Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
___________________________________________________________________________
Committee : Board
Date : Monday 19 October 2015
Time : 08.30 – 16:30 hrs. (lunch will be arranged)
Place : Regina Palace Hotel, Stresa, Italy
Reference : 2015_milan_board_agenda.doc
Chairman : Mr. Vic Krahn, AIPH
Secretary : Mr. Tim Briercliffe, AIPH
___________________________________________________________________________
1. Opening by the chairman, AIPH president Mr. Vic Krahn and approval of the agenda
2. A. Minutes
Minutes of the Board meeting 18 March, 2015, Paris (annex 1) – already approved by email.
- Matters arising
4. Financial update
4.1. Update on legal case against Mr. Langeslag
The final court hearing should take place on 20 October. Mr Vic Krahn will provide an
update to the Board
4.2. Request for payment of historical expenses from Mr. Doeke Faber (Annex 8)
Mr Tim Briercliffe will summarise a request from Mr. Faber for payment of historical
expenses. The Board needs to make a decision on whether payment is appropriate.
4.3. 2014 P&L and Balance Sheet and Explanatory Notes (annex 9a and 9b).
These were discussed during the last Board meeting so are provided for information.
These accounts were the basis for the Assurance Report provided by the accountants
and will be presented to members at the General Meeting on 21 October.
4.4. 2014 Assurance Report (Annex 10)
As agreed by the Board through email the 2014 accounts were not subjected to a full
audit. Instead the AIPH bookkeeper/accountants were contracted to prepare an
Assurance Report to provide an independent evaluation of AIPH financial affairs.
4.5. 2015 P&L, Balance Sheet to date and Explanatory Notes (annex 11a, 11b and 11c - to
follow)
4.6. Cash flow forecast (annex 12)
In light of the fact that funds will run low until the first gate fees are collected from
Antalya and Tangshan Expos a cash flow forecast has been prepared.
1/3
4.7. 2016 Budget and long term forecast (annex 13a, 13b)
6. AIPH Governance
6.1. Election process (annex 15)
Mr Tim Briercliffe will outline the election process to take place during the General
Meeting. According to the re-election schedule within annex 15 the following positions
will be open for election:
President – Candidate: Mr. Bernard Oosterom (Netherlands)
Vice President – Candidate: Mr. Tim Edwards (UK)
Chair Novelty Protection Committee – Candidate: Mr. Tim Edwards (UK)
Chair Green City Committee – Candidate: Ms. Karen Tambayong (Indonesia)
Representative Region 2 – Candidate: Mr. Gijs Kok (Netherlands)
6.2. Regional representation on AIPH Board (annex 16)
During the last meeting Board approved new regions to be proposed to the General
Meeting. These changes have also been incorporated within proposed changes to AIPH
Regulations to be discussed in 6.3.
6.3. AIPH Elections procedure – Regional Representatives (annex 17)
A new procedure for electing regional representatives has been added to the AIPH
Regulations (Section V.4).
6.4. Revision of AIPH Regulations (annex 17)
In addition to 6.3 other small changes have been made to the AIPH Regulations. These
are highlighted in Annex 17. Board requested to recommend approval of revised
Regulations to General Meeting.
7. AIPH Strategy
7.1. AIPH Strategic Plan – Action Plan Update (annex 18)
Mr Tim Briercliffe will update the Board on progress of Strategy Actions
8. Committees
8.1. Committee work plans and budgets (annex 19)
The chairs of the Committees will explain workplan activity since the last meeting and
proposals for 2016.
8.2. Terms of reference (annex 20)
Updated Terms of Reference for each Committee will be presented to the General
meeting:
8.3. Relevant issues for the committees
8.4. Science and Education
Mr. Tim Briercliffe will update the Board on the development of a Growers conference in
2018.
9. Statistical yearbook
9.1. Update on sales of the 2014 edition and launch of 2015 edition
Mr Andras Treer and Ms Maria Wallin will update the Board.
2/3
11.1. International Vision for Global Ornamental Horticulture project to evaluate the future for
the production industry (annex 21)
Mr. Tim Briercliffe will introduce to the Board this new project funded by the former Dutch
Product Board. There will be a specific session on this project for members on 20
October.
11.2.Proposed new group for Flower Auction Markets
Mr. Kevin Chung proposed the idea of a new group within AIPH to address the common
issues for Flower Auction Markets. This idea has been welcomed by FloraHolland and
Holambra (Brazil) and will be proposed to the Board to approve investigating the concept
further.
12. Exhibitions
12.1. Revision of the regulations on exhibitions (annex 22a and 22b)
Mr. Tim Briercliffe will introduce the proposed new Regulations for Exhibitions. These
draft regulations take on board points raised during the last meeting of the Marketing
Committee and the last Board meeting. These draft regulations will be proposed to the
Marketing Committee on 21 October 2015 to secure final agreement.
12.2.Contracts for Expo Oraganisers
Mr. Tim Briercliffe will introduce the contracts that have been signed (Almere, Annex 23)
and those to be signed for Tangshan (Annex 24), Taichung (Annex 25), Beijing (Annex
26)
12.3.Expo Antalya 2016 – progress concerns (annex 27)
Mr. Tim Briercliffe will detail the current situation regarding progress at this Expo
16. Closure
After this meeting all participants are invited to dinner
3/3
Minutes (Final)
___________________________________________________________________________
Committee : Board
Date : Tuesday 17 March, 2015
Time : 09.00 – 16:30 hrs.
Place : Paris Marriott Opera Ambassador Hotel, Paris, France
Reference : 2015_paris_board_minutes_draft.doc
Chairman : Mr. Vic Krahn, AIPH
Secretary : Mr. Tim Briercliffe, AIPH
___________________________________________________________________________
Present:
Mr Vic Krahn Chairman
Mr Shinya Wada Vice-Chairman and Representative Region VI
Mr Bernard Oosterom Vice-Chairman and Chair of Novelty Protection Committee and
Representative Region II
Mr Tim Edwards Representative Region I
Mr Bill Stensson Representative Region IV
Ms Karen Tambayong Chair Green City Committee
Ms Haiyan Kong Representative Region VI
Mr Osman Bagdatlioglu Representative Region V
Mr Andras Treer Chair Statistics Committee and Representative Region III
Mr Gery Heungens Chair Environment Committee
Mr Kevin Chung Chair of Marketing Committee
In attendance:
Mr Tim Briercliffe Secretary General
Ms Maria Wallin AIPH Business & Events Manager
Prof Qixiang Zhang China Flower Association
Ms Sevgin Utlulig OAIB, Turkey
Apologies:
Mr Bill Hardy Chair Science & Education Committee
1. Opening by the chairman, AIPH president Mr. Vic Krahn and approval of the agenda
The Chairman welcomed everyone, including Professor Zhang and Maria Wallin. Mr. Krahn
told Board members that we need to work to keep relevant to growers and all that we are
engaged in. He is excited about the new Expo Conference and this helps us keep relevant.
Also we’re working now to our Strategic Plan so a lot has been put in place.
2. A. Minutes
Minutes of the Board meeting 15 September, 2014, Qingdao (annex 1) – These had already
been approved by email. This was noted by the Board.
- Matters arising- none
4. Financial update
4.1. Update on legal case against Mr. Langeslag
2/8
V Krahn updated the Board. Following the negative result last year from the Dutch
courts AIPH was permitted to appeal. The appeal was prepared by Diusens lawyers.
To ensure that all arguments were fully covered V Krahn and B Oosterom met with
another legal firm in November and it was agreed that they should audit the appeal
prepared by Diusens. This was done and the Diusens work was endorsed. The appeal
was due to be heard in January but it was delayed. The judge was supposed to reach a
verdict by the end of February but this will now be 29 March. We do not yet know the
outcome.
K Tambayong asked what the consequences would be of the outcome. V Krahn said
that this depends on the outcome. K Tambayong advised caution in not spending too
much more pursuing this. V Krahn confirmed that there would be no further spending on
this issue without Board approval.
4.2. Bank account status
T Briercliffe informed the Board that AIPH had finally opened a bank account with
Barclays in the UK. Within this account we will run a Euro and Sterling (GBP) account.
4.3. 2014 P&L, Balance Sheet and Explanatory Notes
T Briercliffe introduced the draft 2014 P&L and Balance Sheet to the Board along with
the explanatory notes which were appreciated. T Briercliffe explained the foreign
currency exchange losses figure. T Edwards suggested that we could seek to reduce
this loss by hedging money and buying currency forwards. H Kong asked whether we
could pay UK bills in Euros but it was pointed out that this would still be converted to the
exchange rate and UK companies would not take the currency risk on this. H Kong
asked whether this risk could be shared with the supplier. W Stensson advised that
forward buying of currency is usually only done for large transactions and that the
amounts discussed here would probably be too small to make this worth considering. A
Treer suggested increasing the amount of income gained in GBP. It was agreed that
when large sums are being billed (e.g. expo gate fees) then AIPH should consider the
most favourable currency for that transaction.
Board asked for a more detailed breakdown on the income and expenditure from the
2014 Green City Conference in London.
4.4. 2015 P&L and Balance Sheet to date
T Briercliffe introduced the reports to end of January 2015. There were no comments on
this.
4.5. Updated long term best and worst case forecasts and Income Generation Plan
T Briercliffe introduced the different forecasts which were provided to the Board to flag
issues to consider when planning the 2016 budget.
K Tambayong suggested that costs could be reduced by making more use of members
within a region rather than always sending the President or SG. This would also help
reduce carbon footprint.
W Stensson pointed out that the ‘worst case’ forecast still assumes new income from
IGOTY and gate fees. A true worst case forecast should allow for these not coming
through. H Kong supported the comment by W Stensson and also proposed evaluating
SG performance against financial income success and rewarding accordingly.
T Briercliffe mentioned that there will also be new income from the FloraHolland project
but as this has only just been discovered there are no numbers included for this.
3/8
from members on what they are doing for AIPH in their own countries. A Treer noted that he
was very happy with the reporting.
6. AIPH Governance
6.1. Election process for Vice President
T Briercliffe outlined the election process to take place during the General Meeting and
informed the Board that only one nomination had been received – Professor Zhang
(CFA)
6.2. Re-election process for Board members
T Briercliffe explained the process of re-election for Board members. During the General
Meeting W Stensson and A Treer would stand down and be put forward for re-election to
the Board.
6.3. Regional representation on AIPH Board (annex 9)
T Briercliffe introduced Annex 9 which had been prepared following the
recommendations made at the last Board meeting in Qingdao. Board commented on
the proposal.
S Wada – Region 4 (N America) is too small. W Stensson suggested including Central
America, down to Panama.
H Kong challenged the need for having regional representation and highlighted that
keeping key experience and skills on the Board is more important. She also questioned
the need to separate SE Asia from Asia and putting SE Asia and Oceania in the same
region. K Tambayong said there was a good reason for SE Asia to be a specific region.
W Stensson noted that we need to formalize the regional election procedure within our
Regulations. H Kong suggested that AIPH can provide certified documents when any
AIPH member from any country or region needs to apply for funding support from local
governments.
H Kong recommended leaving scope for the Board to be able to co-opt someone with
particular skills/benefits to the association.
V Krahn raised the issue of whether we need to specify what part of the world Vice
Presidents should come from or whether this is best left to Board discretion.
W Stensson suggested that we add a statement to the Regulations that says the Board
is encouraged to think about an east/west split when making appointments.
S Wada commented that Vice Presidents should be at least from different regions. T
Briercliffe urged the Board not to create too many rules that may later be regretted.
T Edwards said that we should state that the Board is encouraged to create a
geographically balanced mix. Therefore not too prescriptive.
H Kong suggested that the SG be asked to propose new Regulations for the election of
both regional representatives and committee chairs.
V Krahn suggested that a decision on this could be formulated as follows:
Motion to propose a new regional structure, revised according to the opinions of the
Board, to the General Meeting in Congress 2015 including the change that Central
America will be included with North America. Proposed T Edwards, seconded W
Stensson. All in favour.
V Krahn proposed that new regulations for elections within regions and for committee
chairs be prepared for the next meeting. All in favour.
4/8
S Utlulig noted that the new logo looks similar to the Apple iphone photos icon. T
Briercliffe said that this had been noted before and checked with the designers. It had
been agreed that it was sufficiently different not to be a concern.
K Tambayong said that she did not really like the Green City sub-brand and asked if it
could it be expanded to open up more. T Briercliffe noted that this was a section of the
main brand and if you changed it then that link would not work. W Stensson suggested
that rather than a separate design for Green City you could just make the whole flower
shape green for Green City work. A Treer suggested that maybe Green City did not
need a separate brand at this stage but this might be useful for the future. S Wada
suggested that the black and white version of the logo seemed a bit harsh and maybe it
could be more greys than blacks.
T Briercliffe explained that he had been in discussion with a trademark lawyer to look
into protecting the new brand. However, due to the number of countries where the
brand would have to be registered the cost was prohibitive (i.e. over 150,000 euro). T
Edwards suggested that we could just register it in the countries where there will be an
expo and we should start with Turkey. A Treer suggested we just get it trademarked in
UK. W Stensson suggested building the cost of registration into the expo fees to
organisers. K Tambayong said that she would get an alternative registration quote
within Indonesia as she thinks she may be able to achieve this at a lower cost.
7.2. AIPH Strategic Plan – Action Plan Update (Annex 11)
T Briercliffe updated the Board on progress against Strategy Actions. The update was
taken as read.
7.3. Region VI Secretariat Support
T Briercliffe informed the Board that V Krahn, B Oosterom and T Briercliffe had met with
Ms Hongmei Liu during the FloraHolland Trade Fair in November 2014. Ms. Liu is a
grower with nurseries in China and Germany. During this meeting Ms. Liu offered to
provide help to AIPH as she believes in the importance of the association. Following
that meeting T Briercliffe contacted H Kong to suggest that AIPH appoint Ms Liu as a
Regional Manager for Region VI, reporting to the SG. This proposal was not supported
by CFA and subsequently Ms. Liu withdrew her offer to work with AIPH in this capacity.
It was noted by V Krahn and T Briercliffe that Ms Liu had some particular skills in relation
to her knowledge of the Chinese and European nursery industries and these may prove
valuable to AIPH in future. It was agreed that in the event that Ms Liu could provide
valuable support on a particular issue or project then she could be engaged to do this by
agreement between AIPH and CFA.
8. Committees
8.1. Review of Committee work plans and budgets (annex 12)
Green City Committee – K Tambayong asked about the status of the Terms of
Reference and these need to be updated. For example she would like to see them
include a statement that AIPH will include one conference and one exchange platform
each year. We also need to include reference to the health benefits of Green Cities. V
Krahn questioned whether ‘green’ is the right term to use. K Tambayong agreed this
should be reviewed. V Krahn suggested that the Green City Working Group become a
virtual group as exists with Novelty Protection Committee.
Novelty Protection Committee – B Oosterom updated the Board on the work on EU
implementation of Nagoya protocol and the extra funding raised from members and
outside sources. Also the EU is deciding on whether to adopt patent laws which we
think is harmful to the sector. B Oosterom requested that AIPH should be an observer to
CPVO. This will cost 10,000 euro per year. Would like to fund one third from members
and other orgs, one third with money saved from the NP Budget and one third from
FloraHolland. V Krahn asked whether it will affect this year? Yes. This would involve
5/8
seeking to raise additional funds from members again and half would be required this
year. G Heungens asked whether AIPH would be looking to collect money from all
members or just the SPG. B Oosterom said all members would be invited to contribute.
T Edwards suggested getting companies that would benefit to become affiliate members
and use the income from this to support this activity. V Krahn pointed out that if funding
requests are being sent to members then these need to be explained very clearly and
must come through the SG. Board members agreed to this request on the basis that it
will require no further financial input from AIPH beyond the existing budget. The financial
situation will be reviewed at the next meeting.
8.2. Terms of reference
Committee chairs should ensure that Committee Terms of Reference are updated ahead
of the annual congress.
8.3. Relevant issues for the committees- no further issues raised.
8.4. Science and Education (annex 13)
T Briercliffe summarised the discussions held during the meeting of the new AIPH
Science Group, held at IPM Essen on 28 January 2015. As part of this AIPH members
will be surveyed to find out the key areas of research where they feel that an
international growers conference would be most beneficial. If a draft programme can be
pulled together then this could be held in association with the ISHS congress in Istanbul
in 2018. Also the group is looking at developing a database of researchers operating in
horticultural science along with their areas of interest. The group plans to meet again at
IPM 2016.
8.5. New Projects (annex 14)
V Krahn outlined a proposal for a procedure for members who wish to initiate new
projects/initiatives within AIPH. V Krahn explained that this form should be used when
requesting work from the secretariat or additional funds. W Stensson asked what the
rules should be for using this and when it should be submitted. He suggested that
funding requests should be circulated to the Board six weeks before a meeting. T
Edwards suggested that a budget timeline is circulated to the Board.
Board agreed on the adoption of this procedure.
9. Statistical yearbook
9.1. Update on sales of the 2014 edition and report on plans for online sales and the 2015
edition
A Treer updated the Board following the recent working group meeting with Hannover
University and Union Fleurs at IPM Essen on 30 January 2015. We are continuing
discussion on how to make the PDF available but still protecting it from being circulated
to those that have not paid for it. There is no clear solution on this yet. A Treer said that
the current pricing was being discussed. Currently the CD costs 110 euro + VAT; we
would look to increase this but make the report also available in sections. The possibility
of a special rate for students has been discussed but it was felt that students have no
money so any price will be too high. He informed the Board that CD format is not the
future and that the next edition will only be available as an online download from the
AIPH website.
In terms of content A Treer said that we would like more data codes for categorising the
trade data and that he hoped B Oosterom could assist us in accessing more detailed
information from the Dutch auctions. We also want to fill the gaps for countries where
we lack information and suggested that ENA could maybe help with this too.
T Briercliffe reminded members to ensure that they completed the survey that was
circulated recently. G Heungens said that Belgium carry out an annual survey of
members and he was happy to share this.
6/8
10. International Grower of the Year
10.1. Launch of new IGOTY competition
T Briercliffe updated the Board on discussions with FCI and IPM regarding the plan to
hold the next IGOTY Awards Gala Dinner during IPM 2016 in January 2016. This was
welcomed by the Board. T Edwards suggested that we stop using the existing ‘rose’ logo
and replace with our own. He also suggested selling tables at the dinner for countries.
Regarding categories A Treer suggested combining nursery stock and trees and adding
cut flowers. G Heungens suggested making the categories cut flowers, outdoor produced,
undercover produced, young plants.
G Heungens said that we should consider some form of support to potential winners to
incentivize participation and maybe keep the subsidy for travel.
Q Zhang asked whether the competition includes fruit and vegetables. V Krahn said that
it does not but this is something we need to consider for the longer term.
T Briercliffe said that this would be presented to members at the General Meeting but with
modified categories following this discussion.
11. Exhibitions
11.1. Revision of the regulations on exhibitions (annex 15)
T Briercliffe introduced the proposed new Regulations for Exhibitions. These draft
regulations take on board points raised during the last meeting of the Marketing
Committee as well as some new ideas. These draft regulations will be proposed to the
Marketing Committee on 18 March 2015 but agreement on a final version is not expected
until the annual congress.
Comments on Annex 15:
Section 1 – K Tambayong suggests ‘increase global appreciation for the use of
plants’ rather than ‘appreciation for horticulture’. Also should include objective to
improve local economy (through tourism, etc)
Section 3 – T Edwards suggested that the proposed new 2% gate fee for A1 expos
should say ‘up to 2% as determined by AIPH’. This gives flexibility to AIPH to add
further controls (and costs) if deemed necessary to make the expo successful but
avoid penalizing those already experienced and established in expos.
Section 4 – T Edwards suggested that experts should be used for site inspections
and K Tambayong suggested that all Board members should be given the
opportunity to take part in these. B Oosterom suggested that if site inspections are
held in the four years before an expo then these should be done by experts (e.g.
engineers, etc). W Stensson agreed with this and suggested that this cost be
incorporated in the fees.
Section 8 – Regarding the provision of a AIPH staff member on site if was
suggested that we should have the option of requiring this depending on the view of
the application.
Section 9 – Fees. It was suggested that a fee called a ‘gate fee’ cannot be charged
before gate income has been gained. T Edwards suggested that we call it a ‘license
fee’ and we make this a fixed fee, not linked with visitor numbers or gate income.
This could be different for each category or based on predicted numbers/income.
The Board were keen that we further investigate this proposal.
H Kong said that whatever is agreed it is important to have this detailed within a
contractual agreement with the organisers.
K Tambayong made the point that promotion of Green City principals should be
incorporated.
11.2.Guide for Expo Organisers (annex 16)
T Briercliffe had circulated the final draft of the Expo Guide. This was welcomed by the
Board.
7/8
11.3.Expo Antalya 2016 – progress concerns (annex 17)
T Briercliffe and B Oosterom presented their concerns about the progress at Antalya
following recent visits. T Briercliffe explained that we had only just received a response to
the letter that was sent in December 2014. It was felt that a change in leadership and
management at the Expo Agency would improve the situation.
11.4.Expo Antalya 2016 – AIPH communications with Antalya Expo Agency
O Bagdatlioglu explained to the Board his disappointment that the December report was
sent to the Antalya Board without his final approval. However, since this time the matter
had been discussed with the SG and a new working arrangement agreed. O Bagdatlioglu
said that AIPH needs to be more active in insisting on expo inspections which are very
important for stimulating activity. He also supported the use of professional inspectors.
At this point T Briercliffe raised a concern from the organisers of Floriade Almere 2022.
They had been sent a contract to sign which referred to compliance with the Regulations
that would be agreed at the Annual Congress 2015. Almere said that they could not sign
an open-ended contract like that. The Board agreed to leave it to the Executive
Committee to develop a suitable contract for Almere.
15. Closure
V Krahn thanked Board members for their participation.
8/8
AIPH Membership Application Form
Active Membership
Please complete and return the application form, in English, to AIPH Secretary General, Tim
Briercliffe at sg@aiph.org. AIPH meetings and communications are in English. Please ensure the
named contacts are able to speak, read and understand the English language.
A copy of the Charter or Articles of Association and Regulations for your association.
