Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SCHOOL OF LAW
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A basic course on the law of persons and the family which first views the effect and
application of laws and the law on human relations, and then proceeds to examine the legal
norms affecting civil personality, marriage, property relations between husband and wife, legal
separation, the matrimonial regimes of absolute community, conjugal partnership of gains, and
complete separation of property, family, paternity and filiation, adoption, guardianship, support,
parental authority, surnames, absence and emancipation, including the rules of procedure relative
to the foregoing.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1: KNOWLEDGE – Know and understand the fundamental civil rights of persons as well as the
various laws governing the family. Articulate the essence of marriages, the rights and
responsibilities of parents to each other and to their children.
3: THINKING SKILLS - Identify and articulate legal issues; apply legal reasoning and research
to generate appropriate responses to legal issues; engage in critical analysis and make a
reasoned choice amongst alternatives; and think creatively in approaching legal issues
and generating appropriate responses.
4: RESEARCH SKILLS – Develop the skill to research on jurisprudence and laws that are
applicable to subject matter and apply the same to case problem given for analysis and discussion.
6: SELF-MANAGEMENT
At the end of the law program, the Josenian law graduate is expected to be QUALITY
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ORIENTED individuals that to embody the following Graduate
Attributes:
A COMPETENT PROFESSIONAL
Critical thinker
Lifelong learner
Skilled researcher
Sound decision- maker
Innovative problem-solver
Effective and articulate communicator
A CHRISTIAN EXEMPLAR
Incorruptible servant leader
Ethical and values-driven practitioner
CLLO 1: Explain, analyze and apply the legal rules and concepts governing and regulating
family relationships;
CLLO 2: Critically analyze and apply key cases and statutes to a given problem scenario;
CLLO 4: React favorably and with integrity to situations that would require knowledge of
the law on Persons and Family Relations;
CLLO 6 : Integrate the values of fairness, equity, honesty and good faith in all dealings as
well as in interpreting the provisions of law; and
CLLO 7: Develop confidence and competence in answering questions on the law on persons
and family relations in preparation for the bar examinations.
The course materials are all academic property of the course professor. A student may not record,
copy or take photos of any part of the class by any means, and in exceptional cases that the student
receives written faculty authorization to record a class, the student may not copy or download such
recording to a computer or any device for distribution. All course materials are for the student’s personal
education and study. Unauthorized use of the course materials, downloading, uploading or reproduction
shall be treated as violation of the University policy on honesty as well as infringement of copyright laws.
METHODOLOGY
Methods used in teaching the course shall include lecture discussion, cases and class
recitation.
COURSE OUTLINE:
A. Nature - (Art. 1)
1. Not an Ordinary Contract
Art. XV, 1987 Constitution
RA 8369 (Family Courts)
2. Union between Man and a Woman
Silverio vs. Republic, G.R. No. 174689, Oct. 22, 2007
3. State Policy
Tuazon vs. CA, GR No. 116607, April 10, 1996, 256 SCRA 160
Philippine Telegraph & Telephone Company vs. NLRC, 272 SCRA 596
Duncan vs. Glaxo, GR No. 162994, Sept. 17, 2004, 438 SCRA 343
Star Paper Corporation vs. Simbol, G.R. No. 164774, April 12, 2006, 487 SCRA 222
4. Lifetime Commitment
Santos vs. CA, 240 SCRA 20
B. Requisites (Art. 2-26)
1. Essential
a. Legal Capacity
b. Contracting Parties Must be of Different Sex
c. Effect of Sex Change
Silverio vs. Republic, G.R. No. 174689, October 22, 2007
Republic vs. Cagandahan, G.R. No. 166676, September 12, 2008
d. Consent
2. Formal
a. Authority of Solemnizing Officer
Beso vs. Daguman, AM No. MTJ-99-1211, January 28, 2000
b. Marriage License
People vs. de Lara, CA L-12585-R, Feb. 15, 1955
Geronimo vs. CA et. al., GR No. 105540, July 5, 1993, 43 SCAD 311
Cosca, et. al. vs. Hon. Lucio Palaypayon, Jr., et. al., A.M. No.
