Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0352-1
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
turn, may vary in any arbitrary manner along with the Finite Element Modelling
length of the member [1, 2]. The results obtained from
various studies generally show a very wide variation. Finite element (FE) modelling of pre-twisted columns was
However, all of the studied models agree that, with the developed using the commercial software ANSYS Work-
increase in the angle of twist, the buckling strength of the bench 12. Each column was modelled using a three-di-
column increases [3–5]. Therefore, pre-twisting can be mensional solid part and was meshed with 20-node three-
considered as a simple method of strengthening thin col- dimensional solid elements of SOLID186. A fixed–fixed
umns subjected to axial loads or making thinner (lighter ends condition was introduced such that the rotation and
and more economical) columns with the same strength. translations were restricted at the supports.
Currently, a high risk of terrorist attacks is observed. The column sections used in this study are
Bomb attacks are the most frequent terrorist activities.
• Unboxed section—ISHB 150 9 150 9 11.8
Blast phenomenon lasts only a period of milliseconds and
• Boxed section—ISJC 175 9 150
results in the production of very high temperatures and
pressure. Unfortunately, public infrastructure, such as air- The material properties used for the steel column are
ports and railway stations, shopping centres, offices, shown in Table 1. The steel column was modelled in
financial and government institutions, are highly exposed ANSYS Workbench 12, its cross-sectional details are
to such attacks [6]. Blast loading of the critical supporting shown in Fig. 1, and its dimensional details are shown in
elements of public facilities can cause considerable Table 2.
reduction in their carrying capacities and will result in the Different rotational angles are considered in the present
partial or global collapse of the buildings. The problem of FE analysis. The column length used in this study is 3
blast wave interaction with the structure and its destructive metres. A set of pre-twisted angles between 0 and 360
effect has already been presented in many papers, but there
are no studies regarding its effect on the pre-twisting of
Table 1 Material properties of steel columns
structural compression members. From previous studies,
the effect of pre-twisting that resulted in the increase in Material property Value
buckling capacity also requires detailed study, including Density 7850 kg/m3
boxed sections that will display local failure on compres- Young’s modulus 2 9 1011 Pa
sion [7]. Abed et al. evaluated the improvement in elastic Poisson’s ratio 0.3
buckling capacity of pre-twisted steel columns using linear Tensile yield strength 2.344 9 108 Pa
perturbation analysis of various lengths twisted at angles of Compressive yield strength 2.344 9 108 Pa
0–180 [8, 9]. He explained that there is a significant
Tensile ultimate yield strength 4.6 9 108 Pa
improvement in the critical buckling capacity for different
slenderness ratios. Chiew et al. [10] conducted an experi-
mental investigation of the ultimate load behaviour of thin-
walled box columns, and the result shows that the failure
was caused by the local buckling of the component plates.
Various blast analysis studies have been conducted on steel
columns. Tiwary et al. [11] studied that, for axially loaded
steel columns, there exists a critical lateral blast impulse,
and any impulse above this value results in the collapse of
the column. The studies also show that, along with the
structural damage caused by the blasting, a significant
reduction in the load-carrying capacity of the member
occurs [12, 13]. The present research will investigate the
effect of pre-twisting on the buckling capacity of steel
columns under pure axial compression and attempt to find
an optimal twist angle. Blast load analysis of pre-twisted
steel columns is conducted using ANSYS AUTODYN for
loaded and unloaded conditions for a 10-kg TNT blast
charge.
Fig. 1 a Cross section of the I section; b FE modelling of the I
section; c cross section of the box section; d FE modelling of the box
section
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
ISHB 150 9 150 9 11.8 150 132 11.8 9 Reference density 0.001225 g/cm3
ISJC 175 9 150 150 175 8 12 Gamma 1.4
Reference temperature 288.200012 K
Specific heat 717.599976 J/kg K
Internal energy 2.068 9 105 kJ/kg
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Fig. 4 Blast wave propagation in the one-dimensional wedge where D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 are material constants, p is
the pressure, and reff is the effective stress. The J–C
and the air is defined as an Euler element; hence, the material for mild steel is given in Table 6.
coupling between the column and air is achieved by The column was analysed for loaded and unloaded
defining them to be ‘‘fully coupled,’’ making the Lagran- conditions for the 10-kg TNT blasting. The safe axial load
gian mesh interact dynamically with the Eulerian mesh. capacity of the prismatic boxed and unboxed columns was
determined by multiplying the buckling capacity by the
Blast Analysis of Pre-twisted Steel Columns reduction factor kk depending upon the slenderness ratio of
the columns, as given in Table 7.
