Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract Introduction
An ecological assessment of Imbang River in The deterioration of rivers is a consequence of
Negros Occidental was undertaken from December human population growth and accelerated
1992 to February 1995. The effluents from sugar urbanization. People demand increasing amounts of
mills, households, shrimp farms, sugarcane clean water, and discharge waste water into the
plantations and rice fields were characterized and nearest waterways. A river provides a convenient
their pollutant loads estimated. Water quality and means of disposing waste products and used water.
invertebrate assemblages were analyzed at several A river has self-purifying capacity but excessive and
sites along the river to determine the environmental unabated addition of pollutants could lead to
status. Results showed significant seasonal and site ecological imbalance, endanger public health, and
variations in water quality along Imbang River. The adversely affect the livelihood of communities using
dry season, coinciding with the milling season, was the river water. Moreover, competing interests and
the more critical time of the year as water quality demands of the various users of communal water
tended to deteriorate. The segments of the river near resources have also spawned socioeconomic and
the sugar mills and households had the poorest water even political disturbances. For these reasons, there
quality. Sugar mill effluents had high water is heightened interest and growing concern over the
temperature (average 33oC but as high as 50oC), low status and management of rivers and other natural
dissolved oxygen, high total solids, the highest waters in the Philippines and elsewhere.
settleable solids (average 2.5 and as high as 17 m/l), Many of the country's rivers are widely
and the highest biochemical oxygen demand perceived to be badly degraded but there is scarce
(average 259 ppm but as high as 14,800 ppm BOD). historical data and little documentation of their
Domestic effluents had low pH, high ammonia, very present condition. Reported pollution from
high BOD, plus detergents or surfactants and high industrialization is mostly circumstantial or
levels of fecal coliform bacteria. Agricultural run- anecdotal in nature. The lack of adequate baseline
off had high nitrate, high total solids, and the highest information has hampered attempts to intervene and
total suspended solids (average 296 ppm but as high rationalize use of river resources.
as 5,095 ppm TSS). Shrimp ponds used saline water The present research project was designed to
of average 23 ppt, and had the highest total solids generate information that could be used to assess the
(average 23,456 ppm and as high as 57,400 p p m ) . state of a river of socioeconomic importance in
By far the major contributor of pollutant loads into Region VI and fill some of the information gaps
Imbang River was agriculture, due to its huge areal about rivers in the country in general. Results of an
extent and huge volume of water use and run-off. investigation of this type are useful considerations
Agricultural run-off carried the highest annual loads for any scheme to rationalize use of the river and get
of 7,858 kg phosphate; 6,495 kg ammonia; 794 kg sustained benefits from it.
nitrite; 67,212 kg nitrate; 16,987 metric tons The specific objectives of this study were:
settleable solids; 16,800,000 mt total solids, and To characterize the effluents from agriculture,
11,890,000 mt total suspended solids; but only 297 sugar mills, households, and shrimp farms along
mt BOD. Sugar mill effluents had the highest BOD Imbang River
load (1,583 mt/yr) and also had high nutrient loads. To estimate the pollutant loads of the effluents
Household effluents contributed the second largest from these four sectors
loads of solids next to agriculture, and also added To assess the effects of these effluents on the
surfactants (966 kg/yr) and fecal coliforms into the river water quality and invertebrate fauna
river. The six shrimp farms at the lower reaches of To evaluate the status of the river and
Imbang River were a minor contributor of pollutants recommend ways to properly manage the
into the river, annually adding about 891 kg various uses of the river
ammonia; 1,077 kg phosphate; and 181,325 mt total
solids.
36 Fisheries Sector Program
Figure 1. The Imbang River system in Negros Occidental and the sampling stations during the study, May 1993 to February1995
Table 1. Sampling stations along Imbang River and tributaries, Negros Occidental, 1993-1995
Table 2. Analytical procedures for water quality determination (after APHA 1989)
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 37
Discharge rates of all waste water were measured Secondary data were provided by a number of
during sample collection, except for agricultural run- government and private offices and individuals
off. Discharges from shrimp ponds were calculated (Table 3). Some secondary data needed for the
based on actual volumes of pond water drained out research were unavailable or non-existent. Available
during water exchanges and total drainage. data, on the other hand, were often incomplete and
Outflows from sugar mills were estimated from the sometimes conflicting. Given the private ownership
cross-section of the discharging conduits, and from of the establishments discharging waste waters into
the flow velocity as indicated by a current meter. Imbang River, the project team had no control over
The discharge from agriculture was estimated access, schedule of wastewater releases, and other
from the drainage area, average rainfall, and a run- factors that had direct bearing on the conduct and
off constant value considered appropriate for the results of the study.
area on the basis of its topography, ground cover,
and soil type. Analysis of data
Discharge from households could not be
measured in the absence of a centralized and Variations in water quality variables, biodiversity
supervised sewerage system in the area. index, and other factors by seasons and sites were
The quantities of pollutants loaded into Imbang analyzed by ANOVA, correlation analysis,
River were calculated from the discharge rates and agglomerate clustering, using the Statistical Package
the concentration of the pollutant in the effluent. for Social Science program.
