Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
C ONTEMPORARY
NURSING KNOWLEDGE
Analysis and Evaluation
of Nursing Models and
Theories
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page ii
C
ONTEMPORARY
NURSING KNOWLEDGE
Analysis and Evaluation
of Nursing Models and
Theories
SECOND EDITION
F. A. Davis Company
1915 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
www.fadavis.com
Copyright © 2000, 2005 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of
it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, me-
chanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher.
As new scientific information becomes available through basic and clinical research, recommended treatments
and drug therapies undergo changes. The author and publisher have done everything possible to make this book
accurate, up to date, and in accord with accepted standards at the time of publication. The author, editors, and
publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions or for consequences from application of the book, and make
no warranty, expressed or implied, in regard to the contents of the book. Any practice described in this book should
be applied by the reader in accordance with professional standards of care used in regard to the unique circum-
stances that may apply in each situation. The reader is advised always to check product information (package in-
serts) for changes and new information regarding dose and contraindications before administering any drug.
Caution is especially urged when using new or infrequently ordered drugs.
Fawcett, Jacqueline.
Contemporary nursing knowledge : analysis and evaluation of nursing models
and theories / Jacqueline Fawcett. — 2nd ed.
p. cm.
Combines the content from the author’s previous books titled: Analysis and
evaluation of conceptual models of nursing.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8036-1194-3
1. Nursing models. 2. Nursing models—Evaluation. I. Fawcett, Jacqueline.
Analysis and evaluation of conceptual models of nursing.II. Title.
[DNLM: 1. Models, Nursing. 2. Nursing Theory. WY 100 F278c 2005]
RT84.5.F393 2005
610.73—dc22
2004017695
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is
granted by F. A. Davis Company for users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional
Reporting Service, provided that the fee of $.10 per copy is paid directly to CCC, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
01923. For those organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by CCC, a separate system of payment
has been arranged. The fee code for users of the Transactional Reporting Service is:8036–1194/05 0 + $.10.
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page v
Preface
v
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page vi
vi PREFACE
derstanding of the relations among the metaparadigm of nursing, philosophies of nursing, con-
ceptual models of nursing, nursing theories, and empirical indicators. Chapter 2 acquaints the
reader with strategies used to implement conceptual models of nursing and nursing theories in
the real world of nursing practice.
Part Two introduces the reader to conceptual models of nursing. Chapter 3 presents a distinctive
framework for the analysis and evaluation of nursing models. Chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 il-
lustrate the application of the analysis and evaluation framework, and acquaint the reader with
the most widely recognized and most frequently cited nursing models. In these chapters, the
reader enters the world of nursing as conceptualized by Dorothy Johnson in her Behavioral
System Model, Imogene King in her Conceptual System, Myra Levine in her Conservation
Model, Betty Neuman in her Systems Model, Dorothea Orem in her Self-Care Framework,
Martha Rogers in her Science of Unitary Human Beings, and Sister Callista Roy in her Adaptation
Model.
Part Three introduces the reader to nursing theories. Chapter 11 presents a distinctive framework
for the analysis and evaluation of nursing theories. Chapters 12, 13, 14, 15, and, 16 illustrate the
application of the analysis and evaluation framework. These chapters acquaint the reader with
the most widely recognized and most frequently cited nursing theories. In Chapters 12 and 13,
the reader learns about two grand theories—Margaret Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding
Consciousness and Rosemarie Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming. In Chapters 14, 15, and 16,
the reader learns about three middle-range theories—Ida Jean Orlando’s Theory of the
Deliberative Nursing Process, Hildegard Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, and Jean
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring.
Part Four introduces the reader to the possibilities of nursing knowledge now and in the future.
Chapter 17, the last chapter in this book, offers the reader an opportunity to consider a strategy
to promote the integration of nursing knowledge with nursing research and nursing practice and
to explore what the discipline of nursing could become.
The Appendix includes such resources as societies devoted to the advancement of particular con-
ceptual models of nursing and nursing theories, internet home pages, audio and video produc-
tions, CD-ROMs, and strategies for computer-based literature searches.
Chapters 1 and 2 should be read before the remainder of the book. Those first two chapters pro-
vide the background that facilitates understanding of the place of conceptual models of nursing
and nursing theories in the structural hierarchy of contemporary nursing knowledge and the use
of nursing models and theories in nursing practice. Chapter 17 may be read at any time. That
chapter should be of special interest to nurses who are committed to fostering the survival and
advancement of the discipline of nursing. Chapter 3 should be read before the subsequent chap-
ters dealing with various conceptual models of nursing. Similarly, Chapter 11 should be read be-
fore the chapters dealing with various nursing grand theories and middle-range theories.
I have continued to draw from my extensive personal conversations and correspondence with the
authors of the conceptual models and theories, as well as from the vast literature about the con-
ceptual models and theories, with emphasis on the latest primary source materials. The book in-
cludes comprehensive reviews of virtually all of the published literature dealing with the use of
conceptual models of nursing and nursing theories as guides for nursing practice, nursing ad-
ministration, nursing education, and nursing research. In an attempt to make the primary source
material and other literature in each chapter more immediately accessible to readers, tables are
used to present practice and research methodologies for each conceptual model and theory, as
well as lists of uses of each conceptual model and theory as a guide for nursing research, nursing
education, nursing administration, and nursing practice.
Special features of this edition include:
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page vii
PREFACE vii
Readers are encouraged to use this book in combination with the primary source materials that
are cited in the chapter references and bibliographies. The references at the end of each chapter
are supplemented by the CD, which comes with the book. The CD includes comprehensive bib-
liographies of all relevant literature that could be located through hand and computer-assisted
searches of an extensive list of nursing books and journals. The bibliographies include citations
to the full range of debate and dialogue about contemporary nursing knowledge and each con-
ceptual model and theory. The bibliographies for each of the conceptual model and theory chap-
ters are divided into several sections: Primary Sources; Commentary: General; Commentary:
Research; Commentary: Education; Commentary: Administration; Commentary: Practice;
Research; Doctoral Dissertations; Master’s Theses; Research Instruments and Nursing Practice
Tools; Education; Administration; and Practice. I continue to be grateful to the authors of the
conceptual models and theories and to my students and colleagues for the many citations of rel-
evant publications they have shared with me. I also continue to be grateful to the staff of the
Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for their technical support,
which has greatly facilitated my searches of the literature over the years.
I believe that a hallmark of this book, as with my other books about nursing conceptual models
and theories, is the care that I take to present an accurate account of each conceptual model and
theory as it was developed by its author rather then to draw from secondary analyses and other
interpretations of the author’s work. Each of those chapters includes many direct quotes from the
author’s original works. The quotations reflect the author’s writing style and the language cus-
toms at the time of publication of the particular book or journal article. Despite some criticism
from colleagues, I have decided to continue to not alter pronouns to reflect current gender-
neutral language. However, in this edition I have endeavored to replace the word “clinical” with
“practice” or “nursing practice,” in response to contemporary dialogue about “clinical” referring
solely to bedside nursing. A chapter about Leininger’s Theory of Culture Care Diversity and
Universality has not been included in this edition of the book because I was unable to obtain
permission for the quotations needed for the analysis of the theory. Readers interested in that
grand theory are referred to the many books, book chapters, and journal articles by Madeleine
Leininger and those who use her theory to guide their research and practice.
The success of the previous editions of my books, as well as the successive editions of other texts
dealing with conceptual models of nursing and nursing theories, indicates continued interest of
nurses in nursing knowledge, rather than in the knowledge of other disciplines. Nurses are espe-
cially fortunate to be able to select as a guide for their work any one of many conceptual models
and theories that already have been used widely. Thus, novice users can draw from the experi-
ences of those who forged the way. And, experienced users can expand their work by examining
what other users have done.
The works included in the book continue, in my opinion, to be the major representatives of con-
ceptual models and nursing theories in the contemporary nursing literature. Readers who are in-
terested in understanding the content of other nursing conceptual models and theories are
encouraged to use the frameworks for analysis and evaluation of conceptual models of nursing
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page viii
viii PREFACE
and nursing theories that are given in Chapters 3 and 11. My sincere hope is that this book will
stimulate readers to continue their study of conceptual models and nursing theories and to adopt
explicit conceptual-theoretical-empirical structures for their nursing activities.
The writing of this edition of the book was, as always, a consuming, stimulating, and growth-
enhancing experience. Thanks for its preparation is owed to many people. First, I continue to be
indebted to Dorothy Johnson, Imogene King, Myra Levine, Betty Neuman, Dorothea Orem,
Martha Rogers, Callista Roy, Margaret Newman, Ida Jean Orlando, Rosemarie Parse, Hildegard
Peplau, and Jean Watson, whose efforts to continuously refine the knowledge base for the disci-
pline of nursing made this book possible. My conversations and written communications with
those nursing pioneers have greatly enhanced my understanding and appreciation of all the ob-
stacles they have overcome to share their visions of nursing with us. I am greatly saddened by the
deaths of Martha Rogers, Myra Levine, Hildegard Peplau, and Dorothy Johnson, but am heart-
ened by the works of other nurses who have had the courage to advance Martha’s, Myra’s,
Hildegard’s, and Dorothy’s ideas about nursing. I also am indebted to those courageous re-
searchers, educators, administrators, and clinicians who stand for nursing by using explicit con-
ceptual models of nursing and nursing theories to guide their work.
Moreover, I am indebted to my students and colleagues at the universities where I have been priv-
ileged to teach, serve as a visiting faculty member, or to present a paper, for their support, intel-
lectual challenges, and constructive criticism. In addition, I am indebted to Joanne DaCunha of
F.A. Davis Company for her encouragement and the time spent discussing the content and de-
sign of this edition of the book. Finally, I continue to be indebted to Robert G. Martone of F.A.
Davis Company for his steadfast support of my work.
My gratitude to my husband, John S. Fawcett, for his unconditional love and support through-
out our 40 years of marriage and his understanding of the demands of my nursing career, con-
tinues to extend to the infinite universe.
Jacqueline Fawcett
Waldoboro, Maine
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page ix
Credits
Quotations and Figure 2–2 from Rogers, M.E. (1992). Transformative learning:
Understanding and facilitating nurses’ learning of nursing conceptual frameworks.
Unpublished manuscript, were reprinted with permission of M.E. Rogers. Copyright 1991.
Quotations from King, I.M. (1971). Toward a theory for nursing were reprinted with per-
mission of Imogene M. King.
Quotations and Figures 5–1 and 5–2 from King, I.M. (1981). A theory for nursing were
reprinted with permission of Imogene M. King.
Quotations from Levine, M.E. (1973). Introduction to clinical nursing (2nd ed.) were
reprinted with permission of F.A. Davis Company, Publishers. Copyright 1973.
Quotations from Schaefer, K.M., & Pond, J.B. (Eds.). (1991). Levine’s conservation model
were reprinted with permission of F.A. Davis Company, Publishers. Copyright 1991.
Quotations and Figure 7–1 from Neuman, B., & Fawcett, J. (Eds.) (2002). The Neuman sys-
tems model (4th ed.) were reprinted with permission of Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle
River, N.J. Copyright 1995.
Quotations from Newman, M.A. (1994). Health as expanding consciousness were reprinted
by permission of Margaret A. Newman.
Quotations from Orem, D.E. (2001). Nursing: Concepts of practice (6th ed.) were reprinted
with permission of Elsevier. Copyright 2001.
A portion of Table 14–1 was adapted from Orlando, I.J. (1972). The discipline and teaching
of nursing process (An evaluation study) (pp. 60–61, 63) with permission of Ida Jean
Orlando Pelletier.
Quotations from Orlando, I.J. (1972). The discipline and teaching of nursing process (An
evaluation study) were reprinted with permission of the Ida Jean Orlando Pelletier.
Quotations from Parker, M.E. (2001). Nursing theories and nursing practice were reprinted
with permission of F.A. Davis Company, Publishers. Copyright 2001.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective
for nurses and other health professionals. Copyright 1998 by Sage Publications. Reprinted
by permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (2003). Community: A human becoming perspective were
reprinted with permission from Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA.
www.jbpub.com.
Quotations from Rogers, M.E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing
were reprinted with permission of F.A. Davis Company, Publishers. Copyright 1970.
Table 9–1 was adapted from Rogers, M.E. (1990). Nursing: Science of unitary, irreducible,
human beings: Update 1990. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based nurs-
ing (p. 9) with permission of the National League for Nursing. Copyright 1990 by the
ix
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page x
x CREDITS
National League for Nursing. Permission of National League for Nursing, and Jones and
Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA. www.jbpub.com.
Quotations from King, I.M., & Fawcett, J. (Eds.). (1997). The language of nursing theory and
metatheory were reprinted with permission of Sigma Theta Tau International Center
Nursing Press. Copyright 1997.
Quotations from Nightingale, F.N. (1992). Notes on nursing: What it is, and what it is not
(Commemorative ed.) were reprinted with permission of J.B. Lippincott. Copyright 1992.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (1987). Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and cri-
tiques were reprinted with permission of W.B. Saunders Company. Copyright 1987.
Quotations and Figures 15–1 and 15–2 from Peplau, H.E., Interpersonal relations in nursing
were reprinted with permission of Springer Publishing Company. Copyright 1991 by
Springer Publishing Company.
Quotations and Figure 10–1 from Roy, C., & Andrews, H.A. (1999). The Roy adaptation
model (2nd ed.) were reprinted with permission of Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River,
N.J. Copyright 1999.
Quotations from Roy, C., & Roberts, S.L. (1981). Theory construction in nursing: An adap-
tation model were reprinted with permission of Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Copyright 1981.
Quotations from King, I.M. (1990). Health as the goal for nursing. Nursing Science
Quarterly, 3, 125, 127–128. Copyright 1990 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permission
of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from King, I.M. (1992). King’s theory of goal attainment, Nursing Science
Quarterly, 5, 19–22, 24. Copyright 1992 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from King, I.M. (1996). The theory of goal attainment in research and practice.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 9, 61–66. Copyright 1996 by Sage Publications. Permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from King, I.M. (1997). Reflections on the past and a vision for the future.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 15–17. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from King, I.M. (1997). King’s theory of goal attainment in practice. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 10, 180–185. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Levine, M.E. (1996). The conservation principles: A retrospective. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 9, 38–41. Copyright 1996 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Neuman, B.M. (1990). Health as a continuum based on the Neuman
Systems model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 129–131.
Quotations from Neuman, B. Chadwick, P.L., Beynon, C.E., Craig, D.M., Fawcett, J., Chang,
N.J., Freese, B.T., & Hinton-Walker, P. (1997). The Neuman Systems Model: Reflections and
projections. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 18–21. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications.
Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Newman, M.A. (1990). Newman’s theory of health as praxis. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 3, 37–41. Copyright 1990 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permission
of Sage Publications, Inc.
Table 12–1 was adapted from Newman, M.A. (1990). Newman’s theory of health as praxis.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 39. Copyright 1990 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page xi
CREDITS xi
Quotations from Newman, M.A. (1997). Evolution of the theory of health as expanding con-
sciousness. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 22–25. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications.
Permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Orem, D.E. (1997). Views of human beings specific to nursing. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 10, 26–31. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (1990). Health: A personal commitment. Nursing Science
Quarterly, 3, 136–140. Copyright 1990 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (1990). Parse’s research methodology with an illustration of the
lived experience for hope. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 9–17. Copyright 1990 by Sage
Publications. Permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (1992). Human becoming. Parse’s theory of nursing. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 5, 35–42. Copyright 1992 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permission
of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Parse, R.R. (1997). The human becoming theory: The was, is, and will be.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 32–38. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Peplau, H.E. (1992). Interpersonal relations: A theoretical framework for
application in nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 13–18. Copyright 1992 by
Sage Publications. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Peplau, H.E. (1997). Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 10, 162–167. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Rogers, M.E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age, Nursing Science
Quarterly, 5, 27–33. Copyright 1992 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Roy, C. (1988). An explication of the philosophical assumptions of the Roy
Adaptation Model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 26–34. Copyright 1988 by Sage
Publications. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Artinian, N.T., & Roy, C. (1990). Strengthening the Roy adaptation model
through conceptual clarification. Commentary [Artinian] and response [Roy]. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 3, 60–66. Copyright 1990 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Roy, C. (1997). Future of the Roy model: Challenge to redefine adaptation.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 42–48. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Frederickson, K., & Williams, J.K. (1997). Nursing theory–guided practice:
The Roy adaptation model and patient/family experiences. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10,
53–54. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Watson, J. (1988). New dimensions of human caring theory. Nursing
Science Quarterly, 1, 175–181. Copyright 1988 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage
Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Watson, J. (1997). The theory of human caring: Retrospective and prospec-
tive. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 49–52. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications.
Permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Quotations from Smith, M.C. (1997). Nursing theory-guided practice: Practice guided by
Watson’s theory—The Denver Nursing Project in Human Caring. Nursing Science Quarterly,
10, 56–58. Copyright 1997 by Sage Publications. Permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page xii
Contents
Part one
STRUCTURE AND USE OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE 1
chapter 1 THE STRUCTURE OF CONTEMPORARY
NURSING KNOWLEDGE 3
chapter 2 IMPLEMENTING NURSING MODELS AND
THEORIES IN PRACTICE 31
Part two
ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF CONCEPTUAL
MODELS OF NURSING 49
chapter 3 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
OF NURSING MODELS 51
chapter 4 JOHNSON’S BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODEL 60
chapter 5 KING’S CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM 88
chapter 6 LEVINE’S CONSERVATION MODEL 128
chapter 7 NEUMAN’S SYSTEMS MODEL 166
chapter 8 OREM’S SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK 223
chapter 9 ROGERS’ SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS 315
chapter 10 ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL 364
Part three
ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF NURSING THEORIES 439
chapter 11 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
OF NURSING THEORIES 441
chapter 12 NEWMAN’S THEORY OF HEALTH AS EXPANDING
CONSCIOUSNESS 450
xiii
00Fawcett-FM 09/18/2004 5:26 PM Page xiv
xiv CONTENTS
Part four
NURSING KNOWLEDGE IN THE 21ST CENTURY 587
chapter 17 INTEGRATING NURSING MODELS, THEORIES,
RESEARCH, AND PRACTICE 589
APPENDIX RESOURCES FOR CONCEPTUAL MODELS OF
NURSING AND NURSINGTHORIES 601
INDEX 609
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 1
Part One
STRUCTURE AND
USE OF NURSING
KNOWLEDGE
Chapter 1
The Structure of
Contemporary Nursing
Knowledge
This book celebrates nursing as a distinct discipline, and this chapter lays the
groundwork for the remainder of the book. Here, a structural holarchy of con-
temporary nursing knowledge is identified and described. Each component of
the structure—metaparadigm, philosophies, conceptual models, theories, and
empirical indicators—is defined and its functions are delineated. Then the dis-
tinctions between the components are discussed, with special emphasis on the
differences between conceptual models and theories and the need to view and
use these two knowledge components in different ways.
Overview CONCEPTS
PROPOSITIONS
Nonrelational Proposition
The structural holarchy differentiates the various com-
Relational Proposition
ponents of contemporary nursing knowledge according
METAPARADIGM
to their level of abstraction. Drawing from Wilber (1998),
Requirements for a Metaparadigm
the term holarchy, rather than hierarchy, is used to de-
Metaparadigm of Nursing
note components that are whole within themselves but
PHILOSOPHIES
also part of a larger whole. In this case, the larger whole
Philosophies of Nursing
is contemporary nursing knowledge. Thus, each compo-
Reaction World View
nent of contemporary nursing knowledge is a complete
Reciprocal Interaction World View
whole but also part of a larger whole. The components
Simultaneous Action World View
of the structural holarchy of contemporary nursing
Categories of Nursing Knowledge
knowledge are listed here. Each component is defined
CONCEPTUAL MODELS
and described in detail in this chapter.
Conceptual Models of Nursing
THEORIES
Grand Theory
Key Terms Middle-Range Theory
Nursing Theories
STRUCTURAL HOLARCHY OF CONTEMPORARY EMPIRICAL INDICATORS
NURSING KNOWLEDGE
3
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 4
FUNCTIONS OF A METAPARADIGM
Empirical Indicators1...n Most Concrete
Articulation of the metaparadigm brings a certain unity to
FIG. 1–1. The structural holarchy of contemporary nursing a discipline. In particular, specification of the concepts and
knowledge: components and levels of abstraction. propositions that represent the subject matter of a disci-
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 5
pline permits the members of that discipline to communi- encompasses diverse philosophies and conceptual models.
cate to members of other disciplines and to the general Thorne and colleagues’ (1998) comments reflect support
public what is of special interest to that discipline. In other for the third requirement. They stated, “We believe that
words, the members of the discipline can say, “This is who our central concepts ought to be characterized by para-
we are and what our work is all about.” Similarly, speci- digmatic neutrality” (p. 1265). In contrast, Cody (1996)
fication of the metaparadigm concepts and propositions and Malinski (1996) maintained that the third requirement
facilitates communication of what the discipline is not is not appropriate or even possible. Cody asserted that the
about. Thus, members of the discipline can also say, “This requirement is “an impossibility recognized throughout
is what we are not about.” In addition, the boundary im- post-positivist philosophy of science and the human sci-
posed by the metaparadigm concepts and propositions ence perspectives of hermeneutics and critical theory”
helps the members of the discipline identify the focus of (p. 98). Malinski (1996) pointed out that the metapara-
their knowledge development activities and to have confi- digm of nursing, at least the proposal put forth by Fawcett
dence that what they are doing is, indeed, consistent with (1996), “is reflective of the dominant view in nursing,”
the subject matter of the discipline. Members of the disci- which she labeled as the totality paradigm (p. 101). The dif-
pline then can say, “This is why I am doing what I am ferences of opinion about the requirement of perspective
doing.” neutrality indicate that consensus about the appropriate
The functions of a metaparadigm, then, are to summa- requirements for the metaparadigm of any discipline does
rize the intellectual and social missions of a discipline and not yet exist within nursing.
place a boundary on the subject matter of that discipline
(Kim, 1989, 2000b). Those functions are reflected in four
requirements for a metaparadigm (Fawcett, 1992, 1996.). METAPARADIGM OF NURSING
The four requirements, which pertain to the metapara-
digm of any discipline, are: Origins of the Metaparadigm of Nursing
1. The metaparadigm must identify a domain that is dis-
The notion of a metaparadigm was introduced in the nurs-
tinctive from the domains of other disciplines. That re-
ing literature in the late 1970s, when nursing, as Rawnsley
quirement is fulfilled only when the concepts and
(1996) pointed out, “was struggling to defend its self-
propositions represent a unique perspective for inquiry
nominated status as a science” (p. 102). In 1978, Hardy
and practice.
defined a metaparadigm as “a gestalt … within a disci-
2. The metaparadigm must encompass all phenomena of
pline” (p. 38). Hardy went on to explain that a metapara-
interest to the discipline in a parsimonious manner. That
digm “provides a map which guides the scientist thought
requirement is fulfilled only if the concepts and propo-
the vast, generally incomprehensible world. It gives focus to
sitions are global and if there are no redundancies in
scientific endeavor which would not be present if scientists
concepts or propositions.
were to explore randomly” (p. 38). Hardy likened the meta-
3. The metaparadigm must be perspective neutral. That re-
paradigm to the “prevailing paradigm in a discipline [that]
quirement is fulfilled only if the concepts and proposi-
presents a general orientation … that holds the commit-
tions do not represent a specific perspective, that is, a
ment and consensus of the scientists in a particular disci-
specific paradigm or conceptual model, or a combina-
pline” (p. 39). In 1979, Smith used the term metaparadigm
tion of perspectives.
to refer to a way of organizing and structuring nursing
4. The metaparadigm must be international in scope and
phenomena. Later, Fawcett (1984b) defined the metapara-
substance. That requirement, which is a corollary of the
digm of any discipline as “a statement or group of state-
third requirement, is fulfilled only if the concepts and
ments identifying its relevant phenomena” (p. 84). She
propositions do not reflect particular national, cultural,
claimed that a review of the literature of the time revealed
or ethnic beliefs and values.
“evidence supporting the existence of a metaparadigm of
The requirements indicate that the metaparadigm of any nursing” (p. 84).
discipline must be highly abstract and general; concise
and free of redundant terms; not aligned with a particular
disciplinary frame of reference; and free of particular na- Proposals for the Nursing Metaparadigm
tional, cultural, or ethnic group orientations. Conflicting
opinions have been voiced about the third requirement, Fawcett (1978) initially identified what she called the
which calls for perspective neutrality. That means that the central units of nursing as person, environment, health,
metaparadigm should not embrace a particular philo- and nursing. She then formalized those units as the con-
sophic stance or conceptual model within a discipline that cepts of the metaparadigm of nursing in her article, “The
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 6
Metaparadigm of Nursing: Present Status and Future proposition 2 links the concepts human beings and envi-
Refinements” (Fawcett, 1984b). In her response to ronment. Relational proposition 3 links the concepts
Fawcett’s paper, Brodie (1984) pointed out, “Fawcett’s health and nursing. Relational proposition 4 links the con-
metaparadigm can be viewed as an evolution of a nursing cepts human beings, environment, and health. The rela-
metaparadigm and an organization of the growth of nurs- tional propositions are:
ing knowledge rather than as a completed and finalized
1. The discipline of nursing is concerned with the princi-
product” (p. 87). Indeed, several proposals for different
ples and laws that govern human processes of living and
versions of the nursing metaparadigm have emerged since
dying.
that time. Some of those proposals were in direct response
2. The discipline of nursing is concerned with the pattern-
to Fawcett’s proposal, whereas others were offered without
ing of human health experiences within the context of
reference to Fawcett’s work.
the environment.
3. The discipline of nursing is concerned with the nurs-
The Fawcett Proposal. The metaparadigm of nursing is
ing actions or processes that are beneficial to human
made up of four concepts, four nonrelational propositions,
beings.
and four relational propositions. The four concepts are:
4. The discipline of nursing is concerned with the human
● Human beings processes of living and dying, recognizing that human
● Environment beings are in a continuous relationship with their envi-
● Health ronments.
● Nursing This version of Fawcett’s proposal for the metaparadigm
The nonrelational propositions of the metaparadigm of of nursing represents refinement of earlier versions
nursing, which are constitutive definitions of the meta- (Fawcett, 1984b, 2000). One refinement is the modification
paradigm concepts, are: in the labels for the four metaparadigm concepts. The fre-
quently cited metaparadigm concepts of person, environ-
● The metaparadigm concept of human beings refers to ment, health, and nursing were a modification of labels for
the individuals, if individuals are recognized in a culture, four concepts induced from the conceptual frameworks of
as well as to the families, communities, and other groups baccalaureate programs accredited by the National League
or aggregates who are participants in nursing. for Nursing. The original concepts were labeled man, soci-
● The metaparadigm concept of environment refers to ety, health, and nursing (Yura & Torres, 1975). “Man” was
human beings’ significant others and physical surround- changed to “person” to avoid gender-specific language,
ings, as well as to the settings in which nursing and “society” was changed to “environment” to more fully
occurs, which range from private homes to health-care encompass phenomena relevant to the person (Fawcett,
facilities to society as a whole. The metaparadigm con- 1978). In the current version of the metaparadigm, “per-
cept of environment also refers to all local, regional, son” has been changed to “human beings.” That change was
national, and worldwide cultural, social, political, and made in response to Leininger’s (1991a) argument that the
economic conditions that are associated with human be- concept of person is not a globally understood term. She
ings’ health. stated, “From an anthropological and nursing perspective,
● The metaparadigm concept of health refers to human the use of the term person has serious problems when used
processes of living and dying. transculturally, as many non-Western cultures do not focus
● The metaparadigm concept of nursing refers to the defi- on or believe in the concept person, and often there is no
nition of nursing, the actions taken by nurses on behalf linguistic term for person in a culture, family and institu-
of or in conjunction with human beings, and the goals or tions being more prominent” (pp. 39–40). Furthermore,
outcomes of nursing actions. Nursing actions are viewed the change may address Jacobs’ (2001) charge that “The
as a mutual process between the participants in nursing concept of ‘person’ … is … insufficient to represent all of
and nurses. The process encompasses activities that are nursing’s phenomena, thereby indicating a continued need
frequently referred to as assessment, labeling, planning, for clarification and validation” (pp. 19–20).
intervention, and evaluation. Another refinement is the inclusion of a constitutive
definition for each metaparadigm concept. Continued re-
The relational propositions of the metaparadigm of nurs- finement of the constitutive definitions of the metapara-
ing, which were drawn from work by Donaldson and digm concepts has resulted in the current reference to the
Crowley (1978) and Gortner (1980), assert the linkages human being as a participant in nursing, rather than a
between metaparadigm concepts. Relational proposition 1 recipient of nursing. In keeping with Thorne and col-
links the concepts human beings and health. Relational leagues’ (1998) belief that the central concepts of nursing
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 7
should be characterized by “common currency” (p. 1265), Taken together, the four concepts, the four nonrela-
that change was made to better reflect the contempo- tional propositions, and the four relational propositions
rary emphasis on human beings as active participants in identify the unique focus of the discipline of nursing
the process of nursing, rather than passive recipients of and encompass all relevant phenomena in a parsimonious
pronouncements by and ministrations from nurses. manner. The concepts and propositions are perspective-
Continued refinement also has resulted in an expansion of neutral because they do not reflect a specific philosophic
the constitutive definition for the metaparadigm concept perspective, a specific paradigm, or a specific conceptual
environment. That refinement was made to better reflect model. Furthermore, the metaparadigm concepts and
the multitude of environmental conditions that are rele- propositions do not reflect the beliefs and values of nurses
vant in nursing (Kleffel, 1991). In addition, refinement of from any one country or culture and, therefore, are inter-
the constitutive definitions has resulted in a change in the national in scope and substance.
definition of health from states of wellness and illness to There is, however, some debate about whether the
human processes of living and dying. That change was Fawcett proposal does, indeed, meet the four requirements
made in response to Cody’s (1996) point that Fawcett’s for a metaparadigm. Cody (1996) explicitly rejected the
“view of health as a ‘state’ that can be characterized on a claim that the Fawcett proposal meets the four require-
continuum from ‘high-level wellness to terminal illness’ … ments for a metaparadigm. He maintained that it is unrea-
[implies that] everyone’s health ultimately and unavoid- sonable to believe that “four common, global, disparate
ably reaches abysmal levels in the natural dying process” concepts, all studied by many disciplines, [could] reflect
(p. 98). Other refinements include the formalization of the unique focus of nursing at all, much less ‘parsi-
metaparadigm themes into relational propositions and the moniously’” (p. 97). Continuing, Cody maintained that
addition of the fourth relational proposition. Fawcett’s claim that the four metaparadigm concepts
The current version of the metaparadigm meets the meet the requirement of encompassing all phenomena of
four requirements for a metaparadigm given earlier in this interest to nursing is “manifestly unfounded in light of
chapter. In particular, the four metaparadigm concepts— the many prevalent concepts in nursing that are excluded”
human beings, environment, health, nursing—generally (pp. 97–98). In addition, Cody maintained that it is impos-
are regarded as the central or domain concepts of nursing sible to present a perspective-neutral statement of discipli-
(Flaskerud & Halloran, 1980; Jennings, 1987; Thorne et al., nary phenomena. Inasmuch as Cody most likely does not
1998; Wagner, 1986). Additional support for the centrality recognize a need for a disciplinary metaparadigm, it is not
of the four metaparadigm concepts comes from the suc- surprising that he did not offer an alternative to Fawcett’s
cessful use of those concepts as a schema for analysis of the proposal.
content of conceptual models of nursing and nursing the- Morse (1996) maintained that the four metaparadigm
ories (Fitzpatrick & Whall, 1996; George, 2002; Marriner- concepts in the Fawcett proposal “were—and remain—
Tomey & Alligood, 2002; Parker, 2001). The utility of the inappropriate and restrictive” (p. 78). She did not, however,
four metaparadigm concepts is underscored by their adop- explain in what way the concepts were inappropriate and
tion, with appropriate modifications, as the concepts of the restrictive, nor did she offer a different set of concepts.
metaparadigm of dental hygiene. More specifically, Darby Leininger (1991a) questioned the inclusion of environ-
and Walsh (1994) identified the concepts of the dental ment as a metaparadigm concept. She commented, “While
hygiene metaparadigm as client, environment, health/oral environment is very important to nursing, I would contend
health, and dental hygiene actions. it is certainly not unique to nursing, and there are very few
The relational propositions of the metaparadigm pro- nurses who have advanced formal study and are prepared
vide a unique perspective of the metaparadigm concepts to study a large number of different types of environments
that helps to distinguish nursing from other disciplines. or ecological niches worldwide” (p. 40). Cody (1996) also
Relational propositions 1, 2, and 3 represent recurrent noted that environment is not unique to nursing, because
themes identified in the writings of Florence Nightingale it is studied by other disciplines. Leininger and Cody have
and many other nursing scholars and practitioners of the failed to acknowledge that the point of the inclusion of the
19th and 20th centuries. Donaldson and Crowley (1978) concept environment in Fawcett’s proposal for the meta-
commented, “These themes suggest boundaries of an area paradigm was to provide a context for human beings, to in-
for systematic [i]nquiry and theory development with po- dicate that participants in nursing actions are surrounded
tential for making the nature of the discipline of nursing by and interact or engage in mutual process with other
more explicit than it is at present” (p. 113). Relational people and the social structure.
proposition 4, according to Donaldson and Crowley Although Leininger (1991a) did not reject the inclusion
(1978), “evolve[d] from the practical aim of optimizing of of health as a metaparadigm concept, she did point out
human environments for health” (p. 119). that the concept is not unique to nursing, because many
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 8
disciplines study health. Cody (1996) also pointed out that maintained that nursing should remain a part of the meta-
health is studied by many other disciplines. Several schol- paradigm. They stated, “We contend that the term ‘nursing’
ars have addressed the metaparadigm concept of nursing. ought to remain prominent in our lexicon, whatever addi-
Their comments indicate that the inclusion of this con- tional terms we use to qualify it, and that its essence retain
cept does not meet the requirement of a metaparadigm for the notion of an expert service that we can offer to indi-
parsimony. Conway (1985, 1989) responded directly to viduals and society” (p. 1265).
Fawcett’s (1984) initial presentation of the metaparadigm
of nursing. She claimed that the term “nursing” represents The Newman Proposal. Newman (1983) proposed that
the discipline or the profession and is not an appropri- the term “client” be one of four concepts that make up
ate metaparadigm concept because it creates a tautology. the domain of nursing, or what she called the nursing
Rawnsley (1996), who agreed with Conway’s position, ex- paradigm. Elaborating, she stated, “The phenomena of
plained, “The rationale, or perhaps the rationalization, that our concern—the major components of the nursing
[the] inclusion [of nursing] within the metaparadigm paradigm—are nursing (as an action), client (human
refers primarily to nursing actions and activities rather being), environment (of the client and of the nurse-client),
than to a holistic worldview is simply unacceptable. Such a and health” (p. 388). Newman also offered what can be
myopic view of our discipline only reinforces reductionist considered a relational proposition for her version of the
themes that have too long stymied creative scientific break- nursing metaparadigm: “The nurse interacts with the client
throughs” (p. 104). and the environment for the purpose of facilitating the
Leininger (1988) also rejected the metaparadigm con- health of the client” (p. 388). Despite its merits, Newman’s
cept of nursing in Fawcett’s proposal. She commented, proposal is not completely perspective-neutral, in that the
“[I] reject the idea that nursing … explain[s] nursing, for concept of client reflects a particular view of human be-
one cannot explain nor predict the same phenomenon one ings. Indeed, Levine (1996) maintained that “client” means
is studying. Nursing is the phenomenon to be explained” “follower,” which is not an appropriate perspective for par-
(p. 154). Adding to her position in a later publication, ticipants in nursing processes.
Leininger (1991b) noted, “Nursing cannot be logically used
to explain and predict nursing. The [concept] is a redun- The King Proposal. King’s (1984) review of the philoso-
dancy and a contradiction to explain the same phenome- phies of a representative sample of National League for
non being studied by the same concept” (p. 152). Nursing accredited nursing education programs in the
Cody (1996) and Meleis (1997) also regarded the inclu- United States revealed nine concepts: man, health, environ-
sion of nursing in the metaparadigm of nursing as a tau- ment, social systems, role, perceptions, interpersonal rela-
tology. Meleis commented, “It would be an instance of tions, nursing, and God. King found that not all nine
tautological conceptualizing to define nursing by all the concepts were evident in the philosophies of all schools
concepts and then include nursing as one of the concepts” included in the sample. She recommended that the most
(p. 106). Cody (1996) asserted, “One could hardly ask for a frequently cited concepts could represent the domain of
better textbook example of a tautology” (p. 98). nursing. Those concepts are man, health, role, and social
Kolcaba and Kolcaba (1991) rejected the charge of a systems.
tautology. They noted that, inasmuch as the metaparadigm King’s proposal falls short of meeting all requirements
concept of nursing stands for nursing activities or actions, for a metaparadigm. First, the inclusion of role and social
a tautology is not created. Furthermore, other scholars systems reflects a sociologic orientation to nursing.
view nursing as a distinct phenomenon of interest to the Second, the elimination of environment and nursing re-
discipline. Kim (1987) identified nursing as a component sults in a narrow view of the domain, and leaves a list of
of two domains of nursing knowledge. She regarded nurs- concepts more closely aligned with the discipline of social
ing as the central feature of the practice domain and as an work (Ben-Sira, 1987) than with nursing.
essential component of the client-nurse domain. In addi-
tion, Barnum (1998) identified nursing acts as a common- The Kim Proposal. Kim (1987, 1997, 2000b) identified
place, that is, a topic addressed by most nursing theories; four domains of nursing knowledge. The client domain is
Newman (1983) included nursing as an action in her list of concerned with the client’s essential characteristics, patho-
nursing metaparadigm concepts; and King (1984) found logic or abnormal deviations from normal patterns of
that nursing was a central concept in the philosophies of healthy living, and experiences in the health-care system.
nursing education of several nursing education programs. Kim (2000a) has proposed that the client domain be
That finding suggests that the concept nursing is an im- viewed as human living, which she conceptualized within
portant concept that should be included in the metapara- three dimensions: living of oneself, living with others,
digm. Furthermore, Thorne and her colleagues (1998) and living in situations. She explained, “By orienting its
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 9
mission to clients’ living rather than limiting its focus perspective. Moreover, although Newman et al. (1991) of-
to clients’ states, nursing can clarify its distinctive role fered their proposition as a single statement that integrates
within the community of healthcare providers, formulate “concepts commonly identified with nursing at the meta-
client-centered outcomes that are uniquely related to its paradigm level” (p. 3), and they identified the metapara-
knowledge-based practice, and ensure public recognition digm concepts as person, environment, health, and
of its distinctive professional contribution in healthcare” nursing, their proposition does not include environment.
(Kim, 2000a, p. 38). In an attempt to clarify their position, Newman, Sime, and
The client-nurse domain focuses on direct contacts, Corcoran-Perry (1992) later stated, “We view the concept
communication, and interactions between the client and of environment as inherent in and inseparable from the in-
the nurse. The practice domain emphasizes the cognitive, tegrated focus of caring in the human health experience”
behavioral, social, and ethical aspects of professional nurs- (p. vii). Despite that clarification, their proposal is neither
ing actions and activities performed in relation to patient sufficiently comprehensive nor perspective-neutral.
care. The environment domain focuses on the physical,
social, and symbolic boundaries of the client’s environ- The Malloch, Martinez, Nelson, Predeger, Speakman,
ment. Steinbinder, and Tracy Proposal. Malloch, Martinez,
Hinshaw (1987) pointed out that Kim’s (1987) pro- Nelson, Predeger, Speakman, Steinbinder, and Tracy (1992)
posal work did not include the concept of health, and suggested a revision of the Newman, Sime, and Corcoran-
asked: “Is health a strand that permeates each of the … Perry (1991) statement. Their focus statement is: “Nursing
domains … rather than a major separate domain?” is the study and practice of caring within contexts of the
(p. 112). Kim (personal communication, October 31, 1986) human health experience” (p. vi). Malloch and her col-
indicated that the client domain could encompass health. leagues (1992) maintained that their statement extends the
In the most recent version of her proposal, Kim (2000b) focus of the discipline to nursing practice and incorporates
has explicitly identified health within the client domain. the environment by the use of the term contexts. They
She explained, “In a holistic posture, phenomena in the noted that environment “includes, but is not limited to,
domain of client are conceptualized as systems of inter- culture, community, and ecology” (p. vi). Moreover, they
linked elements, either with respect to the nature of human claimed that the use of the term caring brings unity to the
beings or to that of health” (p. 61). Kim’s proposal may metaparadigm concepts of person, environment, health,
be regarded as an informative explication of the discipline and nursing. Apparently, they do not regard caring as a
of nursing. However, her use of the term client for a do- particular perspective of nursing. Thus, although the
main of the discipline introduces a particular perspec- Malloch et al. proposal is sufficiently comprehensive, it is
tive, as noted earlier in the discussion of the Newman not perspective neutral.
proposal. Her recent focus on human living may reflect
her recognition of that problem and represent an attempt The Leininger, Watson, and Lewis Proposals. Leininger
at perspective-neutrality. Rawnsley (2000), however, (1995) asserted, “With transcultural nurse knowledge and
pointed out that Kim’s descriptions of the processes within consumer demands, many nurses are recognizing that
each of the dimensions of human living reflect a particular human care, health, and environmental cultural context
perspective. must become the central focus, essence, and dominant do-
mains of nursing knowledge to replace the ‘Eastern’ four
The Newman, Sime, and Corcoran-Perry Proposal. concept metaparadigm” (p. 97). In setting the stage for her
Newman, Sime, and Corcoran-Perry (1991) claimed that proposal, Leininger charged that “a small group of ‘Eastern’
the focus of the discipline of nursing is summarized in the USA nurse researchers … declared in nursing publications
following statement: “Nursing is the study of caring in the that nursing’s major foci or ‘metaparadigm’ for the disci-
human health experience” (p. 3). In a later publication, pline … would be health, nursing, person, and environ-
they asserted, “The theme of caring is sufficiently domi- ment. It was quite clear to me that these nurses blatantly
nant, when combined with the theme of the human health failed to recognize [that] human care, caring, and cultural
experience, to be considered as the focus of the discipline” factors were important phenomena of nursing. It appeared
(Newman, Sime, & Corcoran-Perry, 1992, p. vii). to me and other care scholars that this small elite group
Despite Newman and colleagues’ (1992) claims to the was lobbying against the rapidly growing interest in care
contrary, their proposition represents just one frame of ref- and transcultural nursing” (p. 96). Leininger’s charge re-
erence for nursing and for health. In fact, Newman and her garding lobbying against her ideas by a small, elite group of
colleagues (1991) ended their initial treatise by maintain- “Eastern” nurses has no basis—none of the discussions of
ing that caring in the human health experience can be most the metaparadigm concepts have included negative com-
fully elaborated only through a unitary-transformative ments about caring or transcultural nursing.
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 10
In another publication, Leininger (1990) claimed that The Meleis Proposal. Meleis (1997) proposed that the
“human care/caring [is] the central phenomenon and central concepts of nursing are nursing client, transitions,
essence of nursing” (p. 19) and Watson (1990) maintained interaction, nursing process, environment, nursing thera-
that “human caring needs to be explicitly incorporated peutics, and health. She explained, “The nurse interacts
into nursing’s metaparadigm” (p. 21). Even more to the (interaction) with a human being in a health/illness situa-
point, Leininger (1991a) maintained: “Care is the essence tion (nursing client) who is in an integral part of his soci-
of nursing and the central, dominant, and unifying focus of ocultural context (environment) and who is in some sort
nursing” (p. 35). She also has claimed that “human care of transition or is anticipating a transition (transition); the
and caring [are] the central, distinct, and dominant foci to nurse/patient interactions are organized around some
explain, interpret, and predict nursing as a discipline and purpose (nursing process, problem solving, holistic assess-
profession” (Leininger, 2002, p. 47). Lewis (2003) asserted, ment, or caring actions) and the nurse uses some actions
“I believe that caring and healing are core processes of (nursing therapeutics) to enhance, bring about, or facilitate
nursing” (p. 37). She went on to explain that she regards health (health)” (p. 106). Meleis and Trangenstein (1994)
caring as “being with others” (p. 37). and Schumacher and Meleis (1994) highlighted the im-
Both Leininger and Watson failed to acknowledge that portance and centrality of the concept transitions. In par-
although the term caring is included in several conceptual- ticular, Meleis and Trangenstein (1994) maintained that
izations of the discipline of nursing (Morse, Solberg, “the transition experience of clients, families, communi-
Neander, Bottorff, & Johnson, 1990), it is not a dominant ties, nurses, and organizations, with health and well-being
theme in every conceptualization and, therefore, does not as a goal and an outcome, meets … the criteria … of an or-
represent a discipline-wide viewpoint (Wilson, 1994). ganizing concept that allows for a variety of viewpoints
Indeed, caring reflects a particular view of nursing and a and theories within the discipline of nursing, … [is] not
particular kind of nursing (Eriksson, 1989). Lewis (2003) culture bound, and … should help in identifying the focus
acknowledged that point by explaining, “The frame of of the discipline” (p. 255).
reference that guides my thinking is aligned with the Although Meleis’ proposal is meritorious, the inclusion
unitary-transformative perspective (Newman, Sime, & of nursing process, nursing therapeutics, and interactions
Corcoran-Perry, 1991)” (p. 37). Furthermore, as Swanson represents a redundancy that can be avoided by use of the
(1991) pointed out, although there may be “characteristic single concept, nursing. The inclusion of transitions re-
behavior patterns that are universal expressions of nurse flects a particular perspective of human life. Indeed, Meleis
caring … caring is not uniquely a nursing phenomenon” and Trangenstein (1994) referred to their discussion of
(p. 165). Lewis (2003) has attempted to identify the unique transitions as a “conceptual framework” (p. 258).
features or characteristics of caring as being in nursing.
She identified four pathways—honoring one another The Parse Proposal. Parse (1997) asserted, “The core focus
through artistic endeavors, moving beyond ourselves of nursing, the metaparadigm, is the human-universe-
through caring relationships and spirituality, being health process” (p. 74). She went on to explain that the
grounded in our healing environment, and soulful caring “hyphens between the words create a … construct incar-
consciousness—as the “ubiquitous or unique nature of nating the notion that the study of nursing is the science of
caring as being” (p 38). the human-universe-health process. Consequently, all
Caring behaviors, moreover, may not be generalizable nursing knowledge is in some way concerned with this
across national and cultural boundaries (Mandelbaum, phenomenon” (p. 74).
1991). And, as Rogers (1992) asserted, “As such, caring does Parse’s proposal has merit in that her use of the term
not identify nurses any more than it identifies workers universe extends the environment far beyond the immedi-
from another field. Everyone needs to care” (p. 33). Rogers ate surroundings of human beings and the settings in
(1994b) went on to say, “I don’t think nurses care any more which nursing occurs. However, her proposal does not
than anybody else, or that it’s a characteristic any more pe- explicitly name nursing as a concept of the metapara-
culiar to nursing than to any other field. [But caring] does digm. That omission is a problem in that many disciplines
differ among different groups … It is the body of knowl- could be interested in humans, the universe, and health.
edge about the phenomenon of concern that determines Furthermore, the meaning Parse ascribed to the hyphens
the nature of the caring that one is going to demonstrate” used reflects a particular perspective of the named phe-
(p. 34). Elaborating, Rogers (1994a) added, “Caring is nomenon. That is, humans, the universe, and health must
doing, it is practice. Caring is a way of using knowledge” be viewed as unitary.
(p. 7). Viewed from a different vantage point, Roper (1994)
commented, “I consider that ‘care’ is implicit in ‘nursing’ The Thorne, Canam, Dahinten, Hall, Henderson, and
and therefore ‘nursing care’ is a tautology” (p. 460). Kirkham Proposal. Thorne, Canam, Dahinten, Hall,
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 11
Henderson, and Kirkham (1998) presented a proposal for and substantial contribution?” (p. 89). Her question has
the metaparadigm of nursing that encompasses the four never been explicitly answered. Apparently, nurses have as-
metaparadigm concepts of human beings, environment, sumed that Donaldson and Crowley’s (1978) claim that
health, and nursing but describes those concepts differ- nursing is a professional discipline was enhanced by the
ently. Their proposal states: “Nursing is the study of human claim of a formal metaparadigm.
health and illness processes. Nursing practice is facilitating, Contemporary scholars are, however, raising questions
supporting and assisting individuals, families, communi- with regard to the need for a metaparadigm of nursing.
ties, and/or societies to enhance, maintain and recover Rawnsley (1996) acknowledged that although “the word
health, and to reduce and ameliorate the effects of illness. metaparadigm will not easily disappear from nursing’s
Nursing’s relational practice and science are directed to- lexicon,” nurses should demythologize the power of the
ward the explicit outcome of health related quality of life metaparadigm over nursing science (p. 105). Cody (1996)
within the immediate and larger environmental contexts” implied that there is no need for a metaparadigm of nurs-
(p. 12 of on-line full text version of manuscript). ing. He claimed, “There is no way to circumscribe all of
Thorne, Canam, Dahinten, Hall, Henderson, and nursing without leaving some nurses out” (p. 99). Instead,
Kirkham regard their statement as a perspective-neutral he urged each nurse to be responsible for “identifying the
proposal that represents a “common core of purpose” nature and parameters of his or her own view” (p. 99). It is
(p. 12 of on-line full text version of manuscript). Certainly unclear how such an essentially anarchistic view would
their proposal has merit, although it does not overcome serve the discipline as a whole. Malinski (1996) also advo-
objections to an inclusion of individuals and also raises cated for elimination of the basic idea of a nursing meta-
questions about whether the inclusion of the terms, health paradigm. She asserted, “Perhaps it is time to drop the
and illness, reflect a particular perspective of health, such metaparadigm entirely. The desire to identify some grand,
as health as dichotomous with illness. unifying schema for all of nursing is no longer warranted”
(p. 100). Malinski went on to point out that given the di-
The Jacobs Proposal. Jacobs (2001) proposed that “the versity of contemporary views of nursing, a nursing meta-
central phenomenon of nursing is not health or some sort paradigm would have to be “so broad and general as to be
of restoration of holistic balance and harmony but respect relatively meaningless in terms of defining the scope of
of human dignity” (p. 26). Elaborating, she stated, “The nursing and providing direction for all of its members”
central phenomenon [of nursing] is the respect for or the (p. 100). Cody’s and Malinski’s comments suggest that they
restoration of human dignity, our being in community, our may have failed to fully appreciate the global nature of a
sea, our moral imperative” (p. 33). One could argue that re- metaparadigm and the necessity of some means of dis-
spect for human dignity is perspective-neutral and inter- tinguishing one discipline from another, if for no other
national in scope and substance, but it is not necessarily reason than to create manageable units with institutions
unique to nursing nor does this single idea encompasses all of higher learning, and organize funding agencies and
phenomena of interest to the nursing discipline. scholarly societies.
Kim (2000b) has offered a stronger rationale for a meta-
The merits of the various proposals for the nursing paradigm of nursing than manageable units and organiza-
metaparadigm deserve attention from all nurses, and tion of agencies and societies. She pointed out that the
they should not be regarded as premature closure on an ex- metaparadigm of nursing is the way in which the profes-
planation of phenomena of interest to the discipline of sional discipline of nursing delineates and makes public its
nursing. It is anticipated that modifications in the meta- particular nature and distinguishes itself from the natural,
paradigm concepts and propositions will continue to be social, and human sciences. Kim also pointed out that pub-
offered as the discipline of nursing evolves. All nurses are lic articulation of the metaparadigm of nursing is neces-
urged to offer their proposals so that members of the dis- sary because the metaparadigm serves as the primary guide
cipline and the public will better understand what the field for the development of nursing knowledge.
of nursing encompasses and how what is studied guides
practice. Modifications must, however, fulfill the four re-
quirements for a metaparadigm. PHILOSOPHIES
Contemporary Issues Related The second component of the structural holarchy of con-
to the Metaparadigm of Nursing temporary nursing knowledge is the PHILOSOPHY (see
Fig. 1–1). A philosophy may be defined as a statement en-
Many years ago, Brodie (1984) asked, “To whom in the dis- compassing ontological claims about the phenomena of cen-
cipline of nursing will the metaparadigm make a valued tral interest to a discipline, epistemic claims about how those
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 12
phenomena come to be known, and ethical claims about what nursing reflect one or more of three contrasting world
the members of a discipline value. views: the reaction world view, the reciprocal interaction
world view, and the simultaneous action world View
(Fawcett, 1993b.). Those three world views emerged from
FUNCTION OF A PHILOSOPHY an analysis of five other sets of world views: mechanism
and organicism (Ackoff, 1974; Reese & Overton, 1970);
Philosophies are directed at discovery of knowledge and change and persistence (Hall, 1981, 1983; Thomae, 1979;
truth, as well as the identification of what is valuable and Wells & Stryker, 1988); totality and simultaneity (Parse,
important to members of a discipline; philosophic prob- 1987); particulate-deterministic, interactive-integrative,
lems focus on the nature of existence, knowledge, morality, and unitary-transformative (Newman, 1992); and heuris-
reason, and human purpose (McEwen, 2002). The function tic and complementarity (Rawnsley, 2003). The different
of a philosophy, then, is to communicate what the mem- world views lead to different conceptualizations of the
bers of a discipline believe to be true in relation to the phe- metaparadigm concepts, different statements about the
nomena of interest to that discipline, what they believe nature of the relations between those metaparadigm con-
about the development of knowledge about those phe- cepts (Altman & Rogoff, 1987), and different ways to gen-
nomena, and what they value with regard to their actions erate and test knowledge about the concepts and their
and practices (Kim, 1989; Salsberry, 1994; Seaver & connections.
Cartwright, 1977). In other words, the function of each
philosophy is to inform the members of disciplines and the
public about the beliefs and values of a particular disci- Reaction World View
pline.
This world view, which contains elements of the mechanis-
tic, persistence, totality, and particulate-deterministic
world views, has these features:
PHILOSOPHIES OF NURSING
● Humans are bio-psycho-social-spiritual beings. The
Grace (2002) pointed out that philosophies of nursing “at- metaphor is the compartmentalized human being, who
tempt to answer the question, ‘What is nursing?’ as well as is viewed as the sum of discrete biological, psychological,
a related significant question—‘Why is nursing important sociological, and spiritual parts.
to human beings?’” (p. 64). In particular, philosophies of ● Human beings react to external environmental stimuli
nursing encompass ontological and epistemic claims in a linear, causal manner. Human beings are regarded
about the phenomena of interest to the discipline of nurs- as inherently at rest, responding in a reactive manner to
ing and ethical claims about nursing actions, nursing external environmental stimuli. Behavior is considered
practices, and the character of individuals who choose to a linear chain of causes and effects, or stimuli and reac-
practice nursing (Salsberry, 1994). Ontological claims ad- tions.
dress “the totality of assumptions about the nature of ● Change occurs only for survival and as a consequence of
the world or the portion of reality in question … [that is,] predictable and controllable antecedent conditions.
the nature of being” (Young, Taylor, & McLaughlin- Change occurs only when human beings must modify
Renpenning, 2001, p. 9). The ontological claims in philoso- behaviors to survive. Consequently, stability is valued.
phies of nursing state what is believed about the nature of Threats to stability are, however, predictable and con-
human beings, the environment, health, and nursing. trollable if enough is known about the stimuli that
Epistemic claims address “knowledge itself: what is it, what would force a change.
its properties are, and why it has these properties. [These ● Only objective phenomena that can be isolated, observed,
claims focus on] answers about the properties of truth defined, and measured are studied. Knowledge is devel-
and falsity, the nature of evidence, and the certainty that oped only about objective, quantifiable phenomena that
evidence produces in scientific knowledge” (Young et al., can be isolated and observed, defined in a concrete man-
2001, p. 10). Epistemic claims in philosophies of nursing ner, and measured by objective instruments.
provide “some information on how one may come to learn
about the world [and] about how the basic phenomena
can be known” (Salsberry, 1994, p. 13). Epistemic claims in Reciprocal Interaction World View
nursing extend the ontological claims by directing how
knowledge about human beings, the environment, health, This world view, which is a synthesis of elements from the
and nursing is developed. organismic, simultaneity, totality, change, persistence, and
Ontological and epistemic claims in philosophies of interactive-integrative world views, has these features:
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 13
knowledge” (Johnson, 1974, p. 376). Each category, then, opment and growth” (Chin, 1980, p. 32), and may be
emphasizes different phenomena and leads to different viewed as (a) a natural component of human beings un-
questions about nursing situations. Consequently, each dergoing change, (b) a coping response to new situations
category fosters development of a different body of knowl- and environmental factors that leads to growth and de-
edge about human beings, the environment, health, and velopment, or (c) internal tensions within a human
nursing. The characteristics of each category of knowledge being that at some time reach a peak and cause a disrup-
are summarized in the following paragraphs. tion that leads to further growth and development.
● Human beings are assumed to have the inherent poten-
Developmental Category of Knowledge. The origin of tial for change; potentiality may be overt or latent, trig-
this category of knowledge is the discipline of psychology. gered by internal states or certain environmental
In this category: conditions.
● Identification of actual and potential developmental
problems and delineation of intervention strategies that Systems Category of Knowledge. The origins of this
foster maximum growth and development of people and category of knowledge are the disciplines of biology and
their environments are emphasized. physics. In this category:
● Processes of growth, development, and maturation also
are emphasized. ● Identification of actual and potential problems in the
● Change is the major focus, with the assumption made function of systems and delineation of intervention
“that there are noticeable differences between the states strategies that maximize efficient and effective system
of a system at different times, that the succession of these operation is emphasized; change is of secondary impor-
states implies the system is heading somewhere, and that tance.
there are orderly processes that explain how the system ● A system is defined as “a set of objects together with re-
gets from its present state to wherever it is going” (Chin, lationships between the objects and between their attrib-
1980, p. 30). utes” (Hall & Fagen, 1968, p. 83).
● Changes are regarded as directional—the individuals, ● Phenomena are treated “as if there existed organization,
groups, situations, and events of interest are headed in interaction, interdependency, and integration of parts
some direction. The direction of change is: “(a) some and elements” (Chin, 1980, p. 24).
goal or end state (developed, mature), (b) the process ● Systems are viewed as open or closed. An open system
of becoming (developing, maturing), or (c) the degree of “maintains itself in a continuous inflow and outflow, a
achievement toward some goal or end state (increased building up and breaking down of components,”
development, increase in maturity)” (Chin, 1980, p. 31). [whereas a closed system is] “considered to be isolated
● Different states of human beings are examined over from [its] environment” (von Bertalanffy, 1968, p. 39).
time. Those states frequently are termed stages, levels, Open systems continuously import energy in a process
phases, or periods of development; they may be quanti- called negative entropy or negentropy, so that the system
tatively or qualitatively differentiated from one another. may become more differentiated, more complex, and
Shifts in state may be either small, nondiscernible steps more ordered. Conversely, closed systems exhibit en-
that eventually are recognized as change, or sudden, cat- tropy, such that they move toward increasing disorder.
aclysmic changes (Chin, 1980). All living organisms are open systems (von Bertalanffy,
● Developmental change is thought to be possible through 1968). Although closed systems therefore do not exist in
four different forms of progression: (1) unidirectional nature, it sometimes is convenient to view a system as if
development may be postulated, such that “once a stage it did not interact with its environment (Chin, 1980).
is worked through, the client system shows continued The artificiality of that view, however, must be taken into
progression and normally never turns back;” (2) devel- account.
opmental change may take the form of a spiral, so that ● Environment is defined as “The set of all objects a
although return to a previous problem may occur, the change in whose attributes affects the system and also
problem is dealt with at a higher level; (3) development those objects whose attributes are changed by the behav-
may be seen as “phases which occur and recur … where ior of the system” (Hall & Fagen, 1968, p. 83).
no chronological priority is assigned to each state; there ● The boundary is the line of demarcation between a sys-
are cycles;” or (4) development may take the form of “a tem and its environment, “the line forming a closed
branching out into differentiated forms and processes, circle around selected variables, where there is less inter-
each part increasing in its specialization and at the same change of energy … across the line of the circle than
time acquiring its own autonomy and significance” within the delimiting circle” (Chin, 1980, p. 24). The
(Chin, 1980, pp. 31–32). placement of the boundary must take all relevant system
● Forces are regarded as “causal factors producing devel- parts into account. Boundaries may be thought of as
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 15
more or less permeable. The greater the boundary per- and experience of phenomena—depend on meanings
meability, the greater the interchange of energy between attached to those phenomena. The meanings, or defini-
the system and its environment. tions of the situation, determine how human beings be-
● Tension, stress, strain, and conflict are the forces that have in a given situation. Human beings actively set goals
alter system structure. The differences in system parts, as based on their perceptions of the relevant factors in a
well as the need to adjust to outside disturbances, lead to given situation, which are derived from social interac-
different amounts of tension within the system (Chin, tions with others.
1980). Internal tensions arising from the system’s struc- ● Communication is through language, “a system of sig-
tural arrangements are called the stresses and strains of nificant symbols” (Heiss, 1981, p. 5). Communication,
the system (Chin, 1980). Conflict occurs when tensions therefore, involves the transfer of arbitrary meanings of
accumulate and become opposed along the lines of two things from one human being to another. Human beings
or more components of the system. Change then occurs are thought to actively evaluate communication from
to resolve the conflict. others, rather than passively accept their ideas.
● Systems are assumed to tend to move toward a balance ● Roles are “prescriptions for behavior which are associ-
between internal and external forces. “When the balance ated with particular actor-other combinations … the
is thought of as a fixed point or level, it is called ‘equilib- ways we think people of a particular kind ought to act to-
rium.’ ‘Steady state,’ on the other hand, is the term … ward various categories of others” (Heiss, 1981, p. 65).
used to describe the balanced relationship of parts that is Each human being has many different roles, each one
not dependent upon any fixed equilibrium point or providing a behavioral repertoire. Human beings adopt
level” (Chin, 1980, p. 25). Steady state, which also is re- the behaviors associated with a given role, when, through
ferred to as a dynamic equilibrium, is characteristic of communication, they determine that a given role is
living open systems and is maintained by a continuous called for in a particular situation.
flow of energy within the system and between the system ● Self-concept is defined as “the individual’s thoughts and
and its environment (von Bertalanffy, 1968). feelings about him[her]self ” (Heiss, 1981, p. 83). An im-
● Feedback is the flow of energy between a system and its portant aspect of self-concept is self-evaluation, which
environment. Systems “are affected by and in turn affect refers to “our view of how good we are at what we think
the environment. While affecting the environment, a we are” (Heiss, 1981, p. 83).
process we call output, systems gather information about
how they are doing. Such information is then fed back Needs Category of Knowledge. This category:
into the system as input to guide and steer its operations”
(Chin, 1980, p. 27). The feedback process works so that, ● Focuses on nurses’ functions and consideration of the
as open systems interact with their environments, any patient in terms of a hierarchy of needs. When patients
change in the system is associated with a change in the cannot fulfill their own needs, nursing is required. The
environment, and vice versa. function of the nurse is to provide the necessary action
to help patients meet their needs. The human being is re-
duced to a set of needs, and nursing is reduced to a set of
Interaction Category of Knowledge. The origin of this
functions. Nurses are portrayed as the final decision
category of knowledge is symbolic interactionism, from
makers for nursing practice (Meleis, 1997).
the discipline of sociology. Symbolic interactionism views
human beings “as creatures who define and classify situa-
tions, including themselves, and who choose ways of acting Outcomes Category of Knowledge. In this category:
toward and within them” (Benoliel, 1977, p. 110), and ● Emphasis is placed on the outcomes of nursing practice
“postulates that the importance of social life lies in pro- and comprehensive descriptions of the recipient of that
viding [human beings] with language, self-concept, role- practice (Meleis, 1997).
taking ability, and other skills” (Heiss, 1976, p. 467). In this
category: Client-Focused Category of Knowledge. This category:
● Identification of actual and potential problems in inter- ● Refers to a comprehensive focus on the client as viewed
personal relationships and delineation of intervention from a nursing perspective (Meleis, 1997).
strategies that promote optimal socialization are empha-
sized. Person-Environment-Focused Category of Knowledge.
● Social acts and relationships between human beings are In this category:
also emphasized.
● The human being’s perceptions of other people, the en- ● Emphasis is placed on the relationships between clients
vironment, situations, and events—that is, the awareness and their environments (Meleis, 1997).
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 16
Nursing Therapeutics Category of Knowledge. In this The ethical claims in philosophies of nursing address the
category: values “that guide the nurse’s relationship with patients/
clients, … the character of the persons entering and re-
● Emphasis is placed on what nurses should do and under maining in the field of nursing … [and] the values that reg-
what circumstances they should act (Meleis, 1997). ulate nursing practice” (Salsberry, 1994, p. 18). Ethical
claims in nursing are summarized in the dominant col-
Energy Fields Category of Knowledge. This category:
lective philosophy of humanism (Gortner, 1990), which
● Incorporates the concept of energy (Marriner-Tomey, emphasizes “humanistic (moral) values of caring and the
1989), and focuses on human beings as energy fields in promotion of individual welfare and rights” (Fry, 1981,
constant interaction with their environment or the uni- p. 5). Ethical claims in nursing also articulate values about
verse (Hickman, 1995). “the treatment of others,” including the respect that should
be accorded human beings “simply for what they are,” val-
Intervention Category of Knowledge. This category: ues about consideration of human dignity when engaging
in nursing practice, values about caring, values about au-
● Emphasizes the nurse’s professional actions and deci- tonomy, values about the rights of people to health care,
sions and regards the patient as an object of nursing and values about beneficence (Salsberry, 1994, pp. 13–14).
rather than a participant in nursing. Agency, or action,
rests with the nurse, who makes the practice decisions
and manipulates selected patient or environmental vari- CONCEPTUAL MODELS
ables to bring about change (Barnum, 1998).
The third component of the structural holarchy of con-
Conservation Category of Knowledge. This category: temporary nursing knowledge is the CONCEPTUAL
● Emphasizes preservation of beneficial aspects of the MODEL (see Fig. 1–1). A conceptual model is defined as a
patient’s situation that are threatened by illness or actual set of relatively abstract and general concepts that address the
or potential problems. Agency rests with the nurse, but phenomena of central interest to a discipline, the propositions
he or she acts to conserve the existing capabilities of the that broadly describe those concepts, and the propositions
patient (Barnum, 1998). that state relatively abstract and general relations between
two or more of the concepts.
Substitution Category of Knowledge. This category: The term conceptual model is synonymous with the
terms conceptual framework, conceptual system, para-
● Focuses on provision of substitutes for patient capabili- digm, and disciplinary matrix. Conceptual models have ex-
ties that cannot be enacted or have been lost. Agency isted since people began to think about themselves and
rests with the patient, in that the patient exercises his or their surroundings. They now exist in all areas of life and
her will and physical control to the greatest possible ex- in all disciplines. Indeed, everything that human beings
tent. Nursing acts as a substitute for the patient’s will or see, hear, read, and experience is filtered through the cog-
intent when the patient is incapacitated (Barnum, 1998). nitive lens of some conceptual frame of reference
(Kalideen, 1993; Lachman, 1993).
Sustenance/Support Category of Knowledge. This cate- The concepts of a conceptual model are so abstract and
gory: general that they are not directly observed in the real
world, nor are they limited to any particular individual,
● Focuses on helping the patient endure insults to health
group, situation, or event. Human adaptive system is an ex-
and supporting the patient while building psychological
ample of a conceptual model concept (Roy & Andrews,
and physiological coping mechanisms. Required nursing
1999). It can refer to several types of human systems, in-
is determined by the extent to which the patient can or
cluding individuals, families, groups, communities, and
cannot cope without assistance in a particular situation
entire societies.
(Barnum, 1998).
The propositions of a conceptual model also are so ab-
Enhancement Category of Knowledge. In this category: stract and general that they are not amenable to direct em-
pirical observation or test. Nonrelational propositions
● Nursing is regarded as a way to improve the quality of found in conceptual models are general descriptions or
the patient’s existence following a health insult. Nursing constitutive definitions of the conceptual model concepts.
enables the patient to emerge from a health insult some- Because conceptual model concepts are so abstract, their
how stronger, better, or improved because he or she constitutive definitions typically are broad. Adaptation
experienced or overcame the health insult (Barnum, level, for example, is defined as “a changing point influ-
1998). enced by the demands of the situation and the internal
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 17
resources [of the human adaptive system, including] capa- and other aspects are ignored. For example, Neuman’s
bilities, hopes, dreams, aspirations, motivations, and all Systems Model (Neuman & Fawcett, 2002) focuses on pre-
that makes humans constantly move toward mastery” (Roy venting a deleterious reaction to stressors, whereas Orem’s
& Andrews, 1999, p. 33). Moreover, because the concepts (2001) self-care framework emphasizes enhancing each
are so abstract, nonrelational propositions that are op- human being’s self-care capabilities and actions. Note
erational definitions, that is, propositions that state how that Neuman’s conceptual model does not deal with self
the concepts are empirically observed or measured, are care, and Orem’s does not focus on reactions to stressors.
not found in conceptual models, nor should they be ex- Furthermore, different conceptual models place varying
pected. emphasis on the metaparadigm concepts. For example,
The relational propositions of a conceptual model state King’s (1995) General Systems Framework does not ignore
the relations between conceptual model concepts in a rela- but does not emphasize the nursing metaparadigm con-
tively abstract and general manner. They are exemplified by cept of environment, whereas Rogers’ (1994b) Science of
the following statement: “Adaptation level affects the Unitary Human Beings places equal emphasis on the
human [adaptive] system’s ability to respond positively in nursing metaparadigm concepts of human beings and en-
a situation” (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 36). vironment.
Conceptual models evolve from the empirical observa- Each conceptual model also provides a structure and a
tions and intuitive insights of scholars or from deductions rationale for the scholarly and practical activities of its ad-
that creatively combine ideas from several fields of inquiry. herents, who comprise a subculture or community of
A conceptual model is inductively developed when gener- scholars within a discipline (Eckberg & Hill, 1979). More
alizations about specific observations are formulated and is specifically, each conceptual model gives direction to the
deductively developed when specific situations are seen as search for relevant questions about the phenomena of
examples of other more general events. For example, much central interest to a discipline and suggests solutions to
of the content of the self-care framework was induced from practical problems. Each one also provides general criteria
Orem’s observations of “the constant elements and rela- for knowing when a problem has been solved. Those fea-
tionships of nursing practice situations” (Orem & Taylor, tures of a conceptual model are illustrated in the following
1986, p. 38). In contrast, Levine (1969) indicated that she example. The Roy Adaptation Model focuses on adapta-
deduced the conservation model from “ideas from all areas tion of human beings to environmental stimuli and pro-
of knowledge that contribute to the development of the poses that management of the most relevant stimuli leads
nursing process” (p. viii). to adaptation (Roy & Andrews, 1999). Here, a relevant
question might be, “What are the most relevant stimuli
in a given situation?” Anyone interested in solutions to
FUNCTIONS OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL adaptation problems would focus on the various ways of
managing stimuli, and one would be led to look for mani-
A conceptual model provides a distinctive frame of re- festations of adaptation when seeking to determine if the
ference—“a horizon of expectations” (Popper, 1965, problem has been solved.
p. 47)—and “a coherent, internally unified way of thinking Kaplan (1964) pointed out that advances in knowledge
about … events and processes” (Frank, 1968, p. 45) for its occur “when scientists understand one another with as lit-
adherents that tells them how to observe and interpret the tle uncertainty as possible” (p. 269). In addition, he noted
phenomena of interest to the discipline. Each conceptual that uncertainty is reduced when the scientist “make[s]
model, then, presents a unique focus that has a profound clear to others just what he [or she] had in mind” by expli-
influence on individuals’ perceptions. The unique focus of cating the conceptual model that is being used to guide the
each conceptual model is a characterization of a possible work (p. 269).
reality. Each conceptual model includes concepts and
propositions that the model author considers relevant and
as aids to understanding (Lippitt, 1973; Reilly, 1975). Thus, CONCEPTUAL MODELS OF NURSING
although conceptual models address all of the concepts
representing the subject matter of the discipline, as identi- Conceptual models are not new to nursing; they have
fied in the metaparadigm, each metaparadigm concept is existed since Nightingale (1859/1946) first advanced her
defined and described in a different way in different con- ideas about nursing. Most early conceptualizations of
ceptual model. nursing, however, were not presented in the formal manner
Conceptual models, then, provide alternative ways to of models. It remained for the Nursing Development
view the subject matter of the discipline; there is no “best” Conference Group (1973, 1979), Johnson (1974), Riehl and
way. More specifically, certain aspects of the phenomena of Roy (1974, 1980), and Reilly (1975) to explicitly label vari-
interest to a discipline are regarded as particularly relevant, ous perspectives of nursing as conceptual models.
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 18
Peterson (1977) and Hall (1979) linked the proliferation clients and how nurses can best provide for these needs. The
of formal conceptual models of nursing with interest in difference may be that for modern nursing such [a conceptual
conceptualizing nursing as a distinct discipline and the model] is self-consciously explicit, while for nurses trained in
concomitant introduction of ideas about nursing theory. the traditional manner [the conceptual model] was implicit; it
was the hidden mutually accepted but taken for granted
Meleis (1997) reached the same conclusion in her histori-
understanding that underpinned the fabric of care (p. 82).
ography of nursing knowledge development. Readers who
are especially interested in the progression of nursing Elaborating, Kalideen (1993) stated:
knowledge are referred to Meleis’ (1997) excellent work,
because a comprehensive historic review is beyond the Whatever you may think, we all use models to guide our ac-
scope of this book. tions, be it the way we conduct our personal lives or the way
The works of several nurse scholars currently are re- we nurse. These are based on the beliefs and values of family,
cognized as conceptual models. Among the best known friends, peers, and those we respect or those who have influ-
are Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, King’s General enced us greatly. One of the problems of each of us using an
individual model of practice is that it is difficult for others to
Systems Framework, Levine’s Conservation Model,
understand how we think, and why we do what we do. Since
Neuman’s Systems Model, Orem’s Self-Care Framework, none of us care for patients in isolation, it is important that
Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, and Roy’s others (our peers, ward colleagues, medical staff) can under-
Adaptation Model (Johnson, 1980, 1990; King, 1971, 1981, stand us (p. 4).
1990; Levine, 1969, 1991; Neuman & Fawcett, 2002;
Neuman & Young, 1972; Orem, 1971, 2001; Rogers, 1970, Conceptual models of nursing, then, are the explicit and
1990; Roy, 1976; Roy & Andrews, 1999). Those conceptual formal presentations of some nurses’ implicit, private im-
models of nursing are discussed in Chapters 4 through ages of nursing. Explicit conceptual models of nursing
10 of this book. “provide [explicit] philosophical and pragmatic orienta-
The development of conceptual models of nursing and tions to the service nurses provide patients—a service
the labeling of them as such was an important advance for which only nurses can provide—a service which provides a
the discipline. Reilly’s (1975) comments help underscore dimension to total care different from that provided by any
this point: other health professional” (Johnson, 1987, p. 195). Explicit
conceptual models of nursing provide explicit orientations
We all have a private image (concept) of nursing practice. In
turn, this private image influences our interpretation of data, not only for nurses but also for other health professionals
our decisions, and our actions. But can a discipline continue and the public. They identify the purpose and scope of
to develop when its members hold so many differing private nursing and provide frameworks for objective records of
images? The proponents of conceptual models of practice are the effects of nursing. Johnson (1987) explained that ex-
seeking to make us aware of these private images, so that we plicit conceptual models “specify for nurses and society the
can begin to identify commonalities in our perceptions of the mission and boundaries of the profession. They clarify the
nature of practice and move toward the evolution of a well- realm of nursing responsibility and accountability, and
ordered concept (p. 567). they allow the practitioner and/or the profession to docu-
Johnson (1987) also pointed out that nurses always use ment services and outcomes” (pp. 196–197). Moreover, use
some frame of reference for their activities and explained of an explicit conceptual model helps achieve consistency
the drawbacks of implicit frameworks: in nursing practice by facilitating communication among
nurses, reduces conflict among nurses who might have
It is important to note that some kind of implicit framework different implicit goals for practice, and provides a system-
is used by every practicing nurse, for we cannot observe, see, atic approach to nursing research, education, administra-
or describe, nor can we prescribe anything for which we do tion, and practice.
not already have some kind of mental image or concept.
Unfortunately, the mental images used by nurses in their prac-
tice, images developed through education and experience and
continuously governed by the multitude of factors in the prac- THEORIES
tice setting, have tended to be disconnected, diffused, incom-
plete and frequently heavily weighted by concepts drawn from The fourth component of the structural holarchy of con-
the conceptual schema used by medicine to achieve its own temporary nursing knowledge is the THEORY (see Fig.
social mission (p. 195). 1–1). A theory is defined as one or more relatively concrete
and specific concepts that are derived from a conceptual
In a similar vein, Bradshaw (1995) stated:
model, the propositions that narrowly describe those concepts,
Both the modern academic nursing approach and the old- and the propositions that state relatively concrete and specific
fashioned practical training nursing approach presume some relations between two or more of the concepts.
kind of [conceptual model] about the needs of patients and Scholars have used many different terms to refer to the-
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 19
ory, as defined in this chapter. Among those terms are dicting how it occurs. Middle-range descriptive theories
atomistic theory, grand theory, macro theory, micro the- are the most basic type of middle-range theory. They
ory, middle-range theory, mid-range theory, practice the- describe or classify a phenomenon and, therefore, may en-
ory, praxis theory, and theoretical framework (King & compass just one concept. When a middle-range descrip-
Fawcett, 1997b). This book focuses on grand theories and tive theory describes a phenomenon, it simply names the
middle-range theories. commonalities found in discrete observations of individu-
als, groups, situations, or events. When a middle-range de-
scriptive theory classifies a phenomenon, it categorizes the
GRAND THEORY AND MIDDLE- described commonalities into mutually exclusive, overlap-
RANGE THEORY ping, hierarchical, or sequential dimensions. A middle-
range classification theory may be referred to as a typology
Theories vary in their level of abstraction and scope. The or a taxonomy.
more abstract and broader type of theory is referred to as a Middle-range explanatory theories specify relations be-
grand theory. The more concrete and narrower type of tween two or more concepts. They explain why and the
theory is referred to as a middle-range theory. extent to which one concept is related to another concept.
Grand theories are broad in scope. They are composed Middle-range predictive theories move beyond explana-
of concepts and propositions that are less abstract and gen- tion to the prediction of precise relations between concepts
eral than the concepts and propositions of a conceptual or the effects of one or more concepts on one or more
model but are not as concrete and specific as the concepts other concepts. This type of middle-range theory addresses
and propositions of a middle-range theory. Consciousness how changes in a phenomenon occur.
is an example of a grand theory concept (Newman, 1994). The definition of a theory used in this book indicates
An example of a grand theory nonrelational proposition that a conceptual model is always the precursor to a grand
is as follows: Consciousness is the informational capacity theory or a middle-range theory. Indeed, Popper (1970)
of the human system and encompasses interconnected maintained that inasmuch as “we approach everything in
cognitive (thinking) and affective (feeling) awareness, the light of a preconceived theory (p. 52), the belief held by
physiochemical maintenance including the nervous and some that theory development proceeds outside the con-
endocrine systems, growth processes, the immune system, text of a conceptual frame of reference is “absurd” (Popper
and the genetic code (Newman, 1994). An example of a 1965, p. 46). As Slife and Williams (1995) explained, “All
grand theory relational proposition, which links the theories have implied understandings about the world that
concepts consciousness and pattern, is as follows: “The are crucial to their formulation and use… [In other
evolving pattern of person-environment can be viewed words,] all theories have assumptions and implications
as a process of expanding consciousness” (Newman, 1994, embedded in them [and] stem from cultural and historic
p. 33). contexts that lend them meaning and influence how they
Middle-range theories are narrower in scope than grand are understood and implemented” (pp. 2, 9).
theories. They are composed of a limited number of con- Moreover, inasmuch as each grand theory and each
cepts and propositions that are written at a relatively middle-range theory deals only with a limited aspect of
concrete and specific level. Nurse’s activity is an example of reality, many theories are needed to deal with all of the
a middle-range theory concept (Orlando, 1961). An exam- phenomena encompassed by a conceptual model. Each
ple of a middle-range theory nonrelational proposition is conceptual model, then, is more fully specified by several
as follows: Nurse’s activity is “only what [the nurse] says grand or middle-range theories, as indicated in Figure 1–1
or does with or for the benefit of the patient,” such as in- by the subscript notation 1 … n.
structions, suggestions, directions, explanations, informa- Grand theories are derived directly from conceptual
tion, requests, and questions directed toward the patient; models (Fig. 1–2). For example, Rogers (1986) derived
making decisions for the patient; handling the patient’s three grand theories from her conceptual model, the
body; administering medications or treatments; and Science of Unitary Human Beings: the Theory of Accel-
changing the patient’s immediate environment (Orlando, erating Evolution, the Theory of Rhythmical Correlates of
1961, p. 60). An example of a middle-range theory rela- Change, and the Theory of Paranormal Phenomena.
tional proposition, which links the concepts nurse’s reac- The grand theories derived from conceptual models
tion and nurse’s activity, is as follows: “What a nurse says or can serve as the starting points for middle-range theory
does is necessarily an outcome of her reaction to some- development (see Fig. 1–2). Alligood (1991), for example,
thing in the situation” (Orlando, 1961, p. 61). derived a middle-range theory of creativity, actualization,
Each middle-range theory addresses a more or less rela- and empathy from Rogers’ (1986) grand theory of acceler-
tively concrete and specific phenomenon by describing ating evolution.
what the phenomenon is, explaining why it occurs, or pre- Alternatively, middle-range theories can be derived
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 20
directly from the conceptual model (see Fig. 1–2). For ex- work is a middle-range explanatory theory, and Orlando’s
ample, King (1981) derived the middle-range theory of work is a middle-range predictive theory. These theories
goal attainment from her Conceptual System. are discussed in Chapters 14 through 16 of this book.
It is likely that many other middle-range nursing
theories exist (Smith & Liehr, 2003), but they are not
FUNCTIONS OF A THEORY always recognizable as such. The paucity of recognizable
middle-range nursing theories is a result of nurse re-
One function of a theory is to narrow and more fully spec- searchers’ failure to be explicit about the theoretical
ify the phenomena contained in a conceptual model. components of their studies and to label their work as
Another function is to provide a relatively concrete and theories and to practicing nurses’ failure to be explicit
specific structure for the interpretation of initially puzzling about the theoretical elements in their discussions of
behaviors, situations, and events. nursing practice. Therefore, the ideas presented by
nurses in books, monographs, and journal articles should
be closely examined for evidence of the concepts and
NURSING THEORIES propositions that compose middle-range theories.
Identification of the components of a theory is accom-
A few nurses have presented their ideas about nursing in plished by the technique of theory formalization, also
the form of explicit grand theories. For example, Newman called theoretical substruction. Discussion of that tech-
(1986, 1994) has presented her Theory of Health as nique is beyond the scope of this book. Readers who are
Expanding Consciousness and Parse (1981, 1998) has pre- interested in theory formalization are referred to
sented her Theory of Human Becoming. These grand the- Hinshaw’s (1979) pioneering work and Fawcett’s (1999)
ories are discussed in Chapters 12 and 13 of this book. more recent work.
A few other nurses have presented their ideas about
nursing in the form of explicit middle-range theories.
Orlando (1961) presented her Theory of the Deliberative Unique, Borrowed, and Shared Nursing Theories
Nursing Process, Peplau (1952, 1992) presented her Theory
of Interpersonal Relations, and Watson (1985, 1997) pre- Some theories used by nurses are unique to nursing, and
sented her Theory of Human Caring. Peplau’s work is others are borrowed from adjunctive disciplines (Smith
a middle-range descriptive classification theory, Watson’s & Liehr, 2003). The theories developed by Newman,
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
GRAND THEORIES1...n
FIG. 1–2. Derivation of grand theories and middle-range theories from a conceptual model.
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 21
Orlando, Parse, Peplau, and Watson are unique nursing research methods or methods of inquiry that are used to
theories. Many other theories used by nurses have been gather evidence about the empirical adequacy of a middle-
borrowed from other disciplines. Theories of stress, cop- range theory. The other aspects include the participants
ing, locus of control, reasoned action, planned behavior, from whom the data are collected and the procedures used
and self-efficacy are just a few examples of borrowed theo- to collect and analyze the data.
ries. Unfortunately, few nurses have attempted to present a
rationale for the use of such theories as guides for nursing
research or practice by linking the theory with a nursing FUNCTION OF AN EMPIRICAL INDICATOR
conceptual model. One exception is the linkage of the the-
ory of planned behavior with Neuman’s Systems Model The function of empirical indicators is to provide the
and Orem’s Self-Care Framework (Villarruel, Bishop, means by which middle-range theories are generated or
Simpson, Jemmott, & Fawcett; 2001). tested. Empirical indicators that are instruments yield data
Also unfortunately, these theories sometimes are used that can be sorted into qualitative categories or calculated
with no consideration given to their empirical adequacy as quantitative scores. For example, responses to an inter-
in nursing situations. There is, however, increasing aware- view schedule composed of open-ended questions can be
ness of the need to test borrowed theories to determine analyzed to yield categories or themes, and responses to
if they are empirically adequate in nursing situations. The questionnaires composed of fixed-choice items can be sub-
theory testing work by Lowery and associates (1987) is jected to mathematical calculations that yield a number
an especially informative example of what can happen or score.
when a theory, borrowed in this case from the discipline Empirical indicators that are experimental conditions
of psychology, is tested in the real world of acute and or procedures tell the researcher or practitioner exactly
chronic illness. The investigators determined that a basic what to do. They are, in effect, protocols or scripts that di-
proposition of attribution theory, stating that people rect actions in a precise manner.
search for causes to make sense of their lives, was not
fully supported in their research with patients with arthri-
tis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or myocardial in- NURSING EMPIRICAL INDICATORS
farction. Further research should determine whether a
modification of attribution theory is empirically adequate Nurses have developed a plethora of empirical indicators
in nursing situations or if an entirely new theory is re- in the form of research instruments and nursing practice
quired. The available results, however, mean that attri- tools. Those that measure concepts associated with the
bution theory cannot be considered a shared theory, that is, conceptual models of nursing and nursing theories dis-
a theory that is borrowed from another discipline and cussed in this book are listed and described in tables in
found to be empirically adequate in nursing situations Chapters 4 through 10 and 12 through 17.
(Barnum, 1990).
In contrast, the theory of self-efficacy is a borrowed the-
ory that appears to be developing into a shared theory. This DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN THE
theory was developed initially in the discipline of social COMPONENTS OF THE STRUCTURAL
psychology and has received empirical support in some HOLARCHY OF CONTEMPORARY
nursing situations (e.g., Burns, Camaione, Froman, & NURSING KNOWLEDGE
Clark, 1998; Froman & Owen, 1990; Hickey, Owen, &
Froman, 1992; Lev & Owen, 2002). The distinctions between the various components of the
structural holarchy of contemporary nursing knowledge
require some discussion. The discussion that follows
EMPIRICAL INDICATORS should be kept in mind when reading the remainder of this
book.
The fifth and final component of the structural holarchy of
contemporary nursing knowledge is the EMPIRICAL IN-
DICATOR (see Fig. 1–1). An empirical indicator is defined THE METAPARADIGM, PHILOSOPHIES,
as a very concrete and specific real world proxy for a middle- CONCEPTUAL MODELS, THEORIES,
range theory concept; an actual instrument, experimental AND EMPIRICAL INDICATORS
condition, or procedure that is used to observe or measure a
middle-range theory concept. The information obtained Empirical indicators are directly connected to theories by
from empirical indicators is typically called data. means of the operational definition for each middle-range
Empirical indicators are one aspect of the empirical theory concept. As can be seen in Figure 1–1, there is no
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 22
direct connection between empirical indicators and con- underlying philosophical claims. Further support is evi-
ceptual models, philosophies, or the metaparadigm. dent in the content of Chapters 12 through 17, where clear
Consequently, those components of the structural hol- distinctions are made between philosophical claims and
archy of contemporary nursing knowledge cannot be sub- propositions that compose grand theories or middle-range
jected to empirical testing. Rather, the credibility of a theories and reflect underlying philosophical claims. More
conceptual model is determined indirectly through empir- specifically, each of these chapters explicitly identifies state-
ical testing of middle-range theories that are derived from ments that are beliefs and values, that is, philosophical
or linked with the model. Furthermore, philosophies claims, and then identifies the concepts and propositions
cannot be empirically tested either directly or indirectly of the conceptual model, grand theory, or middle-range
because they are statements of beliefs and values. theory that clearly reflect—but do not duplicate—those
Philosophies should, however, be defendable based on philosophical claims.
logic or through dialogue. More specifically, philosophies
can and should be “reconsidered, rejected, or modified
through a process of considered reflection spurred on by THE METAPARADIGM, PHILOSOPHIES,
debate and discussion with one’s peers” (Salsberry, 1994, AND CONCEPTUAL MODELS
p. 18). Similarly, the metaparadigm cannot be empirically
tested, but should be defendable based on dialogue and Philosophies do not follow directly in line from the meta-
debate about the phenomena of interest to the discipline as paradigm of the discipline, nor do they directly precede
a whole. conceptual models (see Fig. 1–1). Rather, the metapara-
digm of a discipline identifies the phenomena about which
ontological, epistemic, and ethical claims are made. The
THE METAPARADIGM, PHILOSOPHIES, unique focus and content of each conceptual model then
CONCEPTUAL MODELS, AND THEORIES reflect certain philosophical claims. The philosophies
therefore are the foundation for other formulations, in-
When viewed from the perspective of the structural hol- cluding conceptual models, grand theories, and middle-
archy of contemporary nursing knowledge (see Fig. 1–1), it range theories. Salsberry (1994) explained, “A philosophy
is clear that the metaparadigm, philosophies, conceptual consists of the basic assumptions and beliefs that are built
models, and theories are distinct formulations. Yet Kikuchi upon in theorizing” (p. 18).
(1997) argued that certain aspects of the structural hol- For example, a metaparadigm might identify people as
archy of contemporary nursing knowledge are “problem- a central concept. A philosophy then might make the claim
atic in that they contain seeds of confusion regarding the that all people are equal. That philosophical claim then
nature of conceptions about nursing—seeds sown, it would be reflected in a conceptual model that depicts the
would seem, by virtue of the failure to see that the concep- nurse and the patient as equal partners in the process of
tions are philosophical, rather than scientific in nature and nursing.
the eclectic amalgamation of ideas” (p. 102). She went on
to argue that, with the exception of empirical indicators, all
other components of the structural holarchy are better THE METAPARADIGM AND
thought of as philosophies of nursing, “having the form of CONCEPTUAL MODELS
a philosophic nursing theory” (p. 107).
Moreover, Salsberry (1994) implied that what are called Most disciplines have a single metaparadigm but multiple
conceptual models in this book actually are philosophies. conceptual models, as indicated by the subscript notation
She noted, “Much of what has been referred to a concep- 1 … n in Figure 1–1. For example, this book identifies
tual model is, in fact, a philosophy—that is, a set of beliefs seven different conceptual models that address the con-
about what the basic entities of nursing are, how these cepts of the metaparadigm of nursing, and Darby and
entities are known, and what values should guide the disci- Walsh (1994) identified eight different conceptual models
pline. The model development arises when these philo- that address the concepts of the metaparadigm of dental
sophical claims are arranged into a particular structure” hygiene. Moreover, Waters (1994) identified five different
(p. 18). general conceptual models, and Nye and Berardo (1981)
Support for the structural holarchy as presented in this identified 16 different conceptual models of the family that
book is especially evident in the content of Chapters 4 address the concepts of the discipline of sociology.
through 10, where clear distinctions are made between Multiple conceptual models allow the members of a dis-
philosophical claims and the concepts and propositions cipline to think about the phenomena of central interest in
that comprise conceptual models of nursing and reflect different ways. They speak to the view that “there is no one
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 23
reality of [a discipline]. There is no clear and universal CONCEPTUAL MODELS AND THEORIES
[conceptual model] of what should underpin practice pre-
cisely because there is no such thing as universal knowl- A central thesis of this book is that a conceptual model
edge” (Bradshaw, 1995, p. 83). is not a theory, nor is a theory a conceptual model. This
Conceptual models address the phenomena identified thesis requires further discussion because considerable
by a metaparadigm and, therefore, incorporate the most confusion about those two components of the structural
global concepts and propositions in a more restrictive yet holarchy of contemporary nursing knowledge still exists in
still abstract manner. Each conceptual model, then, pro- the minds of some students and scholars. The distinctions
vides a different view of the metaparadigm concepts. As between conceptual models and theories described here
Kuhn (1970) explained, although adherents of different and the meaning ascribed to conceptual models are in
conceptual models are looking at the same phenomena, “in keeping with earlier works by Rogers (1970), Johnson
some areas they see different things, and they see them in (1974), and Reilly (1975) in nursing; Hempel (1970) in
different relations to one another” (p. 150). The acceptance philosophy; Reese and Overton (1970) in developmental
of multiple conceptual models is an outgrowth of the psychology; and Nye and Berardo (1966) in sociology; and
recognition of the advantages of diverse perspectives for a more recent work by Darby and Walsh (1994) in dental hy-
discipline (Moore, 1990; Nagle & Mitchell, 1991). giene. Although some writers consider distinctions be-
As in other disciplines, the conceptual models of nurs- tween conceptual models and theories a semantic point
ing represent various paradigms that address the phenom- (e.g., Flaskerud & Halloran, 1980; Meleis, 1997), the issue
ena identified by the metaparadigm of the discipline of should not be dismissed so easily. Indeed, King (1997)
nursing. Thus, it is not surprising that each defines the four called for “a consensus on a definition of the term ‘theory’
metaparadigm concepts differently and links those con- to clearly differentiate it from ‘conceptual system”’ (p. 16),
cepts in diverse ways (see Chapters 4 through 10). which is the term she prefers over conceptual model, con-
Examination of conceptual models of nursing reveals ceptual framework, or paradigm.
that human beings usually are identified as integrated bio- The distinction between a conceptual model and a the-
psycho-social beings, but are defined in diverse ways, such ory should be made because of the differences in the way
as adaptive systems (Roy & Andrews, 1999), behavioral sys- that each is used—if one is to know what to do next, one
tems (Johnson, 1990), self-care agents (Orem, 2001), or must know whether the starting point is a conceptual
energy fields (Rogers, 1990). Environment frequently is model or a theory. As can be seen in Figure 1–1, conceptual
identified as internal structures and external influences, models and theories differ in their level of abstraction.
including family members, the community, and society, A conceptual model is composed of several abstract and
as well as human beings’ physical surroundings. The envi- general concepts and propositions. A grand theory or a
ronment is seen as a source of stressors in some models middle-range theory, in contrast, deals with one or more
(Neuman & Fawcett, 2002), but a source of resources in relatively concrete and specific concepts and propositions.
others (Rogers, 1990). Health is presented in various ways, Distinguishing between conceptual models, grand the-
such as a continuum of client system wellness or stability ories, and middle-range theories on the basis of level of ab-
(Neuman & Fawcett, 2002), a dichotomy of behavioral sta- straction raises the question of how abstract is abstract
bility or instability (Johnson, 1990), or a value identified by enough for a work to be considered a conceptual model.
each cultural group (Rogers, 1990). Although the decision in a few cases may be somewhat ar-
The conceptual models also present descriptions of the bitrary, the following rule serves as one guideline for dis-
concept of nursing, usually by defining nursing and then tinguishing between conceptual models and theories. The
specifying goals of nursing actions and a nursing process. rule requires determination of the purpose of the work.
The goals of nursing action frequently are derived directly If the purpose of the work is to articulate a body of dis-
from the definition of health given by the model. For ex- tinctive knowledge for the whole of the discipline of nurs-
ample, a nursing goal might be to assist people to attain, ing, the work most likely is a conceptual model. Given
maintain, or regain client system stability (Neuman & that this was the explicitly stated purpose of authors such
Fawcett, 2002). The nursing process, or practice methodol- as Johnson (1980), King (1971), Levine (1969), Neuman
ogy, described in each conceptual model emphasizes as- (Neuman & Young, 1972), Orem (1971), Rogers (1970),
sessing and labeling human beings’ health conditions, and Roy (1976), their works are classified as conceptual
setting goals for nursing action, implementing nursing models.
actions, and evaluating health conditions after nursing in- If the purpose of the work is to further develop one
tervention. The labels for and content of the steps or com- aspect of a conceptual model, the work most likely is a
ponents of the process, however, frequently differ from one grand theory. For example, both Newman (1986) and
conceptual model to another. Parse (1981) explained that they elected to further develop
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 24
the concept of health from the perspective of Rogers’ for empirical testing of a middle-range theory. First, the
(1970) conceptual model. As can be discerned from these theory must be stated; second, empirical indicators must
examples, nurse scholars who consider conceptual models be identified; and third, empirically testable hypotheses
and grand theories to be synonymous (e.g., Barnum, 1998; must be specified.
Kim, 1983; Marriner-Tomey & Alligood, 2002) mislead Failure to distinguish between a conceptual model and
their readers. a theory leads to considerable misunderstanding and inap-
If the purpose of the work is to describe, explain, or propriate expectations about the work. When a conceptual
predict concrete and specific phenomena, the work most model is labeled a grand theory or, especially, a middle-
likely is a middle-range theory. For example, Peplau’s range theory, expectations regarding empirical testing and
(1952) theory of interpersonal relations is a classification applicability in practice immediately arise. When such ex-
of the stages of the nurse-patient relationship. Peplau did pectations cannot be met, the work is frequently regarded
not, nor did she intend to, address the entire domain of as inadequate. Similarly, when a grand theory or a middle-
nursing. Consequently, her theory is classified as a middle- range theory is labeled a conceptual model, expectations
range theory. In summary, if a given work is an abstract regarding comprehensiveness arise. When those expecta-
and general frame of reference addressing all four concepts tions cannot be met, that work also may be regarded as
of the metaparadigm of nursing, it is a conceptual model. inadequate.
If the work is more concrete, specific, and restricted to a
more limited range of phenomena than that identified by
the conceptual model, it is a grand theory or middle-range NOTES ON LANGUAGE
theory.
Another rule for distinguishing between conceptual The meaning given to conceptual models in this book
models and theories requires determination of how many should not be confused with the meaning of model found
levels of knowledge are needed before the work may be in the philosophy of science literature and some nursing
applied in particular nursing situations. If, for example, literature. The latter refers to representations of testable
the work identifies physiologic needs as an assessment theories. Rudner (1966), for example, defined a model for
parameter, but does not explain the differences between a middle-range theory as “an alternative interpretation of
normal and pathologic functions of body systems in con- the same calculus of which the theory itself is an interpre-
crete terms, it most likely is a conceptual model. As such, tation” (p. 24). That kind of a model is composed of ideas
the work is not directly applicable in practice. A theory of or diagrams that are more familiar to the novice than are
normal and pathologic functions must be linked with the the concepts and propositions of the theory. Thus, the
conceptual model so that judgments about the physiologi- model is a heuristic device that facilitates understanding of
cal functions of body systems may be made. Conversely, if the theory. Rudner illustrated this by the analogy of the
the work includes a detailed description of particular peo- flow of water through pipes as a model for a middle-range
ple’s behavior, or an explanation of how particular factors theory of electric current wires. So-called models that ac-
influence particular behaviors, it most likely is a middle- tually are diagrams of theories are found with increasing
range theory. In that case, the work may be directly applied frequency in reports of nursing research. For example,
in practice. The rule also is exemplified by the number of Hamner (1996) labeled her diagrams of the relations be-
steps required before empirical testing can occur (Reilly, tween the concepts of a middle-range theory of factors
1975). A conceptual model cannot be tested directly, be- associated with patient length of stay in an intensive care
cause its concepts and propositions are not empirically unit as a model.
measurable. More concrete and specific concepts and The concepts and propositions of each conceptual
propositions have to be derived from the conceptual model and each theory often are stated in a distinctive vo-
model; that is, a middle-range theory must be formulated. cabulary. One conceptual model, for example, uses the
Those more concrete concepts then must be operationally term conservation (Levine, 1996), another uses the terms
defined and empirically testable hypotheses must be de- stimuli and adaptation level (Roy & Andrews, 1999), and
rived from the propositions of the theory. Four steps are re- still another uses the terms resonancy, helicy, and integral-
quired before a conceptual model can be tested, albeit ity (Rogers, 1990). Furthermore, the meaning of each term
indirectly. First, the conceptual model must be formulated; is usually connected to the unique focus of the conceptual
second, a middle-range theory must be derived from the model or theory. Thus, the same or similar terms may have
conceptual model; third, empirical indicators must be different meanings in different conceptual models and
identified; and fourth, empirically testable hypotheses theories. For example, adaptation is defined in one con-
must be specified. In contrast, only three steps are required ceptual model as “the process and outcome whereby think-
01Fawcett-01 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 25
Chapter 2
Implementing Nursing
Models and Theories
in Practice
31
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 32
a profession, the beliefs and values held by a particular ceptual model, theories, and empirical indicators into a
health care institution about the nursing participant and formal nursing knowledge system. Creation of a C-T-E
health care, and the beliefs and values of the nurses who system of nursing knowledge requires the linkage of a con-
work in the institution about nursing participants, the ceptual model of nursing, one or more theories, and one or
environment, health, and methodologies for nursing prac- more empirical indicators. The starting point may be a
tice. Philosophical statements about the discipline and the conceptual model of nursing (Chapters 4 through 10), a
profession of nursing appear in documents such as the nursing grand theory (Chapters 12 through 14), or a nurs-
American Nurses’ Association Code of Ethics, and philo- ing middle-range theory (Chapters 15 through 17).
sophical statements about human beings and health care Regardless of the starting point, a full C-T-E system—not
appear in the Patient’s Bill of Rights. The philosophy of the just a conceptual model or a theory—actually is used to
nursing department of each health care institution typi- guide nursing practice.
cally incorporates relevant notions from a code of ethics C-T-E systems are comprehensive professional practice
and a patient’s bill of rights and further articulates the models that extend the statement of values, professional
nurses’ particular beliefs and values. and structural relationships, communication channels,
management approach, governance structure, and com-
pensation and rewards packages that compose the so-
called professional practice models described in the
TRANSLATING THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL, nursing literature (e.g., Hoffart & Woods, 1996; Stenglein
THEORIES, AND EMPIRICAL INDICATORS et al., 1993; Zelauskas & Howes, 1992). Here, the meaning
INTO A PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE MODEL of a professional practice model is extended to also include
the conceptual models and theories that always guide
The third substantive element of implementing C-T-E scientific and practical nursing activities (Brooks &
system–based nursing practice is translation of the con- Rosenberg, 1995).
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 35
The process of selecting the conceptual model of nurs- certain broad principles of intervention. This way, nurses will
ing or nursing theory that is the starting point for the cre- be encouraged to make use of up-to-date studies to inform
ation of a C-T-E system is discussed later in this chapter. practice (p. 42).
Suffice it to say that the conceptual model of nursing or
nursing theory that is selected must be appropriate for the The results of studies inform practice in a very formal
population of nursing participants served by the health- manner when those results are regarded as the theories that
care institution and congruent with the philosophy of the further specify the general parameters of assessment, label-
nursing department. If the starting point is a nursing the- ing, planning, intervention, and evaluation that are pro-
ory, the conceptual model from which the theory was vided by the conceptual model. Thus, research results
derived has to be identified, as do appropriate empirical in- become one way to specify the theory part of a C-T-E sys-
dicators. If the starting point is a conceptual model, unique tem of nursing knowledge.
nursing theories and theories from adjunctive disciplines The conceptual model and theories selected for inclu-
that address the specific knowledge required for practice sion in a C-T-E system must be logically congruent. Whall
with the population of nursing participants served by (1980) presented the first substantial discussion in the
the health care institution have to be identified. These the- nursing literature of elements to consider when assessing
ories represent practice knowledge that is in the form logical congruence between conceptual models of nursing
of relatively concrete and specific descriptions, explana- and theories. She proposed that conceptual models and
tions, and predictions about elements of nursing practice theories must be examined for their stands on holism and
that come from the results of nursing research and research linearity. Holism is a major characteristic of both the re-
in such adjunctive disciplines as physiology, biochem- ciprocal interaction and simultaneous action world views,
istry, nutrition, pharmacology, sociology, psychology, whereas linearity is a central characteristic of the reaction
and education. The reports of relevant research can be world view (Fawcett, 1993) (see Chapter 1). Whall’s (1980)
found in textbooks, practice specialty journals, and re- discussion suggested that if the world views of the concep-
search journals. tual model and the theory are not congruent, the theory
In addition, a theory of delivery of nursing services should be discarded and another more congruent one cho-
must be included in the C-T-E system. Such theories ad- sen; otherwise, the theory should be reformulated so that it
dress methods used to deliver nursing services, including is congruent with the model. Inasmuch as the conceptual
team nursing, primary nursing, case management, and model is the more abstract starting point, the theory—
managed care (Hood & Leddy, 2003; Manthey, 1990; not the model—is reformulated to ensure congruence.
Rafferty, 1992; Zander, 1990). Inasmuch as C-T-E system- Examples of linkage of logically congruent conceptual
based nursing practice virtually mandates individualized models and theories, using reformulated theories from
practice for each nursing participant, the service delivery adjunctive disciplines, are given in Fitzpatrick and col-
theory should facilitate that type of practice. Primary nurs- leagues (1982), McFarlane (1988), and Whall (1986). An
ing has been recommended as a particularly appropriate example of the linkage of two conceptual models of nurs-
theory for C-T-E system-based nursing practice (Shea et ing—Neuman’s Systems Model and Orem’s Self-Care
al., 1989; Walsh, 1989). Another appropriate theory is nurs- Framework—with the logically congruent theory of
ing case management (Ethridge, 1991). planned behavior from the discipline of psychology, is
The theories of delivery of nursing services address only given in Villarruel, Bishop, Simpson, Jemmott, and Fawcett
the way in which nursing services are organized and deliv- (2001).
ered to the nursing participant; they do not provide the Empirical indicators are selected after the conceptual
substance of those nursing services (Brazen, 1992). The model and relevant theories have been selected. When
substance comes from the conceptual model and theories. translated for nursing practice, empirical indicators refer to
The recognition of the need to link theories with con- the documents and technology—the practice tools—used
ceptual models reflects an understanding of the different to guide and direct nursing practice, to record observations
functions of conceptual models and theories. As Aggleton and results of interventions, and to describe and evaluate
and Chalmers (1990) explained, nursing job performance. In other words, the empirical in-
dicators encompass the standards for nursing practice, de-
While it is reasonable to expect a model of nursing to provide
partment and unit objectives, nursing care plans, patient
general guidelines for intervention, it is unlikely that [the
model] will give detailed guidance on the precise ways in database and classification tools, flow sheets, Kardex forms,
which nurses can act. It is crucial for the model to have this computer information systems, quality assurance tools,
kind of emphasis, since it alerts nurses to the need to look else- nursing job descriptions and performance appraisal tools,
where to find out more about a particular issue. Indeed, it is and other relevant documents and technologies (Fawcett,
probably undesirable for a model to go beyond advocating 1992; Fitch et al., 1991; Laurie-Shaw & Ives, 1988). Each
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 36
practice tool selected for inclusion in a C-T-E system must ● The fourth guideline identifies the characteristics of le-
be logically congruent with the conceptual model and gitimate participants in nursing practice.
must be a reliable and valid indicator of the theory concept ● The fifth guideline identifies the nursing process to be
it is to measure. employed and the technologies to be used, including pa-
rameters for assessment, labels for practice, a strategy for
planning, a typology of interventions, and criteria for
General Guidelines for Nursing evaluation of outcomes.
● The sixth guideline identifies the nature of contributions
Each conceptual model is a distinctive professional nursing that nursing practice makes to the well-being of nursing
perspective (see Fig. 2–1) that stipulates rules, or guide- participants.
lines, for nursing activities. Guidelines that are inherent in
each conceptual model of nursing provide broad guide- A conceptual model guides all aspects of practice and all
lines for nursing practice, as well as for nursing research, aspects of the nursing practice methodology. The specifics
education, and administration. Inasmuch as nursing prac- of nursing assessment, labeling, planning, intervention,
tice should be based on the findings of nursing research, and evaluation must, however, come from theories. Al-
is learned through nursing education, and is organized though the conceptual model may, for example, direct the
through nursing administration, guidelines for research, practitioner to look for certain categories of problems in
education, and administration are specified here, along adaptation, theories of adaptation are needed to describe,
with those for practice. The general guidelines for nursing explain, and predict manifestations of actual or potential
practice are listed in the following paragraphs, followed by patient problems in particular situations. Similarly, theo-
those for nursing research, nursing education, and nursing ries are needed to direct the particular nursing interven-
administration. The particular guidelines for each concep- tions required in such situations (Lipsey, 1993; Sidani &
tual model included in this book are given in Chapters 4 Braden, 1998). The C-T-E structure is completed when rel-
through 10. The guidelines encompass a set of statements evant empirical indicators, such as standards for nursing
about a domain of interest and epistemic and methodolog- practice, an assessment format, a classification system, in-
ical norms about how that domain can be applied in real tervention protocols, a quality assurance program, and an
world situations (Laudan, 1981), and are followed when information system, are identified.
conceptual models are linked with theories and empirical
indicators to form C-T-E systems. General Guidelines for Nursing Research. The function of
nursing research is to generate or test nursing theories.
General Guidelines for Nursing Practice. Conceptual Every theory development effort is guided by a conceptual
models of nursing provide general guidelines for nursing model, which acts as a research tradition. Laudan (1981)
practice. A fully developed conceptual model represents a explained the relations between conceptual models (which
particular view of and approach to nursing practice. When he called research traditions), theories, and empirical test-
a conceptual model is used to guide nursing practice, the ing. He stated,
metaparadigm concept of human beings refers to the nurs-
ing participant, who may be an individual, a family, or a Research traditions are not directly testable, both because
community requiring nursing. Environment refers to the their ontologies are too general to yield specific predictions
and because their methodological components, being guide-
nursing participant’s significant others and physical sur-
lines or norms, are not straightforwardly testable assertions
roundings, as well as to the nursing practice setting. Health about matters of fact. Associated with any active research tra-
refers to the health-related condition of the nursing partic- dition is a family of theories. … The theories … share the on-
ipant. Nursing refers to the nursing process, or practice tology of the parent research tradition and can be tested and
methodology, used. The domain of nursing practice and evaluated using its methodological norms (p. 151).
nursing processes are specified in six guidelines that are in-
herent in each conceptual model: When a conceptual model is used to guide nursing re-
search, the metaparadigm concept of human beings be-
● The first guideline identifies the purposes to be fulfilled comes the study participant. Environment becomes the
by nursing practice. relevant surroundings of the study participant, as well as
● The second guideline identifies the general nature of the the research infrastructure available to the investigator.
practice problems to be considered. Health refers to the study participant’s health-related con-
● The third guideline identifies the settings in which nurs- dition, and nursing refers to the research methods.
ing practice occurs. A fully developed conceptual model reflects a particular
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 37
research tradition that includes seven guidelines that guide becomes the educational setting. Health refers to the stu-
theory generation and testing through all phases of a study dent’s health-related condition, and nursing refers to the
(Laudan, 1981; Schlotfeldt, 1975): educational goals, outcomes, and processes.
The curricular structure and educational processes are
● The first guideline identifies the purposes to be fulfilled specified in five guidelines that are inherent in each con-
by the research. ceptual model:
● The second guideline identifies the phenomena that are
to be studied. ● The first guideline identifies the distinctive focus of the
● The third guideline identifies the nature of the problems curriculum and the purposes to be fulfilled by nursing
to be studied. education.
● The fourth guideline identifies the source of the data ● The second guideline identifies the general nature and
(individuals, groups, animals, documents) and the set- sequence of the content to be presented.
tings in which data are to be gathered. ● The third guideline identifies the settings in which nurs-
● The fifth guideline identifies the research designs, instru- ing education occurs.
ments, and procedures that are to be employed. ● The fourth guideline identifies the characteristics of le-
● The sixth guideline identifies the methods to be em- gitimate students.
ployed in reducing and analyzing the data. ● The fifth guideline identifies the teaching-learning
● The seventh guideline identifies the nature of contribu- strategies to be used.
tions that the research will make to the advancement of
knowledge. When a conceptual model is used for curriculum con-
struction, it must be linked with theories about education
A conceptual model contains the concepts from which spe- and the teaching-learning process, as well as with substan-
cific variables are derived for the research and the general tive theoretical content from nursing and adjunctive disci-
propositions from which testable hypotheses are eventually plines (Fawcett, 1985). In addition, appropriate empirical
derived. In addition, the conceptual model guides the indicators, in the form of the actual classroom content,
selection of appropriate empirical indicators. The subject practicum experiences, and student assignments, must be
matter of the study might be one concept or the relation identified. The resulting C-T-E system then applies to the
between two or more concepts. A study may involve gener- nursing participant, the student, and the educator.
ation or testing of a unique nursing theory, or theories bor-
rowed from other disciplines may be linked with the General Guidelines for Nursing Administration. When a
conceptual model to test the empirical adequacy of the conceptual model is used in nursing administration, it pro-
theory in nursing situations. Care must be taken, however, vides a systematic structure for thinking about administra-
to ensure that the conceptual model and the theory are tive structures, for observations of the administrative
logically congruent; that is, the model and the theory must situation, and for interpreting what is seen in administra-
reflect compatible world views about the nature of the phe- tive settings (Fawcett et al., 1989). Each fully developed
nomena to be studied (Fawcett, 1993; Whall, 1980). conceptual model represents a particular view of and ap-
The findings of research based on explicit C-T-E sys- proach to administration of nursing services. When a con-
tems of nursing knowledge are, of course, used to evaluate ceptual model is used to guide nursing administration, the
the empirical adequacy of the theory. Those findings also metaparadigm concept of human beings may refer to the
constitute indirect evidence regarding the conceptual staff of a health-care institution, the department of nursing
model and are used to evaluate its credibility. Thus, the as a whole, or even the entire institution. Environment be-
credibility of the conceptual model should be considered comes the relevant practice milieu for the staff and the
in addition to the empirical adequacy of the theory when- surroundings of the department of nursing and the health-
ever research is conducted. care institution. Health refers to the health-related con-
ditions of the staff or the functional condition of the
General Guidelines for Nursing Education. In nursing ed- department or institution. Nursing encompasses the man-
ucation, the conceptual model, or conceptual framework as agement strategies and administrative policies used by the
it usually is called, provides the general outline for curricu- nurse administrator on behalf of or in conjunction with
lum content and teaching-learning activities. A fully devel- the staff, the department of nursing, and the institution.
oped conceptual model represents a particular view of and
approach to nursing education. When a conceptual model The administrative structure and management practices
is used to guide nursing education, the metaparadigm con- are specified in five guidelines that are inherent in each
cept human beings becomes the student, and environment conceptual model:
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 38
planning committee should include an on-site consultant models of nursing and nursing theories are identified in
who is an expert in the content of conceptual models of Chapters 4 through 10 and 12 through 17.
nursing and nursing theories and the process of imple- C-T-E system–based nursing practice is most effective
menting C-T-E system-based nursing practice (Northrup when all categories of nursing personnel, from aides
& Cody, 1998). Although one or more nurses within the through the nurse executive, use the designated C-T-E sys-
health-care institution may have such expertise, a nurse tem to guide their nursing activities. The C-T-E system can
consultant who has no formal tie to the institution fre- be adapted to the particular focus of each person’s activi-
quently is more effective in moving the implementation ties. For example, nurse managers and the nurse executive
project forward. A major function of the consultant is to may use a version of the C-T-E system that is adapted for
help all personnel to understand that conceptual models of administration, whereas the nurse aides, practical nurses,
nursing and nursing theories provide a scientific base for registered nurses, clinical specialists, and nurse practition-
nursing practice, which, in turn, helps the nurse to “under- ers use the version that directly addresses nursing practice.
stand people, the causes of illness and its treatment, and The depth of use and the scope of phenomena addressed
the organizational settings within which nursing is prac- within the context of the particular C-T-E will vary ac-
ticed” (Anderson, 1997, p. 249). cording to the educational level and concomitant knowl-
The long-range and business plans should contain a edge of each category of nursing personnel (Cox, 1991).
specific timeline for actions and the human and material As the long-range plan develops, additional phases of
resources required. More specifically, the plan should ad- planning and implementing C-T-E system-based nursing
dress: (a) the outcomes that are anticipated from use of the practice need to be identified, along with the estimated
C-T-E system; (b) the nursing personnel who will use the time for each phase. The typical implementation project
C-T-E system; (c) the identification of subsequent phases proceeds through seven more phases: the fourth through
of implementation and the time required for each phase; the tenth.
and (d) the financial resources that are needed and those The business plan should focus on expenditures. The
that are available. actual cost of implementing C-T-E system-based nursing
The decision to implement C-T-E system-based nursing practice has not yet been fully addressed in the nursing or
practice is typically undertaken in response to the quest for health-care literature. Costs most likely vary from institu-
a way to articulate the substance and scope of professional tion to institution depending on the staff ’s current knowl-
nursing practice to members of other health care disci- edge of conceptual models and theories, existing staff
plines and the public and to improve the conditions and development resources, extent of change in documenta-
outcomes of nursing practice. Consequently, one antici- tion, and the like. Categories of costs include, but are not
pated outcome of C-T-E system-based nursing practice is limited to, consultation fees, printing of all documents,
enhanced understanding of the role of nursing in health staff orientation and development, and data analysis. Some
care by administrators, physicians, social workers, dieti- cost categories represent existing budget items, but others
tians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, respira- represent new items. For example, most health-care insti-
tory therapists, and other health-care team members, as tutions already allocate funds for staff orientation and
well as by the population of nursing participants served by development, but few regularly allocate funds for consulta-
the health-care institution. Another anticipated outcome is tion from nurse experts. Consequently, the nurse executive
increased nursing staff satisfaction with the conditions must be prepared to negotiate with the finance officer and
and outcomes of nursing practice through an explicit focus the institution administrator for the supplemental funds
on and identification of nursing problems and actions, as that will be needed to sustain the implementation project.
well as through enhanced communication and documen- In addition, the nurse executive may apply to federal agen-
tation (Fitch et al., 1991). Still another anticipated outcome cies, foundations, or other extramural sources for funding
is increased satisfaction of nursing participants and their (Capers et al., 1985).
families with the nursing received. Other more specific
outcomes that are relevant to a particular health-care insti-
tution may be formulated as the long-range plan is devel- FOURTH PHASE: REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS
oped. For example, a computerized documentation system
or a patient classification system based on the C-T-E sys- The Fourth Phase: Review of Documents focuses on re-
tem may be a desired outcome. Indeed, such an outcome viewing all documents that serve as a base for nursing prac-
may be the catalyst for the implementation of C-T-E tice. In particular, the mission statement of the health care
system–based nursing practice. Still other outcomes are institution and the philosophy of the nursing department
tied to the particular C-T-E system selected. Anticipated should be reviewed at this point in the implementation
and actual outcomes of the use of various conceptual project. The written mission statement of the health-care
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 40
institution should be examined to determine its congru- ory as the starting point should proceed through the fol-
ence with the actual situation. As the statement is exam- lowing four steps:
ined, the opportunity for all members of the health-care
team to reaffirm their commitment to a particular popula- 1. Thoroughly analyze and evaluate several conceptual
tion of nursing participants is provided. The opportunity models of nursing and nursing theories.
to discuss changes in the population of nursing partici- 2. Compare the content of each conceptual model and
pants served is, of course, also provided. theory with the mission statement of the health-care
Next, the philosophy of the nursing department should institution to determine if the model or theory is ap-
be reviewed to determine if it reflects current beliefs about propriate for use with the population of nursing partic-
nursing held by the members of the discipline at large, as ipants served.
well as by the nurses at the health-care institution where 3. Determine if the philosophic claims undergirding each
the implementation project is taking place. The implemen- conceptual model or theory are congruent with the phi-
tation project, then, may act as a catalyst for reaffirmation losophy of the nursing department.
or revision of the nursing department’s current philosophy 4. Select the conceptual model or theory that most closely
of nursing. matches the mission of the health care institution and
A comprehensive review of the current philosophy the philosophy of the nursing department.
could take the form of a survey of all nursing personnel
that seeks to elicit each nurse’s beliefs and values about Chapters 4 through 10 and 12 through 16 of this book
nursing participants, their environments and health, and contain thorough analyses and evaluations of Johnson’s
nursing processes. Or the review could be in the form of a Behavioral System Model, King’s General Systems
request that all nursing personnel comment on the current Framework, Levine’s Conservation Model, Neuman’s
philosophy and engage in “reflective deliberation” to reaf- Systems Model, Orem’s Self-Care Framework, Rogers’
firm or develop a shared understanding of the beliefs Science of Unitary Human Beings, Roy’s Adaptation
and values undergirding nursing practice at the health care Model, Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding
institution (Cheek, Gibson, & Heartfield, 1993, p. 69). Consciousness, Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming,
Regardless of the approach taken, the result should be a Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process,
document that articulates a philosophy representing the Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, and Watson’s
beliefs and values of those nurses who are responsible for Theory of Human Caring. Reading these chapters, along
the nursing of the population of nursing participants with the primary source material for each conceptual
served by the health care institution. model or theory, provides the foundation for the selection
Moreover, as Johns (1989) noted, the philosophy of the of the conceptual model or theory.
nursing department “must be relevant to the context of The next step is the comparison of the content of vari-
where [nursing] is carried out … [as well as] to how nurs- ous conceptual models and theories with the mission
ing organizes the delivery of [services] on the unit and the statement of the health care institution, with particular at-
relationship nursing has with medicine and the organiza- tention given to whether that content will lead to nursing
tion in general” (p. 3). He pointed out that the document actions that are appropriate for the population of nursing
may go through successive drafts until both the philo- participants served by that institution. Next, the fit of the
sophic content and the language in which it is expressed are underlying philosophic claims of each conceptual model
clearly understood and accepted by all nursing personnel and theory with the philosophy of the nursing department
(Johns, 1990). should be determined.
