Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
During the recent years, there is a gradual change in the grading system in
Philippine education setting due to the introduction of the K to 12 Basic Education
Program. The K-12 uses a standard and competency - based grading system. Learners
from Senior High School will be graded based on written works, performance tasks, and
quarterly assessments every quarter. For the selection of honor students, they should
have attained an average of at least 90 and passed all learning areas with no grades lower
than 85. Some schools even set higher standards (increase of the lowest grade possible
as a criterion for the selection of honor students) which is a challenge for students to exert
more effort in their studies. In line with this, students are expected to progress towards
meeting the standards of the school’s expectations.
Studies today have shown that youth value their grades more than they value
learning (Lemons, 2019). Due to this education system, most students will go to whatever
means necessary to be successful in the classroom, whether those means spending more
time in studying, which could trigger school stress.
Although there is a pressure for students, there are sources that could help them in
studying more effectively than usual to withstand any negative circumstances brought by
high expectations of the school. Sources have shown different strategies for efficient
studying and essential tips that students may consider in maintaining good grades.
Studies related to the present one includes that of Minnaert et al., (2013). In
education system, learners are expected to show initiative in learning or studying and
understanding lessons and contents. An efficient growth of knowledge inside and outside
of school is only possible if students have skills which initiate, guide, and control the search
for information and later on its processing and storage. The learner’s motivation is mostly
regarded as a central condition for successful learning. Effective learning needs strategies
controlling one’s own learning and thinking. Therefore, students need both the will and the
skills to be successful in the classroom. One can show willingness by exploring which
strategy will work best that can lead in an effective learning.
Some studies have proven benefits of reviewing strategies as Elsevier (2013)
conducted a test to 188 sixth grade Taiwanese students in computing classes through
assignments and divided them to each strategy to compare the effects of reviewing
strategies in their academic activities, including questioning, summarizing and note
reading. The results of this study revealed that the students with reviewing strategies
achieved better grades on the unit tests and overall assessment two weeks later than
those of usual condition.
In comparison to these studies, the present study aims to identify the reviewing
strategies that works best for most honor students and how beneficial it is in attaining
academic success. This study will use a focus group discussion to find out the benefits
and effectiveness of using strategies to meet the academic standards of the school.
This study is significant and timely as the increased pressure and expectations on
students can affect them in many aspects (e.g., physically, emotionally, mentally)
especially their health which they tend to sacrifice to cope with examination and deadline
pressures. Hence, the result of this study is most beneficial for students who are having a
hard time in balancing schoolworks as it may prove that reviewing strategies may improve
their study habits, manage stress, and ease the workload in school. Students who do not
use reviewing strategies will know the benefits of using one while the students who are
already using one will be given an opportunity to explore new reviewing strategies. For
teachers, this will serve as an eye-opener to help students cope with academic challenges,
balance academic demands, and motivate them to participate and focus.
Objectives of the Study
Generally, this study aims to identify the reviewing strategies used by Grade 12
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics honor students.
Specifically, this research aims to (1) distinguish different reviewing strategies that
works best for students; (2) identify the effects and benefits of using reviewing strategies;
and (3) compare the academic performance of students who review lessons with and
without the use of reviewing strategies in academics.
Researchers conducted this study at Immaculate Conception College at Balayan,
Batangas. The researchers had intended their research locale at the said institution since
they believed that the chosen respondents have the ability to comply, comprehend, and
provide accurate and honest answers throughout the data gathering procedure. The
locality centeredness fits to the location and is very convenient to the researchers to
conduct this study.
Methodology
Participants
The researchers chose five respondents to participate in giving of data in need for
this study. The participants were selected through purposive sampling; three seventeen-
year-old males, one seventeen-year-old and one eighteen-year-old female. All were honor
students of the Science, Engineering, Technology, and Mathematics Strand in year 12.
Data from the participants determined and achieved the objectives of this study. All the
respondents are students of Immaculate Conception College of Balayan, Batangas.
Materials
There was one focus group conducted and participated by all the chosen
participants. The respondents were rest assured about the confidentiality of the data they
will be giving for this research study. The focus group took place in a quiet classroom at
school (Immaculate Conception College of Balayan). The video and voice recorder were
turned on when the interview started. The researchers first introduced themselves,
enlightened the participants on information about the research study, and stated its
objectives. The discussion centered on the reviewing strategies used of the participants
as honor students, and their experiences of trying and having different strategies and
techniques in reviewing. The interview session lasted for about thirty minutes and was
ended when all the questions were answered, and enough data was collected from the
respondents. The participants gave permission for the focus group discussion to be
recorded in need for the research study. The collected data will be used in interpreting
relationship between the variables of the study.