MTJ-92-721, Sept. 30, 1994, 55 SCAD 759
Engrace Ninal, et. al. vs. Norma Bayadog, G.R. No. 133778, Mar. 14, 2000
Sy vs. CA, et. al. GR No. 127263, April 12, 2000
Aranes vs. Occiano, AM No. MTJ-02-1390. April 11, 2002
Sevilla vs. Cardenas, GR. No. 167684, July 31, 2006
Alcantara vs. Alcantara, GR No. 167746, Aug. 28, 2007, 531 SCRA 446
c. Marriage Ceremony
5
Go vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 114791, May 29, 1997, 82 SCAD 887
Morigo vs. People, GR. No. 145226, Feb. 6, 2004
3. Marriage Certificate is Not an Essential or a Formal Requisite
Villanueva vs CA, 198 SCRA 472
De Loria vs Felix, 104 Phil 1
Pugeda vs Trias, 4 SCRA 849
Delgado Vda Dela Rosa vs. Heirs of Damain, January 27, 2006
4. Distinctions between Absent and Defective Requisites
Republic vs. CA, 236 SCRA 257
Cosca vs. Palaypayon, Jr., 237 SCRA 251, September 30, 1994
Martinez vs. Tan, 12 Phil 731
5. Criminal Liability for those Responsible for the Irregularities in Formal Requisites
U.S. vs Dulay, 10 Phil 305
People vs Rosal, 49 Phil 509
Villasanta vs. Peralta, 101 Phil 313
6. Legal Age for Marriage
7. Religious Rites, No Form Required
Eugenio vs. Velez, 185 SCRA 434
Martinez vs. Tan, 12 Phil 731
Enriquez vs. Enriquez, 8 Phil 565
8. Who can Solemnize Marriage
9. Specified Venues of Marriage
10. Marriage before a Judge Outside his Court
Cosca vs. Palaypayon, Jr., 237 SCRA
Navarro vs. Domagtoy, A.M. No MTJ 06-1088, July 19, 1996; 72 SCAD 328; 259
SCRA 135
Aranes vs. Judge Salvador Occiano AM No. MTJ-02-1390; April 11, 2002; 380
SCRA 402
11. Marriage License
a. Where to Apply
b. Filipino Marriages Abroad
c. Application under oath
d. Duties of the Civil Registrar
e. Papers to be Presented
f. Parental Consent, when Required
g. Parental Advice, when Required
h. Certificate of Marriage Counseling
i. Posting of Notices
j. What to Do in case of known impediments
k. License Fees
l. Effectivity
m. Certificate of Legal Capacity, Required of Foreigners
Affidavit of Legal Capacity, required of Stateless Persons and Refugees
n. Distinguished from Marriage Certificate
12. Proof of Marriage
Balogbog vs. CA, GR No. 83598, March 7, 1977
Trinidad vs. CA, GR No. 118904, April 20, 1998; 289 SCRA 188
Sarmiento vs. CA, GR No. 96740, March 25, 1999
De Jacob vs. CA, GR No. 135216, August 19, 1999
13. Lex Loci Celebrationis Recognized subject to Exceptions and Recognition of
Foreign Divorce (Art. 26)
Van Dorn vs. Romillo, GR No. 68470, October 8, 1985, 139 SCRA 140
Pilapil vs. Ibay-Somera, et. al., GR No. 80116, June 30, 1989, 174 SCRA 663
Quita vs. Dandan, GR No. 124862, Dec. 22, 1998
