Paper - Business Model Innovation PDF

Strategy & Leadership
Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore

Henry Chesbrough,
Article information:
To cite this document:
Henry Chesbrough, (2007) "Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore", Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 35 Issue: 6,
pp.12-17, https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714
Permanent link to this document:
https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714
Downloaded on: 25 April 2019, At: 09:59 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 49186 times since 2007*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
Downloaded by Universidad Nacional de Colombia At 09:59 25 April 2019 (PT)
(2013),"Will business model innovation replace strategic analysis?", Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 41 Iss 2 pp. 31-38 <a href="https://
doi.org/10.1108/10878571311318222">https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571311318222</a>
(2004),"Co-creating unique value with customers", Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 32 Iss 3 pp. 4-9 <a href="https://
doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249">https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249</a>
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:506952 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than
290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional
customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Business model innovation: it’s not just
about technology anymore
Henry Chesbrough
Henry Chesbrough is here was a time, not so long ago, when ‘‘innovation’’ meant that companies needed to
Executive Director, Center
for Open Innovation, T invest in extensive internal research laboratories, hire the most brilliant people they
could find, and then wait patiently for novel products to emerge. Not anymore. The
University of California,
costs of creating, developing, and then shipping these novel products have risen
Berkeley (chesbrou@
tremendously (think of the cost of developing a new drug, or building a new semiconductor
haas.berkeley.edu). He is
fabrication facility, or launching a new product into a crowded distribution channel). Worse,
the author of Open
Business Models: How to
shortening product lives mean that even great technologies no longer can be relied upon to
Thrive in the New Innovation earn a satisfactory profit before they become commoditized. Today, innovation must include
Landscape (Harvard business models, rather than just technology and R&D.
Business School Press, Business models matter. A better business model often will beat a better idea or technology.
2006) and Open Innovation: Consider Wal-Mart in retailing, Dell in PCs, or Southwest Airlines. But business models are
The New Imperative for
not all the same. To innovate your business model, you must first understand what it is, and
Creating and Profiting from
then examine what paths exist for you to improve upon it.
Technology (HBSP, 2003).
What is a business model?

Every company has a business model, whether they articulate it or not. At its heart, a
business model performs two important functions: value creation and value capture. First, it
defines a series of activities, from procuring raw materials to satisfying the final consumer,
which will yield a new product or service in such a way that there is net value created
throughout the various activities. This is crucial, because if there is no net creation of value,
the other companies involved in the set of activities won’t participate. Second, a business
model captures value from a portion of those activities for the firm developing and operating
it. This is equally critical, for a company that cannot earn a profit from some portion of its
activities cannot sustain those activities over time.
There can be real tensions between the aspects of a business model that create value and
those that help to capture a portion of that value. A high-value proprietary technology, for
example, easily earns a profit for the firm, if alternatives offer lesser value. But in many
circumstances customers are reluctant to buy such products (because of price, limited
availability, or delivery or service issues). Yet making the technology more open, which
makes it more appealing to customers, makes it harder to capture value from the offering. So
these offsetting factors must be balanced.
How to define a business model? The term ‘‘business model’’ is often used, but not often
clearly defined. Richard S. Rosenbloom, Professor Emeritus of Harvard, and I have
developed a specific working definition (see Exhibit 1)[1].
A better business model often will beat a better idea or technology.
One benefit of this working definition is that each of its six parameters identifies where
innovation might generate new value in an industry.
PAGE 12 j STRATEGY & LEADERSHIP j VOL. 35 NO. 6 2007, pp. 12-17, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1087-8572 DOI 10.1108/10878570710833714
Exhibit 1 Functions of a business model
The functions of a business model are:

1. Articulate the value proposition, that is, the value created for users by the offering
2. Identify a market segment, that is, the users to whom the offering is useful and for what purpose
3. Define the structure of the value chain required by the firm to create and distribute the offering,
and determine the complementary assets needed to support the firm’s position in this chain. This
includes the firm’s suppliers and customers, and should extend from raw materials to the final
customer
4. Specify the revenue generation mechanism(s) for the firm, and estimate the cost structure and
profit potential of producing the offering, given the value proposition and value chain structure
chosen
5. Describe the position of the firm within the value network (also referred to as an ecosystem)
linking suppliers and customers, including identification of potential complementors and
competitors
6. Formulate the competitive strategy by which the innovating firm will gain and hold advantage
over rivals
B Value proposition. The GE Aircraft engines unit crafted an innovative value proposition
when they shifted from selling airlines jet engines to selling them flight hours. This shifted
the risk of downtime from the airline customer to GE, and enabled GE to establish a very
profitable service operation.
B Target market. Ryanair, a growing European discount airline, innovated a different target
market by going after leisure travelers, instead of the usual business travelers.
B Value chain. Wal-Mart (which targeted an innovative market by going after underserved
rural communities in its early days) is celebrated for its management of its supply chain.
B Revenue mechanism(s). Xerox got its start in the copier business by leasing its copiers,
instead of selling them. Air Products gets paid for the delivery of its industrial gases right
to the manufacturing station inside the plant, instead of by the box car.
B Value network or ecosystem. Ryanair again innovated here, by striking novel
arrangements with underutilized regional airports. Ryanair gets a percentage of
concession sales at these airports, and in some circumstances even gets paid for landing
passengers at the airports.
B Competitive strategy.. One interesting aspect of business models is how difficult it is for
others to imitate them. Many airlines have tried to emulate Southwest’s low cost approach.
Most of their attempts have not fared well. Copying the Southwest model apparently
creates too many conflicts with the airlines’ established business model.
Thus this working definition points the way to certain improvements that can be made to a
business model. But more can be done to improve a specific business model if managers
think of stages of business model advancement. The Business Model Framework (BMF) is a
model that sequences possible business models from very basic (and not very valuable)
models to far more advanced (and very valuable) models. Using the BMF, companies can
assess where their current business model stands in relation to its potential and then define
appropriate next steps for the further advancement of that model.
The Business Model Framework

Type 1 – Company has an undifferentiated business model. The vast majority of companies
operating today do not articulate a distinct business model, and lack a process for
managing it. These companies are operating with Type 1 business models. A business using
the undifferentiated model competes on price and availability, and serves customers who
buy on those criteria. In a word, firms utilizing Type 1 business models are selling
commodities, and are doing so in ways that are no different from many, many other firms.
They often are caught in the ‘‘commodity trap’’. Think of restaurants and barber shops as
examples of this commodity model.
j j
VOL. 35 NO. 6 2007 STRATEGY & LEADERSHIP PAGE 13
Type 2 – Company has some differentiation in its business model. In companies using Type 2
business models, the company has created some degree of differentiation in its products or
services. This differentiation can also lead to a different business model from that of the
Type 1 company, allowing the company to target a customer other than those that buy simply
upon price and availability (such as a performance-oriented customer). This allows the
Type 2 company to serve a different and less congested market segment from that served by
its Type 1 counterpart.
The Type 2 company may lack the resources and staying power to invest in the supporting
innovations to sustain its differentiated position. This gives rise to the pattern of so-called
‘‘one hit wonders’’, where a company or inventor has a successful first product, but is unable
to follow up this success with additional products of similar success. Many technology
startup companies fall into this type.
Type 3 – Company develops a segmented business model. The company now can
compete in different segments simultaneously. More of the market is thus served, and more
profit is extracted from the market as well. The price sensitive segment provides the volume
base for high volume, low cost production. The performance segment supplies high
margins for the business. Other niches can now be addressed, creating a stronger
presence in the distribution channels. The firm’s business model now is more distinctive
and profitable, which supports the firm’s ability to plan for its future via product and
technology roadmaps.
While its greater level of planning helps the Type 3 company avert the one-hit wonder
syndrome, problems still remain. The Type 3 firm remains vulnerable to any major new
technical shift beyond the scope of their current business and innovation activities, and also
to major shifts in the market. Think of a mature, vertically integrated industrial company, as an
example of this kind of model. Or in the IT space, think of an ERP system that is deeply
connected to business processes, but has few ways to link in other software on top of its own
code.
Type 4 – Company has an externally aware business model. In this business model, the
company has started to open itself to external ideas and technologies in the development
and execution of the business. This unlocks a significantly greater set of resources available
to such a company.
The roadmaps of the Type 4 firm provide a shopping list of needs within the firm for external
ideas and technologies. Relationships with outsiders help identify external projects that fulfill
some of these needs. This reduces the cost of serving the business, reduces the time it takes
to get new offerings to market, and shares the risks of new products and processes with
external parties.
Internal roadmaps are now shared with suppliers and customers on a frequent basis. This
enables the firm to make much more systematic use of innovative ideas from suppliers and
from customers. It also allows suppliers and customers to plan their own activities in concert
with the innovative activities of the firm. Companies that make it a practice to share real-time
information with their suppliers exemplify this approach.
Type 5 – Company integrates its innovation process with its business model. In a Type 5
model, the company’s business model now plays a key integrative role within the company.
Suppliers and customers now enjoy formalized institutional access to the firm’s innovation
process, and this access is now reciprocated by the suppliers and customers. Customers
and suppliers now share their own roadmaps with the company, giving the company much
better visibility into the customers’ future requirements.
In this stage, companies begin to experiment more directly with the business model itself.
Type 5 companies now take the time to understand the supply chain all the way back to the
basic raw materials, as they look for major technical shifts or cost reduction opportunities.
Type 5 companies also invest substantial resources to study ‘‘the customer’s customer’’ to
learn about the deeper unmet needs and opportunities in the market. Some experimentation
is conducted on alternative distribution channels, and indeed, upon alternative
j j
PAGE 14 STRATEGY & LEADERSHIP VOL. 35 NO. 6 2007
‘‘ The Business Model Framework (BMF) is a model that
sequences possible business models from very basic (and not
very valuable) models to far more advanced (and very
valuable) models. ’’
configurations of the business model. Companies that are moving from offering products to
offering services, and are bringing in external technologies to support this new approach are
examples of Type 5 models.
Type 6 – Company’s business model is an adaptive platform. The Type 6 business model is
an even more open and adaptive model than types 4 or 5. This ability to adapt requires a
commitment to experimentation with one or more business model variants. This
experimentation can take a number of different forms. Some companies utilize corporate
venture capital as a means to explore alternative business models in small startup
companies. Some utilize spin-offs and joint ventures as means to commercialize
technologies outside of their own current business model. Some have created internal
incubators to cultivate promising ideas that are not yet ready for high volume
commercialization.
In Type 6 firms, key suppliers and customers become business partners, entering into
relationships in which both technical and business risk may be shared. The business models
of suppliers are now integrated into the planning processes of the company. The company in
turn has integrated its business model into the business model of its key customers. Intel,
Microsoft and Wal-Mart are examples here.
One important capability that enables this integration of business models throughout a value
chain is the ability of the company to establish its technologies as the basis for a platform of
innovation for that value chain. In this way, the company can attract other companies to
invest their resources, expanding the value of the platform without consuming extra
investment by the platform maker. For example, anyone making software for PCs,
accessories for iPods, or games for cell phones is indirectly contributing to the value of each
of these platforms[2].
Improving your own business model

