Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Some people claim that television is the root of all evil, while others think of television as a best friend.
Some blame the television for society's violence, consumerism, and misinformation, while others see
it as a rich resource for education and global understanding.
Who is right?
I know many people who just can't seem to live without TV. As soon as they get home, they turn it on.
Even if they have work to do, family to be with, or friends to see, they do it all with the TV on. For many
of us, television is such a constant presence in our lives that we haven't stopped to question whether
or not it is good, and most never ask ourselves if and how television might be hurting us.
For those of you who are asking this question—to satisfy your own curiosity or for an essay, debate,
or other school project—below you will find the costs and benefits of watching television.
If you took a genius and plopped her down in front of the idiot box, would she be any less smart by the
end of the day? What if she went through her entire childhood without watching a single show: How
would her intelligence be affected? And how would her intelligence compare to that of other geniuses
who had spent their whole lives latched onto the boob tube?
As you can probably guess, it all depends on who is watching, what they are watching, and for how
long.
Certainly, we can all point to anecdotal evidence that shows how television is full of lies, half-truths,
propaganda, cliché, stereotypes, and misinformation, and how it can hinder people's ability to think for
themselves. It's also easy to find examples of how television manipulates people's opinions (and
morals) and makes them more prone to consumerism (and debt). We all have personal experience
with television that persuades us to believe it is valuable or not.
But what do the scientists say?
Researchers have been diligently studying this question for a long time, perhaps ever since the late
1940s, when television became a popular fixture in the home. Many studies have been done to
ascertain the effects of television on intelligence, although most of the studies focus on younger
children and results are not always conclusive.
The first two years of life are critical for a child's brain development; this is a time when a child learns
motor, language, and social skills by playing and interacting, not by sitting idly and watching passively.
According to pediatricians and the American Academy of Pediatrics, TV provides no educational
benefits for children 2 years old and younger, and can in fact be harmful. For kids this age, TV actually
might delay development since it fills time a child might have spent doing other activities, ones that
actually help them learn. Interacting with their environment, playing with others, and active participation
are the things children should be doing but aren't when they're parked in front of the boob tube.
A 2013 study at Ohio State University shows that preschoolers who live in homes where the television
is constantly kept on (or even have a TV in their bedroom) have difficulties developing a thing called
a "Theory of Mind" (ToM), which is the ability to attribute mental states (knowledge, intents, beliefs,
desires, etc.) to oneself and others and to understand that others have desires and intentions that are
different from their own. In other words, these kids don't have the same opportunity to exercise their
ability to understand other people and differentiate others' perspectives from their own.
Research has shown that high-quality shows like Sesame Street can improve children's cognitive
abilities. Study after study has shown that kids from 3 to 5 years old who watch an educational program
for one hour a day are able to recognize numbers, shapes, and letters better than those who don't.
When 500 kids who had participated in studies were contacted later as teenagers, researchers found
that those who had watched educational programs in preschool had better grades, placed more value
on achievement, read more books, and were more creative than those who hadn't.