Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By:______________ Date__________
DATE: DATE:
Project Area Discipline Type Originator Package Sequence-Sht Revision
Document Control No.
EES EXGN ADM PLN FOD 000 30001-00 H01
Revision History
REV DATE ISSUE PURPOSE ORIGINATOR CHECKED APPROVED
BY: BY:
Holds:
Table of Contents
Page i
7.2 Health, Environment and Safety Plan ............................................................................. 12
7.2.1 HES Training Requirements................................................................................ 12
7.2.2 Project Orientation ................................................................................................ 12
7.2.3 Worksite Inspections ............................................................................................ 12
8.0 COMMUNICATION PLAN ...................................................................................................... 12
8.1 Document Retention and Distribution............................................................................. 13
8.2 Correspondence .................................................................................................................. 13
8.3 Document Numbering System ......................................................................................... 13
8.4 Document Transmittals ..................................................................................................... 13
8.5 Data Storage Format .......................................................................................................... 13
8.6 Change Management ......................................................................................................... 14
8.7 Information Security.......................................................................................................... 15
9.0 PROJECT CONTROLS BASELINE ........................................................................................ 15
10.0 NIGERIAN CONTENT .............................................................................................................. 17
List of Appendices
Page ii
Project Procedure PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN Page 1
1.0 ACRONYMS
The existing Escravos 26” Crude Export Pipeline is approximately 40 years old and is subject
to numerous age related, third-party and security risks. It passes through two Platforms,
Okan Production Platform and the Berth Operating Platform, and is capable of loading
through SPM 2 and 3. The Escravos Export System Project (EESP) will install a new export
pipeline and a new loading berth.
The Escravos Export System Project (EESP), Phase 3 scope of services is defined by CNL
document RWE 092 as revised with CNL-approval during the execution of the project
contract (FAC-2005-40021787). FODE-GIE intends for the set of EESP Phase 3 project
deliverables as defined in RWE 092, Appendix 8, and revised as project document EES-
EXGN-TEC-LST-CNL-000-00001-00 to fully represent the project-scope at project
completion.
As an introduction to the Project Execution Plan, the following paragraphs describe the high
level functions embodied in executing the scope of services.
3.1 Engineering
• Design Calculations and Drafting
• Technical Studies and Reports
• Specifications and Data Sheets
• Quality Assurance/Quality Control for all documentation
• Collaborate in decision making
The process of quantifying risks and identifying reduction measures will be achieved by
formal technical review sessions and team meetings.
3.4.1 Communication
• Assign a single point of accountability for management and communication of
project information.
• Conduct weekly and monthly internal meetings
• Informal and telephone conversations as required
• Disburse information to CNL through formal document transmittals
o Weekly Meetings
o Weekly and Monthly Progress Reports
o Memorandums
o Letters
o Request for Information (RFI)
o Trends
o Technical documents supporting the FEED Engineering effort
• Weekly Team Meeting with CNL
4.2 Methodology
The work will be done according to selected FODE-GIE procedures (part of the quality
assurance plan) as modified by comments in the last column of the table below.
5.0 ORGANIZATION
As described in the organization chart, the project manager’s team comes with a wide range
of experience. This will encourage a reduction of the time spent on supervisory issues, given
the relatively high level of technical expertise placed at the lead engineer positions. This will
enable the engineering coordinator to focus on the challenge of reducing inter-disciplinary
interface issues. Additionally, the CAD team is grouped under the senior Drafter to ensure an
efficient use of the drafting resources in a multi-tasking role.
POSITION INCUMBENT
Project Manager Bob Davey
Engineering Coordinator Glen Sumner
Lead Pipelines Engineer (1) Glen Sumner
Lead Pipelines Engineer (2) Gabriel Rosoiu
Specialist Pipelines Engineer (Hydraulic) Tharma Naguleswaran
Lead Installation/Survey Engineer Gary Fellers
Lead Piping Engineer Keith Buchan
Lead Electrical Engineer Berlian Syako
Lead Structural Engineer Florian Smochina
Lead Instrument Engineer Ranjit Gupta
Intermediate Designers George Udoh, David Okokhia
Junior Engineers Oliver Onoh
Electrical Designer Marketa Fiserova
Senior Drafter/Head CAD Services Olusola Olotu
Project Services Manager James Crawford, Michael Stephens
Project Controls Engineer Joel Tiongco
Cost Estimate Engineer Kayode Aderibigbe
Document Control Supervisor Grace Oyinlola
HES Engineer Remmy Okorie
Technical Assistant Princewell Nnakwe
It is anticipated that the work will be done in Lagos. There are two aspects to the cost of
running an inspection pig; the capital cost to provide a means for launching and recovery, and
the cost of conducting the operation.