Llorente vs. CA, GR No. 124371, November 23, 2000; 345 SCRA 592
Garcia vs. Recio, G.R. No. 138322, October 2, 2001, 366 SCRA 437
Roehr vs. Rodriguez, et. al., GR No. 142820, June 20, 2003
6
Republic vs. Crasus L. Iyoy, GR No. 152577, Sept. 21, 2005
Republic vs. Orbecido, G.R. No. 154380, October 5, 2005, 472 SCRA 114
Bayot vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 144635/163979, November 7, 2008, 570
SCRA 472
Merope Enrique vda. De Catalan vs. Louella A. Catalan-Lee, G.R. No. 183622,
February 8, 2012
Minoru Fujiki vs. Maria Paz Galena Marinay, etc., G.R. No. 196049, June 26,
2013
Perez vs. Catindig, A.C. No. 5816, March 10, 2015
C. Marriages Exempt From License Requirement (Arts. 27-34)
1. Marriage in Articulo Mortis
2. Marriage in Remote Places
3. Marriage during Voyage
4. Marriage within Zones of Military Operations
5. Muslim Marriages, Others
6. Ratification of Marital Cohabitation
Engrace Niñal, et. al. vs. Norma Bayadog, G.R. No. 133778, March 14, 2000;
328 SCRA 122
Manzano vs. Sanchez, AM No. MTJ 00-1329, March 8, 2001; 354 SCRA 1
De Castro vs. Assidao-De Castro, G.R. No. 160172, February 13, 2008, 545
SCRA 162
Republic vsl. Dayot, G.R. No. 175581, March 28, 2008, 550 SCRA 435
Rex M. Tupal vs. Judge Remegio V. Rojo, A.M. No. MTJ-14-1842, FEBRUARY
24, 2014
Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Anatalio S. Necessario et. Al, A.M.
No. MTJ-07-1691, APRIL 2, 2013
D. Void and Voidable Marriages (Arts. 35-54)
1. Void Marriages (Art. 35)
a. Party is Below 18 years old
b. Lack of Authority of Solemnizing Officer
c. Lack of Marriage License
Sy vs. CA, 330 SCRA 550 (2000)
Republic vs. CA, 236 SCRA 257
Cariño vs. Cariño, 351 SCRA 127 (2001)
Mallion vs. Alcantara, G.R. No. 141528, October 31, 2006
d. Bigamous or Polygamous Marriages
Conjuangco vs. Palma, A.C. No. 2474, June 30, 2005
e. Mistake in Identity of Other Party
f. Void Subsequent Marriages Under Art. 53
g. Psychological Incapacity of Any Party (Art. 36)
Salita vs. Magtolis, 233 SCRA 100 (1994)
Santos vs. CA, GR No. 112019, Jan. 4, 1995, 240 SCRA 22
Ramon Velasco vs. Norma V. Velasco, CA-GR No. 36075, Feb. 16, 1995
Tuazon vs. CA, 256 SCRA 158 (1996) G.R. No. 116607, April 10, 1996
Chi Ming Tsoi vs. CA, GR No. 119190, Jan. 16, 1997, 266 SCRA 324
Republic vs. CA & Molina, GR No. 108763, February 13, 1997; 268 SCRA 198
Hernandez vs. CA, GR No. 126010, Dec. 8, 1999; 320 SCRA 76
Marcos vs. Marcos , G.R. 136490, G.R. 136490, October 19, 2000
Republic vs. Dagdag, G.R. No. 109975, Feb. 9, 2001, 351 SCRA 425
Sin vs. Sin, GR No. 137590, March 26, 2001
Pesca vs. Pesca G.R. 136921, April 17, 2001.