The Business Model Framework can help you generate an assessment of your current
business model. Be objective about identifying the stage where your business is right now.
Then look at the attributes of the next stage of the framework. They provide some guidelines
for how to advance your business model further.
If you have already achieved a level 5 or level 6 model, there is good news and bad news.
The good news is that your model is likely to be very profitable and hard to imitate. The bad
news is that no great business model lasts forever. Xerox’s highly successful leasing model
was later upset by Japanese firms entering the market with a simpler copier with replaceable
cartridges that could be sold through retailers. As another example, pharmaceutical
companies are finding that the blockbuster drug business model is becoming prohibitively
expensive. The large market segments are saturated, the costs of R&D are rising steeply,
and the failure rate has been disappointingly high. Future markets will be smaller, more
highly targeted (and effective), and this new approach will require different processes to
develop and launch drugs successfully.
So at any stage of the framework, a company is going to need to think hard about how to
sustain and innovate its business model. This brings us to another dimension of the problem.
j j
Why don’t more companies innovate their business models?
In my observations, many organizations have a ‘‘business model innovation leadership gap.’’
That is, no one person in the organization gap has the authority and the capability to innovate
the business model. Think of your own company: who is responsible for business-model
innovation? It can’t be left to the chief technology officer and his or her staff alone;
business-model innovation clearly requires involvement of top leadership. Yet who within the
company, other than the CEO, is responsible for all the ways the business creates value in its
products and services and captures that value in the form of revenue from its customers?
Certainly the chief financial officer needs to be involved, both for measuring accurately the
results of the model and for communicating these results to outside investors. The marketing
leadership focuses on brand development and channels of distribution. The chief legal
officer has a role to play, particularly when intellectual property is an important contributor to
the ability to capture value from the model. But no one of these people has the ability to drive
the entire business.
In some businesses, a general manager or division president may have complete
responsibility for the financial performance of a business unit. Even here, though, there often
are sharp limits to the ability of these managers to innovate their business models. Some
companies, for instance, put their general managers through two-year to three-year rotations
running specific businesses, increasing the size of the businesses the managers run over
time.
This is too short a time frame to create new business models. It takes more time than that to
develop business-model experiments, obtain clear results, interpret and understand the
results, and then carry out a broad deployment of those results. Little wonder, then, that most
general managers simply stay with the current business model, and show top management
their ability to grow the business within the constraints of that model. In turn, the CEO
typically delegates responsibility for the business model to the general manager of the
business unit.
All this inertia is reinforced by the fact that the top managers of the organization reached their
current level of responsibility by executing within the current business model. So that model
is familiar and reassuring to them. They know in their bones what its strengths are, and how
best to exploit those advantages. And they are less comfortable with anything that differs
from this model. And the more radically different a potential new model is, the more data
needs to be provided to justify its consideration. All too often, the result is that the
established business model becomes unchallengeable.
Nurturing a new business model isn’t easy, but it can be done

Business model innovation is difficult, but it can be done. One great example is that of IBM,
which saw the need for innovation in its business model and effectively reinvented. In the
1960s and 1970s, IBM was a very large, enormously successful, extremely well managed
company. But by January of 1993, the company was in need of a new approach. That month,
IBM announced what was then the largest loss in US corporate history, $5 billion for 1992,
along with the latest in a string of layoffs. Soon after that announcement, IBM fired its chief
executive officer and brought in the first outside CEO the company had ever had in its
history, Lou Gerstner. IBM’s business-model innovation was born out of this financial crisis.
Once IBM realized that it had to change its business model, it began a fervent hunt for new
revenue sources. One experiment was to offer IBM’s semiconductor lines to act as a foundry
for other companies’ products. This brought in new revenue and increased the utilization rate
of IBM’s equipment and facilities. IBM’s need to generate greater profits also led it to rethink
its whole approach to managing its patents and technology. The company was able to raise
hundreds of millions of dollars a year by licensing its intellectual property. However, the most
successful experiment was the discovery that IBM’s expertise could be the basis for a
services business, taking care of customers’ IT needs. More than half of the company’s $90
billion revenue in 2006 came from its IBM Global Services arm, a business that didn’t exist 15
years earlier.
j j
PAGE 16 STRATEGY & LEADERSHIP VOL. 35 NO. 6 2007
Ideally, of course, a company will figure out how to innovate its business model before it is
compelled to act by financial stress. To begin with, an organization must give a senior
manager the resources and authority to define and launch business-model experiments.
This will require cooperation from many other parts of the organization. Once the data from
these experiments are received, that senior executive can decide which experiments to
continue, which new ones to initiate, and whether and when enough information exists to
justify the wider adoption of a new business model.
Companies also need ways to protect their business-model experiments internally – so that
they don’t directly compete with the mainstream initiatives within the company. One way to
do this is by funding these experiments with a separate pool of money set aside specifically
for this purpose. This step prevents these projects from being perceived as taking resources
away from immediately rewarding initiatives.
Once a new business model demonstrates real potential, the company needs to deploy that
model more widely. This is another stage of testing: Can the new business model work at
higher volume and greater scale of operation? If it can, its expansion increases the
competition for resources between the new model and the established model (which,
remember, has been proved successful over many years, and often the top executives of the
company owe their career success to the current model). While the competition between the
two models can no longer be avoided at this stage, it can and must be managed. Each
model deserves a chance to demonstrate its continued viability. Customers will ultimately be
the final arbiter of whether one is better than the other.
In many cases, though, there may be market segments in which each business model works
well, and thus they can co-exist. At Barnes and Noble booksellers, for example, it is now clear
that many of the company’s customers prefer to buy books online, while other customers
prefer to go to their local B&N bookstore, peruse the shelves, and purchase their books at the
register. B&N now employs both business models as valuable ways to serve its market.
There is no way to know today exactly what your company’s future business model will look
like. The only way forward is to conduct some experiments, gather the evidence, identify the
most promising direction and then run some further experiments. Later, a promising model
will have to be scaled up, and integrated across the company. If this sounds expensive and
time-consuming, it is. But the better perspective is to evaluate the cost of competing in the
market with an obsolete business model, against other companies who made the
investments and took the risks to innovate a superior business model. Seen this way,
investing in business model innovation is money well spent.
Notes
1. Source, H. Chesbrough, Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape,
Harvard Business School Press, 2006, chapter 5.
2. For two excellent recent books on the topic of platforms and building the surrounding ecosystem,
see Annabelle Gawer and Michael Cusumano, Platform Leadership (Harvard Business School
Press, 2002), and Marco Iansiti and Roy Levien, The Keystone Advantage (Harvard Business
School Press, 2004).
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com

Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
j j
This article has been cited by:
1. Bernardo Balboni, Guido Bortoluzzi, Roberto Pugliese, Andrea Tracogna. 2019. Business model evolution, contextual
ambidexterity and the growth performance of high-tech start-ups. Journal of Business Research 99, 115-124. [Crossref]
2. Joan Manuel F. Mendoza, Alejandro Gallego-Schmid, Adisa Azapagic. 2019. Building a business case for implementation of
a circular economy in higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production 220, 553-567. [Crossref]
3. Kati Brock, Elke den Ouden, Kees van der Klauw, Ksenia Podoynitsyna, Fred Langerak. 2019. Light the way for smart cities:
Lessons from Philips Lighting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142, 194-209. [Crossref]
4. Francesco Schiavone, Francesco Paolone, Daniela Mancini. 2019. Business model innovation for urban smartization.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142, 210-219. [Crossref]
5. LiaoSuqin, Suqin Liao, LiuZhiying, Zhiying Liu, FuLihua, Lihua Fu, YePeichi, Peichi Ye. 2019. Investigate the role of
distributed leadership and strategic flexibility in fostering business model innovation. Chinese Management Studies 13:1,
93-112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
6. Munjae Lee, Sewon Park, Kyu-Sung Lee. 2019. What Are the Features of Successful Medical Device Start-Ups? Evidence
from KOREA. Sustainability 11:7, 1948. [Crossref]
7. Xiaobo Wu, Ziyi Zhao, Banghao Zhou. 2019. Legitimacy in Adaptive Business Model Innovation: An Investigation of
Academic Ebook Platforms in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55:4, 719-742. [Crossref]
8. M. Ritter, H. Schanz. 2019. The sharing economy: A comprehensive business model framework. Journal of Cleaner Production
213, 320-331. [Crossref]
9. Dennis M. Steininger. 2019. Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT-associated and
digital entrepreneurship research. Information Systems Journal 29:2, 363-407. [Crossref]
10. Humberto Falcão Martins, João Paulo Mota, Caio Marini. 2019. Business models in the public domain: the public governance
canvas. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 17:1, 49-67. [Crossref]
11. Eduardo Z. Milian, Mauro de M. Spinola, Marly M. de Carvalho. 2019. Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda.
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 34, 100833. [Crossref]
12. Fernanda da Silva Momo, Giovana Sordi Schiavi, Ariel Behr, Percival Lucena. 2019. Business Models and Blockchain: What
Can Change?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 23:2, 228-248. [Crossref]
13. KlimanovDenis, Denis Klimanov, TretyakOlga, Olga Tretyak. 2019. Linking business model research and marketing: new
network-based approach to business model analysis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 34:1, 117-136. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
14. Birte Freudenreich, Florian Lüdeke-Freund, Stefan Schaltegger. 2019. A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models:
Value Creation for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 17. . [Crossref]
15. BaloccoRaffaello, Raffaello Balocco, CavalloAngelo, Angelo Cavallo, GhezziAntonio, Antonio Ghezzi, Berbegal-
MirabentJasmina, Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent. Lean business models change process in digital entrepreneurship. Business
Process Management Journal, ahead of print. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
16. HOSSEIN MAHDAVIMAZDEH, LOREN FALKENBERG, MADELYNN STACKHOUSE. 2019. THE INNOVATION
VALUE CANVAS: A GUIDE TO DEFINING VALUE PROPOSITIONS AND TARGET CUSTOMERS FOR
COMMERCIALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS. International Journal of Innovation Management
16, 2050012. [Crossref]
17. Martijn Hamelink, Raymond Opdenakker. 2019. How business model innovation affects firm performance in the energy
storage market. Renewable Energy 131, 120-127. [Crossref]
18. Qinying Fang, Liwen Chen, Dalin Zeng, Lin Zhang. 2019. Drivers of Professional Service Model Innovation in the Chinese
Construction Industry. Sustainability 11:4, 941. [Crossref]
19. Andrea Urbinati, Davide Chiaroni, Vittorio Chiesa, Federico Frattini. 2019. The Role of Business Model Design in the
Diffusion of Innovations: An Analysis of a Sample of Unicorn-Tech Companies. International Journal of Innovation and
Technology Management 16:01, 1950011. [Crossref]
20. Karolin Frankenberger, Wouter Stam. 2019. Entrepreneurial copycats: A resource orchestration perspective on the link
between extra-industry business model imitation and new venture growth. Long Range Planning . [Crossref]
21. Lars Groeger, Kyle Bruce, Iain Rolfe. 2019. Adapt fast or die slowly: Complex adaptive business models at Cisco Systems.
Industrial Marketing Management 77, 102-115. [Crossref]
22. BashirMakhmoor, Makhmoor Bashir, VermaRajesh, Rajesh Verma. 2019. Internal factors & consequences of business model
innovation. Management Decision 57:1, 262-290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
23. Shinhye Kim, Melanie Bowen, Xiaohan Wen. 2019. The ultimate co-creation: leveraging customer input in business model
innovation. AMS Review 27. . [Crossref]
24. Chien Chi Yeh, Edward C.S. Ku. 2019. Process innovation capability and subsequent collaborative team performance in travel
planning: a knowledge exchange platform perspective. Current Issues in Tourism 22:1, 107-126. [Crossref]
25. Maria Elo, Indianna Minto-Coy. Towards a Multi-disciplinary Framing of Diaspora Networks in International Business
637-652. [Crossref]
26. Wolfgang Becker, Patrick Ulrich, Meike Stradtmann. Aufbau von Kooperationen mit Start-ups – eine mittelstandsgerechte
Alternative zu Geschäftsmodellinnovationen? 249-279. [Crossref]
27. Wolfgang Becker, Tim Botzkowski. Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf das Geschäftsmodell mittelständischer
Unternehmen: Eine unternehmensgrößen-, branchen- und geschäftsmodelltypabhängige Analyse 319-340. [Crossref]
28. Annabeth Aagaard. Identifying Sustainable Business Models Through Sustainable Value Creation 1-24. [Crossref]
29. Sung-Hwan Yoon, Nguyen Si Thin, Vo Thi Thanh Thao, Eun-Tak Im, Gwang-Yong Gim. A Study on Success Factors for
Business Model Innovation in the 4th Industrial Revolution 105-127. [Crossref]
30. Grazia Concilio, Amalia De Götzen, Francesco Molinari, Nicola Morelli, Ingrid Mulder, Luca Simeone, Ilaria Tosoni, Kirsten
Van Dam. Innovation and Design 61-83. [Crossref]
31. Robin P. G. Tech, Jonas Kahlert, Jessica Schmeiss. Blockchain-Enabled Open Business Models: New Means to Shared Value
Capturing? 63-76. [Crossref]
32. Kai-Ingo Voigt, Daniel Kiel, Christian Arnold. Geschäftsmodelle im Wandel durch Industrie 4.0 583-614. [Crossref]
33. Catia Lopes, Annibal Scavarda, Guilherme Vaccaro, Christopher Pohlmann, André Korzenowski. 2019. Perspective of Business
Models and Innovation for Sustainability Transition in Hospitals. Sustainability 11:1, 5. [Crossref]
34. Xinxiang Zhang, Lijun Hu, Manjula Salimath, Ching-Chung Kuo. 2019. Developing Evaluation Frameworks for Business
Models in China’s Rural Markets. Sustainability 11:1, 118. [Crossref]
35. Michel J. F. Dubois, Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi, Jérôme Dantan, Davide Rizzo, Mehdi Jaber, Loïc Sauvée. The Agricultural
Innovation Under Digitalization 276-303. [Crossref]
36. Jan F. Tesch. 3. [Crossref]
37. Jan F. Tesch. 19. [Crossref]
38. Jan F. Tesch, Anne-Sophie Brillinger. The Evaluation Aspect of Digital Business Model Innovation 67-86. [Crossref]
39. Gerrit Remané, Andre Hanelt, Jan F. Tesch, Lutz M. Kolbe. The Business Model Pattern Database: A Tool for Systematic
BMI 89-144. [Crossref]
40. Kirstin E. Bosbach, Jan F. Tesch, Uwe C. M. Kirschner. A Business Model Perspective on Innovation Susceptibility 145-164.
[Crossref]
41. Larissa v. Alberti-Alhtaybat, Khaldoon Al-Htaybat, Khalid Hutaibat. 2019. A knowledge management and sharing business
model for dealing with disruption: The case of Aramex. Journal of Business Research 94, 400-407. [Crossref]
42. Andreja Pucihar, Gregor Lenart, Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar, Doroteja Vidmar, Marjeta Marolt. 2019. Drivers and Outcomes
of Business Model Innovation—Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Perspective. Sustainability 11:2, 344. [Crossref]
43. Shahrokh Nikou, Harry Bouwman. Mobile Health and Wellness Applications 1437-1463. [Crossref]
44. Ufuk Cebeci. The Project Management of Industry 4.0 Strategy for Software Houses 228-241. [Crossref]
45. Veronica Scuotto, Francesca Serravalle, Alan Murray, Milena Viassone. The Shift Towards a Digital Business Model 120-143.
[Crossref]
46. Andreas Schumacher, Tanja Nemeth, Wilfried Sihn. 2019. Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an
Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP 79, 409-414. [Crossref]
47. Carsten Feldmann, Colin Schulz, Sebastian Fernströning. Geschäftsmodell-Innovation: Wert für den Kunden und Erträge
für das Unternehmen 29-37. [Crossref]
48. Susana Costa e Silva, Maria Elo. Chapter 9 New Digital Layers of Business Relationships – Experiences from Business-to-
business Social Media 217-241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
49. Sven M. Laudien, Robin Pesch. 2018. Understanding the influence of digitalization on service firm business model design:
a qualitative-empirical analysis. Review of Managerial Science 20. . [Crossref]
50. Pia Ulvenblad, Henrik Barth, Jennie Cederholm* Björklund, Maya Hoveskog, Per-Ola Ulvenblad, Jenny Ståhl. 2018. Barriers
to business model innovation in the agri-food industry: A systematic literature review. Outlook on Agriculture 47:4, 308-314.
[Crossref]
51. Matthijs J Janssen, Carolina Castaldi. 2018. Services, innovation, capabilities, and policy: Toward a synthesis and beyond.
Science and Public Policy 45:6, 863-874. [Crossref]
52. Seyed Kamran Bagheri, Parya Raoufi, Mojgan Samandar Ali Eshtehardi, Saeed Shaverdy, Bahram Ramezani Akbarabad,
Babak Moghaddam, Amirhosein Mardani. 2018. Using the crowd for business model innovation: the case of Digikala. R&D
Management 37. . [Crossref]
53. Thomas Clauss, Peter Harengel, Marianne Hock. 2018. The perception of value of platform-based business models in the
sharing economy: determining the drivers of user loyalty. Review of Managerial Science 13. . [Crossref]
54. RothSteffen, Steffen Roth, ValentinovVladislav, Vladislav Valentinov, Kaivo-ojaJari, Jari Kaivo-oja, DanaLéo-Paul, Léo-Paul
Dana. 2018. Multifunctional organisation models. Journal of Organizational Change Management 31:7, 1383-1400. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
55. Guiwen Liu, Kaijian Li, Asheem Shrestha, Igor Martek, Yang Zhou. 2018. STRATEGIC BUSINESS MODEL
TYPOLOGIES EVIDENT IN THE CHINESE REAL-ESTATE INDUSTRY. International Journal of Strategic Property
Management 22:6, 501-515. [Crossref]
56. WahyonoWahyono, Wahyono Wahyono. Business model innovation: a review and research Agenda. Journal of Indian Business
Research, ahead of print. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
57. Shahrokh Shahrivar, Shaban Elahi, Alireza Hassanzadeh, Gholamali Montazer. 2018. A business model for commercial open
source software: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 103, 202-214. [Crossref]
58. Concetta Metallo, Rocco Agrifoglio, Francesco Schiavone, Jens Mueller. 2018. Understanding business model in the Internet
of Things industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136, 298-306. [Crossref]
59. Hanna Rydehell, Hans Löfsten, Anders Isaksson. 2018. Novelty-oriented value propositions for new technology-based firms:
Impact of business networks and growth orientation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 29:2, 161-171.
[Crossref]
60. SchiaviGiovana Sordi, Giovana Sordi Schiavi, BehrAriel, Ariel Behr. 2018. Emerging technologies and new business models:
a review on disruptive business models. Innovation & Management Review 15:4, 338-355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
61. Di FattaDavide, Davide Di Fatta, CaputoFrancesco, Francesco Caputo, DominiciGandolfo, Gandolfo Dominici. 2018. A
relational view of start-up firms inside an incubator: the case of the ARCA consortium. European Journal of Innovation
Management 21:4, 601-619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
62. Martin Geissdoerfer, Doroteya Vladimirova, Steve Evans. 2018. Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of
Cleaner Production 198, 401-416. [Crossref]
63. SAM TAVASSOLI, LARS BENGTSSON. 2018. THE ROLE OF BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION FOR PRODUCT
INNOVATION PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Innovation Management 22:07, 1850061. [Crossref]
64. LaudalThomas, Thomas Laudal. 2018. Measuring shared value in multinational corporations. Social Responsibility Journal
14:4, 917-933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
65. Benedikt Simmert, Philipp Alexander Ebel, Christoph Peters, Eva Alice Christiane Bittner, Jan Marco Leimeister. 2018.
Conquering the Challenge of Continuous Business Model Improvement. Business & Information Systems Engineering 46. .
[Crossref]
66. Ke Rong, Dean Patton, Weiwei Chen. 2018. Business models dynamics and business ecosystems in the emerging 3D printing
industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 134, 234-245. [Crossref]
67. Xiaojing Zhao, Bon-Gang Hwang, Qiuchen Lu. 2018. Typology of business model innovations for delivering zero carbon
buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production 196, 1213-1226. [Crossref]
68. Mychal Langenus, Michaël Dooms. 2018. Creating an industry-level business model for sustainability: The case of the
European ports industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 195, 949-962. [Crossref]
69. Payam Hanafizadeh, Mohammad Mehrabioun, Kambiz Badie, Jahanyar Bamdad Soofi. 2018. A Systemic Framework for
Business Model Design and Development -Part A: Theorizing Perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research 31:4,
437-461. [Crossref]
70. Arnesh Telukdarie, Eyad Buhulaiga, Surajit Bag, Shivam Gupta, Zongwei Luo. 2018. Industry 4.0 implementation for
multinationals. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 118, 316-329. [Crossref]
71. OjasaloJukka, Jukka Ojasalo, OjasaloKatri, Katri Ojasalo. 2018. Service Logic Business Model Canvas. Journal of Research in
Marketing and Entrepreneurship 20:1, 70-98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
72. Craig Standing, Jan Mattsson. 2018. “Fake it until you make it”: business model conceptualization in digital entrepreneurship.
Journal of Strategic Marketing 26:5, 385-399. [Crossref]
73. Wenyao Zhang, Tugrul Daim, Qingpu Zhang. 2018. Understanding the disruptive business model innovation of E-business
microcredit: a comparative case study in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30:7, 765-777. [Crossref]
74. PetrulaitieneVitalija, Vitalija Petrulaitiene, KorbaPia, Pia Korba, NenonenSuvi, Suvi Nenonen, JylhäTuuli, Tuuli Jylhä,
JunnilaSeppo, Seppo Junnila. 2018. From walls to experience – servitization of workplaces. Facilities 36:9/10, 525-544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
75. FehrerJulia A., Julia A. Fehrer, WoratschekHerbert, Herbert Woratschek, BrodieRoderick J., Roderick J. Brodie. 2018. A
systemic logic for platform business models. Journal of Service Management 29:4, 546-568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
76. Julian Marius Müller, Oana Buliga, Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2018. Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model
innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 132, 2-17. [Crossref]
77. Qinyun Liu, Lin Zou, Hua Zhou, Hongji Yang. An Approach to Proposing New Business Models Basing on Association
Rule Learning, BP Neural Network and Creative Computing 122-125. [Crossref]