Findings
Table 1
Reviewing Strategies
Each respondent has his/her own strategy that works best for him/her in
preparation for an examination such as studying lessons before sleeping, jotting down
notes during discussions, rewriting lessons, reviewing time before the examination, and
doing quick review sessions at home. Some of the respondents were alike in the strategies
they have been using like eating foods while they are studying, having a to-do-list in order
to manage time, as well as resting in between review sessions for the body and mind to
function properly.
Respondents have also considered strategies in the past like highlighting important
words, listening to music while studying, reviewing early in the morning, drinking water
when memorizing, studying alone in contrast with one respondent whom prefers to study
in place with other people.
Because of great influence from other people and seeing its effectiveness, they
give thought to trying new strategies in the future that other respondents have already
been using in the present such as eating chocolates, listening to music while studying and
reviewing in the morning. One out of five respondents do not have any strategies to
consider in the future as he finds contentment with what he’s trying and using.
Out of the mentioned strategies by the respondents that they use to review lesson
for exams and quizzes, three are most commonly mentioned. This includes note-taking
techniques, establishing rest-study pattern, and setting the reviewing environment.
Note-taking is writing down pieces of information in a systematic way that could be
done during a discussion which is a great help for most students in reviewing, as well as
rewriting those notes and highlighting important key words. The rest-study pattern is also
one of the most mentioned strategies that learners see as a way to balance out academic
stress - studying with rest periods to decrease the odds of draining oneself mentally and/or
burning out. Reviewing environment can affect the productivity of students for it may bring
distraction. For some, they can focus more when studying alone rather than studying in
groups, and vice versa.
Oxford divides strategies into two major classes: direct and indirect. Direct
strategies, which "involve direct learning and use of the subject matter are subdivided into
three groups: memory strategies, cognitive strategies and compensation strategies.
Memory strategies include the use of mnemonic devices, chunking, writing sentences,
visualization, and understanding. Cognitive strategies comprise repetition, organizing new
language, summarizing meaning, and using imagery for memorization while giving
rewards and recognition are examples of compensation strategies where people become
more motivated to work and exert an effort. Indirect strategies, which "contribute indirectly
but powerfully to learning" are also subdivided into three groups: metacognitive strategies,
affective strategies and social strategies. Metacognitive strategies include planning how
to approach a learning task, solving problems, self-assessment, and monitoring of one’s
own comprehension of text. Affective strategies are concerned with managing emotions
which is done through encouraging and counselling co-learners through pair and group
work. Social strategies involve interaction with other people, brainstorming, and sharing
ideas. According to Fleming and Walls (1998), social or affective strategies mainly involve
the learner in communicative interaction with another person; for example, when
collaboration with peers in problem-solving exercises. Some depends on listening to music
while studying for better concentration. Gregorc (2019) defined learning style as consisting
of ‘distinctive behaviors which serve as indicators of how a person learns from and adapts
to his environment.
Table 2
Benefits and Choice of Reviewing Strategies
Table 2 shows the effects and benefits of using reviewing strategies for students,
their experiences and reasons that led them to explore and try new strategies to know if
the said strategies really worked for them.
Respondent Emerging
Statement Categories Theme
No. Concept
Mas
1 nakakapagfocus More focused
ako.
Yung pagkain ko ng
Eating
chocolate,
2 chocolates
nakakapagboost siya
boost memory.
ng memory.
Matagal kong Lessons were
1 makalimutan yung not easily
mga nireview ko. forgotten
Mas namamanage Use time
1
ko yung time ko. efficiently
Narerelax yung isip Relaxation of
2 Benefits of
ko. mind
using
2 Di ako naooverload. Unload work
strategies
Consistent naman
Consistent high
2 lagi, okay po ang
grades
grades.
Akin kasi ‘di ko
talaga siya sure kung
naging effective ba Strategy unsure
1
yung ginamit kong if effective.
strategy na yun sa
grades.
Minsan may Strategies have
2 downside din ang downside,
strategy ko. sometimes
Mas mabilis kong Easier to
2 natatandaan lahat ng memorize
Experiences
inaaral ko. lessons
that shows
Yung mga gawain ko
1 Work easier strategy is
mas napapadali.
effective.
Mas marami akong Memorize more
1
natatandaan. things
Naging okay yung
Great help in
1 takbo ng pag-aaral
studies
ko. Effects and
Consistent pa din Consistent Benefits of
1
ako sa honor roll. honor student Using
Tingin ko mas Reviewing
makakapagpabilis ng Strategies
1 pagrereview at Saves time
makakapagsave ako
ng maraming time.
