Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/330880939
CITATIONS READS
0 27
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Study on nutritional requirement and development of cost-effective diets commonly available freshwater ornamental fish in India View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Kedar NATH Mohanta on 05 February 2019.
1 1 1 2
1 2
Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India; Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai,
Maharashtra, India
..............................................................................................
D-1 (10.5 D-2 (12.5 D-3 (14.6 D-4 (16.7 D-5 (18.8
Ingredients MJ kg)1 diet) MJ kg)1 diet) MJ kg)1 diet) MJ kg)1 diet) MJ kg)1 diet)
For preparation of experimental diets, the required quan- of diet (Gomes et al. 1995) in the expense of a-cellulose
tities of various dietary ingredients except gelatin were during the last 30 days of the experiment. The unconsumed
weighed and put in five different aluminum trays. A desired feed and feces were removed 1 h after first two feeding of the
quantity of water was heated in a 1-L beaker to 80 C by using day at 1000 and 1300 h and then the freshly voided feces were
an electric heater and the required amount of gelatin was collected after 1 h (Mohanta et al. 2007b, 2008a,b). The
dissolved into it with slow stirring. The dextrin, vitamin and feces of initial 5 days were discarded and next 25 days sam-
mineral mixture thoroughly mixed earlier with oil were added ples were collected following the immediate pipetting method
to it and blended in a mixer followed by the addition of outlined by Spyridakis et al. (1989). Pooled fecal samples of
remaining dietary ingredients excepting carboxymethyl cellu- each treatment were dried at 55 C and stored in refrigerator
lose, which was added at the last to make dough. The dough at )20 C for subsequent analysis (Mohanta et al. 2007b,
was steam-cooked for 5 min in a pressure cooker and passed 2008a,b).
through a hand pelletizer with a 2 mm diameter to prepare the
pellets. The pellets were dried at 60 C and stored in a refrig-
erator at 4 C until use (Sau et al. 2004). The fresh feeds were
prepared at every 15 days using the same lot of ingredients that Proximate analysis. The proximate composition of experi-
were purchased at one time from the market to ensure almost mental diets, fecal samples and whole body was analyzed in
constant quality of nutrients in the respective diets that were triplicates (AOAC 1990). Dry matter was estimated by oven
prepared at different times during the experiment (Mohanta drying the samples at 105 C till a constant weight and crude
et al. 2007a, 2008a,b). We presumed that by preparing the protein percent was calculated by estimating nitrogen content
fresh feed at 15 days interval and storing these at 4 C, there by micro-Kjeldahl method and multiplying with a factor
was a very little chance of mold or bacterial contamination. 6.25. Ether extract was determined by solvent extraction with
petroleum ether, boiling point 40–60 C, for 10–12 h. Total
ash content was determined by incinerating the sample at
650 C for 6 h and crude fiber by acid digestion (1.25%)
Apparent nutrient digestibility coefficients of the diets were followed by alkali digestion (1.25%). Gross energy in diets,
determined by indirect method using 10 g chromic oxide kg)1 fecal samples and fish body was calculated by using Bomb
..............................................................................................
Table 2 Growth and diet utilization of P. gonionotus fed diets with varying levels of energy
Experimental diets
Initial weight (g) 1.86 ± 0.1a 1.76 ± 0.08a 1.80 ± 0.04a 1.77 ± 0.07a 1.78 ± 0.03a
Final weight (g) 12.69 ± 0.38d 13.58 ± 0.49cd 16.21 ± 0.52a 15.49 ± 0.44ab 14.56 ± 0.24bc
Weight gain (g) 10.83 ± 0.25d 11.82 ± 0.42cd 14.41 ± 0.51a 13.72 ± 0.40ab 12.78 ± 0.22bc
DFI (mg diet fish)1 day)1) 203 ± 9.0a 221 ± 8.8a 239 ± 10.9a 237 ± 8.8a 225 ± 3.7a
SGR (% day)1) 2.13 ± 0.03c 2.27 ± 0.01b 2.44 ± 0.01a 2.41 ± 0.03a 2.34 ± 0.02b
FCR 1.69 ± 0.04a 1.68 ± 0.01a 1.49 ± 0.02c 1.55 ± 0.02bc 1.58 ± 0.02b
PER 1.96 ± 0.04c 1.97 ± 0.01c 2.22 ± 0.03a 2.13 ± 0.03ab 2.09 ± 0.03b
HSI 1.74 ± 0.03c 1.79 ± 0.01c 1.84 ± 0.01c 2.16 ± 0.03b 3.04 ± 0.06a
VSI 8.40 ± 0.03b 8.44 ± 0.04b 8.47 ± 0.01b 8.52 ± 0.03b 10.11 ± 0.07a
Mean values with same superscripts in each row are not significant (P > 0.05). Values are means of three replicates in each experimental
diet ± SE.
DFI, daily feed intake; SGR, specific growth rate; FCR, food conversion ratio; PER, protein efficiency ratio; HSI, hepatosomatic index; VSI,
viscerosomatic index.
..............................................................................................
Experimental diets
Mean values with same superscripts in each row are not significant (P > 0.05). Values are means of three replicates in each experimental
diet ± SE.
PPV, protein productive values; EPV, energy productive values; ADCProtein, apparent digestibility coefficient of the diet for protein; ADCLipid,
apparent digestibility coefficient of the diet for lipid; ADCEnergy, apparent digestibility coefficient of the diet for energy.
1
Protease activity: lg of leucine liberated mg)1 tissue protein h)1 at 37 C.
2
Lipase activity: lg of a-napthol reduced mg)1 tissue protein h)1 at 37 C.
3
Amylase activity: mg of maltose liberated mg)1 tissue protein h)1 at 37 C.
Table 4 Whole body composition (g kg)1 wet weight) and RNA and DNA concentrations (lg mg)1 muscle tissue) of P. gonionotus fed diets
with varying levels of energy
Final
Mean values with same superscripts in each row are not significant (P > 0.05). Values are means of three samples ± SE.
..............................................................................................
..............................................................................................