The most recent statement of financial accounts for your organisation
3 Country ITALY
7 Website WWW.ANVE.IT
From 2012 to 2014, ANVE held the presidency of ENA, the European
Nurserystock Association. Currently, its two delegates are in the plant
protection and promotion working groups. The latter draws up
mediumterm strategies for the sector and recommends structural
policies to the most important European institutions, such as the
11 Total number of members 859 MEMBERS (Ordinary and supporting members) AND PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT WITH “DISTRETTO FLORICOLO INTERPROVINCIALE LUCCA-
PISTOIA” AND “ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA ARCHITETTURA DEL
PAESAGGIO”
12 Number of ornamentals plant 803
and flower growers
represented
14 Number of landscaping 32
businesses represented
16 Why you want to join AIPH TO JOIN OF A INTERNATIONAL AND WORLD WIDE NETWORK; MAKE
PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES; LOOKING FOR NEW MARKETS; ENHANCE
THE KNOWLEDGES; SHARE INFORMATIONS.
Pagina 1 di 2
SITUAZIONE ECONOMICA AL 31/12/2014 DAL AL 31/12/2014
Conto Descrizione conto Saldo dare Saldo avere
** COSTI, SPESE E PERDITE
66/30/025 CANCELLERIA 322,78
66/30/491 ALTRI ACQUISTI INDEDUCIBILI 22,90
66/30/*** ALTRI ACQUISTI 345,68
66/**/*** COSTI P/MAT.PRI,SUSS.,CON.E MER. 345,68
68/05/160 PRESTAZIONI COLLEGIO SINDACALE 1.346,84
68/05/220 RIMB. PIE' LISTA ATTIN. ATTIV. 5.552,44
68/05/261 COMP.PROF. ATTINENTI ATTIVITA' 15.613,01
68/05/265 COMP.PROF.NON DIR.AFFER.ATTIVITA 1.483,78
68/05/300 PARTECIPAZIONE FIERE MANIFEST. 81.944,35
68/05/325 SPESE CELLULARI 494,28
68/05/330 SPESE POSTALI E DI AFFRANCATURA 7,08
68/05/341 PASTI/SOGGIORNI-SPESE DI RAPPRES 1.045,30
68/05/346 SPESE PER VIAGGI 901,66
68/05/360 SPESE PER BORSE DI STUDIO 2.000,00
68/05/370 ONERI BANCARI 341,80
68/05/386 TEN.PAGHE,CONT.,DICH.DA LAV.AUT. 3.339,67
68/05/490 ALTRI SERVIZI DEDUCIBILI 3.949,30
68/05/520 SPESE PER PASTI E PERNOTT. 2.701,31
68/05/*** COSTI PER SERVIZI 120.720,82
68/**/*** COSTI PER SERVIZI 120.720,82
74/20/010 AMM.TO MARCHI DI FABB.E DI COMM. 120,00
74/20/*** AMM.TO CONCESS.,LICENZE,MARCHI 120,00
74/**/*** AMM.TI IMM. IMMATERIALI 120,00
75/30/040 AMM.TO ORD.ARREDAMENTO 90,00
75/30/*** AMM.TO ALTRI BENI 90,00
75/**/*** AMM.TO IMM. MAT. - ORDINARIO 90,00
84/05/005 IMPOSTA DI BOLLO 100,00
84/05/070 DIRITTI CAMERALI 30,00
84/05/*** IMPOSTE E TASSE 130,00
84/10/005 PERDITE SU CREDITI 6.032,50
84/10/035 MULTE E AMMENDE INDEDUCIBILI 23,40
84/10/055 SOPRAV. PASSIVE ORD.INDEDUCIBILI 367,13
84/10/090 ABBUONI/ARROTONDAMENTI PASSIVI 17,59
84/10/190 ALTRI ONERI DI GEST. DEDUC. 79,20
84/10/191 ALTRI ONERI DI GEST.INDEDUCIBILI 4,11
84/10/*** ALTRI ONERI DIVERSI DI GESTIONE 6.523,93
84/**/*** ONERI DIVERSI DI GESTIONE 6.653,93
88/20/046 INTERESSI PASSIVI INDEDUCIBILI 5,00
88/20/*** VERSO ALTRI (0NERI FINANZIARI) 5,00
88/**/*** INT. PASS.E ALTRI ONERI FINANZ. 5,00
*** TOTALE COSTI 127.935,43
** RICAVI E PROFITTI
58/10/005 RICAVI PER PRESTAZ. DI SERVIZI 8.000,00
58/10/506 RICAVI PARTECIPAZIONE FIERE 73.944,35
58/10/*** RICAVI DELLE PRESTAZ. - IMPRESE 81.944,35
58/**/*** RICAVI 81.944,35
64/05/100 ABBUONI/ARROT. ATTIVI IMP. 0,01
64/05/115 SOPRAVVENIENZE ORDINARIE ATTIVE 9.238,73
64/05/155 PROVENTI PER LIBERALITA' 6.000,00
64/05/390 QUOTE ASSOCIATIVE 40.800,00
64/05/*** ALTRI RICAVI E PROVENTI 56.038,74
64/**/*** ALTRI RICAVI E PROVENTI 56.038,74
87/20/035 INT.ATT.SU DEPOSITI BANCARI 1,77
87/20/*** PROV. DIVERSI DAI PRECEDENTI 1,77
87/**/*** ALTRI PROVENTI FINANZIARI 1,77
*** TOTALE RICAVI 137.984,86
**** AVANZO DI ESERCIZIO 10.049,43
***** TOTALE A PAREGGIO 137.984,86 137.984,86
Pagina 2 di 2
AIPH Membership
Application Form
Please complete and return the application form, in English, to AIPH Secretary General, Tim
Briercliffe at sg@aiph.org.
AIPH meetings and communications are in English. Please ensure the named contacts are able to
speak, read and understand the English language.
A copy of the Charter or Articles of Association and Regulations for your association.
The most recent statement of financial accounts for your organisation
3 Country GREECE
6 Fax number
Postal Address
MICHALAS NURSERIES, FRAGAVILLA, AMALIADA 27200 GREECE
14 Number of landscaping The promo team has 8 members, landscape market professionals. All
businesses represented Greece has more or less 3000 professionals
16 Why you want to join AIPH TO ENLARGE OUR FORCE AND EXCHANGE EXPERIENCE AND
KNOW HOW
17 Estimated value of national About 7.000.000 euros (tension for this year)- last year about 4.5 million
production of euro (the exports)
flowers/ornamental plants
(euros) About 12.000.000 euros circulation (estimation for this year)
The companies and cooperatives that are members of HE.P.M.E.A cover an important
range of varieties of plant materials such us:
-indoors and tropical plants (ficus, orchids, ardisias , small plants in special
complexes pots etc)
Also, among the members are the most important Greek manufacture in pots, special
editions about gardening and landscape and a worldwide logistic platform about
plants.
These companies are the most important Greek Exporters in this field of
horticulture/garden market.
The importance of these Association reflects also great garden design and landscape
planning approach, construction and maintenance that guides to full “eco-system
services” in sustainable development, as E.U newly “Green Infrastructure”
Programme asks for. Also, HE.P.M.E.A, will focus to exchange “know how” with
foreign countries and participate in E.U programmes.
(*) the first permanent council are : Thanos Vaiopoulos (TANI), Sotiris Mammos
(MAMMOS NURSERIES), Aristos Triantafyllou (MODAGRI) , Vasilis
Zafeiropoulos (RHODOLAND), Stathis Kornaros (CRESSA LAND COOP) and
Pantelis Michalas (MICHALAS PLANTS)
info@esefy.gr // thymakis@agroartistico.com
mob: +306958104535
18/09/2015
HELLENIC
PLANT METERIAL
EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION
About HE.P.M.EA
1
18/09/2015
2
18/09/2015
3
18/09/2015
First movements….
During this period, a lot of research and efforts in other markets
(such us Iran, Turkey, Ukraine, Russia, Holland, Italy , Qatar and
Kenya) and participation in the 1st round table of E.N.A
(European Nursery stock Association) (Catania, 25-27 June
2013), gave a remarkable potential to HE.P.M.E.A efforts to start
to expand the exports of plant materials , with important results
already.
4
18/09/2015
• -indoors and tropical plants (ficus, orchids, ardisias , small plants in special
complexes pots etc)
5
18/09/2015
Popular products
6
18/09/2015
7
18/09/2015
8
HEPMEA Members
HONORARY MEMBER
Vaiopoulos Thanos
HELLENIC GARDEN
TEAM-THE PROMO
TEAM OF HEPMEA
Thymakis Nikos www.agroartistico.com
Gounidis Panagiotis www.giardino.gr
Vekkos Cornelious www.vekkosgarden.gr
Kanaki Matina
Ktenakis Giannis
Gryllis Giannis www.greekponds.gr
Nikoloudis Konstantinos www.consultit.gr
Anagnostou Michalis www.xomata.gr
EXPERT CONSULTANT
Thymakis Nikos
LAWYER
Apostolaki Aryro
Accountant
MANTO KARALI
Annex 4a – Affiliate Membership application from Val’hor, France
To AIPH Board:
I am pleased to say that Val'hor (France) would like to become a member of AIPH. As we heard in
Paris they are heavily involved in promoting the industry in France, especially through their Green
City project and other promotional initiatives. They are particularly keen to participate in AIPH work
and information sharing in this area.
However, due to the nature of their organisation they are not able to join as a Full Member.
Although they do meet the criteria from an AIPH perspective they cannot do this from their own
governance perspective. The true growers association in France is FNPHP. Val'hor have discussed
AIPH membership with FNPHP but this is a small and struggling organisation that does not have the
time or funds to support a commitment to AIPH membership. Val'hor would like to be involved with
AIPH but cannot formally represent the interests of French growers so would not be permitted to
take this role. Val'hor is an organisation funded through a levy (tax) on the industry which it uses to
fund its promotional initiatives.
Therefore, Val'hor will apply for Affiliate Membership of AIPH as this is the only route they are
permitted to follow from their own governance perspective. They have the same arrangement with
Union Fleurs where they are also Affiliate Members. Their request to join as an affiliate is not
related to the cost of membership but is because of the role they play in the French horticulture
industry.
I propose to the Board that we should accept Val'hor as an Affiliate Member of AIPH for the reasons
outlined above.
Regards
Tim Briercliffe
Secretary General
AIPH – International Association of Horticultural Producers
AIPH Affiliate Membership
Application Form
Please complete and return the application form, in English, to AIPH Secretary General, Tim
Briercliffe at sg@aiph.org.
AIPH meetings and communications are in English. Please ensure the named contacts are able to
speak, read and understand the English language.
Business/Organisation HORTIALLIANCE
name:
Website: WWW.HORTIALLIANCE.COM
Reference
AIPH Full Member Reference:
(Visit www.aiph.org to find whether there is a current member in your country)
Organisation name: VBN or NTR
Trade Reference:
(If no AIPH Full member in your country)
Organisation name:
Contact name:
Contact email:
AIPH Affiliate Membership
Application Form MPH
Please complete and return the application form, in English, to AIPH Secretary General, Tim
Briercliffe at sqaiph.orq.
AIPH meetings and communications are in English. Please ensure the named contacts are able to
speak, read and understand the English language.
Website: www.philips.comlhorti
Description of applicant Having completed hundreds of projects, Philips Lighting has many
businesslorganisation: years of experience investigating the effects of LED on a broad range
of crops. In every project we are on the lookout for the optimum light
recipe”. This is an instruction based on our knowledge of how to use
light to grow a certain crop under certain conditions.
Reference
AIPH Full Member Reference:
(Visit www.aiph.org to find whether there is a current member in your country)
Organisation name: VBN
Trade Reference:
(If no AIPH Full member in your country)
Organisation name:
Contact name:
Contact email:
I declare that the information above is correct and this business is applying to become an Affiliate Member of
AIPH. I agree to pay the annual subscription charge (currently 500 Euro + VAT) and for this application to be
considered at the next AIPH General Meeting.
Date: 2/ /
1
j
Profit & Loss (Euro)
Income
Cautions retained 28,851
Gate fees 219,919
Interest Income received 4,038
Membership fees 27,899
Publications (EC sales) 4,077
Publications (no vat) 2,831
Publications (vat) 2,574
Receipts (other) 124,858
Total Income 415,047
Profit & Loss (Euro) | AIPH - International Association of Horticultural Producers | 18 September 2015 Page 1 of 2
Profit & Loss (Euro)
31 Dec 14
Telephone & Internet 790
Travel expenses - President 15,033
Travel expenses - Secretary General 19,680
Total Operating Expenses 408,753
Notes
Profit & Loss (Euro) | AIPH - International Association of Horticultural Producers | 18 September 2015 Page 2 of 2
Balance Sheet (Euro)
Assets
Bank
Rabobank - Current **8952 12,620 170,417
Rabobank - Savings **6503 391,914 486,814
Total Bank 404,534 657,232
Current Assets
Accounts Receivable 94,679 91,142
Other Debtors - 5,100
Prepayments 219,612 -
Provision for Bad Debts (84,671) (79,058)
Total Current Assets 229,620 17,184
Fixed Assets
Computer Equipment 1,092 -
Less Accumulated Depreciation on Computer Equipment (31) -
Total Fixed Assets 1,061 -
Total Assets 635,216 674,415
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 9,779 25,444
Accruals 56,369 7,701
Historical Adjustment (1,684) (1,576)
Net Wages (8) -
Other Creditors - Cautions 114,344 113,000
PAYE Payable 1,773 -
Rounding - -
VAT (7,038) (6,668)
Total Current Liabilities 173,535 137,900
Total Liabilities 173,535 137,900
Equity
Capital 536,200 501,796
Current Year Earnings (111,618) 1,576
Retained Earnings 37,099 33,142
Total Equity 461,681 536,515
Notes
Balance Sheet (Euro) | AIPH - International Association of Horticultural Producers | 18 September 2015 Page 1 of 2
Balance Sheet (Euro)
1.28769 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 31 Dec 2014.
1.20507 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate entered by John Donovan on 31 Dec 2013.
1.28769 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 31 Dec 2014.
1.20507 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate entered by John Donovan on 31 Dec 2013.
Balance Sheet (Euro) | AIPH - International Association of Horticultural Producers | 18 September 2015 Page 2 of 2
Accountant’s Independent Assurance Report
We have performed certain procedures in respect of the association’s unaudited financial statements for the year ended
31 December 2014, made enquiries of the association’s officials and assessed accounting policies adopted by the board, in
order to gather sufficient evidence for our conclusion in this report.
This report is made solely to the association’s board in accordance with our terms of engagement. It has been released to
the board on the basis that this report shall not be copied, referred to or disclosed, in whole (save for the board’s own
internal purposes or as may be required by law or by a competent regulator) or in part, without our prior written consent.
Our work has been undertaken so that we might state to the board those matters that we have agreed to state to them in
this report and for no other purposes. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to
anyone other than the association and the association’s board for our work, for this report or the conclusions we have
formed.
Respective responsibilities
You have confirmed that you have met your duty. You consider that the company is exempt from the requirement for an
audit for the year. Our responsibility is to form and express an independent conclusion, based on the work carried out, to
you on the financial statements.
Scope
We conducted our engagement in accordance with the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Interim
Technical Release AAF 03/06. Our work was based primarily upon enquiry, analytical procedures and assessing accounting
policies. If we considered it to be necessary, we also performed limited examination of evidence relevant to certain
balances and disclosures in the financial statements where we became aware of matters that might indicate a risk of
material misstatement in the financial statements.
The terms of our engagement exclude any requirement to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the risks of material
misstatement, a consideration of fraud, laws, regulations or internal controls, and we have not done so. We are not
required to, and we do not, express an audit opinion on these financial statements.
Conclusion
Based on our work, nothing has come to our attention to refute the board’s confirmation that the financial statements give
a true and fair view of the state of the association’s affairs as at 31 December 2014 and of its income and expenses for the
year then ended and have been properly prepared.
Assets
Bank
Barclays Current - EUR 251,039 -
Barclays Current - GBP 43,517 -
Rabobank - Current **8952 3,652 12,620
Rabobank - Savings **6503 954 391,914
Total Bank 299,162 404,534
Current Assets
Accounts Receivable 166,760 109,679
Prepayments 21,836 219,612
Provision for Bad Debts (79,058) (79,058)
Total Current Assets 109,537 250,233
Fixed Assets
Computer Equipment 1,207 1,092
Less Accumulated Depreciation on Computer Equipment (268) (31)
Total Fixed Assets 939 1,061
Total Assets 409,638 655,828
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 1,077 9,779
Accruals 57,418 51,644
Historical Adjustment (1,861) (1,684)
Net Wages - (8)
Other Creditors - Cautions 139,668 126,434
PAYE Payable - 1,773
Rounding (1) -
Suspense (32) -
VAT (4,889) (7,038)
Total Current Liabilities 191,380 180,899
Total Liabilities 191,380 180,899
Equity
Capital 592,323 536,200
Current Year Earnings (306,380) (98,370)
Retained Earnings (67,684) 37,099
Total Equity 218,259 474,929
Notes
Balance Sheet (Euro) - July 2015 | AIPH - International Association of Horticultural Producers | 1 September 2015 Page 1 of 2
Balance Sheet (Euro)
Balance Sheet (Euro) - July 2015 | AIPH - International Association of Horticultural Producers | 1 September 2015 Page 2 of 2
Annex 11c – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
The chart below shows the exchange rate fluctuations during 2014-2015 as the Pound
strengthened against the Euro. Since the end of 2014 the pound has gone on to achieve a
high of 1.36 euros to the pound.
Overall committee and general working expenses will come out below budget due to cost
saving measures put in place wherever possible. This excludes the foreign currency costs
which of course push the costs over budget.
‘Expo Conference’ – this event made a profit of 8,362 Euro.
‘Spring Meeting’ – This figure shows a net cost for the 2015 Spring Meeting (Paris) of
27,839 Euro against a budgeted cost of 5,000 Euro. Before the final accounts for 2015 are
calculated this figure will be reduced because at the moment it still includes some of the
costs that should be allocated to the Green City Committee for the costs associated with the
Working Group meeting held on 19 March. However, when this is done it will still show a
large than budgeted cost for the Spring Meeting and this is due to the high number of free
places (i.e. Board members) and the fact that AIPH tried to keep the costs for members
close to those for the London Spring Meeting by subsidising meals and venue costs. Paris
is an expensive place for meetings. Milan is also expensive but it was decided to recover
the costs fully for this event hence higher than normal delegate fees.
2. Budget 2016
2016 is an important year for AIPH with two exhibitions bringing in gate fee. The final
amount of this fee will have a significant impact on what can be budgeted for 2017 and
beyond. Therefore the long term forecast for 2017-2020 should not be seen as a budget. It
contains many assumptions and the outcome figures should not be seen as those that we
are planning to achieve. However, it is useful for viewing income that we do know about.
2016 is also important as we seek to gain funding for the Green City work. If this is
successful then it will have a significant impact on what AIPH can do and how it operates,
but at the moment there is no guarantee of this income.
Whether or not there is an Expo in Gold Coast (Australia) in 2018 will also have a significant
impact.
Under the way AIPH runs at the moment the association is still heavily reliant on regular
expo gate fee income. Other income streams are developing (i.e. affiliate membership, new
model for statistical yearbook, sponsorship from expo conferences, profitable Grower of the
Year awards and delivery of contracted projects like ‘International Vision’) but these are not
yet significant enough and growth has be strong to make useful contribution to overheads.
During the Board meeting in Paris (March 2015) the Board considered an Income
Generation Plan. This is repeated below with updates shown in red italics.
AIPH Income Generation Plan
Exhibitions
For exhibitions there is a short term and a long term solution and they are different.
Short term objectives:
Work to ensure that existing scheduled expos reach their potential in terms of gate
fee income. The lower than expected numbers to Qingdao raises the possibility that
this might be the same in Tangshan. Also with Antalya wanting to charge a
maximum of 5 euro per head to enter their expo then potential income to AIPH is
Annex 11c – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
likely to be less than 200,000 euro. Amend regulations to reduce risk on income flow
and to set minimum fee to enable reliable budgeting.
Establish rules for payment of expenses by organisers and establish consultancy
fees for additional support.
Ensure we are getting expo applications for 2020 and beyond. – We are expecting an
application for 2021 from China and then hopefully others (UK, Turkey) for after.
Short term Actions:
Get signed contracts with Tangshan and Antalya and seek to incorporate a minimum
payment. – Contracts have been submitted to Antalya (including minimum gate fee
charge), Tangshan, Taichung and Beijing. This will make this income safer.
Awaiting confirmation that these will be signed.
Get Antalya to agree to payment of a minimum agreed gate fee. In their application
they specified 80 million euro entrance income which would give AIPH 800,000 Euro.
No-one thinks this is achievable now but maybe we could agree at least 250,000
euro this year? Osman wants to help with this. – Contract includes minimum
payment of 380,000 Euro
Get approval on new regulations with minimum gate fee payments, increased
financial guarantees and phased payment before the expo (although won’t apply until
post-2019 expos) – by October 2015 (first milestone – Spring Meeting). – In
proposed new regulations.
Adoption of these new regs is key, for example, if Geochang re-applies for 2020 this
year under the new proposed regs then there will be a 50,000 euro financial
guarantee. If we change this to ‘application fee’ (of which 80% is non-refundable)
then we can put 80% of it onto the P&L result this year too. Regarding gate fee if
their expo was in 2020 then we would start getting income from 2017, ie about
80,000 euro in that year.
Identify a target list of countries that we would hope will be making an expo
application. Develop action plans for each country and carry out a ‘sales and
awareness raising trip’ to promote the concept to countries that may benefit from this.
Countries include: Singapore, Australia, India, UK, Thailand, UAE, UK, Malaysia,
Brunei, Brazil. These may not all need ‘visits’ but we need to find ways to speed up
their interest to get some applications on the table soon. Maybe we should more
publically advertise available years and encourage competition? – during 2015/16 –
Active promotion in Australia. New applications expected from China, Turkey, UK.
Visit being planned for Singapore.
