INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ELVEN C. OSORIO Name of Rater: EVELYN S. HENOGUIN

Position: TEACHER Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/D Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied JUNE Quality No acceptable Showed knowledge of 5 5 5.000 0.375
Education Knowledge knowledge of 2018- Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge evidence was content with a rating
Services and content within and MARCH of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its shown of 7 in COT 1-4
Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 integration within integration within integration within integration within
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 4 lessons
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was using MOV 1 and
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown supported other given
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other MOVs like
given MOV given MOV given MOV Instructional materials,
test materials

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
Services that enhance strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and numeracy
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as skills with a rating of 6
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 in 4 COT
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 learner-
7.5% learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was centered lessons as
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown shown ni MOV 1 and
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in other MOV like:
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other * 3 Dll
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV *
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV Instructional materials
given given given
* test materials

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education Knowledge of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Services and strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown with a rating of 6 in 4
Pedagogy develop critical and and creative and creative and creative and creative COTs,
creative thinking, as thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
well as other higher and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
order thinking skills. as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 3 lessons
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was supported with other
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown MOVs like:
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV * DLL
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV * Instructional
materials * Test
result
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable Used classroom 5 4 4.500 0.337
Education Environme classroom structure Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was management
Services nt and to engage learners, management management management management shown strategies that engage
Diversity of individually or in strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that learners in
Learners groups, in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in activities/tasks as
meanigful activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1 with
exploration, shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 a rating of 7
discovery and with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%
hands-on activities Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable * Submitted 4 COTs
within a range of lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported supported by any of evidence was * DLL
physical learning by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any the acceptable shown *
environments. 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV Instructional Materials
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner 7.5% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education behavior management management management management evidence was management
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that promote
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive positive and non-
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent violent discipline as
learning-focused discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown shown in MOV
environment in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted with a rating
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 of 6
 discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent violent discipline as
learning-focused discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown shown in MOV
environment in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted with a rating
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 of 6

Submitted 4 given
Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 strategies:
Submitted any 1 of * Provided
of the given of the given of the given No acceptable
the given strategies motivation *
Efficiency strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence was
as observed in only Praising the learners
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 shown
1 lesson * Setting house
4 lessons lessons lessons
rules * Giving
equal opportunities to
learners

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable Applied differentiated 5 4 4.500 0.337
Education Environme differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was teaching strategies to
Services nt and developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown address learner
Diversity of appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner diversity as shown in
Learners learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown MOV 1 with a rating of
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a 7
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, interests Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
and experiences. differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated teaching
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown strategies in 2 lessons
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as with other supported
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in documents like:
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the * COT
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV * DLL
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV *
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV Instructional materials

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education Curriculum managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
Services and implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
Planning developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning process
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as as shown in MOV 1
learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
to meet curriculum with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
requirements and
 teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as as shown in MOV 1
learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
to meet curriculum with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 3
7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally Submitted 1 developmentally
sequenced sequenced sequenced developmentally sequenced teaching
teaching and teaching and teaching and sequenced and learning process
No acceptable
learning process as learning process as learning process as teaching and and other documents
Efficiency evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in learning process as like: *
shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidently shown in COT
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any 1 of the given * DLLs
of the other given of the other given of the other given MOV * Instrucional
MOV MOV MOV materials

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 3. 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Frequently 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education Curriculum collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was participated in
Services and discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
Planning use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner to discuss
learner feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner
enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV instruction as shown
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

7.5%
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable submitted personal
least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was notes of teachers on
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown LACs. *
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the Minutes of LAC
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV sessions
the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and used 4 3 3.500 0.262
Education developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was varied teaching and
Services organized and used teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown learning resources,
appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, including ICT, to
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to address learning
learning resources, address learning address learning address learning address learning goals as shown in
including ICT, to goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of
address learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating 5
goals. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
 including ICT, to goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of
address learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating 5
goals. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

