DepEd Rating Sheet for Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM)

Title: __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Author(s): _____________________________________________________________________________________________
Illustrator(s): ___________________________________________________________________________________________
Layout Artist(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________
Subject Area: _________________________________________
Grade / Year Level: ___________________________________
Learning Competency/ies (Code): _____________________
Number of Pages: _____

Instructions:
a. Read the material carefully and rate it along each criterion by writing the appropriate number (5 being the
highest – Outstanding 4 - Very Satisfactory (VS), 3 – Satisfactory (S), 2 – Less Satisfactory (LS), and 1 being the
lowest – Unsatisfactory (US) in the column provided)

b. For a rating below 4, cite specific pages where comments and findings related to the evaluation criterion
are found. Write your comment, justifications, and suggestions for the space provided.

Remarks Rating
(Please specify the missing or
Criteria inadequate indicator/s and
write your comments and
suggestions)
Focus 1: CONTENT
1. Material aligns with curriculum and standards, and is
current, valid and reliable, with real-world examples.
2. Material is age-appropriate and is designed to meet the
needs of individual learners from various skills levels.
3. Material is in-depth and enhances conceptual
understanding and engages higher order of thinking skills.
4. Material is free from bias
Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.
Focus II. Equity and Accessibility
1. Material is durable, easily stored, transported and is
universally accessible.
2. Material is easily updated, adaptable and customizable to
match the resources of the school
3. Material works properly without purchase of additional
components
4. Material can be used by all students without extensive
supervision or special assistance
Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.
Focus III. Assessment
1. There is an observable performance that is relevant to real
world experience and that can be used to measure student
engagement
2. Assessment methods are appropriate and suited to the
learning objectives
3. Assessment is suited to goals and student ability and easily
assesses what has been learned
4. The Materials keep an on-going record of students’
progress and allows the teacher’s full-access to individual
student monitoring of activities
Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.
Focus IV. PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION
1. Content and directions are clear and understandable and
distinguish between important and trivial information
2. Materials are easy to navigate through
3. There are provisions for the practice of old and new skills,
and for students to enter and exit materials easily
4. Materials are interactive and provide high quality sensory
experience for all users
Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.
Focus V. Instructional Design and Support
1. The delivery method is used appropriately and successfully
engages the students
2. Technical procedures, such as installation and set-up are
easy and error-free
3. Technical specifications and limitations are adequately
described and noted
4. Assistance is readily available at any point in the website
and many supplemental resources are available
Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.
Focus VI. Replicability
1. The material was validated before classroom use
2. Developed material is based on least mastered skill
3. Material used has improved mastery level
4. The material is easy to copy and the cost is less
Note: Resource must score at least 12 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.
SUMMARY
Content
Equity and Accessibility
Assessment
Organization and Presentation
Instructional Design and Support
Replicability
TOTAL SCORE
Suggestion/s and Recommendation/s:

Evaluator: _____________________________________________
Date of Evaluation: ____________________________________