The literature associated with the conceptual models of
nursing and nursing theories included in this book sug-
FIFTH PHASE: SELECTION AND gests that each is appropriate in a wide range of nursing
DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL- situations and for many different populations of nursing
THEORETICAL-EMPIRICAL SYSTEM participants. Aggleton and Chalmers (1985) noted that
OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE such literature “might encourage some nurses to feel that it
does not really matter which model [or theory] of nursing
The Fifth Phase: Selection and Development of a is chosen to inform nursing practice within a particular
Conceptual-Theoretical-Empirical System of Nursing care setting” (p. 39). They also noted that the literature
Knowledge involves the selection of a conceptual model or might “encourage the view that choosing between models
nursing theory as the starting point for development of a [or theories] is something one does intuitively, as an act of
formal C-T-E system of nursing knowledge. The process of personal preference. Even worse, it might encourage some
selecting a conceptual model of nursing or a nursing the- nurses to feel that all their everyday problems might be
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 41
eliminated were they to make the ‘right choice’ in selecting the next placing the patient back in a dependent and pas-
a particular model [or theory] for use across a care setting” sive role” (Mascord, 1988/1989, p. 15). Moreover, all of the
(p. 39). successful implementation projects that have been re-
Nurses have not yet addressed the extent to which the ported in the literature focused on just one conceptual
fit of a conceptual model or theory to particular popula- model of nursing or nursing theory (see Chapters 4
tions of nursing participants might have been forced. through 10 and 12 through 17).
Furthermore, little attention has been given to the extent Once a conceptual model or theory has been selected,
to which a particular conceptual model or theory is modi- work can proceed to development of an explicit C-T-E
fied by an individual or group to fit a given situation or system. The issues involved in the creation of an explicit
culture (C.P. Germain, personal communication, October C-T-E system were discussed earlier in this chapter, in the
21, 1987; Fawcett, 2003). Although modifications certainly section on substantive elements. In short, care must be
are acceptable, they should be acknowledged and serious taken to link a conceptual model, one or more theories,
consideration should be given to renaming the conceptual and one or more empirical indicators that are logically
model or theory to indicate that modifications have been congruent. Special attention should be given to reviewing
made. Clearly, systematic exploration of the nursing spe- each existing document and all current technology for con-
cialty practice implications of various conceptual models gruence with the conceptual model and theories. Although
and theories, coupled with more practical experience with revision in or replacement of existing documents and tech-
each model and each theory in a variety of settings and cul- nologies is frequently required, and although the work may
tures, is required. seem overwhelming at the outset, the importance of hav-
Although pluralism in conceptual models and theories ing documents and technologies that are congruent with
has been advocated (Barr, 1997; Kristjanson, Tamblyn, & the conceptual and theoretical components of the C-T-E
Kuypers, 1987; Nagle & Mitchell, 1991; Story & Ross, system cannot be overemphasized. Indeed, congruence
1986), it is recommended that just one conceptual model may be regarded as the sine qua non of C-T-E system-based
or theory be selected for initial use on all nursing units of nursing practice.
a health-care institution. Health-care institutions that serve The need seems obvious for revisions in or develop-
just one particular population of nursing participants or ment of new documents and technology that have a direct
encompass just one practice specialty area should not influence on nursing practice, such as standards of prac-
have difficulty using one conceptual model or one theory tice, nursing care plans, and patient classification systems,
to guide all nursing practice activities. General-purpose so that they are congruent with the conceptual and theo-
health-care institutions, however, may encounter difficul- retical components of the C-T-E system. The need to revise
ties if the conceptual model or theory selected does not job descriptions and performance appraisal tools so that
readily guide practice for all nursing specialty areas and all they, too, are congruent with the conceptual and theoreti-
populations of nursing participants served. However, use cal components may not be as obvious. Yet, as Laurie-Shaw
of more than one conceptual model or theory within an and Ives (1988) pointed out, these documents should ac-
institution may pose problems for a nurse who works on knowledge the use of the C-T-E system and “reinforce the
different units, as well as for nursing participants who are importance of operationalizing the nursing standards of
moved from unit to unit as their health condition changes. the department” (p. 18).
In addition, use of more than one conceptual model or
theory in a health care institution could have a negative
impact on continuity of nursing and could dramatically SIXTH PHASE: EDUCATION
increase the cost of implementing C-T-E system-based OF THE NURSING STAFF
nursing practice because different forms, teaching mate-
rials, and procedures would have to be developed (Dee, The Sixth Phase: Education of the Nursing Staff focuses
1990). on the education of the nursing staff for C-T-E system-
Schmieding (1984) claimed that adopting a single con- based practice. Education may occur through participation
ceptual model or theory as the starting point for C-T-E in staff development or continuing education seminars,
system-based nursing practice in a health care institution workshops, retreats, discussion groups, unit conferences,
“can help nurses work together for [high] quality nursing and nursing grand rounds; formal courses offered by
care” (p. 759). Furthermore, “without commitment to one local colleges or through distance learning programs; and
[conceptual model or theory] the confusion remains; atti- independent study. Ongoing educational activities should
tudes, values, and beliefs about nursing vary from one be made available to the current nursing staff and other
nurse to another and the delivery of care is left to the whim members of the health care team, as well as to individuals
of the moment, one day demanding patient self-care and who join the health care institution as the implementation
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 42
project proceeds. Educational programs should contain Evaluation should be done periodically throughout the
information about the content of the C-T-E system and entire implementation project, and especially during the
realistic examples of its use in nursing practice. Initially, eighth phase, “to capture the flow and timing of the change
the consultant and other nurses who have experience with [in outcomes]” (Fitch et al., 1991, p. 25). The evaluation
C-T-E system-based nursing practice may act as preceptors should be carefully and systematically designed, in the
to the staff. As the staff members become proficient, they form of an experimental or a quasi-experimental study
can take over the preceptor role during the orientation of (McKenna, 1993).
new employees. Outcomes in terms of the quality of nursing practice
should be emphasized and should encompass the interper-
sonal and technical competence of the nurses, the physical
SEVENTH PHASE: DEMONSTRATION SITES and technical conditions of the health-care institution,
and the sociocultural atmosphere of the institution (Wilde
The Seventh Phase: Demonstration Sites encompasses the et al., 1993). The evaluation also should include documen-
designation of certain nursing units to serve as demonstra- tation of environmental factors that might influence nurse
tion sites and the implementation of C-T-E system-based and nursing participant outcomes, such as a major organi-
practice on those units. Participants in many implemen- zational change or changes in leadership within nursing or
tation projects credit their success to careful phasing in the larger institution (Fitch et al., 1991). Other environ-
of C-T-E system-based practice through demonstration mental factors to consider include changes in institution
projects on pilot units before implementing the C-T-E sys- accreditation criteria and changes in standards developed
tem on all of the nursing units. Implementation of C-T-E by national and international nursing organizations.
system-based nursing practice appears to be most success- Conclusions drawn from the evaluation of administrative,
ful when the procedures are “tailored to the particular style nurse, and nursing participant outcomes should be in the
and variables of each nursing unit” (Laurie-Shaw & Ives, form of statements documenting the merit of the C-T-E
1988, p. 19). The seventh phase also includes evaluation of system, including strengths and limitations.
the results of C-T-E system–based nursing practice on the
pilot units, with emphasis on refinement of nursing docu-
ments and procedures for implementation. TENTH PHASE: DISSEMINATION
OF IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT
PROCEDURES AND OUTCOMES
EIGHTH PHASE: INSTITUTION-WIDE
IMPLEMENTATION The Tenth Phase: Dissemination of Implementation
Project Procedures and Outcomes involves presentations
The Eighth Phase: Institution-Wide Implementation fo- and publications that disseminate the implementation
cuses on implementation of the C-T-E system on all nurs- project procedures and outcomes (K.M. Tong, personal
ing units throughout the health care institution. This phase communication, January 29, 1995). No implementation
requires continuing attention to the education of current project should be considered complete until presentations
staff and the orientation of new staff with regard to C-T-E are given and manuscripts are published. Indeed, sharing
system-based nursing practice, as well as ongoing monitor- what was done to implement C-T-E system-based nursing
ing of and refinements in the implementation procedures. practice and what happened as a result is a crucial aspect of
Again, procedures for implementation should take the any implementation project. Posters and oral presentations
characteristics of each unit into account (Laurie-Shaw & should be prepared for the administrators and staff of the
Ives, 1988). health-care institution, the public served by the health-care
institution, and nursing peers at local, regional, national,
and international conferences. Manuscripts should be pre-
NINTH PHASE: EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES pared for publication as books, book chapters, and journal
articles.
The Ninth Phase: Evaluation of Outcomes focuses on
evaluation of administrative, nurse, and nursing partici-
pant outcomes of the implementation of C-T-E system- PERSPECTIVE TRANSFORMATION
based nursing practice. Although the evaluation phase
actually overlaps with other phases, its importance to the The successful implementation of C-T-E system-based
entire implementation project mandates that it be high- nursing practice requires recognition of the time needed by
lighted as a separate phase (K.M.Tong, personal communi- each nurse and the health-care institution as a whole to
cation, January 29, 1995). evolve from use of individual, implicit frames of reference
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 43
for nursing practice to an explicit C-T-E system. Given the fusion, dwelling with uncertainty, saturation, synthesis,
paucity of attention given to the teaching of the content of resolution, reconceptualization, and return to stability
nursing conceptual models and theories in many nursing (Rogers, 1992). The prevailing period of stability is dis-
programs (Mitchell, 2002), it is likely that many nurses rupted when the idea of implementing C-T-E system-
are using their own implicit frame of reference for their based nursing practice is introduced. Dissonance occurs as
practice. This situation underscores the importance of the the nurses begin to examine their private images or mean-
process that occurs during the period of evolution, which ing perspectives in light of the challenge to adopt a public,
is referred to as PERSPECTIVE TRANSFORMATION. professional one. As the nurses begin to learn the content
Drawing from Mezirow’s (1975, 1978) early work in the of the conceptual model or theory that is the starting point
development of adult learning theory, Rogers (1989) ex- for an explicit C-T-E system, they see the discrepancies be-
plained that perspective transformation is based on the as- tween the current way of practice and what nursing prac-
sumption that “individuals have a personal paradigm or tice could be. A phase of confusion follows. As the nurses
meaning perspective that structures the way in which they struggle to learn more about the conceptual model or the-
existentially experience, interpret, and understand their ory and its implications for practice, they find themselves
world” (p. 112). She went on to define and describe per- “lying in limbo between [meaning] perspectives” (Rogers,
spective transformation as the process “whereby the as- 1992, p. 22). Throughout the phases of dissonance and
sumptions, values, and beliefs that constitute a given confusion, the nurses frequently feel anxious, angry, and
meaning perspective come to consciousness, are reflected unable to think. Rogers (1992) explained that those dis-
upon, and are critically analyzed. The process involves tressing emotions “seem to arise out of the grieving of a
gradually taking on a new perspective along with the cor- loss of an intimate part of the self. The existing meaning
responding assumptions, values, and beliefs. The new per- perspective no longer makes sense, yet the new perspective
spective gives rise to fundamental structural changes in the is not sufficiently internalized to provide resolution”
way individuals see themselves and their relationships with (p. 22). Kappeli (1987) added that “confrontation with a
others, leading to a reinterpretation of their personal, so- model [or theory] can be threatening and produce hostil-
cial, or occupational worlds” (p. 112). ity as it implies the requirement of change” (p. 38).
Thus, the process of perspective transformation when The phase of confusion is following by the phase of
C-T-E system-based nursing practice is implemented in dwelling with uncertainty. At this point, each nurse ac-
a health-care institution involves the shift from one mean- knowledges that his or her confusion “is not a result of
ing perspective about nursing and nursing practice to some personal inadequacy” (Rogers, 1992, p. 22). As a con-
another, from one way “of viewing and being with sequence, anxiety is replaced by a “feeling of freedom to
human beings” to another (Nagle & Mitchell, 1991, p. 22). critically examine old ways and explore the new [meaning]
Inasmuch as practice that is not based on an explicit perspective” (Rogers, 1992, p. 22). The phase of dwelling
C-T-E system is based on an implicit, private image of with uncertainty is spent immersed in information that
nursing (Reilly, 1975), the shift in meaning perspective is frequently seems obscure and irrelevant. It is a time of
from a private image of nursing to a public image, that is, “wallowing in the obscure while waiting for moments
to an explicit “professional meaning perspective” (Rogers, of coherence that lead to unity of thought” (Smith, 1988,
1989, p. 113). p. 3).
Rogers, a Canadian nurse who is not related to the au- The phase of saturation occurs when the nurses “feel
thor of the Science of Unitary Human Beings, commented that they cannot think about or learn anything more about
that her work as a consultant to nurses who were imple- the nursing conceptual [model or theory]” (Rogers, 1992,
menting C-T-E system-based nursing practice in health- p. 22). That phase does not represent resistance but rather
care institutions revealed that the cognitive and emotional “the need to separate from the difficult process of transfor-
aspects of perspective transformation represent “dramatic mation, [which] is part of the natural ebb and flow of the
individual change for every nurse” (Rogers, 1989, p. 112). learning experience” (Rogers, 1992, p. 22).
Moreover, she underscored the importance of recognizing, The phase of synthesis occurs as insights render the
appreciating, and acknowledging that during the process of content of the conceptual model or theory coherent and
perspective transformation, each nurse evolves from feel- meaningful. The formerly obscure C-T-E system-based
ing “a [profound] sense of loss followed by an ultimate nursing practice becomes clear and worthy of the imple-
sense of liberation and empowerment” (Rogers, 1992, mentation effort. Increasing tension is followed by ex-
p. 23). Clearly, as Nagle and Mitchell (1991) pointed out, hilaration as insights illuminate the connections between
perspective transformation requires considerable effort the content of the conceptual model or theory and its
and a strong commitment to change. use in nursing practice (Rogers, 1992; Smith, 1988). “These
Perspective transformation encompasses the nine insights,” Smith (1988) explained, “are moments of coher-
phases depicted in Figure 2–2: stability, dissonance, con- ence, flashes of unity, as though suddenly the fog lifts and
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 44
STABILITY
RECONCEPTUALIZATION DISSONANCE
Competing Conceptualizations
RESOLUTION CONFUSION
SATURATION
FIG. 2–2. Learning a conceptual model of nursing or a nursing theory: phases of the trans-
formation process. (Source: Rogers, M.E. (1992, February–April). Transformative learning:
Understanding and facilitating nurses’ learning of nursing conceptual frameworks. Paper
presented at Sigma Theta Tau Conferences, “Improving Practice and Education Through
Theory.” Chicago, IL; Pittsburgh, PA; Wilkes-Barre, PA. ©1991 Martha Rogers, with per-
mission.)
clarity prevails. These moments of coherence push one be- theories be included (Pilkington, Bunkers, Clarke, &
yond to deepened levels of understanding” (p. 3). Frederickson, 2002). Although one may be philosophically
The phase of resolution is characterized by “a feeling inclined toward a nonlinear view of human processes, any
of comfort with the new nursing conceptual [model or adaptation of Rogers’ and Mezirow’s works requires fur-
theory]. The feelings of dissonance and discontent … are ther empirical study of the process nurses use to learn and
resolved and the anxiety is dissipated” (Rogers, 1992, adopt an explicit conceptual model of nursing as a guide
p. 23). During that phase, “nurses describe themselves as for their activities.
changed, as seeing the world differently and feeling a dis- The nine phases of perspective transformation de-
tinct sense of empowerment” (Rogers, 1992, p. 23). scribed by Rogers (1992) are strikingly similar to three
The phase of reconceptualization occurs as the nurses stages or phases of perspective transformation that occur
consciously reconceptualize nursing practice using the when faculty members adopt an explicit conceptual model
new meaning perspective, that is, the C-T-E system of nursing as a guide for curriculum construction.
(Rogers, 1992). During that phase, the nurses compare the Heinrich (1989) identified three stages—upheaval, evolu-
activities of practice, from patient assessment through tion, and integration—that were experienced by both
shift reports, according to the old and new meaning per- faculty and students when the Roy Adaptation Model
spectives, and change those activities so that they are in was adopted as a curriculum guide at the University of
keeping with the new perspective. The final phase, return Hartford in Hartford, Connecticut. The stage of upheaval
to stability, occurs when the new meaning perspective pre- was characterized by a “right-wrong struggle;” the stage
vails, that is, when nursing practice is based on an explicit of evolution, by “facing the conflict;” and the stage of inte-
C-T-E system. gration, by “humor, creativity, and cooperative learning”
Rogers’ presentation of the phases of perspective trans- (p. 4).
formation as a linear process (see Fig. 2–2) is based on Mengel and colleagues (1989) identified three periods
Mezirow’s (1975, 1978) empirical work. Bunkers proposed of faculty evolution—excitement, reorganization, and
that nonlinear accounts of descriptions of nurses’ partici- acceptance—that occurred when the Roy Adaptation
pation in the process of learning new nursing models and Model was adopted at the Community College of
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 45
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. They explained, “In the period description of a recent interaction with a nursing partici-
of excitement, we were naïvely overconfident that the re- pant. Regardless of the strategy selected, group discussion
vised curriculum would work. ‘Why doesn’t it work?’ was then is used to extract each nurse’s underlying perspective
the theme of the reorganization period. During reorgani- of nursing practice from the words, pictures, or descrip-
zation we began to make changes to meet our needs. tions of interactions.
Finally, in the period of acceptance, we discovered that Once the nurses have gained a clear understanding of
with further adaptations, a curriculum based on the Roy their private images, they should be helped to explore the
model does meet our needs” (p. 125). difference between nursing practice as it is now and as it
The phases of perspective transformation experienced should be, between real and ideal nursing practice. This
by adult learners and nurses is similar to the phases of can be accomplished through the use of provocative strate-
transformative change experienced by members of busi- gies. One provocative strategy is to raise questions about
ness organizations as they create a new way of doing how situations such as childbirth and death are actually
business (Nevis, Lancourt, & Vassallo, 1996). When under- managed and how they ought to be managed. Another
going transformative change, organization members strategy is to ask the nurses to describe what is unique
progress from the status quo, or traditional phase, through about nursing practice or what they would do if they did
exploration and generation to internalization. Like per- not have to carry out physicians’ orders for medications
spective transformation, transformative change requires and treatments.
each individual to significantly alter his or her under- Rogers (1989) pointed out that as the nurses become
standing of the fundamental customs, values, and basic as- aware of the differences between the real and the ideal, they
sumptions that guide the functions of the organization. experience a cognitive dissonance or discomfort that
Resistance to change occurs when people do not view the comes from “the awareness of the ‘what is’ versus ‘what
organization in the same way. The challenge is to facilitate should be’” (p. 115). She went on to point out that
evolution of a new shared reality that will, after a time,
automatically guide the organization’s functions. Most nurses hold in the back of their minds a clear image of
the ideal nurse and ideal practice. Much of the ideal image
was learned in their educational programs and sustained, if
at all, by collegial interaction with other nurses or mentors
STRATEGIES TO FACILITATE who shared the same image. It also appears that while many
PERSPECTIVE TRANSFORMATION nurses have a clear sense of the ideal, they have had to subli-
mate that image to accommodate a system which does
Rogers (1989) identified several strategies that can be used not share the same image. Many nurses can describe their feel-
to facilitate perspective transformation as C-T-E system- ings of loss as they let go of the ideal and came to accept
based nursing practice is being implemented in a health- the real. [Consequently,] nurses need to rekindle an image of
care institution. Those strategies are especially effective the ideal, the what could be or should be [that is represented
during the early phases of perspective transformation, by the C-T-E system]. More importantly, nurses need to
experience a sense of powerfulness to realize the ideal vision.
when the nurses are experiencing a move from their im- Empowerment of nurses through discussion of the value and
plicit, private images of nursing to a shared perspective in importance of nursing knowledge, acts, and processes is es-
the form of an explicit C-T-E system. sential (pp. 115–116).
One strategy is to use analogies to facilitate understand-
ing of the term conceptual model. Such analogies as a chair Rogers (1989) concluded by noting that when cognitive
or book can be used for conceptual, and the analogy of a dissonance “has been experienced by nurses both individ-
model home or model airplane can be used for model. ually or collectively, then perspective transformation can
Rogers (1989) noted that the act of conceptualizing can be occur and a climate for the implementation of a nursing
demystified “by stating that it is not a process reserved for conceptual [model] will have been created” (p. 116).
intellectuals, but rather a cognitive process of all humans Subsequent stages of perspective transformation and
that begins in infancy as a baby puts together all the pieces the implementation of C-T-E system-based nursing prac-
to form the concept of mother” (p. 114). tice are facilitated by constant reinforcement. Accordingly,
Two other strategies are directed toward identification all nursing activities at the health-care institution should
of the nurses’ existing private images of nursing practice. be tied to the C-T-E system in a systematic manner. The
One of those strategies is to ask each nurse to list words novice user of a C-T-E system should not become discour-
that reflect his or her view of nursing practice. Similarly, aged if initial experiences with that system seem forced
each nurse could be asked to depict his or her view of nurs- or awkward. Adoption of an explicit C-T-E system does
ing practice in drawings or collages of photographs. require restructuring the nurse’s way of thinking about
Another strategy is to ask each nurse to present a detailed nursing situations and use of a new vocabulary. However,
02Fawcett-02 09/17/2004 1:42 PM Page 46
repeated use of the C-T-E system should lead to more sys- participation in the hospital-based career advancement
tematic and organized endeavors. As Broncatello (1980) program, and participation in shared governance councils
commented, “The nurse’s consistent use of any [C-T-E which actively promoted development of [C-T-E system]-
system] for the interpretation of observable client data is based practice” (p. 83). Their findings clearly support the
most definitely not an easy task. Much like the develop- inclusion of courses addressing the content and applica-
ment of any habitual behavior, it initially requires thought, tion of C-T-E systems in nursing education programs, the
discipline and the gradual evolvement of a mind set of linkage of practice career advancement programs to the
what is important to observe within the guidelines of the use of an explicit C-T-E system, and the institution of
[C-T-E system]. As is true of most habits, however, it shared governance councils that actively promote and sup-
makes decision making less complicated” (p. 23). port C-T-E system-based nursing practice.
Part Two
ANALYSIS AND
EVALUATION
OF CONCEPTUAL
MODELS OF
NURSING
Chapter 3
Framework for Analysis
and Evaluation
of Nursing Models
51
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 52
52
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 53
ous action world views, discussed in Chapter 1, are ap- presented their ideas in the form of explicit statements
propriate here. The questions that should be asked when about each of the metaparadigm concepts. Therefore this
analyzing the origins of the nursing model are: part of the analysis is most readily accomplished first by
categorizing the content of the model into the concepts
● What is the historical evolution of the nursing model? that represent human beings, the environment, health, and
● What motivated development of the nursing model? nursing. Next, the nonrelational propositions that define
● On what philosophical beliefs and values about nursing and describe those concepts are identified. Finally, the rela-
is the nursing model based? tional propositions that link the concepts are extracted and
● What strategies for knowledge development were used to categorized according to linkages among the four meta-
formulate the nursing model? paradigm concepts. The questions about the content of the
● What scholars influenced the model author’s thinking? nursing model are:
● What world view is reflected in the nursing model?
● How are human beings defined and described?
● How is environment defined and described?
ANALYSIS STEP 2: UNIQUE FOCUS ● How is health defined? How are wellness and illness dif-
OF THE NURSING MODEL ferentiated?
● How is nursing defined?
The second step in the analysis of a nursing model is ex- ● What is the goal of nursing?
amination of its unique focus. The need to identify the ● How is nursing practice described?
unique focus of the nursing model stems from the under- ● What statements are made about the relations among the
standing that although most authors start with the same four metaparadigm concepts?
view of the general purpose of nursing, in final form the
nursing models present distinctive views of the metapara-
digm concepts (Johnson, 1974). Indeed, different models EVALUATION OF THE NURSING
are concerned with different problems in nursing situa- MODEL
tions or different problems in interactions between human
beings and their environments (Christensen & Kenney, Evaluation of a nursing model is accomplished by
1995; Duffey & Muhlenkamp, 1974). They also are con- comparing its content with certain criteria. Those criteria
cerned with different actual and potential deviations from address explication of origins, comprehensiveness of
desired health conditions and with different modes of content, logical congruence, generation of theory, credi-
nursing intervention (Johnson, 1987). bility, and contributions to the discipline of nursing. The
The factors thought to influence the development of evaluation is based on the results of the analysis, as well as
problems or deviations and to direct types of nursing in- on a review of previously published critiques, research re-
terventions also vary from model to model. The unique ports, and reports of the application of the nursing model
focus of a nursing model is specified by its classification re- in nursing education, administration, and practice.
garding one or more categories of nursing knowledge. As
explained in Chapter 1, the relevant categories are develop-
mental, systems, interaction, needs, outcomes, client fo- EVALUATION STEP 1:
cused, person-environment interaction focused, nursing EXPLICATION OF ORIGINS
therapeutics, energy fields, intervention, conservation,
The first step of evaluation concerns explication of origins
substitution, sustenance/support, and enhancement. The
of the nursing model. Identification of the author’s beliefs
question is:
and values yields information about the philosophical
● What is the unique focus of the nursing model? foundations of the model and helps identify special points
of emphasis in the view of nursing put forth by the nursing
model.
ANALYSIS STEP 3: CONTENT The expectation is that philosophical claims have been
OF THE NURSING MODEL made explicit by the author. Indeed, “a statement of one’s
value system is an essential accompaniment to a model”
The third step in the analysis of a nursing model is exami- (Johnson, 1987, p. 197). Furthermore, because the content
nation of its content. The content of a nursing model is of most nursing models draws from existing knowledge in
presented in the form of abstract and general concepts and nursing and adjunctive disciplines (Levine, 1988, 1995), it
propositions. Most authors of nursing models have not is expected that the works of other scholars have been
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 54
cited. The questions that should be asked when evaluating pectation is that the nursing model is a useful frame of
the origins of the nursing model are: reference for many nursing activities, it is recognized that
any one nursing model may not be appropriate for all prac-
● Are the philosophical claims on which the nursing tice situations in all cultures. Indeed, it is entirely possible
model is based explicit? that the content of the model precludes consideration of
● Are the scholars who influenced the model author’s or application to certain situations or cultures (Fawcett,
thinking acknowledged and are bibliographical citations 2003a, 2003b). In such a case, potential users of the model
given? must decide if the limitations are sufficient to warrant its
elimination as a viable one for nursing. The questions to
ask when evaluating the breadth of the content of the nurs-
EVALUATION STEP 2: ing model are based on suggestions from Johnson (1987)
COMPREHENSIVENESS OF CONTENT and reflect the guidelines for nursing research, education,
administration, and practice that were described in
The second step of evaluation deals with the comprehen- Chapter 2. The questions are:
siveness of content of the model. Emphasis is placed on
the depth and breadth of content. ● Is the researcher given sufficient direction about what
No well-established criterion for the depth of the con- questions to ask and what methodology to use?
tent of a nursing model has been established. It seems ● Does the educator have sufficient guidelines to construct
reasonable to expect, however, that the content should en- a curriculum?
compass the four metaparadigm concepts and that the ● Does the administrator have sufficient guidelines to or-
content is relatively unambiguous. Consequently, the ex- ganize and deliver nursing services?
pectation is that the nursing model includes concepts and ● Is the practitioner given sufficient direction to be able to
nonrelational propositions that represent a description of make pertinent observations, decide that an actual or
human beings, an identification of the relevant environ- potential need for nursing exists, and prescribe and exe-
ment, a description of the author’s meaning of health, a cute a course of action that achieves the goal specified in
definition of nursing, a statement of nursing goals or out- a variety of practice situations?
comes, and a description of nursing practice, which may be
in the form of a nursing process or a methodology for
nursing practice. In addition, the nursing process or prac-
EVALUATION STEP 3: LOGICAL CONGRUENCE
tice methodology should be grounded in a base of scien- The third step of evaluation of a nursing model considers
tific knowledge, permit dynamic movement between each the logic of its internal structure. logical congruence is
component, and be compatible with ethical standards for evaluated through an intellectual process that involves
nursing practice (Walker & Nicholson, 1980). judging the congruence of the model author’s espoused
It also seems reasonable to expect the relational propo- philosophical claims with the content of the model. In ad-
sitions of the nursing model to link all four metaparadigm dition, the process requires judgments regarding congru-
concepts. This may be done in a series of propositions that ence of the world view(s) and category(ies) of nursing
reflect linkage of two or more metaparadigm concepts, or knowledge reflected by the model. Evaluation of logical
it may be accomplished by one summary statement en- congruence is especially important if the nursing model
compassing all four metaparadigm concepts. These propo- incorporates more than one world view or category of
sitions will, of course, be stated in the vocabulary of the nursing knowledge, because different schools of thought
particular nursing model. The questions that should be cannot be combined easily, if at all. However, viewpoints
asked when evaluating the depth of the content of a nurs- sometimes may be merged or translated by redefining all
ing model are: concepts in a consistent manner. More specifically, nursing
● Does the nursing model provide adequate descriptions models that strive to combine concepts and propositions
of all four concepts of nursing’s metaparadigm? derived from different world views or different categories
● Do the relational propositions of the nursing model of nursing knowledge must first reformulate or translate
completely link the four metaparadigm concepts? the concepts and propositions to ensure just one congruent
frame of reference.
The criterion for the breadth of the content of a nursing Reformulation or translation is accomplished by re-
model requires that it be sufficiently broad to provide defining concepts and restating propositions that do not
guidance in practice situations of normalcy, risk, crisis, and reflect the preferred world view or category of nursing
morbidity (Magee, 1994) and to also serve as a basis for knowledge, so that all ideas presented in the nursing model
research, education, and administration. Although the ex- are consistent (Reese & Overton, 1970; Whall, 1980) (see
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 55
Chapter 2). The expectation is that all elements of the tice of nursing” (See, 1986, p. 355). Acceptance or rejection
nursing model are logically congruent. The questions that of that impression by means of a thorough evaluation of
should be asked when evaluating logical congruence are: the credibility of each nursing model is crucial if nursing is
to continue to advance as a respected discipline character-
● Does the model reflect more than one world view? ized by excellent scholarship.
● Does the model reflect characteristics of more than one The credibility of a nursing model cannot be deter-
category of nursing knowledge? mined directly. Rather, the abstract and general concepts
● Do the components of the model reflect logical transla- and propositions of the nursing model must be linked with
tion or reformulation of diverse perspectives? the more concrete and specific concepts and propositions
of a middle-range theory and appropriate empirical indi-
cators to determine credibility. The resulting conceptual-
EVALUATION STEP 4: theoretical-empirical system of nursing knowledge then
GENERATION OF THEORY is used to guide nursing activities, and the results of use
are examined. Thus credibility of nursing models is deter-
The fourth step of the evaluation of a nursing model re- mined through tests of conceptual-theoretical-empirical
flects the relationship between a more abstract and general systems of nursing knowledge. In particular, credibility is
conceptual model and a more concrete and specific theory. examined by means of the criteria of social utility, social
As explained in Chapter 1, grand theories and middle- congruence, and social significance. Judgments regarding the
range theories are derived from nursing models (see Fig. extent to which the nursing model meets those criteria re-
1–2). Thus, the extent to which the nursing model leads to quire a review of all available publications and presenta-
generation of theory should be judged. tions by the author of the nursing model, as well as those
The need for logically congruent conceptual-theoretical- by other nurses who have used the model.
empirical systems of nursing knowledge for nursing
activities mandates that at least some theories be derived
from each nursing model. The expectation, therefore, is Social Utility
that the abstract concepts and propositions of the model be
sufficiently clear so that the more concrete concepts and Social utility addresses the special education required to
propositions of grand theories and middle-range theories apply the nursing model; the feasibility of implement-
can be deduced and testable hypotheses can be formulated. ing the nursing model in nursing practice; and the extent
The question is: to which the nursing model actually is used to guide nurs-
ing research, education, administration, and practice.
● What theories have been generated from the nursing Although model authors should strive to write and discuss
model? their work clearly and concisely (Cormack & Reynolds,
1992), the abstract and general nature of nursing models
and the special vocabulary of each one typically require
EVALUATION STEP 5: CREDIBILITY
collegiate or continuing education for mastery. In addition,
OF THE NURSING MODEL
special training in interpersonal and psychomotor skills
The fifth step of evaluation focuses attention on the credi- may be necessary to apply the model in practice situations
bility of the nursing model. Credibility determination is (Magee, 1994). The expectation is that the nurse has a full
necessary to avoid the danger of uncritical acceptance and understanding of content of the nursing model, as well as
adoption of nursing models, which could easily lead to the interpersonal and psychomotor skills necessary to
their use as ideologies. Critical reviews of the evidence apply it. Thus, the first question to be asked when evaluat-
regarding the credibility of each nursing model must be ing the social utility of a nursing model is:
encouraged and acceptance of work that is “fashionable, ● Are education and special skill training required before
well-trodden or simply available in the nursing library” applying the nursing model in nursing practice?
(Grinnell, 1992, p. 57) must be avoided.
The ultimate aim of credibility determination is to as- The evaluation of social utility also considers the feasibil-
certain which nursing models are appropriate for use in ity of implementing practice protocols derived from the
which practice situations and with which populations. It is nursing model and related theories in nursing practice.
likely that determination of credibility will either support The expectation is, of course, that the implementation
or refute the impression that any nursing model “can ex- of such protocols is feasible. Feasibility is determined by
plain or guide any nursing intervention in any setting, and evaluating the human and material resources needed to
that all [models] are equally relevant for guiding the prac- establish the model-based nursing actions as customary
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 56
practice (Magee, 1994). Requisite resources include the sionals of various cultures and in diverse geographic re-
time required to learn and implement the protocols; the gions?
number, type, and expertise of personnel required for their
application; and the funds for continuing education,
salaries, equipment, and protocol-testing procedures. The Social Significance
question is:
The criterion of social significance requires a judgment to
● Is it feasible to implement practice protocols derived be made with regard to the social value of a nursing model,
from the nursing model and related theories? with emphasis placed on the effect of use of a nursing
model on the health conditions of people (Magee, 1994).
In addition, evaluation of social utility requires considera- “This criterion,” according to Johnson (1974), “recognizes
tion of the extent to which the nursing model actually is that a professional service is a highly valued one because it
used to guide nursing research, education, administration, is critical to people in some way” (p. 376). The social sig-
and practice. The expectation is that the nursing model has nificance of a nursing model is determined by analysis of
been applied in some situations. Although a completely ac- data from practice projects and formal studies.
curate appraisal of actual use is impossible, a continually The practice project method of determining social sig-
growing body of literature documents the application of
nificance is accomplished by examining the conclusions
nursing models to the design of nursing studies, the con-
drawn by nurses who have applied the nursing model-
struction of educational programs and administrative
based system of knowledge in the real world of nursing
structures, and the care of people who require nursing. The
practice. The conceptual-theoretical-empirical system of
question is:
knowledge is considered credible if practice outcomes are
● To what extent is the nursing model actually used to in accordance with expectations. If, however, outcomes are
guide nursing research, education, administration, and not in accordance with expectations, the credibility of the
practice? knowledge system, and hence the nursing model, must be
questioned.
The formal study method of determining social signifi-
Social Congruence cance is accomplished by examining the findings of re-
search guided by conceptual-theoretical-empirical systems
Social congruence refers to the compatibility of nursing of nursing knowledge. More specifically, determination of
model-based nursing activities with the expectations for credibility is accomplished by comparing the research find-
nursing practice of the human beings who require nursing, ings with the propositions of the conceptual-theoretical-
the community, and the health-care system (Magee, 1994). empirical system of nursing knowledge that was used to
In particular, the culturally determined expectations of guide the research. If the research findings support the em-
people who require nursing and the community, as well as pirical adequacy of the theory, it is likely that the nursing
various discipline-oriented expectations of health care model is credible. If, however, the research findings do not
team members, with regard to appropriate areas of assess- support hypothesized expectations, both the empirical ad-
ment, relevant goals, appropriate nursing interventions, equacy of the theory and the credibility of the nursing
and relevant outcomes must be taken into account model must be questioned.
(Aggleton & Chalmers, 1985; Jones, 1989; McLane, 1983). The expectation for the criterion of social significance is
Furthermore, expectations based on the system of health that the use of the nursing model has a significant, positive
care delivery in various countries should be considered impact on the well-being of the public. The question is:
(Cormack & Reynolds, 1992). If others’ expectations for
nursing are not congruent with the practice that is derived ● Does application of the nursing model, when linked with
from the nursing model, they must be helped to expect a relevant theories and appropriate empirical indicators,
different kind of nursing. This is especially important, make important and positive differences in the health
because without the expected affirmative answer to the conditions of the public?
question of social congruence, “nursing will not continue
to be sanctioned as a profession or an occupation, and in a
nursing shortage situation [or in any era of health care EVALUATION STEP 6: CONTRIBUTIONS
reform], … the nurse may be replaced with other health TO THE DISCIPLINE OF NURSING
professionals” (Johnson, 1987, p. 197). The question is:
The sixth and final step of evaluation of nursing models,
● Does the nursing model lead to nursing activities that which is as general as the conceptual models themselves,
meet the expectations of the public and health profes- requires a judgment to be made with regard to the contri-
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 57
TABLE 3–1
A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF NURSING MODELS
(continued)
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 58
TABLE 3–1
A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF NURSING MODELS (continued)
REFERENCES Cormack, D.F., & Reynolds, W. (1992). Criteria for evaluating the
clinical and practical utility of models used by nurses. Journal of
Advanced Nursing, 17, 1472–1478.
Aggleton, P., & Chalmers, H. (1985). Critical examination. Duffey, M., & Muhlenkamp, A.F. (1974). A framework for theory
Nursing Times, 81(14), 38–39. analysis. Nursing Outlook, 22, 570–574.
Barnum, B.J.S. (1998). Nursing theory: Analysis, application, Fawcett, J. (1980). A framework for analysis and evaluation of
evaluation (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott. conceptual models of nursing. Nurse Educator, 5(6), 10–14.
Christensen, P.J., & Kenney, J.W. (Eds.). (1995). Nursing Fawcett, J. (2003a). Conceptual models of nursing: International
process: Application of conceptual models (4th ed.). St. Louis: in scope and substance? The case of the Roy adaptation model.
Mosby. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 315–318.
03Fawcett-03 09/17/2004 1:43 PM Page 59
Chapter 4
Johnson’s Behavioral
System Model
Dorothy Johnson presented the rudimentary ideas for the Behavioral System
Model in her 1959 journal article, “A Philosophy of Nursing,” and in her 1961
journal article, “The Significance of Nursing Care.” However, Johnson did not
present her entire conceptual model in the literature until she prepared a chap-
ter for the second edition of Riehl and Roy’s (1980) book, Conceptual Models for
Nursing Practice. Before the publication of that book chapter, the only public
records of the model were a widely cited paper that Johnson presented at
Vanderbilt University in 1968 and an audiotape of her 1978a presentation at the
Second Annual Nurse Educator Conference. Versions of the model had, how-
ever, been available to interested nurses since Grubbs published her interpreta-
tion of the Behavioral System Model in 1974 and Auger published her
interpretation in 1976.
Johnson did not present any major revisions in her conceptual model after the
1980 book chapter, although she continued to discuss and provide more detail
about various aspects of the model, especially the practice methodology, in her
1990a book chapter, “The Behavioral System Model for Nursing,” and presented
a very informative discussion of the origins of the model in her 1992 book chap-
ter, “The Origins of the Behavioral System Model.” Dorothy Johnson died on
February 4, 1999.
60
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 61
ANALYSIS OF JOHNSON’S edge needed to attain the goal of nursing. Johnson (1990a)
BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODEL stated that she approached that task historically, empiri-
cally, and analytically. The historical approach led her to
This section presents an analysis of Johnson’s Behavioral accept from Nightingale nursing’s traditional concern with
System Model. The analysis relies heavily on Johnson’s human beings who are ill, rather than with diseases per se,
1980 and 1990a publications, “The Behavioral System as well as “a focus on the basic human needs of the person
Model for Nursing,” and also draws from her 1992 publica- and a concern for the relationship between the person and
tion, “The Origins of the Behavioral System Model.” the environment” (Johnson, 1992, p. 24). The empirical ap-
proach led to a review of studies of nursing tasks. Johnson
noted that this approach, which defines nursing as what
ORIGINS OF THE NURSING MODEL nurses do, was not fruitful. However, it kept the focus on
human beings who are ill or who might be prevented from
Historical Evolution and Motivation becoming ill. Finally, the analytical approach led Johnson
to consider what reason suggests. This turned out to be the
Johnson (1990a) noted that the Behavioral System Model most useful approach.
“has been in the process of development for nearly the en- “The work began,” as Johnson (1992) noted, “with the
tire course of my professional life” (p. 23). The unique effort to develop course content in the basic curriculum by
focus and content of the model evolved over a period of focusing on common human needs, moving on to ‘care
20 years, beginning in the early 1940s when Johnson and comfort’ as organizing principles, and then to stress
began to teach nursing. As she developed baccalaureate and tension reduction as the major principles” (p. 24).
nursing courses, Johnson was motivated to ask several Through reasoning, Johnson (1980) finally came to con-
questions: ceive of nursing’s specific contribution to patient welfare as
● What content is properly included in a course in nursing “the fostering of efficient and effective behavioral func-
because it constitutes nursing knowledge? tioning in the patient to prevent illness and during and fol-
● Knowledge for what purpose, to what end? lowing illness” (p. 207). That perspective led Johnson
● What is the explicit, ideal goal of nursing? (Johnson, (1990a) to accept “a theoretical view of the client, the per-
1990a, p. 23) son, as a behavioral system in much the same way that
physicians have accepted a theoretical view of the person as
In answering those questions, the task as Johnson saw it a biological system” (p. 24).
was to clarify nursing’s social mission from the perspective Elaborating, Johnson (1992) explained that the Behav-
of a theoretically sound view of human beings served by ioral System orientation leads nursing to fulfill its social
nursing and to identify the nature of the body of knowl- mission through the special responsibility of promoting
61
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 62
“the most effective and efficient behavioral system possi- with adequate understanding of the potential for and the
ble, as well as to prevent specific problems from occurring means to obtain a more optimal level of behavioral func-
in the system. Meeting this responsibility would also con- tioning than is evident at the present time (Johnson,
tribute to healthier biologic and social systems” (pp. 1978a).
26–27).
Beliefs about the Nature and Operation of the Behavioral
System
Philosophical Claims
● A system is a whole which functions as a whole
Johnson presented the philosophical claims undergirding (Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
the Behavioral System Model in the form of beliefs, as- ● Parts or elements of a system are organized, interac-
sumptions, premises, and a value system. Examination of tive, interdependent, and integrated (Johnson, 1980, p.
those statements yielded fundamental values about behav- 208).
ior, beliefs about the nature and operation of the ● The system tends to achieve a balance among various
Behavioral System, and beliefs about nursing that are listed forces acting within and upon it (Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
here. ● Man strives continually to maintain behavioral system
balance and [a] steady state by more or less automatic
Fundamental Values about Behavior
adjustments and adaptations to the natural forces im-
● There is a wide range of behavior which is tolerated in pinging upon him (Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
this society or any other, and only the middle section of ● Behavioral System balance represents adjustments and
the continuum can be said to represent the cultural adaptations that are successful to some degree and in
norms (Johnson, 1968, p. 4). some way, even though observed behavior may not
● So long as behavior does not threaten the survival of so- match cultural or biologic norms for acceptable or
ciety, either directly through the death or lack of pro- healthy behavior (Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
ductivity of individuals or indirectly through the ● Man actively seeks new experiences that may disturb bal-
creation of massive disorder or deviance from estab- ance, at least temporarily, and that may require small
lished social values, it appears to be acceptable (Johnson, or large behavioral system modification to reestablish
1968, p. 4). balance (Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
● The outer limits of acceptable, and therefore tolerated, ● Observed regularities and constancies in human behav-
behavior are thus set for the professions by society, but in ior that result from behavioral system balance and stabil-
fact, the limits of acceptable behavior set by the health ity are functionally significant for the individual and for
professions, including nursing, probably tend to be nar- social life (Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
rower in some areas and in some respects than those set ● Living systems can and do operate at varying levels of ef-
by the larger society (Johnson, 1968, p. 4). ficiency and effectiveness; but in order for a system to
● Since the professions have an obligation which goes operate at all, it must maintain a certain level of balance
beyond accepting the current state of affairs to shaping and stability internally and in its environmental interac-
the reality of the future, an additional facet of this tions (Johnson, 1978a; 1990a, p. 25).
problem of values is that of determining what is desir- ● Behavioral systems have sufficient flexibility to take ac-
able, rather than simply acceptable, behavior. At least count of the usual fluctuations in the impinging forces
two closely related facts must be remembered in this and enough stress tolerance for adjustment to many
connection. In the first place, forced change in behavior common, but extreme, fluctuations (Johnson, 1980, p.
in one area of life may and often does require other 209).
behavioral modifications. The consequences may be un- ● When behavioral regularities are disturbed, integrity of
foreseen, unintended, and undesirable. Second, the the person is threatened and functions served by such
current status of knowledge about man and his universe order are less than adequately fulfilled (Johnson, 1978a).
does not allow us to predict, with reasonable certainty, a ● If extraordinarily strong impinging forces, or a lowered
configuration of behavioral responses which measured resistance to or capacity to adjust to more moderate
against some established standards could be said to be of forces disturb behavioral system balance, the integrity of
a “better” or “higher” level in an absolute way (Johnson, the person is threatened (Johnson, 1968, p. 4).
1968, p. 4). ● During their lives, most individuals probably experience
● The final judgment of the desired level of functioning is a psychologic or social crisis or physical illness grave
the right of the individual, given that that level is within enough to disturb system balance and require external
survival limits and that the individual has been provided assistance (Johnson, 1980, p. 209).
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 63
and changing, reacting and adapting to their respective UNIQUE FOCUS OF THE NURSING MODEL
environments, including other behavioral systems in that
environment” (1992, p. 25). The unique focus of the Behavioral System Model is
human beings as behavioral systems (Johnson, 1968,
1978a, 1980, 1990a). More specifically, the focus of the
World View Behavioral System Model “is on social behavior—the ob-
servable features and actions of the person that take into
The Behavioral System Model reflects the reciprocal inter- account the actual or implied presence of other social be-
action world view. The features of that world view that are ings. In particular, the focus is on those forms of behavior
evident in the Behavioral System Model are: that have been shown to have major adaptive significance”
● The Behavioral System Model reflects a holistic view of (Johnson, 1990a, p. 25).
human beings, with emphasis on the behavioral system Particular attention is given to actual or potential struc-
as a whole. tural or functional problems in the behavioral system as a
● The behavioral system is active, not reactive (Johnson, whole and in the various subsystems and to behavioral
personal communication cited in Brown et al., 1998). functioning that is at a less than desired or optimal level
● Human beings are regarded as active organisms who (Johnson, 1980, 1990a). Two types of behavioral system
seek new experiences. disorders are particularly relevant—“those that are related
● Each subsystem strives to achieve a particular goal, and tangentially or peripherally to disorder in the biological
each human being makes certain behavioral choices. system; that is, they are precipitated simply by the fact of
● Individuals are active beings who adjust environments to illness or the situational context of treatment, and those
ensure better functioning for themselves. that are an integral part of a biological system disorder in
● Human beings determine and limit the interactions be- that they are either directly associated with or a direct con-
tween themselves and the environment, and establish sequence of a particular kind of biological system disorder
their relationship to the objects, events, and situations in or its treatment” (Johnson, 1968, pp. 6–7).
the environment (Johnson, 1990a). Johnson (1990a) maintained, “The acceptance of the
● Persistence is reflected in Johnson’s emphasis on behav- behavioral system as the client is the primary component
ioral system balance and stability. “Interestingly, one of this nursing model” (p. 24). She claimed, “The concep-
of the first of the current nursing theorists, Dorothy tion of man as a behavioral system, or the idea that man’s
Johnson, tried to head the profession in the direction specific response patterns form an organized and inte-
of persistence. She takes equilibrium as a starting point grated whole is original with me, so far as I know”
in her original conception. The goal of nursing care, in (Johnson, 1980, p. 208). She further noted that the litera-
her model, emphasizes balance, order, stability, and ture indicates that others support her idea. Indeed, Ackoff
maintenance of the integrity of the patient” (Hall, 1981, used the term Behavioral System in 1960.
p. 5).
● Change is postulated to occur only when necessary for
survival. Behavior changes when it no longer is “func- Category of Knowledge
tionally efficient and effective … in managing the indi-
vidual’s relationship to the environment … or when The Behavioral System Model is classified as a systems
some more optimal level of functioning is perceived as model by Barnum (1998), Marriner-Tomey (1989), and
desirable by the individual” (Johnson, 1990a, p. 25). Riehl and Roy (1980). Meleis (1997) regards the Behavioral
System Model as a prominent example of the outcome cat-
The focus on the behavioral system as a whole and empha- egory of models and also classified the model as client fo-
sis on behavior, per se, indicate a holistic view of human cused. Although Barnum (1998) classified the Behavioral
beings. Subsystems are explicitly identified as parts of System Model as a systems model, she also placed it within
the whole behavioral system, rather than as discrete the intervention category of her classification scheme. The
entities. Consistent with the reciprocal interaction world appropriateness of the systems category classification is ev-
view, the Behavioral System Model incorporates elements ident in the comparison of the Behavioral System Model
of both persistence and change. As Johnson (1980) noted, content with the characteristics of the systems category of
the behavioral system “both requires and results in some knowledge, as can be seen here.
degree of regularity and constancy in behavior. …
Behavioral system balance reflects adjustments and adap- ● System: Human beings are behavioral systems.
tations that are successful in some way and to some degree” ● Integration of Parts: The parts are the subsystems, which
(p. 208). are “linked and open, as is true in all systems, and a dis-
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 65
turbance in one subsystem is likely to have an effect on The metaparadigm concept of environment is repre-
others” (Johnson, 1980, p. 210). sented by the Behavioral System Model concept of SYSTEM
● Environment: Internal and external environments are ENVIRONMENT, which has two dimensions—Internal
mentioned but particular parameters are not identified Environment and External Environment. The metapara-
(Johnson, 1980, 1990a). digm concept of health is represented by the Behavioral
● Boundary: Not addressed explicitly, although boundary System Model concepts of BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM BAL-
permeability is alluded to: “There appears to be built into ANCE AND STABILITY and BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM IM-
the system sufficient flexibility to take account of the BALANCE AND INSTABILITY, both of which are
usual fluctuations in the impinging forces and enough unidimensional.
stress tolerance for the system to adjust to many com- The metaparadigm concept of nursing is represented in
mon, but extreme fluctuations” (Johnson, 1980, p. 209). the Behavioral System Model by the concept of EXTER-
● Tension, Stress, Strain, and Conflict: The “natural” forces NAL REGULATORY FORCE. That concept has three
impinging upon the behavioral system are regarded as dimensions—Impose External Regulatory or Control
the source of tension or stress, and lead to “more or less Mechanisms, Change Structural Components, and Fulfill
automatic adjustments and adaptations” required for Functional Requirements.
continuing behavioral system balance and stability
(Johnson, 1980, p. 208).
● Steady State: Steady state is associated with behavioral Nonrelational Propositions
system balance (Johnson, 1980). Although the concept of The definitions of the concepts of the Behavioral System
behavioral system balance and stability implies that the Model are listed here. Those constitutive definitions are the
system is at a fixed point or achieves equilibrium when nonrelational propositions of this nursing model.
stable, Johnson apparently regards stability as a dynamic
equilibrium. That aspect of the conceptual model re- BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM
quires clarification.
● Feedback: According to Johnson (1978a), it is necessary ● The whole individual is a behavioral system (Johnson,
to understand input, output, feedback, and regulatory 1980, 1990a).
control mechanisms to analyze behavioral system func- ● The behavioral system is composed of “all patterned,
tioning. However, the nature of those system operations repetitive, and purposeful ways of behaving that charac-
was not described. terize each man’s life” (Johnson, 1980, p. 209).
The concept of Behavioral System encompasses seven
CONTENT OF THE NURSING MODEL dimensions, which are viewed as subsystems (Johnson,
1980, 1990a)—the Attachment or Affiliative Subsystem,
Concepts the Dependency Subsystem, the Ingestive Subsystem, the
Eliminative Subsystem, the Sexual Subsystem, the
The metaparadigm concepts of human beings, environ- Aggressive Subsystem, and the Achievement Subsystem.
ment, health, and nursing are reflected in the concepts of Each of the seven subsystems has a distinctive and special-
the Behavioral System Model. Each conceptual model con- ized task or function needed to maintain the integrity of
cept is classified here according to its metaparadigm fore- the whole behavioral system and manage its relationship to
runner. the environment (Johnson, 1980, 1990a). Each function
The metaparadigm concept of human beings is repre- evolves “to carry out its own specialized tasks for the sys-
sented by the Behavioral System Model concepts of BE- tem as a whole. … [The] responses are differentiated, de-
HAVIORAL SYSTEM, STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS, veloped, and modified through maturation, experience,
and FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. Each of those con- and learning. They are determined and are continuously
cepts is multidimensional. The concept of Behavioral governed by a multitude of physical, biological, psycholog-
System has seven dimensions, which are viewed as subsys- ical, and social factors operating in a complex and inter-
tems—Attachment or Affiliative Subsystem, Dependency locking fashion” (p. 26). The functions of the seven
Subsystem, Ingestive Subsystem, Eliminative Subsystem, subsystems are given here.
Sexual Subsystem, Aggressive Subsystem, and Achieve-
ment Subsystem. The concept of Structural Components ● Attachment or Affiliative Subsystem: Functions are
has four dimensions—Drive or Goal, Set, Choice, and attainment of the security needed for survival as well
Action or Behavior. The concept of Functional Require- as social inclusion, intimacy, and the formation and
ments has three dimensions—Protection, Nurturance, and maintenance of social bonds (Johnson, 1980, 1990a).
Stimulation. This subsystem is “one of the first response systems to
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 66
emerge developmentally . . .[and as] probably the most ● Achievement Subsystem: Function is mastery or control
critical subsystem for it forms the basis for all social or- of some aspect of self or environment, with regard to in-
ganization” (Johnson, 1990a, p. 27). tellectual, physical, creative, mechanical, social, and care-
● Dependency Subsystem: Functions are succoring behav- taking (of children, spouse, home) skills, and as
ior that calls for a response of nurturance as well as ap- measured against some standard of excellence (Johnson,
proval, attention, or recognition, and physical assistance 1980, 1990a). This subsystem, according to Johnson
(Johnson, 1980, 1990a). Dependency subsystem behav- (1990a), probably develops through “exploratory behav-
ior, according to Johnson (1990a), “in the socially opti- ior and attempts to manipulate the environment” (p. 29).
mum case evolves [developmentally] from almost total
dependence on others to a greater degree of dependence Johnson (1980) explained that the seven subsystems “are
on self, with a certain amount of interdependence essen- linked and open, … and a disturbance in one subsystem is
tial to the survival of social groups” (p. 28). likely to have an effect on others” (p. 210). She further ex-
● Ingestive Subsystem: Function is appetite satisfaction, plained, “Although each subsystem has a specialized task or
with regard to when, how, what, how much, and under function, the system as a whole depends on an integrated
what conditions the individual eats, which is governed performance” (p. 210).
by social and psychological considerations as well as bi- Johnson (1980, 1990a) maintained that the subsystems
ological requirements for food and fluids (Johnson, are found cross-culturally and across a broad range of
1980, 1990a). The ingestive subsystem extends beyond the phylogenetic scale, suggesting that they are genetically
the biological function of ingestion of substances. programmed. She also noted the significance of social and
“Ingestive behavior,” in Johnson’s (1990a) view, “serve[s] cultural factors involved in the development of the subsys-
the broad function of appetitive satisfaction in its own tems. The seven subsystems are not, however, to be re-
right, [which] may be and all too often is at odds with bi- garded as a complete set, because “the ultimate group of
ological requirements for [f]oods and fluids” (p. 28). response systems to be identified in the behavioral system
● Eliminative Subsystem: Function is elimination, with re- will undoubtedly change as research reveals new systems
gard to when, how, and under what conditions the indi- or indicates changes in the structure, functions, or behav-
vidual eliminates wastes (Johnson, 1980, 1990a). The ior pattern groupings in the original set” (Johnson, 1980,
eliminative subsystem, however, extends beyond the bio- p. 212).
logical function of elimination of waste products.
Although the function of the eliminative subsystem, STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Johnson (1990a) admitted, “is more difficult to differen- ● Refers to the structural elements of the subsystems
tiate from that of the biological system” (p. 28) than is
(Johnson, 1980).
the ingestive subsystem, “clearly all humans … must
learn expected modes of behavior in the excretion of The concept of Structural Components encompasses four
wastes, and these behaviors often take precedence over dimensions (Johnson, 1980, 1990a)—Drive or Goal, Set,
or strongly influence otherwise purely biological acts” Choice, and Action or Behavior.
(p. 28).
● Sexual Subsystem: Functions are procreation and grati- ● Drive or Goal: Refers to motivation for behavior
fication, with regard to behaviors dependent on the indi- (Johnson, 1980, 1990a). The drive is “that which is a
vidual’s biological sex and gender role identity, including stimulant to action [whereas] the goal is that which is
but not limited to courting and mating (Johnson, 1980, sought”(Johnson, 1990a, p. 27). Drive or goal is “perhaps
1990a). The sexual subsystem, which as Johnson (1990a) the most significant structural component” (Johnson,
pointed out, “has strong biological underpinnings … 1990a, p. 27). The drive or goal of each subsystem is, in
probably originates with the development of a gender general, the same for all people, “but there are variations
role identity and covers the broad range of those behav- among individuals in the specific objects or events that
iors dependent upon that identity” (p. 28). are drive-fulfilling, in the value placed on goal attain-
● Aggressive Subsystem: Function is protection and ment, and in drive strength” (Johnson, 1980, p. 210).
preservation of self and society (Johnson, 1980, 1990a). This structural component cannot be observed directly
Johnson’s (1990a) view of the aggressive subsystem “fol- but is inferred from the individual’s action or behavior.
lows the thinking of animal behaviorists [and is in sharp ● Set: Refers to the individual’s predisposition to act in
contrast to] that of the behavioral reinforcement school, certain ways, rather than in other ways, to fulfill the
which maintains that aggressive behavior is not only function of each subsystem (Johnson, 1990a). With re-
learned, but has as its primary intent the injury of oth- gard to set, Johnson (1980) explained that “through mat-
ers” (p. 29). uration, experience, and learning, the individual comes
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 67
to develop and use preferred ways of behaving under ● Protection: Protection is needed from noxious influences
particular circumstances and with selected individuals” with which the system cannot cope (Johnson, 1980).
(p. 211). This structural component cannot be observed ● Nurturance: Nurturance is acquired through the input
directly but is inferred from the individual’s action or of appropriate supplies from the environment (Johnson,
behavior. 1980).
● Choice: Refers to the individual’s total behavioral reper- ● Stimulation: Stimulation is needed to enhance growth
toire for fulfilling subsystem functions and achieving and prevent stagnation (Johnson, 1980).
particular goals (Johnson, 1980). The behavioral reper-
toire encompasses the scope of action alternatives from The ability of the seven subsystems to fulfill their functions
which individuals can choose (Johnson, 1980). With re- depends on those three functional requirements. If human
gard to choice, Johnson (1980) pointed out that people beings are unable to provide adequate protection, nurtu-
rarely use all of the alternatives in their behavioral reper- rance, and stimulation to fulfill their subsystem functions,
toire, but rather choose certain preferred behaviors. those requirements must be supplied by other human be-
However, the other behaviors are available if the pre- ings or institutions (Johnson, 1980).
ferred ones do not work in a certain situation. She also
noted that people continuously acquire new choices and SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT
modify old ones, and that the most adaptable individu- ● The environment is of the behavioral system.
als are those with the largest repertoire of choices. This
structural component cannot be observed directly but is Johnson (1980) did not provide an explicit definition for
inferred from the individual’s action or behavior. the concept of System Environment. She did, however,
● Action or Behavior: Refers to the actual organized and refer to the internal environment and the external environ-
patterned behavior in a situation (Johnson, 1980). ment of the system, as well as to “the interaction between
Action or behavior is “A set of behavioral responses, re- the person and his environment” (p. 209). It can, therefore,
sponsive tendencies, or actions systems … [that] are de- be inferred that the concept of System Environment en-
veloped and modified over time through maturation, compasses two dimensions—Internal Environment and
experience, and learning. They are determined develop- External Environment (Johnson, 1980).
mentally and are continuously governed by a multitude
of physical, biologic, psychologic, and social factors op-
● Internal Environment: Not explicitly defined but it can
erating in a complex and interlocking fashion. These re- be inferred that the components include, although they
sponses are reasonably stable, though modifiable, and may not be limited to, “the composition, quantity, tem-
regularly recurrent, and their action pattern is observ- perature, and distribution of body fluids” (Johnson,
able” (Johnson, 1980, p. 209). Behavior or action is insti- 1961, p. 64).
gated, inhibited, shaped, continued, or terminated by the
● External Environment: Not explicitly defined but it
complex biological, psychological, sociological, and can be inferred that the components are objects, events,
physical factors that constitute the other structural com- situations, and forces that impinge on the person
ponents (Johnson, 1980). This is the only structural and to which the person adjusts and adapts (Johnson,
component that can be observed. Johnson (1990a) ex- 1980).
plained, “Only the actual behavior can be directly ob-
served, but inferences can be made as to the [nature] of BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM BALANCE AND STABILITY
the components of the subsystems by studying the form ● Demonstrated by observed behavior that is purposeful,
the behavior takes (its organization and patterning), the orderly, and predictable (Johnson, 1978a).
significant ambient variables, and the consequences ● Purposeful behavior is goal directed; that is, actions re-
achieved by the behavior” (p. 27). veal a plan and cease at an identifiable point (Johnson,
1978a).
FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS ● Orderly behavior is methodical and systematic, as op-
● Refers to the requirements “that must be met through posed to diffuse and erratic; and encompasses actions
the individual’s own efforts, or through outside assis- that build sequentially toward a goal and form a rec-
tance” so that the behavioral subsystems can fulfill their ognizable pattern (Johnson, 1978a).
functions (Johnson, 1980, p. 212). ● Predictable behavior is that which is repetitive under
particular circumstances (Johnson, 1978a).
The concept of Functional Requirements encompasses
three dimensions (Johnson, 1980, 1990a)—Protection, ● Purposeful, orderly, and predictable behavior is main-
Nurturance, and Stimulation. tained when it is efficient and effective in managing the
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 68
individual’s relationship to the environment. Individuals chotomy rather than a continuum. Caution must be
are said to achieve efficient and effective behavioral func- observed, however, when assessing the adequacy of those
tioning when their behavior is commensurate with social inferences. Indeed, Johnson (1990b) commented that
demands, when they are able to modify their behavior in health is neither a continuum nor a dichotomy, but she did
ways that support biological imperatives, when they are not explain the meaning of her comment or identify her
able to benefit to the fullest extent during illness from view of health.
the physician’s knowledge and skill, and when their be-
havior does not reveal unnecessary trauma as a conse- EXTERNAL REGULATORY FORCE
quence of illness (Johnson, 1978a, 1980).
● “Nursing acts to preserve the organization and integra-
BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM IMBALANCE AND tion of the patient’s behavior at the highest possible level
INSTABILITY under those conditions in which behavior constitutes a
threat to physical or social health, or in which illness is
● Not explicitly defined but can be inferred from the fol- found” (Johnson, 1990a, p. 29).
lowing statement to be a malfunction of the behavioral
system: “The subsystems and the system as a whole tend The concept of External Regulatory Force encompasses
to be self-maintaining and self-perpetuating so long as three dimensions (Johnson, 1980, 1990a)—Impose Exter-
conditions in the internal and external environment of nal Regulatory or Control Mechanisms, Change Structural
the system remain orderly and predictable, the condi- Components, and Fulfill Functional Requirements.
tions and resources necessary to their functional require-
ments are met, and the interrelationships among the ● Impose External Regulatory or Control Mechanisms:
subsystems are harmonious. If those conditions are not Nursing actions that are directed toward inhibition,
met, malfunction becomes apparent in behavior that is stimulation, or reinforcement of certain behaviors
in part disorganized, erratic, and dysfunctional. Illness or (Johnson, 1990a).
other sudden internal or external environmental change ● Change Structural Components: Nursing actions that
is most frequently responsible for such malfunctions” involve “changes in the drive (goal), the set, the choices,
(Johnson, 1980, p. 212). and the behavior itself and [that require] such things as
● Occurs when efficiency and effectiveness of behavior are attitudinal changes, redirection of goals, and sometimes
no longer evident or when a more optimal level of func- reduction in drive strength” (Johnson, 1990a, p. 31).
tioning is perceived as desirable (Johnson, 1978a, 1990a). ● Fulfill Functional Requirements: Nursing actions that
“provide the [essential] conditions and resources [such
Johnson (1978b) commented that health, in its most global as] information giving, role modeling, attention to the
sense, is a concern of the members of all health professions, food being offered or the way in which it is being served,
political scientists, agronomists, and others. Her particular and seeing that infants or young children have access to
focus, however, and one that she considered appropriate their parents or elderly people to their pets” (Johnson,
for nursing, is the health of the Behavioral System. This 1990a, p. 31).
focus is reflected in Johnson’s (1968) statement that “one
or more of [the behavioral system] subsystems is likely to “The need for nursing,” according to Johnson (1990a),
be involved in any episode of illness, whether in an an- “arises when there are disturbances in the structure or
tecedent or a consequence way, or simply in association, function of the system as a whole or in one or more sub-
directly or indirectly, with the disorder or its treatment” systems, or when behavioral functioning is at a less than
(p. 3). In various presentations and publications, Johnson desired level for the individual” (p. 29). Johnson (1992)
has mentioned behavioral system balance and stability, ef- also indicated that there is a need for nursing when pre-
ficient and effective behavioral functioning, and behavioral vention is the goal. In particular, she stated that nursing
system imbalance and instability. should concentrate on “developing preventive nursing
Johnson (1980) also referred to physical and social to fulfill its social obligations” (p. 26). She went on to ex-
health, but she did not explicitly define wellness. Moreover, plain that “clarifying nursing’s social mission through an
she did not define illness, although she mentioned psycho- explicit goal in client care and using a specific body of
logical and social crisis, physical illness, and the person knowledge relevant to that goal therefore enables the disci-
who is ill. It may be inferred that wellness is Behavioral pline to work toward completing its special tasks in pre-
System Balance and Stability in the form of purposeful, vention, thus contributing to a high level of wellness in
orderly, and predictable behavior that supports efficient society” (p. 27).
and effective behavioral functioning, and conversely, that Johnson (1980, 1990a) clearly distinguished nursing
illness is Behavioral System Imbalance and Instability. from medicine by stating that nursing views the client as a
These inferences suggest that Johnson views health as a di- behavioral system and medicine views the client as a bio-
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 69
logical system. She views nursing as “a service that is p. 214; 1990a, p. 29). That goal may be expanded to include
complementary to that of medicine and other health pro- helping the person to achieve a more optimal level of bal-
fessions, but which makes its own distinctive contribution ance and stability when that is possible and desired
to the health and well-being of people” (Johnson, 1980, (Johnson, 1978a).
p. 207). Johnson (1990a) referred to the nursing process as the
The GOAL OF NURSING is “to restore, maintain, or at- NURSING DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT PROCESS.
tain behavioral system balance and dynamic stability at the That process, which is the PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
highest possible level for the individual” (Johnson, 1980, for the Behavioral System Model, is outlined in Table 4–1.
TABLE 4–1
JOHNSON’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE NURSING DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT PROCESS
(continued)
69
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 70
TABLE 4–1
JOHNSON’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE NURSING DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT PROCESS
(continued)
The nurse determines what nursing is to accomplish on behalf of the behavioral system by determining who makes the
judgment regarding the acceptable level of behavioral system balance and stability.
The nurse identifies the value system of the nursing profession.
The nurse identifies his or her own explicit value system.
The nurse negotiates with the client to select a type of treatment.
The nurse temporarily Imposes External Regulatory or Control Mechanisms by:
• Setting limits for behavior by either permissive or inhibitory means.
• Inhibiting ineffective behavioral responses.
• Assisting the client to acquire new responses.
• Reinforcing appropriate behaviors.
The nurse Repairs Damaged Structural Components in the desirable direction by:
• Reducing drive strength by changing attitudes.
• Redirecting goal by changing attitudes.
• Altering set by instruction or counseling.
• Adding choices by teaching new skills.
The nurse Fulfills Functional Requirements of the subsystems by:
• Protecting the client from overwhelming noxious influences.
• Supplying adequate nurturance through an appropriate input of essential supplies.
• Providing stimulation to enhance growth and to inhibit stagnation.
The nurse negotiates the treatment modality with the client by:
• Establishing a contract with the client.
• Helping the client to understand the meaning of the nursing diagnosis and the proposed treatment.
If the diagnosis or proposed treatment is rejected, the nurse continues to negotiate with the client until agreement is
reached.
be) the force that supplies assistance both at the time of be enhanced in some instances. Johnson addressed all four
occurrence and at other times to prevent such occur- concepts of nursing’s metaparadigm—human beings, en-
rences (Johnson, 1980, p. 209). vironment, health, and nursing. The human being is clearly
E. Nursing is thus seen as an external regulatory force defined and described as a Behavioral System. Johnson
which acts to preserve the organization and integration referred to human beings as patients in her early publica-
of the client’s behavior at an optimal level under those tions, but as clients in her later work. The reason for the
conditions in which the behavior constitutes a threat to change in terminology is not known. Although Johnson
physical or social health, or in which illness is found mentioned environment repeatedly in her publications,
(Johnson 1980, p. 214). she never defined the term explicitly. Furthermore, she did
not clearly specify the parameters of the relevant environ-
ment beyond references to the Internal Environment
EVALUATION OF JOHNSON’S and the External Environment. Randell’s (1991) work ex-
BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODEL panded the concept of environment through the specifica-
tion of internal and external environmental regulators.
This section presents an evaluation of the Behavioral “Regulators,” Randell (1991) explained, “represent specific
System Model. The evaluation is based on the results of the units of the environment that simultaneously influence
analysis of the model, as well as on publications and pre- and are influenced by behavior” (p. 157). The Internal
sentations by others who have used or commented on Environment is composed of the biophysical regulator,
Johnson’s work. the psychological regulator, and the developmental regula-
tor. The External Environment is composed of the socio-
cultural, the family, and the physical environmental
EXPLICATION OF ORIGINS regulators.
Johnson explicated the origins of the Behavioral System Johnson also did not define health explicitly. As a con-
Model clearly and concisely. She chronicled the develop- sequence, inferences must be made about what she meant
ment of the model over time and indicated what moti- by wellness and illness, as well as how one is distinguished
vated her to formulate a conceptual model of nursing. from the other. In particular, the relation of health to
Furthermore, she stated her philosophical claims explicitly Behavioral System Balance and Stability versus Behavioral
in the form of beliefs about nursing, beliefs about the na- System Imbalance and Instability must be articulated.
ture and operation of the behavioral system, and a com- Furthermore, although Behavioral System Balance and
prehensive value system regarding what should be Stability is clearly and comprehensively described, the de-
considered acceptable behavior. scription of Behavioral System Imbalance And Instability
Johnson stated that the use of the Behavioral System is not explicit. It must be inferred that this is the converse
Model is based on the values of the nursing profession as of Behavioral System Balance and Stability.
well as those of the individual nurse. She valued a focus on Other aspects of Johnson’s discussion of health also re-
each human being’s behavior and viewed that behavior as quire clarification. Although the model clearly focuses on
a manifestation of the momentary condition of the whole behavior, Johnson uses the terms psychological and social
behavioral system and the subsystems. Johnson also valued crises and physical illness. The meaning of those terms in
nursing intervention before, during, and following illness. relation to the various subsystems of the Behavioral
Moreover, she valued the client’s contributions to his or her System is not clear. One interpretation of Johnson’s state-
care, as indicated by her recommendation that a contract ments about illness is that the condition is separate from
for nursing intervention be negotiated between the nurse Behavioral System functioning. Thus, it is not clear if ill-
and the client. ness (physical, psychological, or social) is an external con-
Johnson explicitly acknowledged other scholars and dition that affects behavior in certain subsystems, or if
cit-ed the knowledge she drew on from nursing and ad- illness is manifested when those subsystems are not func-
junctive disciplines. She was especially informative with tioning efficiently and effectively. Similarly, the meaning
regard to the influence of Nightingale’s work and general of the terms physical and social health and their relation
system theory on the development of the Behavioral to the condition of the Behavioral System require specifi-
System Model. cation.
It must be pointed out, however, that Johnson (1978b)
regarded health as “an extremely elusive state” (p. 6). It is
COMPREHENSIVENESS OF CONTENT not surprising, then, that her conceptual model does not
include an explicit definition of health and that there is
The Behavioral System Model is sufficiently comprehen- some lack of clarity about aspects of that concept.
sive with regard to depth of content, although clarity could Johnson adequately defined and described nursing, the
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 72
Goal of Nursing, and the Practice Methodology. She em- system cannot be prevented until the nature of the prob-
phasized the need to base judgments about Behavioral lem is fully explained, preventive nursing is not possible
System functioning on theoretical and empirical knowl- until problems in the behavioral system are explicated. To
edge of systems, as well as on the scientific knowledge deal- the extent that any problem that might arise can be antici-
ing with each subsystem (Johnson, 1980). Johnson did not pated, and appropriate methodologies are available, pre-
present the Practice Methodology of the Behavioral ventive action is in order” (p. 31).
System Model as a particularly dynamic activity, although Moreover, Johnson (1990a) maintained that then-
some dynamism is evident in the negotiation of proposed current knowledge supported her claim that the seven sub-
treatment between nurse and client. Johnson’s explication systems encompass all relevant behavior, despite others’ at-
of her value system, her statement that the use of the model tempts to add an eighth subsystem dealing with restorative
should be based on the values of the nursing profession as behavior (e.g., Grubbs, 1974) and to interpret the func-
well as those of the individual nurse, and the inclusion of tions of some of the subsystems in other ways (e.g., Auger,
negotiation of treatment between client and nurse all attest 1976). She stated that her discussion of the seven subsys-
to her concern for ethical standards for nursing practice. tems and their functions “is my original conception and
The relational propositions of the Behavioral System the one to which I still subscribe. This point needs to be
Model link human beings and the environment; human emphasized since major changes to the model have been
beings, the environment, and health; and human beings, made over the years by those using it, and these changes
health, and nursing. No one statement links all four meta- have appeared in the literature. The changes are such that
paradigm concepts, and there is no direct link between en- they alter the fundamental nature of the behavioral system
vironment and nursing. That linkage was implied, as originally proposed, and I do not agree with them”
however, when Johnson (1980) stated that nursing is “an (Johnson, 1990a, p. 27).
external regulatory force … that operates through the The comprehensiveness of the breadth of the Behavioral
imposition of external regulatory or control mechanisms” System Model is further supported by the direction it pro-
(p. 214). It may be inferred that nursing is part of the vides for research, education, administration, and practice.
External Environment. Although guidelines for each area are not explicit in
Some limitations of the Behavioral System Model, espe- Johnson’s writings, many can be extracted from Johnson’s
cially those related to the lack of comprehensive descrip- publications about the focus and content of the model. The
tions of some metaparadigm concepts, have been developing guidelines for research, nursing education, ad-
overcome by others who have extended the model. Auger ministration of nursing services, and nursing practice are
(1976) provided an interpretation of the model that fo- listed in the following paragraphs.
cused on the human being as a personality system
(Johnson, personal communication, October 17, 1977),
thus extending the model further into the psychological Nursing Research Guidelines
realm. Grubbs (1974, 1980) presented an interpretation of
the model that expanded each of the metaparadigm con- The guidelines for nursing research based on the
cepts. Randell (1991) expanded the description of the en- Behavioral System Model, which were constructed from
vironment. In addition, Holaday (2002) outlined a practice Johnson (1968, p. 6; 1980, 1990a, 1996), are:
methodology for the Behavioral System Model that in- ● Purpose of the research
cludes a detailed list of the elements of the model within ● One focus of Behavioral System Model-based research
the categories of behavioral assessment, environmental as- is on problems in the structure or function of the be-
sessment, diagnostic analysis, planning and intervention, havioral system and its subsystems. The task is to iden-
and evaluation, along with questions nurses should con- tify, describe, and explain these problems.
sider as they think critically about and apply the practice ● The second focus of research is the prevention and
methodology. treatment of problems in the structure or function of
The Behavioral System Model also is sufficiently com- the behavioral system and its subsystems. The task is to
prehensive in breadth of content. Johnson has specified a develop the scientific bases for intervention, as well as
broad goal for nursing that focuses attention on correction specific methodologies for intervention.
of existing behavioral system problems, as well as the pre-
vention of problems. Sensitive to a criticism that the ● Phenomena of interest
Behavioral System Model does not permit preventive nurs- ●The phenomena of interest are the behavioral sys-
ing actions, Johnson (1990a) stated emphatically, “That is tem as a whole, as well as the structural components
not true” (p. 31). Elaborating, she stated: “The fact is, how- and the functional requirements of the behavioral sub-
ever, that like medicine where problems in the biological systems.
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 73
Alligood (1997, 2002) labeled Holaday, Turner-Henson, interviews revealed a rudimentary theory of the meanings
and Swan’s (1996) explanatory theory of chronically ill associated with self-report and self-management decision
children’s achievement behavior as the Theory of Sustenal making about metastatic cancer bone pain. They con-
Imperatives. Holaday and colleagues indicated that they cluded, “Consistent with the JBSM [Johnson Behavioral
derived that middle-range theory directly from the System Model], pain was perceived as protecting both men
Behavioral System Model. The theory asserts that: and women with bone metastasis by providing them with
incentive to seek cancer treatment and preventing them
Children not receiving adequate amounts of protection, nur-
turance, and stimulation from [functional requirements] can
from ‘doing too much’ and thus causing further harm to
be classified as being at risk for an imbalanced behavioral sys- themselves” (Coward & Wilkie, 2000, p. 106).
tem or a deficiency in desirable life experiences. The more risk In addition, the formation of conceptual-theoretical-
factors in a child’s life and the longer the periods of time dur- empirical systems of nursing knowledge is evident in many
ing which those factors are present, the more likely the child of the applications of the Behavioral System Model listed
will experience a behavioral system imbalance (Holaday et al., in the Research and Practice sections of the chapter refer-
1996, p. 41). ences and chapter bibliography (see CD-ROM for the
chapter bibliography). In several instances, selected con-
The theory was tested empirically in a cross-sectional sur-
cepts of the model were linked with theories and empirical
vey designed to examine factors related to chronically ill
indicators borrowed from other disciplines. One example
children’s use of time outside of school. The sample in-
comes from Wilkie and colleagues’ (1988) work. They
cluded 365 children with chronic illnesses and a parent or
linked the aggressive subsystem with the gate control the-
caretaker of each child. Data were collected via interviews
ory of pain in their study of the relation of cancer pain
using a 59-item open-ended and multiple-choice child
control behaviors and pain intensity. The empirical indica-
questionnaire, an 83-item open-ended and multiple-
tors for that study were a Demographic Pain Data Form,
choice parent/caretaker questionnaire, and a medical back-
which was adapted from existing pain assessment ques-
ground questionnaire. Demographic data for the children
tionnaires, a Behavioral Observation-Validation Form, and
and the parents/caretakers also were collected. The child
a visual analog scale.
questionnaire items focused on the children’s physical and
Another example comes from Lachicotte and Alexan-
nonphysical activities when alone and with friends. The
der’s (1990) research. They linked the Behavioral System
parent/caretaker questionnaire items focused on socializa-
Model with the Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model to
tion priorities, childbearing practices, and questions about
guide their study of the relationship between nurse admin-
the neighborhood and available services.
istrators’ attitudes toward nurse impairment and their
Holaday (personal communication, August 26, 1987)
method of dealing with the impairment. The empirical in-
indicated that the long-range goal of the theory develop-
dicators were the Attitudes toward Nurse Impairment
ment work is to identify “the important [functional re-
Inventory and the Methods for Dealing with Nurse
quirements] for each subsystem and how they influence
Impairment Questionnaire.
choice and action.” She went on to say that she and her col-
leagues “will attempt to see if there is a hierarchy of [func-
tional requirements] for each subsystem.” CREDIBILITY OF THE NURSING MODEL
Riegel (1989) derived an explanatory theory of the rela-
tion of social support, self-esteem, anxiety, depression, and Social Utility
perceptions of functional capacity to adjustment to coro-
nary heart disease directly from the dependency subsys- Johnson (1980) claimed that the Behavioral System Model
tem, functional requirements, and structural components “has already proved its utility in providing clear direction
elements of the Behavioral System Model. She used several for practice, education, and research” (p. 215). Publications
empirical indicators, including the UCLA Social Support by proponents of the Behavioral System Model indicate
Inventory, the Self-Perception Inventory, the Profile of that it also has provided useful guidelines for administra-
Mood States, the General Health Perceptions Inventory, tion.
and the Interpersonal Dependency Inventory to test the Johnson’s Behavioral System Model is especially attrac-
theory in a sample of clients 1 and 4 months after myocar- tive to those nurses who are familiar with general system
dial infarction (Riegel, 1990). theory and the attendant vocabulary. Although Rawls
Coward and Wilkie (2000) used the aggressive subsys- (1980) regarded the complex and unique terminology used
tem to guide their theory-generating study of behaviors re- to explain the model as a disadvantage, this limitation is
ported by men and women with cancer and bone readily overcome by studying the model’s vocabulary.
metastasis. Analysis of data collected via semi-structured Indeed, Johnson (1988) maintained that an understanding
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 76
of the vocabulary of any science or framework is a prereq- sources required to revise existing nursing assessment
uisite to description of relevant phenomena. In addition, forms; develop teaching materials; conduct ongoing in-
study is required to fully understand the unique focus and service education programs to orient staff to the model
content of the Behavioral System Model. Johnson (1980) and provide a forum for ongoing dialogue on the refine-
explained: ment of the model; conduct orientation classes for new
employees and supervise those employees in the applica-
Adoption of this model for practice carries with it direct re-
sponsibilities in education [see Nursing Education Guidelines
tion of the model; develop strategies to overcome resist-
on page 73]. The user will need a thorough grounding in the ance to change; develop a patient classification instrument
underlying natural and social sciences. Emphasis should be that includes parameters to determine staffing needs; and
placed in particular on the genetic, neurologic, and endocrine develop standardized nursing care plans, model-based
bases of behavior; psychologic and social mechanisms for the nursing diagnoses, and criteria to evaluate client outcomes.
regulation and control of behavior; social learning theories;
and motivational structures and processes. (p. 214) Nursing Research. The utility of the Behavioral System
Model for nursing research is documented by several stud-
Furthermore, Johnson (1990a) pointed out that the effec-
ies that have been guided by the model. Instrument devel-
tive use of the Behavioral System Model in practice re-
opment research based on the Behavioral System Model is
quires “intensive study of the rich literature available on
listed in Table 4–2. Published reports of descriptive and
the seven response [sub]systems” (p. 32). She went on to
correlational studies that have been derived from the
explain,
Behavioral System Model are listed in Table 4–3. Citations
The nurse must know, for example, how these [sub]systems to published abstracts of doctoral dissertations and a mas-
develop over time, the many factors that influence that devel- ter’s thesis are listed in the Doctoral Dissertations and
opment, the cultural variations in the basic response [sub]sys- Master’s Thesis sections of the chapter bibliography on the
tems to be expected, and much more. The nurse must also CD-ROM. Holaday (personal communication, August 26,
acquire an understanding of how living systems operate. Only 1987) reported that other master’s theses based on the
with such knowledge and understanding is it possible for the Behavioral System Model were conducted by Broering
practitioner to be aware of the kinds of data needed about the
individual. Only with such knowledge can the practitioner an-
(1985), Dawson (1984), Kizpolski (1985), Miller (1987),
alyze [those] data and intervene effectively (p. 32). Moran (1986), and Wilkie (1985).
Although much of the Behavioral System Model-based
Johnson (1980) also stated that the user of the model must research is limited to a single study on a single topic, pro-
study the behavioral system as a whole and as a composite grammatic research has been conducted by Derdiarian;
of subsystems, as well as pathophysiology, medicine’s and Holaday, and colleagues; and nurses at the UCLA
nursing’s clinical sciences, and the health-care system (see Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, including Poster,
Nursing Education Guidelines on page 73). In addition, the Dee, Randell, and their colleagues (see Tables 4–2 and 4–3).
potential user of the Behavioral System Model must un- Derdiarian’s collective research findings provide empirical
derstand Johnson’s value system and accept as appropriate support for Johnson’s (1980) contention that the behav-
a wide range of behavior. In addition, the user of the model ioral subsystems are “linked and open, … and a distur-
must be willing and have the interpersonal skills to negoti- bance in one subsystem is likely to have an effect on others”
ate nursing treatment options with the client (see Table (p. 210). Commenting on Holaday’s program of research,
4–1). Johnson (1996) stated, “Through Holaday’s long series of
The implementation of Behavioral System Model-based studies of achievement behavior in chronically ill children,
nursing practice is feasible. Herbert (1989) commented, she has [begun to build] a body of knowledge in this area.
“Considerable changes in education and resources would Her work, and that of her colleagues, exemplifies quite well
be necessary to allow general implementation” (p. 34). She the value of cumulative research in the development of a
did not, however, identify the specific changes that would sound substantive base in a practice field” (p. 34). The pro-
be required. Dee (1990) maintained, “The challenge to gram of research at the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute
nurse executives is to create environments that promote and Hospital has yielded empirical evidence of the effec-
optimal professional practice so that the quality of client tiveness of Behavioral System Model-based nursing inter-
care can be sustained and further enhanced” (p. 41). Her ventions on promotion of behavioral system balance and
description of the implementation of Behavioral System stability.
Model-based nursing practice at the University of
California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Neuropsychiatric Institute Nursing Education. The utility of the Behavioral System
and Hospital indicated that administrators at that institu- Model for nursing education is documented by its use as a
tion committed the time and human and material re- guide for curriculum construction in nursing education
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 77
TABLE 4–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODEL
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Derdiarian Behavioral System Model Instrument Self- Measures cancer patients’ self-reported behavioral
Report Form (DBSM) (Derdiarian, 1983, 1984, 1988, changes in all behavioral subsystems.
1990; Derdiarian & Forsythe, 1983)
Derdiarian Behavioral System Model Observational Recording form for nurses’ observations of cancer
Form (DBSM-O) (Derdiarian, 1990) patients’ behavioral changes in all behavioral subsys-
tems.
Johnson Model First-Level Family Assessment Tool Measures the needs of members of families with a
(JFFA-J) (Lovejoy, 1982, 1983) chronically ill child.
Sexual Behaviors Questionnaire (Wilmoth 1993; Wilmoth Measures female sexual behaviors, including communi-
& Townsend, 1995) cation, appearance, desire, arousal, activity level, tech-
niques, orgasm, and satisfaction.
Wilmoth Sexual Behaviors Questionnaire— Female Measures women’s self-reported current
(Wilmoth & Tingle, 2001) sexual behaviors.
PRACTICE TOOLS
Patient Classification Instrument (PCI) (Auger & Dee, Provides a classification system for psychiatric patients
1983; Dee & Auger, 1983; Dee, 1986) based on behaviors in each behavioral subsystem and
identifies appropriate nursing interventions for each
classification level.
Behavioral System Assessment (Dee et al., 1998) An extension of the PCI that includes an overall behav-
ioral category rating of the patient’s severity of illness
based on the degree of effectiveness or ineffective-
ness of each behavioral subsystem and the degree of
overall system balance or imbalance, as well as a rat-
ing of the impact of biophysical, psychological, devel-
opmental, familial, sociocultural, and physical
environmental regulators on the behavioral system
and each subsystem.
Patient Indicators of Nursing Care Instrument Measures the quality of nursing care in terms of the pre-
(Majesky et al., 1978) vention of nursing care complications.
Quality Assurance Audit Tool (Bruce et al., 1980) Measures outcome criteria for fluid and electrolyte bal-
ance in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Predicted Patient Outcome Instrument (Poster et al., 1997) Tool to record medical record data on patient demo-
graphics, patient behavior acuity ratings, predicted
outcomes, short- and long-term goals, and nursing in-
terventions.
The Johnson Model and the Nursing Process Tool to guide the Behavioral System Model Practice
(Holaday, 2002) Methodology, with questions to guide the nurse’s
thinking about each element of the methodology.
*See Research Instruments and Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
77
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 78
TABLE 4–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODEL
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Dependency behaviors Children who made numerous visits to Stamler & Palmer, 1971
an elementary school nurse
Differences in perceived body image and Visually handicapped and normally Small, 1980
spatial awareness sighted preschool children
Differences in needs of visitors of patients Visitors who did and did not maintain Lovejoy, 1985
in cancer research units vigils at the patient’s bedside
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome Clients with AIDS or AIDS-related Lovejoy & Moran, 1988
(AIDS) beliefs, behaviors, and complex
informational needs
Quality of nursing care Nursing care plans for cancer patients Derdiarian, 1991
Meaning of pain in the context of pain self- Men and women with cancer and bone Coward & Wilkie, 2000
report and self-management decision making metastasis
Satisfaction with Behavioral System Model- Cancer patients Derdiarian, 1990a
based nursing care Registered nurses
Perceived changes in the direction, quality, and Clients with AIDS Derdiarian & Schobel, 1990
relative importance of subsystem behaviors
Differences in achievement behavior Chronically ill and well children Holaday, 1974
Mothers’ responses to the crying behaviors Pairs of mothers and chronically ill in- Holaday, 1982, 1987
of their chronically ill infants fants
Use of out-of-school time Chronically ill children Bossert et al., 1990
Holaday & Turner-Henson,
1987
Holaday et al., 1996
Frequency of use of Behavioral System Retrospective review of charts of hospi- Lewis & Randell, 1991
Model-based diagnostic labels talized geriatric psychiatric patients
Comparison of frequency of use of NANDA- Retrospective review of charts of hospi- Randell, 1991
based and Behavioral System Model-based talized adult and geriatric psychiatric
diagnostic labels patients
Behavioral changes during hospitalization Hospitalized adolescent psychiatric pa- Poster & Beliz, 1988, 1992
tients
Nursing care needs, level of functioning, Retrospective review of charts of inpa- Dee et al., 1998
and length of hospital stay tients under managed behavioral
health care contracts
CORRELATIONAL STUDIES
Relation of selected physiological disequilibria Clients with posttransfusion Damus, 1974
to behavioral disequilibria and relation of hepatitis
particular nursing diagnoses to effective
nursing interventions
Relation of nurse administrators’ attitudes Nurse administrators Lachicotte & Alexander,
toward nurse impairment and their 1990
method of dealing with nurses who
were impaired by alcoholism or other
drug dependency
* See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations.
78
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 79
programs. Hadley (1970) described the use of the model at child and adolescent psychiatric unit, a child and adoles-
the University of Colorado in Denver. Harris (1986) ex- cent developmental disabilities unit, general adult psychi-
plained how a modified version of the Behavioral System atric units, and a geropsychiatry unit. The Patient
Model guided curriculum design at the University of Classification Instrument and the Predicted Patient
California in Los Angeles. Fleming (1990) described its use Outcome Instrument (see Table 4–2) are used at the UCLA
by the Department of Nursing at California State Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, as is a Behavioral
University in Bakersfield. Carino (personal communica- System Model-based nursing diagnostic system (Lewis &
tion, January 24, 1990) explained how the model was oper- Randell, 1991). Dee (1990) explained that use of the
ationalized in the curriculum at the University of Hawaii in Behavioral System Model at the UCLA Neuropsychiatric
Honolulu in the 1960s. The utility of the Behavioral System Institute and Hospital:
Model for nursing education also is documented by (1) provides a comprehensive and systematic method of
Derdiarian (1981), who discussed the application of the assessing patient behaviors, (2) facilitates the identification
model to cancer nursing education. No literature was lo- of specific areas of patient strengths and weaknesses in
cated that described the use of the Behavioral System ways that are observable and measurable, (3) enhances
Model to guide development of Johnson’s proposal for consistency and continuity of care, (4) promotes the or-
postbaccalaureate programs to prepare professional nurses ganization of diverse data into meaningful segments, (5)
or associate degree programs to prepare technical nurses prioritizes the provision of care on the basis of an under-
(see Nursing Education Guidelines on p. 73). standing of subsystem interactions, (6) promotes a com-
mon language and unity in the practice environment, (7)
Nursing Administration. The utility of the Behavioral facilitates a sense of professional identity, and (8) enhances
System Model for nursing administration is documented the equitable allocation of resources according to variable
by its use as a guide for the nursing administrative struc- patient care needs rather than allocation of resources
tures of health-care institutions. Hackley (1987) reported merely by census. (pp. 38, 41)
the work she did to redesign nursing care processes within Glennin (1980) developed Behavioral System Model-
the context of the Behavioral System Model for the psychi- based standards of nursing practice for hospitalized clients
atric unit at the United States Naval Hospital in receiving acute care from professional registered nurses.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She noted that the model Emphasis was placed on psychosocial, rather than physio-
guided the practice of all health-care team members, from logic, management. Glennin classified the standards ac-
orderlies to nurses to the staff psychiatrist. cording to the generic nursing process areas of data
Dee (1990) presented a detailed description of the use gathering, assessment, diagnosis, prescription, implemen-
of the model at the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and tation, and evaluation. In each area, specific standards were
Hospital in Los Angeles, California. She explained that the formulated for relevant concepts and propositions of the
Behavioral System Model is implemented in the child and model.
adult psychiatric inpatient services with clients ranging Rogers (1973) proposed that the behavioral subsystems
from 2 to over 90 years of age. Practice settings include a represent areas for clinical specialization in nursing. One
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 80
could, for example, be a clinical specialist in the aggressive putation, neurological problems, cardiac problems, cere-
subsystem or the attachment subsystem. There is no evi- brovascular accident, renal problems, problems requiring
dence to indicate that her innovative proposal has ever surgery, cancer, and emotional problems. In addition,
been implemented. nursing practice has been directed toward caregivers of in-
In contrast, nurse administrators at the UCLA dividuals with brain injuries and Alzheimer’s disease.
Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital developed and im- Moreover, the Behavioral System Model has been used to
plemented the Behavioral System Model-based role of the guide nursing practice for individuals who reside in the
“attending nurse” (Dee & Poster, 1995; Moreau, Poster, & community and those who are hospitalized. Several of the
Niemela, 1993; Niemela, Poster, & Moreau, 1992). The research instruments, as well as the practice tools, listed in
major focus of the new role is clinical case management. Table 4–2 are helpful guides for assessment of individuals
Role responsibilities include direct patient care; delegation and members of families and facilitate documentation of
and monitoring of selected aspects of nursing care; provi- nursing practice.
sion of leadership, consultation, and guidance to nursing Lobo (2002) maintained that although the use of the
staff; and collaboration with multidisciplinary team mem- Behavioral System Model “can be generalized across the
bers. Moreau and colleagues (1993) reported that the new lifespan and across cultures, … [its] focus … may make
nursing role was well received by the nurses and members it difficult for nurses working with physically impaired in-
of the multidisciplinary team. Moreover, attending nurses dividuals to use the model” (p. 166). Lobo did not, how-
reported an increase in job satisfaction and retention and a ever, give an explanation for why use of the model would
decrease in role conflict. Neimela and colleagues (1992) re- be difficult when working with physically impaired indi-
ported that the attending nurse role increased general sat- viduals.
isfaction and role clarity and decreased role tension for the The Behavioral System Model emphasizes and focuses
nurses, and increased their communication with patients’ explicitly on the individual behavioral system. Lobo (2002)
family members. commented that families “can be considered only as the en-
Additional empirical evidence supporting the utility vironment in which the individual presents behaviors and
of the Behavioral System Model for nursing administra- not as the focus of care” (p. 166). Johnson (1978a) sug-
tion is provided by the findings of Derdiarian’s (1991) gested the use of Chin’s (1961) intersystem model for
study of the effects of using two Derdiarian Behavioral nurses who are interested in the care of families and other
System Model assessment instruments on the quality of groups. This approach permits consideration of each
nursing care. She found that when compared with rou- individual behavioral system and the interaction of those
tine nursing assessment, the use of the model-based in- systems.
struments resulted in a statistically significant increase
in the completeness of objective and subjective data gath-
ered; the quality of the nursing diagnosis; the compatibil- Social Congruence
ity and specificity of nursing interventions with the
nursing diagnoses; and the appropriateness and recording The Behavioral System Model remains generally congruent
of follow-ups, evaluation of outcomes, and discharge with contemporary social expectations regarding nursing
plans. practice. Commenting on that criterion, Johnson (1980)
Several of the practice tools derived from the Johnson stated, “Insofar as it has been tried in practice, the resulting
Behavioral System Model are particularly useful to nurse nursing decisions and actions have generally been judged
administrators. Those tools are identified and described in acceptable and satisfactory by clients, families, nursing
Table 4–2. staff, and physicians” (p. 215). Later, Johnson (1990a)
noted that the Behavioral System Model “is commensurate
Nursing Practice. Evidence supporting the utility of the with what nurses and the public perceive as nursing’s func-
Behavioral System Model in various practice settings is ac- tion” (p. 31). Dee (1990) added, “The Johnson Model has
cumulating. The published reports listed in Table 4–4 indi- provided nurses with a framework not only to describe
cate that the Behavioral System Model can be used in many phenomena, but also to explain, predict, and control
different practice situations with clients of all ages. In clinical phenomena for the purpose of achieving desired
particular, review of the publications cited in Table 4–4, as patient outcomes. Levels of nursing care provided for
well as those listed in the Commentary: Practice section of the patient are, therefore, purposeful and nursing prac-
the chapter bibliography on the CD-ROM, indicate that tice is more meaningful for the practitioner” (p. 41).
the Behavioral System Model has been used to guide the Furthermore, Grubbs (1980) maintained that the role
nursing of children and adults with such conditions as am- of the nurse, as described in this model, “is congruent
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 81
TABLE 4–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM MODEL
Assessment of health status A 6-year-old child scheduled for surgery, a 12-year-old Holaday, 1974
and development of nursing child with meningomyelocele and multiple
interventions urinary tract problems, and a 15-year-old retarded child
with a discrepancy of the eliminative subsystem
Promotion of the development of The mother of a dying brain-injured 22-year-old man Skolny & Riehl, 1974
hope
Development of a nursing care plan An adult amputee with a problem in body image Rawls, 1980
A 75-year-old woman with flaccid hemiplegia caused by a Herbert, 1989
cerebrovascular accident
Family-centered nursing care Clients with ventricular tachycardia McCauley et al., 1984
Pain management Cancer patients Wilkie, 1990
Development of a support group Caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease Fruehwirth, 1989
Assessment of quality of life Clients with end-stage renal disease Ma & Gaudet, 1997
Assessment of fear of crime and Older adults residing in the community Benson, 1997
development of client-focused and
community/ neighborhood-focused
nursing interventions
Application of the Behavioral System A 12-year-old boy with myelomeningocele and neuro- Holaday, 1997, 2002
Model genic bladder
A pregnant woman Urh, 1998
A 29-year-old woman with cervical cancer Holaday, 1997, 2002
A 58-year-old Navajo Indian with metastatic mandibular Derdiarian, 1993
cancer
A 16-year-old male adolescent who had attempted sui- Fawcett, 1997
cide
A 25-year-old woman who had attempted suicide Poster, 1991
Application of Auger’s interpretation Long-term hemodialysis patients Broncatello, 1980
of the Behavioral System Model
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations.
with society’s expectations of nursing and that nursing’s societal expectations. She maintained, “The value of the
contribution to health care is a socially valued service” model does not lie so much in the fact that it leads
(p. 218). to very different forms of action—if it did depart mar-
Empirical evidence supporting the claims made by kedly from currently accepted practice, it would perhaps
Johnson, Dee, and Grubbs comes from Derdiarian (1990), be open to greater question than it otherwise might be”
who reported a statistically significant increase in both (p. 6).
cancer patients’ and nurses’ satisfaction with the nursing In contrast with her 1968 comment, 10 years later
process, including the comprehensiveness of assessment, Johnson (1978a) indicated that in some situations, the
the appropriateness and priority rank of diagnoses, the nurse, the client, or both may accept a wider range of be-
interventions, and the effectiveness of outcomes, when havior than prescribed by cultural norms. In such cases, so-
nursing assessments were structured according to the ciety would have to be helped to accept variances from the
Behavioral System Model compared with routine assess- average. Additionally, society may have to be helped to ac-
ment. cept the role of nursing in assisting people to maintain ef-
Johnson (1968) deliberately attempted to structure ficient and effective behavioral functioning when the threat
nursing practice so that it would be congruent with of illness exists. This is because, although there is increased
81
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 82
worldwide attention on primary health care with its em- ferences in the dependency, affiliative, aggressive, and
phasis on promotion of wellness and prevention of illness, achievement subsystems from admission to discharge.
some people still do not expect nursing care before the
onset of illness.
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE
DISCIPLINE OF NURSING
Social Significance
Johnson (1980) claimed that the Behavioral System Model Johnson certainly may be considered a pioneer in the de-
leads to nursing actions that are socially significant, stating velopment of distinctive nursing knowledge, despite the
that “resulting [nursing] actions have been thought to fact that she did not publish her model until 1980. The
make a significant difference in the lives of the persons in- Behavioral System Model makes a substantial contribution
volved” (p. 215). Grubbs (1980) agreed with Johnson, not- to nursing knowledge by focusing attention on the individ-
ing that the model “provides the framework for ual’s behavior, rather than on his or her health state or
categorizing all aspects of the nursing process so that the disease condition. Johnson used that distinction to clarify
science of nursing, the personal satisfaction of the nurse, the different foci of nursing and medicine, a clarification
and ultimately the welfare of the patient will improve” that is especially important for continued development of
(p. 249). Neither Johnson nor Grubbs, however, supported nursing as a distinct discipline. However, she recognized
the boundary overlaps that are inevitable in all disciplines.
her claim with empirical evidence.
Elaborating, Johnson (1968) pointed out that “this model
Rawls (1980) provided anecdotal evidence from prac-
attempts to specify [the goal of nursing] in keeping with
tice of the social significance of the Behavioral System
our historical concerns, and to reclarify nursing’s mission
Model. She stated:
and area of responsibility. In doing so, no denial of nurs-
Use of the Model allowed me to systematically assess the pa- ing’s old relationship with medicine is intended. Nursing
tient and facilitated identification of specific factors which has, and undoubtedly always will play an important role in
influenced the effectiveness of nursing care. The assess- assisting medicine to fulfill its mission. We do this directly
ment data allowed identification of interventions which had by taking on activities delegated by medicine, but also, and
the desired effect and resulted in effective care for the patient.
(p. 16)
perhaps more importantly, we may contribute to the
achievement of medicine’s goals by fulfilling our own mis-
Ma and Gaudet (1997) added anecdotal evidence from sion” (p. 9).
practice when they stated: Johnson (1968) identified the advantages she saw in the
Behavioral System Model. The list adequately summarizes
The benefits of using [the Behavioral System Model] are high-
lighted in its effectiveness and user friendliness. The model the many contributions her conceptual model makes to the
provides nurses with a systematic framework for assessing discipline of nursing:
clients from a behavioural perspective. … Using [the model] 1. The assumptions and values of the model are made ex-
complements the application of the medical model and en-
plicit. This allows their examination and offers the pos-
ables the nurse to conduct a more comprehensive assessment
of the whole person. (p. 16) sibility that those assumptions which have not been
adequately verified can be logically and perhaps empir-
Poster and Beliz (1988, 1992) provided empirical evidence ically tested.
from research of the social significance of the Behavioral 2. The model offers a reasonably precise and limited ideal
System Model. Using the Patient Classification Instrument goal for nursing by stating the end product desired.
(see Table 4–2), they found that 90 percent of the 38 ado- Specification of this ideal state or condition is the first
lescent psychiatric inpatients studied had an adaptive step in its operational definition in the concrete case. It
change in at least one behavioral subsystem after one week thus offers promise for the establishment of standards
of Behavioral System Model-based nursing care. against which to measure the effectiveness and signifi-
Furthermore, on average, the patients demonstrated signif- cance of nursing actions.
icant improvement in all behavioral subsystems during the 3. The model directs our attention to those aspects of the
discharge phase of hospitalization. patient, in all his complex reality, with which nursing is
Dee, van Servellen, and Brecht (1998) added empirical concerned, and provides a systematic way to approach
research evidence of the social significance of the the identification of nursing problems.
Behavioral System Model with their findings of improve- 4. It provides us with clues as to the source of difficulty
ment in all behavioral subsystems for inpatients under (i.e., either functional or structural stress).
managed behavioral health-care contracts. More specifi- 5. It offers a focus for intervention and suggests the major
cally, the study results revealed statistically significant dif- modes of intervention which will be required.
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 83
6. It opens the door to focused research programs in nurs- Barnum, B.J.S (1998). Nursing theory: Analysis, application, eval-
ing and the possibility that the findings of individual in- uation (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
vestigators will become cumulative and of theoretical as Broering, J. (1985). Adolescent juvenile status offenders’ percep-
well as of practical significance. (pp. 7–8) tions of stressful life events and self-perception of health status.
Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, San
Commenting on the contributions of the Behavioral Francisco.
System Model in a later paper, Johnson (1992) added: Brown, V.M., Conner, S.S., Harbour, L.S., Magers, J.A., & Watt,
J.K. (1998). Dorothy E. Johnson: Behavioral system model. In A.
Admittedly even now knowledge about the behavioral pat- Marriner-Tomey & M.R. Alligood (Eds.), Nursing theorists and
terns in the response or action systems is greater than their work (4th ed., pp. 227–242). St. Louis: Mosby.
knowledge of the underlying structures, and knowledge
about the parts or subsystems is greater than knowledge of the Buckley, W. (Ed.). (1968). Modern systems research for the be-
system as a whole. Nonetheless, the body of knowledge about havioral scientist. Chicago: Aldine.
the behavioral system and its subsystems is sufficiently Chin, R. (1961). The utility of system models and developmental
substantial to allow pertinent observations and useful inter- models for practitioners. In W.G. Bennis, K.D. Beene, & R. Chin
pretations in practice. It also points to many possibilities (Eds.), The planning of change (pp. 201–214). New York: Holt,
for intervention as well as avenues for research. In this way Rinehart & Winston.
a body of knowledge about disorders in the behavioral Coward, D.D., & Wilkie, D.J. (2000). Metastatic bone pain:
system and their prevention and treatment will be developed Meanings associated with self-report and self-management deci-
and expanded over time and will be known as nursing science. sion making. Cancer Nursing, 23, 101–108.
(p. 26) Crandal, V. (1963). Achievement. In H.W. Stevenson (Ed.), Child
psychology (pp. 416–459). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
In conclusion, the Behavioral System Model has been en-
Dawson, D.L. (1984). Parenting behaviors of mothers with hospi-
thusiastically adopted by many nurses interested in a sys-
talized children under two years of age. Unpublished master’s the-
tematic approach to nursing. It has documented utility in sis, University of California, San Francisco.
nursing research, administration, and practice, and it pro-
Dee, V. (1990). Implementation of the Johnson model: One hos-
vides direction for curriculum development. The credibil- pital’s experience In M.E. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories in prac-
ity of the Behavioral System Model is beginning to be tice (pp. 33–44). New York: National League for Nursing.
established by means of studies directly derived from sev- Dee, V., & Poster, E.C. (1995). Applying Kanter’s theory of inno-
eral of its concepts and linked with relevant theories and vative change: The transition from a primary to attending model
appropriate empirical indicators. That empirical work of nursing care delivery. Journal of the American Psychiatric
must be expanded, and more systematic evaluations of the Nurses Association, 1, 112–119.
use of the model in various practice situations and educa- Dee, V., van Servellen, G., & Brecht, M. (1998). Managed behav-
tional settings are needed. ioral health care patients and their nursing care problems, level of
functioning, and impairment on discharge. Journal of the
American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 4, 57–66.
REFERENCES Derdiarian, A.K. (1981). Nursing conceptual frameworks:
Ackoff, R.L. (1960). Systems, organizations, and interdisciplinary Implications for education, practice, and research. In D.L.
research. General Systems, 5, 1–8. Vredevoe, A.K. Derdiarian, L.P. Sarna, M. Eriel, & J.C. Shipacoff
Ainsworth, M. (1964). Patterns of attachment behavior shown by (Eds.), Concepts of oncology nursing (pp. 369–385). Englewood
the infant in interaction with mother. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10(1), 51–58. Derdiarian, A.K. (1990). Effects of using systematic assessment
Ainsworth, M. (1972). Attachment and dependency: A compari- instruments on patient and nurse satisfaction with nursing care.
son. In J. Gewirtz (Ed.), Attachment and dependency (pp. Oncology Nursing Forum, 17, 95–101.
97–137). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Derdiarian, A.K. (1991). Effects of using a nursing model-based
Alligood, M.R. (1997). Models and theories: Critical thinking assessment instrument on quality of nursing care. Nursing
structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner Tomey (Eds.), Nursing Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 1–16.
theory: Utilization and application (pp. 31–45). St. Louis: Mosby. Feshbach, S. (1970). Aggression. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s
Alligood, M.R. (2002). Philosophies, models, and theories: manual of child psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 159–259). New
Critical thinking structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner York: Wiley.
Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theory: Utilization and application (2nd Fleming, B.H. (1990). Use of the Johnson model in nursing edu-
ed., pp. 41–61). St. Louis: Mosby. cation (Abstract). In Proceedings of the National Nursing Theory
Atkinson, J.W., & Feather, N.T. (1966). A theory of achievement Conference (pp. 109–111). Los Angeles: UCLA Neuropsychiatric
maturation. New York: Wiley. Institute and Hospital Nursing Department.
Auger, J.R. (1976). Behavioral systems and nursing. Englewood Gewirtz, J. (Ed.). (1972). Attachment and dependency.
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
04Fawcett-04 09/17/2004 1:52 PM Page 84
Chapter 5
King’s Conceptual System
Imogene M. King presented the foundation for her Conceptual System in her
1964 publication, “Nursing Theory—Problems and Prospect.” She then identified
several concepts of the Conceptual System in her 1968 article, “A Conceptual
Frame of Reference for Nursing.” The entire Conceptual System was presented
in her 1971 book, Toward a Theory for Nursing. King went on to describe refine-
ments in the Conceptual System in her 1978 speech at the Second Annual
Nurse Educator Conference. She presented further refinements in the
Conceptual System and introduced the Theory of Goal Attainment in her 1981
book, A Theory for Nursing: Systems, Concepts, Process. Subsequently, King
published overviews of the Conceptual System and theory, with some refine-
ments, in a book (King, 1986a), book chapters (King, 1986b, 1987b, 1989a,
1990b, 1995a, 1995b), and a journal article (King, 1992a). In 1987, King (personal
communication, July 18, 1987) stated that her Conceptual System “will not
change but will continue to generate theories.” Later, King (2001) commented
that “there has been no change in the conceptual system or theory except to
add the concept of coping in the personal system” (p. 281). (In an earlier paper,
King (1987a) had placed coping in the interpersonal system.) King (2001a) went
on to note, “The word ‘spiritual’ was added to my assumptions about human
beings. This was in my original manuscript in 1971 but was accidentally omitted
in the publication” (p. 281).
Theories derived from the Conceptual System continue to be generated, and
two other changes in the Conceptual System, not mentioned by King, are evi-
dent. Those changes are the addition of learning as a dimension of the concept
of personal system and the addition of control as a dimension of the concept of
social system (King, 1986a).
88
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 89
Systems Framework and then began to refer to the Con- SOCIAL SYSTEM
ceptual System as King’s Conceptual System (King, Organization
1997a, 1997c). The title General Systems Framework Authority
was used in the previous edition of this book (Fawcett, Power
2000). Here, the title King’s Conceptual System is used. Status
The concepts of King’s Conceptual System and her Decision Making
Theory of Goal Attainment and their dimensions and Control
subdimensions are listed here, along with the goals of ENVIRONMENT
nursing and the components of King’s practice method- INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
ology. The concepts, their dimensions and subdimen- EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
sions, and the methodology components are defined HEALTH
and described, and the goal of nursing is discussed in HEALTH
detail later in this chapter. ILLNESS
NURSING
ACTION, REACTION, AND INTERACTION PROCESS
Key Terms GOAL OF NURSING
Help Individuals, Families, Groups, and
HUMAN BEINGS Communities Attain, Maintain, and
PERSONAL SYSTEM Restore Health, So That They Can
Perception Function in Their Respective Roles,
Self and to Help Individuals Die with Dignity
Growth and Development PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE INTERACTION-
Body Image TRANSACTION PROCESS
Time Perception
Personal Space Judgment
Learning Action
INTERPERSONAL SYSTEM Reaction
Interaction Disturbance
Communication Mutual Goal Setting
Verbal Communication Exploration of Means to Achieve Goals
Nonverbal Communication Agreement on Means to Achieve Goals
Transaction Transaction
Role Attainment of Goals
Stress THEORY OF GOAL ATTAINMENT
Coping
ANALYSIS OF KING’S CONCEPTUAL the 1960s (e.g., Moore, 1968, 1969), maintained that the
SYSTEM delineation of a theoretical body of knowledge was neces-
sary for the advancement of nursing. King (1964) voiced
This section presents an analysis of King’s Conceptual her concern that an existing “antitheoretical bias” in nurs-
System and her Theory of Goal Attainment. The analysis ing had resulted in “nursing theory … based on practical
relies heavily on King’s (1981) book, A Theory for Nursing: techniques—the ‘how’ rather than the ‘why’” (p. 395). She
Systems, Concepts, Process; her book chapter (1990b), therefore deliberately set out to develop a conceptual frame
“King’s Conceptual Framework and Theory of Goal of reference for nursing as a precursor to a theory that
Attainment;” and her journal article (1992a), “King’s would explicate the “why” of nursing actions.
Theory of Goal Attainment;” and draws from other recent King (1988) stated that the specific motivation to de-
publications (King, 1995a, 1995b, 1997c). velop her Conceptual System was the need to select essen-
tial content for a new master’s degree program in nursing.
She went on to explain:
ORIGINS OF THE NURSING MODEL
In 1963 as I worked with a faculty committee to develop a new
Historical Evolution and Motivation master of science in nursing program, I was challenged by a
question from a philosophy professor who was familiar with
King began to develop her Conceptual System at a time my undergraduate philosophy courses. He asked: “Imogene,
when nursing was striving for status as a science and hence have you or any nurses defined the ‘nursing act’?” I perceived
as a legitimate profession. She, along with other writers of this to be a philosophical type question and my response was
89
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 90
of varying sizes and organizational structure. Nurses are Assumptions about Human Beings
expected to perform many functions in these organiza-
tions. A third idea was that changes in society, changes in ● Characteristics that are common to human beings are
the role of women, and advancement in knowledge from that they are unique, holistic individuals of intrinsic
research and technology have influenced changes in nurs- worth who are capable of rational thinking and decision
ing” (pp. 19–20). making in most situations (King, 1995b, p. 26).
● Individuals are sentient and social, as observed by their
interactions with persons and objects in the environ-
Philosophical Claims ment (King, 1995b, p. 26).
● Individuals] are perceived as reacting beings who are
King presented the philosophical claims undergirding her controlling, purposeful, action-oriented, and time-
Conceptual System and the Theory of Goal Attainment in oriented in their behavior (King, 1995b, p. 26).
the form of a philosophical orientation to science and a ● Individuals are social, spiritual, sentient, and rational
philosophical orientation to nursing. King (1989a, 1990b, human beings who act in situations by perceiving, con-
1997b, 2001) has revealed that her philosophical orienta- trolling, and exhibiting purposeful action-oriented be-
tion to science is general system theory. She explained, havior over time (King, 1997b, p. 21).
My philosophical position is rooted in General System
● Individuals have the capacity to think, to know, to make
Theory, which guides the study of organized complexity as choices, and to select alternative courses of actions
whole systems. This philosophy gave me the impetus to focus (King, 1995b, pp. 26–27).
on knowledge development as an information-processing, ● Human beings have an intellect and by nature, they de-
goal-seeking, and decision-making system. General System sire to know (King, 1997b, p. 21).