A discrete model of pre-twisted steel columns was devel- The columns were fixed at the top and bottom, and the
oped using 20 nodded 3D solid elements, and the plastic– column itself is restricted to velocity along its axial
elastic material model was applied to describe the steel direction such that the column does not move in the axial
element properties. The columns were named based on the direction. A flow-out boundary condition was given around
blast loading cases, and the loaded and unloaded conditions the air domain to let the blast energy flow out without
for both the boxed and unboxed sections are shown in reflecting when it reaches its end boundaries. In loaded
Table 5. columns, the top support provides the safe load capacity of
The Johnson–Cook (J–C) model provides an appreciable column. Gauges are provided at three points to measure the
prediction of the response of a material and high strain rate
effects on stress flow. According to the J–C material Table 6 Johnson–Cook material model and damage constants for
mild steel
Material constants Value
Table 5 Column notations
Initial yield (A) 234.4 MPa
Notation Description
Strain hardening (B) 413.8 MPa
UI Unloaded I section under 10 kg of TNT Hardening exponent (n) 0.25
UTI Unloaded twisted I section under 10 kg of TNT Thermal softening (m) 1.03
LI Loaded I section under 10 kg of TNT Strain rate coefficient (C) 0.0033
LTI Loaded twisted I section under 10 kg of TNT D1 5.625
UB Unloaded box section under 10 kg of TNT D2 0.3
UTB Unloaded twisted box section under 10 kg of TNT D3 - 7.2
LB Loaded box section under 10 kg of TNT D4 - 0.0123
LTB Loaded twisted box section under 10 kg of TNT D5 0
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Table 7 Reduction factor (kk) for stresses with respect to the slenderness ratio for steel columns
k 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
responses of the column near the top and bottom supports buckling load of Pcr = 18,104 kN is observed at a twist
and at the middle of the support. angle of 155, as shown in Fig. 5.
Linear Buckling Analysis During buckling, the pre-twisted steel sections assumed
deformed configurations normal to the plane where the
From the linear buckling analysis of pre-twisted columns, axial compressive load was applied. The compression
critical buckling loads were recorded to study the members were assumed to be slender enough to achieve
improvement in buckling capacity due to pre-twisting. global buckling as shown in the deformed shapes presented
Figure 5 shows the increase in buckling capacity for the in Figs. 6 and 7. The I section suffered global buckling, and
unboxed and boxed sections with respect to the critical the first three failure modes are presented in Fig. 6.
loads corresponding to varying pre-twisting angles. However, in the case of the boxed section, due to its thin
Assessment of the FE results for pre-twisting up to walls, the thin walls undergo local buckling before the
[ = 180 indicates that the buckling capacity is always overall column buckles laterally, as shown in Fig. 7. This
higher than P0 ; in the case of an I section. The increase in phenomenon occurs because, in closed sections such as the
critical load is therefore always rising until the optimum hollow rectangular section, both flanges and webs behave
pre-twisting angle is reached, which is found to be 135, as internal elements, and the local buckling of the flanges
after which the improvement decreases relatively, but the and webs depends on their respective width–thickness
critical buckling load of the I section Pcr = 6612.7 kN ratios. Local buckling has the effect of reducing the load.
remains of larger value than the reference P0 = 4378.7 kN
(critical buckling load at 0 pre-twist). Blast Analysis
In the case of the boxed section, buckling capacity was
analysed at varying twist angles from 0 to 180 with an Figure 8 shows the pressure–time curve for 10 kg of TNT
increment of 15. The optimum twist angle with the highest explosive. From the figure, the maximum peak value of the
pressure reached 900 kPa at 1 ms and diminished to an
ambient pressure of 101.4 kPa at 4 ms in air. The pressure–
Isection time curve for 10 kg of TNT resembles the ideal blast
Boxsection
18000
curve.
16000 I Section
14000 (a) Unloaded
Buckling Load (kN)
12000
Figure 9 shows the displacement time graph for the
10000 unloaded prismatic and twisted I sections for 10 kg of
TNT. At the initial stage up to 10 ms, the displacement for
8000
prismatic and twisted columns was equal, but after that, the
6000 twisted column showed higher displacement.
Figure 10 shows the kinetic energy time plot for U13
4000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 and UT13 for 10 kg of TNT; the energy absorbed by the
Twist Angle (degrees) twisted column was 19.375 J at 2.508 ms and by the
prismatic column was 5.844 J at 1.818 ms. The energy
Fig. 5 Variation of buckling load with varying twist angles of the
boxed section
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
UI
UTI
20
15
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fig. 8 Pressure–time curve for 10-kg TNT blast wave
Time (ms)
25 rate was higher for the twisted column due to its multiple-
20
phase interaction with the blast load.
