The most common answer to the question, “Why was Africa called the Dark Continent?

” is
that Europe did not know much about Africa until the 19th century, but that answer is
misleading and disingenuous. Europeans had known quite a lot about Africa for at least 2,000
years, but because of powerful imperial impulses, European leaders began purposefully
ignoring earlier sources of information.

At the same time, the campaign against slavery and for missionary work in Africa actually
intensified Europeans’ racial ideas about African people in the 1800s. They called Africa the
Dark Continent, because of the mysteries and the savagery they expected to find in the
“Interior."

Exploration: Creating Blank Spaces

It is true that up until the 19th century, Europeans had little direct knowledge of Africa
beyond the coast, but their maps were already filled with details about the continent. African
kingdoms had been trading with Middle Eastern and Asian states for over two millennia.
Initially, Europeans drew on the maps and reports created by earlier traders and explorers
like the famed Moroccan traveler Ibn Battuta who traveled across the Sahara and along the
North and East coasts of Africa in the 1300s.

During the Enlightenment, however, Europeans developed new standards and tools for
mapping, and since they weren’t sure precisely where the lakes, mountains, and cities of
Africa were, they began erasing them from popular maps. Many scholarly maps still had more
details, but due to the new standards, the European explorers—Burton, Livingstone, Speke,
and Stanley—who went to Africa were credited with (newly) discovering the mountains,
rivers, and kingdoms to which African people guided them.

The maps these explorers created did add to what was known, but they also helped create the
myth of the Dark Continent. The phrase itself was actually popularized by the explorer H. M.
Stanley, who with an eye to boosting sales titled one of his accounts "Through the Dark
Continent," and another, "In Darkest Africa." However, Stanley himself recalled that before he
left on his mission, he had read over 130 books on Africa.

Imperialism and Duality

Imperialism ran rampant in the west in the 19th century, but there were subtle differences
between the imperialist hunger for Africa compared to other parts of the world. Most empire
building begins with the recognition of trading and commercial benefits that could be accrued.
In Africa's case, the continent as a whole was being annexed to fulfill three purposes: the spirit
of adventure, the desire to support good work of civilizing the natives, and the hope of
stamping out the slave trade. Writers such as H. Ryder Haggard, Joseph Conrad, and Rudyard
Kipling fed into the romantic depiction of a place that required saving by strong men of
adventure.

An explicit duality was set up for these adventurers: dark versus light and Africa versus West.
The African climate invited mental prostration and physical disability; the forests were seen
as implacable and filled with beasts; and crocodiles lay in wait, floating in sinister silence in
the great rivers. Danger, disease, and death were part of the "uncharted reality" and the exotic
fantasy. The idea of a hostile Nature and a disease-ridden environment as tinged with evil was
perpetrated by fictional accounts by Joseph Conrad and W. Somerset Maugham.

The Heart of Darkness

Africa was seen by these men as an erotically and psychologically powerful place of darkness,
that could only be cured by a direct application of Christianity, the "light which drives away
the darkness," and, of course, capitalism. Geographer Lucy Jarosz describes this stated and
unstated belief that Africa was seen as "a primeval, bestial, reptilian or female entity to be
tamed, enlightened, guided, opened and pierced by white European males through western
science, Christianity, civilization, commerce, and colonialism."

By the 1870s and 1880s, European traders, officials, and adventurers were going to Africa to
seek their fame and fortune, and recent developments in guns gave these men significant
power in Africa. When they abused that power—especially in the Congo—Europeans blamed
the Dark Continent, rather than themselves. Africa, they said, was the that supposedly
brought out the savagery in man.

Abolitionists and Missionaries

In the late 1700s, British abolitionists were campaigning hard against slavery. They published
pamphlets described the horrid brutality and inhumanity of plantation slavery. One of the
most famous images showed a black man in chains asking “Am I not a man and a brother?”

Once the British Empire abolished slavery in 1833, however, abolitionists turned their efforts
against slavery within Africa. In the colonies, the British were also frustrated that former
slaves didn’t want to keep working on plantations for very low wages. Soon the British were
portraying African men not as brothers, but as lazy idlers or evil slave traders.

At the same time, missionaries began traveling to Africa to bring the word of God. They
expected to have their work cut out for them, but when decades later they still had few
converts in many areas, they began saying that African people’s hearts were locked in
darkness. They were closed off from the saving light of Christianity.

The Myth Today

Over the years, people have given lots of reasons for why Africa was called the Dark Continent.
Many people think it is a racist phrase but can't say why, and the common belief that the
phrase just referred to Europe's lack of knowledge about Africa makes it seem out-dated, but
otherwise benign.

Race does lie at the heart of this myth, but it not about skin color. The myth of the Dark
Continent referred to the savagery Europeans said was endemic to Africa, and even the idea
that its lands were unknown came from erasing centuries of pre-colonial history, contact, and
travel across Africa.