Choa vs. Choa, GR No. 143376, November 26, 2002
Barcelona vs. CA, GR No. 130087, September 24, 2003
Dedel vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 151867, January 29, 2004
Tenebro vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 150785, February 18, 2004
Republic vs. Quintero-Hamano, G.R. No. 149498, May 20, 2004; 428 SCRA 735
7
Juanita Carating-Siayngco vs. Manuel Siayngco, G.R. No. 158896, October 27,
2004; 441 SCRA 442-439
Buenaventura vs. CA , et. al., GR Nos. 127358, 127449, March 31, 2005
Republic vs. Iyoy, GR No. 152577, Sept. 21, 2005
Leonilo Antonio vs. Marie Ivonne F. Reyes, G.R. No. 155880, March 10, 2006
Republic vs. Melgar, GR. No. 139676, March 31, 2006
Ma. Armida Perez-Ferraris vs. Brix Ferraris, G.R. No. 162368, July 17, 2006
Mallon vs. Alcantara, GR. No. 141528, Oct. 31, 2006
Zamora vs. CA, GR No. 141917, Feb. 7, 2007
Republic vs. Tanyag-San Jose, GR. No. 168328, Feb. 28, 2007
Navarro vs. Navarro, GR No. 162049, April 13, 2007
Tongol vs. Tongol, G.R. No. 1576101, October 19, 2007, 537 SCRA 135
Navales vs. Navales, G.R. No. 167523, June 27, 2008
Republic vs. Cabahug-Baguio, G.R. No. 171042, June 30, 2008
Laurena vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 159220, September 22, 2008
Te vs. Yu-Te & the Republic of the Philippines, GR No. 161793, February 13,
2009
Reyes So vs. Valera , G.R. No.150667, June 5, 2009
Lester Benjamín S. Halili vs. Chona M. Santos-Halili & the Republic of the
Philippines, G.R. No. 1654224, June 9, 2009
Rumbaua vs. Rumbaua, GR. No. 166738, August 4, 2009
Aspillaga vs. Aspillaga, G.R. No. 170925, October 26, 2009
Chan Paz vs. Paz, G.R. No. 166579, February 18, 2010
Lim vs. Lim, G.R. No. 176464, February 24, 2010
Toring vs. Toring, G.R. No. 165321, August 3, 2010
Reyes vs. Reyes, G. R. No. 185286, August 18, 2010
Ochoa vs. Alano, G.R. No. 167459, January 26, 2011
Yambao vs. Republic of the Philippines and Yambao, G.R. No. 184063, January
24, 2011
Republic of the Philippines vs. Court of Appeals & Eduardo C. De Quintos, Jr.,
G.R. No. 159594, November 12, 2012
Willem Benmer vs. Avelina Amores, G.R. No. 195670, December 3, 2012
Arabelle Mendoza vs. Republic of the Philippines & Dominic Mendoza, G.R. No.
1576749, November 12, 2012
Republic vs. Cesar Encerlan, G.R. No. 170022, January 9, 2013
Republic of the Philippines vs. Rodolfo O. de Gracia. G.R. No. 171557, February
12, 2014
Valerio Kalaw vs. Ma. Elena Fernandez, G.R. No. 166357, January 14, 2015
Viñas vs. Viñas, G.R. No. 208790, January 21, 2015
Mallilin vs. Jamesolamin & the Republic, G.R. No. 192718, February 18, 2015
h. Incestuous Marriages (Art. 37)
i. Void Marriages for Reasons of Public Policy (Art. 38)
2. Imprescriptibility of Action or Defense; Exception (Art. 39)
Niñal vs. Bayadog, G.R. No. 133778, March 14, 2000
3. Nullity of Previous Marriage; Final Judgment, Basis for Purposes of Remarriage
(Art. 40); Exception
Wiegel vs Sempio - Diy, 143 SCRA 499; August 19, 1986
Terre vs. Terre, 211 SCRA 7, July 2, 1992
Domingo vs CA & Delia Auera, GR No. 104818, Sept. 17, 1993, 226 SCRA 572
Atienza vs Brillantes, Jr., A.M. No. MTJ-92-708, March 29, 1995,243 SCRA 32
Valdes vs. RTC, GR No. 122749, July 31, 1996, 260 SCRA 221
People vs Vicente Cobar, CA - G.R. No. 19344, Nov. 10, 1997
Apiag vs. Cantero, 268 SCRA 61
Bobis vs. Bobis, GR No. 138509, July 31, 2000
Mercado vs. Tan, G.R. No. 137110, August 1, 2000
Te vs. CA, G.R. No. 126746, November 29, 2000
Susan Nicdao Carino vs. Susan Yee Carino, GR No. 132529, Feb. 2, 2001
8
Morigo vs. People, G.R. No. 145226, February 6, 2004
Tenebro vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 150758, February 18, 2004,
423 SCRA 272
Antone vs. Beronilla, G.R. No. 183824, December 8, 2010
Merlinda Cipriano Montanez vs. Lourdes Tajolosa Cipriano, G.R. No. 181089,
October 22, 2012
James Walter P. Capili vs. People of the Philippines & Shirley Tismo-Capili, G. R.