Theory provides a holistic approach to study nursing phe- ● Individuals differ in their needs, wants, and goals (King,
nomena as an open system and frees one’s thinking from the 1995b, p. 27).
parts versus whole dilemma (King, 2001a, p. 277). ● Values form the basis of each person’s goals (King,
King (1990b) requested that her work be read “from the 1995b, p. 27).
perspective of General System Theory and a science of
● Because each person is unique, the nature of values em-
wholeness, which is my philosophical position” (p. 74). anates from the nature of human beings (King, 1995b, p.
Furthermore, King (1990b) maintained that her philo- 27).
sophical orientation to science is congruent with her philo-
● [Values] are demonstrated in the standards of human
sophical orientation to nursing. All of King’s philosophical conduct and have been handed down from one genera-
claims, which are expressed as assumptions about open tion to another (King, 1995b, p. 27).
systems, human beings, and nurse-client interactions; be-
● Values are linked to cultures and, therefore, vary from
liefs about nursing; and propositions about nursing, are person to person, family to family, and society to society
presented here. (King, 1995b, p. 27).
● Human beings are open systems who think, who set
Assumptions about Open Systems goals, and who select means to achieve them (King,
1997b, p. 20).
● Open systems exhibit an exchange of energy and infor- ● Human beings … are open systems in transaction with
mation and are goal directed (King, 1997a, p. 180; 1997b, the environment (King, 1995b, p. 26).
p. 20). ● Individuals exhibit a sense of wonder about their world
● Open systems exhibit equifinality in that different means and ask questions, seek answers, identify problems, and
may be used to attain similar goals (King, 1997b, p. 20). seek resolution (King, 1997b, pp. 20–21).
● A system is composed of at least five elements: goals, ● Individuals process selective inputs from the environ-
structure, functions, resources, and decision making ment through the senses (King, 1981).
(King, 1997a, p. 180). ● Individuals are in continuous transaction with their in-
● Resources flow into the system as inputs, activities indi- ternal and external environments (King, 1997b, p. 21).
cate the use of resources, and outputs are generated ● Transaction connotes that there is no separateness be-
(King, 1997b, p. 20). tween human beings and environment (King, 1995b, p.
● When inputs are converted to outputs, transformation 26).
takes place (King, 1997b, p. 20). ● Individuals organize and relate information from the ex-
● Open systems are essential in studying the wholeness of ternal environment with the internal environment
nursing (King, 1997a, p. 181). (King, 1997b, p. 20).
● The goal of the system is health (King, 1997a, p. 181). ● Human beings have the ability through their language
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 92
and other symbols to record their history and preserve ● The relationships among the dimensions have an effect
their culture (King, 1995b, p. 27). upon the nursing process (King, 1964, p. 401).
● Individuals generally wish to preserve life, avoid ● Nursing includes specific components: (a) nursing judg-
pain, procreate, gratify desires, and insure their security. ment, (b) nurse action, (c) communication, (d) evalua-
In addition, individuals want to perform functions tion, (e) coordination (King, 1964, p. 402).
associated with activities of daily living (King, 1990a, p. ● The nursing judgment will vary relative to each nursing
127). action (King, 1964, p. 402).
● People and money are the key resources in achieving ● The effectiveness of nursing action will vary with the
goals (King, 1997a, p. 181). extent to which it is communicated to those responsible
for its implementation (King, 1964, p. 402).
Beliefs about Nursing ● Nursing action is more effectively assured if the goals
● The focus of nursing is the human being and human acts are communicated and standards of nursing perform-
(King, 1985a). ance have been established (King, 1964, p. 402).
● Nursing action is based on facts, which may change;
● The focus of nursing is human beings interacting with
thus, nursing judgments and action are evaluated and
their environment leading to a state of health for indi-
revised as the situation changes (King, 1964, p. 402).
viduals, which is an ability to function in social roles ● Nursing action is one component of health care; thus
(King, 1981, p. 143).
health care is affected by the coordination of nursing
● Nursing is perceived by me to be a complex, organized
with health services (King, 1964, p. 402).
whole system transacting with a variety of whole systems
(King, 1997b, p. 21).
● Nursing is a goal-seeking system (King, 1997b, p. 21). Assumptions about Nurse-Client Interactions
● Nurses, in the performance of their roles and responsi- ● Perceptions of nurse and of client influence the interac-
bilities, assist individuals and groups in society to attain,
tion process (King, 1981, p. 143).
maintain, and restore health (King, 1971, p. 22). ● Goals, needs, and values of nurse and client influence the
● In the process of functioning in social institutions,
interaction process (King, 1981, p. 143).
nurses assist individuals to meet their basic needs at ● Individuals and families have a right to knowledge about
some point in time in the life cycle when they cannot do
their health (King, 1992a, p. 21).
this for themselves (King, 1971, p. 22). ● [Individuals and families] have a right to participate in
● An understanding of basic human needs in the physical,
decisions that influence their life, their health, and com-
social, emotional, and intellectual realm of the life
munity services (King, 1992a, p. 21).
process from conception to old age, within the context of ● Health professionals have a responsibility to share infor-
social systems of the culture in which nurses live and
mation that helps individuals make informed decisions
work, is essential and basic content for learning the prac-
about their health (King, 1992a, p. 21).
tice of nursing (King, 1971, p. 22). ● [Individuals and families] have a right to accept or to re-
Propositions about Nursing ject health care (King, 1992a, p. 21).
● Goals of health professionals and goals of recipi-
● The nursing process is conducted within a social system, ents of health care may be incongruent (King, 1981, p.
the dimensions [of which] include: (a) the nursing 144).
process, (b) the individuals involved in the nursing ● Health professionals have a responsibility to gather rele-
process, (c) the individuals involved in the environment vant information about the perceptions of the client so
within which the nursing process is activated, (d) the so- that their goals and the goals of the client are congruent
cial organization within which the process takes place, (King, 1992a, p. 21).
[and] (e) the community within which the social organ- ● The assumption that individuals (nurse and client) are
ization functions (King, 1964, p. 401). capable of interacting to set mutual goals and agree on
● The nursing process will differ, dependent upon the in- means to achieve the goals has been extended to include
dividual nurse and each recipient of nursing service mutual goal setting with family members in relation to
(King, 1964, p. 401). clients and families (King, 1986b, p. 200).
● The nursing process will differ relative to all individuals
in the environment (King, 1964, p. 401). Strategies for Knowledge Development
● The nursing process will differ relative to the social or-
ganization in which the nursing process takes place King used both inductive and deductive thought processes
(King, 1964, p. 401). to formulate her Conceptual System and Theory of Goal
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 93
Attainment. Explaining her approach, King (1975) com- Haas (1964), Hall (1959), Hall and Fagen (1956),
mented: Havighurst (1953), Ittleson and Cantril (1954), Janis
(1958), Jersild (1952), Katz and Kahn (1966), Klein (1970),
My personal approach to synthesizing knowledge for nursing Linton (1963), Lyman and Scott (1967), Monat and
was to use data and information available from research in
nursing and related fields and from my 25 years in active prac-
Lazarus (1977), Orme (1969), Parsons (1951), Piaget
tice, teaching, and research. … A search of the literature in (1969), Ruesch and Kees (1972), Schilder (1951), Selye
nursing and other behavioral science fields, discussion with (1956), Shontz (1969), H.A. Simon (1957), Y.R. Simon
colleagues, attendance at numerous conferences, inductive (1962), Sommer (1969), von Bertalanffy (1956, 1968),
and deductive reasoning, and some critical thinking about the Wapner and Werner (1965), Watzlawick, Beavin, and
information gathered, led me to formulate my own frame- Jackson (1967), and Zald (1970). Moreover, King (1992a)
work. (pp. 36–37) revealed that the term transaction “came from a study
of Dewey’s theory of knowledge (Dewey & Bentley, 1949)”
Elaborating on the process she used to review the litera- (p. 21).
ture, King (1992a) stated, “The process used … to identify King (1971, 1981) also acknowledged the influence of
relevant concepts began with a review of the literature. … students, academic colleagues, nurse researchers, and prac-
From the literature review, a list of words [was] recorded ticing nurses on her thinking. During an interview con-
using content analysis. A reconceptualization of this list ducted in the late 1980s, King (1988) highlighted the
provided the comprehensive concepts for the King concep- contributions to her thinking made by Kaufmann (1958),
tual system. … Subsequent to the review of literature and Orlando (1961), and Peplau (1952). King (1988) explained
discussions with colleagues and with nurses giving direct that Kaufmann’s (1958) doctoral dissertation led her to ex-
care, and with critical thinking about the information plore the concepts of perception, time, and stress. She also
gathered, [I] was led to formulate the conceptual system” noted that the research conducted at Yale University School
(pp. 19–20). of Nursing to test Orlando’s (1961) theory of the delibera-
tive nursing process influenced her thinking. King and
Peplau (as cited in Takahashi, 1992) pointed out the con-
Influences from Other Scholars nections between their works with regard to patient out-
King (1971, 1975, 1981, 1989a, 1992a) has repeatedly men- comes. Peplau commented, “When [King] talks about
tioned the influence of the literature of nursing and setting goals and I talk about beneficial outcomes for the
adjunctive disciplines on the development of her Con- patient in relation to the nurse’s interventions in present-
ceptual System and Theory of Goal Attainment. She ex- ing phenomena, I think you have a very close connection”
plained: (p. 86). King responded by saying, “And I have to tell you
all publicly that Dr. Peplau’s [1952] work influenced my
I know of no other discipline that deals with knowledge that is work” (p. 86).
so vitally essential in the empirical world of application to Furthermore, King (1988) noted that a review of her
practice as the knowledge we expect nurses to have for deci- 1971 book by Rosemary Ellis (1971) encouraged her to
sion making for immediate action in many situations. If one continue her work by deriving a theory from her Concep-
analyzes the knowledge required for nurses to function in the tual System. The result was the Theory of Goal Attainment.
complex world of practice, that knowledge is composed of Moreover, King (2001a) acknowledged the influence of
concepts in every discipline in higher education. This is what
motivated me to identify those concepts in other disciplines
the Howland Systems Model (Howland, 1976) and the
that give nurses specific knowledge that is applied in real Howland and McDowell conceptual framework (Howland
world situations. (King, 1989a, p. 150) & McDowell, 1964) on the development of her diagram of
the interactions among the personal, interpersonal, and
Furthermore, although King (1981) cited the influence of social systems concepts of her conceptual system. That di-
general system theory on the formulation of her Concep- agram is displayed in Figure 5–1.
tual System in the past, she has underscored that influence
in more recent publications (King, 1989a, 1990b, 1997b,
2001). World View
Among the numerous authors from many disciplines
whose works King cited are Benne and Bennis (1959), King’s Conceptual System reflects a reciprocal interaction
Boulding (1956), Bross (1953), Bruner and Krech (1968), world view. Particularly compelling is King’s (1990b)
Cherry (1966), DiVincenti (1977), Erikson (1950), Etzioni philosophical allegiance to “a science of wholeness” (p. 74).
(1975), Fisher and Cleveland (1968), Fraser (1972), Freud Moreover, the focus of the Conceptual System on the
(1966), Gesell (1952), Gibson (1966), Griffiths (1959), personal, interpersonal, and social systems as wholes
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 94
characteristics of both the systems category and the inter- Interaction Category of Knowledge
action category of knowledge are evident, as can be seen
here.
● Social Acts and Relationship: The social act of human in-
teraction occurs in the relationship between nurse and
Systems Category of Knowledge patient.
● Perception: Perception is a dimension of the personal
● System: “A system is defined as a set of elements system, and is a central aspect of the process of human
connected by communication links that exhibits goal- interaction.
directed behavior” (King, 1997a, p. 180). King’s Concep- ● Communication: Communication is a dimension of the
tual System encompasses the personal, interpersonal, interpersonal system and is used to establish and main-
and social systems (King, 1971, 1981, 1995a). tain relationships between human beings, and nurses
● Integration of the Parts: The personal, interpersonal, and and patients communicate to establish mutual goals and
social systems are open, dynamic, and interacting (King, decide on the means to achieve these goals (King, 1981).
1971, 1981, 1995a). The concepts associated with each ● Role: Role is a dimension of the interpersonal system
system in no way represent parts or subsystems. Rather, and is addressed in the definition of health as “an ability
they may be construed as global characteristics of the to function in social roles” (King, 1981, p. 143).
system. ● Self-Concept: Self-concept is addressed through the con-
● Environment: Environment is viewed as internal and ex- cept of self, which is a dimension of the personal system.
ternal. The personal, interpersonal, and social systems King’s definition of self as “a composite of thoughts and
interact with the environment and exchange matter, en- feelings which constitute a person’s awareness of his in-
ergy, and information (King, 1981). The interaction be- dividual existence, his conception of who and what he is”
tween open systems and the environment is dynamic: (Jersild, 1952, as cited in King, 1981, p. 9) coincides with
The nursing process is defined as a dynamic, ongoing in- Heiss’ (1981) definition of self-concept as “the individ-
terpersonal process in which the nurse and the patient ual’s thoughts and feelings about himself ” (p. 83), which
are viewed as a system with each affecting the behavior of Heiss (1981) explicitly identified as a part of symbolic
the other and both being affected by factors within the interactionism.
situation (Daubenmire & King, 1973, p. 513).
● Boundary: “Open systems, such as man interacting with
the environment, exhibit permeable boundaries permit- CONTENT OF THE NURSING MODEL
ting an exchange of matter, energy, and information” Concepts
(King, 1981, p. 69). “The structure of the theory [of goal
attainment] indicates some semipermeable boundaries The metaparadigm concepts of human beings, environ-
of two or more individuals interacting in a health-care ment, health, and nursing are reflected in the concepts of
system for a purpose that leads to goal attainment” King’s Conceptual System. Each conceptual model concept
(King, 1989a, p. 155). The “artificial boundaries of nurs- is classified here according to its metaparadigm forerunner.
ing [are] individuals and groups interacting with the en- The metaparadigm concept of human beings is repre-
vironment” (King, 1981, p. 1). sented by King’s Conceptual System concepts of PER-
● Tension, Stress, Strain, Conflict: “When transactions are SONAL SYSTEM, INTERPERSONAL SYSTEM, and
made, tension or stress is reduced in a situation” (King, SOCIAL SYSTEM. Each of those concepts is multidimen-
1981, p. 82). sional. The concept of Personal System has seven dimen-
● Steady State: Steady state is not explicitly addressed. sions—Perception, Self, Growth and Development, Body
King’s (1981) statement that the dynamic life experience Image, Time, Personal Space, and Learning.
of health involves continuous adjustment to environ- The concept of Interpersonal System has six dimen-
mental stressors suggests that King would accept the sions—Interaction, Communication, Transaction, Role,
idea of a steady state, rather than a fixed point equilib- Stress, and Coping. The dimension of Communication has
rium. two subdimensions—Verbal Communication and Nonver-
● Feedback: Feedback is such that “perception of the nurse bal Communication. The concept of Social System has six
leads to judgments and to action by the nurse. Simulta- dimensions—Organization, Authority, Power, Status,
neously, the perception of the patient leads to judgments Decision Making, and Control.
and then to actions by the patient. This is a continuous King (1989a) explained that the placement of the di-
dynamic process rather than separate incidents in which mensions within the concepts of Personal System, Inter-
the action of one person influences the perceptions of personal System, and Social System required arbitrary
the other and vice versa” (King, 1971, p. 92). decisions because the three systems are “so interrelated in
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 96
the interactions of human beings with their environment” ence, represents one’s image of reality, and influences
(p. 151). King (1995a) went on to explain that the “dimen- one’s behavior (King, 1981, p. 24). Perception is defined
sions … represent knowledge essential for understanding as each person’s representation of reality. It is an aware-
the interactions between the three systems” (p. 18). Indeed, ness of persons, objects, and events (King, 1981, p. 146).
although the dimensions of “all three systems [are] interre- Perception involves the following elements: (1) import of
lated when one observe[s] any concrete nursing situation, energy from the environment organized by information,
the purpose for placing these [dimensions] in [a particu- (2) transformation of energy, (3) processing of informa-
lar] system was to facilitate learning about self as an indi- tion, (4) storing of information, [and] (5) export of in-
vidual and about interactions with other individuals” formation in overt behaviors (King, 1981, p. 146).
(King, 1992a, p. 20). Knowledge of perception, for exam- Perception varies from one individual to another be-
ple, “is essential for nurses to understand self and to un- cause each human being has different backgrounds of
derstand other individuals… Knowledge of interaction is knowledge, skills, abilities, needs, values, and goals
essential for nurses to understand a fundamental process (King, 1989a, p. 152).
for gathering information about human beings… [And] ● Self: The self is a composite of thoughts and feelings
knowledge of organization is essential for nurses to under- which constitute a person’s awareness of his individual
stand the variety of social systems within which individu- existence, his conception of who and what he is. A per-
als grow and develop” (King, 1989a, pp. 152–153). son’s self is the sum total of all he can call his. The self in-
The metaparadigm concept of environment is represen- cludes, among other things, a system of ideas, attitudes,
ted by King’s Conceptual System concepts of INTERNAL values, and commitments. The self is a person’s total sub-
ENVIRONMENT and EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT. jective environment. It is a distinct center of experience
Both concepts are unidimensional. The metaparadigm and significance. The self constitutes a person’s inner
concept of health is represented by King’s Conceptual world as distinguished from the outer world consisting
System concepts of HEALTH and ILLNESS, both of which of all other people and things. The self is the individual
are unidimensional. The metaparadigm concept of nursing as known to the individual. It is that to which we refer
is represented by King’s Conceptual System concept of AC- when we say “I” (Jersild, 1952, as cited in King, 1981, pp.
TION, REACTION, AND INTERACTION PROCESS, 9–10). Self [is defined as] a personal system synonymous
which also is unidimensional. with the terms I, me, and person. Self is a unified, com-
plex whole person who perceives, thinks, desires, imag-
ines, decides, identifies goals and selects means to
Nonrelational Propositions achieve them (King, 1986b, p. 201).
The definitions of the concepts of King’s Conceptual
● Growth and Development: Growth and development in-
System and their dimensions and subdimensions are listed clude cellular, molecular, and behavioral changes in
here. Those constitutive definitions are the nonrelational human beings (King, 1981, p. 30). Growth and develop-
propositions of this nursing model. ment are defined as continuous changes in individuals at
the cellular, molecular, and behavioral levels of activities
PERSONAL SYSTEM (King, 1986b, p. 201). Growth and development are
a function of genetic endowment, meaningful and satis-
● Personal systems … are individuals (King, 1986a, p. 80). fying experiences, and an environment conducive to
● [The personal system is] a unified, complex whole self helping individuals move toward maturity (King, 1981,
who perceives, thinks, desires, imagines, decides, identi- p. 31).
fies goals, and selects means to achieve them (King, 1981, ● Body Image: [Body image is] a person’s perceptions of
p. 27). his own body, others’ reactions to his appearance, and is
● Personal systems encompass both healthy and ill indi- a result of others’ reactions to self (King, 1981, p. 33).
viduals (King, 1992b). ● Time: [Time is] the duration between the occurrence of
one event and the occurrence of another event (King,
The concept of Personal System encompasses seven di-
1981, p. 44). Time is a sequence of events moving on-
mensions—Perception, Self, Growth and Development,
ward to the future; a continuous flow of events in suc-
Body Image, Time, Personal Space, and Learning (King,
cessive order that implies change; a past and a future
1995a).
(King, 1986b, p. 201). [Time gives] order to events and
● Perception: [Perception is] a process of organizing, in- [is used] to determine duration based on perceptions of
terpreting, and transforming information from sense each person’s experiences (King, 1981, p. 45).
data and memory. It is a process of human transactions ● Personal Space: [Personal space refers to the space that]
with the environment. It gives meaning to one’s experi- exists to the extent that it is perceived by each person
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 97
(King, 1981, p. 36). [Space is defined as] existing in all di- The concept of Interpersonal System encompasses
rections and is the same everywhere … [and] as the six dimensions—Interaction, Communication, Transac-
physical area called territory and by the behavior of indi- tion, Role, Stress, and Coping (King, 1986a, 1987a). The
viduals occupying space (King, 1981, pp. 37–38). Space is dimension of Communication encompasses two subdi-
that element that exists in all directions and is the same mensions—Verbal Communication and Nonverbal Com-
everywhere… [It is] a physical area called territory, and munication (King, 1995a).
is defined by the behavior of individuals occupying space
such as gestures, postures, and visible boundaries erected
● Interaction: Interaction is a process of perception and
to mark off personal space (King, 1986b, p. 201). Spatial communication between person and person and person
arrangements communicate role, position, and interac- and environment, represented by verbal and nonverbal
tions with others. Marking off an area [of the invisible behaviors that are goal directed (King, 1981, p. 145).
boundaries of personal space] for self gives individuals a [Interactions are defined as] the acts of two or more per-
sense of security and identity (King, 1981, p. 37). Space sons in mutual presence (King, 1981, p. 85). Interactions
orients a person to his or her environment (King, 1981, can reveal how one person thinks and feels about an-
p. 37). Space is unique to an individual and [is] influ- other person, how each perceives the other and what the
enced by needs, past experiences, and culture (King, other does to him, what his expectations are of the other,
1981, p. 37). and how each reacts to the actions of the other (King,
● Learning: Learning is a process of sensory perception, 1981, p. 85). The process of interaction between two or
conceptualization, and critical thinking involving multi- more individuals represents a sequence of verbal and
ple experiences in which changes in concepts, skills, sym- nonverbal behaviors that are goal directed (King, 1981, p.
bols, habits, and values can be evaluated in observable 60). The process of interaction consists of each person’s
behaviors and inferred from behavioral manifestations simultaneous perceptions and judgments about the
(King, 1986a, p. 24). Learning is self-activity; no one can other in the interaction, the taking of some mental ac-
learn from another individual (Gulitz & King, 1988, p. tions based on the judgments, and reacting to the other’s
129). Learning is dynamic, goal oriented, and self regu- perceptions. Interaction follows those mental processes,
lating in that reinforcement and feedback influence in- and this is followed in turn by transaction (King, 1971,
puts and outputs (Gulitz & King, 1988, p. 129). 1981). In the interactive process, two individuals mutu-
ally identify goals and the means to achieve them. When
King (1981) summarized the connections among the di- they agree to the means to implement the goals, they
mensions of the concept of Personal System, with the ex- move toward transactions. Transactions are defined as
ception of learning, in this statement: goal attainment (King, 1981, p. 61).
An individual’s perceptions of self, of body image, of time and
● Communication: [Communication is] the vehicle by
space influence the way he or she responds to persons, objects, which human relations are developed and maintained
and events in his or her life. As individuals grow and develop (King, 1981, p. 79). Communication is a process whereby
through the life span, experiences with changes in structure information is given from one person to another either
and function of their bodies over time influence their percep- directly in face-to-face meetings or indirectly through
tions of self. (p. 19) telephone, television, or the written word (King, 1986b,
p. 201). All behavior is communication (King, 1981, p.
INTERPERSONAL SYSTEM 80). All human activities that link person to person and
● [The interpersonal system is composed of] two, three, or person to environment are forms of communication
more individuals interacting in a given situation (King, (King, 1981, p. 79).
1976, p. 54).
● Interpersonal systems … are dyads, triads, [and] small The dimension Communication encompasses two sub-
and large groups (King, 1986a, p. 80). dimensions—Verbal Communication and Nonverbal
Communication (King, 1981).
In regard to the Interpersonal System, King (1990a) ex- ● Verbal Communication: Verbal communication, which
plained that “individuals increase consciousness and are is both intrapersonal and interpersonal in nature, en-
open to interpersonal perceptions in the communications compasses verbal signs and symbols, including spoken
and interactions with persons and things in the environ- and written words, used by individuals to express their
ment. Individuals have the potential to make transactions goals and values (King, 1981).
that include goal setting, and choosing means to attain ● Nonverbal Communication: Nonverbal communica-
goals to maintain their health and function in roles” (p. tion, which is both intrapersonal and interpersonal
127). in nature, encompasses nonverbal signs and symbols,
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 98
including gestures and touch, used by individuals to which individuals form groups to carry on activities of
express their goals and values (King, 1981). Nonverbal daily living to maintain life and health and, hopefully,
communication is use of space and defense of space happiness (King, 1976, p. 54).
(King, 1981, p. 38).
King (1992b) commented that the inclusion of the Social
● Transaction: [Transaction is defined as] a process of in- System in her Conceptual System “reminds us that a vari-
teraction in which human beings communicate with en- ety of [such] systems provide[s] the background for each
vironment to achieve goals that are valued. Transactions person’s growth, and development, etc., and health profes-
are goal directed human behaviors (King, 1981, p. 82). sionals assess situations on that basis” (p. 604).
Transaction is defined as observable behavior of human The concept of Social System encompasses six dimen-
beings interacting with their environment that leads to sions—Organization, Authority, Power, Status, Decision
goal attainment (King, 1986b, p. 201). Transactions are Making, and Control (King, 1986a).
viewed as a flow of information from the environment
through coding, transformation, and processing of sen-
● Organization: An organization is composed of human
sory, linguistic, and neurophysiologic elements resulting beings with prescribed roles and positions who use re-
in decision making that leads to human actions (King, sources to accomplish personal and organizational goals
1997b, p. 20). (King, 1981, p. 119).
● Role: Role is a set of behaviors expected when occupying
● Authority: Authority is a transactional process charac-
a position in a social system (King, 1981, p. 93). Role is terized by active, reciprocal relations in which members’
a set of behaviors expected of persons occupying a values, background, and perception play a role in defin-
position in a social system; rules that define rights and ing, validating, and accepting the authority of individu-
obligations in a position; [and] a relationship with one als within an organization. One person influences
or more individuals interacting in specific situations another, and he recognizes, accepts, and complies with
for a purpose (King, 1986b, p. 201). Role is a relationship the authority of that person (King, 1981, p. 124).
with one or more individuals interacting in specific
● Power: The process whereby one or more persons influ-
situations for a purpose (King, 1981, p. 93). [Roles in- ence other persons in a situation. Power defines a situa-
volve] rules or procedures [that] define [the] rights and tion in a way that people will accept what is being done
obligations [of] a position in an organization (King, while they may not agree with it (King, 1981, p. 127).
1981, p. 93).
● Status: The position of an individual in a group or a
● Stress: Stress is a dynamic state whereby a human being group in relation to other groups in an organization
interacts with the environment to maintain balance for (King, 1981, p. 129). Status is ascribed or achieved (King,
growth, development, and performance, which involves 1981).
an exchange of energy and information between the per-
● Decision Making: Decision making in organizations is a
son and the environment for regulation and control of dynamic and systematic process by which goal-directed
stressors (King, 1981, p. 98). Stress is viewed as negative choice of perceived alternatives is made and acted on by
and positive as well as constructive and destructive individuals or groups to answer a question and attain a
(King, 1981). Stress is reduced when transactions are goal (King, 1981, p. 132).
made (King, 1981).
● Control: A dimension of the concept of Social System
● Coping: An essential area of knowledge related to the in- (King, 1986a).
terpersonal system (King, 1987a). [Coping refers to] The linkages among the Personal System, Interpersonal
coping with stress (King, 1992a, p. 21). System, and Social System are explicated in King’s (1989a)
statement that the focus of her Conceptual System is “on
SOCIAL SYSTEM individuals whose interactions in groups within social sys-
tems influence behavior within the systems” (p. 152). The
● [A social system is] an organized boundary system of so- linkages are illustrated in Figure 5–1. The figure clearly de-
cial roles, behaviors, and practices developed to maintain picts the three “open systems in a dynamic interacting
values and the mechanisms to regulate the practices and framework” (King, 1981, p. 10).
rules (King, 1981, p. 115).
● Social systems … are the groups that form to achieve INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
specific purposes within society, such as the family, the
school, the hospital, industry, [social organizations,] and ● Not explicitly defined, but it can be inferred that the in-
the church (King, 1986a, p. 80, 1989a). ternal environment is a source of stressors and energy
● Social systems describe units of analysis in a society in (King, 1981).
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 99
and communities maintain health” (King, 1997b, p. 21). nursing process an “interaction-transaction process model”
King went on to say that if health is not possible, “nurses (King, 1989a, p. 153), a “transaction model” (King, 1989a,
help individuals die with dignity” (King, 1981, p. 13). The p. 157), and a “transaction process” (King, 1997a, p. 181).
various statements about the Goal of Nursing can be inte- This model, which is the PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
grated into this statement: for King’s Conceptual System, is elaborated through the
Theory of Goal Attainment. King (1992b) explained that
The goal of nursing is to help individuals, families, groups,
the theory “has identified an interaction process that leads
and communities attain, maintain, and restore health, so that
they can function in their respective roles, and to help indi- to transactions and then to goal attainment (p. 604). The
viduals die with dignity. components of the Interaction-Transaction Process (King,
1981, 1990b, 1992a, 1997a) are identified and described in
King referred to the nursing process as an INTERACTION- Table 5–1 and depicted in Figure 5–2.
TRANSACTION PROCESS. In particular, she labeled the The Interaction-Transaction Process is “a dynamic, on-
TABLE 5–1
KING’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE INTERACTION-TRANSACTION PROCESS
PERCEPTION
One aspect of the assessment phase of the interaction-transaction process.
The nurse and the client meet in some nursing situation and perceive each other.
Accuracy of perception will depend upon verifying [the nurse’s] inferences with the client (King, 1981, p. 146).
The nurse can use the Goal-Oriented Nursing Record (GONR) to record perceptions (see Table 5–2 on p. 110).
JUDGMENT
Another aspect of the assessment phase of the interaction-transaction process.
The nurse and the client make mental judgments about the other.
The nurse can use the GONR to record judgments.
ACTION
Another aspect of the assessment phase of the interaction-transaction process.
Action is a sequence of behaviors of interacting persons, which includes (1) recognition of presenting conditions; (2) op-
eratives or activities related to the condition or situation; and (3) motivation to exert some control over the events to
achieve goals (King, 1971, pp. 90–91).
The nurse and the client take some mental action.
The nurse can use the GONR to record mental actions.
REACTION
Another aspect of the assessment phase of the interaction-transaction process.
The nurse and the client mentally react to each one’s perceptions of the other.
The nurse can use the GONR to record mental reactions.
DISTURBANCE
The diagnosis phase of the interaction-transaction process.
The nurse and the client communicate and interact, and the nurse identifies the client’s concerns, problems, and distur-
bances in health.
The nurse conducts a nursing history to determine the client’s activities of daily living, using the Criterion-Referenced
Measure of Goal Attainment Tool (CRMGAT) (see Table 5–2 on p. 110); roles; environmental stressors; perceptions; and
values, learning needs, and goals. The nurse records the data from the nursing history on the GONR.
The nurse records the medical history and physical examination data, results of laboratory tests and radiographic exami-
nation, and information gathered from other health professionals and the client’s family members on the GONR.
The nurse records diagnoses on the GONR.
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 101
TRANSACTION
The implementation phase of the interaction-transaction process.
[Transaction refers to] the valuational components of the interaction (King, 1990a, p. 128).
The nurse and the client carry out the measures agreed upon to achieve the mutually set goals.
The nurse can use the GONR flow sheet and progress notes to record the implementation of measures used to achieve
goals.
ATTAINMENT OF GOALS
The evaluation phase of the interaction-transaction process.
The nurse and the client identify the outcome of the interaction-transaction process. The outcome is expressed in terms
of the client’s state of health, or ability to function in social roles.
The nurse and the client make a decision with regard to whether the goal was attained and, if necessary, determine why
the goal was not attained.
The nurse can use the CRMGAT to record the outcome and the GONR to record the discharge summary.
Constructed from King, 1981, pp. 59–63, 144–149, 164–176; 1985b; 1986b, p. 200; 1989b; 1992a, p. 22; 1995b; 1997a, p. 182; 1999,
pp. 295–296.
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 102
Feedback
obviously values a goal, identifies means to achieve it, and
Perception takes action to attain it” (p. 62). In later publications,
however, King noted that inferences must be made about
Judgment
each person’s perceptions and mental judgments, whereas
Nurse Action all of the other behaviors encompassed by the Interaction-
Reaction Interaction Transaction Transaction Process are directly observable in concrete
Action
Patient situations in nursing practice” (King, 1992a, p. 22; 1996,
Judgment p. 62).
Perception
theory over time and indicated her motivation for the parameters. Although King (personal communication to R.
work. Furthermore, she explicated the philosophical claims Martone, July 25, 1989) claimed that her concept of Social
undergirding the Conceptual System and theory in the System “explains environments and internal [environ-
form of assumptions about open systems, human beings, ment] is explained in [the] communication concept,” fur-
and nurse-client interactions; beliefs about nursing; and ther explication of the concepts of Internal Environment
propositions about nursing. and External Environment would provide clarification.
The philosophical claims indicate that King values the Health was clearly defined in King’s Conceptual System.
client’s participation in nursing. They also indicate that King revealed that she rejected the idea of health as a con-
King values the client’s right to accept or reject the services tinuum of wellness to illness because that is a linear notion.
offered by nurses and other health-care professionals. Using the same reasoning, it may be inferred that she also
King’s presentation of the Interaction-Transaction rejects the idea of health as a dichotomy of wellness and ill-
Process (see Table 5–1) indicates that she values equally the ness. That inference, however, requires explicit commen-
nurse’s and the client’s perceptions of any given situation. tary by King. King defined Illness and related that concept
In addition, King (1999) has introduced the need for con- to the concept of Health by indicating that disturbances in
sideration of ethical issues, including understanding of the the dynamic state that is health are regarded as illness or
client’s and family’s value system, in the mutual goal- disability.
setting component of the Interaction-Transaction Process. King defined and described nursing in a comprehen-
Furthermore, a central feature of the Interaction- sive manner and clearly identified the Goal of Nursing.
Transaction Process is the participation of both nurse and Moreover, over the years, King has reinforced the one-to-
client in goal setting and determining the means to achieve one correspondence between her Theory of Goal Attain-
the goals. ment and the Interaction-Transaction Process.
King explicitly acknowledged the influence of other Furthermore, King defined and described the compo-
scholars on her thinking and provided extensive biblio- nents of the Interaction-Transaction Process and has re-
graphic citations of relevant works. In addition, she under- lated those components to the steps of the generic nursing
scored the influence of general system theory on the process (Yura & Walsh, 1983). There is, however, an incon-
development of her Conceptual System and theory. sistency in her publications with regard to whether Action
and Reaction are observable components of the process
(King, 1981, 1992a, 1996). In addition, it is unclear whether
COMPREHENSIVENESS OF CONTENT the Interaction-Transaction Process can be used not only
with individuals but also with groups and social organiza-
King’s Conceptual System is sufficiently comprehensive re- tions, and if so, how that might be accomplished. King
garding depth of content, although some inconsistencies (1983a, 1983b, 1983c) extended the nursing process to
are evident and some points require clarification. King families, although explicit use of the Interaction-
provided a comprehensive discussion of the metaparadigm Transaction Process was not evident in the examples given.
concept of person. Indeed, her descriptions of the dimen- Indeed, King’s extension of the nursing process to families
sions of the concepts of Personal System, Interpersonal contradicts her emphasis on the individual, as is evident in
System, and Social System provide more specification of the following statement: “Although the primary point of
individuals, groups, and society than usually is found in a interest in the [Theory of Goal Attainment] relates to in-
conceptual model. terpersonal systems of an individual in the role of caregiver
An inconsistency evident in King’s discussion of human and an individual in the role of recipient of care, the goals
beings is the designation of the human being as a client in to be attained relate to the individual receiving care” (King,
most of her writings and the designation of the human 1989a, p. 155).
being as a patient in others. Moreover, in some instances, King deliberately related the concepts making up her
she refers to the human being as a client and as a patient in Conceptual System to theoretical and empirical literature
the same paper (e.g., King, 1990b, 1999). In addition, defi- about human behavior. That is especially obvious in the
nitions of the Coping dimension of the concept of strong scientific knowledge base used to describe each di-
Interpersonal System and the Control dimension of the mension of the concepts of Personal System, Interpersonal
concept of Social System are needed to enhance the clarity System, and Social System. Moreover, King underscored
of King’s Conceptual System. the need for an extensive base of knowledge on which to
In contrast to the comprehensive consideration of base judgments regarding nursing diagnoses and goals. She
human beings, King’s discussion of the concepts of emphatically stated, “Judgments made by nurses will be in-
Internal Environment and External Environment is vague. fluenced by their knowledge of the physical, psychological,
She did not define either concept, nor did she identify any and social components of man, by their system of values,
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 104
and by their selected perceptions in the nursing situation” ing research, education, administration, and practice.
(King, 1971, p. 92). In particular, interaction is based on Many guidelines can be extracted from King’s publications
the perceptions, judgments, mental actions, and mental re- about the Conceptual System. The guidelines for research,
actions of the nurse and the client engaged in a nursing sit- nursing education, administration of nursing services, and
uation. Furthermore, the database requires collection of nursing practice are listed below.
considerable information about the person for the identi-
fication of nursing diagnoses and goals.
King (1971) conceptualized human interaction as a dy- Nursing Research Guidelines
namic process. She explained, “Perception of the nurse The guidelines for nursing research based on King’s
leads to judgments and to action by the nurse. Conceptual System, which were constructed from Byers
Simultaneously, the perception of the patient leads to judg- (1985), Fawcett (2001, p. 314), and King (1968, 1971, 1981,
ments and then to action by the patient. This is a continu- 1989a), are:
ous dynamic process rather than separate incidents in
which the action of one person influences the perceptions ● Purpose of the research
of the other and vice versa” (p. 92). ●
The ultimate purpose of King’s Conceptual System-
Furthermore, the Goal-Oriented Nursing Record based research is to determine the effects of mutual
(GONR) suggests a dynamic nursing process inasmuch as goal setting and implementation of the nursing inter-
that documentation tool fosters continual monitoring of ventions related to goals on goal attainment.
changes in the status of nursing diagnoses and recording of
the client’s current health status, as well as frequent revi-
● Phenomena of interest
sions in the nursing diagnoses and goal list on the basis of
●The phenomena of interest are transactions and
outcomes of nursing care (see Table 5–2, p. 110). health.
King’s concern for ethical standards of nursing practice
●[Transaction is] a critical dependent variable in nurse-
is evident in her insistence on consideration of the client’s client interactions that lead to goal attainment (King,
perception of a situation and explication of the client’s and 1986b, p. 202).
family’s value system. Her concern for ethical standards
●Health—the ability to function in social roles—is an
also is evident in her insistence that the client or a designee outcome variable (King, 1986b, p. 200).
participate in goal setting and identification of the means
●Other phenomena are the set of variables that are pre-
to attain the goals. dictors of nurse behaviors, including the nurse’s edu-
The relational propositions of King’s Conceptual cation and experience, which can be used to predict
System link the metaparadigm concepts. Statements were effectiveness of nursing care.
located that link human beings and environment; human
●Still other phenomena are the set of variables that in-
beings, the environment, and nursing; human beings, fluence the whole complex of behaviors entering the
health, and nursing; and human beings, the environment, nursing process, such as patient perceptions and ex-
health, and nursing. pectations, as well as the structure of the health-care
King’s Conceptual System is sufficiently comprehensive organization.
in breadth of content. King has specified a relatively
●Additional phenomena are the set of variables that
broad goal for nursing that focuses on the health of indi- focus on situational behaviors related to nurse-patient
viduals, groups, and society. She has claimed that her con- interaction, including communication and interper-
cept of Health “includes health promotion, health sonal relationships.
maintenance, and regaining health when there is some in-
●Other phenomena are the set of variables that encom-
terference along the life cycle—for example, an illness” pass criteria of effectiveness of nursing care, such as the
(King, 1995b, p. 25). In addition, King (1981) maintained client’s performance of activities of daily living and
that “nurses play strategic roles in the process of human knowledge about health maintenance.
growth and development and in helping individuals cope ● Problems to be studied
with disturbances in their health. They have an essential ● The precise problems to be studied are actual or po-
role in community planning for the delivery of health serv- tential disturbances in the client’s ability to function in
ices to the public. As professionals, nurses deal with behav- social roles.
ior of individuals and groups in potentially stressful
situations pertaining to health, illness, and crises [includ- ● Study participants
ing death], and help people cope with changes in daily ac- ● Study participants include individuals; dyads, triads,
tivities” (p. 13). and other groups; and families, social organizations,
King’s Conceptual System provides direction for nurs- and health-care systems.
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 105
decisions, and act consistently and reasonably as mem- ● Settings for nursing services
bers of a profession and a democratic society. ●
Nursing services are located in many different settings,
including acute and chronic care facilities and ambula-
● Teaching-learning strategies tory clinics.
● Teaching-learning strategies should be directed toward
providing a climate conducive to individual growth ● Management strategies and administrative policies
and freedom to inquire into the nature of the environ- ●
Nurse administrators restructure job descriptions to
ment. reflect differentiation in roles and functions of all
● Learning experiences should move the student from nursing personnel and change the organizational chart
looking at the state of health to disturbances in the to clearly show the lines of communication and re-
state of health, and back to health. sponsibility for each level of nursing personnel.
● Specific strategies include lecture and discussion; ●Nursing personnel who are affected by any changes in
group discussion; role playing; demonstrations of in- the organizational structure are encouraged by nurse
terviewing techniques, participant and nonparticipant administrators to participate in decision making about
observation techniques, and structured observations; the changes in the job descriptions and the organiza-
and individual and group conferences between stu- tional chart.
dents and teachers. ●Nurse administrators recommend the use of the
GONR to document nursing care and to measure the
effectiveness of that care.
Administration of Nursing Services Guidelines
Guidelines for the administration of nursing services based Nursing Practice Guidelines
on King’s Conceptual System, which were constructed
from King (1986a, 1989b), are: Guidelines for nursing practice based on King’s Concep-
tual System, which were constructed from Fawcett (2001, p.
● Focus of nursing in the health-care institution 314) and King (1981, p. 2; 1986b, 1989a), are:
● The distinct focus of King’s Conceptual System-based
nursing services in health-care organizations is the ● Purpose of nursing practice
nurse and the client interacting for the purpose of mu- ● The purpose of King’s Conceptual System-based nurs-
tual goal setting and goal attainment. ing practice is to perceive, think, relate, judge, and act
vis-à-vis the behavior of individuals who come to a
● Purpose of nursing services nursing situation.
● The purpose of nursing services is to help clients attain ● More specifically, the purpose of nursing practice is to
their goals. help individuals attain and maintain their health, and
● Characteristics of nursing personnel if there is some disturbance such as illness or disabil-
●Nursing personnel include both technical and profes- ity, nurses’ actions are goal directed to help individuals
sional nurses, whose functions are clearly differenti- regain health or live with a chronic illness or a disabil-
ated. ity.
– Technical nurses are prepared in associate degree ● Practice problems of interest
programs and provide general nursing with supervi- ● Practice problems encompass the client’s activities of
sion from professional nurses. daily living related to the performance of social roles.
– Professional nurses are prepared in postbaccalaure-
ate Doctor of Nursing (ND) degree programs ● Settings for nursing practice
and are able to supervise and manage nursing ● A nursing situation is the immediate environment, the
practice, observe behaviors in the form of reactions spatial and temporal reality, in which nurse and client
and symptoms of disease and illness, record and establish a relationship to cope with health states and
report facts about clients and evaluate the total adjust to changes in activities of daily living if the situ-
situation, implement nursing goals, direct nurs- ation demands adjustment.
ing with individuals and groups, provide for essen- ● Nursing practice can occur in acute and chronic care
tial health education to help them maintain their settings, as well as those appropriate to delivery of care
health, supervise nursing personnel, and imple- for the maintenance of health.
ment physician’s orders for treatments and ● Opportunities for health promotion exist wherever
medications based on nursing knowledge and un- people are in their communities, regardless of their age
derstanding. and health state.
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 107
served as the knowledge base for using the nursing process the implementation of any conceptual model or theory, re-
of assessing, [diagnosing,] planning, implementing, and quires considerable time and effort. Byrne-Coker and
evaluating nursing care. The [conceptual system and theory Schreiber (1990a, 1990b) identified several strategies that
have] helped teachers assist learners to organize a multi- facilitate King’s Conceptual System-based nursing practice
tude of facts into meaningful wholes” (pp. 22–23). The so- in health-care organizations. One strategy is a 2-week ori-
cial utility of King’s Conceptual System and Theory of Goal entation program that progresses from discussion of the
Attainment are further documented by an entire book, Personal System, with emphasis on comparison of the new
which contains 21 chapters of extensions and tests of the employee’s values with those of the health-care organ-
Conceptual System and theory in nursing research, educa- ization, to the Social System, with emphasis on how the
tion, administration, and practice (Frey & Sieloff, 1995). organization defines the role of the nurse, to the Interper-
The knowledge required for application of King’s sonal System, with emphasis on the nursing process. The
Conceptual System and Theory of Goal Attainment comes orientation program concludes with a formal presentation
from extensive study of the dimensions of the concepts of of the Conceptual System. In addition, new nurses receive
Personal System, Interpersonal System, and Social System an exercise book “to help them practice applying the con-
through course work in nursing and adjunctive disciplines. cepts in their clinical area” (Byrne-Coker & Schreiber,
King (1986a) identified several courses in the adjunctive 1990b, p. 26).
disciplines as prerequisite to the nursing major (see Another strategy is 45-minute inservice education ses-
Nursing Education Guidelines on pp. 105–106). sions offered on all shifts on all units to help continuing
King (1986a) indicated that implementation of King’s staff learn the content and processes of the Conceptual
Conceptual System and Theory of Goal Attainment System and theory. Still another strategy is ongoing inser-
requires not only theoretical and empirical knowledge vice education in the form of a “concept of the month.”
of the dimensions of the concepts Personal System, Byrne-Coker and Schreiber (1990a) explained that “each
Interpersonal System, and Social System, but also the abil- month, a concept [of the Conceptual System] was featured
ity to use that knowledge with people of all ages, with a and information about the concept, taken from King’s text,
focus on their activities of daily living. In addition, use of was posted. In addition, mini-discussions, 15 minutes each,
the Conceptual System and theory requires the perceptual highlighted the selected concept and encouraged nurses to
and psychomotor skills necessary to assess individuals’ begin thinking about it. Nurses thought about how the
health states and the interpersonal and communication concept influenced their nursing care that particular
skills necessary to engage in mutual goal setting. Further- month and were asked to write this on the perimeter of the
more, the user of the Conceptual System and theory must poster” (p. 90).
learn to be sensitive to and accepting of the client’s percep- Another strategy is to redesign existing nursing history
tion of what is happening. King (1992a) indicated that pro- and assessment forms, nursing diagnoses, patient teaching
fessional values also must be learned. Finally, King (1986a) programs, and quality assurance programs so that they are
identified four processes as essential nursing content that consistent with King’s Conceptual System. An additional
must be mastered in order to use the Conceptual System strategy is to design computer software that is consistent
and theory—nursing process, teaching and learning with the Conceptual System and theory.
processes, transaction process, and research process. Finally, Byrne-Coker and Schreiber (1990a) drew atten-
King (2001a) explained that the Conceptual System and tion to the need to use morale-boosting strategies during
theory are not applied directly. Rather, as she noted she has periods of waning enthusiasm for Conceptual System- and
stated repetitively, “One cannot apply and abstraction, theory-based nursing. They cited the effectiveness of a visit
which is what conceptual frameworks, models, and theo- to the health-care organization by King herself, as well as
ries represent. What one applies is the knowledge of the “Kingratulations” parties held at the completion of all the
concepts of the structure and process proposed in the ab- “concepts of the month.”
stractions” (p. 281). Messmer (1992) described other strategies that make
The many concepts that make up King’s Conceptual the implementation of King’s Conceptual System and
System and Theory of Goal Attainment provide an exten- Theory of Goal Attainment feasible. She reported the ef-
sive vocabulary. However, the concepts and their defini- fectiveness of case study presentations, a self-study module
tions were taken from well-known works. Thus, mastery of for staff nurses and newly employed nurses that carries 5
the vocabulary should not pose a major problem for po- contact hours of continuing education credits, and “lunch
tential users of the Conceptual System and theory. and learn” inservice education sessions.
Implementation of practice protocols derived from the West (1991) described other strategies. She commented
knowledge of the content of King’s Conceptual System and on the effectiveness of a video and “resources nurses” for
Theory of Goal Attainment certainly is feasible but, as with each unit who helped their peer staff nurses to “internalize
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 110
theory (as they understood it) and accept it as an every day Nursing Research. The utility of King’s Conceptual
part of nursing” (p. 29). In addition, a coordinator super- System for nursing research is documented by the
vised the overall implementation process on all nursing many studies that have been guided by this conceptual
units. model of nursing. Instrument development research is
Clearly, the administrators of the health-care organiza- listed in Table 5–2. Published reports of descriptive, corre-
tion must be willing to underwrite the cost of such strate- lational, and experimental studies are listed in Table 5–3.
gies, in terms of the required personnel time and materials. Published abstracts of doctoral dissertations and master’s
In addition, the nurses must be willing to expend the time theses are listed in the Doctoral Dissertations and Master’s
and energy required to revise forms and implement Theses sections of the chapter bibliography on the CD-
changes. ROM.
(Text continues on page 114)
TABLE 5–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM KING’S CONCEPTUAL
SYSTEM AND THEORY OF GOAL ATTAINMENT
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Postpartum Satisfaction Inventory (PPSI) (Pfoutz, 1990) Measures postpartum women’s satisfaction with their mater-
nity care
Killeen-King Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care Measures patient satisfaction with nursing care
(KKPSNC) (Killeen, 1996)
Sieloff-King Assessment of Departmental Power Measures nursing’s power within a hospital
(SKADP) (Sieloff, 1996); revised as the Sieloff-King
Assessment of Group Power Within Organizations
(Sieloff, personal communication, January 4, 1999)
PRACTICE TOOLS
Criterion-Referenced Measure of Goal Attainment Used to assess, plan, and evaluate nursing in terms of the
Tool (CRMGAT) (King, 1988; Young et al., 2001) client’s physical ability to perform activities of daily living
(ADL), level of consciousness, hearing, vision, smell, taste,
touch, speaking ability, listening ability, reading and writing
abilities, nonverbal communication, and decision-making abil-
ity; response to the performance of ADL; and goals to be at-
tained
Goal-Oriented Nursing Record (GONR) (King, 1981, A documentation system used to record and evaluate the
1984, 1989) nurse’s observations and actions and the client’s responses
to nursing. The GONR is composed of a database, nursing di-
agnoses, a goal list, nursing orders, flow sheets, progress
notes, and a discharge summary
Assessment Format (Swindale, 1989) Guides assessment of the minor surgery patient’s anxieties,
coping strategies, and nature of information needed
Nursing Process Tool (Norris & Frey, 2002) Displays the relationship among the nursing process, critical
thinking process, transaction process, and ethical decision-
making process
Nursing Process Format for Families (Gonot, 1986) Guides the use of a Theory of Goal Attainment-based nursing
process for families
Family Needs Assessment Tool (Rawlins et al., 1990; Measures the special needs of the families of chronically ill
Young et al., 2001) children
Community Health Assessment (Hanchett, 1988) Guides assessment of a community according to the dimen-
sions of personal systems, interpersonal systems, and social
systems
*
See the Research Instruments and Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
110
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 111
TABLE 5–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY KING’S CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM AND THEORY
OF GOAL ATTAINMENT
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Process of scientific nursing knowledge Imogene M. King Messmer, 1995
development, epitomized through King’s family members, friends, and col-
Imogene M. King’s life and work leagues
Correspondence
Photographs
Books and articles
Videotape
Power Literature review Hawks, 1991
Empathy Literature review Alligood et al., 1995
Theory of empathy derived from King’s Hermeneutic interpretation of King’s Alligood & May, 2000
personal system writings about the personal system
concept in her Conceptual System
Description of the image of nurses on Greeting cards obtained from the Pierce et al., 2002
Internet greeting cards Internet
Perceptions of benefits of and barriers to Female adolescents Hanna, 1994
use of oral contraceptives
Perceptions of the female domestic Women residing in a shelter for domes- Mayer, 2000
violence victim’s experience in an tic violence victims
emergency department
Perceptions of living with chronic inflam- Young adults Daniel, 2002
matory bowel disease
Patients’ satisfaction with their choice of Adult surgical patients Porteous & Tyndall, 1994
walking or going by stretcher from a
same-day surgery admitting area to
the operating room
Types of space Swedish nurses’ written descriptions of Rooke, 1995a
critical situations related to the con-
cept of space in a geriatric hospital
Nurses’ interpretations of transaction, Swedish nurses’ written descriptions of Rooke, 1995b
interaction, perception, and time nursing situations
Nurses’ self-esteem, gender identity, Members of the American Association Levine et al., 1988
and personality characteristics of Critical Care Nurses
Nurses’ perceptions of their competence Newly employed Norwegian nurses Olsson & Forsdahl, 1996
and role expectations
Identification of the elements of transactions Nurses King, 1981
Medical-surgical patients
Perceived needs of family members Registered nurses working in neonatal Jacono et al., 1990
or adult intensive care units
Family members of patients in a neona-
tal or adult intensive care unit
Description of interpersonal relationships Adults with hypertension who were not Moreira & Araújo, 2002
with health professionals compliant with treatment
Identification of categories of nurse-patient Videotapes of nurses and surgical pa- Rundell, 1991
interactions tients on high-dependency (intermedi-
ate or step-down) units
Factors in nurse-patient interactions that Japanese nurses Kusaka, 1991
interfere with transactions Orthopedic patients Kameoka [nee Kusaka], 1995
*
See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
111
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 112
TABLE 5–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY KING’S CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM AND THEORY
OF GOAL ATTAINMENT (continued)
CORRELATIONAL STUDIES
Relation of adequacy of prenatal care to Low-income pregnant and postpartal Schiffman et al., 1995
changes from pregnancy to postpartum women
depression, family functioning, social
support, functional status, and life events
Relations among menopausal stage, current Women 40 to 55 years of age Sharts Engel, 1984, 1987;
life change, attitude toward women’s roles, Sharts-Hopko, 1995
menopausal symptoms, use of hormone
therapy, socioeconomic status, and
perceived health status
Relation of uncertainty, role, functioning, and Adult women with cancer eligible for a Ehrenberger et al., 2002
social support to emotional health (hope and cancer clinical trial
mood state) and relation of emotional health
(hope and mood state) to treatment decision
Relation of social support and anomia to Older nursing home residents Zurakowski, 2000
self-reported health
Relation between chronic sorrow and Parents of children with a neural tube de- Hobdell, 1995
accuracy of parental perception of the fect
child’s cognitive development
112
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 113
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effect of attending behavior on mental status Investigator Rosendahl & Ross, 1982
Older people residing in a chronic
care facility
Effects of animal-assisted therapy on Individuals recovering from chemical Campbell-Begg, 2000
abstinence addictions
Effect of a King’s Conceptual System-based White, Black, and Hispanic men 18 to Martin, 1990
cancer awareness educational program on 64 years of age
knowledge of and attitudes toward prostate
and testicular cancer
Effects of a Theory of Goal Attainment-based Patients undergoing pyelolithotomy or Hanucharurnkul & Vinya-
nursing intervention and a control inter- nephrolithotomy nguag, 1991
vention on pain sensation and distress,
analgesic use, ambulation, complications,
and satisfaction with nursing
Effect of a Theory of Goal Attainment-based Female adolescents Hanna, 1993, 1995
nursing intervention and a control interven-
tion on oral contraceptive adherence
Effect of a teaching program on medication- African-American patients 65 years of Long et al., 1998
taking behavior age or older receiving hemodialysis
Effect of education about urinary incontinence Community-dwelling older adults with Milne, 2000
on help-seeking behaviors urinary incontinence
Effects of individualized teaching on knowl- Family caregivers of older adults Suresh, 2002
edge of physical changes, psychological
problems, and home care of older adults
Effects of an experimental patient appoint- Veterans Health Administration pa- Wilkenson & Williams, 2002
ment guidebook and a control standard tients
appointment reminder letter on patient
participation in the health-care visit and
perceptions of primary-care visit effectiveness
113
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 114
Nursing Practice. King (1992a) maintained that her Con- of Goal Attainment] can be used in most nursing situa-
ceptual System and Theory of Goal Attainment provide a tions” (p. 24). Indeed, King’s Conceptual System and the
useful approach for nursing practice. She claimed that al- Theory of Goal Attainment have documented utility in
though any one Conceptual System theory “cannot cover nursing practice with individuals of various ages and with
every nursing situation [the nursing process of the Theory many different conditions of health (Table 5–4).
TABLE 5–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY KING’S CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM AND THEORY
OF GOAL ATTAINMENT
Application of King’s Conceptual System A critically ill infant Frey & Norris, 1997; Norris
& Frey, 2002
Couples who are infertile Davis, 1987
Women experiencing menopause Heggie & Gangar, 1992
A man receiving individual psychotherapy DeHowitt, 1992
A 29-year-old woman with cervical cancer Frey & Norris, 1997; Norris
& Frey, 2002
A 41-year-old woman with breast cancer, toxic Fawcett et al., 1995
megacolon, and spinal osteomyelitis
Alcohol-dependent women who were victims of McKinney & Frank, 1998
sexual abuse
An older man with a leg ulcer Lucas, 1998
Patients scheduled for minor elective surgery Swindale, 1989
Patients with cardiac disease and their families Sirles & Selleck, 1989
A subcommunity of prostitutes working in a Hanchett, 1988
large community
A community Batra, 1996
Application of the Theory of Goal Infants in a neonatal intensive care unit and Norris & Hoyer, 1993
Attainment their parents
A 17-year-old high school student with an ankle Hughes, 1983
injury admitted to an emergency department
A 25-year-old female victim of domestic violence Benedict & Frey, 1995
admitted to an emergency department
A 17-year-old female accident victim with multi- Alligood, 1995
ple fractures
Women participating in a self-esteem group Laben et al., 1995
A 30-year-old woman who had a cesarean birth Smith, 1988
A 40-year-old woman with chronic back pain Alligood, 1995
A man with AIDS-related lymphoma receiving Porter, 1991
outpatient chemotherapy
A 43-year-old man who had coronary artery by- King, 1986
pass surgery
Individuals who have neurofibromatosis Messner & Smith, 1986
Adults with diabetes mellitus Husband, 1988
An older widower residing alone in an apart- Kohler, 1988
ment complex
A 70-year-old hospitalized woman with diabetes Jonas, 1987
mellitus
*
See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 116
TABLE 5–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY KING’S CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM AND THEORY
OF GOAL ATTAINMENT (continued)
George (2002) argued that a limitation of King’s work used to guide nursing practice with children, adolescents,
“is the lack of development of application of the theory in and adults with such conditions as ankle injury, infertility,
proving nursing care to groups, families, or communities.” cesarean birth, menopause, coronary artery bypass surgery,
She evidently ignored the family theory development work cerebrovascular accident, end-stage renal disease, neurofi-
by Doornbos (1995, 2000) and Wicks (1995, 1997) and the bromatosis, diabetes, and mental illness.
growing literature documenting the use of King’s Furthermore, turning attention to groups other than
Conceptual System and Theory of Goal Attainment with families, Laben and her colleagues (1991) focused on
families and communities (see Table 5–4), as well as the group therapy for offenders in the criminal justice system.
practice tools for assessment of families and communities Moreover, King (1984) discussed the application of her
(see Table 5–2). work in community health nursing. And Hanchett (1988,
More specifically, review of the publications cited in 1990) provided informative discussions of the use of King’s
Tables 5–2 and 5–4 and those listed in the Commentary: work when the client is the community.
Practice section of the chapter bibliography on the CD- Although a client’s inability to communicate verbally
ROM reveals that King’s Conceptual System and Theory of may seem to limit the use of King’s Conceptual System and
Goal Attainment are equally applicable to individuals, fam- Theory of Goal Attainment, King (1992a) explained that
ilies, and communities. In particular, King’s work has been “when clients cannot communicate with a nurse, they can
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 117
nonverbally send and receive messages. In some situations, equate scientific findings and enduring traditions deemed
nurses use their judgment and set goals for the patients and acceptable by society.
families when they are unable to do this for themselves. … The Interaction-Transaction Process, with its emphasis
When working with patients who are comatose, nurses can on mutual goal setting, is particularly appealing to health-
verbally communicate and observe for nonverbal gestures care consumers and nurses who believe that health care is
such as muscle movement, the squeezing of the nurse’s a collaborative endeavor and to health-care consumers
hand, or changes in facial expressions” (p. 24). who wish to participate actively in their nursing care.
In a specific example, King (1986b) described the use Indeed, King (1992b) noted that the Interaction-
of the Theory of Goal Attainment by a graduate student Transaction Process “is based on knowledge of human in-
who was caring for a comatose patient. Because the patient teractions in which a critical human variable (coping)
could not communicate verbally, mutual goals were should be of concern in helping those we serve to build col-
set with the patient’s husband. The student, however, com- laborative relationships and participate as informed deci-
municated verbally with the patient and observed sion makers in their own health care” (p. 604).
and recorded her nonverbal responses. The student ascer- Bramlett, Gueldner, and Sowell (1990) pointed out that
tained that goals set with the husband were attained after King’s assumptions about human beings and her emphasis
the patient regained consciousness and returned to her on mutual goal-setting support “a need to redefine the
home. concept of advocacy to accommodate a more active and
Furthermore, practice tools have been developed to less dependent client role in decision making” (p. 160).
guide assessment of individuals, families, and communi- They also pointed out that “King’s focus on the informa-
ties, and to document nursing practice based on the tion giving role of the nurse is consistent with the concept
Theory of Goal Attainment. Those tools are identified and of consumer-centric advocacy” (p. 160). Health-care con-
described in Table 5–2. sumers and nurses who do not subscribe to such an ap-
In addition, King has pointed out that her Conceptual proach to nursing practice would have to be persuaded to
System and Theory of Goal Attainment can be used see its value. That is especially so when caring for clients
by family members and by teachers. She explained, with external locus of control. More specifically, King
“Families can be taught how to use the transaction process (1987a) noted that the use of the Interaction-Transaction
in their interactions, so that they are mutually setting Process may be limited to clients who have internal locus
goals with each other. A spouse can be taught to mu- of control because it is difficult to set mutual goals with a
tually set goals with his or her partner. A mother can be client who has an external locus of control.
taught to mutually set goals with her children. King’s Conceptual System and Theory of Goal Attain-
Furthermore, the transaction process can be taught to ment are appropriate for use with clients of various cul-
teachers, who can mutually set goals with the students” tural backgrounds. Husting (1997) maintained that the
(Fawcett, 2001, p. 314). Elaborating, King declared, “The Theory of Goal Attainment is congruent with international
key is that my work is based on general system theory; this and multicultural nursing, and that use of the theory pre-
means that the whole system of interest is identified. The vents cultural stereotypes. Frey and colleagues (1995) ex-
concepts of my [Conceptual System] and theory can be plicitly refuted charges by others (e.g., Meleis, 1985) that
used with any system because the knowledge of the con- the Conceptual System and theory may not be appropriate
cepts relate to human beings and environment” (Fawcett, for people of diverse cultures. They presented examples of
2001, p. 314). the successful use of the Conceptual System and theory for
many years in Japan and Sweden, as well as in the United
States. Rooke (1995b) added that King’s Conceptual
Social Congruence System and Theory of Goal Attainment have been used
successfully to guide nursing practice in Sweden.
The social congruence of King’s Conceptual System and Furthermore, King’s Conceptual System and Theory of
the Theory of Goal Attainment is based, in part, on King’s Goal Attainment have been used by nurses in Thailand
(1975) deliberate construction of the Conceptual System (King, as cited in Takahashi, 1992), and have been imple-
from “recurring ideas or … concepts that were undergoing mented successfully in health-care organization in Canada.
verification through systematic investigation” (p. 37) and Moreover, King’s 1968 journal article and her 1971 and
systematic derivation of the theory from selected dimen- 1981 books were translated into Japanese (Frey et al.,
sions of the Conceptual System concepts. The resulting 1995), and her 1981 book was translated into Spanish
unique conceptual-theoretical system of nursing knowl- (King, personal communication, May 7, 1992, as cited in
edge emphasizes nursing practice based on empirically ad- Carter & Dufour, 1994).
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 118
Attainment is a major contribution to the growing list of King’s (1997c) vision for the future “is a dream that
distinctive nursing theories. Noteworthy is the empirical nurses will be at the center of health-care delivery systems
testing of and initial support for the Theory of Goal At- in the next century. In addition, my conceptual system and
tainment. However, additional tests of the Theory of Goal theory of goal attainment will provide the structure for
Attainment are needed. Furthermore, the credibility of gathering information relative to access, quality, and cost
King’s Conceptual System requires additional investigation for all human beings” (p. 16). Later, King (2001a) indicated
by means of systematic tests of conceptual-theoretical- that her vision for the future of nursing is that:
empirical structures derived from the Conceptual System,
… nursing will provide access to health care of all citizens. The
the Theory of Goal Attainment or other relevant theories,
United States health-care system will be structured using my
and appropriate empirical indicators. conceptual system. Entry into the system will be via nurses’ as-
The emphasis on client participation in King’s sessment so individuals are directed to the right place in the
Conceptual System and Theory of Goal Attainment, in- system for nursing care, medical care, social services informa-
cluding mutual goal setting and exploration of means to tion, health teaching, or rehabilitation. My [Interaction-
achieve goals, should be attractive to the many nurses who Transaction Process] will be used by every practicing nurse so
are consumer advocates. The Conceptual System and that goals can be achieved to demonstrate quality care that is
theory also should be attractive to those clients who wish cost effective. My conceptual system, Theory of Goal
to actively participate in their health care. Attainment and [Interaction-Transaction Process] will con-
King’s Conceptual System, as King (1995a) pointed out, tinue to serve a useful purpose in delivering professional nurs-
ing care (p. 284).
describes “a holistic view of the complexity in nursing,
within various groups, [and] in different types of health Given the widespread interest in King’s work, her dream is
care systems” (p. 21). More specifically, King’s Conceptual likely to become a reality.
System “provides a way of thinking about the ‘real world’ of
nursing practice … suggests one approach for selecting
concepts from the literature that represent fundamental REFERENCES
knowledge for the practice of professional nursing …
[and] shows a process for developing concepts that sym- Alligood, M.R. (1997). Models and theories: Critical thinking
bolize experiences within various environments in which structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner-Tomey (Eds.),
nursing is practiced” (King, 1995a, p. 17). Nursing theory: Utilization and application (pp. 31–45). St.
Furthermore, the Theory of Goal Attainment and the Louis: Mosby.
Interaction-Transaction Process represent “a human Alligood, M.R. (2001). Philosophies, models, and theories:
process of interactions that lead to transactions and to goal Critical thinking structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner-
attainment [which is] successful … because it enables one Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theory: Utilization and application (2nd
to predict outcomes of sets of events in the concrete world ed., pp. 41–61). St. Louis: Mosby.
of practice” (p. 62). Alligood, M.R., Evans, G.W., & Wilt, D.L. (1995). King’s interact-
The scholarly work needed to continue to generate and ing systems and empathy. In M.A. Frey & C.L. Sieloff (Eds.),
Advancing King’s systems framework and theory of nursing (pp.
evaluate empirical data about King’s Conceptual System, 66–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
the Theory of Goal Attainment, and other theories derived
Alligood, M.R., & May, B.A. (2000). A nursing theory of personal
from the Conceptual System was advanced by several system empathy: Interpreting a conceptualization of empathy in
members of the King International Nursing Group (KING; King’s interacting systems. Nursing Science Quarterly, 113,
King International Nursing Group, 2000) during its exis- 243–247.
tence, as well as by other nurses who are interested in this Arndt, C., & Huckabay, L.M.D. (1980). Nursing administration:
perspective of nursing. The KING was founded in 1997 “to Theory for practice with a systems approach (2nd ed). St. Louis:
improve the quality of patient care, and to contribute to Mosby.
the science of nursing, through advancement of King’s Barnum, B.J.S. (1998). Nursing theory. Analysis, application, eval-
[Conceptual System] for Nursing … [and] the Theory of uation (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Goal Attainment as well as other theoretical formulations Benne, R.D., & Bennis, W.G. (1959). The role of the professional
derived from the [Conceptual System]” (Bylaws of the King nurse. American Journal of Nursing, 59, 380–383.
International Nursing Group, April 17, 1998, p. 1). The Boulding, K. (1956). General system theory—The skeleton of sci-
KING published a newsletter, King’s Systems Update, and ence. Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General
sponsored annual educational conferences. At the request System Theory, 1(1), 11–17.
of Imogene King, the KING disbanded in 2002. The work Bramlett, M.H., Gueldner, S.H., & Sowell, R.L. (1990). Consumer-
to advance King’s Conceptual System and Theory of Goal centric advocacy: Its connection to nursing frameworks. Nursing
Attainment will, however, continue. Science Quarterly, 3, 156–161.
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 120
ADMINISTRATION Batra, C. (1996). Nursing theory and nursing process in the com-
munity. In J.M. Cookfair (Ed.), Nursing care in the community
Byrne, E., & Schreiber, R. (1989). Concept of the month: (2nd ed., pp. 85–124). St. Louis: Mosby.
Implementing King’s conceptual framework at the bedside. Benedict, M., & Frey, M.A. (1995). Theory-based practice in the
Journal of Nursing Administration, 19(2), 28–32. emergency department. In M.A. Frey & C.L. Sieloff (Eds.),
Byrne-Coker, E., Fradley, T., Harris, J., Tomarchio, D., Chan, V., & Advancing King’s systems framework and theory of nursing (pp.
Caron, C. (1990). Implementing nursing diagnoses within the 317–324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
context of King’s conceptual framework. Nursing Diagnosis, 1, Brown, P., & Yantis, J. (1996). Personal space intrusion and PTSD.
107–114. [Reprinted in Frey, M.A., & Sieloff, C.L. (Eds.). (1995). Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services,
Advancing King’s systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. 34(7), 23–28.
161–175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.] Calladine, M.L. (1996). Nursing process for health promotion
Byrne-Coker, E., & Schreiber, R. (1990a). Implementing King’s using King’s theory. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 13,
conceptual framework at the bedside. In M.E. Parker (Ed.), 51–57.
Nursing theories in practice (pp. 85–102). New York: National Davis, D.C. (1987). A conceptual framework for infertility.
League for Nursing. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 16,
Byrne-Coker, E., & Schreiber, R. (1990b). King at the bedside. 30–35.
Canadian Nurse, 86(1), 24–26. DeHowitt, M.C. (1992). King’s conceptual model and individual
Fawcett, J.M., Vaillancourt, V.M., & Watson, C.A. (1995). psychotherapy. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 28(4), 11–14.
Integration of King’s framework into nursing practice. In M.A. Fawcett, J.M., Vaillancourt, V.M., & Watson, C.A. (1995).
Frey & C.L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s systems framework Integration of King’s framework into nursing practice. In M.A.
and theory of nursing (pp. 176–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Frey & C.L. Sieloff (Eds.), Advancing King’s systems framework
Gill, J., Hopwood-Jones, L., Tyndall, J., Gregoroff, S., LeBlanc, P., and theory of nursing (pp. 176–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lovett, C., Rasco, L., & Ross, A. (1995). Incorporating nursing di- Frey, M.A., & Norris, D. (1997). King’s systems framework and
agnosis and King’s theory in the O.R. documentation. Canadian theory in nursing practice. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner-
Operating Room Nursing Journal, 13(1), 10–14. Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theory: Utilization and application (pp.
Jones, S., Clark, V.B., Merker, A., & Palau, D. (1995). Changing be- 71–88). St. Louis: Mosby.
haviors: Nurse educators and clinical nurse specialists design a
Gonot, P.W. (1986). Family therapy as derived from King’s con-
discharge planning program. Journal of Nursing Staff
ceptual model. In A.L. Whall (Ed.), Family therapy theory for
Development, 11, 291–295.
nursing. Four approaches (pp. 33–48). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-
King, I.M. (1996). The theory of goal attainment in research and Century-Crofts.
practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 9, 61–66.
Hanchett, E.S. (1988). Nursing frameworks and community as
LaFontaine, P. (1989). Alleviating patient’s apprehensions and client: Bridging the gap. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
anxieties. Gastroenterology Nursing, 11, 256–257.
Heggie, M., & Gangar, E. (1992). A nursing model for menopause
Messmer, P.R. (1992). Implementing theory based nursing prac- clinics. Nursing Standard, 6(21), 32–34.
tice. Florida Nurse, 40(3), 8.
Hughes, M.M. (1983). Nursing theories and emergency nursing.
Schreiber, R. (1991). Psychiatric assessment—a la King. Nursing
Journal of Emergency Nursing, 9, 95–97.
Management, 22(5), 90–94.
Husband, A. (1988). Application of King’s theory of nursing to
Sowell, R.L., & Fuszard, B. (1989). Inpatient nursing case man-
the care of the adult with diabetes. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
agement as a strategy for rural hospitals: A case study. Journal of
13, 484–488.
Rural Health, 5, 201–205.
Jonas, C.M. (1987). King’s goal attainment theory: Use in geron-
Sowell, R.L., & Lowenstein, A. (1994). King’s theory as a frame-
tological nursing practice. Perspectives, 11(4), 9–12.
work for quality: Linking theory to practice. Nursing
Connections, 7(2), 19–31. Kemppainen, J.K. (1990). Imogene King’s theory: A nursing case
Sowell, R.L., & Meadows, T.M. (1994). An integrated case man- study of a psychotic client with human immunodeficiency virus
agement model: Developing standards, evaluation, and outcome infection. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 4, 384–388.
criteria. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 18(2), 53–64. King, I.M. (1981). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts,
process (pp. 169–176). New York: Wiley. [Reissued 1990. Albany,
West, P. (1991). Theory implementation: A challenging journey.
NY: Delmar.]
Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, 4(1), 29–30.
King, I.M. (1983a). The family coping with a medical illness.
Analysis and application of King’s theory of goal attainment. In
PRACTICE I.W. Clements & F.B. Roberts (Eds.), Family health: A theoretical
approach to nursing care (pp. 383–385). New York: Wiley.
Alligood, M.R. (1995). Theory of goal attainment: Application to King, I.M. (1983b). The family with an elderly member. Analysis
adult orthopedic nursing. In M.A. Frey & C.L. Sieloff (Eds.), and application of King’s theory of goal attainment. In I.W.
Advancing King’s systems framework and theory of nursing (pp. Clements & F.B. Roberts (Eds.), Family health: A theoretical ap-
209–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. proach to nursing care (pp. 341–345). New York: Wiley.
05Fawcett-05 09/17/2004 1:58 PM Page 127
Chapter 6
Levine’s Conservation
Model
128
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 129
129
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 130
Philosophical Claims The widespread use of the substitute term “client” was
just as deliberately excluded even though many nurses
Levine presented the philosophical claims undergirding use it habitually. Its original purpose, to add some pro-
the Conservation Model in the form of a value system, as- fessional elegance to nursing practice, does not justify
sumptions about human beings and nursing, and beliefs the moral failure it reflects. The word client comes from
about nursing. Those philosophical claims are listed here. the Latin root that means “follower.” That idea is a pure
Review of Levine’s assumptions about human beings indi- derivative of the paternalistic-parentalistic relationship
cates that she placed human beings within the context of and ought to be forbidden in nursing on moral grounds.
their surroundings. Furthermore, Levine’s values extend to The word “patient” comes from the Latin word for “suf-
her very deliberate choice of the term “patient” to describe fering.” Job, for example, is often credited with patience,
the human being in need of nursing. not because he was willing to wait without complaint
until his ordeal was over, but because he was suffering.
Levine’s Value System He was not a quiescent sufferer; he argued, complained,
lamented, and despised his undeserved misfortune
● The two moral imperatives of Western democratic soci- (Levine, 1989a, p. 126).
eties are the sanctity of life and the prevention or allevi- ● The labeling of persons as clients reinforces … depend-
ation of suffering (Levine, 1989a, 1989d). ency because a client is a follower. The provenance of the
● The fundamental belief of the sanctity of life provides word patient is sufferer. It is the condition of suffering
the structure upon which all moral systems are based that makes it possible to set independence aside and
(Levine, 1989a, p. 125). accept the services of another person (Levine, 1990,
● All the efforts of the healing sciences are founded on the p. 199).
holiness and wholeness of the human being, and the spe- ● It is patients whose predicament of need sets the stan-
cial injunction this places on the caregiver to bring dig- dards of ethical responsibility (Levine, 1989c, p. 5).
nity and compassion to the tasks of caring for another ● It is the challenge of the nurse to provide the individual
person. … The sanctity of life … is the essence of the re- with appropriate care without losing sight of the indi-
spectful relationship that one person must have for an- vidual’s integrity, to honor the trust that the patient has
other. It is never more important than when a placed in the nurse, and to encourage the participation
nurse-patient dyad is created whereby one individual en- of the individual in his or her own welfare. The patient
ters dependency, willing or not, and places his trust in comes in trust and dependence only for as long as the
another person. … Every moment of a nurse-patient in- services of the nurse are needed. The nurse’s goal is al-
teraction requires recognition of the selfhood, the ways to impart knowledge and strength so that the indi-
uniqueness of each individual: nurse and patient. … The vidual can resume a private life—no longer a patient, no
nurse functions in the role of caregiver and assumes an longer dependent (Levine, 1990, p. 199).
additional moral burden to recognize, value, and defend ● There are four guidelines for the personal responsibility
the dependency of the patient (Levine, 1989a, p. 125). that is the particular province of the caregivers, privileges
● The fundamental moral responsibility of patient care is of behavior that have been awarded by the community
the limitation and relief of suffering (Levine, 1989c, pp. that licenses them to practice (Levine, 1989d, p. 88).
4–5). ● Persons who require [care] enter with a contract of trust.
● The health care system is dedicated to the task of pre- They place their well being, and often their lives in the
venting or alleviating suffering. It is the individual who hands of caregivers. To respect that trust by the most vig-
enters “patienthood” who is the sufferer. It is the moral orous effort is a moral responsibility (Levine, 1989d, pp.
duty of the nurse to confront the suffering individual 88–89).
and bring all the skills of hand, heart, and mind to alle- ● It is not the task of the practitioner … to evaluate the so-
viate it. It is equally binding that once the conditions of cial worth of the patient. Judgments as to the quality of
patienthood have been successfully overcome, the indi- life of individual patients are inappropriate and unsup-
vidual is free of his dependent role. He ceases to be a pa- portable and should never be used as a rationale for
tient. His privacy is restored (Levine, 1989a, p. 126). withholding or withdrawing essential care (Levine,
● The ultimate freedom of the individual is to make deci- 1989d, p. 89).
sions. The patient’s freedom must prohibit the imposi- ● The decisions for introducing treatments should be
tion of the nurse’s values into his decisions for his care based (as they have been historically) on the physician’s
(Levine, 1989a, p. 126). evaluation of the patient’s condition and the consequent
● The word “patient” has been deliberately used whenever appropriate interventions. The interference of third
the care recipient [is] discussed [in my publications]. party payers in which therapeutic decisions are dictated
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 131
by cost or any other extraneous factors is morally repug- interact with the environment seems ineluctably tied to
nant (Levine, 1989d, p. 89). his sensory organs (Levine, 1973, p. 446).
● Life or death decisions are not properly those of care-
givers and never should be left to those whose mission is Assumptions about Nursing
to protect life and relieve suffering. Decisions to use ex-
traordinary means of sustaining life processes should be
● A basic assumption of the Conservation Model is that
made in advance of the actual events by the informed nursing intervention is a conservation activity (Levine,
wisdom of the physician whenever possible. The care- 1973).
givers—physicians and nurses—should bring all their
● The multidimensional unity of life must be conserved
skills to bear to alleviate suffering, but that does not in- (Levine, 1973, p. 6).
clude hastening the death of another human being
● The holistic nature of the human response to the envi-
(Levine, 1989d, p. 89). ronment provides the rationale for substantive princi-
● The wholeness which is part of our awareness of our- ples of nursing. A principle is a fundamental concept
selves is shared best with others when no act diminishes that forms the basis for a chain of reasoning. Formulated
another person, and no moment of indifference leaves on a broad base, it establishes the relationships between
him with less of himself. Every moment of moral injus- apparently otherwise unrelated facts. Nursing principles
tice extracts a price from both patient and nurse, just as are fundamental assumptions which provide a unifying
every moment of moral responsibility gives each structure for understanding a wide variety of nursing ac-
strength to grow in his wholeness (Levine, 1977, p. 849). tivities. Nursing principles are all “conservation” princi-
● True conservation demands that the nurse accept the pa- ples (Levine, 1973, p. 13).
tient the way he is (Levine, 1967, p. 55).
● Nursing intervention must deal with the rights and priv- Beliefs about Nursing
ileges of the individual in tangible ways. … The empha- ● Emphasizing the integrity of the patient brings integrity
sis on patient teaching recognizes the individual’s right to the nursing profession and the individual nurse.
to be assisted in understanding the implications of his Bringing together the best science and the most devoted
disease, his treatment, and his care. He must also be as- humanism is the ultimate aim of nursing. In finding,
sured that his medical and social problems will remain valuing, and cherishing the integrity of the patient, the
privileged and confidential (Levine, 1967, p. 54). nurse’s integrity is acknowledged and rewarded (Levine,
1990, p. 200).
Assumptions about Human Beings ● All nursing actions are moral statements. … Expecta-
tions [regarding care] must be realistic. Goals that are
● Living things of every kind share the earth, and the mul- impossible are more than merely frustrating; they are
titude of environmental habitats exist in a vital, changing also unethical. Nurses cannot promise good health and
harmony. To understand the individual, the place and long life to everyone, and it is cruel to place the onus of
time of his or her living must also be understood failure on the individual. Nurses have long been expert at
(Levine, 1990, p. 196). celebrating small victories with patients. It may be, fi-
● The individual cannot be understood outside of the con- nally, that such moments most truly reflect the moral
text of a place and time. The individual cannot be sepa- burden of nursing practice. Moral judgments must be re-
rated from the influence of everything that is happening served and patients must be accepted as they are—for
around him or her, nor indeed, from all those events— what they are—with dignity and honesty (Levine, 1989c,
remembered and forgotten—which have created the in- p. 6).
dividual as he or she is at this precise moment. Nursing
can succeed only when it recognizes that the person is
not summarized by the immediate present, but is bur- Strategies for Knowledge Development
dened by a lifetime of experience—recorded not only on
the tissues of the body, but on the spirit and mind as well Levine’s use of knowledge from a variety of adjunctive dis-
(Levine, 1990, p. 197). ciplines indicates that she used a deductive approach to de-
● The human being responds to the forces in his environ- velop the Conservation Model. That approach is further
ment in a singular yet integrated fashion (Levine, 1973, illustrated in Levine’s (1969a) comment that “the essential
p. 6). science concepts develop the rationale [for nursing ac-
● Human beings are sentient, thinking, future-oriented tions], using ideas from all areas of knowledge that con-
and past-aware individuals (Levine, 1989b, p. 326). tribute to the development of the nursing process in the
● The human being is a sentient being, and the ability to specific area of the model” (p. viii).
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 132
Influences from Other Scholars Nursing that describe the experience of the patient seem very
personal, even though her own invalidism had hardly begun.
Levine is known for her careful citations of the many schol- She lists many of the behaviors basic to the personal integrity
ars and scientists from nursing and adjunctive disciplines of the patient and the nurse. … Notes on Nursing was directed
whose work influenced her thinking. Levine (personal at the social integrity, health, and well-being of the English
communication, February 2, 1982) stated that she “did not people. (pp. 41–42)
invent the notion of Conservation—I simply live in a nat-
ural world where it is a characteristic of experience.” World View
Indeed, Levine (1988b, 1991, 1996) pointed out that con-
servation is a natural law of science and cited Feynman The Conservation Model clearly reflects the reciprocal in-
(1965), who described conservation “as one of the ‘great teraction world view. Levine has always emphasized the
general principles [which] all detailed laws … seem to fol- wholeness of the human being, but she did not always em-
low’ [p. 59]” (Levine, 1991, p. 3). She went on to explain brace holism. Indeed, as she explained:
that “no sophisticated theorizing can displace the funda-
When the first edition of Introduction to Clinical Nursing was
mental importance of natural law” (p. 3). published in 1969, I decided against using “holistic” in favor of
Levine (1990) commented that her use of concepts and “organismic,” largely because the term “holistic” had been ap-
theories from adjunctive disciplines “brings coherence to propriated by pseudoscientists endowing it with the mythol-
nursing problems, encouraging freedom of exploration in ogy of transcendentalism. I used holism in the second edition
practice, research, and teaching without losing sight of the in 1973 because I realized it was too important to be aban-
integrity of either the practitioner or the patient” (p. 196). doned to the mystics. (Levine, 1996, p. 39)
She explicitly acknowledged the contributions to her
The features of the reciprocal interaction world view that
thinking made by the work of Bates (1967), Beland (1971),
are evident in Levine’s Conservation Model are:
Bernard (1865/1957), Cannon (1939), Cohen (1968),
Dubos (1961, 1965), Erikson (1964, 1968), Gibson (1966), ● The Conservation Model focuses on human beings as
Goldstein (1963), Hall (1959, 1966), Hochachka and holistic beings who constantly strive to preserve whole-
Somero (1984), Margulis (1971), Sacks (1985), Selye ness and integrity (Levine, 1973, 1989a, 1990, 1991,
(1956), Sherrington (1906), Tillich (1961), Waddington 1996).
(1968), and Wiener (1954). Moreover, Levine (1996) cred- ● Nursing intervention, traditionally directed by proce-
ited Gaylin for pointing out the distinction between the dures or manifestations of disease symptoms, needs new
terms “patient” and “client” but, surprisingly, did not pro- directions if the holistic approach is to be utilized. The
vide a citation for that work. individual must be recognized in his wholeness, and the
Levine (personal communication, February 2, 1982) powerful influence of adaptation recognized as a dy-
disclaimed “even with some vigor,” however, any depend- namic and ever-present factor in evaluating his care.
ence on Maslow and other more recent authors whose Instead of listing “needs” or “symptoms,” it should be
works focus on holism. Moreover, she decried Maslow’s in- possible to identify for each individual the patterns of his
fluence on nursing education (Levine, 1991). adaptive response, and to tailor intervention to enhance
Furthermore, Levine (1992) identified parallels between their effectiveness (Levine, 1971, pp. 257–258).
the Conservation Model and Nightingale’s (1859) ideas ● All nursing care is focused on man and the complexity of
about observation, environment, and nursing. She ex- his relationships with his environment, both internal
plained, “I quoted [Nightingale’s] words on ‘observation’ in and external, and common experience emphasizes that
my text (Levine, 1973), and emphasized, as I believe she every response to every environmental stimulus results
did, that observation was a guardian activity” (p. 41). from the integrated and unified nature of the human or-
Nightingale’s emphasis on environment influenced Levine ganism. In other words, every response is an organismic
in that “the Conservation Model insists that the person can one—no other kind is possible—and every adaptive
only be understood in the context of environment” (p. 41). change is accomplished by the entire individual (Levine,
Levine (1992) went on to discuss the link between 1967, p. 46).
Nightingale and the Conservation Model concerning nurs- ● Human beings are regarded as active participants in in-
ing: teractions with the environment.
The nursing that Nightingale describes fits comfortably into
● The individual can … never be passive. He is an active
the Conservation principles. She details the parameters of the participant in his environment, not only altering it by his
conservation of energy. … Although her physiology is very presence but also actively and constantly seeking infor-
limited, Nightingale recognizes the importance of conserva- mation from it (Levine, 1969b, p. 96).
tion of structural integrity. … Those injunctions in Notes on ● The person is an active participant, exploring, seeking,
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 133
and testing understanding of the world he or she inhab- or her structural, personal, and social integrity (Levine,
its (Levine, 1992, p. 41). 1969b, 1973, 1989a, 1990, 1991, 1996).
● The perceptual systems provide information to the indi-
vidual; usually this is knowledge sought by the individ-
ual (Levine, 1973, p. 450). Category of Knowledge
● Persistence is reflected in Levine’s emphasis on home- At one time, Levine (cited in Riehl-Sisca, 1989) apparently
ostasis and conservation. regarded the Conservation Model as an interaction model,
● Homeostasis is “a state of energy-sparing” (Levine, and Riehl-Sisca (1989) classified it as such. The content of
1989b, p. 329); it even “might be called the state of con- the model does not, however, address any of the character-
servation” (p. 329). The essence of conservation, in turn, istics of that category as described in Chapter 1 of this
is use of responses “that cost the least to the individual in book. Certainly, the Conservation Model deals with the in-
expense of effort and demand on his or her well-being” teraction between human beings and environment, but
(p. 329). that is not the same as the symbolic interactionism empha-
● Change also is evident in the content of the sis of the interaction category of knowledge. When asked
Conservation Model. about the interaction classification, Levine (personal com-
● Change is the essence of life, and it is unceasing as long munication, August 13, 1987) agreed that her conceptual
as life goes on. … here] Change is characteristic of life model does not reflect symbolic interactionism. She went
(Levine, 1973, p. 10). on to say that hers is “an adaptation model.”
● Change is characteristic of life, and adaptation is the Meleis (1997) regards the Conservation Model as a
method of change. The organism retains its integrity in prominent example of the outcome category of models.
both the internal and external environment through its She also placed the Conservation Model in her nursing
adaptive capability. Adaptation is the process of change therapeutics category, noting that Levine’s work focuses on
whereby the individual retains his integrity within the nursing activities and actions designed to care for people.
realities of his environments (Levine, 1973, pp. 10–11). Marriner-Tomey (1989) placed the Conservation Model
In keeping with the reciprocal interaction world view, the within her energy fields category. Barnum (1998) classified
Conservation Model incorporates elements of both per- the Conservation Model in the conservation category.
sistence and change. Despite the pervasiveness of change in Close examination of the content of the Conservation
a human being’s life, however, conservation—and hence Model indicates that the systems category is the most ap-
persistence—appear to be predominant. Apparently, propriate classification. The appropriateness of the systems
Levine regarded the many changes that must occur as category classification is evident in the comparison of the
human beings face environmental challenges as necessary Conservation Model content with the characteristics of the
for survival. Conservation facilitates and maintains the systems category of knowledge, as can be seen here:
patterns and routines of human behavior, and adaptive ● System: The human being, or organism, is a system.
changes represent the invention of new routines to avoid ● Integration of Parts: The parts are the organism’s sys-
extinction. tems. The total life process of the entire organism is de-
pendent upon the inter-relatedness of its component
UNIQUE FOCUS OF THE NURSING MODEL systems. In fact, the organism is a system of systems
(Levine, 1973, pp. 8–9). Human life must be described in
The unique focus of the Conservation Model is the conser- the language of “wholes” … perceiving the “wholes” de-
vation of the human being’s wholeness (Levine, 1969b, pends upon recognizing the organization and interde-
1973, 1989a, 1990, 1991). More specifically, the focus of the pendence of observable phenomena (Levine, 1971, p.
Conservation Model is on adaptation as the process by 255).
which human beings maintain their wholeness or integrity. ● Environment: The environment is viewed as both inter-
Thus, the model emphasizes the effectiveness of human be- nal and external. However, “The person cannot be de-
ings’ adaptations (Levine, 1969b, 1973, 1989a, 1990, 1991, scribed apart from the specific environment in which he
1996). or she is found” (Levine, 1989b, p. 325).
Furthermore, the Conservation Model focuses the ● Open System: The idea of “wholeness” is associated with
nurse’s attention on human beings and the complexity of the idea of the open system (Levine, 1973). A whole is an
their relationships with the internal and external environ- open system (Levine, 1973). The unceasing interaction
ments (Levine, 1969b, 1973, 1989a, 1990, 1991, 1996). The of the individual organism with its environments does
Conservation Model also emphasizes the nurse’s responsi- represent an “open and fluid” system (Erikson, 1968,
bility for conservation of the patient’s energy, as well as his cited in Levine, 1973, p. 11).
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 134
the quality of the adaptation possible for the individual Organismic Responses are redundant. Levine (1989b)
(Levine, 1973, p. 11). pointed out that because the responses are redundant,
“they do not follow one another in a prescribed sequence,
The concept of Adaptation encompasses three dimen-
but are integrated in individuals by their cognitive abilities,
sions—Historicity, Specificity, and Redundancy (Levine,
the wealth of their previous experience, their ability to de-
1989b, 1996).
fine their relationships to the events and the strengths of
● Historicity: [The fundamental nature of adaptation is] a their adaptive capabilities” (p. 330). She further noted that
consequence of a historical progression: the evolution of although some responses can be considered physiological
the species through time, reflecting the sequence of and some behavioral, “the integration of living processes
change in the genetic patterns that have recorded the argues that they are one and the same—not merely paral-
change in the historical environments (Levine, 1989b, p. lel and not merely simultaneous—but essential portions of
327). [Refers to the information] conveyed by genera- the same activity” (p. 330).
tions of genes that every living creature has inherited— The concept of Organismic Responses encompasses
but for each individual in a unique pattern—no two four dimensions—Fight or Flight Response, Inflammatory-
alike. Life experience creates further patterns for each Immune Response, Stress Response, and Perceptual
person throughout the life span (Levine, 1996, p. 38). Awareness.
● Specificity: Specificity is exemplified by the synchro-
nized tasks of body systems—each body system has spe- ● Fight or Flight Response: The most primitive level
cific tasks involving biochemical changes in response to of organismic response (Levine, 1973, 1989b). An
environmental challenges. Although the tasks are spe- adrenocortical-sympathetic reaction that is an instanta-
cific, they are synchronized with each other and serve the neous response to a real or imagined threat (Levine,
individual as a whole (Levine, 1989b). Specificity in bio- 1973, 1989b). Swiftly provides a condition of physiolog-
chemistry is dependent upon sequential change that oc- ical and behavioral readiness for sudden and unex-
curs in cascades (Levine, 1989b). [The cascade] is plained environmental challenges (Levine, 1973, 1989b).
characterized by the intermingling of the steps with each ● Inflammatory-Immune Response: The second level of
other—the precursor is not entirely exhausted when the organismic response (Levine, 1973, 1989b). A response to
intermediate forms develop and the final stage is con- injury that is important for maintenance of structural
gruent with the steps that precede it (Levine, 1989b, p. continuity and promotion of healing (Levine, 1973,
328). 1989b). Assures restoration of physical wholeness and the
● Redundancy: [Refers to shared functions that] not only expectation of complete healing (Levine, 1989b, p. 330).
provide a “menu” of related activities but also spreads the ● Stress Response: The third level of organismic response
energy cost (Levine, 1996, p. 39). Refers to the series of (Levine, 1973, 1989b). [A response that is] recorded over
wave-like adaptive responses that are available to the in- time and is influenced by the accumulated experience of
dividual when environmental challenges arise (Levine, the individual (Selye, 1956, as cited in Levine, 1989b, p.
1989b). [Examples of redundancy in adaptation include 330).
the] ubiquitous … “fail-safe” options in the anatomy, ● Perceptual Awareness: The fourth level of organismic re-
physiology, and psychology of individuals (Levine, 1991, sponse (Levine, 1973, 1989b). The response, which is
p. 6). Some redundant systems respond instantly to mediated through the sense organs, is concerned with
threatened shifts in physiological parameters. Others are gathering information from the environment and con-
corrective and utilize the time interval provided by the verting it to meaningful experience (Levine, 1969b,
instantaneous response to correct imbalances. Still other 1989b). Individual identity arises out of information re-
redundant systems function by reestablishing a previ- ceived through [five] intact and functional perceptual
ously failed response (Levine, 1989b, 1991). systems (Gibson, 1966, as cited in Levine, 1969b, p. 97).
changes in gravity, acceleration, and movement Conservation is the product of Adaptation. Levine
(Gibson, 1966, as cited in Levine, 1969b, 1973). (1989b) explained, “Survival depends on the adaptive abil-
● Visual System: Permits the human being to look ity to use responses that cost the least to the individual in
(Gibson, 1966, as cited in Levine, 1969b, 1973). expense of effort and demand on his or her well-being.
●
Auditory System: Permits listening to sounds as well as That is, of course, the essence of conservation” (p. 329).
identifying the direction from which they are coming Levine (1989b, 1991) linked Conservation to both of
(Gibson, 1966, as cited in Levine, 1969b, 1973). the Internal Environment concept dimensions of
●
Haptic System: Permits responses to touch through re- Homeostasis and Homeorrhesis. With regard to
ception of sensations by the skin, joints, and muscles Homeostasis, Levine (1989b) maintained, “Conservation is
(Gibson, 1966, as cited in Levine, 1969b, 1973). clearly the consequence of the multiple, interacting, and
●
Taste-Smell System: Provides information about chem- synchronized negative feedback systems that provide for
ical stimuli and facilitates safe nourishment (Gibson, the stability of the living organism. … [Indeed,] home-
1966, as cited in Levine, 1969b, 1973). ostasis might be called the state of conservation” (p. 329).
Speaking of the link between Homeorrhesis and
Levine (1969b, 1973, 1989b) drew from Gibson (1966) to Conservation, Levine (1991) claimed, “Homeor[r]hesis …
explain the subdimensions of the dimension of Perceptual [is] a consequence of conservation: the frugal, economic,
Awareness. In particular, Levine (1989b) pointed out that contained, and controlled use of environmental resources
for Gibson (1966), “individuals do not merely ‘see’—they by the individual organism in his or her best interest. This
look; they do not merely ‘hear’—they listen. Thus equipped is the achievement of adaptation” (p. 5).
with the ability to select information from the environ- The concept of Conservation encompasses four
ment, the individual is an active, seeking participant in it— dimensions—the Principle of Conservation of Energy,
not merely reacting but influencing, changing, and creating the Principle of Conservation of Structural Integrity, the
the parameters of his or her life” (p. 330). Principle of Conservation of Personal Integrity, and
CONSERVATION the Principle of Conservation of Social Integrity (Levine,
1967, 1973, 1989b, 1990, 1991, 1996).
● Conservation is keeping together (Levine, 1989b, p. 331).
● Conservation is a universal concept (Levine, 1990, p. ● Principle of Conservation of Energy: Refers to balancing
192). energy output and energy input to avoid excessive fa-
● Conservation is the guardian activity that defends and tigue, that is, adequate rest, nutrition, and exercise
protects [wholeness, which is] the universal target of (Levine, 1988b, p. 227). A natural law found to hold
selfhood (Levine, 1991, p. 4). everywhere in the universe for all animate and inanimate
● Conservation describes the way complex systems are entities (Levine, 1989b, p. 331). There are finite sources
able to continue to function even when severely chal- of energy available to human beings. Conservation of
lenged. They sustain themselves, not only in the face of energy assures that “energy is spent carefully with essen-
immediate disruptive threats, but in such a way as to as- tial priorities served first” (Levine, 1991, p. 7). Although
sure the vitality of future responses. This work is accom- individuals conserve their energy, the energy from life-
plished in the most economic way possible (Levine, sustaining activities, such as biochemical changes, is ex-
1990, p. 192). pended even at perfect rest (Levine, 1989b). Energy is
● The … process of conservation is characteristic of the not directly observable, although “the consequences of
way that physiological functions are regulated in the its exchange are predictable, manageable, and quantifi-
body. Negative feedback is activated when something able. Instruments can monitor, measure, produce or cap-
needs to be adjusted, but is quiescent otherwise (Levine, ture energy” (Levine, 1991, p. 7). The conservation of
1990, p. 192). energy is clearly evident in the very sick, whose lethargy,
● Conservation defends the wholeness of living systems withdrawal, and self-concern are manifested while, in its
by ensuring their ability to confront change appropri- wisdom, the body is spending its energy resource on the
ately and retain their unique identity (Levine, 1990, p. processes of healing (Levine, 1989b, p. 332).
192). ● Principle of Conservation of Structural Integrity: Refers
● Every self-sustaining system monitors its own behavior to maintaining or restoring the structure of the body,
by conserving the use of resources required to define its that is, preventing physical breakdown and promoting
unique identity (Levine, 1991, p. 4). healing (Levine, 1988b, p. 227). Focuses on human be-
● [The ultimate purpose of conservation is] to defend, sus- ings’ ability to move and choose activities freely (Levine,
tain, maintain, and define the integrity of the system for 1988b). Human beings expect and have confidence in the
which it functions (Levine, 1991, p. 3). ability of their bodies to heal. Healing is the defense of
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 139
wholeness … [and] a consequence of an effective im- of the abilities, life experience and desires of the “self ” who
mune system (Levine, 1989b, p. 333). Emphasizes that makes the choices. Every activity is a product of the dynamic
the individual’s defense[s] against the hazards of the en- social systems to which the individual belongs. (p. 10)
vironment are achieved with the most economical ex-
pense of effort (Levine, 1991, p. 8). Results in repair and CHANGE
healing to sustain the wholeness of structure and func- ● Change is the essence of life (Levine, 1973, p. 10).
tion (Levine, 1991, p. 7). ● The life process is characterized as unceasing change
● Principle of Conservation of Personal Integrity: [Refers (Levine, 1973).
to] the maintenance or restoration of the patient’s sense ● Change is directed, purposeful, and meaningful (Levine,
of identity, self-worth, and acknowledgment of unique- 1973, p. 10).
ness (Levine, 1988b, p. 227). Emphasizes individuals’ ● The organism represents a pattern of orderly, sequential
perseverance in retaining their identities. Everyone seeks change. Because it is both ordered and sequential, the
to defend his or her identity as a self, in both that hidden, pattern is a message. So long as the pattern is consistent,
intensely private person that dwells within and in the it is also understandable. … The change which supports
public faces assumed as individuals move through their the well-being of the organism can be predicted, meas-
relationships with others (Levine, 1989b, p. 334). Every ured, and observed, and therefore is a cogent message
individual defends his unique personhood, the individ- (Levine, 1973, pp. 9–10).
ual within known as the “self.” Wholeness is summarized
in that knowledge [of self] (Levine, 1991, p. 8). [The self HEALTH
is] much more than a physical experience of the whole
body, although it is unquestionably a part of that aware- ● A pattern of adaptive change (Levine 1973, 1984a).
ness (Levine, 1989b, p. 334). ● A state of being described as “health” … is inherent in
● Principle of Conservation of Social Integrity: Refers to the life experience (Levine, 1991, p. 4).
the acknowledgment of the patient as a social being ● Every individual defines health for himself or herself
(Levine, 1988b, p. 227). Involves the recognition and (Levine, 1991, p. 4).
presentation of human interaction, particularly with the ● [Health] is not an entity, but rather a definition imparted
patient’s significant others (Levine, 1988b, p. 227). by the ethos and beliefs of groups to which the individ-
[States that each individual’s identity places him or her] ual belongs (Levine, personal communication to K.M.
in a family, a community, a cultural heritage, a religious Schaefer, February 21, 1995, as cited in Schaefer, 1996, p.
belief, a socioeconomic slot, an educational background, 187).
a vocational choice (Levine, 1989b, p. 335). [Emphasizes ● Health is socially defined in the sense of “Do I continue
that] selfhood needs definition beyond the individual … to function in a reasonably normal fashion?” (Levine,
[and that] the individual is created by the environment 1984b).
and in turn creates within it (Levine, 1989b, p. 335). It is
impossible to acknowledge the wholeness of the individ- Levine (1991) pointed out that Health, whole, and healing
ual without placing him into his social context (Levine, all share the same root. She explained:
1991, p. 9). Healing is the avenue of return to the daily activities compro-
mised by ill health. It is not only the insult or injury that is re-
Levine (1989b) pointed out that the Principle of paired—but the person himself or herself as whole and
Conservation of Energy, the Principle of Conservation healing. Indeed, the expectation that healing will restore the
of Structural Integrity, the Principle of Conservation of conditions that existed before the intrusion persists even in
Personal Integrity, and the Principle of Conservation situations where the therapeutic outcome leaves a loss of func-
of Structural Integrity do not operate singly but rather are tion or effectiveness. It is not merely the healing of an afflicted
“joined within the individual as a cascade of life events, part. It is, rather, a return to selfhood, where the encroach-
churning and changing as the environmental challenge is ment of the disability can be set aside entirely, and the indi-
confronted and resolved in each individual’s unique way” vidual is free to pursue once more his or her own interests
(p. 336). Elaborating on the integration of the four conser- without constraint. (p. 4)
vation principles, Levine (1991) stated: Levine (1984b) indicated that she did not like the term
The conservation principles address the integrity of the indi- wellness and preferred the word healthy. It may be inferred
vidual … from birth to death. Every activity requires an en- from her description of health as “wholeness” (Levine,
ergy supply because nothing works without it. Every activity 1973, p. 11) and as “successful adaptation” (Levine, 1966a,
must respect the structural wholeness of the individual be- p. 2452) that she used the term Health to mean wellness.
cause well-being depends upon it. Every activity is chosen out It also may be inferred that wellness means social
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 140
well-being. This inference is supported by Levine’s (1966a) Levine (1973) emphasized the importance of scientific
statement that “one criterion of successful adaptation is the concepts and knowledge as the basis for nursing. She
attainment of social well-being, but there is tremendous noted, “Nursing knowledge, thoroughly grounded in mod-
variation in the degree to which this is achieved” (p. 2452). ern scientific concepts, allows for a sensitive and produc-
Levine’s description of Health indicates that she con- tive relationship between the nurse and the individual
ceptualized that concept as a continuum. This interpreta- entrusted to her care. … Nursing practice has always mir-
tion is supported by the following comment: rored the prevailing theories of health and disease that per-
vade every culture” (p. 1).
Adaptation … is susceptible to an infinite range within the
limits of life compatibility. Within that range, there are nu-
Nursing is also based on the unique beliefs of nurses.
merous possible degrees of adaptation. Thus, the dynamic Indeed, “nursing itself is a subculture, possessing ideas and
processes establishing balance along the continuum are adap- values which are unique to nurses, even though they mirror
tations (Levine, 1973, p. 11). the social template which created them” (Levine, 1973, p. 3).
The GOAL OF NURSING, according to Levine (1984a),
DISEASE is the promotion of wholeness for all people, well or sick.
She maintained: “The goal of all nursing care should be to
● A pattern of adaptive change (Levine, 1973, 1984a). promote wholeness, realizing that for every individual that
● Disease is undisciplined and unregulated change, a dis- requires a unique and separate cluster of activities. The in-
ruption in the orderly sequential pattern of change that dividual’s integrity—his one-ness, his identity as an indi-
is characteristic of life. This anarchy of pattern may not vidual, his wholeness—is his abiding concern, and it is the
be successful in supporting life (Levine, 1973). nurse’s responsibility to assist him to defend and to seek its
● Such anarchy, in fact, occurs in disease processes, and realization” (Levine, 1971, p. 258).
unless the pattern can be restored, the organism will die For Levine, the nursing process of the Conservation
(Levine, 1973, p. 9). Model is Conservation. Levine (1989b) stated that conser-
● [The anarchy of disease processes is a positive feedback vation—the “keeping together” function—should be the
mechanism, which] results in an increasing rate of major guideline for all nursing intervention (p. 331).
function without the regulatory control that restores bal- “Every nursing act,” Levine (1991) maintained, “is dedi-
ance. Thus, a “vicious cycle” is instituted which produces cated to the conservation or the ‘keeping together’ of the
more and more disruption of function (Levine, 1973, wholeness of the individual” (p. 3). Although Levine did
p. 10). not identify an explicit nursing process, it was possible to
● Disease represents efforts of the individual to protect his extract a PRACTICE METHODOLOGY from several of
integrity (Levine, 1971, p. 257). her publications. The NURSING PROCESS AS CONSER-
Levine (1971) used Wolf ’s (1961) conception of Disease as VATION, which Levine (1966b) regards as a “scientific ap-
adaptation to noxious environmental forces for her de- proach in the determination of nursing care” (p. 57), is
scription of illness. In a later publication, Levine (1991) outlined in Table 6–1.
noted that inasmuch as “illness challenges the integrity of In keeping with her view of nursing as a Human
the person, defending his health—his unique wholeness— Interaction, Levine (1973) emphasized the roles of both
is a continuing endeavor” (p. 4). nurse and patient in the Nursing Process as Conservation.
Levine (1973) pointed out that individuals acknowledge She explained:
illness through their perceptual systems. She explained, “To keep together” means to maintain a proper balance be-
“Physical well-being is dependent upon an experienced tween active nursing intervention coupled with patient partic-
body which is communicating the “right” signals. The ipation on the one hand and the safe limits of the patient’s
constancy of awareness of the internal feeling of the body ability to participate on the other. (p. 13)
is the baseline against which well-being is measured. … Levine (1984b) stated that she regarded patients as part-
Individuals can acknowledge “illness” only in recognizing ners or participants in nursing care. Levine viewed the
an alteration in their perception of internal feelings” (p. human being who is a patient as being temporarily de-
456). pendent on the nurse. The nurse’s goal is to end the de-
pendence, that is, the status of patient, as quickly as
HUMAN INTERACTION possible. More specifically:
● Nursing is a human interaction. It is a discipline rooted An individual who enters into the dependency of health care
in the organic dependency of the individual human is a patient. The nurse provides whatever service is needed—
being on his relationships with other human beings even if it is only health counseling—but only for as long as the
(Levine, 1973, p. 1). nurse’s professional services are required. Then the depend-
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 141
TABLE 6–1
LEVINE’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: NURSING PROCESS AS CONSERVATION
TROPHICOGNOSIS
Observation
The nurse observes and collects data that will influence nursing practice rather than medical practice.
The nurse uses appropriate assessment tools derived from the Conservation Model.
The nurse uses data to establish an objective and scientific rationale for nursing practice.
The nurse fully understands his or her role in medical and paramedical prescriptions.
The nurse understands the basis for the prescribed medical regimen, including the medical diagnosis, the medical his-
tory, and the laboratory and x-ray reports—with specific reference to areas influencing the nursing care plan.
The nurse consults with the physician to share information and clarify nursing decisions.
The nurse understands the basis for the prescribed paramedical regimen, including paramedical diagnoses and prescrip-
tions for care.
The nurse determines the nursing processes required by medical and paramedical treatment by observing the effects of
the medical regimen on the patient’s progress.
The nurse gathers additional data by consulting with family members or other individuals concerned with the patient, in-
cluding the religious counselor.
The nurse conducts a nursing history with specific reference to aspects that will influence the nursing care plan.
The nurse assesses the patient’s Conservation of Energy by determining his or her ability to perform necessary activities
without producing excessive fatigue.
Relevant observations include vital signs, the patient’s general condition, the patient’s behavior, and the patient’s toler-
ance of nursing activities required by his or her condition, and allowable activity for the patient based on his or her
energy resources.
The nurse assesses the patient’s Conservation of Structural Integrity by determining his or her physical functioning.
Relevant observations include status of any pathophysiological processes, status of healing processes, and effects of
surgical procedures.
The nurse assesses the patient’s Conservation of Personal Integrity by determining his or her moral and ethical values
and life experiences.
Relevant observations include the patient’s life story, determining the patient’s interest in participating in decision mak-
ing, and identifying the patient’s sense of self.
The nurse assesses the patient’s Conservation of Social Integrity by taking the patient’s family members, friends, and
conceptual environment into account.
Relevant observations include identification of the patient’s significant others, participation in workplace or school ac-
tivities, religion, and cultural and ethnic history.
The nurse understands the basis for implementation of the nursing care plan, including principles of nursing science, and
how to adapt nursing techniques to the unique cluster of needs demonstrated in the individual patient.
Awareness of Provocative Facts
The nurse identifies the provocative facts within the data collected, that is, the data that provoke attention on the basis
of knowledge of the situation.
Construction of a Testable Hypothesis
The provocative facts provide the basis for a hypothesis, or trophicognosis.
The nurse accurately records and transmits observations and the trophicognosis.
INTERVENTION/ACTION
A Test of the Hypothesis
The nurse implements the nursing care plan within the structure of administrative policy, availability of equipment, and
established standards of nursing.
The nurse accurately records and transmits evaluation of the patient’s response to implementation of the nursing care
plan.
The nurse identifies the general type of nursing intervention required.
(continued)
141
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 142
TABLE 6–1
LEVINE’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: NURSING PROCESS AS CONSERVATION (continued)
Source: Constructed from Levine, 1966b, pp. 57–60; 1967, 1973, pp. 13–18, 28; 1988b, p. 227; Schaefer, 1991a, p. 222.
ency must be ended. I want the patient to walk away from me. Because the term, nursing diagnosis, is now susceptible of
As participants in their care, individuals need to retain what- legal interpretation, and other usages of the term are semanti-
ever portion of their independence they can, and they should cally incorrect, it is proposed that a new nursing term be used
not be defined as [clients, that is, as] followers. (Levine, 1996, to describe the scientific approach in the determination of
p. 40) nursing care. Such a method of ascribing nursing care needs
may be called trophicognosis (p. 57).
Levine (1989b) noted that, as part of the patient’s environ-
ment, the nurse brings to nursing care situations his or her Levine (1966b) drew from Feiblemann’s (1959) description
“own cascading repertoire of skill, knowledge, and com- of the scientific method to construct the steps involved in
passion. It is a shared enterprise and each participant is re- formulation of a Trophicognosis. Those steps are Obser-
warded” (p. 336). vation, Awareness of Provocative Facts, and Construction of a
Within her Nursing Process as Conservation, Levine Testable Hypothesis (see Table 6–1).
(1966b) presented Trophicognosis as an alternative to Observation, for Levine (1966b), focuses on the collec-
nursing diagnosis. Tracing the development of nursing di- tion of data that is especially relevant to nursing. She ex-
agnosis and its legal interpretation, Levine (1966b) pointed plained:
out that the term always referred to “diagnosis of disease
The development of a trophicognosis requires a reorientation
made by a nurse” (p. 55). Then, citing the dictionary defi-
in the selection of data because the information required to
nition of diagnosis as “knowledge of disease,” she main- project nursing care needs differs somewhat from the kind of
tained that it is “incorrect to use the term diagnosis as a information required to direct medical therapy. Although
synonym for observations, judgments, problems, needs or nurses are exhorted to observe from the first day of clinical
assessments” (pp. 56–57). In concluding her argument, practice, the focus of attention is almost invariably on collect-
Levine stated: ing data for the physician’s use. Too infrequently does the
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 144
person’s interactions with the environments in which tion of the Conservation Model indicates that she values a
he or she functions (Levine, 1991, pp. 4–5). holistic approach to nursing of all human beings, well or
G. The person cannot be described apart from the specific sick. She also values the unique individuality of each
environment in which he or she is found. The precise human being, as noted in comments such as those given
environment necessarily completes the wholeness of here:
the individual (Levine, 1989b, p. 325).
Ultimately, decisions for nursing intervention must be based
H. The goal of conservation is health (Levine, 1990, p. on the unique behavior of the individual patient. … A theory
193). of nursing must recognize the importance of unique detail of
I. Conservation of the integrity of the person is essential care for a single patient within an empiric framework which
to assuring health, and providing the strength to con- successfully describes the requirements of all patients. (Levine,
front disability. Indeed, the importance of conservation 1973, p. 6)
in the treatment of illness is precisely focused on the Patient centered nursing care means individualized nursing
reclamation of wholeness, of health (Levine, 1991. p. 3). care. It is predicated on the reality of common experience:
J. The environment is not always “user-friendly.” every man is a unique individual, and as such he requires a
Successful engagement with the environment depends unique constellation of skills, techniques, and ideas designed
upon the individual’s repertoire—that store of adapta- specifically for him. (Levine, 1973, p. 23)
tions which is either built into the genes or achieved
through life experience. While there are redundant or Furthermore, although Levine (1973) noted that human
back-up systems that offer options when the initial re- beings are dependent on their relationships with other
sponse is insufficient, health and safety are products of human beings, she values the patient’s participation in
a competent conservation (Levine, 1990, p. 193). nursing care. That is attested to by the comment here:
K. The nurse cannot enter another person’s environment “To keep together” means to maintain a proper balance be-
without becoming an essential factor in it (Levine, tween active nursing intervention coupled with patient partic-
1992, p. 41). ipation on the one hand and the safe limits of the patient’s
L. The nurse participates actively in every patient’s envi- ability to participate on the other. (p. 13)
ronment, and much of what she does supports his Levine carefully cited the many scholars and scientists from
adaptations as he struggles in the predicament of illness nursing and adjunctive disciplines whose work influenced
(Levine, 1973, p. 13). her thinking. With the single exception of her reference to
M. But even in the presence of disease, the organism re- Gaylin (Levine, 1996), she heeded her own mandate to
sponds wholly to the environmental interaction in provide proper bibliographic references to influential
which it is involved, and a considerable element of works (Levine, 1988a).
nursing care is devoted to restoring the symmetry of
response—symmetry that is essential to the well-being
of the organism (Levine 1969b, p. 98). COMPREHENSIVENESS OF CONTENT
The Conservation Model is sufficiently comprehensive
EVALUATION OF LEVINE’S with regard to depth of content. Levine’s descriptions of
CONSERVATION MODEL human beings, environment, health, and nursing are com-
prehensive and essentially complete.
This section presents an evaluation of the Conservation Clarity could, however, be enhanced with regard to the
Model. The evaluation is based on the results of the analy- most appropriate description of the concept of Internal
sis of the model, as well as on publications and presenta- Environment. Despite Levine’s (personal communication,
tions by Levine and by others who have used or August 13, 1987) comment that homeostasis best reflects
commented on the Conservation Model. congruence of human beings with the environment, she
continued to imply that homeorrhesis is the more appro-
priate descriptor of the internal environment (Levine,
EXPLICATION OF ORIGINS 1989b, 1991). Levine (1996) provided some illumination
on this matter when she stated: “But [neither] of these
Levine explicated the origins of the Conservation Model terms [homeostasis and homeorrhesis] suffice because the
clearly and concisely, and she identified the motivation for labels simply do not fit the complexity of events as we have
development of the model. In addition, Levine articulated come to know them. There must be a bridge that allows
her philosophical claims in the form of a reasoned discus- ready movement from one environmental reality to
sion of assumptions, beliefs, and values. Levine’s presenta- another. Adaptation is the bridge” (p. 38).
