Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Module Tutor:
Melvin Goh
Submitted by:
Dinesh
Word Count:
2886 Words
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 10
References ................................................................................................................................ 11
3
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
INTRODUCTION
The business environment in each passing phase is becoming tougher for organizations and
they find it difficult to survive in competitive business without any fitting marketing plan and
strategies trailed by appropriate activities. Organizations cannot succeed in the market for the
long run unless the marketing approach is not adopted (Micheels and Gow, 2012). As long as
profit is required for organizational survival in competition, the importance of marketing
functions cannot be put aside. This always has high calling for a business direction that
essentially includes marketing as an orientation to have better visuals about future and
organizational operations to be certain of long-term survival. No organizations can ensure long-
term growth and survival in market if profit cannot be achieved (Anon, 2018). Surely this
highlights that business in order to strengthen its position in market needs to have marketing
approach and this cannot be possible without marketing orientation. In this essay several
orientations of business have been discussed and marketing orientation has been evaluated in
relation to others for understanding if marketing is more important and orientation regarding
this can help organizations running their business effectively in a competitive market.
Customers are the most important stakeholders and the ultimate determinants of business fate
in competitive markets which is the major cause for firms to adopt marketing orientation which
combines marketing activities as well as customers service related performance for increasing
satisfaction among customers (Dibb and Stern, 2000).
A marketing oriented firm places the company’s necessities and objectives as an apex priority
in spite of the fact that it perceives that these necessities can be met just through the procedure
of fulfilling the customers’ needs & demands (Houston, 1986). A marketing oriented firm
chooses its target market and manages its potential and core competencies to the fullest in order
to meet its goals and objectives. Furthermore, there are researches conducted in the past that
shows that a market driven organizations are more susceptible to innovation (Houston, 1986).
The study exclaimed that these marketing oriented firms are in a better position to foresee the
existing and the forthcoming needs and demands of the target customers, thus resulting into
innovation of products and services. There’s a realization that the customers at one point won’t
know what they want in the future, this is where the marketing orientation plays a crucial role.
It follows a 5 proposition that “market-pull” product development isn’t just the only correct
way available but “technology-push” absolutely has its benefits (Sharp, 1991, p-24). Moreover,
innovation emphatically influences firms' competitive advantage over its competitors as it
improves organizations’ responsiveness to new challenges, willingness to change, and new
product development while diminishing internal organizational resistance (Grinstein, 2008).
Marketing orientation has three main components namely, Customer orientation, Competitor
orientation, and Interfunctional coordination (Narver & Slater, 1990). The same has been well
depicted in the following diagram.
5
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
Customer and competitor orientation include gathering all the necessary information like
customers’ existing and forthcoming wants and competitors core competencies and weaknesses
from the target market and further propagate the same through different inter-functional
departments (Narver & Slater, 1990, p. 21). These information then becomes a key input for
the marketing oriented firm in 6 order to excel form its competitors and satisfy their customers
in their target market (Narver & Slater, 1990).
Types of Orientation
Production Orientation
prime focus was on R & D, production and management of money. Hence, they could not
understand customers’ needs.
Product Orientation
It is about inventing new things and ideas. It involves to make the existing product better and
better or innovate new product to solve the problems with current product. The leaders in such
firms concentrate on advantages and quality of product. This firms put more efforts on
customer satisfaction, feedback and their needs. By focusing on customer’s requirements such
companies build relationship and loyalty of customers.
Sales Orientation
It is related to sell or push produced goods in the market even if sometime at the cost of
customer satisfaction and loyalty. Sales team is forced to sell whatever is produced or supplied.
Since, the strategy does not work on customer’s needs it results in customer turnover. In sales
orientation, achieving sales target is the success and the customers are of secondary
importance. They hire good sales people to cope with customer’s resistance to buy a product.
Marketing Orientation
Slater et al (2010) suggested that marketing orientation involves marketing performance with
some focused aspects of business and these are advertisements and promotion, high
performance for achieving sales target, arrangement and implementation of strategies for
expediting business growth to achieve more sales and more profits in business. Varadarajan
(2015) holds the same view and further highlighted that marketing orientation never limits the
7
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
concept of customers’ satisfaction and their requirements from business and most essentially
with help of marketing orientation, satisfaction among customers becomes higher since
customers are actually informed about availability of their products and they also get to
understand whether the products and services are on par with their needs understood by the
brands they are associated with. Therefore, the purpose of customer orientation becomes
justified. This view is also supported by Winer and Dhar (2014).