7.5%
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and Submitted any
Submitted 2 varied
learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, teaching and
teaching and learning
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as learning resource, No acceptable
resources: *
Efficiency evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in including ICT, as evidence was
Activity Sheets
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidently shown in shown
*
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any of the
DLLs
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable Designed, selected, 4 4 4 0.3
Education Assessmen selected, organized organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was organized and used
Services t and and used diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown diagnostic, formative
Reporting diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and and summative
formative and summative summative summative summative assessment strategies
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment consistent with
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies curriculum
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with requirements as
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum shown in MOV 1 with
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as a rating of 6
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable COTs and Summative
varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was Test with Table of
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown Specification
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Education
Services Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored Consistently
monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated monitored and
evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evaluated learner
No acceptable
progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
Quality evidence was
achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
shown
learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in the
11. Monitored and the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted
evaluated learner
progress and
7.5%
achievement using
learner attainment Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
data. combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was Submitted 3
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown acceptable MOVs like:
acceptable MOV MOV MOV Grading sheets
* DLL and Summative
test with TOS

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 12.Communica ted Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Consistently showed 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Education Assessmen promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was prompt and clear
Services t and clearly the learners’ clear communication of clear communication of shown communication of the
Reporting needs, progress communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
and achievement to the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and progress and
key stakeholders, progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key achievement to key
including parents/ achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders,
guardians. stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/
including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as guardians as shown in
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV the MOV submitted
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

7.5%
Efficiency
 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted the
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was following documents:
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown *
acceptable MOV MOV MOV Minutes of PTA
meetings, * 3
corrected test papers
* Report cards with
parents or guardians
signature.

Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV were
Timeliness were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was distributed across 3
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown quarters

Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed 10% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Consistently 5 4 4.500 0.450
Education Factor various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
Services works/activities that related related related work/activities that shown related work/ activities
contribute to the work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the that contribute to the
teaching-learning contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning teaching learning
process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown process.
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

Efficiency different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Very Satisfactory 4.209

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ELVEN C. OSORIO EVELYN S. HENOGUIN ANGELO L. EDUARDO
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
R
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: ELVEN C. OS

Position: TEACHER
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED/ CALOOCAN
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4
Objective 3 7.5% 4
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4
Objective 6 7.5% 5
Objective 7 7.5% 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4
Objective 9 7.5% 4
Objective 10 7.5% 4
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5

ELVEN C. OSORIO EVELYN S. HENOGUIN

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater: EVELYN S. HENOGUIN

Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
5 5.000 0.375
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.500 0.337
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.500 0.337
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
3 3.500 0.262
4 4.000 0.300
4 4 4.333 0.324
4 4 4.333 0.324
4 4.500 0.450
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.209

ELYN S. HENOGUIN ANGELO L. EDUARDO

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IP

Name of Employee: EVELYN S. HENOGUIN Name of Rater: ANGELO L. EDUARDO

Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CALOOCAN CITY/ CAMARIN ELEM. SCHOOL Date of Review: APRIL 8, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018- APRIL 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective June Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
Education Knowledge applications of 2018- applications of content applications of applications of content
Services and content knowledge March knowledge within and content knowledge knowledge within and
Pedagogy within and across 2019 across curriculum within and across across curriculum
curriculum teaching teaching areas as curriculum teaching teaching areas as
areas. shown in MOV 1 with a areas as shown in shown in MOV 1 with
rating of 8 MOV 1 with a rating of a rating of 6
7

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons

lessons as evidenced as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by MOV
by MOV 1 and 1 from colleagues and 1 from colleagues and
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated with June Quality Conducted, completed Conducted and Conducted action
Education colleagues in the 2018- and disseminated completed action research with
Services conduct and March action research with research with colleagues
application of 2019 colleagues colleagues
research to enrich
knowledge of
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 MOV
content and 7.5%
the given MOV the acceptable MOV
pedagogy.

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the

research report within research report within research report within
the rating period the rating period the rating period

