Kikuchi, R. et al.

Paper:

A Comparison of Disaster Management Plans for

Both Japan and Myanmar
Rena Kikuchi∗,† , Muneyoshi Numada∗∗ , May Myat Mon∗∗∗ , Tun Naing∗∗∗ ,
Khin Than Yu∗∗∗ , and Kimiro Meguro∗∗
∗ Department of Civil Engineering, the University of Tokyo
4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
† Corresponding author, E-mail: renakiku@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp
∗∗ International Center for Urban Safety Engineering, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
∗∗∗ Yangon Technological University, Yangon, Myanmar

[Received September 1, 2017; accepted February 7, 2018]

Recently, national level disaster management legis-
lation systems have been established in Myanmar,
and preparation of disaster management plans at the
township level has also been encouraged. This study
aims to explain these disaster management plans in
Myanmar through content analysis and comparison
with the Japanese Municipality Disaster Management
Plan. The classification of activities by 45 categories
revealed the prioritized activities in the disaster man-
agement plan for each township. Furthermore, the
comparison identified differences between the disas-
ter management plans of the two countries, of which
some are explained by the difference in situations in
Myanmar and Japan, but the others indicate activities
missed in the township disaster management plans in
Myanmar.
Keywords: Myanmar, disaster management, disas-
ter management plan, disaster management law, content
analysis
1. Introduction
Located in the South Asia, Myanmar is a country with
a population of 56 million. After its transition from a mil-
itary government to a democratic one in 2011, this coun-
try attracts a sizable amount of investments from other
countries, which will consequently lead to large-scale de-
velopment. However, Myanmar is vulnerable to natural
disasters, as the damage of a cyclone Nargis in 2008,
with 84,537 deaths and 53,836 missing, has shown [1].
Furthermore, its vulnerability can be intensified with the
coming developments. In order to accomplish economic
growth from development projects, disaster management
is one of the indispensable issues to Myanmar.
Recently, national level disaster management legisla-
tion systems, such as the National Disaster Management
Law and the Disaster Management Rules have been im-
plemented in Myanmar. In addition, preparation of dis-
aster management plans at township level is also encour-
aged. The township is recognized as an important actor
that connects local communities and state/division district
level in disaster management. To promote township disas-
ter management plans, the Guideline on township disaster
management plan has been issued by the Relief and Reset-
tlement and General Administration Department and the
Asian Disaster Preparedness Center. Within this context,
the production of disaster management plans at the town-
ship level is currently in progress.
On the other hand, the preparation of municipal disas-
ter management plans started in the 1960s in Japan. At
present, all 1,742 municipalities there have created a dis-
aster management plan, and the almost half of the mu-
nicipalities have revised their disaster management plan
in 2015. This indicates that municipality disaster man-
agement plans continue to improve with the added expe-
rience of natural disasters. As a result, we could say that
the Japanese municipality disaster management plans are
relatively mature.
This study aims to explain the situation, and to re-
veal the issues of the disaster management plan in Myan-
mar. First, the outline of the legislation systems related to
disaster management in Myanmar and Japan will be ex-
plained in order to offer the big picture of the whole sys-
tem. Second, the content analysis of the Standing Order
has been carried out with the purpose of understanding the
national level disaster management plan. Third, the disas-
ter management plan at the township level has been ana-
lyzed with the aim of comprehending field level activities
through the content analysis and a comparison with the
Municipality Disaster Management Plan in Japan, which
has been developed through many experiences of natural
disasters, in order to clarify problems in Myanmar’s dis-
aster management plan.
2. Legislation Systems Related to Disaster
Management in Myanmar and Japan
2.1. Disaster Management Systems in Myanmar
The Ministry of Welfare, Relief and Resettlement
which is the principal ministry in disaster management in

