THE BERGOGLIAN

ANTIPAPACY:

THE FREEMASONIC /
TEUTONIC FINAL ATTACK
ON THE PETRINE SEE
 THIS IS PART 2,
RECORDED 

JUNE 16, ARSH 2019.
PLEASE ALSO WATCH PART 1,
RECORDED IN NOVEMBER OF
ARSH 2018.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
-MR. MARK DOCHERTY,
NONVENIPACEM BLOG

-“THE GERMANS”

-MR. VIDEOGRAPHER

-MY FRIEND PHIL

-SUPPORTERS
 THE ANSWER TO THIS
QUESTION LIES IN 

CANON LAW.
THE PAPACY IS A JURIDICAL
OFFICE. THEREFORE, WE WILL
FIND THE AUTHORITATIVE
TRUTH IN CANON LAW, IN THIS
CASE, THE 1983 CODEX.
 CANON 188

A RESIGNATION MADE OUT OF GRAVE
FEAR THAT IS INFLICTED UNJUSTLY OR
OUT OF MALICE, SUBSTANTIAL ERROR, 

OR SIMONY IS 

INVALID BY THE LAW ITSELF.

RENUNTIATIO, EX METU GRAVI, INIUSTE

INCUSSO, DOLO VEL ERRORE SUBSTANTIALI
AUT SIMONIACE FACTA, IPSO IURE IRRITA EST.
 CANON 188

WHAT IS THE LEGAL DEFINITION
OF “SUBSTANTIAL ERROR”?

IGNORANCE OR MISJUDGMENT
ABOUT THE ESSENTIAL NATURE,
MAIN TERMS, OR PRINCIPAL MOTIVE
OF THE OBJECT OF AN ACT.
POPE BENEDICT’S FAILED ATTEMPTED
PARTIAL ABDICATION OF FEBRUARY
2013 VIOLATES ALL THREE TERMS IN
THIS DEFINITION.  
THE ESSENTIAL OBJECT OF THE ACT
OF RESIGNATION OF THE PAPACY IS
THE RENUNCIATION OF THE OFFICE
(MUNUS).  THIS IS EXPLICITLY LAID
DOWN IN CANON 332.2, SIMPLY
CONFIRMING COMMON SENSE.
AN OFFICE IS A STATE OF BEING.  IN ORDER
TO RESIGN THE PAPACY, YOU HAVE TO
RENOUNCE BEING THE POPE, THAT IS,
HOLDING THE OFFICE.  MINISTRY
(MINISTERIUM) REFERS TO THINGS THAT THE
POPE MAY OR MAY NOT ELECT TO DO OR BE
ABLE TO DO AS A RESULT OF BEING THE
POPE, SUCH AS TEACHING, GOVERNING
AND PRESIDING.  A MINISTERIUM IS
DERIVATIVE OF THE MUNUS.  MINISTRIES ARE
OPTIONAL CONTINGENT ACTIVITIES OF THE
ONTOLOGICAL STATE OF BEING THE HOLDER
OF THE PETRINE OFFICE.  
 THESE TWO MAIN TERMS,
OFFICE AND MINISTRY,
BELONG TO COMPLETELY
DIFFERENT CATEGORIES,
‘BEING’ AND ‘DOING’, AND
THUS CAN NOT NOW NOR
EVER BE ARGUED TO BE
SYNONYMOUS IN ENGLISH OR
ANY OTHER LANGUAGE.  
JOSEPH RATZINGER IS THE POPE.


GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS
THE FIRST POTUS.

WHEN QUEEN ELIZABETH DIES,

PRINCE CHARLES WILL BE THE
KING OF ENGLAND.  
THE POPE GOVERNS, TEACHES
AND LEGISLATES.


THE POTUS COMMANDS THE
MILITARY AND ENFORCES THE
LAW.

THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND

PRESIDES OVER PARLIAMENT.  
 WHEN POPE JPII WAS IN AN INDUCED
COMA AFTER BEING SHOT, HE DID NOT
LOSE THE PETRINE OFFICE, EVEN THOUGH
HE WAS INCAPABLE OF EXECUTING THE
PETRINE MINISTRY IN ANY WAY.


WHEN PRESIDENT REAGAN WAS SHOT
AND IN A COMA, HE RETAINED THE
OFFICE, AND V.P. BUSH REMAINED THE
VICE PRESIDENT, WHILE TEMPORARILY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE PRO TEM.  
 CANON 131.1
THE ORDINARY POWER OF GOVERNANCE
IS THAT WHICH IS JOINED TO A CERTAIN
OFFICE BY THE LAW ITSELF; DELEGATED,
THAT WHICH IS GRANTED TO A PERSON
BUT NOT BY MEANS OF AN OFFICE.

POTESTAS REGIMINIS ORDINARIA EA EST,

QUAE IPSO IURE ALICUI OFFICIO
ADNECTITUR; DELEGATA, QUAE IPSI
PERSONAE NON MEDIANTE OFFICIO
CONCEDITUR.
 “FINAL” PAPAL AUDIENCE, 

27 FEBRUARY, 2013
THE “ALWAYS” IS ALSO A “FOR EVER” – THERE CAN NO
LONGER BE A RETURN TO THE PRIVATE SPHERE. MY DECISION
TO RESIGN THE ACTIVE EXERCISE OF THE MINISTRY DOES
NOT REVOKE THIS. I DO NOT RETURN TO PRIVATE LIFE, TO A LIFE
OF TRAVEL, MEETINGS, RECEPTIONS, CONFERENCES, AND SO
ON. I AM NOT ABANDONING THE CROSS, BUT REMAINING IN
A NEW WAY AT THE SIDE OF THE CRUCIFIED LORD. I NO
LONGER BEAR THE POWER OF THE OFFICE FOR THE
GOVERNANCE OF THE CHURCH, BUT IN THE SERVICE OF
PRAYER I REMAIN, SO TO SPEAK, IN THE ENCLOSURE OF
SAINT PETER. SAINT BENEDICT, WHOSE NAME I BEAR AS POPE,
WILL BE A GREAT EXAMPLE FOR ME IN THIS. HE SHOWED US
THE WAY FOR A LIFE WHICH, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE, IS
COMPLETELY GIVEN OVER TO THE WORK OF GOD.
 DELEGATING RESPONSIBILITIES/
FUNCTIONS OF AN OFFICE DOES NOT
CONFER THE OFFICE.

