Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Adjudication
Its use by the Sub-contractor
Why? – Because it is a quick and relatively cheap means of disposing of problems between the parties to a building contract.
You may already be in dispute or it may be that you envisage a dispute arising in the near future.
Can adjudication help you? – Yes it most certainly can. First you should ask yourself the following questions:
• Is my contract a construction contract and is it in writing?
• Have I been underpaid, not paid at all, not received my rightful dues on time or have I suffered some other financial
misfortune.
• Has the payer withheld money against me without giving the proper notice?
• Have I suffered delay or are there alleged problems with the quality of my work?
• Am I in a dispute with my client about other issues not directly involving payment, for example is my client insisting that I
inspect the scaffolds or adopt a particular method of working?
You should certainly consider adjudication as a possible means of settling your differences.
If for example the payer has failed to give you notice of what you are to be paid, when you are to be paid and the basis of the
calculation of that sum, the payer will have almost certainly placed himself in breach of his obligations and adjudication can be
used to overcome the problems created by such a breach.
In light of the recent revision to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 in the form of Part 8 of the
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 please find below the following amendments to the
Adjudication process that have been brought in:
Section 140 – Adjudicators Power to make corrections
The Adjudicator now has the power to correct errors in their decisions that have been brought about by clerical or
typographical mistakes, or that may have arisen by way of an accident or omission on the adjudicator’s part.
A 5 day period is provided for under the scheme for appeals to be lodged. Therefore any errors which require correcting must
be identified as soon as possible after the Adjudicators decision is issued.
This system is however about to change and upon the next revision of each of the JCT contracts, including the
sub-contracts, in the event that no deletions have taken place, the referring party will have the right to make
his own choice from the list of 4 nominating bodies shown.
The Procedure
It is vitally important that you follow precisely the following procedure when embarking upon an adjudication.
2. Serve notice on the other party of your intention to refer your dispute to adjudication. The notice must include within it all the
matters that you wish the adjudicator to decide upon. This notice will determine what the adjudicator is able to decide
for he must not step outside the matters included in the Notice of Intent. For this reason it is advisable to seek
advice on the preparation of this document.
3. Immediately after serving the above notice you must complete and forward an application for nomination of an adjudicator
together any appropriate fee due.
Note: no agreement by the other party is normally required in order for you to proceed to adjudication
Response from
Receipt of response
other party
Reply by claimant if
permitted by adjudicator
Adjudicators decision
Whilst every effort has been made to provide reliable and accurate information, we would welcome any corrections to information provided by the Writer which
may not be entirely accurate, therefore and for this reason, the NASC or indeed the Writer, cannot accept responsibility for any misinformation posted.