78. Carlo Bagnoli, Maurizio Massaro, Francesca Dal Mas, Matteo Demartini. 2018. Defining The Concept Of Business Model.
International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science 9:3, 48-64. [Crossref]
79. Tim Mazzarol, Delwyn Clark, Sophie Reboud, Elena Mamouni Limnios. 2018. Developing a conceptual framework for the
co-operative and mutual enterprise business model. Journal of Management & Organization 24:4, 551-581. [Crossref]
80. AaltolaPasi, Pasi Aaltola. 2018. Investing in strategic development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 15:2,
206-230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
81. Ta Hung Anh, Thammarat Koottatep, Chongrak Polprasert. 2018. Business model analysis for faecal sludge collection and
transport services in Thailand and Vietnam. Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development washdev2018026.
[Crossref]
82. Pascal Kranich, Andreas Wald. 2018. Does model consistency in business model innovation matter? A contingency-based
approach. Creativity and Innovation Management 27:2, 209-220. [Crossref]
83. Andres Laya, Jan Markendahl, Stefan Lundberg. 2018. Network-centric business models for health, social care and wellbeing
solutions in the internet of things. Scandinavian Journal of Management 34:2, 103-116. [Crossref]
84. Steven Sarasini, Marcus Linder. 2018. Integrating a business model perspective into transition theory: The example of new
mobility services. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27, 16-31. [Crossref]
85. Giovanni Zenezini, J.H.R. van Duin, Lorant Tavasszy, Alberto De Marco. Stakeholders' Roles for Business Modeling in a
City Logistics Ecosystem: Towards a Conceptual Model 39-58. [Crossref]
86. Rachel Howell, Cees van Beers, Neelke Doorn. 2018. Value capture and value creation: The role of information technology
in business models for frugal innovations in Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 131, 227-239. [Crossref]
87. CowdenBirton J., Birton J. Cowden, BendicksonJoshua S., Joshua S. Bendickson. 2018. Impacts of regulatory focus and
institutions on innovation. Management Decision 56:5, 939-954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
88. David-WestOlayinka, Olayinka David-West, UmukoroImmanuel Ovemeso, Immanuel Ovemeso Umukoro, OnuohaRaymond
Okwudiri, Raymond Okwudiri Onuoha. 2018. Platforms in Sub-Saharan Africa: startup models and the role of business
incubation. Journal of Intellectual Capital 19:3, 581-616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
89. Rongzhen Du, Ganli Liao, Erjun Zhang, Jingyu Wang. 2018. Battery charge or change, which is better? A case from Beijing,
China. Journal of Cleaner Production . [Crossref]
90. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, Wencke Gwozdz, Kerli Kant Hvass. 2018. Exploring the Relationship Between Business
Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values within the Fashion Industry. Journal of Business Ethics
149:2, 267-284. [Crossref]
91. Karla Münzel, Wouter Boon, Koen Frenken, Taneli Vaskelainen. 2018. Carsharing business models in Germany:
characteristics, success and future prospects. Information Systems and e-Business Management 16:2, 271-291. [Crossref]
92. Stefan Schrauder, Alexander Kock, Christian V. Baccarella, Kai‐Ingo Voigt. 2018. Takin' Care of Business Models: The Impact
of Business Model Evaluation on Front‐End Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management 35:3, 410-426. [Crossref]
93. Tom Evens, Tim Raats, M. Bjørn von Rimscha. 2018. Business model innovation in news media organisations – 2018 special
issue of the European Media Management Association (emma). Journal of Media Business Studies 53, 1-6. [Crossref]
94. OliveiraMaicon Gouvêa de, Maicon Gouvêa de Oliveira, MendesGlauco Henrique de Sousa, Glauco Henrique de Sousa
Mendes, AlbuquerqueAndrei Aparecido de, Andrei Aparecido de Albuquerque, RozenfeldHenrique, Henrique Rozenfeld.
2018. Lessons learned from a successful industrial product service system business model: emphasis on financial aspects.
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 33:3, 365-376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
95. FedosovaAlina, Alina Fedosova, VolkovaIrina, Irina Volkova. 2018. Client orientation of central power generation companies.
International Journal of Energy Sector Management 12:1, 169-188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
96. Ivanka Visnjic, Andy Neely, Marin Jovanovic. 2018. The path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and
open business models. Technovation 72-73, 46-59. [Crossref]
97. Albrecht Karlusch, Wolfgang Sachsenhofer, Kathrin Reinsberger. 2018. Educating for the development of sustainable business
models: Designing and delivering a course to foster creativity. Journal of Cleaner Production 179, 169-179. [Crossref]
98. Sanja PFEIFER, Marina STANIĆ, Sunčica OBERMAN PETERKA. 2018. THE MICRO- AND SMALL ENTERPRISES
IN CREATIVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: A BUSINESS MODEL PERSPECTIVE. Creativity Studies 11:1, 102-115.
[Crossref]
99. Jens Leker, Hannes Utikal. Management Challenges in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industry 1-30. [Crossref]
100. Andreas Welsch, Verena Eitle, Peter Buxmann. 2018. Maschinelles Lernen. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik . [Crossref]
101. Jukka Ojasalo, Katri Ojasalo. 2018. Lean Service Innovation. Service Science 10:1, 25-39. [Crossref]
102. Christina M. Bidmon, Sebastian F. Knab. 2018. The three roles of business models in societal transitions: New linkages
between business model and transition research. Journal of Cleaner Production 178, 903-916. [Crossref]
103. Johannes Kriegel, Anton Riedl, Linda Tuttle-Weidinger, Anna-Maria Stöbich. 2018. Future strategic topics in the business
model of hospitals in Austria. International Journal of Healthcare Management 15, 1-8. [Crossref]
104. Linda H.M. van de Burgwal, Pim van Dorst, Henk Viëtor, Regina Luttge, Eric Claassen. 2018. Hybrid business models for
‘Organ-on-a-Chip’ technology: the best of both worlds. PharmaNutrition . [Crossref]
105. Fabian Futterer, Jochen Schmidt, Sven Heidenreich. 2018. Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success?
Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning
51:1, 64-81. [Crossref]
106. Fredrik Hacklin, Joakim Björkdahl, Martin W. Wallin. 2018. Strategies for business model innovation: How firms reel in
migrating value. Long Range Planning 51:1, 82-110. [Crossref]
107. Roberto Biloslavo, Carlo Bagnoli, David Edgar. 2018. An eco-critical perspective on business models: The value triangle as
an approach to closing the sustainability gap. Journal of Cleaner Production 174, 746-762. [Crossref]
108. BrooksChay, Chay Brooks, GherhesCristian, Cristian Gherhes, VorleyTim, Tim Vorley, WilliamsNick, Nick Williams. 2018.
The nature of publicly funded innovation and implications for regional growth. Competitiveness Review 28:1, 6-21. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
109. Ming-Huei Chen, Hong-Yan Wang, Ming-Chao Wang. 2018. Knowledge sharing, social capital, and financial performance:
the perspectives of innovation strategy in technological clusters. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 27, 1-16.
[Crossref]
110. Arash Najmaei. Architecture of Technology Ventures: A Business Model Perspective 21-48. [Crossref]
111. MICHAEL ABEBE, PHYU PHYU AUNG MYINT. 2018. BOARD CHARACTERISTICS AND THE LIKELIHOOD
OF BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION ADOPTION: EVIDENCE FROM THE SMART HOME INDUSTRY.
International Journal of Innovation Management 22:01, 1850006. [Crossref]
112. Wolfgang Becker, Patrick Ulrich, Meike Stradtmann. Einleitung 1-6. [Crossref]
113. Wolfgang Becker, Patrick Ulrich, Meike Stradtmann. Grundlagen 7-49. [Crossref]
114. Eleanor E. Cranmer, M. Claudia tom Dieck, Timothy Jung. How can Tourist Attractions Profit from Augmented Reality?
21-32. [Crossref]
115. Robin P. G. Tech. Introduction: High-Tech Startup Financing 1-28. [Crossref]
116. M. Pielen, T. Röth, T. Flatten. Erfolgsfaktoren künftiger Geschäftsmodelle von urbanen, geteilten Mobilitätsdienstleistungen
435-448. [Crossref]
117. Michael Naor, Cheryl Druehl, Ednilson S. Bernardes. 2018. Servitized business model innovation for sustainable
transportation: Case study of failure to bridge the design-implementation gap. Journal of Cleaner Production 170, 1219-1230.
[Crossref]
118. Joachim Schreiner, Anna Katharina Klostermann. Mit digitalen Geschäftsmodellen maximal skalieren 441-460. [Crossref]
119. Achim Kampker, Jana Frank, Marcel Schwartz, Philipp Jussen. Lernen von den Besten: Fünf Erfolgsfaktoren bei der
Entwicklung von Smart Services 151-165. [Crossref]
120. Wolfgang Becker, Patrick Ulrich, Tim Botzkowski, Alexandra Fibitz, Meike Stradtmann. Grundlagen 9-54. [Crossref]
121. Jennie Cederholm Björklund. 2018. Barriers to Sustainable Business Model Innovation in Swedish Agriculture. Journal of
Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation 14:1, 65-90. [Crossref]
122. Antonio Ghezzi, Angelo Cavallo. 2018. Agile Business Model Innovation in Digital Entrepreneurship: Lean Startup
Approaches. Journal of Business Research . [Crossref]
123. Yurong Chen, Yannick Perez. Business Model Design: Lessons Learned from Tesla Motors 53-69. [Crossref]
124. Martin Geissdoerfer, Doroteya Vladimirova, Kirsten Van Fossen, Steve Evans. 2018. Product, service, and business model
innovation: A discussion. Procedia Manufacturing 21, 165-172. [Crossref]