62 Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018


Myanmar, offers some assistance for implementation in
disaster risk reduction, and arranges coordination among
other ministries. The National Natural Disaster Man-
agement Central Committee (NDMC), chaired by a Vice
President, is an interministerial body, which is formed in
order to implement the provisions of the Disaster Man-
agement Law.
When a major natural disaster occurs and the President
declares a state of disaster for an affected area, the disas-
ter is considered to be controlled at the national level. In
that case, the ministries communicate closely with each
other through this committee and 12 working committees,
which are formed under the NDMC. Myanmar’s min-
istries have their branch offices at local levels, such as the
state or township level, and they are a part of the local au-
thority. As a result, the decision made by the committees
is transmitted to the branch offices from the central office
of each ministry if necessary. It appears that this system
of a chain of communication reflects the centralized char-
acteristics of the previous military government.
2.2. Outline of Disaster Management Law and
Plans in Myanmar
In Myanmar, the National Disaster Management Law
(2013) [2], the Disaster Management Rules (2015) [3],
and the Standing Order on Natural Disaster Management
(2009) [4] are the primary law or rules for the natural dis-
aster management at the national level.
The Standing Order, finalized in 2009 and updated in
2011, serves as the Disaster Preparedness Plan and the
Emergency Response Plan in Myanmar after its transi-
tion to a democratic government. The Standing Order
identifies duties and responsibilities to be executed at the
national level and state/division level. The duties to be
carried out are classified by disaster phases and disaster
types. Though it has to be noted that the Standing Or-
der needs to be updated, based on the changing context
and in accordance with the Disaster Management Law and
Rules, and the Sendai Framework, the Standing Order is
still a key document giving a detailed description of the
roles and responsibilities for national level players in dis-
aster management.
The National Disaster Management Law, which was
enacted in 2013, is the principle national law about dis-
aster management in Myanmar. This law specifies the
roles and responsibilities of four implementation bodies:
(1) the NDMC; (2) the national disaster management bod-
ies of the region or state; (3) the President; and (4) the de-
partment, organization, or person that has been assigned
responsibility under this law, in the different phases of a
disaster. These phases include: (1) preparatory measures,
(2) prevention measures, (3) the disaster stage, and (4)
rehabilitation and reconstruction. This law also includes
a description regarding the establishment of the Natural
Disaster Management Fund.
The Disaster Management Rules is subsequent to the
Disaster Management Law which the Ministry of Social
Welfare, Relief, and Resettlement issued in 2015. The
Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018
A Comparison of Disaster Management Plans
for Both Japan and Myanmar
Rules details the role and responsibilities of the Min-
istry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement, and also
prescribes that local bodies, from the region or state to
ward or village tract, should prepare disaster manage-
ment plans. To assist township governments in devel-
oping township-level disaster management plans, the Re-
lief and Resettlement and General Administration De-
partment and the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center
(ADPC), which is a regional non-profit organization that
works for the resilience of people and institutions to dis-
asters in Asia and the Pacific, has formed the Guideline
on Township Disaster Management Plan [5]. They con-
tain the following three objectives; (1) to assist the town-
ship authorities to prepare for township disaster, (2) to as-
sist in ensuring uniformity in township disaster prepared-
ness plans across townships by standardization of disaster
management terminologies, and (3) to provide a standard
template for township disaster management plans.
The guideline consists of four sections; an introduction,
approach for preparation of the township disaster manage-
ment plan (TDMP), outline of the TDMP, and explanatory
notes.
According to the description in the Natural Disaster
Management Law, the targeted disasters in the Myanmar’s
law and rules related to disaster management includes nat-
ural disasters such as floods and earthquakes, and man-
made disasters such as industrial or chemical accidents,
which is also true of the Japanese Disaster Countermea-
sures Basic Act.
2.3. Outline of Disaster Management Law and
Plans in Japan
In Japan, the principle law on disaster management is
the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act [6] which was
enacted in 1961 and has been constantly reviewed and
amended since its enactment. The Act clarifies financial
measures to be taken in case of natural disasters and the
responsibilities of actors, including the national, prefec-
tural, and municipal governments as well as designated
public institutions. Like the Disaster Management Rules
in Myanmar, the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act pre-
scribes the establishment of disaster management plans at
all levels of government.
Within this context, Japan has a disaster management
planning system which is composed of four types of
plans: (1) the Basic Disaster Management Plan, (2) the