ATTEMPTING TO ESTABLISH A DE FACTO

REGENCY DOES NOT CONFER NOR
TRANSFER THE OFFICE TO THE REGENT, OR
ANY DELEGATE.
DELEGATING ADMINISTRATIVE/GOVERNANCE POWER IS NOT
RENOUNCING THE OFFICE. IT IS EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE. ONLY ONE
WHO HOLDS AND RETAINS AN OFFICE CAN DELEGATE, BY DEFINITION.
 POPE BENEDICT’S PRINCIPAL MOTIVE IN
PROFFERING HIS INVALID ATTEMPTED
PARTIAL ABDICATION OF ONLY THE “ACTIVE
PETRINE MINISTRY” FOR “THE GOVERNANCE
OF THE CHURCH” SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN
LONG-DISCUSSED AND LONGED-FOR BY
20TH CENTURY TEUTONIC THEOLOGIANS, AS
WELL AS FREEMASONS LOOKING TO
DESTROY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BY
DISSOLVING THE PETRINE OFFICE – THE LAST
REMAINING ABSOLUTE MONARCHY – INTO
A “COLLEGIAL, SYNODAL, SHARED
MINISTRY”.
 SINCE THE PETRINE OFFICE,
ESTABLISHED BY JESUS CHRIST
HIMSELF, CANNOT BE
“FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORMED”
NOR “EXPANDED”, NOR CAN THE
PETRINE OFFICE BE TRANSFERRED
BY DELEGATION, THE PRINCIPAL
MOTIVE OF THE OBJECT OF THE ACT
WAS DEFECTIVE, THAT IS,
SUBSTANTIALLY ERRONEOUS.
 THE PROJECT OF THE
FREEMASONS, ACTING
THROUGH THE TEUTONIC
THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS OF
THE 20TH CENTURY, HAS BEEN
THE DISSOLUTION OF THE
PAPACY ALONG THE MUNUS-
MINISTERIUM DISTINCTION.
 QUAPROPTER BENE CONSCIUS
PONDERIS HUIUS ACTUS PLENA
LIBERTATE DECLARO ME
MINISTERIO EPISCOPI ROMAE,
SUCCESSORIS SANCTI PETRI,
MIHI PER MANUS CARDINALIUM
DIE 19 APRILIS MMV COMMISSO
RENUNTIARE…
 CANON 332.2
IF IT HAPPENS THAT THE ROMAN
PONTIFF RESIGNS HIS OFFICE, IT
IS REQUIRED FOR VALIDITY THAT
THE RESIGNATION IS MADE
FREELY AND PROPERLY
MANIFESTED BUT NOT THAT IT IS
ACCEPTED BY ANYONE.
 CANON 332.2
SI CONTINGAT UT ROMANUS
PONTIFEX MUNERI* SUO
RENUNTIET, AD VALIDITATEM
REQUIRITUR UT RENUNTIATIO
LIBERE FIAT ET RITE MANIFESTETUR,
NON VERO UT A QUOPIAM
ACCEPTETUR.