No. 183805, July 3, 2013
People of the Philippines vs. Edgardo V. Odtuhan, G.R. No. 1911566, July 17,
2013
Social Security Commision vs. Azote, G.R. No. 209741, April 15, 2015
4. Validity of Void Marriage Collateraly Attacked
De Castro vs. De Castro, GR No. 160172, Feb. 13, 2008
5. Voidable Bigamous Marriage (Art. 41)
a. Declaration of Presumptive Death/Requisites for Remarriage
Republic vs. Nolasco, GR No. 94053, March 17, 1993, 220 SCRA 20
Calisterio vs. Calisterio, GR No. 136467, April 6, 2000
Republic vs. Bermudez-Lorino, GR. No. 160258, Jan 19, 2005
Republic vs. Court of Appeals, et. al. , GR No. 163604, May 6, 2005
Eduardo Manuel vs. People, GR No. 165842, November 29, 2005
Republic vs. CA, et. al., GR No. 159614, December 9, 2005
SSS vs. Vda de Bailon, GR No. 165545, March 24, 2006
Valdez vs. Republic, G.R. No. 180863, September 8, 2009
Republic vs. Hon. Estrada and Olemberio, G.R. No. 214792, March 18, 2015
b. Effects of Reappearance (Art. 42)
c. Effects of Termination of Subsequent Marriage (Art. 43)
6. Voidable Marriages (Art. 45-54)
a. Lack of Parental Consent
b. Unsoundness of Mind
c. Consent Obtained through Fraud
1. Frauds in Marriage (Art. 46)
Almelor vs. Regional Trial Court, G.R. No. 179620, August 26, 2008
d. Consent Obtained by Force, Intimidation or undue Influence
Villanueva vs. Court of Appeals, 505 SCRA, Oct. 27, 2006
e. Physical Incapacity of Consummating the Marriage
7. Prescriptive Periods for Annulment (Art. 47)
8. No Declaration of Default
Tuazon vs. CA, GR No. 116607, April 10, 1996, 256 SCRA 160,
70 SCAD 132
Ancheta vs. Ancheta, G.R. No. 145370, March 4, 2004
9. Effects of Annulment (Art. 50)
Macadangdang vs, CA, 108 SCRA 314
Ledesma vs Intestate Estate of Cipriano Pedrosa, 219 SCRA 806
10. Partition and Presumptive Legitime (Art. 51)
11. Recording of Requirements; Effects of Non-compliance (Arts. 52-53)
12. Status of Children (Art. 54)
13. A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC: Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void
Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages
Ablaza vs. Republic, G.R. No. 158298, August 11, 2010
Bolos vs. Bolos, G.R. No. 186400, October 20, 2010
Office of the Court Administratory vs. Hon. Liberty O. Castaneda et. al., A.M. No.
RTJ-12-2316, October 9, 2012
14. A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC: Rule on Provisional Orders
III. Rights and Obligations Between Husband and Wife (Arts. 68-73) 1 hour
A. Basic Obligations
Ilusorio vs. Ilusorio, G.R. No. 139789, July 19, 2001 &
G.R. No. 139808, May 12, 2000
Tenchavez vs. Escano, 15 SCRA 355
B. Fixing the Domicile
C. Support of Family
D. Management of Household
E. Exercise of Legitimate Profession
F. Republic Act No. 10572 amending Art. 73 & 111 of the Family Code (Approved:
May 24, 2013)
IV. Property Relations Between Husband and Wife (Arts. 74-148) 8 hours
A. Marriage Settlement
1. Definition
2. Time Made or Modified (Art. 76)
3. Requisites for Enforceability (Art. 77)
4. Nationality Principle; Exceptions (Art. 80)
5. Effects when Marriage Does Not take Place (Art. 81)
B. Donations By Reason of Marriage (Arts. 82-87)
1. Requisites
2. Prevailing Laws
3. Limitations
4. Revocation
5. Donations Between Husband and Wife During Marriage and
Common Law Spouses, Void : Arcaba vs. Tabancura Vda. De Batocael, GR No.