The pigging contractor will also provide input for a related but separate task, the process and
cost of commissioning the pipeline. Refer to Scope of Work – Pigging Study, document
number EES-EXGN-PPL-RPT-FOD-000-30004-00
A Project Quality Management System (PMS), [FODE Quality Management System,] which
as a minimum, complies with the minimum requirements of the Quality Standard ISO 9001:
2000 has been developed to pursue the quality objective of the Team. System compliance
shall be verified by a program of internal project system auditing. Documents required by
FODE Quality Management System shall be controlled and managed according to FODE
document control and records procedure (PM-055 Rev.0) and the project Quality Assurance
Plan as modified to meet CNL requirement.
The Project Team declares its total commitment to achieving this policy objective through the
observance and implementation of the following principles:
• The Project Team produces a quality product by fully understanding and satisfying
contract needs and requirements.
• Development and use of qualified personnel, trained with necessary skills and
experience to perform their duties.
• Performance in accordance with the documented Project Quality Management
System with the aim of satisfactory product realization and error free
performances.
• Open communication with CNL and project suppliers to ensure awareness and
maintenance of project quality standards and objectives.
All calculations, reports and drawings shall be in the English language. Units of Measure
will be according to CNL Drafting and Design Guideline. Refer to document 55-FAC-CNL-
PRO-0005.
FODE shall submit for CNL review and approval all drawings, specifications, data sheets,
calculations, reports, schedules, forms, lists, plans, analyses, programs, procedures, manuals,
certifications and all other documentation as Technical Requirements dictates. All designs
and documentation that require CNL review or approval shall be submitted immediately to
CNL upon completion of FODE`s internal review.
FODE shall provide a Master Document Register of all documents to be prepared during the
course of the project. CNL will review this register and advise FODE of any documents
which require longer review period cycles. CNL reserves the right to amend these review
period cycles at any time.
CNL will review and return one (1) drawing/document submitted for approval marked as
either:
Work may proceed immediately on drawings Code 1, 2, or 4. Work may not proceed on
drawings marked Code 3. Drawings marked Code 2 shall be revised and returned to CNL. If
comments are extensive or were not fully incorporated, additional review/revise cycles will
be required until documents achieve Code 1 condition. Drawings marked Code 3 shall be
revised and resubmitted for CNL approval. Code 4 indicates that the CNL does not intend to
“approve/not approve” the document submitted. This does not relieve the FODE from fully
complying with the Technical Requirements.
CNL shall have fourteen working (14) days to comment on the submittal, counting from the
working day after the release of transmittal by FODE Document Controller to CNL
Document Controller. Certain key documents shall have longer review periods. Should
“comment/approval” not be received by FODE after the comment period, FODE may
proceed with work as though the submittal had been marked “Code 4”, “Receipt Noted”.
Document review status shall be included as a topic during weekly progress review meetings.
FODE shall submit final FEED report encompassing all design drawings, engineering
calculations and document deliverables to CNL in electronic format and hard copy format.
• Preserves the health, safety and security of all staff, contractor staff personnel and
members of the public
• Minimize the impact of operations in the environment and
• Is sensitive to the needs of the host communities.
• All activities shall be analyzed to systematically identify related hazard risk and
sensitivities.
Every employee and sub-contractor employee is to perform their work in accordance with
this policy. Each employee is required to report, and where necessary suspend any activity
which he considers, is in contravention of this policy. Safety incidents will be reported to
FODE EESP Project Manager.
Dr Hammond Clinic
Zenon House
2 Ajose Adeogun Street
Victoria Island, Lagos
Tel- 01-2700740, 01-2630138
• Good house-keeping shall be required. This means that all personnel are required
to ensure that all equipment is in the appropriate places and ensuring that all waste
materials are properly disposed.
• Ensure that courses on pollution prevention and control are attended by our
employees.
The HES Engineer is responsible to ensure that waste materials (paper) generated during the
FEED project are collected and disposed of in a manner that does not compromise
confidentiality.
All formal communication shall be carried out in the eRoom created by the client and strictly
controlled by the document controller of both CNL and FODE.
Informal and routine communications can be done via emails; however, FODE will not act on
informal communications. The document Control Procedure mandates that such email
documents will be archived in the Project Folder at periodic intervals.
8.2 Correspondence
All formal correspondence must be approved by the Project Manager and copied to the
Document Controller. In the absence of the Project Manager, the Project Services Manager is
mandated to approve such outgoing correspondence.
The information storage system is designed to manage efficiently the flow of documents
throughout the lifecycle of the EESP project.
The flow-diagram below summarizes the information retrieval and storage process
As shown in the process diagram above, FODE project group interfaces with the Document
Controller (DC) and the Client project group (Client). Data for design work is received
through the DC. The DC stores electronic data received from Client on the File Server
P:\drive and advises the project group of the location. After retrieving, drafting, or reviewing
data for final transmission to client (for approval or review), documents are sent to the DC
who appends/ verifies the required document numbering systems, files a copy on the server,
and transmits document to the Client DC.
