pre-tes post-test

22 31 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

40
26 27
28 32 35 Variable 1
28 32 Mean 30.3684210526
30
28 34 Variance 20.0233918129
31 36 25 Observations 19
32 30 pre-test
Pearson Correlation 0.5722806228
20
31 32 post-test Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
26 27 15 df 18
31 28 t Stat 2.1794494718
10
26 37 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0214120373
34 34 5 t Critical one-tail 1.7340635923
30 36 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0428240746
0
30 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 t Critical two-tail 2.1009220369
26 25
30 28
Pre-Test & Post Test Analysis
28 26
35 33
Interpretation of Data
17 19
Highest 35 37
The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from17 to 35 while post test
Lowest 17 19 scores ranged from 19 to 37 which means an increase of scores as shown in the gap between
the red line(posttest) and blue line(pretest). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 30.36
for posttest and 28.36 for pre-test.

Analysis
The table reveals that the t Stat is equal 2.179, this is the mean difference between
the post test and pres test scores. The p-value is .021 which is greater than .01 which means
that the test scores are NOT significantly different at 1% level.

Conclusion

As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions made during the
Competency-Based Training(CBT) for Trainers Methodology Level I has no effect with the
trainees.

Recommendation

Competency-Based Training for Enhanced Training Methodology I is therefore

 Competency-Based Training for Enhanced Training Methodology I is therefore
recommended:
1. CBLM must contain sufficient information and is relevant to the objectives.
2. Select methods that are appropriate with the training need.
3. Provide appropriate course activities.
Variable 2
28.3684210526
17.2456140351
19
PRE-TEST POST-TEST
41 61
49 57 80
53 62 70
53 62
53 64 60
59 66 50
61 60
40 Column A
59 62
Column B
49 57 30
59 58
49 67 20
65 64 10
57 66
57 60 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
49 55
57 58
53 56
67 63
31 49
53.74 60.37

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 60.3684210526 53.7368421053
Variance 20.0233918129 68.9824561404
Observations 19 19
Pearson Correlation 0.5722806228
Hypothesized Mean D 0
df 18
t Stat 4.2405044127
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.000245961
t Critical one-tail 1.7340635923
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.000491922
t Critical two-tail 2.1009220369

Pre-Test - Post Test Analysis

Interpretation of Data

The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from 31 to 67 while post test scores ranged from
Pre-Test - Post Test Analysis
Interpretation of Data

The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from 31 to 67 while post test scores ranged from
49 to 67 which means increase of scores as shown in the gap between the red line(posttest) and blue
line(pretest). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 60.37 for posttest and 53.74 for pre-test.

Analysis

Comparison between pre-test and posttest using paired t-test as revealed by the table of values shows
pre-test and posttest are significantly different with a p = 0.00025. This means that mean scores increased.

Conclusion

As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions made during the Competency-
Based Training(CBT) for Enhanced Training Methodology I effectively increased the learnings of the trainees.
Recommendation

Competency-Based Training for Trainers Methodology I is therefore recommended for use in all TESDA
institutions using the Competency-Based Training Materials(CBLM).
 Column A
Column B

ores ranged from

ores ranged from
nd blue
st.

le of values shows
res increased.

e Competency-
of the trainees.

or use in all TESDA