146683, November 22, 2001; 370 SCRA 414
C. System of Absolute Community (Arts. 88-104)
1. What Constitute Community Property
2. Exclusive Properties
3. Liabilities of the Absolute Community
10
Ayala Investment & Dev. Corp, et. al. vs. CA, GR No. 1183305, Feb. 12, 1998
Wong vs. IAC, GR No. 70082, Aug. 19, 1991
Carlos vs. Abelardo, GR No. 146504, April 9, 2002
4. Ownership, Administration, Enjoyment and Disposition of the Community Property
Sabalones vs. CA, 230 SCRA 79
Giuang vs. CA, G.R. No. 125172, June 26, 1998
Jader-Manalo vs. Camaisa, et. al. GR No. 147978, January 28, 2002
Vda. De Ramones vs. Agbayani, GR No. 137808, September 30, 2005, 471 SCRA
306
5. Dissolution of Absolute Community Regime
6. Liquidation of the Absolute Community Assets and Liabilities
a. Procedure
b. Liquidation when Marriage Terminated by Death
c. Simultaneous Liquidation of Community Properties of two or more marriages
Dael vs IAC, GR No. 68873, March 31, 1989, 171 SCRA 524
Vda. de Delizo vs. Delizo, 69 SCRA 216
D. Conjugal Partnership of Gains (Arts. 105-133)
1. Concept
2. Immutability of Matrimonial Property Regime
3. Exclusive Properties
4. Conjugal Properties
Spouses Ricky and Anita Wong, et. al. vs. IAC, et.al.,
GR No. 70082, Aug. 19, 1991
Ching vs. Court of Appeals, GR No. 126642, Feb. 23, 2004
Villanueva et.al. vs. Court of Appeals et.al., GR No. 143286, April 14, 2004
Pintiano-Anno vs. Anno, GR No. 163743, Jan 27, 2006
Go vs. Yamane, GR No. 160762, May 3, 2006
Ferrer vs. Ferrer, GR No. 166496, Nov. 9, 2006 (Art. 120)
MBTC vs. Tan, GR No. 163712, Nov. 30, 2006
Matthews vs. Taylor, Gr. No. 164584, June 22, 2009
5. Liabilities of the Conjugal Partnership
Costuna vs. Domondon, GR No. 82753, Dec. 19, 1989
Carlos vs. Abelardo, G.R. No. 146504, April 4, 2002
Carandang vs. Heirs of Quirino de Guzman, GR No. 160347, Nov. 29, 2006
SBTC vs. Mar Tierra Corp., GR No. 143382, Nov. 29, 2006
6. Administration of the Conjugal Partnership Property
Guiang vs CA, G. R. 125172, June 25, 1998
Roxas vs CA, 198 SCRA 543
Abalos vs. Macatangay, Jr., GR No. 155043, September 30, 2004; 439 SCRA 649
7. Property Bought on Installment Paid from Mixed Funds
Jovellano vs. CA, GR No. 100728, June 18, 1992
8. Ownership of Improvements made on separate property
Francisco Muñoz, Jr. vs. Erlinda Ramirez, et. al, Gr. No. 156125, August 25, 2010
9. Sale/Mortgage of properties of the conjugal partnership needs
the consent of the spouses; Otherwise, void
Sps. Antonio and Luzviminda Guiang vs. CA, et. al., GR No. 125172,
June 26, 1998, 95 SCAD 264
Jose Uy, et. al., vs. CA, et. al., GR No. 109557, November 29, 2000
Abalos vs. Macatangay, GR No. 155043, Sept. 30, 2004
Bautista vs. Silva, 502 SCRA 334, Sept. 19, 2006