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic 1. Content 3. Developed and June Quality Demonstrated effective Demonstrated Demonstrated
Education Knowledge applied effective 2018- teaching strategies to effective teaching effective teaching
Services and teaching strategies March promote critical and strategies to promote strategies to promote
Pedagogy to promote critical 2019 creative thinking, as critical and creative critical and creative
and creative well as other higher- thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
Education Knowledge applied effective 2018- teaching strategies to effective teaching effective teaching
Services and teaching strategies March promote critical and strategies to promote strategies to promote
Pedagogy to promote critical 2019 creative thinking, as critical and creative critical and creative
and creative well as other higher- thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
thinking, as well as order thinking skills as other higher-order other higher-order
other higher-order shown in MOV 1 with a thinking skills as thinking skills as
thinking skills. rating of 8 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or more Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons
lessons as evidently as evidently shown in as evidently shown in
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other
the other MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality Modeled and shared Modeled and shared Modeled and shared
Education Environment colleagues to model effective classroom effective classroom effective classroom
Services and Diversity and share effective management management management
of Learners techniques in the strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that engage
management of learners in activities/ learners in activities/ learners in activities/
classroom structure tasks done in different tasks done in different tasks done in different
to engage learners, physical learning physical learning physical learning
individually or in environments as environments as environments as
groups, in shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
meaningful rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6
exploration,
7.5%
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons
environments.enviro lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1
nments. MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the and any 1 of the other
the other acceptable other acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight
Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective and Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Education Environment and constructive constructive behavior and constructive and constructive
Services and Diversity behavior management skills by behavior behavior management
of Learners management skills applying positive and management skills by skills by applying
by applying positive non-violent discipline applying positive and positive and non-
and non-violent to ensure learning- non-violent discipline violent discipline to
discipline to ensure focused environments to ensure learning- ensure learning-
learning-focused shown in MOV 1 with a focused environments focused environments
environments. rating of 8 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6
7.5%

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies as the given strategies the given strategies as
 Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies as the given strategies the given strategies as
observed in at least 4 as observed in 3 observed in 2 lessons
lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with 7.5% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with
Education colleagues to share colleagues at least in colleagues in the colleagues but no
Services differentiated, the district/cluster department or grade evidence of sharing
developmentally level to share lesson level to share lesson with others
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’
differences in Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
gender, needs, lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
strengths, interests shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
and experiences. Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and Quality Developed and applied Developed and Developed and
Education and Planning applied effective effective strategies applied effective applied effective
Services strategies in the showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning process and learning process and learning process
sequenced teaching as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
and learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
processes to meet 7.5%
curriculum Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as
requirements and lessons as evidenced as evidenced by evidenced by shown
varied teaching by MOV 1 and 2 and MOV 1 and 2 and in MOV 1 and/or 2
contexts. supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of and supported by any
the other acceptable the other acceptable 1 of the other
MOV MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Reviewed with 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led
Education and Planning colleagues, teacher participated in collaborative reviews collaborative reviews
Services and learner LACs/FGDs/meetings of teacher and learner of teacher and learner
feedback to plan, to discuss feedback as feedback as
facilitate and enrich teacher/learner evidenced by the evidenced by the
teaching practice. feedback to enrich MOV submitted MOV submitted
instruction as shown in
the MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

collaborative reviews collaborative reviews collaborative reviews
of teacher and learner of teacher and learner of teacher and learner
feedback as evidently feedback as evidently feedback as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised and Quality Consistently advised Frequently advised Occasionally advised
Education guided colleagues in colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
Services the selection, selection, organization, selection, selection,
organization, development and organization, organization,
development and appropriate use of development and development and
use of appropriate teaching and learning appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and resources as shown in teaching and learning teaching and learning
 development and appropriate use of development and development and
use of appropriate teaching and learning appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and resources as shown in teaching and learning teaching and learning
learning resources, the MOV submitted resources as shown in resources as shown in
including ICT, to 7.5% the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
address specific
learning goals. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 teaching Submitted 2 teaching
teaching and learning and learning and learning
resources as resources as resources as
evidenced by at least 1 evidenced by at least evidenced by at least
of the acceptable MOV 1 of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable
Timeliness MOV MOV
Basic 4. 10. Worked Quality Consistently reviewed Frequently reviewed Occasionally reviewed
Education Assessment collaboratively with collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively
Services and Reporting colleagues to review assessment tools with assessment tools with assessment tools with
the design, colleagues as shown colleagues as shown colleagues as shown
selection, in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
organization and use
of a range of
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
effective diagnostic,
7.5% assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools as
formative and
evidently shown in any evidently shown in evidently shown in
summative
of the acceptable MOV any of the acceptable any of the acceptable
assessment
MOV MOV
strategies consistent
with curriculum
requirements.
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic 4. 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Education Assessment collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
Services and Reporting monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
of attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as
support learner shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
progress and submitted submitted submitted
achievement.
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 of
different types of MOV of the same kind of the same kind of MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in
Education the effective
Services communication of
learner needs, Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally applied
progress and skills in the effective skills in the effective skills in the effective
achievement to key communication of communication of communication of
stakeholders, Quality learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and
including progress to parents/ progress to parents/ progress to parents/
parents/guardians. guardians as shown in guardians as shown guardians as shown in
the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted

7.5%
 Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 3 MOV Submitted any 2 MOV
the acceptable MOV
7.5%

Timeliness

Occasionally
Frequently performed
Consistently performed performed special
special tasks and/or
special tasks and/or tasks and/or
Quality assignments as
assignments as shown assignments as
shown in the MOV
in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted
submitted

13. Performed
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2
various related
Basic different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
works/activities that
Education 5. Plus Factor 10% acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
contribute to the
Services
teaching-learning
process.

Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory EVELYN S. HENOGUIN ANGELO L. ED
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater
T AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

er: ANGELO L. EDUARDO

NCIPAL
ew: APRIL 8, 2019

G TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

formance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Modeled effective No Modeled effective 5 5 5.000 0.375
applications of acceptable applications of content
content knowledge evidence knowledge within and across
within and across was shown curriculum teaching areas as
curriculum teaching shown in MOV 1 with a rating
areas as shown in of 8
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No Submitted 3 lessons as

as evidenced by acceptable evidenced by MOV 1.
MOV 1 from evidence
colleagues and was shown
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No 1 1 1 1.000 0.075

research with acceptable
colleagues evidence No acceptable evidence was
was shown shown

Submitted any 1 No No acceptable evidence was

MOV acceptable shown
evidence
Proposed the was
No shown No acceptable evidence was
research report acceptable shown
within the rating evidence
period was shown

formance Indicators Rating

Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated No Demonstrated effective 4 5 4.500 0.337
effective teaching acceptable teaching strategies to
strategies to promote evidence promote critical and creative
critical and creative was shown thingking as well as HOTs
thinking, as well as with a rating of 7.
 effective teaching acceptable teaching strategies to
strategies to promote evidence promote critical and creative
critical and creative was shown thingking as well as HOTs
thinking, as well as with a rating of 7.
other higher-order
thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No Submitted 3 lessons as

as evidently shown in acceptable evidently shown in MOV 1.
MOV 1 and evidence
supported by any of was shown
the other MOV given

Modeled and shared No Modeled and shared effective 4 5 4.500 0.337

effective classroom acceptable classroom management
management evidence strategies that engage
strategies that was shown learners in activities/ tasks
engage learners in done in different physical
activities/ tasks done learning environments as
in different physical shown in MOV 1 with a rating
learning of 8
environments as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No Submitted 3 lessons

supported by any of acceptable supported by MOV 1 and
the acceptable MOV evidence any 1 of the other acceptable
was shown MOV

formance Indicators Rating

Actual Results Ave Score
Unsatisfactory Poor
(2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective No Learners are actively 4 5 4.500 0.337
and constructive acceptable encouraged to take
behavior evidence responsibilityfor their
management skills was shown behavior. Applied 7
by applying positive of the given strategies : *
and non-violent Providing motivation
discipline to ensure * Praising the learners
learning-focused * Setting house
environments shown rules/ Rules in group
in MOV 1 with a activities
rating of 5 * Ensuring learner's
active partcipation * Allowing
learners to express their
ideas (group activites/
recition)
Applied any of the No Applied at least 7 of the given
given strategies as acceptable strategies as observed in at
 Applied any of the No Applied at least 7 of the given
given strategies as acceptable strategies as observed in at
observed in only 1 evidence least 3 lessons
lesson was shown

Worked with No Work with colleagues in the 4 5 4.500 0.337

colleagues but no acceptable
grade level ( grade two
evidence of sharing evidenceteachers) to share
with others was shown
differentiated,
developmentally appropriate
opportunities to address
learners differences.
Submitted at least 1 No Submitted DLL highlighting
lesson, as evidenced acceptable strategies on differentiated
by either MOV 2 or 3 evidence and developemtally -
but no evidence of was shown appropriate opportunities. *
sharing with others Minutes of LAC session
* Write-up from
colleagues of the lessons.