Short-term load estimates were extrapolated to give
long-term or annual estimates.
program.
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 39
Table 4. Water quality of effluents from six shrimp farms at downstream end of Imbang River,
Negros Occidental, May 1993 to February 1995
User sector Water temp (oC) Salinity (ppt) pH Diss oxygen (ppm)
Mean range Mean range Mean range Mean range
Sugar mills 0.8 0.1–2.7 0.4 0–1.0 0.01 0–0.05 0.4 0–2.1
Households 0.7 0.1–1.9 0.7 0–2.5 0.04 0–0.44 1.0 0–7.1
Agriculture 0.2 0–0.8 0.2 0–1.1 0.02 0–0.11 1.7 0.1–6.1
Shrimp ponds 0.2 0–2.2 0.1 0–0.8 0.003 0–0.04 0.1 0–0.7
Sugar mills 2.5 0–17 1,000 140–3,790 118 42–498 259 8–14,800
Households 0.8 0–18 469 167–2,240 132 26–474 142 2–440
Agriculture 0.4 0–9 465 100–5,700 296 26–5,095 7 1–49
Shrimp ponds 0.2 0–2 23,456 8,000–57,400 231 48–598 20 2–114
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 41
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 43
Unlike the continuous flow of domestic drainage or More intense sunlight during dry months caused
the intermittent release of water from ponds, the water to be significantly warmer than during the
annual cycles of wet and dry periods and sugarcane rainy season (Fig. 2). A significant seasonal
milling exert seasonal perturbations on Imbang difference in temperature was also related to the
River. Table 10 shows significant seasonal release of heated or relatively warm water from the
differences in most of the water quality variables. sugar mill. The average rise in temperature (3.4oC)
Wet and dry seasons. The meteorological and just downstream of the sugar mill exceeded the
hydrological regime around Imbang River differs allowable 3oC (DENR 1990b).
between the dry season (November to April) and the Higher temperature lowers the quantity of
wet season during the rest of the year. Rain oxygen that dissolves in a given volume of water,
increases the volume and discharge of the tributaries but accelerates the rate of oxygen consumption by
and the main channel, but also the dilution capacity. aquatic organisms. Warmer water has greater
Run-off washes down into the river large loads of potential to develop anoxic conditions, with
dissolved and particulate matter from the unfavorable impacts on fish and other aquatic biota.
surrounding plains and slopes. In contrast, during the Higher temperature also speeds up evaporation and
dry months, the river contracts to a smaller bed, concentrates particulates in the water. Temperature
concentrates pollutants and other materials, and also stimulates spawning of aquatic animals, but if
receives little run-off. too high, may instead prevent spawning
Milling season and off-season. Along the main Only stations 13 and 14 nearest the river mouth
channel of the river, the opening and progress of the had slightly saline water, higher during the dry
milling season (September-May) were marked by season (Fig. 3).
the release from sugar mill A of warm (up to 50°C) The pH was lower near the sugar mill, and
effluent. During the off-season, the sugar mill was significantly lower during the milling season (Fig.
cleaned for about a month. 4). Lime treatment moderated the effluent's impact
The milling season nearly coincided with the and the acidity imparted to the river was not as high
dry season around Imbang River. Figures 2-16 show as might have been. All stations had acceptable pH
plots of the water quality variables along Imbang 6.5-8.5. The pH can be important because it
River during the wet and dry seasons (left panels) regulates the concentration or toxicity of ammonia
and during the milling season and off-season (right and hydrogen sulfide.
panels).
