is a severe problem all around the world. One of the general solutions given by some environmentalists is to impose heavy taxes on car drivers and use this money to make public transport better. This essay intends to discuss both merits and demerits of this measure in upcoming subsequent paragraphs.
On the positive side, there are many benefits of this
measure. Firstly, this step could reduce count of vehicles on roads and improve quality of public transport. To elaborate, heavy taxes would discourage car owners from using their cars because it would become very expensive to drive. This would mean that they would begin to make use of public transport instead. For example, we often see old buses and trains that people would rather not use. High taxes would generate enough money to make necessary changes. What is more? We can put curb on some environment such as pollution and excessive use of limited natural resources. To be more precise, more the number of vehicles on roads mean more the toxic gases given out by their exhausts. So, if people start using public transport overwhelmingly then automatically noise and air pollution would reduce in cities. On the downside, there can be various drawbacks of such solution. First and the foremost, this would act as extra burden on the car drivers. Illustrating it, taxes are already high for a lot of people, and so further taxes would only mean less money at the end of the month for most people who may have no choice but to drive every day. Secondly, this measure can reduce job opportunities for those who are working in automobile industry. If extra taxes are imposed on car owners then owning a car would not be affordable by everyone. As a result of this, people have to depend on public transport and they would not buy their own personal vehicles which would reduce manufacturing of cars. A large number of workforces would be workless due to less demand of such vehicles in the market.
To conclude, this solution is worth considering for
improving the current situation of various nations, but there are numerous benefits and drawbacks which should be kept in mind before introducing such a policy. TASK 1 The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited certain Brighton attractions between 1980 and 2010. In an overview, we can see that in 1980 and in 2010 the favourite attractions were the pavilion and the festival. In 1980 the least popular attraction was the pier but in 2010 this changed and the art gallery was the least popular.
During the 1980s and 1990s there was a sharp increase in
visitors to the pavilion from 28% to 48% and then the percentage gradually went down to 31% in 2010. The trend for the art gallery was similar to the pavilion. Visitors increased rapidly from 22% to 37% from 1980 to 1985 then gradually decreased to less than 10% over the next twenty- five years. The number of tourists who visited the Brighton Festival fluctuated slightly but in general remained steady at about 25%. Visitors to the pier also fluctuated from 1980 to 2000 then rose significantly from 12% to 22% between 2000 and 2010.