Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Mary-Margaret Whitten
Wrong-site surgery is the action of performing surgery at the wrong site or laterality of
the body, performing the wrong procedure, or performing a surgery on the wrong patient (Tena,
League & Brennan, 2018). Despite efforts by the Joint Commission (JHCAO), the World Health
Organization (WHO), and other professional organizations such as the Association of peri-
Operative Registered Nurses (AORN), to develop standardized processes and protocols in efforts
to reduce the risk of human error to cause a patient harm (Collins et al., 2014) mistakes are still
being made, and wrong site surgeries are still being performed.
operating room (OR) that is struggling to keep its patients safe while undergoing surgery, due to
the lack safety precautions in place, such as the use of a surgical safety checklist, to safeguard
from mistakes reaching the patient. The hospital is situated in the heart of a working-class, low
income part of the city. Limited resources prohibit residents from receiving primary or
preventive care. Therefore, the patient population is sicker, has more comorbidities, and higher
Even the physical layout of the OR presents safety issues, as it is spread across 3 floors
and two buildings. The Main OR is on floors one and two. The first floor has 8 ORs adjacent to
the same day surgery pre-op holding area, and the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as
the central supply room and sterile core. There are an additional four OR rooms that can be
reached via an elevator inside the sterile core that delivers passengers to the second floor about 5
feet on the outside of the red line, indicating only authorized personnel beyond that point. The
ability to access the sterile core via an elevator that originates outside of the operating room
3
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
demonstrates additional disregard of safety protocols and policies. The direct connection of
sterile and unsterile areas, as well as the ability of non-authorized personnel to accidentally enter
the area compromises the sterility of the entire core, increasing risk for surgical site infections in
every operation performed using the instruments and supplies stored within it.
The hospital is situated in the heart of a working-class, low income part of the city.
Limited resources prohibit residents from receiving primary or preventive care. Therefore, the
patient population is sicker, has more comorbidities, and higher acuity levels on admission than
patients found in surrounding area hospitals. The OR does not employ enough nurses to supply
the patient need for surgery. The staff is a close-knit, competent team, but they are exhausted due
to working long hours and being on-call far too often to achieve any sort of work-life balance.
Morale is low and stress levels are high. Recent leadership changes, following poor department
management, has left the staff frustrated, stressed, tired and with an unrecognized decrease in
their ability to care for (and possibly about) their patients. Staff are desensitized to the inherent
high-risk environment that is the OR, and this leads to omission of safety precautions, such as the
use of a surgical safety checklist, to keep the patients and staff safe.
Clinical Problem
Clinically, Chippenham Medical Center falls behind its competition in the area of wrong-
site surgeries. Recently, a wrong site surgery reached the patient when a notoriously quick
orthopedic surgeon implanted the wrong knee during what should have been a routine total knee
arthroplasty. The mistake was allowed to continue until the cuts had been made in the patients
bones to accommodate the implant. The sales rep caught the error when they began trialing the
implants and the new joint would not sit flush as it was made to fit the anatomic opposite. That’s
when he spoke up telling the team “oh no I set you up for a right side. Sorry I had on my
4
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
paperwork that this was a right. What does the consent say?” After talking with the patient’s
family, the doctor proceeded to give the man bilateral knee implants, making his recovery much
longer and harder. Not to mention he now has two implanted knees and he only needed one.