*DATIVE SINGULAR CASE OF MUNUS
 “NON SOLUM PROPTER” WAS
MISTRANSLATED FROM THE LATIN
INTO ITALIAN BY THE VATICAN.
BOTH INSTANCES OF “MUNUS”
WERE ERRONEOUSLY TRANSLATED
INTO “MINISTERIO” INSTEAD OF
“UFFICIO”. ALL SUBSEQUENT
TRANSLATIONS WERE THEN MADE
USING THE ERRONEOUS ITALIAN
VERSION.
 POPE BENEDICT IN “NON
SOLUM PROPTER” DID NOT
RESIGN THE MUNUS (OFFICE,
STATE OF BEING THE POPE) PER
CANON 332.2, BUT ONLY THE
MINISTERIO (ACTIVE MINISTRY
FOR THE GOVERNANCE OF THE
CHURCH, AS HE MADE CLEAR).
 THE SOLE ARBITER OF THE VALIDITY OF A
PAPAL RESIGNATION IS THE LAW ITSELF.
 CHRIST SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT HE
BINDS HIMSELF TO CHURCH LAW WHEN
HE SAID TO PETER IN MATTHEW 16:19,
“AND I WILL GIVE TO THEE THE KEYS OF
THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. AND
WHATSOEVER THOU SHALT BIND UPON
EARTH, IT SHALL BE BOUND ALSO IN
HEAVEN: AND WHATSOEVER THOU SHALT
LOOSE UPON EARTH, IT SHALL BE LOOSED
ALSO IN HEAVEN.”
 CANON 332.2
…BUT NOT THAT IT IS ACCEPTED BY
ANYONE.
THIS CLAUSE COMPLETELY PROTECTS
THE PAPACY FROM THE MOB, AND
PERHAPS MORE SPECIFICALLY FROM
THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS ITSELF,
AND, AS WE HAVE IN THIS CASE,
FROM THE POPE HIMSELF SHOULD
HE BE IN SUBSTANTIAL ERROR.
DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU
THAT THERE WOULD BE THESE LAWS
WRITTEN ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF A
PAPAL RESIGNATION, BUT AS LONG
AS A SUFFICIENT PERCENTAGE OF
THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS, OR
THE PEOPLE IN GENERAL, ACCEPTED
AN ILLEGAL, INVALID
RESIGNATION, THEN… MEH, IT’S
ALL GOOD?  
  IF SO, THAT WOULD MEAN THAT
THE MOB, EITHER IN THE SENSE OF
THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS, OR
IN THE SENSE OF THE PEOPLE
THEMSELVES COULD WILL A POPE’S
DEPOSITION AND THE ILLEGAL
INSTALLATION OF ANOTHER MAN
AS “POPE”. AS LONG AS MOST
PEOPLE “GO ALONG WITH IT”.  
 THE WILL OF THE MOB WOULD TRUMP THE NATURAL
AND DIVINE LAW, AND A COERCED RESIGNATION
WOULD BE VALIDATED BY “UNIVERSAL AND PEACEFUL
ACCEPTANCE.”  OR, A POPE BEING BOUGHT OFF
(SIMONY) WOULD BE HUNKY-DOREY, AS LONG AS
EVERYONE WENT ALONG WITH IT.  AND, AS WE ARE
LIVING RIGHT NOW AND MANY PEOPLE ARE
ARGUING, A PAPAL RESIGNATION MADE IN
SUBSTANTIAL ERROR WOULD BE TOTALLY FINE AND
DANDY, AS LONG AS EVERYONE IS COOL WITH IT
INCLUDING THE VERY POPE WHO WAS HIMSELF IN
SUBSTANTIAL ERROR, AND A CANONICALLY INVALID
CONCLAVE WOULD BE “SANATED” AND “VALIDATED”
BY NOTHING MORE THAN THE WILL OF THE MOB. 
 CANON 332.2
…BUT NOT THAT IT IS
ACCEPTED BY ANYONE.
 TO ARGUE THAT “UNIVERSAL PEACEFUL
ACCEPTANCE” OF AN ILLEGAL PAPAL
RESIGNATION BY THE COLLEGE OF
CARDINALS SANATES THAT RESIGNATION
IS TO MAKE AN IDOL OF THE COLLEGE
OF CARDINALS, PUTTING THEM OVER
AND ABOVE NATURAL, DIVINE AND
CANON LAW, AND DIRECTLY IMPLIES
THAT THE PAPACY IS BESTOWED UPON A
MAN BY THE CARDINALS OR EVEN THE
CHURCH, AND NOT DIRECTLY BY CHRIST. 
THIS IS IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO PASTOR AETERNUS:
“AT OPEN VARIANCE WITH THIS CLEAR DOCTRINE OF HOLY SCRIPTURE,
AS IT HAS EVER BEEN UNDERSTOOD BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, ARE
THE PERVERSE OPINIONS OF THOSE WHO, WHILE THEY DISTORT THE
FORM OF GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED BY CHRIST THE LORD IN HIS
CHURCH, DENY THAT PETER, IN HIS SINGLE PERSON, PREFERABLY TO
ALL THE OTHER APOSTLES, WHETHER TAKEN SEPARATELY OR TOGETHER,
WAS ENDOWED BY CHRIST WITH A TRUE AND PROPER PRIMACY OF
JURISDICTION; OR OF THOSE WHO ASSERT THAT THE SAME PRIMACY
WAS NOT BESTOWED IMMEDIATELY AND DIRECTLY UPON BLESSED
PETER HIMSELF, BUT UPON THE CHURCH, AND THROUGH THE CHURCH
ON PETER AS HER MINISTER.
IF ANYONE, THEREFORE, SHALL SAY THAT BLESSED PETER THE APOSTLE
WAS NOT APPOINTED THE PRINCE OF ALL THE APOSTLES AND THE
VISIBLE HEAD OF THE WHOLE CHURCH MILITANT; OR THAT THE SAME,
DIRECTLY AND IMMEDIATELY, RECEIVED FROM THE SAME, OUR LORD
JESUS CHRIST, A PRIMACY OF HONOR ONLY, AND NOT OF TRUE AND
PROPER JURISDICTION; LET HIM BE ANATHEMA.
POPE PIUS IX, PASTOR AETERNUS, 18 JULY 1870
 CAN THE POPE BREAK
NATURAL LAW?

CAN THE POPE DECLARE

THAT ANY POSITIVE INTEGER
GREATER THAN 1 IS EQUAL
TO 1? CAN THE POPE BREAK
THE LAWS OF ARITHMETIC?
 CAN THE POPE BREAK 

DIVINE LAW?

CAN THE 7TH COMMANDMENT

BE ABROGATED AND THE
PAPACY BE STOLEN AS LONG
AS THE POPE AND COLLEGE OF
CARDINALS GOES ALONG
WITH IT?
 DOES ERROR HAVE
RIGHTS?
RIGHTS ARE A CLAIM
GIVEN BY GOD. IS GOD,
WHO IS HIMSELF TRUTH,
NOW GIVING CLAIM TO
FALSITY?
 DOES THE POPE SERVE
AT THE PLEASURE OF
THE COLLEGE OF
CARDINALS, SUBJECT TO
A “NO CONFIDENCE”
VOTE AND DEPOSITION?
 THE UNIVERSAL PEACEFUL ACCEPTANCE
ARGUMENT LEADS INSTANTLY TO AN ISLAMIC
CHAOS, WHEREIN GOD IS PURE WILL, DEVOID OF
RATIONALITY, THE LAW IS UTTERLY
MEANINGLESS, OBJECTIVE TRUTH IS SHIFTING
AND UNKNOWABLE, AND THE UNDERSTANDING
OF THE STABILITY OF REALITY ITSELF IS ATTACKED -
I.E. ONTOLOGICAL REALITIES CAN BE CHANGED
IN RETROSPECT AND SOMETHING CAN BOTH BE
AND NOT BE DEPENDING ON ONE’S POSITION
IN TIME. THIS IS NOTHING LESS THAN A FULL
FRONTAL ASSAULT ON THE LAW OF NON-
CONTRADICTION. THIS PUMP WAS PRIMED BY
COOKIE-CUTTER ANNULMENTS.
 GLORY BE TO THE FATHER,
AND TO THE SON, AND TO
THE HOLY GHOST. 

AS IT WAS IN THE
BEGINNING, IS NOW AND
EVER SHALL BE. 

WORLD WITHOUT END. AMEN.
 CANON 359
WHEN THE APOSTOLIC SEE IS VACANT, THE
COLLEGE OF CARDINALS POSSESSES ONLY
THAT POWER IN THE CHURCH WHICH IS
ATTRIBUTED TO IT IN SPECIAL LAW.