Homeowners Savings & Loan Bank vs. Miguela Dailo, GR No. 153802,
March 11, 2005
Pelayo vs. Perez, G.R. No. 141323, June 8, 2005, 459 SCRA 475
Spouses Ravina vs. Villa Abrille, et. al., GR. No. 16070, October 16, 2009
Spouses Aggabao vs. Dionisio Parulan, Jr., et. al., Gr. No. 165803, September 1,
2010
9. Dissolution of Conjugal Partnership Regime
11
Spouses Buado vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 145222, April 24, 2009
10. Liquidation of the Conjugal Partnership's Assets and Liabilities
Quiao vs. Quiao, G.R. No. 176556, July 4, 2012
E. Separation of Property of the Spouses and Administration of Common Property
By One Spouse During the Marriage (Arts. 134-142)
1. Separation of Property, When Allowed
2. Sufficient Causes for Judicial Separation of Property
Adolfo vs. Adolfo, G..R. No. 201427, March 18, 2015
3. Voluntary Judicial Separation of Property
Agustin De Luna vs. Linatoc, 74 Phil 15
Maquilan vs. Maquilan, GR No. 155409, June 8, 2007
4. Revival of Old Property Regime
5. Transfer of Administration of Exclusive Property
F. Regime of Separation of Property (Arts. 143-146)
1. Definition and When Allowable
Toda, Jr. vs CA, 183 SCRA 713
2. Rights and Liabilities
3. Liability for Family Expenses
G. Property Regime of Unions Without Marriage (Arts. 147-148)
1. Exclusive Cohabitation of Capacitated Persons Without Marriage; Cohabitation
under a Void Marriage
Belcodero vs CA, 227 SCRA 303
Valdez vs RTC of Quezon City, GR No. 122749, July 31, 1996, 260 SCRA 221
Nicdao Carino vs. Yee Carino, GR No. 132529, February 2, 2001; 351 SCRA 127
Mercado-Fehr vs. Fehr, GR No. 1527716, October 23, 2003
Joaquino vs. Reyes, GR No. 154645, July 13, 2004
Lupo Atienza vs. Yolanda de Castro, GR No. 168698, Nov. 29, 2006
Francisco vs. Master Iron Works Construction Corp.,
GR No. 151967, Feb. 16, 2005
Gonzales vs. Gonzales, 478 SCRA, Dec 16, 2005
Alain M. Diño vs. Ma. Caridad L. Diño, GR. No. 178044, January 19, 2011
Juan Sevilla Salas, Jr. Vs. Eden Villena Aguila, G.R. No. 202370, September 23,
2013
2. Other Kinds of Cohabitation
Uy vs CA, May 27, 1994, 232 SCRA 581, 51 SCAD 248
Agapay vs Palang, GR No. 116668, July 28, 1997,
276 SCRA 340, 85 SCAD 145
Villanueva et. al. vs. Court of Appeals, et. al., G.R. No. 143286, April 14, 2004
Jacinto Saguid vs. Court of Appeals, et. al., G.R. No. 150611, June 10, 2003; 403
SCRA 679
Tumlos vs. Sps. Mario Fernandez, GR No. 137650, April 12, 2000
Borromeo vs. Descallar, G.R. No. 159310, February 24, 2009
Betty B. Lacabayan vs. Bayani Samoy, JR., G.R. No. 165427, March 21, 2011
Pacific Ace Finance Ltd. vs. Eiji Yanagisawa, G.R. No. 175303, April 11, 2012
Edilberto U. Ventura, Jr. vs. Spouses Paulino & Evangeline Abuda, G.R. No.