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 146
Clarity also could be enhanced with regard to Levine’s The propositions of the Conservation Model link all
discussion of health. Levine herself (personal communica- four metaparadigm concepts. In addition, the integral
tion to K.M. Schaefer, February 21, 1995, as cited in nature of the four conservation principles is specified
Schaefer, 1996, p. 187) admitted that she “felt a little empty clearly.
on [my] discussion of health.” The Conservation Model also is sufficiently compre-
Moreover, clarity could be enhanced concerning the as- hensive in breadth of content. Levine has repeatedly and
sessment component of the Nursing Process as emphatically explained that her conceptual model is
Conservation. Levine never explicitly identified the pa- equally applicable for the nursing care of sick and healthy
rameters of nursing assessment, although her various dis- individuals. She stated:
cussions of the conservation principles suggest that they I have described energy conservation and the wholeness em-
can be used in the assessment, that is, the Trophicognosis bodied in the integrity of structure, person, and society in
component, of the Nursing Process as Conservation and broad terms in order to emphasize that the Conservation
the Intervention/Action component. Many nurses who Principles are not limited only to the care of the sick in the
have used the Conservation Model to guide nursing prac- hospital. I have borne the burden of that naive and foolish
tice used the conservation principles as the framework for criticism for several years—ever since two misinformed grad-
nursing assessment; some included the elements of the uate students wrote a chapter in which they made clear they
perceptual, operational, and conceptual environments as knew more about what was in my mind than I did (Esposito
well. The levels of organismic response, which Schaefer & Leonard, 1980). They chose my textbook of medical-
surgical nursing, Introduction to Clinical Nursing (Levine,
(1991a) used in the evaluation phase of the nursing 1969[a], 1973) as the text from which to critique my work.
process, also could be a part of the assessment phase. That text … was begun in 1963. I was not writing a nursing
Levine repeatedly emphasized the importance of deriv- theory. I was teaching medical-surgical nursing to students
ing trophicognoses and interventions from scientific whose practice was in a hospital. That is the way it was in the
knowledge (see Table 6–1), as well as from the messages early 60s. (Levine, 1990, p. 195)
given by the patient, as is evident in these comments:
Indeed, the Conservation Model represents a broad organ-
The modern nurse has available rich knowledge of izing framework “within which nursing practice in every
human anatomy, physiology, and adaptability. (Levine, 1966a, environment can be anticipated, predicted, and performed.
p. 2453) In acute care institutions, nursing homes, clinics, and
Ultimately, decisions for nursing intervention must be based community health programs and in their management and
on the unique behavior of the individual patient. It is the administration—everywhere nursing is essential—the
nurse’s task to bring a body of scientific principles on which rules of conservation and integrity hold” (Levine, 1990,
decisions depend into the precise situation which she shares p. 195).
with the patient. (Levine, 1966a, p. 2452) Furthermore, the Conservation Model permits a focus
The integrated response of the individual to any stimulus re- on prevention through the principle of social integrity
sults in a realignment of his very substance, and in a sense this (Levine, 1990). Schaefer (1991a) pointed out that the prin-
creates a message which others may learn to understand. Each ciple of social integrity “provides a basis for the nurse to
message, in turn, is the result of observation, selection of rele- consider environmental factors that affect the patient and
vant data, and assessment of the priorities demanded by such may indeed be far removed from the immediate environ-
knowledge. … Understanding the message and responding to ment. It is within this framework that nurses could con-
it accurately constitute the substance of nursing science. sider more of the social, cultural, environmental, and
(Levine, 1967, pp. 46–47)
political factors that might affect the human condition and
The dynamic nature of the nursing process is evident in over which they could have some control” (p. 220). Such
Levine’s (1973) statement that nursing care plans “must factors also could be considered within the context of the
allow for progress and change and project into the future conceptual environment.
the patient’s response to treatment” (p. 46), as well as in The comprehensiveness of the breadth of the Conser-
Levine’s (1989b) description of nursing practice as use of a vation Model is further supported by the direction it pro-
“cascading repertoire of skill, knowledge, and compassion” vides for nursing research, education, administration, and
(p. 326). Given Levine’s explanation of cascades as nonlin- practice. Although all guidelines are not explicit in Levine’s
ear interacting and evolving processes, the nursing process writings, many can be extracted from the focus and con-
clearly is dynamic. Levine’s explication of her own value tent of the model and from the publications of nurses who
system, with its emphasis on the patient’s freedom to make have used the model. The developing guidelines for re-
decisions, attest to her exceptional concern for ethical stan- search, nursing education, administration of nursing serv-
dards for nursing practice. ices, and nursing practice are listed below.
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 147
– The conservation of energy focuses the administra- homeless to ambulatory clinics to emergency depart-
tor on productivity issues, which have a direct effect ments to critical care units.
on cost.
– The conservation of structural integrity focuses the
● Characteristics of legitimate participants in nursing
administrator on the equipment (technology), sup- practice
plies, and human resources needed for the nursing
● [Legitimate participants of nursing are] individuals
department to function in a cost-effective manner. [who] enter into a state of patienthood when they re-
– The conservation of personal integrity focuses the quire the expert services that physicians and nurses can
administrator on the need to run a department that provide. [Patients may be sick or healthy.] Once indi-
considers the individual needs of the each staff viduals are restored, the dependent but willing part-
member, measures to ensure job satisfaction, and nership is dissolved. Their privacy restored to them,
the need for a management style (decentralized ver- individuals cease to be patients (Levine, 1989c, pp.
sus centralized; shared governance) that supports 4–5).
the human element of the department. ● Nursing Process
– The conservation of social integrity focuses the ad- ●The nursing process for the Conservation Model is
ministrator on how well the nursing department is Nursing Process as Conservation. The components of
meeting the needs of the community or the social the process are Trophicognosis, Intervention/Action,
system, while at the same time considering the effect and Evaluation of Intervention/Action (see Table 6–1).
of the community and the social system on the
nursing department. ● Contributions of nursing practice to participants’ well-
being
● Conservation Model-based nursing practice con-
Nursing Practice Guidelines tributes to the well-being of individuals by promoting
wholeness.
Guidelines for nursing practice based on the Conservation
Model, which were constructed from Levine (1989c, 1990,
1991), are: LOGICAL CONGRUENCE
● Purpose of nursing practice
The Conservation Model is logically congruent. The con-
● The purpose of Conservation Model-based nursing
tent of the model flows directly from Levine’s philosophi-
practice is conservation of the patient’s wholeness.
cal claims. The overriding world view is that of reciprocal
● Every nursing act is dedicated to the conservation, or
interaction. There is no evidence of the reaction world
“keeping together,” of the wholeness of the individual
view in the Conservation Model. Levine (1971) explicitly
(Levine, 1991, p. 3).
rejected mechanism: “The mechanistic view of the body
● The practice of conservation in nursing is dedicated to
and mind does little to restore to the individual the whole-
providing the best possible health status available to
ness he recognizes in himself ” (p. 254). Although Levine
the individual (Levine, 1990, p. 198).
(1966a) stated that “the human being responds to the
● Practice problems of interest forces in his environment in a singular yet integrated fash-
● Practice problems encompass conditions of health and ion” (p. 2452), she successfully translated the mechanistic
disability reflected in the four conservation principles. idea of reaction to the environment by bringing in the idea
● Every patient displays some problems in each of the of a more holistic, integrated response. However, Levine
areas [that] the Conservation Principles describe. did cite Selye’s mechanistic approach to stress within her
Concerns for energy conservation and structural, per- description of the levels of organismic response. That po-
sonal, and social integrity are always present—though tential threat to the logical consistency of the Conservation
one area may present a more demanding problem than Model could be eliminated by the selection of a formula-
another. These areas can be explored individually, but tion of the stress response that reflects the reciprocal inter-
they cannot be separated from the person (Levine, action world view.
1990, p. 199).
● Settings for nursing practice GENERATION OF THEORY
● The conservation principles have implications for
every nursing situation (Levine, 1990, p. 199). Conse- Levine (1978a) stated that she was trying to develop
quently, nursing practice occurs in virtually any set- two theories, which she called Therapeutic Intention
ting, ranging from patients’ homes to shelters for the and Redundancy. Work on the Theory of Therapeutic
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 150
Intention began in the early 1970s. Levine (personal com- that every idea I ever had was in some way associated
munication to L. Criddle, July 22, 1987) indicated that she with the Conservation Principles—but that is simply not
“was seeking a way of organizing nursing intervention true. My thought habits are fairly consistent but I have
growing out of the reality of the biological realities which devoted them to many areas which are not organically
nurses had to confront.” related.”
Schaefer (2001) has identified what she called the “guid- Schaefer (1991a) regarded the Theory of Therapeutic
ing assumptions” for the Theory of Therapeutic Intention Intention as “very exciting” (p. 223). She commented, “Not
(p. 117). Those assumptions are: only will the nurse have a repertoire of tested interventions,
● Conservation is the outcome of adaptation. given that a theory provides specific information about
● Change associated with therapeutic intervention results care delivery, but also the nurse should have information
in adaptation. about the expected organismic responses. With this in
● The proper application of conservation (conservation mind the theory provides direction for quality-assurance
principles) results in the restoration of health. activities and measures of cost effectiveness” (p. 223). “The
● Activities directed toward the preservation of health in- expected outcome of therapeutic intention,” Schaefer
clude health promotion, surveillance, illness prevention, (2001) explained, “would be a therapeutic response meas-
and follow-up activities. (p. 117) ured by the organismic change (e.g., adaptation resulting
in conservation)” (p. 117).
Levine’s thinking about therapeutic intention is summa- Levine (1978a) noted that she and a colleague had been
rized in the seven areas of therapeutic intention listed here. working on the Theory of Redundancy for some time. This
Levine (personal communication, August 13, 1987) re- “completely untested, completely speculative” theory has
garded the seven areas of therapeutic intention as an “im- “redefined aging and almost everything else that has to do
perfect list that is not yet complete.” with human life.” She proposed that “aging is the dimin-
● Therapeutic [regimens] that support the integrated heal- ished availability of redundant systems necessary for effec-
ing processes of the body and permit optimal restoration tive maintenance of physical and social well-being”
of structure and function through natural response to (Levine, 1978b). Later, Levine (1991) noted that “the possi-
disease. bility exists that aging itself is a consequence of failed re-
● Therapeutic [regimens] that substitute an external ser- dundancy of physiological and psychological processes” (p.
vomechanism for a failure of autoregulation of an essen- 6). More specifically, the Theory of Redundancy postulates
tial integrating system. “that loss of redundant systems accounts for the process
● Therapeutic [regimens] that focus on specific causes, of aging. A critical loss of redundancy is not compatible
and by surgical restructuring or drug therapy, restore in- with health and is often life-threatening” (Levine, 1996, p.
dividual integrity and well-being. 39). The theory clearly extends the discussion of the
● Therapeutic [regimens] that cannot alter or substitute Redundancy dimension of the concept of Adaptation.
for the pathology so that only supportive measures are Indeed, Schaefer (2001) commented that the Theory of
possible to promote comfort and humane concern. Redundancy “is grounded in the concept of adaptation.
● Therapeutic [regimens] that balance a significant toxic Change is the process of adaptation and conservation is the
risk against the threat of the disease process. outcome of adaptation” (p. 117).
● Therapeutic [regimens] that simulate physiological Schaeffer (1991a) pointed out that the theory “is less
processes and reinforce or antagonize usual responses in clear than therapeutic intention because the thinking has
order to create a therapeutic change in function. not been related successfully to nursing practice. Contin-
● Therapeutic [regimens] that provide manipulation of ued work is needed before it can be considered for use” (p.
diet and activity to correct metabolic imbalances related 223). Citing a personal communication (September 21,
to nutrition and/or exercise. (Levine, personal commu- 1989), Schaefer (1991a) reported that Levine “would like to
nication to L. Criddle, July 22, 1987) continue to work on the development of [the] Theories [of
Therapeutic Intention and Redundancy] but is unsure of
Although the Theory of Therapeutic Intention seems to the direction she will take” (p. 223). Unfortunately, Levine
extend the Levine’s Practice Methodology, that is, the did not have the opportunity to continue her theoretical
Nursing Process as Conservation, Levine (personal work before her death in 1996.
communication to L. Criddle, July 22, 1987) stated that Schaefer, however, has continued the development of
she never associated the idea of therapeutic intention the theory by identifying statements that can be separated
with the conservation principles. She explained, “I suppose into an assumption undergirding the theory and three
it would be a claim to some greater wisdom to suggest propositions about redundancy. The assumption is:
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 151
A thorough understanding of the extensive and rich principle of the conservation of energy (see Table 6–2).
base of knowledge on which the Conservation Model is Moreover, Foreman’s research on confusion in older per-
grounded requires considerable study in nursing and di- sons represents the beginning of a program of research, as
verse adjunctive disciplines. Specific courses are identified do Schaefer’s studies (see Table 6–2).
in the Nursing Education Guidelines section on page 148. Noteworthy is Mock and colleagues’ use of Levine’s
Conservation Model-based nursing practice is feasible Conservation Model to guide a multisite study of the ef-
for many different patient populations in many different fects of an exercise intervention on fatigue among patients
settings. George (2002) stated, “A major strength of with cancer (see Table 6–2). The study was conducted as a
Levine’s work is its universality. Her concepts apply to all central component of the Fatigue Initiative Through
human beings wherever they may be. … [T]he use of this Research and Education (FIRE) project, which was a joint
work is not limited to any given setting but may be used effort of the Oncology Nursing Foundation and the
wherever there is a nurse and a patient” (p. 237). Oncology Nursing Society and funded by Ortho Biotech
Cox’s (1991) description of the use of the Conservation Incorporated (Haberman, 1998).
Model at the Alverno Health Care Facility (Clinton, Iowa)
provides glimpses of the human and material resources Nursing Education. The utility of the Conservation
needed to implement the model at the health-care organi- Model for nursing education is documented. Findings
zation level. The Alverno is a 136-bed intermediate care fa- from surveys of baccalaureate nursing programs con-
cility that provides long-term care to a patient population ducted by Hall (1979) and Riehl (1980) revealed that the
with an average age of 85 years. Staff members are taught Conservation Model was used as a guideline for curricu-
to structure all nursing according to the conservation lum development. In particular, Riehl found that Levine’s
principles, and nursing goals have been established for model was “popular with faculty, especially in the Chicago
each conservation principle. Parameters have been iden- area” (p. 396). The names of the schools of nursing using
tified to determine the need to terminate activities because the Conservation Model were not given in the survey re-
of excessive energy expenditure (conservation of energy) ports. However, Cox (1991) noted that the Conservation
and to assess functional capability (structural integrity). Model was used as a basis for course work in the master’s
Staff members learn to show respect for the residents degree medical-surgical nursing program at Loyola
by asking them how they wish to be addressed, and time University of Chicago in the late 1960s.
is taken to learn the residents’ former routines and to in- Grindley and Paradowski (1991) presented a detailed
corporate as much of that routine as possible into the description of the use of the Conservation Model as the
plan of care (personal integrity). Residents and staff nego- curriculum guide for the baccalaureate nursing program at
tiate their roles and goals, and efforts are made to help Allentown College of St. Francis de Sales in Center Valley,
the residents maintain ties with the local community Pennsylvania. Schaefer (1991b) described the Conser-
(social integrity). Moreover, Cox (1991) commented vation Model-based curriculum for the master’s program
that the conservation principles “allow each level of practi- in nursing at the same college.
tioner (nurse’s aide, LPN, RN) to provide care based In addition, Zwanger (personal communication, June 4,
upon the knowledge appropriate for the level of practice” 1982) reported that Levine’s Conservation Model was used
(p. 196). in nursing education programs sponsored by Kapat-
Holim, the Health Insurance Institution of the General
Nursing Research. The utility of the Conservation Model Federation of Labour in Israel, based in Tel Aviv. Moreover,
for nursing research is documented by several studies. Stafford (personal communication, June 2, 1982) stated
Published reports of descriptive, correlational, and experi- that she used the model “in teaching formal and informal
mental studies are listed in Table 6–2. Citations for those classes such as the Critical Care Nursing course, Pacemaker
studies, as well as published abstracts of doctoral disserta- Therapy, and The Nurse’s Role in Electrocardiography” at
tions are listed in the Doctoral Dissertations section of the the Hines Veterans Administration Medical Center in
chapter bibliography on the CD-ROM. In addition, Levine Hines, Illinois.
(1989b) pointed out that Wong’s (1968) master’s thesis was
derived from the Conservation Model. Nursing Administration. Levine’s Conservation Model
Although much of the Conservation Model-based re- has documented utility for nursing service administration.
search is limited to a single study on a single topic, some Taylor developed a tool that can be used to evaluate the
programmatic research is evident. Burd and colleagues quality of nursing practice (Table 6–3). Stafford (personal
conducted a major program of pressure ulcer research communication, June 2, 1982) commented that she used
derived from the principle of the conservation of structural Levine’s Conservation Model to identify process and out-
integrity (see Table 6–2). In addition, Winslow and as- come criteria in the nursing care of patients with cardio-
sociates conducted a series of studies derived from the vascular problems.
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 153
TABLE 6–2
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE CONSERVATION MODEL
Conservation of Energy: Energy utilization during Healthy adults Winslow et al., 1984, 1985
toileting and bathing Cardiac patients Personal communication to
M.E. Levine from
Winslow, October 6, 1982
Conservation of Energy: Energy expenditure Healthy adults Lane & Winslow, 1987
during rest, occupied bedmaking, and
unoccupied bedmaking
Conservation of Energy: Effects of boomerang Healthy adult women Roberts et al., 1994
and straight pillows on respiratory capacity
Conservation of Energy: Sleep disturbances Patients who had coronary artery Schaefer et al., 1996
1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months bypass surgery
after surgery
Conservation of Energy: Use of music therapy Hospitalized patients Gagner-Tjellesen et al., 2001
and other independent therapeutic nursing
intervention in acute care
Conservation of Energy: Effects of waterbeds Medically stable preterm infants Deiriggi & Miles, 1995
on heart rate
Conservation of Structural Integrity: Prevalence Hospice patients Hanson et al., 1991
and incidence of pressure ulcers Patients in a nonacute rehabilitation Hunter et al., 1992
center
Patients in a skilled care nursing
home
Patients in an acute care hospital, a Burd et al., 1992
skilled care nursing home, a reha- Langemo et al., 1993
bilitation hospital, a home care
agency, and a hospice
Conservation of Structural Integrity: Incidence Patients in an acute-care hospital, a Langemo et al., 1991
and prediction of pressure ulcers skilled-care nursing home, a reha-
bilitation hospital, a home-care
agency, and a hospice
Conservation of Structural Integrity: Effect of Hospice patients Hanson et al., 1994
pressure ulcer prevention and treatment Patients in a nonacute rehabilitation Hunter et al., 1995
protocols on prevalence of pressure ulcers hospital
Patients in a skilled nursing home Burd et al., 1994
Patients in a skilled nursing home Langemo et al., 1993
and a rehabilitation hospital
Conservation of Structural Integrity: Incidence Patients from two community hos- Dibble et al., 1991
of and factors associated with intravenous pitals, a large teaching hospital,
site symptoms and a government hospital
Conservation of Energy and Structural Integrity: Registered nurses MacLean, 1987, 1988
Identification of cues used by nurses for
diagnosing activity intolerance related to
an imbalance between oxygen supply
and demand
Conservation of Energy and Structural Integrity: Infants 2 weeks to 2 years of age in Hader & Sorensen, 1988
Effect of different body positions on a pediatric intensive care unit
transcutaneous oxygen tension
Conservation of Energy and Social Integrity: Newborn infants Newport, 1984
Comparison of body temperature of infants
placed on their mothers’ chests immediately
after birth and infants placed in a warmer
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
153
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 154
TABLE 6–2
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE CONSERVATION MODEL (continued)
Conservation of Energy and Structural Frail older women residing in nurs- Roberts et al., 1995
Integrity: Effects of a boomerang pillow ing homes
on respiratory capacity
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Women in labor Yeates & Roberts, 1984
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity:
Comparison of the effects of two bearing-
down techniques during the second stage
of labor on labor progress
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Women in labor Roberts et al., 1991
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity:
Integration of authors’ previous research
on perineal integrity
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Patients with congestive heart Schaefer, 1990, 1991
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity: failure Schaefer & Potylycki, 1993
Description and causes of fatigue
associated with congestive heart failure
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Chronically ill patients receiving Higgins, 1998
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity: long-term mechanical ventilation
Relation of nutritional status, depression,
and sleep-rest to fatigue
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Women with breast cancer receiv- Mock et al., 1998, 2001
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity: ing chemotherapy or radiation
Effects of a walking exercise intervention therapy
and a usual care control intervention on
fatigue, physical functioning, emotional
distress, social functioning, and quality
of life
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Hospitalized older patients Foreman, 1987, 1989, 1991
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity:
Incidence and onset of, andpsychophysi-
ological variables associated with, the
onset of acute confusional states
(delirium)
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Hospitalized older patients Nagley, 1986
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity:
Effects of Conservation Model-based
nursing actions and control nursing actions
on prevention of confusion
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, Hospitalized confused geriatric Clark et al., 1995
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity: patients
Effects of a Conservation Model-based
dayroom program on complications from
hospitalization and family satisfaction
Maintaining wholeness: Living with fibromyalgia Women with fibromyalgia Schaefer, 1995, 1996
Identification of the nursing diagnosis of Male and female patients sched- Piccoli & Galvão, 2001
infection risk uled for surgery
Description of health needs of students with School Nurse Organization of Lowe & Miller, 1998
chronic health problems that require nursing Minnesota members
interventions in the school setting and nature
and extent of nursing services provided in
schools in the late 1990s
154
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 155
TABLE 6–3
PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE CONSERVATION MODEL
Wound Assessment Instrument Permits assessment of the conservation of structural integrity by docu-
(Cooper, 1991) menting the visual characteristics of open, soft-tissue wounds.
Family Assessment Tool (Lynn- Permits assessment of family members of patients in critical care units
McHale & Smith, 1991) in terms of the conservation of energy (perception of the event, cop-
ing mechanisms, transportation logistics), conservation of structural in-
tegrity (nature of patient’s illness, family functioning, current and
future health needs), conservation of personal integrity (past experi-
ences with illness, life events, ethnic/religious factors, family needs
for solitude, information, meetings with physician or nurse), and con-
servation of social integrity (family support systems, visitation, work
patterns).
Assessment Tool (McCall, 1991) Permits identification of the nursing care needs of patients with seizures
in terms of the conservation of energy (description of seizures and
other medical problems), conservation of structural integrity (safety
measures during seizures), conservation of personal integrity (effects
of seizures on patient’s feelings and functioning) and conservation of
social integrity (patient’s interactions with significant others, visitors
during hospitalization, and other patients).
Nursing Diagnosis Assessment Guide Permits assessment of neurological patients in terms of conservation of
(Taylor, 1987, 1989) energy (oxygen supply, nutrition, activity/rest/sleep, illness-related en-
ergy expenditures), conservation of structural integrity (integument,
musculoskeletal system, sensation/ perception, cerebral perfusion
pressure, elimination, fluids and electrolytes, treatment-related risks),
conservation of personal integrity (mental status, communication,
image of self, adaptation), and conservation of social integrity
(family/significant others, social situation). Assessment data are used
to develop a comprehensive nursing care plan that lists the nursing di-
agnoses, expected outcomes, and interventions for each conservation
principle.
Levine’s Nursing Process Tool Provides guidelines for each component of Levine’s Practice
(Schaefer, 2001, 2002) Methodology.
Levine’s Nursing Process in Provides guidelines for each component of Levine’s Practice
the Community Tool (Schaefer, Methodology, within the context of the community.
2001)
Evaluation of Quality of Care Tool Permits evaluation of the quality of nursing care of neurological patients;
(Taylor, 1974) the conservation principles serve as the goals of nursing care and are
used as the frame of reference for defining commonly recurring nurs-
ing problems on the neurological service.
*See the Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
155
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 156
The utility of Levine’s conceptual model as a guide for 111–112). She also developed a practice tool for use of
the administration of nursing services is further docu- Levine’s Nursing Process as Conservation for communi-
mented by its use at The Alverno Health Care Facility (Cox, ties (see Table 6–3), and identified areas for community-
1991). Here, the conservation principles structure the based assessment within each conservation principle.
format of the nursing care plan and provide guidelines The assessment areas for the Principle of Conservation
for staff development. The nursing care plan contains an of Energy include hours of employment, water supply,
extensive summary of the patient’s trophicognosis, and and community budget. The assessment areas for the
nursing practice is organized according to the four con- Principle of Conservation of Structural Integrity in-
servation principles. The Conservation Model also was clude city planning, availability of resources, transporta-
used to guide delivery of nursing services at the Temple tion, and public services. The assessment areas for the
Health Connection Neighborhood Nursing Center in Principle of Conservation of Structural Integrity in-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Pond, personal communica- clude community identity, governmental mission, and po-
tions, 1995–1998). litical environment. The assessment areas for the Principle
of Conservation of Social Integrity include recreation and
Nursing Practice. Evidence supporting the utility of the social services.
Conservation Model for nursing practice is accumulating.
Cooper, Lynn-McHale and Smith, McCall, and Taylor all
have developed tools for assessment of patients with par- Social Congruence
ticular health problems, and Schaefer has developed tools
to guide the application of Levine’s Nursing Process Although the Conservation Model was initially formulated
as Conservation methodology for individuals and com- many years ago, it is congruent with the present-day em-
munities (Table 6–3). George (2002) commented, “A limi- phasis on holistic approaches to health care and consider-
tation [of Levine’s Conservation Model] could be ation of each human being as a unique individuals. Levine
considered the need for each nurse to create his or her own developed her conceptual model at a time when nursing
assessment tool to use Levine’s conservation principles. activities in acute care settings were becoming more me-
This could also be viewed a providing flexibility and allow- chanical as a result of the rapid increase in medical tech-
ing each nurse to create a personal fit with the principles” nology. More than 30 years ago, Levine (1966a) spoke out
(p. 238). The first sentence in George’s comment is espe- against the growing functionalism of nursing and reori-
cially puzzling, given the existence of the practice tools ented nurses to the patient as a whole being:
listed in Table 6–3. Discovering ways to perceive and cherish the essential whole-
The utility of the Conservation Model in many different ness of man becomes imperative with the rapid growth of au-
settings and for patients with many different conditions is tomation in modern disciplines which possess a technology.
evident. The available published reports are listed in Table Nursing is one of them, and nurses will not escape the sweep-
6–4. ing changes that automation promises. But nurses do know
Review of the publications cited in Table 6–4 and those that the integrated human being is not merely “programmed”
listed in the Commentary: Practice section of the chapter to respond to life in automatic ways. … It is the task of nurs-
ing to recognize and value the wondrous variety of all
bibliography on the CD-ROM reveals that the principles of mankind while offering ministrations that conserve the
conservation have been used to guide nursing practice in unique and special integrity of every man. (p. 2453)
inpatient settings for children and adults with conditions
such as pneumonia, developmental delay, burn injuries, Levine (1973) noted that “the whole man is the focus of
cancer, cardiac disease, failure of nervous system integra- nursing intervention—in health and sickness, in tragedy
tion, cognitive impairment, confusion, hormonal distur- and joy, in hospitals and clinics and in the community” (p.
bances, and fluid and electrolyte imbalances. The vii). Although little discussion of the use of the
principles of conservation also have been used to guide Conservation Model in health promotion and illness pre-
nursing practice in emergency departments, operating vention situations is available, its broad focus is congruent
rooms, obstetrical units, medical and surgical units, ambu- with society’s increasing interest in promotion of health
latory clinics, a home for older adults, homeless shelters, and prevention of illness. Indeed, “The four conservation
and city streets. principles can be used in all nursing contexts” (Schaefer,
Schaefer (2001) extended the Conservation Model to 2002, p. 219).
the community. She explained, “Using Levine’s Conser- The Conservation Model is acceptable to all members
vation Model, community was initially defined as ‘a group of the health-care team. Pond and Taney (1991) reported
of people living together within a larger society, sharing that the use of the Conservation Model effectively high-
common characteristics, interests, and location’” (pp. lighted the nursing components of collaborative nurse-
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 157
TABLE 6–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE CONSERVATION MODEL
Use of the haptic system as an Older individuals with compromised percep- Gingrich, 1971
information-gathering system tual systems
Development of trophicognoses A 57-year-old man with end-stage heart dis- Fawcett et al., 1987
ease
Development of nursing diagnoses A 73-year-old woman who had a cerebrovascu- Taylor, 1987, 1989
based on the conservation principles lar accident
Conservation of Energy Patients who had a myocardial infarction and Littrell & Schumann, 1989
have a sleep disturbance
Conservation of Structural Integrity Patients with soft-tissue wounds Cooper, 1990
Neswick, 1997
Conservation of Personal Integrity and Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary Dow & Mest, 1997
Social Integrity disease
Conservation of Energy, Structural Integrity, An infant hospitalized with pneumonia Dever, 1991
Personal Integrity, and Social Integrity
A 16-month-old boy with multiple handicaps Savage & Culbert, 1989
and severe developmental delay
A teenager with severe burn injuries Bayley, 1991
A 32-year-old woman with seizures of un- McCall, 1991
known etiology
A 42-year-old man with epilepsy McCall, 1991
Patients with an ostomy Neswick, 1997
Patients with incontinence Neswick, 1997
Women with bladder dysfunction after radical O’Laughlin, 1986
hysterectomy for cervical cancer
Patients with cardiac disease Brunner, 1985
Patients with congestive heart failure Schaefer, 1991
A woman undergoing reimplantation of digits Crawford-Gamble, 1986
of her hand
A man who had undergone extensive bowel Webb, 1993
surgery resulting in a colostomy
A 56-year-old woman with chronic pain from Pasco & Halupa, 1991
arthritis
A 60-year-old man with chronic pain from Pasco & Halupa, 1991
metastatic prostate cancer
Patients who are cognitively impaired as a Hirschfeld, 1976
result of illness
Hospitalized confused older patients Foreman, 1991
Patients who had a cerebrovascular accident Levine, 1973
Patients with diabetes Levine, 1973
Patients with congestive circulatory failure Levine, 1973
Patients with a peptic ulcer Levine, 1973
Patients with emphysema Levine, 1973
Patients with anemia Levine, 1973
Patients with cancer Herbst, 1981
Application of the Conservation Model Patients with an acute infection Levine, 1973
Infants in an intensive care nursery Levine, 1973
A 29-year-old woman with cervical cancer Langer, 1990
A 44-year-old woman with fibromyalgia Schaefer, 1997, 2002
Women with fibromyalgia Schaefer, 1997, 2002
A 29-year-old white man with Schaefer, 1996
glomerulonephritis Fawcett et al., 1992
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
157
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 158
TABLE 6–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE CONSERVATION MODEL (continued)
physician practice in an emergency department. Cox Surely, nursing care that incorporates Levine’s four conserva-
(1991) indicated that she had continued to use the conser- tion principles can make a difference to the individual and
vation principles for more than 20 years in her work in the family equilibrium that are disturbed by events as devastating
long-term care setting “because they are a natural fit for as mental impairment. (p. 1984)
[that] setting” (p. 197). She also pointed out that the Lathrop (personal communication, May 5, 1982) used the
Conservation Model Conservation Model to guide the nursing care of patients
provides direction for nursing practice and staff development. in the Intensive Treatment Unit for Mentally Ill Offenders
The conservation principles provide an organizing frame- at Saint Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, D.C. She stated
work, an easy-to-remember guide, for promoting wholeness that nursing audits based on the American Nurses’
within the limits imposed by the aging process and the conse- Association Psychiatric/Mental Health Standards of
quences of chronic illness. … The model allows for the con- Nursing Practice revealed that “treatment provided was
tributions made by all of the members of the interdisciplinary more holistic in nature.”
team. (p. 196) Cox (1991) reported that the four conservation princi-
ples provide a comprehensive focus for care and that “the
Social Significance identification of common recurring nursing problems and
goals in long-term care gives direction and unity to nurs-
The evidence supporting the social significance of the ing practice that fosters [high] quality care” (p. 196). Webb
Conservation Model is both anecdotal, coming from re- (1993) commented that the Conservation Model was use-
ports of application of the model in nursing practice, and ful in guiding postoperative nursing care “because of the
empirical, coming from reports of Conservation Model- emphasis it places on psychosocial nursing intervention, an
based nursing research. area that is often neglected” (p. 128). Webb went on to say,
Anecdotal evidence from practice is evident in several “Nurses everywhere must redefine their attitude to psycho-
published reports of the use of the Conservation Model logical support and participate in truly holistic care that
in many settings. Hirschfeld (1976) noted that “Myra acknowledges all elements of the patient’s environment”
Levine’s four principles of conservation are useful in de- (p. 128).
ciding what will help the cognitively impaired aged person Savage and Culbert (1989) pointed out that use of the
and determining what the priorities should be in his or conservation principles “allows the nurse to take a flexible,
her care” (p. 1981). She went on to describe application of creative approach to caring for the family with a develop-
the conservation principles to the care of several patients mentally disabled child. Various approaches are incorpo-
who had cognitive impairments. In concluding her article, rated into the nurse’s role, moving the nurse from a
Hirschfeld stated: peripheral position to a more central one on the early in-
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 159
tervention multidisciplinary team. In turn, the nurse can The study results provide support for … the Levine conserva-
contribute to the family’s process of successful adaptation, tion model, with regard to each of its four conservation prin-
which is the ultimate goal in the early intervention setting” ciples. High-walk subjects conserved energy as reflected in
(p. 345). lower fatigue levels compared with low-walk subjects. The
conservation of structural integrity for high-walk subjects was
Pond and Taney (1991) maintained that the use of the
demonstrated by increased functional capacity. … The con-
Conservation Model servation of personal integrity was reflected in lower mood
distress scores … and higher [quality of life] scores … for
… strengthens communication among health care providers
high-walk subjects, while scores for low-walk subjects de-
and improves the way nursing care is transmitted to and re-
creased over the course of their breast cancer treatment. (p.
ceived by patients. In an atmosphere of collaboration each
126)
participant—health care provider and patient—is rewarded
with respect and active contribution to the adaptation process.
Both the internal and external environments of the patient are
affected in such a way as to provide a move toward homeosta- CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE
sis. This is the goal called conservation or, from the medical DISCIPLINE OF NURSING
model point of view, health maintenance. (p. 166)
The Conservation Model makes a substantial contribution
Furthermore, Pond (1991) noted the difficulty of working
to the discipline of nursing by focusing attention on the
with homeless patients but pointed to the success of
wholeness of each human being. Levine moved beyond the
Conservation Model-based nursing care. She commented,
idea of the total person to the concept of the human being
“As the conservation principles are used to assess each pa-
as a holistic being. Pointing to the limitations of the so-
tient, a comprehensive picture develops. … Many of our
called total person approach, Levine (1969b) commented:
patients are easily managed and are integrated into the ex-
isting health care resources. Although it is never easy, many Nurses have long known that patients are complete persons,
patients become independent in their health care and less not groups of parts. It is out of this realization that the at-
dependent on our outreach services. We consider these tempts toward “comprehensive care” and “total care” have
many successes as reflective of the dedicated nursing inter- come, and it is because we have been frustrated by failing to
ventions with these challenging situations” (p. 178). achieve the ideal of completion that the search for a more de-
finitive approach to bedside care has continued. (p. 94)
In summarizing the empirical evidence, Schaefer (2001)
pointed out that “studies support that energy can be con- The Conservation Model is consistent in its approach to
served with nursing interventions and can be measured human beings as holistic beings. Wholeness is the central
through the assessment of organismic responses” (p. 115). feature of the model. Indeed, Levine (1995a) stated, “I in-
Empirical evidence from experimental studies of the effects troduced the concept [wholeness] with the Conservation
of skin care strategies on pressure ulcer prevalence is espe- Principles in 1964, and it has remained a hallmark of my
cially compelling. Use of skin care prevention and inter- work ever since” (p. 262). Wholeness is evident in all as-
vention strategies, which were derived directly from the pects of the Conservation Model—physiological and be-
Principle of Conservation of Structural Integrity, resulted havioral responses are regarded as the same, and the
in a statistically significant and practically meaningful conservation principles are joined. Moreover, the conser-
reduction in development of pressure ulcers in patients vation principles provide a comprehensive framework for
in a rehabilitation hospital and a skilled nursing home. holistic nursing care and focus attention on the patient as
More specifically, the prevalence of pressure ulcers de- an unique individual.
clined 60 percent in the rehabilitation hospital (Hunter Grindley and Paradowski (1991) maintained that “the
et al., 1995), and 54 percent in the nursing home (Burd adaptability of the model is one of its greatest strengths.
et al., 1994). The conservation principles have easily stood the test of
Also compelling is the evidence from Mock and col- time and the impact of technology” (p. 207). They went on
leagues’ (2001) multisite study of the effects of an exercise to say:
intervention on variables representing the four conserva-
tion principles in a sample of women receiving adjuvant Individuals continue to be unique; they cope with ever-
increasing assaults on their energies. The constant barrage on
treatment for breast cancer. They reported that women
their integrities by the world around them reinforces the fact
who exercised at least 90 minutes each week (the high-walk that the nurse must be ever alert to the potential and actual
group) experienced less fatigue and emotional distress and impact of these assaults. Holistic care touches the individual,
higher functional ability and quality of life than women the family, and the community. Levine’s principles are appli-
who exercised less (the low-walk group). Mock and col- cable not only to individuals but also to a larger group, the
leagues (2001) explained: others who are significant to them. (pp. 207–208)
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 160
Noteworthy is the accurate use of knowledge from what Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theory: Utilization and application (2nd
Levine (1988a) called adjunctive disciplines. She credited ed., pp. 41–61). St. Louis: Mosby.
the scholars of other disciplines from whose works she Barnum, B.J.S. (1998). Nursing theory: Analysis, application,
drew for the development of her conceptual model, and evaluation (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
she heeded her own requirement to use that knowledge ap- Bates, M. (1967). A naturalist at large. Natural History, 76(6),
propriately (Levine, 1995b). 8–16.
Although documentation of the utility of the Conserva- Beland, I. (1971). Clinical nursing: Pathophysiological and psy-
tion Model for nursing activities is increasing, additional chosocial implications (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
empirical evidence of its credibility is warranted. System- Bernard, C. (1957). An introduction to the study of experimental
atic evaluations of the use of the model in various medicine. New York: Dover. [Unabridged and unaltered reprint of
nursing situations are needed, as are more studies that test the first English translation, published 1927. Originally published
conceptual-theoretical-empirical structures derived di- in French in 1865.]
rectly from the conservation principles. An excellent exam- Burd, C., Olson, B., Langemo, D., Hunter, S., Hanson, D., Osowski,
ple of a Conservation Model-based conceptual-theoretical- K.F., & Sauvage, T. (1994). Skin care strategies in a skilled nursing
home. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 20(11), 28–34.
empirical structure was provided by Mock and colleagues
(1998, 2001). Perhaps the most important need is for more Cannon, W.B. (1939). The wisdom of the body. New York:
Norton.
valid and reliable empirical indicators to measure the phe-
nomena encompassed by the Conservation Model. The Cohen, Y. (1968). Man in adaptation: The biosocial background.
Chicago: Aldine.
practice tools that already have been developed require sys-
tematic testing to determine intrarater and interrater relia- Cox, R.A., Sr. (1991). A tradition of caring: Use of Levine’s model
in long-term care. In K.M. Schaefer & J.B. Pond (Eds.), Levine’s
bility. Schaefer (1991a) pointed out, “An assessment tool is
conservation model: A framework for nursing practice (pp.
perhaps the most important measure of wholeness. Using 179–197). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
the elements of trophicognosis, practitioners and re-
Dubos, R. (1961). Mirage of health. New York: Doubleday.
searchers are encouraged to develop assessment measures
Dubos, R. (1965). Man adapting. New Haven: Yale University
based on Levine’s Conservation Model and to test for a re- Press.
liable and valid data base common to all patients present-
Erikson, E.H. (1964). Insight and responsibility. New York:
ing with a need for nursing care” (p. 221). Norton.
Myra Levine’s death was not the end of the Conser-
Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York:
vation Model. Rather, the literature indicates that many Norton.
nurses remain interested in using the Conservation Model
Esposito, C.H., & Leonard, M.K. (1980). Myra Estrin Levine. In
as a guide for their nursing activities. Their collective works Nursing Theories Conference Group, Nursing theories. The base
augur well for the continued development of this concep- for professional nursing practice (pp. 150–163). Englewood
tual model of nursing. As Schaefer (2002) put it, the Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Conservation Model “has continued to have utility for Feiblemann, J.K. (1959). The logical structure of the scientific
nursing practice and research and is receiving increased method. Dialectica, 13, 209.
recognition in this twenty-first century” (p. 219). Feynman, R. (1965). The character of physical law. Cambridge,
In conclusion, Levine’s Conservation Model provides MA: M.I.T. Press.
nursing with a logically congruent, holistic view of human George, J.B. (2002). The conservation principles, A model for
beings. Theories related to the model have been formu- health: Myra E. Levine. In J. B. George (Ed.), Nursing theories:
lated, but they require further development and empirical The base for professional nursing practice (5th ed., pp.
testing. The lack of major limitations suggests that the 2225–2240). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Conservation Model may be an effective and comprehen- Gibson, J.E. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems.
sive guide for nursing actions in diverse settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Goldstein, K. (1963). The organism. Boston: Beacon Press.
Grindley, J., & Paradowski, M. (1991). Developing an undergrad-
REFERENCES uate program using Levine’s model. In K.M. Schaefer & J.B. Pond
(Eds.), Levine’s conservation model: A framework for nursing
Alligood, M.R. (1997). Models and theories: Critical thinking practice (pp. 199–208). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner-Tomey (Eds.), Haberman, M. R. (1998). Implementing the FIRE® planning
Nursing theory: Utilization and application (pp. 31–45). St. grant: Introduction. Oncology Nursing Forum, 25, 1389–1390.
Louis: Mosby. Hall, E. (1959). Silent language. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.
Alligood, M.R. (2002). Philosophies, models, and theories: Hall, E. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY:
Critical thinking structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner- Doubleday.
06Fawcett-06 09/17/2004 2:01 PM Page 161
Chapter 7
Neuman’s Systems Model
Betty Neuman (2002b) traced the evolution of the Neuman Systems Model from
its inception in 1970 to its current form. The Neuman Systems Model was first
published in 1972, in an article entitled “A Model for Teaching Total Person
Approach to Patient Problems” (Neuman & Young, 1972). A refinement of the
model was published in the 1974 edition of Riehl and Roy’s book Conceptual
Models for Nursing Practice and reprinted in their 1980 edition (Neuman, 1974,
1980). Further refinements were presented in a chapter (Neuman, 1982a) of the
first edition of Neuman’s (1982b) book The Neuman Systems Model: Application
to Nursing Education and Practice. Other refinements were included in the sec-
ond edition of Neuman’s (1989c) book The Neuman Systems Model. Still other
refinements in the Neuman Systems Model were presented in a journal article
(Neuman, 1990a) that was based on Neuman’s presentation at the 1989 Nurse
Theorist Conference and a book chapter (Neuman, 1990b) that was based on
Neuman’s presentation at a spring 1990 conference sponsored by Cedars
Medical Center in Miami, Florida. Further refinements were presented in the
third edition of Neuman’s (1995b) book The Neuman Systems Model. The most
recent refinements in the model were presented in the fourth edition of The
Neuman Systems Model (Neuman & Fawcett, 2002).
Neuman’s conceptual model has undergone changes in its title since its in-
ception. The model originally was published under the title “A Model for Teaching
Total Person Approach to Nursing Care” (Neuman & Young, 1972). The title was
changed to “The Betty Neuman Health-Care Systems Model: A Total Person
Approach to Patient Problems” in Neuman’s 1974 and 1980 publications.
Neuman’s 1982a chapter carried the title “The Neuman Health-Care Systems
Model: A Total Approach to Client Care,” although her book (1982b) title was The
Neuman Systems Model. In her 1985b journal article, Neuman referred to the
model as “The Neuman Systems Model,” and that title has been retained in
subsequent publications.
166
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 167
Assumption about Nursing of client care. She also cited Beckstrand’s (1980) proposal
to advance nursing knowledge “by rigorous application
● Nursing is concerned with reduction of potential or of the methods of science, ethics, and philosophy to prob-
actual stressor reaction through use of primary, second- lems encountered in the professional experience of nurses”
ary, or tertiary prevention as intervention to retain, (p. 6).
attain, and maintain an optimal wellness level. The goal Furthermore, Neuman (1974, 2002d) identified the
of nursing is optimal client system stability or wellness. knowledge from adjunctive disciplines that contributed to
Perceptual distortions between client and nurse, as well the content of the Neuman Systems Model. Scholars and
as goal plans, are mutually negotiated and resolved works that were particularly influential include de
(Neuman, 1990b, p. 259). Chardin’s (1955) philosophical beliefs about the wholeness
of life; Marxist philosophical views of the oneness of man
Strategies for Knowledge Development and nature (Cornu, 1957); Gestalt and field theories of the
interaction between human beings and environment
The Neuman Systems Model arose from Neuman’s obser- (Edelson, 1970); a general system theory of the nature of
vations, her practice and teaching experiences in mental living open systems (von Bertalanffy, 1968); Emery’s
health nursing, and her synthesis of knowledge from sev- (1969) and Lazarus’s (1981, 1999) views of systems, stress,
eral adjunctive disciplines. As is evident in Neuman’s and perception of stressors; Caplan’s (1964) articulation of
(2002b) description of the development of the model, both levels of prevention; and Heslin’s (1986) ideas about revi-
inductive and deductive strategies were used: talization of living open systems.
in Neuman’s (2002d) statement that “a system implies dy- Systems Model always has been classified as a systems
namic energy exchange [with the environment], moving model (Barnum, 1998; Marriner-Tomey, 1989; Riehl &
either toward or away from stability” (p. 10). Persistence Roy, 1974, 1980; Riehl-Sisca, 1989). Neuman (personal
and change, then, appear to be on a dual continuum of communications, November 6 and 13, 1980) commented
more or less persistence and more or less change at any that she did not consider classification when formulating
time in the life of the client system. That interpretation of her model, but agrees that systems is the appropriate cate-
Neuman’s work requires validation. gory. She stated, “The Neuman Systems Model is an open
Although the primary world view of the Neuman systems model that views nursing as being primarily con-
Systems Model is reciprocal interaction, the reaction world cerned with defining appropriate action in stress-related
view is introduced in Neuman’s description of the created situations or in possible reactions of the client/client sys-
environment as an unconscious structure, which implies tem” (Neuman, 1995a, p. 11). The appropriateness of the
a psychoanalytic orientation. The psychoanalytic orienta- systems category classification is evident in the comparison
tion associated with the reaction world view also is evi- of the concepts and propositions of the Neuman Systems
dent in Neuman’s description of the spiritual variable as Model with the characteristics of the systems category of
consciously developed. In the most recent version of knowledge, as can be seen here.
her conceptual model, Neuman (2002d) has deleted ear-
lier references to the closed system view of illness as en- ● System: Individuals, families, communities, and social
tropy and Selye’s (1950) mechanistic conceptualization issues are considered client systems (Neuman, 2002d).
of stress. ● Integration of Parts: The interacting open client system
is a dynamic composite of the interrelationship of phys-
iological, psychological, sociocultural, developmental,
UNIQUE FOCUS OF THE NURSING MODEL and spiritual variables (Neuman, 2002d).
● Environment: All factors affecting and affected by the
The unique focus of the Neuman Systems Model is the system (Neuman, 2002d, p. 12). All internal and external
wellness of the client/client system in relation to environ- factors or influences surrounding the identified client or
mental stress and reactions to stress (Neuman, 1974, client system (Neuman, 2002d, p. 18). The environment
2002d, pp. 24–25). Stability preserves the character of the dimensions—Primary Prevention as Intervention,
system. An adjustment in one direction is countered by a Secondary Prevention as Intervention, and Tertiary
movement in the opposite direction, both movements Prevention as Intervention.
being approximately rather than precisely compensatory.
With opposing forces in effect, the process of stability is
an example of the regulatory capacity of a system Nonrelational Propositions
(Neuman, 2002d, p. 25).
● Feedback: Feedback of output into input makes the sys- The definitions of the concepts of the Neuman Systems
tem self-regulatory in relation to either maintenance of Model are given here. Those constitutive definitions are the
a desired health state or goal outcome (Neuman, 2002d, nonrelational propositions of this nursing model.
p. 25).
CLIENT/CLIENT SYSTEM
CONTENT OF THE NURSING MODEL ● The client is an interacting open system in interaction
and total interface with both internal and external envi-
Concepts ronmental forces or stressors (Neuman, 2002d, p. 12).
The concept of Client/Client System encompasses four
The metaparadigm concepts of human beings, environ- dimensions—Individual, Family, Community, and Social
ment, health, and nursing are evident in the concepts of Issue.
the Neuman System Model. Each conceptual model con-
cept is classified here according to its metaparadigm ● Individual: The client as a system represents an “individ-
forerunner. ual,” a “person,” or “man” (Neuman, 2002d, p. 15).
The metaparadigm concept of human beings is rep- ● Family: A type of group (Neuman, 2002d).
resented by the Neuman Systems Model concepts of ● Community: A type of group (Neuman, 2002d).
CLIENT/CLIENT SYSTEM, INTERACTING VARI- ● Social Issue: A type of group (Neuman, 2002d).
ABLES, BASIC STRUCTURE, FLEXIBLE LINE OF
DEFENSE, NORMAL LINE OF DEFENSE, and LINES INTERACTING VARIABLES
OF RESISTANCE. The concept of CLIENT/CLIENT
SYSTEM has four dimensions—Individual, Family, ● The client system is a composite of five interacting vari-
Community, and Social Issue. The concept of INTER- able areas (Neuman, 2002d, p. 16).
ACTING VARIABLES has five dimensions—Physiologic ● Ideally, the five variables function harmoniously or are
Variable, Psychological Variable, Sociocultural Variable, stable in relation to internal and external environmental
Developmental Variable, and Spiritual Variable. The con- stressor influences (Neuman, 2002d, p. 17).
cepts of BASIC STRUCTURE, FLEXIBLE LINE OF DE- ● The client, whether in a state of wellness or illness, is a
FENSE, NORMAL LINE OF DEFENSE, and LINES dynamic composite of the interrelationships of vari-
OF RESISTANCE are unidimensional. ables—physiologic, psychological, sociocultural, devel-
The metaparadigm concept of environment is repre- opmental, and spiritual (Neuman, 2002d, p. 14).
sented by the Neuman Systems Model concepts of INTER- The concept of Interacting Variables encompasses
NAL ENVIRONMENT, EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT, five dimensions—Physiological Variable, Psychological
CREATED ENVIRONMENT, and STRESSORS. The con- Variable, Sociocultural Variable, Developmental Variable,
cepts of INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT, EXTERNAL and Spiritual Variable.
ENVIRONMENT, and CREATED ENVIRONMENT are
unidimensional. The concept of STRESSORS has three ● Physiological Variable: Refers to bodily structure and
dimensions—Intrapersonal Stressors, Interpersonal internal function (Neuman, 2002d, p. 16).
Stressors, and Extrapersonal Stressors. ● Psychological Variable: Refers to mental processes and
The metaparadigm concept of health is represented interactive environmental effects, both internally and
by the Neuman Systems Model concepts of HEALTH/ externally (Neuman, 2002d, p. 16).
WELLNESS/OPTIMAL CLIENT SYSTEM STABILITY, ● Sociocultural Variable: Refers to combined effects of
VARIANCES FROM WELLNESS, ILLNESS, and RECON- social cultural conditions and influences (Neuman,
STITUTION. Each concept is unidimensional. 2002d, p. 16).
The metaparadigm concept of nursing is represented ● Developmental Variable: Refers to age-related devel-
in the Neuman Systems Model by the concept of PRE- opment[al] processes and activities (Neuman, 2002d,
VENTION AS INTERVENTION. That concept has three p. 17).
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 172
Basic structure
Basic factors common to
all organisms include:
Normal Temperature
Range
Genetic Structure
Response Pattern
Organ Strength
Weakness
Ego Structure
ible Line of Defens Knowns or Commonalities
Flex e
Basic
structure
energy
resources
FIG. 7–1. Diagram of the client system. (From Neuman, B. (2002). The Neuman systems
model. In B. Neuman & J. Fawcett (Eds.), The Neuman Systems Model (4th ed., p. 15).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, with permission.)
[such as] mobilization of white blood cells or activation The five Interacting Variables are considered to be inher-
of immune system mechanisms,… thus protecting sys- ent within the Flexible Line of Defense, the Normal Line
tem integrity (Neuman, 2002d, p. 18). of Defense, and the Lines of Resistance. Neuman (2002d)
● Implicit within each client system are internal resistance explained that the five Interacting Variables contained
factors known as lines of resistance, which function to within the Flexible Line of Defense “ideally would protect
stabilize and return the client to the usual wellness state the client system from possible instability caused by
(normal line of defense) or possibly to a higher level of stressors. Determining factors would include the client’s
stability following an environmental stressor reaction physiologic condition, sociocultural influences, develop-
(Neuman, 2002d, p. 14). mental state, cognitive skills, and spiritual considera-
● The lines of resistance protect the basic structure and tions” (p. 22). Similarly, the five Interacting Variables
support return to wellness (Neuman, 1990b, p. 259). contained within the Normal Line of Defense can protect
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 174
the Client/Client System. Here, influencing factors include ● [The created environment] acts as an immediate or long-
“coping patterns, lifestyle factors, developmental and spir- range safe reservoir for existence or the maintenance of
itual influences, and cultural considerations” (Neuman, system integrity expressed consciously, unconsciously, or
2002d, p. 18). Neuman did not identify any particular de- both simultaneously (Neuman, 2002d, p. 19).
termining or influencing factors within the Lines of ● The created environment . . is intrapersonal, interper-
Resistance. sonal, and extrapersonal in nature (Neuman, 2002d,
p. 18).
INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT The Created Environment plays an important role in de-
● Consists of all forces or interactive influences internal to termining the response to a Stressor. Neuman (1990a) ex-
or contained solely within the boundaries of the defined plained that the created environment “is a self-help
client/client system (Neuman, 2002d, p. 18). phenomenon that can reflect a temporary health state as
● [The internal environment] correlates with Neuman a response to situational stressors on the client’s flexible
Systems Model intrapersonal factors or stressors [and normal] line[s] of defense [and lines of resistance]”
(Neuman, 2002d, p. 18). (p. 130). Although the client may be conscious of “the en-
vironmental reality that inexorably shapes the health con-
dition” (p. 130), the created environment functions as a
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
subjective safety mechanism that “may block conscious
● Consists of all forces or interaction influences external to awareness of the true reality of the environment and the
or existing outside the defined client/client system health experience [by structuring] a semblance or illusion
(Neuman, 2002d, p. 18). of harmony in wellness” (p. 130) for the client system.
● [The external environment] correlates with both the More specifically, “the insulating effect of the created envi-
inter- and extrapersonal factors or stressors (Neuman, ronment changes the response or possible response of the
2002d, p. 18). client to environmental stressors, for example, the use of
denial or envy (psychological), physical rigidity or muscu-
CREATED ENVIRONMENT lar constraint (physiological), life-cycle continuation of
survival patterns (developmental), required social space
● Represents an open system exchanging energy with both range (sociocultural), and sustaining hope (spiritual)”
the internal and external environment (Neuman, 2002d, (Neuman, 2002d, p. 20).
p. 19).
● The created environment is dynamic and represents the STRESSORS
client’s unconscious mobilization of all system variables
(particularly the psycho-sociocultural), including the ● Tension producing stimuli or forces occurring within the
basic structure energy factors, toward system integra- internal and external environmental boundaries of the
tion, stability and integrity. It is inherently purposeful. client/client system (Neuman, 2002d, p. 21).
Though unconsciously developed, its function is to offer The concept Stressors encompasses three dimensions—
a protective coping shield (Lazarus, 1981) or safe arena Intrapersonal Stressors, Interpersonal Stressors, and
for system function as the client is usually cognitively Extrapersonal Stressors.
unaware of the host of existing psychosocial and physio-
logical influences. It pervades all systems, large and ● Intrapersonal Stressors: Internal environmental forces
small, at least to some degree; it is spontaneously created, that occur within the boundary of the client/client
increased, or decreased, as warranted by a special condi- system (e.g., conditioned response or autoimmune re-
tion of need (Neuman, 2002d, pp. 19–20). sponse) (Neuman, 2002d, p. 22).
● [The created] environment [is] developed unconsciously ● Interpersonal Stressors: External environmental forces
by the client [as] a symbolic expression of system whole- that occur outside the boundaries of the client/client sys-
ness (Neuman, 2002d, p. 19). tem at proximal range (e.g., between one or more role
● The created environment is based on unseen, uncon- expectations or communication patterns) (Neuman,
scious knowledge, as well as self-esteem, beliefs, energy 2002d, p. 22).
exchanges, system variables, and predisposition; it is a ● Extrapersonal Stressors: External environmental inter-
process-based concept of perpetual adjustment within action forces that occur outside the boundaries of the
which a client may either increase or decrease available client/client system at distal range (e.g., between one or
energy affecting the wellness state (Neuman, 2002d, more social policies or financial concerns) (Neuman,
p. 21). 2002d, p. 22).
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 175
The outcome of the Client/Client System’s encounter with the system to achieve balance during periods of instabil-
a Stressor is determined in part by natural and learned re- ity (Neuman, 1990a).
sistance, which is manifested by the strength of the Flexible ● Health is reflected in the level of wellness: when system
Line of Defense, the Normal Line of Defense, and the needs are met, a state of optimal wellness exists.
Lines of Resistance. The amount of resistance, in turn, is Conversely, unmet needs reduce the client wellness con-
determined by the interrelation of the five Interacting dition (Neuman, 2002d, p. 12).
Variables of the Client/Client System. ● Health and wellness [is] defined as the condition or the
The Flexible Line of Defense is immediately called into degree of system stability, that is, the condition in which
action when the Client/Client System encounters a all parts and subparts (variables) are in balance or har-
Stressor and attempts to maintain stability. Stressors are mony with the whole of the client/client system
inert or neutral, but the outcome of a reaction to a stressor (Neuman, 2002d, p. 12).
may be beneficial or noxious, positive or negative ● Wellness is a state of saturation or inertness, one free of
(Neuman, 1985a, 2002d). If the Flexible Line of Defense disrupting needs (Neuman, 2002d, p. 25).
cannot withstand the impact of one or more Stressors, the ● Wellness is a stable condition in which system subparts
Normal Line of Defense is penetrated. A reaction, in the are in harmony with the whole system (Neuman, 2002e,
form of Client/Client System Instability or illness, occurs p. 324)
when the Normal Line of Defense is rendered ineffective in ● Wellness is a matter of degree, a point on a continuum
relation to the impact of the Stressor(s). The Lines of running from the greatest degree of wellness to severe ill-
Resistance are involuntarily activated when an environ- ness or death (Neuman, 2002d, p. 3)
mental Stressor invades the Normal Line of Defense. ● Wellness is on a continuum of available energy to sup-
“Effectiveness of the lines of resistance in reversing the re- port the system in an optimal state of system stability
action to stressors,” Neuman (2002d) explained, “allows the (Neuman, 2002d, p. 14).
system to reconstitute; ineffectiveness leads to energy de- ● [Wellness as energy] is a manifestation of the highest
pletion and death” (p. 18). possible level of system stability, implying that energy is
The nature and extent of the reaction to a Stressor also sufficient for necessary system function from the cellular
are influenced by such factors as “the time of stressor oc- level to gross motor participation in the life processes of
vention modality is used for tertiary prevention as takes into account the perceptions of both the client and
wellness maintenance, that is, to protect client system the caregiver. Underscoring that point, Neuman (2002d)
reconstitution or return to wellness following treatment maintained that proper assessment requires consideration
[i.e., following secondary prevention as intervention]. … of both the client’s and the caregiver’s perceptions of the
The goal is to maintain an optimal wellness level by sup- basic structure; the lines of resistance and defense; and the
porting existing strengths and conserving client system internal, external, and created environments. Neuman
energy (Neuman, 2002d, p. 28). Tertiary prevention as (1990a) pointed out that although identification of the rel-
intervention can begin at any point in client reconstitu- evant factors in the client’s internal and external environ-
tion following treatment, that is, when some degree of ments is relatively easy, determination of the created
system stability has occurred (Neuman, 2002d, p. 28). environment can be challenging:
The familiar conscious level of internal (intrapersonal) and
Neuman (1974) views nursing as a “unique profession external (interpersonal and extrapersonal) environment fac-
[that] is concerned with all the variables affecting an indi- tors of the model can be easily determined, whereas those
vidual’s response to stressors” (p. 102). The three dimen- of the unconsciously derived created environment are more
sions of the concept Prevention as Intervention actually are [e]lusive and fragile, requiring discovery of causal as well as
nursing intervention modalities that represent a typology defining factors. These created environment factors can
of nursing actions. The typology identifies the client’s entry best be identified and defined as client patterned responses
point into the health-care system and the type of interven- through caregiver use of intuition, empathy, inference, and
clustering of response patterns to form mini-hypotheses for
tion needed. Neuman (2002d) pointed out that more than careful informal testing in client-nurse interaction (p. 130).
one prevention modality may be used simultaneously if the
client’s condition warrants such multilevel intervention.
She stated, “Ideally, primary prevention is also considered Relational Propositions
concomitant with secondary and tertiary preventions as
interventions” (p. 26). Moreover, “tertiary prevention tends The relational propositions of the Neuman Systems Model
to lead back, in circular fashion, toward primary preven- are listed here. The relationship between the metapara-
tion” (p. 29). Specific nursing functions or actions taken as digm concepts human being and environment is men-
Text/image rights not available.
part of Primary Prevention as Intervention, Secondary
Prevention as Intervention, and Tertiary Prevention as
Intervention include but are not limited to initiating, plan-
tioned repeatedly in the Neuman Systems Model. The
reciprocal nature of that relationship is articulated in rela-
tional propositions A, B, C, D, and E. The linkage of the
ning, organizing, monitoring, coordinating, implement- metaparadigm concepts human beings, environment, and
ing, integrating, advocating, supporting, and evaluating health is asserted in relational propositions F and G. The
(Neuman, 2002d). integral relationship of the metaparadigm concepts human
In keeping with the concept of Prevention as beings, environment, health, and nursing is evident in rela-
Intervention and its three dimensions, the GOAL OF tional propositions H and I.
NURSING is “to facilitate optimal wellness for the client
A. The client is a system capable of both input and output re-
through retention, attainment, or maintenance of client lated to intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal envi-
system stability” (Neuman, 1995a, p. 25). In particular, ronmental influences, interacting with the environment by
“nursing goals should enable the client in creating and adjusting to it or, as a system, adjusting the environment to it-
shaping reality in a desired direction, related to retention, self (Neuman, 2002d, pp. 23–24).
attainment, or maintenance of optimal system wellness, or
B. Input, output, and feedback between the client and the en-
a combination of these, through purposeful interventions
vironment is of a circular nature; client and environment have
[that] should mitigate or reduce stress factors and adverse a reciprocal relationship, the outcome of which is corrective or
conditions which affect or could affect optimal client func- regulative for the system (Neuman, 2002d, p. 23).
tioning, at any given point in time” (Neuman, 1995a, p.
16). “The major goal for nursing,” Neuman (1995a) de- C. Many known, unknown, and universal environmental
clared, “is to reduce stressor impact, whether actual or po- stressors exist. Each differs in its potential for disturbing a
client’s usual stability level, or normal line of defense. The par-
tential, and to increase client resistance” (p. 36). ticular interrelationships of client variables—physiological,
Neuman (2002d) presented the NEUMAN SYSTEMS psychological, sociocultural, developmental, and spiritual—at
MODEL NURSING PROCESS FORMAT, which is the any point in time can affect the degree to which a client is pro-
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY for the Neuman Systems tected by the flexible line of defense against possible reaction
Model. The format is outlined in Table 7–1. to a single stressor or a combination of stressors (Neuman,
The Neuman Systems Model Nursing Process Format 2002d, p. 14).
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 178
TABLE 7–1
NEUMAN’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL NURSING PROCESS FORMAT
The nurse uses the Neuman Systems Model Assessment and Intervention Tool, the Neuman Systems Model Nursing
Diagnosis Taxonomy, and any other relevant practice tools to guide collection of data and facilitate documentation of
nursing diagnoses, nursing goals, and nursing outcomes (see Table 7–2).
NURSING DIAGNOSIS
The nurse establishes a database that includes the simultaneous consideration of the dynamic interactions
of physiologic, psychological, sociocultural, developmental, and spiritual variables.
The nurse identifies the client/client system’s perceptions and his or her own perceptions by:
Assessing the condition and strength of client/client system’s basic structure factors and energy resources.
Assessing the characteristics of the client/client system’s flexible and normal lines of defense, lines of resistance,
degree of potential or actual reaction, and potential for reconstitution following a reaction.
Assessing the internal and external environmental stressors that threaten the stability of the client/client
system by:
Identifying and evaluating potential or actual intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal stressors that threaten
the stability of the client/client system.
Classifying stressors that threaten the stability of the client/client system through deprivation, excess, change,
or intolerance.
Identifying, classifying, and evaluating potential and actual intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extrapersonal
interactions between the client/ client system and the environment, considering all five interacting
variables.
Assessing the client/client system’s created environment by discovering the nature of the client/client system’s cre-
ated environment. This is accomplished by:
Assessing the client/client system’s perception of stressors.
Identifying the client/client system’s major problem, stress areas, or areas of concern.
Identifying the client/client system’s perceptions of how present circumstances differ from the usual pattern
of living.
Identifying ways in which the client/ client system handled similar problems in the past.
Identifying what the client/client system anticipates for self in the future as a consequence of the present
situation.
Determining what the client/client system is doing and what he or she can do to help himself or herself.
Determining what the client/client system expects caregivers, family, friends, or others to do for him
or her.
Determining the degree of protection provided by the client/client system’s created environment.
Uncovering the cause of the client/client system’s created environment.
Evaluating the influence of past, present, and possible future life processes and coping patterns on client/client
system stability.
Identifying and evaluating actual and potential internal and external resources for an optimal state of client/client
system wellness.
The nurse compares the client/client system’s and the nurse’s perceptions by identifying similarities and differences in
perceptions.
The nurse facilitates client awareness of major perceptual distortions.
The nurse and client/client system work to resolve differences in perceptions.
The nurse identifies variances from wellness by synthesizing the client database with relevant theories from
nursing and adjunctive disciplines.
The nurse states a comprehensive nursing diagnosis that encompasses the client/client system’s general
condition or circumstances, including identification of actual or potential variances from wellness and available
resources.
178
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 179
NURSING OUTCOMES
The nurse implements nursing interventions through the use of one or more of the three prevention as intervention
modalities.
Primary Prevention as Intervention nursing actions to retain system stability are implemented by:
Preventing stressor invasion.
Providing resources to retain or strengthen existing client/client system strengths.
Supporting positive coping and functioning.
Desensitizing existing or possible noxious stressors.
Motivating the client/client system toward wellness.
Coordinating and integrating interdisciplinary theories and epidemiological input.
Educating or reeducating the client/client system.
Using stress as a positive intervention strategy.
Secondary Prevention as Intervention nursing actions to attain system stability are implemented by:
Protecting the client/client system’s basic structure.
Mobilizing and optimizing the client/client system’s internal and external resources to attain stability and energy
conservation.
Facilitating purposeful manipulation of stressors and reactions to stressors.
Motivating, educating, and involving the client/client system in mutual establishment of health-care goals.
Facilitating appropriate treatment and intervention measures.
Supporting positive factors toward wellness.
Promoting advocacy by coordination and integration.
Providing primary preventive intervention as required.
Tertiary Prevention as Intervention nursing actions to maintain system stability are implemented by:
Attaining and maintaining the highest possible level of client/client system wellness and stability during
reconstitution.
Educating, reeducating, and reorienting the client/client system as needed.
Supporting the client/client system toward appropriate goals.
Coordinating and integrating health services resources.
Providing primary and secondary preventive intervention as required.
The nurse evaluates the outcome goals by:
Confirming attainment of outcome goals with the client/client system.
Reformulating goals as necessary with the client/client system.
The nurse and client/client system set intermediate and long-range goals for subsequent nursing action that
are structured in relation to short-term goal outcomes.
Source: Adapted from Neuman, B. (1990). Health as a continuum based on the Neuman systems model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3,
129–135; Neuman, B. (2002). The Neuman systems model. In B. Neuman & J. Fawcett, The Neuman systems model (4th ed., 29–30).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; and Neuman, B. (2002). Assessment and intervention based on the Neuman systems model. In B.
Neuman & J. Fawcett (Eds.), The Neuman systems model (4th ed., pp. 347–359). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, with permission.
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 180
wellness and levels of wellness requires greater specifica- Neuman’s (2002a) emphasis on the client’s perception of
tion. However, given the abstract and general nature of the situation and the negotiation needed for identification
conceptual models, Neuman’s descriptions of concepts of appropriate goals and interventions reflects a concern
representing the metaparadigm concepts human beings, for ethical standards.
environment, health, and nursing are generally adequate. Some Neuman Systems Model relational propositions
The revisions and refinements to date certainly suggest link the metaparadigm concepts human beings and envi-
that Neuman has been responsive to critiques of her work, ronment and human beings, environment, and health. Two
such as the chapter on analysis and evaluation of the model other relational propositions provide clear linkages be-
by Fawcett and associates (1982) published in the first edi- tween human beings, environment, health, and nursing.
tion of The Neuman Systems Model (Neuman, 1982b), and The Neuman Systems Model is comprehensive in
a similar chapter by Fawcett (1989) in the second edition of breadth of content. “The major goal for nursing,” Neuman
The Neuman Systems Model (Neuman, 1989c). Indeed, (2002d) asserted, “is to reduce stressor impact, whether ac-
Stevens (1982) commended Neuman for the scholarly atti- tual or potential, and to increase client resistance” (p. 29).
tude and scientific detachment demonstrated by inclusion She went on to point out that the Neuman Systems Model
of the Fawcett et al. (1987) critique in the book. With re- encompasses both health promotion and illness care:
gard to refinements, Neuman (personal communication,
October 6, 1993) commented that “the model was origi- Ideally, health promotion goals should work in concert with
nally set forth as a comprehensive guide for nursing prac- both secondary and tertiary preventions as interventions to
prevent recidivism and to promote optimal wellness, since the
tice, open to creative interpretation and implementation. Neuman Systems Model is wellness oriented. Health promo-
However, the author of the model does not sanction struc- tion, in general, and within the primary prevention concept,
tural changes which alter its basic intent, meaning, and relates to activities that optimize the client wellness potential
purpose.” A review of all versions of the Neuman Systems or condition (p. 29).
Model (Neuman, 1974, 1980, 1982a, 1989d, 1995a, 2002d;
Neuman & Young, 1972) indicates that the basic intent, The comprehensiveness of the breadth of the Neuman
meaning, and purpose of the model have been retained. Systems Model is further supported by the direction it pro-
Neuman’s (2002a, 2002d) approach to the nursing vides for nursing research, education, administration, and
process reflects systems thinking (see Table 7–1). She practice. Guidelines have been explicated for each area.
stated, “Using a wholistic systems approach to protect and Although the guidelines presented here are targeted to
promote client welfare, nursing action must be skillfully nursing, Neuman’s (2002d) interest in the interdisciplinary
related to the meaningful and dynamic organization of … and multidisciplinary use of the Neuman Systems Model
the whole” (Neuman, 1995a, pp. 10–11). She went on to calls for the extrapolation of the guidelines to other disci-
say, “Both system processes and nursing actions are pur- plines concerned with the health of individuals, families,
poseful and goal directed. That is, nursing vigorously at- and communities. That work has begun. In their introduc-
tempts to control variables affecting client care” (Neuman, tion to the guidelines for Neuman Systems Model-based
2002d, pp. 8). nursing research, Louis, Neuman, and Fawcett (2002) de-
The Neuman Systems Model is based on reputable sci- clared, “These guidelines are applicable to Neuman
entific findings from several disciplines. Neuman has con- Systems Model-based nursing research conducted by one
tinuously emphasized the importance of basing nursing or more members of any health care discipline” (p. 113).
diagnoses on knowledge derived from a synthesis of theory Newman, Neuman, and Fawcett (2002) presented “guide-
with the database of client factors (see Table 7–1). The lines for Neuman Systems Model-based education for the
Neuman Systems Model Nursing Process Format is dy- health professions” (p. 193). Shambaugh, Neuman, and
namic in that there is ongoing establishment of nursing Fawcett (2002) explained, “As a systems approach, the
goals, negotiation between nurse and client with regard to Neuman Systems Model is easily adapted by nurse admin-
the goals and intervention strategies, and feedback from istrators for the management of nursing services. The
client outcomes to confirm goals or serve as a basis for Neuman Systems Model also can be used by the adminis-
reformulation of new goals (see Table 7–1). Dynamism trators of the fully array of other health care services …
also is evident in the circularity of the Prevention as These guidelines are applicable to the administration of
Intervention modalities. As Neuman (2002d) noted, services in any health care discipline” (pp. 265–266). And
“Ideally, primary prevention is also considered concomi- Freese, Neuman, and Fawcett (2002) deliberately worded
tant with secondary and tertiary preventions as interven- the Neuman Systems Model guidelines for practice in such
tions [and] tertiary prevention tends to lead back, in a way that they “are applicable to clinical practice in any
circular fashion, toward primary prevention” (pp. 26, 29). health care discipline” (p. 37).
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 182
The guidelines for research and those for practice stipu- collaborative relationships between two or more indi-
late a reciprocal relationship between research and prac- viduals. The investigator also is a study participant.
tice, such that research and practice are linked to “through
the use of research findings to direct practice. In turn, ● Data analysis
problems encountered in … practice give rise to new re- ●
Data analysis techniques associated with both qualita-
search questions” (Freese, Neuman, & Fawcett, 2002, p. 38; tive and quantitative methods are appropriate.
Louis, Newman, & Fawcett, 2002, p. 114). ●Quantitative methods of data analysis should consider
the flexible line of defense as a moderator variable and
the lines of resistance as a mediator variable.
Research Guidelines ● Contributions to knowledge development
The guidelines for research based on Neuman’s Systems
●Neuman Systems Model-based research findings ad-
Model, which were given by Louis, Newman, and Fawcett vance understanding of the influence of prevention in-
(2002, p. 114), based on previous work by Gigliotti (1997) terventions on the relation between stressors and client
and Grant, Kinney, and Davis (1993), are: system stability.
GENERATION OF THEORY
LOGICAL CONGRUENCE
Neuman (2002d) explained that she and her colleague,
The content of the Neuman Systems Model is not com- Audrey Koertvelyessy, “jointly identified the major theory
pletely logically congruent. The model was developed pri- for the [Neuman Systems Model] as being the Theory of
marily within the tradition of the reciprocal interaction Optimal Client System Stability” (p. 30). The only propo-
world view. Despite refinements in content, elements of the sition of that theory articulated to date is, “Stability repre-
reaction world view remain in Neuman’s conceptualization sents health for the system” (Neuman, 2002d, p. 30).
of the Created Environment. To her credit, Neuman has In addition, a rudimentary Theory of Prevention as
attempted to translate the Created Environment in such a Intervention has begun to be generated from the Neuman
way that it reflects the reciprocal interaction world view. Systems Model. Citing a personal communication in the
She explained that although the Created Environment is fall of 1987 with Koertvelyessy, Neuman (2002d) ex-
functionally at the unconscious level, “it exchanges energy plained:
with and encompasses the internal and external environ-
ments, making it congruent with the open system con- [Koertvelyessy] views the concept of prevention—whether
cept … of the Neuman System Model” (Neuman, 1990a, primary, secondary, or tertiary—as prevalent and significant
pp. 129–130). Still, however, the emphasis on the uncon- in the Neuman Systems Model, linked to each of the broad
concepts of the model, that is, client, environment, health,
scious reflects a mechanistic, psychoanalytic orientation to
and nursing. Inasmuch as the prevention strategies are the
the concept. modes instituted to retain, attain, or maintain stability of
The logical problem found in Neuman’s view of the client’s health status, she considers the development of a
Stressors in previous versions of her conceptual model was theory statement linking these concepts as a necessary next
resolved by incorporating Lazarus’ (1981, 1999) view of step (p. 31).
stressors, which is more dynamic than Selye’s (1950) view
(Neuman, 2002d). Moreover, in the most recent version of Alligood (2002) commented, “Both theories are useful in
her model, Neuman (2002d) eliminated any mention of practice because nursing action is linked to a nursing out-
wellness as negentropy and illness as entropy. That change come for the client. These broad theories have numerous
in Neuman’s conceptualization of health was needed be- applications when age, health status, and nature of stres-
cause general system theory, on which Neuman based a sors are specified” (p. 49).
substantial portion of her model, views the living open sys- Neuman (2002d) noted that “several other theories in-
tem as negentropic. Entropy, according to von Bertalanffy herent within the model could be identified and clarified
(1968), is a characteristic only of closed systems. Neuman with the goal of optimizing health for the client” (p. 30).
now focuses on the flow of energy between the client and To date, three other explicit middle-range theories have
the environment and the amount of energy that is available been derived from the Neuman Systems Model. Lamb
to the client system at any time rather than referring to en- (1999) derived the Theory of Optimal Student System
tropic or negentropic conditions. Stability, which addresses baccalaureate nursing students’
In addition, in the most recent version of her model, perceptions of empathy and stress experienced in student-
Neuman (2002d) eliminated any mention of homeostasis, instructor interactions. Her study findings supported the
which was not logically compatible with her view of the hypothesis that the higher the levels of empathy baccalau-
client system as a living open system. Instead, she focuses reate nursing students perceive when interacting with clin-
on stability of the client system in a dynamic manner. ical instructors, the less stressful students perceive the
Neuman (personal communication, October 6, 1993) ex- interaction to be.
plained, “The dynamic equilibrium or state of system sta- Casalenuovo (2002) derived the Theory of Well-Being
bility equates with the degree of system wellness. The from the Neuman Systems Model. The theory addresses
dynamism is inherent in the interactions [between client the relations among stress, well being, and fatigue. Her
system and environment] and results in a particular degree study findings supported the hypothesis that disruption in
of system stability or wellness.” well being in adults living with the stress of diabetes melli-
The Neuman Systems Model clearly represents the sys- tus leads to greater fatigue.
tems category of knowledge. Although the model includes Stepans and Knight (2002) derived the Theory of Infant
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 185
Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke from selected Lowry and Anderson (1993) also presented an explicit
concepts of the Neuman Systems Model. They constructed conceptual-theoretical-structure, in this case for their de-
an explicit conceptual-theoretical-empirical structure that scriptive pilot study of reactions to mechanical ventilation.
linked extrapersonal stressors with environmental tobacco They linked selected concepts of the Neuman Systems
smoke, as measured by personal air monitoring, cigarette Model (extrapersonal stressor; physiological, developmen-
butt collection, and a Smoking Habits Questionnaire and tal, psychological, and spiritual variables; interpersonal fac-
the physiological variable in the flexible line of defense tors) to the study variables (mechanical ventilation, disease
with the epithelium. They linked the physiological variable state or injury, age, anxiety, control, level of hope, and so-
in the normal line of defense with the respiratory system, cial support), and then linked the study variables to appro-
the circulatory system, the sympathoadrenal system, the priate empirical indicators (hospital chart documentation
hepatic system, and the renal system, as measured by uri- of multiple failed weaning attempts, medical diagnosis,
nary levels of nicotine and cotinine; and the physiological chronological age, Anderson-Lowry Ventilation Scale,
variable in the lines of resistance with increased carbon Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales, Hope
monoxide affinity for heme, increased carboxyhemoglo- Scale, and Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire).
bin, decreased oxygen availability, increased respiratory Villarruel and colleagues (2001) added to the discussion
rate, decreased phagocytic functioning, decreased ciliary of nursing middle-range theory development within the
functioning, and increased biogenic amine release, as context of the Neuman Systems Model by describing a
measured by carboxyhemoglobin, blood pressure, and the strategy for linking borrowed theories with the Neuman
incidence of bronchitis, otitis media, and pneumonia. Systems Model. They claimed that linking a theory from
Finally, they linked the physiologic variable in the basic another discipline with a nursing conceptual model and
structure with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), lung testing that middle-range theory within the context of the
function and impairment, asthma, and carcinogenesis, as nursing conceptual model could, if the theory were found
measured by a pulmonary function test and the incidence to be empirically adequate, yield a shared theory. They il-
of cancer, SIDS, and asthma. lustrated their strategy by linking the Neuman Systems
Gigliotti’s (2001) analysis of relational propositions Model with the theory of planned behavior, a middle-
found in Neuman Systems Model-based research reports is range theory developed within the discipline of social psy-
a major contribution to middle-range theory develop- chology (Ajzen, 1985, 1991; Doll & Ajzen, 1992). Simpson
ment. The next step in that work is to formalize the rela- (2000) tested the linkage of the Neuman Systems Model
tional propositions and the concepts contained within and the theory of planned behavior in her study of con-
those propositions as explicit middle-range theories. dom use among Black women. She concluded that the
Hoffman’s (1982) translation of the abstract concepts of theory was empirically adequate and may be considered a
the Neuman Systems Model into more concrete middle- shared theory.
theory concepts is another major contribution to middle- Latham (2002) rejected the strategy of linking theories
range theory development. For example, she proposed that borrowed from other disciplines with nursing conceptual
the internal environment could be represented by strength models. She declared:
or weakness of various body parts or organs. Hoffman’s at-
tempt is a noteworthy first step, but it stops short of iden- Grafting a particular borrowed theory onto a nursing concep-
tifying the methods needed to empirically measure the tual model may be a questionable exercise. … Rather the
emphasis could be placed on creating distinctive cognitive ap-
concepts. Measurement of strength or weakness of body proaches with the parameters of nursing. … investigating
parts, for example, must be described in observable terms borrowed theories in the hope of sharing them may not be the
if the Neuman Systems Model concept of internal environ- most appropriate way forward. Nursing research will not ad-
ment is to be empirically tested. vance knowledge if it continues to hang on the coattails of
Breckenridge (1997, 2002) has contributed to theory other disciplines (p. 264).
generation within the context of the Neuman Systems
Model by presenting an explicit conceptual-theoretical-
structure for her qualitative studies of dialysis modality CREDIBILITY OF THE NURSING MODEL
and prostate cancer treatment decision making. She linked
the Neuman Systems Model emphasis on client percep- Social Utility
tions with open-ended interview schedules, and then
linked the themes identified in the responses of clients re- The social utility of the Neuman Systems Model is thor-
ceiving hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal oughly documented. Four editions of The Neuman Systems
dialysis and those receiving different forms of treatment Model (Neuman, 1982b, 1989c, 1995b; Neuman & Fawcett,
for prostate cancer with the physiological, psychological, 2002), which contain numerous examples of the use of the
sociocultural, developmental and spiritual variables. model in nursing education, practice, administration, and
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 186
research, have been published. Furthermore, a monograph cision making. Unless nurses can clearly articulate to others,
addressing the use of the Neuman Systems Model in nurs- particularly to the client, the why and how for arriving at a
ing education has been published (Lowry, 1998). particular nursing diagnosis, they cannot claim the validity of
Moreover, the number of book chapters and journal arti- their position; nor can they be certain of appropriate subse-
quent interventions (pp. 57–58).
cles dealing with applications of the model continues to
grow. The model is being used by nurses in many different
Neuman Systems Model-based nursing practice is feasible
educational and practice settings throughout the United
for the health promotion and illness care of individuals,
States, and in Puerto Rico, Costa Rica, Brazil, Canada,
families, and communities experiencing many different
Iceland, England, Wales, Holland, Denmark, Finland,
health conditions. Caramanica and Thibodeau (1987)
Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Australia, New Zealand,
identified some of the human and material resources
Thailand, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, among other
needed to implement the model at the health-care organi-
countries. Furthermore, International Neuman Systems
zation level. They cited the need for a formal action plan, a
Model Symposia have been held every 2 or 3 years since
task force made up of nurses from all levels, and a consult-
1986.
ant. Moreover, they maintained that the use of a conceptual
The Neuman Systems Model has gained such wide ac-
model of nursing is especially important when resources
ceptance due, at least in part, to “its flexibility for use with
are limited, commenting that in times of rapid change, a
individuals, families, groups, and communities, and its em-
theory-based model which reflects staff ’s beliefs gives pur-
phasis on prevention as intervention. Furthermore, the so-
pose, direction, and organization to a department of nurs-
ciocultural variable highlights the unique culture, values
ing. It profiles desired nursing practice and facilitates
and beliefs, life patterns, infrastructure, economy, educa-
unified, goal-directed nursing care behaviors so vital in
tion, and health-care delivery system of each country and
times of reduced resources and increased acuity (p. 71).
region of the world. [The model also] provides an ideal
Capers and colleagues (1985) underscored the impor-
framework for international initiatives related to the World
tance of thorough planning for the implementation of the
Health Organization goal of ‘health for all by the year
Neuman Systems Model at the health-care organization
[2010]’” (Neuman et al., 1997, p. 20).
level. Their strategies include the appointment of a plan-
The content of the Neuman Systems Model comprises
ning committee to oversee the entire implementation proj-
many terms, but most are familiar words; therefore, use of
ect, with philosophy, nursing process, and implementation
the model does not require mastery of an extensive new vo-
subcommittees; and the establishment of a timetable for
cabulary. Craig and Beynon (1996) commented that they
implementation and evaluation, with target dates for a
decided not to alter the language of the model during its
pilot implementation project, subsequent adoption of the
implementation in a public health nursing agency, and
model by several units, and evaluation of the project. Other
found that “as staff began to think-through the model, its
strategies are a formal staff education program with colle-
terminology, regarded initially as a limitation, became
giate courses, continuing education, and independent
more meaningful” (p. 255).
study options along with use of nurse preceptors, planning
Extensive study of the concepts of the Neuman Systems
unit conferences, patient-centered unit conferences, and
Model and relevant theories from nursing and adjunctive
nursing grand rounds. Capers and colleagues (1985) cited
disciplines is, however, required before knowledgeable ap-
the importance of including representatives from head
plication in nursing research, education, administration,
nurse, coordinator, and staff nurse levels on the subcom-
and practice. Indeed, as Neuman (1989b) pointed out:
mittees and ascertaining that nurses from all three shifts
It is assumed that the professional nurse operates from a the- are included in all aspects of the project. They also recom-
oretical perspective as client data are gathered. It is most often mended hiring a project facilitator to coordinate the plan-
in the interpretation of client data that theory is either not ning, implementation, and evaluation phases of the project
explicitly used or improperly related to client data, resulting and, whenever possible, seeking consultation from the fac-
in confusing and often faulty diagnoses. It is more common ulty of a nearby college that uses the Neuman Systems
for theory to be related to interventions than to diagnoses. Model. In addition, Capers and colleagues (1985) empha-
Professional nurses should (to be considered truly profes- sized the importance of developing a comprehensive docu-
sional) be able to justify their diagnostic statement based upon mentation package that is congruent with the Neuman
specific theoretical relationships with available client data. [In
Systems Model, including a nursing assessment form, a
addition,] when client data are specifically related to [nursing
and] social sciences theories in developing the nursing diag- nursing care plan format, a nursing flow sheet, nursing
nosis, nurses can present themselves as professional in a progress notes, and a nursing discharge summary.
knowledgeable manner. It is a responsibility to one’s self, pro- Moreover, they noted the importance of adequate funding
fession, clients, colleagues, and other health disciplines to be for the project and encouraged solicitation of funds from
able to present a logical and rational justification for such de- foundations or other extramural sources.
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 187
Moynihan (1990) emphasized the utility of a forced- practice be examined, as well as the utility of practice tools
choice Neuman Systems Model-based assessment tool for and educational tools (see Table 7–2) for research pur-
decreasing the missing data that frequently occur when an poses. The Spiritual Care Scale was initially proposed as a
open-ended format is used and noted the effectiveness of practice tool (Carrigg & Weber, 1997); subsequently, Young
self-directed learning using an educational booklet. and colleagues (2001) and Gigliotti and Fawcett (2002)
Moreover, she highlighted the need for a surveillance or identified its potential for use as a research instrument (see
oversight committee to track progress toward full imple- Table 7–2).
mentation of the model at the health-care organization Published reports of Neuman Systems Model-based
level. studies are listed in Table 7–3. Published abstracts of doc-
Craig and Beynon (1996) used many of the strategies toral dissertations and master’s theses are listed in the
mentioned previously and emphasized the importance of a Doctoral Dissertations and Master’s Theses sections of the
strategic plan. They identified the keys to successful imple- chapter bibliography on the CD-ROM. Another master’s
mentation of the Neuman Systems Model in a health-care thesis, which is not available in Master’s Abstracts
organization given here: International, was completed by Collins (2000). Citations
and abstracts for several unpublished studies conducted by
● Plan the pace of the implementation project to reflect the graduate students and faculty, obtained from a survey of
workplace culture and revise the pace on the basis of reg- schools of nursing in the United States, Canada, and
ular feedback from participants. Europe, are given in Louis and Koertvelyessy (1989); Louis
● Maintain the momentum and sense of inquiry by provided an updated list of largely unpublished studies in
routinely integrating opportunities to sustain ongo- her 1995 book chapter.
ing commitment to the model and to theory-based A review of the research listed in Table 7–3, as well as the
practice. results of an integrative review of the Neuman Systems
● Use both structured and unstructured activities to en- Model-based research published through 1997 (Fawcett &
courage staff to use the model and critically analyze their Giangrande, 2001, 2002) revealed that the Neuman
practice. Systems Model has guided a range of study designs, from
● Rotate or share responsibility for scanning the literature descriptions of diverse Neuman Systems Model phenom-
for new resources and examples of how the Neuman ena to experiments that tested effects of prevention in-
Systems Model is being used in practice, education, ad- terventions on a variety of client system outcomes. Most of
ministration, and research. the Neuman Systems Model-based research is limited to a
● Allocate staff development funds for purchase of re- single study on a single topic, although some programs of
sources and attendance at conferences. research are beginning to emerge. For example,
● Use resources that encourage self-reliance and collegial Breckenridge (2002) described her research program,
peer networks. which focuses on decision making regarding treatment
● Establish a supportive and consultative network of options. In addition, several studies have focused on the
model users within and outside the agency. Neuman Systems Model phenomenon of client/client
● Expand use of the model and develop expertise in system perceptions of stressors, and several other
areas such as program development and planning, studies have focused on prevention interventions (see
administrative practice, and organizational develop- Table 7–3).
ment. Fawcett and Giangrande (2002) urged researchers to
“explicate the linkages between the Neuman Systems
Nursing Research. Neuman Systems Model-based re-
Model concepts and propositions and their study variables
search continues to increase. Research instruments derived
in a clear and concise manner” (p. 135). They went on to
from the Neuman Systems Model are listed in Table 7–2.
say:
Gigliotti and Fawcett’s (2002) review of research reports
published in journals and book chapters yielded 121 dif- It is not sufficient only to mention that the Neuman Systems
ferent research instruments that have been used to measure Model guided the study. Rather, the Neuman Systems Model
middle-range theory concepts representing Neuman’s concepts and propositions selected to guide the study must be
Systems Model concepts. The 24 of those 121 instruments identified and explicitly linked to the study variables and hy-
potheses. Faculty supervising doctoral dissertations and mas-
that were directly derived from the Neuman Systems ter’s theses, journal and book editors, and peer reviewers all
Model are listed in Table 7–2. Gigliotti and Fawcett (2002) are strongly encouraged to require an explicit statement of
recommended that the review of research be extended to such linkages as a condition of acceptance of the manuscript.
doctoral dissertations and master’s theses, so that the in- Furthermore, educators are strongly encouraged to include
struments used in those studies can be identified. They also strategies for explicating the linkages in all nursing research
recommended that the utility of research instruments for courses (p. 135).
(Text continues on page 198)
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 188
TABLE 7–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS, PRACTICE TOOLS, AND EDUCATIONAL TOOLS DERIVED
FROM THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Measurement of Stressors
Smoking Questionnaire (Cantin & Mitchell, 1989; Gigliotti Measures stressors in the form of nurses’ age, gender,
& Fawcett, 2002) education, work area, and setting.
Smoking Habits Questionnaire (Stepans & Fuller, 1999; Measures the smoking habits of mothers as an indicator
Stepans & Knight, 2002) of their infants’ exposure to environmental tobacco
smoke.
Needs Assessment Interview Schedule (Decker & Young, Measures caregivers’ (of home hospice patients) life
1991; Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) situation.
Neuman Stressors Inductive Interviews (Blank, Clark, Measures home care needs and stressors of cancer
Longman, & Atwood, 1989; Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) patients and their caregivers.
Telephone Interview Schedule and Health Interview Measures physical, mental, social, economic, and general
Schedule health of homeless persons and care providers.
(Bowdler & Barrell, 1987; Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002)
Self-Identified Needs Questionnaire (Grant & Bean, 1992; Measures self-identified needs of caregivers of head-
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) injured adults.
Hospital and Home Visits (Johnson, 1983; Gigliotti & Measures stressors and coping patterns.
Fawcett, 2002)
Semi-Structured Interview Guide (Maligalig, 1994; Gigliotti Measures parents’ (of children who had day surgery)
& Fawcett, 2002) perceptions of stressors.
Logs of Problems, Solutions, Actions (Skipwith, 1994; Measures physical and psychological problems of care-
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) givers of elders.
Cancer Survivors Questionnaire (Loescher et al., 1990; Measures physiologic, psychological, and sociocultural
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) changes and problems/concerns of long-term cancer
survivors.
Interview Schedule (Gries & Fernsler, 1988; Gigliotti & Measures perception of the intubation experience of
Fawcett, 2002) mechanically ventilated patients.
Neuman Model Nursing Assessment Guide (Hoch, 1987; Measures the impact of aging and retirement.
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002)
The Perceived Stress Level Tool (Open-Ended Stressor Rank) Measures stressors of wives of alcoholics.
(Montgomery & Craig, 1990; Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002)
Patient Stressor Scale (Wilson, 1987; Gigliotti & Fawcett, Measures patients’ perceptions of surgical intensive care
2002) unit stressors.
Measurement of Lines of Defense and Resistance
and Client System Response
Semi-Structured Interview Schedule (Semple, 1995; Measures stressors and experiences of family members
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) of persons with Huntington’s disease.
Cancer Survivors Questionnaire (Loescher et al., 1990; Measures needs of long-term cancer survivors.
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002)
Measurement of Prevention Interventions
Telephone Counseling Intervention (Skipwith, 1994; Protocol for telephone counseling primary, secondary, and
Gigliotti & Fawcett, 2002) tertiary prevention interventions for caregivers of elders.
*See the Research Instruments, Practice Tools, and Educational Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
188
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 189
TABLE 7–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS, PRACTICE TOOLS, AND EDUCATIONAL TOOLS DERIVED
FROM THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL (continued)
Depression Symptom Assessment Checklist (Clark, Guides assessment and documentation of depression.
1982; Russell, 2002)
Nursing Assessment of the Elderly Form (Gunter, A modification of the Neuman Systems Model Assess-
1982; Russell, 2002) ment and Intervention Tool for use with elderly clients.
Systematic Nursing Assessment Tool for the CAPD Guides assessment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialy-
Client (Breckenridge et al., 1982; Russell, 2002) sis (CAPD) clients.
Grid for Stressor Identification (Johnson et al., 1982; Guides assessment of types and sources of stressors.
Russell, 2002)
Client Perception of Transfer as a Stressor Tool (Dunbar, Measures the client’s perception of readiness for transfer from
1982; Russell, 2002) a surgical intensive care unit.
Interdisciplinary High Risk Assessment Tool of Rehabili- Permits prediction of adult rehabilitation inpatients at risk for
tation Inpatient Falls (Cotten, 1993; Russell, 2002) falling.
Occupational Health Nursing Risk Profile (McGee, 1995; Guides assessment of environmental stressors and stressor
Russell, 2002) impact on workers’ lines of defense and resistance, along
with calculation of relative risk and attributable risk.
Assessment/Intervention Tool (Beitler et al., 1980; Guides assessment, using an interview format, and
Russell, 2002) documents associated interventions.
Assessment/Intervention Tool for Postrenal Transplant Guides assessment of stressors and lists appropriate interven-
Clients (Breckenridge, 1982; Russell, 2002) tions for clients who have had a renal transplant.
Modified Assessment/Intervention Tool for Critical Care A modification of the Neuman Systems Model Assessment
(Dunbar, 1982; Russell, 2002) and Intervention Tool for use in the critical care setting.
Nursing Health Assessment Tool and Nursing Care Plan A modification of the Neuman Systems Model Assessment
(Felix et al., 1995; Russell, 2002) and Intervention Tool for use with elderly residents of
chronic care facilities.
Guide for Data Synthesis to Derive Nursing Diagnosis Permits documentation of client system responses to stres-
(Johnson et al., 1982; Russell, 2002) sors and etiology of each stressor.
Neuman Systems Model Nursing Diagnosis Taxonomy Provides a taxonomy of nursing diagnoses directly derived
(Ziegler, 1982; Russell, 2002) from the Neuman Systems Model; permits documentation
of nursing diagnoses based on the Neuman Systems Model.
Decision Matrix for Nursing Intervention (McGee, 1995; Facilitates planning of nursing interventions.
Russell, 2002)
Guide for Planning Theoretically Derived Nursing Permits documentation of nursing diagnoses; theoretically de-
Practice (Johnson et al., 1982; Russell, 2002) rived plan, goals, and intervention; and expected
outcomes and evaluation.
Care Plan (Fulbrook, 1991; Russell, 2002) Permits documentation of problems, goals, interventions, and
evaluation of interventions.
Nursing Process Tool (Stepans & Knight, 2002) Provides a structure for organizing and analyzing client assess-
ment data in terms of client boundaries, a physiological vari-
able within the boundaries, environmental stressors
affecting the boundaries, the client’s responses and reac-
tions to the stressors affecting the boundaries, and the
client’s responses and reactions to the stressors in terms of
variance from wellness, as well as a structure to record a
nursing diagnosis, nursing goals and outcome criteria, nurs-
ing interventions, and evaluation of outcomes.
190
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 191
(continued)
191
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:06 PM Page 192
TABLE 7–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS, PRACTICE TOOLS, AND EDUCATIONAL TOOLS DERIVED
FROM THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL (continued)
Family Systems Stressor-Strength Inventory: Family Guides assessment of the family’s perceptions of general
Form (Mischke-Berkey & Hanson, 1991; Russell, 2002) and specific family system stressors and family system
strengths.
Family Systems Stressor-Strength Inventory: Clinician Guides assessment of the clinician’s perceptions of general
Form (Mischke-Berkey & Hanson, 1991; Russell, 2002) and specific family system stressors and family system
strengths.
Community As Client System
Community Assessment Guide (Benedict & Sproles, Guides assessment of communities, including intracommu-
1982; Russell, 2002) nity, intercommunity, and extracommunity factors, and
community’s and health planner’s perceptions of stressors.
Community-As-Client Assessment Guide (Beddome, Guides collection of data about geopolitical and aggregate
1989, 1995; Russell, 2002) needs, community resources, and resource utilization pat-
terns from the perspective of clients and caregivers.
Organization As Client System
Neuman Systems-Management Tool for Nursing and Permits the nurse administrator to assess, resolve, prevent,
Organizational Systems (Kelley & Sanders, 1995; and evaluate stressors in any type of administrative set-
Kelley et al., 1989; Neuman, 1995a; Russell, 2002) ting; measures the total system response to an environ-
mental stressor.
A Systems-Based Assessment Tool for Child Day- Guides assessment of stressors in child day-care centers.
Care Centers (Bowman, 1982; Russell, 2002)
EDUCATIONAL TOOLS
Format for Organization of Class Content (Tollett, 1982; Facilitates organization of course content by variable areas
Reed, 2002) and prevention interventions.
Nursing Assessment Guide (Beckman et al., 1998; Reed, A modification of the Neuman Systems Model Assessment
2002) and Intervention Tool; helps students to collect and organ-
ize client system data.
Assessment and Analysis Guideline Tool (McHolm Guides health assessment and formulation of nursing diag-
& Geib, 1998; Reed, 2002) noses; may be used to teach students how to do a
Neuman Systems Model-based assessment and analysis.
Clinical Evaluation Form Three forms used to measure and document faculty and stu-
Summary of Clinical Evaluation Form dent perceptions of the student’s progress toward achiev-
Profile of Clinical Evaluations Form (Strickland-Seng, ing the expected level of performance in 25 behaviors
1995, 1998; Reed, 2002) exhibited in sophomore, junior, and senior year nursing
courses.
Student Clinical Evaluation Tool (Beckman et al., 1998; Permits assessment of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective
Reed, 2002) student outcomes.
Lowry-Jopp Neuman Model Evaluation Instrument Measures students’ and new graduates’ internalization of
(LJNMEI) (Lowry, 1998; Lowry & Jopp, 1989; Lowry Neuman Systems Model concepts and application of the
& Newsome, 1995; Reed, 2002) model to practice.
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 193
TABLE 7–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Psychometric evaluation of the Levels of Baccalaureate program senior nursing students Flannery, 1995
Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale Registered nurses
Neuropsychologists
Videotapes of clients with traumatic brain injury
Comparison of smoking rates Canadian registered nurses, registered psychi- Cantin & Mitchell,
atric nurses, licensed practical nurses, and 1989
the Canadian population as a whole
Use of alcohol, marijuana, over-the-counter Men and a women with traumatic spinal cord Radwanski, 1992
drugs, and prescription drugs injuries and chronic pain
Real and perceived safety risks Community health nurses Gellner et al., 1994
Health needs The homeless population of Richmond, Virginia Bowdler & Barrell,
1987
Changes, problems, concerns, and needs Adult cancer survivors Loescher et al., 1990
related to long-term and late effects of
cancer and cancer therapy
Home care needs Clients with metastatic cancer and their signifi- Blank et al., 1989
cant other caregivers
Perceptions of the mechanical ventilation Men and women hospitalized in a critical care Gries & Fernsler, 1988
experience unit
Caregivers’ needs Informal caregivers of head-injured adults in the Grant & Bean, 1992
home setting
Caregivers’ needs Primary caregivers of terminally ill home- Decker & Young, 1991
hospice clients
Parents’ perceptions of stressors Parents of children undergoing day surgery Maligalig, 1994
Parents’ needs Parents of infants in a neonatal intensive care Bass, 1991
unit
Description of online functional Nursing students who were conducting a fam- Molinari, 2001
communication ily nursing action research project
Dialysis modality decision making Clients with end-stage renal disease Breckenridge, 1997a,
receiving hemodialysis or continuous ambula- 1997b
tory peritoneal dialysis
Program of research about how, why, and by Renal patients and prostate cancer Breckenridge, 2002
whom treatment modalities are chosen patients
Use of coping strategies Adult cancer survivors Cava, 1992
Comparison of use of, satisfaction with, and Younger (40–64 years of age) and older (≥65 Narsavage & Romeo,
need for cancer education and years of age) cancer survivors 2003
support services
Labeling and management of problematical Lay Black adults Capers, 1991
behavior Black and White registered nurses
Feelings about mechanical ventilation, locus Ventilator-dependent adults hospitalized in in- Lowry & Anderson,
of control, and perceptions of hope and tensive care units 1993
social support
Family needs Families with a critically ill member who had Kahn, 1992
and those who did not have a “Do Not
Resuscitate” order
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
193
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 194
TABLE 7–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL (continued)
Spiritual needs Adults who had surgery due to cancer or car- Clark et al., 1991
diac disease
Cultural stressors A 36-year-old southern Black woman who expe- Johnson, 1983
rienced a hypertensive crisis
Healing practices for common childhood Hmong parents residing in California Nuttall & Flores, 1997
illnesses
Caregivers’ needs Family members and caregivers of individuals Semple, 1995
with Huntington’s disease
Evaluation of health education programs Elderly adults residing in a government- Imamura, 2002
assisted apartment complex in Ohio
Description of meaning of health and identifi- Thai elderly clients Pothiban, 2002
cation of stressors and stressor reactions
Difference in ability to formulate nursing di- Baccalaureate program senior nursing Purushotham &
agnoses with and without the use of the students Walker, 1994
Neuman Systems Model
Factors constraining or facilitating physical Registered nurse case managers, nurse admin- Skillen et al., 2001
assessment istrators, and staff development coordinators
working in continuing care facilities in Canada
Comparison of maternal role development Pregnant women who underwent or declined Denson & Komnenich,
to undergo maternal serum screening 2002
Description of problems identified and Secondary analysis of Omaha assessment data- Burns-Vandenberg &
interventions utilized during postpartum bases completed by student nurses for fami- Jones, 1999
home visits lies with a mother no more than 6 months
postpartum
Assessment of patient flow and use of Observations in public health clinics Lowry et al., 2001
human resources
Description of opinions about holistic care Male patients in a detoxification unit Norrish & Josste, 2001
CORRELATIONAL STUDIES
Identification of beliefs that differentiate African-American, Puerto Rican, and non- Hanson, 1999
smokers and nonsmokers Hispanic White teenage females
Relation of demographic characteristics to Motor vehicle crash victims Bueno et al., 1992
safety restraint use and alcohol use
Relation between inclusion of perioperative Registered nurses holding a baccalaureate Roggensack, 1994
nursing theory and clinical experience in a degree
baccalaureate nursing program and selec-
tion of the perioperative setting for clinical
practice following program completion
Relation between job stress and burnout, Registered nurses Marsh et al., 1999
as mediated by spiritual well-being and
hardiness
Relation between month of hospital Charts of individuals who had experienced a Gifford, 1996
admission and diagnosis of cerebrovascu- cerebrovascular accident
lar accident
Relation between psychological responses Clients in a surgical intensive care unit Wilson, 1987
to the surgical intensive care unit and
identification of stressors
194
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 195
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effects of type of audiometry on identification Elementary school children Mannina, 1997
of hearing loss and middle ear disease
Effects of four combinations of antiseptics Hospitalized children with cancer who had a Freiberger et al., 1992
and dressings on skin bacterial growth central venous line
Effects of public health clinic prenatal care and Low socioeconomic status pregnant women Lowry et al., 1997
tertiary multidisciplinary clinic prenatal care on
client satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes
Effect of an experimental structured demonstra- Postpartum women Vijaylakshmi, &
tion about breast-feeding techniques and a Raman, 2002
control intervention on breast-feeding knowl-
edge and skill and nipple pain and trauma
Effects of maternal smoking on infant Infants of mothers do did and did not smoke Stepans & Fuller, 1999
urinary nicotine and cotinine levels,
temperature, pulse, respiratory rate,
blood pressure, and oxygen saturation
(continued)
195
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 196
TABLE 7–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL (continued)
Effects of a cardiovascular health fair Participants in church-based health fairs Wilson, 2000
Effects of radiant heat alone or in combina- Adults who had surgery Heffline, 1991
tion with pharmacological intervention on
postanesthesia shivering
Effect of structured preoperative instruction Patients scheduled for cataract surgery Morrell, 2001
on preoperative and postoperative anxiety
Effects of preparation for bronchial Patients scheduled to undergo bronchial Leophonte et al., 2000
fibroscopy on anxiety fibroscopy
Effects of preoperative information versus a Adult men and women who had abdominal Ziemer, 1983
control intervention on postoperative com- surgery
plications
Effect of a preoperative psychoeducational in- Egyptian men and women with bladder Ali & Khalil, 1989
tervention on postoperative state anxiety cancer
Effects of changes in body position every 2 Clients who had coronary artery bypass Gavigan et al., 1990
hours versus maintenance of the supine graft surgery
position for the first 24 hours on atelecta-
sis, other postoperative complications,
and length of stay in the surgical critical
care unit and in the hospital
Effect of an ocean sounds (white noise) Clients who had coronary artery bypass Williamson, 1992
intervention versus usual environment graft surgery
sounds on night sleep pattern following
transfer from an intensive care unit
Effects of planned surgery for hip replacement Elderly persons who had undergone Bowman, 1997
versus emergency surgery for hip fracture on orthopedic hip surgery
incidence of delirium, sleep satisfaction, pain
perceptions, and psychological concerns
Effect of guided-imagery discharge teaching Adults ≥ 65 years of age hospitalized for Leja, 1989
versus a control intervention on depression surgery
scores 1 week after hospital discharge
Effect of an educational program about Acute care patients with documented Smith et al., 2003
alternatives to physical restraints on use restraint use
of physical restraints
Effects of a partial psychiatric hospitalization Participants in a 5-week partial psychiatric Waddell & Demi, 1993
program on fear of fear, severity of psy- hospitalization program
chological impairment, and general emo-
tional distress
Effect of psychiatric nurse home visits ver- Patients with depression, discharged from a Barker et al., 1999
sus standard care on readmission rates mental health unit
Effect of transitional case management serv- Discharged psychiatric patients Chiverton et al., 1999
ices versus traditional care on depression,
cognitive status, patient and caregiver satis-
faction (case management services only),
and costs related to utilization of services
Effects of a fiber and fluid nursing interven- Residents of a long-term health-care Rodrigues-Fisher et al.,
tion on maintenance of bowel movements facility 1993
and elimination aid withdrawal
196
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 197
197
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 198
TABLE 7–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL
Well Adults
Women seeking information about oral contraceptives Lindell & Olsson, 1991
A 29-year-old primipara making a decision regarding Gigliotti, 1998
method of infant feeding
A man with learning disabilities Spencer, 2002
Older women residing in a home for the aged Gibson, 1996
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations.
202
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 203
(continued)
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 204
TABLE 7–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE NEUMAN SYSTEMS
MODEL (continued)
More specifically, the applicability of the model to all significance of the Neuman Systems Model in nursing ed-
health-care disciplines can foster a common perspective, ucation, nursing administration, and nursing practice
but in doing so, it may fail to point out the distinct contri- exists. The success of the Neuman Systems Model as a
bution of nursing to health care. guide for nursing curricula is documented in several
The Neuman Systems Model is generally congruent reports. For example, Mirenda (1986) commented, “The
with current societal expectations of nursing practice. The nursing faculty at Neumann College have reported their
increased emphasis on primary prevention and health pro- satisfaction with this systems approach to the curriculum
motion seen in the news media and in numerous self-help and to client care, and nursing students have demonstrated
books and articles is increasing consumers’ awareness of both professional growth and personal maturity” (p. 148).
the contributions of all health-care workers, including Furthermore, Dale and Savala (1990), who described a col-
nurses, to the promotion of wellness and prevention of ill- laborative demonstration project between the University of
ness. As more nurses move into ambulatory care settings, Wyoming and the Veterans Administration Medical Center
their roles in primary prevention are becoming a typical in Cheyenne for a baccalaureate nursing program senior
expectation of consumers. Neuman (2002d) maintained practicum, reported that the staff, who acted as preceptors,
that “Primary prevention as intervention with inherent became more aware of documentation, holistic nursing
health promotion is an expanding futuristic, proactive care, and the rationale for nursing practice, and students
concept with which the nursing field must become increas- gained confidence, became responsible and self-motivated,
ingly concerned. It has unlimited potential for major role and became more proficient with time management and
development that could shape the future image of nursing decision making. Cammuso and Wallen (2002) added that
as world health care reform continues to evolve into the the Neuman Systems Model-based baccalaureate and mas-
twenty-first century” (p. 29). ter’s degree education at Fitchburg State University “offers
The Neuman Systems Model’s emphasis on considera- direction for truly collaborative practice that can create
tion of both the client’s and the nurse’s perception of stres- a better world for clients and health professionals alike”
sors and resources and negotiation of nursing goals and (p. 251). And, in her report of the implementation of a
prevention interventions between client and caregiver en- Neuman Systems Model-based at the Dutch Reformed
hances its congruence with those members of society who University in Holland, de Kuiper (2002) concluded,
desire input into nursing. Neuman and colleagues (1997) “Success is evident at the present time—the students are
pointed out that the Neuman Systems Model’s “emphasis happy, and the affiliated institutes are satisfied with the stu-
on both the client’s and the nurse’s perceptions of stressors dents’ level of competence” (pp. 261–262). She also noted
and negotiated outcome goals are consonant with current that since the implementation of the Neuman Systems
and projected health mandates” (p. 20). Later, Neuman Model-based curriculum, the Dutch Reformed University
(2002d) commented, “These characteristics follow current has been “on the top of the list [of the 19 nursing schools
mandates within the health care system for client rights in evaluated by a national Visitation Committee] for three
health care issues” (p. 30). Paradoxically, however, the em- consecutive years” (p. 262).
phasis on client participation may limit the congruence of The success of the Neuman Systems Model as a guide
Neuman Systems Model-based practice with the expecta- for delivery of nursing services also is documented in sev-
tions for nursing held by individuals whose personal or eral reports. For example, Beynon (1995) commented that
culturally derived beliefs lead to the lack of desire to play an the flexibility of the model readily accommodated the
active part in nursing. shifting emphasis in public health nursing in Canada from
an individual-based to a population-based approach, with
greater focus on “groups and aggregates and an acknowl-
Social Significance edged need for different strategies and modes of inter-
vention … [including] community development, social
Neuman and colleagues (1997) noted that “The future of marketing, and healthy public policy” (p. 543). Beynon
the Neuman Systems Model looks bright. The holistic, (1995) went on to report that the Neuman Systems Model
comprehensive, and flexible nature of the [model] can Assessment and Intervention Tool “is used effectively as a
readily accommodate such future changes in healthcare community development tool with focus groups to assist
delivery as increased interdisciplinary collaboration and communities in identifying areas of concern and deter-
home care” (p. 20). Moreover, Neuman (2002b, 2002c) has mining possible solutions” (p. 543). de Munck and Merks
maintained that use of the model may resolve cross- (2002) added that at Emergis Institute for Mental Health
cultural differences and improve health care in the many Care in Holland, the Neuman Systems Model “has served
countries where it has been successfully applied. not only as a model for practice but also guided the design
Considerable anecdotal evidence supporting the social of the implementation and research projects” (p. 314).
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 206
And, Torakis (2002) explained that although the process of psychiatric nursing practice is realized when psychiatric
implementing the Neuman Systems Model at the nurses base their practice on a conceptual model of nurs-
Children’s Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, “has been lengthy ing” (p. 107). They reported that although the nurses’ nar-
and often tiresome … the positive outcome is proof of a ratives indicated their understanding of most components
newly created healthy and stable professional environ- of the Neuman Systems Model, they “struggle with such
ment” (p. 298). She went on to explain: components as the created environment and the process of
reconstitution” (p. 107). Nevertheless, Crawford and Tarko
The use of the Neuman Systems Model in a pediatric hospital
(2002) concluded that “Documentation from the literature
setting has many benefits. The Neuman Systems Model sys-
tems perspective provides an ideal framework for working and the nurses’ narratives further supports the utility of the
closely with families. Therefore, the unique needs of children Neuman Systems Model for theory-based psychiatric nurs-
and their families together can be assessed by nurses; the ill- ing practice in Canada, to enhance and strengthen the
ness episode as well as the hospitalization may only partially mental health system and services to client systems”
represent the stressors experienced by the child and family. (p. 107).
Through the use of the Neuman Systems Model, nursing staff Speaking of the success of the Neuman Systems Model
have greatly improved their ability to recognize and wholisti- as a guide to nursing practice in a changing health-care en-
cally assess and care for the entire client system while greatly vironment, Bueno and Sengin (1995) pointed out:
increasing their professionalism (p. 298).
The dramatically increased use of inpatient technology, com-
Nurses who have described the use of the Neuman Systems pressed length of stay, and increasing demand for family-
Model in practice generally have indicated their own satis- centered services will influence the delivery of nursing care. To
faction with the resultant nursing practice in terms of com- facilitate this evolutionary health care system, a paradigm shift
prehensiveness. Millard (1992), for example, indicated that will be necessary to provide a comprehensive structure that
use of the model facilitated achievement of the primary guides and directs critical care nursing practice. The Neuman
health-care team’s short- and medium-term objectives for Systems Model provides a framework that will work extremely
well (p. 290).
an elderly couple. Knight’s (1990) comment that the out-
comes of a client- and nurse-negotiated plan of care were The empirical evidence related to the social significance of
“found to be largely congruent with the expected out- the Neuman Systems Model is mixed. In the realm of nurs-
comes” (p. 455) suggests that satisfaction with Neuman ing education, Lowry and Newsome (1995) reported that a
Systems Model-based nursing practice extends to the formal evaluation of the graduates of the associate degree
client. program at Cecil Community College revealed that they
Galloway (1993) offered an informative Neuman “internalize the model concepts very well. Graduates use
Systems Model-based self-analysis of her practice with a the model most of the time when fulfilling the roles of care
mentally and physically impaired infant. She stated: provider and teacher” (p. 205). In the realm of nursing ad-
Through analyzing my role as a student nurse in a difficult ministration, Beynon (1995) reported that annual surveys
clinical situation, I learned that I not only adapted well but of the staff of the Middlesex-London Health Unit Public
also experienced personal growth. I did not avoid the reality of Health Nursing Division, in Ontario, Canada, revealed in-
my situation; rather, I worked within the difficulties it pre- creasing acceptance and use of the Neuman Systems Model
sented. Understanding the importance of identifying and ex- “when assessing individuals, families, and groups; when
pressing emotions, I did not deny my positive and negative formulating nursing diagnoses, expected outcomes, and
feelings. By using effective coping mechanisms and introduc- nursing interventions; in recording; and in case consulta-
ing alternative methods as necessary to deal with stressors, I tions with supervisors” (p. 539).
achieved a positive result. Although my flexible line of defense In the realm of nursing research, the findings of some
contracted slightly due to the influence of specific negative
variables, it buffered effectively so that my underlying normal
studies support the effectiveness of preventive interven-
line of defense was not penetrated (p. 36). tions, but the results of other studies do not. Fawcett and
Giangrade (2002) found that just 10 of 62 (16%) studies
Crawford and Tarko (2002) collected and analyzed narra- they included in their integrative review yielded statisti-
tives from 20 Canadian psychiatric nurses, who explained cally significant findings, whereas 7 (11%) of the studies
how their practice changed as a result of using the Neuman yielded nonsignificant findings, and 19 (31%) yielded
Systems Model. They commented, “The Neuman Systems some statistically significant and some statistically non-
Model and its utility with client populations enables psy- significant findings. Statistical significance was not re-
chiatric nurses to provide comprehensive, wholistic psychi- ported for 5 (8%) of the studies, and statistical significance
atric nursing care, working as an integral part of the was not relevant for 21 (34%) descriptive studies. In
interdisciplinary health-care team. The notion of advanced addition, more than one half (n ⫽ 15, 54%) of the 28 ex-
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 207
perimental studies they reviewed yielded some statistically work and professional forums. Furthermore, the establish-
significant and some statistically nonsignificant findings. ment of the Neuman Systems Model Archives at Neumann
Six (21%) of the 28 experimental studies yielded statisti- College in Aston, Pennsylvania, has facilitated access to im-
cally significant findings, 4 (14%) yielded nonsignificant portant documents. And, the establishment of the Neuman
findings, and statistical significance was not reported for 3 Systems Model Institute (Gigliotti, 2003; Smith & Edgil,
(11%) of the experimental studies. Additional research 1995) should enhance the continuation of Neuman
clearly is warranted. Systems Model-based scholarly work for many years to
come.
