Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Handout untuk MK Antropologi Ekonomi, Dep. Antropologi FISIP UI, 17 & 19 September 2019
© Semiarto Aji Purwanto
Potlatch
• FuncXonalist: self-interested lens of analysis would show how
gi*s and exchange lead to the redistribuXon of resources,
which benefits the organizers of those exchanges
• Social-poliXcal perspecXve: produced status and presXge
among the parXcipants; by giving away more goods than
another person, a chief could build his reputaXon and gain
new respect and posiXon in the community
• Ritual perspecXve: reinforces who people are, builds their
sense of personhood, and ulXmately expresses the essence of
cultural groups
© Semiarto Aji Purwanto
What is a gi*?
• Marcell Mauss, The Gi=: The Form and Reason for Exchange in
Archaic Socie:es 1924
• “Why do humans feel obliged to reciprocate when they
receive a gi*?”
• no gi* is truly free
• gi*s creates a link between the people involved
• entail the idenXty of the giver something powerful: hau
• receiving the gi* always carries an obligaXon to reciprocate,
because the hau “wants” to return to its original owner,
though now it may be a?ached to another’s object.
• Gi* economy
© Semiarto Aji Purwanto
Gi* vs capitalism
• Marx and Mauss: capitalism was ruining the social world
because of commodiXes and the commodiXzaXon of socieXes
• Marx: CommodiXes, from the Marxist viewpoint, were
produced for commerce rather than for the people who made
them
• no amount of money or commodiXes bought in the
marketplace can ever really saXsfy the workers because the
one thing they cannot buy is the freedom of controlling their
own labor and lives
• Gi* economies were seen as the opposite of the impersonal
commodity-producing capitalist system
© Semiarto Aji Purwanto
Beyond Value
• Gregory’s gi*/commodity disXncXon and Appadurai’s life history of
objects approach are two of the major direcXons taken by more
recent interpretaXons of the economic circulaXon of goods:
property.
• private property: a single individual holds all rights to an object à
simply never exist in reality
• Godelier countered that some things cannot be given away or
exchanged à inalienability of many forms of property
• ownership is inalienable; the others merely enjoy rights of
possession and use, which are alienable and temporary and are
transferred with the object
• objects may move from one person to another, but they conXnue
to be owned by the first person
© Semiarto Aji Purwanto