Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY
GROUP NO: 3
MEMBERS:
CABALUNA, MELLANIE
DAUMAR, MARINELA
MALERIADO, ALYANNA
2
ABSTRACT
The lab exercise was conducted for the students to be exposed to the harvest
method for estimating productivity in a grassland ecosystem. It is a productivity
measuring technique, most commonly used for estimates of primary productivity,
especially in situations in which predation is low (e.g. among annual crops, on
certain heathlands, in colonizing grasslands, and sometimes in pond ecosystems).
Sample areas are harvested at intervals throughout the growing season, and the
material is dried to estimate dry weight or calorific value.
Sustainable use of an ecosystem relies on not using resources faster than they
are made. Productivity relies on the diversity of the ecosystem to ensure efficient
cycling of resources, and loss of diversity lowers ecosystem productivity.
Unsustainable use of resources feeds back on itself and the ecosystem loses
productivity, and less can be taken from the ecosystem in the long term.
INTRODUCTION
Gross primary productivity, or GPP, is the rate at which solar energy is captured
in sugar molecules during photosynthesis (energy captured per unit area per unit
time). Producers such as plants use some of this energy for metabolism/cellular
respiration and some for growth (building tissues). Net primary productivity, or NPP, is
gross primary productivity minus the rate of energy loss to metabolism and
3
maintenance. In other words, it's the rate at which energy is stored as biomass by
plants or other primary producers and made available to the consumers in the
ecosystem.
To observe the above concept, a lab exercise was conducted for the students
to be exposed to the harvest method for estimating productivity in a grassland
ecosystem.
I. Materials
The materials used in the experiment were as follows: four square quadrats,
glass clippers, scissors, guna or bolo-guna (weeding knife), straw, measuring tape,
sticks, rice sack, paper bag, and weighing scale.
II. Procedure
During this particular experiment, a specific study site with uniform vegetation
was selected. Within the study site, a wide area where the vegetation is of almost
uniform growth or size was chosen. In the chosen area, 4 m 2 quadrats were laid out
side by side. At the borders of each quadrat, the standing vegetation were parted so
that all of the stems rooted in the quadrat were inside the boundary markers. Then, all
of the recent dead material including individual leaves and entire plants from the first
quadrat were removed. All the dead materials were placed on a sack labeled “Dead”.
Then, all standing leaves and stems were clipped as close to the ground as possible
and placed into a sack labeled “Live”. Lastly, all the roots from the first quadrat were
removed and placed into a sack labeled “Roots”. Then the roots and live and dead
materials were weighed daily until the weight was constant. The different plant species
were identified. The following procedures was repeated for the rest of the quadrats. In
order to get the primary productivity, the harvest method was used.
The recorded weight of the live and dead materials and roots are shown at the
table below. Each week live and dead materials and roots were gathered from one of
the 4 plots or quadrat.
4
Table 1. Recorded weight of the live and dead materials and roots
The table above shows that the weight recorded was not immediately constant,
for four days the live and dead materials and roots were repeatedly weighed until its
weight remained constant.
The following plant species were found during the lab exercise: Mimosa pudica
/makahiya, Asthma weed/Tawa-tawa, Velvetleaf, Paspalum distichum L. (Bakbaka),
Amaranth. Majority of the weed collected was the Paspalum distichum L. (Bakbaka),
it made up 80% of the weighed species. To get the primary productivity, the harvest
method was used. It is a productivity measuring technique, most commonly used for
estimates of primary productivity, especially in situations in which predation is low (e.g.
among annual crops, on certain heathlands, in colonizing grasslands, and sometimes
in pond ecosystems). Sample areas are harvested at intervals throughout the growing
season, and the material is dried to estimate dry weight or calorific value. The table
above shows that the average primary productivity is 62.6 g/m2, this indicates that area
selected doesn’t produce as much as the other areas in the selected location. It is
because the largeness of primary productivity depends on the photosynthetic capacity
of producers and the existing environmental conditions, such as solar radiation,
temperature and soil moisture. In the data collected, it can be seen that the productivity
increases per week. The reason may be because the other plots have gotten time to
grow and produce more unlike the first plot that was used for the lab exercise.