Disaster Management Operation Plan, (3) the Local Dis-
aster Management Plan, and (4) the Community Disaster
Management Plan. The Basic Disaster Management Plan
is the highest level plan in the disaster management plan-
ning system in Japan, prepared by the Central Disaster
Management Council, which is established in the cabi-
net office based on the Disaster Countermeasures Basic
Act. It forms the foundation for the Disaster Management
Operation Plan and the Local Disaster Management Plan.
The Plan also clarifies responsibilities of related bodies:
the national and local governments, and public corpora-
tions and other entities. The Disaster Management Op-
63
Kikuchi, R. et al.
eration Plan is a plan prepared by each designated gov-
ernment organization and designated public corporations
such as utility companies. The Local Disaster Manage-
ment Plan is a plan established by each prefectural and
municipal disaster management council which considers
local situations. This plan details basic responsibilities
and duties which are assigned to the local government in
the basic disaster management plan. The community dis-
aster management plan is a disaster management activity
plan, formulated by residents and businesses at the com-
munity level.
2.4. Differences Between Myanmar and Japan
The differences between the disaster management plan-
ning systems in Myanmar and Japan are found in the rela-
tionship among plans. The Japanese Basic Disaster Man-
agement Plan is the upper level plan for local disaster
management plans and the Disaster Management Oper-
ation Plan, which is a plan made by the designated gov-
ernment organizations, such as ministries, and designated
public corporations, such as utility companies. Thus, the
Basic Disaster Management Plan describes not only the
roles and responsibilities of the national ministries, but
also the ones of the prefectural and municipal ministries.
Then, the Local Disaster Management Plan and the Dis-
aster Management Operation Plan serve to detail duties
or responsibilities assigned in the Basic Disaster Manage-
ment Plan. The Basic Disaster Management Plan has a su-
perior legal authority with which the disaster management
plans of local governments and national ministries should
comply, and serves to ensure the consistency among the
plans of ministries and local governments. Conversely,
in Myanmar’s case, the Standing Order just describes the
roles and responsibilities of the national ministries and the
state /division government, and doesn’t describe the roles
and responsibilities at the township level. As a result,
the Standing Order does not serve to lump disaster man-
agement plans together, while the Japanese Basic Dis-
aster Management Plan does. Even though the Disaster
Management Rules of Myanmar prescribes that disaster
management plans at the lower level should be submit-
ted to the disaster management bodies at upper level for
approval, it appears that the relationship among disaster
management plans of various disaster management bod-
ies at different levels are weaker in Myanmar’s system
than they are in the Japanese System. Thus, in Myan-
mar case, it is likely to cause the lack of the consistency
among plans, and this system can be an obstacle to a good
cooperation among authorities of different levels.
3. Analysis of Contents of the Standing Order
To understand, the Disaster Management Plan at the
national level in Myanmar, the contents of the Standing
Order on Natural Disaster have been analyzed.
64
Fig. 1. Disaster management phase in the standing order.
3.1. Targets of Analysis
In the Standing Order, the responsibilities and duties to
be taken by each actor are itemized. These items are basi-
cally grouped by actors. As noted previously, the disaster
phases are also specified for most of the items, as well as
the target disaster type for some items. The target of the
analysis is all responsibilities and rules whose actors are
specified. As a result, 1,575 items of the actors are tar-
geted in this analysis. The target organizations are as fol-
lows: the National Committee for Natural Disaster Man-
agement, the Inter-Ministerial Coordination Committee
for Disaster Management, the Advisory Committee for
Natural Disaster Management, 21 additional ministries,
and the State/Division Advisory Committee for Natural
Disaster Management Committees.
3.2. Methods
The targeted 1,575 items are classified by the actors,
disaster phases, and target disaster types. In the classifi-
cation process, it was discovered that terms representing
disaster phases are not unified in the document. To solve
this problem, these items were re-classified under the fol-
lowing four terms which are mainly used in the Standing
Order to categorize the items: (1) Normal Times, (2) Alert
and Warning Stage, (3) During Natural Disasters, and,
(4) Relief and Rehabilitation. These four terms are also
used for the classification in the section of the Ministry
of Welfare, Relief and Resettlement, which is the primary
administrator of disaster management. In addition to the
unification of terms, the disaster stage of the items whose
disaster phase are not specified in the Standing Order on
the basis of the content. In case that the phase is not clear,
the item’s disaster phase is classified as “not specified.”
3.3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the result of classification of the 1,575
items in the Standing Order by the disaster phases. It
Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018
 A Comparison of Disaster Management Plans
for Both Japan and Myanmar