125. Daniel R. A. Schallmo. 49. [Crossref]
126. Daniel R. A. Schallmo. 87. [Crossref]
127. Sveinung Jørgensen, Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen. Experimentation Rather than Turnaround 75-88. [Crossref]
128. Alex Hope. Sustainable Business Model Design: A Review of Tools for Developing Responsible Business Models 377-394.
[Crossref]
129. Annabeth Aagaard. Managing Sustainable Innovation 13-28. [Crossref]
130. Vuk Miletić. 2018. Business model adjustment: A condition of an organization's sustainability on the market. Ekonomika
64:3, 67-76. [Crossref]
131. Stephan Reinhold, Sara Dolnicar. How Airbnb Captures and Disseminates Value . [Crossref]
132. Daniel Kiel, Christian Arnold, Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2017. The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models
of established manufacturing companies – A business level perspective. Technovation 68, 4-19. [Crossref]
133. Andrea Urbinati, Davide Chiaroni, Vittorio Chiesa. 2017. Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models.
Journal of Cleaner Production 168, 487-498. [Crossref]
134. Anna-Greta Nyström, Miia Mustonen. 2017. The dynamic approach to business models. AMS Review 41. . [Crossref]
135. AzariMohammad Javadinia, Mohammad Javadinia Azari, MadsenTage Koed, Tage Koed Madsen, MoenØystein, Øystein
Moen. 2017. Antecedent and outcomes of innovation-based growth strategies for exporting SMEs. Journal of Small Business
and Enterprise Development 24:4, 733-752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
136. Federico Adrodegari, Nicola Saccani, Christian Kowalkowski, Jyrki Vilo. 2017. PSS business model conceptualization and
application. Production Planning & Control 28:15, 1251-1263. [Crossref]
137. FernandesAdji Achmad Rinaldo, Adji Achmad Rinaldo Fernandes, Solimun, Solimun. 2017. The mediating effect of strategic
orientation and innovations on the effect of environmental uncertainties on the performance of business in the Indonesian
aviation industry. International Journal of Law and Management 59:6, 1269-1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
138. MassaSilvia, Silvia Massa, TestaStefania, Stefania Testa. 2017. Opening up innovation processes through contests in the food
sector. Business Process Management Journal 23:6, 1290-1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
139. Jiban Khuntia, Sunil Mithas, Ritu Agarwal. 2017. How Service Offerings and Operational Maturity Influence the Viability
of Health Information Exchanges. Production and Operations Management 26:11, 1989-2005. [Crossref]
140. Jens Jacob Fredriksson, Pamela Mazzocato, Rafiq Muhammed, Carl Savage. 2017. Business model framework applications in
health care: A systematic review. Health Services Management Research 30:4, 219-226. [Crossref]
141. Raimundo Díaz-Díaz, Luis Muñoz, Daniel Pérez-González. 2017. Business model analysis of public services operating in the
smart city ecosystem: The case of SmartSantander. Future Generation Computer Systems 76, 198-214. [Crossref]
142. . Bibliography 143-162. [Crossref]
143. Le Floc’hGaël, Gaël Le Floc’h, ScaringellaLaurent, Laurent Scaringella. 2017. Another failed M&A: misaligned business
models as culprit. Journal of Business Strategy 38:5, 18-26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
144. DellermannDominik, Dominik Dellermann, FliasterAlexander, Alexander Fliaster, KollochMichael, Michael Kolloch. 2017.
Innovation risk in digital business models: the German energy sector. Journal of Business Strategy 38:5, 35-43. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
145. ZhaoXiaojing, Xiaojing Zhao, PanWei, Wei Pan. 2017. Co-productive interrelations between business model and zero carbon
building. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 7:4, 353-365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
146. Abdul RazakArbaiah, Arbaiah Abdul Razak, MurrayPeter A., Peter A. Murray. 2017. Innovation strategies for successful
commercialisation in public universities. International Journal of Innovation Science 9:3, 296-314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
147. Ricarda B. Bouncken,, Andreas J. Reuschl. 2017. Coworking-Spaces: Chancen für Entrepreneurship und Business Model
Design. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 65:3, 151-168. [Crossref]
148. Martina Dopfer, Sara Fallahi, Markus Kirchberger, Oliver Gassmann. 2017. Adapt and strive: How ventures under resource
constraints create value through business model adaptations. Creativity and Innovation Management 26:3, 233-246. [Crossref]
149. , , . 2017. Towards a Conceptual Framework of Sustainable Business Model Innovation in the Agri-Food Sector: A Systematic
Literature Review. Sustainability 9:9, 1620. [Crossref]
150. Jessica Lagerstedt Wadin, Kajsa Ahlgren, Lars Bengtsson. 2017. Joint business model innovation for sustainable
transformation of industries ? A large multinational utility in alliance with a small solar energy company. Journal of Cleaner
Production 160, 139-150. [Crossref]
151. Alina Sorescu. 2017. Data-Driven Business Model Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 34:5, 691-696.
[Crossref]
152. Eugenia Rosca, Marlen Arnold, Julia C. Bendul. 2017. Business models for sustainable innovation – an empirical analysis
of frugal products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production 162, S133-S145. [Crossref]
153. MansourDina, Dina Mansour, BarandasHortensia, Hortensia Barandas. 2017. High-tech entrepreneurial content marketing
for business model innovation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 11:3, 296-311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
154. Michaela Sprenger, Tobias Mettler, Robert Winter. 2017. A viability theory for digital businesses: Exploring the evolutionary
changes of revenue mechanisms to support managerial decisions. Information Systems Frontiers 19:4, 899-922. [Crossref]
155. R. Sandra Schillo, Jeffrey S. Kinder. 2017. Delivering on societal impacts through open innovation: a framework for
government laboratories. The Journal of Technology Transfer 42:4, 977-996. [Crossref]
156. Mathias Georg Dilger, Tanja Jovanović, Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2017. Upcrowding energy co-operatives – Evaluating the potential
of crowdfunding for business model innovation of energy co-operatives. Journal of Environmental Management 198, 50-62.
[Crossref]
157. Stephan Winterhalter, Marco B. Zeschky, Lukas Neumann, Oliver Gassmann. 2017. Business Models for Frugal Innovation
in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Medical Device and Laboratory Equipment Industry. Technovation 66-67, 3-13.
[Crossref]
158. Edurne A. Inigo, Laura Albareda, Paavo Ritala. 2017. Business model innovation for sustainability: exploring evolutionary
and radical approaches through dynamic capabilities. Industry and Innovation 24:5, 515-542. [Crossref]
159. Marko Peric, Jelena Durkin, Vanja Vitezic. 2017. The Constructs of a Business Model Redefined: A Half-Century Journey.
SAGE Open 7:3, 215824401773351. [Crossref]
160. Jaideep Prabhu. 2017. Frugal innovation: doing more with less for more. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:
Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375:2095, 20160372. [Crossref]
161. Alexandra Palzkill, Karoline Augenstein. 2017. Business model resilience – understanding the role of companies in societal
transformation processes. uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum 25:1-2, 61-70. [Crossref]
162. Simone Franzo, Davide Chiaroni, Vittorio Chiesa, Federico Frattini. Emerging business models fostering the diffusion of E-
mobility: Empirical evidence from Italy 1-5. [Crossref]
163. JUNE MARQUES FERNANDES, LUCIANA PAULA REIS, LUIZ CARLOS DI SERIO. 2017. PLANNING
TECHNOLOGICAL BUSINESSES: A STUDY OF MARKET POSITIONING AND THE VALUE CHAIN. RAM.
Revista de Administração Mackenzie 18:3, 70-116. [Crossref]
164. Karl Täuscher, Nizar Abdelkafi. 2017. Visual tools for business model innovation: Recommendations from a cognitive
perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management 26:2, 160-174. [Crossref]
165. Konrad Exner, Rainer Stark, Ji Yoon Kim, Rainer Stark. Data-driven business model a methodology to develop smart services
146-154. [Crossref]
166. Gianluca Elia, Antonio Lerro, Giuseppina Passiante, Giovanni Schiuma. 2017. An Intellectual Capital perspective for Business
Model Innovation in technology-intensive industries: empirical evidences from Italian spin-offs. Knowledge Management
Research & Practice 15:2, 155-168. [Crossref]
167. Ioanna Deligianni, Irini Voudouris, Spyros Lioukas. 2017. Do Effectuation Processes Shape the Relationship Between Product
Diversification and Performance in New Ventures?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 41:3, 349-377. [Crossref]
168. Guiwen Liu, Kaijian Li, Dong Zhao, Chao Mao. 2017. Business Model Innovation and Its Drivers in the Chinese Construction
Industry during the Shift to Modular Prefabrication. Journal of Management in Engineering 33:3, 04016051. [Crossref]
169. WinterhalterStephan, Stephan Winterhalter, WeiblenTobias, Tobias Weiblen, WechtChristoph H., Christoph H. Wecht,
GassmannOliver, Oliver Gassmann. 2017. Business model innovation processes in large corporations: insights from BASF.
Journal of Business Strategy 38:2, 62-75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
170. ZhangQian, Qian Zhang, WuChao, Chao Wu, QiaoHan, Han Qiao, WangShouyang, Shouyang Wang. 2017. No advertising,
but more sponsorship?. Chinese Management Studies 11:1, 90-106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
171. Cinzia Battistella, Alberto F. De Toni, Giovanni De Zan, Elena Pessot. 2017. Cultivating business model agility through
focused capabilities: A multiple case study. Journal of Business Research 73, 65-82. [Crossref]
172. ArbussaAnna, Anna Arbussa, BikfalviAndrea, Andrea Bikfalvi, MarquèsPilar, Pilar Marquès. 2017. Strategic agility-driven
business model renewal: the case of an SME. Management Decision 55:2, 271-293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
173. Marco Perona, Nicola Saccani, Andrea Bacchetti. 2017. Research vs. Practice on Manufacturing Firms’ Servitization Strategies:
A Gap Analysis and Research Agenda. Systems 5:1, 19. [Crossref]
174. B. Baldassarre, G. Calabretta, N.M.P. Bocken, T. Jaskiewicz. 2017. Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-
driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of Cleaner Production 147, 175-186. [Crossref]
175. HolzmannPatrick, Patrick Holzmann, BreiteneckerRobert J., Robert J. Breitenecker, SoomroAqeel A., Aqeel A. Soomro,
SchwarzErich J., Erich J. Schwarz. 2017. User entrepreneur business models in 3D printing. Journal of Manufacturing
Technology Management 28:1, 75-94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
176. Federico Adrodegari, Nicola Saccani. 2017. Business models for the service transformation of industrial firms. The Service
Industries Journal 37:1, 57-83. [Crossref]
177. Kul Bhushan C. Saxena, Swanand J. Deodhar, Mikko Ruohonen. Business Model Innovation 35-60. [Crossref]
178. Anne S. Tsui, Yingying Zhang, Xiao-Ping Chen. Building a Company with Teamwork and Co-operation, Diversity and
Unity 85-104. [Crossref]
179. JinHyo Joseph Yun. Concept, Structures, and Decision Factors of Open Innovation 63-85. [Crossref]
180. Kul Bhushan C. Saxena, Swanand J. Deodhar, Mikko Ruohonen. The Business Model Concept and Its Use 13-34. [Crossref]
181. Danielle Dupont, Ariel Beresniak, Mats Sundgren, Andreas Schmidt, John Ainsworth, Pascal Coorevits, Dipak Kalra, Marc
Dewispelaere, Georges De Moor. 2017. Business analysis for a sustainable, multi-stakeholder ecosystem for leveraging the
Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) platform in Europe. International Journal of Medical Informatics
97, 341-352. [Crossref]
182. Xenia Ziouvelou, Panagiotis Alexandrou, Constantinos Marios Angelopoulos, Orestis Evangelatos, Joao Fernandes, Nikos
Loumis, Frank McGroarty, Sotiris Nikoletseas, Aleksandra Rankov, Theofanis Raptis, Anna Ståhlbröst, Sebastien Ziegler.
Crowd-Driven IoT/IoE Ecosystems: A Multidimensional Approach 341-375. [Crossref]
183. Michael Hamwi, Iban Lizarralde. 2017. A Review of Business Models towards Service-Oriented Electricity Systems. Procedia
CIRP 64, 109-114. [Crossref]
184. Lesley A. Clack. Strategies with Service Business Model Innovation 21-30. [Crossref]
185. Romana Rauter, Jan Jonker, Rupert J. Baumgartner. 2017. Going one's own way: drivers in developing business models for
sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 144-154. [Crossref]
186. Daniela Andreini, Cristina Bettinelli. Business Model Innovation: A Thematic Map 55-116. [Crossref]
187. Daniela Andreini, Cristina Bettinelli. Conclusions and Research Agenda 159-176. [Crossref]
188. Andreas Engelen, Clara von Gagern. Unternehmensbezogene Tools der Opportunity Recognition 21-86. [Crossref]
189. Artur Caetano, Gonçalo Antunes, João Pombinho, Marzieh Bakhshandeh, José Granjo, José Borbinha, Miguel Mira da Silva.
2017. Representation and analysis of enterprise models with semantic techniques: an application to ArchiMate, e3value and
business model canvas. Knowledge and Information Systems 50:1, 315-346. [Crossref]
190. Angela Caridà, Monia Melia, Maria Colurcio. Business Model Design and Value Co-creation: Looking for a New Pattern
339-361. [Crossref]
191. JinHyo Joseph Yun. Business Model and Open Innovation Conditions for the Sustainable Growth of SMEs 133-147.
[Crossref]
192. Ashish Malik, Vijay Pereira. Theorising Human Capital Formation for Innovation in India’s Global Information Technology
Sector 221-249. [Crossref]
193. Christian Arnold, Daniel Kiel, Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2017. Innovative Business Models for the Industrial Internet of Things. BHM
Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte 162:9, 371. [Crossref]
194. Daniela Andreini, Cristina Bettinelli. Business Model Definition and Boundaries 25-53. [Crossref]
195. Daniela Andreini, Cristina Bettinelli. BMI from the Perspective of Five Disciplines 137-158. [Crossref]
196. Wolfgang Becker, Patrick Ulrich, Tim Botzkowski. Strategien und Geschäftsmodelle für Industrie 4.0 77-89. [Crossref]
197. Andreas Pfeiffer, Matthias Jarke. Digital Transformation Within the Emobility Market–Learnings and Insights from Early
Market Development 23-42. [Crossref]