The day the WSS occurred, I couldn’t believe this “never” or “sentinel event” had not
only occurred, but it had both reached and harmed a patient. Until it happened, I would never
have believed that wrong-site surgeries are a real threat to patient safety. Much less was this
something that could happen in my hospital, to my competent coworkers. This clinical problem
hits close to home in a way that I never thought possible. Until recently, a WSS was something
of the past, not a modern-day problem to be solved. I was one of the many health care providers
blissfully ignorant to and unaware of the continued prevalence of WSS. With the proven
interventions we have to prevent WSS and protect patient safety, how did everyone involved, fail
The culture of the OR continues to allow preventable errors to reach and cause harm to
the patient. For example, the OR does not employ enough nurses to supply the patient need for
surgery. The nursing shortage means there are only five full time nurses who take call resulting
in minimum call requirements of 125 hours a month or more. Temporary agency nurses barely
fill the “warm body” requirement because by the time they start to get acclimated and are
independently useful, they are off to the next assignment and the cycle starts over. The staff is a
close-knit and competent team, but they are exhausted from working long hours and no real
work-life balance. Morale is low and stress levels are high. Recent leadership changes, following
poor department management, has left the staff frustrated, stressed, tired and with an
5
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
unrecognized decrease in their ability to care for (and possibly about) their patients. Staff seems
desensitized to the inherent high-risk environment that is the OR, leading to omission of safety
precautions and nursing interventions, such as the use of a surgical safety checklist, to keep the
This does not excuse nurses from deviating from the evidence-based standards of care,
nor the policies and protocols laid out by professional organizations and hospital systems to
guide nursing practice. On my unit the staff is constantly being pushed to improve their
“metrics.” Each morning the focus is on time starts, fast turnover times and rushing to get the
doctors into and out of the operating room as fast as possible. Patient safety is barely a
consideration to many of the staff even though these patients are going to be on the operating
room table, possibly for hours, without any position aides to prevent pressure ulcers and skin
breakdown, but it saves a few minutes and time is money. The collective focus is on “getting it
The current clinical practice, a result of formal mechanisms driving perioperative nursing
care at Chippenham Medical Center adheres to the 2009 WHO recommendations for use of a
surgical safety checklist in all operative procedures as a part of the fulfillment of the universal
protocol. Because most errors related to safety concerns can be attributed to inadequate
communication and poor teamwork, the Surgical Safety Checklist drafted by the WHO in 2007
outlined a three-part checklist that requires interruption of anesthesia course to allow for three
specifically timed briefings (Fudickar, Horle, Wiltfang, & Bein, 2012). Another formal
approach to prevent wrong-site surgeries to include pre-op verification using two patient
6
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
identifiers, before the patient is sedated, marking of the surgical site and the institution of the
time-out prior to beginning surgery. Formal mechanisms to prevent wrong site surgery as
outlined in the AORN perioperative standards and recommended practices (2013) as it relates to
delineate the responsibilities of RNs engaged in practice in the perioperative setting” (AORN,
2013).
While all perioperative nurses understand the need for the universal protocol’s “time out”
there are times when the timeout may be performed in an improper or abbreviated form. If the
use of the surgical safety checklist is to perform as a fail-safe measure to preventing wrong-site
surgeries, all components must be used properly (Collins et al., 2014). The nurse performing the
time out during the WSS at Chippenham did not follow hospital protocol. It is imperative that the
timeout be performed using the surgical safety checklist, while verifying that the consent
matches what you are set up to do, and that everyone in the room is engaged during each step of
the process, or the system cannot be relied on the effectively prevent wrong site surgeries. The
nurse in this situation was rushing to hook up all the equipment in the room to get the surgery
started, when the surgeon called for the time out. In the interest of time the nurse performed the
timeout from memory, only glancing at her notes briefly during the timeout. By this point, the
doctor who was operating in two adjacent operating rooms on this particular day, working his
way back and forth between the two rooms. He would operate in one room while the surgical
assistant finished closing the previous patient’s wounds, and quickly cleaned and turned over the
room to expedite the next surgery. If the staff was moving at the pace the doctor preferred, he
would just be walking out of one room as the surgical assistant finishes draping the patient so he
7
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
can stop by the scrub sink and start all over again. Typically, the doctor walked into the room
with hands still dripping with soapy water from the scrub sink ready for his gown, gloves, and
the time-out. When the doctor arrived, the day of the WSS, the leg was already prepped and
draped. By the time the nurse was performing her time-out from memory, the final check before
the incision is made, no one was paying attention to her anyways and no one noticed she was not
Deviation from the evidence-based standards of care, and/or the policies and protocols
laid out by the AORN to guide perioperative nursing practice will lead to errors (Conrardy,
Brenek, & Myers, 2010). Every day at Chippenham is an uphill battle for the staff. They are
suffering from physical and mental exhaustion, and it is burning them out. Many of the older
employees are waiting out their retirement and they lack the motivation to work hard. The
Chippenham is fast paced, bustling with “activity, numerous distractions, a hierarchical reporting
structure, advanced technology, and complex equipment, all of which can affect health care
Corners are getting cut. Precautions that are usually commonplace taken to protect
patient’s skin, such as using egg crate to pad boney prominences and any lines or drains when
positioning the patient to avoid skin breakdown, get forgotten. It is the responsibility of the
perioperative nurse to advocate for the patient and keep him free of harm. On my unit, this
important step is often being skipped due to limited resources (i.e. someone forgot to order the
egg crate) limited time to gather supplies from storage locations across 3 floors of the large
hospital, and limited time for pre-op preparations from the doctor because he has been waiting,
8
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
not so patiently, for several hours to get operating room time due to the lack of staff to run the
rooms.