Aim to get a speaking slot at the next BIE General Assembly to promote the new Hort
Expo Guide and to stimulate interest in horticultural expos. – By November 2015. –
Not finalised
Long term objectives
I think we need to consider a completely new model for expos and our role in
approving expos and other horticultural events in the future. Traditionally our role is
in authorising international participation in expos. However, as highlighted by the fact
that Qingdao paid for all their international participants and the difficulty being
experienced by Antalya in attracting countries who have to pay for themselves the
old model of countries funding a garden at an expo is disappearing. Germany have
already embraced this changed and run international expos without inviting other
countries. The Netherlands is perhaps the only organiser who has really worked to
make this succeed.
Annex 11c – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
If, in the future, this continues then the need for AIPH reduces and we need to
redefine our role. However, alongside this the need to restrict the number of expos
also reduces. During 2015 we should develop a longer term strategy for AIPH role in
expos, linked much more to the added value we provide (marketing, consultancy,
international network/contacts) along with the financial considerations. We should
also evaluate whether ‘horticulture’ is the right hook to have in the names of
exhibitions. Should we consider food, environment and leisure more in the niche
offering we have (without losing sight of why we exist!)? We need to develop this
soon to ensure that AIPH is an indispensable component of international hort expos
regardless of whether countries actively participate in each others expos.
Long term actions:
Develop new expo strategy that addresses these issues – by Spring 2016. – In
discussion with Sven Stimac on these ideas and further developing the support
structure with guides and consultancy
IGOTY
Objectives
To generate a 40,000 euro ‘profit’ from the next IGOTY competition with gala dinner
at IPM in Jan 2016.
To increase profit as follows: 45,000 euro in 2017, 50,000 euro in 2018, etc.
Actions
Develop full Business Plan for the Jan 2016 event by April 2015 – Plan and budget
developed
Confirm agreement with IPM by end March 2015 – agreement confirmed
Launch new competition at Spring Meeting 2015 - done
Identify sponsor target list, develop sponsorship brochure and begin targeting in April
2015 - done
Sponsor target meetings (SG and AIPH members with contacts) during May/June
2015 – T Briercliffe and B Oosterom visited major international hort companies in
July. 75,000 euro sponsorship secured to date.
Green City
Objectives
To develop a ‘Green City Standard’ to which cities can be audited against, scored
and benchmarked – by end 2015
To have 20 cities audited by 2018
To generate ‘profit’ for AIPH as follows: 150,000 euro in 2016, 150,000 euro in 2017
and 150,000 euro in 2018. These are ambitious goals and the most likely way for
this to be achieved is through the securing of a major international sponsor who
would commit sponsorship of about 1 million euro over a 3-4 year period. Possible
sponsors include Vanke (China), BP and UN but more work would be required (and
possibly consultancy advice) to identify the right targets and the routes to access
them. This is a new and unproven route for AIPH to date.
An alternative route would be to develop the standard and then market this directly to
cities and ask them to pay. It would be harder to generate the target profits using this
model.
Annex 11c – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
Actions
Complete ‘Green City Standard’ and Business Plan during 2015 – On track as will be
discussed in Green City Committee
Identify target ‘sponsors’ – by November 2015 – meeting with Beijing Expo during
congress. Investigating other options too.
Develop sponsor specific action plans – by November 2015
Conduct meetings and secure sponsorship – By Spring 2016 – in progress
Other incomes
Events
I do not see profit-making opportunities for the congress and spring meetings as we work
hard to keep attendance costs at a minimum for members and the events are not very
attractive for sponsors.
If the AIPH Expo Conference is a success on 19 March 2015 then I will look to repeat this
annually. The next opportunity would be in Antalya in October 2016. Income is based on
delegate fees (with a higher fee for non-members) and sponsorship income. So far for 2015
we have secured 9,000 euro of sponsorship. I am still hoping for some more. For 2016 I
would like to secure 15,000 euro profit from the Expo conference and in 2017 20,000 euro
profit.
The other major event planned is an international growers conference in 2018 possibly in
Istanbul alongside the ISHS Congress. I would like to achieve 30,000 euro profit from this
event. This will largely depend on sponsorship support.
AIPH could run other events like study tours but organising events like this is very time and
cost consuming and potential profits are probably too small to justify the activity at this stage.
Industry information
We should continue to drive the sales of the statistical yearbook to be profit-making. This
will be done through increasing the price, increased promotion and easier accessibility
through online download and the option to buy in sections.
AIPH will manage a project funded by the Dutch PT. This will bring in 60,000 euro per year
for three years but will require expenditure too.
Membership
I have planned for a steady increase in membership of full members. I have also planned a
slow increase in Affiliate Membership as we define the benefits further for Affiliates. This is
accommodated in the forecast.
Income
Gate fees £0.00 £0.00 £158,684.09 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Interest Income received £3,138.55 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Membership fees £0.00 £3,519.60 £1,199.87 £0.00 £0.00 £1,200.00 £10,251.00 £5,000.00 £6,050.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Publications (EC sales) £728.28 £82.06 £161.61 £80.06 £158.08 £78.00 £208.00 £158.00 £158.00 £158.00 £2,000.00 £1,500.00
Publications (no vat) £261.73 £82.06 £0.00 £613.85 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £82.00 £500.00 £500.00
Publications (vat) £259.39 £152.25 £93.23 £67.25 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00
Receipts (other) £0.00 £449.41 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £3,500.00 £0.00
Spring Meeting Revenue £291.22 £3,925.01 £7,288.62 £4,236.60 £3,458.19 £1,600.00 £842.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Expo Conference £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Annual Congress £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £2,136.00 £7,000.00 £10,000.00 £10,000.00 £2,000.00 £0.00
International Vision project £44,000.00
Grower of the Year - Dinner tickets £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £2,000.00 £2,000.00 £2,000.00 £4,000.00
Grower of the Year - sponsorship £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £12,000.00 £12,000.00 £12,000.00 £6,500.00 £6,500.00
Accounts Receivable -£188.96 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Total Income £4,490.21 £8,210.39 £167,427.42 £4,997.76 £3,616.27 £2,878.00 £13,437.00 £24,218.00 £30,268.00 £24,300.00 £60,560.00 £12,560.00
Operating Surplus (Deficit) -£27,041.63 -£50,142.66 £132,401.71 -£31,580.63 -£28,919.88 -£30,893.00 -£26,618.00 -£23,137.00 -£20,876.00 -£24,180.87 £13,166.00 -£24,880.00
Net Cash Movement -£37,572.95 -£57,324.33 £119,501.87 -£29,137.19 -£34,019.59 -£34,185.00 -£29,892.00 -£23,137.00 -£20,876.00 -£24,180.87 £13,166.00 -£24,880.00
Summary
Opening Balance £314,154.67 £276,581.72 £219,257.39 £338,759.25 £309,622.08 £275,602.49 £241,417.49 £211,525.49 £188,388.49 £167,512.49 £143,331.62 £156,497.62
Plus Net Cash Movement -£37,572.95 -£57,324.33 £119,501.87 -£29,137.19 -£34,019.59 -£34,185.00 -£29,892.00 -£23,137.00 -£20,876.00 -£24,180.87 £13,166.00 -£24,880.00
Closing Balance £276,581.72 £219,257.39 £338,759.26 £309,622.06 £275,602.49 £241,417.49 £211,525.49 £188,388.49 £167,512.49 £143,331.62 £156,497.62 £131,617.62
Notes:
1: Figures converted into British Pound using the following rate:
1.36877 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 30 Apr
2: Figures converted into British Pound using the following rate:
1.38044 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 31 Mar
3: Figures converted into British Pound using the following rate:
1.37889 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 28 Feb
4: Figures converted into British Pound using the following rate:
1.33477 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 31 Jan
5: Figures converted into British Pound using the following rate:
1.28769 EUR Euro per GBP. Rate provided by XE.com on 31 Dec
CASH FLOW 2016
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Income Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast
Gate fees £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £250,000.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Interest Income received £0.00 £1,380.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Membership fees £0.00 £10,000.00 £10,000.00 £3,500.00 £0.00 £0.00 £400.00 £400.00 £0.00 £400.00 £400.00 £0.00
Publications (EC sales) £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £500.00 £1,500.00 £1,000.00
Publications (no vat) £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00 £300.00
Publications (vat) £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00 £60.00
Receipts (other) £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00 £290.00
Spring Meeting Revenue £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Expo Conference + Events £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £2,000.00 £3,000.00 £2,000.00 £2,000.00 £1,000.00 £0.00 £0.00
Annual Congress £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Grower of the Year - Dinner tickets £10,000.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £2,000.00 £2,000.00 £2,000.00 £4,000.00
Grower of the Year - sponsorship £5,000.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £12,000.00 £12,000.00 £12,000.00 £6,500.00 £6,500.00
Green City Committee
Accounts Receivable £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00
Total Income £16,150.00 £12,530.00 £11,150.00 £4,650.00 £1,150.00 £253,150.00 £4,550.00 £15,550.00 £17,150.00 £16,550.00 £11,050.00 £12,150.00
Operating Surplus (Deficit) -£28,700.94 -£24,540.69 -£12,590.15 -£33,658.06 -£30,336.50 £231,922.50 -£27,127.50 -£21,177.50 -£21,577.50 -£37,477.50 -£22,177.50 -£17,077.50
Net Cash Movement -£28,700.94 -£24,540.69 -£12,590.15 -£33,658.06 -£30,336.50 £231,922.50 -£27,127.50 -£21,177.50 -£21,577.50 -£37,477.50 -£22,177.50 -£17,077.50
Summary
Opening Balance £131,617.62 £102,916.68 £78,375.99 £65,785.84 £32,127.78 £1,791.28 £233,713.78 £206,586.28 £185,408.78 £163,831.28 £126,353.78 £104,176.28
Plus Net Cash Movement -£28,700.94 -£24,540.69 -£12,590.15 -£33,658.06 -£30,336.50 £231,922.50 -£27,127.50 -£21,177.50 -£21,577.50 -£37,477.50 -£22,177.50 -£17,077.50
Closing Balance £102,916.68 £78,375.99 £65,785.84 £32,127.78 £1,791.28 £233,713.78 £206,586.28 £185,408.78 £163,831.28 £126,353.78 £104,176.28 £87,098.78
2016 Draft Budget & Long Term
Forecast 2015-2020
Profit & Loss account
Profit and loss account (Euro) Forecast 2020 Forecast 2019 Forecast 2018 Forecast 2017 Budget 2016
Revenues Debit Credit Debit Credit Debit Credit Debit Credit Debit Credit
8000 - Membership fee 50,000 50,000 50,000 45,000 40,000
8100 - Publications sold 25,000 25,000 25,000 20,000 17,000
8200 - Interest 500 500 500 1,000 500
Grower of the Year 170,000 170,000 160,000 160,000 147,000
Expo Conference 35,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
Spring Meeting 0 0 0 6,000 0
Annual congress 0 0 0 0 0
Green City Committee 360,000 360,000 345,000 340,000 380,000
Marketing Committee 0 0 0 0 0
International Vision project 0 0 0 60,000 60,000
8400 - Receipts (other) 0 0 0 0 0
Revenues Exhibitions
8300 - Cautions retained 0 15,000 12,000 0 32,000
8320 - Gate fee 0 500,000 110,000 0 550,000
8330 - Support and advice 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Total: Revenues Exhibitions 2,000 517,000 124,000 2,000 584,000
Total: Revenues 642,500 1,157,500 734,500 664,000 1,258,500
Expeditures
International Vision project 0 0 0 40,000 40,000
4010 - Publication expenses 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
Costs Exhibitons
4040 - Jury costs 0 18,000 5,000 0 30,000
4050 - Awards 0 20,000 0 0 20,000
4060 - AIPH Expo garden 0 0 0 0 0
Total: Costs Exhibitons 0 38,000 5,000 0 50,000
Depreciation
4800 - Depreciation inventory 400 400 400 400 400
4810 - Depreciation receivables (fees, book ) 0 0 0 0 0
4820 - Provision bad debts (adm. 2008-2012) 0 0 0 -8,000 -8,000
Total: Depreciation 400 400 400 -7,600 -7,600
Working expenses committees
4093 - Science and education 0 0 0 0 0
4094 - Expenses Green City 320,000 320,000 305,000 300,000 340,000
4095 - Expenses Environment and Plant Health 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
4096 - Expenses Economics and Statistics 0 0 0 0 0
4097 - Expenses Marketing and Exhibitions 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
4098 - Expenses Novelty Protection 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500
4099 - Expenses Executive Committee 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Total: Working expenses committees 361,500 361,500 346,500 341,500 381,500
Working expenses other
Travelling expenses President 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 15,000
Travelling expenses SG 20,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 20,000
Travelling expenses Business & Events Mgr 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
4106 - Travelling expenses President/Secr.Gen.
4110 - Office expenses (incl. insurance)
Employers National Insurance 28,500 28,500 28,500 28,500 28,000
Insurance 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Office expenses 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
Postage, freight and courier 300 300 300 300 300
Printing and stationery 400 400 400 400 400
Staff salaries 244,000 244,000 242,000 241,000 235,000
Staff training 200 200 200 200 200
Telephone and internet 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Fee - Marketing Comm chair 0 0 0 0 0
4201 - Fee President 0 0 0 0 0
4210 - Expenses board 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
4300 - Grower of the Year 125,000 125,000 125,000 130,000 120,000
4600 - Bank charges 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
4660 - Bookkeeping and audit 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 8,000
Foreign currency gains and losses 30,000
4700 - Costs for website 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
4750 - Communication and PR 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 15,000
Legal expenses 2,000
4900 - Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
4905 - Donation and subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
Total: Working expenses other 476,400 476,400 467,400 471,400 499,900
Spring meeting and annual congress
4102 - Annual congress 0 0 0 0 0
Expo Conference 20,000 20,000 20,000
4103 - Spring Meeting 5,000 5,000 5,000 11,000 5,000
Total: Spring meeting and annual congress 5,000 0 5,000 0 25,000 0 31,000 0 25,000 0
Total: Expenditures 858,300 0 896,300 0 859,300 0 851,300 0 963,800 0
Result -215,800 261,200 -124,800 -187,300 294,700
We received good feedback from members regarding the Spring Meeting in Paris.
The venue and accessibility was appreciated.
Expo Conference
Feedback from the Expo conference was positive. Overall members and expo
organisers found it a worthwhile activity and felt that it is something we should repeat.
The provision of interpretation services for Chinese and Turkish delegates helped to
maximise their benefit from the event and this is a service that can be used again for
Expo Conferences in future if the delegates attending are willing to cover the cost.
Two AIPH Expo Conferences are being considered for 2016.
o Tangshan – April 2016 – This provisional event would be run in partnership
with China Flower Association and Tangshan Expo. The aim will be to attract
other prospective city hosts from within China and also to invite other Asian
expo hosts. It will also be an opportunity to promote expos to other
Asian/Pacific countries who may be considering an expo (e.g. Singapore,
Australia, Japan, Brunei, etc)
o Antalya – October 2016 – This would potentially be run as an additional day
at the AIPH Congress in Antalya. .
Attracting sponsorship is important for the viability of these events. We were able to
attract sponsorship from Dopplemayr (cable cars) and some smaller sponsors and
will look to attract more sponsors for future events.
Congress 2015 – Stresa, Italy
Without a member in Italy this event has been organised by AIPH alone. Maria
Wallin (AIPH Business & Events Manager) has organised all the logistics, venues,
promotion, booking process, etc.
We have benefited from the help of Mr. Arturo Croci in Italy. He has great knowledge
and experience of the Italian industry and will provide an overview of the industry in
Italy during the Opening Ceremony.
We have identified a national Italian growers organisation (www.anve.it) who will join
the first day of the congress and have applied to become AIPH members. They are
assisting us with invitations for visa applications where necessary.
The delegate and accompanying persons costs are higher than in previous years as
without having a member in Italy it is harder to subsidise costs. Using a hotel in
Stresa is much cheaper than being in central Milan and we believe we have secured
a very good deal on hotel costs. However, the Milan area, especially during the
World Expo, is expensive.
Spring Meeting 2016 – Vancouver
Plans are firmly in place for this event which incorporates a Green City conference
and Green City tour. The AIPH meetings will run in parallel with meetings held by
ELCA and Canadian Landscape associations. The programme will incorporate a
1
meeting between AIPH and ELCA Board members. The event is being organised by
Rebecca Doutre at CNLA with guidance from Bill Hardy and a steering group
including AIPH. Bill Hardy intends to provide more information to members during
the Congress.
Annual Congress 2016 – Antalya
We have agreed to run this event in conjunction with Union Fleurs. We will plan
sessions together and separately.
Exhibitions
Antalya 2016 – I visited Antalya on 6-7 July. The former Secretary General was
replaced following our previous inspection report in December 2014. The new SG,
Mr. Hasmet Suicmez, is moving the project forwards as fast as possible. Site
construction, including all buildings, is on track for completion before December
2015. I still have concerns about the lateness of much of the planting on the site but
they are doing what they can in the time they have. We have made detailed
recommendations on this and on the marketing and promotion underway for the
expo.
Tangshan 2016 – I visited Tangshan on 2-3 June with Kevin Chung and CFA. We
were pleased with progress being made. This is set to be an impressive Expo. CFA
are working with the organisers to develop the rules for competitions.
Taichung 2018 – I visited Taichung on 29-
30 May with Kevin Chung. It was good to
see that the new mayor is committed to the
Expo. We participated in a press conference
with the mayor where he publically affirmed
his support. This was widely reported by
Chinese Taipei media. They now need to
move quickly to commence site
development.
Beijing 2019 – I visited Yanqing and Beijing
on 4-5 June with Kevin Chung and CFA. We
received a report on progress with the masterplan and development and promotional
activity. I also toured the organising office which is in the building formerly used for
the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
Almere 2022 – The Almere council has formerly confirmed support for the 2022
Floriade in Almere. There was a formal signing of the AIPH contract, in the presence
of the media, in Almere on 1 September. I carried out a site inspection with Bernard
Oosterom in March and we visited again on 15 July to discuss their planned Green
City event in Milan Expo in October. The event in Milan will take place on 16 October
and follows the launch of the Milan Urban Food Policy Pact on 15 October. Cities
from around the world will sign the Pact which will then be presented to UN Secretary
General Ban Ki Moon. The seminar will provide a forum for cities to discuss how
they will implement the pact within their cities and Almere will highlight the link with
city greening and the 2022 Floriade.
There has been no further contact from Geochang (Korea). There is potentially an
application from Gold Coast (Australia) to be considered during the Congress. The
request for an Expo in the UK has been submitted to the UK Government by the
industry, this has received a good response so discussion will continue.
2
AIPH Expo Guide
I attended the BIE General Assembly in Paris on 9 June. Updates were given from
Antalya and Beijing.
During the meeting I made contact with the organisers of Expo Astana 2017
(Kazakstan). We will try to meet to assess potential for enhancing horticulture on
their expo site.
Green City
A Green City working group meeting was held in Paris on 20 March. This included
academics and experts from around the world. From this a draft plan has been
developed which splits into three phases:
1. Development and implementation of a Green City audit
2. Production of new Green City Guidelines
3. Development of a Green City Awards programme
Work has started on drafting a Green City audit and I have a proposal from a Green
Infrastructure consultant to progress this further. This will be presented at the
Congress.
Niek Roozen and Michele de Roo are also working on a proposal for new Green City
Guidelines and Niek will present this at the Congress too.
Crucially I also need to focus on finding funding for this work. We are hoping to
attract significant external funding to make this project possible.
Bill Hardy and CNLA are working hard on developing a strong Green City conference
programme for Vancouver in March 2016. The programme is almost complete and
will be launched soon.
Antalya will also organise a Green City conference to be held during the Expo.
Karen Tambayong has put work into developing potential content for this event.
AIPH is an Official Partner for GreenUrbanScape Asia 2015 which is being held in
Singapore in November 2015.
Novelty Protection
3
Thomas Leidereiter has been confirmed
to speak at the NP Committee in Milan
Congress. He is an international IP
expert who will bring a fresh look on the
topic for AIPH members.
Tim Edwards and I attended the UPOV
Technical Working Group for
Ornamentals meeting held in
Cambridge, UK on 14 September. This
included meeting key personnel from
UPOV and CPVO.
Environment
We are planning to discuss plant health issues during this Committee in Milan
Congress. This will include a presentation from the Italian association on their own
threat from the pathogen Xylella.
Statistics
4
The promotion of this event has been a major focus
of AIPH activity over recent months. With the new
rules in place it was critical that we received a good
number of candidates for each of the three new
categories. We are pleased to have participation
from Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, China, UK,
Canada, USA, Australia, Japan, Italy, Turkey and
Thailand.
The international jury will consist of: Jaap Kras,
Gery Heungens, Tetsu Nomura, Andras Treer, Bill
Stensson, Tim Edwards and Peter van de Pol. This
new jury includes specialists covering each of the
new categories. The jury will review entries and
meet at the congress.
We have been very active in pursuing sponsorship
for the awards. This is critical for their financial viability. During 14-16 July I was with
Bernard Oosterom in Netherlands to visit possible sponsors that had shown interest.
FloraHolland have confirmed that they will take up the Headline Sponsorship. Other
sponsors so far include Expo 2016 Antalya, Rabobank and Royal Brinkman. A long
list of other possible sponsors are also being pursued.
FloraCulture International is confirmed as the media partner and they are providing
extensive promotion for the contest including whole page adverts from June-
December. This magazine is now owned by FloraHolland.
Awards will be announced and presented at IPM Essen on the evening of 28 January
2016. We will start selling tickets and tables from the end of September. Details will
be available at www.aiph.org/groweroftheyear.
Membership
The new logo, brand and purpose for AIPH was agreed at the Spring Meeting.
This new look must be used in all AIPH communications from now on.
The new look has received a lot of positive comments.
Website
The new website launched at the end of April. This is a great new tool for AIPH and
much positive feedback has been received. This will continue to develop over time.
5
Office
Maria Wallin (AIPH Business & Events Manager) has now successfully completed 9
months at AIPH. She has worked hard to make AIPH events successful. She
successfully organised the Paris Spring Meeting and has organised the Annual
Congress. At the same time she is managing the International Grower of the Year
Awards. This is a considerable workload for her first year.
Amanda Wallace (AIPH Communications Manager) is continuing to provide PR
support for AIPH on a one day/week basis. She worked intensively for AIPH as the
website was finalised and made that project happen.
Finances
The process of opening the bank account with Barclays in the UK is complete and
funds have now been transferred from the Rabobank account. From now on all
transactions will be through the Barclays account.