Fig. 2. Classification by disaster management phases and actors.

shows that the four phases are evenly mentioned in the 4. Comparison Between Township Disaster
Standing Order. However, with consideration of the Management Plans in Myanmar and a Mu-
length of each phase, there are more items per unit of time nicipal Disaster Management Plan in Japan
in the Alert and Warning Stage and the During Natural
Disasters, compared to the other phases. In the Sendai To understand differences in the local level disaster
Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, “In- management plans in both countries, an analysis of plan
vesting in disaster risk governance to manage disaster contents and a comparison were conducted.
risk” and “Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective
response” are listed in the four priorities for action. Given
this, more items might need to be described for the pre- 4.1. Targets of Analysis
paredness phase in the Standing Order.
To investigate the Township Disaster Management plan
Figure 2 shows the result of classification by the dis-
in Myanmar, the following documents were used in the
aster phases and actors. The Ministry of Welfare, Re-
analysis: the Guideline on Township Disaster Manage-
lief and Resettlement, which plays a primary role in the
ment Plan, the Hlaingbwe Township Disaster Manage-
Disaster Management at the national level, has the great-
ment Plan [7], and the Kyaikmaraw Township Disaster
est number of duties and responsibilities. This ministry
Management Plan [8]. Although the Guideline on Town-
plays a major role in all phases, such as, “Make arrange-
ship Disaster Management Plan is a guideline to support
ments to have helicopters, transport aircraft, ships for in-
townships in developing a disaster management plan, the
land water transport and motor vehicles at the ready for
duties and responsibilities of the Twantay Township Dis-
impact surveillance and rescue operations” in the Alert
aster Preparedness Committee and the subcommittees in
and Warning stage, or, “Form teams and implement roads,
Pyapon Township are given as examples. One of the ob-
bridges and infrastructure restoration depending on prior-
jectives of the publication of the guideline was to provide
ity to prevent disruptions in transportation” in the Relief
a standard template for a township disaster management
and Rehabilitation stage. The Ministry of Education is
plan. Thus, the duties and the responsibilities of the com-
also assigned a large number of items, especially in Nor-
mittees of Twantay and Pyapon can be considered as stan-
mal Times. For example, “Include disaster-related curric-
dard examples of township disaster management plans in
ula at basic education schools, universities and degree col-
Myanmar. Specifically, the Hlaingbwe Township Disaster
leges as required” and, “Carry out repair, maintenance and
Management Plan and the Kyaikmaraw Township Disas-
construction of schools for in areas vulnerable to natural
ter Management Plan are the only two disaster manage-
disasters including storms, ensuring disaster resistance”
ment plans which are available in English. Furthermore,
are the duties of Ministry of Education in Normal Times.
in Myanmar, the production of township disaster man-
agement plans is still in progress, so we could consider

Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018 65

Kikuchi, R. et al.
Table 1. Classification of activity categories.
these examples as precedents, which would be followed
by other townships in Myanmar.
In all documents, the duties and responsibilities are
itemized, grouped by committees. To sum up, the analysis
targets the duties and responsibilities of following: (1) the
Twantay Disaster Preparedness Committee (44 items), (2)
the Pyapon Township subcommittees (52 items), (3) the
Hlaingbwe Township Disaster Preparedness Committee
and subcommittees (86 items), and (4) the Kyaikmaraw
Township Disaster Preparedness Committee and subcom-
mittees (205 items).
For analysis of Japanese municipal disaster manage-
ment plans, the Tsu-shi City Municipal Disaster Manage-
ment Plan [9] was adopted. Tsu-shi is located in Mie pre-
fecture, and its population is the second largest in the pre-
fecture. Tsu-shi has a three-volume disaster management
plan. Each volume corresponds to a disaster type; earth-
quake, flood, and tsunami. This disaster management plan
66
was selected as the Japanese case for this analysis for the
following reasons. First, the population of Tsu-shi and its
area size are similar to Twantay, one of the target town-
ships of Myanmar, and given these similarities in area
size and population, it is likely that the volume and the
contents of disaster management activities for the two ar-
eas are also similar. Second, as noted above, Tsu-shi has
a three-volume disaster management plan, and therefore
its content relatively rich in comparison to other Japanese
municipality disaster management plans. Also, as the Ta-
ble 1 shows, this disaster management plan covers most
of the activity categories. Thus, we could say that the
Tsu-shi Municipality Disaster Management Plan is appro-
priate as a plan to compare.
In the analysis, the volumes for earthquake and flood
are targeted, because tsunami is not a disaster type which
is assumed in all municipalities or townships. Each vol-
ume is composed of three sub-plans: a Disaster Prepared-
Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018