DO and BOD
High concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen in The counts of total coliform bacteria and fecal
freshwater bodies are environmental concerns coliforms were lower during the rainy season (Fig.
because they lead to eutrophication. During the 15-16), probably because of the higher river
study, Imbang River had no excessive populations of discharge and swifter currents that facilitated export
algae or other aquatic plants. DENR prescribes a to sea. Fecal coliforms made up 54% of total during
standard of 0.4 ppm phosphorus, but no standards the dry season but only 30% during the wet. Non-
for ammonia, nitrite, or nitrate. Baker (1980) fecal coliforms were higher during periods of greater
considers 0.03 ppm phosphorus sufficient for algal soil erosion. During the milling season, the
growth. coliforms were about 51% fecal and 49% non-fecal
Phosphate concentrations in Imbang River were in origin. But the fecal component rose to 81% once
within the DENR limit the whole year, but were the mill operations closed for the year.
higher during the dry season (Fig. 7). The dry Imbang River is categorized as Class C,
season operations of the sugar mill contributed high principally intended for fish propagation or fishing.
phosphate concentrations at station 2A, which The total coliform counts passed the DENR standard
received the mill effluents. During the rainy season, of 5000 MPN/100 ml (1990b) for Class C waters.
agricultural run-off was probably a significant However, stricter regulations should be applied to
contributor of phosphate and other nutrients to the Imbang, such as those for Class AA or A (for
river. drinking water) or for Class B (for primary contact,
Ammonia showed no seasonal differences (Fig. e.g., bathing, swimming, etc.) waters because the
8), probably because it was loaded from households river is often used by local folks for bathing, clothes-
and agriculture, spread throughout the year, in washing, and even for drinking. The river failed the
addition to sugar mills. stringent limits for Class B waters —1000 MPN/100
Nitrate and nitrite levels were higher during the ml total coliforms during the milling season, or 200
wet season and lower during the milling season than MPN/100 ml fecal coliforms at all times of the year.
during the rest of the year (Figs. 9-10). Both The river was therefore hazardous to human health.
nutrients were loaded mostly from agricultural run- Some householders around Imbang River claimed to
off (Table 5). have acquired water-related diseases such as skin
disorders, eye irritations, and stomach trouble.
Solids
The total solids (TS) in Imbang River did not show Discussion and conclusion
significant variations between seasons, except at
stations 13 and 14 nearest the sea (Fig. 11). Imbang River is a stressed water course that receives
Total suspended solids (TSS) were higher a mix of polluting materials from different point and
during the rainy months (Fig. 12) due to eroded nonpoint sources. The upstream end was the least
materials and disturbed bottom sediments. The stressed, and the segments near a sugar mill and a
fraction of TS due to TSS rose from 6% during the dense community of local residents were the most
dry season to 52% during the wet season; at stations disturbed. Partial recovery in water quality occurred
13 and 14 nearest the sea, the TSS fraction went in the middle segments and at the river mouth.
from 2% to 11%. Sugar mills discharged large amounts of high-
During the milling season, TSS constituted less BOD effluents during the dry season, when the
than 10% of TS at station 2A, and 90% was due to river‘s dilution and assimilation capacities were
settleable solids (SS). After the mill had shut down, lowest. The result was poor water quality and a
the TSS component rose to 47% and SS fell to 53%; distressed biota downstream of the mill.
SS downstream of the mill was 1.6x the upstream Similarly, dumping of raw sewage by human
concentration. The SS concentrations did not differ settlements seriously degraded the river. Raw
significantly between the wet and dry seasons (Fig. sewage also deoxygenates the water and unloads
13). pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Fecal pollution is a
health risk that should be curbed as soon as possible.
Surfactants Local residents reported occasional incidences of
illnesses that may indeed have been caused by water
There were no substantial differences in surfactant -borne pathogens.
concentrations between dry and wet seasons and the Nutrient inputs from agricultural lands of other
river passed the DENR standard (Fig. 14). The sources did not show adverse impacts on the river.
disposal rate of detergent-containing wash water No nuisance growths of aquatic plants were
from households into the river was about the same observed to indicate excessive enrichment of the
throughout the year. waterways.