CAN. 359 — SEDE APOSTOLICA VACANTE,

CARDINALIUM COLLEGIUM EA TANTUM IN
ECCLESIA GAUDET POTESTATE, QUAE IN
PECULIARI LEGE EIDEM TRIBUITUR.
THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS HAS ZERO
AUTHORITY OR CAPABILITY TO CALL A
CONCLAVE IF THE SEE IS OCCUPIED.
NO MATTER WHAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
PERIOD. FULL STOP.

NO VACANT SEE, 

NO VALID CONCLAVE.
HAVE ANY CANONISTS COMMENTED OR OBJECTED?
YES!! SANDRO MAGISTER PUBLISHED ON THIS IN
SEPTEMBER 2014

-MANUEL JESUS ARROBA, A PROFESSOR OF CANON LAW AT

THE PONTIFICAL LATERAN UNIVERSITY

-“LEADING LIGHT OF CANON LAW” AND FORMER RECTOR OF

THE PONTIFICAL GREGORIAN UNIVERSITY, THE JESUIT
GIANFRANCO GHIRLANDA

-VALERIO GIGLIOTTI, PROFESSOR OF THE HISTORY OF

EUROPEAN LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORINO

-FR. STEFANO VIOLI, PROFESSOR OF LAW AT THE

THEOLOGICAL FACULTY OF EMILIA ROMAGNA
DID THIS WHOLE PARTIAL ABDICATION AND
“EXPANDED PETRINE MINISTRY” ERROR
JUST COME OUT OF LEFT FIELD?
NO. THIS STEW HAS BEEN SIMMERING
FOR DECADES. 

LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO…

THE MILLER DISSERTATION:


“THE DIVINE RIGHT OF THE PAPACY IN
RECENT ECUMENICAL THEOLOGY”
 THE MILLER DISSERTATION IS A SYNTHESIS AND
COMPENDIUM OF THE TEUTONIC THEOLOGICAL
ACADEMY’S INTENSE, AGONIZED, DETAILED
DISCUSSIONS OF THE PAPACY AND THE NEED TO
FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM IT IN ORDER TO APPEASE
SCHISMATICS (LUTHERANS AND ANGLICANS IN
PARTICULAR) AND TO MAKE THE PAPACY “RELEVANT”,
CONGRUENT WITH AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE “MODERN,
DEMOCRATIZED” WORLD. IT IS TAKEN FOR GRANTED
THAT THE PAPACY QUA ABSOLUTE MONARCHY IS AN
“EXPIRED” PARADIGM.


AND IT IS WRITTEN BY AN AMERICAN, IN ENGLISH.

 THE MILLER DISSERTATION
CONTAINS LITTLE SPECULATIVE
THOUGHT BY MILLER HIMSELF.
ITS VALUE IS IN ITS COMPILATION
OF SOURCES AND QUOTATIONS,
AND IN ITS BIBLIOGRAPHY AND
FOOTNOTES.
 THE MILLER DISSERTATION IS 300 PAGES OF
AGONIZING OVER THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND
DISTINCTIONS BY THE TEUTONIC THEOLOGICAL
ACADEMY OF THE MID-20TH CENTURY:

IUS DIVINUM VS. IUS HUMANUM

IRREVERSIBLE VS. REVERSIBLE PAPACY

IMMUTABLE VS. MUTABLE PAPACY

PETRINE OFFICE VS. 


PETRINE MINISTRY/FUNCTION
 Who are the key players?

Far Left (Abolitionists):
 Right-Far Right:


Hans Kung (Tubingen)
 Joseph Ratzinger
Johannes Neumann
(Tubingen)

Center-Left-Moderate:

(Transformationalists/Dissolution Hypothesis)

Karl Rahner

*Walter Kasper*

Gustave Thils
 CHAPTER 8:

CONTEMPORARY CATHOLIC VIEWS
ON PAPAL PRIMACY SURE DIVINO

“THE PRESENT CRISIS OF THE

PAPACY IS ONE OF
LEGITIMATION.” 