For a SME (Small and Medium Enterprises), manufacturing is one of the key determinants for
its growth, success and profitability in a long run (Vickery et al, 1993). There are four main
components which determines operational excellence in a manufacturing firm – manufacturing
cost, quality, delivery, and flexibility (Hayes and Pisano, 1994). There’s always a need or an
urgency to reduce the manufacturing cost so that not only the firm has an opportunity to
increase its profits but also levy some benefits to the customers by reducing products selling
price and have a competitive advantage over its competitors (Miller and Roth, 1994).
8
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
According to Subramanian & Gopalakrishna (2001), market orientation has a strong dominance
over all the four components mentioned earlier. According to them, market oriented
companies’ are more likely to comprehend the value of providing better products or services
(i.e. better quality products as compared to its competitors) to its customers with the reduced
manufacturing cost. For this purpose the manufacturing firms will implement operational
excellence programs like TQM, lean six sigma, kaizen, Toyota production system (TPS) in
their firms (Subramanian & Gopalakrishna, 2001). Moreover market oriented firms adopt pull
production system rather than push production system, which is commonly adopted by the
production and selling oriented firms, thus reducing the chances of incurring inventory carrying
cost (Timsit, Castiaux, Truong, & Kling 2015). Furthermore, reducing the products absorption
cost (Timsit, Castiaux, Truong, & Kling 2015). Timely product delivery too plays an important
role in complete customer satisfaction (Gaur, & Vasudevan 2011). Market orientation helps the
firm to ascertain right delivery schedule, comprehends the significance of timely delivery and
streamlines the supply chain in order to ensure timely product delivery (Gaur, &Vasudevan
2011). Market orientation plays a leading role in this too; for e.g. customer orientation helps to
find out the delivery expectations of the customers. Competitor orientation helps the firm to set
a benchmark in terms of delivery schedule, which indeed motivates the firm to excel in
comparison to its competitors. And inter-functional orientation helps to communicate the
objective to all the relevant parties across the organization. Thus streamlining all the
departments to one common objective i.e. total customer satisfaction (Morash and Clinton,
1998). Also firms cannot be flexible in terms product mix unless they comprehend their clients’
needs, have a decent learning of their contenders' present and future strategic moves, their
capabilities, and have synchronous function within the firm. Market orientation helps in doing
so as it propagates a culture which is driven by innovation and continuous improvement (Gaur,
& Vasudevan 2011).
This according to Anon, (2018) gives clear notion that marketing orientation is the main aspects
which could enable a firm to focus on products for ensuring that growth is possible subject to
increase in sales and profit based on products of the firm. Therefore, marketing orientation is
the key focus which can optimize customer services for multiplying satisfaction among
customers and sales growth as stated by Felix, (2015). Laukkanen et al,.(2016) argued that
marketing plays subordinate roles to other business orientations because marketing does the
9
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
task of getting products accepted in markets and this follows the proper arrangement often
ensured by other orientations. Mandal, (2017), argued with this notion and stated that
Marketing orientation is the prime requirement which an organizational culture does proliferate
and promote for confirming that business is adequately thoughtful on satisfaction of customers
and profit-making is the most vital objective which helps firms to understand that only market
orientation is helpful in strengthening position in markets whereas other orientations are fully
effective in presence of better marketing approach that is again effective with help of marketing
orientation in organizations in competitive industry (M’zungu et al., 2015). Therefore, among
all types of orientation, marketing orientation is the most leading cause for customers’
satisfaction and successful survival in the industry.
Characters of MO for international market are greater ability to generate market intelligence
and circulate it to relevant decision makers in all departments and response quickly to the
information/market intelligence (Dalgic et al.,2013).
Investment in technology is required but not adequate for gaining customer relationship
management (CRM). In pursuit of it, top management in hotels should lead effectively and
work on motivation of staff members with their engagement in MO (Padilla-Meléndez at
al.,2014).