Table 2. Profile of townships.
Source: The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census – The Union
Report, May 2015 (web).
ness Plan, a Disaster Emergency Response Plan, and a
Disaster Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Plan. Each
plan describes actions to be taken, grouped by type. The
details of each action, the necessary information for the
action and the actors, such as the crisis management unit
of the municipality, are also clarified. The actions at the
level where the actor is clear were treated as items in the
analysis. Finally, 287 items were targeted.
The profiles of the targeted townships and municipality
are showed in Table 2.
4.2. Methods
The targeted items are classified by the actors and the
45 activity categories listed in Table 1. For every item,
the actor is specified in the original documents. The clas-
sification of the activity categories was determined on the
basis of activity content.
4.3. Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows the result of the classification by 45 ac-
tivity categories. Here, it needs to be noted that the tar-
geted items are limited to those of the Township Disas-
ter Preparedness Committee in case of Twantay, and sub-
committees in case of Pyapon, while Kyaikmaraw and
Hlaingbwe include all activities of their Township Dis-
aster Preparedness Committee and subcommittees.
The following categories accounts for the largest por-
tion of items in each municipality and township: “Secure
safety of buildings, infrastructure and lifelines” for Tsu-
shi, “Support evacuation life” for Kyaikmaraw, “Disas-
ter management plan” for Hlaingbwe, “Secure safety of
buildings, infrastructure and lifelines” for Twantay, and
“Support evacuation life” for Pyapon. Focusing on the
disaster management phases, particularly after a disaster,
it is revealed that there are more items classified in the
Rehabilitation Phase, than in the Reconstruction Phase
in Kyaikmaraw and Hlaingbwe, while the distribution for
these two phases is rather balanced in Tsu-shi.
At the individual category level, four differences be-
tween the Tsu-shi Municipal Disaster Management Plan
and the Myanmar Township Disaster Management Plan,
especially of Kyaikmaraw and Hlaingbwe were noted.
The first difference is the presence of “Processing
Body” activities. In case of Tsu-shi, two activities, “Pre-
serve dead bodies” and “Cremate victims,” are classified
Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018
A Comparison of Disaster Management Plans
for Both Japan and Myanmar
in this category. However, only one activity for four town-
ships in Myanmar is classified to this category. That ac-
tivity is, “To arrange cremation for dead victims” of the
Pyapon Search and Rescue Subcommittee.
Second, “Secure Safety of buildings, infrastructure and
lifelines” activities take much bigger part in the Tsu-shi
Municipal Disaster Management Plan, than they do for
Kyaikmaraw and Hlaingbwe. An examination of activi-
ties classified in this category, revealed two likely expla-
nations for this difference. The first reason is that activ-
ities to secure the safety of lifelines are detailed in Tsu-
shi. In other words, one item is allocated to each life-
line type such as electricity or gas. The second reason is
that actions for the prevention of overturned furniture and
falling objects are described in the Tsu-shi Disaster Man-
agement Plan in addition to strengthening buildings. In
the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–
2030 [9], Priority 4 is, “Enhancing disaster preparedness
for effective response and to ‘Build Back Better’ in re-
covery, rehabilitation and reconstruction.” In this prior-
ity, promoting the resilience of infrastructures, including
water, transportation, and telecommunications infrastruc-
tures is described as important. Within this context, these
types of activities received higher priority in the township
disaster management plans in Myanmar.
Regarding these two differences, the activities, which
are scarcely described in the township disaster manage-
ment plans, are also not described in the disaster manage-
ment plans of upper level authorities. Thus, it is likely
that the activities of these categories are not mentioned in
any disaster management plan in Myanmar.
In contrast to two previous points, the third point is
that more activities are written in the Kyaikmaraw and
Hlaingbwe plans than those for Tsu-shi in the category of
“Collaboration with other organization.” In particular, the
Myanmar Township Disaster Management Plans includes
many activities related to nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs). This situation is reasonable, considering NGOs’
contribution to disaster management in Myanmar.
Lastly, the activities related to evacuation are ad-
dressed. To examine them, the activities are classified in
detail in Table 3. Though evacuation related activities are
included in every target township disaster management
plan in Myanmar on some level, activities categorized
under “Preparedness for Evacuation” are fewer than are
found in the Tsu-shi Disaster Management Plan. Further-
more, they are not mentioned at all in the Hlaingbwe and
Pyapon plans. At least the Kyaikmaraw Disaster Manage-
ment Plan describes activities within this category such as
the designation of shelters and the preparation for shelter