198. GERRIT REMANE, ANDRE HANELT, JAN F. TESCH, LUTZ M. KOLBE. 2017. THE BUSINESS MODEL
PATTERN DATABASE — A TOOL FOR SYSTEMATIC BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION. International Journal
of Innovation Management 21:01, 1750004. [Crossref]
199. Daniela Andreini, Cristina Bettinelli. Multilevel Analysis of Business Model Innovation 117-135. [Crossref]
200. Seppo Kuula, Harri Haapasalo. Continuous and Co-creative Business Model Creation 249-268. [Crossref]
201. JinHyo Joseph Yun. Dynamics of the Open Innovation Economy System 17-40. [Crossref]
202. Lorenzo Massa, Christopher L. Tucci, Allan Afuah. 2017. A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research. Academy of
Management Annals 11:1, 73-104. [Crossref]
203. Karin Tollin, Antonia Erz, Jesper Vej. The strategic viewpoints of innovation and marketing teams on the development of
novel functional foods 63-83. [Crossref]
204. Shahrokh Nikou, Harry Bouwman. 2017. Mobile Health and Wellness Applications. International Journal of E-Business
Research 13:1, 1-24. [Crossref]
205. Jarmila Šebestová, Zuzana Palová. Support of Social Innovations 165-187. [Crossref]
206. In Lee. An Exploratory Study of the Impact of the Internet of Things (IoT) on Business Model Innovation 423-440.
[Crossref]
207. Job Taminiau, Joseph Nyangon, Ariella Shez Lewis, John Byrne. Sustainable Business Model Innovation 140-159. [Crossref]
208. Raphayela Belém Schluep. Fashion Technology and the Development of New Business Models 1-37. [Crossref]
209. Tamami Komatsu, Alessandro Deserti, Francesca Rizzo, Manuela Celi, Sharam Alijani. Social Innovation Business Models:
Coping with Antagonistic Objectives and Assets 315-347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
210. SVEN M. LAUDIEN, BIRGIT DAXBÖCK. 2016. THE INFLUENCE OF THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF
THINGS ON BUSINESS MODEL DESIGN: A QUALITATIVE-EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. International Journal of
Innovation Management 20:08, 1640014. [Crossref]
211. Alex Yang-chan Hsu, Brian King, Dan Wang, Dimitrios Buhalis. 2016. In-destination tour products and the disrupted tourism
industry: progress and prospects. Information Technology & Tourism 16:4, 413-433. [Crossref]
212. CHRISTIAN ARNOLD, DANIEL KIEL, KAI-INGO VOIGT. 2016. HOW THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF
THINGS CHANGES BUSINESS MODELS IN DIFFERENT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES. International
Journal of Innovation Management 20:08, 1640015. [Crossref]
213. Francesca Ricciardi, Alessandro Zardini, Cecilia Rossignoli. 2016. Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model
innovation: The triple paradox configuration. Journal of Business Research 69:11, 5487-5493. [Crossref]
214. Jinhyo Joseph Yun, Jeongho Yang, Kyungbae Park. 2016. Open Innovation to Business Model. Science, Technology and Society
21:3, 324-348. [Crossref]
215. Yuan-Chieh Chang, Min-Nan Chen. 2016. Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in
Taiwan. Research Policy 45:9, 1845-1857. [Crossref]
216. Ricarda B. Bouncken, Viktor Fredrich. 2016. Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on
business model innovation. Journal of Business Research 69:11, 5196-5202. [Crossref]
217. Martin Geissdoerfer, Nancy M.P. Bocken, Erik Jan Hultink. 2016. Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business
modelling process – A workshop based on a value mapping process. Journal of Cleaner Production 135, 1218-1232. [Crossref]
218. Ying Li, Changjie Zhan, Martin de Jong, Zofia Lukszo. 2016. Business innovation and government regulation for the
promotion of electric vehicle use: lessons from Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 134, 371-383. [Crossref]
219. Jean-François Rougès, Diane Poulin, Benoit Montreuil. 2016. Comment trois organisations ont géré l’innovation de leur
modèle d’affaires autour de la mobilité et du e-commerce. Logistique & Management 24:3-4, 171-178. [Crossref]
220. Barbara Bigliardi, Francesco Galati. 2016. Which factors hinder the adoption of open innovation in SMEs?. Technology Analysis
& Strategic Management 28:8, 869-885. [Crossref]
221. Ricarda B. Bouncken, Viktor Fredrich. 2016. Business model innovation in alliances: Successful configurations. Journal of
Business Research 69:9, 3584-3590. [Crossref]
222. Philipp Ebel, Ulrich Bretschneider, Jan Marco Leimeister. 2016. Leveraging virtual business model innovation: a framework
for designing business model development tools. Information Systems Journal 26:5, 519-550. [Crossref]
223. Anahita Baregheh, Jennifer Rowley, David Hemsworth. 2016. The effect of organisational size and age on position and
paradigm innovation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 23:3, 768-789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
224. Sarel Gronum, John Steen, Martie-Louise Verreynne. 2016. Business model design and innovation: Unlocking the
performance benefits of innovation. Australian Journal of Management 41:3, 585-605. [Crossref]
225. Sven M. Laudien, Birgit Daxböck. 2016. Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms:
insights from a multiple-case study. Journal of Business Economics 86:6, 611-645. [Crossref]
226. Hans Berends, Armand Smits, Isabelle Reymen, Ksenia Podoynitsyna. 2016. Learning while (re)configuring: Business model
innovation processes in established firms. Strategic Organization 14:3, 181-219. [Crossref]
227. Günter Fandel, Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2016. Editorial. Journal of Business Economics 86:6, 575-577. [Crossref]
228. Patrick Spieth, Sabrina Schneider. 2016. Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model
innovation. Journal of Business Economics 86:6, 671-696. [Crossref]
229. Ulrike Baumöl, Linda Hollebeek, Reinhard Jung. 2016. Dynamics of customer interaction on social media platforms.
Electronic Markets 26:3, 199-202. [Crossref]
230. Na Jiao, Steve Evans. 2016. Secondary use of Electric Vehicle Batteries and Potential Impacts on Business Models. Journal
of Industrial and Production Engineering 33:5, 348-354. [Crossref]
231. Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras, Maria Beatriz Gonzalez-Sanchez, Jacobo Gomez-Conde. 2016. The effects of the interactive use of
management control systems on process and organizational innovation. Review of Managerial Science 10:3, 487-510. [Crossref]
232. Pennie Frow, Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, Adrian Payne. 2016. Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care
ecosystem. Industrial Marketing Management 56, 24-39. [Crossref]
233. William Jones, Mahesh Sooriyabandara, Mike Yearworth, Angela Doufexi, R. Eddie Wilson. 2016. Planning For 5G: A
Problem Structuring Approach for Survival in the Telecoms Industry. Systems Engineering 19:4, 301-321. [Crossref]
234. Martin E. Wainstein, Adam G. Bumpus. 2016. Business models as drivers of the low carbon power system transition: a multi-
level perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 126, 572-585. [Crossref]
235. Luo, Xing-Wu, 강강강, Liu, Ying. 2016. Exploring Business Model Evolution Mechanism from the Perspective of Value
Creation: A Case Study of Chinese Circulation Firm. Journal of Distribution and Management Research 19:3, 61-72. [Crossref]
236. Gilberto Francisco Ceretta, Dálcio Roberto dos Reis, Adilson Carlos da Rocha. 2016. Inovação e modelos de negócio: um
estudo bibliométrico da produção científica na base Web of Science. Gestão & Produção 23:2, 433-444. [Crossref]
237. Christian Landau, Amit Karna, Miriam Sailer. 2016. Business model adaptation for emerging markets: a case study of a
German automobile manufacturer in India. R&D Management 46:3, 480-503. [Crossref]
238. Mohammad H. Rezazade Mehrizi, Mojtaba Lashkarbolouki. 2016. Unlearning Troubled Business Models: From Realization
to Marginalization. Long Range Planning 49:3, 298-323. [Crossref]
239. Patrick Spieth, Dirk Schneckenberg, Kurt Matzler. 2016. Exploring the linkage between business model (&) innovation and
the strategy of the firm. R&D Management 46:3, 403-413. [Crossref]
240. Himanshu Gupta, Mukesh Kumar Barua. 2016. Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using
best–worst multi criteria decision making method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 107, 69-79. [Crossref]
241. 강강강, Seungkwon Jang. 2016. Value Creation Process of Social Enterprise: The Case Study of Good Town in Seoul, Korea.
사사사사사사사(Social Enterprise Studies) 9:1, 185-215. [Crossref]
242. Baoliang Hu, Wenqing Chen. 2016. Business model ambidexterity and technological innovation performance: evidence from
China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28:5, 583-600. [Crossref]
243. Anish Purkayastha, Sunil Sharma. 2016. Gaining competitive advantage through the right business model: analysis based on
case studies. Journal of Strategy and Management 9:2, 138-155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
244. Thierry Rayna, Ludmila Striukova. 2016. 360° Business Model Innovation: Toward an Integrated View of Business Model
Innovation. Research-Technology Management 59:3, 21-28. [Crossref]
245. Nabil Amara, Norrin Halilem, Namatié Traoré. 2016. Adding value to companies' value chain: Role of business schools
scholars. Journal of Business Research 69:5, 1661-1668. [Crossref]
246. Steve Burt, Ulf Johansson, John Dawson. 2016. International retailing as embedded business models. Journal of Economic
Geography 16:3, 715-747. [Crossref]
247. Thorsten Helms. 2016. Asset transformation and the challenges to servitize a utility business model. Energy Policy 91, 98-112.
[Crossref]
248. Sarah Philipson. 2016. Radical innovation of a business model. Competitiveness Review 26:2, 132-146. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
249. Luís Farinha, João Ferreira, Borges Gouveia. 2016. Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study.
Journal of the Knowledge Economy 7:1, 259-275. [Crossref]
250. Nigel Roome, Céline Louche. 2016. Journeying Toward Business Models for Sustainability. Organization & Environment
29:1, 11-35. [Crossref]
251. Christian Gärtner, Oliver Schön. 2016. Modularizing business models: between strategic flexibility and path dependence.
Journal of Strategy and Management 9:1, 39-57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
252. Vassilis Barkoukis, Katerina Kartali, Lambros Lazuras, Haralambos Tsorbatzoudis. 2016. Evaluation of an anti-doping
intervention for adolescents: Findings from a school-based study. Sport Management Review 19:1, 23-34. [Crossref]
253. JinHyo Joseph Yun, DongKyu Won, EuiSeob Jeong, KyungBae Park, JeongHo Yang, JiYoung Park. 2016. The relationship
between technology, business model, and market in autonomous car and intelligent robot industries. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change 103, 142-155. [Crossref]
254. F. Zingrebe, Michael Stephan, S. Lorenz. Geschäftsmodellinnovationen in der deutschen Automobilindustrie im Zukunftsfeld
der Elektromobilität 43-61. [Crossref]
255. Jad Asswad, Georg Hake, Jorge Marx Gómez. Overcoming the Barriers of Sustainable Business Model Innovations by
Integrating Open Innovation 302-314. [Crossref]
256. Nabyla Daidj, Linda Salahaldin. 2016. The impact of cognitive radio technology on mobile network operators'
interorganizational networks and business models. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 27:2, 101-109.
[Crossref]
257. Zvezdan Vukanović. Business Model Research Agenda Positioning: Conceptual Frameworks, Functions, Benefits, Rationale,
Dynamics, Performance, and Economic Feasibility 5-66. [Crossref]
258. Oliver Gassmann, Karolin Frankenberger, Roman Sauer. Introduction 1-5. [Crossref]
259. Oliver Gassmann, Karolin Frankenberger, Roman Sauer. Leading Business Model Research: The Seven Schools of Thought
7-46. [Crossref]
260. Dominik Paulus-Rohmer, Heike Schatton, Thomas Bauernhansl. 2016. Ecosystems, Strategy and Business Models in the
age of Digitization - How the Manufacturing Industry is Going to Change its Logic. Procedia CIRP 57, 8-13. [Crossref]
261. Stefan Vorbach. Technologischer Fortschritt als Treiber von Geschäftsmodellinnovationen 83-102. [Crossref]
262. Kaveh Abhari, Elizabeth J. Davidson. Creative Co-production: The Adaption of an Open Innovation Model in Creative
Industries 119-130. [Crossref]
263. Erno Vanhala, Jussi Kasurinen. Improving the Length of Customer Relationships on the Mobile Computer Game Business
116-132. [Crossref]
264. Federico Adrodegari, Nicola Saccani, Christian Kowalkowski. 2016. A Framework for PSS Business Models: Formalization
and Application. Procedia CIRP 47, 519-524. [Crossref]
265. Antonio Ghezzi, Andrea Cavallaro. Business Model Change and Refinement along Business Model Lifecycle: Evidences from
a Multiple Case Study on Mobile Telecommunications New Ventures 1477-1486. [Crossref]
266. Thierry Rayna, Ludmila Striukova. 2016. From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business
model innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 102, 214-224. [Crossref]
267. Sebastian Hohenberg, Stephan Mühlhäuser, Aline Gehring. Business Modelizer: Durch Geschäftsmodellinnovationen das
Management von Kundenzufriedenheit nachhaltig gestalten 567-587. [Crossref]
268. Yan Li, Maria Holgado, Steve Evans. Business Model Innovation in State-Owned and Private-Owned Enterprises in China
528-535. [Crossref]
269. Marjeta Marolt, Gregor Lenart, Damjan Maletič, Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar, Andreja Pucihar. 2016. Business Model
Innovation: Insights from a Multiple Case Study of Slovenian SMEs. Organizacija 49:3. . [Crossref]
270. Sabine Löbbe, Gerhard Jochum. Thriving Despite Disruptive Technologies: A German Utilities’ Case Study 323-341.
[Crossref]
271. Olof Sivertsson, Joakim Tell. 2015. Barriers to Business Model Innovation in Swedish Agriculture. Sustainability 7:12,
1957-1969. [Crossref]
272. JinHyo Joseph Yun. 2015. How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open Innovation.
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 1:1. . [Crossref]
273. 강강강, An, Chi-Soon. 2015. A Study on Social Responsibility Model of Public Institutions in Korea: Focusing on Business
Model of Social Enterprise Connected with KOSPO’ Samcheok Green Power. Korean Comparative Government Review 19:4,
1-30. [Crossref]
274. Petra Gsodam, Romana Rauter, Rupert J. Baumgartner. 2015. The renewable energy debate: how Austrian electric utilities
are changing their business models. Energy, Sustainability and Society 5:1. . [Crossref]
275. Valentina Della Corte, Alessandra Iavazzi, Chiara D’Andrea. 2015. Customer involvement through social media: the cases of
some telecommunication firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 1:1. . [Crossref]
276. Junghee Han, Okjoo Cho. 2015. Platform business Eco-model evolution: case study on KakaoTalk in Korea. Journal of Open
Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 1:1. . [Crossref]
277. Naoshi Uchihira, Hirokazu Ishimatsu, Shigeaki Sakurai, Yoshiteru Kageyama, Yuji Kakutani, Kazunori Mizushima, Hiroshi
Naruse, Susumu Yoneda. 2015. Service innovation structure analysis for recognizing opportunities and difficulties of M2M
businesses. Technology in Society 43, 173-182. [Crossref]
278. Ryan Rumble, Vincent Mangematin. Business Model Implementation: The Antecedents of Multi-Sidedness 97-131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
279. Florian Waldner, Marion K. Poetz, Christoph Grimpe, Markus Eurich. Antecedents and Consequences of Business Model
Innovation: The Role of Industry Structure 347-386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
280. JinHyo Joseph Yun, WooYoung Jung, JeongHo Yang. 2015. Knowledge strategy and business model conditions for sustainable
growth of SMEs. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 6:3, 246-262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
281. Michael Blaschke, Maurus L. Wuetherich, Uwe V. Riss, Petros Papakostas. Business Model Management System Design:
Manifesto, Requirements, and Prototype 153-160. [Crossref]
282. Mokter Hossain, K. M. Zahidul Islam. 2015. Ideation through Online Open Innovation Platform: Dell IdeaStorm. Journal
of the Knowledge Economy 6:3, 611-624. [Crossref]
283. Yuandi Wang, Zhao Zhou, Lutao Ning, Jin Chen. 2015. Technology and external conditions at play: A study of learning-
by-licensing practices in China. Technovation 43-44, 29-39. [Crossref]
284. Qiang Wang, Chris Voss, Xiande Zhao, Zhiqiang Wang. 2015. Modes of service innovation: a typology. Industrial Management
& Data Systems 115:7, 1358-1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
285. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, Sarah Netter. 2015. Collaborative consumption: business model opportunities and barriers
for fashion libraries. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 19:3, 258-273. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
286. Sune Gudiksen. 2015. Business Model Design Games: Rules and Procedures to Challenge Assumptions and Elicit Surprises.
Creativity and Innovation Management 24:2, 307-322. [Crossref]
287. Tina Saebi, Nicolai J. Foss. 2015. Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies
with business model dimensions. European Management Journal 33:3, 201-213. [Crossref]
288. Patrick Holzmann. 2015. Geschäftsmodellinnovation. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 63:2, 183-189.
[Crossref]
289. Kirsi Niinimäki, Esben Pedersen, Kerli Hvass, Lisbeth Svengren-Holm. Fashion Industry and New Approaches for
Sustainability 453-474. [Crossref]
290. Yariv Taran, Harry Boer, Peter Lindgren. 2015. A Business Model Innovation Typology. Decision Sciences 46:2, 301-331.
[Crossref]
291. Jiban Khuntia, Mohan Tanniru, John Zervos. 2015. Extending Care Outside of the Hospital Walls. International Journal of
E-Business Research 11:2, 1-17. [Crossref]
292. Violetta Gerasymenko, Dirk De Clercq, Harry J. Sapienza. 2015. Changing the Business Model: Effects of Venture Capital
Firms and Outside CEOs on Portfolio Company Performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 9:1, 79-98. [Crossref]
293. Oleksiy Osiyevskyy, Jim Dewald. 2015. Explorative Versus Exploitative Business Model Change: The Cognitive Antecedents
of Firm-Level Responses to Disruptive Innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 9:1, 58-78. [Crossref]
294. 2015. WITHDRAWAL : Füller, Johann; Hutter, Katja; Hautz, Julia; and Matzler, Kurt; Open Innovation within Company
Boundaries: What Motivates and Hinders Employees to Engage in Internal Innovation Communities. Journal of Product
Innovation Management 32:2, 306-306. [Crossref]