-FOOTNOTE 1, WALTER KASPER, 

“DIENST AN DER EINHEIT,” 83
 “WALTER KASPER ON THE THEOLOGY AND
PRAXIS OF THE BISHOP’S OFFICE”:
KASPER DOES NOT ENTER INTO THE LONG
DISCUSSION, PRECONCILIAR, CONCILIAR, AND
POSTCONCILIAR ON THE IMPORTANCE OF
INVOLVING BISHOPS IN THE GOVERNANCE OF
THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH. BUT THE DISCUSSION IS
BOTH AN INNER-CATHOLIC QUESTION AND AN
ECUMENICAL IMPERATIVE. IN HIS ENCYCLICAL UT
UNUM SINT (NO. 96), JOHN PAUL II ISSUED A
CALL FOR PRACTICAL SUGGESTIONS ON HOW THE
PETRINE MINISTRY MIGHT BE EXERCISED. “SUCH A
DIALOGUE,” KASPER SUGGESTS, “WOULD MAKE
SENSE ONLY IF IT LED TO A NEW HISTORICAL
FORMATION OF THE OFFICE OF PETER.
-KILIAN MCDONNELL, 2002
 KILIAN MCDONNELL CONTINUED…..
A NEW FORM WOULD BE SIMILAR TO THAT WHICH THE
OFFICE OF PETER HAD IN THE FIRST THOUSAND YEARS,
BUT IN A FORM APPROPRIATE TO THE DIFFERENCES IN
HISTORICAL PERIODS AND THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE
VARIOUS CHURCHES.” THIS APPEARS TO POINT TO AN
EXERCISE OF THE PETRINE FUNCTION WHICH IS MORE
PARTICIPATORY IN STYLE, INVOLVING THE BISHOPS OF
THE WORLD.
KASPER COULD CALL ON A NUMBER OF HISTORICAL
STUDIES TO SUPPORT THE CONTENTION THAT THE
PETRINE OFFICE HAS HISTORICALLY EXPERIENCED A
NUMBER OF EPOCHAL TRANSFORMATIONS, AND NONE
OF ITS HISTORICAL FORMS IS IDENTICAL WITH THE
OFFICE, INCLUDING THE ONE THAT OBTAINS TODAY.
 KILIAN MCDONNELL CONTINUED…..
“ONE MUST INDEED SAY THAT IN THE
PRESENT FORM OF ITS EXERCISE, THE PETRINE
MINISTRY HAS FAR FROM COMPLETELY
EXHAUSTED ITS ECUMENICAL
POSSIBILITIES.”52 IN ANY NEW FORM THE
ESSENTIAL NATURE OF THE PETRINE OFFICE
WOULD HAVE TO REMAIN UNCHANGED. BUT
THE CALL FOR A NEW FORM NEEDS TO BE
UNDERSTOOD IN REFERENCE TO
KASPER’S READING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF
CATHOLIC ECCLESIOLOGY, READ THROUGH
THE EYES OF VATICAN I AND II.
 KILIAN MCDONNELL CONTINUED…..
HE IS OBVIOUSLY CONVINCED THAT THE
CATHOLIC SENSE OF THE CHURCH DEMANDS A
STRONG, EVEN VIGOROUS, PAPACY. ANY NEW
FORM ISSUING FROM POPE JOHN PAUL II’S CALL
FOR HELP IN RETHINKING THE PETRINE MINISTRY
WOULD NOT MEAN A DIMINISHED PETRINE
ROLE, BUT, ON THE CONTRARY, AS HE SAID IN A
DIFFERENT CONTEXT, “AN EVEN BIGGER
ROLE.”53 THE NEW EXPRESSION OF THE PETRINE
OFFICE WOULD INCLUDE A SIGNIFICANT ROLE
FOR THE WHOLE EPISCOPACY IN THE
GOVERNANCE OF THE CHURCH.
 MILLER, CHAPTER 8, PAGES 194-195:
ALTHOUGH IN DEALING WITH THE ORIGINS OF THE PAPACY
CONTEMPORARY THEOLOGIANS EMPHASIZE THE CLOSE
RELATION BETWEEN IUS DIVINUM AND IUS HUMANUM,
WHEN CONSIDERING THE PERMANENCE OF THE PAPACY
THEY STRESS RATHER THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE
CHANGEABLE AND IMMUTABLE ELEMENTS.  THIS
DISTINCTION WITHIN PAPAL PRIMACY AS AN INSTITUTION
IS OFTEN FORMULATED IN TERMS OF RELATION BETWEEN A
CENTRAL UNCHANGEABLE NUCLEUS AND ITS REALIZATION
IN CHANGEABLE AND HISTORICAL FORMS. THEOLOGICAL
(FOOTNOTE 98), EXEGETICAL (FOOTNOTE 99), AND
HISTORICAL STUDIES (FOOTNOTE 100) ALL MAKE USE OF A
SIMILAR DISTINCTION IN EXPLAINING WHY A REVISION IN
THE EXERCISE OF PRIMATIAL AUTHORITY IS POSSIBLE.
 MILLER, CHAPTER 8, PAGES 194-195:
ANOTHER WAY OF MAKING THE SAME POINT IS
TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE PETRINE
MINISTRY OR FUNCTION, AND THE PAPACY.   A
SIGN AND INSTRUMENT OF UNITY IS NEEDED
FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CHURCH.  THIS
TASK CORRESPONDS TO WHAT IS ALSO CALLED
THE NUCLEUS OF THE PAPACY.  FOR THESE
THEOLOGIANS THE PAPACY HAS BEEN, AND IS,
THE HISTORICAL REALIZATION OF THE PETRINE
MINISTRY. 

THE TWO REALITIES ARE, HOWEVER,
CONCEPTUALLY DISTINCT.
 MILLER, CHAPTER 8, PAGES 194-195:
FOOTNOTE 98:
BURNS, “COMMUNION, COUNCILS, AND COLLEGIALITY,” 172;
KASPER, IN “MINISTERO PETRINO,” 56, CONTRASTS THE
“ESSENZA” OF AN INSTITUTION, NAMELY THE PETRINE
OFFICE, WITH “UNA BEN DETERMINATA FORMA DELLA SUA
REALIZZAZIONE;” MCDONNELL, “PAPAL PRIMACY,” 185-186;
THILS IN PRIMAUTE PONTIFICALE, 171, DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN
“FOND” AND “FORME.”  RAHNER’S TERMINOLOGY VARIES,
BUT HE CERTAINLY HOLD THAT, ALTHOUGH THE PAPACY IS
IURE DIVINO, THIS DOES NOT EXCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY
THAT “IN THE FUTURE THE PAPACY, WHILE RETAINING ITS
BASIC ‘GENERIC FORM’, WILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT QUITE A
DIFFERENT ‘IMAGE’ (IF WE MAY SO EXPRESS IT) FROM THAT
TO WHICH WE HAVE HITHERTO BEEN ACCUSTOMED” (“BASIC
OBSERVATIONS,” 18). CF. RAHNER, “DEMOKRATIE IN DER
KIRCHE?” 8; RAHNER, “KIRCHLICHE WANDLUNGEN,” 514; AND
RAHNER, “OPEN QUESTIONS ON DOGMA,” 219.
 RATZINGER IN HIS 1996 BOOK, “SALT OF THE EARTH”
SEEWALD: DO YOU THINK THE PAPACY WILL
REMAIN AS IT IS?
RATZINGER: IN ITS CORE IT WILL REMAIN. IN OTHER
WORDS, A MAN IS NEEDED TO BE THE SUCCESSOR OF
PETER AND TO BEAR A PERSONAL FINAL AUTHORITY
THAT IS SUPPORTED COLLEGIALLY.  PART OF
CHRISTIANITY IS A PERSONALISTIC PRINCIPLE; IT
DOESN’T GET VAPORIZED INTO ANONYMITIES BUT
PRESENTS ITSELF IN THE PERSON OF THE PRIEST, OF
THE BISHOP, AND THE UNITY OF THE UNIVERSAL
CHURCH ONCE AGAIN HAS A PERSONAL EXPRESSION.
THIS WILL REMAIN, THE MAGISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE UNITY OF THE CHURCH, HER FAITH, AND HER
MORALS THAT WAS DEFINED BY VATICAN I AND II.  
 RATZINGER IN HIS 1996 BOOK, 