management. However, other aspects, including “inform
citizens of evacuation information” are lacking.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we outlined the disaster management plan
in Myanmar through its content analysis and compared it
with that of Japan. First, an overview of the legislation
67
Kikuchi, R. et al.
Table 3. Classification of evacuation related activities.
system on disaster management in Myanmar and Japan
was presented, and the differences in the structure of dis-
aster management plans in the two countries were noted.
As a result, the possible issue of the system of disaster
management plan in Myanmar was pointed out. In addi-
tion, we conducted a content analysis of the Standing Or-
der on Natural Disaster Management in Myanmar, which
is the national level disaster management plan in Myan-
mar. In this way, the number of duties and responsibilities
of each actor in each disaster management phase was re-
vealed.
We also conducted a content analysis of the Township
Disaster Management Plan of four townships in Myan-
mar. The classification of items in township disaster man-
agement plans of the activity categories was carried out on
the basis of activity content. Additionally, the results were
compared with the Japanese Municipality Disaster Man-
agement Plan of Tsu-shi. Next, some differences were
described. The differences, such as the description of co-
operation with NGOs, were explained by different situa-
tions in Myanmar and Japan. However, some of the dif-
ferences, such as the description of preparedness for evac-
uation, would indicate that township disaster management
plans in Myanmar lack some activities which need to be
recorded.
The analysis in this study was conducted based on dis-
aster management plans, but actual activities in disaster
management do not necessarily follow these plans. In or-
der to comprehend disaster management at the township
level, further research on actual activities is necessary.
Furthermore, comparison with prepared plans helps to im-
prove disaster management plans in Myanmar, and further
research on the role division between different players,
with consideration of the division of authorities, will en-
rich the considerations of the Disaster Management Plan
in Myanmar.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the JICA-JST SATREPS Project (Ti-
tle: Development of a Comprehensive Disaster Resilience System
and Collaboration Platform in Myanmar, Principal Investigator:
Prof. MEGURO Kimiro).
68
References:
[1] https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/number-dead-and-missing-
myanmar-cyclone-raised-138000 [accessed Jan. 5, 2018]
[2] The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, “Natural Disaster Manage-
ment Law,” 2013.
[3] The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, the Union Government,
the Ministry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement, “Disaster
Management Rules,” 2014.
[4] The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, “Standing Order on Natu-
ral Disaster Managmenet in Myanmar,” 2011.
[5] Relief and Resettlement Department, General Administration De-
partment, ADPC, “Guideline on Township Disaster Management
Plan,” 2010.
[6] Japan, “Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act,” 1959 (in Japanese).
[7] The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, “Natural Disaster Manage-
ment Law,” 2013.
[8] The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, the Union Government,
the Ministry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement, “Disaster
Management Rules,” 2014.
[9] The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, “Standing Order on Natu-
ral Disaster Management in Myanmar,” 2009.
[10] Relief and Resettlement Department, General Administration De-
partment, ADPC, “Guideline on Township Disaster Management
Plan,” 2010.
[11] Japan, “Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act,” 1959 (in Japanese).
[12] Hlaingbwe Township, “Hlaingbwe Township Disaster Management
Plan,” 2012.
[13] Kyaikmaraw Township, “Kyaikmaraw Township Disaster Manage-
ment Plan,” 2015.
[14] Tsu-Shi City Municipality, “Tsu-Shi Area Disaster Management
Plan,” 2015.
[15] United Nations, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
2015-2030,” 2015.
[16] Y. Tahira, A. Kawasaki, and N. Ichihara, “Disaster Management
System of the Myanmar Central Government after Shifting to Civil-
ian Rule and its Challenges,” Institute of Social Safety Science,
No.21, pp. 189-198, 2013.
[17] JICA, “Basic Research for ASEAN Area Disaster Management
Cooporation, Final Report, Myanamar (transrated by the author),”
2012.
[18] ADPC, “Instituitional Arrangements for Disaster Management in
Myanmar,” 2009.
[19] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “Disaster Management in
Japan,” 2015.
[20] M. Numada, S. Kondo, M. Inoue, and K. Meguro, “Analysis of De-
scription of Local Disaster Management Plan for Smooth and Ef-
fective Wide-Area Support System During Large-Scale Disaster,”
JDR, Vol.7 No.2, pp. 147-159, 2012.
[21] N. Maki, “Proposal for Disaster Management Act in High Seismic-
ity Decades All hazards, All disciplines, and Response to Mega-
Disaster,” Institute of Social Safety Science, No.11, 2009.
Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018
 A Comparison of Disaster Management Plans
for Both Japan and Myanmar