295. Elias G. Carayannis, Stavros Sindakis, Christian Walter. 2015. Business Model Innovation as Lever of Organizational
Sustainability. The Journal of Technology Transfer 40:1, 85-104. [Crossref]
296. Yingying Zhang, Yu Zhou. The Rise of China: Innovation or Cost Leader 1-14. [Crossref]
297. Maarten van Limburg, Jobke Wentzel, Robbert Sanderman, Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen. 2015. Business Modeling to
Implement an eHealth Portal for Infection Control: A Reflection on Co-Creation With Stakeholders. JMIR Research Protocols
4:3, e104. [Crossref]
298. Ke Rong, Guangyu Hu, Yong Lin, Yongjiang Shi, Liang Guo. 2015. Understanding business ecosystem using a 6C framework
in Internet-of-Things-based sectors. International Journal of Production Economics 159, 41-55. [Crossref]
299. Marlena Grabowska. 2015. Innovativeness in Business Models. Procedia Computer Science 65, 1023-1030. [Crossref]
300. Mosad Zineldin, Valentina Vasicheva. Banking and Financial Sector in the Cloud: Knowledge, Quality and Innovation
Management 178-194. [Crossref]
301. Lasse Torkkeli, Hanna Salojärvi, Liisa-Maija Sainio, Sami Saarenketo. 2015. Do All Roads Lead to Rome? The Effect of
the Decision-Making Logic on Business Model Change. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation 11:3, 5-24.
[Crossref]
302. Aki Harima, Sivaram Vemuri. 2015. Diaspora Business Model Innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and
Innovation 11:1, 29-52. [Crossref]
303. Päivi Jokela, Maria Elo. 2015. Developing Innovative Business Models in Social Ventures. Journal of Entrepreneurship,
Management and Innovation 11:1, 103-118. [Crossref]
304. Adam Jabłoński. 2015. Design and Operationalization of Technological Business Models. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et
Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63:3, 927-935. [Crossref]
305. . A Dynamic Vision of Value Chains 156-182. [Crossref]
306. Richard Cuthbertson, Peder Inge Furseth, Stephen J. Ezell. Innovation Ability 85-95. [Crossref]
307. Göran Roos. 2014. Business Model Innovation to Create and Capture Resource Value in Future Circular Material Chains.
Resources 3:4, 248-274. [Crossref]
308. Samantha Sharpe, Renu Agarwal. 2014. Strengthening Industrial Ecology’s Links with Business Studies: Insights and
Potential Contributions from the Innovation and Business Models Literature. Resources 3:4, 362-382. [Crossref]
309. Carlos M. DaSilva, Peter Trkman. 2014. Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not. Long Range Planning 47:6, 379-389.
[Crossref]
310. Hannu Saarijärvi, Christian Grönroos, Hannu Kuusela. 2014. Reverse use of customer data: implications for service-based
business models. Journal of Services Marketing 28:7, 529-537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
311. Samuel W. Short, Nancy M.P. Bocken, Claire Y. Barlow, Marian R. Chertow. 2014. From Refining Sugar to Growing
Tomatoes. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18:5, 603-618. [Crossref]
312. Arbaiah Abdul Razak, Peter A. Murray, David Roberts. 2014. Open Innovation in Universities: The Relationship Between
Innovation and Commercialisation. Knowledge and Process Management 21:4, 260-269. [Crossref]
313. Jolanta Krolczyk, Stanisław Legutko. 2014. Innovation as a Key Factor for Entrepreneurial Activity. Applied Mechanics and
Materials 657, 1046-1050. [Crossref]
314. Pennie Frow, Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, Toni Hilton, Anthony Davidson, Adrian Payne, Danilo Brozovic. 2014. Value
propositions. Marketing Theory 14:3, 327-351. [Crossref]
315. Elias G. Carayannis, Evangelos Grigoroudis, Stavros Sindakis, Christian Walter. 2014. Business Model Innovation as
Antecedent of Sustainable Enterprise Excellence and Resilience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5:3, 440-463. [Crossref]
316. Guangyong Xu, Jingjing Wang. Nonlinear ANP sorting method applying in evaluation of enterprise's sustainable innovation
capability 559-562. [Crossref]
317. Ales Novak. 2014. Business Model Literature Overview. FINANCIAL REPORTING :1, 79-130. [Crossref]
318. Baoliang Hu. 2014. Linking business models with technological innovation performance through organizational learning.
European Management Journal 32:4, 587-595. [Crossref]
319. Anahita Baregheh, David Hemsworth, Jennifer Rowley. 2014. Towards an Integrative View of Innovation in Food Sector
SMEs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 15:3, 147-158. [Crossref]
320. Morten Rask. 2014. Internationalization through business model innovation: In search of relevant design dimensions and
elements. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 12:2, 146-161. [Crossref]
321. Dorothea Bowyer, Ross L. Chapman. 2014. Does privatisation drive innovation? Business model innovation through
stakeholder viewpoints: the case of Sydney Airport 10 years post-privatisation. Journal of Management & Organization 20:3,
365-386. [Crossref]
322. 강강강, 강강강. 2014. Case study on startup consulting with students of entrepreneuship graduate and undergraduate. Asia-Pacific
Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship 9:2, 23-33. [Crossref]
323. SÉRGIO ANDRÉ CAVALCANTE. 2014. DESIGNING BUSINESS MODEL CHANGE. International Journal of
Innovation Management 18:02, 1450018. [Crossref]
324. Satu Pätäri, Kirsi Sinkkonen. 2014. Energy Service Companies and Energy Performance Contracting: is there a need to renew
the business model? Insights from a Delphi study. Journal of Cleaner Production 66, 264-271. [Crossref]
325. René Bohnsack, Jonatan Pinkse, Ans Kolk. 2014. Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model
evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy 43:2, 284-300. [Crossref]
326. Dina Dellyana, Togar M. Simatupang. 2014. Existing Music Business Model in Indonesia in Search of New Income Sources.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 115, 407-414. [Crossref]
327. Daniel Kindström, Christian Kowalkowski. 2014. Service innovation in product-centric firms: a multidimensional business
model perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 29:2, 96-111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
328. Talya Miron-Shatz, Itamar Shatz, Stefan Becker, Jigar Patel, Gunther Eysenbach. 2014. Promoting Business and
Entrepreneurial Awareness in Health Care Professionals: Lessons From Venture Capital Panels at Medicine 2.0 Conferences.
Journal of Medical Internet Research 16:8, e184. [Crossref]
329. Ilan Bijaoui. Models of Economic Development 32-60. [Crossref]
330. Andrea Giessmann, Philipp Kyas, Pasi Tyrvainen, Katarina Stanoevska. Towards a Better Understanding of the Dynamics of
Platform as a Service Business Models 965-974. [Crossref]
331. Vinzent Rudtsch, Jürgen Gausemeier, Judith Gesing, Tobias Mittag, Stefan Peter. 2014. Pattern-based Business Model
Development for Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Procedia CIRP 25, 313-319. [Crossref]
332. Nikolaos Goumagias, Ignazio Cabras, Kiran Jude Fernandes, Feng Li, Alberto Nucciarelli, Peter Cowling, Sam Devlin, Daniel
Kudenko. A Phylogenetic Classification of the Video-Game Industry’s Business Model Ecosystem 285-294. [Crossref]
333. Gernot Lechner, Marc Reimann. 2014. Impact of product acquisition on manufacturing and remanufacturing strategies.
Production & Manufacturing Research 2:1, 831-859. [Crossref]
334. Hao-Chen Huang, Mei-Chi Lai, Meng-Chun Kao, Chien-Hui Sung. 2014. A team-learning framework for business model
innovation in an emerging market. Journal of Management & Organization 20:1, 100-120. [Crossref]
335. Réjean Landry, Nabil Amara, Jean-Samuel Cloutier, Norrin Halilem. 2013. Technology transfer organizations: Services and
business models. Technovation 33:12, 431-449. [Crossref]
336. Dean Johnson, Cara Wrigley, Karla Straker, Sam Bucolo. Designing innovative business models: Five emerging meta-models
70-77. [Crossref]
337. Anja Krabye, Judy Matthews, Cara Wrigley, Sam Bucolo. From production to purpose-Using design led innovation to build
strategic potential in a family-owned SME 37-46. [Crossref]
338. Chunxia Ye, Xiang Yu, Wei Li. 2013. Empirical Analysis on Evolution and Small World Effect of Chinese Enterprise-
Enterprise Patent Cooperation Network: From the Perspective of Open Innovation. Information 4:4, 398-410. [Crossref]
339. Mario Richter. 2013. Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy. Energy Policy
62, 1226-1237. [Crossref]
340. Yixin Cai, Hewu Wang, Qiang Ye, Minggao Ouyang. Analysis of two typical EV business models based on EV taxi
demonstrations in China 1-6. [Crossref]
341. Hao-Chen Huang, Mei-Chi Lai, Lee-Hsuan Lin, Chien-Tsai Chen. 2013. Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen
business model innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management 26:6, 977-1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
342. Lars Witell, Martin Löfgren. 2013. From service for free to service for fee: business model innovation in manufacturing firms.
Journal of Service Management 24:5, 520-533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
343. Hai Guo, Jing Zhao, Jintong Tang. 2013. The role of top managers' human and social capital in business model innovation.
Chinese Management Studies 7:3, 447-469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
344. Sérgio André Cavalcante. 2013. Understanding the impact of technology on firms’ business models. European Journal of
Innovation Management 16:3, 285-300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
345. Philip H. Coombes, John D. Nicholson. 2013. Business models and their relationship with marketing: A systematic literature
review. Industrial Marketing Management 42:5, 656-664. [Crossref]
346. Maureen Benson-Rea, Roderick J. Brodie, Herbert Sima. 2013. The plurality of co-existing business models: Investigating
the complexity of value drivers. Industrial Marketing Management 42:5, 717-729. [Crossref]
347. Karl A. Stroetmann. 2013. Achieving the integrated and smart health and wellbeing paradigm: A call for policy research and
action on governance and business models. International Journal of Medical Informatics 82:4, e29-e37. [Crossref]
348. Frank Boons, Florian Lüdeke-Freund. 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards
a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 45, 9-19. [Crossref]
349. Martina Musteen, Mujtaba Ahsan. 2013. Beyond Cost: The Role of Intellectual Capital in Offshoring and Innovation in
Young Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 37:2, 421-434. [Crossref]
350. Jacob Buur, Bernd Ankenbrand, Robb Mitchell. 2013. Participatory business modelling. CoDesign 9:1, 55-71. [Crossref]
351. VIVEK K. VELAMURI, BASTIAN BANSEMIR, ANNE-KATRIN NEYER, KATHRIN M. MÖSLEIN. 2013.
PRODUCT SERVICE SYSTEMS AS A DRIVER FOR BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION: LESSONS LEARNED
FROM THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY. International Journal of Innovation Management 17:01, 1340004.
[Crossref]
352. SABRINA SCHNEIDER, PATRICK SPIETH. 2013. BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION: TOWARDS AN
INTEGRATED FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA. International Journal of Innovation Management 17:01, 1340001.
[Crossref]
353. Sanna Mutka, Pertti Aaltonen. 2013. The impact of a delivery project's business model in a project-based firm. International
Journal of Project Management 31:2, 166-176. [Crossref]
354. Amir Bonakdar, Tobias Weiblen, Christina Di Valentin, Theresa Zeissner, Anton Pussep, Markus Schief. Transformative
Influence of Business Processes on the Business Model: Classifying the State of the Practice in the Software Industry
3920-3929. [Crossref]
355. Zhu Naixiao, Huang Chunhua. Research on Open Innovation in China 714-720. [Crossref]
356. Hao-Chen Huang, Mei-Chi Lai, Meng-Chun Kao, Yi-Chun Chen. 2012. Target Costing, Business Model Innovation, and
Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Firms. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne
des Sciences de l'Administration 29:4, 322-335. [Crossref]
357. D.M. Halemane, F. Janszen. Business model innovation for entrepreneurs 456-459. [Crossref]
358. Yang Liu, Jiang Wei, Ying Ying. Linking business model innovation, strategy and technology innovation: A case study
553-557. [Crossref]
359. Mark Esposito, Amit Kapoor, Sandeep Goyal. 2012. Enabling healthcare services for the rural and semi‐urban segments in
India: when shared value meets the bottom of the pyramid. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in
society 12:4, 514-533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
360. Hans C. Curtius, Karoline Künzel, Moritz Loock. 2012. Generic customer segments and business models for smart grids.
der markt 51:2-3, 63-74. [Crossref]
361. Sam Solaimani, Harry Bouwman. 2012. A framework for the alignment of business model and business processes. Business
Process Management Journal 18:4, 655-679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
362. Anastasia Tsvetkova, Magnus Gustafsson. 2012. Business models for industrial ecosystems: a modular approach. Journal of
Cleaner Production 29-30, 246-254. [Crossref]
363. Andreas Björke. 2012. Is there happiness therein? BM and HRCA for self‐employed. Journal of Human Resource Costing &
Accounting 16:2, 95-111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
364. 강강강, 강강강. 2012. Development Business Model Six Principles and Application Smart-Work Business. The e-Business Studies
13:2, 203-222. [Crossref]
365. Eva Bucherer, Uli Eisert, Oliver Gassmann. 2012. Towards Systematic Business Model Innovation: Lessons from Product
Innovation Management. Creativity and Innovation Management 21:2, 183-198. [Crossref]
366. Cinzia Battistella, Gianluca Biotto, Alberto F. De Toni. 2012. From design driven innovation to meaning strategy. Management
Decision 50:4, 718-743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