We expect two gate fee payments next year (Antalya and Tangshan) but in the
period until these payments come in AIPH funds will run low. We have prepared a
cash flow forecast which indicates the need for careful spending control during the
first half of 2016. This situation is manageable but will require a disciplined approach
to spending and weighting spending to later into next year where possible. The
situation is not helped by the strength of the pound against the euro. Monies are
held in the Euro account for as long as possible.
The following activities are being pursued to secure predicted income and identify
new income:
o Contracts with minimum payments for expo organisers
o Aiming for around 60,000 Euro of cash sponsorship for International Grower
of the Year
o Seeking funding for Green City plans
o FloraHolland / Product Board project
o New yearbook pricing and sales strategy
To comply with German VAT rules AIPH is registering for VAT in Germany for the
IGOTY dinner costs/incomes.
Misc
During my visit to China I met with CFA and discussed the important relationship
between our two associations. I also toured Beijing Forestry University and met with
key personnel including Prof Zhang Qixiang.
The legal case against Auxon is ongoing with no new developments to report.
The project for developing a vision for international ornamental horticulture is being
developed. This will be funded by the Dutch Product Board (PT). I am currently
sourcing a Project Manager and developing a detailed work plan. The Steering
Group will hold its first meeting in Aalsmeer (Netherlands) on 2 October. The
Congress will include a session on this project.
A powerpoint presentation has been prepared that summarises the work and plans of
AIPH. This can be used by AIPH delegates to present back to their associations and
Boards on what AIPH is doing thus demonstrating the value of membership.
A suggestion has been made that AIPH should establish a specialist international
group for flower auction markets. There is interest from Taipei Flower Auction,
FloraHolland and Holambra Brazil. It is proposed that AIPH facilitate an initial small
6
meeting of interested auctions meet during IFTF (Netherlands) in November to
discuss the potential for this.
Other Organisations
ISHS – Rob Bogers has discussed with the ISHS Board the potential for running a
AIPH growers conference alongside the 2018 ISHS Congress in Istanbul. They were
open to the idea but further discussion on how this would work is required.
iVerde – No update.
ELCA – Bill Hardy has agreed with ELCA that they will hold their 2016 meeting
alongside the AIPH Green City Conference to be held in Vancouver in March 2016.
IFLA – no update.
BIE – see above.
Union Fleurs – President Herman de Boon and SG Sylvie Mamias attended the
Spring Meeting. It is being planned that the 2016 Annual Congress will be held in
association with Union Fleurs.
ENA – No update.
IPM – They are providing the venue for the IGOTY dinner on 28 January and will
assist us in promoting the competition to their database.
CIOPORA – No update
Fleuroselect – We have promoted the Fleuroselect winning varieties in the AIPH
newsletter. They have also provided us with a database of potential candidates for
the Young Plants category in IGOTY.
Media Activity
Recent media releases are shown below. They can be viewed in full at
http://aiph.org/latest-news/.
67th AIPH Annual Congress - September 22 2015
FloraHolland to be Headline Sponsor at AIPH International Grower of the
Year Awards 2016 - September 21 2015
AIPH approves horticultural world exhibition in Almere, The Netherlands –
Floriade Amsterdam Almere 2022 - September 4 2015
Entry deadline extended for AIPH International Grower of the Year Awards
2016 - August 4 2015
New members strengthen AIPH - May 19 2015
New look AIPH International Grower of the Year Awards 2016 - May 5 2015
AIPH re-brands and redefines its purpose - May 1 2015
7
Timescale for election / re-election of AIPH Board 21/09/2015
country
start
Office Name 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Proposed changes (highlighted) for approval at AIPH General Meeting, Milan, 21 October
2015 Deleted: Approved AIPH Annual Congress, 17 September
2014, Qingdao, China
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
I Membership
In accordance with Article 6 of the AIPH Charter an organization applying for Active/Full Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
membership shall submit to the AIPH General Secretariat, the required documents; these
shall include:
II Membership Fees
1. The membership in their General Meeting will establish the membership fee annually
for the following year. Subscriptions must be paid before April 1 of the same year.
2. Annual Membership fees must be paid within 60 days of invoice. Members who have
not paid their membership within that period cannot vote and will have membership
privileges withdrawn.
4. Each Active Member is entitled to one vote during the General Meeting.
1. The services provided by AIPH are at the disposal of all the members, provided they
respect the confidentiality of information provided by other members and adhere to
decisions based on it. Within the framework of its Charter, AIPH is committed to
extend its activities to all areas of the ornamental horticulture industry. This requires
the co-operation of the member organisations, which are obliged in particular to
contribute information to and views on issues under discussion. This will include the
provision of information, when it is requested by the General Secretariat and by the
secretaries of the Standing Committees.
3. The flow of all information and issues will be through the General Secretariat.
1. All income and expenditure will be recorded under the agreed general Ledger
headings in the form of a profit and loss sheet and a balance sheet keeping track of
the property, the separate committee budgets, and the exhibition profit and expenses
by the Secretary General (SG).
2. The SG will assist the committee chairpersons in building their budgets and work
plans for the following year as an agenda item for the spring meeting. Work plans
must be finalized and submitted to the SG by June 1 of any given year for the
following years’ budget. The SG and Board of Directors will use these budgets as a
basis for the entire AIPH budget to be proposed to the Members at the General
Meeting for their approval.
3. Expenditure on exceptional items requires the approval of the Board of Directors or,
in the absence of a Board meeting, of the President. The President will report such
expenditure to the board electronically as soon as possible.
5. The President or any other active member may at any time inspect the financial
records of the Association.
V Regional Structure
1. The present members of AIPH are grouped into regions (see Annex 1) to facilitate
communication and information exchange. AIPH also requires an updated contact
person with fluent English capability as the primary liaison between the member and
AIPH.
2. New members will be allocated to a region by the Board of Directors. New regions
can be added if required.
3. From among the members within a region, one member will be nominated, to
represent that region on the AIPH Board of Directors. It is assumed that this position
will rotate to other members within the regions from time to time. Deleted: Additional members may be nominated by these
4. A region is responsible for the nomination of a representative following the procedure regions when there are more than six countries within a region,
one additional member being nominated for each additional six
below: countries in that region.
a) When it is known that there is a vacancy for a regional Board representative this Deleted: .
will be made known to members in that region by the Secretary General.
Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b,
Members within that region will be invited to propose a candidate for the role c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.25 cm +
within a timescale as set by the Secretary General, but no less than four weeks. If Indent at: 1.88 cm
the existing representative intends to stand for re-election then members will be
informed of this at the same time.
b) Following the deadline for nominating candidates the Secretary General will
inform members in the region, by email, who the candidates are and in the event
that there is more than one candidate, will request them to vote for their preferred
representative within the timescale determined by the Secretary General which
will be at least two weeks. Candidates will be invited to supply a CV and any
supporting statements that can be shared with the members that will be voting.
c) The candidate that has the majority of votes from the members in the region, by
the deadline date, will be nominated for the position at the next General Meeting
according to the procedure in Section IX.
d) In the event that there is only one candidate then the Secretary General will ask
members whether they support that candidate to be their representative. If the
majority of members in the region support the nomination then they will be
nominated at the next General Meeting according to the procedure in Section IX.
Deleted: <#>¶
5. The member organisations, within a region, may establish a regional AIPH secretariat <#>In order to ensure a wide regional coverage, regions will
take account of the membership of the Board of Directors
and/or form a regional committee structure. The Board representative for the region when nominating their representatives.¶
will be the co-ordinator of activities in her/his respective region and s/he will inform Deleted: A regional representative, appointed to the
member organisations within the region of such activities. Executive Committee,
1. The Board of Directors will be constituted in accordance with Article 10 of the Charter.
Persons eligible to be appointed to the Board of Directors (up to 15 people) are:
President/Chairperson
Deputy Chair x 2
2. Established Standing Committees will have a chair, and the SG, or other nominated
person, will act as the official secretary. The committee may have an additional
expert serving within the committee as it sees fit, their membership may include
representatives of members and experts nominated by General Meeting. The
Chairpersons of the committees will have a three year term and be subject to
reappointment. The process for election or re-election of Committee Chairs will be
subject to Section IX of the Regulations. Each Committee will prepare their own Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
Terms of Reference for approval at each General Meeting submitted with their report.
3. Any AIPH Active and Affiliate member is entitled to attend and participate in meetings Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
of the Standing Committees. Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
Deleted: , to participate
VIII Agendas and Minutes
1. The SG, with the approval of the Board of Directors, will prepare agendas for General
Meetings and Board meetings. The Chairpersons and SG will prepare agendas for
meetings of their respective Standing Committees and working groups. The SG is
responsible for the correct and timely distribution of the agendas of all meetings; they
are sent direct to members of the body concerned, with copies for information
available to Members through the website.
The conduct of elections and the voting procedure within the General Meeting, will
conform to the following regulations.
2. The voting right of Members in the General Meeting is contained in Article 6 of the
Charter and II of these Regulations. Proposals and decisions made within
Committees will be voted on at the General Meeting.
3. The Chair of the meeting will preside over elections unless he is a candidate, in which
case members present will appoint another person to discharge this role. The chair or
person so appointed will be responsible for the proper conduct of the election and the
4. Members will be informed of any vacancies of offices in the Board of Directors, the
Executive Committee or the Standing Committees six months in advance if this is
known by the Secretariat that far ahead. Members will be informed of the timescale
for re-election of current Board members. Members wishing to stand for election to
those positions, regardless of whether the incumbent is standing for re-election, will
be aware of this and can prepare their nominations accordingly. Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
5. Proposals for nominations for any positions within AIPH should be submitted to the
SG at least one month before the spring meeting of AIPH in order for the Board of
Directors to consider the proposals. Proposals for nominations with names of
candidates for vacant offices will be stated on the agenda of the General Meeting.
6. The exiting chair will seek in consultation with the EC a suitable candidate for the
position to the members at the General Meeting. It is advisable to have CV and
permission from the candidate to let their name stand before the General Meeting.
7. In the event that a member of the Board steps down within 6 months of the General
Meeting then the SG will inform members of the vacancy that has arisen at the
earliest opportunity to allow time for nominations to be made and communicated to
members in good time.
8. Clause IX 7 above does not change the fact that members have the right to propose
candidates for vacant functions from the floor at the General Meeting. It is hoped and
advisable that the candidates’ names be submitted to the SG at least 6 weeks before
the next General Meeting.
9. The General Meeting will elect candidates by voting. A simple majority elects the
candidate.
X Expenses
1. Member organisations will normally bear the travelling and accommodation expenses
of their delegates to the Annual Congress and other meetings of AIPH. Travelling and
accommodation expenses of the President and the SG will be reimbursed by AIPH.
2. Travelling expenses for the Board of Directors to attend two meetings a year can be
claimed by Board members. This is to be in accordance with the AIPH Travel Policy
and is dependent on budget allocation.
Ireland
Austria
Slovakia
Serbia
Ukraine
Greece
Mexico
Ecuador
Chile
Argentina
REGION VI (West Asia & Middle East) REGION VI
Turkey Russia
Kazakhstan
Israel
UAE
India
Sri Lanka
Bangladesh
Indonesia Singapore
Thailand Vietnam
Philippines
New Zealand
REGION IX (Africa) REGION IX
Kenya
Ethiopia
Tanzania
Uganda
South Africa
Rwanda
Deleted: Region I¶
Denmark¶
Great Britain and Guernsey¶
Finland¶
Region II¶
Belgium¶
Germany¶
The Netherlands¶
Region III¶
Czech Republic¶
Hungary¶
Switzerland¶
Region IV¶
Canada¶
Brazil¶
Region V¶
Turkey¶
Region VI¶
Australia¶
P R China¶
Japan¶
Chinese Taipai¶
Thailand¶
Indonesia¶
Rep Korea
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.27 cm, Space After: 16 pt, No
bullets or numbering
To review AIPH Horticultural Exhibitions Regulations and update Oct 2014 TB Final proposed version to be presented to
Congress for approval in October 2015
To review funding mechanisms for AIPH activity with expos to facilitate Dec 2014 TB/SW Included in Regulations re-draft for October
improvements, benefits to organisers and alignment with BIE 2015
To develop and begin implementation of an annual inspection of Sep 2014 TB/SW Outline is not yet ready but inspections
approved expos in the five years before each expo. This will cover all undertaken by SG in ’14/’15 (Qingdao,
aspects of expo organization but with particular emphasis on ensuring Beijing, Tangshan, Antalya) have started
high horticultural standards. Proposed outline for review at Congress process of identifying criteria.
To define horticultural standards for sites, planting and maintenance Dec 2015 TB/SW Not progressed
for expos
To establish an AIPH Media Centre from which information from expos Dec 2014 TB Completed
can be promoted worldwide
To develop an AIPH ‘Exhibition Services’ offer which makes available Mar 2015 TB/SW To trial this consultancy has been offered to
consultancy skills and expertise to assist expo organisers. This would Antalya although not taken up yet.
be funded by customers of the service but would exploit AIPH’s Regulations update will also include
experience and contacts to ensure organisers have the best possible provision.
support from the outset.
To develop a brochure and website that promotes the concept and Dec 2015 TB This has been completed within the AIPH
benefits of expos to potential organisers and governments. This Expo Guide launched at the Expo
should then actively be promoted to potential organisers, with an Conference in Mar 2015.
emphasis on poorly represented regions A new section on ticketing systems should
also be completed by Oct 2015 and a new
module on Mobility in expos will also be
commissioned.
1
AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan, Italy
Annex 18
To hold at least one profitable international green city conference each Ongoing TB/KT Plans well underway for Vancouver 2016. A
year Green City Conference will take place in
Antalya in 2016.
To develop a standard for the Green City that can be independently Dec 2015 TB/KT First working group meeting of experts to
inspected took place in Paris on 20 March. Following
this work has commenced on developing a
Green City Audit and funding routes are also
being investigated.
To identify a pool of ‘Green City consultants’ that can be promoted to Jun 2015 TB/KT See Green City Strategy above
countries around the world, with a commission to AIPH
To have agreed a working relationship on Green City with interested Jun 2015 TB/KT See Green City Strategy above. Vancouver
organisations (i.e. ELCA, iVerde, ENA, etc) conference to be developed in association
with ELCA. Meetings have been held with
iVerde and SG gave presentation to ENA
meeting.
To develop an international Green City newsletter Jun 2015 TB/KT See Green City Strategy above
Novelty Protection
To improve member engagement in the Novelty Protection Committee Jun 2014 MB Completed and group now operating
through the development of a sparring partner group that will discuss
the issues and define AIPH position and actions.
To produce you-tube films on PBR issues, and the AIPH position, that Sep 2014 MB Not progressed to date due to lack of budget
can be promoted to growers worldwide. Project and funding plan to and other NP priorities
be developed
2
AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan, Italy
Annex 18
To work towards a common position paper on minimum distances Dec 2014 MB AIPH supports CIOPORA position paper and
between AIPH and CIOPORA that will enable an effective lobby within have proposed the recommendations within
UPOV this to UPOV.
To engage in discussions with UPOV on all the relevant issues on Ongoing MB Ongoing. Joint AIPH/CIOPORA letter sent to
which the working of the PBR system could be improved (like UPOV SG in February 2015. AIPH is also in
minimum distances, the breeders exemption, scope and exhaustion of communication with President of CPVO
the right, EDV, enforcement, avoiding of monopoly positions of regarding possible observer status for AIPH.
breeders, sufficient supply of propagating material to the market
against reasonable prizes and conditions etc).
To produce at least three press releases per year raising awareness Ongoing MB/TB Completed and well publicised in
of AIPH activity in this area international trade press (especially
HortiDaily)
Certification Schemes
To be active members within the Floriculture Sustainability Initiative Ongoing TB/GF Ongoing
(FSI) working groups to argue the case for growers and ensure that
sustainability standards do not compromise industry competitiveness.
To respond to ongoing FSI consultation
Plant Health
Proposal: To develop an international Code of Practice that defines an Sep 2015 TB/GF The Environment Committee in Milan 2015
AIPH minimum acceptable standard in relation to international plant will discuss plant health issues and a
movement procedures. Scope to be discussed at 2014 Congress. possible role for AIPH
Science
To define a clear mechanism and working relationship between AIPH Dec 2014 TB/WH/RB Inaugural AIPH Science Group meeting held
and ISHS at IPM Essen in January 2015 with ISHS
represented. R Bogers has discussed with
ISHS IHC Istanbul 2018 organisers potential
for a collaborative growers conference.
To determine the potential for an AIPH Science & Education working Sep 2014 TB/WH Completed. See above
group
To plan to run a specialized symposium, in conjunction with ISHS, at Dec 2016 TB/RB
an international horticultural expo
3
AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan, Italy
Annex 18
To develop a ‘science plan’ with expos that include scientific lectures Dec 2017 TB
from experts and the potential for an ISHS display booth.
To identify a mechanism for the effective exchange of R&D Dec 2015 TB Discussed during the AIPH Science Group
information relevant to ornamental horticulture meeting. Initial ideas for a researcher
database to be progressed.
To organize an annual international conference/event for growers to Dec 2016 TB In principle agreed at the AIPH Science
hear how they can apply the latest global R&D, potentially in Group Meeting in January 2015
partnership with ISHS
To raise awareness of information and events produced by ISHS and Ongoing TB/RB Relevant symposia highlighted on AIPH
to encourage grower participation website
Purpose 3 - To be the place where growers come to for
international industry information and knowledge exchange
AIPH will commence a 3 year project, funded
by Dutch Product Board, on developing an
‘International Vision’ for ornamental
production. This will include detailed
analysis of countries worldwide and lead to
publication of an authoritative report. First
steering group meeting 2 Oct 2015.
To increase sales of the Statistical Yearbook to break-even point Dec 2014 TB Net cost in 2014 was 7310 euro. Plan to
breakeven for 2015 through higher prices,
and website availability.
To develop a new website with strong SEO (Search Engine Sep 2014 TB Website completed.
Optimisation), compelling promotion and the ability to enable Yearbook will be available to be purchased
immediate purchase online directly online for 2015 edition
To conduct a review of the Statistical Yearbook to review user Dec 2014 TB Considering ideas for improving the Stats
feedback, industry demand, perceived value, publication frequency, Yearbook from FloraCulture International for
publication format, etc the 2016 edition, i.e. more case studies and
interpretation.
To develop a regular (quarterly?) grower-focussed newsletter that Apr 2015 TB Completed. E-Newsletter now published
enables/encourages members to share current developments, frequently and sent to broad database.
projects and information and is of sufficient quality and interest for
members to share with their own grower members
To develop a regular (bi-monthly?) newsletter for members to Apr 2014 TB Completed. Currently the same as above
communicate AIPH news and activities
4
AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan, Italy
Annex 18
To improve media reach for AIPH press releases through subscription Apr 2014 TB Completed. This is activated through
to a global media contact database subscription to CISION media database.
To increase followers of AIPH on Twitter to 1000 Dec 2014 TB Currently 434 followers for @AiphGlobal.
@TimBriercliffe has 2365 followers so AIPH
messages also out through that.
To establish a grower discussion forum via LinkedIn Dec 2014 TB Completed. This is active with Karen
Tambayong being the main contributor
To establish a AIPH Facebook page Dec 2014 TB To be completed following completion of the
website
To develop a programme of international info/knowledge exchange Apr 2015 TB
events (conferences/study tours, webinars, etc) for growers
To increase participation in the International Grower of the Year Sep 2014 TB This has been achieved
(IGOTY) competition to 10 countries
To gain sponsorship for IGOTY that enables the competition to break Sep 2014 TB The 2016 competition is budgeted to make a
even during 2014. profit with sponsorship secured already
exceeding 75,000 euro by Sep 2015
To promote the best practice exhibited by nominated businesses Ongoing TB
through trade press articles
More members
Development of promotional brochure outlining features and benefits Sep 2014 TB Still to be completed although website
of membership contains all the content.
Affiliate membership brochure developed and
promoted to prospective affiliate members at
IPM Essen.
New website that clearly articulates membership benefits and provides Sep 2014 TB Completed and widely welcomed by
a mechanism for application members and stakeholders
5
AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan, Italy
Annex 18
Increased awareness of AIPH activities through more press releases Sep 2014 TB Ongoing
and improved reach of these press releases within the trade media of
every major producing nation.
Improvement in the usefulness of AIPH meetings to justify attendance Apr 2015 TB/VK Spring Meeting has been separated from
and participation Expo progress reports to benefit those with
interests in different areas.
Congress to include a session on the
international vision project and clear
business focused discussions within the
committees.
More direct contact/communication with growers
Investigate the development of a magazine and/or email news bulletin Apr 2015 TB Not progressed to date however there is a
that can be sent directly to growers. This could be a new publication very close working relationship with
or AIPH could consider purchasing an existing one. FloraCulture International which is now
owned by FloraHolland.
6
Annex 19 – AIPH Board Meeting- 19 October 2015
1
Annex 19 – AIPH Board Meeting- 19 October 2015
AIPH Green City Audit – based on a ‘governance standard’ that will assess the
attitude, ambition, policy, progress and practice of a city administration in becoming
greener.
AIPH Global Green City Guidelines – a new, updated and expanded version of the
‘Green City Guidelines’ publication that clearly shows to cities how to become Green
and the characteristics of a Green City.
AIPH Green City Awards – alongside recognition of cities that ‘pass’ the audit AIPH
should also develop a programme of awards that recognise specific developments or
greening projects within cities anywhere in the world.
This will assess city authorities against a ‘standard’ that can be expected from a city
that claims to be a ‘Green City’
It will be conducted through completion of a questionnaire and on-site inspection by
approved independent inspectors.
Crucially it will be a standard based on policy and ambition for ‘green’ within the
authority rather than a quantitative evaluation of plant use in the city. Therefore the
content will have a political imperative and should stimulate change and improvement
rather than just acknowledgement of what already exists.
How will it be developed?
An initial draft will be created based on the outcome of the Green City working group
discussion in Paris. This will then be sent to Beijing Forestry University, Sheffield
University and the working group for further comments and development. Additional
consultation will be conducted if required.
It will then be necessary to test the audit on ‘volunteer’ cities if funding permits, eg.
Qingdao, Tangshan, Almere, etc
Cities can pass or fail the audit and we should consider a gold, silver, bronze level for
those that pass to stimulate continual improvement.