Titingnan ko po kung See its
1
effective nga. effectiveness
Sabi ko paano bay
un parang kasi pag Try other
Reasons in
ako yung gumawa strategies due
exploring
nun parang mas to interest
1 new
mabibigyan ko ng despite of
strategies
atensyon yung kanta negative
kesa sa nirereview expectations
ko.
Feel ko mas okay
Refreshing for
1 yun, mas lalo kang
the mind
makakapagisip.
Nakita ko sa post sa
Saw in social
1 facebook, mas
media
efficient.
Yung standards ko Strategy that
1 kasi, kailangan kong could save more
mas mapabilis. time
Wala naman po Standards in
3 akong standards o No standards choosing
basis. learning
Pag po nabalitaan Dependent on strategies
kong effective sa iba, effectiveness
2
tyaka ko and other
sinusubukan. people
Depende, kasi yung
strategy mo dapat Accompanied
2
sinasamahan mo ng with diligence
Depends on
sipag.
students
Depende din po sa
3 estudyante kung Adaptation
kayang i-adapt yung
paggamit ng strategy
na yun.
Naghahanap lang
ako ng bagong way
Finding a more
2 na mas mapapabilis
efficient strategy
yung pagrereview
ko.
Tinigil ko na yung Studying alone
magreview ng mag- considered
1 isa kasi ano po boring, does not
motivate, and
nakakatamad oi induces
walang motivation. procrastination
Kaya ko tinigil yung
pag-inom ng tubig
Losses focus Discontinue
kasi once na
when of Using
matanggal yung
multitasking; Strategies
1 mata ko sa
wants
nirereview ko
uninterrupted
nawawala na yung
studying
focus ko sa
pagrereview.
Yung akin tinigil ko
na yung sa manila Prefers
paper kasi nga ano strategies that
yung pera mas are cost
1
nagagastusan ako, effective and
tapos yung sa time involves less
din, maggagawa ka steps
pa ng ganon ganyan.
All the respondents agreed that having reviewing strategies when studying is a
great help in academics. They have stated such benefits like eating chocolates boost
memory, lessons were not easily forgotten, it saves more time as they were able to use
it efficiently and become more focused in doing different tasks. In conclusion, most
students see that the use of reviewing strategies have benefited them as it improved
their memory (i.e., memorizing lectures easily, retaining lessons longer in mind, etc.) and
they were able to work efficiently by being more productive as they have greater time for
some other things. In connection to this, Oxford (1990) stated that memory strategies,
such as creating mental linkages and employing actions, aid in entering information into
long-term memory and retrieving information when needed for communication.
Two out of five respondents find it beneficial to reduce stress resulting in relaxation
of the mind, unload work, and having consistent high grades. In line with this, their shared
experiences in which they proved the strategies’ effectiveness have resulted to positive
outcomes as their academic lives became easier to deal with. For the respondents whom
listening to music while studying and having break time between review sessions, they
find their strategies to have downside sometimes.
Respondents were open in exploring new strategies because they think it might help them
manage time and refresh their minds. Trying strategies that they have seen in social media
applications and those within self-interest could test how effective it could be for
themselves. Three out of five respondents do not have any standards in choosing learning
strategies, while some depend on how effective it is as seen from other students.
It is also important that the strategy saves time, as they notice that the use of these
kinds of strategies is more beneficial and is proven effective by others. Pond (2013)
showed the importance of time management and work organization in distinguishing
high-achieving students from those who were less successful.
All have stated that the effectiveness of these reviewing strategies may or may not
be the same with other students, it may also depend on how they adapt it through hard
work and diligence. As Kanfer & Ackerman (2012) suggests that students with a learning
goal may have more of their working memory devoted to the task and task related
cognitions, thereby resulting in more effective cognition.
Metacognitive strategies help learners exercise executive control through
planning, arranging, focusing, and evaluation their own learning process. Finally, those
who reject the idea of learning styles might, nevertheless, see value in creating a more
precise vocabulary with which to talk about learning, motivation and the idea of
metacognition – where better self-awareness may lead to more organized and effective
approaches to teaching and learning.
Table 3
Comparison of With and Without Use of Reviewing Strategies
Table 3 discern the comparison between using reviewing strategies and not, as
well as the effects of both aspects in students. The struggles they have experienced are
also stated and how students have overcome it.