Effective strain and von Mises stress plots for LI are
15 shown in Fig. 15. It can be seen that the column reached an
10
effective strain value of 0.012 and von Mises stress value
of 3.392 9 105 kPa, which were greater than the yielding
5 values. Therefore, we could say that yielding had occurred
0
in the column, but it did not fail at 100 ms. Further
0 20 40 60 80 100 increment of von Mises stress and strain will not occur
Time (ms) because the energy absorption diminished at 80 ms. Fig-
ure 16 shows that the effective strain and von Mises stress
Fig. 9 Displacement–time curve for the unloaded prismatic and
plot for LTI attained at a strain value of 0.011 with a
twisted I section for 10 kg of TNT
corresponding stress value of 3.382 9 105 kPa.
Box Section
the twisted column, the effective strain generated was
2.965 9 10-4, and a von Mises stress value of (a) Unloaded
6.839 9 104 kPa was generated at 2 ms, as shown in Figure 17 shows the displacement–time curve for the
Fig. 12. In both cases, the effective strain and von Mises prismatic and twisted box sections for a blast load of 10 kg
stress values did not exceed the limited value, i.e. the of TNT. From the figure, it can be seen that the prismatic
yielding value. Hence, both columns withstood the 10-kg section exhibited slightly higher displacement compared to
TNT blast load. the corresponding twisted box section up to 75 ms.
(b) Loaded Figure 18 shows the kinetic energy–time curve for the
unloaded prismatic and twisted box section, in which the
Figure 13 shows the displacement time graph for the twisted column exhibits greater kinetic energy absorption
loaded prismatic and twisted I sections for 10 kg of TNT. (9 J at 3 ms) than the prismatic column (0.4 J at 3 ms). In
At the initial stage up to 10 ms, the displacement for the twisted column, the absorption of more kinetic energy
prismatic and twisted sections was equal, but after that, the is due to the effect of blast pressure on multiple phases.
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Fig. 11 Effective strain and von Mises stress contour plot of UI at 8.28 ms
LTI LTI
120 LI LI
7000
100
6000
80
Displacement (mm)
5000
Kinetic Energy (J)
4000
60
3000
40
2000
20
1000
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (ms) Time (ms)
Fig. 13 Displacement–time curve for the loaded prismatic and Fig. 14 Kinetic energy–time curve for the loaded prismatic and
twisted I sections for 10 kg of TNT twisted I sections for 10 kg of TNT
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Fig. 15 Effective strain and von Mises stress contour plot of LI at 100 ms
Fig. 16 Effective strain and von Mises stress contour plot of LTI at 100 ms
UB UB
UTB UTB
60 60
50 50
Displacement (mm)
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (ms) Time (ms)
Fig. 17 Displacement–time curve for the unloaded prismatic and Fig. 18 Kinetic energy–time curve for the unloaded prismatic and
twisted box sections for 10 kg of TNT twisted box sections for 10 kg of TNT
Figure 19 shows the strain contour plot and von Mises Figure 20 shows the strain contour plot and von Mises
stress plot of UB at 3 ms. UB showed a maximum strain stress plot of UTB at 3 ms. UTB had shown a maximum
value of 2.471 9 10-5 and von Mises stress value of strain value of 7.02 9 10-5 and von Mises stress value of
5.703 9 103 kPa at 3 ms, and the material has not yielded. 1.62 9 104 kPa at 3 ms. As we can see, the column
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Fig. 20 Maximum effective strain and von Mises stress plot of UTB
LB
LTB LB
LTB
50 6000
40 5000
Displacement (mm)
4000
30
3000
20
2000
10
1000
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (ms) Time (ms)
Fig. 21 Displacement–time curve for the twisted and prismatic Fig. 22 Kinetic energy–time curve for the twisted and prismatic
loaded box sections loaded box sections
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Fig. 23 Maximum effective strain and maximum von Mises stress of LB at 100 ms
Fig. 24 Maximum effective strain and maximum von Mises stress of LTB at 100 ms
resisted the blast pressure, and from the stress and strain Summary of Results
plot, we can see that yielding has not yet started.
The results obtained from the blast analysis of pre-twisted
(b) Loaded
and prismatic steel columns under loaded and unloaded
The displacement–time curve for the loaded box section, conditions for three different load cases are tabulated and
for a blast load of 10 kg, is shown in Fig. 21. From the shown in Table 8.
graph, it can be noted that the twisted and prismatic box From Table 8, it can evidently be seen that all unloaded
sections showed a similar displacement value up to 50 ms, columns, i.e. both prismatic and twisted columns, did not
after which the twisted column showed higher fail under blast loading and that all loaded columns had
displacement. yielded but did not suffer the initiation of any cracks. The
The kinetic energy–time graph in Fig. 22 shows that the kinetic energy absorbed by the column had diminished to
higher energy absorbed for both columns was the same at zero, and hence, it could be said that the column withstood
the initial stage; after that, in the prismatic column, the the 10-kg blast load.
