The arc constantly changes, fol-
lowing the random pulsation of the air, leading to a non-uniform surface treatment.
To increase uniformity, the exposure time should be significantly increased, cutting
down the production rate. On the other hand, high current density within the arc
makes the arc plasma very hot, and exposure time is limited by the thermal damage
threshold of the surface.
The plasma effect on the material strongly depends on the exposure time because
each material requires a minimum exposure time to activate its surface. The required
level of surface modification depends on the application (printing, bonding, coating,
etc.) as well as on the applied ink, adhesives, coatings, and curing process. Occasion-
ally, there is not a sufficient window for the necessary exposure time and thermally
safe material handling for 3D corona treaters. This is especially true of tough-to-treat
materials (plasmaphobic) in which the surface gets burned rather than modified.
This is also the case for heat sensitive materials, thin wall plastic objects, wires with
thin insulation, fiber optics, thin coating layers, etc. This problem is partly solved by
installation of several discharge heads along the process line. If the problem is not
solved, other techniques are used to avoid burning.
3D corona treaters also generate ozone. To reduce high ozone concentration, special
filters are required to comply with clean room environment regulations for the med-
ical and semiconductor industries. A high-voltage signal applied to the electrodes
usually has an audible frequency (60 Hz and up). Electrical breakdown takes place
during each half-period of the cycle and produces a small shock wave with distinctive
sound. This may generate significant amounts of noise in multiple head discharge
systems, requiring noise abatement and hearing protection.
When the arc strikes a solid object, it travels across the surface and returns back into
the enclosure.[21] The treatment is achieved by moving the object under the discharge
head or by moving the head over the object. The arc is essentially a one-dimensional
object (like a wire), and a treatment of 3D surfaces requires at least two heads. It is
difficult to treat objects with complicated geometry, especially with internal cavities
or channel structures, including tubing. The average power required for one head
operation is about 500 W. The effective power dissipated in the arc could be as low
as 50 W. Most of the ions and electrons travel between the two electrodes along the
arc trajectory where the main transfer of energy occurs.
Although the fan cools the arc continuously, it still has a fairly high core temperature.
The air stream created by the fan is usually unstable. The arc constantly changes, fol-
lowing the random pulsation of the air, leading to a non-uniform surface treatment.
To increase uniformity, the exposure time should be significantly increased, cutting
down the production rate. On the other hand, high current density within the arc
makes the arc plasma very hot, and exposure time is limited by the thermal damage
threshold of the surface.
The plasma effect on the material strongly depends on the exposure time because
each material requires a minimum exposure time to activate its surface. The required
level of surface modification depends on the application (e.g., printing, bonding,
coating, etc.) as well as on the applied ink, adhesives, coatings, and curing process.
Occasionally, there is not a sufficient window for the necessary exposure time
and thermally safe material handling for 3D corona treaters. This is especially true
of tough-to-treat materials (plasmaphobic) in which the surface gets burned rather
than modified. This is also the case for heat sensitive materials, thin wall plastic
objects, wires with thin insulation, fiber optics, thin coating layers, etc. This problem
is partly solved by installation of several discharge heads along the process line. If
the problem is not solved, other techniques are used to avoid burning.
3D corona treaters also generate ozone. To reduce high ozone concentration, special
filters are required to comply with clean room environment regulations for the med-
ical and semiconductor industries. A high-voltage signal applied to the electrodes
usually has an audible frequency (60 Hz and up). Electrical breakdown takes place
during each half-period of the cycle and produces a small shock wave with distinctive
sound. This may generate significant amounts of noise in multiple head discharge
systems, requiring noise abatement and hearing protection.