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE
DISCIPLINE OF NURSING REFERENCES
The Neuman Systems Model reflects nursing’s interest in Alligood, M.R. (2002). Philosophies, models, and theories:
people as holistic systems, whether well or ill, and in envi- Critical thinking structures. In M.R. Alligood & A. Marriner-
ronmental influences on health. The use of terms such as Tomey (Eds.), Nursing theory: Utilization and application (2nd
variances from wellness and primary prevention under- ed., pp. 41–61). St. Louis: Mosby.
scores the emphasis Neuman places on wellness. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned
Furthermore, Neuman’s clear emphasis on clients’ percep- behavior. In J. Kuhland & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control:
tions of stressors and resources, and the central part that From cognitions to behavior (pp.11–39). Heidelberg, Germany:
clients play in setting goals and identifying relevant pre- Springer.
vention interventions, underscore the importance of the Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational
client system in the nursing situation. Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
The primary contribution of the Neuman Systems Amaya, M.A. (2002). The Neuman systems model and clinical
Model has been pragmatic, in that it is an exceptionally practice: An integrative review, 1974–2000. In B. Neuman &
J. Fawcett (Eds.), The Neuman systems model (4th ed., pp.
useful guide for nursing education and nursing practice in 43–60). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
various settings in several countries. The model is readily
Barnum, B.J.S. (1998). Nursing theory: Analysis, application,
translatable to other cultures and, therefore, has the poten- evaluation (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
tial to facilitate resolution of universal nursing concerns
Beckstrand, J. (1980). A critique of several conceptions of practice
(Neuman, 2002c). Despite the large number of studies al- theory in nursing. Research in Nursing and Health, 3, 69–79.
ready conducted, programs of targeted Neuman Systems
Beynon, C.E. (1995). Neuman-based experiences of the
Model-based research are needed to determine the credi- Middlesex-London health unit. In B. Neuman, The Neuman sys-
bility of the model beyond pragmatic considerations. tems model (3rd ed., pp. 537–547). Norwalk, CT: Appleton &
Neuman’s (2002d) words best summarize the overall Lange.
contributions of the Neuman Systems Model. She stated: Breckenridge, D.M. (1997). Decisions regarding dialysis treat-
ment modality: A holistic perspective. Holistic Nursing Practice,
The Neuman Systems Model fits well with the wholistic con-
12(1), 54–61.
cept of optimizing a dynamic yet stable interrelationship of
spirit, mind, and body of the client in a constantly changing Breckenridge, D.M. (2002). Using the Neuman systems model
environment and society (Neuman & Young, 1972). The to guide nursing research in the United States. In B. Neuman
Neuman Systems Model has fulfilled the World Health organ- & J. Fawcett (Eds.), The Neuman systems model (4th ed.,
ization mandate for the year 2000 and reaches far beyond, pp. 176–182). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
seeking unity in wellness states—wellness of spirit, mind, Bueno, M.M., & Sengin, K.K. (1995). The Neuman systems model
body, and environment. The Neuman Systems Model also is in for critical care nursing: A framework for practice. In B. Neuman,
accord with the views of the American Nursing Association, The Neuman systems model (3rd ed., pp. 275–291). Norwalk,
sharing its concern about potential stressors and its emphasis CT: Appleton & Lange.
on primary prevention, as well as world health care reform Cammuso, B.S., & Wallen, A.J. (2002). Using the Neuman systems
concern for preventing illness (p. 32). model to guide nursing education in the United States. In
B. Neuman & J. Fawcett (Eds.), The Neuman systems model (4th
Neuman (2002f) explained that she ensured the continued ed., pp. 244–253). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
evolution of her conceptual model through establishment Capers, C.F., O’Brien, C., Quinn, R., Kelly, R., & Fenerty, A.
of the Neuman Systems Model Trustees Group in 1988. (1985). The Neuman systems model in practice. Planning phase.
Trustees and Group members from the United States and Journal of Nursing Administration, 15(5), 29–39.
several other countries are committed to supporting and Caplan, G. (1964). Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York:
promoting the Neuman Systems Model through scholarly Basic Books.
07Fawcett-07 09/17/2004 2:07 PM Page 208
Chapter 8
Orem’s Self-Care
Framework
223
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 224
(Nursing Development Conference Group, 1973, p. ix). In and/or by “helping him to learn how to do for himself.”
particular, the Self-Care Framework was formulated as a Nursing is also practiced by helping a capable person from the
solution to the problem of “the lack of specification of, and patient’s family or a friend of the patient to learn how “to do
agreement about, the general elements of nursing that give for” the patient. Nursing the patient is thus a practical and a
didactic art (p. 85).
direction to (1) the isolation of problems that are specifi-
cally nursing problems and (2) the organization of knowl-
edge accruing from research in problem areas” (Nursing In her 1959 report, Orem stated that human limitations for
Development Conference Group, 1973, p. 6). self-care associated with health situations give rise to a re-
Ideas that helped to shape the Self-Care Framework quirement for nursing. Orem (2001) regards that state-
were formulated as Orem experienced a period of intensive ment as the articulation of the “proper object of nursing
exposure to nurses and their endeavors from 1949 to 1957, considered as a field of knowledge and a field of practice”
during her tenure as a nursing consultant in the Division of (p. 489). She then identified areas of daily self-care, condi-
Hospital and Institutional Services of the Indiana State tions that limit individuals’ self-care capabilities, and
Board of Health. Her observations led to the idea that methods of assisting those whose self-care abilities are lim-
“nursing involved both a mode of thinking and a mode of ited. Orem (2001) pointed out that her 1959 report repre-
communication” (Orem & Taylor, 1986, p. 41). Orem’s “in- sents the formal beginning of her work of theorizing about
terest in and insights about the domain and boundaries of nursing.
nursing” progressed from a global focus on “preventive The questions were answered more fully as Orem first
health care” to a formal search “to know nursing in a way worked with the Catholic University of America Nursing
that would enlarge and deepen its meaning” and to identify Model Committee and then with the Nursing Develop-
“a proper nursing focus” (Orem, 1991, p. 60; Orem & ment Conference Group. The theoretical concept of nurs-
Taylor, 1986, p. 39). Her search for the meaning of nursing ing system was expressed in 1970. Orem (2001) explained,
was structured by six questions: “All of the conceptual elements [of the Self-Care
Framework] were formalized and validated as static con-
● What do nurses do and what should nurses do as practi- cepts by 1970. Since then, some refinement of expression
tioners of nursing? (Orem & Taylor, 1986, p. 39) and further development of substantive structure and con-
● Why do nurses do what they do? (Orem & Taylor, 1986, tinued validation have occurred, but no change of concep-
p. 39) tual elements has been made” (p. 492).
● What results from what nurses do as practitioners of Indeed, the structure and components of the Self-Care
nursing? (Orem & Taylor, 1986, p. 39) Framework have undergone various interpretations and
● What human conditions and circumstances are associ- refinements over time. In the first edition of her book
ated with persons’ requirements for the service of nurs- Nursing: Concepts of Practice, Orem (1971) referred to di-
ing? (Orem, 2001, p. 15) mensions of self-care and dimensions of nursing. By the
● What brings the human conditions and circumstances second edition, she regarded her work as a “general com-
associated with requirements for nursing outside the do- prehensive theory of nursing,” which was made up of three
main of personal and family responsibilities and into the “theoretical constructs” or theories—self-care deficit, self-
domain of a publicly available service, nursing? (Orem, care, and nursing system (Orem, 1980, p. 26). This struc-
2001, p. 15) ture was maintained in the third edition of Orem’s (1985)
● What is the nature and structure of the service, the prod- book. A slight digression from the structure was noted in
uct that nurses make for persons who have requirements Orem and Taylor’s 1986 book chapter, in which the theory
for nursing? (Orem, 2001, p. 15) of nursing system was referred to as “the general theory of
The answers to those questions began to emerge when nursing, because it explains the product made by nurses in
Orem (1956, 1959) first articulated a definition of nursing, nursing practice situations in relation to two conceptual-
followed by rudimentary elements of the Self-Care ized properties of individuals who need nursing, as these
Framework. Orem’s 1956 report contained the following properties are expressed and related in the theory of self-
definition of nursing. care deficit” (p. 44).
Returning to the earlier structure in the fourth, fifth,
Nursing is an art through which the nurse, the practitioner of
nursing, gives specialized assistance to persons with disabili-
and sixth editions of her book, Orem (1991, 1995, 2001)
ties of such a character that more than ordinary assistance is gave a title to the general theory of nursing and provided a
necessary to meet daily needs for self-care and to intelligently hierarchical structure for the theories of self-care, self-care
participate in the medical care they are receiving from the deficit, and nursing system. She explained, “The named
physician. The art of nursing is practiced by “doing for” the theories in their articulations with one another express the
person with the disability, by “helping him to do for himself ” whole that is self-care deficit nursing theory. The theory of
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 226
or forces of gravity can arise from both the individual other are components of infant and child care, care of
and prevailing environmental conditions (Orem, 1997, the aged, and care of adolescents (Orem, 2001, p. 45).
p. 29). ● Adult persons require assistance from persons in social
● The object view of individual human beings is a view services or health care services whenever they are unable
taken by nurses whenever they provide nursing of in- to obtain needed resources and maintain conditions nec-
fants, young children, or adults unable to control their essary for the preservation of life and promotion of
positions and movement in space and contend with health for themselves or for their dependents; assistance
physical forces in their environment (Orem, 1997, p. 29). may be needed for the accomplishment or the supervi-
● Taking the object view carries with it a requirement for sion of care of self or care of dependents (Orem, 2001,
protective care of persons subject to such forces (Orem, p. 45).
1997, p. 29).
Assumptions About Self-Care Requisites
Premises About Human Beings ● Human beings, by nature, have common needs for the
● Human beings require continuous deliberate inputs to intake of materials (air, water, foods) and for bringing
themselves and their environments in order to remain about and maintaining living conditions that support
alive and function in accord with natural human endow- life processes, the formation and maintenance of struc-
ments (Orem, 2001, p. 140). tural integrity, and the maintenance and promotion of
● Human agency, the power to act deliberately, is exercised functional integrity (Orem, 2001, p. 48).
in the form of care of self and others in identifying ● Human development, from intrauterine life to adult
needs for and in making needed inputs (Orem, 2001, maturation, requires the formation and maintenance
p. 140). of conditions that promote known developmental
● Mature human beings experience privations in the processes at each period of the life cycle (Orem, 2001,
form of limitations for action in care of self and others p. 48).
involving the making of life-sustaining and function- ● Genetic and constitutional defects and deviations from
regulating inputs (Orem, 2001, p. 140). normal structural and functional integrity and well-
● Human agency is exercised in discovering, developing, being bring about requirements for (1) their prevention
and transmitting to others ways and means to identify and (2) regulatory action to control their extension and
needs for and make inputs to self and others (Orem, to control and mitigate their effects (Orem, 2001, p. 48).
2001, p. 140).
● Groups of human beings with structured relationships Assumptions About Deliberate Action
cluster tasks and allocate responsibilities for providing ● The agent, the person performing the actions, has in-
care to group members who experience privations for
coming sensory knowledge and awareness of the reality of
making required deliberate input to self and others
the situation of action. The agent reflects on the meaning
(Orem, 2001, p. 140).
of existent conditions and circumstances for the set or
Presuppositions About Self-Care series of actions in process and for attainment of results
toward purpose achievement. Reflection terminates in a
● Self-care is understood as conduct, as voluntary behavior particular productive situation with the agent’s decision
guided by principles that give direction to action. In about the action that will be taken (Orem, 2001, p. 62).
terms of ego psychology, it is ego-processed behavior ● Accepting the [assumption] that deliberate action in-
(Orem, 2001, p. 45). volves reflection as well as judgment and decision mak-
● Self-care as conduct reflects the essence of the concept ing requires the acceptance of human beings as having
[self-care]: self-care is behavior, it exists in reality situa- intrinsic activity rather than passivity or strict reactivity
tions (Orem, 1991, p. 119). to stimuli (Orem, 2001, p. 65).
● Self-care is understood as learned activity, learned ● Persons must have available the knowledge necessary to
through interpersonal relations and communications distinguish something as good or desirable from bad and
(Orem, 2001, p. 45). undesirable and to reflect on its desirability or undesir-
● Adult persons are viewed as having the right and re- ability. The goal and ways to achieve it must be concep-
sponsibility to care for themselves to maintain their own tualized or imagined (Orem, 2001, p. 65).
rational life and health, and as having such responsibili- ● Reasons for selecting certain actions to attain what has
ties for persons socially dependent on them (Orem, been appraised as good or desirable and afforded the
2001, p. 45). tentative status of a goal should be known (Orem, 2001,
● Giving, assisting with, or supervising the self-care of an- p. 65).
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 228
sion of [several] conditions that may encourage action ten- factors affecting the kind and amount of nursing required.
dencies for self-care” (p. 65). (See Assumptions About Orem (1995, 2001) also acknowledged the contributions of
Deliberate Action in the Philosophical Claims section of Susan Taylor and graduate students at the University of
this chapter.) Missouri, Columbia, School of Nursing, and of Evelyn
Vardiman to the development and refinement of a nursing
history form. And, Orem (1995, 2001) acknowledged the
Influences from Other Scholars faculty of Incarnate Word College in San Antonio, Texas,
who added the notions of dependent-care, dependent-care
Orem has always cited the works of scholars in several ad- agency, and dependent-care agent to the developing Self-
junctive disciplines and has acknowledged the contribu- Care Framework in the 1970s.
tions to her thinking from her educational experiences. She Most recently, Orem (2001) has acknowledged the con-
commented that she read in a “wide range of fields, from tributions of the members of Orem Study Group, includ-
organization and administration to social philosophy, in- ing Gerd Bekel, Mary Denyes, George Evers, Elizabeth
cluding the philosophic notions of points of order in Geden, Marcella Hart, Donna Hartweg, Marjorie Isenberg,
wholes composed of parts and different kinds of wholes; Bonnie Neuman, Kathie Renpenning, and Susan Taylor.
from hygiene and sanitation to cultural anthropology; Dorothea Orem herself also is a member of the Study
from the philosophic notion of human acts to action Group. In addition, Orem (2001) acknowledged the con-
theory as developed in sociology, psychology, and phi- tributions of Barbara E. Banfield, whose philosophic
losophy; and from action theory to a concept of systems inquiry of Orem’s framework “addresses the philosophic
and the constructs of cybernetics” (Orem & Taylor, 1986, foundations for my work, expressed or implicit views of
p. 43). humankind, and the compatibility of [the Self-Care
Orem explicitly acknowledged the influences of Arnold Framework] with various research paradigms” (p. 495).
(1960) and Kotarbinski (1965) on her ideas about deliber- There is no evidence to support contentions that the
ate human action and of Parsons (1937, 1951) on her ideas Self-Care Framework is based on earlier works by
about the context of action. She also acknowledged Frederick and Northam (1938) or Henderson (1955).
Lonergan’s (1958) influence on her thinking. She com- Indeed, although the idea of patient as care agent was put
mented that her ability to express her ideas “required forth by Frederick and Northam, the idea of self-care orig-
self-knowledge toward clarification of my own reality of inated with and was formalized by Orem (Nursing
knowing nursing in a dynamic way. B.J.F. Lonergan’s Development Conference Group, 1979). Moreover, Orem
(1958) work, Insight, was a helpful though difficult guide to explicitly denied that her Self-Care Framework was derived
self-knowledge” (Orem & Taylor, 1986, p. 43). She also has from Henderson’s 1955 definition of nursing (Orem &
cited Black (1962), Harré (1970), Wallace (1983, 1996), and Taylor, 1986), although she recognized the similarities
Weiss (1980), among other scholars. between her 1959 idea of the proper object of nursing
In addition, Orem (1991, 1995, 2001) acknowledged the and Henderson’s 1955 statement about nursing (Orem,
contributions of the members of the Nursing Development 1995, 2001).
Conference Group to the development and refinement of
much of the content of the Self-Care Framework. Over the
years of its existence, the group included Sarah E. Allison, World View
Joan E. Backscheider, Cora S. Balmat, Judy Crews, Mary B.
Collins, M. Lucille Kinlein, Janina B. Lapniewski, Melba Banfield (2001) reported that her philosophic inquiry re-
Anger Malatesta, Sheila M. McCarthy, Joan Nettleton, vealed that Orem’s Self-Care Framework “rests on a coher-
Louise Hartnett Rauckhorst, Helen A. St. Denis, and ent philosophic system. Her views regarding the nature of
Dorothea Orem. The product of their combined effort to reality, the nature of human beings, and nursing as a prac-
formalize a concept of nursing was the publication of two tice science all reflect the philosophic system of moderate
editions of the book, Concept Formalization in Nursing: realism” (p. xvi).
Process and Product (Nursing Development Conference Within the context of the world views considered in this
Group, 1973, 1979). Furthermore, Orem (1997) explicitly book, Orem’s view of the relationship between the person
acknowledged the contributions of Hartnett-Rauckhorst’s and the environment clearly reflects the reciprocal interac-
(1968) thesis work to the development of nursing-specific tion world view. In keeping with the reciprocal interaction
views of human beings. Moreover, Orem (1995, 2001) world view, the Self-Care Framework reflects elements of
explicitly acknowledged her collaboration with Janet L. both persistence and change. The features of the reciprocal
Fitzwater and Evelyn Vardiman in the conduct of a survey interaction world view that are evident in Orem’s Self-Care
of nursing home residents about reasons for admission and Framework are given here:
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 232
fect themselves as responsible human beings who raise cept of PATIENT has two dimensions—Individual and
questions, seek answers, reflect, and come to awareness Multiperson Unit. The concept of THERAPEUTIC SELF-
of the relationship between what they know and what CARE DEMAND has three dimensions—Universal Self-
they do” (Orem, 2001, pp. 187–188). Care Requisites, Developmental Self-Care Requisites,
● Identifiable State: Differences in self-care agency occur and Health Deviation Self-Care Requisites. The concept
throughout life. The child is viewed as being in a stage of of SELF-CARE AGENCY has three dimensions—
dependent-care, and the healthy adult is in a stage of Development, Operability, and Adequacy. The concept of
total self-care and dependent-care agency. Socially de- POWER COMPONENTS has two dimensions—Self-Care
pendent adults, including ill and disabled persons, are in Agency Power Components and Nursing Agency Power
a stage of dependent-care. “Infants and children require Components. The remaining concepts are unidimensional.
care from others because they are in the early stages of The metaparadigm concept of environment is repre-
development physically, psychologically, and psychoso- sented by the Self-Care Framework concept ENVI-
cially. The aged person requires total care or assistance RONMENTAL FEATURES. That concept has two
whenever declining physical and mental abilities limit dimensions—Physical, Chemical, and Biologic Features;
the selection or performance of self-care actions. The ill and Socioeconomic-Cultural Features.
or disabled person requires partial or total care from The metaparadigm concept of health is represented by
others (or assistance in the form of teaching or guid- the Self-Care Framework concepts of HEALTH STATE and
ance) depending on his or her health state and immedi- WELL-BEING. Each of these concepts is unidimensional.
ate or future requirements for self-care. Self-care is an The metaparadigm concept of nursing is represented in
adult’s continuous contribution to his or her own con- the Self-Care Framework by the concept of NURSING
tinued existence, health, and well-being. Care of others is AGENCY. This concept has three dimensions—Social
an adult’s contribution to the health and well-being of System, Interpersonal System, and Professional-
dependent members of the adult’s social group” (Orem, Technologic System.
2001, pp. 43–44).
● Form of Progression of Development: Cycles of change
occur in self-care agency; although the overall direction Nonrelational Propositions
is toward increasing ability for self-care and dependent-
care, loss of some agency does occur at various times The definitions of the concepts of the Self-Care Framework
throughout life, such as when illness or disability im- are given here. These constitutive definitions are the non-
poses limitations on self-care and dependent-care relational propositions of this nursing model.
agency (Orem, 2001).
● Forces that Produce Growth and Development: Self-care PATIENT
and dependent-care agency naturally increase as the per-
son matures, and people have an inherent, overt poten- ● A receiver of care, someone who is under the care of a
tial for development of self-care agency (Orem, 2001). health care professional at this time, in some place or
places (Orem, 2001, p. 70).
The concept of Patient specifies who is the unit of service
CONTENT OF THE NURSING MODEL for nursing practice. The concept encompasses two
dimensions—Individual and Multiperson Unit.
Concepts
● Individual: Refers to the person as an individual or an
The metaparadigm concepts of human beings, environ- individual member of a multiperson unit as the unit of
ment, health, and nursing are reflected in the concepts of service for nursing practice (Taylor & Renpenning,
the Self-Care Framework. Each conceptual model concept 2001).
is classified here according to its metaparadigm forerunner. ● Multiperson Unit: Made up of more than a single per-
The metaparadigm concept of human beings is repre- son and [is] regarded as a whole—as “we” (Taylor &
sented by the Self-Care Framework concepts PATIENT, Renpenning, 2001, p. 397). [Refers to situations with
THERAPEUTIC SELF-CARE DEMAND, SELF-CARE, more than one person as the unit of service for nursing
SELF-CARE AGENT, DEPENDENT-CARE, DEPEN- practice where the] health and well-being of each person
DENT-CARE AGENT, SELF-CARE AGENCY, DEPEN- are subject to the effects of the interactions between and
DENT-CARE AGENCY, BASIC CONDITIONING among the persons in the situation and the system of liv-
FACTORS, POWER COMPONENTS, SELF-CARE ing within the unit (Taylor & Renpenning, 2001, p. 398).
DEFICIT, and DEPENDENT-CARE DEFICIT. The con- Taylor and Renpenning (2001) identified two types of
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 234
1. Provide and maintain an adequacy of materials, such include guilt and guilt feelings, states of guilt, and un-
as water and food, and conditions essential for devel- conscious conflict.
opment of the human body at stages when founda- 8. Promote positive mental health through deliberate ef-
tions for bodily features are laid down and dynamic forts to (a) function within a veridical (reality) frame of
developments occur, and at later stages. reference, (b) function to bring about and maintain
2. Provide and maintain physical, environmental, and order in daily living, (c) function with integrity and self
social conditions that ensure feelings of comfort and awareness, (d) function as a person in community, (e)
safety, the sense of being close to another, and the function with increasing understanding of one’s own
sense of being cared for. humanity (Orem, 2001, pp. 231–232).
3. Provide and maintain conditions that prevent both
sensory deprivation and sensory overload. [Developmental self-care requisites addressing interfer-
4. Provide and maintain conditions that promote and ences with development are those] that adversely affect
sustain affective and cognitional development. human development at the various stages of the life
5. Provide conditions and experiences to facilitate be- cycle. The two goals of those development self-care requi-
ginning and advances in skill development essential sites are:
for life in society, including intellectual, perceptual,
1. Provide conditions and promote behaviors that will
practical, interactional, and social skills.
prevent the occurrence of deleterious effects on devel-
6. Provide conditions and experiences to foster aware-
opment.
ness that one possesses a self and of being a person
2. Provide conditions and experiences to mitigate or over-
within the world of the family and community.
come existent deleterious effects on development. The
7. Regulate the physical, biologic, and social environ-
conditions and problems referred to include (a) educa-
ment to prevent development of states of fear, anger,
tional deprivation, (b) problems of social adaptation,
or anxiety (Orem, 2001, p. 231).
(c) failures of healthy individuation, (d) loss of relatives,
friends, associates, (e) loss of possessions, loss of occu-
[Developmental self-care requisites addressing engage-
pational security, (f) abrupt change of residence to an
ment in self-development] demand the deliberate involve-
unfamiliar environment, (g) status-associated prob-
ment of the self in processes of development (Orem, 2001,
lems, (h) poor health or disability, (i) oppressive living
p. 231). Those self-care requisites are:
conditions, and (j) terminal illness and impending
death (Orem, 2001, p. 232).
1. Seek to understand and form habits of introspection
and reflection to develop insights about self, one’s per- ● Health-Deviation Self-Care Requisites: [Self-care requi-
ception of others, relationships to others, and attitudes sites that] are associated with genetic and constitutional
toward them. defects and human structural and functional deviations
2. Seek to accept feelings and emotions as leading, after re- and with their effects and with medical diagnostic and
flection on them, to insights about self and about rela- treatment measures and their effects (Orem, 2001, p. 48).
tionships to others, to objects, or to life situations. Self-care requisites [that] exist for persons who are ill or
3. Use talents and interests in preparing for and in main- injured, have specific forms of pathology including
taining and supporting engagement in productive work defects and disabilities, and who are under medical
in society. diagnosis and treatment (Orem, 2001, p. 233). One cate-
4. Engage in clarification of goals and values in situations gory of health-deviation self-care requisites arises
that demand personal involvement. directly from disease, injury, disfigurement, and disabil-
5. Act with responsibility in life situations in accord with ity. Another category arises from the medical care
one’s role or roles and with a developed or developing measures that physicians perform or prescribe (Orem,
self-ideal. 2001).
6. Seek to understand the value of positive emotions in de- The six actions that need to be performed in relation
velopment of firm emotional dispositions that give rise to genetic and constitutional defects, human structural
to habits we call virtues. Positive emotions and action and functional deviations and their effects, and medical
impulses include the desire to know; variations of diagnostic and treatment measures prescribed or per-
human love, love of beauty, joy of making and doing, formed by physicians are:
mirth and laughter, religious emotions, [and] happiness. 1. Seeking and securing appropriate medical assistance
7. Seek to understand that negative emotions and action when there is exposure to specific physical or biologic
impulses are experienced when conduct is in discord agents or environmental conditions associated with
with one’s life goals and self-ideal. Negative emotions human pathologic events and states, or when there is
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 236
Biologic environmental features include pets, wild ani- Orem (2001) differentiated Health State from disease,
mals, and infectious organisms or agents along with their which she defined as “an abnormal biologic process with
human and animal hosts (Orem, 2001). characteristic symptoms” (p. 390). Orem (2001) also dif-
● Socioeconomic-Cultural Features: Socioeconomic- ferentiated between illness, which she variously referred to
cultural environmental features focus on the family and as acute, chronic, and disabling, and Health State. In addi-
the community. Socioeconomic-cultural environmental tion, Orem (2001) differentiated between Health State and
family features include composition by roles and ages; sickness or poor health, as well as injury, disorder, or dis-
cultural prescriptions of authority, responsibilities, and ability. The distinctions between Health State and disease,
rights for the family unit; dominant family member and illness, injury, and disability are especially evident in
other members; positions of members within families Orem’s (2001, p. 204) classification of nursing situations by
and their culturally prescribed relationships; time-place health focus. The classification is given here.
localizations of family members; family dynamics; famil-
ial, contractual, and/or coercive nature of family rela- Group 1: Life Cycle
tionships; the system of family living; resources of the
individual members and of the family unit; cultural pre-
● The health focus is oriented to events and circumstances
scriptions for securing, managing, and using resources; in relation to the life cycle that give rise to anatomic,
and cultural elements specifying patterns of self-care and physiologic, or psychologic changes associated with peri-
dependent-care and selection and use of care measures ods of growth and development, maturity, parenthood,
(Orem, 2001). Socioeconomic-cultural environmental aging, and old age.
community features include the population and its com-
● General health state is within the range of excellent to
position by family units, by other functional, collaborat- good.
ing social units, and by governmental organs; the
availability of resources for community members’ daily Group 2: Recovery
living and for special needs of the community as a whole; ● The health focus is oriented to the process of recovery
and the kind, localization, availability, openness to indi- from a specific disease … or injury … or to overcoming
viduals and families, accessibility, cultural practices and or compensating for the effects of the disease or injury.
prescriptions about use, cost, and methods of financing ● Permanent dysfunction, disfigurement, or disability
of health services (Orem, 2001). may or may not be present or expected.
● General health state is within the range of excellent to
Orem (2001) pointed out that Environmental Features good.
“can be isolated, identified, and described, and [that]
some environmental features are subject to regulation Group 3: Illness of Undetermined Origin
or control” (p. 79). She also noted that the two dimen-
sions of the concept of Environmental Features—Physical, ● The health focus is oriented to illness or disorder of unde-
Chemical, and Biologic Features and Socioeconomic- termined origin, with concern for the degree of illness,
Cultural Features—“may be interactive” (p. 79). specific effects of the disorder, and effects of specific di-
Orem (2001) underscored the potential contribution of agnostic or therapeutic measures used.
Environmental Features to the person’s development. She ● General health state is within the range of good to fair.
explained, “It is the total environment, not any single part
of it, that makes it developmental” (p. 58). Group 4: Genetic and Developmental Defects
and Biologic Immaturity
HEALTH STATE ● The health focus is oriented to defects of a genetic or de-
velopmental nature, or the biological state of the prema-
● A state of the person that is characterized by soundness ture infant, or the low-birth-weight infant.
or wholeness of developed human structures and of ● The state of general health may be affected by the di-
bodily and mental functioning (Orem, 2001, p. 186). rect or indirect effects of the defect or the biological
● A person’s manifestation to self and others of features state.
of his or her existence including the circumstances
under which he or she exists (Orem & Vardiman, 1995,
Group 5: Cure or Regulation
p. 165).
● Health state is made up of inseparable anatomic, physi- ● The health focus is oriented to regulation through active
cal, physiological, psychological, interpersonal, and so- treatment of a disease or disorder or injury of determined
cial aspects (Orem, 2001). origin, with concern for the degree of illness; the specific
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 240
4. Accepts and respects himself or herself and others as their cultural practices, and communication prob-
developing persons, recognizing that each person has lems resulting from genetic defects and pathological
characteristic ways of conducting himself or herself in processes) sufficient for effecting and maintaining
interpersonal situations. relationships essential in the production of wholly
5. Is courteous and considerate of others. compensatory, partly compensatory, and supportive-
6. Is responsible in the provision of nursing to individu- educative nursing systems for patients.
als or multiperson units within defined types of nurs- 8. Accepts persons who are under nursing care and
ing situations. works with them in accordance with their roles in
7. Understands nursing with its domain and boundaries self-care and dependent-care.
as one of the health services provided for by society. 9. Identifies broader social and legal aspects of interper-
8. Understands the nature of contractual and profes- sonal situations … and is able to represent these in a
sional relationships and is able to perform the opera- prudent way to patients or their significant others
tions of nursing practice within limits set by these (Orem, 2001, pp. 291–292).
relationships (Orem, 2001, p. 291).
● The Professional-Technological System: The system of
● The Interpersonal System: Constituted from series and action productive of nursing (Orem, 1997, p. 28). An ac-
sequences of interactions and communications among tion system made up of one type of desirable nurse char-
legitimate parties necessary for the design and produc- acteristics (Orem, 1995). Desirable nurse characteristics
tion of nursing in time-place frames of reference (Orem, constituting the professional-technological system of
1997, p. 28). An action system made up of one type of nursing are:
desirable nurse characteristics (Orem, 1995). Desirable 1. Has mastery of valid and reliable techniques for
nurse characteristics constituting the interpersonal sys- nursing diagnosis and prescription; for meeting the
tem of nursing are: therapeutic self-care demands of individuals with
1. Is well informed about the psychosocial dimensions various mixes of universal, developmental, and
of human functioning. health-deviation self-care requisites; and for regulat-
2. Has knowledge of factors that facilitate or impede ing the exercise of self-care agency of individuals, its
interpersonal functioning. protection, and its development.
3. Has knowledge of conditions necessary for the devel- 2. Is experienced or becoming experienced in using
opment of helping relationships. valid and reliable techniques in performing the tech-
4. Is interested in identifying and resolving human nologic operations of nursing practice in defined
problems that interfere with satisfying relationships types and subtypes of nursing situations and in pro-
with others and produce emotional pain or suffering. ducing nursing systems within these situations.
5. Has a repertoire of interpersonal skills that can be ad- 3. Is able to integrate the use of methods of helping with
justed to infants, children, and adults, including those the technologic operations toward the production
who are ill, disabled, or debilitated, and that enable and management of effective nursing systems for
the nurse to: (a) be an active participant in relation- individuals and multiperson units.
ships with patients and their significant others, (b) be 4. Is alert, at ease, and confident in nursing situations;
a participant observer in interpersonal relationships is relaxed but able to mobilize for immediate and ef-
with patients and their significant others with the goal fective action to protect patients’ well-being and to
of identifying personality characteristics … signifi- regulate the variables of nursing systems and the rela-
cant in the relationship, … (c) reduce patients’ emo- tionships among them.
tional pain and physical discomfort and pain by 5. Seeks nursing practice experience and supervision as
effecting conditions that increase patients’ comfort well as specialized education and training to extend or
and satisfaction within the nurse-patient relationship, deepen his or her area of nursing practice with respect
[and] (d) increase awareness of the interpersonal sit- to nursing populations.
uation in terms of the desirable or undesirable factors 6. Works toward the formulation and testing of methods
that affect meeting patients’ therapeutic self-care de- and techniques for technologic operations of nursing
mands and regulating their self-care agency. practice within his or her nursing specialization.
6. Is able to relate to patients and their significant others 7. Strives to increase ability to apprehend those factors
in a manner that conforms to the conventional form in nursing situations that condition the values of the
for human interactions. patient variables, self-care agency, and therapeutic
7. Has a repertoire of communication skills (adjusted self-care demand and thus set up requirements that
to the age and developmental state of individuals, nursing agency be of a particular value.
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 242
tients … for self-care (or dependent-care)” (p. 289). The associated, self-care or dependent-care deficits” (Orem,
three components of this goal are: 2001, p. 491).
1. Helping the patient accomplish therapeutic self-care Orem lodged the nursing process within the
2. Helping the patient move toward responsible self-care, Professional-Technological System dimension of the con-
which may take the form of (a) steadily increasing cept of Nursing Agency. Orem (2001) explained that she
independence in self-care actions, (b) adjustment to uses the term process “in the sense of a continuous and reg-
interruptions in self-care capabilities, or (c) steadily de- ular sequence of goal-achieving, deliberately performed
clining self-care capacities actions of particular kinds carried out in a definite man-
3. Helping members of the patient’s family or other per- ner” (p. 309). Orem’s version of the nursing process, which
sons who attend the patient become competent in is the PRACTICE METHODOLOGY for the Self-Care
providing and managing the patient’s care using appro- Framework, is outlined in Table 8–1.
priate nursing supervision and consultation (Orem, Orem (2001) noted that nursing practice may occur at
1985). three levels of prevention: primary, secondary, and tertiary.
Universal self-care and developmental self-care, when
The Goal of Nursing Agency requires consideration of who therapeutic, constitute the primary level of prevention.
are legitimate patients of nurses and, by extension, who are Nursing care at this level includes assisting the patient to
legitimate nurses. Legitimate patients of nurses “are per- learn self-care practices that “promote and maintain health
sons whose self-care agency or dependent-care agency, be- and development and [that] prevent specific disease”
cause of their own or their dependents’ health states or (p. 201). Health-deviation self-care, when therapeutic, con-
health care requirements, is not adequate or will become stitutes the secondary or tertiary level of prevention. Nurs-
inadequate for knowing or meeting their own or their de- ing care at these levels focuses on helping the patient learn
pendents’ therapeutic self-care demands” (Orem, 2001, self-care practices that “regulate and prevent adverse effects
p. 490). Legitimate nurses “are persons who have the sets of the disease, prevent complicating diseases, prevent pro-
of qualities symbolized by the term nursing agency to the longed disability, or adapt or adjust functioning to over-
degree that they have the capability and the willingness come or compensate for the adverse effects of permanent
to exercise it in knowing and meeting the existent and or prolonged disfigurement or dysfunction” (p. 202).
emerging nursing requirements of persons with health- (Text continues on page 249)
TABLE 8–1
OREM’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
OF NURSING PRACTICE
DIAGNOSTIC OPERATIONS
The nurse identifies the unit of service for nursing practice as an individual, an individual member of a multiperson unit,
or a multiperson unit.
The nurse determines why the person needs nursing in collaboration with the patient or family and with continued re-
view of decisions by the patient or family.
The nurse collects demographic data about the patient and information about the nature and boundaries of the patient’s
health-care situation and nursing’s jurisdiction within those boundaries.
(continued)
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 244
TABLE 8–1
OREM’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
OF NURSING PRACTICE (continued)
DIAGNOSTIC OPERATIONS
The nurse calculates the person’s present and future therapeutic self-care demand by:
• Identifying, formulating, and expressing each universal self-care requisite, developmental self-care requisite,
and health-deviation self-care requisite in its relation to some aspect(s) of human functioning and
development, including particularizing the values and frequency with which each requisite should
be met.
• Identifying the presence of human and environmental conditions that are enabling for meeting each
requisite, and those that are not enabling and constitute obstacles to or interference with meeting each
requisite.
• Determining the methods or technologies that are known or hypothesized to have validity and
reliability in meeting each requisite under prevailing human and environmental conditions and
circumstances.
• Specifying the sets and sequences of actions to be performed when a particular method or technology or some
combination is selected for use as the means through which each particularized requisite will be met under
existent and emerging conditions and circumstances.
The nurse determines the person’s self-care agency or dependent-care agency by:
• Identifying the person’s self-care or dependent-care abilities by ascertaining the degree of development, the
operability, and the adequacy of his or her ability to:
• Attend to specific things and exclude other things.
• Understand the characteristics and meaning of the characteristics of specific things.
• Apprehend the need to change or regulate the things observed.
• Acquire knowledge of appropriate courses of action for regulation.
• Decide what to do.
• Act to achieve change or regulation.
The nurse identifies the influence of power components on the exercise and operability of self-care or dependent-care
agency by:
• Identifying the person’s ability to maintain attention and exercise requisite vigilance with respect to self as
self-care or dependent-care agent and internal and external conditions and factors significant for self-care or
dependent-care.
• Identifying the person’s use of available physical energy for the initiation and continuation of self-care or
dependent-care operations.
• Identifying the person’s ability to control body position and parts in the execution of the movements required
for the initiation and completion of self-care or dependent-care operations.
• Identifying the person’s ability to reason within a self-care or dependent-care frame of reference.
• Identifying the person’s motivation for self-care or dependent-care.
• Identifying the person’s ability to make decisions about self-care or dependent-care and to operationalize those
decisions.
• Identifying the person’s ability to acquire technical knowledge about self-care or dependent-care from authoritative
sources, to retain it, and to operationalize it.
• Identifying the person’s repertoire of cognitive, perceptual, manipulative, communication, and interpersonal skills
for self-care or dependent-care operations.
• Identifying the person’s ability to order discrete self-care or dependent-care actions systems into
relationships with prior and subsequent actions toward the achievement of goals of self-care or
dependent- care.
• Identifying the person’s ability to consistently perform self-care or dependent-care operations, integrating them
with relevant aspects of personal, family, and community living.
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 245
PRESCRIPTIVE OPERATIONS
The nurse specifies the means to be used to meet the therapeutic self-care demand, in collaboration with the
patient or family.
The nurse specifies all care measures needed to meet the entire therapeutic self-care demand, in collaboration
with the patient or family.
The nurse specifies the roles to be played by the nurse(s), patient, and dependent-care agent(s) in meeting the
therapeutic self-care demand, in collaboration with the patient or family.
The nurse specifies the roles to be played by the nurse(s), patient, and dependent-care agent(s) in regulating the
patient’s exercise or development of self-care agency or dependent-care agency, in collaboration with the patient
or family.
(continued)
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 246
TABLE 8–1
OREM’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
OF NURSING PRACTICE (continued)
A single patient may require one or a sequential combination of the three types of nursing systems. All three nursing
systems are most appropriately used with individuals.
Multiperson units usually require combinations of the partly compensatory and supportive-educative nursing systems,
although it is possible that such multiperson units as families or residence groups would need wholly compensatory
nursing systems under some circumstances.
• Wholly compensatory nursing system:
The nurse accomplishes the patient’s therapeutic self-care, compensates for the patient’s inability to engage in self-
care, and supports and protects the patient.
The nurse selects wholly compensatory nursing system subtype 1 for persons unable to engage in any form of delib-
erate action, including:
• Persons who are unable to control their position and movement in space.
• Persons who are unresponsive to stimuli or responsive to internal and external stimuli only through hearing and feel-
ing.
• Persons who are unable to monitor the environment and convey information to others because of loss of motor abil-
ity.
• The nurse selects this method of helping:
• Acting for or doing for the patient.
The nurse selects wholly compensatory nursing system subtype 2 for persons who are aware and who may be able to
make observations, judgments, and decisions about self-care and other matters but cannot or should not perform ac-
tions requiring ambulation and manipulative movements, including:
• Persons who are aware of themselves and their immediate environment and able to communicate with others nor-
mally or in a restricted manner.
• Persons who are unable to move about and perform manipulative movements because of pathologic
processes or the effects or results of injury, immobilizing measures of medical treatment, or extreme
weakness or debility.
• Persons who are under medical orders to restrict movement.
• The nurse selects one or more of these methods of helping:
• Providing a developmental environment.
• Acting for or doing for the patient.
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 247
(continued)
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 248
TABLE 8–1
OREM’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: PROFESSIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
OF NURSING PRACTICE (continued)
evaluation and control, and case management” (p. 289); Orem’s (2001) characterization of nursing as having a
“diagnostic operations” (p. 308), “prescriptive operations” moral component: “Nursing practice has not only techno-
(p. 308), “treatment or regulatory operations” (p. 308), logic aspects but also moral aspects, because nursing deci-
and “case management operations” (p. 312); and “nursing sions affect the lives, health, and welfare of human beings.
diagnosis” (p. 312), “prescriptive operations” (p. 313), “reg- Nurses must ask is it right for the patient as well as if it will
ulation or treatment operations” (p. 318), “designs for work” (p. 95). She went on to say, “Closely allied to nurses’
performance of regulatory operations” (p. 321), “planning capabilities to produce nursing for others are the good
for regulatory operations” (p. 321), “production of regula- habits (or virtues) of art and prudence. … The proper
tory care” (p. 322), and “control operations” (p. 324). The interest of prudence is the morality, the goodness of indi-
Practice Methodology (see Table 8–1) presented in this vidual human actions in concrete situations of daily living.
chapter finally resulted from a synthesis of Orem’s discus- Prudence is right reason about things to be done. …
sions about the nursing process in the 1985, 1991, 1995, Prudence is a virtue of the mind and of the character of
and 2001 editions of her book. individuals” (p. 293).
The Self-Care Framework is based on philosophical, The criterion for the linkage of concepts requires that
theoretical, and scientific knowledge about human behav- the propositions of the conceptual model link all four
ior, with emphasis placed on theories of deliberate action. metaparadigm concepts. This criterion was met only by
Orem (2001) noted that nursing agency is based in large recourse to a quotation found in the second edition of
part on knowledge of nursing, sciences, arts, and humani- Orem’s (1980) book.
ties, and that the design of a nursing system is based on the The Self-Care Framework is sufficiently comprehensive
nurse’s factual knowledge about the patient, accumulated concerning breadth of content. The framework has been
information about various therapeutic self-care demands used in a wide variety of nursing situations and with indi-
and methods of helping, and knowledge about self-care as viduals and multiperson units with many different states
deliberate action. of health. For Orem (1991; Taylor & Renpenning, 1995,
The dynamic nature of the nursing process is evident in 2001), multiperson units include families, residence
the following quotations from Orem’s (2001) book: groups, work groups, self-help groups, prenatal or postna-
tal groups, weight control groups, and groups of patients in
Case management is concerned with the integration of tech-
nologic operations to form a dynamic system of health service nursing clinics, as well as communities. Taylor and
that is effective and judicious in the use of resources and that Renpenning’s (1995, 2001) chapters in the fifth and sixth
minimizes both psychological and physical stress for persons editions of Orem’s book brought some clarification to the
seeking and receiving the health service (p. 309). Individual and Multiperson Unit dimensions of the con-
cept of Patient.
Development of designs for the production of regulatory The comprehensiveness of the breadth of the Self-Care
nursing care [is done] with attention to continuing nursing
diagnosis and prescription (p. 295).
Framework is further supported by the direction it pro-
vides for nursing research, education, administration, and
Nursing diagnosis precedes nursing prescription but the practice. Although guidelines for each area are not explicit
nursing diagnostic operation is not necessarily complete be- in Orem’s publications, many can be extracted from the
fore prescriptions are made and regulatory care provided content of the Self-Care Framework and various publica-
(p. 309). tions about its use. The developing guidelines for research,
Nurses [should] avoid conceptualizing the provision of nursing education, administration of nursing services, and
nursing as a linear process moving from a complete, defini- nursing practice are listed below.
tive nursing diagnosis to nursing regulation and evaluation
(p. 310).
Control operations … can be performed concurrently with Nursing Research Guidelines
regulatory or treatment operations of nursing practice
(p. 325). The guidelines for nursing research based on the Self-
Care Framework, which were constructed from Banfield
Orem’s inclusion of the patient’s perspective of health sta- (1998), Geden (1985, p. 265), Orem (2001), and Smith
tus, her emphasis on determining the extent of the patient’s (1979), are:
willingness to collaborate with nurses and participate in
nursing, and her emphasis on obtaining sufficient infor- ● Purpose of the research
mation for an accurate diagnosis all reflect her concern ● The purpose of Self-Care Framework-based nursing
with ethical standards. This concern is underscored by research is to develop knowledge for the practical
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 252
or theoretically practical and practically practical content that will help nursing practitioners to
components. maintain currency with scientific and technologi-
● Professional nursing component course content en- cal developments, guidelines for nursing practice,
compasses components of self-care, dependent-care, changes in health service needs of populations,
self-care agency, dependent-care agency, self-care and relevant environmental and social conditions
deficits, dependent-care deficits; the social system, in- associated with needs for changes in nursing
terpersonal system, and professional-technological practice.
system dimensions of nursing agency; and elements of
the wholly compensatory, partly compensatory, and
● Settings for nursing education
supportive-educative nursing systems, including
● Professional nursing education occurs in senior col-
methods of helping. leges and universities.
● Nursing practicum courses provide experiential ● Characteristics of students
knowledge of social and interpersonal situations; op- ●Students interested in professional nursing education
portunities for development of the social and interper- have to meet requirements for admission to senior col-
sonal skills needed to work with adults and children leges or universities.
individually and in multiperson units; and opportuni- ●Nursing students must have the ability to achieve mas-
ties for the development of personal knowledge arising tery “of a general comprehensive [conceptual model]
from direct insights into self and others in personal re- of nursing [so that they will] become able to maintain
lationships. awareness of the relationship between what they
● Other nursing courses address nursing as a field of know and what they do as nursing practitioners”
knowledge and practice, including nursing’s domain (Orem, 1991, p. 339). Nursing students also must have
and boundaries as defined by the proper object of the ability to develop themselves as persons who can
nursing, nursing’s social field, the profession and occu- (1) establish contacts, negotiate agreements, and
pation of nursing, nursing jurisprudence, nursing maintain contacts with persons who need nursing and
ethics, and nursing economics. those who seek it for them; (2) interact and communi-
● Nursing courses are not to be based on content prima- cate with persons under nursing and their significant
rily from the biologic, behavioral, and medical sci- others, with other nurses and caregivers under ranges
ences. of conditions and circumstances that facilitate or hin-
● The curriculum also requires a preprofessional com- der interactions and communication; (3) direct inter-
ponent, with courses addressing the arts and humani- actions and communications toward the development
ties, the history of health care and nursing in western of interpersonal and functional unities; (4) perform
and eastern civilizations, languages and cultural ele- with increasing developing skills professional-techno-
ments of specific cultural groups, foundational and logical operations of nursing, including observation,
basic sciences (such as human physiology, environ- reasoning, judgment and decision making, and pro-
mental physiology, and pathology), and applied med- duction of practical results in interpersonal and group
ical and public health sciences. situations; (5) seek nursing consultation as needed
● Programs of professional nursing education follow a with respect to the professional-technological opera-
sequence of a preprofessional component, a profes- tions of nursing; and (6) maintain a dynamic sense of
sional component, and a continuing education com- duty in all nursing practice situations.
ponent.
– Undergraduate nursing education focuses on the ● Teaching-learning strategies
operations of information giving and acquiring, re- ● Teaching-learning strategies are predicated on the as-
flection on the information received, making some sumption that the faculty understand the Self-Care
judgments, and problem solving. Framework and have the required skills in its use.
– At the master’s level, emphasis is placed on acquir- ● Students are presented initially with an overview of the
ing specialized areas of information, increasing abil- structure of the framework. Then, as students progress
ities to reflect and make judgments, and developing through the educational program, specific linkages can
some facility with the operations of investigation be made between the framework and new content. By
and meaning. the completion of the program, the student should
– At the doctoral level, emphasis is placed on the ad- have seen the overall structure of the Self-Care
vanced understanding of the operations of investi- Framework, examined its elements in detail, related
gation and meaning. the elements back to the overall framework, and ap-
– Continuing professional education focuses on plied the framework in practice settings.
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 254
from nursing; (2) determining if and how patients can LOGICAL CONGRUENCE
be helped through nursing; (3) responding to patients’
requests, desires, and needs for nurse contacts and as- The Self-Care Framework is logically congruent. The con-
sistance; (4) prescribing, providing, and regulating di- tent of the Self-Care Framework flows directly from
rect help to patients (and their significant others) in Orem’s philosophical claims. Just one world view—recip-
the form of nursing; and (5) coordinating and inte- rocal interaction—is evident. Smith (1987) claimed that
grating nursing with the patient’s daily living, other Orem’s work “fits with the totality paradigm” (p. 97). To
health care needed or being received, and social and the extent that the totality paradigm reflects the reaction
educational services needed or being received (Orem, world view or even a bridge between the reaction and re-
1991, p. 340). ciprocal interaction world views, there is no evidence of the
reaction world view in the content of Orem’s Self-Care
● Practice problems of interest Framework.
● Practice problems of interest are the individuals’ self- Furthermore, although the Self-Care Framework has
care deficits and dependent-care deficits. Those prob- been classified as a systems model (Riehl & Roy, 1980) and
lems occur when the health focus is people across an interaction model (Riehl-Sisca, 1989), its classification
the life cycle, people in recovery, people with illnesses as a developmental model, with no evidence of the charac-
of undetermined origin, people with genetic and de- teristics of other categories of knowledge, is supported.
velopmental defects or biologic immaturity, people
experiencing cure or regulation of disease, people ex-
periencing stabilization of integrated functioning, GENERATION OF THEORY
people whose quality of life is irreversibly affected, and
Orem views the Theory of Self-Care, the Theory of Self-
people who have a terminal illness.
Care Deficit, and the Theory of Nursing System as the
● Settings for nursing practice constituent elements of the more general Self-Care Deficit
● Nursing practice occurs in diverse settings, including Nursing Theory, that is, what is referred to in this chapter
people’s homes, neighborhoods, group residential fa- as the Self-Care Framework. Accordingly, an attempt was
cilities, meeting places of various community-based made to incorporate the three theories into the analysis of
groups, ambulatory clinics, rehabilitation and nursing the framework. That attempt yielded a cumbersome and
home facilities, and tertiary medical centers. confusing structure. Consequently, the decision was made
to treat the broad concepts of Patient, Therapeutic Self-
● Characteristics of legitimate participants in nursing Care Demand, Self-Care, Dependent-Care, Self-Care
practice Agency, Self-Care Agent, Dependent-Care Agency,
● An adult requires nursing when he or she does not Dependent-Care Agent, Basic Conditioning Factors,
have the ability to continuously maintain the amount Power Component, Self-Care Deficit, Dependent-Care
and quality of self-care that is therapeutic in sustaining Deficit, Environmental Features, Health State, Well-Being,
life and health, in recovering from disease or injury, or and Nursing Agency as the concepts of the Self-Care
in coping with their effects. A child requires nursing Framework, and to discuss the central ideas and proposi-
when his or her parent or guardian cannot continu- tions of the three theories here. Continued refinement of
ously maintain the amount and quality of care that is Orem’s work is required to clarify its structure with regard
therapeutic. to the conceptual and theoretical elements.
● Nursing process An analysis of the Theory of Self-Care, the Theory of
●The nursing process for the Self-Care Framework is Self-Care Deficit, and the Theory of Nursing System re-
Orem’s Professional-Technological Operations of vealed that each one may be regarded as a grand theory.
Nursing Practice. The components of the process are The decision to classify the three theories as grand theories
case management operations, diagnostic operations, was based on Orem’s (2001) comments that the proposi-
prescriptive operations, regulatory operations, and tions of each theory are not logically related but represent
control operations (see Table 8–1). suggested guides for the formulation of hypotheses and
the further development of that theory, as well as on an
● Contributions of nursing practice to participants’ well- analysis of several studies that were guided by Orem’s
being work. For example, Moore and her colleagues have
● Self-Care Framework-based nursing practice con- conducted a series of studies that were guided explicitly by
tributes to the well-being of nursing participants by the Theory of Self-Care Deficit and yielded successive re-
regulating self-care agency or dependent-care agency finements of a middle-range theory of the relation between
and meeting the therapeutic self-care demand. concepts representing the basic conditioning factors and
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 256
dependent-care to the qualitative and quantitative self- ● Legitimate recipients of nursing are persons, as individ-
care or dependent-care demand can be determined uals or members of groups, with powers of self-care
when the value of each is known (Orem, 2001, p. 147). agency or dependent-care agency that are rendered
● The relationship between care abilities and care demand totally or partially inadequate by their own or their de-
can be defined in terms of equal to, less than, and more pendents’ states of health or by the nature of health care
than (Orem, 2001, p. 147). requirements (Orem, 2001, p. 148).
● Nursing is a legitimate service when (1) care abilities ● In the design and production of the nursing system,
are less than those required for meeting a known self- nurses seek and confirm information needed to make
care demand (a deficit relationship); and (2) self-care or judgments about the components (some or all) of ther-
dependent-care abilities exceed or are equal to those apeutic self-care demands and powers of self-care agency
required for meeting the current self-care demand, but a or dependent-care agency of persons under their care
future deficit relationship can be foreseen because of (Orem, 2001, p. 148).
predictable decreases in care abilities, qualitative or ● The compensatory nature of nursing systems for indi-
quantitative increases in the care demand, or both viduals in their time-place localizations is specified by
(Orem, 2001, p. 147). the immediacy of their need to meet components of
● Persons with existing or projected care deficits are in, or their therapeutic self-care demands and by their existent
can expect to be in, states of social dependency that inabilities for taking the required kinds of action (Orem,
legitimate a nursing relationship (Orem, 2001, p. 147). 2001, p. 148).
● A self-care deficit may be relatively permanent or it may ● The action limitation overcoming nature of nursing sys-
be transitory (Orem, 2001, p. 147). tems is specified by persons’ limitations of self-care
● A self-care or a dependent-care deficit may be wholly or agency that can be overcome by learning, by skill devel-
partially eliminated or overcome when persons with opment and exercise, and by developing, enhancing, or
deficits have the necessary human capabilities, disposi- adjusting skills in self-direction and self-management
tions, and willingness (Orem, 2001, p. 147). (Orem, 2001, p. 148).
● Self-care deficits, when expressed in terms of persons’ ● The structure of nursing systems vary with what le-
limitations for engagement in the estimative (inten- gitimate recipients of nursing can and cannot do in
tional) or production operations of self-care, provide knowing and meeting their own or their dependents’
guides for selection of methods of helping and under- therapeutic self-care demands and in overcoming exis-
standing patient roles in self-care (Orem, 2001, p. 147). tent or projected action limitations (Orem, 2001, p. 148).
● The structure, content, and results of nursing systems in
The central idea of the Theory of Nursing System is that operation in concrete life situations vary with nurses’ de-
“All action systems that are nursing systems are formed veloped powers of nursing agency, with their willingness
(designed and produced) by nurses for legitimate recipi- to exercise these powers, and with factors internal to
ents of nursing by exercising their powers of nursing nurses or with external circumstances and conditions
agency. These systems compensate for or overcome existent that facilitate or impede nurses’ exercise of their powers
or emerging health-derived or health-associated limita- of nursing agency (Orem, 2001, p. 149).
tions of the recipients’ powers of self-care agency or de- ● The linkages of nursing systems (as here described) to
pendent-care agency in meeting their own or their more encompassing interpersonal systems vary with the
dependents’ known, existent, or projected therapeutic self- powers of legitimate recipients of nursing to interact and
care demands in relatively stable or changing life situa- communicate with nurses and with nurses’ powers of in-
tions. Nursing systems may be produced for individuals, teraction and communication (Orem, 2001, p. 149).
for persons who constitute a dependent-care unit, for
groups whose members have therapeutic self-care de- Orem (1989) also developed a rudimentary General
mands with similar components or who have similar limi- Theory of Nursing Administration. This theory also may
tations for engagement in self-care or dependent-care, or be regarded as a grand theory. The propositions of the
for families or for other multiperson units” (Orem, 2001, p. theory are:
148). The concepts of the Theory of Nursing System are
Patient, Therapeutic Self-Care Demand, Self-Care Agency, ● All actions that are proper to nursing administration are
Dependent-Care Agency, Nursing Agency—Professional- actions that are produced by persons with foreknowl-
Technological System and Interpersonal System dimen- edge of: (1) nursing as a field of knowledge and practice,
sions, and Power Components—Nursing Agency Power (2) the purpose or mission of the institution of which
Components dimension. The concept definitions are the they are an organic part, (3) how nursing contributes to
same as the corresponding concepts of the Self-Care mission fulfillment, and (4) the domain and boundaries
Framework. The propositions of the theory are: of their received powers to manage courses of affairs that
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 258
minology used to name the elements of the [framework] Taylor (1990) noted that the implementation of Self-
and the theories and their elements has its origin in the Care Framework-based nursing practice requires consider-
language traditionally used to describe and explain delib- ation of “the philosophy, goals, and objectives; the
erate result-seeking action of human beings” (p. 49). Thus standards and quality assurance program; and the docu-
familiarity with the language of the theories of deliberate mentation, job description, and personnel evaluation sys-
human action enhances understanding of Orem’s work. In tems” of the institution (p. 65). The array of human and
particular, “nurses must understand the actions that con- material resources required for such an undertaking are ev-
stitute self-care and dependent-care, as well as the capabil- ident in the comprehensive plans for the implementation
ities that are enabling for performing these kinds of of Self-Care Framework-based nursing practice described
actions” (Orem, 1991, p. 145). Furthermore, the vocabulary by Nunn and Marriner-Tomey (1989) and by Fernandez,
of the Self-Care Framework reflects Orem’s distinctive view Hebert, and Bliss-Holtz (1996). The strategies that can be
of those features of Individuals and Multiperson Units that used to implement the Self-Care Framework in nursing
are specific to nursing. It is clear that even though Orem’s practice settings, which are taken from recommendations
terminology is at times obtuse, her work has overcome the and suggestions given by Nunn and Marriner-Tomey
handicap represented by “the lack of a nursing language … (1989), Fernandez et al. (1996), Hooten (1992), and
in nurses’ communications about nursing to the public Paternostro (1992), are presented here.
as well as to persons with whom they work in the health
field” (Orem, 1997, p. 29). Confusion about the meaning ● Phase 1: Identification (2–8 months). In this phase, var-
and measurement of each concept of the Self-Care ious conceptual models of nursing are reviewed and the
Framework, which has been noted in the past (Anna et al., decision is made to select the Self-Care Framework. In
1978; Foster & Janssens, 1985), has decreased as appropri- addition, a nursing care delivery model that has built-in
ate research instruments and practice tools become avail- accountability is selected. Primary nursing or collabora-
able (see Table 8–2). tive practice is regarded as appropriate for use with the
The use of the Self-Care Framework requires under- Self-Care Framework. Team nursing also could be effec-
standing of the preprofessional and professional compo- tive if a permanent team leader can assure continuity
nents of nursing. Understanding the relations between and accountability for care; however, neither team nurs-
the social, interpersonal, and professional-technological ing with rotating team leaders nor functional nursing is
systems of nursing agency also is required. Furthermore, effective.
nurses must develop “the diagnostic skill to identify the ● Phase 2: Education (2–4 years). All members of the
self-care deficits of adult patients in meeting their current nursing department are educated so that they have a
or projected therapeutic self-care demands. A related diag- clear understanding of the focus and content of the Self-
nostic skill [to be developed] is that of determining the in- Care Framework. Education is initially directed to the
fant or child care or dependent adult care competencies of key people, including the nurse administrators, nurse ed-
responsible adults who seek nursing for socially dependent ucators, and quality assurance staff. At this point, a show
family members” (Orem, 2001, p. 251). Most of all, “nurses of support by the nurse administrators can be demon-
must be knowledgeable about and skilled in investigating strated by hiring a consultant and sponsoring a retreat
and calculating individuals’ therapeutic self-care demands, devoted to the framework. Next, education spreads to
in determining the degrees of operability of self-care the staff nurses. Then the key people participate with
agency, and in estimating persons’ potential for regulation the staff nurses in the development of plans for imple-
of the exercise or development of their powers of self-care mentation and provide leadership in revisions of the
agency” (Orem, 1997, p. 27). nursing philosophy, objectives of nursing service, care
The implementation of Self-Care Framework-based plans, standards of care, and evaluation mechanisms.
nursing practice is feasible for patients of virtually all ages Development of new practice tools or any needed mod-
who are found in diverse practice situations ranging from ifications in existing practice tools for use in the particu-
health promotion practices to critical care units (Foster & lar health-care institution is undertaken. As education of
Bennett, 2002; Young, Taylor, & Renpenning, 2001). key people and staff nurses continues, the Self-Care
Indeed, Foster and Bennett (2002) declared that the Self- Framework is introduced to the health-care workers who
Care Framework “applies to all of those who need nursing are responsible for services external to nursing, including
care” (p. 144). The framework may not, however, be appro- but not limited to the hospital administrator, physicians,
priate for use in special hospitals for the criminally insane. physical therapists, occupational therapists, and respira-
Mason and Chandley (1990) pointed out that the frame- tory therapists. If the institution is affiliated with one or
work “produces a fundamental conflict between the patient more schools of nursing, the faculty is informed that
and society according to the clash of values embroiled with Self-Care Framework-based nursing practice is being
the special hospital setting” (p. 670). implemented. In addition, the Self-Care Framework is
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 260
TABLE 8–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (Kearey & Measures the patient’s self-care agency in United States, French,
Fleischer, 1979; McBride, 1987, 1991; Riesch & Swedish, East German, and Japanese populations.
Hauck, 1988; Robichaud-Ekstrand & Loiselle,
1998; Whetstone, 1987; Whetstone & Hansson,
1989; Yamashita, 1998; Young et al., 2001)
Perception of Self-Care Agency Questionnaire Measures adults’ perception of their self-care agency; items reflect
(Hanson, 1981; Bickel, 1982; Hanson & Bickel, the 10 power components. May not be appropriate for use with
1985; Weaver, 1987; Bottorff, 1988; Cleveland, older adults.
1989; McBride, 1991; Young et al., 2001)
Children’s Self-Care Performance Questionnaire Measures performance of self-care activities in the areas of univer-
(Mosher & Moore, 1998; Young et al., 2001) sal, developmental, and health-deviation self-care requisites by
children with cancer.
Child and Adolescent Self-Care Practice Measures children’s and adolescents’ performance of self-care
Questionnaire activities in the areas of universal, developmental, and health-
(Moore, 1995; Moore & Mosher, 1997; Young et al., deviation self-care requisites.
2001)
Dependent Care Agency Questionnaire (Moore & Measures mothers’ performance of their children’s self-care
Gaffney, 1989; Young et al., 2001) activities.
Denyes Self-Care Agency Scale (DSCAI) (Denyes, Measures adolescents’ self-care agency.
1980, 1982; Gaut & Kieckhefer, 1988; McBride,
1991; Young et al., 2001)
Denyes Self-Care Practice Instrument (DSCPI) Measures self-care actions taken by adolescents.
(Denyes 1980, 1988; Gast et al., 1989; Young et
al., 2001)
Self-As-Carer Inventory (SCI) Measures perceived capacity to care for self in diverse ethnic
(Geden & Taylor, 1991; Lukkarinen & Hentinen, groups, including American Indians, Asian/Pacific Islanders,
1994; Young et al., 1002) Hispanics, Black, and White populations residing in the United
States, as well as Finnish patients scheduled for coronary artery
bypass graft surgery.
Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale Measures heart failure-related self-care activities.
(Artinian et al., 2002; Jaarsma et al., 2000)
Self-Care Agency Inventory Measures enactment of self-care; scores identify those who and
(Lantz et al., 1995) who will not enact self-care due to lack of knowledge or lack of
motivation
Maieutic Dimensions of Self-Care Agency Measures selected capabilities and dispositions foundational to
(O’Connor, 1995) self-care agency.
Self-Care Limitations Tool Measures limitations in self-care.
(Beech et al., 1996)
Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale (ASA-A Form) Measures self-reported (ASA-A Form) and nurse-reported (ASA-B
(ASA-B Form) (van Achterberg et al., 1991; Evers, Form) self-care agency of elderly populations in the United
et al., 1993; Fok et al., 2002; Halfens et al., 1999; States, The Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and
Lorensen et al., 1993; Söderhamn & Cliffordson, Hong Kong, China.
2001; Söderhamn, Ek et al., 1996; Söderhamn,
Evers et al., 1996; Söderhamn, Lindencrona et al.,
1996; Sonninen, 1999; Young et al., 2001)
*See the Research Instruments and Practice Tools section in the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
261
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 262
TABLE 8–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK
(continued)
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Lorensen’s Self-Care Capability Scale Measures the degree of the elderly person’s self-care capability to
(LSCS) (Lorensen, 1998) manage everyday life; items represent the universal, develop-
mental, and health-deviation self-care requisites.
Mental Health Related Self-Care Agency Scale Measures individuals’ capabilities to perform mental health–
(West & Isenberg, 1997; Young et al., 2001) related self-care.
Self-Care Ability Scale for the Elderly Measures perceived self-care ability of elderly individuals.
(Söderhamn, Ek, et al., 1996; Söderhamn,
Lindencrona et al., 1996)
Biggs Elderly Self-Care Assessment Tool Measures family caregiver-rated self-care abilities of the elderly;
(BESCAT) (Biggs, 1990) items are based on the universal, developmental, and health-
deviation self-care requisites.
Self-Care Needs Inventory (Page & Ricard, Measures the self-care requisites of women being treated for
1996) depression.
Nursing Assessment of Readiness for Measures young women’s readiness for breast self-examination
Instruction of Breast Self-Examination instruction, in the areas of knowledge, perceived susceptibility,
Instrument (NARIB) (Eith, 1983) and perceived severity.
Danger Assessment Tool (Campbell, 1986) Measures the extent to which battered women are in danger of
homicide.
Functional Status Instrument (FSI) Measures the functional status of patients hospitalized for total
(Willard, 1990) hip or knee replacement.
CAPD Self-Efficacy Scale (Lin et al., 1998) Measures the self-efficacy of individuals receiving continuous
ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
Stressors Questionnaire (Hayward et al., Measures stressors experienced by new renal transplant patients;
1989) stress is viewed as a self-care deficit.
Self-Care Assessment Tool (SCAT) (McFarland Permits assessment of the cognitive and functional skills needed
et al., 1992) for self-care in persons with spinal cord injuries, including skills
in bathing, grooming, nutritional management, taking medica-
tions, bowel management, and dressing.
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self-Care Scale Measures activities of daily living of persons diagnosed with multi-
(Gulick, 1987, 1988) ple sclerosis and other chronic neurological illnesses.
MS-Related Symptom Checklist (Gulick, 1989) Rates symptoms related to multiple sclerosis; scale scores are
used to determine potential self-care deficits for universal self-
care requisites.
Risk Factor Self-Care Assessment Instrument Measures caregivers’ knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors in
(Carlisle et al., 1993) children and self-care activities performed by caregivers to facili-
tate their children’s cardiovascular health.
Oucher Scale—Hispanic and African-American Measures young children’s perception of pain.
Versions (Villarruel & Denyes, 1991)
Children’s Self-Care Behaviors Instrument Measures parents’ rating of self-care behaviors performed by chil-
(CSCB) (Rew, 1987) dren with chronic illness, including general daily health behav-
iors and behaviors specific to long-term implications of coping
with chronic illness
Self-Care Behavior Questionnaire (SCBQ) A self-report instrument that measures the self-care behaviors
(Hanucharurnkul, 1989) performed by patients receiving radiation therapy.
262
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 263
PRACTICE TOOLS
Patient Information Letter (Fernandez & A letter given to hospitalized patients explaining basic care needs that
Wheeler, 1990) are universal to all self-care agents.
Steps in Orem’s Nursing Process (Dennis, Provides a format for documentation of each component of the
1997) professional-technological operations of nursing practice.
Nursing History (Orem, 1995) Guides the assessment of changes in a patient’s therapeutic self-care
demand and the patient’s self-care agency, as well as the patient’s
conditions and pattern of living.
Development of Self-Care Agency Scale Guides assessment of degree of development of self-care agency in re-
(Nursing Development Conference Group, lation to a known therapeutic self-care demand.
1979)
Operability of Self-Care Agency Scale Guides assessment of degree of operability of self-care agency in
(Nursing Development Conference Group, relation to a known therapeutic self-care demand.
1979)
Adequacy of Self-Care Agency Scale (Nursing Guides assessment of adequacy of self-care agency in relation to a
Development Conference Group, 1979) known therapeutic self-care demand.
Guide for Nursing Assistance (GNA)—Step A Guides collection of information regarding the patient’s present health
(Herrington & Houston, 1984) state and ability to perform self-care.
Guide for Nursing Assistance (GNA)—Step B Permits documentation of the nursing system required, including signifi-
(Herrington & Houston, 1984) cant data from the GNA—Step A, potential for self-care, nursing diag-
nosis, patient goals, nursing prescriptions, and evaluation of nursing.
Nursing Assessment Tool (Fernandez & Guides the nursing history and assessment in the areas of the basic
Wheeler, 1990) conditioning factors and universal self-care requisites.
Nursing Checklist (Guerrero Gamboa, 2000) Used to evaluate neonatal units and families of newborn infants.
Nursing Data Base and Admission Guides assessment of universal self-care requisites for hospitalized pa-
Assessment Form (Rossow-Sebring et al., tients.
1992)
Structured Data Collection Tool (Laschinger, Guides assessment of patients in relation to the Self-Care Framework.
1990)
Assessment Format (Swindale, 1989) Guides assessment of the minor surgery patient’s anxieties, coping
strategies, and nature of information needed.
Postoperative Self-Assessment Form (Graff A self-assessment form for use by patients recovering from surgery;
et al., 1992) the information obtained is used to determine the need for home
care nursing.
Self-Care Assessment Instrument A self-assessment instrument for use by cardiac patients; the informa-
(Johannsen, 1992) tion obtained is used by the nurse to develop individualized teaching
and discharge plans.
(continued)
263
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 264
TABLE 8–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK
(continued)
Self-Care Assessment Tool for Hospitalized Guides assessment of self-care for hospitalized patients with chronic
Patients with Chronic Obstructive obstructive pulmonary disease in the areas of respiratory status,
Pulmonary Disease (Michaels, 1985, 1986) level of function, complexity of the care plan, and familiarity with
the care plan.
Chemotherapy Learning Needs Assessment Guides assessment of learning needs of patients receiving
Tool and Contract (Hiromoto & Dungan, chemotherapy, in the areas of universal, development, and health
1991) deviation self-care requisites. Provides a contract statement
regarding use of self-care measures to be signed by both patient
and nurse.
Massey Bedside Swallowing Screen (Massey Assesses the swallowing function of patients who have had a stroke.
& Jedlicka, 2002)
Self-Care Assessment Tool for the Psychiatric Permits assessment of psychiatric patients’ self-care in the areas of
Patient (Davidhizar & Cosgray, 1990) air, food, and fluid; elimination; body temperature and personal
hygiene; rest and activity; and solitude and social interaction, using
a question and answer format.
Assessment Tool for Students with Disabilities Guides initial assessment of individual strengths, self-care deficits,
(Hedahl, 1983) and goals of adolescents with physical disabilities by college health
nurses.
Nursing Evaluation of Neurological Function Guides assessment of function in the areas of consciousness,
(Mitchell & Irvin, 1977) mentation, motor function, and sensory function for patients with
neurological and neurosurgical disorders.
Self-Care of Older Persons Evaluation Provides a structured, brief format for assessment of the actual self-
(SCOPE) (Dellasega, 1995) care abilities of institutionalized older adults.
Self-Management Inventory (Snyder et al., Guides assessment of universal, developmental, and therapeutic
1991) demands of individuals hospitalized with complex health care
problems; particularly useful for elderly individuals with chronic
conditions.
Assessment-Classification Instrument (Leatt Guides assessment and classification of type of long-term care
et al., 1981) required by chronically ill patients.
Medication Knowledge Tool (Taira, 1991) Guides assessment of chronically ill independent-living older persons’
knowledge about their prescribed medications.
Medication Regimen Assessment Permits documentation of self-administration of medications for
(MacSweeney, 1992) patients with Parkinson’s disease.
Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz (Ailinger et al., Measures women’s knowledge of osteoporosis. Revised version pub-
1998, 2003) lished in 2003.
Health Education Questionnaire (Baldwin & Measures parents’ perceptions of themselves as health educators for
Davis, 1989) their school-age children.
The Self-Care Manual for Patients (Kyle & A manual of information about self-care for hospitalized patients. The
Pitzer, 1990) sections of the manual are entitled (1) Philosophy of self-care,
(2) What does self-care mean? (3) What are patients’ and nurses’
roles? (4) How will the nursing staff assist you? and (5) How can
you and your family help?
264
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 265
(continued)
265
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 266
TABLE 8–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK
(continued)
Nursing System Design for New Spinal Cord resents a detailed nursing system design for new spinal cord–
Injury Patients (Allison & Renpenning, injured patients.
1999a)
Nursing Documentation Forms for The forms used for documentation of Self-Care Framework-based
Rehabilitation (Allison & Repenning, 1999b) nursing practice in a rehabilitation setting.
Nursing Documentation Form for Com- The form used for documentation of Self-Care Framework-based
munity Settings (Allison & Renpenning, nursing practice in a community health clinical agency.
1999c)
Self-Care
Deficit Nursing Theory Outcome Categories A list of outcomes for patients and nurses.
(Allison & Renpenning, 1999d)
Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory Outcome A list of outcomes for patients receiving rehabilitation nursing
Categories in Rehabilitation (Allison & services.
Renpenning, 1999e)
Patient Self-Care Classification (Allison & A patient classification system in terms of patient capabilities,
Renpenning, 1999f) limitations, self-care deficits, conditioning factors, and nursing
assistance needed.
Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory Care Map A care map for universal self-care requisites.
(Allison & Renpenning, 1999g)
Nursing Systems International Computer A computer software package for documentation of Orem Self-Care
Software (Bliss-Holtz, 1995; Bliss- Framework-based nursing practice.
Holtz & Riggs, 1996; Paternostro, 1992;
Marvulli et al., 1992; Marvulli & Trofino,
1992; Mulvey et al., 1992; Brennan &
Duffy, 1992)
NICU Skills Checklist (Angeles, 1991) Used to evaluate the new neonatal intensive care nurse’s skills in the
use of Orem’s Self-Care Framework.
Home Help Activities Registration Form (Arts Permits documentation of activities carried out by home health
et al., 1996) workers in The Netherlands.
Therapeutic Nursing Function (TNF) Indicator Permits identification of nurses who provide more patient-centered
(Kitson, 1986) or therapeutic nursing and those who provide routine-centered
or nontherapeutic nursing.
Community Health Assessment (Hanchett, Guides assessment of a community according to universal,
1988) developmental, and health-deviation self-care requisites for
members of high-risk populations.
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 267
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Quality of life Swedish patients who have a Malm et al., 1998
pacemaker
Meaning of health and quality of life Liver transplant recipients 1 year after Forsberg, 2002
transplantation
Symptoms, side effects, and quality of life Women with breast cancer Wengström et al., 2000
during and following treatment with radi-
ation therapy
Description of the Pro-Self Program Cancer patients undergoing Larson et al., 1998
chemotherapy or radiation therapy
Identification of health beliefs and values, Male and female older adults Whetstone & Reid, 1991
perceptions of self-care abilities, and
perceived barriers to health promotion
Desire for normalcy Secondary analysis of data from Pickens, 1999
studies of men and women with
serious mental illness
Meaning of health Older women Maddox, 1999
Meaning of self-care American, East German, and Whetstone, 1987
Swedish people Whetstone & Hansson, 1989
Self-care ability Home-dwelling elderly individuals Söderhamn et al., 2000
in Sweden
Self-care ability and meaning of actualizing Home-dwelling elderly individuals Söderhamn, 1998
self-care ability into self-care activity in Sweden
Meaning of rest Adult men Allison, 1971
Children’s worries about their battered Children of battered women Humphreys, 1991
mothers
Dependent-care activities to protect Battered women Humphreys, 1995
their children
Comparison of perceived self-care agency Pregnant low-socioeconomic Warren, 1998
adolescents who had and had not
been abused or neglected
Responses to potential preterm labor Pregnant women at 20 to 32 weeks Freston et al., 1997
symptoms hypothetically encountered of gestation
at 24 weeks of gestation
Extent of concern for learning Primiparous women Bliss-Holtz, 1988
dependent-care of infants
Interest in learning about labor and delivery Primiparous women Bliss-Holtz, 1991
Comparison of needs for information about Adolescent and young adult mothers Degenhart-Leskosky, 1989
self-care and infant care
Level of self-care agency Members of an Al-Anon group Neil, 1984
Self-care behaviors Individuals who participated in a Utz et al., 1994
smoking cessation program
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
267
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 268
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Self-care behaviors used to stay well Older adults, 57–83 years of age Clark, 1998
Interpretation and use of health informa- White middle-class and working-class Allen, 1988
tion in the practice of self-care related to women
weight management
Health-seeking behaviors in relation to Young adult Asian, Black, White, Native Woods et al., 1992
perimenstrual symptoms American, and Hispanic women
Self-care agency with regard to menarche Black premenarcheal girls Dashiff, 1992
Self-care practices related to menstruation Adult women Patterson & Hale, 1985
Use of information regarding hormone Perimenopausal women Rothert et al., 1990
replacement therapy
Perceived demand for or change in univer- Women with HIV disease Anastasio et al., 1995
sal and health-deviation self-care activity
and the degree of difficulty ascribed to
meeting that demand
Universal and illness-related self-care Young adult married women Woods, 1985
activities used
Self-care actions Middle-aged women Hartweg, 1993
The experience of urinary incontinence Women 58 to 79 years of age Dowd, 1991
Self-care practices Noninstitutionalized women with Klemm & Creason, 1991
urinary incontinence
Self-care responses to respiratory illness Vietnamese persons residing in Texas Hautman, 1987
Adherence to appointment and medication Latino immigrants Ailinger & Dear, 1998
taking for preventive therapy for latent
tuberculosis infection
Knowledge, actions, and decisions Older adults and their caregivers Conn et al., 1995
required to manage medications
Levels of self-care Chinese children with nephrotic Zhimin, 2003
syndrome
Pain intensity and home pain Children with sickle cell disease Conner-Warren, 1996
management techniques
Comparison of self-care agency Healthy adolescents Monsen, 1992
Adolescents with spina bifida
Changes in self-care agency Expectant parents attending childbirth Riesch, 1988
education classes
Description of use of the Young Adolescent mothers Hudson et al., 1999
Parents Project
Side effects and self-care actions Cancer patients receiving inpatient Foltz et al., 1996
chemotherapy
Self-care behaviors in response Cancer patients receiving Richardson & Ream, 1997
to fatigue chemotherapy
Self-care behaviors Cancer patients receiving Dodd, 1982, 1984b, 1988b
chemotherapy or radiation therapy
268
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 269
(continued)
269
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 270
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Health habits, lifestyle practices, and Older men and women Schafer, 1989
perception of need for dependent-care
agents
Health status, satisfaction with lifestyle, Community-dwelling elderly Dahlen, 1997
and needs for nursing Norwegian persons
Postprandial blood pressure changes Healthy elderly persons Lilley, 1997
Self-care activities related to health mainte- Young adult women Lawrence & Schank, 1995
nance and symptom management
Self-care behaviors used to manage cold Adults 65 to 94 years of age Conn, 1991
and influenza episodes
Self-care strategies to function in culturally Women with chronic pelvic pain Zadinsky & Boyle, 1996
prescribed roles during illness
Medication-taking behaviors White non-Hispanic and Hispanic frail eld- Lile & Hoffman, 1991
erly individuals
Perceptions of health, wellness, and Mexican-American women living Mendias et al., 2001
self-care in Texas
Description of diet-related behaviors Elderly Hispanic women residing in New Shuster et al., 2001
and beliefs Mexico
Frequency of and indications used for total National representative sample of Belgian Evers et al., 2000
feeding assistance and tube feeding hospital patients included in the 1990
national minimum nursing data set
Changes in mental status and functional Elderly female nursing home residents Hamilton & Creason, 1992
abilities
Obstacles to meeting universal self-care Nursing home residents Orem, 1995
requisites
Capacity for self-care Individuals with mental illness living in Getty et al., 1998
community residences
Capacity for dependent-care Staff of community residences
Self-care actions related to solitude and Individuals with schizophrenia Harris, 1990
social interaction
Perception of indicators of mental illness Individuals with schizophrenia Hamera et al., 1992
Self-help strategies used for coping with Individuals with schizophrenia Frederick & Cotanch, 1995
auditory hallucinations
Comparison of self-care practices used Adults with and without psychiatric Crockett, 1982
for coping illness
Comparison of value ascribed to Women with and without depression Page & Ricard, 1995
self-care requisites
Morning care behaviors Patients with dementia and their nurses Sandman et al., 1986
Caregivers’ knowledge of and self-care Caregivers and their 2- and 3-year-old chil- Carlisle et al., 1993
activities related to cardiovascular risk dren
factors
Factors influencing opportunities for people Primary caregivers of people with Grov, 1999
with cancer to die at home cancer who died at home
270
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 271
(continued)
271
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 272
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
CORRELATIONAL STUDIES
Relations between autonomy, locus of Fifth-grade school children Moore, 1987a
control, and self-care agency
Relations between child’s age, health Children and adolescents and their Moore, 1993
state, self-care agency, performance of mothers
self-care activities, and mother’s per-
formance of dependent-care activities
272
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 273
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Relation of sociodemographic characteris- Chinese people with diabetes mellitus Wang, 1997
tics, educational level, and perception of residing in Taiwan
health to universal and diabetes melli-
tus–related self-care activities
Relations among age, marital status, social Elderly Taiwanese women residing Wang, 2001
class, perceived health, self-care agency, in a rural area
health-promoting lifestyle, and well-being
Relations among demographic variables, Elderly Taiwanese women residing Wang & Laffrey, 2001
social class, perceived health, social in a rural area
support, self-care agency, health-
promotion self-care behavior, and per-
ceived well-being
Relation of age, education, duration of Adults with rheumatoid arthritis Ailinger & Dear, 1993
illness, and arthritis severity to self-care
agency
Relation of age, gender, and health state Adults with rheumatoid arthritis Ailinger & Dear, 1997
to self-care needs
Relation of self-care agency and social Unmarried pregnant teenagers Mapanga & Andrews, 1995
support from family and friends to
contraceptive practices
Relation of availability and adequacy of Pregnant adolescents Baker, 1996
health-care resources, family system
support, and self-care agency to
initiation of prenatal care
Relation of gravidity, socioeconomic status, Pregnant women attending childbirth Hart & Foster, 1998
resource availability, family system, and education classes or a prenatal clinic
age to self-care agency
Relation of gravidity, weeks of gestation, Pregnant women Hart, 1995, 1996
prenatal risk designation, self-care
agency, basic prenatal care actions, and
foundations for dependent-care agency
to maternal hemoglobin and infant birth
weight
Relation of age, race, socioeconomic sta- Unmarried women at risk for sexually McQuiston & Campbell,
tus, health state, patterns of living, and transmitted disease 1997
influence of decision making to self-care
agency related to sexually transmitted
disease
Relations among health-promoting self- Healthy male and female adults Callaghan, 2003
care behaviors, self-care self-efficacy,
and self-care agency
Relation of age, health, dyad gender, family Community living adult couples, at Geden & Taylor, 1999
behavior, and caregiver reciprocity to least one of whom had a self-labeled
collaborative care system health problem
Relation of symptoms, employment, and Young adult women Maunz & Woods, 1988
sex-role orientation to illness-related
self-care practices
274
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 275
(continued)
275
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 276
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Relation of symptom distress and social Chinese patients who were recipients Wang et al., 1998
support to self-care behaviors of a heart transplant
Relation of psychosocial characteristics, Patients receiving continuous Pressley, 1995
autonomy, attitudes about end-stage ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
renal disease and dialysis, and self-care
agency to occurrence of infectious
complications
Factors affecting self-care Well adults and adults with end-stage Horsburgh 1999
renal disease
Relation between self-esteem and hope Patients receiving a renal transplant Frieson & Frieson, 1996
Relation of age, education, occupation, Taiwanese patients who had a Kao & Ku, 1997
source of family livelihood, perception of colostomy
health condition, social support, and mo-
tivation for self-care to self-care abilities
Relations among personality traits, health Canadian adults awaiting renal Horsburgh et al., 2000
state, self-care abilities, and behaviors transplant
Gender differences in relations among Men and women with diabetes Navuluri, 2000
health-related hardiness, patient attitude
toward compliance, and self-care
adherence to physical activity
Relations of income, education, current Individuals with TB and HIV disease McDonnell et al., 2001
alcohol use, perceived support, barriers
to medication taking, intention to
adhere, and capacity for self-care to
adherence to antituberculosis therapy
Relation of demographic variables to Review of hospital charts of women Graling & Grant, 1995
patient’s choice of treatment with stage I breast cancer
Relation of cancer patients’ quality of life, Female and male adults with cancer Lev & Owen, 2002
symptoms, moods, and self-care self- and their family caregivers
efficacy to family caregivers’ depression,
role strain, and health outcomes
Relation of demographic variables, per- Adults with cancer who were to Dodd & Dibble, 1993
formance status, affective state, social receive the first dose of
support, ability to manage a situation, chemotherapy
self-care ability, and prior health-
promoting activities to self-care behavior
Relation of illness factors, age, gender, Patients receiving radiotherapy Oberst et al., 1991
education, socioeconomic status, family
hardiness, universal and health deviation
self-care burden, and stress appraisal to
mood
Relation of age, marital status, living Thai adults receiving radiation therapy Hanucharurnkul, 1989
arrangements, socioeconomic status
stage and site of cancer, and social
support to self-care behaviors
Relation of symptoms, including tiredness Adults receiving chemotherapy Rhodes et al., 1988
and weakness to self-care activities
276
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 277
(continued)
277
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 278
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Relation between self-care agency and job Public health nurses Behm & Frank, 1992
satisfaction
Relation between perceived and actual Registered nurses Baxley et al., 1997
knowledge of diabetes mellitus
Relation of knowledge and attitudes Registered nurses Bennett et al., 1993
about sex, empathy, and homophobia
to attitudes about AIDS care
Relation of congruent societal and health Registered nurses Evans, 1996
care values, commonalities of patient
needs, and primacy of caring through
knowing the patient to individualized care
Relation of family structure information on Baccalaureate program nursing Siebert et al., 1986
perception of a preschool-age child students
Factors related to the use of the Self-Care Graduates of a liberal arts college Wagnild et al., 1987
Framework in nursing practice baccalaureate nursing program
based on the Self-Care Framework
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effects of an educational program on Preschool-age children attending Arneson & Triplett, 1990
knowledge of car safety and behaviors a day care center
while riding in a car
Effect of an experimental self-care instruc- Fifth-grade school children Blazek & McClellan, 1983
tion program and a control health discus-
sion on health locus of control
Effects of first-aid and assertion training on Fifth-grade school children Moore, 1987b
autonomy and self-care agency
Effect of a planned teaching program on Pre-adolescent girls living in India George, 2003
knowledge of menstrual hygiene
Effects of experimental and control nursing Turkish children with enuresis Terakye & Bulduko-lu, 1997
interventions on child’s enuresis and and their parents
self-esteem, and parents’ behaviors to-
ward the child
Effects of an asthma education program on Individuals with asthma and their Alexander et al., 2000
knowledge, behavior modification, and family members
self-care management
Effects of clinical nurse specialist or hospital Low-income children with chronic Alexander et al., 1988
clinic pediatric resident care on outpatient asthma
department and emergency department
visits, and allergy physician contacts
Effect of experimental computer-assisted Adults with atopic asthma Huss et al., 1991
instruction plus traditional instruction and
control traditional instruction only on ad-
herence to implementing house dust
mite avoidance measures
Effects of an educational program on pre- Korean women with premenstrual Min, 2002
menstrual signs and physical, mental, syndrome
emotional, and behavioral discomforts
278
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 279
279
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 280
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Effects of an experimental self-care plus Thai adult patients undergoing Hanucharurnkul & Vinya-
usual care nursing intervention and a pyelolithotomy or nephrolithotomy nguag, 1991
control usual care intervention on pain
sensation and distress, analgesic use,
ambulation, complications, and satisfac-
tion with care
Effects of types of nurse-patient interac- Adults in a simulated clinical setting Krouse & Roberts, 1989
tion on power, control, satisfaction, and
agreement with prescribed treatment
Effects of an experimental programmed Adults who had surgery for Goodwin, 1979
instruction booklet and a control treat- bronchogenic carcinoma
ment on knowledge, self-care, and
postoperative recovery
Effect of group education classes Adults with chronic obstructive Stockdale-Woolley, 1984
on self-care agency pulmonary disease
Effect of structured and unstructured Individuals who experienced a Toth, 1980
pretransfer information on posttransfer myocardial infarction and were being
anxiety transferred from a coronary care unit
Effect of experimental and control nutrition Men and women who had experienced Aish, 1996
programs on eating habits a myocardial infarction
Effects of an experimental Orem Self-Care Individuals who had experienced Aish & Isenberg, 1996
Framework-based nursing intervention a myocardial infarction
and a control intervention on self-care
agency and self-efficacy for healthy
eating
Effects of an experimental educational Adults with congestive heart failure Hubbard, 2001
program about using a fluid volume who were clients of a hospital-based
management journal and weight change home health agency
parameters on adherence to use of the
journal, hospital readmission, and length
of hospital stay
Effect of a supportive-educative nursing Patients with congestive heart failure Fujita & Dugan, 1994
system on promotion and maintenance
of a prescribed medication regimen
Effect of an experimental medication Patients with congestive heart failure Schneider et al., 1993
discharge planning program and a
control usual informal discharge planning
program on hospital readmission
Effects of an experimental supportive Patients with advanced heart failure Jaarsma et al., 2000
educational nursing intervention and
control routine care on self-care abilities,
self-care behavior, and quality of life
Effects of a hemodialysis educational Adults receiving hemodialysis Korniewicz & O’Brien, 1994
and support program (HESP) and a
control treatment on self-care agency,
functional status, compliance to the
hemodialysis regimen, social
functioning, and alienation
280
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 281
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
282
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 283
Effects of animal-assisted therapy on well- Homebound elderly persons Harris et al., 1993
being and blood pressure
Effect of high and low levels of compo- Elderly women attending senior citizen Chang et al., 1984
nents of care (technical quality, psy- nutrition sites
chosocial care, and patient participation
in planning care) on patient satisfaction
with a hypothetical encounter with a
health care provider
Effect of high and low levels of compo- Elderly women attending senior citizen Chang et al., 1985
nents of care (technical quality, psy- nutrition sites
chosocial care, and patient participation
in planning care) on hypothetical intent
to adhere to the health care plan
Effect of an experimental educational pro- Individuals with hypertension Saounatsou et al., 2001
gram about the importance of mediation
and consequences of not taking the pre-
scribed dosage versus on compliance
with the prescribed drug regimen
Effects of an experimental medication Elderly African-American women with Harper, 1984
self-care program and a control hypertension
hypertension education program on
knowledge of medications, self-care
behaviors, medication errors, and
systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Effects of mechanical lift, rocking axillary, Female nursing students Geden, 1982
self-lift, shoulder-assist, and straight-pull
lifting techniques on oxygen consump-
tion, heart rate, respiratory rate, and
blood pressure
Effect of information about a pediatric Female students in a baccalaureate Glanz et al., 1989
patient’s diagnosis, family structure, nursing program
and gender on students’ stereotyping
behaviors
Effect of information about a client’s Female students in a baccalaureate Ganong & Coleman, 1992
marital status on students’ stereotyping nursing program
behaviors
Effect of curriculum on changes in Nursing students in an Orem Self-Care Hartweg & Metcalfe, 1986
self-care attitudes Framework-based baccalaureate
program
General university students
Effect of an experimental career aware- Practical nursing students Belcher, 1992
ness program and a control no career
awareness program on success rate
Effect of a self-learning module on learning Registered nurses Kang, 2002
to care for hospitalized children with
tracheostomies
Effects of the implementation of Orem’s Registered nurses working in an Rossow-Sebring et al., 1992
Self-Care Framework on nurses’ acute care hospital
attitudes and charting behavior
Effects of implementation of an Orem’s Registered nurses Loveland-Cherry et al., 1985
Self-Care Framework-based nursing pro- Adult day care agency staff
tocol on client receptivity and self-care Aftercare clients attending an adult day
agency and implementation problems care program
(continued)
283
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 284
TABLE 8–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
Effects of a gerontological nursing continu- Registered nurses Harrison & Novak, 1988
ing education program on nurses’ Hospitalized elderly patients
knowledge of and attitudes toward
the elderly and patients’ satisfaction
with and perceptions of nursing
Effects of a decision support system Nurses and elderly patients Ruland, 1999
versus control procedures on elicitation
of elderly patients’ preferences for self-
care capability, nurses’ care priorities,
and patient outcomes of preference
achievement and patient satisfaction
(Text continued from page 260) ranging from moderate to large. They also reported that in-
conducted by nurse researchers, especially by Campbell, terventions designed to promote self-care had positive,
Dodd, Hagopian, Jirovec, Moore, Söderhamm, and their moderate to large effects on various patient-focused out-
respective colleagues (see Table 8–3). Dodd’s work, which comes, such as patient satisfaction, pain, and fasting blood
has been ongoing since 1978, is an outstanding example sugar, and small effects on organization-focused outcomes,
of Self-Care Framework-based programmatic research. such as length of hospital stay.
She and her colleagues designed correlational studies,
based on the findings of early descriptive studies, and Nursing Education. The Self-Care Framework, according
experimental studies, based on descriptive and correla- to Orem, “is useful in all levels of education” (Fawcett,
tional study findings. Furthermore, Dodd returned to de- 2001, p. 36). Nursing education encompasses preprofes-
scriptive work when moving from a focus on cancer sional, professional, and continuing education compo-
patients receiving chemotherapy to those receiving radia- nents, as well as beginning, advanced, and scientific levels
tion therapy and when expanding from a focus on patients (Orem, 2001). “Professional nursing programs preparatory
to patients and their family members. Dodd (1997) ex- for entrance to practice and for movement toward the
plained that the descriptive and correlational studies professional (scientific) form of practice have as their or-
were important “because [they] documented the therapeu- ganizing center human beings and the range of types of
tic self-care demand and served as a basis for subsequent conditions and problems of persons who can benefit from
work that looked at specific self-care behaviors and health- nursing” (Orem, 2001, p. 440).
deviation self-care requisites. As a result of this work, The utility of the Self-Care Framework for nursing
[Self-Care Framework]-based interventions were devel- education is evident. Citing an unpublished survey by Karb
oped to promote self-care” (p. 984). The experimental in- and Von Cannon, Berbiglia (1991) noted that “of the four
tervention studies now have progressed to the level of nursing [models] most frequently used by [National
randomized controlled clinical trials, and outcomes in- League for Nursing] accredited baccalaureate programs
clude not only self-care activities but also chemotherapy- that adopted a single [model], the [Self-Care Framework]
related morbidity. ranked second in use” (p. 1159). Berbiglia (1991) went
Hanucharurnkul and colleagues (2003) reported the re- on to explain that the Self-Care Framework has guided
sults of a meta-analysis of self-care research conducted in the curriculum “for more than a decade and has empha-
Thailand, including master’s theses and doctoral disserta- sized educator competency in the use of this [framework
tions, as well as research conducted by nursing program in] a parochial liberal arts college in the south-west United
faculty members. Most studies were guided by Orem’s States,” but she did not identify the school by name
Self-Care Framework. The investigators reported that the (p. 1160).
collective study findings support the relation between As can be seen below, published reports indicate that the
variables representing the basic conditioning factors and Self-Care Framework has been used as a guide for curricu-
self-care agency or dependent-care agency, with effect sizes lum construction in diploma, associate degree, and bac-
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 285
calaureate nursing programs, as well as in continuing edu- ● Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
cation and inservice education programs. The complete ci- (Staff Education Programs) (Harman et al., 1989; Reid
tations for the publications are given in the Education et al., 1989)
section of the chapter references. The use of the Self-Care
Framework in many other nursing education programs is In addition, Berbiglia and Saenz (2002) described an un-
documented in a list published by the International Orem dergraduate elective course, Nursing Concepts: Self-Care,
Society for Nursing Science and Scholarship (1994). that is based on the content of the Self-Care Framework.
They did not, however, identify the school at which the
● Diploma Nursing Program course was offered. In an unpublished paper, Mullin and
●Methodist Medical Center of Illinois, Peoria, Illinois Weed (1980) outlined the use of the Self-Care Framework
(Woolley et al., 1990) as a guide for the baccalaureate nursing curriculum at
George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia.
● Associate Degree Nursing Program
●
Thornton Community College, South Holland, Illinois
(Fenner, 1979) Nursing Administration. Orem (2001) defined nursing
administration as “the body of persons who function in sit-
● Baccalaureate Degree Nursing Programs uational contexts to collectively manage courses of affairs
●
Georgetown University, Washington, DC (Piemme & enabling for the provision of nursing to the population
Trainor, 1977) currently served by an organized health service institution
● Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, Illinois or agency and to populations to be served at future times”
(Woolley et al., 1990) (p. 451). The utility of the Self-Care Framework for ad-
● University of Missouri–Columbia (Taylor, 1985) ministration of nursing services is evident.
● University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Allison and Renpenning (1999) developed a model for
Mississippi (Herrington & Houston, 1984; Richeson & nursing administration derived from the Self-Care
Huch, 1988) Framework and Orem’s General Theory of Nursing
● Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas (Kurger, Administration. They reasoned that nurse administrators
1988) must know and think nursing to achieve nursing goals, and
● University of Quebec in Hull, Hull, Quebec, Canada that the Self-Care Framework provides the requisite men-
(Family nursing theory and practice courses) tal model. Their model elaborates on the governing func-
(deMontigny et al., 1997) tions, executive functions, and essential operations
● University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Junior functions that Orem (1989, 1995) identified as compo-
year nursing course) (Story & Ross, 1986) nents of nursing administration.
● Robert Gordon University, Foresterhill Campus, A particularly innovative application of the Self-Care
Aberdeen, Scotland (Adult Branch Program of a Framework in nursing administration was the Professional
Diploma in Higher Education Nursing Course) Care System, a computer software package for nursing doc-
(Gordon & Grundy, 1997) umentation (Bliss-Holtz et al., 1992). Software develop-
ment was initiated by Patricia Sayers, the founder and
● Continuing Education and Inservice Education president of Nursing Systems International Incorporated
●Binghamton General Hospital, Binghamton, New York of Columbus, New Jersey. The software package “is an in-
(Orientation Program for New Graduates) (Feldsine, formation system based in [the Self-Care Framework] that
1982) supports nursing practice and management of nursing
●Riverview Medical Center, Red Bank, New Jersey services” (McLaughlin et al., 1990, p. 175). The input to the
(Management Education Program for Staff Nurses, computer is clinical data from patients, structured within
Unit-based and Hospital-wide Educational Programs) the context of the Self-Care Framework. “Output from the
(O’Brien et al., 1992; Hooten, 1992) system includes production of individualized patient
●Veterans Administration Medical Center, Salem, care plans, a chronological record of patient care, reports
Virginia (Surgical Unit Staff Education Program) in narrative or chart form relating patient variables with
(McCoy, 1989) nurse action and patient outcomes, quality assurance
●University of Missouri-Columbia (Continuing reports, and other periodic management reports” (Bliss-
Education Course in Gerontological Nursing) Holtz, McLaughlin, & Taylor, 1990, p. 175). The
(Langland & Farrah, 1990) software also can generate personalized critical paths and
●Bessemer Carraway Medical Center, Bessemer, care maps. Placement of computers or terminals at the pa-
Alabama (Staff Development Program) (Romine, tient’s bedside facilitates comprehensive documentation
1986) (Paternostro, 1992). Furthermore, the software can be used
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 286
TABLE 8–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations.
288
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 289
(continued)
289
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 290
TABLE 8–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK (continued)
290
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 291
FAMILIES
Siblings of a premature or ill infant Doll-Speck et al., 1993
A family experiencing pertussis Logue, 1997
An African-American family living in an urban low-income Chin, 1985
housing project
A Spanish-American family with a mentally ill member Orem, 1983b
A family with a member with diabetes mellitus and Orem, 1983a
leukemia
A family with a member who is dying Jones, 1996
COMMUNITIES
A community Batra, 1996
A small urban community Abraham & Fallon, 1997
An urban community Nowakowski, 1980
An affluent residential community Hanchett, 1988
assumptions about human beings and the overall focus of had been adopted by both patients and staff. Anna and col-
the Self-Care Framework lead to the consumer-centric leagues (1978) also noted that a Mexican-American patient
form of nursing advocacy. They commented, “Although in the nursing home “did not see the relevance of perform-
Orem’s framework does not explicitly admonish paternal- ing self-care activities, and he functioned with the expecta-
istically based advocacy, [it] specifies that advocacy activi- tion that the staff would do everything for him” (p. 11).
ties should be limited to only those instances when an Similarly, Roach and Woods (1993) reported that although
individual is incapable of complete self-care, and that such physicians and many patients had positive responses to an
behaviors should be temporary, and patients should be Orem Self-Care Framework-based cooperative care pro-
provided with as much information regarding their health gram that encourages patient self-care and family involve-
as possible” (p. 160). ment in caregiving, the program “was not attractive to all
Similarly, the Self-Care Framework is congruent with patients” (p. 28). They attributed the lack of acceptance of
the primary health-care focus of the “Health for All by the cooperative care by patients at a veterans’ hospital in South
Year 2010” initiative and other similar initiatives. Dier Carolina “in part to the fact that many of our patients were
(1987) pointed to that congruence and proposed a collab- older men from traditional southern backgrounds who
orative project between Canada and Thailand that “com- were cared for by spouses and female relatives” even when
bines the Canadian experience in using Orem’s Self-Care the men were functionally able to care for themselves
Framework with the extensive Thai knowledge about nurs- (p. 29).
ing in primary health settings” (p. 326). Orem (2001) noted that when the person is able but re-
The emphasis on self-care agency during times of illness luctant to engage in self-care, he or she must be helped to
is, however, not completely congruent with some people’s view himself or herself as a self-care agent. Elaborating, she
expectations of nursing practice. Moreover, attention must stated, “Self-care is performed largely out of habit, but in-
be given to expectations of people of different regional and dividuals who have not thought about their self-care role
cultural groups. For example, Anna and associates (1978) may need to be helped to look at themselves as self-care
found that the nursing goal of self-care agency for the pa- agents in order to understand the values to which their
tient was not well accepted by either patients or staff of a habits commit them and to appraise the adequacy of their
nursing home. In that situation, a more dependent sick role self-care” (p. 256). Roach and Woods (1993) added that “in
view, with the nurse doing for and acting for the patient, such instances, patients were encouraged to learn to care
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 292
propriate use of the services occurs. Furthermore, empha- view of the person who is the patient is an appropriate one
sis on self-care agency could reduce the length of time for nursing.
the person requires health-care services. This may be Perhaps the most important contribution of the Self-
especially important in the continuing milieu of cost con- Care Framework is its explicit focus on what matters to
tainment. nurses and how that focus helps nurses to retain a nursing
The empirical evidence related to the social significance perspective in the multidisciplinary milieu of health care.
of the Self-Care Framework is, however, equivocal. Some Dodd (1997) explained that “Orem’s [framework] provides
study results reveal beneficial effects of framework-based a nursing-based focus and systematic guidelines for exam-
nursing interventions, but other results fail to support the ining the balance between a person’s needs, capabilities,
hypothesized benefits. Dodd (1997), for example, reported and limitations in exercising self-care actions to enhance
that her experimental studies have not always yielded the personal health. … Although we have incorporated knowl-
expected beneficial effects on self-care. Consequently, addi- edge from other disciplines (e.g., physiology, pharmacol-
tional research that builds on the knowledge gained from ogy, dentistry), Orem’s [framework] assisted us in
past research is warranted. As Dodd (1997) pointed out, maintaining a focus on issues salient to nursing practice”
“through testing of Orem’s [Self-Care Framework], we (p. 987).
have learned from the propositions that were supported Orem has continued to develop aspects of the Self-Care
and those that were not supported” (p. 987). Furthermore, Framework and the Theory of Self-Care, the Theory of
sufficient research addressing particular topics now exists Self-Care Deficit, and the Theory of Nursing System. In
to support a meta-analysis that could determine the mag- 1987, Orem (personal communication, August 6, 1987)
nitude of effects and identify design and other study char- stated that her future work would focus specifically on “de-
acteristics that may enhance understanding of the velopment of practice models, development of rules for
conflicting findings (Rosenthal, 1991). practice when certain conditions prevail, continued study
of ‘foundational capabilities and dispositions’ in their rela-
tionship to action, and development of … models for each
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE of the power components of self-care agency.”
DISCIPLINE OF NURSING In the fifth edition of her book, published in 1995,
Orem explained that advances in those areas had been
The Self-Care Framework and the Theory of Self-Care, the made by “teachers of generic undergraduate nursing stu-
Theory of Self-Care Deficit, and the Theory of Nursing dents, registered nurses and nursing assistants, nursing
System represent a substantial contribution to nursing practitioners in specialty areas of nursing, nursing re-
knowledge by providing an explicit and specific focus for searchers, nursing scholars, and theorists. Some develop-
nursing actions that is different from that of other health- ments, [however,] are scattered, awaiting the efforts of
care professions. Orem has fulfilled her goal of identifying scholars of [the Self-Care Framework] to organize specific
the domain and boundaries of nursing as a science and an developments and research findings within the structure
art. The Self-Care Framework has, as Orem (2001) pointed provided by the [framework]” (p. 437).
out, been widely accepted “by nursing practitioners, by In the sixth edition of her book, published in 2001,
nursing curriculum designers, by teachers of nursing, by Orem explained that her work can be organized into six
nursing researchers and scholars as a valid general compre- main themes. Those themes are:
hensive [nursing model]. It also [unfortunately] has been
denigrated and rejected by some nurses since its inception” ● Why persons need and can be helped through nursing
(p. 420). “Clearly,” as Isenberg (2001) declared, the Self- ● The tridimensional relationship between person who
Care Framework “is playing, and is expected to continue to need nursing and persons who produce nursing, includ-
play, a pivotal role in the advancement of nursing science ing a social relationship, an interpersonal relationship,
and professional practice” (p. 187) and a technologic or clinical relationship
The emphasis on self-care agency in the Self-Care ● The unitary nature of human beings who function as
Framework and the consideration given to the patient’s persons in their life situations
perspective of health status underscore the importance of ● Deliberate action, or actions that are deliberately selected
the person in the nursing care situation. The wide accept- and deliberately performed by persons to achieve a fore-
ance of the Self-Care Framework suggests that these fea- seen and desired result or condition that does not
tures are especially attractive to nurses who view the presently exist
person as capable of deliberate and independent action. ● The methods that one person can use in the process of
Moreover, the use of the framework in many different set- assisting or helping a person or persons do what should
tings and with different age groups suggests that Orem’s be done but which the person is unable to do because of
08Fawcett-08 09/17/2004 2:14 PM Page 294
Chapter 9
Rogers’ Science of Unitary
Human Beings
Overview ogy. Each concept and its dimensions and the compo-
nents of the practice methodology are defined and de-
scribed, and the goal of nursing is discussed in detail,
Rogers’ work focuses on unitary, irreducible human
later in this chapter.
beings and their environments. Rogers (personal com-
munication, June 17, 1987) regarded her work as an ab-
stract conceptual system that “is not of the same
order as the other conceptual models, nor does it de-
Key Terms
rive from the same world view. Rather, it derives from HUMAN BEINGS AND ENVIRONMENT
a different world view and deals with a different phe- ENERGY FIELD
nomenon.” The Science of Unitary Human Beings Human Energy Field
does, however, fit the definition of a conceptual model Environmental Energy Field
used in this book. OPENNESS
The concepts of the Science of Unitary Human PATTERN
Beings and their dimensions are listed here, along with PANDIMENSIONALITY
the components of the associated practice methodol- HOMEODYNAMICS
315
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 316
Unitary Human Beings reflect Rogers’ concern with lan- ● The uniqueness of nursing lies in its focus on unitary, ir-
guage and the insights she gained over the years from new reducible human beings and their environments
knowledge. She commented: (Rogers, 1994a, p. 3).
The development of a science of unitary human beings is a
● If … we believe that there is a body of knowledge unique
never-ending process. This abstract system first presented to nursing, we start out with a phenomenon that is
some years ago has continued to gain substance. Concomi- unique, and nursing is certainly unique in focusing on
tantly, early errors have undergone correction, definitions the irreducible human being and its environment, both
have been revised for greater clarity and accuracy, and updat- defined as energy fields (Rogers, 1994b, p. 33).
ing of content is ongoing (Rogers, 1992b, p. 28). ● Nursing knowledge is rooted in the new reality [of new
age science] and emerges as a synthesis of this new sci-
Philosophical Claims ence and metaphysics (Rogers, 1994a, p. 3).
● Nursing is a learned profession (Rogers, 1970, 1978a,
Rogers presented the philosophical claims undergirding 1978b, 1980a, 1986, 1992b).
the Science of Unitary Human Beings in the form of beliefs ● The explication of an organized body of abstract knowl-
about human beings, beliefs about energy fields, a be- edge specific to nursing is indispensable to nursing’s
lief about the world, assumptions about causality, assump- transition from pre-science to science (Rogers, 1970,
tions about nursing, assumptions about human beings and 1978a, 1978b, 1980a, 1986, 1992b).
nursing, and a belief about licensure for professional nurs- ● Nursing is … an independent science (Rogers, 1994b,
ing practice. Those philosophical claims are listed here. p. 34).
● [Nursing is a basic, open-ended science that builds and
Beliefs About Human Beings refines as] new knowledge brings new insights (Rogers,
● People have the capacity to participate knowingly and 1992b, p. 28).
probabilistically in the process of change (Rogers, 1970, ● [Nursing] science provides a unique view of people and
1978a, 1978b, 1980a, 1986, 1992b). their world (Rogers, 1994a, p. 3).
● [A belief] in a humane and optimistic view of life’s po- ● The focus of [nursing] science is different from that of
tentials [that] grows as a new reality appears (Rogers, any other field’s phenomenon of concern (Rogers,
1992b, p. 28). 1994a, p. 3).
● A science of unitary or irreducible human beings is
Beliefs About Energy Fields unique to nursing (Rogers, 1994a, p. 3).
● [Energy fields] constitute the fundamental unit of both ● Nursing is both an empirical science and an art (Rogers,
the living and the nonliving (Rogers, 1992b, p. 30). 1970, 1978a, 1978b, 1980a, 1986, 1992b).
● [Energy fields] are not biological fields, physical fields, ● The descriptive, explanatory, and predictive principles
social fields, or psychological fields. Nor are human and that direct nursing practice are derived from a concep-
environmental fields a summation of biological, physical, tual system (Rogers, 1970, 1978a, 1978b, 1980a, 1986,
social, and psychological fields (Rogers, 1992b, p. 30). 1992b).
● Nursing is an organized abstract system that uses its
Belief About the World knowledge in practice (Rogers, 1994a, p. 5).
● [Nursing] practice is not nursing; rather, it is the way in
● [A belief in a] new vision of a world encompassing far which we use nursing knowledge. … Practice is the use
more than planet earth … [and a future] of growing di- of nursing knowledge (Rogers, 1994a, p. 5).
versity, of accelerating evolution, and of nonrepeating
rhythmicities (Rogers, 1992b, p. 33).
Assumptions About Human Beings and Nursing
Assumptions About Causality
● Nursing exists to serve people. Its direct and over-riding
● The appearance of causality is an illusion, a mirage responsibility is to society … the safe practice of nursing
(Rogers, 1980a, p. 334). depends on the nature and amount of scientific nursing
● In a universe of open systems, causality is not an option knowledge the individual brings to practice and the
(Rogers, 1992b, p. 30). imaginative, intellectual judgment with which such
knowledge is made explicit in service to mankind
Assumptions About Nursing (Rogers, 1970, p. 122).
● Nursing … is … an independent discipline with its own ● Nursing’s abstract system is the outgrowth of concern for
unique phenomena, unique in terms of any other field human health and welfare. The science of nursing aims
(Rogers, 1994b, p. 34). to provide a growing body of theoretical knowledge
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 318
rect perception. Rogers’ denial of parts as constituting the view. … This new reality, whether called new age science
person is similar to the Buddhist argument that the aggre- or a similar expression, represents the foundation on
gates do not constitute the person” (p. 170). In addition, which the science of nursing is built. This new reality is
Hanchett (1992) noted that the Rogerian notion of unique one of synthesis and holism and gives a broadened per-
pattern within the integral human and environmental en- spective of science in the future (Rogers, 1994a, p. 3).
ergy fields “is similar to the functioning of recognizable, ● [A new world view,] compatible with the most progres-
conventional persons and phenomena within the inter- sive knowledge available … has become a necessary prel-
connected web of dependent arising in the middle way con- ude to studying human health and to determining
sequence school of Tibetan Buddhist philosophy” (p. 170). modalities for its promotion both on this planet and in
Although the Science of Unitary Human Beings reflects outer space. The [Science of Unitary Human Beings] is
a holistic view of the world, Rogers (1992b) did not ini- rooted in this new world view, a pandimensional view of
tially use the term holistic because of its ambiguous and people and their world (Rogers, 1992b, pp. 27–28).
varied meanings. She pointed out, “The use of the term ● The human energy field is regarded as an active organ-
unitary human beings is not to be confused with current ism who is integral with the environmental energy field
popular usage of the term holistic, generally signifying a (Rogers, 1986, 1990b, 1992b).
summation of parts, whether few or many. The unitary na- ● Human and environmental energy fields change contin-
ture of environment is equally irreducible. The concept of uously. Change, therefore, is regarded as natural and de-
field provides a means of perceiving people and their re- sirable.
spective environments as irreducible wholes’ (p. 29). ● Change just is (Rogers et al., 1990, p. 377).
Rogers (1970) explicitly rejected the reaction world view ● Change is creative and innovative, always in the direc-
tenet of reductionism, with its focus on parts, stating, tion of increasing diversity. Thus human beings
“Reductionism, representative of an atomistic world view always are progressing, always reaching toward their po-
in which complex things are built up of simple elements, is tential.
contrary to a perception of wholeness” (p. 87). She also ● Change is continuous, relative, and innovative. The in-
stated that her conceptual system “is humanistic, not creasing diversity of field patterning characterizes this
mechanistic. Moreover, this is an optimistic model though process of change. Individual differences serve only to
not a utopian one” (Rogers, 1987d, p. 141). She also explic- point up the significance of this relative diversity
itly rejected mechanistic causality, stating, “In a universe of (Rogers, 1992b, p. 31).
open systems, causality is not an option. Acausality had ● People’s capacity to participate knowingly in the process
come in with quantum theory.… Causality is invalid” of change is postulated (Rogers, 1992b, p. 28).
(Rogers, 1986, p. 5). Furthermore, Rogers (1970) rejected
the reaction world view of human beings as reacting to
environmental stimuli. She commented, “The all-too- UNIQUE FOCUS OF THE NURSING MODEL
common perception of man predominantly subjected to
multiple negative environmental influences with patholog- The unique focus of the Science of Unitary Human Beings
ical outcomes denies man’s unity with nature and his is “people and their worlds in a pandimensional universe”
evolutionary becoming” (p. 85). (Rogers, 1992b, p. 29). The distinction between nursing
The features of the simultaneous action world view that and other disciplines and the uniqueness of nursing lie in
are evident in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings the phenomenon of central interest to each, in what is
are: known rather than what is done in practice (Rogers,
1990b). The phenomenon of central concern to nursing is
● The Science of Unitary Human Beings clearly reflects a “the study of unitary, irreducible human beings and their
holistic view of human beings and environment. Human respective environments” (Rogers, 1990b, p. 108).
beings and the environment are clearly conceptualized as
irreducible, indivisible wholes (Rogers, 1970, 1978a, The uniqueness of nursing, like that of other sciences, lies in
1978b, 1980a, 1986, 1990b, 1992b). the phenomenon central to its focus. For nurses, that focus
● My own work focuses on developing a holistic world consists of a long-established concern with people and the
world they live in. It is the natural forerunner of an organized,
view by proposing a science of unitary, irreducible beings abstract system encompassing people and their environments.
that is coordinate with a world view that includes outer The irreducible nature of individuals is different from the sum
space. … A holistically oriented space-age paradigm is of their parts. Furthermore, the integrality of people and their
the substance of nursing’s science of unitary, irreducible environments coordinates with a pandimensional universe of
human beings (Rogers, 1990b, pp. 106–107). open systems, points to a new paradigm, and initiates the
● [We are on] the threshold of a new reality, a new world- identity of nursing as a science (Rogers, 1992b, p. 28).
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 320
CONTENT OF THE NURSING MODEL are specific to the whole and which cannot be predicted
from knowledge of the parts (Rogers, 1992b, p. 29).
Concepts
Rogers (1992b) extended the notion of the Human Energy
The metaparadigm concepts of human beings, environ- Field to groups. She commented that the Science of
ment, health, and nursing are reflected in the concepts of Unitary Human Beings “is equally as applicable to groups
the Science of Unitary Human Beings. Each conceptual as it is to individuals. The group energy field to be consid-
model concept is classified here according to its metapara- ered is identified. It may be a family, a social group, or a
digm forerunner. community, a crowd or some other combination” (p. 30).
The metaparadigm concepts of human beings and Group energy fields have the same characteristics as indi-
environment are represented by the Science of Unitary vidual energy fields—they are continuously open and inte-
Human Beings concepts of ENERGY FIELD, OPENNESS, gral with their own environmental fields, they are
PATTERN, PANDIMENSIONALITY, and HOMEODY- pandimensional, and they have pattern that changes con-
NAMICS. The concept of ENERGY FIELD has two tinuously.
dimensions—Human Energy Field and Environmental ● Environmental Energy Field: [The environment is] an
Energy Field. The concept of HOMEODYNAMICS has irreducible, [indivisible] pandimensional energy field
three dimensions—Resonancy, Helicy, and Integrality. identified by pattern and integral with the human [en-
The remaining concepts are unidimensional. ergy] field (Rogers, 1992b, p. 29).
The metaparadigm concept of health is represented by
the Science of Unitary Human Beings concept of WELL- OPENNESS
BEING. That concept is unidimensional.
The metaparadigm concept of nursing is represented ● Energy fields are open, not a little bit or sometimes, but
by the Science of Unitary Human Beings concepts of continuously (Rogers, 1992b, p. 30).
INDEPENDENT SCIENCE OF NURSING and ART OF ● Openness is nonvariant (Rogers, 1992b).
NURSING PRACTICE. Both of those concepts are unidi-
mensional. PATTERN
● [Pattern is] the distinguishing characteristic of an energy
Nonrelational Propositions field perceived as a single wave (Rogers, 1992b, p. 30).
● Pattern is an abstraction, its nature changes continu-
The definitions of the concepts of the Science of Unitary ously, and it gives identity to the field. … Each human
Human Beings are given here. These constitutive defini- field pattern is unique and is integral with its own unique
tions are the nonrelational propositions of this nursing environmental field pattern (Rogers, 1992b, p. 30).
model. ● Energy field patterns are not directly observable (Rogers,
1992b).
ENERGY FIELD ● Manifestations of field patterning are observable events
● A means of perceiving people and their respective envi- in the real world. They are postulated to emerge out of
ronments as irreducible wholes (Rogers, 1992b, p. 29). the human-environmental field mutual process (Rogers,
● Field … is a unifying concept and energy signifies the 1992b, p. 31).
dynamic nature of the field. Energy fields are infinite and
● Manifestations of energy field pattern range from the
pandimensional; they are in continuous motion (Rogers, physical body to such rhythmical phenomena as diver-
1992b, p. 30). sity in the experiences of time passing, the speed of mo-
tion, and sleep-wake cycles (Rogers, 1986, 1992b).