“SALT OF THE EARTH”
SEEWALD: DO YOU THINK THE PAPACY WILL
REMAIN AS IT IS?
RATZINGER CONT’D: FORMS OF EXERCISE CAN
CHANGE, THEY WILL CERTAINLY CHANGE, WHEN
HITHERTO SEPARATED COMMUNITIES ENTER INTO
UNITY WITH THE POPE.  BY THE WAY, THE PRESENT
POPE’S [JOHN PAUL II] EXERCISE OF THE
PONTIFICATE – WITH THE TRIPS AROUND THE WORLD
– IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THAT OF PIUS XII.
 WHAT CONCRETE VARIATIONS EMERGE I
NEITHER CAN NOR WANT TO IMAGINE.  WE
CAN’T FORESEE NOW EXACTLY HOW THAT WILL
LOOK. 
 “DEMYTHOLOGIZE” THE PAPACY.
THAT IS, REMOVE ALL SUPERNATURAL AND MONARCHICAL
CHARACTER FROM THE PAPACY. DISSOLVE THE PETRINE
OFFICE. EMPTY IT OF ALL SUPERNATURAL GRACE.

NEW BUZZWORDS: DEMOCRATIZE, COLLEGIAL, SYNODAL,

EXPANDED, FUNCTIONAL, REVOLUTION, KENOSIS,
KENOTIC PAPACY

LUTHERAN CONCEPT OF PAPACY “EMPTIED AND DEVOID

OF POTENCY”: BULTMANN, FROM KANT, FROM SPINOZA
“DEMYTHOLOGIZE” THE PAPACY.
WHY? BECAUSE THE ANTICHURCH WILL NEED TO HAVE
ALL OF THE EXTERNAL APPEARANCES OF THE TRUE
CHURCH, BUT WILL BE TOTALLY DEVOID OF GRACE.
THE PAPACY HAS TO BE “DESTROYED” BUT THE
APPEARANCE REMAIN IN ORDER TO DECEIVE EVEN THE
ELECT INTO FOLLOWING AN ANTIPOPE INTO THE
ANTICHURCH.

THIS IS THE KASPERIAN-FREEMASONIC AGENDA IN A

NUTSHELL.
 THE MOMENTOUS RESIGNATION OF THE THEOLOGIAN POPE
REPRESENTED A STEP FORWARD PRIMARILY BY THE FACT THAT, ON
FEBRUARY 11, 2013, SPEAKING IN LATIN IN FRONT OF THE
SURPRISED CARDINALS, HE INTRODUCED INTO THE CATHOLIC
CHURCH THE NEW INSTITUTION OF “POPE EMERITUS,” STATING
THAT HIS STRENGTH WAS NO LONGER SUFFICIENT “TO PROPERLY
EXERCISE THE PETRINE MINISTRY.” THE KEY WORD IN THAT
STATEMENT IS MUNUS PETRINUM, TRANSLATED — AS HAPPENS
MOST OF THE TIME — WITH “PETRINE MINISTRY.” AND YET,
MUNUS, IN LATIN, HAS A MULTIPLICITY OF MEANINGS: IT CAN
MEAN SERVICE, DUTY, GUIDE OR GIFT, EVEN PRODIGY. BEFORE
AND AFTER HIS RESIGNATION, BENEDICT UNDERSTOOD AND
UNDERSTANDS HIS TASK AS PARTICIPATION IN SUCH A “PETRINE
MINISTRY.” HE HAS LEFT THE PAPAL THRONE AND YET, WITH THE
STEP MADE ON FEBRUARY 11, 2013, HE HAS NOT AT ALL
ABANDONED THIS MINISTRY. INSTEAD, HE HAS
COMPLEMENTED THE PERSONAL OFFICE WITH A COLLEGIAL AND
SYNODAL DIMENSION, AS A QUASI SHARED MINISTRY
(ALS EINEN QUASI GEMEINSAMEN DIENST)
 ”IT WAS “THE LEAST EXPECTED STEP IN
CONTEMPORARY CATHOLICISM,” REGOLI
WRITES, AND YET A POSSIBILITY [PAPAL
“RETIREMENT”] WHICH CARDINAL
RATZINGER HAD ALREADY PONDERED
PUBLICLY ON AUGUST 10, 1978 IN MUNICH,
IN A HOMILY ON THE OCCASION OF THE
DEATH OF PAUL VI. THIRTY-FIVE YEARS LATER,
HE HAS NOT ABANDONED THE OFFICE
OF PETER — SOMETHING WHICH WOULD
HAVE BEEN ENTIRELY IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM
AFTER HIS IRREVOCABLE ACCEPTANCE OF
THE OFFICE IN APRIL 2005.
 BY AN ACT OF EXTRAORDINARY COURAGE, HE HAS
INSTEAD RENEWED THIS OFFICE (EVEN AGAINST THE
OPINION OF WELL-MEANING AND UNDOUBTEDLY
COMPETENT ADVISORS), AND WITH A FINAL EFFORT HE
HAS STRENGTHENED IT (AS I HOPE). OF COURSE ONLY
HISTORY WILL PROVE THIS. BUT IN THE HISTORY OF THE
CHURCH IT SHALL REMAIN TRUE THAT, IN THE YEAR 2013,
THE FAMOUS THEOLOGIAN ON THE THRONE OF PETER
BECAME HISTORY’S FIRST “POPE EMERITUS.” SINCE THEN,
HIS ROLE — ALLOW ME TO REPEAT IT ONCE AGAIN — IS
ENTIRELY DIFFERENT FROM THAT, FOR EXAMPLE, OF THE
HOLY POPE CELESTINE V, WHO AFTER HIS RESIGNATION
IN 1294 WOULD HAVE LIKED TO RETURN TO BEING A
HERMIT, BECOMING INSTEAD A PRISONER OF HIS
SUCCESSOR, BONIFACE VIII (TO WHOM TODAY IN THE
CHURCH WE OWE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUBILEE
YEARS).
 TO DATE, IN FACT, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A
STEP LIKE THAT TAKEN BY BENEDICT XVI. SO IT
IS NOT SURPRISING THAT IT HAS BEEN SEEN BY
SOME AS REVOLUTIONARY, OR TO THE
CONTRARY AS ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH THE
GOSPEL; WHILE STILL OTHERS SEE THE PAPACY
IN THIS WAY SECULARIZED AS NEVER BEFORE,
AND THUS MORE COLLEGIAL AND
FUNCTIONAL OR EVEN SIMPLY MORE HUMAN
AND LESS SACRED. AND STILL OTHERS ARE OF
THE OPINION THAT BENEDICT XVI, WITH THIS
STEP, HAS ALMOST — SPEAKING IN
THEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL-CRITICAL
TERMS — DEMYTHOLOGIZED THE PAPACY.
AND I, TOO, A FIRSTHAND WITNESS OF
THE SPECTACULAR AND UNEXPECTED
STEP OF BENEDICT XVI, I MUST ADMIT
THAT WHAT ALWAYS COMES TO MIND
IS THE WELL-KNOWN AND BRILLIANT
AXIOM WITH WHICH, IN THE MIDDLE
AGES, JOHN DUNS SCOTUS JUSTIFIED
THE DIVINE DECREE FOR THE
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF THE
MOTHER OF GOD:
“DECUIT, POTUIT, FECIT.”
THAT IS TO SAY: IT WAS FITTING, BECAUSE
IT WAS REASONABLE. GOD COULD DO IT,
THEREFORE HE DID IT. I APPLY THE AXIOM
TO THE DECISION TO RESIGN IN THE
FOLLOWING WAY: IT WAS FITTING,
BECAUSE BENEDICT XVI WAS AWARE THAT
HE LACKED THE NECESSARY STRENGTH
FOR THE EXTREMELY ONEROUS OFFICE.
HE COULD DO IT, BECAUSE HE HAD
ALREADY THOROUGHLY THOUGHT
THROUGH, FROM A THEOLOGICAL POINT
OF VIEW, THE POSSIBILITY OF POPES
EMERITUS FOR THE FUTURE. SO HE DID IT.
 TWO KEY POINTS:

1.) DISSOLVING THE “OFFICE” IN FAVOR OF A

“TRANSFORMED, EVOLVED, EXPANDED,
COLLEGIAL, SYNODAL PETRINE MINISTRY”
HAS BEEN THE FREEMASONIC-TEUTONIC
AGENDA FOR 100+ YEARS TO TOPPLE THE
PAPACY AND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHURCH

2.) RELINQUISHING GOVERNANCE WITHOUT

ABDICATING THE OFFICE IS EXACTLY WHAT
BLESSED EMPEROR CHARLES I HABSBURG DID
UNDER FREEMASONIC COERCION IN
NOVEMBER 1918.
 POPE LEO XIII, HUMANUS GENUS (1884):

15. BUT AGAINST THE APOSTOLIC SEE AND THE ROMAN

PONTIFF THE CONTENTION OF THESE ENEMIES HAS BEEN FOR
A LONG TIME DIRECTED. THE PONTIFF WAS FIRST, FOR
SPECIOUS REASONS, THRUST OUT FROM THE BULWARK OF
HIS LIBERTY AND OF HIS RIGHT, THE CIVIL PRINCEDOM;
SOON, HE WAS UNJUSTLY DRIVEN INTO A CONDITION
WHICH WAS UNBEARABLE BECAUSE OF THE DIFFICULTIES
RAISED ON ALL SIDES; AND NOW THE TIME HAS COME WHEN
THE PARTISANS OF THE SECTS OPENLY DECLARE, WHAT IN
SECRET AMONG THEMSELVES THEY HAVE FOR A LONG TIME
PLOTTED, THAT THE SACRED POWER OF THE PONTIFFS MUST
BE ABOLISHED, AND THAT THE PAPACY ITSELF, FOUNDED BY
DIVINE RIGHT, MUST BE UTTERLY DESTROYED.
 POPE LEO XIII, HUMANUS GENUS (1884):

IF OTHER PROOFS WERE WANTING, THIS FACT

WOULD BE SUFFICIENTLY DISCLOSED BY THE
TESTIMONY OF MEN WELL INFORMED, OF WHOM
SOME AT OTHER TIMES, AND OTHERS AGAIN
RECENTLY, HAVE DECLARED IT TO BE TRUE OF THE
FREEMASONS THAT THEY ESPECIALLY DESIRE TO
ASSAIL THE CHURCH WITH IRRECONCILABLE
HOSTILITY, AND THAT THEY WILL NEVER REST UNTIL
THEY HAVE DESTROYED WHATEVER THE SUPREME
PONTIFFS HAVE ESTABLISHED FOR THE SAKE OF
RELIGION.
VATICAN NEWS, 15 JANUARY, 2019:

A DIFFICULT TASK FOR THE CHURCH

IN RESPONSE, THE POPE (SIC) SAID, THE
CHURCH IS CALLED TO REACT AGAINST THE
NEGATIVITY THAT “FOMENTS DIVISION,
INDIFFERENCE, AND HOSTILITY.” THIS IS A
DIFFICULT TASK FOR THE CHURCH, WHICH IS IN
DANGER OF FAILING TO RECOGNIZE THE
GRAVITY OF THE CONTEMPORARY
EMERGENCY. “IT’S TIME,” HE SAID, “FOR A
NEW VISION AIMED AT PROMOTING A
HUMANISM OF FRATERNITY AND SOLIDARITY
BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND PEOPLES.”
Emperor Wilhelm II of Germany warned
the Archbishop of Cologne, Cardinal
”IT WAS “THE LEAST EXPECTED STEP IN CONTEMPORARY CATHOLICISM,” REGOLI