The AORN publishes its “Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices for
reflects the RN’s scope of professional responsibility and provide essential information for the
delivery of safe perioperative patient care and a safe work environment” (AORN, 2013). The
AORN recommended practices represent “what is believed to be the optimal and achievable
perioperative nursing practice and are based on the highest level of evidence available” (2013).
When sentinel events occur, there is often no one singular mistake that directly influences
its occurance. Often it is a combination of many smaller events or mistakes that synergize to
create one big mistake. The use of a surgical safety check list is a simple way to avoid wrong-site
surgery caused by human error. To be effective at preventing mistakes the entire surgical team
must respect and participate in the process fully. The adoption of the checklist alone is not
enough to stop the various process failures that continue to occur because of the departure from
checklist. We currently don’t have one and having come from a facility that placed a printed
copy of the WHO surgical safety check list on every chart when patients arrived for surgery, I
believe it has the both the ability to improve safety and foster a sense of teamwork (Benham et
al., 2016). Studies show that checklists have the ability to identify problems early, preventing
surgery delays, suggesting that the use of a checklist can prevent patient harm, wrong site
surgeries, build comradery between teams while improving operating room flow, increasing OR
utilizing a checklist. I will require the doctor to initiate a pre-operative verification before the
time out and then performing the final time out after the patient is prepped and draped. Having
the final time out after prepping and draping allows the surgical team to verify the site marking
during the time out (AORN, 2019). The entire team will participate in confirming surgical site,
laterality, procedure and then the team will introduce themselves and state their role. Currently
the nurse calls for the time out and is often ignored, making the timeout and surgical checklist
and unreliable check. According to the Joint Commission (2019) between 2015 and 2018 the
incidence of 440 wrong-site surgeries were reported to the sentinel event data. Almost 30% of
the 440 WSS could be attributed to incomplete or incorrectly performed surgical timeout,
indicating a need for continued efforts and education into standardizing and conducing effective
My third intervention will include clustering like surgeries together. For example, for
orthopedic surgeons with two block days will spend one block day doing right joints and one day
doing left joints. This should decrease the likelihood of an error without any additional work on
the team. This has been done in other local facilities with good results and I am eager to try at
Chippenham.
Conclusion
requires a multidisciplinary team approach consisting of active staff and patient participation,
all involved (AORN, 2010). As regulatory bodies and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) focus their efforts on patient safety and reducing the errors
10
PREVENTING WRONG-SITE SURGERY
that reach and potentially harm the patient. Based on evidence-based practices detailed by the
AORN, perioperative nurses have the ability to minimize error and reduce wrong-site surgeries.
The most important part of implementing the WHO check list is that the list is not merely
something to check off, or mindlessly recite but it is a tool to improve communication and
promote a culture of safety within the operating room, leading to reduced human error resulting
References
48.
Algie CM, Mahar RK, Wasiak J, et al. Interventions for reducing wrong-site surgery and
10.1002/14651858.CD009404.pub3.
Benham, E., Richardson, W., Dort, J., Lin, H., Tummers, A., Walker, M., & Stefanidis, T.
1115–1122. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.odu.edu/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60121-X
Chinn, S. (2014). Avoiding Medical Errors: Joint Commission’s 2013 National Patient Safety
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.lib.odu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=107
834522&scope=site
Clarke, John R. (2015). Quarterly Update on Wrong-Site Surgery: Do You Really Want to Wake
the Patient Up and Start Over? Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory, 12(1), 41-44.
Croke, Lisa. (2019). Updated statistics underscore the importance of the surgical time out.
Devcich DA, Weller J, Mitchell SJ, et al A behaviorally anchored rating scale for evaluating the
use of the WHO surgical safety checklist: development and initial evaluation of the
Gillespie, B. M., Harbeck, E., Lavin, J., Gardiner, T., Withers, T. K., & Marshall, A. P. (2019).
32(1), 9-18.
Pashley HS. Management Connections: Implementing the AORN surgical checklist and its effect
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.lib.odu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=c8h&AN=104
Tena, R., League, S., & Brennan, J. (2018). peak technique. Preventing wrong site, wrong
procedure, wrong patient errors. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy, 16(3), 10–13. https://doi-
org.proxy.lib.odu.edu/10.1097/01.NME.0000531884.39767.8f
Wallace, Susan C. (2014). What Can Pennsylvania Learn from Minnesota's Program to Prevent