Name:
Rena Kikuchi Name:
Khin Than Yu
Affiliation:
Master Student, Department of Civil Engineer-
Affiliation:
ing, Faculty of Engineering, the University of
Pro-Rector, Yangon Technological University
Tokyo
Address:
Insein 11011, Yangon, Yangon Region, Myanmar
Brief Career:
1991- 2001 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering , Yangon
Address: Technological University
4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan 2001-2002 Deputy Director, Department of Technical Promotion and
Brief Career: Coordination, Ministry of Science and Technology
2015- Graduate Student, the University of Tokyo 2005 Professor (Acting Rector), Myanmar Aerospace Engineering
University (MAEU)

Name:
Muneyoshi Numada

Affiliation: Name:
Lecturer, International Center for Urban Safety Kimiro Meguro
Engineering, Institute of Industrial Science, the
University of Tokyo Affiliation:
Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, The
University of Tokyo

Address:
4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Brief Career:
2009- Associate Researcher, the University of Tokyo Address:
2014- Lecturer, the University of Tokyo 4-6-1-Be604, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
Brief Career:
1991 Research Associate, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of
Tokyo
1995 Associate Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of
Name: Tokyo
May Myat Mon 1995 Associate Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of
Tokyo
2007 Director of International Center for Urban Safety (ICUS), Institute of
Affiliation:
Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo
Master Student, Yangon Technological University
2008 Visiting Professor of The Open University of Japan
Address: 2010 Professor, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies,
Insein 11101, Yangon, Yangon Region, Myanmar The University of Tokyo
2015 The director of the Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering
2016 Special Advisor of Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
Selected Publications:
Name: • M. Kohiyama, A. S. Kiremidjian, K. Meguro, and M. Ohara, “Incentives
Tun Naing and Disincentives Analysis for Improving Policy for Seismic Risk
Management of Homeowners in Japan,” Natural Hazards Review, ASCE,
Affiliation: Vol.9, No.4, pp. 170-178, 2008.
Professor, Yangon Technological University • Matsuoka and Nojima, “Building Damage Estimation by Integration of
Seismic Intensity Information and Satellite L-band SAR Imagery,” Remote
Sensing, MDPI, Vol.2, No.9, pp. 2111-2126, 2010.
• K. Meguro and H. Tagel-Din, “Applied Element Simulation of RC
Structure under Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Structural Engineering,
ASCE, Vol.127, No.11, pp. 1295-1305, 2001.
Address: Academic Societies & Scientific Organizations:
Insein 11011, Yangon, Yangon Region, Myanmar • Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE)
Brief Career: • Institute of Social Safety Science (ISSS)
1995 B.Sc (Geology), Mandalay University • Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering (JAEE)
1998 D.A.G (Engineering Geology), Post-graduate Diploma in Applied • International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE)
Geology, Yangon University • World Seismic Safety Initiative (WSSI)
2002 M.Sc (Engineering Geology), Yangon University • Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science
2003 M.Res (Geotechnical Engineering), Yangon University • Japan Society for Active Fault Studies (JSAF)
2010 Ph.D (Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering), Universitas Gadjah
Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, and Kyoto University, Japan
2013 Post-Doctoral Fellowship (Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering),
Kyoto University, Japan
2015 Short-term Researcher (Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering),
Kyoto University, Japan

Journal of Disaster Research Vol.13 No.1, 2018 69