Objectives of the audit
To stimulate cities to invest more attention and finance into developing the ‘green’
aspect of their city.
To have 50 cities approved as ‘AIPH Green Cities’ (or other appropriate name) by
2020.
To promote AIPH Green Cities globally to Governments, policy makers, and citizens
To complement the audit AIPH will produce new Green City Guidelines to update the
past edition.
These guidelines will provide specific examples and case studies to illustrate how to
achieve a Green City
2
Annex 19 – AIPH Board Meeting- 19 October 2015
To be the leading global resource on green city development for city decision makers
How will the guidelines be developed?
3
Annex 19 – AIPH Board Meeting- 19 October 2015
Promote audit
Recruit cities - marketing materials 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000
PR campaign 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000
Event attendance/sponsorship to promote 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
Website development 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
PR resource 15 7000 7000 7000 7000 7000
City inspections
Review QA 2 1400 1400 1400 1400 1400
Conduct inspection 5 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500
Write inspection report 2 1400 1400 1400 1400 1400
Award presentation 1 470 470 470 470 470
Award costs 900 900 900 900 900
Travel expenses 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
Office Costs
Project Manager 60000 60000 60000 60000 60000
Admin support (1 FT) 13000 28000 28000 28000 28000
Office consumables 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
Additional Office rental 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
IT equipment/mobiles 4000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Insurances 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
Travel expenses 15000 10000 10000 10000 7000
TOTAL AUDIT PROJECT COSTS (incl 10 cities per year) 310700 298044 303888 315576 338952 € 1,567,160.00
Visitor analysis
Tourism
Hospitality
Guided tours
Personnel and training
Volunteers
Security
Food and beverage
Traffic management
Pre-opening tests
Financial analysis
Further work may be carried out but where possible we would look to identify external
funding for Mr. Stimac’s time
This budget request is strongly linked with income generation for AIPH and should be seen
as an investment for that purpose. Mr. Stimac has good relationships expo suppliers who
are potential sponsors of AIPH activities. It is hoped (although not included in the budget)
that some of this cost will be recovered from sponsorship.
5
Annex 19 – AIPH Board Meeting- 19 October 2015
The Committee for Environment & Plant Health functions as a platform to exchange
information and opinions of the member countries. The main objectives and work areas of
the committee are:
1. Informing AIPH-members about relevant environmental issues and political
developments in the field of environment in member countries and in the organisations;
2. Looking after the interest of the ornamental sector in international organisations like EU,
EPPO regarding environmental and phytosanitary issues;
3. Following developments in eco labels and certification schemes like FSI, MPS, Global
GAP;
4. Cooperation with EPPO in the field of invasive alien species;
5. New Plant Health regime in EU;
6. Biodiversity and genetic engineering;
7. Water management policies;
8. Peat;
9. CITES
Work plan
1. In Brussels the discussion will continue about the package on plant health, animal
health, seeds and official controls, published in 2013 by the European Commission. As a
stakeholder AIPH will contribute in meetings, seminars and conferences about these
proposals and will prepare statements and opinions from the point of view of the
ornamental sector, whether or not in consultation with other organizations.
2. EPPO organises yearly a panel meeting on invasive alien plants. As observer AIPH will
attend that meeting and will discuss the progress of the Code of Conduct on invasive
alien plants for horticulture. In 2015 the meeting takes place in Paris.
3. AIPH has become a member of FSI. There has to be find out which role AIPH may play
within FSI, e.g. in working groups;
4. Collection of relevant information on the above mentioned items and distribute it to the
members or put it on the agenda of the committee meeting(s)
Budget
Meetings EPPO and EU Plant Health 550,00
FSI membership 5.250,00
------------
Total budget € 5.750,00
6
Annex 20 – AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan
Committee Terms of Reference updates
GENERAL PURPOSE
As established in AIPH Regulation VII, the Committee for Novelty Protection (NP) is a
standing committee reporting to the AIPH General Meeting through the Board. The objective
of the Committee is to clarify and communicate the views of growers (producers) in relation
to plant novelty protection and plant breeders rights (PBR) in particular, as well as supporting
the development and implementation of good intellectual property regulations for the
industry. Society is aware that the breeding of new plant varieties benefits the progress of
mankind. Therefore the availability of new and better varieties is very important, not only for
society but also for breeders and farmers. The goal of PBR is to stimulate plant breeding by
an intellectual property right system that supports and accelerates innovation in plant
breeding. Therefore AIPH has to clearly defend the interests of growers to treaty negotiators
and national legislators, like UPOV, EU and the national governments.
AIPH fully endorses the UPOV plant variety rights system and is of the opinion that the
system plays a positive role in the development of the sector and the relationship between
breeders, growers, wholesalers, retailers and consumers (http://www.upov.int/). AIPH
lobbies law and treaty writers on the national and international level to improve treaties and
regulations with the aim to create the best conditions for innovation in plant breeding. AIPH is
encouraging countries to accelerate the implementation of plant breeder’s rights and to bring
their legislation in line with the UPOV-Convention 1991. AIPH pleads for a strong and
balanced plant breeders right (PBR) system and related obligations of the breeders in acting
against infringement of their rights and therewith the rights of those growers who legally use
the protected varieties.
The Novelty Protection Committee of the AIPH is mandated to coordinate and to realize this
purpose. The committee fulfils this mandate by:
DUTIES/ASSIGNMENTS
1. Identify and prioritize the issues affecting the horticultural sector internationally as it
relates to various PVR issues.
2. Maintain the working group, called the Sparring Partner Group, to improve the
structure of the NP and to enlarge the engagement and involvement of AIPH
members in the subject.
3. Prepare and select information papers on these issues for the meetings (prepared by
the chair and secretary or individual members).
4. Provide information on the issues by giving presentations at the meetings.
5. Build long term relationships with the various international associations and
organizations in the field (like UPOV, CPVO, CIOPORA), working closely with the
Secretary General to ensure a succinct and complete download to the AIPH
members of information and contacts arising from participation in these organizations.
6. Use the AIPH website to ensure that all pertinent information is updated at regular
intervals. Ensure that AIPH confers with pertinent agencies to link agendas and
inform the member organizations.
7. Share via the website, international programs that address PVR and novelty
protection issues on a priority basis.
8. Write articles to be published to support the growers position. (For example in the
magazine FloraCulture International).
9. Invite relevant speakers to address AIPH members during AIPH meetings when there
is time and when it contributes to the objectives of the Committee. Such speakers
could include representatives from governmental organizations (e.g. UPOV, CPVO),
national plant breeders rights authorities, relevant stakeholders (e.g. breeders
associations of ISF, CIOPORA, ESA, Fleuroselect and national breeders
organizations like Plantum or Bundesverband Deutscher Pflanzenzüchter) and
scientist or specialist in the PBR /IE field (e.g. advocates, lawyers or academics)
10. Prepare an annual operating plan including a budget and executive summary for
general activities associated with the committee.
11. Prepare an annual evaluation of the committee's achievements of these Terms of
Reference, recommending changes and amendments to AIPH Board.
12. Review the Terms of Reference annually with recommendations made to AIPH
General Meeting for the annual congress.
To serve the members of AIPH, the Sparring Partner Group is installed and maintained:
1. The aim/task of the SPG will be to take serious knowledge at an early stage of all the
information, developments and productions of the NP (Plant Breeders
Rights/Intellectual Property Rights (IP) developments, information papers ,
statements , presentations etc.) in such a way that the decisions can be taken
immediately (after final approval of the Board) or that decisions at the meetings are
prepared thoroughly and can be taken quickly.
2. Discuss the prepared information via e-mail and, if needed, agree AIPH action,
statements, position papers or press releases with finally publication on the website.
3. The members of the SPG have committed themselves to take time to take serious
knowledge of all the given information and to give reactions and needed support to
the secretary of the NP.
Annex 20 – AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan
Committee Terms of Reference updates
4. Way of working: see Update and the organization of the Sparring Partner Group
(SPG) of the Committee for Nov. Prot. Confirmed 2-4-2014 (spring meeting 2014,
London)
The Chairperson of the Novelty Protection shall be a member of the Board of AIPH.
DURATION OF APPOINTMENT
Appointments to the committee will be for a three year term and is governed by the AIPH
charter.
RESOURCES
The Committee shall require the support of the Secretary General as ex-officio member and
as administrative support to committee activities.
The Committee will require an annual operating budget to meet travel, accommodation and
meeting expenses.
GENERAL PURPOSE:
In accordance with the AIPH Regulations, the Green City Committee is a standing committee
reporting to the Board of Directors. Reporting via its Chairperson, the Green City Committee
assists the Board of Directors in its function of governance by:
Promoting the environmental, health, social and wellbeing benefits of horticulture and
ornamental horticulture in urban areas
Working with National, Regional and International Organizations that promote,
enhance and improve urban landscapes from a horticultural perspective;
To be the central archive point for all Green Industry promotional campaigns to
preserve history and assist other organizations with similar missions by being a
resource of information and contact networks;
Provide an inclusive network and forum where issues, progress and results can be
shared and mutually beneficial to participating organizations’ whose purpose is Green
City promotion
DUTIES/ASSIGNMENTS
The Green City Committee is assigned the following tasks during the period of these terms of
reference:
1. To identify and liaise with a network or organisations supportive of the goals of AIPH,
including ELCA, iVerde, FloraHolland, IFLA
2. To organize and/or promote an annual International Green City Conference for the
purpose of promoting best practice in city greening and inspiring change
3. To identify a project and funding to promote the benefits of plants to cities worldwide
4. To collect information, marketing materials and strategies from existing organizations
promoting horticulture in society in a positive manner, and then having this
information accessible to member associations and allied green industry promotion
groups
5. To encourage a global social movement to increase, enhance, promote and sustain
green spaces in society, especially in urban centres for the present and future
generations
6. To offer a forum for organizations that promote Green Cities to work together in order
to save resources, save time and enhance their marketing campaigns for the
Environmental, Lifestyle and Economic benefits of society
7. To offer more positive promotion for the long term sustainability and positive image of
the industry
8. To prepare an annual operating plan including a budget
9. To prepare a Green City Committee report for the semi-annual meetings.
10. To prepare an annual evaluation of the committee’s achievements of these Terms of
Reference, recommending changes and amendments to the Board of Directors.
11. Review the Terms of Reference annually with recommendations made to the Board of
Directors at the annual meeting.
Annex 20 – AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan
Committee Terms of Reference updates
APPOINTMENTS AND COMPOSITION
The Board of Directors shall appoint, by motion, the Committee Chairperson and Secretariat.
Other committee members shall be appointed as recommended by the committee and
approved by the Board.
DURATION OF APPOINTMENT
RESOURCES
The committee shall require an annual operating budget to cover promotional activities,
travel, accommodation and meeting expenses.
Annex 20 – AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan
Committee Terms of Reference updates
GENERAL PURPOSE:
Horticultural exhibitions dramatically raise the profile of gardens and plants. They
demonstrate the importance of plants to the environment, society, economies and personal
health and wellbeing. They demonstrate how plants can be used domestically and
commercially to enhance urban areas and improve quality of life. They provide the
opportunity to promote horticulture for what it is; technologically advanced, pushing the
boundaries of science, economically significant and a sector with potential for future value
and growth.
Whilst AIPH does not directly organize exhibitions it has the role of approving them and
agreeing the international expo calendar in accordance with its regulations and the 1928
International Convention on exhibitions. Therefore AIPH has the responsibility to ensure
approved expos:
Can meet the appropriate horticultural standards that will inspire increased domestic
and commercial consumption of ornamental trees, plants and flowers.
Expos can generate sufficient visitor numbers to have a positive impact on sales.
Are organized and delivered to a high and professional standard that leaves a
positive impression of the sector and what it can achieve.
Are promoted worldwide, along with the positive stories they generate, to maximize
the benefit beyond the host country and to attract more international participation and
visitors.
Maximise global impact through a wide geographical coverage – in every continent.
DUTIES/ASSIGNMENTS
The Marketing Committee is assigned the following tasks during the period of these terms of
reference:
The Board of Directors shall appoint, by motion, the Committee Chairperson. Other
committee members shall be appointed as recommended by the committee and approved by
the Board.
DURATION OF APPOINTMENT
RESOURCES
The committee shall require an annual operating budget to cover promotional activities,
travel, accommodation and meeting expense.
Annex 20 – AIPH Board Meeting, 19 October 2015, Milan
Committee Terms of Reference updates
GENERAL PURPOSE:
The Environment and Plant Health Committee of the AIPH is mandated to coordinate an
international overview and compile current information on the issues pertinent to ornamental
growers, brokers, wholesalers, and associated members focused on environmental
protection.
This will include issues surrounding air, water and soil conservation; protection of our
environment and safeguarding the industry in dealing with public and private concerns
regarding environmental matters.
The Environment and Plant Health Committee will help establish the international industry as
strong proponents of environmental safety and will continue to build and enhance its role and
image as responsible and ethical stewards and custodians of our environment on a global
basis.
The Environment and Plant Health Committee supports members and other relevant
organizations in the efforts of preventing the worldwide spread of harmful organisms.
DUTIES/ASSIGNMENTS
1. To maintain contact with the various international associations: review and report the
various environment issues, which are of concern for the industry.
2. Identify and prioritize the issues affecting the industry internationally as it relates to
various environmental issues. Using the AIPH website to ensure that all pertinent
information is updated at regular intervals. Ensure that AIPH confers with pertinent
agencies to link agendas and inform the member countries.
3. Share via website, international programs that address environmental issues affecting
the industry.
4. Provide a forum for members to exchange information regarding environmental
challenges faced as well as initiatives to tackle them
5. Prepare and submit an annual operating budget and a Committee Report in advance
of meetings of the Committee.
6. Review the Terms of Reference bi-annually with recommendations to the Board of
Directors at the annual meeting.
AIPH shall appoint a chairperson and secretary. The Committee will also be supported by
the staff of AIPH. The secretary general of the AIPH shall be an ex-official member of the
committee. The chair of the Environment and Plant Health Committee shall answer directly to
the Board of AIPH.
DURATION OF APPOINTMENT
Committee meetings will be held in conjunction with the spring AIPH meeting and the Fall
AIPH meeting
The committee shall require the support of the Secretary General as ex-official member of
the committee as administrative support to committee activities.
The committee will require an annual operating budget to cover travel accommodations and
meeting expenses as described in the Regulations of AIPH.
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
In the past the production and marketing of ornamentals has been focused around servicing demand
in developed countries. The associated trading and logistics infrastructure has developed around
this model. For many years the industry has been expanding production in developing countries
(with lower production costs) but still with a market focus on the traditional market, particularly
Northern Europe and North America. In these cases the majority of product exported from
developing countries has been cut flowers, rather than potted plants, due to transport costs.
There are a number of countries undergoing rapid economic development and urbanisation. For
example Bloomberg Business reports on the top 20 fastest growing economies based on their survey
(Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-25/the-20-fastest-growing-economies-
this-year). Their analysis is below:
The world is expected to grow 3.2 percent in 2015 and 3.7 percent next year after
expanding 3.3 percent in each of the past two years, according to a Bloomberg survey of
economists. China, the Philippines, Kenya, India and Indonesia, which together make up
about 16 percent of global gross domestic product, are all forecast to grow more than 5
percent in 2015.
By comparison, the U.S. and U.K., which combined account for about a quarter of global
growth, are expected to grow 3.1 percent and 2.6 percent this year, respectively. The
euro area probably will expand just 1.2 percent as European Central Bank President
Mario Draghi deals with a fragile Greece and embarks on a bond-purchase program to
stimulate the region's growth.
1
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
China still remains the fastest-growing G-20 nation, even though the Asian economy
is no longer expanding at the pace it did a few years ago. China's economy grew 7.3
percent in the fourth quarter of 2014 from a year earlier, and is expected to slow to 7
percent in 2015.
To counter that slowdown, People's Bank of China policy makers are boosting monetary
stimulus. The central bank cut its benchmark interest rate in November for the first time
since 2012. This month officials lowered by 50 basis points the deposit reserve ratio,
which is the amount of reserves that banks need to keep on hand.
Nigeria, Africa's largest economy, is projected to expand 4.9 percent this year, according
to the Bloomberg survey. Kenya will probably grow 6 percent in 2015, even as
unemployment and poverty remain stubbornly high, with over 40 percent of Kenyans
living below the poverty line.
U.S. growth forecasts for 2015 are coalescing around 3 percent even as the dollar soars
to its highest level in more than a decade. As growth picks up, the Federal Reserve is
weighing whether to raise interest rates for the first time since 2006. Their benchmark
federal funds rate has remained near zero since December 2008.
These countries are changing the structure of international trade and developing their own
production capabilities and alongside this their own research and innovation which will in turn
strengthen their competitive position as they take control of their own industries rather than just
responding to or being led by the ‘old markets’.
Not all of them will develop an ornamentals production capability, export capability or market but
some of them will and the international ornamentals industry needs to understand what is
2
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
happening and to forecast what may happen in the future. In East and South East Asia for example
urbanisation is being facilitated through the construction of high-rise housing to feed the economic
development of the cities. Without domestic gardens city planners are integrating trees, plants and
green spaces within cities driving significant growth in outdoor plant production. As countries
develop so personal wealth increases so spend on luxuries like flowers increases too. As countries in
Africa develop they may take a different path and of course climate plays a big role in assessing
scope for the use of ornamentals.
These developing countries will vary in their ability to produce and distribute ornamentals. Their
ability to understand and access both their own and global markets will vary too. Government
policies may restrict or promote production and export and the priority given to the development of
infrastructure will impact heavily on the growth potential of the sector.
Overall the power base for global ornamentals production is shifting. How and where needs to be
more fully understood for the benefit of growers in every country.
This project is designed to increase this understanding, forecast future changes in the structure of
the industry and to identify opportunities to grow the overall international market for ornamental
crops.
This will include an analysis of existing international organisations and it will propose a model to
improve future information sharing and collaboration to capitalise on this work and make it
increasingly beneficial to the industry in the future. The International Association of Horticultural
Producers (AIPH) is uniquely positioned to facilitate the collation and analysis of industry data,
information (quantitative and qualitative) and experience through its existing international network
with grower associations around the globe. The project will also identify how this role can be
strengthened for the future in a way that genuinely includes all the relevant nations of the world.
Project Plan
For this project to be successful it requires the participation of many stakeholders worldwide. A
steering group will fulfil the following role:
3
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
Remote access (by conference call or Skype) will be facilitated for group members that cannot
always be physically present.
These times and locations are selected as times when group members are most likely to be present
together anyway.
The first meeting is scheduled for September 2015 to maximise the benefit of the AIPH Congress in
Milan in October. Due to time and location this meeting may not involve all group members.
AIPH and the Project Manager will report progress to each Steering Group meeting by way of a pre-
circulated report and presentation at the meeting. Steering Group minutes will be recorded and
circulated within the group.
In addition a Management Group will be formed which will oversee day-to-day management of the
project, the use of project funds and the allocation of spending. The Management Group will consist
of:
The first task of the Steering Group will be to agree the project objectives. From this will be defined
the exact information that needs to be collected which could include:
Production (area and value) and consumption statistics (volume and value) for the last ten years (list
just a suggestion at this stage) broken down by product category (e.g. flowers, potted plants, trees,
bulbs, etc) for:
4
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
Within the countries with production and market potential we then need to identify:
Factors affecting import and export potential - including Government policies, subsidies, tax
issues, plant health controls, bureaucracy (administration), logistics and accessibility,
infrastructure, IT capability, welfare conditions for staff, national security and terror threat,
certification, government involvement, level of foreign investment, environmental
responsibility and ability to produce sustainably
Factors affecting potential to increase production – including ownership and investment
policies and practice, Government incentives/dis-incentives, attitude of banks/lenders,
availability of labour (skilled and unskilled), cost of labour, technical expertise, access to raw
materials and equipment (water, growing media, pots, greenhouses, machinery, pesticides,
etc), corruption and crime, climate, political stability, foreign investment policy and attitude
to foreign investors, union activity, attitude to plant breeders rights
Factors affecting potential to increase consumption – including consumer confidence,
household income trends, taxes, national economic growth, GDP, unemployment, housing
construction, inflation, fashion, environmental awareness
The project will review current data sources including the AIPH/UF Statistical Yearbook and market
research (contact Sheila Mahmood, FloraHolland), market information reports (e.g. Mintel etc),
Eurostat trade data, etc
There will be a session held during the AIPH Annual Congress in Milan on 21 October 2015. This will
include a structured session to identify information available and qualitative views on global trends.
5. Plan for filling the gaps in data and knowledge – including identifying information sources
5
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
Results will be collated and a SWOT analysis carried out on each of the ‘priority’ countries as agreed
between AIPH and the Steering Group.
An event could be organised to ‘test’ the draft findings on an invited audience of industry players
and academics (e.g. via ISHS) alongside an existing international event (e.g. IPM Essen and/or IFTF,
ProFlora, etc). They could be provided with an ‘exclusive preview’ of the results as long as they give
their comment. This will be a double check that we have got it right!
A final report will be prepared that lays out the work completed, the objectives, the findings as well
as the conclusions. These conclusions will form the basis of the ‘International Vision’ for the industry
and will be formulated in association with the Steering Group.
This will include recommendations on how national and international associations and
representative organisations can work together to identify and exploit the opportunities that exist to
grow the global market for ornamentals. This will include recommendations on how to strengthen
AIPH as an international leader on this topic for the good of growers worldwide. It could also
propose specific initiatives that will hasten progress towards the vision. These could relate to
market information, production and trade data collection/sharing, promotional/marketing
campaigns and resources and PR/communications.
Important to the success of this project will be the effective international communication of the
results and conclusions to reach a genuinely shared international vision. The following could be
considered to deliver this:
Formal report available in different languages (to be agreed by steering group) online from
AIPH, AIPH member and stakeholder websites
Powerpoint presentation summarising the project to be available to all and promoted
through members, steering group network and national/international trade media.
Members will be encouraged to present and promote within their own countries
Filmed presentation available online and promoted. This could be available in different
languages (e.g. with subtitles or voiceovers) to maximise global reach
Presentations, debates and report circulation at international industry events e.g. IPM trade
shows, IFTF, Proflora, IFTEX, Cultivate, AIPH approved Expos, etc
Promotion through the AIPH international media database
Active ‘sell in’ to consumer and international business media could also be considered.