Plants typically capture and convert about 1.3 - 1.6% of the solar energy that
reaches Earth's surface and use about a quarter of the captured energy for metabolism
and maintenance. So, around 1% of the solar energy reaching Earth's surface (per
unit area and time) ends up as net primary productivity. Net primary productivity varies
among ecosystems and depends on many factors. These include solar energy input,
temperature and moisture levels, carbon dioxide levels, nutrient availability, and
community interactions (e.g., grazing by herbivores). These factors affect how many
photosynthesizers are present to capture light energy and how efficiently they can
perform their role. In terrestrial ecosystems, primary productivity ranges from
about 2000 g/m2/yr in highly productive tropical forests and salt marshes to less
than 100 g/m2/yr in some deserts.
CONCLUSION
Sustainable use of an ecosystem relies on not using resources faster than they
are made. Productivity relies on the diversity of the ecosystem to ensure efficient
cycling of resources, and loss of diversity lowers ecosystem productivity.
Unsustainable use of resources feeds back on itself and the ecosystem loses
productivity, and less can be taken from the ecosystem in the long term.
GUIDE QUESTIONS
7
2.) List in detail the ways in which the net primary productivity is lost from the plants
and which therefore, cause the ANP value to be low.
The plant net primary production (NPP) is an important indicator to reflect the
function of the grassland ecosystems. Some research results are reviewed about the
effects of plant species diversity, resource availability, grazing, restoration of degraded
grassland and climate change on NPP of grassland ecosystems in the paper. These
researches show that (1) there are inconsistent conclusions about the relationship
between plant diversity and NPP which depends on experimental site, starting status
and indicators measured; most of the studies find their “single peak relationship due
to compensation effect of different plant resource utilization niche. However, some
studies report that they are positive and negative relationships when NPP is relatively
low and high, respectively. there are many mechanisms to explain their negative
correlations including the hypotheses of disturbance, competition and resources
availability. (2) Resource availability determines NPP and modifies the relationship
between it and plant diversity. Some researches show that there is an interactive effect
on NPP between different resources. Improving the level of a limiting resource may
reduce its use efficiency, but it may improve the use efficiency of other resources.
8
Nutrient additions improve the productivity of the grassland, while it reduces plant
diversity. (3) Grazing affects NPP through changing plant composition and resource
availability. Heavy grazing reduces soil nitrogen (N) mineralization rate and NPP, while
moderate grazing increases them. In particular, moderate grazing enhances plant
diversity due to increase of grassland heterogeneity. (4) Availability of nutrient
resources and feedback of plants to it play key roles on NPP in the restoration of
degraded grasslands. With the increasing of root biomass, root C/N ratio and the
amount of microbial C and soil carbon pool, the net N mineralization rates and N
bioavailability rapidly decline during the processes of the restoration. Plant-soil
interaction manifestes as negative feedback, which in turn limites the further
improvement of plant productivity. NPP may increase with restoration of the degraded
grasslands, whereas maximum NPP occurs in the middle or late stages of the
restoration. NPP will decline at the late stage of the restoration if there is no
disturbance or grazing.(5) Most of experimental warming studies show that there are
inconsistent effects of warming on NPP and plant diversity which varies with the
different locations and grassland ecosystems due to differences of resource
availability and grazing/clipping. In general, the impacts of warming on underground
NPP is larger than on aboveground NPP.
3.) List down and describe very briefly some other methods used by ecologists to
estimate productivity in terrestrial ecosystem.
LITERATURE CITED
Campbell, Neil A., Jane B. Reece, Lisa A. Urry, Michael L. Cain, Steven A.
Wasserman, Peter V. Minorsky, and Robert B. Jackson. "Ecosystems." In Campbell
Biology, 8th ed., 1222-1244. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, 2008.
Wang, C. & Meng, Fandong & Li, Xin-E & Jiang, Lili & Wang, Shiping. (2014). Factors
affecting plant primary productivity of grasslands: A review. Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta
Ecologica Sinica. 34. 4125-4132. 10.5846/stxb201212171811.
Roy, J. et al. Terrestrial Global Productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (2001).
10