Developed and No COT rating sheet and inter- 4 5 4.500 0.337

applied effective acceptable observer agreement form
strategies showing evidence with a rating of 7
developmentally- was shown
sequenced teaching
and learning process
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No Submitted 3 lessons as

as evidenced by any acceptable evidence by MOV 1 &2 *
1 of the acceptable evidence Instructional Materials * test
MOV was shown materials

formance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely led No Manages well-structured 5 4 4.500 0.337
collaborative reviews acceptable lessons with emphasis on
of teacher and evidence explicit connections between
learner feedback as was shown previous learning and new
evidenced by the concepts and skills.
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No Submitted 4 collaborative

collaborative review acceptable reviews of teacher and
of teacher and evidence learner feedback;
learner feedback as was shown * Minutes of LAC sessions
evidently shown in on use of teacher and learner
any of the acceptable feedback to enrich teaching
MOV practice with proof of
attendance

Rarely advised No Consistently advised 5 5 5.000 0.375

colleagues in the acceptable colleagues in the selection,
selection, evidence organization, development
organization, was shown and appropriate use of
development and teaching and learning
appropriate use of resources.
teaching and learning
 development and teaching and learning
appropriate use of resources.
teaching and learning
resources as shown
in the MOV
submitted
Submitted 1 No Submitted 3 teaching and
teaching and learning acceptable learning resources.
resource as evidence * Lesson plans by
evidenced by any of was shown colleagues critiqued.
the acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed No Frequently reviewed 5 5 5.000 0.375

collaboratively acceptable collaboratively assessment
assessment tools evidence tools with colleagues.
with colleagues as was shown
shown in the MOV
submitted
Submitted 1 No Submitted formative test *
assessment tool as acceptable summative assessment with
evidently shown in evidence TOS. *
any of the acceptable was shown Diagnostic test with TOS
MOV

formance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely collaborated No Frequently collaborated with 5 5 5 0.375
with colleagues in the acceptable colleagues in the
interpretation of evidence interpretation of assessment
assessment data as was shown data.
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No Collaborative interpretation of

the MOV acceptable the index of mastery obtained
evidence from 1 class. *
was shown colalborative interpretation of
item analysis of quarterly
examinations

5 5 5.000 0.375

Rarely applied skills

in the effective Consistently applied skills in
communication of No the effective communication
learner needs and acceptable of learner needs and
progress to parents/ evidence progress to parents/
guardians as shown was shown guardians as shown in the
in the MOV MOV submitted
submitted
 Submitted any 1 Submitted 4 of the
MOV acceptable MOVs: *
Agreement for learners at risk
signed by parents and
corresponding evidence of
improvement. *
Learners tests' results signed
by parents. * Attendance
sheet/ minutes pf paren-
teacher conference. *
Signed report card of pupils
at risk with corresponding
evidence of improvement.

Rarely performed
No Consistently performed
special tasks and/or
acceptable special tasks and/or
assignments as
evidence assignments as shown in the
shown in the MOV
was shown MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No Observed classes of

the acceptable MOV acceptable Teachers ( 23 Grade Two
evidence teachers) * 5 4.5 4.740 0.474
was shown Certificates of Recognition
and Participation *
Certificate of Training *
Certificate of Speakership

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory 4.446

ANGELO L. EDUARDO DR. NERISSA ROXAS-LOMEDA

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: EVELYN S. HENOGUIN

Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CALOOCAN CITY/ CAMARIN ELEM. SCHOOL
Rating Period: JUNE 2018- APRIL 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratin

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 1
Objective 3 7.5% 4
Objective 4 7.5% 4
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4
Objective 6 7.5% 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 5
Objective 10 7.5% 5
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5

Adje

EVELYN S. HENOGUIN ANGELO L. EDUARDO

Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater: ANGELO L. EDUARDO

Position: PRINCIPAL
Date of Review: APRIL 8, 2019

Numerical Ratings Score

E T Ave
5 5.000 0.375
1 1 1.000 0.075
5 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
4 4.500 0.337
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
4.48 4.740 0.474
Final Rating 4.446
Adjectival RatingVery Satisfactory

GELO L. EDUARDO DR. NERISSA ROXAS-LOMEDA

Rater Approving Authority