Project Delivery
Delivery of the project will be the responsibility of AIPH under the leadership of Secretary General,
Tim Briercliffe.
6
Annex 21 – AIPH Board Meeting – 19 October 2015
AIPH will appoint an independent ‘Project Manager’ who will be tasked with delivering the project to
the agreed timescales and milestones.
Where necessary additional contractors (e.g. consultants and experts) will be appointed to assist in
supporting the data and information collection required in the project.
AIPH and the Project Manager will report to the Steering Group with project updates and for
guidance.
7
AIPH Regulations for International Horticultural Exhibitions (Expos) – DRAFT vs 4
September 2015
Introduction to the revising of the Regulations:
Since the AIPH Congress in Qingdao in 2014 there has been discussion regarding the
revision of AIPH Regulations for exhibition organisers to:
1
Proposed Regulations
Contents
1 AIPH Objective and Role
2 AIPH Governance and Regulatory Authority
3 Exhibition Categories
4 Application Process
5 Approval
6 Reporting to AIPH
7 Sanctions
8 Services Provided by AIPH
9 Fees
10 Use of AIPH Brand
11 Exhibition Requirements
12 Rules for Participation
13 Managing Disputes
Section 1
AIPH Objective and Role
The AIPH objective for international horticultural exhibitions (Expos) is to promote the products of the
horticultural industry to the general public, businesses and governments and to increase global appreciation
for horticulture in terms of its benefits to individuals and societies.
The role of AIPH is to ensure expos are successful through a defined approval and monitoring process and
through regulating the number of permitted expos.
Section 2
AIPH Governance and Regulatory Authority
The approval and implementation of the AIPH Regulations for International Horticultural Exhibitions is done in
accordance with the Charter and Internal Regulations of AIPH as published on the AIPH website www.aiph.org.
AIPH has international responsibility for the approval of international horticultural exhibitions.
A1 Exhibitions:
According to Article 4.B.2 of the Convention Relating to International Exhibitions, the Bureau International des
Expositions (BIE) will grant recognition to A1 horticultural exhibitions approved by the International Association
of Horticultural Producers (AIPH), provided that there is an interval of at least two years between such
2
exhibitions in different countries and at least ten years between events held in the same country; due to be held
in the interval between two registered exhibitions.
A1 International Horticultural Exhibitions must comply with the Regulations of both AIPH and BIE.
Section 3
Exhibition Categories
Invitations can
be issued
through
diplomatic
channels
3
Opening and hundred
closing dates thousand)
must not clash
with opening
and closing
dates of an A1
exhibition
With each
Exhibition, AIPH
members
should
recommend at
least 5 trading
4
organizations
for reference
list.
After every
Exhibition, AIPH
will integrate
the trading and
organizations’
information on
the website
Section 4
Application Process
Application for AIPH recognition must be supported by a Full Member organization of AIPH in the country where
the exhibition will be held.
In the case of a country where there is no Full Member of AIPH an application can be submitted without the
support of a Full Member of AIPH but the financial guarantee will be increased by 100% and AIPH may require
further investigative work which will be at the cost of the applicant.
A1 applications should also have the documented support of the national government.
The application must be submitted to the Secretariat General of AIPH at least 6 weeks prior to the next AIPH
Marketing & Exhibitions Committee and General Meeting. The Secretariat General reserves the right not to put
forward for approval any application received later than this.
An application will consist of the following documents:
AIPH questionnaire
Feasibility study
AIPH Site inspection report
Formal letter of support from the AIPH member (if applicable)
Formal letter of support from the host city/region (for B)
Formal letter requesting approval from the organization or authority making the application. This
should be signed by the most senior person in that organization
Confirmation that the necessary finance will be provided to deliver the proposed exhibition
Confirmation of support from national government (Class A1 only)
The relevant financial guarantee must be paid to AIPH 30 days prior to the AIPH meeting where the application
will be considered or before an AIPH Site Inspection, whichever is sooner.
The documents will be circulated to all AIPH members prior to the next Marketing & Exhibitions Committee and
General meeting.
The applicant will be invited to make a presentation of the application during the meeting of the AIPH Marketing
& Exhibitions Committee.
Section 5
Approval
5
AIPH will consider the application in closed session and inform the applicant of the decision at the earliest
opportunity. The General Meeting is entitled to grant approval subject to conditions.
In the event that there is competition for a particular time period for hosting an exhibition AIPH will reach a
judgement on the matter.
For Class A1 World Horticultural Exhibitions it is also necessary to gain recognition from the BIE (www.bie-
paris.org). AIPH approval is required prior to making an application to BIE.
Section 6
Reporting to AIPH
Following approval from AIPH, organisers are required to verbally report progress to AIPH meetings and field
questions from members. Reports must be presented in English. The frequency of reports required will be
specified by the AIPH Secretariat General but will be at least once per year following approval.
During the four years prior to an A1 and B Class exhibition organisers will be subject to the following on-site
inspections:
The number of inspectors within the AIPH inspection team will be determined by AIPH but will normally be two.
Following each inspection a report will be produced by the AIPH inspector. This report will be made available to
the organisers and to AIPH Full Members.
Note: We can develop annexes that specify the key areas that will be inspected during each inspection. These
will be different in each year.
AIPH reserves the right to require more frequent inspections if non-conformities are identified during an annual
inspection or if requested by the organiser.
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for up to two AIPH inspectors per visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
6
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or the organiser) then
an additional fee per day will be required to cover the additional time cost. Fees will be specified by Secretariat
General.
Following approval from AIPH, organisers are required to verbally report progress to AIPH meetings and field
questions from members. Reports must be presented in English. The frequency of reports required will be
specified by the AIPH Secretariat General but will be at least once per year following approval.
Class C and D exhibitions will not automatically require an on-site inspection in advance of the exhibition.
However, AIPH reserves the right to do so in the following circumstances:
Concerns about progress
If a complaint is raised by a member of AIPH
If requested by the organiser
If the exhibition is new and has never been run before
When an inspection is required then Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for up to
two AIPH inspectors per visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or the organiser) then
an additional fee per day will be required to cover the additional time cost. Fees will be specified by Secretariat
General.
Final Reports
Exhibition organisers are required to submit a final report to the AIPH Secretariat within 90 days of the closing
of the exhibition. The report must include the points outlined in Annex #.
Section 7
Sanctions
If, after approval has been granted to an exhibition by AIPH, it transpires that the organizers have not respected
the provisions of the regulations, or have respected them only partially, the approval will be withdrawn, and all
members of AIPH will be informed of this decision.
In the event that inspection visits highlight serious concerns that could prevent the organisers from achieving
the quality of exhibition required by AIPH or if the exhibition fails to meet other obligations to AIPH then AIPH
reserves the right to withdraw its approval of the exhibition.
Any decision to withdraw approval would require majority approval by the AIPH General Meeting.
7
In the event that approval is withdrawn there would be no reimbursement of any of the financial guarantee and
the organisers would be liable to pay to AIPH the full gate fee payment as agreed at the original approval.
When approval is withdrawn the exhibition must remove all reference to AIPH in any communication relating to
the event.
For Class A1 exhibitions then AIPH would inform BIE of its decision.
Section 8
Services Provided by AIPH
AIPH assists in organizing 3 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for the flight tickets (economy
class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two of them are to be nominated by
AIPH.
AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skillful international Honorary Jury members.
AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of an AIPH certificate, and an
‘AIPH award trophy’.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition.
AIPH can provide support (on site if necessary) in the development and organization of competitions
during the Expo. This includes the following:
Assistance in organization and management of the juries (national and international competitions)
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize winners
through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters. AIPH will also seek to attract more
international visitors to the exhibition.
AIPH will endeavour to respond to questions relating to technological, infrastructural and horticultural
aspects of exhibitions or to recommend appropriate consultancy support.
AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International Horticultural Exhibitions as well
as to related Technical Guidance Notes
AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial obligations
of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation occurs.
AIPH assists in organizing 2 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for the flight tickets (economy
8
class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two of them are to be nominated by
AIPH.
AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skilful international Honorary Jury members.
AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of an AIPH certificate, and an
‘AIPH award trophy’.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition.
AIPH can provide support in the development and organization of competitions during the Expo. This
includes the following:
Assistance in organization and management of the juries (national and international competitions)
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize winners
through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters. AIPH will also seek to attract more
international visitors to the exhibition.
AIPH will endeavour to respond to questions relating to technological, infrastructural and horticultural
aspects of exhibitions or to recommend appropriate consultancy support.
AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International Horticultural Exhibitions as well
as to related Technical Guidance Notes
AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial obligations
of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation occurs.
AIPH assists in organizing one International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for the flight tickets (economy
class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two of them are to be nominated by
AIPH.
AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skilful international Honorary Jury members.
AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of an AIPH certificate, and an
‘AIPH award trophy’.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition.
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize winners
through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters.
AIPH will endeavour to respond to questions relating to technological, infrastructural and horticultural
9
aspects of exhibitions or to recommend appropriate consultancy support.
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial obligations
of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation occurs.
AIPH assists in organizing one International Honorary Jury round and pays for the flight tickets (economy
class) and hotel rooms of 2 foreign Honorary Jury Members nominated by AIPH.
AIPH donates a prize for an International competition for the best stand. This prize consists of an AIPH
certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition.
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize winners
through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters.
AIPH will endeavour to respond to questions relating to technological, infrastructural and horticultural
aspects of exhibitions or to recommend appropriate consultancy support.
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial obligations
of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation occurs.
Section 9
Fees
Financial Guarantee:
Applicants for recognition of an exhibition by AIPH are obliged to pay a financial guarantee to AIPH directly as
the application is submitted, AIPH will send an invoice to the organization that applies for AIPH approval.
Provided that the organizers have fulfilled all their obligations, including the submission of a final report (format
as in Appendix 3) not later than ninety days after the closing date, AIPH will refund the following proportion of
the financial guarantee:
Class A1: € 100,000
Class B: € 60,000
Class C: € 6,000
Class D: € 12,500
If an application is not accepted by AIPH, or if within one year of definitive recognition the application is
withdrawn, 20% of the financial guarantee will be repaid by AIPH. If an application is withdrawn more than one
year after definitive approval, AIPH will retain the whole financial guarantee.
Gate Fee:
For all exhibitions, the organizers are bound to pay to AIPH the specified license fee (See section 3) depending on
the predicted number of visitors.
10
Caution License Caution License
< 5 million € 150,000 € 500,000 € 100,000 € 400,000
5-10 million € 150,000 € 750,000 € 100,000 € 600,000
> 10 million € 150,000 € 1,000,000 € 100,000 € 800,000
This figure will be estimated and specified in the original application approved by AIPH and this estimate becomes
the minimum sum which must be paid to AIPH. If final numbers exceed those predicted then organisers will be
required to pay the higher level fee after the event.
Payment of the license fee starts from 3 years ahead of the opening of the exhibition for A1 and B Class exhibitions
and is due for payment by the following times:
3 years before opening: 25% of total fee
1 year before opening: 25% of total fee
1 month before closing: remaining outstanding fee
Payment of the license fee starts from 2 years ahead of the opening of the exhibition for C and D Class exhibitions
and is due for payment by the following times:
2 years before opening: 25% of total fee
1 year before opening: 25% of total fee
1 month after closing: remaining outstanding fee
AIPH is registered for Value Added Tax (VAT) in the United Kingdom. Payment should be made following receipt
of invoice which will include the addition of UK VAT for exhibitions organised in the European Union.
Penalties:
In the event that any payment is not made by the due date then interest will be charged on outstanding debts.
As AIPH finances operate from the United Kingdom the interest rate applied will be in accordance with the 2002
amendment to the UK Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998. This entitles AIPH to charge an 8%
interest rate plus the Bank of England Base Rate. The interest charged will be the sum of these two interest rates.
Section 10
Use of AIPH Brand
AIPH encourages the use of the AIPH brand in association with the promotion and endorsement of exhibitions.
Organisers are required to follow the AIPH Brand Use Rules as outlined in Annex #.
11
On information provided to exhibitors
On media releases
Visible at exhibition entrances
On exhibition entry tickets
On a flag displayed
The AIPH brand can be used on merchandise sold from the exhibition. In this case all uses must obtain prior
approval from the AIPH Secretariat and may be subject to a royalty charge.
Section 11
Exhibition Requirements
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for the AIPH officer delivering the speech:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
12
will be possible in this manner to prevent particular undesirable exhibitors from participating in an international
horticultural exhibition.
Exhibitions which have been registered with the BIE should only admit or reject foreign exhibitors with the
approval of the Commissioner of the Government of the country concerned.
International horticultural exhibitions which have been recognized by AIPH must set up a committee consisting
of one delegate from each of the participating countries. The function of committee is to ensure the equal
observance of the rights and duties of exhibitors and they should be enabled, in an advisory capacity, to assist the
organizers of exhibitions in laying down the conditions for exhibiting and for the regulation of the award of the
prizes.
Reimbursement of travel and lodging costs of delegates (travel tickets, hotel costs, subsistence etc.) is the
responsibility of member organizations or the organizing committees in the various countries.
11.3 – Competitions
Competitions are an important component of horticultural exhibitions. They stimulate the interest of both
participants and visitors; they provide incentive for exhibitors and enable organizers to reward excellence.
Organizers of international horticultural exhibitions are therefore required to include competitions in their events,
to make efficient arrangements for their judging and to award appropriate prizes to those whose exhibits are of
exceptional quality. Organizers are required to provide information about these aspects when answering the
application questionnaire and their response will be taken into account in the review procedure. However, AIPH
recognizes that arrangements for these activities will differ between exhibitions. Therefore recommendations
have been prepared for the guidance of organizers (Annex #).
The organizers are obliged to send to the AIPH secretariat details of the regulations relating to their competitions
not later than one year prior to the opening of the exhibition concerned. AIPH will respond with required
amendments within one month of submitting the regulations. Organizers are required to accept the amendments
requested.
The organizers must guarantee that all exhibitors who participate in an international exhibition will be entitled,
without discrimination of nationality, to participate in all the competitions which are organized by the
organizing committee and to be eligible for prizes awarded by this committee.
An international jury is to be organized as outlined in Section 8 and procedures for dealing with jury members
are outlined in Annex #. Organizers are required to make practical and travel arrangements for the
international jury.
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost (with exception of costs covered by AIPH as outlined in Section
8), the following for international jury members:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
13
at least two years before the opening date of an A1 exhibition for indoor exhibitions;
at least one year before the opening of B, C and D Class exhibitions.
11.4.1 – Transport Costs (Class A1, B and C)
The organizers shall undertake to contribute to the costs of two-way transport of plants and materials necessary
for the building of the stands.
The minimum contribution to these costs shall be reimbursement of the two-way trip from the national border
(customs post, port, airport) to the location of the exhibition.
These costs are calculated on the basis of transport rates applicable in the host country.
No payment shall be due for the return leg of the journey:
for cut flowers;
if the plants on the exhibition stand are sold in the country where the show is taking place.
11.4.5 – Insurance
Organizers of and exhibitors at international horticultural exhibitions must take out an insurance for civil liability.
14
Organizers are required reduce the cost of exhibiting for participants. This can be done either by contributing to
the cost of construction and maintenance or offering money prizes.
Overall amount of money prizes
Organizers who decide to award money prizes must consult the AIPH Secretariat on the overall value of money
prizes to be awarded for an exhibition.
11.4.8 – Promotion
The exhibition is required to provide information for the international media relating to the exhibition and to
enable it to be promoted worldwide. There must be a clear media contact point with information available in
appropriate languages, including English.
12.1 – Sponsorship
All participants in AIPH recognized exhibitions shall be free to negotiate financial and other support from third
parties, provided that support is permissible under the legislation of the host country and, in the case of BIE
recognized events, complies with that organization’s requirements.
Organizers of all exhibitions recognized by AIPH shall include in their conditions for participation full details of any
restrictions which will apply to the display of advertisements, the distribution of literature and any other activities
intended to promote products and services other than those exhibited by the participant.
These conditions shall permit participants to promote such products and services but the organizers are entitled
to limit the inclusion of or reference to them to a maximum of 5% of the total surface area of the exhibit itself.
As far as publicity is made within the exhibition, sponsorship agreements concluded by exhibitors may not be
conflicting with the sponsorship interests of the organizer of the exhibition nor with the image of the exhibition.
On collective country exhibits of exhibitions the sale of national products which might be in conflict with
agreements of the organizer made with sponsors must be allowed.
12.2 – Commercial activities
Retail sales on the stand are permitted. However, these must not exceed 20% of the total covered area of the
exhibit or 100 square meters, whichever is the smallest area. For stands that are larger than 2000 square meters
then the area allocated for retail sales should be determined through negotiation between organizer and
exhibitor. Any product sold should be related to the exhibit and linked with the exhibiting country and in a way
that supports the objectives of the exhibit.
15
With a view to distribution of commercial information, an information area can be made available ONLY FOR THE
TRADE in the NATIONAL stands (stands representing countries, or regions if the country itself is not taking part,
or of communities which are representing a country).
An information area is only allowed on national stands with a minimum area of 500 m2 (or when 500 m2 was
requested but not granted).
The maximum area of this information area: 100 m2 to be set up and incorporated in the stand in such a way that
it is not “visible” to the general public.
The form, layout and design of the information stand must be submitted to the organizers for approval.
The cost of setting up an information stand will be met by the exhibitor.
12.3 – Commercial contact days
In order to improve the commercial appeal of Class A1 and B exhibitions, the organizers must make it possible for
participants to organize commercial contact days.
Section 13
Managing disputes
Annexes
Competition guidelines
16
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
AIPH Regulations for International Horticultural Exhibitions (Expos) – DRAFT vs 4
Deleted: 10 February
September 2015
Deleted: 2
Red – proposed new text Deleted: February
Contents
1 AIPH Objective and Role
2 AIPH Governance and Regulatory Authority
3 Exhibition Categories
4 Application Process
5 Approval
6 Reporting to AIPH
7 Sanctions
8 Services Provided by AIPH
9 Fees
10 Use of AIPH Brand
11 Exhibition Requirements
12 Rules for Participation
13 Managing Disputes
Section 1 OBJECT
AIPH Objective and Role In order to enhance the value of true international horticultural exhibitions,
to prevent their being held too frequently and to guarantee their success,
the horticultural organizations which are members of AIPH have agreed
The AIPH objective for international horticultural exhibitions (Expos) is to promote the on the following guidelines for the organization of international horticultural
products of the horticultural industry to the general public, businesses and governments exhibitions. The objective of these international horticultural exhibitions is
and to increase global appreciation for horticulture in terms of its benefits to individuals to promote productivity in all sectors of horticulture and the use of
Deleted: .
horticultural products, as well as the general public’s appreciation of this
and societies. production.
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
International horticultural exhibitions promote world-wide co-operation in
The role of AIPH is to ensure expos are successful through a defined approval and monitoring professional horticulture and unhindered free trade in horticultural Deleted: 10 February
products and services.
process and through regulating the number of permitted expos. Deleted: robust
A1 International Horticultural Exhibitions must comply with the Regulations of both AIPH and BIE. Deleted: 10 February
Section 4 1.1
Application Process Application for AIPH recognition must be supported by a member
organization of AIPH in the country where the exhibition will be
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
Application for AIPH recognition must be supported by a Full Member organization of AIPH in the held. The application must be forwarded to the Secretariat
country where the exhibition will be held. General of AIPH. Deleted: 10 February
Approval for horticultural exhibitions can only be granted, if the
In the case of a country where there is no Full Member of AIPH an application can be submitted requesting organization has been a member of AIPH for at least
without the support of a Full Member of AIPH but the financial guarantee will be increased by 24 months. The Council of AIPH can make an exception in
100% and AIPH may require further investigative work which will be at the cost of the applicant. extraordinary circumstances.
A1 applications should also have the documented support of the national government. If an application for recognition of an exhibition is not accepted by
the AIPH, a new application may only be submitted at least one
The application must be submitted to the Secretariat General of AIPH at least 6 weeks prior to the year after the refusal to accept was notified.
next AIPH Marketing & Exhibitions Committee and General Meeting. The Secretariat General If several countries wish to organize a horticultural exhibition in
reserves the right not to put forward for approval any application received later than this. the course of the same year, AIPH will adjudicate in the matter.
An application will consist of the following documents: 1.2 INSCRIPTIONS IN PROGRAM OF EXHIBITIONS
A decision on the approval of a horticultural exhibition, for which
AIPH questionnaire Deleted: Completed
an application for inscription in the AIPH program of exhibitions
Feasibility study has been lodged, will be the exclusive responsibility of AIPH.
In order to obtain recognition the completed questionnaire on the
AIPH Site inspection report exhibition itself and the phytosanitary regulations must be
Formal letter of support from the AIPH member (if applicable) submitted in time. The participation and influence of the
profession in the organization and management of the exhibition,
Formal letter of support from the host city/region (for B) the fair treatment of all exhibits for competition, the free access of
exhibition products and services for home and foreign exhibitors
Formal letter requesting approval from the organization or authority making the and the observance of the special AIPH-rules for exhibitions are
application. This should be signed by the most senior person in that organization important criteria for recognition.
The information given in the questionnaire on regulations for
Confirmation that the necessary finance will be provided to deliver the proposed commercial trade is for the use of prospective participants only.
exhibition
Confirmation of support from national government (Class A1 only)
The relevant financial guarantee must be paid to AIPH 30 days prior to the AIPH meeting where
the application will be considered or before an AIPH Site Inspection, whichever is sooner.
The documents will be circulated to all AIPH members prior to the next Marketing & Exhibitions
Committee and General meeting.
The applicant will be invited to make a presentation of the application during the meeting of the Deleted: short
AIPH Marketing & Exhibitions Committee.
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 10 February
Section 5
Approval
AIPH will consider the application in closed session and inform the applicant of the decision at the
earliest opportunity. The General Meeting is entitled to grant approval subject to conditions.
In the event that there is competition for a particular time period for hosting an exhibition AIPH will
reach a judgement on the matter.
For Class A1 World Horticultural Exhibitions it is also necessary to gain recognition from the BIE Deleted: approval
(www.bie-paris.org). AIPH approval is required prior to making an application to BIE.
Deleted: Details of this process are available from BIE.
