RÚBRICA PARA EVALUAR BLOGS ACADÉMICOS

CRITERIA SCORE

Exemplary 2 ptos. Proficient 1 ptos. Limited 0.5 ptos. Unsatisfactory 0 ptos.

Postings provide Postings provide moderate Postings provide minimal Postings show no evidence
Content and creativity
comprehensive insight, insight, understanding insight, understanding and of insight, understanding or
(50%) understanding, and about the topics. reflective thought about the reflective thought about the
reflective thought about the topics. topics.
topics.
Postings are written in a Postings are written in a Postings are written in a Postings do not reflect an
style that is appealing and style that is generally style that does not fully awareness of the audience
appropriate for the appropriate for the consider the audience, and and it is difficult to identify
Voice (20%) intended audience and a intended audience and an the author’s voice is the author’s voice.
consistent voice is evident attempt is made to use a difficult to identify.
throughout. consistent voice.
High quality graphics and Selects and inserts Selects and inserts many Does not select or insert
Text layout, use of multimedia when graphics and multimedia low-quality graphics and any graphics or
graphics and multimedia appropriate to enhance the that are mostly high quality multimedia which are not multimedia. The content is
(20%) contents visual appeal to clarify the content. attractive of clarify the to simple.
content.
Displays appropriate Most of the images, Some of the images, There are no copyright
copyright permissions and graphics, media created by graphics, media created by permissions and no
accurate citations, someone else display someone else dos not citations formatted.
Citations (10%) appropriate copyright display copyright
permissions and citations permissions and citations
are properly formatted. are not properly formatted.

Adapted from: A Rubric for Evaluating Student Blogs. (s.f.). Recuperado 12 agosto, 2019, de https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/
profdev/rubrics/blogrubric.html