The concept of Energy Field encompasses two dimen- ● Rogers has stated that she considers “physical bodies to
sions—Human Energy Field and Environmental Energy be manifestations of field [pattern]” (Rogers et al., 1990,
Field. Rogers (1992b) pointed out that “human beings and p. 377).
the environment are energy fields; they do not have energy ● The evolution of life and non-life is a dynamic, irre-
fields” (p. 30). Consequently, the possessive cannot be used ducible, nonlinear process characterized by increasing
when referring to a human energy field or an environmen- complexification of energy field patterning. The nature
tal energy field. of change is unpredictable and increasingly diverse
(Rogers, 1990a, p. 8) (see Table 9–1).
● Human Energy Field: [The unitary human being is] an
irreducible, indivisible, pandimensional energy field The Pattern of an Energy Field is conceptualized as a wave
identified by pattern and manifesting characteristics that phenomenon. Rogers (1970) noted, “A multiplicity of
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 322
TABLE 9–1
MANIFESTATIONS OF RELATIVE DIVERSITY IN ENERGY FIELD PATTERNING
Adapted from Rogers, M.E. (1990). Nursing: Science of unitary, irreducible, human beings: Update 1990. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions
of Rogers’ science-based nursing (p. 9). New York: National League for Nursing, with permission.
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 323
bitrarily defined, culturally infused, and value laden” (p. ● Art of Nursing Practice: The creative use of the science
85). She went on to explain: of nursing for human betterment (Rogers, 1992b, p. 28).
Health and sickness, however defined, are expressions of the [Nursing’s] creative use of its knowledge [is] the art of
process of life. Whatever meaning they may have is derived out practice (Rogers, 1994a, p. 5).
of an understanding of the life process in its totality. Life’s de-
viant course demands that it be viewed in all of its dimensions Nursing, for Rogers (1994b), is “a learned field of en-
if valid explanations of its varied manifestations are to emerge deavor” (p. 34). Earlier, Rogers (1992b) referred to nursing
(p. 85). as “a learned profession” (p. 28).
Rogers (1992b) noted that “historically, the term ‘nurs-
Wellness and illness, then, are not differentiated within the ing’ most often has been used as a verb signifying ‘to do,’
context of the Science of Unitary Human Beings. Rather, rather than as a noun meaning ‘to know.’ When nursing is
they are considered value terms imposed by society. As identified as a science the term ‘nursing’ becomes a noun
such, “manifestations of human and environmental field signifying ‘a body of abstract knowledge’” (pp. 28–29). The
pattern deemed to have high value are labeled wellness by combination of the concepts of Independent Science of
the society, and those deemed to have low value are labeled Nursing and Art of Nursing Practice is evident in Rogers’
illness” (Rogers, 1980f). Similarly, “Disease and pathology (1992c) description of nursing as “compassionate concern
are value terms applied when the human field manifests for human beings. It is the heart that understands and the
characteristics that may be deemed undesirable” (Rogers, hand that soothes. It is the intellect that synthesizes many
1992b, p. 33). More specifically, within the Science of learnings into meaningful ministrations” (p. 1339).
Unitary Human Beings, “There are no absolute norms for The GOAL OF NURSING is “to promote human bet-
health. There are patterns that emerge from the human terment wherever people are, on planet earth or in outer
process that may be experienced as pain, happiness, illness, space” (Rogers, 1992b, p. 33). Although Rogers mentioned
or any behavior. Society labels some of these behaviors prevention of disease as a nursing goal in her 1970 book,
‘sick.’ What behaviors a society accepts as sick or well she later pointed out that prevention is a negative concept
varies with culture and history. Families also have their that is contradicted by the philosophical and conceptual
own definitions of sick or well. … So there are no absolutes tenets of the Science of Unitary Human Beings (Rogers,
about what constitutes sickness or wellness” (Madrid & 1980g). She also pointed out that the term promotion re-
Winstead-Fry, 1986, p. 91). flects a more positive, optimistic approach and therefore is
In keeping with the Science of Unitary Human Beings, consistent with the Science of Unitary Human Beings.
Madrid and Winstead-Fry (1986) then defined health as The nursing process, according to Rogers (1970), fol-
“participation in the life process by choosing and executing lows from the Independent Science of Nursing. She ex-
behaviors that lead to the maximum fulfillment of a per- plained:
son’s potential” (p. 91).
Despite her lack of differentiation of wellness and ill- Broad principles are put together in novel ways to help explain
ness, Rogers (1970) viewed those health states in the form a wide range of events and multiplicity of individual differ-
of a continuum. She explained, “Health and illness are part ences. Action, based on predictions arising out of intellectual
of the same continuum. They are not dichotomous condi- skill in the merging of scientific principles, becomes under-
tions. The multiple events taking place along life’s axis de- written by intellectual judgments (pp. 87–88).
note the extent to which man is achieving his maximum
health potential and vary in their expressions from greatest Rogers (1978b) regarded the nursing process as a modality
health to those conditions which are incompatible with for application of nursing knowledge but lacking in any
maintaining life processes” (p. 125). However, Rogers substance of its own. She did not specify a particular nurs-
(1970) indicated that she thought that society views well- ing process format but did mention assessment,
ness and illness as dichotomous, discrete entities. diagnosis, goal setting, intervention, and evaluation in
her 1970 book. Although Rogers’ later publications and
NURSING presentations did not explicitly address a nursing process,
components of a PRACTICE METHODOLOGY can be
The concept of Nursing encompasses two dimensions— extracted from those and related works, especially Barrett’s
Independent Science of Nursing and Art of Nursing (1988, 1990c, 1998) and Cowling’s (1990) descriptions of
Practice. health patterning and Cowling’s (1997) description of
● Independent Science of Nursing: An organized body of pattern appreciation. The Science of Unitary Human
abstract knowledge arrived at by scientific research and Beings PRACTICE METHODOLOGY, THE HEALTH
logical analysis (Rogers, 1992b, p. 28; 1994b). A body of PATTERNING PRACTICE METHOD, is outlined in Table
knowledge specific to nursing (Rogers, 1994a, p. 5). 9–2.
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 324
TABLE 9–2
THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE HEALTH PATTERNING
PRACTICE METHOD
324
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 325
Constructed from Barrett, 1988, 1990b, 1990c, 1993, 1998; Boguslawski, 1990; Butcher, 2001; Cowling, 1990, 1997; Rogers, 1970, 1980f,
1980g, 1985c, 1987b, 1990a, 1992b, 1994a; Rogers et al., 1990.
With regard to nursing practice, Rogers (1992b) noted assessment, diagnosis, and goal-setting phases of the nurs-
that as the diversity of the Pattern of the Human Energy ing process. Knowing refers to apprehending pattern man-
Field and the Environmental Energy Field increases, “so ifestations (Barrett, 1988), and appreciation refers to
too will individualization of [nursing] services” (p. 33). She perception of the pattern (Cowling, 1997). Drawing from
maintained that the individualization of nursing services is Cowling (1997), Butcher (2001) explained that “Apprecia-
necessary to help people achieve their maximum potential tion requires sensitivity [and] recognition of the excellence
in a positive fashion. of the meaning of energy field patterning .… Appreciation
The diversity of human and environment energy field is reaching for the essence of pattern and has the potential
pattern manifestations is apprehended through what to deepen understanding [of] … the client’s process
Rogers (1990a, 1992b) referred to as synthesis and pattern of knowing participation in change and transformation”
seeing. Elaborating, Barrett (1988) identified pattern (p. 209).
manifestation appraisal, which she later renamed Pattern The second component of the HEALTH PATTERNING
Manifestation Knowing (Barrett, 1998), as the first com- PRACTICE METHOD originally was called deliberative
ponent of the Science of Unitary Human Beings HEALTH mutual patterning (Barrett, 1988) but has been renamed
PATTERNING PRACTICE METHOD. The Pattern Mani- Voluntary Mutual Patterning (Barrett, 1998). That com-
festation Knowing and Appreciation—Assessment com- ponent refers to what typically is regarded as the interven-
ponent encompasses what typically is regarded as the tion phase of the nursing process.
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 326
Beings. Other philosophical claims, in the form of Rogers’ fied. Health is designated as well-being and is defined
beliefs, were easily extracted from her publications. Those through its relation to the life process. Furthermore, desig-
assumptions and beliefs indicate that Rogers viewed nurs- nation of health conditions as wellness or illness is consid-
ing as a legitimate science and an art that must base its ered a social value.
practice on a body of empirically adequate knowledge. The Moreover, nursing is described, and emphasis is placed
assumptions also indicate that Rogers valued a unitary on its characteristics as a noun. The goal of nursing is
view of human beings and the environment. Rogers clearly delineated. A nursing process, in the form of the
pointed out that this perspective of human beings identi- Health Patterning Practice Method, was extracted from
fies nursing as a unique discipline. Rogers’ publications and from publications by main pro-
Rogers repeatedly emphasized her view that health is so- ponents of the Science of Unitary Human Beings.
cially defined, which suggests that she expected specific The Science of Unitary Human Beings is consistent with
goals for nursing intervention to be based on the values of scientific findings. That is particularly evident in Rogers’
society, not those of the nurse or nursing alone. Moreover, insistence that nursing actions—the Art of Nursing
Rogers’ discussion of nursing intervention indicates that Practice—must stem from an organized and empirically
she valued individualized nursing for each person. Indeed, adequate knowledge base—the Independent Science of
individualized nursing is mandated by the Science of Nursing. Indeed, Rogers repeatedly emphasized that nurs-
Unitary Human Beings because of the uniqueness and di- ing is an empirical science, such that any and all judgments
versity of each human energy field. must be based on scientific knowledge. She commented,
Rogers explained how she drew from the knowledge of “The education of nurses gains its identity by the trans-
various sciences in developing the Science of Unitary mission of nursing’s body of theoretical knowledge. The
Human Beings, and she cited the works of several scholars practice of nurses, therefore, is the creative use of this
from adjunctive disciplines. Refinements in the Science of knowledge in human service” (Rogers, 1992b, p. 29).
Unitary Human Beings can clearly be traced to new knowl- Rogers always maintained that nursing practice must be
edge in nursing and adjunctive disciplines. For example, in theory-based. More specifically, she declared, “Nursing
explaining the change in the definition of helicy from the practice must be flexible and creative, individualized and
term probabilistic to the term unpredictable, Rogers socially oriented, compassionate and skillful. Professional
(1990a, 1992b) cited publications about chaos theory. practitioners in nursing must be continuously translating
Interestingly, however, Rogers (as cited in Huch, 1995) theoretical knowledge into human service.… Nursing’s
seemed to reject chaos theory when she noted that “chaos conceptual system provides the foundation for nursing
is from an old worldview” (p. 43). Elaborating, she stated: practice” (Rogers, 1970, p. 128).
Rogers (1987a) also declared, “For nurses to fulfill their
There is nothing new about the idea of chaos theory; it had
been proposed 30 to 40 years ago and had been worked on
social and professional responsibilities in the days ahead
then. But what they were saying was, since the human being is demands that their practice be based upon a substantive
not very knowledgeable and he can’t possibly know every- theoretical base specific to nursing. The practice of nurses
thing, then of course he can’t predict everything. Then there is the use of this knowledge in service to people” (pp.
was a great big but; but if the human being did know every- 121–122). Furthermore, Rogers (1980a) stated, “Broad
thing, it would all be laid out and he could predict everything. principles to guide practice must replace rule-of-thumb”
In other words, the some old absolutist philosophy that was (p. 337).
supposedly pushed out of the way around the turn of the cen- The dynamic nature of nursing is evident in Rogers’
tury when Einstein and some of the others came along (1970) statement that “the dynamic nature of life signifies
(Rogers, as cited in Huch, 1995, p. 43). continuous revision of the nature and meaning of diag-
nostic data and concomitant revision of interventional
COMPREHENSIVENESS OF CONTENT measures” (p. 125). In addition, the dynamic nature of the
Health Patterning Practice Method is evident in Voluntary
The Science of Unitary Human Beings is sufficiently com- Mutual Patterning as nurse and participants in nursing are
prehensive with regard to depth of content. The many re- in continuous mutual process and also is evident in the use
visions and refinements in the conceptual system attest to of Pattern Manifestation Knowing and Appreciation for
Rogers’ concern for precision in language. Rogers defined evaluation of pattern manifestations following the applica-
and described the four metaparadigm concepts—human tion of nursing modalities.
beings, environment, health, nursing—sufficiently for a The Science of Unitary Human Beings is compatible
conceptual model. Human beings and environment are with ethical standards for nursing practice. Rogers (1992b)
clearly defined, and the relationship between unitary commented, “Continued emphasis on human rights, client
human beings and their environments is explicitly identi- decision-making, and noncompliance with the traditional
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 328
method, the unitary field pattern portrait research meaning, testing the hypodeductive system for consis-
method, and the photo-disclosure methodology. tency, and then testing correspondence to the world.
● Case studies and longitudinal research designs that ● Data should be interpreted within the context of the
focus on the identification of manifestations of human concepts and propositions of the Science of Unitary
and environmental energy field patterns are more ap- Human Beings.
propriate than cross-sectional designs, given the em- ● Bracketing and objectivity are not possible given the
phasis in the Science of Unitary Human Beings on the integral nature of the researcher and the study partici-
uniqueness of the unitary human being. pants as energy fields in mutual process.
● Hypotheses should not be stated in causal language,
in recognition of the unitary nature of the problem to
● Contributions
be studied and Rogers’ rejection of the notion of
●Science of Unitary Human Beings–based research en-
causality. hances understanding of the continuous mutual
● Purposive sampling is appropriate, so that study par- process of human and environmental energy fields and
ticipants who manifest the phenomenon of interest manifestations of changes in energy field patterns.
may be included. Ultimately, Science of Unitary Human Beings–based
● Research instruments that are directly derived from research will yield a body of nursing-specific knowl-
the Science of Unitary Human Beings should be used edge.
(see Table 9–3).
● Researchers are the primary pattern-apprehending in-
strument, as they are the only instrument sensitive to Nursing Education Guidelines
and able to interpret and understand pandimensional
potentialialities in manifestations of human and envi- The guidelines for nursing research based on the Science of
ronmental energy field patterns. The researcher may Unitary Human Begins, which were constructed from
use tacit and mystical intuition and all forms of sen- Barrett (1990a), Gueldner et al. (1994), Mathwig et al.
sory knowing to apprehend pattern manifestations. (1990), Rogers (1961, 1970, 1985a, 1987a, 1990b, 1994a),
● Inclusion of study participants in the process of in- Rogers (as cited in Takahashi, 1992), and Young (1985),
quiry enhances mutual exploration, discovery, and are:
knowing participation in change. ● Focus of the curriculum
● Research design may change and evolve during a ● Nursing education can be for professional nursing or
study; any changes should be documented. for technical nursing. The type of practice depends on
the nature and amount of knowledge that underwrites
● Data analysis the two separate career paths.
●Synthesis rather than an analysis that separates parts is ● Although Rogers acknowledged the importance of
the goal of data analysis. both professional and technical nursing education
●Data analysis techniques must take the unitary nature as entry levels to practice, the focus of the guide-
of human beings and the integrality of the human and lines for Science of Unitary Human Beings–based
environmental energy fields into account. Conse- nursing education is on preparation for professional
quently, the use of standard data analysis techniques nursing.
that employ the components of variance model of sta- ● The purpose of professional education is to provide
tistics is precluded, because this statistical model is log- knowledge and the tools to use that knowledge in
ically inconsistent with the assumption of holism practice.
stating that the whole is greater than the sum of parts. ● The focus of Science of Unitary Human Beings–based
●Multivariate analysis procedures, particularly canoni- professional nursing education programs is the trans-
cal correlation, are useful techniques for generating a mission of a body of scholarly nursing knowledge.
constellation of variables representing human field
pattern properties. However, canonical correlation is a ● Nature and sequence of content
component of variance procedure, as are all paramet- ●The content of a Science of Unitary Human Beings–
ric correlational techniques. based curriculum encompasses a body of scientific
●New data analysis techniques that permit examination knowledge specific to nursing. That body of knowl-
of the integrality of human and environmental energy edge determines the safety and scope of nursing prac-
fields must be developed so that the ongoing testing of tice. The imaginative and creative use of knowledge for
the Science of Unitary Human Beings does not have to the betterment of humankind finds expression in the
be done through the logical empiricist criterion of art of nursing.
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 330
Health as Expanding Consciousness. The central thesis of ● Theory of Kaleidoscoping in Life’s Turbulence (Butcher,
the theory is that health is the expansion of consciousness. (1993)
According to Newman (1986, 1994), the meanings of life ● Theory of Enfolding Health-as-Wholeness-and-
and health are found in the evolving process of expanding Harmony (Barrett et al., 1997)
consciousness. More specifically, the theory asserts that ● Theory of Healthiness (Leddy & Fawcett, 1997)
“every person in every situation, no matter how disordered ● Theory of Perceived Dissonance (Bultemeier, 1997a)
and hopeless it may seem, is part of the universal process of ● Theory of Aging (Alligood & McGuire, 2000)
expanding consciousness” (Newman, 1992, p. 650). ● Theory of Enlightenment (Hills & Hanchett, 2001)
Parse (1981, 1992, 1998) formulated a grand theory, ● Theory of the Art of Professional Nursing (Alligood,
now called the Theory of Human Becoming, that “synthe- 2002b)
sizes Martha E. Rogers’ principles and concepts about
man with major tenets and concepts from existential- Barrett (1986; Caroselli & Barrett, 1998) derived a middle-
phenomenological thought” (Parse, 1981, p. 4). In particu- range theory of power—the Theory of Knowing
lar, Parse based her theory on Rogers’ principles of helicy, Participation in Change—from the principle of helicy.
complementarity (now integrality), and resonancy; Rogers’ Power is defined as “the capacity to participate knowingly
concepts of energy field, openness, pattern and organiza- in the nature of change characterizing the continuous
tion, and four- dimensionality (now pandimensionality); repatterning of the human and environmental fields” (p.
and the existential phenomenological tenets of human 174). Elaborating, Barrett (1986) explained that knowing
subjectivity and intentionality and the concepts of cocon- participation “is being aware of what one is choosing to do,
stitution, coexistence, and situated freedom. The central feeling free to do it, and doing it intentionally. Awareness
thesis of the Theory of Human Becoming is that “humans and freedom to act intentionally guide participation in
participate with the universe in the cocreation of health” choices and involvement in creating changes” (p. 175).
(Parse, 1992, p. 37). Parse (as cited in Takahashi, 1992) ex- Ference (1986b, 1989) derived a middle-range theory
plained that “human becoming refers to the human being from the principle of resonancy. The Theory of Human
structuring meaning multidimensionally while cocreating Field Motion proposes that “as a human field engages in
rhythmical patterns of relating and cotranscending with ever-higher levels of human field motion, the pattern
possibles” (p. 86). evolves toward greater complexity, diversity, and differenti-
Fitzpatrick (1983, 1989) derived the Life Perspective ation” (Ference, 1989, p. 123). Ference (1989) cited empir-
Rhythm Model, which can be considered a grand theory, ical evidence of the correlates of human field motion,
from the Science of Unitary Human Beings and from the stating that “human field motion expands with increased
findings of research by Fitzpatrick (1980), Fitzpatrick and physical motion, with meditation, with risk-taking, and
Donovan (1978), and Fitzpatrick, Donovan, and Johnston with higher levels of participation in change” (p. 123).
(1980). The life perspective rhythm model, according to Parker (1989) derived the Theory of Sentience
Fitzpatrick (1989), “is a developmental model which pro- Evolution from the concept of sentience, which Rogers
poses that the process of human development is character- (1970) included as a concept in an early version of her con-
ized by rhythms. Human development occurs within the ceptual system. The theory focuses on sleeping, waking,
context of continuous person-environment interaction. and beyond waking, which are regarded as manifestations
Basic human rhythms that describe the development of of relative diversity in energy field patterning (see Table
persons include the identified indices of holistic human 9–1). “Sentience evolution,” according to Parker (1989), “is
functioning, that is, temporal patterns, motion patterns, thinking, feeling, and perceiving in the sleeping, waking,
consciousness patterns, and perceptual patterns. The and beyond waking states” (p. 5). Accordingly, beyond
rhythmic correlates developed by Rogers are consistent waking is “sentience experienced as a higher frequency
with this life perspective rhythm model” (p. 405). phenomenon” (p. 5).
The middle-range theories that have been derived from Alligood (1991) derived her middle-range theory—the
the Science of Unitary Human Beings are: Theory of Creativity, Actualization, and Empathy—from
Rogers’ Theory of Accelerating Evolution, which is a grand
● Power as Knowing Participation in Change (Barrett, theory. Alligood’s theory proposes that creativity and
1986; Caroselli & Barrett, 1998) actualization are related to empathy. The conceptual-
● Theory of Human Field Motion (Ference, 1986b, 1989) theoretical-empirical structure for Alligood’s work was
● Theory of Sentience Evolution (Parker, 1989) presented by Fawcett (1994). Empirical research supported
● Theory of Creativity, Actualization, and Empathy the empirical adequacy of Alligood’s (1991) theory for men
(Alligood, 1991) and women 18 to 60 years of age, but not for men and
● Theory of Self-Transcendence (Reed, 1991, 1997) women 61 to 92 years of age.
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 334
Hanchett (2001) reported that their research findings sup- practice based on the Science of Unitary Human Beings re-
ported all but the last proposition. They explained, “The quires a commitment to lifelong learning and the use of
finding that awareness and human field motion were each what nurses know as well as what they can imagine.
associated with as much variance in well-being as all three Implementation also requires creativity and compassion.
[concepts, i.e., awareness, wakefulness, and human field The new reality represented by the Science of Unitary
motion] together suggest the theory of enlightening needs Human Beings requires “new ways of thinking, new ques-
further development” (p. 16). tions, new interpretations” (Rogers, 1990b, p. 111). In par-
Alligood (2002b) formalized a Theory of the Art of Pro- ticular, nurses “should learn to think through what it is
fessional Nursing from Rogers’ publications through use of they are dealing with and then practice will always be new
an interpretive hermeneutic research approach. The three and innovative” (Rogers, as cited in Takahashi, 1992, p. 89).
concepts of the theory—respect, responsibility, and empa- Gueldner and colleagues (1994) emphasized the impor-
thy—were derived from the homeodynamic principles of tance of experiential learning when initially introduced to
the Science of Unitary Human Beings. Respect was derived the Science of Unitary Human Beings. They recommended
from the principle of resonancy; responsibility, from the such strategies as a week-long retreat, mentoring by
principle of helicy; and integrality, from the principle of Science of Unitary Human Beings nurse experts, opportu-
integrality. The theory proposes that the art of professional nities for free-flowing dialogue and reflection, and atten-
nursing is the nurse’s ability to balance respect for human dance at the Rogerian conferences.
freedom and individual rights with responsibility for the Rogers’ conception of human beings as unitary and the
welfare of others through empathy. presentation of the Science of Unitary Human Beings in
Butcher (2001) considers the Personalized Nursing just a few concepts and propositions might be considered
LIGHT Model (Anderson & Smereck, 1989a, 1989b, 1992) elegant in its simplicity. Yet as Newman (1972) noted,
to be a middle-range practice theory. Close examination of “Many a graduate student will attest to the difficulty of re-
the publications about that model, however, indicate that is organizing one’s thinking about [each human being] in
it a derivative of the Science of Unitary Human Beings but order to consider [him or her] a unified being and not as a
has not been formalized as a set of relatively concrete and composite of organs and systems and various psychosocial
specific concepts and propositions. components” (pp. 451–452). Although the same might be
said about any conceptual model that puts forth a holistic
view of human beings, some nurses find it especially diffi-
CREDIBILITY OF THE NURSING MODEL cult when studying the Science of Unitary Human Beings.
Social Utility Perhaps the difficulty is associated with a view of the
world that “requires a new synthesis, a creative leap and in-
The social utility of the Science of Unitary Human Beings culcation of new attitudes and values” (Rogers, 1989, p.
is well documented by its use as a guide for nursing re- 188). Or it may be due to Rogers’ use of ideas and associ-
search, education, administration, and practice. Rogerian ated terms that are unfamiliar to some people. Rogers
conferences have been held in New York City every 2 to 4 (1970, 1978a, 1980b, 1986, 1990a, 1992b) has, however, re-
years since 1983, and the Society of Rogerian Scholars peatedly defended her terminology, pointing out that she
sponsors conferences every 1 or 2 years. Malinski’s (1986a) selected terms that are in the general language and initially
edited book, Explorations on Martha Rogers’ Science of defined those terms according to the dictionary. As the Sci-
Unitary Human Beings, Barrett’s (1990d) edited book, ence of Unitary Human Beings evolved, Rogers recognized
Visions of Rogers’ Science-Based Nursing, Madrid and the need for more specific definitions to facilitate unifor-
Barrett’s (1994) edited book, Rogers’ Scientific Art of mity of usage and precision. She noted that this procedure
Nursing Practice, and Madrid’s (1997) edited book, Patterns is common in all sciences. Nevertheless, use of the Science
of Rogerian Knowing are devoted exclusively to reports of of Unitary Human Beings must be preceded by mastery of
and issues related to research and practice derived from the a vocabulary that may be new to many nurses. This task
Science of Unitary Human Beings. Two other books, can be facilitated by use of the glossary of terms that is in-
Martha E. Rogers: Eighty Years of Excellence and Martha E. cluded in Rogers’ (1986, 1990a, 1992b) publications.
Rogers: Her Life and Her Work, both edited by Barrett and The application of the Science of Unitary Human
Malinski, were published in 1994. In addition, the official Beings in nursing practice is feasible. Comprehensive plans
journal of the Society of Rogerian Scholars, Visions: The for introducing the Science of Unitary Human Beings into
Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, premiered in 1993. a nursing service setting have been described by Ference
The use of the Science of Unitary Human Beings re- (1989), Heggie and colleagues (1989, 1994), and Caroselli
quires considerable background and ongoing study. Rogers (1994). The three plans are presented in an integrated
(1990b) maintained that the implementation of nursing manner here.
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 336
highly complex philosophical nature, but also because it reflect the investigators’ creative attempts to devise strate-
cannot influence the politico-legal components” (p. 671). gies for the study of energy field pattern manifestations. As
Parse (2001) pointed out, the Science of Unitary Human
Nursing Research. The utility of the Science of Unitary Beings-specific research methodologies are qualitative ap-
Human Beings for nursing research is very well docu- proaches. In contrast, the research instruments are quanti-
mented. In recent years, Science of Unitary Human Beings- tative in nature, with the exception of Carboni’s Mutual
specific research methodologies have been developed. Exploration of the Healing Human-Environmental Field
Those methodologies are: Relationship instrument, which employs a qualitative ap-
proach (see Table 9–3).
● Unitary Pattern Appreciation Case Method (Cowling,
Garon (2002) listed the Time Metaphor Test as a tool
1997, 1998, 2001)
developed for the Science of Unitary Human Beings. That
● Rogerian Process of Inquiry (Carboni, 1995)
research instrument was not, however, directly derived
● Unitary Field Pattern Portrait Research Method
from the Science of Unitary Human Beings, although it has
(Butcher, 1994, 1998, 2001)
● Photo-Disclosure Methodology (Bultemeier, 1997a) been used in studies based on the Science. The results of
Watson, Sloyan, and Robalino’s (2000) psychometric test of
Furthermore, several research instruments have been de- the Time Metaphor Test indicated that modifications are
rived directly from the Science of Unitary Human Beings needed for use in Science of Unitary Human Beings-based
(Table 9–3). The research methodologies and instruments research.
TABLE 9–3
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE SCIENCE
OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Human Field Motion Test (HFMT) (Ference, Measures human field motion by means of semantic differential rat-
1980, 1986; Young et al., 2001) ings of the concepts My Motor Is Running and My Field Expansion.
Perceived Field Motion Scale (PFM) (Yarcheski Measures the perceived experience of motion by means of semantic
& Mahon, 1991; Young et al., 2001) differential ratings of the concept My Field Motion.
Human Field Rhythms (HFR) (Yarcheski & Measures the frequency of rhythms in human-environmental energy
Mahon, 1991; Young et al., 2001) field mutual process by means of a one-item visual analogue scale.
Index of Field Energy (IFE) (Gueldner, as cited Measures human field dynamics by means of semantic differential rat-
in Watson et al., 1997; Young et al., 2001) ings of 18 pairs of simple black-and-white line drawings.
Power as Knowing Participation in Change Measures the person’s capacity to participate knowingly in change by
Tool (PKPCT) (Barrett, 1984, 1986, 1990; means of semantic differential ratings of the concepts Awareness,
Watson et al., 1997; Young et al., 2001) Choices, Freedom to Act Intentionally, and Involvement in Creating
Changes.
Diversity of Human Field Pattern Scale Measures diversity of human field pattern, or the degree of change in
(DHFPS) (Hastings-Tolsma, 1993; the evolution of human potential throughout the life process, by
Watson et al., 1997; Young et al., 2001) means of Likert scale ratings of 16 items.
Human Field Image Metaphor Scale Measures the individual’s awareness of the infinite wholeness of the
(HFIMS) (Johnston, 1993a, 1993b, human field by means of Likert scale ratings of 14 metaphors that
1994; Young et al., 2001) represent perceived potential and 11 metaphors that represent per-
ceived field integrality.
Temporal Experiences Scale (TES) Measures subjective experience of temporal awareness by means of
(Paletta, 1988, 1990; Young et al., 2001) Likert scale ratings of 24 metaphors representing the factors of
time dragging, time racing, and timelessness.
*See the Research Instruments and Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 338
TABLE 9–3
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE SCIENCE
OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS (continued)
Assessment of Dream Experience (ADE) Measures dreaming as a beyond waking experience by means of
(Watson, 1994, 1999; Watson et al., Likert scale ratings of the extent to which 20 items describe what
1997; Young et al., 2001) the individual’s dreams have been like during the past 2 weeks.
Person-Environment Participation Scale (PEPS) Measures the person’s experience of continuous human-
(Leddy, 1995, 1999; Young et al., 2001) environment mutual process by means of semantic differential
ratings of 15 bipolar adjectives representing the content areas of
comfort, influence, continuity, ease, and energy.
Leddy Healthiness Scale (LHS) (Leddy, Measures the person’s perceived purpose and power to achieve
1996; Young et al., 2001) goals by means of Likert scale ratings of 26 items representing
meaningfulness, ends, choice, challenge, confidence, control, ca-
pacity, capability to function, and connections.
McCanse Readiness for Death Instrument Measures physiological, psychological, sociological, and spiritual as-
(MRDI) (McCanse, 1988, 1995) pects of healthy field pattern as death is developmentally ap-
proached by means of a 26-item structured interview
questionnaire.
Mutual Exploration of the Healing Human- Measures nurses’ and clients’ experiences and expressions of chang-
Environmental Field Relationship (Carboni, ing configurations of energy field patterns of the healing human-
1992; Young et al., 2001) environmental field relationship using semi-structured and
open-ended items. Forms for a nurse and a single client and a
nurse and two or more clients are available.
PRACTICE TOOLS
Nursing Process Format (Falco & Lobo, 1995) Guides use of a Rogerian nursing process, including nursing assess-
ment, nursing diagnosis, nursing planning for implementation, and
nursing evaluation according to the homeodynamic principles of in-
tegrality, resonancy, and helicy.
Assessment Tool (Smith et al., 1991) Guides use of a Rogerian nursing process, including assessment, di-
agnosis, implementation, and evaluation according to the homeo-
dynamic principles of complementarity (i.e., integrality), resonancy,
and helicy, for patients hospitalized in a critical care unit and their
family members, using open-ended questions.
Critical Thinking for Pattern Appraisal, Mutual Provides guidance for the nurse’s application of pattern appraisal,
Patterning, and Evaluation Tool (Bultemeier, mutual patterning, and evaluation, as well as areas for the client’s
2002) self-reflection, patterning activities, and personal appraisal.
Nursing Assessment of Patterns Indicative of Guides assessment of pattern, including relative present, communi-
Health (Madrid & Winstead-Fry, 1986) cation, sense of rhythm, connection to environment, personal
myth, and system integrity.
Assessment Tool for Postpartum Mothers Guides assessment of mothers experiencing the challenges of their
(Tettero et al., 1993) first child during the postpartum period.
Assessment Criteria for Nursing Evaluation of Guides assessment of the functional status of older adults living in
the Older Adult (Decker, 1989) their own homes, including demographic data, client prioritization
of problems, sequential patterning (e.g., family of origin, culture,
past illnesses), rhythmic patterning (e.g., health-care usage, med-
ication usage, social contacts, acute illnesses), and cross-sectional
patterning (e.g., current living arrangements and health concerns,
cognitive and emotional status).
338
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 339
As can be seen in the Doctoral Dissertations and 1970s also focused on locus of control, field independence,
Master’s Theses sections of the chapter bibliography on the and differentiation, exemplified by research conducted by
CD-ROM, a great many dissertations and theses have been Barnard (1973), Miller (1974), and Swanson (1976).
guided by the Science of Unitary Human Beings. Ference Ference (1986a) pointed out that much of the early re-
(1986a), who traced the evolution of research that was search only mentioned Rogers’ work and used theories
guided by the Science of Unitary Human Beings from the borrowed from other disciplines as a basis for hypotheses.
late 1960s through the mid-1980s, noted that the early Research conducted during the late 1970s and into the
studies were conducted as doctoral dissertations at New 1980s used the Science of Unitary Human Beings in a more
York University. She explained that all of those studies comprehensive manner, often identifying a particular prin-
“were based upon some guiding assumptions and a philos- ciple of homeodynamics as the focus of study. One of the
ophy that the nurse cares for the whole person” (p. 37). Her first studies that reflected that focus was conducted by
retrospective analysis of those studies yielded groupings of Ference (1980) herself.
research. In the mid-1960s, studies focused on human de- Review of published reports of Science of Unitary
velopment, such as Porter’s (1968) research, and on man- Human Beings–based research revealed a growing number
environment interaction, exemplified by Mathwig’s (1968) of descriptive studies, many correlational studies, and sev-
research. Research conducted from the late 1960s to the late eral experimental studies. This research is listed in Table
1970s focused on body image, exemplified by Fawcett’s 9–4.
(1977) and Chodil’s (1979) studies. Several studies com- Much of the published research focuses on the indi-
pleted in the early to mid-1970s focused on the variable of vidual human energy field, although some investigators
time, such as the research by Newman (1971) and have explored family-related phenomena in childbearing
Fitzpatrick (1976). Studies conducted during the early couples or mother-daughter dyads (see Table 9–4).
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 340
TABLE 9–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY
HUMAN BEINGS
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Evaluation of the Time Metaphor Test Adults living in the mid-Atlantic region of the Watson et al., 2000
United States
Perception of the human energy field Children 3–9 years of age France, 1993
Physical and psychological symptoms Childbearing women and their husbands residing Drake, Verhulst, &
during pregnancy and the postpartum in Canada Fawcett, 1988
Essence of the lived experience of Registrants of the American Holistic Nurses’ Lincoln, 2000
an ecospiritual consciousness Association Certificate Program in Holistic
Nursing
The lived experience of recovering Recovering addicts Banonis, 1989
from addiction
Description of self-attributes Elderly persons residing in a retirement home Donahue & Alligood, 1995
Factors associated with patterns of Older adults who experienced a stroke Bays, 2001
hope
Description of dispiritedness Adults 52–92 years of age who identified them- Butcher, 1996
selves as having experienced dispiritedness
Physical, social, and emotional obsta- Gay men, heterosexual men, and women taking Halkitis & Kirton, 1999
cles to and self-strategies to en- highly active antiretroviral therapy
hance taking prescribed HIV
antiretroviral medications
The process of extraordinary healing Individuals who experienced spontaneous remis- Schneider, 1995
sions or healing that could not be explained by
medical treatment received
Description of patterns of symptoms Adults with multiple sclerosis Gulick & Bugg, 1992
and activities of daily living
Description of nursing practice with Case study of a nurse expert in addictions nurs- Conti-O’Hare, 1998
addicted clients ing practice
Experiences of giving and receiving Case study of a woman suffering from migraine Green, 1996
therapeutic touch headache and a nurse
Case study of a client experiencing pain and as- Green, 1998
sociated anxiety and a nurse
Description of the experience of Adults who received therapeutic touch Samarel, 1992
therapeutic touch
Adults who received therapeutic touch and the Heidt, 1990
nurses who gave the therapeutic touch
Description of the experience of Individuals who work with the meditations of Gibson, 1996
meditation Lazaris
Mental health status Older adults Reed, 1989
The meaning of laughing at oneself Senior citizens Reeder, 1991
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
341
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 342
TABLE 9–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY
HUMAN BEINGS (continued)
342
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 343
(continued)
343
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 344
TABLE 9–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY
HUMAN BEINGS (continued)
344
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 345
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effect of experimental therapeutic Adult males and females hospitalized in a car- Quinn, 1984
touch (TT) and control mimic TT on diovascular unit
anxiety Adult males and females scheduled for open Quinn, 1989
heart surgery
Effects of therapeutic touch (TT) on Recently bereaved individuals Quinn & Strelkauskas,
anxiety, mood, time perception, 1993
perception of TT effectiveness, and
immune function
Effect of TT on time distortion Recently bereaved individuals Quinn, 1992
Effect of experimental TT and control Males and females experiencing tension Keller & Bzdek, 1986
mimic TT on tension headache pain headaches
Effect of experimental TT, control Adult postoperative patients Meehan, 1993
mimic TT, and narcotic analgesia
on postoperative pain
Effects of experimental therapeutic Women with breast cancer before and after sur- Samarel et al., 1998
touch and dialogue and control gery
quiet time and dialogue on anxiety,
mood, and postoperative pain
Effect of experimental TT, control progres- Older adult males and females with a medical Peck, 1998
sive muscle relaxation, and control rou- diagnosis of degenerative arthritis
tine treatment on functional ability
Effect of an educational intervention on Nursing students Lowry, 2002
willingness to receive TT Women belonging to a professional business
women’s group
Effects of experimental therapeutic mas- Hospitalized male and female cancer patients re- Smith et al., 2002
sage and control nurse interaction on ceiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment
pain intensity, pain distress, sleep qual-
ity, symptom distress, and anxiety
(continued)
345
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 346
TABLE 9–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY
HUMAN BEINGS (continued)
Effects of experimental guided im- Community hospital staff members Butcher & Parker, 1988,
agery and control educational in- 1990
formation on the experience of
time and human field motion
Effects of guided imagery and relax- Adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging Thompson & Coppens,
ation on anxiety and movement 1994
Effects of experimental relaxation Lamaze-trained primigravida women Wiand, 1997
plus music or ocean sounds and
control relaxation alone and
biofeedback modalities
Effects of music on anxiety and People with chronic obstructive pulmonary dis- McBride et al., 1999
dyspnea ease
Effect of reminiscence on power Well elderly persons Bramlett & Gueldner,
1993
Effect of movement therapy on Nursing home residents Goldberg & Fitzpatrick,
morale and self-esteem 1980
Effects of a preoperative exercise People with lung cancer Wall, 2002
program on hope and power
Effects of magnet, placebo, and stan- Individuals with chronic primary headache Kim, 2001
dard treatments on pain and power
Effect of epidermal growth factor on Porcine skin Gill & Atwood, 1981
wound healing
Effect of budgetary knowledge on at- Staff nurses Meehan, 1992
titudes toward administration and
cost containment
Effects of petting one’s own dog, Adult males and females who owned a dog Gaydos & Farnham, 1988
petting an unknown dog, and read-
ing quietly on heart rate and blood
pressure
Effects of varied harmonious auditory Well adults confined to bed for the purposes of Smith, 1975, 1979, 1984,
input and quiet ambience on tem- the study 1986
poral experience and perception of
restfulness
Effect of lower and higher frequency Well, full-term Hispanic infants Girardin, 1992
light waves and standard nursery
lighting on sleep-wakefulness
frequency
Effects of passive cycling exercises Infants Porter, 1972a, 1972b
on growth and development
Effects of experimental Personalized Adults self-identified as injecting drug users or Andersen & Hockman,
LIGHT nursing practice and a control crack cocaine users 1997
standard education and counseling
program on HIV risk behaviors
346
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 347
TABLE 9–5
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN
BEINGS
INDIVIDUALS
Application of the Science of Clients in an ambulatory primary care practice Thomas, 1990
Unitary Human Beings A 51-year-old woman with chronic low back pain Kodiath, 1991
Patients with decreased cardiac output Whelton, 1979
A 35-year-old man with a cerebral aneurysm Madrid & Winstead-
Fry, 1986
An 82-year-old man admitted to the hospital with the med- J. Gold, 1997
ical diagnoses of sepsis, atrial fibrillation, and pemphigus
An 89-year-old woman admitted to the hospital with the J. Gold, 1997
medical diagnosis of severe cerebrovascular accident
A 74-year-old woman who had experienced a stroke and Webb, 1992
was admitted to an acute elderly care/assessment ward
A man, admitted to an intensive care unit with multiple in- Chapman et al., 1994
juries after being hit by a car, and his family, including
two Rogerian-educated nurses, who shared his care
with the unit staff
Patients with impaired neurological function Whelton, 1979
A 15-year-old girl with borderline personality disorder ad- Thompson, 1990
mitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit
An adolescent with a behavioral disturbance admitted to a Sheu et al., 1997
children’s mental health outpatient department
A 36-year-old woman hospitalized repeatedly for self- Horvath, 1994
mutilative behavior
A young male musician who experienced pervasive anxi- Horvath, 1994
ety, fits of anger, and destructive relationships
A 52-year-old man who was afraid to leave his apartment Horvath, 1994
Clients seeking brief, solution-oriented therapy Tuyn, 1992, 1994
A male nurse who was a pain medication abuser Johnson, 1996
An elderly man with metastatic cancer who is terminally ill Buczny et al., 1989
Persons who are dying Ference, 1989
Talley, 1994
Assessing pattern Women with hyperthyroidism Sayre-Adams & Wright,
1995
Pattern manifestation ap- Clients of a private nursing practice Malinski, 1994
praisal and deliberative A 29-year-old woman who underwent a radical hysterec- Bultemeier, 1997, 2002
mutual patterning tomy for cervical cancer
A 33-year-old woman with a medical diagnosis of leukemia Madrid, 1994
who was dying
A 42-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer Bultemeier, 1997, 2002
A woman who underwent a bilateral mastectomy Biley, 1993
A 76-year-old man with advanced lung cancer Barrett, 1988
Groups of people living with AIDS Sargent, 1994
Elderly persons experiencing confusion, depression, incon- Cowling, 1990
tinence, or sleeplessness
Use of Rogerian Health Patter- A young woman who had been treated for an arteriove- Barrett, 2000
ning Practice Methodology nous malformation in the brain
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
347
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 348
TABLE 9–5
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN
BEINGS (continued)
Application of the Unitary A woman in her early 50s who was experiencing ongoing Cowling, 2000
Pattern Appreciation despair
Practice Methodology
A patient’s perspective of the A woman admitted to an emergency department and then Mandl, 1997
application of the Science to the inpatient service
of Unitary Human Beings
Use of health patterning Clients of a private nursing practice Barrett, 1990
Use of innovative imagery A 29-year-old female client of a private nursing practice Barrett, 1992
who experienced depression and felt “nervous”
Use of music Psychiatric inpatients Covington, 2001
Use of centering Women who had been raped and later had a gynecologic Dole, 1996
examination
Use of therapeutic touch Clients of a pain management center associated with an Joseph, 1990
acute care hospital
A patient experiencing pain from metastatic cancer Meehan, 1990
A 29-year-old man with AIDS who was experiencing respi- Newshan, 1989
ratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, fever, pain, and
anxiety
A man who fell from a ladder and injured his elbow Herdtner, 2000
A 66-year-old woman with multiple sclerosis admitted to a Payne, 1989
rehabilitation center
A 62-year-old woman who underwent a below-the-knee Payne, 1989
amputation and was admitted to a rehabilitation center
Use of therapeutic touch and A 30-year-old man with AIDS hospitalized for gastrointesti- Madrid, 1990, 1994
imagery nal bleeding
Male and female clients of a private nursing practice who Hill & Oliver, 1993
experienced mental health problems
Use of energy healing A 20-year-old mother and her 2-year-old son Starn, 1998
A 43-year-old single mother Starn, 1998
A woman with metastatic cancer Starn, 1998
Medical practice guided by a Patients in private medical practices Field, 1997
unitary perspective J.L. Gold, 1997
GROUPS
Application of the Science of Elderly Black adults participating in a clinical group en- Forker & Billings, 1989
Unitary Human Beings counter in the community
FAMILIES
Application of the Science of A woman who underwent a mastectomy and her family Rogers, 1983
Unitary Human Beings A family experiencing an argument between members Johnston, 1986
A 13-year-old girl who ran away from home and her family Reed, 1986
Pattern manifestation ap- Children with heart variations and their families Morwessel, 1994
praisal and deliberative
mutual patterning
COMMUNITIES
Community health assessment The midwestern city of Kalamazoo Hanchett, 1988
348
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 349
relationship with human beings, Rogers’ view of human human beings. The research potentials of nursing’s abstract
beings and environment as integral energy fields is unique system are multiple. It is logically and scientifically tenable,
and visionary. it is flexible and open-ended. The practice implications for
Commenting on the contributions of her model, Rogers human health and well-being are already demonstrable”
(as cited in Safier, 1977) stated, “The conceptual system … (Rogers, 1987a, p. 123).
provides for a substantive body of knowledge in nursing Potential users of the Science of Unitary Human Beings
that will have relevance for all workers concerned with are urged to consider its strengths and its limitations and
people, but with special relevance for nurses, not because it work to systematically evaluate its credibility as a guide for
matters to nurses per se, but because it matters to human the plethora of nursing activities for which it was devel-
beings, and consequently to nurses” (p. 320). Moreover, oped. The advancement, continued refinement, and evalu-
Rogers (1986) pointed out that “the Science of Unitary ation of the credibility of the Science of Unitary Human
Human Beings identifies nursing’s uniqueness and signifies Beings should be ensured by the work of the members of
the potential of nurses to fulfill their social responsibility in the Society of Rogerian Scholars, which was founded in
human service” (p. 8). 1986. The mission of the Society is “to advance nursing sci-
Whall (1987) noted that the Science of Unitary Human ence through an emphasis on the Science of Unitary
Beings has advanced the discipline of nursing through the Human Beings. The focus of the Society is education, re-
many debates it has sparked. She pointed out that Rogers’ search, and practice in service to humankind” (Mission
conceptual model “has generated lively debates and seems Statement, Society of Rogerian Scholars, 1996). The
to have raised more questions than it answers. It has ex- Society published a newsletter, Rogerian Nursing Science
plained disparate views while engendering debate regard- News, for many years, and continues to publish the journal,
ing techniques that may be used to measure concepts and Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science.
relationships. The debates engendered by [Rogers’] model The advancement, continued refinement, and evalua-
have in a sense forced nursing to move on. In a sense, it tion of the credibility of the Science of Unitary Human
forced nurse scholars to question and seek answers again Beings also should be ensured by the establishment of the
and again. If this … is in essence the value of a [conceptual Martha E. Rogers Center for the Study of Nursing Science.
model], Rogers’ framework will stand as a milestone” (p. The Center was established in 1995 at New York University
158). “to honor Martha Rogers and to provide a structure
Rogers continued to refine her conceptual system until through which her work could be continued. The Center
shortly before her death. Speaking to the need for contin- has helped to focus national and international scholarly ac-
ued evolution of her model, Rogers (1970) declared, “The tivity relating to the Science of Unitary Human Beings; dis-
emergence of a science of nursing demands a clear, un- seminate relevant information through conferences and
equivocal conceptual frame of reference. This is not to pro- publication; provide an interactive mechanism for sharing
pose that nursing’s conceptual system is either static or ideas and knowledge; generate support for further research
inflexible. Quite the contrary. In its evolution it is properly and scholarship; and provide for a collection of writings
subject to reformulation and change as empirical knowl- and other works related to the science of unitary human
edge grows, as conceptual data achieve greater clarity, and beings” (Mission Statement, Martha E. Rogers Center for
as the interconnectedness between ideas takes on new di- the Study of Nursing Science, 1995). The Center has spon-
mensions” (p. 84). sored a visiting scholar program and published a newslet-
Later, Rogers (1987a) noted that nursing research is cru- ter, and is a cosponsor of periodic dialogues among
cial for the continued refinement of the Science of Unitary Rogerian scholars and the Rogerian Conference held at
Human Beings. She stated, “The future of research in nurs- New York University.
ing is based on a commitment to nursing as a science in its In conclusion, Martha Rogers made a substantial con-
own right. The science of nursing is identified as the sci- tribution to the discipline of nursing by proposing a vi-
ence of unitary human beings” (p. 123). For Rogers, then, sionary conceptual model that may be an appropriate
“science is never finished. It is always open ended” (Rogers guide for nursing activities as human beings continue to
et al., 1990, p. 380). Stated in other words, “science is open- evolve and as we move farther into the space age. As Rogers
ended; it will never stop” (Rogers, 1994b, p. 34). (1990b) stated:
Rogers was largely successful in her commitment to ad- As a holistic reality revolutionizes our thinking and as space
vancing the discipline of nursing through development of exploration and space living provide spin-off from space that
a unique and substantive body of knowledge. She com- can be helpful on planet Earth, nursing will change, as will
mented, “The future of nursing is based on a commitment other fields. We are on the threshold of a fantastic and
to nursing as a science in its own right. The [independent] unimagined future. Our potential for human service is greater
science of nursing is identified as the science of unitary than it has ever been (p. 112).
09Fawcett-09 09/17/2004 2:17 PM Page 352
Chapter 10
Roy’s Adaptation Model
Sister Callista Roy first published the basic ideas that make up her conceptual
model in 1970 in an article titled “Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework for
Nursing.” She went on to publish additional elements of the model and implica-
tions for practice and education in journal articles that were published 1971 and
1973. The model was explicated more fully in a chapter of the 1974 edition of
Riehl and Roy’s book Conceptual Models for Nursing Practice (Roy, 1974). A
major expansion of the model was presented in Roy’s (1976b) text Introduction
to Nursing: An Adaptation Model. Refinements of the model then were pre-
sented in Roy’s 1978 speech at the Second Annual Nurse Educator Conference,
in the 1980 edition of Riehl and Roy’s book (Roy, 1980), and in Roy and Roberts’
(1981) text Theory Construction in Nursing: An Adaptation Model. Further refine-
ments of the model were published in the second edition of Roy’s (1984a) text
Introduction to Nursing: An Adaptation Model, in Andrews and Roy’s (1986) book
Essentials of the Roy Adaptation Model, and in a chapter (Roy, 1989) of the third
edition of Conceptual Models for Nursing Practice (Riehl-Sisca, 1989).
Roy articulated her philosophical assumptions in the 1988b journal article “An
Explication of the Philosophical Assumptions of the Roy Adaptation Model,” and
she elaborated on her definitions of adaptation and health in the 1990 journal ar-
ticle “Strengthening the Roy Adaptation Model through Conceptual Clarification:
Commentary and Response” (Artinian & Roy, 1990). The 1991 text The Roy
Adaptation Model: The Definitive Statement (Roy & Andrews, 1991) contained
further refinements in the model. The authors explicitly stated that the purpose
of that book was “to assume the role of the definitive text on the model” (Roy
& Andrews, 1991, p. xvii). A 1993 book chapter, “The Roy Adaptation Model:
Theoretical Update and Knowledge for Practice” (Roy & Corliss, 1993), pre-
sented additional refinements and a restatement of so-called scientific assump-
tions, presented earlier in Roy’s 1989 book chapter and the 1991 book, in the
form of philosophical claims. Roy presented a new definition of adaptation and
refined and restated her scientific assumptions and philosophical assumptions in
the 1997 journal article “Future of the Roy Model: Challenge to Redefine
Adaptation.” Some rewording of the scientific assumptions and philosophical
assumptions and considerable refinement in the content of the conceptual
model are evident in the second edition of the Roy and Andrews (1999) book,
now titled The Roy Adaptation Model. The purpose of the second edition, which
Roy and Andrews (1999) still regard as “the definitive text” (p. xvii), is “to pro-
vide an update that (1) maintains the essential concepts of the model while
reflecting new developments and enhanced integration of the model elements;
(2) focuses on contemporary issues of health care delivery with social and
364
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 365
365
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 366
366
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 367
Model initially came from the work of Helson (1964) and World View
von Bertalanffy (1968). Later, Roy (1997) explained that
Helson’s work “remains the parent theory for the origin of The Roy Adaptation Model reflects the reciprocal interac-
the Roy adaptation concept. However, given a broad view tion world view. Human beings and groups, for Roy (1997;
of person and environment interactions that is the focus of Roy & Andrews, 1999), are holistic, adaptive systems that
nursing practice now and in the future, the time has come are constantly changing in concert with a constantly
to be free of the limitation of [Helson’s] particular defini- changing environment. The features of the reciprocal in-
tion of adaptation. The notion from Helson that will re- teraction world view that are evident in the Roy Adaptation
main useful in nursing assessment is that adaptation is a Model are:
pooled effect of multiple influences, which he called focal,
contextual, and residual stimuli” (p. 45). ● The Roy Adaptation Model reflects a holistic view of the
In addition, Roy (1997) cited Gould (1983) and Zohar person.
(1990) in the discussion of her revised definition of adap- ● [Individuals and groups are holistic adaptive systems]
tation. In discussing the revisions in her scientific assump- that function as wholes in one unified expression of
tions, Roy (1997) also cited Davies (1988), Gendreau and meaningful human behavior. They are, then, more than
Caranfa (1984), Maloney (1991), and Swimme and Berry the sum of their parts (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 35).
(1992). ● Persons represent unity in diversity. Similarly, there is di-
Roy’s notions of coping are tied to the work of Coelho, versity among persons and their earth, yet all are united
Hamburg, and Adams (1974) and Lazarus, Averill, and in a common destiny (Roy & Andrews, 1999, pp. 35–36).
Opton (1974). She also drew from Levine (1966) and com- ● The adaptive system is regarded as active.
pared the concepts of her model with ideas put forth by ● The notion of adaptation level conveys that the human
Henderson (1960), Nightingale (1859), and Peplau (1952). system is not passive in relation to the environment (Roy
Elaborating on influences from Nightingale, Roy (1992b) & Andrews, 1999, p. 41).
noted that her own work is congruent with Nightingale’s ● Human systems have thinking and feelings capacities,
beliefs about “how to promote ‘health existences’ and the rooted in consciousness and meaning, by which they ad-
proper use of the environment to aid the natural reparative just effectively to changes in the environment and, in
processes” (p. 64). turn, affect the environment (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p.
Moreover, Roy (1988b, 1997, 2002) acknowledged the 36).
influence of several philosophers on the development of ● According to this nursing model, the person is to be re-
her philosophical assumptions. Among those whose works spected as an active participant in his care. It is the in-
were cited are Chaisson (1981), de Chardin (1956, 1959, formation that the patient shares with the nurse that
1964, 1965, 1969), Ewing (1951), Fox (1983), Haught forms the assessment. The goal arrived at is one of mu-
(1993), Helminiak (1998), Kant (Boas, 1957), O’Murchu tual agreement between nurse and patient. Interventions
(1995, 1997), Pinckaers (1995), Popper (Popper & Eccles, are the options that the nurse provides for the patient
1981), Rush (1981), Wilbur (1997), and Young (1993). Roy (Roy & Roberts, 1981, p. 47).
and Corliss (1993) explained that the philosophical as- ● Humans and environment are constantly in the process
sumptions “stem from Roy’s lifelong study, conviction, and of change (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 37).
living of a theologically based religious faith. In addition, ● For human beings, life is never the same. It is constantly
Roy built upon both undergraduate and graduate studies changing and presenting new challenges (Roy &
in philosophy, especially related to the nature of person Andrews, 1999, p. 51).
and the place of persons in a cosmos set in motion by a lov-
ing Creator. Early on, she studied the philosophies of
Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, as well as the philosophical UNIQUE FOCUS OF THE NURSING MODEL
roots and historical methods of hermeneutical exegesis of
biblical texts. Later the works of Freud, Jung, Adler, de The unique focus of the Roy Adaptation Model is changes
Chardin, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Freire were added. A that occur in the human adaptive system and the environ-
strong basis in sociology, social psychology, and anthropol- ment (Roy & Andrews, 1999). Adaptation is the central fea-
ogy opened doors into structural analysis, empirical de- ture and a core concept of the Roy Adaptation Model.
ductive knowledge strategies, interactionist theory, and Problems in adaptation arise when the human adaptive
phenomenology. Current teaching of the epistemology of system is unable to cope with or respond to stimuli from
nursing has allowed Roy to study the philosophy of science the internal and external environments in a manner that
movements affecting nursing over the past few decades and maintains the integrity of the system (Roy, 1989; Roy &
the thinking of current nurse philosophers” (p. 218). Andrews, 1999).
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 370
cept is classified here according to its metaparadigm Life Process. The metaparadigm concept of health is repre-
forerunner. sented by the Roy Adaptation Model concept of HEALTH,
The metaparadigm concept of human beings is repre- which is unidimensional.
sented by the Roy Adaptation Model concepts of HUMAN The metaparadigm concept ofnursing is represented by
ADAPTIVE SYSTEM, COPING PROCESSES, BEHAV- the Roy Adaptation Model concepts of SCIENCE and
IOR, and ADAPTIVE MODES. The concept of HUMAN ART. The concept of SCIENCE has two dimensions—
ADAPTIVE SYSTEM is has two dimensions—Individual Basic Nursing Science and Clinical Nursing Science. The
Persons and Groups or Relational Persons. The concept concept of ART is unidimensional.
of COPING PROCESSES has four dimensions—Regulator
Coping Subsystem, Cognator Coping Subsysteml, Stabi-
lizer Subsystem Control Process, and Innovator Sub- Nonrelational Propositions
system Control Process. The concept of BEHAVIOR has
two dimensions—Adaptive Response and Ineffective The definitions of the concepts of the Roy Adaptation
Response. The concept of ADAPTIVE MODES has four Model are given listed here. Those constitutive definitions
dimensions—Physiological/Physical Mode, Self-Concept/ are the nonrelational propositions of this nursing model.
Group Identity Mode, Role Function Mode, and Interde-
HUMAN ADAPTIVE SYSTEM
pendence Mode. The Physiological Mode component of
the dimension Physiological/Physical Mode has nine ● A whole with parts that function as a unity for some pur-
subdimensions—Oxygenation; Nutrition; Elimination; pose (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 31).
Activity and Rest; Protection; Senses; Fluid, Elec- ● Human systems function as wholes in one unified ex-
trolyte, and Acid-Base Balance; Neurological Function; pression of meaningful human behavior. They are, then,
and Endocrine Function. more than the sum of their parts (Roy & Andrews, 1991,
The Self-Concept component of the dimension Self- p. 35).
Concept/Group Identity Mode encompasses two subdi- ● Human systems have thinking and feeling capacities
mensions—Physical Self (Body Sensation, Body Image) rooted in consciousness and meaning, by which they ad-
and Personal Self (Self-Consistency, Self-Ideal, Moral- just effectively to changes in the environment and, in
Ethical-Spiritual Self). The Group Identity Mode compo- turn, affect the environment (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p.
nent of the dimension Self-Concept/Group Identity Mode 36).
encompasses four subdimensions—Interpersonal Rela- ● Human systems include people as individuals or in
tionships, Group Self-Image, Social Milieu, and Group groups including families, organizations, communities,
Culture. and society as a whole (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 31).
The dimension Role Function encompasses seven sub-
dimensions—Primary Role, Secondary Role, Tertiary Role, The concept of Human Adaptive System has two dimen-
Instrumental Behavior, Expressive Behavior, Role-Taking, sions—Individual Persons and Groups or Relational
and Integrating Roles. The dimension Interdependence Persons.
Mode encompasses three subdimensions for individuals ● Individual Persons: Refers to a single person as the
and groups—Affectional Adequacy, Developmental Ade- human adaptive system.
quacy, and Resource Adequacy; two subdimensions for in- ● Groups or Relational Persons: Groups refer to the
dividuals—Significant Others and Support Systems; and human adaptive system as a collective or aggregate (Roy
three subdimensions for groups—Context, Infrastructure, & Andrews, 1999). Relational Persons refers to the
and Resources. human adaptive system as individuals relating in groups
The metaparadigm concept of environment is repre- such as families, organizations, communities, nations,
sented by the Roy Adaptation Model concept of STIMULI. and society as a whole (Hanna & Roy, 2001; Roy, 2003),
That concept has three dimensions—Focal Stimulus, or groups of persons in relationships (Hanna & Roy,
Contextual Stimuli, and Residual Stimuli. 2001, p. 9).
The metaparadigm concepts of human beings and envi-
ronment are represented by the Roy Adaptation Model COPING PROCESSES
concepts of ADAPTATION and ADAPTATION LEVEL.
The concept of ADAPTATION has five dimensions— ● Innate or acquired ways of interacting with (responding
Survival, Growth, Reproduction, Mastery, and Person and to and influencing) the changing environment (Roy &
Environment Transformations. The concept of ADAPTA- Andrews, 1999, p. 46).
TION LEVEL has three dimensions—Integrated Life ● Innate coping processes are genetically determined or
Process, Compensatory Life Process, and Compromised common to the species and are generally viewed as
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 372
Behavior, Roy and Andrews (1999) explained, pertains to ● Physiological/Physical Mode: The Physiological/Physi-
both individuals and groups, and can be “observed, some- cal Mode is made up of two components—the Physio-
times measured, or subjectively reported” (p. 43). logical Mode and the Physical Mode. [The Physiological
The concept of Behavior encompasses two dimen- Mode component pertains to the individual. It is the
sions—Adaptive Responses and Ineffective Responses. mode] in which a person manifests the physical and
chemical processes involved in the function and activi-
● Adaptive Responses: Behaviors that promote integrity in ties of a living organism (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 101).
terms of the goals of human systems (Roy & Andrews, [The Physiological Mode component] is associated with
1999, pp. 30, 67). Responses that promote the integrity the way humans as individuals interact as physical beings
of the human system in terms of the goals of adap- with the environment. Behavior in this mode is the
tation: survival, growth, reproduction, mastery, and manifestation of the physiologic activities of all the
person and environment transformations (Roy & cells, tissues, organs, and systems comprising the human
Andrews, 1999, p. 44). body. … The underlying need … is physiologic integrity
Adaptive Responses refers to those behaviors that appro- (Roy & Andrews, 1999, pp. 48–49). [The Physical Mode
priately meet the goals of adaptation. Although one component pertains to groups. It is the] manner in
goal is survival, “in some situations and at some develop- which the collective human adaptive system manifests
mental stages, the appropriate response may be adaptation relative to needs associated with basic operat-
discontinuation of the system [i.e., the group], or death, as ing resources (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 100). The
it relates to the individual” (Roy & Andrews, 1999, Physical Mode component focuses on physical operating
p. 44). resources (Roy, 2003). [The Physical Mode component]
pertains to the manner in which the collective human
● Ineffective Responses: Behaviors that do not contribute adaptive system manifests adaptation relative to basic
to integrity in terms of the goals of the human system operating resources, that is, participants, physical facili-
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, pp. 31, 67). Responses … that ties, and fiscal resources. The basic need … for the group
neither promote integrity nor contribute to the goals of is resource adequacy, or wholeness achieved by adapting
adaptation and the integration of persons with the earth to change in physical resource needs (Roy & Andrews,
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 44). [Responses that] can, in 1999, p. 49).
the immediate situation or if continued over a long time, The Physiological Mode component of the dimension
threaten the human system’s survival, growth, reproduc- Physiological/Physical Mode encompasses nine subdi-
tion, mastery, or person and environment transforma- mensions—Oxygenation; Nutrition; Elimination; Activity
tions (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 44). and Rest; Protection; Senses; Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-
Base Balance; Neurological Function; and Endocrine
ADAPTIVE MODES Function.
● Ways of behaving (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 99).
● Oxygenation: One of five basic needs (Roy & Andrews,
● Ways of manifesting adaptive processes (Roy, 2003) 1999). The processes (ventilation, gas exchange, and
● Four categories or modes in which behaviors of both in- transport of gases [to and from the tissues]) by which
dividuals and [groups] that result from coping activity cellular oxygen supply is maintained in the body (Roy
can be observed (Roy & Andrews, 1999). & Andrews, 1999, p. 126).
● Nutrition: One of five basic needs (Roy & Andrews,
The concept of Adaptive Modes encompasses four dimen- 1999). The series of processes by which a person takes
sions—Physiological/Physical Mode, Self-Concept/Group in nutrients and assimilates and uses them to maintain
Identity Mode, Role Function Mode, and Interdependence body tissue, promote growth, and provide energy (Roy
Mode. Although the four dimensions of the concept of & Andrews, 1999, p. 149). Concerns the food people
Adaptive Modes are discussed separately, they are interre- eat and how their bodies use it (Roy & Andrews, 1999,
lated. In particular, “behavior in [one] mode may have an p. 149).
effect on or act as a stimulus for one or all of the other ● Elimination: One of five basic needs (Roy & Andrews,
modes” (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 51). 1999). A life process that concerns elimination of waste
Adaptive Modes pertain to both individual and group products from the body, including intestinal elimina-
Human Adaptive Systems, with certain components of the tion and urinary elimination (Roy & Andrews, 1999).
four dimensions (Physiological/Physical Mode, Self- Intestinal elimination is the expulsion from
Concept/Group Identity Mode, Role Function Mode, the body of undigested substances via the anus in the
Interdependence Mode) encompassing subdimensions form of feces (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 171). Urinary
relevant for the individual and others for the group. elimination pertains to the elimination of fluid wastes
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 374
identification with the group [and] involves [the] ● Role Function Mode: Behavior pertaining to roles in
process of sharing identity and goals (Roy & Andrews, human systems (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). [The Role
1999, pp. 49, 381). Function Mode for the individual] focuses on the roles
The Self-Concept component of the dimension Self- that the individual occupies in society. Role [refers to]
Concept/Group Identity Mode encompasses two subdi- the functioning unit of society [and] is defined as a set of
mensions—Physical Self (Body Sensation, Body Image) expectations about how a person occupying one position
and Personal Self (Self-Consistency, Self-Ideal, Moral- behaves toward a person occupying another position.
Ethical-Spiritual Self). The basic [underlying] need is social integrity, the need
● Physical Self : A component of the Self-Concept Mode to know who one is in relation to others so that one can
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). The person’s appraisal of act (Roy & Andrews, 1999, pp. 49–50). [The Role
one’s own physical being, including physical attributes, Function Mode for the group focuses on] the action
functioning, sexuality, health and illness states, and ap- components associated with group infrastructure [that]
pearance; includes the components of body sensation are designed to contribute to the accomplishment of the
and body image (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 383). Body group’s mission, or the tasks or functions associated with
sensation [refers to] how one feels and experiences the the group. …The basic [underlying] need is … role clar-
self as a physical being (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 381). ity, the need to understand and commit to fulfill ex-
Body image [refers to] how one views oneself physi- pected tasks, so that the group can achieve common
cally and one’s view of personal appearance (Roy & goals (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 50).
Andrews, 1999, p. 381). The dimension Role Function Mode encompasses
● Personal Self : A component of the Self-Concept Mode seven subdimensions—Primary Role, Secondary Role,
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). The individual’s ap- Tertiary Role, Instrumental Behavior, Expressive Behavior,
praisal of one’s own characteristics, expectations, val- Role-Taking, and Integrating Roles.
ues, and worth, including self-consistency, self-ideal, ● Primary Role: An ascribed role based on age, sex,
and the moral-ethical-spiritual self (Roy & Andrews, and developmental stage; it determines the majority
1999, p. 381). Self-Consistency [refers to] that part of of behaviors engaged in by a person during a particu-
the personal self … which strives to maintain a consis- lar growth period of life (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p.
tent self-organization and to avoid disequilibrium; an 431).
organized system of ideas about self (Roy & Andrews, ● Secondary Role: A role that a person assumes to
1999, p. 382). Self-Ideal [refers to] that aspect of the complete the tasks associated with a develop-
personal self … which relates to what the person mental stage and primary role (Roy & Andrews, 1999,
would like to be or is capable of doing (Roy & p. 432).
Andrews, 1999, p. 382). Moral-Ethical-Spiritual Self ● Tertiary Role: A role that is freely chosen by a
[refers to] that aspect of the personal self which in- person, temporary in nature, and often associated
cludes a belief system and an evaluation of who one with the accomplishment of a minor task in a
is in relation to the universe (Roy & Andrews, 1999, person’s current development (Roy & Andrews, 1999,
p. 381). p. 432).
● Instrumental Behavior: Goal-oriented behavior; role
The Group Identity Mode component of the dimen- activities the person performs (Roy & Andrews, 1999,
sion Self-Concept/Group Identity Mode encompasses four p. 430).
subdimensions—Interpersonal Relationships, Group Self- ● Expressive Behavior: The feelings and attitudes held by
Image, Social Milieu, and Group Culture. the person about role performance (Roy & Andrews,
● Interpersonal Relationships: A component of the Group 1999, p. 430).
Identity Mode (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). ● Role-Taking: A process of looking at or anticipating
● Group Self-Image: A component of the Group Identity another person’s behavior by viewing it within
Mode (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). a role attributed to the other; basing one’s inter-
● Social Milieu: A component of the Group Identity action on the judgment about the other’s role;
Mode (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). focuses on the meaning that the acts have to both
● Group Culture: A component of the Group Iden- persons in a role interaction (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p.
tity Mode (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 49). The group’s 431).
agreed upon expectations, including values, goals, ● Integrating Roles: The process of managing different
and norms for relating (Roy & Andrews, 1999, roles and their expectations (Roy & Andrews, 1999,
p. 381). p. 431).
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 376
Affectional Adequacy, Developmental Adequacy, and generally, the point of interaction of the human system
Resource Adequacy; two subdimensions for individuals— and the environment (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 32).
Significant Others and Support Systems; and three subdi- ● A stimulus is a factor in the internal environment (inter-
mensions for groups—Context, Infrastructure, and nal stimulus) or external environment (external stimu-
Resources. lus) that provokes a response (Roy & Andrews, 1999).
● Affectional Adequacy (Individuals and Groups): The ● Common stimuli are culture, including socioeconomic
need to give and receive love, respect, and value satis- status, ethnicity, and belief system; the structure and
fied through effective relations and communication tasks of a family or aggregate; developmental stage, in-
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 474). cluding the individual’s age, sex, tasks, heredity, and ge-
● Developmental Adequacy (Individuals and Groups): netic factors, or the longevity and vision of an aggregate;
[Refers to] learning and maturation in relationships the integrity of the adaptive modes; the adaptation level;
achieved through developmental processes (Roy & the perception, knowledge, and skill aspects of cognator
Andrews, 1999, p. 474). or innovator effectiveness; and environmental consider-
● Resource Adequacy (Individuals and Groups): The need ations, including changes in the internal or external en-
for food, clothing, shelter, health, and security vironment, medical management, use of drugs, alcohol,
achieved through interdependent processes (Roy & and tobacco, and political or economic stability (Roy &
Andrews, 1999, p. 475). Andrews, 1999, p. 72).
● Significant Others (Individuals): The individuals to
The concept of Stimuli encompasses three dimensions—
whom the most meaning or importance is given [by a
Focal Stimulus, Contextual Stimuli, and Residual Stimuli.
person] (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 475).
● Support Systems (Individuals): Persons, groups, [and] ● Focal Stimulus: The internal or external [environmen-
organizations with whom one associates in order to tal] stimulus most immediately in the awareness of
achieve affectional, developmental, and resources re- the human system; the object or event most present in
quirements (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 475). consciousness (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 38). The inter-
● Context (Groups): External (economic, social, politi- nal or external stimulus most immediately confronting
cal, cultural, belief, family systems) and internal the human adaptive system (Roy & Andrews, 1999,
(mission, vision, values, principles, goals, plans) influ- p. 66).
ences within relationships (Roy & Andrews, 1999, ● Contextual Stimuli: All other stimuli present in the
p. 474). situation that contribute to the effect of the focal stimu-
● Infrastructure (Groups): The affectional, resource, and lus.… All the environmental factors that present to the
developmental processes that exist within a relation- human system from within or without but which are not
ship (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 474). the center of attention or energy. These factors will in-
● Resources (Groups): Refers to food, clothing, shelter, fluence how the human system can deal with the focal
meeting places, physical facilities for organizations, stimulus (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 39). All internal and
supplies, equipment, technology, and finances (Roy & external stimuli evident in the situation other than the
Andrews, 1999). focal stimulus (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 66).
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 377
is elaborated further by a comparison of the goals of med- Roy and Andrews (1999) pointed out that it is not pos-
icine and nursing. The physician’s goal is “to move the pa- sible for every human system to experience optimal health,
tient along the continuum from illness to health” (Roy, in the commonly recognized form of complete physical,
1970, p. 43). mental, and social well-being. It is therefore the nurse’s role
In contrast, the GOAL OF NURSING is: “to increase the person’s adaptive response[s] and to de-
crease ineffective responses” (Roy, 1984a, p. 37). It also is
To promote adaptation for individuals and groups in the four the nurse’s role “to promote adaptation in situations of
adaptive modes, thus contributing to health, quality of life, health and illness and to enhance the interaction of human
and dying with dignity by assessing behavior and factors that systems with the environment … through acceptance, pro-
influence adaptive abilities and by intervening to expand those tection, and fostering of interdependence and to promote
abilities and to enhance environmental interactions (Roy & personal and environmental transformations” (Roy &
Andrews, 1999, p. 13). Andrews, 1999, p. 55).
The Roy Adaptation Model includes a detailed PRAC-
Roy and Roberts (1981) placed the Goal of Nursing within TICE METHODOLOGY, in the form of the ROY ADAP-
the context of the overall goal of the health team when they TATION MODEL NURSING PROCESS. Roy and
stated, “The projected outcome [of nursing] is an adapted Andrews (1999) regard the ROY ADAPTATION MODEL
state in the patient which frees him to respond to other NURSING PROCESS as “a problem-solving approach for
stimuli. This freeing of energy makes it possible for the goal gathering data, identifying capacities and needs, establish-
of nursing to contribute to the overall goal of the health ing goals, selecting and implementing approaches for nurs-
team, high-level wellness. When energy is freed from inad- ing care, and evaluating the outcomes of care provided”
equate coping attempts, then it can promote healing and (pp. 63–64). The components of the ROY ADAPTATION
wellness” (p. 45). MODEL NURSING PROCESS are outlined in Table 10–1.
TABLE 10–1
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE ROY ADAPTATION MODEL NURSING PROCESS
ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIOR
The nurse systematically gathers data about the behavior of the human adaptive system and judges the current
state of adaptation in each adaptive mode.
The nurse uses one or more of the Roy Adaptation Model–based research instruments or practice tools to guide
application and documentation of the practice methodology (see Table 10–2).
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 380
TABLE 10–1
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE ROY ADAPTATION MODEL NURSING PROCESS (continued)
• The first priority is behaviors that threaten the survival of the individual, family, group, or community.
• The second priority is behaviors that affect the growth of the individual, family, group, or community.
• The third priority is behaviors that affect the continuation of the human race or of society.
• The fourth priority is behaviors that affect the attainment of full potential for the individual or group.
ASSESSMENT OF STIMULI
The nurse recognizes that stimuli must be amenable to independent nurse functions. Consequently, factors such as
medical diagnoses and medical treatments are not considered stimuli because those factors cannot be independently
managed by nurses.
The nurse identifies the internal and external focal and contextual stimuli that are influencing the behaviors of particular
interest, in the order of priority established at the end of the Assessment of Behavior component of the Roy
Adaptation Model Nursing Process.
The nurse recognizes that residual stimuli typically are present and attempts to confirm the presence
of those stimuli by asking the human adaptive system about other stimuli or by recourse to theoretical
or experiential knowledge. When residual stimuli are identified, they are classified as contextual or focal
stimuli.
The nurse identifies the internal stimulus of the adaptation level and determines whether it reflects integrated,
compensatory, or compromised life processes.
Stimuli associated with ineffective responses are of interest because the nurse wants to change them to
adaptive behaviors, and adaptive responses are of interest because the nurse wants to maintain or enhance
them.
In situations where all behaviors are judged as adaptive responses, assessment of stimuli focuses on identifying poten-
tial threats to adaptation.
The nurse identifies stimuli by means of observation, using the senses of sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell;
objective measurement, using paper and pencil instruments and measures of physiological parameters; and
purposeful interviews.
The nurse validates perceptions and thoughts about relevant stimuli with the human adaptive system of interest, using
Orlando’s (1961) deliberative nursing process (see Chapter 14, Table 14–4):
• The nurse shares perceptions and thoughts about relevant stimuli with the human adaptive system.
• The nurse asks if those are the relevant stimuli.
• The human adaptive system confirms or does not confirm the identified stimuli as relevant.
• If the stimuli are not confirmed as relevant, the nurse and the human adaptive system discuss their perceptions of the
situation until agreement about relevant stimuli is reached.
NURSING DIAGNOSIS
The nurse uses a process of judgment to make a statement conveying the adaptation status of the human adaptive sys-
tem of interest.
The nursing diagnosis is a statement that identifies the behaviors of interest together with the most relevant influencing
stimuli.
The nurse uses one of three different approaches to state the nursing diagnosis:
• Behaviors are stated within each adaptive mode and with their most relevant influencing stimuli.
• A summary label for behaviors in each adaptive mode with relevant stimuli is used.
• A label that summarizes a behavioral pattern across adaptive modes that is affected by the same stimuli is used.
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 381
GOAL SETTING
The nurse articulates a clear statement of the behavioral outcomes in response to nursing provided to the human
adaptive system.
The nurse actively involves the human adaptive system in the formation of behavioral goals if possible, recognizing
that that involvement provides an opportunity to explore the rationale behind certain goals and gives the adaptive
system a chance to suggest goals and evaluate whether others are realistic.
The nurse states goals as specific short-term and long-term behavioral outcomes of nursing intervention.
The goal statement designates the behavior of interest, the way in which the behavior will change, and the time frame
for attainment of the goal.
Goals may be stated for ineffective behaviors that are to be changed to adaptive behaviors and also for adaptive behav-
iors that should be maintained or enhanced.
INTERVENTION
The nurse selects and implements nursing approaches that have a high probability of changing stimuli or strengthening
adaptive processes.
Nursing intervention is the management of stimuli. The nurse may alter stimuli, increase stimuli, decrease stimuli, re-
move stimuli, or maintain stimuli.
The nurse manages the focal stimulus first if possible, and then manages the contextual stimuli.
Identification and Analysis of Possible Nursing Interventions
The nurse uses the McDonald and Harms (1966) nursing judgment method, in collaboration with the human adaptive
system, to select a nursing intervention:
• Alternative approaches to management of stimuli are listed, along with the consequences of management of each
stimulus.
• The probability (high, moderate, low) for each consequence is determined.
• The value of the outcomes of each approach is designated as desirable or undesirable.
• The options are shared with the human adaptive system.
• The nursing intervention with the highest probability of reaching the valued goal is selected.
Implementation
• The nurse determines and implements the steps that will manage the stimulus appropriately.
EVALUATION
The nurse judges the effectiveness of nursing interventions in relation to the behaviors of the human adaptive system.
The nurse systematically reassesses observable and nonobservable behaviors for each dimension and subdimension of
the four adaptive modes.
The nurse gathers the behavioral data by means of observation, using the senses of sight, sound, touch, taste, and
smell; objective measurement, using paper and pencil instruments and measures of physiological parameters; and
purposeful interviews.
The nurse uses the following criteria to judge the effectiveness of nursing intervention:
• The goal was attained.
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 382
TABLE 10–1
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY: THE ROY ADAPTATION MODEL NURSING PROCESS (continued)
If the criteria for nursing intervention effectiveness are met, and if there is no threat that the behavior will
become ineffective again, that behavior may be deleted from nursing concern.
If, however, the criteria are not met, the nurse must determine what went wrong. Possibilities include:
• The goals were unrealistic or unacceptable to the human adaptive system.
• The assessment data were inaccurate or incomplete.
• The selected nursing intervention approaches were not implemented properly.
• The nurse then returns to Assessment of Behaviors to closely examine behaviors that continue to be ineffective and
to try to further understand the situation.
The end result of the Roy Adaptation Model Nursing Process is an update of the nursing care plan.
Constructed from Andrews & Roy, 1991b, pp. 29–47; Logan, 1990; Roy, 1984a; Roy, 1989, p. 109; Roy & Andrews, 1999, pp. 63–96.
pendence
ha
and affect the fluid and electrolyte, and acid-base bal- of health and illness and to enhance the interaction of
ance, and the endocrine system. The information is human systems with the environment, thereby pro-
channeled automatically in the appropriate manner moting health (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 55).
and an automatic, unconscious response is produced
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 46) [Explanation of the ac-
tion of the Regulator Coping Subsystem]. EVALUATION OF ROY’S
B. Internal and external stimuli including psychological, ADAPTATION MODEL
social, physical, and physiological factors act as inputs to
the cognator subsystem (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 47). This section presents an evaluation of the Roy Adaptation
C. Stimuli and adaptation level serve as input to human Model. The evaluation is based on the results of the analy-
adaptive systems. … Processing of this input through sis of the conceptual model, as well as on publications by
control processes [i.e., regulator and cognator coping Roy and by others who have used or commented on Roy’s
subsystems or stabilizer and innovator subsystem con- work.
trol processes] results in behavioral responses (Roy &
Andrews, 1999, p. 43).
D. Human systems, as individuals, families, groups, or- EXPLICATION OF ORIGINS
ganizations, or communities, must sense changes in
the environment and make adaptations in the way they Roy has explicated the origins of the Roy Adaptation
function to accommodate new environmental require- Model clearly and concisely. She chronicled the develop-
ments (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 44). ment of the model over time and identified her motivation
E. Adaptation level affects the human system’s ability to to formulate a conceptual model of nursing. Furthermore,
respond positively in a situation (Roy & Andrews, she explicitly stated her philosophical claims in the form of
1999, p. 36). a claim about the person and the environment, a claim
F. The changing environment stimulates the person to about adaptation, scientific assumptions and philosophical
make adaptive responses. For human beings, life is assumptions about the person and the environment, values
never the same. It is constantly changing and present- about nursing, and claims about nursing and nurse schol-
ing new challenges. The person has the ability to make ars/nurse theorists.
new responses to these changing conditions. As the en- Roy’s (1997; Roy & Andrews, 1999) refinement of
vironment changes, the person has the opportunity to her philosophical assumptions made explicit her beliefs
continue to grow, to develop, and to enhance the mean- about God. Inasmuch as adoption of a conceptual model
ing of life for everyone (Andrews & Roy, 1991a, p. 18). as a guide for nursing activities is predicated on the nurse’s
G. The characteristics of the internal and external stimuli acceptance of the underlying philosophical claims,
influence the adequacy of cognitive and emotional Roy’s explication of her spiritual beliefs in the form
processes [i.e., cognator coping subsystem] (Roy & of God, rather than in a broader spirituality, may limit the
Andrews, 1999, p. 547). adoption of the Roy Adaptation Model by nurses who
H. The characteristics of the internal and external stimuli do not believe in God and may limit the applicability of
influence [behavioral] responses (Roy & Andrews, the model to those human adaptive systems who do believe
1999, p. 547). in God.
I. Human beings [are] described as adaptive systems con- Roy assumes that people are integrated wholes capable
stantly growing and developing within changing envi- of action, and she values the active participation of human
ronments. Health for human adaptive systems can be adaptive systems in the Roy Adaptation Model Nursing
described as a reflection of this interaction or adapta- Process (see Table 10–1). Roy noted that although active
tion (Roy & Andrews, 1999, pp. 53–54). participation may not always be possible, as in the case of
J. The goal of nursing [is] the promotion of adaptation infants and unconscious or suicidal patients, the nurse “is
in each of the four [adaptive] modes, thereby con- constantly aware of the active responsibility of the patient
tributing to health, quality of life, or dying with dignity to participate in his own care when he is able to do so” (Roy
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 55). & Roberts, 1981, p. 47).
K. The general goal of nursing intervention … is to main- Roy acknowledged the nurses and other scholars whose
tain and enhance adaptive behavior and to change in- works influenced her thinking. Moreover, she provided
effective behavior to adaptive (Roy & Andrews, 1999, bibliographic citations to the works that were especially
p. 81). relevant and explained how each one contributed to the
L. It is the nurse’s role to promote adaptation in situations development of the Roy Adaptation Model.
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 384
publication of Roy’s 1997 journal article, in which she put Nursing Research Guidelines
forth a new definition of adaptation and explained that she
now limits reliance on Helson’s theory to his notion of The guidelines for nursing research based on the Roy
focal, contextual, and residual stimuli. Adap-tation Model, which were constructed from Fawcett
Roy has consistently maintained that nursing science (1999), Roy (1988b, 2003), and Roy and Andrews (1999),
should provide the basis for the selection of behaviors to are:
observe when assessing the adaptive system. Furthermore,
judgments about the behaviors should be based on explicit ● Purpose of the research
criteria drawn from existing scientific knowledge, and in- ● Study of the phenomena encompassed by the Roy
terventions with the highest probability of empirically doc- Adaptation Model requires both basic nursing research
umented success should be selected. and clinical nursing research.
The Roy Adaptation Model Nursing Process is dynamic ● The purpose of Roy Adaptation Model-based basic
in that the components, or steps, are “ongoing and simul- nursing research is to understand and explain people
taneous” (Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 64). Moreover, the re- adapting within their life situations, including des-
sults of the last step, Evaluation, lead back to the first step, criptions of individual and group coping processes
Assessment of Behaviors, and subsequent updating of the and adaptation to environmental stimuli and expla-
nursing care plan. nations of the relation between adaptation and
Roy’s insistence that the human adaptive system be an health.
active participant in the decision-making aspects of the ● The purpose of Roy Adaptation Model-based clinical
nursing process attests to her concern for ethical standards nursing research is to develop and test interventions
of nursing practice. Indeed, “collaboration with the person and other strategies designed to enhance positive life
in each step of the nursing process is important. processes and patterns.
Individuals must be involved in observation of and deci-
sions relative to their state of adaptation. They provide ● Phenomena of interest
valuable insight that may assist the nurse in attempts to ●The phenomena to be studied include basic life
promote adaptation” (Andrews & Roy, 1991b, p. 28). processes and how nursing maintains or enhances
Roy’s concern with ethical standards is especially evi- adaptive responses or changes ineffective responses to
dent in the statement that “In fulfilling nursing activities, adaptive responses. The particular foci of inquiry are
nurses hold a profound regard for human and environ- focal, contextual, and residual stimuli; adaptation
mental consciousness, meaning, and common destiny. level; regulator and cognator coping processes in indi-
These beliefs are held with respect to individuals and viduals and stabilizer and innovator coping processes
groups receiving care, other participants in the provision of in groups; and responses in the physiological/physical,
the care, and nurses themselves. As such, nurses promote self-concept/group identity, role function, and interde-
the rights of individuals to define their own health-related pendence adaptive modes.
goals and seek out health care that reflects their values” ●Within the context of basic nursing science, phenom-
(Roy & Andrews, 1999, p. 64). ena of particular interest are the person or group as
Roy linked the metaparadigm concepts of human be- an adaptive system, including coping processes (cog-
ings and environment; human beings, environment, and nator and regulator processes for individuals, stabilizer
health; and human beings, health, and nursing in various and innovator processes for groups); stability of adap-
relational propositions. The linkage of all four metapara- tive patterns; dynamics of evolving adaptive patterns;
digm concepts is stated concisely in one statement regard- cultural and other influences on the development and
ing the nurse’s role (see Relational Proposition L). interrelatedness of the adaptive modes; and adapta-
The Roy Adaptation Model is sufficiently comprehen- tion related to health, including person and environ-
sive with regard to breadth of content. The model is equally ment interaction and integration of the adaptive
applicable to individuals, families, groups, communities, or modes.
society as a whole, in diverse health situations. ●Within the context of clinical nursing science, the phe-
The comprehensiveness of the breadth of content of the nomena of particular interest are changes in the effec-
Roy Adaptation Model is further supported by the direc- tiveness of coping processes; changes within and
tion it provides for nursing research, education, adminis- among the adaptive modes; and nursing interventions
tration, and practice. Guidelines for each area continue to that promote adaptive behavioral responses, in times
be formulated. The current guidelines for nursing research, of transition, during changes in the environment, and
nursing education, nursing administration, and nursing during acute and chronic illness, injury, treatment, and
practice are listed below. threats from use of health technology.
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 386
universities. Thus the model may be used to guide cur- clients by means of organizational nursing systems and
ricula for diploma, associate degree, and baccalaureate associated resources.
and higher degree programs.
● Characteristics of nursing personnel
● Characteristics of students ●The collective nursing staff is viewed as an adaptive
●Students have to meet the requirements for admission system in an environment of constantly changing in-
to the relevant nursing program. ternal and external conditions. The department of
●Students must have the ability to adapt to a variety of nursing or the entire health-care institution also may
stimuli in the educational environment, which is facil- be viewed as an adaptive system. Consequently, the
itated by faculty and peer support and personal aware- nursing personnel, the department, and the institution
ness of relevant influencing factors. must possess individual and collective abilities to
adapt to the changing environmental conditions.
● Teaching-learning strategies ●Nursing personnel are differentiated on the basis of
● An introductory course could include such teaching
knowledge of the Roy Adaptation Model, rather than
strategies as exposing students to the views of experts
by educational level or institutional definitions.
in adjunctive disciplines and to the notions of systems ●The two levels of personnel are the general health-care
theory before presenting the content of the Roy
aide and the professional nurse.
Adaptation Model, contracting with an adult client
– The aide possesses public information, common
in the community to develop a nursing care plan that
sense, and basic instruction about persons and their
includes interventions to maintain health or correct
needs related to the adaptive mode that is used in
existing problems, small group (15 or fewer students)
assisting professionals in providing care based on
seminars, group discussions, individual faculty-
individual pattern maintenance.
student consultations, and pen-and-paper tests.
– Professional nurses are differentiated from aides
● Another teaching strategy is the use of a continuing
and each other on the basis of their knowledge.
case study dealing with a fictional extended family ● The first-level professional nurse deals more
throughout the academic year.
specifically than the aide with developing patterns
● Physiological mode content can be taught effectively
of the human adaptive system, such as growth
by asking students to consider why the body exhibits a
and development, eating, and sleeping.
particular set of physiological behaviors. ● The second-level professional nurse is prepared to
● Practicum courses focus on helping students learn
deal with complex changes in patterns of the
how to use practice tools directly derived from the Roy
human adaptive system and specializes in under-
Adaptation Model (see Table 10–3). The hospital
standing particular processes for particular pa-
record can be used as a source of information rather
tient populations.
than a guide for nursing practice when practice at the ● The third-level professional nurse conducts basic
health-care organization is not based on the Roy
and clinical nursing research.
Adaptation Model.
● Settings for nursing services
● The settings for nursing services encompass most
Administration of Nursing Services Guidelines types of health-care organizations and most specialty
Guidelines for the administration of nursing services based practice areas.
on the Adaptation Model, which were constructed from ● Management strategies and administrative policies
DiIorio (1989), Fawcett et al. (1989), Roy (1991), and Roy ●Management strategies emphasize promotion of staff,
and Anway (1989), are: departmental, and institutional adaptation to con-
● Focus of nursing in the health-care organization stantly changing environmental stimuli.
● The distinctive focus of Roy Adaptation Model-based ●The goal of the nurse manager is to manage stimuli so
nursing in a health-care organization is provision of that the staff ’s adaptive behavioral responses are en-
nursing services designed to promote the adaptation of hanced. Thus the nurse manager strives to maintain or
individuals and groups in the physiological/physical, enhance the health of the organization.
self-concept/group identity, role function, and interde- ●The managerial process emphasizes planning, organiz-
pendence modes. ing, staffing, leading, controlling, and especially goal
setting, which is recognized as a key managerial
● Purpose of nursing services activity.
● The specific goal of nursing service management is to ●The nurse manager assesses behaviors related to plan-
ensure the most effective delivery of nursing services to ning, organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling;
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 388
because the adaptation level includes all the person’s capa- 3.2. Target organs and tissues must be able to respond to
bilities, hopes, dreams, aspirations, and motivations, in hormone levels to effect body responses.
other words, all that makes the person constantly move to- 4.1. Neural inputs are transformed into conscious per-
ward greater mastery” (Artinian & Roy, 1990, p. 64). ceptions in the brain (process unknown).
Work remains to be done, however, in the full transla- 4.2. Increase in short-term or long-term memory will
tion of the twenty-first century scientific assumptions and positively influence the effective choice of psy-
philosophical assumptions into the concepts and proposi- chomotor response to neural input.
tions of the Roy Adaptation Model. For example, the scien- 4.3. Effective choice of response, retained in long-term
tific assumption addressing person and environment memory, will facilitate future effective choice of re-
transformations is mentioned as an additional goal of sponse.
adaptation in Roy and Andrews’ 1999 book, but that goal is 4.4. The psychomotor response chosen will determine
not defined or described in any detail. Furthermore, the the effectors activated and the ultimate body re-
philosophical assumption addressing the human being’s sponse.
relationships with the world and God is not yet fully inte- 5.1. The body response resulting from regulator
grated into the discussion of the moral-ethical-spiritual processes is fed back into the system.
self aspect of the Personal Self component of the Self- ● Propositions That Link the Basic Regulator Subsystem
Concept/Group Identity Mode.
Propositions
● The magnitude of the internal and external stimuli
GENERATION OF THEORY will positively influence the magnitude of the physio-
logical response of an intact system (1.1 through 2.1,
The Roy Adaptation Model has led to the generation of a 3.2, 4.4).
general Theory of the Person as an Adaptive System and ● Intact neural pathways will positively influence neural
separate theories of the four adaptive modes—the Theory output to effectors (2.1 through 3.1, 4.4).
of the Physiological Mode, the Theory of the Self-Concept ● Chemical and neural inputs will influence normally
Mode, the Theory of the Role Function Mode, and the responsive endocrine glands to hormonally influence
Theory of the Interdependence Mode (Roy & Roberts, target organs in a positive manner to maintain a state
1981). Roy (1984a, 1987a) pointed out that her distinctions of dynamic equilibrium (1.1 through 3.2).
between conceptual models and theories are based on form ● The body’s response to external and internal stimuli
and function rather than on levels of abstraction, as is the will alter those external and internal stimuli (1.1
case in this book. Alligood (2001) classified the Theory of through 5.1).
the Person as an Adaptive System as a grand theory and the ● The magnitude of the external and internal stimuli
other theories as middle-range theories. may be so great that the adaptive systems cannot re-
The Theory of the Person as an Adaptive System con- turn the body to a state of dynamic equilibrium (1.1
siders the person holistically. The major concepts of the through 5.1).
theory are System Adaptation, Regulator Subsystem, and
Cognator Subsystem. The propositions of this theory,
● Cognator Subsystem Propositions
which were constructed from Roy (personal communica- 1.1. The optimum amount and clarity of input of
tion, September 22, 1982) and Roy and Roberts (1981, pp. internal and external stimuli positively influences
62, 65), are: the adequacy of selective attention, coding, and
memory.
● Basic Regulator Subsystem Propositions 1.2. The optimum amount and clarity of input of inter-
1.1. Internal and external stimuli are basically chemical nal and external stimuli positively influences the ad-
or neural; chemical stimuli may be transduced into equacy of imitation, reinforcement, and insight.
neural inputs to the central nervous system. 1.3. The optimum amount and clarity of input of inter-
1.2. Neural pathways to and from the central nervous nal and external stimuli positively influences the ad-
system must be intact and functional if neural stim- equacy of problem solving and decision making.
uli are to influence body responses. 1.4. The optimum amount and clarity of input of inter-
2.1. Spinal cord, brainstem, and autonomic reflexes act nal and external stimuli positively influences the ad-
through effectors to produce automatic, uncon- equacy of defenses to seek relief, and affective
scious effects on the body responses. appraisal and attachment.
3.1. The circulation must be intact for chemical stimuli 2.1. Intact pathways and perceptual/information-pro-
to influence endocrine glands to produce the ap- cessing apparatus positively influences the adequacy
propriate hormone. of selective attention, coding, and memory.
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 390
Theorem: The level of alveolar-capillary exchange and ● Theory of the Self-Concept Mode
perfusion will positively influence the level of oxy- ●Propositions
genation and circulatory balance. 1.1. The positive quality of social experience in the
Hypothesis: If the nurse helps the patient achieve an op- form of others’ appraisals positively influences the
timal level of oxygenation and circulation, the pa- level of feelings of adequacy.
tient’s alveolar-capillary system will perform at a 1.2. Adequacy of role taking positively influences
higher level (Roy & Roberts, 1981, p. 181). the quality of input in the form of social experi-
ence.
● Temperature 1.3. The number of social rewards positively influ-
Axiom: The magnitude of the internal and external stim- ences the quality of social experience.
uli will positively influence the magnitude of the 1.4. Negative feedback in the form of performance
physiological response of an intact system. compared with ideals leads to corrections in levels
Theorem: The amount of input in the form of heat will of feelings of adequacy.
positively influence the temperature regulatory sys- 1.5. Conflicts in input in the form of varying ap-
tem. praisals positively influences the amount of self-
Hypothesis: If the nurse helps the patient maintain a tem- concept confusion experienced.
perature level for normal physiological functioning, 1.6. Confused self-concept leads to activation of
the patient’s cellular activity and body metabolism mechanisms to reduce dissonance and maintain
will perform at a more optimal level (Roy & Roberts, consistency.
1981, p. 199). 1.7. Activity of mechanisms for reducing dissonance
● The Senses and maintaining consistency (e.g., choice) tends
Axiom: The magnitude of the internal and external stim- to lead to feelings of adequacy.
uli will positively influence the magnitude of the 1.8. The level of feelings of adequacy positively influ-
physiological response of an intact system. ences the quality of presentation of self (Roy &
Theorem: The amount of sensory input via each sensory Roberts, 1981, p. 255).
●Deductive Proposition Set
modality will positively influence the level of cortical
Axiom1: Adequacy of role taking positively influences
arousal.
the quality of input in the form of social experi-
Hypothesis: If the nurse provides optimal sensory input,
ence.
the patient will achieve an optimal level of cortical
Axiom2: The positive quality of social experience posi-
arousal (Roy & Roberts, 1981, p. 218).
tively influences the level of feelings of adequacy.
● Endocrine System Theorem: Adequacy of role taking positively influences
Axiom: Chemical and neural inputs will influence nor- the level of feelings of adequacy.
mally responsive endocrine glands to hormonally in- Hypothesis: If the nurse helps the new mother to prac-
fluence target organs in a positive manner to tice role taking, the mother will develop a higher
maintain a state of dynamic equilibrium. level of feelings of adequacy. (Roy & Roberts, 1981,
Theorem: The amount of hormonal input and control p. 258).
will positively influence hormonal balance.
Hypothesis: If the nurse helps the patient maintain an op- ● Theory of the Role Function Mode
timal level of hormonal secretion, the patient will ●Propositions
achieve a higher level of hormonal or endocrine bal- 1.1. The amount of clarity of input in the form of role
ance (Roy & Roberts, 1981, p. 243). cues and cultural norms positively influences the
adequacy of role taking.
The Theory of the Self-Concept Mode, the Theory of the 1.2. Accuracy of perception positively influences the
Role Function Mode, and the Theory of the clarity of input in the form of role cues and cul-
Interdependence Mode consider those modes as systems tural norms.
“through which the regulator and cognator subsystems act 1.3. Adequacy of social learning positively influences
to promote adaptation” (Roy & Roberts, 1981, p. 248). the clarity of input in the form of role cues and
Each theory describes the relevant system in terms of its cultural norms.
wholeness, subsystems, relation of parts, inputs, outputs, 1.4. Negative feedback in the form of internal and ex-
and self-regulation and control. The propositions and a de- ternal validations leads to corrections in adequacy
ductive set of propositions for each theory are presented of role taking.
here. 1.5. Conflicts in input in the form of conflicting role
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 392
processes of arousal and attention, sensation and percep- Model have been published by Randell, Poush Tedrow, and
tion, coding, concept formation, memory, language, plan- Van Landingham (1982), Rambo (1984), and Welsh and
ning, and motor responses. The model proposes that the Clochesy (1990).
basic cognitive processes, which occur within the field of The Roy Adaptation Model encompasses an extensive
consciousness, are dependent on neurological and neuro- vocabulary with several new words. Furthermore, even fa-
chemical functions. The model further proposes that cog- miliar words, such as adaptation, have been given new
nitive processes are directed toward dealing with the focal meanings in Roy’s attempt to translate notions that reflect
stimulus of the immediate sensory experience, within the the reaction world view into ideas that reflect the recipro-
reference frame of contextual and residual stimuli in the cal interaction world view. Consequently, considerable
form of the person’s education and experience. study is required to fully understand the unique focus and
In recent years, other explicit middle-range theories content of the Roy Adaptation Model. Roy (1991) empha-
have been derived from the Roy Adaptation Model. Those sized the need to study “development, interrelatedness, cul-
theories are: tural, and other influences” on adaptive mode responses
(p. 35). Andrews (1989) pointed out that “conceptual clar-
● Theory of caregiver stress (Tsai, 1999, 2003) ity relative to the understanding of the essential elements
● Theory of adapting to diabetes (Whittemore & Roy, of a nursing model is a particular challenge and of great
2002) importance if the conceptualization is to be effective in its
● Theory of psychosocial adaptation to termination of application” (p. 139). She recommended detailed study of
pregnancy for fetal anomaly (Kruszewski, 1999) the content of the four adaptive modes and highlighted the
● Theory of adaptation during childbearing (Tulman & importance of diagrams (such as Fig. 10–1) to facilitate un-
Fawcett, 2003) derstanding of the various components of the Roy
Additional theory development work stemming from the Adaptation Model.
Roy Adaptation Model includes the construction of ex- Implementation of Roy Adaptation Model-based nurs-
plicit conceptual-theoretical-empirical structures for sev- ing practice is feasible. The human and material resources
eral studies, including preparation for cesarean childbirth needed for implementation of the model at the health-care
(Fawcett, 1990); correlates of functional status in normal organization level are evident in the following descriptions
life situations and serious illness (Fawcett & Tulman, 1990; of implementation projects.
Samarel & Fawcett, 1992; Tulman & Fawcett, 1990a, Gray (1991) presented a comprehensive report of the
1990b); adaptation to chronic illness (Pollock, 1993); strategies used for implementation of the Roy Adaptation
cross-cultural responses to pain (Calvillo & Flaskerud, Model at five Southern California hospitals. The hospitals
1993); stress experiences of spouses of coronary artery by- ranged from a 100-bed proprietary hospital to a 248-bed
pass graft patients (Artinian, 1991, 1992); correlates of nonprofit, community-owned hospital. Drawing from the
physiological and psychosocial adaptation in spinal Ingalls (1972) System of Management, Gray (1991) de-
cord–injured persons (Barone & Roy, 1996); correlates of scribed the processes of climate setting, mutual planning,
psychological distress and life satisfaction in diverse care- assessing needs, forming objectives, designing, implement-
giver populations (Ducharme et al., 1998; Levesque et al., ing, and evaluating. Climate setting focuses on assessment
1998); and the effects of walking exercise for women with of the physical, psychological, and organizational climate.
breast cancer (Mock et al., 1994, 1997). She pointed out that “if a hospital waits for the perfect time
to begin a change project, no change projects would ever be
started” (p. 433). Planning should be carried out by all lev-
CREDIBILITY OF THE NURSING MODEL els of nursing staff, along with the hospital personnel re-
sponsible for medical records, purchasing, central supply,
Social Utility social services, laboratories, x-ray, and respiratory therapy.
Needs assessment encompasses the individual staff nurse,
The utility of the Roy Adaptation Model for nursing re- the nursing department, and the health-care system as a
search, education, administration, and practice is well doc- whole. Gray (1991) underscored the importance of mar-
umented. The conceptual model is being used by nurses keting the model-based nursing services to consumers as a
throughout the United States and in other countries, in- method of contributing to the fiscal needs of the health-
cluding Canada, Colombia, Switzerland, and Japan care organization.
(Fawcett, 2003a; Roy, personal communication, May 15, Gray (1991) went on to point out that the overall objec-
1982). In addition to Roy’s own texts (Andrews & Roy, tive of an implementation project dealing with the Roy
1986; Roy, 1976b, 1984a; Roy & Andrews, 1991, 1999; Roy Adaptation Model is “to improve the quality of patient care
& Roberts, 1981), books related to the Roy Adaptation through the use of written care plans” (p. 437). More spe-
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 394
sion making as a drawback. Ingram (1995) weighed those view of 54 Roy Adaptation Model-based studies published
limitations with the advantages of the nursing diagnosis between 1995 and 2001, including 28 journal articles, 25
and goal-setting components of the Roy Adaptation doctoral dissertations, and 1 master’s thesis. Twenty-two
Model Nursing Process and suggested that the model be studies focused on adaptive modes and processes; seven, on
modified so that it could be used effectively in emergency the physiological mode; seven, on the self-concept mode;
departments. five, on the role function mode; three, on the interdepend-
Echoing Ingram’s (1995) concerns, Galbreath (2002) ence mode; five, on stimuli; and five, on the effects of in-
commented, “In a practice arena that is increasingly chal- terventions.
lenged with time constraints, the amount of time required The authors of the Boston Based Adaptation Research
to fully implement the two areas of [Roy Adaptation Nursing Society (1999) book noted that although some
Model] assessment [assessment of behaviors, assessment of programs of research were evident, many more research
stimuli] may be viewed as insurmountable. This is partic- programs are needed. Fawcett and Newman (2003) re-
ularly true as one begins to use the [model]; a nurse more viewed the publications listed in Table 10–3 and identified
experienced in the use of the [model] may find the time several programs of research, some of which have become
constraints less compelling” (p. 330). It could be argued evident since the Boston Based Adaptation Research
that conversely, a less systematic assessment or an ad hoc Nursing Society book (1999) was completed (see, for ex-
assessment could take more time in the long run, as nurses ample, research by Cottrell and Shannahan; Fawcett and
have to add crucial information to the patient data base as colleagues; Ducharme and Levesque and colleagues;
they realize that aspects of the initial assessment were not Lutjens; Mock and colleagues; Modrcin and colleagues;
completed. Niska; Pollock and colleagues; and Tulman and col-
leagues). In addition, Fawcett (2003b) presented a brief
Nursing Research. The Roy Adaptation Model has proved overview of the research on functional status that she and
very useful as a guide for nursing research. Several research her colleagues and doctoral students have been conducting
instruments have been derived directly from the Roy for several years. And, Tulman and Fawcett (2003) pub-
Adaptation Model (see Table 10–2). Moreover, as can be lished a book-length report of their study of correlates of
seen in the Doctoral Dissertations and Master’s Theses sec- women’s functional status during and after pregnancy,
tions of the chapter bibliography on the CD-ROM, many which is one of several of the studies in their program of
dissertations and theses have been guided by the model. research (see Table 10–3).
Published reports of research based on the Roy Adaptation
Model include descriptive studies of patients’ responses to Nursing Education. The utility of the Roy Adaptation
diverse environmental stimuli, correlational studies of the Model for nursing education is well documented. The early
relation of focal and contextual stimuli to diverse manifes- and widespread interest in using the model in educational
tations of physiological and psychosocial adaptation, and programs is attested to by three conferences that were held
experimental studies of the effects of Roy Adaptation for faculty members who planned to use or were already
Model-based nursing interventions on adaptation. These using the model as a basis for curriculum development in
reports are listed in Table 10–3. their schools. The first and second conferences were held at
In 1999, Roy and her colleagues in the Boston Based Alverno College in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in 1978 and
Adaptation Research Nursing Society (BBARNS) pub- 1979. The third conference was held at Mount St. Mary’s
lished the results of their integrative review of Roy College in Los Angeles, California, in 1981. Annual confer-
Adaptation Model-based research from 1970 through 1994 ences have been held at Mount St. Mary’s College to recog-
(Boston Based Adaptation Research Nursing Society, nize the leadership role of the College in the initial
1999). They classified 163 reports of empirical nursing re- development of the Roy Adaptation Model and to provide
search, including 51 doctoral dissertations, 25 master’s the- a forum for Roy Adaptation Model-based issues in educa-
ses, and 87 published research articles, into categories of tion and practice (Wallace, 1993). In addition, Mount St.
studies focusing on stimuli (n ⫽ 19), coping processes (n ⫽ Mary’s College initiated a lecture and seminar series in
36), the physiological mode (n ⫽ 21), the self-concept honor of Sr. Callista Roy in 1991.
mode (n ⫽ 18), the role function mode (n ⫽ 21), the in- Roy (personal communication, May 15, 1982) provided
terdependence mode (n ⫽ 20), and effects of nursing in- a list of schools of nursing where she or a faculty member
terventions (n ⫽ 28). They found that 116 of the studies from Mount St. Mary’s College had made consultant visits
were explicitly designed to test propositions of the Roy and there was “some evidence of follow-through with cur-
Adaptation Model. riculum development.” The nursing programs named are
More recently, Roy (2003) presented the results of a re- listed on page 414.
(Text continues on page 414)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 396
TABLE 10–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE ROY ADAPTATION MODEL
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Health-Illness (Powerlessness) Questionnaire Measures hospitalized patients’ perception of powerlessness in ill-
(Roy, 1979) ness.
Hospitalized Patient Decision Making (Roy, Measures hospitalized patients’ perceptions of decisions they ac-
1979) tually make while in a hospital and the decisions they would
prefer to make.
Cognitive Adaptation Processing Scale Measures five dimensions of cognitive adaptation strategies—
(CAPS) (Roy & Andrews, 1999f; Roy & cognitive processing of self-perception, clear focus and method,
Zhan, 2001; Zhan, 1994) knowing awareness, sensory regulation, and selective focus; a
measure of ways of coping.
Self-Consistency Scale (Roy & Zhan, 2001; Measures self-consistency in older adults, including self-esteem,
Young et al., 2001; Zhan, 1994; Zhan & private consciousness, social anxiety, and stability of self-con-
Shen, 1994) cept.
Inventory of Functional Status—Antepartum Measures the extent to which women continue to perform their
Period (IFSAP) (Tulman, Higgins et al., 1991; usual household, social and community, personal care, child
Young et al., 2001) care, occupational, and educational activities during pregnancy.
Inventory of Functional Status—Fathers (IFS- Measures the extent to which expectant and new fathers con-
F) (Tulman et al., 1993; Young et al., 2001) tinue to perform their usual household, social and community,
personal care, child care, occupational, and educational activi-
ties.
Parental Roles Questionnaire (Varnell, 1990) Measures parentization, operationalized as expectant parents’
own and spouse’s perceptions of parental role behaviors, includ-
ing mothering behaviors, fathering behaviors, incorporating of
norms, and childhood background.
Interdependence Questionnaire (Short, 1994) Measures Roy’s interdependence adaptive mode giving and re-
ceiving behaviors, in the categories of significant other, support
systems (friendships and extended family), and the experience
of feeling alone in newly delivered mothers.
Inventory of Functional Status After Childbirth Measures the extent to which women resume performance of
(IFSAC) (Fawcett et al., 1988; Young et al., their usual household, social and community, personal care, and
2001) occupational activities and assume infant care responsibilities
following childbirth.
Inventory of Functional Status— Caregiver of Measures the extent to which parental caregivers or their surro-
a Child in a Body Cast (Newman, 1997; gates continue their usual household, social and community,
Young et al., 2001) child care, personal care, and occupational activities while caring
for a child in a body cast.
Self-Perceived Adaptation Level (SPAL) (Ide, Measures the perceived ability of well elderly persons to manage
1978) or cope with changes in their internal or external environment
within the context of Roy’s role function and interdependence
adaptive modes.
Inventory of Functional Status in the Elderly Measures the extent to which independent, community-dwelling
(DiMattio, 2001; DiMattio & Tulman, 2003; older adults perform personal care, household, social and com-
Paier, 1994) munity, volunteer/ work, care of another, and leisure activities.
Sleep/Activity Behavior Log (O’Leary, 1991) Used to record sleep and activity patterns of persons with
Alzheimer’s disease.
*See the Research Instruments and Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
396
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 397
PRACTICE TOOLS
Nursing Process Manual (Seo-Cho, 1999) Guides detailed assessment of the physiological, self-concept, role
function, and interdependence modes of adaptation, along with a
discussion of and form for the Roy Adaptation Model Nursing
Process Format.
Questions for Nursing Assessment of Provides a list of questions to ask when assessing the senses aspect
Sensory Impairment (Roy & Andrews, of the physiological/physical adaptive mode.
1999c)
Adaptation Assessment Form (Rambo, 1984) Guides assessment within the context of Roy’s physiological adaptive
mode and the growth and developmental tasks associated with the
person’s primary role within the context of the role function adap-
tive mode.
Admission History and Assessment Form Guides assessment of hospitalized children within the context of
(Jakocko & Sowden, 1986) Roy’s physiological, self-concept, role function, and interdepend-
ence adaptive modes.
Admission Nursing Assessment (Galbreath, A form developed by nurses at Upper Valley Medical Centers in Troy,
2002) Ohio. Questions guide assessment of each adaptive mode and re-
flect the age or acuity of the relevant client population. Subjective,
objective, and measurement data are collected.
Family Development/ Nursing Intervention Guides Roy Adaptation Model-based assessment of school-age chil-
Identifier (Hinman, 1983) dren and their families.
Admission Assessment Form (Hamner, 1989) Guides assessment of adults hospitalized in a coronary care unit,
within the context of Roy’s physiological, self-concept, role func-
tion, and interdependence adaptive modes.
Nursing History Tool (Robitaille-Tremblay, Guides assessment of hospitalized psychiatric patients within the
1984) context of Roy’s physiological, self-concept, role function, and inter-
dependence adaptive modes.
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 398
TABLE 10–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE ROY
ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
PACU [Postanesthesia Care Unit] Preoperative Guides preoperative assessment of surgical patients within the con-
Assessment Tool (Jackson, 1990) text of Roy’s physiological, self-concept, role function, and interde-
pendence adaptive modes.
Comprehensive Sexual Assault Assessment Guides documentation of the assessment of sexual assault victims by
Tool (CSAAT) (Burgess & Fawcett, 1996) Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners; items tap Roy Adaptation Model
stimuli, coping processes, and adaptive modes. CSAAT data can be
used for clinical agency statistical analyses.
Joseph Continence Assessment Tool (JCAT) Permits assessment of factors that may affect success or failure of in-
(Joseph & Lantz, 1996) continence treatment, within the context of Roy’s physiological,
self-concept, role function, and interdependence adaptive modes;
particularly useful for providers in ambulatory care or community
settings.
Osteoporosis Assessment (Doyle & Rajacich, Guides assessment of individuals with osteoporosis within the con-
1991) text of Roy’s self-concept, role function, interdependence, and
physiological adaptive modes.
Questions for Assessing Emotional and Social Guides assessment of the renal dialysis patient within the context of
Adaptation to Dialysis (Frank, 1988) Roy’s self-concept, role function, interdependence, and physiologi-
cal adaptive modes.
Community Health Assessment (Hanchett, Guides assessment of a community in the areas of survival, continu-
1988) ity, growth, transactional patterns, and member control.
Typology of Indicators of Positive Adaptation A list of the indicators of positive adaptation for individuals and groups
(Roy & Andrews, 1999a) in the physiological/physical, self-concept/group identity, role func-
tion, and interdependent adaptive modes.
Typology of Commonly Recurring Adaptation A list of the common adaptation problems for individuals and groups
Problems (Roy & Andrews, 1999b) in the physiological/physical, self-concept/group identity, role func-
tion, and interdependence adaptive modes.
Nursing Diagnostic Categories (Roy & A list of generic nursing diagnoses within the context of indicators of
Andrews, 1999d) positive adaptation, common adaptation problems, and NANDA
nursing diagnoses for all aspects of the physiological/physical adap-
tive mode, and the self-concept/group identity, role function, and in-
terdependence adaptive modes.
Potential Nursing Diagnoses (Frank, 1988) A list of potential nursing diagnoses within Roy’s self-concept, role
function, interdependence, and physiological adaptive modes that
are relevant for patients receiving renal dialysis.
Nursing Diagnoses for MI Patients (Hamner, A list of nursing diagnoses and associated focal and contextual stimuli
1989) that are relevant for patients who have had a myocardial infarction.
A Parent’s Guide to Cesarean Birth (Fawcett & A pamphlet to prepare expectant parents for unplanned or planned
Burritt, 1985; Fawcett & Henklein, 1987) cesarean birth. Provides procedural, sensory, and coping strategies
information about the labor (in the case of unplanned cesarean
birth), delivery, and postpartum periods, organized according to the
four Roy Adaptation Model adaptive modes.
The Patient’s Guide to Preterm Labor (Taylor, A pamphlet to help women deal with preterm labor. Provides proce-
1993) dural, sensory, and coping strategies information about home- and
hospital-based treatment of preterm labor, organized according to
the four Roy Adaptation Model adaptive modes.
398
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 399
399
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 400
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Quality of nursing services Women undergoing termination of preg- Blain, 1993
nancy (TOP) and TOP unit staff nurses
Experiences of pregnancy Pregnant women who had spinal cord in- Craig, 1990
juries
Incidence of couvade symptoms Thai expectant fathers Khanobdee et al., 1993
Comparison of reactions to vaginal Women who had experienced a VBAC Fawcett et al., 1994
birth after cesarean (VBAC) with
reactions to the previous cesarean
birth, description of factors that in-
fluenced the decision to attempt
VBAC, and causes ascribed to the
outcome of the birth experience
Responses to cesarean birth Mothers and fathers who experienced ce- Fawcett, 1981
sarean birth of their infant
White, Hispanic, and Asian mothers who Fawcett & Weiss, 1993
experienced cesarean birth of their in-
fant
Needs of cesarean birth mothers Women who experienced cesarean birth Eakes & Brown, 1998; Kehoe,
of their infant 1981
Attitudes toward cesarean birth Women who experienced cesarean birth Reichert et al., 1993
of their infant
Differences in perceptions of Registered nurses and postpartum moth- Lynam & Miller, 1992
women’s needs during preterm ers
labor
Postpartum functional status Women who had experienced vaginal or Tulman & Fawcett, 1988
cesarean delivery
Interdependence needs Newly delivered mothers Short, 1994
Comparison of perceptions of mater- Mothers of infants in a neonatal intensive Raeside, 1997
nal and infant stressors care unit (NICU) and NICU nurses
Advice to nurses and other mothers Swedish mothers of full-term infants in a Nyqvist & Sjoden, 1993
regarding breastfeeding neonatal intensive care unit
Kinds of touch used during resuscita- Videotapes of premature infants who re- Kitchin & Hutchinson, 1996
tion immediately after delivery quired resuscitation immediately after
delivery
Time required to measure stable axil- Newborn infants Hunter, 1991
lary temperature
Experience of adapting to problems Parents of very-low-birth-weight infants in- Vasquez, 1995
of caring for a very-low-birth- terviewed at 1, 3, and 5 months after
weight infant hospital discharge
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations.