Felix von Hartmann, of the

WRITES, AND YET A POSSIBILITY [PAPAL “RETIREMENT”] WHICH CARDINAL
RATZINGER HAD ALREADY PONDERED PUBLICLY ON AUGUST 10, 1978 IN
MUNICH, IN A HOMILY ON THE OCCASION OF THE DEATH OF PAUL VI. THIRTY-
Freemasonic warplan, and Hartmann
wrote a letter on November 8, ARSH
1918 to the Apostolic Nuncio (Vatican
Ambassador) to Germany who was, at
the time, Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli –
who was to become Pope Pius XII in
March of ARSH 1939.
The letter opened thusly:

“Your Excellency,
His ”IT WAS “THE
Majesty LEAST
the EXPECTEDjust
Emperor STEPhas
IN CONTEMPORARY
let it be knownCATHOLICISM,”
to me that, REGOLI
WRITES, AND YET A POSSIBILITY [PAPAL “RETIREMENT”] WHICH CARDINAL
according to news
RATZINGER HAD that came
ALREADY to himPUBLICLY
PONDERED yesterday, the Grand
ON AUGUST 10, 1978 Orient
IN
[Freemasonic
MUNICH, IN ALodge] hasTHE
HOMILY ON just decidedOFfirst
OCCASION THE to depose
DEATH allVI. THIRTY-
OF PAUL

Sovereigns – first of all him, the Emperor – then to destroy the

Catholic Church, to imprison the pope, etc., and finally to establish
on the ruins of the former bourgeois society a world republic under
the leadership of American Big Capital….”

Emperor Wilhelm II of Germany abdicated the next day, 9

November ARSH 1918, and Emperor Charles I of Austria
“renounced participation in state affairs” two days after that, on
11 November.  Blessed Charles I DID NOT ABDICATE.
 WHY?
WHAT DOES KASPER WANT?

MONEY.

KIRCHENSTEUER TAX REVENUE FROM THE

GERMAN LUTHERAN CHURCHES WOULD
NEARLY DOUBLE ANNUAL REVENUES.
THE ONLY WAY TO GET ANY SORT OF
LUTHERAN RE-UNIFICATION IS TO ELIMINATE
THE PAPACY. FREEMASONRY AND SATAN
SHARE KASPER’S GOAL.

 SO WHAT PROBABLY HAPPENED?

CARDINAL CARLO MARTINI, HEAD OF THE SANKT GALLEN MAFIA

DIED ON 31 AUGUST, 2012.
WALTER KASPER BECAME THE HEAD OF THE SANKT GALLEN GROUP.

KASPER, JOSEPH RATZINGER’S LIFELONG ENEMY, COERCED A PLIABLE

AND DESPAIRING POPE BENEDICT XVI INTO RESIGNING IN ORDER TO
INSTALL THE SANKT GALLEN PUPPET, BERGOGLIO, AND DRIVE
TOWARD A LUTHERAN “REUNIFICATION” 

AND FREEMASONIC WORLD ORDER.
RATZINGER PROFFERED A SUBSTANTIALLY ERRONEOUS AND THUS
INVALID RESIGNATION.
WHETHER POPE RATZINGER BELIEVES HIS ATTEMPTED PARTIAL
ABDICATION TO BE VALID IS NOT GERMANE. POPE BENEDICT’S
MOTIVES, WHILE INTERESTING, ARE NOT DETERMINATIVE.

ONLY THE LAW MATTERS.

 WHY DOES THIS MATTER?

WHY NOT JUST WAIT FOR BERGOGLIO TO DIE?
1.) BECAUSE THE TRUTH MATTERS. 

ONLY THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE. 

EFFEMINACY, SLOTH AND ACEDIA ARE VICES.

2.) SOULS ARE BEING SCANDALIZED. THE FALSE PREMISE OF BERGOGLIO

EVER HAVING BEEN THE POPE LEADS TO 

FALSE SEDEVACANTISM! 

PEOPLE ARE LOSING THEIR FAITH AND FALLING INTO APOSTASY.

3.) THE STANDARD OF SCHISM IS 


UNION WITH THE ROMAN PONTIFF

CANON 751:
SCHISM IS THE WITHDRAWAL OF SUBMISSION TO THE SUPREME PONTIFF
OR FROM COMMUNION WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH SUBJECT TO
HIM.

A PERSON CANNOT BOTH SUBMIT TO BERGOGLIO’S HERESIES AND BE

CATHOLIC.
 THE SATANIC
CHESSBOARD:
“EITHER YOU LET ME
SCHISM THE CHURCH,
OR I WILL SCHISM
THE CHURCH.”
WHAT CAN BE EXPECTED FROM GOING ON OFFENSE AND
CONFRONTING THE BERGOGLIAN ANTIPAPACY?

-RIDICULE

-OSTRACISM

-DEFAMATION AND CALUMNY

-LOSS OF FACULTIES*
-SUPPRESSION*
-EXCOMMUNICATION*
-PHYSICAL ASSAULT

-DEATH

*BERGOGLIO HAS NO REAL AUTHORITY, THEREFORE THESE

ACTIONS WILL BE NULL AND VOID.

IN SHORT, EXPECT THE GRACE AND FAVOR OF 


THE CROSS OF CHRIST.


“ACT, AND GOD WILL ACT.”
 FINAL THOUGHTS:
ON THE VISIBILITY OF THE
CHURCH, ECLIPSE AND HUMILITY
 MATTHEW 17:20 INITIATIVE
ST. CATHERINE OF SIENA

ST. VINCENT FERRER

ST. BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX

ST. PETER DAMIAN

BLESSED CHARLES AND ZITA

ST. JOSEPH

OUR LADY, UNDOER OF KNOTS
PRAY FOR US, FOR THE PAPACY, 

FOR POPE BENEDICT XVI!