Moving Indonesia’s capital city won’t fix Jakarta’s problems and will increase fire risk in Borneo

September 3, 2019 12.31pm WIB

Luca Tacconi, Australian National University

The hope is that building ‘a smart city in the forest’ in North Penajam Paser and Kutai Kartanegara
regencies will ease Jakarta’s myriad problems. But it’s not that simple. EPA/Stringer

Indonesian President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo has officially announced plans to relocate the country’s
capital from the congested, sinking city of Jakarta to East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo.

The hope is that building “a smart city in the forest” in North Penajam Paser and Kutai Kartanegara
regencies will ease Jakarta’s myriad problems. Home to 10 million people, Jakarta struggles with severe
pollution, traffic jams and floods, and parts of it are sinking.

But moving the capital to Borneo, which has large swathes of flammable peatlands, increases the risk of
fires, which would wreak devastating environmental damage and release vast amounts of greenhouse
gas emissions.

And the move wouldn’t necessarily solve Jakarta’s environmental problems.

High forest fire risk

The proposed site of the new capital is not far from the Mahakam Lakes, a beautiful area rich in
peatlands and home to the Irrawaddy dolphin (Orcaella brevirostris), an endangered species known
locally as pesut. Peatland fires are the most significant source of the acrid haze that regularly envelop
various parts of Indonesia, including this year.

Relocating the capital would mean clearing land to make space for new government buildings, houses
and associated infrastructure. The government has reportedly set aside 180,000 hectares for
construction.
It is not surprising that environmental groups such as Greenpeace Indonesia are concerned about the
impact on the forest and the many species that inhabit it, such the orangutan. Unfortunately, forest
clearing is just one of the many environmental impacts, and not even the most significant.

At least 1.5 million public servants are expected to move to the new capital. That’s on top of the
environmental impact of the current population – 900,000 people in Kutai Kartanegara and North
Penajam Paser regencies.

A vastly bigger population close to the Mahakam Lakes increases the risk of peatland fires there.
Migrant inflows into the new capital would encourage agriculture expansion. And people still often burn
land for agriculture expansion in Indonesia, despite a ban on the use of fires for land clearing.

My research and that of other colleagues show that fires in Indonesia are linked not just to large- and
small-scale agricultural activities, but also other livelihood activities such as hunting and fishing.

People already living in the area will hunt and fish more to sell to city dwellers, who will also visit forest
and peatland areas for recreation and to earn a livelihood.

When people hunt and fish during the dry season, they often build campfires and burn vegetation to
find fishing ponds. Fires can escape and become wildfires.

The risk of fire in the area is very real. During the worst El Nino drought on record in Indonesia, which
occurred in 1997-98, fires raged throughout the Mahakam area and the rest of East Kalimantan, the
worst affected province in the country.

If similar fires were to reoccur – which is more likely than not, given the increasing temperatures due to
climate change – the new capital would likely be brought to a standstill for months. Both fire and the
resulting haze would put the health and livelihoods of its inhabitants at risk.

Jakarta’s problems remain

Allocating US$32.7 billion to the construction of the new capital might even worsen Jakarta’s
environmental problems.

Jakarta needs massive infrastructure investment to improve public transport (which reduces congestion
and greenhouse gas emissions) and boost sanitation, including linking all houses to potable water.

Many of its inhabitants are forced to rely on water from deep wells, resulting in over-extraction of
underground water. That, in turn, causes land subsidence.

Without significant regulatory change and investment to stop Jakarta sinking, billions will be lost in
damage to existing infrastructure and connected economic activity.

Relocating 1.5 million people out of Jakarta is not going to resolve the city’s subsidence problem, given
that Jakarta’s population grows by about 250,000 people every year.

Before it approves relocation of the capital, the Indonesian parliament should guarantee sufficient
resources will be available to address Jakarta’s transport and subsidence problems. And it should ensure
any new capital is in a location that’s not going to worsen the region’s fire and haze problem.