energy absorption diminished at 50 ms, and that of the
twisted column diminished at 60 ms. The effective strain
and von Mises stress for LB3 are plotted in Fig. 23. It can Blast Influence Ratio
be seen that the column reached an effective strain value of
0.00325 and von Mises stress value of 2.607 9 105 kPa, To represent the failure pattern for a section under the blast
which were greater than the yielding values, so we could load, it should be expressed in terms of blast influence
say that yielding had occurred in the column, but it did not ratio, i.e. the blast influence ratio should be equal to the von
fail at 100 ms. Mises stress by the yield stress of the material. Figure 25
A similar behaviour was seen for the twisted box col- shows the blast behaviour of a section with respect to blast
umns, in which the strain value had reached to 0.0063 and time, in terms of blast influence ratio, comparing the loaded
von Mises stress value had reached to 2.66 9 105 kPa and unloaded columns. The unloaded column showed a
(Fig. 24). safer side, and its influence ratio is less than one. In the
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
UI 5.557 9 10-4 kPa 1.282 9 105 kPa Lower Lower Yielding not occurred
-4
UTI 2.965 9 10 kPa 6.839 9 104 kPa Higher Higher Yielding not occurred
LI 0.012 kPa 3.392 9 105 kPa Lower Lower Yielding has occurred, did not fail
LTI 0.011 kPa 3.382 9 105 kPa Higher Higher Yielding has occurred, did not fail
-5
UB 2.471 9 10 kPa 5.703 9 103 kPa Higher Lower Yielding not occurred
UTB 7.02 9 10-5 kPa 1.62 9 104 kPa Lower Higher Yielding not occurred
LB 0.00325 kPa 2.607 9 105 kPa Higher Equal Yielding has occurred, did not fail
LTB 0.0063 kPa 2.66 9 105 kPa Lower Equal Yielding has occurred, did not fail
1.2
UB
UI
load, was found to be 135. The I section shows a 51%
UTB
UTI improvement in critical load, and it suffered global buck-
BLAST INFLUNCE RATIO
1.0 ling. The boxed column also shows similar behaviour with
2 an improvement in buckling capacity of 15% with
0.8
increasing twist angles until an optimal angle of 155. In
0.6 addition to global buckling, boxed columns also suffered
local buckling because of their thin walls.
0.4 The kinetic energy absorbed by the columns diminished
0 for 10 kg of TNT, and the loaded columns yielded without
0.2
the initiation of any cracks, whereas unloaded sections did
0.0 not yield. Hence, both twisted and prismatic columns were
0 20 40 60 80 100 safer under a 10-kg TNT blast load. Using blast influence
blast time (ms)
ratio, we can predict the structural behaviour of columns
Fig. 25 Blast influence ratio versus time (ms) with respect to time.
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
8. F.H. Abed, M.H. AlHamaydeh, S.A. Barakat, Nonlinear finite- 13. S. Yao, D. Zhang, X. Chen, F. Lu, W. Wang, Experimental and
element analysis of buckling capacity of pretwisted steel bars. numerical study on the dynamic response of RC slabs under blast
J. Eng. Mech. 139(7), 791–801 (2013) loading. Eng. Fail. Anal. 66, 120–129 (2015)
9. F.H. Abed, M. Megahed, A. Al-Rahmani, On the improvement of 14. M.A. Yusof, R.N. Rosdi, N.M. Nor, A. Ismail, M.A. Yahya, N.C.
buckling of pretwisted universal steel columns. Structures 5, Peng, Simulation of reinforced concrete blast wall subjected to air
152–160 (2015) blast loading. J. Asian Sci. Res. 4(9), 522–533 (2014)
10. S.-P. Chiew, S.-L. Lee, N.E. Shanmugam, Experimental study of 15. F. Zhang, W. Chengqing, H. Wang, Y. Zhou, Numerical simu-
thin-walled steel box columns. J. Struct. Eng. 113(10), lation of concrete filled steel tube columns against BLAST loads.
2208–2220 (1987) Thin Walled Struct. 92, 82–92 (2015)
11. A.K. Tiwary, A.K. Tiwary, A. Kumar, Blast loading effects on 16. V. Karlos, G. Solomos, Calculation of Blast Loads for Applica-
steel columns. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 6(3), 17–22 (2015) tion to Structural Components. JRC technical reports (2013)
12. A.A. Nassr, A.G. Razaqpur, M.J. Tait, M. Campidelli, S. Foo, 17. N. Jha, B.S. Kiran Kumar, Air blast validation using
Experimental performance of steel beams under blast loading. ANSYS/AUTODYN. Int. J. Eng. Res. Tehnol. 3(1), 1794–1797
J. Perform. Construct. Facil. 26(5), 600–619 (2012) (2014)
123