10
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
Conclusion
There is a general belief that MO is the supreme orientation than other business orientations.
Organizations which combine MO with other orientations do even better than organizations
adopt only MO (Grinstein, 2008). No single strategic orientation does guarantee for success in
all situations. Firms should deal with multiple strategic orientations (e.g. Boso et al.,
2013;Cadogan, 2012; Laukkanen et al.,2013). Right proportion between MO and other
orientations is needed to improve performance in organizations (Grinstein, 2008).
Organizations are always eager to serve their customers for ensuring their highest level of
satisfaction. This becomes possible in presence of a suitable orientation. There are several types
of orientations in business and these are customer orientation, customer service orientation,
product orientation, marketing orientation, competitor orientation, organizational culture, inter-
functional coordination. Organizational culture promotes performance and marketing as
effective tools for value creation and satisfaction of customers in competitive markets (Ngo
and O'Cass, 2012). Marketing orientation is, therefore, most important and has supremacy over
all types of orientations when successful business operation and survival in markets are
concerned.
11
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
References
Dibb, S. and Stern, P. (2000) Further thoughts on the marketing trifid: the case of marketing
orientation. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (3) pp214-224
Grinstein (2008) "The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic
orientations: A meta‐analysis", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42 Issue: 1/2, pp.115-
134.
Hayes, R.H. and Pisano, G.P. (1994), “Beyond world class: the new manufacturing strategy”,
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, January-February, pp. 77-86.
Houston, F.S., (1986), “The marketing concept: what it is and what it is not”, The Journal of
Marketing, pp.81-87.
12
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
Laukkanen, T., Tuominen, S., Reijonen, H. and Hirvonen, S. (2016), “Does market orientation
pay off without brand orientation? A study of small business entrepreneurs”. Journal of
Marketing Management, 32(7-8), pp.673-694.
Liao, S.-H., Chang, W.-J., Wu C.-C., Katrichis, J.M. (2011) A survey of market orientation
research (1995-2008). Industrial Marketing Management 40 pp301-310
Lonial, S.C., Tarim, M., Tatoglu, E., Zaim, S. and Zaim, H. (2008), “The impact of market
orientation on NSD and financial performance of hospital industry”, Industrial Management &
Data Systems, 108(6), pp.794-811.
Micheels, E. and Gow, H. (2012) The Effect of Alternative Market Orientation Strategies on
Firm Performance. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 4(3)
Morash, E. and Clinton, S. (1998), “Supply chain integration: customer value through
collaborative closeness versus operational excellence”, Journal of Marketing Theory and
Practice, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 104-20.
M’zungu, S., Merrilees, B. and Miller, D. (2015) Strategic hybrid orientation between market
orientation and brand orientation: guiding principles. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 25(4),
pp.275-288
13
Running Ahead: Marketing Orientation
Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990), “The effect of a market orientation on business
profitability”, The Journal of marketing, pp.20-35.
Sanjaya S. Gaur, Hari Vasudevan, Ajai S. Gaur (2011), "Market orientation and manufacturing
performance of Indian SMEs: Moderating role of firm resources and environmental factors",
European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45 Issue: 7/8, pp.1172-1193.
Sharp, B. (1991), “Marketing orientation: more than just customer focus”, International
Marketing Review, 8(4).
Slater, S., Hult, G. and Olson, E. (2010) Factors influencing the relative importance of
marketing strategy creativity and marketing strategy implementation effectiveness. Industrial
Marketing Management. 39(4), pp.551-559
Varadarajan, R. (2015) Strategic marketing, marketing strategy and market strategy. AMS
Review. 5(3-4), pp.78-90
Vickery, S.K., Droge, C. and Markland, R.E. (1993), “Production competence and business
strategy: do they affect business performance?” Decision Sciences, 24(2), pp.435-456.
Timsit, J.P., Castiaux, A., Truong, Y., Athaide, G.A. and Klink, R.R. (2015), “The effect of
market-pull vs. resource-push orientation on performance when entering new markets”,
Journal of Business Research, 68(9), pp.2005-2014.