During the four years prior to an A1 and B Class exhibition organisers will be subject to the
following on-site inspections:
The number of inspectors within the AIPH inspection team will be determined by AIPH but will
normally be two. Following each inspection a report will be produced by the AIPH inspector. This
report will be made available to the organisers and to AIPH Full Members.
Note: We can develop annexes that specify the key areas that will be inspected during each
inspection. These will be different in each year.
AIPH reserves the right to require more frequent inspections if non-conformities are identified
during an annual inspection or if requested by the organiser. Deleted: deemed necessary because of any concerns that
AIPH may have
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for up to two AIPH inspectors per Deleted: f
visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or the
organiser) then an additional fee per day will be required to cover the additional time cost. Fees
will be specified by Secretariat General.
Class C and D exhibitions will not automatically require an on-site inspection in advance of the
exhibition. However, AIPH reserves the right to do so in the following circumstances:
Concerns about progress
If a complaint is raised by a member of AIPH
If requested by the organiser
If the exhibition is new and has never been run before
When an inspection is required then Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following
for up to two AIPH inspectors per visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or the
organiser) then an additional fee per day will be required to cover the additional time cost. Fees
will be specified by Secretariat General.
Final Reports
Exhibition organisers are required to submit a final report to the AIPH Secretariat within 90 days of
the closing of the exhibition. The report must include the points outlined in Annex #.
In the event that inspection visits highlight serious concerns that could prevent the organisers from Deleted: recognition
achieving the quality of exhibition required by AIPH or if the exhibition fails to meet other
obligations to AIPH then AIPH reserves the right to withdraw its approval of the exhibition.
Any decision to withdraw approval would require majority approval by the AIPH General Meeting.
In the event that approval is withdrawn there would be no reimbursement of any of the financial
guarantee and the organisers would be liable to pay to AIPH the full gate fee payment as agreed at
the original approval.
When approval is withdrawn the exhibition must remove all reference to AIPH in any
communication relating to the event.
For Class A1 exhibitions then AIPH would inform BIE of its decision.
AIPH assists in organizing 3 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for the flight tickets 1. AIPH assists in organizing 3 International Honorary Jury
rounds and pays for the flight tickets (economy class) and
(economy class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two of them
hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two
are to be nominated by AIPH. of them are to be nominated by the Executive Committee of
AIPH.
AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skilful international Honorary Jury members. 2. AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skilful
international Honorary Jury members.
3. As an alternative to point 1 (regarding the International
AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of an AIPH Honorary Jury) AIPH can participate in a short term indoor-
certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’. exhibition; this will be decided in consultation with the
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
organizing committee.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition. 4. AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This Deleted: 10 February
prize consists of an AIPH certificate, an ‘AIPH award cup’ and
a sum of € 10,000 (ten thousand euro). This prize will
AIPH can provide support (on site if necessary) in the development and organization of stimulate participation in the exhibition. Deleted: will
competitions during the Expo. This includes the following: 5. AIPH will stimulate its member organizations by all means to
participate in the exhibition.
Formatted: Font color: Red
6. AIPH will stimulate and contribute by all means (i.e. AIPH
Assistance in preparing competition rules website, websites and magazines of AIPH members) to gain Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 1.27 cm, No bullets or
publicity for the exhibition and for prize winners. numbering, Widow/Orphan control, Tab stops: Not at
Assistance in organization and management of the juries (national and international 7. AIPH will assist with all available knowledge as regards 1.9 cm + 4.44 cm
competitions) technological, infrastructural and horticultural aspects of
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.27 cm
exhibitions.
8. In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH
Formatted: Font color: Red
Assistance in determining the results of jury deliberations can decide to adjust the financial obligations of AIPH that
may result from the services mentioned at 1, 3, 4 and 6. The Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 1.9 cm, No bullets or
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize organizing committee will be informed instantly by AIPH if numbering, Widow/Orphan control, Tab stops: Not at
winners through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters. AIPH will also seek to
such a situation occurs. 1.9 cm + 4.44 cm
attract more international visitors to the exhibition. Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.27 cm
1.6 SERVICES PROVIDED BY AIPH FOR A2/B1 EXHIBITIONS Formatted: Font color: Red
AIPH will endeavour to respond to questions relating to technological, infrastructural and
Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 1.9 cm, No bullets or
horticultural aspects of exhibitions or to recommend appropriate consultancy support. Under the condition that all requirements as mentioned under
1.4 GATE FEE CHARGE are fulfilled, AIPH will provide the numbering, Widow/Orphan control, Tab stops: Not at
hereafter mentioned services and contributions to the approved 1.9 cm + 4.44 cm
AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International Horticultural exhibitions. Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.27 cm
Exhibitions as well as to related Technical Guidance Notes
1. AIPH assists in organizing 2 International Honorary Jury Formatted: Font color: Red
round and pays for the flight tickets (economy class) and
AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 1.27 cm, No bullets or
of them are to be nominated by the Executive Committee of numbering, Widow/Orphan control, Tab stops: Not at
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial AIPH. 1.9 cm + 4.44 cm
2. AIPH will keep and make available a list of skilful international
obligations of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation Honorary Jury members. Deleted: <#> a staff member to be on-site during the
occurs. 3. As an alternative to point 1 (regarding the International exhibition and one month before the opening. The ... [1]
Honorary Jury) AIPH can participate in a short term indoor-
Formatted ... [2]
AIPH will provide the following services to approved Class B exhibitions: exhibition; this will be decided in consultation with the
organizing committee. Formatted ... [3]
4. AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This
AIPH assists in organizing 2 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for the flight tickets prize consists of an AIPH certificate, an ‘AIPH award cup’ and Deleted: ¶ ... [4]
(economy class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two of them a sum of € 7,500 (seven thousand five hundred euro) . This
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
are to be nominated by AIPH. prize will stimulate participation in the exhibition.
5. AIPH will stimulate its member organizations by all means to Deleted: 10 February
participate in the exhibition.
AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skilful international Honorary Jury members. 6. AIPH will stimulate and contribute by all means (i.e. AIPH
website, websites and magazines of AIPH members) to gain
AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of an AIPH publicity for the exhibition and for prize winners.
certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’. 7. AIPH will assist with all available knowledge as regards
technological, infrastructural and horticultural aspects of
exhibitions.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition. 8. In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH
can decide to adjust the financial obligations of AIPH that Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.27 cm, No bullets or
AIPH can provide support in the development and organization of competitions during the may result from the services mentioned at 1, 3, 4 and 6. The numbering
organizing committee will be informed instantly by AIPH if
Expo. This includes the following: such a situation occurs.
Assistance in determining the results of jury deliberations Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 1.27 cm, Bulleted +
Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.63 cm + Indent at: 1.27 cm, No
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize widow/orphan control, Tab stops: 1.9 cm, Left + 4.44
winners through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters. AIPH will also seek to cm, Left
attract more international visitors to the exhibition.
Deleted: ¶
AIPH will endeavour to respond to questions relating to technological, infrastructural and Formatted: List Paragraph, Tab stops: Not at 5.08 cm
horticultural aspects of exhibitions or to recommend appropriate consultancy support.
Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 1.27 cm, No bullets or
AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International Horticultural numbering, Widow/Orphan control
Exhibitions as well as to related Technical Guidance Notes
AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial
obligations of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
occurs.
Deleted: 10 February
AIPH will provide the following services to approved Class C exhibitions:
AIPH assists in organizing one International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for the flight
tickets (economy class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury Members; at least two
of them are to be nominated by AIPH.
AIPH will maintain and make available a list of skilful international Honorary Jury members.
AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of an AIPH
certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’.
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition.
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize
winners through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters.
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial
obligations of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation
occurs.
AIPH assists in organizing one International Honorary Jury round and pays for the flight Deleted: s
tickets (economy class) and hotel rooms of 2 foreign Honorary Jury Members nominated by
AIPH.
AIPH donates a prize for an International competition for the best stand. This prize consists
of an AIPH certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’.
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in the exhibition. Deleted: 10 February
AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition and for prize
winners through the AIPH website, media releases and newsletters.
In exceptional situations the Executive Committee of AIPH can decide to adjust the financial
obligations of AIPH. The organizing committee will be informed by AIPH if such a situation
occurs.
Section 10
Use of AIPH Brand
AIPH encourages the use of the AIPH brand in association with the promotion and endorsement of
exhibitions. Organisers are required to follow the AIPH Brand Use Rules as outlined in Annex #.
The AIPH brand can be used on merchandise sold from the exhibition. In this case all uses must
obtain prior approval from the AIPH Secretariat and may be subject to a royalty charge. Deleted: will
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for the AIPH officer delivering the
speech:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
at least three years before the opening date of an A1 exhibition for outdoor exhibitions; at least three years before the opening date of an A1
exhibition for outdoor exhibitions;
at least two years before the opening date of an A1 exhibition for indoor exhibitions; at least two years before the opening date of an A1
at least one year before the opening of B, C and D Class exhibitions. exhibition for indoor exhibitions;
at least one year before the opening of an A2
exhibition.
11.4.1 – Transport Costs (Class A1, B and C) 5.2. TRANSPORT COSTS
The organizers shall undertake to contribute to the costs of two-way transport of plants and The organizers shall undertake to contribute to the costs of two-
materials necessary for the building of the stands. way transport of plants and materials necessary for the building
of the stands.
The minimum contribution to these costs shall be reimbursement of the two-way trip from the
The minimum contribution to these costs shall be reimbursement
national border (customs post, port, airport) to the location of the exhibition. of the two-way trip from the national border (customs post, port,
These costs are calculated on the basis of transport rates applicable in the host country. airport) to the location of the exhibition.
These costs are calculated on the basis of transport rates
No payment shall be due for the return leg of the journey: applicable in the host country.
for cut flowers; No payment shall be due for the return leg of the journey:
if the plants on the exhibition stand are sold in the country where the show is taking place. for cut flowers;
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
if the plants on the exhibition stand are sold in the country
where the show is taking place. Deleted: 10 February
Section 12 1.1 Only one common stand may be accepted per country for an AIPH
Rules for Participation recognized exhibition. On the common stand, it is naturally permissible
to display the name signs of the individual growers who form part of the
collective display.
12.1 – Sponsorship
All participants in AIPH recognized exhibitions shall be free to negotiate financial and other support from
third parties, provided that support is permissible under the legislation of the host country and, in the case CHAPTER VI : COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AND SPONSORSHIP
of BIE recognized events, complies with that organization’s requirements. 6.1 SPONSORSHIP
Organizers of all exhibitions recognized by AIPH shall include in their conditions for participation full details All participants in AIPH recognized exhibitions shall be free to
of any restrictions which will apply to the display of advertisements, the distribution of literature and any negotiate financial and other support from third parties, provided
other activities intended to promote products and services other than those exhibited by the participant. that support is permissible under the legislation of the host
These conditions shall permit participants to promote such products and services but the organizers are country and, in the case of BIE recognized events, complies with
entitled to limit the inclusion of or reference to them to a maximum of 5% of the total surface area of the that organization’s requirements.
exhibit itself. Organizers of all exhibitions recognized by AIPH shall include in
As far as publicity is made within the exhibition, sponsorship agreements concluded by exhibitors may not their conditions for participation full details of any restrictions
be conflicting with the sponsorship interests of the organizer of the exhibition nor with the image of the which will apply to the display of advertisements, the distribution
exhibition. of literature and any other activities intended to promote products
and services other than those exhibited by the participant.
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
On collective country exhibits of exhibitions the sale of national products which might be in conflict with These conditions shall permit participants to promote such
agreements of the organizer made with sponsors must be allowed. products and services but the organizers are entitled to limit the Deleted: 10 February
inclusion of or reference to them to a maximum of 5% of the total
12.2 – Commercial activities surface area of the exhibit itself.
Retail sales on the stand are permitted. However, these must not exceed 20% of the total covered area of Deleted: surface
the exhibit or 100 square meters, whichever is the smallest area. For stands that are larger than 2000 As far as publicity is made within the exhibition, sponsorship
square meters then the area allocated for retail sales should be determined through negotiation between agreements concluded by exhibitors may not be conflicting with
organizer and exhibitor. Any product sold should be related to the exhibit and linked with the exhibiting the sponsorship interests of the organizer of the exhibition nor
country and in a way that supports the objectives of the exhibit. with the image of the exhibition.
With a view to distribution of commercial information, an information area can be made available ONLY On collective country exhibits of exhibitions the sale of national
FOR THE TRADE in the NATIONAL stands (stands representing countries, or regions if the country itself products which might be in conflict with agreements of the
is not taking part, or of communities which are representing a country). organizer made with sponsors must be allowed.
An information area is only allowed on national stands with a minimum area of 500 m 2 (or when 500 m2
was requested but not granted). 6.2 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES
The maximum area of this information area: 100 m 2 to be set up and incorporated in the stand in such a Retail sales on the stand are prohibited.
way that it is not “visible” to the general public.
Within the exhibition, direct sales to visitors may only be made in
The form, layout and design of the information stand must be submitted to the organizers for approval. rooms or areas of the exhibition especially reserved for this
The cost of setting up an information stand will be met by the exhibitor. purpose. The costs of providing such a room or area will be met
by the exhibitor.
12.3 – Commercial contact days
With a view to distribution of commercial information, an
In order to improve the commercial appeal of Class A1 and B exhibitions, the organizers must make it information area can be made available ONLY FOR THE TRADE
possible for participants to organize commercial contact days. in the NATIONAL stands (stands representing countries, or
regions if the country itself is not taking part, or of communities
which are representing a country).
An information area is only allowed on national stands with a
minimum area of 500 m2 (or when 500 m2 was requested but not
granted).
The maximum area of this information area: 100 m 2 to be set up
and incorporated in the stand in such a way that it is not “visible”
to the general public.
The form, layout and design of the information stand must be
submitted to the organizers for approval.
The cost of setting up an information stand will be met by the
exhibitor.
Deleted: Annex 15, AIPH Marketing Committee, 18 March
New AIPH Exhibitions Regulations – DRAFT vs 4 – 28 September 2015 – Confidential 2015, Paris, France
Deleted: 2
6.3 COMMERCIAL CONTACT DAYS
In order to improve the commercial appeal of A1 and A2 Deleted: 10 February
exhibitions, the organizers must make it possible for participants
to organize commercial contact days.
Annexes
Competition guidelines
Note: In order to help differentiate A1 from other expo classes it is proposed to increase the gate fee
to 2% for A1 expos and to provide a full-time on-site presence during the expo.
Note: It is suggested that we remove the clause permitting the organiser to have an AIPH garden rather
than expenses payment for the jury. The amount is too small to make a significant garden and there
is no mechanism to control what it is like and whether it compliments or detracts from the AIPH brand.
Note: It is suggested that we remove the cash element of the AIPH prize. It is unlikely that a cash prize
stimulates participation and usually it comes as a surprise to the winner! There would be greater
‘value’ in focusing on the trophy and obtaining related media coverage.
In consideration of your agreement to the terms and conditions of this letter AIPH hereby
awards permission to you to organise and hold the international horticultural exhibition
detailed below, subject to the following terms and conditions:
2 You will fulfil all the necessary requirements by no later than, namely:
Payment of the financial guarantee in the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Euro by no
later than 14 March 2015 – completed
Successful site inspection to be completed before 18 March 2015 – completed.
Evidence provided of financial underwriting for the expo before 14 March 2015 –
completed.
3 As these requirements have been fulfilled it is intended that, the AIPH Secretary
General can confirm final approval at the point of the signng of this agreement.
4 You will obtain approval for the exhibition from the Bureau International des
Expositions (otherwise known as BIE, www.bie-paris.org) which has responsibility for
approving non-horticultural exhibitions).
5 You will comply with the Regulations. In the event of a conflict between this letter and
the Regulations, the terms and conditions set out in this letter will prevail.
6.1 You will pay the balance of the gate fee charge (or, where relevant, the
applicable minimum figure) within 90 days of the date on which the exhibition
closes.
6.2 For the purposes of establishing the amount of the gate fee charge you will
send to AIPH a statement showing the total net gate fee income received
from the exhibition when making the payment.
6.3 All payments to AIPH under this letter are exclusive of any value added tax or
other applicable tax. AIPH is registered for VAT in the UK and will charge
VAT in addition to the fees outlined above.
6.4 You will make the payments referred to in this paragraph 6 to AIPH without
any set-off or deduction.
6.5 If you fail to make any payment due under this paragraph 6 on time, you will
pay interest from the due date until payment is made to at a rate of 8% per
annum over the Bank of England base rate from time to time.
7 AIPH is reviewing the Regulations. A small number of changes are applied to this
agreement with Floriade 2022 Almere and the organisers are required to comply with
these. These are shown in Annex I.
8 No variation of this letter will be binding unless made in writing and signed by both
parties.
9 You will not assign or deal with the benefit of this permission letter except with AIPH’s
prior written consent.
10 This letter cannot be enforced by a person who is not a party to it under the United
Kingdom Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or otherwise.
11 No waiver by AIPH of any breach of the terms and conditions in this letter by you will
be considered as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other
provision.
12 If any provision of this letter is declared by any judicial or other competent authority to
be void, voidable, illegal or otherwise unenforceable then that provision will be limited
or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so this letter will otherwise remain in
full force and effect and enforceable.
13 This letter is governed by English law and the English Courts will have non-exclusive
jurisdiction to decide any dispute arising under or in connection with this letter.
Please confirm your agreement to the above by counter-signing this letter, following which we
will issue a formal certificate to confirm the permission granted by this letter.
Yours faithfully
Inspection Visits
During the four years prior to the exhibition Floriade Almere 2022 will be subject to an annual
inspection by an AIPH approved inspector.
Following each inspection a report will be produced by the AIPH inspector. This report will be
made available to the organisers and to AIPH Full Members.
AIPH reserves the right to require more frequent inspections if deemed necessary because of
any concerns that AIPH may have of if requested by Floriade Almere 2022.
Floriade 2022 Almere are required to provide, at their cost, the following for up to two AIPH
inspectors per visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs for the inspectors from their home destination (not outside Europe). This
includes flight costs (economy), rail travel and car mileage depending on the form of
transport.
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or
Floriade Almere 2022) then an additional fee per day will be required to cover the additional
time cost. Fees will be specified by Secretariat General.
Sanctions
If, after recognition has been granted to an exhibition by AIPH, it transpires that the
organizers have not respected the provisions of the regulation, or have respected it only
partially, the recognition will be withdrawn, and all members of AIPH will be informed of this
decision.
In the event that inspection visits highlight serious concerns that could prevent the organisers
from achieving the quality of exhibition required by AIPH or if the exhibition fails to meet other
obligations to AIPH then AIPH reserves the right to withdraw its approval of the exhibition.
Any decision to withdraw approval would require majority approval by the AIPH General
Meeting.
In the event that approval is withdrawn there would be no reimbursement of any of the
financial guarantee and the organisers would be liable to pay to AIPH the full gate fee
payment as agreed at the original approval.
When approval is withdrawn the exhibition must remove all reference to AIPH in any
communication relating to the event.
The AIPH brand can be used on merchandise sold from the exhibition. In this case all uses
must obtain prior approval from the AIPH Secretariat and will be subject to a royalty charge.
Floriade Almere 2022 is required to have an opening and closing ceremony. Organisers must
allow for a speech from an AIPH representative during these ceremonies. AIPH undertakes
to provide a representative to make a speech in English. The speech will be delivered by the
AIPH Secretary General, the AIPH President or an alternative senior AIPH office holder.
AIPH Prizes can also be presented during these ceremonies.
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for the AIPH officer delivering
the speech:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs from their home destination. This includes flight costs (minimum of
‘premium economy / economy plus’ for flights over six hours), rail travel and car
mileage depending on the form of transport.
Commercial activities
Retail sales on the stand are permitted. However, these must not exceed 20% of the total
covered surface area of the exhibit or 100 square meters, whichever is the smallest area. For
stands that are larger than 2000 square meters then the area allocated for retail sales should
be determined through negotiation between organizer and exhibitor. Any product sold should
be related to the exhibit and linked with the exhibiting country and in a way that supports the
objectives of the exhibit.
Dated 26th September 2015
Dear
Your approval is granted subject to your compliance with the Regulations dated October
2010.
In consideration of your agreement to the terms and conditions of this letter AIPH hereby
awards permission to you to organise and hold the international horticultural exhibition
detailed below, subject to the following terms and conditions:
2 You will fulfil all the necessary requirements by no later than, namely:
3 You will comply with the Regulations. In the event of a conflict between this letter and
the Regulations, the terms and conditions set out in this letter will prevail.
4.2 You will pay the balance of the gate fee charge (or, where relevant, the
applicable minimum figure) within 90 days of the date on which the exhibition
closes.
4.3 For the purposes of establishing the amount of the gate fee charge you will
send to AIPH a statement showing the total net gate fee income received
from the exhibition when making the payment. This amount will be converted
to Euros and paid, in Euros to the AIPH bank account. You will cover all
bank charges and exchange rate costs associated with the transfer so the
exact agreed amount in Euros is received by AIPH.
4.4 All payments to AIPH under this letter are exclusive of any value added tax or
other applicable tax.
4.5 You will make the payments referred to in this paragraph 4 to AIPH without
any set-off or deduction.
4.6 If you fail to make any payment due under this paragraph 4 on time, you will
pay interest from the due date until payment is made to at a rate of 8% per
annum over the Bank of England base rate from time to time.
5.1 AIPH assists in organizing 2 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for
the flight tickets (economy class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury
Members; at least two of them are to be nominated by AIPH.
5.2 AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of
an AIPH certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’.
5.3 AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition
and for prize winners through the AIPH website, media releases and
newsletters. AIPH will also seek to attract more international visitors to the
exhibition.
5.5 AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International
Horticultural Exhibitions as well as to related Technical Guidance Notes.
5.6 AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions.
6 No variation of this letter will be binding unless made in writing and signed by both
parties.
7 You will not assign or deal with the benefit of this permission letter except with AIPH’s
prior written consent.
9 This letter cannot be enforced by a person who is not a party to it under the United
Kingdom Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or otherwise.
10 No waiver by AIPH of any breach of the terms and conditions in this letter by you will
be considered as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other
provision.
11 If any provision of this letter is declared by any judicial or other competent authority to
be void, voidable, illegal or otherwise unenforceable then that provision will be limited
or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so this letter will otherwise remain in
full force and effect and enforceable.