367. Yuandi Wang, Wim Vanhaverbeke, Nadine Roijakkers. 2012. Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems
of innovation — A theoretical analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79:3, 419-428. [Crossref]
368. Réjean Landry, Nabil Amara. 2012. Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models.
VINE 42:1, 94-116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
369. Hua Wang, Chris Kimble. Business Model Innovation and the Development of the Electric Vehicle Industry in China 240-253.
[Crossref]
370. Jeaneth Johansson, Malin Malmström, Diana Chroneer, Maria Ek Styven, Anne Engström, Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn.
2012. Business Models at Work in the Mobile Service Sector. iBusiness 04:01, 84-92. [Crossref]
371. Arash Najmaei. Business Model 100-131. [Crossref]
372. Zhu Naixiao, Huang Chunhua. 2012. Research on Open Innovation in China. International Journal of Asian Business and
Information Management 3:1, 65-71. [Crossref]
373. Paul Lillrank, Minni Särkkä. 2011. The service machine as a service operation framework. Strategic Outsourcing: An
International Journal 4:3, 274-293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
374. Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2011. Special topic: strategic innovations. Review of Managerial Science 5:4, 263-264. [Crossref]
375. Florian Lüdeke-Freund, Moritz Loock. 2011. Debt for brands: tracking down a bias in financing photovoltaic projects in
Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production 19:12, 1356-1364. [Crossref]
376. Christoph Zott, Raphael Amit, Lorenzo Massa. 2011. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research.
Journal of Management 37:4, 1019-1042. [Crossref]
377. Abdullah Basiouni, Rod McNaughton. Innovation in e-business models: A net-enabled business innovation cycle (NEBIC)
theory perspective with empirical evidence 114-120. [Crossref]
378. Wan Xing, Xuan Ye, Lv Kui. 2011. Measuring convergence of China's ICT industry: An input–output analysis.
Telecommunications Policy 35:4, 301-313. [Crossref]
379. Jonathan C. Ho, Fang-Mei Tseng, Chung-Shing Lee. Service Business Model Innovation: A Conceptual Model and a
Framework for Management Consulting 247-251. [Crossref]
380. Erik Sandberg, Tobias Kihlén, Mats Abrahamsson. 2011. Characteristics of a Logistics-Based Business Model. Journal of
Marketing Channels 18:2, 123-145. [Crossref]
381. Bao Liang Hu. 2011. Comparison Research on the Structural Elements of Two Business Models with the Different
Performance Level. Advanced Materials Research 217-218, 1-4. [Crossref]
382. Florian Lüdeke-Freund, Moritz Loock. What Kinds of Photovoltaic Projects Do Lenders Prefer to Finance? 107-124.
[Crossref]
383. Eva Bucherer, Dieter Uckelmann. Business Models for the Internet of Things 253-277. [Crossref]
384. Thomas Bieger, Stephan Reinhold. Das wertbasierte Geschäftsmodell – Ein aktualisierter Strukturierungsansatz 13-70.
[Crossref]
385. Daniel Kindström. 2010. Towards a service-based business model – Key aspects for future competitive advantage. European
Management Journal 28:6, 479-490. [Crossref]
386. PETER T. GIANIODIS, S. C. ELLIS, E. SECCHI. 2010. ADVANCING A TYPOLOGY OF OPEN INNOVATION.
International Journal of Innovation Management 14:04, 531-572. [Crossref]
387. Roman Boutellier, Markus Eurich, Patricia Hurschler. 2010. An Integrated Business Model Innovation Approach.
International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation 1:3, 1-13. [Crossref]
388. Rita Gunther McGrath. 2010. Business Models: A Discovery Driven Approach. Long Range Planning 43:2-3, 247-261.
[Crossref]
389. Christoph Zott, Raphael Amit. 2010. Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning 43:2-3,
216-226. [Crossref]
390. Suvi Nenonen, Kaj Storbacka. 2010. Business model design: conceptualizing networked value co‐creation. International
Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 2:1, 43-59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
391. Mika Horttanainen, Juha Kaikko, Riikka Bergman, Minna Pasila-Lehtinen, Janne Nerg. 2010. Performance analysis of power
generating sludge combustion plant and comparison against other sludge treatment technologies. Applied Thermal Engineering
30:2-3, 110-118. [Crossref]

392. ERIK G. HANSEN, FRIEDRICH GROSSE-DUNKER, RALF REICHWALD. 2009. SUSTAINABILITY
INNOVATION CUBE — A FRAMEWORK TO EVALUATE SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED INNOVATIONS.
International Journal of Innovation Management 13:04, 683-713. [Crossref]
393. Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez. 2009. Competitive dynamics and business models in service business: a promising research subject.
Service Business 3:4, 311-318. [Crossref]
394. Reema Khurana, Vijay V. Mandke. 2009. Business process modeling with information integrity. Business Process Management
Journal 15:4, 487-503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
395. Lingyun Wang, P. Jaring, Arto Wallin. Developing a conceptual framework for business model innovation in the context of
open innovation 453-458. [Crossref]
396. Maria Rosita Cagnina, Michele Poian. 2009. Beyond e-business models: the road to virtual worlds. Electronic Commerce
Research 9:1-2, 49-75. [Crossref]
397. Samuel Grandval, Benjamin Morisse. 2009. L'architecture des compétences centrée efficience : un choix risqué ? Le cas
Général Motors. Management & Avenir 28:8, 123. [Crossref]
398. Qiuying Chen. A Value-Oriented Framework of Business Models Innovation 426-430. [Crossref]
399. Brian Harmer, Pak Yoong. 2008. Opportunistic Bargains: Exploring an Unusual B2C E-commerce Model. Journal of
Information Technology Case and Application Research 10:2, 25-36. [Crossref]
400. Nordine Benkeltoum. Bibliographie 215-228. [Crossref]
401. Aleksander Janeš, Roberto Biloslavo, Armand Faganel. Tacit Knowledge Utilization for Global Impact and Organizational
Practices 1-22. [Crossref]
402. Sonia Chien-i Chen, Radwan Alyan Kharabsheh. The Link Between Innovation and Prosperity 200-217. [Crossref]
403. Don Scott-Kemmis. Business Innovation 209-240. [Crossref]
404. Michaela Sprenger. E-Health Business Models 157-168. [Crossref]
405. Raphayela Belém Schluep. Fashion Technology and the Development of New Business Models 174-210. [Crossref]
406. Purna Prabhakar Nandamuri, K. S. Venu Gopala Rao, Mukesh Kumar Mishra. Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through
Business Model Innovation 217-246. [Crossref]
407. Guido Bortoluzzi, Patrizia de Luca, Francesco Venier, Bernardo Balboni. Innovation Scope and the Performance of the Firm
551-568. [Crossref]
408. Jiban Khuntia, Mohan Tanniru, John Zervos. Extending Care Outside of the Hospital Walls 603-620. [Crossref]
409. Vladimír Bureš. Industry 4.0 From the Systems Engineering Perspective 199-223. [Crossref]
410. . Start 21-75. [Crossref]

Paper - Business Model Innovation PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Paper - Business Model Innovation PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Strategy & Leadership

Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

What is a business model?

The functions of a business model are:

The Business Model Framework

Improving your own business model

Nurturing a new business model isn’t easy, but it can be done

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com

Rule Learning, BP Neural Network and Creative Computing 122-125. [Crossref]

innovation: A discussion. Procedia Manufacturing 21, 165-172. [Crossref]

Market Development 23-42. [Crossref]

Innovation Management 32:2, 306-306. [Crossref]

Decision 50:4, 718-743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

30:2-3, 110-118. [Crossref]

Potrebbero piacerti anche