202932, October 23, 2013
Sally Go-Bangayan vs. Benjamin Bangaya, Jr., GR No. 201061, July 3, 2013
Banguis-Tambuyat vs. Balcom-Tambuyat, G.R. No. 202805, March 23, 2015
2. DNA Testing
Arnel Agustin vs. CA, GR No. 162571, June 15, 2005
Rosendo Herrera vs. Alba, GR No. 148220, June 15, 2005
Estate of Ong vs. Diaz, GR No. 171713, Dec. 17, 2007, 540 SCRA 480
A. Concept
Demsey vs RTC, 164 SCRA 384
1. Joint Exercise of parental Authority
2. Parental Authority when Parents are Separated
Luna vs IAC, 137 SCRA 7
Unson III vs Navarro, 101 SCRA 183 (1980)
Cervantes vs Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575
Santos, Sr. vs. CA, GR No. 113054, March 16, 1995, 242 SCRA 407
Espiritu vs. CA; 242 SCRA 362 , 59 SCAD 631 (March 15,1995)
Sombong vs. CA 252 SCRA 663 (1996)
15
Perez vs. CA; 255 SCRA 661 (1996)
Eslao vs. CA, GR No. 116773, January 16, 1997; 266 SCRA 317
Artadi vs. Bondagjy, GR No. 140817, December 7, 2001
Vancil vs. Belmes, GR No. 132223, June 19, 2001
Laxamana vs. Laxamana, G.R. No. 144763, September 3, 2002, 388 SCRA 296
Jocelyn Pablo-Gualberto vs. Crisanto Rafaelito Gualberto, GR No. 154994
And Crisanto Rafaelito Gualberto vs. CA, et.al., GR No. 156254,
June 28, 2005
Hirsch vs. CA, GR No. 174485, July 11, 2007
Dacasin vs. Del Mundo-Dacasin, GR. No. 168785, Feb. 5, 2010
3. On Illegitimate Children
David vs. CA, GR No. 111180, Nov. 16, 1995; 250 SCRA 82
Silva vs. CA, 275 SCRA 604 ; G.R. No. 114742, July 17, 1997; 275 SCRA 604
Tonog vs. Court of Appeals & Daguimol, GR No. 122906.
February 7, 2002; 376 SCRA 523
Briones vs. Miguel, G.R. No. 156343, October 18, 2004; 440 SCRA 455
4. Substitute Parental Authority by Surviving Grandparent
B. Substitute and Special Parental Authority
Amadora vs CA, et. al., L-47745, April 15, 1988, 160 SCRA 327
PSBA vs CA, et. al., GR No. 84698, Feb. 4, 1992, 205 SCRA 733
C. Effect of Parental Authority Upon the Persons of the Children
Tamagro vs CA, et. al. , 209 SCRA 518 (1992)
Libi vs IAC, 214 SCRA 16, GR No. 70890, September 18, 1992
St. Mary’s Academy vs. Carpetanos, et. al., GR No. 143363, Feb. 6, 2002
D. Effect of parental Authority Upon the Propety of the Children
E. Suspension or Termination of Parental Authority
Johanna Sombong vs. CA, et. al., GR No. 111876, Jan. 31, 1996
67 SCAD 529
F. Republic Act No. 8972, “Solo Parents’ Welfare Act of 2000”
G. Republic Act No. 7610, “Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse,
Exploitation and Discrimination Act”
XI. Summary Judicial Proceedings in the Family Law (Arts. 238-253) 1 hour
Republic vs. Court of Appeals et. al., G.R. No. 163605, May 6, 2005
A. P.D. 603 (Child and Youth Welfare Code) Provisions on Rights & Duties of Children
B. Duties of Parents
C. Duty of the State
D. Custody of Children
Cervantes vs. Fajardo, G.R. No. 79955, Jan. 27, 1989; 169 SCRA
Medina vs Macabili, 27 SCRA 502
Unson 111 vs. Navarro, 101 SCRA 183
Luna vs Intermediate Appellate Court, L-68374, June 18, 1985; 137 SCRA 7
Clusa vs Cabangbang, 27 SCRA 791
___________
Total No. of Hours 51 hours
School & legal holidays 9
Examinations 12
TOTAL 72 hours
Grading System:
Mid-term Grade:
Pre-midterm exam & Quizzes/Seatwork Assignments : 40%
Mid-term exam : 60%
100%
Final Grade:
Mid-term average : 30%
Pre-final exams & Quizzes/Seatwork Assignments
Attendance : 20%
Final exam : 30%
Oral recitation : 20%
100%
19