Information security and access rights are defined and documented. Data custodians shall
enforce information security standards and ensure the integrity of data within their area of
responsibility and comply with the statutory requirement.
Information back up is also available in our IT systems and with controlled access in our
organization. Our Data Security, Desktops and Server have controlled access with the use of
passwords. The EESP documents reside on the Intranet on the P-drive that has write
protection and controlled access to identified folders. As much as possible data will be
transferred by electronic means instead of printing. We will shred unused and waste paper to
avoid release of client confidential information to unauthorized persons.
Backups are carried out on a regular basis. A 1000GB external hard disk drive is used for
daily archiving, while 2 x HP Storage Works Ultrium 232 Tape drives are used for weekly
and monthly backup of all servers. A copy of the monthly server backups is kept off-site to
ensure speedy recovery in the event of unforeseen disaster.
This project started with a Request for Work Estimate (RWE) from CNL, outlining the scope
of the proposed work, the required Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and the Deliverables.
CNL raised and approved a Work Authorization (WA) requesting FODE to develop a
Contractor Work Estimate (CWE). The CWE document is supported by Cost, Time and
Resource Analysis (CTR) sheets that identify each of the Deliverables and allocate it
resources by individual and discipline. The CTR is assigned a timeline in the Level 2
schedule allowing the resource data to be integrated with the schedule files. The CTR number
can be directly mapped to CNL’s WBS.
The planning and scheduling is based on detail logic precedence networks using the critical
path method (CPM). Primavera Project Planner (P3) – Version 3.0 or MSProject are the
available software packages. The hierarchy of schedules is:
Level I Project Management Schedule
II Contract Milestone Schedule
III Detail Engineering, Procurement and
Construction Activities
IV Detail Construction and Commissioning
activities
The CTR sheets become the basis of the Weekly Progress Report which is the summation of
various internal reporting systems. Progress is primarily reported in terms of Earned Value as
this incorporates both the cost and schedule elements of the Deliverables. To calculate the
Earned Value of a Deliverable each CTR is weighted and given intermediate nodes, each
having a value that is ‘earned’ when the node is achieved. Each node is assigned a
completion date tying it back to the Schedule.
The Weekly Progress Report is subject to internal reviews with the Discipline Leads and
Managers in order to determine if progress is being achieved to plan and to identify any
variances that might have a cost or schedule impact on the project. If such a variance is
identified it will be processed through a Trend Alert Form. The Risk Matrix will also be
reviewed for additions, deletions and potential impacts. Workaround plans may also be
developed for discussion and approval by CNL
Summary information from the Internal Weekly Progress Report, which updates the progress
of the CTR’s, is presented in tabular and graphical form in the Weekly Reports presented to
CNL.
9.3 Trending
Trends can be brought forward by the Discipline Leads, CNL or may be identified during the
preparation of the Weekly Progress Report and the subsequent internal reviews with the
Discipline Leads and Managers. Any variances that might have a cost or schedule impact on
the project will be evaluated for mitigation or workaround. If a variance cannot be
dispositioned this way it will be processed through a Trend Alert Form.
9.4 Forecasting
Project cost forecasts incorporate changes that have not been identified or detailed by the
trend program, but could have an impact on the project. Effectively it is a ‘heads up’ that
there are issues that may impact on the project and need to be dispositioned.
10.0 NIGERIAN CONTENT
The scope of work will be completed in Nigeria. Technical lead positions are supported by
local engineers. This will ensure that during the project, technology and knowledge transfer
take place. Additionally, at least one local engineer is included for the sole purpose of
gaining pipeline hydraulics knowledge during the FEED and study work activities.
Project management activities will be handled from the FODE office in Lekki Nigeria.
Page 18
APPENDIX A2 - DESIGN APPROVALS MATRIX
Project Specs x x x x x
Equipment Lists x x x x x x
Data sheets x x x x x x x
Requisitions x x x x x x
Calculations x x x x x x
Material x x x x x x
Specifications
Reports / x x x x x x x
Studies
Eng. Drawings x x x x x x x
Page 19
APPENDIX A3 - DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION MATRIX
DOCUMENT CLIENT WEB PROJ LEAD PROJ ESTIMATE E- DCC
PAGE MANAGER DISCIPLINE CONTROLS ENGINEER ROOM
ENGINEERS MANAGER
PEP X O X
Monthly X X O
progress reports
Weekly X X O
progress reports
MoM X X O
Change orders X O X X
Project schedule X O X
Correspondence O X X
Org chart X O X
RFI X O X
Engineering X O X
drawings
Engineering X O X
calculations
RFQs X O X X X
TBAs X X O X X X
Equipment Lists X O X
LEGEND
X COPY
O ORIGINAL
Page 20