400
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 401
(continued)
401
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 402
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
402
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 403
(continued)
403
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 404
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
Semantic structure of the term “per- Text of research report by Orsi et al., 1997 Neto & Pagliuca, 2002
son” related to women with HIV
Experiences and adaptation Swedish women heterosexually infected Florence et al., 1994
with HIV
Differences in body image Spinal cord–injured adults with and with- Harding-Okimoto, 1997
out pressure ulcers
Meaning of suffering Adults with multiple sclerosis Pollock & Sands, 1997
Description of making sense of the Individuals with multiple sclerosis Gagliardi et al., 2002
experience of living with multiple
sclerosis
Psychosexual concerns Men and women hospitalized for diabetes LeMone, 1995
mellitus
Coping strategies Older people with hypertension Oliverira & Araujo, 2002
Physiological and psychosocial adap- Adults with hypertension, diabetes, Pollock, 1986, 1989, 1993;
tation to chronic illness rheumatoid arthritis, or multiple sclero- Pollock et al., 1990
sis
Physical and psychological adjust- Women who had a mastectomy Chen et al., 1999
ment
Description of Roy Adaptation Model Case studies of two adults with schizo- Schmidt, 1981
nursing process phrenia exhibiting withdrawal behavior
Attitudes toward nursing interventions Hospitalized psychiatric patients Leonard, 1975
Experiences of daily living Blind adults living in a rural community in Zungu, 1993
KwaZulu, South Africa
Comparison of the importance and Older persons who had cardiac surgery Paul & Rochichaud-Ekstrand,
availability of expected and re- 2002
ceived types of assistance during
convalescence, from an informal
social support network
Perceived unmet needs, biopsy- Elderly persons who had a stroke Brandriet et al., 1994
chosocial problems, and coping
strategies following termination of
home care services
Readiness to exercise and time Elderly Mexican women Salazar-Gonzalez & Jirovec, 2001
devoted to the wife, household,
grandmother, personal care, and
recreational roles
Elements of holistic nursing Case study of a 79-year-old woman who McIllmurray, 1997
had a stroke
Use of traditional and complemen- Patients with chronic sinusitis Krouse & Krouse, 1999
tary therapies
404
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 405
CORRELATIONAL STUDIES
Relation of pre-pregnant weight gain Pregnant women Tulman et al., 1998
and weight gain during pregnancy
to functional status, physical
symptoms, and physical energy
Relation of expectations about the Women who attended childbirth education Fawcett et al., 1994
possibility of cesarean birth to classes and expected to have a vaginal
type of delivery (vaginal or ce- delivery, who later had either a vaginal
sarean) and perception of the birth or an unplanned cesarean delivery
experience
Relations of health, individual psy- Women interviewed at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, Tulman et al., 1990; Tulman &
chosocial, and family variables to 3 months, and 6 months postpartum Fawcett, 1990b
functional status
Relation of physical health, psychoso- Childbearing women interviewed during Tulman & Fawcett, 2003
cial health, and family relationships the first, second, and third trimesters of
variables to functional status pregnancy and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3
months, and 6 months postpartum
Relation of fraction of inspired oxy- Intubated very-low-birth-weight infants re- Cheng & Williams, 1989
gen levels and number of hand ceiving chest physiotherapy
ventilations to transcutaneous oxy-
gen pressure
Relations among social support, par- Parents caring for children with cancer Yeh, 2003
enting stress, coping style, and
psychological distress
Relation of age, gender, past painful School-aged children having a venipunc- Bournaki, 1997
experiences, temperament, gen- ture and their female caregivers
eral and medical fears, and child-
rearing practices to pain-related
responses
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 406
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
Relation of self-esteem to age, gen- Adolescents aged 12–19 years being Modrcin-Talbott, Pullen,
der, smoking, exercise, depres- treated in an outpatient mental health Ehrenberger et al., 1998
sion, anger, and parental alcohol setting
use
Relation of self-esteem to age group, Healthy adolescents aged 12–19 years Modrcin-Talbott, Pullen, Zandstra
gender, exercise participation, et al., 1998
smoking, parental alcohol use, de-
pression, and anger
Relation between religiosity and to- Male and female adolescents aged 12–19 Pullen, Modricin-Talbott, West,
bacco use years who were clients of a mental Fenske et al., 1999
health agency or members of a church
youth group
Relation of alcohol and drug abuse to Adolescents living in the southeast United Pullen, Modrcin-Talbott, West, &
frequency of religious service at- States Muenchen, 1999
tendance
Relations among appraisal of vaso- Adolescents with sickle cell disease Fletcher, 2000
occlusive events, coping behavior
during the event, and adjustment
Relation of physical abuse, emotional Currently abused, post-abused, and non- Woods & Isenberg, 2001
abuse, risk of homicide to post- abused women
traumatic stress disorder, as medi-
ated by physiological stress
response, self-esteem, functional
status, and interpersonal relation-
ships
Relation of symptoms of en- Women with a diagnosis of endometriosis Christian, 1993
dometriosis to severity of pain and
self-esteem
Relation of circadian type, work envi- Paper mill workers who rotate shifts Phillips & Brown, 1992
ronment, and coping style to adap-
tation to shift work
Relation of conflicts, social support, Informal caregivers of demented relatives Ducharme et al., 1998
perceived stress, and coping at home, informal caregivers of psychi-
strategies to psychological distress atrically ill relatives at home, profes-
and life satisfaction sional caregivers of elderly
institutionalized patients, and elderly
spouses in the community
Relation of gender, conflicts, social Informal caregivers of demented relatives Levesque et al., 1998
support, perceived stress, and at home, informal caregivers of psychi-
coping strategies to psychological atrically ill relatives at home, profes-
distress sional caregivers of elderly
institutionalized patients, and elderly
spouses in the community
Relation between adaptation to focal Hospitalized adult patients Roy, 1978
stimuli and emotional distress
406
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 407
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 408
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
Test of a Roy model-based theory of Taiwanese children with cancer Yeh, 2002
health-related quality of life—rela-
tion of severity of illness, age, gen-
der, communication with others,
and understanding of the illness
with physical function, psychologic
function, peer/school function,
treatment/disease symptoms, and
cognition functions
Test of a Roy model-based theory of Secondary analysis of data from newly di- Nuamah et al., 1999
health-related quality of life-symptom agnosed postsurgical cancer patients,
distress, emotional distress, func- 60–92 years of age
tional status, and social support
Relations among alternative thera- Men and women with multiple sclerosis Fawcett et al., 1996
pies, functional status, and symp-
tom severity
Relation of comorbidity, household Women who had coronary bypass graft DiMattio & Tulman, 2003
composition, fatigue, and surgical surgery
pain to functional status
Relation between physical health and Elderly persons with and without cancer McGill, 1992; McGill
hope & Paul, 1993
Relation between marital status Stroke patients who had completed a re- Baker, 1993
(married/ unmarried/widowed) and habilitation program
level of functioning
Relations among functional health Older women living alone in Appalachia Collins, 1993
status, social support, and morale
Relation of marital status and gender Elderly married and unmarried men and Preston & Dellasega, 1990
to health status and vulnerability to women
stress
Relations among loneliness, social Adults living in senior housing Ryan, 1996
support, depression, and cognitive
functioning
Relation of hearing loss to loneliness Elderly men and women Chen, 1994
and self-esteem
Relation between cognitive adaptation Older persons with hearing loss Zhan, 2000; Roy & Zhan, 2001
processes and self-consistency
Relation of age, sex, length of ill- Adults in a home hospice program Dobratz, 1993
ness, social support, pain, and
physical function to psychological
adaptation
Relation of social support, social net- Widows during the second year of be- Robinson, 1995
work, income/education, spiritual reavement
beliefs, and coping processes to
grief responses
408
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 409
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effect of written birth plans or no Nulliparous pregnant women Springer, 1996
birth plans on anxiety
Effect of an antenatal cesarean birth Expectant parents attending childbirth ed- Fawcett & Burritt, 1985; Fawcett
information program on responses ucation classes who later experienced a & Henklein, 1987
to cesarean birth cesarean birth
Effects of an experimental antenatal Expectant parents attending childbirth ed- Fawcett, 1990; Fawcett et al.,
cesarean birth information pro- ucation classes who later experienced 1993
gram and control usual cesarean an unplanned cesarean birth
birth information on perception of
the birth experience, pain intensity,
distress, self-esteem, functional
status, feelings about the baby,
and changes in the quality of the
relationship with the spouse
Effects of a birthing chair and the tra- Women in labor and their infants Cottrell & Shannahan,1986,
ditional delivery table position on 1987; Shannahan & Cottrell,
duration of second-stage labor, 1985
maternal blood loss, and infant
outcomes
Effects of suctioning, repositioning, Premature infants Norris et al., 1982
and performing a heel stick on
transcutaneous oxygen tension
Effects of environmental illumination Preterm infants Shogan & Schumann, 1993
level on oxygen saturation
Effects of experimental taste, smell, Preterm infants experiencing an apneic Garcia & White-Traut, 1993
and oral tactile stimulation and episode
control traditional tactile stimula-
tion on reinitiation of respiratory
effort
Effects of early parent touch on heart Preterm infants Harrison et al., 1990
rate and arterial oxygen saturation
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 410
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
Effects of experimental gentle human Medically fragile preterm infants Modrcin-Talbott et al., 2003
touch intervention and control routine
neonatal intensive care unit nursing
care on inactivity, motor activity, be-
havioral distress cues, quiet sleep
time, active sleep time, heart rate,
oxygen saturation, length of hospital-
ization, and weight gain
Effects of conventional system ver- High-risk neonates Jones & Smyth, 1999
sus managed care clinical system
on feeding behaviors, length of
stay, severity of illness, readmis-
sions, and cost of care
Effects of structured home nursing Parents of home apnea-monitored infants Komelasky, 1990
visits on anxiety and retention of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
knowledge
Effects of type of thermometer and Children admitted to an emergency de- Pontious, Kennedy, Chang, et
site on accuracy and reliability of partment al., 1994; Pontious, Kennedy,
temperature measurement Shelly, et al., 1994
Effects of a home ventilator care pro- Children with home ventilator assistance Hazlett, 1989
gram on child and family psychosocial and their mothers
adjustment, parental and family
preparation for home care, follow-up
care, use of support services, child
and family unmet needs, costs of
home care, and changes in financial
status or employment associated
with the child’s home care
Effect of the Frame Model of Preadolescent children with attention- Frame, 2003
Preadolescent Empowerment on deficit hyperactivity disorder
perception of self-worth
Effects of an experimental school- Preadolescents diagnosed with attention Frame et al., 2003
based, nurse-facilitated support deficit disorder or attention deficit hy-
group and a control substantial at- peractivity disorder
tention group on perceptions of
scholastic competence, social ac-
ceptance, behavioral conduct, per-
ceived athletic competence,
perceived physical appearance,
and perceived global self-worth
Effect of a psychotherapy group, a College-age adult children of alcoholics Kuhns, 1997
self-help group, or no group on de-
pression
Effects of a safer sex educational College students Vicenzi & Thiel, 1992
module on AIDS-related beliefs
and safer sex practices
410
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 411
Effect of Roy Adaptation Model pre- Circulating operating room nurses Leuze & McKenzie, 1987
operative nursing assessments or
routine preoperative assessments
on knowledge of patients’ physio-
logical and psychosocial needs
Effects of experimental Tellington Healthy members of the National Guard in Wendler, 2003
touch and control social conversa- the Midwest receiving a routine physi-
tion with a friendly medic on blood cal examination
pressure, heart rate, state anxiety,
and procedural pain
Effect of experimental music therapy Ambulatory patients undergoing Smolen et al., 2002
and control no music on anxiety colonoscopy
Effect of humorous audiotapes, tran- Men and women scheduled for same-day, Gaberson, 1991, 1995
quil music audiotapes, or no audio- elective, nondiagnostic surgery
tapes on preoperative anxiety
Effects of an experimental structured Men and women scheduled for surgery Meeker, 1994
preoperative teaching program and
control usual teaching on postop-
erative atelectasis incidence and
patient satisfaction
Effects of a preoperative experimen- Women scheduled for laparoscopic tubal Coslow & Eddy, 1998
tal structured or control unstruc- ligation
tured education program on
postoperative vital signs, use of
analgesics, nausea and vomiting,
length of postanesthesia care unit
stay, and patient satisfaction
Effects of an experimental nursing Sedated surgical patients awaiting general Nolan, 1977
assessment and supportive inter- anesthesia induction
vention and a control routine nurs-
ing intervention on postoperative
recall of perceptions in relation to
the environment, feelings, events,
and people during the immediate
preanesthesia preoperative period
Effect of family member visitation, Women surgical patients in a postanes- Vogelsang & Ragiel, 1987
familiar nurse visitation, or no visi- thesia care unit
tation on anxiety
Effects of a substance abuse clinical Hospitalized medical patients at risk for Lopez-Bushnell & Fassler, 2002
pathway on co-morbidity, number substance abuse
of re-admissions, provider satisfac-
tion, patient satisfaction, length of
stay, hospital discharge statistics,
and number of referrals to outpa-
tient substance abuse treatment
Effect of an experimental care con- Family members of patients being trans- Bokinskie, 1992
ference and a control no care con- ferred from a neurological intensive care
ference on anxiety unit to a general care unit
(continued)
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 412
TABLE 10–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
412
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 413
413
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 414
in hospitals and medical centers across the United States Furthermore, Roy and Anway (1989) presented an adapta-
and in Canada, England, and Sweden. Moreover, practice tion of the Roy Adaptation Model for nursing administra-
tools that are particularly relevant to the administration of tion (RAMA). The organizational modes of adaptation are
nursing services, including standards of nursing practice, the physical system, the role system, the interpersonal sys-
nursing job descriptions, quality assessment tools, a per- tem, and the interdependence system. Those systems adapt
formance appraisal system, and a format for intershift re- to internal and external environmental conditions through
port, have been developed within the context of the Roy stabilizer and innovator central mechanisms. The notions
Adaptation Model (see Table 10–2). The health-care or- of the physical system and the stabilizer and innovator
ganizations in which Roy Adaptation Model-based nursing mechanisms presented in Roy and Anway’s (1989) descrip-
practice has been implemented, as described in the avail- tion of the RAMA have been incorporated into the most
able literature, are listed here. The complete citations for recent version of the Roy Adaptation Model, as presented
the publications are given in the Administration section of in Roy and Andrews’ (1999) book.
the chapter references. DiIorio (1989) also described the application of the
conceptual model to nursing administration. Furthermore,
● Montefiore Medical Center, Henry and Lucy Moses Roy and Martinez (1983) presented a conceptual frame-
Division Neurosurgical Nursing Unit, New York City, work for clinical specialist nursing practice based on the
New York (Frederickson, 1991, 1993; Frederickson & Roy Adaptation Model and systems notions. In addition,
Williams, 1997; Parse, 1990; Roy, 1992) Zarle (1987) described a Roy Adaptation Model-based
● Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Day model for planning continuing care following hospitaliza-
Gynecologic Chemotherapy Unit, Philadelphia, tion.
Pennsylvania (Torosian et al., 1985)
● National Hospital for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Nursing Practice. The Roy Adaptation Model has docu-
Arlington, Virginia (Mastel et al, 1982; Silva & Sorrell, mented utility for nursing practice with patients across the
1992) lifespan who have various health conditions and are in var-
● St. Joseph Regional Medical Center, Lewiston, Idaho ious settings. Phillips (2002) agreed that “Roy’s model is
(Connerley et al., 1999) generalizable to all settings in nursing practice” (p. 287)
● Veterans Administration Medical Center, Nursing but criticized the model for the limitations in its scope,
Home Care Unit, Roseburg, Oregon (Dorsey & Purcell, “because it primarily addresses the concept of person-
1987) environment adaptation and focuses primarily on the pa-
● Providence Hospital, Oakland, California (Laros, 1977) tient. Information on the nurse is implied” (p. 287).
● South Coast Medical Center, Laguna Beach, California Published reports of the application of the Roy Adaptation
(Gray, 1991) Model in practice are listed in Table 10–4.
● Anaheim Memorial Hospital, Anaheim, California Galbreath (2002) pointed to the broad applicability of
(Gray, 1991) the Roy Adaptation Model. She stated:
● Children’s Hospital of Orange County, Orange, The concepts of the model have application for individuals
California (Jakocko & Sowden, 1986) across the life span and for families, groups, and other collec-
● Sharp Memorial Hospital, Mary Birch Hospital for tive human adaptive systems. No age or situation is particu-
Women, San Diego, California (Weiss & Teplick, 1993, larly outside the scope of the model [although] portions of the
1995) model may be of greater concern to the nurse at different
● Centre Hospitalier Pierre Janet, Hull, Quebec, Canada times. … The model helps the nurse organize and apply the
(Robitaille-Tremblay, 1984) vast body of knowledge of nursing science and related sciences
and arts to promote adaptation of individuals and groups
● Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Fitch
(p. 324).
et al., 1991)
● Orthopedic and Arthritic Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, More specifically, a review of the published reports listed in
Canada (Rogers et al., 1991) Table 10–4 and the publications listed in the Commentary:
● La Sanbana University Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia Practice section of the chapter bibliography on the CD-
(Fawcett, 2003) ROM reveals that the Roy Adaptation Model has been used
● Fundación Cardio Infantil-Istituto de Cardiologia, to guide nursing practice with children and adolescents
Pediatric Critical Care and Neonatal Units, Bogotá, with chronic and acute medical conditions, such as
Colombia (Fawcett, 2003) Kawasaki disease, juvenile dermatomyositis, diabetes,
● Brighton General Hospital, Acute Surgery Ward, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and cancer. The model also
Brighton, England (Lewis, 1988) has guided nursing practice with well adults, including
● University Children’s Hospital, Neonatal Intensive Care childbearing women and new fathers, and with men and
Unit, Uppsala, Sweden (Nyqvist & Karlsson, 1997) women with such chronic or acute medical conditions as
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 416
TABLE 10–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL
INDIVIDUALS
Application of Roy’s Young children who are hospitalized Galligan, 1979
Adaptation Model
10-month-old child with tracheomalacia Lankester & Sheldon, 1999
Children with Kawasaki disease Nash, 1987
An 8-year-old boy with leukemia Wright et al., 1993
A 9-year-old girl with juvenile dermatomyositis Hartley & Campion-Fuller, 1994
Adolescents with cancer Ellis, 1991
Adolescents with asthma Hennessy-Harstad, 1999
A teenager with diabetes mellitus Roy, 1971
A 19-year-old college student Barnfather et al., 1989
A pregnant woman Sato, 1986
Women undergoing genetic testing during pregnancy Stringer et al., 1991
Women experiencing preterm labor Eganhouse, 1994
A 22-year-old multipara who did not want the baby, in active Wagner, 1976
labor
Postpartum cesarean-delivered mothers Kehoe, 1981
Fathers whose infants were born by cesarean Fawcett, 1981
A 27-year-old woman who delivered an infant in respiratory Downey, 1974
distress
Women experiencing cardiomyopathy during the peripartum Sirignano, 1987
period
A 25-year-old new mother experiencing emotional problems Fawcett, 1997
A 23-year-old man who was severely injured in a farm accident Giger et al., 1987
Adults experiencing multiple trauma DiMaria, 1989
Adults who suffered severe burns Summers, 1991
A 25-year-old woman with Hodgkin’s disease Gerrish, 1989
A 29-year-old woman recovering from surgery for cervical Phillips, 1997, 2002
cancer
A woman scheduled for excision of bilateral breast lumps Fox, 1990
A 37-year-old woman who had a benign chest mass West, 1992
A woman who had gynecologic surgery Roy, 1971
A 38-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer Piazza et al., 1992
Adults with HIV disease Griffiths-Jones & Walker, 1993
A 27-year-old man with AIDS Phillips, 1997, 2002
A hospitalized 34-year-old woman and a 39-year-old man expe- Frederickson, 1993
riencing anxiety due to surgical or medical problems
A 30-year-old woman alcoholic admitted to a detoxification unit McIver, 1987
Adult cocaine abusers recovering from anesthesia for surgery Rogers, 1991
A 44-year-old man who had a heart transplant Cardiff, 1989
A 47-year-old man recovering from surgery for a cerebral Fawcett et al., 1992
aneurysm
Adults who had stomal surgery Hughes, 1991
Women experiencing changes associated with menopause Cunningham, 2002
Women experiencing depression during the climacteric Coleman, 1993
Adults experiencing depression Lambert, 1994
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
417
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 418
TABLE 10–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL (continued)
418
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 419
COMMUNITIES
Application of Roy’s A community Batra, 1996
Adaptation Model A county in need of a shelter for the victims of domestic vio- Hanchett, 1988
lence
by other disciplines by placing it within the context of the determination. More comprehensive case studies and clin-
person or group as a holistic adaptive system. Thus, the ical research that draw definitive conclusions regarding the
Roy Adaptation Model presents a distinctive view of the credibility of the Roy Adaptation Model are needed.
person and the group, one that developed within the disci- In conclusion, “few can fail to be excited by the explo-
pline of nursing. sive use of the Roy Adaptation Model in [nursing] practice,
Roy and others (e.g., Randell, Poush Tedrow, & Van nursing administration, nursing education, and scholarly
Landingham, 1982) have continued to develop the various research” (Galbreath, 2002, p. 329). The Roy Adaptation
concepts of the conceptual model, so that only a few gaps Model has been adopted enthusiastically by many nurse
and omissions remain. Roy and Roberts’ (1981) work to educators, nurse researchers, and practicing nurses.
develop the Theory of the Person as an Adaptive System Although such enthusiasm about the model could result in
and the theories of the adaptive modes and Roy’s (2003) its uncritical application, Roy has attempted to guard
more recent work is especially noteworthy. That work re- against that by pointing out areas of the model needing
sulted in construction of the beginning of logically con- further clarification and development. She commented:
gruent conceptual-theoretical-empirical structures that As models and frameworks continue to make their contribu-
can be used for nursing activities. The importance of the tion to nursing, conceptual clarification and other theoretical
Theory of the Person as an Adaptive System to nursing was development will be done by the theorists and others. … A
summarized by Roy and Roberts (1981). They stated, number of issues related to the concepts of the Roy adaptation
“Investigation of adaptive systems is evident in the litera- model [have been raised]. Although major changes in the
ture of a number of fields including genetics, biology, phys- model do not seem to be called for, a rethinking of some basic
iology, physics, psychology, anthropology, and sociology. definitions and distinctions among the key concepts provides
All of these approaches can be helpful in conceptualizing the stimulus for further theoretical and empirical growth
the adaptive system. Yet each approach views the person or (Artinian & Roy, 1990, p. 66).
the group from the perspective of that discipline. The nurs- Some assumptions about the model should be validated—for
ing model directs that the nurse view the patient holisti- example, the assumption that the person has four modes of
cally. We need a theory of the holistic person as an adaptive adaptation. Assumed values, particularly the value concerning
system. Since the basic sciences do not provide nurses with the uniqueness of nursing, need to be made more explicit, and
a single working theory, the nurse using the adaptation perhaps should also be supported. The model’s goal, patiency,
model must create one for herself. This … is a beginning source of difficulty, and intervention in terms of focus and
effort to do this—to create a theory of the holistic person mode are all replete with possibilities for further clarification.
A particularly fruitful field for study is the patient’s use of
as an adaptive system” (p. 49). Given the importance of adaptive mechanisms and the nurse’s support of these in each
that work, it is unfortunate more programs of research de- adaptive mode (Roy, 1989, p. 113).
signed to systematically test propositions still have not
been developed. Further clarification and development of the Roy
With regard to middle-range theory development, Adaptation Model may be spearheaded by the Roy
Phillips (2002) explained that “Roy has explicated a great Adaptation Association (RAA; formerly known as the
number of propositions, theorems, and axioms that serve Boston Based Adaptation Research Nursing Society). The
well in the development of middle-range theory. The ho- purposes of the RAA are to advance nursing practice by de-
listic nature of the model serves well for nurse researchers veloping basic and clinical nursing knowledge based on the
who are interested in the complex reaction between physi- Roy Adaptation Model and its philosophical perspective,
ological and psychosocial adaptive processes” (p. 287). He provide forums for special interest in Roy Adaptation
went on to point out, researchers need to “continue to Model based research, education and practice all focused
build middle-range theory based on the [Roy Adaptation on creative social change, and enhance networks of dis-
Model] and to develop empirical referents [that is, research semination of knowledge for practice and education.
instruments] specifically designated to measure concepts Continued development of the Roy Adaptation Model
proposed in the derived theory” (p. 287). should progress as RAA members and other nurses con-
Additional work is needed to fully establish the credibil- tinue their work. The RAA has held annual conferences
ity of conceptual-theoretical-empirical structures derived each year since 2000. Practicing nurses, faculty, and re-
from the Roy Adaptation Model. Gerrish’s (1989) thought- searchers have opportunities to present their Roy
ful evaluation of her use of the model in nursing practice Adaptation Model-based practice and education innova-
represents a prototype case study for credibility determina- tions and the findings of their Roy Adaptation Model-
tion. Hoch’s (1987) clinical study comparing the use of an based studies at those conferences. The RAA also publishes
explicit conceptual model of nursing with an implicit a bi-annual newsletter, the Roy Adaptation Association
model is a prototype for more systematic credibility Review.
10Fawcett-10 09/17/2004 2:20 PM Page 422
Part Three
ANALYSIS AND
EVALUATION OF
NURSING THEORIES
Chapter 11
Framework for Analysis
and Evaluation of
Nursing Theories
This chapter presents a framework for analysis and evaluation of nursing theo-
ries. The framework emphasizes the most important features of grand theories
and middle-range theories and is appropriate to the level of abstraction of these
two types of nursing theories. The framework was first published several years
ago (Fawcett, 1993) and was refined for the first edition of this book (Fawcett,
2000). The current version reflects attention to language that encompasses all
nursing practice situations and settings, not just those situations and settings
that connote nursing at the bedside of the sick, or clinical nursing (Parse, 2002).
This framework, like the framework for analysis and evaluation of nursing
models presented in Chapter 3, reflects critical reasoning and, therefore, “high-
lights strengths and exposes problems inherent in a line of reasoning” (Silva &
Sorrell, 1992, p. 17). Application of the framework yields a descriptive, analytical,
and critical commentary that enhances understanding of the theory and can
lead to refinements in its concepts and propositions (Meleis, 1997).
441
11Fawcett-11 09/17/2004 2:21 PM Page 442
ANALYSIS OF NURSING THEORIES ● Which metaparadigm concepts are addressed by the the-
ory?
ANALYSIS of a nursing theory, using the framework ● Does the theory deal with human beings?
presented in this chapter, is accomplished by a systematic ● Does the theory deal with the environment?
examination of exactly what the author has written about ● Does the theory deal with health?
the theory, rather than by relying on inferences about ● Does the theory deal with nursing processes or goals?
what might have been meant or by referring to other ● Which metaparadigm propositions are addressed by the
authors’ interpretations of the theory. When the author
theory?
of the theory has not been clear about a point or has ● Does the theory deal with human processes of living
not presented certain information, it may be necessary
and dying?
to make inferences or to turn to other reviews of the ● Does the theory deal with patterning of human health
theory. That, however, must be noted explicitly, so that the
experiences within the context of the environment.
distinction between the words of the theory author and ● Does the theory deal with nursing actions or processes
those of others is clear. Theory analysis, therefore, involves
that are beneficial to human beings?
a nonjudgmental, detailed examination of the theory, ● Does the theory deal with human processes of living
including Theory Scope, Theory Context, and Theory
and dying, recognizing that human beings are in a con-
Content.
tinuous relationship with their environments?
Other questions about context focus on the philosophical
ANALYSIS STEP 1: THEORY SCOPE claims on which the theory is based. Philosophical state-
ments, as noted in Chapter 1, explicate values and beliefs
The first step in theory analysis is to classify the Theory
about nursing, as well as the world view of the relationship
Scope. Recall, from Chapter 1, that grand theories are
between human beings and the environment. The ques-
broad in scope and substantively nonspecific; their con-
tions are:
cepts and propositions are relatively abstract. Middle-
range theories, in contrast, are more circumscribed and ● On what philosophical claims is the theory based?
substantively specific; their concepts and propositions are ● What world view is reflected in the theory?
relatively concrete. In addition, middle-range theories are
classified as descriptive, explanatory, or predictive. The Another question dealing with the context of a theory fo-
question that should be asked is: cuses on the conceptual model from which the theory was
derived. As explained in Chapter 1, a conceptual model is
● What is the scope of the theory? more abstract than a theory and serves as a guide for the-
ory development. The question is:
ANALYSIS STEP 2: THEORY CONTEXT ● From what conceptual model was the theory derived?
The second step in theory analysis is examination of The final question dealing with theory context highlights
the Theory Context. Barnum (1998) regarded the context the knowledge from nursing and other disciplines used by
of a nursing theory to be “the environment in which the theorist. This question reflects recognition that “nurs-
nursing acts occur. It tells the nature of the world of nurs- ing theories do not spring forth fully formed” (Levine,
ing and, in most cases, this involves describing the salient 1988, p. 16). Instead, most nurse theorists draw on existing,
characteristics of the patient’s surroundings” (p. 19). or antecedent, knowledge from nursing and adjunctive dis-
Context, as used in this book, goes beyond Barnum’s de- ciplines as they construct and refine their theories. The
scription to encompass identification of the concepts question is:
and propositions of the nursing metaparadigm addressed ● What antecedent knowledge from nursing and adjunc-
by the theory, the philosophical claims on which the tive disciplines was used in the development of the the-
theory is based, the conceptual model from which the the- ory?
ory was derived, and the contributions of knowledge from
nursing and adjunctive disciplines to the theory develop-
ment effort. ANALYSIS STEP 3: THEORY CONTENT
The metaparadigm of nursing, as explained in Chapter
1, is made up of four global concepts and four global The third step in theory analysis is examination of Theory
propositions. The questions about the metaparadigm con- Content. The content, or subject matter, of a theory is ar-
cepts and propositions are: ticulated through the theory’s concepts and propositions.
11Fawcett-11 09/17/2004 2:21 PM Page 443
The concepts of a theory are words or groups of words ● Is the conceptual model from which the theory was de-
that express a mental image of some phenomenon. They rived explicit?
represent the special vocabulary of a theory. Furthermore, ● Are the authors of antecedent knowledge from nursing
the concepts give meaning to what can be imagined or and adjunctive disciplines acknowledged and are biblio-
observed through the senses. They enable the theorist to graphical citations given?
categorize, interpret, and structure the phenomena encom-
passed by the theory. Concepts can be unidimensional, or
they can have more than one dimension. EVALUATION STEP 2: INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
The propositions of a theory are declarative statements
about one or more concepts, statements that assert what is The second step in theory evaluation focuses on both the
thought to be the case. As explained in Chapter 1, nonrela- context and the content of the theory. The criterion is
tional propositions describe concepts by stating their con- Internal Consistency. This criterion requires all elements
stitutive definitions. Relational propositions express the of the theorist’s work, including the philosophical claims,
associations or linkages between two or more concepts. conceptual model, and theory concepts and propositions,
Analysis of the content of a theory requires systematic to be congruent.
examination of all available descriptions of the theory by Furthermore, the internal consistency criterion requires
its author. The questions are: the theory concepts to reflect semantic clarity and seman-
tic consistency. The semantic clarity requirement is more
● What are the concepts of the theory? likely to be met when a constitutive definition is given
● What are the propositions of the theory? for each concept than when no explicit definitions are
●Which propositions are nonrelational? given.
●Which propositions are relational? The semantic consistency requirement is met when the
same term and the same definition are used for each con-
cept in all of the author’s discussions about the theory.
EVALUATION OF NURSING THEORIES Semantic inconsistency occurs when different terms are
used for a concept or different meanings are attached to the
EVALUATION of a theory requires judgments to be made same concept.
about the extent to which a theory satisfies certain criteria. The internal consistency criterion also requires that
These criteria are Significance, Internal Consistency, propositions reflect structural consistency, which means
Parsimony, Testability, Empirical Adequacy, and that the linkages between concepts are specified and
Pragmatic Adequacy. The evaluation is based on the re- that no contradictions in relational propositions are
sults of the analysis, as well as on a review of previously evident.
published critiques, research reports, and reports of practi- The questions to be asked when evaluating the internal
cal applications of the theory. consistency of a theory are:
● Are the context (philosophical claims and conceptual
EVALUATION STEP 1: SIGNIFICANCE model) and the content (concepts and propositions) of
the theory congruent?
The first step in theory evaluation focuses on the context of ● Do the concepts reflect semantic clarity and semantic
the theory. The criterion is Significance. consistency?
The criterion of significance requires justification of the ● Do the propositions reflect structural consistency?
importance of the theory to the discipline of nursing. That
criterion is met when the metaparadigmatic, philosophical,
and conceptual or paradigmatic origins of the theory are EVALUATION STEP 3: PARSIMONY
explicit, when the antecedent nursing and adjunctive
knowledge is cited (Levine, 1995), and when the special The third step in theory evaluation focuses only on the
contributions made by the theory are identified. The ques- content of the theory. The criterion is Parsimony. This cri-
tions to be asked when evaluating the significance of the terion requires a theory to be stated in the most economi-
theory are: cal way possible without oversimplifying the phenomena
of interest. This means that the fewer the concepts and
● Are the metaparadigm concepts and propositions ad- propositions needed to fully explicate the phenomena of
dressed by the theory explicit? interest, the better.
● Are the philosophical claims on which the theory is The parsimony criterion is met when the most parsi-
based explicit? monious statements clarify rather than obscure the
11Fawcett-11 09/17/2004 2:21 PM Page 444
EVALUATION STEP 5: EMPIRICAL ADEQUACY say here that the more tests of a theory that yield support-
ing evidence, the more empirically adequate the theory.
The fifth step in theory evaluation deals with an assessment It is important to point out that a theory should not be
of the theory’s Empirical Adequacy. The empirical ade- regarded as the truth or an ideology that cannot be modi-
quacy criterion requires the assertions made by the theory fied. Indeed, no theory should be considered final or ab-
to be congruent with empirical evidence. The extent to solute, because it is always possible that subsequent studies
which a theory meets the criterion of empirical adequacy is will yield different findings or that other theories will pro-
determined by means of a systematic review of the findings vide a better fit with the data. Thus the aim of evaluation
of all studies that have been guided by the theory. of empirical adequacy is to determine the degree of confi-
The logic of scientific inference dictates that if the em- dence warranted by the best empirical evidence, rather
pirical data conform to the theoretical assertions, it may be than to determine the absolute truth of the theory. The
appropriate to tentatively accept the assertions as reason- outcome of evaluation of empirical adequacy is a judgment
able or adequate. Conversely, if the empirical data do not regarding the need to modify, refine, or discard one or
conform to the assertions, it is appropriate to conclude that more concepts or propositions of the theory.
the assertions are false.
Evaluation of the empirical adequacy of a theory should
take into consideration the potential for circular reasoning. Determining the Empirical Adequacy
More specifically, if data always are interpreted in light of a of Grand Theories
particular theory, it may be difficult to “see” results that are The extent to which a grand theory meets the criterion of
not in keeping with that theory. Indeed, if researchers con- empirical adequacy is determined by a continuation of the
stantly uncover, describe, and interpret data through the description of personal experiences approach discussed
lens of a particular theory, the outcome may be limited earlier in the section on testability of grand theories. The
to expansion of that theory and that theory alone (Ray, data used to determine the empirical adequacy of a grand
1990). Therefore, unless alternative theories are considered theory may come from multiple personal experiences of an
when interpreting data or the data are critically examined individual or similar personal experiences of several indi-
for both their fit and nonfit with the theory, circular viduals. The question to be asked when evaluating the em-
reasoning will occur and the theory will be uncritically pirical adequacy of a grand theory is:
perpetuated. Circular reasoning can be avoided if the data
are carefully examined to determine the extent of their ● Are the findings from studies of descriptions of personal
congruence with the concepts and propositions of the experiences congruent with the concepts and proposi-
theory, as well as from the perspective of alternative theo- tions of the grand theory?
ries (Platt, 1964).
In other words, evaluation of a theory always should
take alternative theories into account when interpreting Determining the Empirical Adequacy
data collected within the context of the theory in question. of Middle-Range Theories
Testability of a grand theory requires interpretations of de- The extent to which a middle-range theory meets the crite-
scriptions of personal experiences within the context of the rion of empirical adequacy is determined by a continua-
grand theory of interest, as well as within the context of tion of the traditional empirical approach discussed earlier
one or more alternative grand theories. Testability of a in the section on testability of middle-range theories. The
middle-range theory requires interpretations of the empir- question is:
ical data within the context of the middle-range theory of
interest, as well as within the context of one or more alter- ● Are theoretical assertions congruent with empirical evi-
native middle-range theories. dence?
It is unlikely that any one test of a theory will provide
the definitive evidence needed to establish its empirical ad- EVALUATION STEP 6: PRAGMATIC ADEQUACY
equacy. Thus decisions about empirical adequacy should
take the findings of all related studies into account. Meta- The sixth step in evaluation of a theory focuses on the the-
analysis, metasynthesis, metasummary, and other formal ory’s utility for practice. The criterion is Pragmatic
procedures can be used to integrate the results of related Adequacy. The extent to which a grand theory or a middle-
studies. Readers are referred to other texts for comprehen- range theory meets this criterion is determined by review-
sive discussions of those procedures (Cooper, 1989; ing all descriptions of the use of the theory in practice.
Fawcett, 1999; Rosenthal, 1991, Sandelowski & Barnum, The pragmatic adequacy criterion requires that nurses
2003; Sandelowski, Docherty, & Emden, 1997). Suffice it to have a full understanding of the content of the theory, as
11Fawcett-11 09/17/2004 2:21 PM Page 446
TABLE 11–1
A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF NURSING THEORIES
(continued)
11Fawcett-11 09/17/2004 2:21 PM Page 448
TABLE 11–1
A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF NURSING THEORIES (continued)
Step 3: Parsimony
• Is the theory content stated clearly and concisely?
Step 4: Testability
Grand Theories
• Is the research methodology qualitative and inductive?
• Is the research methodology congruent with the philosophical claims and content of the grand theory?
• Will the data obtained from use of the research methodology represent sufficiently in-depth descriptions of one
or more personal experiences to capture the essence of the grand theory?
Middle-Range Theories
• Does the research methodology reflect the middle-range theory?
• Are the middle-range theory concepts observable through instruments that are appropriate empirical indicators
of those concepts?
• Do the data analysis techniques permit measurement of the middle-range theory propositions?
Step 5: Empirical Adequacy
Grand Theories
• Are the findings from studies of descriptions of personal experiences congruent with the concepts and
propositions of the grand theory?
Middle-Range Theories
• Are theoretical assertions congruent with empirical evidence?
Step 6: Pragmatic Adequacy
• Are education and special skill training required before application of the theory in practice?
• Has the theory been applied in the real world of nursing practice?
• Is it generally feasible to implement practice protocols derived from the theory?
• Does the practitioner have the legal ability to implement and measure the effectiveness of theory-based nursing
actions?
• Are the theory-based nursing actions compatible with expectations for nursing practice?
• Do the theory-based nursing actions lead to favorable outcomes?
• Is the application of theory-based nursing actions designed so that comparisons can be made between outcomes
of use of the theory and outcomes in the same situation when the theory was not used?
• Are outcomes measured in terms of the problem-solving effectiveness of the theory?
Chapter 12
Newman’s Theory of
Health as Expanding
Consciousness
Margaret Newman’s ideas about health and the development of her Theory of
Health as Expanding Consciousness were greatly influenced by her mother’s
struggle with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and her experiences as an undergrad-
uate and graduate nursing student (Newman, 1986, 1994a), as well as her con-
cern “for those for whom health as the absence of disease is not a reality”
(Newman, 1992, p. 650). Newman (1997a) explained, “My life experience prior
to entering the profession of nursing, particularly as it related to the care of my
mother, laid the foundation for this nursing theory” (p. 22).
Newman began to formalize her ideas in preparation for a paper delivered at
the Nurse Educator Conference held in New York City in 1978, and she pub-
lished the first version of the theory in her 1979 book, Theory Development in
Nursing. The theory continued to evolve and became known as the Theory of
Health as Expanding Consciousness with the publication of Newman’s 1986
book, Health as Expanding Consciousness. Newman’s continuing refinement of
the theory and development of her ideas about a research/practice methodology
culminated in the publication of the second edition of Health as Expanding
Consciousness in 1994 (Newman, 1994a) and subsequent journal articles
(Newman, 1994b, 1997a, 1997b).
Newman (1997b) noted that the Theory of Expanding Consciousness evolved
in six stages as she thought about the theory and worked with nursing col-
leagues and students:
1. Identifying the underlying assumptions, key concepts, and axiomatic relations
among movement, space, time, and consciousness as relevant to patterning of
health
2. Seeing these concepts emerge from the implicit grasp of the total pattern of
the person
3. Moving from identifying the pattern of person-environment at a point in time,
as was done in the early days of nursing diagnosis, to seeing the pattern as se-
quential configurations evolving over time, like waves of explicit-implicit phe-
nomena, unfolding-enfolding
4. Seeing the insights that occurred in the process as choice points of action
potential
450
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 451
Overview CONSCIOUSNESS
RESEARCH/PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
Phenomenon of Interest
Newman’s work is a grand theory that focuses on health
The Interview
as the expansion of consciousness. The concepts of the
Transcription
Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness and di-
Development of Narrative
mensions are listed here, along with the components of
Pattern Recognition
Newman’s research/practice methodology. Each con-
Diagram
cept and dimension and the methodology components
Pattern Recognition
are defined and described later in this chapter.
Follow-Up
Pattern Recognition
Key Terms Application of the Theory of Health as
Expanding Consciousness
PATTERN
Movement-Space-Time
Rhythm
Diversity
The definitions for the concepts of the Theory of Health as Newman drew from Rogers (1970) for her ideas about
Expanding Consciousness are given here. Those constitu- Pattern. Accordingly, she regards the Pattern of each
tive definitions are the nonrelational propositions of the person’s life as that which gives identity, rather than the
theory. substance that makes up the pattern. But Newman (1987)
has gone beyond Rogers in her assertion that pattern is
PATTERN “the essence of a holistic view of health” (p. 36). Also in
keeping with Rogers, Newman regards Pattern as unitary
● A fundamental attribute of all there is and reveals unity but as manifested in various ways. Drawing from the work
in diversity (Newman, 1994a, p. 71). of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association
● Information that depicts the whole, understanding of nurse theorist group (Roy et al., 1982), Newman (1986)
the meaning of all the relationships at once (Newman, defined the nine specific manifestations of unitary
1994a, p. 71). pattern listed above—exchanging, communicating, relat-
● A pattern possesses meaning. As meaning is discovered, ing, valuing, choosing, moving, perceiving, feeling, and
the pattern becomes apparent (and vice versa) knowing.
(Newman, 2002, p. 4). The concept of Pattern encompasses three dimen-
● Pattern is relatedness and is self-organizing over time, sions—Movement-Space-Time, Rhythm, and Diversity.
i.e., it becomes more highly organized with more infor- Newman (1994a) now refers to what she formerly
mation (Newman, 1994a, p. 72). (1979, 1986) treated as three separate concepts as the
● [Throughout life it is] a pattern that identifies us as a Movement-Space-Time dimension of the concept of
particular person (Newman, 1994a, p. 71). Pattern. She explained, “The relevant task … is to see the
● Pattern [is] an identification of the wholeness of the per- concepts of movement-space-time in relation to each other,
son (Newman, 1990b, p. 132). all at once, as patterns of evolving consciousness” (p. 52).
● Pattern encompasses genetic pattern, voice pattern,
movement pattern, and other types of patterns that are ● Movement-Space-Time: Movement-space-time can be
manifestations of the underlying pattern (Newman, seen as dimensions [of] unitary evolving patterns
1994a). (Newman, 1997a, p. 25). Movement is central to under-
● Exchanging, a manifestation of pattern, is defined as “in- standing the nature of reality (Newman, 1990a, p. 39).
terchanging matter and energy between person and en- Movement is a characteristic of pattern (Newman,
vironment and transforming energy from one form to 1994a). Movement is the natural condition of life. When
another” (Newman, 1986, p. 74). movement ceases, it is an indication that life has gone
● Communicating, a manifestation of pattern, is defined as out of the organism (Newman, 1994a, pp. 56–57).
“interchanging information from one system to an- [Movement is] an essential property of matter [and] a
other” (Newman, 1986, p. 74). means of communicating (Newman, 1979, pp. 61, 62).
● Relating, a manifestation of pattern, is defined as “con- [Movement is] the means whereby one perceives reality
necting with other persons and the environment” and, therefore, [the] means of becoming aware of self
(Newman, 1986, p. 74). (Newman, 1983, p. 165). The pattern of movement re-
● Valuing, a manifestation of pattern, is defined as “assign- flects the overall organization of the thought and feeling
ing worth” (Newman, 1986, p. 74). processes of a person (Newman, 1994a, p. 57). It is
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 456
TABLE 12–1
COMPARISON OF YOUNG’S STAGES OF EVOLUTION AND NEWMAN’S STAGES OF EXPANDING
CONSCIOUSNESS
Adapted from Newman, M.A. (1990). Newman’s theory of health as praxis. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 37–41, p. 39, with permission.
ness and Pattern. Relational propositions C, D, E, F, G, H, and finds one’s identity in space. … Through move-
and I all provide linkages between the concept of ment one discovers the world of time-space and estab-
Consciousness and the Movement-Space-Time dimension lishes personal territory. It is also when movement is
of the concept of Pattern. In addition, relational proposi- restricted that one becomes aware of personal limita-
tion I explains the integration of Young’s (1976a, 1976b) tions and the fact that the old rules don’t work any-
theory of human evolution and Newman’s theory. The more. When one no longer has the power of movement
concept of Consciousness is linked with the Movement- (either physical or social), it is necessary to go beyond
Space-Time and Rhythm dimensions of the concept of oneself. As one is able to recognize the boundaryless-
Pattern in relational proposition J. ness and timelessness of human existence, one gains
the freedom of returning to the ground of conscious-
A. Consciousness is a manifestation of an evolving pattern ness (Newman, 1990a, pp. 39–40).
of person-environment interaction (Newman, 1990a, J. The rhythm of living phenomena is a vivid portrayal of
p. 38). the embeddedness of matter (consciousness) in space-
B. The evolving pattern of person-environment can be time (Newman, 1994a, p. 53).
viewed as a process of expanding consciousness
(Newman, 1994a, p. 33).
C. Movement is a pivotal choice point in the evolution of EVALUATION OF THE THEORY
human consciousness (Newman, 1994a, p. 56). OF HEALTH AS EXPANDING
D. When we reach the choice point when movement (both CONSCIOUSNESS
physical and social) is no longer an option, we learn to
transcend the limitations of time-space-movement to This section presents an evaluation of Newman’s Theory of
higher levels of consciousness (Newman, 1994a, p. 57). Health as Expanding Consciousness. The evaluation is
E. Movement is a reflection of consciousness (Newman, based on the results of the analysis of the theory, as well as
1979, p. 60). on publications by others who have used or commented on
F. The consciousness that characterizes any form of this nursing theory.
life is expressed in its movement (Newman, 1994a,
p. 57). SIGNIFICANCE
G. Time is a measure of consciousness (Newman, 1979, p.
60). The Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness
H. Manifestations of space-time-movement [are] indica- meets the criterion of significance. The metaparadig-
tors of consciousness (Newman, 1994a, p. 63). matic origins of the theory are evident in Newman’s pub-
I. A person comes into being from the ground of con- lications. Furthermore, Newman explicitly identified some
sciousness and loses freedom as one is bound in time philosophical assumptions; other statements that can be
457
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 458
The Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness The Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness meets
meets the criterion of internal consistency in part. Sarter’s the criterion of parsimony. The analysis of the theory
(1988) philosophical analysis of the Theory of Health as yielded two concepts, one of which is multidimensional,
Expanding Consciousness indicates congruence in philo- and several relational propositions.
sophical viewpoints among the scholars from whose works The decision to include Pattern as a separate concept,
Newman drew for her theory. For example, Sarter (1988) rather than a dimension of the concept of Consciousness,
noted that the writings of Moss (1981), Young (1976a, was based on Newman’s frequent reference to Pattern and
1976b), and de Chardin (1959) all reflect process philoso- the central role it plays in the theory. Indeed, she stated that
phy and mysticism. In contrast, Mitchell and Cody (1992) “pattern … is basic to the theory” (Newman, 1990b, p.
pointed out that Newman’s view of human beings as uni- 132). The decision not to include health as a separate con-
tary seems to be inconsistent with her discussion of physi- cept of the Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness
ological structures and functions. In an attempt to is supported by Newman’s (1990a) statement that “health
reconcile the inconsistency, they offered the following in- and the evolving pattern of consciousness are the same” (p.
terpretation of Newman’s views: 38). Inasmuch as health and consciousness are equivalent,
the inclusion of both would have created an unnecessary
The unity of the human “system,” for Newman, is predicated redundancy.
on the idea that “mind and matter are made of the same basic Furthermore, the decision to regard Movement-Space-
stuff ” (1986, p. 37). It is apparently quite appropriate within
Newman’s model to discuss the physiological, psychological,
Time, Rhythm, and Diversity as dimensions of the concept
and emotional processes of the “human system” in conven- of Pattern is supported by Newman’s own statements. In
tional terms, so long as one remembers that everything, from particular, she explicitly stated that “characteristics of pat-
the atom to the human being and beyond, is a manifestation terning include movement, diversity, and rhythm”
of the implicate order, or “absolute consciousness” (Newman, (Newman, 1994a, p. 72); and that “the original concepts of
1986, pp. 36–37) (p. 57). movement-space-time can be seen as dimensions in the
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 459
unitary evolving patterns of consciousness” (Newman, ness as expressed in life patterns (Newman, 1994a). The
1997a, p. 25). components of the Research/Practice Methodology are
identified and described in Table 12–2.
TESTABILITY Newman’s Research/Practice Methodology was, as
Barrett (1998) pointed out, designed to develop new
The Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness meets discipline of nursing-specific knowledge. Newman (1997a)
the criterion of testability for grand theories. Newman has described the Research/Practice Methodology as
developed a specific yet fluid RESEARCH/PRACTICE “hermeneutic, to reflect the search for meaning and under-
METHODOLOGY for her theory that yields middle-range standing and interpretation inherent in the researcher’s
theories addressing the process of expanding conscious- embodiment of the theory; and dialectic because both the
TABLE 12–2
NEWMAN’S RESEARCH AS PRAXIS PROTOCOL: A RESEARCH/PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
PHENOMENON OF INTEREST
The process of expanding consciousness.
THE INTERVIEW
The meeting of the nurse and the study participant/client occurs when there is a mutual attraction via congruent
patterns, i.e., interpenetration of the two fields.
The nurse and study participant/client enter into a partnership, with the mutual goal of participating in an
authentic relationship, trusting that in the process of its unfolding, both will emerge at a higher level of
consciousness.
The nurse explains the study.
The study participant/client agrees to continue in the study and agrees to recording the interview on tape.
The nurse begins the initial interview with a simple, open-ended statement, such as “Tell me about the most
meaningful persons and events in your life.” This question may be modified to fit the focus of the study.
The nurse continues the interview in a nondirectional manner, although more direct questions can be used occasionally.
Examples of additional questions are “Tell me what it has been like living with [a particular medical diagnosis, clinical
condition, or life circumstance].” “What is meaningful to you?” “What do you think about what we have been talking
about?”
The nurse may prompt the study participant/client to think of something from childhood that stands out in memory if he
or she needs help in thinking of something considered important.
The nurse acts as an active listener and clarifies and reflects as necessary.
The nurse is fully present in the moment, is sensitive to intuitive hunches about what to say or ask, and waits for insight
into the meaning of the pattern.
The nurse is free to disclose aspects of himself or herself that are deemed appropriate.
The initial interview lasts 45 to 60 minutes.
TRANSCRIPTION
The nurse listens carefully to and transcribes the tape of the interview soon after the interview is completed.
The nurse is sensitive to the relevance of the data and may omit comments made by the study participant/client that do
not directly relate to his or her life pattern, with an appropriate note to the place on the tape where such comments
occurred, in case those comments seem important later.
(continued)
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 460
TABLE 12–2
NEWMAN’S RESEARCH AS PRAXIS PROTOCOL: A RESEARCH/PRACTICE METHODOLOGY (continued)
Constructed from Moch, 1990, p. 1429; Newman, 1994a, pp. 88–89, 93, 97, 109, 112, 147–149.
process and the content [are] dialectic. The process is the Consciousness. Moreover, the particular philosophical
content. The content is the process” (p. 23). The methodol- claims on which the Research/Practice Methodology is
ogy obviously is qualitative and inductive, and it is com- based flow directly from the more general philosophical
pletely congruent with the philosophical claims claims undergirding the theory.
undergirding the Theory of Health as Expanding The success of the Interview component of the
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 461
Research/Practice Methodology depends on establishing and that it is paradoxical that the whole of the pattern can
the mutuality of the process of inquiry. It requires the be seen in its component parts. The importance of Pattern
nurse to focus on the most meaningful persons and events Recognition is underscored by Newman’s (1997a) claim that
in the study participant’s/client’s life. The nurse is pre- “pattern recognition, finding meaning and understanding,
cluded from viewing the person as an object and instead is accelerates the evolution of consciousness” (p. 23).
required to participate in the evolving pattern of con- The Research/Practice Methodology was designed to
sciousness. Indeed, “the nurse-researcher cannot stand yield sufficiently in-depth descriptions of study partici-
outside the person being researched in a subject-object pants’/clients’ personal experiences to capture the essence
fashion” (Newman, 1990a, p. 40). Rather, clients serve as of patterns that represent expanding consciousness.
partners or co-researchers in the search for health patterns Indeed, the last component of the Research/Practice
(Newman, 1986, 1994a). Methodology, Application of the Theory of Health as
No specific instruments associated with the Research/ Expanding Consciousness, yields themes representing
Practice Methodology have been published, although the similarities of pattern among a group of study partici-
protocol for the Interview (see Table 12–2) includes rele- pants/clients having a similar experience. The themes then
vant questions that can be asked to start and maintain the are summarized in middle-range theory-level proposi-
dialogue with the study participant/ client. In addition, tions. For example, “experiences associated with coronary
Witucki (2002) identified elements of critical thinking that heart disease are the need to excel, the need to please oth-
may be used with the Interview, Development of the ers, and the feeling of being alone” (Newman, 1994a, p. 92)
Narrative, and Follow-Up components of the Research/ is the proposition that summarizes themes identified by
Practice Methodology. Boyd (1990) urged refinement of Newman and Moch (1995) from transcriptions of inter-
the interview method, as well as development of other data views with seven men and four women who had a medical
collection strategies that would be consistent with the diagnosis of coronary heart disease and were clients in a
Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness. She stated: cardiac rehabilitation program.
In summarizing her Research/Practice Methodology,
Explicit incorporation of nursing practice modalities of care
in research methods need not be limited to interview, as …
Newman (2002) stated:
Newman … impl[ies], nor [do] data need to be limited to par- This research takes on the form and purpose of practice (i.e.,
ticipants’ verbal descriptions. Further development of these a shift form observation of “the other” to “we” knowledge)
and other methods for nursing research will profit from the with the intent of assisting clients to get in touch with the
search for and admittance of a variety of data forms that in- meaning of their health experience and thereby get insight
clude a fuller range of human expression. (p. 42) into the pattern of the process and its potential for action. The
nurse comes to the situation with a theoretical perspective that
Pattern Recognition is an important aspect of the then becomes a part of the process. Transformation occurs in
Development of Narrative, Diagram, and Follow-Up com- the interpenetration of the client’s and the nurse’s patterns,
ponents of the Research/Practice Methodology. Newman which include the client’s concept of health and the nurse’s
(1994a) explained that Pattern Recognition “comes from theoretical understanding. The theory illuminates the mean-
within the observer—which means that with any set of ing of the experience and is in turn illuminated by the data of
data or sequence of events, an infinite number of patterns the experience. … The process is directly, immediately appli-
are possible” (pp. 73–74). More specifically, Pattern cable as nursing practice, and one that is illuminating to both
Recognition occurs “by going into ourselves and getting in the researched and the researcher. (p. 4)
touch with our own pattern and through it in touch with
the pattern of the person or persons with whom we are in-
teracting” (p. 107). Newman (2002) explained that Pattern EMPIRICAL ADEQUACY
Recognition evolves The Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness meets
from an authentic, mutual relationship [that] makes a mean- the criterion of empirical adequacy for grand theories. A
ingful difference in the experience of the participants. The di- review of the results of Theory of Health as Expanding
alogue of the encounter follows the lead of the client. The Consciousness–based published research reports (Table
significant events described by the client are viewed as config- 12–3), as well as the master’s theses and doctoral disserta-
urarions (patterns) of relatedness over time. In the process of tions listed in the chapter bibliography on the CD-ROM,
this dialogue, insight regarding the client’s evolving pattern
occurs. The clients grasp greater understanding of themselves
reveals that some middle-range descriptive theories of
and their relationships. (p. 4) patterns of expanding consciousness have been generated.
These middle-range theories represent descriptions of the
Newman (1994a) pointed out that the pattern may not be study participants’/clients’ personal experiences that are
seen all at once, that extending the time and distance from congruent with the concepts and propositions of the grand
relevant events may facilitate recognition of the pattern, theory.
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 462
TABLE 12–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HEALTH AS EXPANDING
CONSCIOUSNESS
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
463
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 464
TABLE 12–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HEALTH AS EXPANDING
CONSCIOUSNESS (continued)
Life patterns† Men and women with coronary heart Newman & Moch, 1991
disease
Life patterns† Icelandic men and women with chronic Jonsdottir, 1998
obstructive pulmonary disease
Evolving pattern† Gay men with human immunodeficiency Lamendola & Newman, 1994
virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome (AIDS)
Meaning of life pattern† Men and women with cancer Newman, 1995
Pattern recognition as a nursing inter- Japanese women with ovarian cancer Endo, 1998
vention†
Health patterning Persons with multiple sclerosis Gulick & Bugg, 1992
Descriptions of health Men and women with cancer or Fryback, 1993
AIDS
Transitions in life patterns† Women living with rheumatoid arthritis Neill, 2002a
or multiple sclerosis
Transitions in life patterns† Women living with rheumatoid arthritis Neill, 2002b
Explication of the health experience Men and women with rheumatoid Schmidt et al., 2003
arthritis
Description of common patterns of Men and women with rheumatoid Brauer, 2001
person-environment interaction arthritis
Comparison of life patterns† Adolescent males convicted of Pharris, 2002
murder
Patterns of interaction with family and Childhood cancer survivors Karian et al., 1998
environment†
Pattern of nurse-parent interaction Families with children who were Tommet, 2003
medically fragile
Family experience of health as expand- Family of a pre-school age child with Litchfield, 1999
ing consciousness† asthma; Young families with complex
health circumstances
Patterns and activities of expanding Midlife women aged 40 to 65 years Picard, 2000
consciousness
Meaning of “staying healthy” Rural African-American adult family Smith, 1995
members
Meaning of “staying healthy” Immigrant Pakistani families living in the Jan & Smith, 1998
United States
Personal transformation† Content analysis of literature from Wade, 1998
several disciplines
†
Used Newman’s research/practice methodology. (continued)
464
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 465
*
Used Newman’s research/practice methodology.
(Text continued from page 462) in facilitating clients’ insight regarding their evolving pat-
The pathway is uncertain and the feeling is unsure. Those who terns” (p. 164).
have gone before us assure us that in letting go and experienc- In keeping with her idea that research is praxis,
ing the moment fully the transformation will take place, and Newman (1986) maintained that Pattern Recognition
through us others will find a new level of integration and “is the essence of practice” (p. 18) and, therefore, “the
growth. (p. 78) task in intervention is pattern recognition” (p. 72).
Despite the potential difficulties of personal transforma- Pattern Recognition “illuminates the possibilities for ac-
tion, Newman (1992) claimed that nurses who practice tion” (Newman, 1990a, p. 40). The objective of nursing
within the context of the Theory of Health as Expanding practice, according to Newman (1986), is “an authentic
Consciousness will “experience the joy of participating in involvement of [the nurse] with the patient in a mutual re-
the expanding process of others and find that their own lationship of pattern recognition and augmentation” (p.
lives are enhanced and expanded by the process” (p. 650). 88).
She also commented, “It is a matter of the nurse’s being The Research/Practice Methodology guides the nurse
transformed by the theory and thereby becoming a trans- and study participant/client to meet, form shared
forming partner in interaction with clients” (Newman, consciousness, and move apart. Thus the nurse-client
1994b, p. 156). relationship has a beginning and an end. The end, the mov-
ing apart, comes when the client “is able to center without
Nursing Practice being connected to the nurse. This occurs gradually as the
client and nurse move apart, then reconnect and move
Newman’s (1994a) view that research is praxis means that apart again, repeating the process until the client can see
“the process of nursing practice is the content of nursing clearly” (Newman, 1994a, p. 112).
research. [Furthermore,] nursing research helps partici- Nurses and clients become partners in Pattern
pants understand and act on their particular situations” Recognition and give up the traditional roles of nurse and
(p. 92). More specifically, Newman (1995) explained that patient. Instead, they are “participants in a greater whole …
the results of use of the Research/Practice Methodology [and] are not separate persons. They are persons experi-
“provide retrospective illumination of the participants’ encing the pattern of consciousness formed by their inter-
patterns and guidance for the process of nursing practice action. Their relationship is based not only on problems
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 466
TABLE 12–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HEALTH AS EXPANDING
CONSCIOUSNESS
Substance abuse Female recovering substance abusers in a residential treat- Woods, 1993
ment center in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Pattern recognition Pregnant women experiencing preterm labor at Abbott Kalb, 1990
Northwestern Hospital in Minneapolis, Minnesota
Various members of the Gloria Dei Lutheran Church in Gustafson, 1990
Duluth, Minnesota
Assessing pattern Woman with hyperthyroidism Sayre-Adams & Wright,
1995
Application of the School-age children with insulin-dependent diabetes Schlotzhauer &
Theoryof Health as mellitus Farnham, 1997
ExpandingConsciousness
29-year-old woman with cervical cancer Witucki, 2002
An elderly woman at home Capasso, 1998
Family caregivers Yamashita, 1997
86-year-old woman with macular degeneration caring for Witucki, 2002
her husband, who has Alzheimer’s disease
A family with a child born with a developmental disability Newman, 1994
Baccalaureate psychiatric nursing students caring for eld- Weingourt, 1998
erly nursing home residents
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations.
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 467
College, and Winona State University in Wisconsin/ importance of shared learning with staff, faculty, other stu-
Minnesota (Fosbinder et al., 1997; Koener et al., 1989; dents, other health-care professionals, and patients.
Koerner & Bunkers, 1994) Furthermore, all participants reported that they had a bet-
The only resources required for application of the theory ter understanding of the distinct roles of nurses prepared
are the time and personnel needed to teach nurses to use at the associate degree and baccalaureate degree levels.
the Research/Practice Methodology. Moreover, practition- Again, controlled experimental studies are necessary, in
ers have the legal ability to implement the Research/ this case to determine the relative contributions of differ-
Practice Methodology and to measure the effectiveness of entiated nursing practice and the use of the Theory of
relevant theory-based outcomes. Health as Expanding Consciousness.
The extent to which use of the Research/Practice Evaluation of the Carondelet St. Mary’s Health Center
Methodology is compatible with expectations for nursing nurse case management project provides an initial com-
practice and the actual effects of its use on health-care pro- parison of outcomes when the theory was used and when
fessionals and clients have begun to be explored. it was not used. Other comparisons that better control for
Evaluation of the use of the Theory of Health as Expanding use of the theory and use of a particular method of deliv-
Consciousness at Carondelet St. Mary’s Health Center, ery of nursing services, such as case management, are
which is a national and international exemplar for nursing needed.
theory-based nurse case management, has resulted in in- The results of research projects (see table 12–3) practice
creased job satisfaction and decreased job stress for nurses, applications (see Table 12–4), and formal implementation
increased patient satisfaction with nursing services, and projects reveal that clients’ problems are solved. Within the
considerable savings of health-care dollars due to de- context of the Theory of Health as Expanding
creased incidence of hospitalization and decreased length Consciousness, this means that patterns are recognized and
of hospital stay (Ethridge, 1991). Controlled experimental used as a catalyst for action.
studies are, however, necessary to determine the relative
contributions of nurse case management and the use of the CONCLUSION
Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness.
The teaching-learning-practice Healing Web project is Newman has made a meaningful contribution to nursing
an exceptional prototype for Theory of Health as by explicating a theory of health that extends Rogers’
Expanding Consciousness-based collaborative nursing ed- (1970, 1990) concept of pattern in person-environment
ucation and practice. Nursing practice is differentiated on mutual process. Evidence of the empirical and pragmatic
the basis of the nurse’s educational preparation. Hence, adequacy of the theory is accumulating. Evidence from im-
nurses who hold the associate degree, those who hold the plementation projects is especially impressive. Continued
baccalaureate degree, and those who hold a graduate de- documentation of outcomes of the use of the Theory of
gree, such as the master’s degree in nursing, take on differ- Health as Expanding Consciousness is needed.
ent practice roles. Healing Web school of nursing partners Exactly what outcomes should be considered may be
educate students for the appropriate role, and health-care difficult, for as George (2002) pointed out, “Since the focus
agency partners offer positions that allow nurses to prac- is on process and not on fixing what is wrong, it is difficult
tice in the role for which they were prepared. Faculty, stu- to define favorable outcomes … The theory is not intended
dent, administrator, and staff evaluations of the project to be measured by outcomes” (p. 531). Yet Newman pro-
have indicated positive outcomes (Fosbinder, Ashton, & vided some direction for the identification of outcomes
Koerner, 1997). In particular, nursing faculty reported that when she declared, “The theory assets that every person in
they had become an active part of the unit staff, staff re- every situation, no matter how disordered and hopeless it
ported that they were actively involved in teaching stu- may seem, is part of the universal process of expanding
dents, students reported that they engaged in teaching staff consciousness—a process of becoming more of oneself, of
and patients, and school of nursing and health-care organ- finding greater meaning in life, and of reaching new
ization administrators reported a high return on their in- dimensions of connectedness with other people and the
vestments in terms of satisfying and effective educational world” (Retrieved March 2, 2002 from http:// www.
and practice environments. Students also reported that healthasexpandingconsciousenss. org).
they were very confident of their practice and organiza- The translation of the second edition of Newman’s
tional skills, understood the value of a detailed care plan (1994a) book, Health as Expanding Consciousness, into
and its effects on the quality of patient care, actively partic- Japanese and Korean indicates international interest in the
ipated in interdisciplinary planning and could see the im- theory (Retrieved March 2, 2002 from http://www.healtha-
portance of integrated planning, and understood the sexpandingconsciousenss.org/bibliography). In addition,
12Fawcett-12 09/17/2004 2:22 PM Page 468
Chapter 13
Parse’s Theory
of Human Becoming
Rosemarie Rizzo Parse set out to create a theory grounded in the human sci-
ences that would enhance nursing knowledge. She explained:
The idea to create such a theory began many years ago when I began to wonder and
wander and ask why not? The theory itself … surfaced in me in Janusian fashion over
the years in interrelationship with others primarily through my lived experience with nurs-
ing. The creation of it has been long and arduous, but with many moments of joy. (Parse,
1981, p. xiii)
Later, Parse (1997b) elaborated on the evolution of her theory:
The was, is, and will be of the human becoming theory is a journey in the art of scienc-
ing, a process of coming to know the world of human experience. The form and struc-
ture of the theory as written does not fully reflect the intuitive-rational process that
birthed its creation. That process germinated multidimensionally throughout [my] life of
being present to and conceptualizing the significance of the discipline’s mission to hu-
mankind. The puzzle that surfaced a concern for the mission was related to early gnaw-
ing musing about whose desires were being served by the medical model practice of
nursing and the keen and growing awareness in [me] that humans were mysteries
emerging in living personal value priorities, not machines to be fixed. Once aware of such
notions, there was a concentrated focus on moving with other possibilities for nursing.
The theory was cast in written form, though not in stone, and thus it has been evolving
ever since. (p. 32)
The initial result of Parse’s intellectual effort was the Theory of Man-Living-
Health, which was first published in her 1981 book, Man-Living-Health: A Theory
of Nursing. Research and practice methodologies congruent with the theory
were introduced in a chapter of Parse’s 1987 edited book, Nursing Science:
Major Paradigms, Theories, and Critiques. The theory was renamed the Theory
of Human Becoming in 1990 because although the term man formerly referred
to mankind, that term currently connotes the male gender (Parse, 1992).
Refinements in the theory, focused primarily on wording, were published in
Parse’s 1992 journal article, “Human Becoming: Parse’s Theory of Nursing.”
Refinements in wording continued, additional research methodologies were de-
veloped, and the research and practice methodologies were added to the sec-
ond edition of Parse’s 1981 book, newly titled The Human Becoming School of
Thought: A Perspective for Nurses and Other Health Professionals (Parse, 1998).
The 1998 book “is offered in the ongoing quest of defining unique nursing
knowledge for the betterment of humankind” (Parse, 1998, p. xi). Most recently,
471
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 472
Overview PONDERING-SHAPING
Considering-Composing
Parse’s work is a grand theory that focuses on the Dialoguing-Listening
human-universe-health process, which Parse (1998) THE PARSE METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH
views as the phenomenon of concern for the discipline Phenomena for Study
of nursing, as well as on cocreated human experiences Structure of the Phenomenon to Emerge
(Parse, 2001b). The concepts and the propositions, Processes
which Parse calls principles, of the Theory of Human Participant Selection
Becoming are listed here. In addition, the components Dialogical Engagement
of the research methodologies and the practice method- Extraction-Synthesis
ology are listed here. Each concept, proposition, and Heuristic Interpretation
methodology component is defined and described later THE HUMAN BECOMING HERMENEUTIC
in this chapter. METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH
Phenomena for Study
Structure of the Phenomenon to Emerge
Key Terms Processes
Participant Selection
HUMAN BECOMING Discoursing
MEANING Interpreting
RHYTHMICITY Understanding
TRANSCENDENCE Disseminating Possibilities
IMAGING PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
VALUING Illuminating Meaning
LANGUAGING Explicating
REVEALING-CONCEALING Synchronizing Rhythms
ENABLING-LIMITING Dwelling With
CONNECTING-SEPARATING Mobilizing Transcendence
POWERING Moving Beyond
ORIGINATING Contexts for Nursing
TRANSFORMING Goal of the Discipline of Nursing
PRINCIPLE 1: Structuring meaning multidimensionally Goal of the Human Becoming Nurse
is cocreating reality through the languaging of True Presence
valuing and imaging. Coming-to-be-Present
PRINCIPLE 2: Cocreating rhythmical patterns Face-to-Face Discussions
of relating is living the paradoxical unity Silent Immersion
of revealing-concealing and enabling-limiting Lingering Presence
while connecting-separating. Ways of Changing Health Patterns in True
PRINCIPLE 3: Cotranscending with the possibles is Presence
powering unique ways of originating in the process Creative Imagining
of transforming. Affirming Personal Becoming
HUMAN BECOMING AND COMMUNITY CHANGE Glimpsing the Paradoxical
CONCEPTS THE PREPROJECT-PROCESS-POSTPROJECT
MOVING-INITIATING DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE METHOD OF
Tunneling APPLIED RESEARCH
Driving Purpose
Laddering Design
Boating Information Sources
Swimming Teaching-Learning Process
Submarining Nurses’ Documentation
Ballooning Personal Health Descriptions
Motorflying Patterns of Becoming
Swinging Nurse-Person Activities
ANCHORING-SHIFTING Plans, Goals, and Priorities for Change
Savoring-Sacrificing Analysis of Information Sources
Revering-Liberating
472
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 473
living of what is cherished and not cherished” (Parse, 1998, ing-nonconforming paradox “is the all-at-once movement
p. 34). to be like others and yet unique” and the certainty-
uncertainty paradox “is all-at-once being sure and unsure
LANGUAGING in choosing among options” (Parse, 1998, p. 35).
● Signifying valued images through speaking—being silent
and moving—being still (Parse, 1998, p. 39). TRANSFORMING
Languaging contains two rhythmical paradoxes: speak- ● Shifting the view of the familiar-unfamiliar, the changing
ing—being silent and moving—being still. Parse (1998) of change in coconstituting anew in a deliberate way
views these paradoxes as the rhythms of languaging. (Parse, 1998, p. 51).
This concept contains the paradox of familiar-unfamiliar.
REVEALING-CONCEALING This paradox refers to “the all-at-once transfiguring of an
● Disclosing—not disclosing all-at-once (Parse, 1998, unfamiliar perspective to the familiar, as others, ideas, ob-
p. 43). jects, and situations are viewed in a new light” (Parse, 1998,
p. 35).
ENABLING-LIMITING
PRINCIPLE 1
● Living the opportunities-restrictions present in all
choosings all-at-once (Parse, 1998, p. 44). ● Structuring meaning multidimensionally is cocreating
reality through the languaging of valuing and imaging
CONNECTING-SEPARATING (Parse, 1998, p. 35).
● Being with and apart from others, ideas, objects, and sit- This proposition focuses on the view that “humans are not
uations all-at-once (Parse, 1998, p. 45). given reality but have to construct it for themselves in their
The concepts of Revealing-Concealing, Enabling- own way. … [The proposition] means that human becom-
Limiting, and Connecting-Separating contain rhythmical ing is the ongoing constructing of reality through assigning
paradoxes, which are evident in the actual labels for those significance to experiences at the many realms of the uni-
concepts. Parse (1998) pointed out that one of the two as- verse that are lived all-at-once” (Parse, 1998, p. 35). In other
pects of each concept is in the foreground, and the other is words, “humans construct what is real for them from
in the background. She did not, however, indicate which choices made at many realms of the universe” (Parse, 1995,
aspect is foreground and which is background or whether p. 6).
which is foreground and which is background depends on
the situation. PRINCIPLE 2
POWERING
● Cocreating rhythmical patterns of relating is living the
paradoxical unity of revealing-concealing and enabling-
● The pushing-resisting process of affirming—not affirm- limiting while connecting-separating (Parse, 1998,
ing being in light of nonbeing (Parse, 1998, p. 47). p. 42).
This concept encompasses three rhythmical paradoxes: This proposition “means that human becoming is an
pushing-resisting, affirming-not affirming, and being- emerging cadence of coconstituting ways of becoming
nonbeing. “The pushing-resisting [paradox] is the mutu- with the universe. These ways of becoming (revealing-
ally forging and holding that enlivens the ebb and flow of concealing, enabling-limiting, and connecting-separating)
life, and [the] being-nonbeing [paradox] is all-at-once liv- are paradoxical, lived rhythmically, and recognized in the
ing the now and the unknown not-yet. The affirming–not human-universe process as patterns” (Parse, 1998, p. 42).
affirming paradox is all-at-once living reverence and disre- In other words, “humans live in rhythm with the universe
gard” (Parse, 1998, p. 35). coconstituting patterns of relating” (Parse, 1995, p. 7).
Rhythmical patterns of relating have the qualities of timing
ORIGINATING and flowing. Parse (1998) explained, “Timing refers to the
● Inventing new ways of conforming-nonconforming in cadence evident in a recurrent beat. It is sometimes fast,
the certainty-uncertainty of living (Parse, 1998, p. 49). sometimes slow, but ever-emerging universally. Flowing
refers to the continuity evident as the changing beats in-
This concept contains two paradoxes: conforming- carnate diverse patterns, like waves of the sea, moving with
nonconforming and certainty-uncertainty. The conform- the alternating rise and fall, somewhat the same yet
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 478
at great depth with the shifting of what is known and not (Parse, 2003a, p. 39). Dialoguing with community in
yet known explicitly (Parse, 2003a, p. 24). pondering-shaping change arises with the discourse of
● Ballooning: Drifting vigilantly with the pattern of the commingling of personal histories (Parse, 2003a, p.
the whole in a buoyant surgence-release, while shifting 40). Listening with pondering-shaping changes arises
winds cocreate the unexpected (Parse, 2003a, p. 24). with the astringent regard integral with coming to know
● Motorflying: Propelling persistently with the gravity of something in depth while gaining an understanding, yet
weaving winds (Parse, 2003a, p. 24). knowing that no understanding is absolute or complete
● Swinging: Soaring in undulating suspension with gusts (Parse, 2003a, p. 40).
of shifting winds in swingshifting to and fro in a bold
leaping beyond (Parse, 2003a, p. 24).
EVALUATION OF THE THEORY
ANCHORING-SHIFTING OF HUMAN BECOMING
● A cocreated paradoxical rhythm of community change This section presents an evaluation of Parse’s Theory of
(Parse, 2003a, p. 36). Human Becoming. The evaluation is based on the results
● [Anchoring-Shifting] is the persisting-diversifying that of the analysis of the theory, as well as on publications
pushes-resists as community (individual or group) in- by others who have used or commented on this nursing
vents new meanings, knowing that all that was and will theory.
be is inextricably woven into the now (Parse, 2003a, p.
36).
Anchoring-Shifting has two processes, or dimensions: SIGNIFICANCE
Savoring-Sacrificing and Revering-Liberating.
The Theory of Human Becoming meets the criterion of
● Savoring-Sacrificing: Delighting in and all-at-once fore- significance. Parse explicitly identified the focus of her the-
going something of value. Savoring is relishing ideas, ob- ory as the human-universe-health process, which she views
jects, or events that are appealing to a community, and as the phenomenon of concern for the discipline of nurs-
these arise as threads of constancy. Sacrificing is giving ing. It is obvious, then, that the theory addresses the meta-
up something originally delighted in and all-at-once tak- paradigm concepts of human beings, environment, and
ing on something else, the view of which has changed health and the metaparadigm proposition of human
with new experiences. (Parse, 2003a, p. 37) processes of living and dying, recognizing that human be-
● Revering-Liberating: Honoring while all-at-once freeing. ings are in a continuous relationship with their environ-
Revering is respecting others, ideas, objects, and events. ments.
Liberating is a buoyant freeing. (Parse, 2003a, p. 37) Parse explicitly identified the philosophical and concep-
tual foundations of her theory. She has made clear that the
PONDERING-SHAPING human sciences, existential-phenomenological philosophy,
and Rogers’ conceptual model of nursing were the starting
● A cocreated paradoxical rhythm of community change points for the assumptions on which her theory is based.
(Parse, 2003a, p. 36). Moreover, she clearly stated the assumptions, categorizing
● [Pondering-Shaping] is contemplating while configur- them into those about the human, becoming, and human
ing (Parse, 2003a, p. 38). becoming. Additional assumptions were easily extracted
Pondering-Shaping has two processes, or dimensions: from her discussion about methodologies for Theory of
Considering-Composing and Dialoguing-Listening. Human Becoming–based research.
Parse acknowledged the scholars from nursing and ad-
● Considering-Composing: Deeply contemplating while junctive disciplines—especially philosophers—whose
all-at-once birthing anew. Considering is ruminating or works undergird her theory. With the one exception of
deliberating about others, ideas, objects, or events that Kafka, she listed specific citations to the works that con-
are important for the moment. Birthing anew is creating tributed to her thinking.
or carving out the possibles. Imaged possibles cocreate A noteworthy feature of the Theory of Human
new meanings that are languaged in composing ways of Becoming is its process orientation and the emphasis on
connecting-separating that reveal-conceal value priori- paradoxical rhythmical patterns of relating between the
ties. (Parse, 2003a, p. 39) human and the universe. Another feature is the focus on
● Dialoguing-Listening: Unconditional witnessing with the human’s participation and connectedness with the uni-
all-at-once speaking-being silent and moving-being still verse in cocreating health.
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 480
and, Transcendence as theory concepts rather than philo- HERMENEUTIC METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH are
sophical themes was based on their integral place in the identified and described in Table 13–2. This method per-
three nonrelational propositions that Parse calls Principles mits interpretation of literary texts from the perspective of
and in relational proposition A. Overall, the concepts and the Theory of Human Becoming. Cody (1995) explained
propositions of the Theory of Human Becoming are stated that he drew primarily from Gadamer (1976, 1989 [origi-
clearly and concisely. nal work published 1960]) for his understanding of
hermeneutics. He proposed that “hermeneutic inquiry
[with literary texts] surfaces truths of vital importance to
TESTABILITY the discipline of nursing” (p. 280).
Both basic research methods were, as Barrett (1998)
The Theory of Human Becoming meets the criterion of pointed out, designed to develop new disciplines of nurs-
testability for grand theories. Parse (1997c, 1998) regards ing-specific knowledge. Both methods are qualitative and
Theory of Human Becoming–based research as “sciencing inductive and are completely congruent with the philo-
human becoming,” which she defined as “the process of sophical foundation of the theory. Parse (1998) explicitly
coming to know and understand human experiences identified assumptions that undergird the Parse Method of
through creative conceptualization and formal inquiry” Basic Research and Cody (1995) explicated the connec-
(1997c, p. 74; 1998, p. 60). The term sciencing “is used to tions between the hermeneutic study of literary text and
reflect inquiry as an ongoing process” (1998, p. 60). Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming.
Creative conceptualization “is a playful process of reflect- Edwards (2000) challenged Parse’s (1998, 2001a) claim
ing and contemplating phenomena to imaginatively con- that the Parse Method of Basic Research and the Human
struct ideas” (1997c, p. 74). Formal inquiry “is the process Becoming Hermeneutic Method of Basic Research focus
of coming to know through use of specific research on entities that are “universal lived experiences of health
methodologies” (1997c, p. 74). and quality of life, meaning that all persons experience
“Sciencing,” Parse (2001a) pointed out, “is in stark the phenomenon” (2001a, p. 165). He pointed out that “the
contrast to science, which specifies inquiry as pursuing appeal to human universals may … be threatened by
and achieving the absolute truth, as if there are undis- the observation of cultural diversity .… [and that] the
putable, unchanging truths. … The term sciencing im- whole idea of universals has been called into question in
plies that knowing is ever-changing with new experiences” both philosophical literature … and in nursing literature”
(p. 1). (p. 196).
Two basic research methodologies have been designed The Parse Method of Basic Research yields sufficiently
specifically for the Theory of Human Becoming. The in-depth descriptions of personal experiences to capture
PARSE METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH was introduced the essence of the lived experience of interest. More specif-
by Parse in 1987, and the HUMAN BECOMING ically, the method yields the structure of a lived experience.
HERMENEUTIC METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH was Such structures may be considered middle-range theories,
introduced by Cody in 1995. as middle-range theories are defined in this book. Parse,
The components of the PARSE METHOD OF BASIC however, refers to the structures as findings, rather than
RESEARCH are identified and described in Table 13–1. theories. She declared, “The products of Theory of Human
The method was, as Parse (1998) pointed out, “constructed Becoming-guided research simply are the findings of the
to be in harmony with and evolve from the ontological be- research, the emergent meanings and the structure of the
liefs of the research tradition” (p. 61). Furthermore, the universal lived experience that was studied” (Fawcett, 2001,
method “is an overall design of precise processes that ad- p. 127). Two examples of structures of lived experiences are
here to scientific rigor[, which] specifies the order within given here.
the processes appropriate for inquiry within the research
tradition” (p. 61). In particular, the Parse Method of Basic ● [The lived experience of] hope is anticipating possibili-
Research is a “phenomenological-hermeneutic method in ties through envisioning the not-yet in harmoniously liv-
that the universal experiences described by participants ing the comfort-discomfort of everydayness while
who lived them provide the source of information, and unfolding a different perspective of an expanding view
participants’ descriptions are interpreted in light of the (Parse, 1990b, p. 15).
human becoming theory’ (Parse, 1998, p. 63). The findings ● The lived experience of considering tomorrow is con-
of Parse Method of Basic Research–based research “con- templating desired endeavors in longing for the cher-
tribute new knowledge and understanding of human expe- ished, while intimate alliances with isolating distance
riences” (Parse, 1998, p. 65). emerge, as resilient endurance surfaces amid disturbing
The components of the HUMAN BECOMING unsureness (Bunkers, 1998, p. 60).
(Text continues on page 483)
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 482
TABLE 13–1
THE PARSE METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH
PROCESSES
Participant Selection
Persons who can describe the meaning of the experience through words, symbols, music, metaphors, poetry,
photographs, drawings, or movements. Participants can be of any age, but must be able to give an authentic
accounting of the lived experience of interest. Two to 10 participants are sufficient for saturation or redundancy
of the data. The criterion for saturation is a pattern in the engagements repeated by a number of participants.
Dialogical Engagement
A researcher-participant discussion that is not an interview in the traditional sense, but rather requires the researcher to
be in true presence with the participant.
The researcher centers before the engagement with each participant.
The researcher obtains a signed consent for protection of participants.
The dialogue is audiotaped and, if possible, videotaped. Tapes are transcribed for later analysis.
The researcher opens the dialogue with a comment such as “Please tell me about your experience of …”
The researcher enters the flow with each participant and remains in true presence without interjecting questions.
The researcher may, however, move the discussion by saying something such as “Go on” or “Please explain more
about your experience of …”
Extraction-Synthesis
The researcher extracts and synthesizes essences from transcribed and recorded descriptions in the
participant’s language by dwelling with the transcribed audiotaped and videotaped dialogues in deep
concentration.
The researcher synthesizes and extracts essences in his or her language to form a structure of the experience.
The researcher formulates a proposition from each participant’s essences.
The researcher extracts and synthesizes core concepts from the formulated propositions of all participants.
The researcher synthesizes a structure of the lived experience from the core concepts. The result is movement of the
descriptions of the lived experience from the language of the participants up the levels of abstraction to the language
of science.
Heuristic Interpretation
The researcher weaves the structure of the lived experience with the Theory of Human Becoming and beyond through
structural transposition and conceptual integration.
Structural transposition involves connecting the synthesized structure to the Theory of Human Becoming, which results
in moving the structure of the lived experience up another level of abstraction.
Conceptual integration further specifies the structure of the lived experience by using concepts of the theory
to create a unique theoretical structure that represents the meaning of the lived experience at the level of
the theory.
Source: Constructed from Parse, 1987, p. 175; 1990b, pp. 10–11; 1997a, p. 33; 1998, pp. 64–65.
482
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 483
TABLE 13–2
THE HUMAN BECOMING HERMENEUTIC METHOD OF BASIC RESEARCH
Source: Constructed from Cody, 1995, pp. 275–281; Parse, 1998, p. 66; 2001a, p. 172.
483
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 484
TABLE 13–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF BASIC RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY
OF HUMAN BECOMING
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations.
†
Used the Parse Method of Basic Research.
#
Used Parse’s method of concept inventing. (continued)
485
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 486
TABLE 13–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF BASIC RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY
OF HUMAN BECOMING (continued)
Lived experience of feeling Women older than 65 years who volunteer in community Parse, 2003b; Bunkers,
very tired† projects in a large metropolitan setting in North America 2003
Men and women living in the southern region of the United Huch & Bournes, 2003;
States Bunkers, 2003
Girls attending a suburban public high school in the north- Baumann, 2003;
east region of the United States Bunkers, 2003
Experience of living with the Persons diagnosed with diabetes Mitchell & Lawton,
consequences of personal 2000
choices†
Lived experience of the strug- Women living in an abusive relationship Pilkington, 2000a
gle of trying to change
health patterns†
Lived experience of bowel ob- Patients with bowel obstruction due to gynecological or Gwilliam, & Bailey,
struction gastric cancer 2001
Meaning of severe visual im- Older women diagnosed with macular degeneration Moore, 2000
pairment
Health Oldest-old persons living in the community Wondolowski & Davis,
1991
Quality of life† Persons with diabetes mellitus Mitchell, 1998
Men and women who had had a stroke Pilkington, 2000b
Men and women with Alzheimer’s disease Parse, 1996
Description of quality of life Men and women living with stroke Dawson, 2000
†
Quality of life Patients receiving acute psychiatric care Fisher & Mitchell, 1998
Case study of changes in Patients suffering from genital herpes Kelley, 1999a
quality of life
Meaning of serenity† Survivors of cancer Kruse, 1999
Rest Young adults confined to bed for 2.5 hours Smith, 1989
Choosing life goals Married women nurse administrators Costello-Nickitas, 1994
Wanting to help another† Nurses whose practice incorporated nontraditional Mitchell & Heidt, 1994
modalities
Feeling understood† A woman with cerebral palsy Jonas-Simpson, 1997
Lived experience of being over- Overweight women and men Overgaard, 2002
weight
Perceptions of living with a Nurses Hodges et al., 2001
chronic illness, using master- Students
works of art as a center
point for dialogue Chronically ill elderly individuals
†
Used the Parse Method of Basic Research.
486
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 487
487
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 488
TABLE 13–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF BASIC RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY
OF HUMAN BECOMING (continued)
Structure of the lived experi- Older women receiving in-patient rehabilitation Jonas-Simpson, 2003
ence of being listened to†
Lived experience of autonomy Elderly women who shared a household with a family Major & Pepin, 2001
member
Being a senior Canadian persons 65 years or older Mitchell, 1994
Taking life day by day† Canadian persons older than 75 years Mitchell, 1990
Being an elder Nepalese persons 50 years or older Jonas, 1992
Restriction of freedom in later Persons 75 years or older Mitchell, 1995b
life†
Meaning of caring for an eld- Middle-aged and older adults who cared for an older family Gates, 2000
erly relative member
Feeling restricted† Institutionalized older adults Heine, 1991
Spiritual perspectives Mental heath nurses Pullen et al., 1996
Description of the meaning of Hospital-based nurse case managers Hellwig et al., 2003
advocacy
What it means to be human‡ Literary text: Walt Whitman’s poems in Leaves of Grass Cody, 1995a
‡
Examination of bearing witness Literary text: Script of the play, “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” Cody, 2001
Identification of meanings Literary text: Thomas Hegg’s poem, “A Cup of Christmas Baumann et al., 2001
about human experiences‡ Tea”
Exploration of the meaning of Literary text: Letters in the book, A Promise to Remember: Ortiz, 2003
lingering presence‡ The NAMES Project Book of Letters
Mutuality Literature: Selected journal articles and book chapters Curley, 1997
A synthesis and discussion of six Research reports Bournes, 2002b
studies of use of the theory of
human becoming in practice
Relation of individual, dyadic, Sexually active, unmarried, heterosexual women, 17–26 Hutchinson, 1999
and family variables to per- years old
ception of risk for sexually
transmitted diseases
Relation of social support and Women who had and had not undergone mammography Fite et al., 1996; Fite &
obtaining a mammogram screening Frank, 1996
Effectiveness of therapeutic Adult females having knee surgery Scales, 2001
touch, healing touch, Reiki,
and reflexology for reduction
of stress and pain
†
Used the Parse Method of Basic Research.
‡
Used the Human Becoming Hermeneutic Method of Basic Research.
488
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 489
Any nursing curriculum, according to Parse (as cited Parse (1987) pointed out that “practice is the empirical life
in Takahashi, 1992), should be based on educational of [a] theory, which means that the practice of one theory
theories of the teaching-learning process, and the substan- would be very different from the practice of another” (p.
tive content of the curriculum should be nursing theories 166). Accordingly, she developed a PRACTICE METHOD-
and frameworks. Elaborating, she explained, “Nursing the- OLOGY that is directly derived from and consistent with
ories and frameworks should not be the curriculum plan; the Theory of Human Becoming (Table 13–4). The
the curriculum plan should be designed on an education Practice Methodology encompasses three dimensions and
theory since that comes from the science of education, three processes that are directly derived from the
but the substantive content to be taught is nursing science” three principles of the Theory of Human Becoming. The
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 490
170). Here, “in a nurse-family process, by synchronizing through mobilizing transcendence ways of relating change.
rhythms, the members uncover the opportunities and lim- When changing views are talked about among family
itations created by the decisions made in choosing irre- members new possibles are seen and thus the ways of relat-
placeable ways of being together. The choices of new ways ing among family members change” (Parse, 1987, p. 170).
of being together mobilizes transcendence” (Parse, 1987, In addition to the practice applications listed in Table
p. 170). 13–5, projects designed to implement the Theory of
The proposition, Changing views emerge in speaking Human Becoming in health-care organizations have been
and moving with others, guides practice by focusing on “il- evaluated using variations of Parse’s PREPROJECT-
luminating meaning of relating ways of being together as PROCESS-POSTPROJECT DESCRIPTIVE QUALITA-
various changing perspectives shed different light on the TIVE METHOD OF APPLIED RESEARCH (Table 13–6),
familiar, which gives rise to new possibles” (Parse, 1987, p. and the reports have been published (Table 13–7). The
170). In this case, family members “relate their values PREPROJECT-PROCESS-POSTPROJECT DESCRIP-
through speech and movement; thus views change and TIVE QUALITATIVE METHOD OF APPLIED RE-
(Text continues on page 494)
TABLE 13–4
THE PRACTICE METHODOLOGY FOR THE THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING
PART 1
(continued)
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 492
TABLE 13–4
THE PRACTICE METHODOLOGY FOR THE THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING (Continued)
Coming-to-be-Present
An all-at-once gentling down and lifting up.
True presence begins in the coming-to-be-present moments of preparation and attention.
Preparation involves:
An emptying to be available to bear witness to the other or others.
Being flexible, not fixed but gracefully present from one’s center.
Dwelling with the universe at the moment, considering the attentive presence about to be.
Attention involves focusing on the moment at hand for immersion.
Face-to-Face Discussions
Nurse and person engage in dialogue.
The nurse tries to understand the person’s perspective by initiating discussions using questions such as:
How are you doing?
How are things going?
How was your day (or night)?
What is life like for you?
What is most important to you at this time?
What do you need most right now?
Conversation may be through discussion in general or through interpretations of stories, films, drawings,
photographs, music, metaphors, poetry, rhythmical movements, and other expressions.
The nurse really listens to the person, without interrupting.
The nurse may seek clarification through such statements as:
Tell me more about that.
What does … mean for you?
What is it like for you to life with … ?
What do you see yourself doing?
What can you do to get help?
What might help you to go on?
What do you hope happens?
Silent Immersion
A process of the quiet that does not refrain from sending and receiving messages.
A chosen way of becoming in the human-universe process lived in the rhythm of speaking—being silent,
moving—being still as valued images incarnate meaning.
True presence without words.
Lingering Presence
Recalling a moment through a lingering presence that arises after an immediate engagement.
A reflective-prereflective “abiding with” attended to through glimpses of the other person, idea, object, or situation.
TABLE 13–5
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING
Nurse-Person
Children in a school-based mental health program Galligan, 2000
Hospitalized adolescents Arndt, 1995
An adolescent male with cancer Melnechenko, 1995
A woman in her home, parish nursing Bunkers, 1998
A woman at a community center Mitchell, 1993
A 24-year-old woman grieving for her stillborn baby Pilkington, 1997
A 29-year-old woman with cervical cancer G.J. Mitchell, 2002
Persons with cancer considering treatment options Plank, 1994
A woman receiving dialysis M.G. Mitchell, 2002
An adult male with diabetes G. J. Mitchell, 2002
Adults, perioperative nursing Andrus, 1995; Markovic,
1997; Mitchell &
Copplestone, 1990
Adults, orthopedic nursing Balcombe et al., 1991
A man with a heart transplant Liehr, 1989
A man at a rehabilitation center after a stroke Mitchell, 1993
A hospitalized elderly woman Mitchell, 1986
An elderly woman with terminal cancer Mitchell, 1991
A 45-year-old South Korean woman with rectal can- Lee & Pilkington, 1999
cer, dying in a hospice
Dying persons Jonas, 1995; Jonas-
Simpson, 1996
Confused older adults Mattice & Mitchell, 1991
A woman with Alzheimer’s disease Mitchell, 1996a
An elderly person in a home for the aged Mitchell, 1988
An elderly woman in a retirement home Bunkers, 1996b
A woman in a nursing home Mitchell, 1996b
Older adults in the community Baumann, 1997
Persons living with dementia Jonas-Simpson, 2001
Women in a drop-in center designed as a safe place Josephson, 2000
for women and families to gather
Women living with violence Smith, 2002
A homeless woman Bunkers, 1996a
A homeless woman’s personal report of her experi- Williamson, 2000
ence of nursing practice guided by the Human
Becoming Theory
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
493
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 494
TABLE 13–5
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING
(Continued)
Nurse-person
Homeless persons Rasmusson, 1995;
Rasmusson et
al., 1991
Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus Relf, 1997
(HIV) disease/acquired immunodeficiency syn-
drome (AIDS)
Persons experiencing music Jonas, 1994; Mavely
& Mitchell, 1994
A man who immigrated to the United States from Letcher, 2000
Sudan
Nurse-family
as A child and family Cody et al., 1995
Families living with HIV disease Cody, 1995
A family facing the death of a member Butler, 1988
A family living with unrest Smith, 1989
Abused women and their families Butler & Snodgrass, 1991
Nurse-group
Persons with genital herpes in a community-based Kelley, 1995
group
Application of Human Becoming
Community Change Concepts
A 24-year-old woman and her three children living in Cody, 2003
a shelter for homeless women and children
[and] have led the way for nurses and other health care formations in their thinking about nursing and themselves
professionals to begin the processes of listening and dia- as nurses. Those personal transformations were reflected in
loguing in a new way” (p. 48). “an enhanced respect for and concern with people as self-
Moreover, Spée (2000) and McLeod and Spée (2003) ex- determining human beings [who] pursue and create their
plained how nursing practice policies changed when the chosen way of being with the world” (Northrup & Cody,
Human Becoming School of Thought was implemented in 1998, p. 29). Pilkington (1999) added,
the Long Term and Veterans Care Directorate at [N]urses … report that [use of the Theory of Human
Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre Becoming] changes everything, not only for patients, but also,
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. McLeod and Spée (2003) ex- for them as care providers. People feel honored and respected,
plained that as nursing practice “moved from the tradi- and they have chance to clarify the meaning of situations for
tional mechanistic model to a patient-focused model based themselves. In doing so, they also clarify their perspective for
on the values and beliefs of the human becoming school of the nurse, which helps in better addressing person’s needs and
thought … we have participated in the struggles of profes- expectations. Clarifying the meaning of situations provides
sional nurses to identify what values they hold most dear, persons with opportunities to see things differently and to
to choose how they will practice, who’s definitions of harm make choices about how to proceed. (p. 5)
they will listen to, and what actions they will take to sup- Moreover, nurses have reported that they spent more time
port self-determination” (p. 119). listening to and talking with persons and groups. In addi-
The feasibility of implementing practice protocols that tion, persons and families reported enhanced satisfaction
reflect the Theory of Human Becoming by nurses who with nursing, and health-care professionals of other disci-
know the theory well is evident in these publications. Also, plines reported favorable changes in their opinions about
it is clear that nurses have the legal ability to implement nursing. Missing from these evaluation projects, however,
those protocols and measure the effectiveness of theory- are data regarding changes in health patterns or the quality
based nursing actions. of life of persons or groups.
The reports of the implementation projects (see Table Additional evidence of the extent to which the Theory
13–7) indicate that several resources are required for suc- of Human Becoming is compatible with expectations for
cessful implementation of Theory of Human Becoming– nursing practice should come from the use of the South
based practice in a health-care organization. These re- Dakota Board of Nursing regulatory decisioning model
sources include “(a) the presence of a consistent, on-site, (Benedict, Bunkers, Damgaard, Duffy, Hohman, & Vander
master’s or doctorally prepared facilitator knowledgeable Woude, 2000; Damgaard & Bunkers, 1998; Vander Woude,
in the theory; (b) the allocation of resources necessary for 1998; Vander Woude & Hutcherson, 1999). That model,
learning; (c) the endorsement of Parse theory-based prac- which reflects the values and principles of the Theory of
tice by management personnel; and (d) administrative Human Becoming, represents a new way of “exploring and
support for continued educational opportunities related to honoring differing paradigms in nursing while grounding
Parse’s theory of human becoming” (Northrup & Cody, nursing regulatory decision-making in nursing science”
1998, p. 30). (Damgaard & Bunkers, 1998, p. 144). Moreover, the pres-
Another resource is a coherent, easy-to-use set of docu- entation of the regulatory decisioning model at confer-
mentation tools. Some such tools are available in a booklet ences served as a catalyst for development of nursing
published by the Nursing Council at Sunnybrook Health education, regulatory, and practice prototypes grounded in
Science Centre, titled Patient Focused Care: Sailing Beyond nursing science.
the Boundaries (Bournes & Mitchell, 1997). Another docu- Use of Parse’s Preproject-Process-Postproject Descrip-
mentation tool, the Human Becoming in Practice Sample tive Qualitative Method of Applied Research permits com-
Documentation Format, was devised by Parse (2001a, parisons of outcomes before and after the theory was used.
p. 178). The various reports published to date do not, however,
The extent to which nursing practice based on the fully address the problem-solving effectiveness of Theory
Theory of Human Becoming is compatible with expecta- of Human Becoming-based practice, in terms of the
tions for nursing practice and the actual results of its use achievement of the disciplinary goal of enhanced quality of
have begun to be examined (see Table 13–7). Taken to- life for persons, families, and communities and the human
gether, the findings of the implementation projects, all of becoming nurse’s goal of being truly present with people as
which took place in the Canadian health-care organiza- they enhance the quality of their lives.
tions, revealed socially meaningful, favorable results that Outcomes and problem-solving effectiveness may not
are compatible with expectations. In particular, nurses who be relevant criteria by which to evaluate the Theory of
gained knowledge of the Theory of Human Becoming and Human Becoming. Edwards (2000) commented, “One
applied the theory in practice experienced personal trans- wonders what counts as being effective within the [human
(Text continues on page 498)
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 496
TABLE 13–6
PARSE’S PREPROJECT-PROCESS-POSTPROJECT DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE METHOD
OF APPLIED RESEARCH
PURPOSE
To ascertain specific changes that emerge after initiation of a project to apply the Theory of Human Becoming in practice.
DESIGN
Information is gathered before the initiation of the project, midway, and at the end of the project.
An evaluator who is not engaged in the day-to-day activity of the setting makes a record of the responses from the
information sources before the teaching-learning sessions begin, midway through the project, and at the end of the
project.
INFORMATION SOURCES
Direct observation of nurses’ documentation.
Written and tape-recorded interviews with nurses regarding their beliefs about human beings, health, and
nursing.
Written and tape-recorded interviews with persons and their families regarding their experiences with
nursing.
Tape-recorded interviews with nurse managers, physicians, and other multidisciplinary health professionals.
TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
Teaching-learning sessions are offered on a regular basis.
A human becoming nurse specialist instructs project participants (nurses and other health professionals) about the the-
ory and guides them in consistent practice and documentation.
NURSES’ DOCUMENTATION
Documentation is done in an easy-to-access format that is determined by nurses.
Personal Health Descriptions
Documentation of the meanings of the situation, the relationship with close others, and the hopes and wishes, as articu-
lated by the person who is receiving nursing.
Patterns of Becoming
Documentation of themes surfacing in discussion, which are paradoxical and guide nurse-person activities.
Nurse-Person Activities
Documentation of activities in which the nurse participates, as decided by the person who is receiving
nursing.
Plans, Goals, and Priorities for Change
Documentation of change in personal patterns of becoming, written from the perspective of the person who
is receiving nursing, and written by that person or the nurse.
496
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 497
TABLE 13–7
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF APPLIED RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
497
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 498
TABLE 13–7
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF APPLIED RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING
(Continued)
Two 20-bed pediatric units and Preproject-postproject descriptive evaluation Santopinto & Smith, 1995
one 42-bed medical-surgical Staff nurses
unit in a 400-bed urban com- Adult clients
munity teaching hospital in Child clients
Canada Parents
Nurse managers
Physicians
Child health workers
Patient ombudsman
Key representatives from other health professions
Ethnographic interviews
Written questionnaires
Chart audits
Photographs
One 16-bed forensic unit, one Preproject-midproject-postproject descriptive evalua- Northrup & Cody, 1998
9-bed neuropsychiatric unit, tion
and one 24-bed geriatric psy- Staff nurses
chiatry unit, all in a 200-bed Unit managers
acute care psychiatric hospi- Hospital supervisors
tal in Canada Patients
Written questionnaires
Taped interviews
Chart audits
Sunnybrook Health Science Time of information gathering not specified Mitchell et al., 1997
Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Patients’ verbatim reports
Canada
becoming school of thought]” (p. 194). Mitchell (1998) basic and applied research and for practice that are consis-
and Young, Taylor, and McLaughlin-Renpenning (2001) tent with her theory. And, she has begun to extend the the-
pointed out that the term outcomes is not consistent with ory to community.
the Theory of Human Becoming. Given that quality of life The Theory of Human Becoming and the Human
can be described only by each person, “there is no standard Becoming School of Thought have attracted scholars from
against which to measure quality of life, and such meas- four continents, with considerable work done by scholars
urement is not consistent with this theory” (Young et al., in the United States, Canada, Finland, and Sweden (Parse,
2001, p. 181). Yet, given that the goal of the human becom- 1998, 2001b). The widespread interest in Parse’s work is at-
ing nurse is to be truly present with people as they enhance tested to by the establishment of the International
their quality of life, some standard for enhanced quality of Consortium of Parse Scholars. The Consortium began as
life seems to be required, even if that standard is adjusted an interest group in 1988; a few years later, it was officially
for each person or family or community. designated as the Consortium. The purpose of the
Consortium is “to contribute to human health and quality
CONCLUSION of life through practice and research guided by Parse’s
human becoming theory” (International Consortium of
Parse has made a meaningful contribution to nursing Parse Scholars, 1997, p. 2). The Consortium sponsors an-
knowledge development by explicating a grand theory that nual seminars and conferences and publishes the newslet-
focuses on the human-universe-health process. In addi- ter Illuminations.
tion, she has contributed distinctive methodologies for Interest in Parse’s work also is attested to by the found-
498
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 499
ing of the Institute of Human Becoming. Since 1992, Parse Bunkers, S.S. (1998). Considering tomorrow: Parse’s theory–
has offered annual summer sessions devoted to the study of guided research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 56–63.
the Theory of Human Becoming and its associated re- Bunkers, S.S. (1999). Translating nursing conceptual frameworks
search and practice methodologies. In addition, an annual and theory for nursing practice. In P.A. Solari-Twadell & M.A.
International Colloquium on Human Becoming has been McDermott (Eds.), Parish nursing: Promoting whole person
held for more than 10 years. Also, Parse’s (1998) book, The health within faith communities (pp. 205–214). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Human Becoming School of Thought: A Perspective for
Nurses and Other Health Professionals, has been translated Bunkers, S.S. (2000). Simple things: Writings of human becom-
ing. Sioux Falls, SD: Health Connections/Simple Things.
into Chinese by Wang and published in Taiwan.
Bunkers, S.S. (2003). Community: An emerging mosaic of human
In summarizing directions for the future of the Theory
becoming. In R.R. Parse, Community: A human becoming per-
of Human Becoming, Parse (2001b) declared: spective (pp. 73–95). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
Through the efforts of Parse scholars the human becoming Bunkers, S.S., Nelson, M., Leuning, C., Crane, J., & Josephson, D.
school of thought will continue to emerge as a force in the (1999). The health action model: Academia’s partnership with the
twenty-first century evolution of nursing science. Knowledge community. In E. Cohen & V. De Back (Eds.), The outcomes
gained from the basic research studies will be synthesized to mandate: Case management in health care today (pp. 92–100). St.
explicate further the meaning of lived experiences. The find- Louis: Mosby.
ings from applied research projects related to evaluation of Camus, A. (1946). The stranger. New York: Random House.
human becoming practice will be synthesized and conclusions Camus, A. (1995). The first man (D. Hapgood, Trans.). New York:
drawn. These syntheses will guide decisions in creating the Knopf.
continuing vision for sciencing and living the art of the Cody, W.K. (1995). Of life immense in passion, pulse, and power:
human becoming school of thought. (p. 233) Dialoguing with Whitman and Parse—A hermeneutic study. In
Continued documentation of the use of the Theory of R.R. Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in
practice and research (pp. 269–207). New York: National League
Human Becoming is needed, with special attention given
for Nursing.
to whether nurses who use the theory contribute to the
Cody, W.K. (2003). Human becoming community change con-
quality of life of individuals, families, and communities. In cepts in an academic nursing practice setting. In R.R. Parse,
addition, the extent to which the Theory of Human Community: A human becoming perspective (pp. 49–71).
Becoming is appropriate for use by health professionals of Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
other disciplines and actually is used by them remains to be Damgaard, G., & Bunkers, S.S. (1998). Nursing science–guided
determined. practice and education: A state board of nursing perspective.
Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 142–144.
de Beauvoir, S. (1948). The ethics of ambiguity. Secaucus, NJ:
REFERENCES Citadel.
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic I. Palo de Beauvoir, S. (1977). A very easy death. New York: Warner.
Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books. Dilthey, W. (1961). Pattern and meaning in history: Thoughts on
Barrett, E.A.M. (1998). Unique nursing research methods: The di- history and society (H.P. Rickman, Ed., Trans.). New York: Harper
versity chant of pioneers. Nursing Science Quarterly, 11, 94–96. & Row.
Benedict, L.L., Bunkers, S.S., Damgaard, G.A., Duffy, C.E., Dilthey, W. (1988). Introduction to the human sciences (R.J.
Hohman, M.L., & Vander Woude, D.L. (2000). The South Dakota Betanzos, Trans.). Detroit: Wayne State University Press. [Original
Board of Nursing theory-based regulatory decisioning model. work published 1883.]
Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 167–171. Dossey, L. (1991). Meaning and medicine: A doctor’s tales of
Bournes, D. (1997). Interview with Dr. Rosemarie Parse. breakthrough and healing. New York: Bantam.
Illuminations, 6(4), 1–3. Edwards, S.D. (2000). Critical review of R.R. Parse’s “The Human
Bournes, D.A. (2000). Concept inventing: A process for creating a Becoming School of Thought: A Perspective for Nurses and Other
unitary definition of having courage. Nursing Science Quarterly, Health Professionals.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 190–196.
13, 143–149. Fawcett, J. (2001). The nurse theorists: 21st century updates—
Bournes, D., & Mitchell, G. (Eds.). (1997). Patient focused care: Rosemarie Rizzo Parse. Nursing Science Quarterly, 14, 126–131.
Sailing beyond the boundaries at Sunnybrook Health Science Frankl, V.E. (1959). The will to meaning. New York; New
Centre. North York, Ontario, Canada: Nursing Council of American Library.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre. Gadamer, H.G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D.E. Linge,
Bruteau, B. (1979). The psychic grid: How we create the world we Ed., Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
know. Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House. Gadamer, H.G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.).
Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man (M. Friedman, Ed.). (Translation revised by J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall.) New
New York: Harper & Row. York: Crossroad. [Original work published 1960.]
13Fawcett-13 09/17/2004 2:24 PM Page 500
Chapter 14
Orlando’s Theory
of the Deliberative
Nursing Process
Ida Jean Orlando Pelletier formulated the Theory of the Deliberative Nursing
Process after reviewing the data collected for a study of experiences in nursing
and teaching that was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, United
States Public Health Service, and was conducted under the auspices of the Yale
University School of Nursing. Orlando (1989) explained that as she sorted the
data into the categories of good and bad outcomes, she realized that the good
outcomes were the result of effective nursing practice in the form of the nurse’s
nonobservable reaction and observable actions in response to the patient’s be-
havior. She pointed out that the fundamental idea of her work is “directed to-
ward the organization, development and implementation of a system of
understanding which makes it possible for nurses to develop and maintain pro-
fessional responsibility for the patient’s care and mutual job responsibility with
others who may affect the nurse’s care of patients” (Orlando, 1972, p. 3).
Orlando first presented her work in her 1961 book, The Dynamic Nurse-
Patient Relationship: Function, Process and Principles. In that book, she labeled
her work a theory of effective nursing practice but later—in the preface to the
1990 reprint of the 1961 book—referred to the work as the nursing process the-
ory. Explaining the change in label, she stated:
If I had been more courageous in 1961, when this book was first written, I would have
proposed it as “nursing process theory” instead of as a “theory of effective nursing
practice.” A “deliberative” process was presented as a guide for nurses to practice
“effectively.” Conversely, an “automatic” process was shown to be “ineffective.”
“Effectiveness” was conceptualized and illustrated as “improvement” in the patient’s
behavior. The “improvement” stemmed from the fact that the deliberative process made
it possible for the nurse to identify and meet the patient’s need for help. (Orlando
Pelletier, 1990, p. vii)
506
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 507
Overview Activities
Sequence
Requirements
Orlando’s work is a middle-range predictive theory that
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
focuses exclusively on the interpersonal process be-
Purpose of the Research
tween people and is directed toward facilitating identi-
Phenomena of Interest
fication of the nature of patients’ distress and their
Study Participants
immediate needs for help by means of a deliberative
Testable Propositions/Hypotheses
nursing process. The concepts of the Theory of the
Study Design
Deliberative Nursing Process and their dimensions are
Data Collection Methods
listed here. The components of Orlando’s research and
Data Analysis
practice methodologies also are listed here. Each con-
Characteristics of Verbal Expressions
cept, dimension, and methodology component is de-
Consistency Between Reactions and
fined and described later in this chapter.
Verbal Expressions
Outcome
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
Key Terms Observations
Direct Observations: Nurse’s Reaction to
PATIENT’S BEHAVIOR Patient’s Behavior
Need for Help Indirect Observations: Other Information
Improvement About the Patient’s Behavior
NURSE’S REACTION Actions
Perception Nurse’s Activity: Deliberative Nursing
Thought Clinical Protocols Process
Feeling Direct Help
NURSE’S ACTIVITY Indirect Help
Automatic Nursing Process Reporting
Deliberative Nursing Process Recording
507
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 508
purposeful and directed toward the reduction of discom- the nurse is necessarily different [from that of the physician];
fort from unmet needs” (p. 144). it offers whatever help the patient may require for his needs to
At the same time, however, the theory “focuses on the be met, i.e., for his physical and mental comfort to be assured
reciprocal interaction between the [patient] and the nurse. as far as possible while he is undergoing some form of medical
treatment or supervision. (p. 5)
Both the [patient] and the nurse are affected by the other’s
behavior” (Sellers, 1991, p. 144). Furthermore, although Hence the purpose of nursing “is to supply the help a pa-
Orlando’s separation of behaviors, perceptions, thoughts, tient requires in order for his needs to be met” (Orlando,
and feelings reflects the totality world view, “she sees each 1961, p. 8). Stated in other words, the nurse’s function,
person as unique and as providing her or his own meaning which is dictated by patients’ predicaments, is “to find out
to the situation, as in the simultaneity [world view]” and meet patients’ immediate needs for help while under-
(Forchuk, 1991, p. 41). Thus it can be concluded that going treatment in prescribed settings” (Pelletier, 1967, p.
Orlando’s philosophical claims most closely reflect the re- 27). Even more specifically, the function of professional
ciprocal interaction world view. nursing is “attending to individuals when [they are] in dis-
tress because they cannot find their own encouragement,
look after themselves, nourish, nurture, or protect them-
Conceptual Model selves, nor give themselves curative care when they are ail-
ing” (Orlando & Dugan, 1989, p. 79). The essence of
Although Orlando did not explicitly identify the concep- professional nursing, then, is knowing when and validating
tual underpinnings of her theory, she did describe human that the nurse’s actions and reactions help or do not help
beings and nursing in some detail. Human beings are de- the patient, and knowing when and validating that the pa-
scribed as patients. Human beings become patients when tient does not need the nurse’s help at a particular time
they submit to medical procedures. Orlando (1972) ex- (Orlando, 1962).
plained: In a further comparison of nursing and medicine,
Once an individual undergoes medical diagnosis, treatment or Orlando (1972) commented:
supervision, he automatically assumes the status of patient
Nursing (not necessarily the nurse) is responsive to individu-
and is vulnerable to the predicament of being a patient. That
als who suffer or anticipate a sense of helplessness; it is focused
is, the patient may not be in a position to control all that hap-
on the process of care in an immediate experience; it is con-
pens to him and may suffer helplessness as a result. (p. 10)
cerned with providing direct assistance to individuals in what-
Professional nurses are needed, according to Orlando ever setting they are found for the purpose of avoiding,
relieving, diminishing or curing the individual’s sense of help-
(1961; Orlando & Dugan, 1989) when human beings lessness. Nursing by another person may take place when an
should but do not know why they are helpless, that is, when individual is unable to nurse himself and may function inde-
human beings do not know why they cannot nurse them- pendently of whether or not the individual is under medical
selves. Professional nurses also are needed when human care. In contrast, medicine is responsive to individuals who
beings do not know why they are unable to nurse them- suffer or are apt to suffer ill health and commits itself to those
selves and, therefore, cannot communicate what their im- who are willing to undergo medical diagnosis, treatment or
mediate need for help is. Moreover, professional nurses are supervision; it is thus focused on the process of disease; it is
needed when human beings experience distress stemming concerned with diagnosis and treatment, carried out by advis-
from physical limitations or adverse reactions to the set- ing or directing patients to follow or undergo specific diag-
ting, or when the unique characteristics of the distress can- nostic, medical, surgical or psychiatric procedures in settings
where patients are found or in whatever setting individuals are
not be observed directly even if it continues or escalates in placed for the purpose of curing, alleviating or preventing dis-
intensity. Conversely, nurses are not needed “when the pa- ease. Medical practice functions independently of whether or
tient is able to meet his own needs and is able to carry out not the patient is able to nurse himself. (p. 12)
prescribed measures unaided” (Orlando, 1961, p. 5).
Orlando (1961) regarded nursing as distinct from med- The distinction between nursing and medicine also is evi-
icine: dent in Orlando’s (1961) comment about medically pre-
scribed activities. She stated, “It is important to recognize
There is a clear distinction between the medical management
that the nurse is using a doctor’s order for the patient and
of a patient and the way the patient would manage his own af-
fairs and his own comforts if he were able to do so. … The is not carrying out orders for the doctor” (p. 72). Orlando
doctor places the patient under the care of the nurse for either (1987) also noted that “medical orders are for and directed
or both of the following reasons: (1) the patient cannot deal at patients who are free to comply or not to comply. They
with what he needs, or (2) he cannot carry out the prescribed may direct a physician’s assistant but not a professional
treatment or diagnostic plan alone. … The responsibility of nurse. Our commitment is to the individual who may or
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 510
is helped to inform the nurse as to how her activity af- acts. … The process … is comprised of four distinct
fects him. items. These separate items reside within an individual
● The specific required activity meets the patient’s need for and at any given moment occur in the following auto-
help and achieves the nurse’s purpose of having helped matic, sometimes instantaneous, sequence: (1) The per-
the patient. son perceives with any one of his five sense organs an
● The nurse is available to respond to the patient’s need for object or objects; (2) the perceptions stimulate auto-
help. matic thought; (3) each thought stimulates an auto-
● The nurse knows how her activity affects the patient. matic feeling; and (4) then the person acts (Orlando,
1972, pp. 24–25).
In contrast, Automatic Nursing Activities may be “correct” D. Any observation shared and explored with the nurse is
(p. 87), but they are ineffective in meeting the patient’s immediately useful in ascertaining and meeting his
need for help. Thus, although automatic activities may need [for help] or finding out that he is not in need at
be designed to help the patient, “deliberation is needed that time (Orlando, 1961, p. 36).
to determine whether the activity actually achieves E. If the nurse automatically decides on the “right” activ-
its intended purpose and whether the patient is helped ity but holds in abeyance what she wants to achieve
by it” (p. 60). Automatic Nursing Activities are ineffective until she ascertains and meets the patient’s need, she
because: helps the patient and achieves her primary objective. If
● The activity is decided on for reasons other than the the nurse is not able to carry out what she thinks is in-
meaning of the patient’s behavior and the unmet need, dicated, she helps the patient tell her why her judgment
giving rise to it. is inappropriate or incorrect. She then makes a new de-
● The activity does not enable the patient to let the nurse cision or continues to explore what is going on so that
know how the activity affects him. the patient will understand and accept what the nurse
● The activity is unrelated to the patient’s immediate need believes is indicated. In either case the purpose is to
for help. help the patient. Another way to think of this is that ei-
ther the patient is willing to go along with the nurse, or
the nurse is willing to go along with the patient. They
Relational Propositions have to move together to achieve a common goal
(Orlando, 1961, p. 89).