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 45
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 2. Average water temperature at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and
during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average salinity (ppt)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 3. Average salinity at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and during the
milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average water pH
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 4. Average water pH at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and during the
milling season and off-season (right panel)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 5. Average dissolved oxygen concentrations at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left
panel) and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average biochemical oxygen demand (mg/l)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 6. Average biochemical oxygen demand at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left
panel) and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average phosphate (mg/l)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 7. Average phosphate concentrations at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel)
and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 47
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 8. Average ammonia concentrations at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel)
and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average nitrite (mg/l)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 9. Average nitrite concentrations at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and
during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average nitrate (mg/l)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 10. Average nitrate concentrations at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel)
and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 11. Average total solids at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and during
the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average suspended solids (mg/l)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 12. Average suspended solids at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and
during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average settleable solids (mg/l)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 13. Average settleable solids at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel) and
during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 49
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 14. Average surfactant concentrations at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel)
and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average total coliform count (MPN/100 ml)
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 15. Average total coliform counts at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel)
and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Average fecal coliforms (mg/
1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 1 2 2A 3 5 6 10 12 13 14
Stations Stations
Figure 16. Average fecal coliform counts at stations along Imbang River during the dry and wet seasons (left panel)
and during the milling season and off-season (right panel)
Pesticide pollution was not a problem in Imbang 2. Improved regulation of sugar mills and effluent
River at the time of this investigation. There was disposals, including economic incentives for
some indication, however, that a few specific compliance
organochlorine pesticides may occur at levels that 3. Better programs for soil conservation —
border on the safe limits during rainy months. Their including better farming technologies and
persistence and capabilities to be magnified in practices, and environment education for
different components of the ecosystem make even watershed stakeholders
low concentrations undesirable. Sediments in the 4. Responsible aquaculture practices to minimize
river bed and some aquatic animals had already effects on the external environment —including
absorbed traces of the organochlorines. environment-friendly farming technologies and
Semi-intensive aquaculture was the least effluent treatment
damaging influence among the four sectors that were 5. A surveillance and monitoring system for water
considered. Most of the TS load from ponds was quality—with frequent and regular sampling
due to the saline water. The effects of pond schedules and a data bank that can be used as
effluents were localized—they did not affect reference
upstream water quality and the other uses of the 6. Research on the waste assimilation capacity of
river. But the shrimp farms were clustered along the the river—including the behavior and
same relatively short segment of the river, which magnitudes of pollutants in relation to
served both as common water source and recipient hydrological conditions and different soil and
of wastes. Hence, the discharge from one farm crop management techniques
could adversely affect neighboring farms and even
itself.
The tides cleansed the lower end of the river up Literature cited
to the site of the shrimp farms. Imbang River
appeared to have adequate capability to flush out APHA. 1989. Standard Methods for the
wastes. This may not necessarily hold true at some Examination of Water and Wastewater 14th
future time. Edition. American Public Health Association,
The state regulates the quality of wastewaters Washington DC, 1193 pp.
that are discharged to the country's surface waters Baker JC. 1980. Agricultural areas as nonpoint
through the Department of Health for sewage and sources of pollution, pp. 273-309. In: MR
DENR for industrial and other effluents. However, Overcash and JM Davidson (eds) Environmental
the monitoring capabilities of these agencies are Impact of Nonpoint Source Pollution. Science
limited. Industrial effluents are monitored with Publishers, Ann Arbor.
varying degrees of strictness by concerned Boyd CE. 1979. Water Quality in Warmwater Fish
authorities. The set of water quality standards Ponds. Auburn University Agricultural
presently in use is applied across all types of Experiment Station. Craftmaster Printers,
effluents regardless of the quality peculiarities and Alabama, 360 pp.
initial strength of each. The standard of 80 ppm for Creswell RL. 1993. Aqua Desk Reference. Harbor
BOD, for example, is imposed for sewage, Branch Oceanographic Institution, Inc. Van
aquaculture effluent, and agriculture run-off. The Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 206 pp.
DENR prescribes separate standards for BOD only DENR 1990a. Revised Effluent Regulations of
for different categories of strong industrial wastes. 1990, Revising and Amending the Effluent
At present, safe limits for nutrients and pesticides Regulations of 1982. DENR Administrative Order
are still lacking. 35 Series of 1990. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Quezon City, 15 pp.
DENR 1990b. Revised Water Usage and
Recommendations Classification/Water Quality Criteria Amending
Section Numbers 68 and 69, Chapter III of the
A comprehensive water quality management plan 1978 NPCC Rules and Regulations. DENR
for the river basin should be developed as soon as Administrative Order 34 Series of 1990.
possible. It should include both short-term and long- Department of Environment and Natural
term courses of action. The plan should include the Resources, Quezon City, 15 pp.
following features: Haedrich RL. 1975. Diversity and overlap as
measures of environmental quality. Water Res. 9:
1. Improved sanitation practices and services — 945-952.
including more toilets for residents, a common Hammer MJ. 1977. Water and Wastewater
sewerage system and effective solid waste Technology. John Wiley and Sons, New York,
management 503 pp.
Department of Agriculture
Research Output Volume 2 51