Respondent Emerging
Statement Categories Theme
No. Concept
Noong elementary
kasi ganito yun, uhm
tamad akong Attained low
3
pumasok so yung mga grades
Struggles
grades ko nga palakol,
experienced
lahat 75.
without the
Parang nalugaw yung Confusion
use of
1 utak ko nung nag- during
strategies
eexam. examinations
and
Negative
Di ko maayos kung experiences overcoming
anong uunahin ko it
at school
1 kung dedepensahan
(bullying);
ko muna yung sarili ko
o mag-aaral ako. confusion on Comparison
prioritization of With and
Kasi po nung Without the
naghiwalay pamilya ko Tried Use of
ganun po nag-aral na strategies Reviewing
po akong mabuti tapos due to Strategies in
1
lahat ng strategies negative Academics
ginawa ko na para occurrence
lang may at home
maipagmalaki po ako. Overcoming
Akin naman kasi nung struggles
grade 7 kasi syempre with the use
galing elementary
of strategies
uhm petiks petiks Tried new
tapos pag tungtong ng strategies
4 grade 7 yung that are
environment nagulat
ako tapos yun nag try effective in
ako ng mga yun nga the present
nag review ako para
mas ma overcome ko
yung nangyari.
As mentioned, respondents have strategies that works for them in the past, but
they discontinue the use of it and consider another strategy that will be best effective for
them. Two out of five respondents tend to find a more efficient strategy than usual. For
some, studying alone is what they prefer more, but based on the experience of
respondent no. 2, it does not motivate her to study as it sometimes gets boring and
induces procrastination. One respondent lost focus with the use of his past strategy and
wants an uninterrupted setting where he prefers to study alone. One reason they see is
that reviewing strategies should not be just advantageous in terms of their academics,
but in their own selves (e.g., financially, emotionally, and physically). Respondents have
experienced struggles with no use of reviewing strategies such as attaining low grades,
confusion during examinations and conflict in prioritization of schoolworks and other
personal things. Due to negative occurrence at home and at school, participants started
applying the use of strategies as part of their study habits to overcome these struggles
and improve their way of learning.
It shows that the most observable effect of the absence of reviewing strategies is
that students are more likely to attain low marks. Personal challenges served as a
motivation which lead students to use strategies for better academic results and study
even harder. Ramsden (2013) emphasizes that students attempt to cope with demands
of the education situation, and their thought processes during studying can be predicted
from knowledge of their perceptions of the situations that they are trying to adapt to.
There are individual differences in the way students study. Weinstein (2010) have
demonstrated that these differences in study strategies are related to thedifferences in
achievement. “A” students study in ways different from those of “C” and “D” students. It
may well be that “A” students use different strategies because they already have a good
grasp of the material, and are able to use more sophisticated strategies than those
students who lack sufficient background and ability. This relationship is one in which
effective study strategies usually result in greater learning. This is demonstrated by a
number of studies in which students were taught to use more effective study strategies
with a resultant improvement in achievement (Kulik et al.).
References
Lin, Y., Mckeachie, W. J., & Pintrich, P. R. (2010). Teaching Learning Strategies. 153-
160.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608099800041?via%3Dihub
BLOCK 5
Research Group &
Reviewing Strategies Used by Grade 12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Research Topic
Mathematics Honor Students
Introduction Key
Components: Good morning/afternoon and welcome to our session.
I want to thank you for taking the time to join us in our discussion. My name is
Thank you Eliyah Raven B. Capuyon and assisting me today is Niandra Kaye M. Namuco.
Your name We’re both from the Grade-12 Philippians taking up Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics Strand. We are currently taking Practical
Purpose Research 2 as one of the required Applied Subject Track in Senior High
Criteria for School.
selection of As a final requirement of the said course, we would like to conduct a study
respondent about the reviewing strategies used by Grade 12 Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics honor students. We are currently at the data
Confidentiality collection stage of our research and we think that your experiences and
Duration perspective are valuable data for our research.
Opportunity for You are invited because the objective of this research is to gather information
about the reviewing strategies from STEM honor students.
questions
This focus group discussion will last for less than an hour. As the moderator, I
will be asking open questions to the group. Please take turn answering the
question.
There are no wrong answers but rather differing point view. Please feel free to
share your point of view even if it differs from what others have said. Keep in
mind that we’re just as interested in negative comments as positive comments,
and at times the negative comments are the most helpful.
Well, let’s begin. We’ve placed name cards on the table in front of you to help
us remember each other’s name. Let’s find some more about each other by
going around the table. Tell us your name and where you live.
Questions: To distinguish different reviewing strategies that works best for students
1. Why did you stop using some strategies that you are already using before?
2. What are your struggles before, when you do not have any strategies to
help you review before an examination? Cite experiences.
Closing Key
Components: After the brief oral summary, the question asked is: “Is this an adequate
summary?”
Additional
“Have we missed anything?” “Do you want to add something so you can be
comments
enlightened?”
Next steps
I’ll be analyzing the information you and others gave me and submitting a
Thank you research report to our research adviser. I’ll be happy to send you a copy if you
are interested.