12 This letter is governed by English law and the English Courts will have non-exclusive
jurisdiction to decide any dispute arising under or in connection with this letter.
Please confirm your agreement to the above by counter-signing this letter, following which we
will issue a formal certificate to confirm the permission granted by this letter.
Yours faithfully
AIPH encourages the use of the AIPH brand in association with the promotion and
endorsement of exhibitions. Organisers are required to follow the AIPH Brand Use Rules.
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for the AIPH officer delivering
the speech:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs from their home destination. This includes flight costs (minimum of
‘premium economy / economy plus’ for flights over six hours), rail travel and car
mileage depending on the form of transport.
Commercial activities
Retail sales on the stand are permitted. However, these must not exceed 20% of the total
covered surface area of the exhibit or 100 square meters, whichever is the smallest area. For
stands that are larger than 2000 square meters then the area allocated for retail sales should
be determined through negotiation between organizer and exhibitor. Any product sold should
be related to the exhibit and linked with the exhibiting country and in a way that supports the
objectives of the exhibit.
Dated 26th September 2015
Dear
Your approval is granted subject to your compliance with the Regulations dated October
2010.
In consideration of your agreement to the terms and conditions of this letter AIPH hereby
awards permission to you to organise and hold the international horticultural exhibition
detailed below, subject to the following terms and conditions:
2 You will fulfil all the necessary requirements by no later than, namely:
3 You will comply with the Regulations. In the event of a conflict between this letter and
the Regulations, the terms and conditions set out in this letter will prevail.
4.2 You will pay the balance of the gate fee charge (or, where relevant, the
applicable minimum figure) within 90 days of the date on which the exhibition
closes.
4.3 For the purposes of establishing the amount of the gate fee charge you will
send to AIPH a statement showing the total net gate fee income received
from the exhibition when making the payment. This amount will be converted
to Euros and paid, in Euros to the AIPH bank account. You will cover all
bank charges and exchange rate costs associated with the transfer so the
exact agreed amount in Euros is received by AIPH.
4.4 All payments to AIPH under this letter are exclusive of any value added tax or
other applicable tax.
4.5 You will make the payments referred to in this paragraph 4 to AIPH without
any set-off or deduction.
4.6 If you fail to make any payment due under this paragraph 4 on time, you will
pay interest from the due date until payment is made to at a rate of 8% per
annum over the Bank of England base rate from time to time.
5 AIPH will provide the following services to Taichung World Flora Exposition:
5.1 AIPH assists in organizing 2 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for
the flight tickets (economy class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury
Members; at least two of them are to be nominated by AIPH.
5.2 AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of
an AIPH certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’.
5.3 AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition
and for prize winners through the AIPH website, media releases and
newsletters. AIPH will also seek to attract more international visitors to the
exhibition.
5.5 AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International
Horticultural Exhibitions as well as to related Technical Guidance Notes.
5.6 AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions.
6 No variation of this letter will be binding unless made in writing and signed by both
parties.
7 You will not assign or deal with the benefit of this permission letter except with AIPH’s
prior written consent.
8 AIPH is reviewing the Regulations and requires Taichung World Flora Exposition to
comply with a number of specific additional requirements. These are shown in Annex
I.
9 This letter cannot be enforced by a person who is not a party to it under the United
Kingdom Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or otherwise.
10 No waiver by AIPH of any breach of the terms and conditions in this letter by you will
be considered as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other
provision.
11 If any provision of this letter is declared by any judicial or other competent authority to
be void, voidable, illegal or otherwise unenforceable then that provision will be limited
or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so this letter will otherwise remain in
full force and effect and enforceable.
12 This letter is governed by English law and the English Courts will have non-exclusive
jurisdiction to decide any dispute arising under or in connection with this letter.
Please confirm your agreement to the above by counter-signing this letter, following which we
will issue a formal certificate to confirm the permission granted by this letter.
Yours faithfully
Inspection Visits
During the four years prior to the exhibition Taichung World Flora Exposition will be subject to
an annual inspection by an AIPH approved inspector.
Following each inspection a report will be produced by the AIPH inspector. This report will be
made available to the organisers and to AIPH Full Members.
AIPH reserves the right to require more frequent inspections if deemed necessary because of
any concerns that AIPH may have of if requested by Taichung World Flora Exposition.
Taichung World Flora Exposition are required to provide, at their cost, the following for up to
two AIPH inspectors per visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs for the inspectors from their home destination (not outside Europe). This
includes flight costs (economy), rail travel and car mileage depending on the form of
transport.
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or
Taichung World Flora Exposition) then an additional fee per day will be required to cover the
additional time cost. Fees will be specified by Secretariat General.
Use of AIPH Brand
AIPH encourages the use of the AIPH brand in association with the promotion and
endorsement of exhibitions. Organisers are required to follow the AIPH Brand Use Rules.
Taichung World Flora Exposition is required to have an opening and closing ceremony.
Organisers must allow for a speech from an AIPH representative during these ceremonies.
AIPH undertakes to provide a representative to make a speech in English. The speech will
be delivered by the AIPH President, the AIPH Secretary General, or an alternative senior
AIPH office holder. AIPH Prizes can also be presented during these ceremonies.
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for the AIPH officer delivering
the speech:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs from their home destination. This includes flight costs (minimum of
‘premium economy / economy plus’ for flights over six hours), rail travel and car
mileage depending on the form of transport.
Commercial activities
Retail sales on the stand are permitted. However, these must not exceed 20% of the total
covered surface area of the exhibit or 100 square meters, whichever is the smallest area. For
stands that are larger than 2000 square meters then the area allocated for retail sales should
be determined through negotiation between organizer and exhibitor. Any product sold should
be related to the exhibit and linked with the exhibiting country and in a way that supports the
objectives of the exhibit.
Dated 26th September 2015
Dear
Your approval is granted subject to your compliance with the Regulations dated October
2010.
In consideration of your agreement to the terms and conditions of this letter AIPH hereby
awards permission to you to organise and hold the international horticultural exhibition
detailed below, subject to the following terms and conditions:
2 You will fulfil all the necessary requirements by no later than, namely:
Payment of the financial guarantee in the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Euro –
completed
Successful site inspection – completed.
3 You will obtain approval for the exhibition from the Bureau International des
Expositions (otherwise known as BIE, www.bie-paris.org) which has responsibility for
approving non-horticultural exhibitions). – completed.
4 You will comply with the Regulations. In the event of a conflict between this letter and
the Regulations, the terms and conditions set out in this letter will prevail.
5 As referred to in paragraph 1.4 of Chapter 1 of the Regulations, under the heading
“Gate Fee Charge” you agree to pay AIPH 1% of the total net gate fee income (i.e.
the income exclusive of local taxes and VAT – this relates to taxes paid by visitors
when purchasing their ticket, not other income related taxes).
5.1 Within 30 days after the opening of the exhibition you will pay a sum
equivalent to 1% of 50% of the expected gate income.
5.2 You will pay the balance of the gate fee charge (or, where relevant, the
applicable minimum figure) within 90 days of the date on which the exhibition
closes.
5.3 For the purposes of establishing the amount of the gate fee charge you will
send to AIPH a statement showing the total net gate fee income received
from the exhibition when making the payment. This amount will be converted
to Euros and paid, in Euros to the AIPH bank account. You will cover all
bank charges and exchange rate costs associated with the transfer so the
exact agreed amount in Euros is received by AIPH.
5.4 All payments to AIPH under this letter are exclusive of any value added tax or
other applicable tax.
5.5 You will make the payments referred to in this paragraph 5 to AIPH without
any set-off or deduction.
5.6 If you fail to make any payment due under this paragraph 5 on time, you will
pay interest from the due date until payment is made to at a rate of 8% per
annum over the Bank of England base rate from time to time.
6 AIPH will provide the following services to International Horticultural Exhibition 2019
Beijing:
6.1 AIPH assists in organizing 3 International Honorary Jury rounds and pays for
the flight tickets (economy class) and hotel rooms of 4 foreign Honorary Jury
Members; at least two of them are to be nominated by AIPH.
6.2 AIPH donates a prize for the International competition. This prize consists of
an AIPH certificate, and an ‘AIPH award trophy’.
6.3 AIPH will promote the exhibition and seek to gain publicity for the exhibition
and for prize winners through the AIPH website, media releases and
newsletters. AIPH will also seek to attract more international visitors to the
exhibition.
6.5 AIPH will give access to the AIPH Guide for the Organisers of International
Horticultural Exhibitions as well as to related Technical Guidance Notes.
6.6 AIPH will provide access to the Final Reports from previous Exhibitions.
6.7 AIPH will encourage its member organizations by all means to participate in
the exhibition.
8 No variation of this letter will be binding unless made in writing and signed by both
parties.
9 You will not assign or deal with the benefit of this permission letter except with AIPH’s
prior written consent.
10 This letter cannot be enforced by a person who is not a party to it under the United
Kingdom Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 or otherwise.
11 No waiver by AIPH of any breach of the terms and conditions in this letter by you will
be considered as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other
provision.
12 If any provision of this letter is declared by any judicial or other competent authority to
be void, voidable, illegal or otherwise unenforceable then that provision will be limited
or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so this letter will otherwise remain in
full force and effect and enforceable.
13 This letter is governed by English law and the English Courts will have non-exclusive
jurisdiction to decide any dispute arising under or in connection with this letter.
Please confirm your agreement to the above by counter-signing this letter, following which we
will issue a formal certificate to confirm the permission granted by this letter.
Yours faithfully
Inspection Visits
During the four years prior to the exhibition International Horticultural Exhibition 2019 Beijing
will be subject to an annual inspection by an AIPH approved inspector.
Following each inspection a report will be produced by the AIPH inspector. This report will be
made available to the organisers and to AIPH Full Members.
AIPH reserves the right to require more frequent inspections if deemed necessary because of
any concerns that AIPH may have of if requested by International Horticultural Exhibition
2019 Beijing.
International Horticultural Exhibition 2019 Beijing are required to provide, at their cost, the
following for up to two AIPH inspectors per visit:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs for the inspectors from their home destination (not outside Europe). This
includes flight costs (minimum of ‘premium economy / economy plus’ for flights over
six hours), rail travel and car mileage depending on the form of transport.
For any additional inspections required beyond the annual inspections (at request of AIPH or
International Horticultural Exhibition 2019 Beijing) then an additional fee per day will be
required to cover the additional time cost. Fees will be specified by Secretariat General.
AIPH encourages the use of the AIPH brand in association with the promotion and
endorsement of exhibitions. Organisers are required to follow the AIPH Brand Use Rules.
The AIPH brand can be used on merchandise sold from the exhibition. In this case all uses
must obtain prior approval from the AIPH Secretariat and will be subject to a royalty charge.
International Horticultural Exhibition 2019 Beijing is required to have an opening and closing
ceremony. Organisers must allow for a speech from an AIPH representative during these
ceremonies. AIPH undertakes to provide a representative to make a speech in English. The
speech will be delivered by the AIPH President, the AIPH Secretary General, or an alternative
senior AIPH office holder. AIPH Prizes can also be presented during these ceremonies.
Organisers are required to provide, at their cost, the following for the AIPH officer delivering
the speech:
Hotel accommodation
Food and drink
Transportation from point of arrival for the duration of the visit
Travel costs from their home destination. This includes flight costs (minimum of
‘premium economy / economy plus’ for flights over six hours), rail travel and car
mileage depending on the form of transport.
Commercial activities
Retail sales on the stand are permitted. However, these must not exceed 20% of the total
covered surface area of the exhibit or 100 square meters, whichever is the smallest area. For
stands that are larger than 2000 square meters then the area allocated for retail sales should
be determined through negotiation between organizer and exhibitor. Any product sold should
be related to the exhibit and linked with the exhibiting country and in a way that supports the
objectives of the exhibit.
Mr. Hasmet Suicmez
Secretary General
Expo 2016 Antalya
04 August, 2015
Dear Mr Suicmez,
I am writing to detail the key points raised during the inspection visit that I carried out
on 7 July 2015. Firstly I would like to thank you for your warm hospitality, as always,
when I visit Antalya. I was pleased that we could talk frankly and openly regarding
the development of the Expo. Of course you already know that in an ideal world you
would not be this far behind with the Expo construction, content development and
promotion. However, considering the time challenge that you have I note that good
progress has been made in building construction on the site. Based on the progress
you have made on this so far I am hopeful that you will meet your deadline of
completing these buildings by late December.
Evidence of detailed milestone planning for the final preparation of the buildings,
including the period available for the exhibitors, should be provided with your next
progress report.
One aspect of this is to ensure that the soil quality is good enough to make the plants
perform well. Sometimes when planting onto a ‘construction site’ the soil may have
been compacted or poor quality. Please can you provide some re-assurance to me
that you have checked soil quality and have plans in place to ensure plants planted
will go into the best possible soil and that soil is appropriate for the plants selected.
I am pleased that you are already in possession of the trees and shrubs that will be
planted. As regards other plants that you may require (e.g. annual and herbaceous
plants) then I would recommend that you make your orders for these as soon as
possible so nurseries can plan this into their crop production cycle. Due to the short
timescale that you now have for planting I would advise you to seek horticultural
advice on whether your current planned planting density is correct. In order to obtain
maximum impact with colour and foliage it may be necessary to plant more plants
and more densely than previously expected. Please do not compromise on this point
as it is so important to create a dramatic horticultural display. You are not creating a
city park, you are creating a horticultural spectacle that the world will want to come
and see.
It would also be beneficial to allow international participants access to the site at the
earliest opportunity to avoid any delays that could arise from wet weather in January
and February. It is also essential that a full irrigation system is installed by this time.
The definitive milestone concerning the availability of the space for the international
participants should be communicated to the participants as soon as possible. This is
an important signal concerning a successful preparation of the Expo 2016 Antalya.
I was very interested to hear from you about the plans for the mosaiculture
structures. This will introduce real innovation to the Expo and importantly these
structures can look beautiful in a very short amount of time so really can look at their
best during the Expo. As with all planting on the site it will be important to ensure
that there will be a succession of colour throughout the duration of the Expo and as
some plants start to pass their best there must be others to replace them so that
whenever visitors come to the Expo they see it at its best. As the mosaiculture
structures are so important for the Expo I am pleased to hear that these are being
trialled now to assess the plants and how they will respond in the Antalya climate.
One of the other horticultural features of the Expo is the use of native plants from
different regions of Turkey. As some of these native plants might not be in
mainstream cultivation by growers it is important that these plants are found as soon
as possible and procured for the site to avoid the disappointment of not being able to
find the plants if you leave it too late.
A lot of work was put into the development of the theme for the Expo. It is not clear
that this is still being carried through as proposed. You should consider appointing
people with responsibility for ensuring the theme is carried through.
Also, a key message of the Expo is ‘A Green Life for Future Generations’. This
means that sustainable, environmentally-friendly, practice should be seen in all
aspects of the construction and maintenance of the site. It will appear very
noticeable if you have the green plants but not ‘green’ practices.
In my report of July 2014 I referred to the need to promote best practices within the
Expo and to identify leading innovation that will be seen first at your Expo and will
become part of the legacy of your Expo. This need remains and I urge you to look
more closely at this.
Children Island is literally the central focus of the Expo. It is critical that this contains
something truly outstanding that brings together the goals of the Expo whilst
providing a unique and unforgettable experience. Please can you provide me with
further details regarding your plans for this area.
Fundamentally it will be necessary for the whole site to work as one and for there to
be a seamless flow of theme and communication to visitors. This will require a co-
ordinated signage and communication system that fully addresses the needs of
international as well as Turkish visitors. This should enhance the whole experience
and atmosphere provided by the Expo.
International Participation
As the Expo gets closer it becomes more difficult for you to secure participation from
other countries. In past reports and communications with your Agency I have
provided my recommendations for how to increase participation. To be successful in
this you need to really understand the benefits that participation will offer to other
countries and they may be different for different countries. For some the driver will
be political. At this stage this route is probably the most likely to be successful and I
would urge you to involve the top levels of the Turkish Government in inviting other
countries. The G20 summit in Antalya later this year provides another opportunity to
use political contact to secure participation. However, it will be no good to just
introduce the Expo to delegates at the meeting as that meeting is so close to the
Expo opening that you need to gain formal commitment by then. One idea is that
you could use the event as a platform for an 'Expo participation signing ceremony'.
For this to work it will be necessary for your team to do a lot of 'behind the scenes'
work with the participating Governments so that those present will collectively want to
sign to show their support and not be left out as those not participating. However,
this can only be achieved in close co-operation with the Turkish Government and
with intensive lobbying ahead of time in the target countries.
It would be helpful if you could prepare a "5 page" information document concerning
the Expo and the participation: garden, stand, national day, cultural activities,
science, B2B which can be given to potential participating countries. There must be
also a clear argumentation why the Expo and the participation of "the" country is so
important for Turkey. I am convinced, that a positive decision will be motivated
primarily from a political perspective.
The other route to encouraging participation is to demonstrate how that will help
these countries promote their country and its image as both a tourism and business
area. To do this you will need to find the relevant authorities in each country who
have an interest in this activity. For each country there needs to be a strong
'business case' prepared. I have made this point on numerous occasions previously
and this is still lacking. AIPH members can help you to gain the attention of their
governments but only if you provide them with compelling information and materials
to inspire them to participate.
Antalya also has sister cities around the world. These should also be approached to
gain their participation as a symbol of their relationship with Antalya.
For many countries or cities the issue of cost will be a significant barrier to their
participation. I would urge you to do what you can to reduce this barrier for potential
participants. You may also need to think of alternative ways of achieving
international participation than just having a garden/pavilion from each country. I
believe that Mr. Sven Stimac has some ideas for you on this.
For countries that will participate please can you confirm the date from when they will
be able to commence construction on the site.
I re-emphasise that the definitive milestone concerning the availability of the space
for the international participants should be communicated to the participants as soon
as possible. This is an important signal concerning a successful preparation of the
Expo 2016 Antalya.
Competitions
You are required to prepare the rules for competitions and the rules for the
international competition should be submitted to AIPH six months before the opening
of the Expo. AIPH is able to offer support in the development of the regulations and
organization of the judging.
For a successful marketing campaign you need to clearly define your target
audience. From what you have described it seems that you have three audiences:
• International tourists
• Domestic visitors
You are still predicting that you will welcome 8 million visitors of which 75% will be
tourists. This relies on you persuading around 50% of all tourists visiting Antalya to
visit the Expo. It is my view, based on the experience of past expos, that you will not
attract this many international visitors. Many visit Antalya with a pre-planned itinerary
or with the aim of just staying in their hotel, playing golf or some other activity.
However, I know that you have carried out your research on this. If you are still
convinced that you will attract such a high proportion of international visitors then you
need to have firm agreements in place with national and international tour operators
as soon as possible. For many this may already be too late.
If you have difficulty enticing tourists to visit the Expo site during the daytime then
another option you have is to run night-time events. If you do this then the site will
need to be appropriately lit. The night time visit experience will be completely
different to the daytime experience so you need to plan for that separately. Any
events to be staged at night (or in the day for that matter) need to be planned well in
advance. High quality entertainers (singers, dancers, performers, etc) book ahead a
long time so you need to get them into the diary as quickly as possible.
Of course you are also hoping to attract the citizens of Antalya to the Expo.
However, it is my view that you should increase your emphasis on attracting Turkish
citizens from other parts of Turkey as well. Traditionally Expos attract more domestic
than international visitors. I believe this will also be the case for Antalya so greater
promotion within Turkey should be carried out.
I was pleased to hear that the Expo website will soon be updated. Please ensure
that this is packed full of compelling reasons for visitors to come.
AIPH is also able to help you promote the Expo. You have a page on the AIPH
website (http://aiph.org/aiph_event/antalya-2016-turkey-a1/) but to make this more
useful to you I need better information to include on the site. AIPH also has an
international media database and we would be happy to promote key messages
about the Expo through this channel if you provide me with good quality press
information in English.
Just before I left you shared with me your proposed new plan for ticketing. Overall I
believe that you are now pursuing the correct strategy with this. A higher value ticket
price demonstrates a higher perceived value for the Expo. The proposed price of 20
Euros per adult is in line with other expos in Europe. Importantly you are also
planning a strategy to make tickets available at lower prices, or free of charge, to
many citizens and tourists through partnership deals with other Turkish businesses
that are in contact with your target audience. This is a good strategy which will help
to raise awareness of the Expo and drive visits. However, these 'deals' with industry
should be done soon to maximise the benefit.
AIPH is currently preparing a new chapter for the AIPH Expo Guide. This chapter
will cover options for ticketing systems. We would be happy to share the results of
this research with you if that is helpful to you.
Although previously you had planned to hold this during 2015 we agreed during our
meeting that this should be held during the Expo instead. AIPH Green City
Committee Chair, Ms. Karen Tambayong, has already provided your agency with a
detailed suggestion for the content of this event. When you are ready to develop this
further and we can assist in sourcing speakers and in promotion.
I would like to invite you to present a report on progress during the Marketing &
Exhibitions Committee meeting of the 67th AIPH Annual Congress which will be held
in Stresa, close to Milan in Italy on 21 October 2015. The Congress runs from 20-23
October and includes a visit to the World Expo in Milan on 22 October. I have sent
details to you about this event. During your presentation please provide up-to-date
photos of the state of progress at that time.
Following our meeting I gave you a copy of the new AIPH Expo Guide. I have also
sent this to your team members electronically. This Guide is there to help you and
does not replace the AIPH Regulations for Exhibitions.
For all AIPH approved exhibitions we are now requiring that a contract is signed by
both AIPH and the organiser. This details our mutual obligations. We discussed this
contract when we met and I will send this to you separately.
Once again I would like to thank you again for hosting my visit. I am encouraged by
the progress and I will report this to AIPH members. I would like to continue to
receive regular updates from you and please do ask if you require further assistance
from AIPH.
Yours sincerely
Tim Briercliffe
Secretary General
C.c. Mr. Kevin Chung, Chairman AIPH Marketing & Exhibitions Committee
Mr. Vic Krahn, President, AIPH
Mr. Bernard Oosterom, Vice-President, AIPH
Mr. Osman Bagdatlioglu, AIPH Board Member
Ms. Anca Anghel, BIE