The relational propositions of the Theory of the F. There are … three possible ways for the patient to be af-
Deliberative Nursing Process are listed below. The Patient’s fected by nursing activities—the activity may help, may
Behavior concept dimension of Need for Help and the not help, or the result may be unknown (Orlando, 1961,
Nurse’s Reaction concept dimension of Perception are p. 67).
linked in relational proposition A. The concepts of Nurse’s G. The nurse recognizes if she has met the patient’s need
Reaction and Nurse’s Activity are linked in relational for help by noting the presence or absence of improve-
proposition B. In relational proposition C, the three di- ment in his presenting behavior. In the absence of im-
mensions of the concept of Nurse’s Reaction are linked to provement, the nurse knows the patient’s need has not
the concept of Nurse’s Activity. This sequential proposi- yet been met, and, if she remains available, she starts the
tion describes what Orlando (1972) called the action process all over again with whatever presenting behav-
process. The concepts of Nurse’s Activity and Patient’s ior is then observed (Orlando, 1961, p. 68).
Behavior are linked in relational propositions D and E. The H. The product of meeting the patient’s immediate need
concept of Nurse’s Activity is linked with the Patient’s for help is … “improvement” in the immediate verbal
Behavior concept dimension of Improvement in relational and nonverbal behavior of the patient. This observable
propositions F, G, H, and I. change allows the nurse to believe or disbelieve that her
activity relieved, prevented or diminished the patient’s
A. The behavior [that] the nurse perceives must be viewed sense of helplessness. In subjective but at least concep-
as a possible manifestation of an unmet need [for help] tual terms the “improvement” has a measure of curative
or a signal of distress … unless she has evidence to the value to the helplessness suffered by patients in imme-
contrary (Orlando, 1961, p. 39). diate experiences. In this conceptual sense the profes-
B. What a nurse says or does is necessarily an outcome of sional function of nursing is fulfilled and its product is
her reaction to something in the situation (Orlando, achieved (Orlando, 1972, pp. 21–22).
1961, p. 61). I. The nurse, in achieving her purpose, contributes simul-
C. The process of a nurse’s activity is based on a specific taneously to the mental and physical health of her pa-
formulation of the process by which any individual tient. This is so because in helping him she affects for
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 514
the patient’s need for help in the immediate nurse-patient of using perceptions, thoughts, or feelings to understand the
contact” (p. xvii). meaning of the patient’s immediate behavior is not something
Semantic inconsistency is, however, evident in changes a person does naturally. It must be developed. (p. xviii)
in certain terms, but that appears to be the result of
Orlando’s (1961, 1972; Orlando Pelletier, 1990) attempt to
find terms that would more effectively convey her ideas. TESTABILITY
Inconsistencies were noted in some terms: help (1961) and
need for help (1990); improvement (1961) and helpful The Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process meets the
outcome (1972); automatic nursing process (1961) and criterion of testability for middle-range theories. Orlando
nursing process without discipline (1972); and deliberative (1972) designed a specific RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
nursing process (1961) and process discipline (1972) or to test the theory. The components of the RESEARCH
nursing process with discipline (1972). METHODOLOGY are identified and described in Table
With regard to the inconsistency in the terms help and 14–1.
need for help, Orlando explained in the preface of the 1990 All components of the Research Methodology are com-
reprint of her 1961 book, “Throughout this text, only the pletely consistent with and reflect the content of the
phrase need for help should have been used and not the Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process. The Purposes
word need” (Orlando Pelletier, 1990, p. vii). With regard to of Research, the Phenomena of Interest, and the Study
the inconsistency in the terms deliberative nursing process, Participants are evident in Orlando’s (1961, 1972) books.
process discipline, and nursing process with discipline, Furthermore, although Orlando (1961, 1972) labeled some
Orlando explained, “The deliberative nursing process was statements as assumptions, they are more appropriately la-
renamed nursing process ‘with discipline’” (Orlando beled as Testable Propositions or Hypotheses. In keeping
Pelletier, 1990, p. vii). Orlando did not explain the incon- with the Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process,
sistency in the terms improvement and helpful outcome. Propositions/Hypotheses 1, 2, and 3 refer to the effects of
The analysis of the Theory of the Deliberative Nursing using or not using the Deliberative Nursing Process;
Process revealed structural consistency. The concepts are Propositions/ Hypotheses 4 and 5 refer to the effects of
adequately linked by means of relational propositions, and training nurses to use the Deliberative Nursing Process.
the progression from Patient’s Behavior (Need for Help) to Those propositions indicate that a quasi-experimental or
Nurse’s Reaction to Nurse’s Activity and back to Patient’s experimental Study Design is required. Orlando (1972)
Behavior (Improvement) is clearly specified. advocated nonparticipant observation, tape-recorded
person-to-person contacts, and process recordings as the
primary Data Collection Methods. Other appropriate
PARSIMONY methods are questionnaires and devices designed to meas-
ure particular manifestations of the patient’s distress and
The Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process meets the specific symptoms. For example, Dumas and Leonard
criterion of parsimony. The theory is elegant in the paucity (1963) measured the incidence of postoperative vomiting,
of words used to convey complex ideas. The theory may, and Anderson, Mertz, and Leonard (1965) measured blood
however, be oversimplified. Schmieding (1987) explained: pressure, pulse rate, and such observable behaviors as sob-
bing and movements of limbs. Moreover, Williamson
A criticism of Orlando’s work, despite its elegant specificity, is
(1978) developed an instrument to measure patients’ and
the lack of repetition and full explanation to accompany im-
portant concepts and formulations. The thought may occur to nurses’ awareness of patients’ physical and emotional
the reader, “if a feature is mentioned, isn’t that sufficient?” needs, and Potter and Bockenhauer (2000) developed the
When learning complex formulations, even if they are clear Bockenhauer/Potter Scale of Immediate Distress to meas-
and precise, and in grasping the meaning and use of abstract ure nurses’ ratings of patient-demonstrated distress (Table
concepts, … repetition and more detailed explanations are 14–2). All of those Data Collection Methods are appropri-
necessary strategies. (p. 440) ate empirical indicators for the concepts of the Theory of
the Deliberative Nursing Process. Orlando (1972) also de-
Schmieding (1987) went on to say, “This criticism does not veloped a schema for Data Analysis, using precise opera-
detract from the soundness of Orlando’s theory; rather it tional definitions to code the Characteristics of Verbal
highlights the fact that practical theories are noted for their Expressions, the Outcome, and the Consistency of the Nurse’s
simplicity and precision” (p. 440). And, in a later commen- Verbal Expression with the Nurse’s Reaction. The Data
tary, Schmieding (1990) pointed out that Analysis schema is in keeping with the Theory of the
the simplicity of [Orlando’s] formulations … disguises the Deliberative Nursing Process and clearly permits measure-
complexity of the nurse-patient interaction. The importance ment of the relation between the concepts of Nurse’s
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 516
TABLE 14–1
ORLANDO’S RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
To determine the effects of the use of the deliberative nursing process on behavior of patients and other persons (staff
and supervisors) in the nursing system.
To test the effects of training in the use of the process discipline on its actual use in practice.
PHENOMENA OF INTEREST
The patient’s or other person’s behavior, the nurse’s reactions, and the nurse’s activity.
STUDY PARTICIPANTS
Patients
Staff nurses
Nurse supervisors
TESTABLE PROPOSITIONS/HYPOTHESES
1. Once the patient has been helped, he feels safer to communicate the distress of which he is aware. … Once he
trusts the nurse, his communications are more explicit and he is more likely to spontaneously discuss the experi-
ences which distress him (Orlando, 1961, p. 26).
2. When the reaction of the nurse, in any of its aspects, is not explored with the patient, his condition remains un-
changed or becomes worse (Orlando, 1961, p. 45).
3. If a nurse automatically acts on any perception, thought, or feeling without exploring it further with the patient, the
activity may very well be ineffective in achieving its purpose or in helping the patient. On the other hand, if the nurse
checks her thoughts and explores her reactions with the patient before deciding on which action to follow, what she
does is more likely to achieve its purpose and help the patient (Orlando, 1961, p. 61).
4. Training would increase the nurse’s use of the [deliberative nursing] process (Orlando, 1972, p. 66).
5. Trained nurses would use the [deliberative nursing] process more than untrained ones (Orlando, 1972, p. 66).
STUDY DESIGN
Quasi-experimental
Experimental
DATA ANALYSIS
Codes for Characteristics of Verbal Expressions
• X An item is verbally expressed.
• Y An item is asked about.
• Z An item that is verbally expressed is designated to the self with a personal pronoun.
• XY An item is first expressed and the same item is asked about.
• XZ An item expressed is designated to the self.
• XYZ An item first expressed is designated to the self and the same item is asked about.
516
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 517
Source: Constructed from Orlando, 1972; data analysis section adapted from Orlando, 1972, pp. 60–61, 63, with permission.
Reaction and Nurse’s Activity, as well as the relation bet- hospital located in Belmont, Massachusetts. The purpose
ween the concept of Nurse’s Activity and the Improvement of that study was to test the effectiveness of the use of the
dimension of the concept of Patient’s Behavior. deliberative nursing process and the value of its use in pa-
tient, staff, and supervisee contacts. Study participants
EMPIRICAL ADEQUACY were staff nurses and supervisors, whose contacts with pa-
tients, other staff, and supervisees were observed and tape-
The Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process meets the recorded. Data were obtained from transcribed tape
criterion of empirical adequacy for middle-range theories. recordings of 144 contacts made by six staff nurses and six
Published reports of the use of the Theory of the supervisors who had been trained in the use of the deliber-
Deliberative Nursing Process as a guide for nursing re- ative nursing process. Other data were obtained from the
search are listed in Table 14–3. written records of 280 verbal exchanges submitted by 28
A review of those reports, along with the master’s theses trainees. Analysis of the data revealed that the use of the
and doctoral dissertations listed in the chapter bibliogra- deliberative nursing process had a significant positive effect
phy on the CD-ROM, revealed considerable empirical sup- on patient and staff behavior, as indicated by a relief from
port. In particular, several studies conducted in the early distress or symptoms or the identification of a solution to
1960s by faculty and students at the Yale University School a living or work problem. Summarizing the results of her
of Nursing provided impressive evidence of the beneficial research, Orlando (1972) stated:
effects of using the Deliberative Nursing Process (see espe-
cially Anderson, Mertz, & Leonard, 1965; Barron, 1966; The research findings amply document that a verbal form of a
Bochnak, 1963; Cameron, 1963; Dumas, 1963; Dumas & [deliberative nursing process] can be isolated, tested and then
Leonard, 1963; Dye, 1963; Elms & Leonard, 1966; Faulkner, evaluated in relation to an operational concept of effectiveness
1963; Fischelis, 1963; Mertz, 1963; Rhymes, 1964; Tryon, in patient, staff and supervisee contacts. Further, the same ver-
1963, 1966; Tryon & Leonard, 1964). bal form is sufficient to measure the use of the [deliberative
Although the Yale studies “came to an abrupt halt,” nursing process] and, therefore, sufficient to measure training
results. Still further, findings show that the [deliberative nurs-
Orlando explained that she “continued to develop and ing process] and training in its use is effective in achieving
refine” her original formulations (Orlando Pelletier, 1990, helpful outcomes in patient and/or staff and/or supervisee
p. vii). The result of her effort was the publication of contacts. … These findings, specific to this research, strongly
the findings of a major National Institute of Mental suggest that the [deliberative nursing process] and training in
Health–funded quasi-experimental study that Orlando its use is directly relevant to solving the more general problem
(1972) conducted at McLean Hospital, a private psychiatric of inadequate patient care (p. viii).
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 518
TABLE 14–2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE THEORY OF THE DELIBERATIVE
NURSING PROCESS
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Bockenhauer-Potter Scale of Immediate Measures the nurse’s rating of the degree of patient-demonstrated
Distress (Potter & Bockenhauer, 2000) distress
Patient’s Physical and Emotional Needs Measures patients’ and nurses’ awareness of patients’ physical and
Instrument (Williamson, 1978) emotional needs
PRACTICE TOOLS
Nursing Process Record (Orlando, 1972, A form that permits recording of perception of or about the patient,
p. 56) thought and/or feeling about the perception, and what the nurse
said and/or did to, with, or for the patient
Assessing a Patient by Using Orlando’s Contains guidelines for finding out and meeting the patient’s immedi-
Theory to Guide the Nurse’s Process ate need for help
(Schmieding, 2002)
*See the Research Instruments and Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
More recently, Potter and Bockenhauer (2000) found evi- Training in the Deliberative Nursing Process is predi-
dence of a greater reduction in patients’ immediate distress cated on Orlando’s (1961) claim that “what the individual
when nurses used the deliberative nursing process than nurse happens to perceive or think (relevant or otherwise)
when nurses used a nonspecified nursing intervention. is not so important as what she does with it. What the
Their sample included 10 registered nurses and 30 patients nurse automatically perceives or thinks cannot ordinarily
at a large, university-affiliated state psychiatric hospital, be controlled, but she can learn a responsive discipline, the
and they used the Bockenhauer/Potter Scale of Immediate discipline [that] phrases or formulates her perceptions or
Distress to measure patient-demonstrated distress. The in- thoughts by questioning and wondering about the mean-
vestigators explained that the nurses’ anecdotal comments ing of them to the patient” (p. 41).
indicated that they felt more effective when using the de- Orlando (1972) used the term training to refer to “the
liberative nursing process as a ‘road map’ for identifying process of preparing nurses to impose a specific discipline
and meeting the patients’ immediate needs for help. on the nursing process to fulfill a specific function and
achieve a specific product” (p. 2). The purpose of training
“is to change the responsiveness of the nurse from the one
PRAGMATIC ADEQUACY described as personal and automatic to one [that] is disci-
plined and professional” (p. 33).
The Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process meets the
Emphasis in training is, therefore, placed on the
criterion of pragmatic adequacy. Orlando specified the
Nurse’s Activity rather than on the dimensions of the
training that is required for use of the theory, and she iden-
Nurse’s Reaction (Perception, Thought, Feeling). Orlando
tified the components of a methodology for applying the
(1972) found that the Deliberative Nursing Process can be
theory in the real world of nursing practice.
taught successfully to staff nurses in 6 weeks and to super-
visors in 3 months. Training is facilitated by use of process
Nursing Education recordings of the trainee’s reaction and activity. The
process recordings are then discussed in individual and
Special training is required to learn how to apply the group conferences between the trainees and training in-
Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process. Schmieding structor. The major task, steps, and outcomes of training
(2002) contended that every student nurse should receive nurses to use the Deliberative Nursing Process are summa-
that special training. rized here.
(Text continues on page 521)
518
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 519
TABLE 14–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF THE DELIBERATIVE
NURSING PROCESS
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Effectiveness of student nurses’ immedi- Senior students in associate degree and bac- Haggerty, 1987
ate responses to distressed patients calaureate degree programs
Videotapes of simulated patients’ physical
and emotional distress
Effectiveness of nurse managers’ re- Nurse managers Schmieding, 1987
sponses to problematic situations Written vignettes about nurse manager–staff
nurse situations
Action processes of nurse administrators Nurse administrators Schmieding, 1988
in problematic situations Written vignettes about patient, nurse, and
physician situations
Types of administrative actions that nurses Staff nurses Schmieding, 1990b
find helpful Head nurses
Supervisors
Written vignettes about patient, nurse, and
physician situations
Types of head nurse actions that staff Staff nurses Schmieding, 1990a
nurses find helpful Head nurses
Written vignettes about patient, nurse, and
physician situations
Immediate responses of staff nurses and Staff nurses Schmieding, 1991
head nurses to problematic situations Head nurses
Written vignettes about staff nurse–patient
situations
Nurses’ perceptions of the structure of se- Master’s degree-prepared nurse Houfek, 1992
lected nursing care episodes Adult surgical patients
List of 17 nurse-patient situations during post-
operative hospitalization
Barriers that prevent effective screening for Registered nurses working in an emergency Ellis, 1999
domestic violence department
Spouses’ identification of their needs Spouses of dying patients Hampe, 1975
Patients’ satisfaction with nurses’ re- Adult postoperative patients Gowen & Morris, 1964
sponses to their expressed needs
CORRELATIONAL STUDY
Relation of nurse-expressed empathy to Staff nurses Olson & Hanchett, 1997
patient-perceived empathy and patient Hospitalized adult medical and surgical
distress patients
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
519
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 520
TABLE 14–3
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF THE DELIBERATIVE
NURSING PROCESS (continued)
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effect of research-based nursing interven- Spouses of patients in a coronary care unit Dracup & Breu, 1978
tions on spouses’ needs
Effect of experimental and control educa- Patients with hypertension Powers & Wooldridge,
tional programs on blood pressure 1982
Effects of an experimental nursing inter- Spouses of hospitalized surgical patients Silva, 1979
vention of information-giving and psycho-
logical support and a control nursing
intervention on spouses’ anxiety and atti-
tudes toward hospitalization
Effect of an experimental interpersonal Hospitalized medical patients Pride, 1968
nursing approach and a control nursing
approach on patients’ hospital-related
stress (urine potassium output, anxiety)
Effect of Orlando’s nursing process on ex- Hospitalized adult medical and surgical Dye, 1963
ploration of patients’ distress patients
Effect of Orlando’s nursing process on Renal transplant clinic patients 1 year or more Nelson, 1978
identification of patient concerns after transplant
Effects of an experimental patient-centered Patients admitted to an emergency depart- Anderson et al., 1965
admission process and a control admis- ment
sion process on patients’ behaviorally Patients admitted to a mental hospital
displayed distress, systolic blood pres-
sure, and pulse rate
Effects of an individualized nursing approach Patients admitted for elective gynecologic Elms, 1964
and two control nursing approaches on pa- surgery Elms & Leonard, 1966
tients’ systolic blood pressure, radial pulse
rate, respiratory rate, and oral temperature
Effect of psychological preparation for sur- Gynecologic surgical patients Dumas, 1963
gery on preoperative patient distress
Effect of experimental and control psycho- Gynecologic surgical patients Dumas & Leonard, 1963
logical preparation for surgery on postop- Dumas et al., 1965
erative vomiting
Effects of an experimental nursing interven- Hospitalized children and their parents Wolfer & Visintainer,
tion of systematic psychological prepara- 1975
tion and continued supportive care and a
control intervention on children’s distress,
cooperation, and posthospital adjustment
problems and parents’ anxiety and satis-
faction with information and nursing care
Effect of a nondirective, patient-centered Pregnant women in labor Tryon, 1962
nursing approach and a control nursing Tryon & Leonard, 1964
approach on effectiveness of the prede-
livery enema
520
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 521
TABLE 14–4
ORLANDO’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY
OBSERVATIONS
Observations encompass any and all information pertaining to a patient that the nurse acquires while
on duty.
Observations are the raw material with which the nurse makes and implements plans for the patient’s care.
ACTIONS
Clinical Protocols
Clinical protocols contain the specific requirements for the Deliberative Nursing Process
The nurse may express and explore any aspect of his or her reaction to the patient’s behavior—perception, thought,
or feeling.
If exploration of one aspect of the nurse’s reaction does not result in identification of the patient’s need for help, an-
other aspect of the reaction can be explored.
If exploration of all aspects of the nurse’s reaction does not yield a verbal response from the patient, the nurse may
use negative expressions to demonstrate continued interest in the patient behavior and to give the patient permis-
sion to respond with his or her own negative reaction.
Examples of negative expressions by the nurse:
• “Is it that you don’t think I’ll understand?”
• “Am I wrong?”
• “It looked like that procedure was very painful, and you didn’t say a word about it.”
Direct Help
The nurse meets the patient’s need directly when the patient is unable to meet his or her own need and when
the activity is confined to the nurse-patient contact.
Indirect Help
The nurse meets the patient’s need indirectly when the activity extends to arranging the services of a person,
agency, or resource that the patient cannot contact by himself or herself.
REPORTING
The nurse receives reports about the patient’s behavior from other nurses and from other health
professionals.
The nurse reports his or her observations of the patient’s behavior to other nurses and other health
professionals.
(continued)
523
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 524
TABLE 14–4
ORLANDO’S PRACTICE METHODOLOGY (continued)
RECORDING
The nurse records the nursing process, including:
• The nurse’s perception of or about the patient.
• The nurse’s thought or feeling about the perception.
• What the nurse said or did to, with, or for the patient.
Constructed from Orlando, 1961, pp. 6–9, 31–36, 42; 1972, p. 56.
mented that nursing administrators at New Hampshire evident—the recognition, expression, and exploration of
Hospital, a large psychiatric hospital in Concord, New Perceptions, Thoughts, and Feelings can occur in any
Hampshire, were beginning to plan to use Orlando’s theory professional nursing situation. The only resources needed
for clinical supervision. When the theory is extended be- are the time and personnel required for proper training.
yond patients, all references to the patient and patient’s be- Furthermore, nurses have the legal ability to apply the
havior are modified to focus on the individual of interest, Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process in practice
such as a staff nurse or a supervisee. and to measure the effectiveness of theory-based nursing
The feasibility of implementing practice protocols that actions.
reflect the Deliberative Nursing Process is almost self- Potter and Tinker (2000) claimed that the use of
TABLE 14–5
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF THE DELIBERATIVE
NURSING PROCESS
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations.
524
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 525
Orlando’s theory at New Hampshire Hospital, “empowers bution to nursing knowledge development by explicating a
nurses not only to survive, but also to thrive in an unstable middle-range predictive theory that specifies a nursing
[health care] environment” (p. 41). They pointed out that process that will meet a person’s immediate need for help.
use of the theory is a cost-effective intervention that allows “There is no doubt,” as Schmieding (1990) pointed out,
nurses to maximize the time they can spend with patients. “that Orlando’s formulations … have had substantial in-
They went on to explain, “Because nurses can use the [the- fluence on the nursing education, practice, research, and
ory] even with time, energy, and financial constraints, they literature that followed [the publication of her theory in
can reduce frustration associated with ‘doing more with 1961]” (p. xviii). Furthermore, use of Orlando’s theory
less’” (p. 41). helps nurses to “rediscover their unique contribution to
Use of the Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process is patient care—meeting the patient’s immediate needs”
compatible with patients’ expectations of nursing practice; (Potter & Tinker, 2000, p. 41). Despite the already impres-
there are no reports to date of patients’ discomfort or dis- sive evidence of the empirical adequacy and pragmatic ad-
satisfaction when the Deliberative Nursing Process has equacy of the Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process,
been used. Indeed, a review of the many examples given in continued study is needed to determine if, as Orlando
Orlando’s (1961, 1972) books revealed that patients and (1972) predicted, “training in the process discipline is di-
staff uniformly reported satisfaction when a nurse used the rectly relevant to the effectiveness of a nursing system de-
Deliberative Nursing Process. Potter and Tinker (2000) re- signed to improve the care of patients on a massive scale”
ported that nurses who use Orlando’s theory felt satisfied (p. 126).
with their practice.
Many of the studies designed to test the Theory of the
Deliberative Nursing Process have included a comparison REFERENCES
of outcomes when the Deliberative Nursing Process was
used and when it was not used (see Table 14–2). The actual Anderson, B., Mertz, H., & Leonard, R. (1965). Two experimental
beneficial outcomes of the use of the Deliberative Nursing tests of a patient-centered admission process. Nursing Research,
Process and its problem-solving effectiveness have been 14, 151–156.
documented extensively by Orlando (1972) and other in- Barron, M.A. (1966). The effects varied nursing approaches have
vestigators and practitioners (see Tables 14–2 and 14–5). on patients’ complaints of pain [Abstract]. Nursing Research, 15,
90–91.
Orlando (1961, 1972) has explained that application of the
Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process yields im- Bochnak, M.A. (1963). The effect of an automatic and delibera-
tive process of nursing activity on the relief of patients’ pain: A
provement in the Patient’s Behavior (or the behavior of a clinical experiment [Abstract]. Nursing Research, 12, 191–192.
staff nurse or other person) because when one individual
Burgess, A.W. (1997). Psychiatric nursing. In A.W. Burgess (Ed.),
in a person-to-person contact expresses and explores his or Psychiatric nursing: Promoting mental health (pp. 10–25).
her own immediate reaction, the other individual in the Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
contact is more able to do the same. Consequently, a more Cameron, J. (1963). An exploratory study of the verbal responses
reliable database is available for professional action and de- of the nurses in 20 nurse-patient interactions [Abstract]. Nursing
cision making, and the person’s immediate need for help is Research, 12, 192.
more likely to be met. In effect, problems are solved. Dumas, R., & Leonard, R.C. (1963). The effect of nursing on the
incidence of postoperative vomiting. Nursing Research, 12,
12–15.
CONCLUSION Dumas, R.G. (1963). Psychological preparation for surgery.
American Journal of Nursing, 63(8), 52–55.
Continuing interest in the Theory of the Deliberative Dye, M. (1963). A descriptive study of conditions conducive to an
Nursing Process is attested to by the reprinting of effective process of nursing activity [Abstract]. Nursing Research,
Orlando’s 1961 book in 1990. Furthermore, the theory 12, 194.
continues to be cited in psychiatric nursing textbooks. Elms, R.R., & Leonard, R.C. (1966). Effects of nursing approaches
For example, Burgess (1997) noted that the Theory of during admission. Nursing Research, 15, 39–48.
the Deliberative Nursing Process is regarded as an excep- Faulkner, S. (1963). A descriptive study of needs communicated
tionally influential theory in contemporary psychi- to the nurse by some mothers on a postpartum service [Abstract].
atric nursing. International interest in the theory is Nursing Research, 12, 26.
documented by translations of the 1961 book into Faust, C. (2002). Clinical outlook. Orlando’s deliberative nursing
Japanese, Hebrew, French, Portuguese, and Dutch process theory: A practice application in an extended care facility.
(Orlando Pelletier, 1990). Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 28(7), 14–18.
Orlando has made a substantial and significant contri- Fischelis, M. (1963). An exploratory study of labels nurses attach
14Fawcett-14 09/17/2004 2:25 PM Page 526
Chapter 15
Peplau’s Theory of
Interpersonal Relations
528
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:26 PM Page 529
Philosophical Claims About Nurses and Nursing Philosophical Claims About the Nurse-Patient
Relationship
● The kind of person each nurse becomes makes a sub-
stantial difference in what each patient will learn as he is ● The nurse-patient relationship is the primary human
nursed throughout his experience with illness (Peplau, contact that is central in a fundamental way to providing
1952, p. xii). nursing care (Peplau, 1997, p. 163).
● Fostering personality development in the direction of ● The nurse-patient relationship is always unique as to
maturity is a function of nursing and nursing educa- process and outcome (Peplau, 1997, p. 167).
tion; it requires the use of principles and methods that ● The nurse-patient relationship is dependent upon
permit and guide the process of grappling with everyday both the nurse’s style and the theoretical concepts the
interpersonal problems or difficulties (Peplau, 1952, nurse has, as well as the intellectual and interper-
p. xii). sonal competencies which are employed (Peplau, 1997,
● The professional and personal growth of the nurse p. 167).
requires changes in his or her own behavior (Peplau, ● Every nurse-patient relationship is an interpersonal situ-
1992, p. 14). ation in which recurring difficulties of everyday living
● Nurses do not have the power to change the behavior of arise (Peplau, 1952, p. xiii).
patients (Peplau, 1992, p. 14). ● The relationship of professional to patient (client) is not
● Unwitting “illness-maintenance” by nurses is unaccept- the same as more common social relationships (Peplau,
able behavior for a professional (Peplau, 1992, p. 14). 1997, p. 163).
● The nursing process is educative and therapeutic when ● The nurse needs information about the patient’s difficul-
nurse and patient can come to know and to respect each ties for the purpose of providing expert nursing care.
other, as persons who are alike, and yet, different, as Data from the patient about the immediate situation is a
persons who share in the solution of problems (Peplau, major source, superior to case history data, nursing his-
1952, p. 9). tory data, and other sources of information, which the
nurse also uses (Peplau, 1992, p. 14).
Philosophical Claims About Interpersonal Relations
● The interaction of nurse and patient is fruitful when a
method of communication that identifies and uses com-
● Interpersonal relationships … are person-to-person in- mon meanings is at work in the situation (Peplau, 1952,
teractions that have structure and content and also are p. 284).
situation-dependent (Peplau, 1994, p. 10). ● To encourage the patient to participate in identifying
● People need relationships with other persons (Peplau, and assessing his problem is to engage him as an active
1997, p. 166). partner in an enterprise of great concern to him.
● Relationships constitute the social fabric of life (Peplau, Democratic method applied to nursing requires patient
1997, p. 166). participation (Peplau, 1952, p. 23).
● Interpersonal relationships are the bedrock of quality of
life (Peplau, 1994, p. 13). Philosophical Claims Undergirding Peplau’s Clinical
● Interpersonal relationships are important throughout Methodology
the entire life span (Peplau, 1994, p. 13).
● Relationship behavior tends to organize around how ● What goes on between people can be noticed, studied,
each person thinks of self (Peplau, 1997, p. 163). explained, understood, and if detrimental changed
● In an interpersonal relationship there is always interac- (Peplau, 1992, p. 14).
tion between the expectations and perceptions of one ● [Three] clearly discernible phases in the [nurse-patient]
person—such as a patient, and the actual behavior of relationship … are to be thought of as interlocking
others (Peplau, 1997, p. 166). (Peplau, 1952, p. 17).
● At their best, relationships confirm self worth, provide a ● [The phases of the nurse-patient relationship] can be
sense of connectedness with others, and support self- recognized; they enter into every total nursing situation
esteem (Peplau, 1997, p. 166). (Peplau, 1952, p. 17).
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:26 PM Page 531
Sellers (1991) initially maintained that Peplau’s theory “es- processes in the direction of creative, constructive, produc-
pouses the behaviorist philosophy of the medical model. tive, personal, and community living” (p. 12). Peplau
Her [theory] exemplifies a mechanistic, deterministic, per- (1952) defined nursing as
sistence … view” (p. 141). Peplau (1989 [original work pre-
a significant, therapeutic, interpersonal process. It functions
sented 1954]), however, rejected that characterization by co-operatively with other human processes that make health
explicitly stating that her work is dynamic rather than possible for individuals in communities. In specific situations
mechanistic. Mechanistic theories, according to Peplau, are in which a professional health team offers health services,
“largely partial, one-sided. [They] depend … on spectator nurses participate in the organization of conditions that facil-
observations made by an individual who presumes detach- itate natural ongoing tendencies in human organisms.
ment from the individual studied” (p. 9). In contrast, as Nursing is an educative instrument, a maturing force, that
Peplau pointed out, dynamic theories require participant aims to promote forward movement of personality in the di-
observation and consider data from both the nurse- rection of creative, constructive, productive, personal, and
observer and the patient, which are essential features of the community living (p. 16).
Theory of Interpersonal Relations. These features, along Consequently, the aim of professional nursing practice
with scrutiny of Peplau’s philosophical claims, indicate that for Peplau (1992) is “to assist patients to become aware of
the theory is most closely aligned with the reciprocal inter- and to solve their problems that interfere with constructive
action world view, with an emphasis on the elements of to- living” (p. 15).
tality that are incorporated into that perspective. Indeed, Peplau (1997) identified clear distinctions between
Forchuk (1991a) indicated that Peplau’s work reflects the nursing and medicine, as well as certain complementary
totality world view, and Sellers (1991) ultimately reached features. She commented:
the same conclusion.
Physicians are mainly concerned about the incidence, etiology,
diagnosis, and treatment of disease. The information which
Conceptual Model their work requires obtains largely through physical examina-
tion and tests which patients undergo.… Much of the medical
theoretical framework flows from anatomy, pathology, physi-
Harry Stack Sullivan’s theory of interpersonal relations ology, biology, chemistry, genetics—the “hard sciences.” The
provided a strong conceptual base for Peplau’s theory. She relationship (often brief) of physician to patient is largely
explained that she had studied Sullivan’s work during the scripted by the treatment, based on diagnosis and laboratory
1930s and 1940s and used it as a starting point for her the- findings. Nurses collaborate in carrying out orders and in
ory. Since 1948, however, her work has been “derived from health teaching related to the medical treatment. However,
extensive study of data from clinical work primarily with the nurse-patient relationship is unscripted. It is dependent
psychiatric patients” (Peplau, 1992, p. 13). largely upon the conceptual knowledge which each nurse has
Peplau (1992) regarded the human being as a client about the patient’s presenting data and the phenomena in the
or patient who merits “all of the humane considerations: domain of nursing. This knowledge is in the nurse’s head,
available for recall and application during the interaction. It is
respect, dignity, privacy, confidentiality, and ethical care”
this kind of intellectual work by nurses that can transform
(p. 14). She went on to say that “patient-persons … have nurse-patient interactions into a learning event for patients.
problems of one kind or another for which expert nursing Much of the current nursing knowledge framework flows
services are needed or sought” (p. 14). She regarded the from the social sciences—the “soft sciences”—psychology,
nurse as a professional with particular expertise. sociology, and the humanities, with some uses of other basic
Peplau did not devote much attention to the environ- sciences, such as biology. This may change when nursing
ment, although she noted the importance of culture on the science is fully developed (pp. 165–166).
formation of personality. In particular, she stated that “it is
the interaction of cultural forces with the characteristic ex-
pression of a particular infant’s biological constitution that Antecedent Knowledge
determines personality” (Peplau, 1952, p. 163). She also
commented, “Increasingly, multi-ethnicity is a factor in the Peplau explicitly acknowledged the influence of Harry
contemporary world as well as in health-care systems; Stack Sullivan and his followers on her ideas. In the preface
therefore, nurses need … to obtain information from pa- to her 1952 book, she stated:
tients about cultures other than their own” (Peplau, 1997, The author wishes to express great indebtedness for indirect
p. 162). help gained through the written works of the late Dr. Harry
Health, according to Peplau (1952), “has not been Stack Sullivan and for direct assistance growing out of study
clearly defined; it is a word symbol that implies forward with Dr. Erich Fromm, various members of the professional
movement of personality and other ongoing human staff of the William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry and
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:26 PM Page 532
On Admission
ORIENTATION PHASE
TERMINATION PHASE
SUBPHASE
During Convalescence
EXPLOITATION
and Rehabilitation
SUBPHASE
On Discharge
Working Phase
PHASES IN Orientation Identification
NURSING Phase Subphase
RELATIONSHIP Exploitation
Subphase
Termination Phase
FIGURE 15–2. Phases and changing roles in the nurse-patient relationship. (Adapted
from Peplau, H.E. (1952). Interpersonal relations in nursing: A conceptual frame of refer-
ence for psychodynamic nursing (p. 54). New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, with permission.
Reprinted 1989. London: Macmillan Education. Reprinted 1991. New York: Springer.)
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:26 PM Page 535
are reactivated and new ones created by challenges in a new response to the patient’s gradual assumption of the role of
situation” (p. 41). adolescent (see Fig. 15–2). As a resource person, the nurse
The nurse’s initial role in the Orientation Phase is that gives “specific, needed information that aids the patient to
of stranger, acted out with the patient who is also in the understand [the] health problem and the new situation”
role of stranger (see Fig. 15–2). “A stranger,” Peplau (1952) (Peplau, 1952, p. 21). As a counselor, the nurse uses inves-
explained, “is an individual with whom another individual tigative inquiry and listens attentively to the patient as he
is not acquainted” (p. 44). As the Orientation Phase pro- or she narrates and reviews the events that led up to hospi-
gresses, the patient may assume the role of infant and, talization and feelings connected with these events. And as
therefore, cast the nurse into a surrogate role, especially a leader, the nurse acts in a democratic, rather than auto-
that of unconditional mother. Peplau (1989 [original work cratic or laissez-faire, manner. As a surrogate for mother,
presented 1965]) maintained that although the parental father, sibling, or other person, the nurse aids the patient by
role may not be useful in some situations, “this surrogate permitting reenactment and examination of older feelings
role may be the logical one for the nurse to fulfill … if the about prior relationships.
patient is acutely ill and requires continual mothering Peplau (1952) identified certain benefits of progressing
care” (Peplau, 1952, p. 55). through the Identification Subphase. First, “identification
The Working Phase focuses on “patients’ reactions to with a nurse who consistently symbolizes a helping person,
illness and the work to be done by patients toward their de- providing abundant and unconditional care, is a way of
velopment of understanding of themselves, and toward meeting felt needs and overwhelming problems. When ini-
learning what their current health condition requires of tial needs are met they are outgrown and more mature
them” (Peplau, 1997, p. 164). Overall, “the work of the needs arise” (p. 41). And second, “when a nurse permits pa-
nurse is broad-based and employs a variety of roles to be tients to express what they feel, and still get all of the nurs-
taken by the nurse [see Fig. 15–2]” (Peplau, 1997, p. 164). ing that is needed, then patients can undergo illness as an
One role is the provider of physical care. “This aspect of in- experience that reorients feelings and strengthens positive
terpersonal communication … [which involves] privileged forces in personality” (p. 31).
access to the naked body of patients,” Peplau (1997) ex- During the Exploitation Subphase, “the main difficulty
plained, “taps into the needs of patients for respect and seems to be that of trying to strike a balance between a
dignity and conversely the need to avoid felt shame, em- need to be dependent, as during serious illness, and a need
barrassment, and humiliation” (p. 164). Other roles taken to be independent, as following recovery” (Peplau, 1952,
by nurses throughout the Working Phase include inter- p. 38). The nurse’s tasks during the Exploitation Subphase
viewer, health teacher, and counselor. These and other roles are to understand what initiates shifts in the patient’s be-
are discussed within the context of the subphases of the havior from dependence to independence and to guard
Working Phase. against excessive exploitation on the patient’s part. While
The Working Phase encompasses the Identification in the Exploitation Subphase, the nurse initiates discharge
Subphase and the Exploitation Subphase. During the planning and continues in the roles of counselor, resource
Identification Subphase, Peplau (1952) explained, the nurse person, leader, or surrogate in response to the patient’s role
and the patient come to know and to respect one another, of adolescent (see Fig. 15–2) (Peplau, 1952, 1997).
as persons who have like and different opinions about the The benefits of progressing through the Exploitation
ways of looking at a situation and in responding to events. Subphase include “new differentiations of the problem and
At this time, patients may respond “(1) on the basis of par- … the development and improvement of skill in interper-
ticipation or interdependent relations with a nurse; (2) on sonal relations. [In addition,] new goals to be achieved
the basis of independence or isolation from a nurse; [or] through personal efforts can be projected” (Peplau, 1952,
(3) on the basis of helplessness or dependence upon a pp. 41–42).
nurse” (Peplau, 1952, p. 33). Peplau (1952) went on to say In the Termination Phase, discharge planning is sum-
that the nurse-patient relationship may progress from one marized (Peplau, 1997). The patient’s wish to terminate the
mode of response to another and that all three modes may relationship, however, may not coincide with medical re-
be required to achieve goals. covery (Peplau, 1952). The central task of the Termination
Throughout the Identification Subphase, the nurse uses Phase, then, is the freeing of the patient to move on in life.
professional education and skill to aid the patient to Both nurse and patient must, of course, participate in the
make full use of the relationship, in order to solve the freeing process. As Peplau (1952) explained, “Movement
health problem. Consequently, the nurse may assume sev- from a hospital situation to participation in community
eral roles, frequently moving from unconditional mother life [requires termination] of nurse-patient relations and
surrogate in response to the patient’s roles of infant and the strengthening of personality for new social interde-
child to counselor, resource person, leader, or surrogate in pendent relationships. When [termination] occurs on the
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:26 PM Page 536
Peplau (1997) indicated that she expects the nurse to be The Theory of Interpersonal Relations meets the criterion
aware of each role taken and of movement from one role to of significance. The metaparadigmatic origin of the theory
another. In addition to the roles already discussed in con- was easily inferred from Peplau’s work, although she never
junction with each phase of the Nurse-Patient explicitly addressed that underpinning of the theory.
Relationship, nurses may assume other roles, including Peplau did, however, explicitly identify several philosophi-
technical expert, consultant, health teacher, tutor, social- cal claims undergirding the theory, and others were ex-
izing agent, safety agent, manager of the environment, me- tracted from her publications.
diator, administrator, recorder, observer, and researcher Peplau has always been especially explicit about the
(Peplau, 1952, 1965). The role of technical expert may be conceptual base for her theory, citing Sullivan’s theory of
assumed during any or all of the phases of the Nurse- interpersonal relations and the publications of his work as
Patient Relationship. In this role, the nurse “understands a major source of antecedent knowledge. Indeed, it is diffi-
various professional devices and manipulates them with cult to discern exactly where Sullivan’s theory leaves off
skill and discrimination in the interest of the patient” and Peplau’s theory begins. Inasmuch as Peplau (1969) re-
(Peplau, 1952, p. 22). The role of health teacher also may be garded nursing as an applied science, the lack of a clear dis-
assumed at any time. This role is, according to Peplau tinction between the theories is not surprising.
(1952), “a combination of all [other] roles” (p. 48). In keep- Peplau also acknowledged the contributions of
ing with her focus on the patient, Peplau (1952) advocated Sullivan’s followers to her thinking, although she men-
a teaching style that “always proceeds from what the pa- tioned only Erich Fromm, Frieda Fromm-Reichman,
tient knows and it develops around his interest in wanting and Helena Render by name and did not provide specific
and being able to use additional medical information” citations to their work. She did, however, provide an ex-
(p. 48). Peplau identified the other roles by name, but she tensive bibliography for the many topics she addressed
did not describe them. in her 1952 book, including anxiety, child development,
Although nurses assume many different roles during communication, conflict, frustration, guilt, illness as an
their interactions with patients, they should not assume event, leadership, learning, motivation, needs, parental
certain roles in which patients may try to cast them. In roles, personality, psychopathology, therapeutic methods,
particular, Peplau (1989 [original work presented 1965]) and general methods.
maintained that the roles of chum, friend, protagonist, Especially noteworthy is the enduring nature of the
and sex object are not useful ones for nurses to take. In Theory of Interpersonal Relations. In 1978, Sills pointed
essence, then, professional and not social behavior is re- out that a literature review spanning the then 25 years since
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 537
the publication of Peplau’s book revealed that the theory, tion, identification, exploitation, and resolution. Peplau
with no revisions, was still useful. The theory continues (1989 [original work published 1987]) and later Forchuk
to be useful more than 50 years later, as documented by (1991b) offered a new term—the working phase—that in-
the recent literature cited in the chapter bibliography (see corporates the phases of identification and exploitation.
CD-ROM), as well as the reprinting of Peplau’s 1952 book Peplau (1989 [original work published 1987], 1997)
by Macmillan Education Ltd. in 1989 and by the Springer changed the term for the final phase from resolution to ter-
Publishing Company in 1991. Moreover, Burgess (1997) mination without any explanation.
maintained that the Theory of Interpersonal Relations An area of confusion is introduced in Peplau’s discus-
remains exceptionally influential in contemporary psy- sion of nursing roles. In particular, it is unclear whether
chiatric nursing. Also, Belcher and Fish (2002) pointed the various roles assumed by the nurse are associated with
out that the theory has been so fully integrated into nurs- particular phases of the nurse-patient relationship, or are
ing practice that it is in the realm of “public domain” taken on during all three phases. The former situation is
(p. 78), as did O’ Toole and Welt (1989, p. 365). evident in Figure 15–2, but the latter situation is intro-
Speaking to the significance of her theory, Peplau duced by the following statement:
(1992) stated that the theory is important because “the be-
havior of the nurse-as-a-person has significant impact on During orientation as well as during the other … phases in
the patient’s well-being and the quality and outcome of the total relationship four interlocking nursing functions
nursing care” (p. 14). In addition, Peplau (1994) noted that may operate: (1) The nurse may function in the role of re-
source person. … (2) A nurse may function in a counseling
enhancement of interpersonal relations through the use of relationship. … (3) The patient may cast the nurse into
her theory can enhance a person’s quality of life. roles, such as surrogate for mother, father, sibling. … (4) The
The special significance of the Theory of Interpersonal nurse also functions as a technical expert … (Peplau, 1952,
Relations lies in its contributions to understanding the pp. 21–22).
phases of the nurse-patient relationship. “That knowledge,”
as Sills (1978) explained, “helped give nursing’s moral aspi- The analysis of Peplau’s theory revealed structural consis-
rations a concrete basis which narrowed the gap between tency. The Theory of Interpersonal Relations is a logical
the ideal and the real” (p. 123). product of deduction from Sullivan’s interpersonal theory
Furthermore, Peplau (1992; as cited in Takahashi, 1992) and induction from Peplau’s observations of nursing prac-
pointed out that interpersonal relations theory has led to tice. O’Toole and Welt (1989) commented:
development of various interviewing techniques and psy-
chotherapeutic modalities, including counseling, psy- Peplau’s method of theory development is both inductive and
chotherapy, family therapy, and group therapy. In addition, deductive.… The process of combining induction (observa-
Peplau (1992) claimed that “advanced psychiatric nursing tion and classification) with deduction (the application of
known concepts and processes to data) provides a creative
gained considerable impetus from this theory, as did the nonlinear approach to the formation of ideas: one that uses
clinical specialist movement, particularly in psychiatric the data of practice, as well as extant theories, as the basis of
nursing” (p. 18). those formulations (p. 355).
The Theory of Interpersonal Relations meets the criterion The Theory of Interpersonal Relations meets the criterion
of internal consistency in part. The theory clearly reflects of parsimony. This middle-range descriptive classification
Peplau’s philosophical claims and is logically derived from theory consists of one concept with three dimensions (the
the conceptual model, which is based on Sullivan’s (1953) phases of the Nurse-Patient Relationship), two subdimen-
theory of interpersonal relations. sions (the subphases of the Working Phase of the Nurse-
The Theory of Interpersonal Relations demonstrates Patient Relationship), and the nonrelational propositions
semantic clarity. Peplau provided a clear and concise that are the constitutive definitions of the concept and its
constitutive definition of the concept of Nurse-Patient dimensions and subdimensions.
Relationship and clear constitutive definitions of the In contrast, Forchuk (1991b) regards the Theory of
phases of the nurse-patient relationship. Interpersonal Relations as “quite complex … due to the
However, the theory demonstrates only partial semantic many concepts, subconcepts, and … sub-sub-concepts
consistency. Peplau’s (1952) original work contained four that are interrelated” (pp. 54–55). Indeed, her analysis
distinct phases of the nurse-patient relationship—orienta- of Peplau’s work yielded a complicated structure that
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 538
TABLE 15–1
PEPLAU’S CLINICAL METHODOLOGY FOR NURSING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
OBSERVATION
Purpose is the identification, clarification, and verification of impressions about the interactive drama, of the pushes and
pulls in the relationship between nurse and patient, as they occur.
Participant Observation
Nurse’s Behavior: Observation of the nurse’s words, voice tones, body language, and other gestural messages
Patient’s Behavior: Observation of the patient’s words, voice tones, body language, and other gestural messages
Interpersonal Phenomena: Observation of what goes on between the patient and the nurse
Reframing Empathic Linkages: Occurs when the ability of the nurse, the patient, or both to feel in self the emotions
experienced by the other person in the same situation is converted to verbal communications by the nurse asking,
“What are you feeling right now?”
COMMUNICATION
Aims are (1) the selection of symbols or concepts that convey both the reference, or meaning, in the mind of the individ-
ual, and referent, the object or actions symbolized in the concept; and (2) the wish to struggle toward the develop-
ment of common understanding for words between two or more people.
Interpersonal Techniques
Verbal interventions used by nurses during nurse-patient relationships aimed at accomplishing problem resolution and
competence development in patients.
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 539
RECORDING
The written record of the communication between nurse and patient, that is, the data collected through participant ob-
servation and reframing of empathic linkages.
Aim is to capture the exact wording of the interaction between the nurse and the patient.
Use a form that permits verbatim recording of the nurse’s observations of the patient when initially approached; the
nurse’s opening remarks, feelings, and thoughts about the patient; the patient’s responses; and the nurse’s responses
(see Table 15–2).
Also can use a tape recorder, or nonparticipant observation by another nurse may be used to record interactions.
DATA ANALYSIS
Focuses on testing the nurse’s hypotheses, which are formulated from first impressions or hunches about the
patient.
Phases of the Nurse-Patient Relationship
Identify the phase of nurse-patient relationship in which communication occurred:
Orientation Phase
Working Phase
Identification Subphase
Exploitation Subphase
Termination Phase
ROLES
Identify the roles taken by the nurse and the patient in each phase of the nurse-patient relationship.
RELATIONS
Identify the connections, linkages, ties, and bonds that go on or went on between a patient and others, including family,
friends, staff, or the nurse.
Analyze the relations to identify their nature, origin, function, and mode:
Nature—patterns or themes that represent the patient’s characteristic ways of behaving in interpersonal relations, and
variations in the patterns or themes.
Origin—the history of the interpersonal relation.
Function—the intent, motive, aim, goal, or purpose of the interpersonal relation.
Mode—the form, style, and method of the interpersonal relation.
(continued)
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 540
TABLE 15–1
PEPLAU’S CLINICAL METHODOLOGY FOR NURSING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE (continued)
Pattern Integrations
Identify the patterns of the interpersonal relation between two or more people that together link or bind them and
that enable the people to transform energy into patterns of action that bring satisfaction or security in the face of
a recurring problem.
Determine the type of pattern integration:
Complementary—the behavior of one person fits with and thereby complements the behavior of the other
person.
Mutual—the same or similar behaviors are used by both persons.
Alternating—different behaviors used by two persons alternate between the two persons.
Antagonistic—the behaviors of two persons do not fit but the relationship continues.
Source: Constructed from Peplau, 1952, pp. 290–293; 1989 [original work published 1987], pp. 58–59, 61; 1992, pp. 14–15, 18; 1997, pp.
162–163.
TABLE 15–2
INSTRUMENTS TO RECORD THE NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
Nursing Process Study (Peplau, A form for recording interpersonal relations in nursing.
1952) The form permits recording of the aspects listed here:
Initial observation of a patient’s behavior.
Hypothesis, based on first impressions or hunches about the patient’s behavior.
Plan to study nurse-patient relationships in order to test the hypothesis.
Repeated observations of the patient as the nurse approaches.
Nurse’s opening remarks, feelings, and thoughts about the patient.
Patient’s responses to the nurse’s remarks and attitudes.
Nurse’s responses.
Social Interaction Inventory Measures the nature and type of verbal responses nurses give in emotion-laden
(Methven & Schlotfeldt, 1962; practice situations.
Young et al., 2001)
Therapeutic Behavior Scale (Spring Contains categories of verbal behavior evident in psychiatric nurse therapists’
and Turk, 1962; Young et al., 2001) communications with their patients and yields a therapeutic behavior score.
Empathy Construct Rating Scale Measures empathy, defined as “a central focus and feeling with and in the
(LaMonica, 1981; Young et al., client’s world. [Empathy] involves accurate perception of the client’s world by
2001) the helper, communication of this understanding of the client, and the client’s
perception of the helper’s understanding” (LaMonica, 1981, p. 398).
Relationship Form (Forchuk & Brown, Measures the progress of the nurse-patient relationship through the orientation,
1989; Young et al., 2001) working (identification and exploitation), and resolution (termination) phases.
Stages of Learning Form (Forchuk & Measures the eight stages of learning outlined by Peplau (1963)—observe,
Voorberg, 1991) describe, analyze, formulate, validate, test, integrate, and utilize.
*See the Research Instruments and Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
Although the available evidence supporting the empiri- public domain. For historical and intellectual reasons, it is ex-
cal adequacy of the Theory of Interpersonal Relations is tremely important to credit and evaluate those early contribu-
impressive, and although Peplau’s (1952) work “influenced tions in light of their relevance to our discipline today. It is
the interpersonal nature and direction of clinical work and apparent … that Peplau’s [theory] continue[s] to be germane
studies” (Sills, 1977, p. 203), very few studies that directly to our research and practice (p. 365).
tested the Theory of Interpersonal Relations have been
conducted in the more than 50 years since the theory Clearly, additional systematic research designed to test the
was first articulated (see Table 15–3 and the Doctoral empirical adequacy of the phases of the nurse-patient rela-
Dissertations section of the chapter bibliography on the tionship and their generalizability to diverse practice situa-
CD-ROM). That may be due to the tendency to assume the tions is needed to further determine the empirical
empirical adequacy of theories that are an integral part of adequacy of the Theory of Interpersonal Relations.
the history of nursing theory development. As O’Toole and
Welt (1989) commented: PRAGMATIC ADEQUACY
Peplau’s theoretical ideas … have become a part of the collec-
tive culture of the discipline of nursing. Many commonly The Theory of Interpersonal Relations meets the criterion
understood and assumed ideas basic to nursing stem from of pragmatic adequacy. Peplau has identified the educa-
her work. As we accumulate knowledge, we tend to lose sight tional prerequisites to the use of the theory, and she has
of the individual contributions of the originators of that explained how the theory can be used as a guide for nurs-
knowledge. In other words, it becomes knowledge in the ing practice.
(Text continues on page 544)
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 542
TABLE 15–3
RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Orientation phase of the nurse-patient Clients with chronic mental illness Forchuk, 1992
relationship
Orientation phase of the nurse-patient Newly formed nurse-client dyads Forchuk, 1994
relationship
Case study of a nurse-patient relationship 60-year-old widower living with relatives Santos, 1998
Development of therapeutic nurse-patient Nursing home residents with Williams & Tappen, 1999
relationships Alzheimer’s disease
Advanced practice nurses
Case study of concerns that need to be A man with AIDS Gauthier, 2000
addressed
Perceptions of the effects of a liver transplant Patients attending an out-patient Robertson, 1999
on quality of life clinic ⭓1 year after liver transplant
Hallucinatory experiences of secluded Adult psychiatric inpatients Kennedy et al., 1994
psychiatric patients
Teaching psychiatric patients about anxiety Group of young females with Hays, 1961
schizophrenia
Validation of the nursing diagnosis anxiety Registered nurses Whitley, 1988
Pattern integrations Young depressed women Beeber, 1996
Beeber & Caldwell, 1996
Assessment of depression Postpartal women Almond, 1996
Feasibility of a depressive symptom screening Women in a primary care setting Beeber & Charlie, 1998
and intervention initiative
Description of negative thoughts experienced Depressed women Peden, 2000
by women with major depression
Process of recovering from depression Women recovering from depression Peden, 1992, 1993, 1996
Strategies used by women recovering from Women recovering from depression Peden, 1994
depression
Experiences of parenting Parents of at least one child who had Jacobson, 1999
completed high school and who had
positive parenting processes
Patterns that influence adolescent females’ Grade 9 Canadian female adolescents Michael, 1998
nicotine smoking and behavior
Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of Registered nurses Lund & Frank, 1991
psychiatric patients’ reasons for Adult psychiatric patients
medication noncompliance
Perception of stressful experiences Student nurses Garrett et al., 1976
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations.
542
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 543
CORRELATIONAL STUDIES
Factors influencing the length of the orienta- Newly formed nurse-client dyads Forchuk, 1995a
tion phase of the nurse-patient relationship
Factors influencing movement from the Nurse-client dyads Forchuk et al., 1998
orientation to the working phase of the
nurse-patient relationship
Factors influencing the uniqueness of the Nurses and clients Forchuk, 1995b
nurse-client relationship
Relation of helping and hampering influences Nurses working in a tertiary care Forchuk et al., 2000
to the nature and progression of the psychiatric hospital
nurse-patient relationship
Factors associated with depressive Young women Beeber, 1998
symptoms
Relation between self-esteem and depressive Female college students Peden et al., 2000a
symptoms, as mediated by negative
thinking
Relation between trait anxiety and Senior year baccalaureate nursing Kim,. 2003
anxiety-provoking clinical experiences students
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effects of continued and control type of Female surgical patients Vogelsang, 1990
contact during the perioperative period
on patients’ readiness to return home
and satisfaction with nursing care
Effects of an individualized nursing approach Patients admitted for elective Elms & Leonard, 1966
and two control nursing approaches on gynecologic surgery
patients’ systolic blood pressure, radial
pulse rate, respiratory rate, and oral
temperature
Effects of a group intervention to reduce Female college students at risk for Peden, 1998
negative thinking depression Peden et al., 2000b
Peden et al., 2001
Effect of patient education on management Insulin-dependent diabetic patients Delpech, 2000
of self-care waste
(continued)
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 544
TABLE 15–3
RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS (continued)
TABLE 15–4
NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
Phases of the nurse- A 23-year-old woman with multiple physical and O’Brien & Smith, 1991
patient relationship psychosocial problems
A 32-year-old woman who was admitted to a chemi- Belcher & Fish, 2002
cal dependency unit for alcohol abuse
A 42-year-old man with shortness of breath— Runtz & Urtel, 1983
outpatient clinic
A man with acquired AIDS and his fiancée Harding, 1995
A man with hemophilia and AIDS and his wife Hall, 1994
Patients with depression Bird, 1992
Stark, 1992
A 28-year-old man with diabetes Nordal & Soto, 1980
A 54-year-old woman with metastatic cancer
A 56-year-old man with a stroke
An 80-year-old woman who had attempted suicide Doncliff, 1994
following the death of a close friend
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations. (continued)
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 546
TABLE 15–4
NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS (continued)
problems, it may “be useful when nurses use health teach- sided. The nurse and the patient cannot work together to
ing to help patients understand [the medical] aspects of become more knowledgeable, develop goals, and mature”
their health problem” (Peplau, 1992, p. 13). (p. 388). Williams and Tappen (1999), however, found that
Still other questions regard the applicability of the the- 83% of the patients with middle or late stage Alzheimer’s
ory when communication between nurses and patients is disease in their study formed therapeutic relationships
limited, such as with individuals who are senile, uncon- with nurses. Therapeutic nurse-patient relationships were
scious, or comatose or with newborn infants (Belcher & not formed primarily when patients had speech difficulties
Fish, 2002; Howk, 2002). Howk (2002) commented, “In or did not speak at all.
such situations, the nurse-patient relationship is often one- The feasibility of implementing clinical protocols that
546
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 547
reflect the theory is evident in the reports of nursing prac- ● Encourage the patient to formulate from the descriptive
tice guided by the Theory of Interpersonal Relations (see data the probable immediate, situational causes for the
Table 15–4). The requisite resources typically are limited to increase in his or her anxiety.
the time and personnel required for training in the use of
the Clinical Methodology. Rationale
Peplau (1989 [original work presented 1965]) identified
the content and criteria for practice protocols derived from
● In keeping with the Theory of Interpersonal Relations,
the Theory of Interpersonal Relations that listed here. the nursing personnel focus their efforts on maintaining
the patient’s awareness of the anxiety and connecting it
to his or her anxiety-relieving behavior.
Content
Nurses have the legal ability to implement practice proto-
● What to observe cols derived from the Theory of Interpersonal Relations
● What to do as a consequence of the observation and to measure the effectiveness of theory-based nursing
● A rationale for what is to be done actions. Indeed, Peplau (1952) maintained that “the nurs-
ing profession has legal responsibility for the effective use
Criteria of nursing and for its consequences to patients” (p. 6). In a
later publication, Peplau (1985) commented that “advances
● The situation should be structured so that the patient is in professional practice have, in part, been the result of a
clear about the nurse’s intentions. sensible balance between self-regulation and external con-
● The nurse should behave like an expert. trols” (p. 141). She went on to express her concern that “the
● The nurse should show appreciation for what the patient privilege of self-regulation is being given away or taken
is up against. away” (p. 141) and urged nurses to guard against further
● The nurse should provide opportunities for the patient erosion of self-regulation.
to check the meaning of experiences. The extent to which nursing practice based on the
Peplau also developed specific protocols for such practice Theory of Interpersonal Relations is compatible with ex-
problems as anxiety, loneliness, and learning (Peplau, 1955, pectations for nursing practice is being explored. Bristow
1962, 1963). Other practice protocols derived from the and Callaghan (1991) found that the application of
Theory of Interpersonal Relations include Morrison’s Peplau’s theory significantly improved nurses’ use of the
(1992) protocol for clinical nurse specialist practice in an nursing process 3 months after its implementation in a
inpatient psychiatric unit and Forchuk and co-workers’ large psychiatric hospital in England. Staff nurse satisfac-
(1989) protocol for a community mental health promotion tion, however, changed very little and patient satisfaction
program targeted to chronically mentally ill clients who decreased. Commenting on their findings, Bristow and
live in boarding homes. An example of a protocol that Callaghan (1991) stated:
Peplau (1962, pp. 53–54) designed to abate a patient’s se- Patient satisfaction is adversely affected, perhaps because of
vere anxiety is given here. the increasing administrative tasks of the [theory] which take
nurses away from patients. As the [theory] emphasizes the
What to Observe partnership between the nurse and the patient, the added re-
sponsibility expected from the patient may invoke an increase
● Observe the patient’s anxiety-related behaviors in stress. Patients whose very problems may stem from diffi-
culties in assuming responsibilities for their activities of living
What to Do as a Consequence of the Observation may see this stress as a deterioration in their health and thus
in their satisfaction with nursing care (p. 40).
● Encourage the patient to identify the anxiety as such.
This is done by having all personnel help the patient to Conversely, Vogelsang (1990) reported that women who
recognize what he or she is experiencing at the point experienced a Theory of Interpersonal Relations–based
when he or she is actually anxious. nursing intervention of continued contact with a familiar
● Encourage the patient to connect the relief-giving pat- nurse from preadmission through postoperative awaken-
terns that he or she uses to the anxiety that requires ing to consciousness reported greater satisfaction with
such relief. nursing than women who had received a control nursing
● Encourage the patient to provide himself or herself and intervention of contact with various nurses throughout the
the nurse with data descriptive of situations and interac- perioperative period.
tions that occur immediately before an increase in anxi- Belcher and Fish (2002) maintained that use of the
ety is noticed. Theory of Interpersonal Relations “directly improves
15Fawcett-15 09/17/2004 2:27 PM Page 548
Chapter 16
Watson’s Theory
of Human Caring
553
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 554
ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY Caring (1979), Nursing: Human Science and Human Care:
OF HUMAN CARING A Theory of Nursing (1985), “Watson’s Theory of
Transpersonal Caring” (1996), “The Theory of Human
This section presents an analysis of Watson’s theory. The Caring: Retrospective and Prospective” (1997), Postmodern
analysis is based on Watson’s publications about her the- Nursing and Beyond (1999), and “Jean Watson: Theory of
ory, especially Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Human Caring” (2001).
554
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 555
SCOPE OF THE THEORY Watson’s philosophical claims take the form of values
about human care and human caring, assumptions about
The central thesis of the Theory of Human Caring is that those values, assumptions about caring and about the
“humans cannot be treated as objects, [and] that humans transpersonal caring relationship, and statements about
cannot be separated from self, other, nature, and the larger nursing that can be considered philosophical in nature.
universe” (Watson, 1997, p. 50). Watson (1989b) claimed Her values about human care and caring are expressed
that her theory encompasses the whole of nursing; the throughout the 1985 book and later in the 1996 book chap-
emphasis, however, is placed on the interpersonal process ter. In addition, Watson (1985, 1996) identified several
between the caregiver and the care recipient. In particular, assumptions about human care and caring values and
the theory focuses on “the centrality of human caring nursing. More recently, Watson (1999, 2001) identified as-
and on the caring-to-caring transpersonal relationship and sumptions about caring and nursing (1999) and about the
its healing potential for both the one who is caring and transpersonal caring relationship (2001). All of those val-
the one who is being cared for” (Watson, 1996, p. 141). ues and assumptions are listed here.
More specifically, the Theory of Human Caring focuses on
the relation between use of the clinical caritas processes Values About Human Care and Human Caring
and the development of a transpersonal caring relation-
ship within the context of the caring occasion/caring mo- ● Deep respect is accorded the wonder and mysteries of life
ment and caring (healing) consciousness. It is, therefore, (Watson, 1985, pp. 34, 73).
appropriately categorized as a middle-range explanatory ● A spiritual dimension to life and internal power of the
theory. human care process are acknowledged (Watson, 1985,
pp. 34, 73).
● The power of humans to grow and to change is
CONTEXT OF THE THEORY acknowledged (Watson, 1985, pp. 34, 73).
● Nonpaternalistic values are related to human autonomy
Metaparadigm Concepts and Proposition and freedom of choice so to preserve personhood,
human dignity, and humanity at individual and global
Watson has begun to identify the influence of the meta- levels (Watson, 1985, pp. 34, 73).
paradigm of nursing on her work. In particular, Watson ● A high regard and reverence is accorded the unfolding
(1996) regards human caring as “an ethic, an ontology, and subjective-inner-life world of self and other(s) (Watson,
a critical starting point for nursing’s raison d’être” (p. 143). 1985, pp. 34, 73).
A review of her publications led to the conclusion that the ● A high value is placed on subjectivity-intersubjectivity as
Theory of Human Caring, per se, focuses on the metapara- evidenced, in a reciprocal relationship between nurse
digm concepts of human beings and nursing. The meta- and other(s), by consciousness; intentionality; percep-
paradigm proposition of interest is the nursing actions or tions and lived experiences related to caring, healing, and
processes that are beneficial to human beings. health-illness conditions in a given caring moment; and
experiences or meanings that transcend the moment and
go beyond the actual experience (Watson, 1985, 1996).
Philosophical Claims ● Emphasis is placed on helping other(s), through ad-
vanced nursing caring-healing modalities, to gain more
Analysis of Watson’s publications revealed that the self-knowledge, self-control, and even self-healing po-
Theory of Human Caring is based on a humanitarian, tential, regardless of the health-illness condition
metaphysical, spiritual-existential, and phenomenologi- (Watson, 1985, 1996).
cal orientation that draws from Eastern philosophy. ● A high value is placed on the relationship between the
Watson (1989b) regards her theory as metaphysical. She nurse and other(s), with all parties viewed as copartici-
explained that “it goes beyond the rapidly emerging pants in the human care process (Watson, 1985).
existential-phenomenological approaches in nursing, to ● Caring is acknowledged as the highest form of commit-
perhaps a higher level of abstraction and sense of person- ment to self, to other, to society, to environment, and, at
hood, incorporating the concept of the soul and transcen- this point in human history, even to the universe
dence” (p. 221). Accordingly, Watson’s evolving ideas and (Watson, 1996, p. 146).
ideals, which are the result of reflective thinking, “are ● If human caring-healing is not sustained as part of our
concerned with spirit rather than matter, flux rather collective values, knowledge, practices, and global mis-
than form, inner knowledge and power, rather than sion, the survival of humankind is threatened (Watson,
circumstance” (p. 219). 1996, p. 147).
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 556
helps another through this process to access the healer ● Human caring can be effectively demonstrated and prac-
within, in the fullest sense of Nightingale’s view of nurs- ticed only interpersonally; however, the process of an
ing (Watson, 2001, p. 348). interpersonal relationship is defined within a transper-
● Ongoing personal-professional development and spiri- sonal context. It transcends each individual and moves in
tual growth and personal spiritual practice assist the concentric circles from self to other, to environment, to
nurse in entering into this deeper level of professional nature, and then to the larger universe (Watson, 1996,
healing practice, allowing the nurse to awaken to the pp. 150–151).
transpersonal condition of the world and to actualize ● Nursing’s social, moral, and scientific contributions to
more fully “ontological competencies” necessary for this humankind lie in its commitment to a human caring-
level of advanced practice of nursing. … Continuous healing ethic and in consciousness of its knowledge,
growth is ongoing for developing and maturing within a practices, and paradigmatic matrix in theory, practice,
transpersonal caring model. The notion of health profes- and research endeavors (Watson, 1996, p. 151).
sionals as wounded healers is acknowledged as part of ● Caring values of nurses and nursing have been sub-
the necessary growth and compassion called forth within merged within contemporary medical systems, which
this theory/philosophy (Watson, 2001, p. 348). are dominated by economics. Nursing and society
are, therefore, in crisis as they try to sustain human car-
Assumptions About Nursing ing ideals and activities in practice. At the same time,
biomedical-technological curing systems proliferate,
● Human caring is the moral ideal and origin for nursing’s without regard to costs or to the caring-healing and
professional role and “calling,” with the goal of protec- health needs of the citizenry (Watson, 1996, p. 150).
tion, enhancement, and preservation of human dignity ● Preservation and advancement of caring-healing and
(Watson, 1985, p. 74; 1996, pp. 145–146). health knowledge and practices are ethical, epistemic,
● Caring is the essence of nursing and the most central and clinical endeavors for all the health sciences. These
and unifying focus for nursing practice (Watson, 1996, issues remain particularly significant for further devel-
p. 150). opment of nursing science and education, and for ad-
● Caring knowledge and actions [are] a serious ontologi- vanced clinical care practices today and into the future
cal, ethical, epistemic, and pragmatic concern for the dis- (Watson, 1996, p. 150).
cipline of nursing (Watson, 1996, p. 146). ● The practice of transpersonal caring-healing requires
● Because nursing phenomena are humans’ and life’s phe- an expanding epistemology and transformative science
nomena, multiple aspects of personal, intuitive, ethical, and art model for further advancement. This practice
empirical, aesthetic, and spiritual dimensions are ac- integrates all ways of knowing. The art and science of
knowledged as foundational to the ontological and epis- a postmodern model of transpersonal caring-healing
temological matrix of the discipline and the profession is complementary to the science of medical curing,
(Watson, 1996, p. 145). modern nursing and medical practices (Watson, 1999,
● As a discipline, nursing has an ethical, social, and scien- p. 103).
tific responsibility to develop new theories and knowl-
edge about caring, healing, and health practices; to Watson (1985) noted that research methodologies
teach them in education and implement them in clinical employed to study transpersonal caring “require a non-
care; and to promulgate them at the ontological, episte- traditional view of science and reside in methods that are
mological, methodological, pedagogical, or praxis level based upon different assumptions about the nature of real-
(Watson, 1996, p. 146). ity, [the] nature of inquirer-object-subject relationship,
● Nursing, as a profession, exists in order to sustain caring, [and the] nature of truth statements” (p. 79). She did not,
healing, and health where, and when, they are threatened however, explicate any of those assumptions.
biologically, institutionally, environmentally, or politi- Watson’s philosophical claims are consistent with hu-
cally, by local, national, or global influences (Watson, manism (Sellers, 1991). Indeed, Watson (1985) explicitly
1996, p. 146). rejected the mechanistic, reductionistic view of the world
● Caring and relationships based on caring are being in favor of a human science perspective. She declared
posited as central components that the public is seek- that “science is emphasized in a human science context”
ing in healing and health outcomes (Watson, 1996, (Watson, 1985, p. 76). Elaborating, Watson (1996), ex-
p. 146). plained that
● Nursing has always held a human-care/caring stance in the context of the [Theory of Human Caring] is both human-
regard to people, society, health-illness, and healing itarian and metaphysical. It calls for a return to reverence and
(Watson, 1996, p. 150). a sense of sacredness with regard to life and human experi-
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 558
Watson (1996) credited her experiences in practice and Analysis of Watson’s 1985 book and her 1996 and 2001
education, along with her philosophical, intellectual, and book chapters revealed that the concepts of the Theory
experiential background as antecedents to the develop- of Human Caring are TRANSPERSONAL CARING
ment of the Theory of Human Caring. More specifically, RELATIONSHIP, CARING MOMENT/CARING OC-
Watson (1985, 1988b, 1989a, 1996, 1997, 2001) noted that CASION, CARING (HEALING) CONSCIOUSNESS,
her theory developed from her own values and beliefs and CLINICAL CARITAS PROCESSES. The concept of
about human beings and life, which were inspired at least TRANSPERSONAL CARING RELATIONSHIP has three
in part by the interpersonal focus of her graduate studies in dimensions—Self, Phenomenal Field, and Intersubjec-
psychiatric–mental health nursing; her doctoral studies in tivity. The concepts of CARING MOMENT/CARING
educational, clinical, and social psychology; and her expe- OCCASION and CARING (HEALING) CONSCIOUS-
riences with other nurses and the indigenous peoples and NESS are unidimensional. The concept of CLINICAL
cultures of New Zealand, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, CARITAS PROCESSES has the 10 dimensions listed
Micronesia, Japan, Korea, the Republic of China, Thailand, here:
India, Egypt, Kuwait, Scandinavia, England, Scotland, Practice of Loving Kindness and Equanimity Within the
Portugal, Brazil, and Canada. She commented: Context of Caring Consciousness
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 561
Being Authentically Present and Enabling and The concept of Transpersonal Caring Relationship is
Sustaining the Deep Belief System and Subjective further described in terms of transactions, which Watson
Life World of Self and One-Being-Cared-For (1985) views as both science and art. She explained that
Cultivation of One’s Own Spiritual Practices and
Transpersonal Self, Going Beyond Ego Self, Opening transpersonal … caring transactions are those scientific, pro-
to Others with Sensitivity and Compassion fessional, ethical, yet esthetic, creative and personalized
giving-receiving behaviors and responses between two people
Developing and Sustaining a Helping-Trusting, Authen- (nurse and other) that allow for contact between the subjec-
tic Caring Relationship tive world of the experiencing persons (through physical,
Being Present To, and Supportive Of, the Expression mental, or spiritual routes or some combination thereof).
of Positive and Negative Feelings as a Connection (p. 58)
With Deeper Spirit of Self and the One-Being-
Cared-For Watson’s emphasis on the art of the Transpersonal Caring
Creative Use of Self and All Ways of Knowing as Part of Relationship is underscored in four statements:
the Caring Process; To Engage in Artistry of Caring-
Healing Practices ● The art of transpersonal caring in nursing as a moral
Engaging in Genuine Teaching-Learning Experience ideal is a means of communication and release of human
that Attends to Unity of Being and Meaning, feelings through the coparticipation of one’s entire self
Attempting to Stay Within Others’ Frames of in nursing (Watson, 1985, p. 70).
Reference ● Collectively, the art of transpersonal caring allows
Creating Healing Environments at All Levels (Physical as humanity to move towards greater harmony, spiritual
well as Non-Physical, Subtle Environment of Energy evolution and perfection (Watson, 1985, p. 70).
and Consciousness, Whereby Wholeness, Beauty, ● The more the art of transpersonal caring in nursing ad-
Comfort, Dignity, and Peace are Potentiated) vances the kinder and more helpful feelings for the
Assisting with Basic Needs, with an Intentional Car- human, the more we can define ideal caring with refer-
ing Consciousness, Administering “Human Care ence to its content and subject matter of nursing
Essentials,” Which Potentiate Alignment of Mind- (Watson, 1985, p. 70).
body-spirit, Wholeness, and Unity of Being in All ● The transpersonal caring process is largely art because of
Aspects of Care, Tending to Both Embodied Spirit the way it touches another person’s soul and feels the
and Evolving Spiritual Emergence emotion and union with another, the goal being the
Opening and Attending to Spiritual-Mysterious, and movement of the person toward a higher sense of self
Existential Dimensions of One’s Own Life-Death; and a greater sense of harmony within the mind, body,
Soul Care for Self and the One-Being-Cared-For and soul (Watson, 1985, p. 71).
indeed is precious. … Caritas conveys … love. (Watson, time (Watson, 1979, 1996); a qualitative philosophy that
2001, p. 345). guides one’s mature life. It is the commitment to and
satisfaction of receiving through giving. It involves the
In her 2001 book chapter, Watson renamed and translated capacity to view humanity with love and to appreciate
what she had previously called carative factors into the diversity and individuality (Watson, 1979, p. 11; 1996).
Clinical Caritas Processes. She explained, “As carative fac- Human caring is grounded on universal humanistic and
tors evolve within an expanding perspective, and as my altruistic values, and the best professional care is pro-
ideas and values evolve, I now offer [a] translation of the moted when the nurse subscribes to such a value system
original carative factors into clinical caritas processes, sug- (Watson, 1989b).
gesting more open ways in which they can be considered” ● Being Authentically Present and Enabling and
(pp. 346–347). She went on to explain, “What differs in the Sustaining the Deep Belief System and Subjective Life
clinical caritas framework [from the carative factors] is that World of Self and One-Being-Cared-For: Translation of
a decidedly spiritual dimension and an overt evocation of the carative factor, Enabling and Sustaining Faith-Hope.
love and caring are merged” (p. 347). Refers to the therapeutic effects of faith and hope in both
The concept of Clinical Caritas Processes refers to nurs- the carative and the curative process (Watson, 1979,
ing interventions, or more precisely, caring processes or 1996). The nurse must instill in the other a sense of faith
caritas processes (Watson, 1985, 2001). Watson (1985) and hope about the treatment and the nurse’s compe-
noted that she found the term, intervention, harsh, me- tence (Watson, 1979).
chanical, and inconsistent with her ideas and ideals, but ● Cultivation of One’s Own Spiritual Practices and
had used the term for pedagogical purposes. Transpersonal Self, Going Beyond Ego Self, Opening to
Watson (1996, 2001) claimed that the Clinical Caritas Others with Sensitivity and Compassion: Translation of
Processes represent the “core” of nursing, which “is the carative factor, Being Sensitive to Self and Others.
grounded in the philosophy, science, and art of caring” Emphasizes the need to recognize one’s feelings and to
(1996, p. 155). She has contrasted the “core” of nursing experience those feelings as a foundation for empathy
with the “trim,” a term she uses to refer to “the practice set- with others (Watson, 1979, 1996). The development of
ting, the procedures, the functional tasks, the specialized sensitivity to self and others plays a part in the nurse’s
clinical focus of disease, technology, and [the] techniques development of self, the ability to utilize the self with
surrounding the diverse orientations and preoccupations others, and the ability to give holistic care (Watson,
of nursing” (Watson, 1997, p. 50). The “trim,” Watson 1979).
(1997) went on to explain, is in no way expendable; it is just ● Developing and Sustaining a Helping-Trusting,
that it cannot be the center of a professional model of nurs- Authentic Caring Relationship: Translation of the cara-
ing. Trim exists in relation to something larger and deeper. tive factor, Developing a Helping-Trusting, Caring
That something deeper is the caring relationship, the Relationship. Focuses on the need to develop an effective
health and healing processes that nurses attend to within a interpersonal relationship with the one cared for
larger professional ethic (p. 50). (Watson, 1979, 1996). This process accomplished when
Watson (1996) maintained that “nurses throughout the nurse views the other as a separate thinking and feel-
time have practiced [the clinical caritas processes] in con- ing being. The attitudinal processes of congruence, or
junction with the trim activities without naming [the clin- genuineness, empathy, and nonpossessive warmth are es-
ical caritas processes] as such” (p. 155). Moreover, Watson sential elements of the helping-trusting, authentic caring
(1996, 2001) regards the clinical caritas processes as the relationship, which is a basic element of high-quality
foundation for “advanced practices and caring modalities nursing care (Watson, 1979).
for healing and health processes and outcomes” (1996, ● Being Present To, and Supportive Of, the Expression of
p. 157). Positive and Negative Feelings as a Connection With
The concept of Clinical Caritas Processes encompasses Deeper Spirit of Self and the One-Being-Cared-For:
ten dimensions (see pages 560 and 561). They are ex- Translation of the carative factor, Promoting and
plained here. Accepting the Expression of Positive and Negative
Feelings and Emotions. Emphasizes the importance
● Practice of Loving Kindness and Equanimity Within the of the expression of both positive and negative feel-
Context of Caring Consciousness: Translation of the ings and the nurse’s acknowledgment and acceptance
carative factor, Forming a Humanistic-Altruistic System of those feelings in the self and in others (Watson, 1979,
of Values. Focuses on the development of a [humanistic 1996); points to the range of feelings and emotions
and altruistic] value system over the period of one’s life- experienced by both nurse and other(s) and the need
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 564
EVALUATION OF THE THEORY the caregiver can become the care receiver. Watson (1989a)
OF HUMAN CARING explained:
The one who is cared for (with expanded aesthetic caring
This section presents an evaluation of Watson’s Theory processes) can experience a release of subjective feelings and
of Human Caring. The evaluation is based on the results thoughts that had been longing and wishing to be released or
of the analysis of the theory, as well as on publications expressed. … Thus, both care provider and care receiver are
by others who have used or commented on this nursing coparticipants in caring; the release can potentiate self-healing
theory. and harmony in both. The release can also allow the one who
is cared for to be the one who cares, through the reflection of
the human condition that in turn nourishes the humanness of
the care provider. (pp. 131–132)
SIGNIFICANCE
The special significance of the Theory of Human Caring
The Theory of Human Caring meets the criterion of lies in the theory’s contributions to understanding a
significance. Watson has begun to focus more explicitly on process that nurses can use to effect positive changes in
the metaparadigmatic origins of the Theory of Human patients’ health states. The theory is a comprehensive de-
Caring, and the metaparadigm concepts and proposition scription of a form of caring that can be used by nurses as
addressed by the theory can be inferred from Watson’s they interact with patients, or in Watson’s terminology, the
publications. Watson clearly explicated the philosophical other, the ones cared for, the care receivers.
claims and conceptual orientation for the theory. Although The special significance of the Theory of Human Car-
she has only begun to label the conceptual model content ing also lies in Watson’s rejection of people as objects.
presented in the analysis section of this chapter as such, Instead, she embraces an orientation that emphasizes
it was possible to extract components of a conceptual “new caring-healing possibilities associated with both
model from her writings. It must be noted, however, that the art and science of transpersonal caring-healing and
the division of statements into philosophical claims and transcendent views of persons in health and illness”
conceptual model seen in the analysis section required (Watson, 1988b, p. 176). Watson’s (1988b) orientation
certain arbitrary decisions. But the need for those deci- leads to a form of nursing that “attends to the human cen-
sions did not come as a surprise inasmuch as Watson ter of both the one caring and the one being cared for”
(1996) explicitly stated that her work can be read as “a phi- (p. 177).
losophy, an ethic, a conceptual model, or a specific theory” The Theory of Human Caring reflects a relatively new
(p. 142). way for Western society to think about the world. That way
Watson explicitly acknowledged the importance of her of thinking is, however, in keeping with ongoing efforts of
own educational experiences and her immersion in other several nurses to advance a science that reflects the com-
cultures, and she cited much of the adjunctive knowledge plexities of human life (see, for example, Fawcett, 2002b).
she drew on from other disciplines. She did not, however, It is likely that not all members of nursing’s scientific and
provide citations for works by Lazarus, Peplau, Marcel, practice communities will agree with the orientation that
Sartre, and Yalom, nor did she cite specific sources of ad- has guided Watson’s work, but she should not be faulted
junctive knowledge from Eastern philosophy. Sarter’s for her ongoing efforts.
(1988) philosophical analysis of Watson’s theory revealed
influences from Vedic, Hindu, and Buddhist philosophies.
In addition, Sarter noted that Watson’s portrayal of har- INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
mony among body, mind, and soul “may have been indi-
rectly derived from some Eastern source such as Taoism” The Theory of Human Caring meets the criterion of inter-
(p. 57). nal consistency in part. Sarter’s (1988) philosophical analy-
A noteworthy feature of the Theory of Human Caring is sis of the Theory of Human Caring raised a question
the attention given to the spiritual aspects of human exis- regarding internal consistency. She pointed out that al-
tence and the soul. Watson’s recent writings place even though Watson would undoubtedly describe her work as
greater emphasis on spirituality (Watson, 1999, 2001; congruent with a holistic perspective, elements of dualism
Watson & Smith, 2002). Another noteworthy feature of are evident. She identified dualism in Watson’s distinctions
the theory is the potential for personal growth by nurses between body, mind, and soul; objective and subjective ex-
as they engage in transpersonal caring relationships. perience; and health and illness. According to Sarter,
Furthermore, through establishment of intersubjectivity, “whenever Watson speaks of harmony among various as-
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 567
pects of human life, there is an implicit dualism” (p. 56). about the precise definition of intersubjectivity because
Similarly, Mitchell and Cody (1992) noted that Watson that term is defined only in conjunction with transpersonal
presented inconsistent views of human beings. They caring.
pointed out that, although Watson claimed that people are Although the language Watson uses may not be clear to
irreducible wholes, she also referred to several selves (real, all readers, she regards the language of her theory as the
inner, ideal) as distinct entities; to the mind, body, spirit, language of nursing, rather than the language of medicine.
and soul; to physical, emotional, and spiritual spheres; and She maintained that
to the “I” and the “me.”
Watson (1992, 1996, 2001) apparently has attempted for this postmodern era, the [clinical caritas processes] pro-
to overcome the charge of dualism and more effectively vide a language for caring that is linked to nursing and core
processes of professional practice. The language of the [di-
convey her idea of a holistic being by using the terms
mensions of the clinical caritas processes] and general caring
“mind-body-spirit” (1992, 1996) and “mind-body-spirit language help to release nursing from its political and practice
unity of being” (2001) in her more recent publications. history of medical language dominance and orientation. The
Furthermore, Watson (1997) explicitly acknowledged that attention to language is especially critical to an evolving disci-
some aspects of her work reflect the totality world view, pline in that during this postmodern era, one’s survival de-
whereas other aspects reflect the simultaneity world view. pends upon having language; writers in this area remind us “if
As her work progresses, it is clear that Watson embraces the you do not have your own language you don’t exist”. (Watson,
simultaneity world view and is attempting to revise the 1997, p. 50)
concepts and propositions of the Theory of Human Caring
to be in keeping with that world view. One particularly Semantic consistency is evident in the consistent use of
noteworthy example is the change from carative factors to most terms. One area of potential confusion, however, is
clinical caritas processes, with concomitant changes in evident in the interchangeable use of the terms transper-
wording of the dimensions of the clinical caritas processes sonal caring and human care relationship throughout
(Watson, 2001). Watson’s (1985) book and the subsequent discussion of
Mitchell and Cody (1992) also pointed out that the components of transpersonal caring as self, phenome-
Watson violated her claim that human beings are free to nal field, actual caring occasion, and intersubjectivity
self-determine and choose. They explained: (pp. 60–61) and the concepts of the human care relation-
ship as phenomenal field, actual caring occasion, and
First, there are references to the nurse’s helping, integrat- transpersonal caring (p. 73). Watson apparently attempted
ing, and “correcting” the patient’s condition to increase har- to overcome confusion in her 2001 book chapter by ex-
mony and to try to find meaning in the situation. Second, plicitly listing the concepts of the Theory of Human Caring
Watson maintains that “ideally [italics added], a person should as Transpersonal Caring Relationship, Clinical Caritas
have the opportunity for self-determination of the meaning
Processes, Caring Occasion/Caring Moment. She added
of a health-illness experience before professionals make deci-
sions [italics added] about treatments and interventions” the concept of Caring (Healing) Consciousness in a sepa-
([Watson], 1985, p. 66). rate section of the chapter. Still another area of potential
confusion is Watson’s use of the terms phenomenal field
Furthermore, although Watson claimed allegiance to (1985) and phenomenal field/unitary consciousness
the human science perspective, her distinction between (2001); caring-healing (1988b), human caring-healing
the person’s experience of the world and the world as it (1992), and transpersonal caring-healing (1988b); caring-
actually is, as well as her suggestion of incongruities healing consciousness (1988b), caring (healing) con-
between the person and nature, are inconsistent with the sciousness (1996), caring-healing consciousness (2001),
human science view that humans cannot be separated caring-healing-loving consciousness (2001), and transper-
from their experienced worlds (Mitchell & Cody, 1992). sonal caring-healing human field-consciousness (1992);
In addition, Watson emphasized the metaphysical, spiri- and actual caring occasion (1985) caring occasion/caring
tual realm, which Mitchell and Cody (1992) noted is in- moment (1996), and caring moment/caring occasion
consistent with the human science view that the lived ex- (2001).
perience is the “primal foundation of human knowledge” Evaluation of the structural consistency of the Theory
(p. 58). of Human Caring revealed no evidence of contradic-
Semantic clarity is evident in the constitutive defini- tions in propositions. The relational propositions ade-
tions and more elaborate descriptions Watson provided quately link the concepts that make up the theory. Absent,
for the concepts of the Theory of Human Caring and most however, is a proposition that links all four concepts of the
of their dimensions. There is, however, some confusion theory.
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 568
TABLE 16–1
WATSON’S DESCRIPTIVE-EMPIRICAL PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH METHOD
PHENOMENON OF INTEREST
The notion of essence, that is, the common intersubjective meaning of the human experience of a certain aspect of
reality.
Anything that can be said about how people perceive, experience, and conceptualize a given human phenomenon.
SOURCE OF DATA
The researcher obtains naive descriptions from people about their experience of a phenomenon.
Research Method (Table 16–2). These two RESEARCH Holmes (1990) questioned the generalizability of
METHODOLOGIES are completely consistent with the Watson’s research methodologies:
philosophical foundation of the Theory of Human Caring.
Watson (1990b) also indicated that the Theory of Unfortunately, Watson adumbrates only one case [in her 1985
Human Caring can be tested by means of illustrations of book], which concerns experiences of grief and loss among
human care and caring as expressed in art and metaphor. Aboriginal people in Western Australia, and it requires a con-
siderable leap of imagination to transpose the technique into
Such methods also are consistent with the philosophical other settings, particularly complex, urbanized ones.
foundation of the theory. None of the methodologies, Nevertheless, it must be regarded as a courageous attempt to
however, is directed toward measurement of the relation explore the phenomenological epoche as a practical tool for
between the Clinical Caritas Processes and the health care purposes, and is a powerful stimulus to innova-
Transpersonal Caring Relationship, which is a central tion. (pp. 192–193)
focus of the Theory of Human Caring.
Watson (1985) advocated the use of the RESEARCH Empirical indicators designed to measure the concepts of
METHODOLOGIES, but she also cautioned that any one the Theory of Human Caring have begun to be developed
method should not supersede the research question. Thus, (Table 16–3). Some instruments have been developed to
although she encouraged investigators to consider “cre- measure the concept of carative factors (now known as the
ative-paradigm transcending” (p. 76) methods that are Clinical Caritas Processes) and the related idea of caring
consistent with human science, rather than quantitative ra- activities. And, the Caring Efficacy Scale represents a step
tionalistic methods that are more consistent with natural toward measurement of the concept of Transpersonal
and medical sciences, she was not dogmatic about a partic- Caring Relationship.
ular method. This is an especially important point to con- It is not appropriate to assume that instruments de-
sider as investigators struggle to identify the best ways not signed to measure the carative factors also measure those
only to describe human life and human conditions from a factors as translated into the Clinical Caritas Processes, es-
human science perspective but also to further develop the- pecially given the “decidedly spiritual” emphasis of those
ories so that predictions may be made with some degree of processes (Watson, 2001, p. 347). Consequently, psychome-
certainty about the effects of nursing interventions on tric testing is needed to determine whether instruments
human life and human conditions from a human science designed to measure the carative factors are valid measures
perspective. of the Clinical Caritas Processes. Noteworthy in this regard
TABLE 16–2
WATSON’S TRANSCENDENTAL-POETIC EXPRESSION OF PHENOMENOLOGY RESEARCH METHOD
PHENOMENON OF INTEREST
The depth of one’s experience, an openness to one’s nature, one’s potential for being.
SOURCE OF DATA
Articulations of experience as felt and lived, which transcend the facts and pure description of the experience.
TABLE 16–3
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PRACTICE TOOLS DERIVED FROM THE THEORY OF HUMAN CARING
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
Caring Behaviors Assessment Tool (Cronin & Measures nurse caring behaviors in terms of the carative
Harrison, 1988; Harrison, 1988; Stanfield, 1992; factors (now known as the clinical caritas processes)
Watson, 2002; Young et al., 2001)
Caring Assessment Tool (Duffy, 1991, 1992; Watson, Measures nurses’ caring activities, in terms of the carative
2002) factors (now known as the clinical caritas processes)
Caring Assessment Tool-Admin (Duffy, 1993; Measures staff nurses’ perceptions of their managers in terms
Watson, 2002) of the carative factors (now known as the clinical
caritas processes)
Caring Assessment Tool-Edu (Watson, 2002) Measures students’ perceptions of faculty caring behaviors
in terms of the carative factors (now known as the clinical
caritas processes)
Caring Behaviors Inventory (Watson, 2002; Measures nurses’ caring behaviors within the context of the
Wolf, 1986; Wolf et al., 1994, 1998; Young carative factors
et al., 2001)
Caring Efficacy Scale (Coates, 1997; Watson, 2002) Assesses the nurse’s belief in his or her ability to express a
caring orientation and to develop caring relationships with
patients
Nyberg Caring Assessment (Attributes) Scale Measures caring attributes, the subjective aspect of caring
(Nyberg, 1989, 1990; Watson, 2002)
Conversation Guide (Nyman & Lützen, 1999 Assessment of needs of women with rheumatoid arthritis,
using open-ended questions for each of the 10 carative
factors
PRACTICE TOOLS
Caring Documentation Instrument (Ekebergh & Permits recording of nurse caring activities
Dahlberg, as cited in Watson, 1996)
Watson’s Carative Factors Redefined, Patients’ Provides a list of each Clinical Caritas Process, along with as-
Subjective Worlds, and Nurses’ Reflections Tool pects of the patient’s subjective world and questions to
(McGraw, (2002) guide the nurse’s reflections about the patient.
Community Assessment Guided by Watson’s A tool to assess community identity, community spirit, internal
Theory (Rafael, 2000) and external environments, community capacity to meet
basic needs of members, community capacity to care for its
most vulnerable members, community capacity to meet
social needs of members, community capacity to promote
growth and development of its members
*See the Research Instruments/Practice Tools section of the chapter references for complete citations.
is McGraw’s (2002) development of a practice tool to guide as well as patients and nurses” (p. xiii). The instruments
application of the Clinical Caritas Processes as defined and are:
described by Watson (2001) (see Table 16–3).
Recently, Watson (2002a) published a compendium ● Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort (CARE-Q)
of 21 instruments designed to “assess and measure caring ● Caring Satisfaction (CARE/SAT)
… that have relevance in assessing caring among students ● Caring Behaviors Inventory
570
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 571
TABLE 16–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN CARING
DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES
Transpersonal caring interactions Nurse-elderly person dyads Clayton, 1989
Essential elements of spirituality Well adults Burns, 1991
Components of spiritual nursing care Registered nurses Dennis, 1991
Definition of hope Well and hospitalized adolescents Hinds, 1984
What homeless children regard as special Photographs taken by children living in a Percy, 1995
public shelter
Educational needs of prospective family Prospective family caregivers of newly Weeks, 1995
caregivers disabled adults
Categories of family members’ involve- Spouses of persons with grave, incurable Andershed, &
ment in the care of a dying relative cancer of the colon, liver, or bile duct Ternestedt, 1999
being cared for at a medical center in
Sweden
Perceptions of nurse caring behaviors Childbearing women Manogin, Bechtel, &
Rami, 2000
Description of nurse caring behaviors as Emergency department patients Baldursdottir &
important indicators of caring Jonsdottir, 2002
Differences in perceptions of nurses’ Adults with sickle cell disease and adults Dorsey et al., 2001
caring behaviors with general medical conditions
Identification of nurse caring behaviors Older adults residing in institutions Marini, 1999
Parents’ perceptions of nurses’ and Bereaved parents who experienced Lemmer, 1991
physicians’ expressions of caring a perinatal loss
Patients’ perceptions of perioperative Adult surgical patients Parsons et al., 1993
nurses’ use of the carative factors
Perioperative nurses’ perceptions of their Registered nurses McNamara, 1995
use of the carative factors
Student nurses’ perceptions of the Second-year diploma nursing students Chipman, 1991
meaning and value of caring
Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of the Nurses Miller et al., 1992
experience of caring in the acute care Adult medical-surgical patients
setting
Nurses’, educators’, and patients’ percep- Staff nurses Watson, 1996
tions of caring needs and experiences Nurse educators
Kidney transplant patients
Nurses’ and caregivers’ perceptions of Primary caregivers Ryan, 1992
helpful nursing behaviors Hospice nurses
*See the Research section of the chapter references for complete citations.
572
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 573
573
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 574
TABLE 16–4
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF RESEARCH GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN CARING (continued)
CORRELATIONAL STUDY
Relation of nurse caring behaviors to pa- Patients with a medical or surgical Duffy, 1992
tient satisfaction, health status, length of diagnosis
stay, and nursing care costs
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Effect of use of Watson’s theory of human Adult patients with hypertension attending Erci et al., 2003
caring on blood pressure and quality of health clinics in Turkey
life
Effects of feeding hospitalized patients College-aged volunteers Robinson et al., 2002
⬎65 years of age who required Nursing staff
assistance with feeding
Effects of experimental therapeutic mas- Hospitalized male and female cancer pa- Smith et al., 2002
sage and control nurse interaction on tients receiving chemotherapy or radia-
pain intensity, pain distress, sleep qual- tion treatment
ity, symptom distress, and anxiety
intentional connection are taking place. Such a caring professions, and we, who deal with the most complex human
consciousness and connection, one to another, has a experiences and health-related phenomena, have never made
healing potential. It is grounded in the individual expe- the connection for the need for additional education to
riences of the two separate persons, but goes beyond the deal with these complex, technological, and evolving human
phenomena. Instead, we talk about less education or the
two; the self connection is every self—the universal self.
same education, resist upping the ante for required higher ed-
We learn to recognize ourselves in others by engaging in ucation for entry. … I think every major academic health sci-
a transpersonal caring moment (pp. 154–155). ence center nursing program should convert its baccalaureate
nursing programs into non-practice degrees in caring science
The delivery of nursing care based on the Theory of
and health, or at least make that degree a major in the field.
Human Caring requires considerable education to better Such a framework for a general undergraduate degree could
understand the expanded view of nursing, science, person, be preparatory as pre-med, pre-nursing, etc. But this hard
and health-illness that is reflected in the theory (Watson, transition into professionalism would entail letting go of the
1990b, 1996). Some of the education required for use of the baccalaureate degree as entry level into nursing, moving
Theory of Human Caring comes from nurses themselves. quickly to graduate-doctoral level, parallel with all other
“Valuable teachers for this work,” Watson (2001) declared, health professionals. Almost all other practicing professions
“include the nurse’s own life history and previous experi- have made this turn—witness pharmacy’s quick shift in the
ences, which provide opportunities for focused studies, the last decade, from baccalaureate degree to Pharm. D.
nurse having lived through or experienced various human [Doctorate of Pharmacy]; similar shifts have occurred in
physiotherapy, psychology, law, and so on (Fawcett, 2002,
conditions and having imagined others’ feelings in various
p. 217).
circumstances” (p. 348).
Watson (2001) identified several facilitators of the un- In keeping with academic preparation at the ND level,
derstanding required for use of the Theory of Human Watson (1996) proposed that professional practice should
Caring. The facilitators include the nurse’s work with peo- be advanced practice in nursing, with expertise in caring-
ples of diverse cultures; the study of the humanities, in- healing and health and “attending nurse” status in health-
cluding art, drama, literature, and personal story narratives care organizations, “working alongside other members of
of illness; the nurse’s exploration of his or her own values, the health team, while assuming responsibility for the
beliefs, relationship with self and others, and his or her caring-healing focus of care” (p. 163). Watson and Foster
own world; and such personal growth experiences as psy- (2003) then described a professional practice model for the
chotherapy, transpersonal psychology, meditation, bioen- attending nurse, which they called the Attending Nursing
ergetics work, and other methods of spiritual awakening. Caring Model®. The proposed model for professional prac-
Watson (2001) went on to point out that “to truly ‘get it,’ tice within the context of Watson’s Theory of Human
one has to experience it personally; thus, the [theory] is Caring is evidence-based and reflective.
both an invitation and an opportunity to interact with The nature of human life, according to Watson (1988a),
the ideas, experiment with and grow within the philoso- is the subject matter of nursing. Hence, nursing education
phy, and to live it out in one’s personal/professional life” focuses on clarification of the values and views regarding
(p. 349). human life. A moral context for nursing education that
Watson (1988a, 1996; Fawcett, 2002) proposed that pro- emphasizes a way of being as a caring professional is re-
fessional nursing education be at the postbaccalaureate quired. In particular, a curriculum based on the Theory of
level of the Doctorate of Nursing (ND); such a program is Human Caring acknowledges caring as a moral ideal and
offered at the University of Colorado Health Sciences incorporates philosophical theories of human caring,
Center School of Nursing (Watson & Phillips, 1992; health, and healing. The special education requirements
Nursing Doctorate, retrieved July 15, 2003 from http:// for learning and applying the Theory of Human Caring are
www2.uchsc.edu/son). Watson presented a clear rationale listed here (Watson, 1989b, 1996, 1997).
for her position when she declared:
● Continual study, development, and research are required
Although the bachelor’s degree is considered still the [unre- to understand the content of the theory and its implica-
solved and impossible to implement] minimal entry into the tions for nursing practice.
professional practice of nursing, the mature practice of ● Core areas of content include the arts and humanities,
nursing, as a career health professional, ideally should be at
the professional doctoral level, or at least the graduate level. social-biomedical sciences, emerging sciences, and
Why should nursing differ from every other practicing disci- human caring content and process.
pline (e.g., dentistry, medicine, pharmacy, psychology, law). It ● Additional content includes knowledge of human behav-
is so ironic and amazing to me that, even as we enter the 21st ior and human responses to actual or potential health
century, we who are the oldest of the caring/health/healing problems; knowledge and understanding of individual
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 576
practicing nurse must continue to integrate the [processes] nurses must continuously “question and be open to new
that effect positive health care” (p. 214). possibilities” (Watson, 1992, p. 1481). A PRACTICE
Nursing practice based on the Theory of Human Caring METHODOLOGY for the Theory of Human Caring,
is not necessarily easy. Indeed, Watson (1989a) pointed out which was extracted from Watson’s publications, guides the
that human caring, “with its need for ethics, emotions, application of the theory in practice situations (see Table
compassion, knowledge, wisdom, intentions, and so on, is 16–5).
always fragile and threatened because it requires a per- The Practice Methodology incorporates what Watson
sonal, social, moral, and spiritual engagement of self and (1999; Watson & Smith, 2002) calls transpersonal caring-
a commitment to oneself and to others’ self and dignity” healing modalities or advanced transpersonal caring
(p. 129). Thus “a radical transformation of traditional pro- modalities. Those caring modalities “draw upon multiple
fessional relationships” is required (p. 132). Furthermore, ways of knowing and being; then encompass ethical, and
TABLE 16–5
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY FOR THE THEORY OF HUMAN CARING
577
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 578
TABLE 16–5
PRACTICE METHODOLOGY FOR THE THEORY OF HUMAN CARING (continued)
AUTHENTIC PRESENCING
The nurse is authentically present as self and other in a reflective mutuality of being and becoming.
The nurse centers consciousness and intentionality on caring, healing, and wholeness, rather than on disease, problems,
illness, complications, and technocures.
The nurse attempts to:
• Stay within the other’s frame of reference.
• Join in a mutual search for meaning and wholeness of being.
• Potentiate comfort measures, pain control, a sense of well-being, or spiritual transcendence of suffering.
Source: Constructed from Watson, 1996, pp. 152–154; 1997, pp. 50–51; 1999, pp. 206–227.
relational caring along with those intentional conscious- ● Denver Nursing Project in Human Caring in Denver,
ness modalities that are energetic in nature, e.g., form, Colorado (Astorino et al., 1994; Leenerts et al., 1996;
colour, light, sound, touch, visual, olfactory, etc. that po- Lyne & Waller, 1990; Neil, 1995, 2001; Nyberg, 1994;
tentiate wholeness, healing, comfort, and well-being” Quinn, 1994; Schroeder, 1993a, 1993b; Schroeder &
(Watson & Smith, 2002, p. 458). The caring-healing Astorino, 1996; Schroeder & Maeve, 1992; Schroeder &
modalities, which emerge from the Clinical Caritas Neil, 1992; Smith, 1994, 1997; Watson, 1996)
Processes, can be traced to Nightingale’s (1859/1946) writ- ● Dementia Unit in a Nursing Home (Residents with de-
ings (Watson, 1999). mentia) (Marckx, 1995)
Despite the potential difficulty of using the Theory of ● Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care in Toronto, Ontario,
Human Caring, evidence of its utility is beginning to Canada (Cappell & Leggat, 1993; Watson, 1996)
emerge in the form of several published reports of nursing ● Nursing Partners at Providence Hospital in Sandusky,
practice and implementation projects with a variety of Ohio (Sanford & Lamb, 1997)
persons in diverse settings (Table 16–6). ● Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center in
The reports listed in Table 16–6, along with the Chicago, Illinois (Brooks & Rosenberg, 1995)
reports listed in the Commentary: Administration and ● Rockford Health System, University of Illinois at
Commentary: Practice sections of the chapter bibliography Chicago, College of Nursing Rockford Program
on the CD-ROM, document the use of the Theory of (Watson, 1996)
Human Caring in the real world of nursing practice with ● University of Natal School of Nursing Decentralised
various populations. The reports lend support to Watson’s Programmes, South Africa (Minnaar, 2002)
(1996) claim that nurses who use the Theory of Human ● Kent State University, Kent, Ohio (A faculty mentoring
Care practice “wherever the patients/clients are located: in program based on a caring theoretical perspective)
and outside of institutions, schools, homes, clinics, and (Snelson et al., 2002)
community settings” (p. 163). Kelley and Johnson (2002)
added that the literature indicates that the theory “has Evidence of the extent to which Clinical Caritas
the potential to apply to any situation in which nursing oc- Processes–based actions are compatible with expectations
curs” (p. 419). for nursing practice and the effects of those actions on
Moreover, various projects designed to implement both the one-cared-for and the one caring is mounting.
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring document the feasibil- The outcomes achieved by the Denver Nursing Project in
ity of implementing practice protocols and practitioners’ Human Caring (DNPHC) during its existence serve as an
legal ability to implement nursing actions based on the exemplar. The DNPHC, a nurse-managed center devoted
Clinical Caritas Processes and to measure the effectiveness to the care of persons living with human immunodefi-
of those actions. The sites of the implementation projects ciency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syn-
are listed here. The complete citations to the published re- drome (AIDS), was established in 1988 as a clinical
ports of the projects are given in the Administration sec- demonstration project of the University of Colorado
tion of the chapter references. School of Nursing and the Center for Human Caring; the
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 579
TABLE 16–6
PUBLISHED REPORTS OF NURSING PRACTICE GUIDED BY THE THEORY OF HUMAN CARING
Use of the carative factors (now Premature infants and their parents Sithichoke-Rattan, 1989
know as the clinical caritas
processes)
A young woman with life-threatening postpartal Saxton, 1994
complications
A patient with HIV Nelson-Marten et al.,
A patient with AIDS 1998
A group of elderly residents of a nursing home Carson, 1992
Application of the Theory of Human An 11-year-old boy and his mother Bollinger, 2001
Caring
A 29-year-old woman with cervical cancer McGraw, 2002
A 35-year-old man dying of AIDS
Patients with Alzheimer’s disease and their Wykle & Morris, 1994
families
A dying patient in the intensive care unit and Mendyka, 1993
family members
Bereaved persons Hubner, 1999
Application of the Theory of Human Patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other de- Sterritt & Pokorny, 1994
Caring—use of art mentias
Patients with cancer Gullo, 1997
Application of the Theory of Human A support group of nurses working in a neuro- Brandman, 1996
Caring—psychiatric consultation logical intensive care unit
liaison nursing
Theory of Human Caring–based Preadolescents Jones, 1991
teaching program about AIDS
Ethical aspects of caring A 12-year-old boy with AIDS Weiser, 1992
Maintenance of authentic caring Nurses caring for patients with HIV/AIDS Montgomery, 1994
Neil, 1994
Nursing strategies to increase hope People with HIV Harrison, 1997
and facilitate spirituality
*See the Practice section of the chapter references for complete citations.
project ended in 1996 (Smith, 1997; Watson, 1996). The personal path for healing,” and that they felt “the energy of
DNPHC, where nursing practice was based on Watson’s love and compassion” (pp. 57–58). In addition, Watson
philosophy and science of human caring, and care was de- (1996) noted that caring extended beyond the nurse-client
livered through the carative factors (now known as the relationship to staff-staff, client-client, and staff-client-
Clinical Caritas Processes), became an international pro- community relationships.
totype for caring-based practice. Smith (1997) reported The reports of implementation projects indicate that
that DNPHC clients stated that each one was “seen as a some comparisons have been made between outcomes be-
whole person with a life and a family,” that nursing care fore and after implementation of the Theory of Human
was “coming home,” that they were helped to discover “a Caring. The results of the various projects revealed that
16Fawcett-16 09/17/2004 2:28 PM Page 580
Part Four
NURSING
KNOWLEDGE IN
THE 21st CENTURY
Chapter 17
Integrating Nursing
Models, Theories,
Research, and Practice
The use of explicit conceptual models of nursing and nursing theories fosters a
systematic approach to nurses’ activities. The use of any one nursing model or
theory—or of a comprehensive conceptual-theoretical-empirical system (C-T-E
system) of nursing knowledge (see Chapter 2)—can easily close the theory-
practice and research-practice gaps. This final chapter begins with a discussion
of nursing as a professional discipline. Next, the value of nursing discipline-
specific C-T-E systems is discussed. The chapter continues with presentation
of a strategy for the integration of C-T-E systems, nursing research, and nursing
practice. The chapter concludes with a proposal that will enhance the probability
of the survival of the discipline of nursing.
589
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 590
THE DISCIPLINE OF NURSING to those questions, and the methods used to obtain the an-
swers, all of which constitute a body of knowledge that
The term discipline comes from the Latin disciplina, mean- can be taught and learned. Kuethe (1963) argued that dis-
ing a branch of instruction or learning (Simpson & Weiner, ciplines are not distinguished by unique bodies of knowl-
1989). Some scholars maintain that disciplines exist and edge nor can they be identified by unique methods of
are distinguished by the subject matter of interest to their inquiry. He maintained that a discipline is distinguished
members (e.g., Schwab, 1962; Walton, 1963). The subject by its unique concern with “certain relations between facts”
matter of a discipline, according to Walton (1963), en- (p. 76).
compasses “concepts, facts, and theories, so ordered Regardless of one’s position, the designation of disci-
that it can be deliberately and systematically taught” (p. 5). pline has come to be a way of organizing knowledge. The
Elaborating, Scheffler (1963) maintained that disciplines designation of discipline also has some utility as an admin-
are “branches of knowledge or bodies of science … [that istrative structure for education. Within colleges and uni-
strive] to offer a complete, systematic account of some versities, for example, disciplines frequently are divided
realm of things in the world. [Each discipline] seeks a com- into separate schools and departments, such as nursing,
prehensive body of true principles describing and explain- psychology, sociology, education, and physics. Within
ing the realm it takes as its proper object” (p. 49). Meleis health-care institutions, disciplines frequently are divided
(1997) stated that a discipline “provides a unique way of into departments, such as nursing and physical therapy.
considering the phenomena that are of interest to its mem- Nursing, according to Donaldson and Crowley (1978),
bers” (p. 42). Shermis (1962) added that what he called is a Professional Discipline. The term, profession, refers
intellectual disciplines are characterized by “(1) a rather to a vocation requiring knowledge of some branch of
impressive body of time-tested works, (2) a technique suit- learning (Simpson & Weiner, 1989). Professions are con-
able for dealing with their concepts, (3) a defensible claim strained by certain standards, policies, and regulations im-
to being an intimate link with basic human activities and posed by society.
aspirations, (4) a tradition that both links the present with Donaldson and Crowley (1978) explained that a profes-
the past and provides inspiration and sustenance for the sional discipline has a societal mandate to conduct what
future, [and] (5) a considerable achievement in both emi- they labeled basic research, applied research, and clinical
nent men [sic] and significant ideas” (p. 84). According to research. Thus, the professional discipline of nursing is re-
those scholars, each discipline claims a distinctive body of sponsible not only for the generation and dissemination of
knowledge and specifies the ways in which that knowledge new knowledge (basic research) and the determination of
is generated and tested, that is, the way in which knowledge the limits of that knowledge in various situations (applied
is developed. research) but also for the determination of the effects of
Peters (1963), in contrast, regards the idea of disciplines nursing practices (clinical research). Education, engineer-
having subject matter as “an archaic relic of the old ing, and physical therapy are examples of other profes-
Baconian myth about scientific method” (p. 17). He went sional disciplines. Academic Disciplines, in contrast, are
on to say that “A discipline develops when there are some responsible only for basic and applied research. Physics,
reasonably well-worked out and structured answers to chemistry, biology, psychology, and sociology are examples
such questions which come to form a body of knowledge, of academic disciplines.
together with techniques and procedures for developing Donaldson and Crowley’s (1978) assertion that nursing
better answers or for dealing with new problems which is a professional discipline remained unchallenged for
these answers give rise to” (pp. 17–18). Peters’ point is that more than 20 years. Recently, however, Parse (Fawcett,
disciplines exist but are not distinguished by what he un- 2001) stated that she disagrees with Donaldson and
derstands to be subject matter. Instead, for Peters, disci- Crowley’s assertion. She prefers to separate the discipline
plines are distinguished by the questions asked, the answers from the profession. In particular, she maintained that the
590
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 591
discipline is a basic science and the knowledge base of results of utilizing knowledge in practice are used to refine
nursing, and that the goal of the discipline is to “expand the C-T-E knowledge system. In other words, the recipro-
knowledge about human experiences through research and cal relation means that the C-T-E systems developed
creative conceptualization” (Fawcett, 2001, p. 127). Parse through research are used in practice, and the outcomes of
maintained that the profession of nursing, in contrast, utilization of the C-T-E systems are used to refine those C-
“consists of persons educated in the discipline according to T-E systems. The reciprocal relation also can be seen when
nationally defined, regulated, and monitored standards. practical problems act as a catalyst for C-T-E-based re-
People join the profession and practice the performing art” search, the results of research suggest solutions for the
(Fawcett, 2001, p. 127). Although Parse’s position certainly problems, and the results of tests of those solutions in
has merit, the notion of a professional discipline as one en- practice influence the further development of the C-T-E
tity, albeit with two dimensions, is used in this book. knowledge system.
The two dimensions of the professional discipline of Recognition of a reciprocal relation between the devel-
nursing are nursing science and the nursing profession opment and utilization of C-T-E systems underscores that
(Fig. 17–1). Nursing Science is accomplished by means of C-T-E systems are not “engraved in tablets of stone”
Nursing Research. The product of nursing research is C-T- (Kalideen, 1993, p. 5). Indeed, the development and dis-
E System Development and Dissemination. The Nursing semination of a C-T-E system informs and transforms the
Profession is actualized through Nursing Practice. The ways in which practice is understood and experienced, and
major activity of nursing practice is C-T-E System the utilization and evaluation of that C-T-E system in-
Utilization and Evaluation in Practice. forms and transforms the C-T-E system by informing and
As depicted in Figure 17–1, the relation between transforming its further development (Speedy, 1989).
Nursing Science and the Nursing Profession is reciprocal, Recognition of nursing as a distinct discipline confers a
as is the relation between Nursing Research and Nursing certain status on nurses. The status conferred by being a
Practice and the relation between C-T-E system develop- member of the professional discipline of nursing, rather
ment and dissemination and C-T-E system utilization and than of an occupation or a trade, carries with it the re-
evaluation in practice. The reciprocal relation means that sponsibility to develop, disseminate, use, and evaluate ex-
although the knowledge contained in a C-T-E system is plicit nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems. In
“the most important source of influence on practice” particular, the responsibility and goal of the professional
(Kerlinger, 1979, p. 296) and “practice is the medium for discipline of nursing is to conduct Discipline-Specific
transforming nursing science knowledge from the world of Research (Mitchell, 1994), using Discipline-Specific
ideas into the world of events” (Rawnsley, 2003, p. 11), the Methodologies (Thorne, Kirkham, & MacDonald-Emes,
1997) and to engage in Discipline-Specific Practice (Smith,
1995).
Anderson (1995) explained that as members of a pro-
Discipline of Nursing
fessional discipline, nurses “must ensure that we have a
solid scholarly and scientific foundation upon which to
base our practice” (p. 247). The development and dissemi-
nation of explicit C-T-E systems already is a hallmark of
success in nursing theory development (Fawcett, 1983).
Nursing Science Nursing Profession But nurses must continue the development of existing
nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems and must de-
velop new ones if the discipline is to thrive.
Nursing Research Nursing Practice The use of nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems
“distinguishes nursing as an autonomous health profes-
sion” and represents “nursing’s unique contribution to the
health care system” (Parse, 1995, p. 128). The use of explicit
C-T-E System Development C-T-E System Utilization C-T-E systems as guides for nursing practice already is a
and Dissemination and Evaluation in Practice
hallmark of professional nursing practice (Fawcett &
FIGURE 17–1. The professional discipline of nursing: re- Carino, 1989). But it is incumbent on all nurses to continue
ciprocal relations between nursing science and the nursing to use and to evaluate explicit nursing discipline-specific
profession, nursing research and nursing practice, and C-T-E systems if the professional discipline of nursing is to
C-T-E system development/dissemination and C-T-E sys- retain its rightful place in the multidisciplinary health-care
tem utilization/evaluation. arena.
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 592
THE VALUE OF NURSING DISCIPLINE- 1990) pointed out, “Nursing models [and theories] have
SPECIFIC C-T-E SYSTEMS provided what many would argue is a much needed alter-
native knowledge base from which nurses can practice in
The rapid growth of advanced practice nursing programs, an informed way. An alternative, that is, to the medical
especially nurse practitioner programs, during the last [perspective] which for so many years has dominated many
decade of the 20th century and continuing into the early aspects of health care” (p. 34). Nursing discipline-specific
years of the 21st century, has diverted attention away from C-T-E systems also provide an alternative to the institu-
nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems and toward a tional model of practice, in which “the most salient values
medical perspective as the base for research and practice. [are] efficiency, standardized care, rules, and regulations”
Consequently, nursing, along with human experiences of (Rogers, 1989, p. 113). The institutional model, moreover,
health, have been medicalized (Chinn, 1999), and nursing typically upholds, reinforces, and supports a medical per-
practice tends to be evaluated within the context of med- spective (Grossman & Hooton, 1993).
ical outcomes rather than outcomes identified by nursing Nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems collectively
conceptual models and theories. Furthermore, independ- identify the distinctive nursing territory within the vast
ent functioning as a nurse has been equated with perform- arena of health care (Feeg, 1989). Each nursing model and
ing skills that physicians perform (McBride, 1999). Indeed, theory provides a holistic orientation that reminds nurses
some nurse practitioners, clinical specialists, nurse mid- of the concepts and propositions of the metaparadigm of
wives, and nurse anesthetists strive to become “quasi prac- nursing (see Chapter 1) and reinforces the view that nurs-
titioners of medicine” (Orlando, 1987, p. 412), physician’s ing practice ultimately is “for our patients’ sake” (Dabbs,
assistants (Martha Rogers, as cited in Huch, 1995), physi- 1994, p. 220). Admittedly, some nurses believe that nursing
cian substitutes (McBride, 1999), physician extenders conceptual models are “dinosaurs that are irrelevant for
(Sandelowski, 1999), junior doctors (Meleis, 1993), mini- contemporary research and practice” (Fawcett, 2003, p.
doctors (Barnum, 1998), or pseudo doctors (Kendrick, 229), or hold the “unfortunate view [that nursing models
1997), engaged in nursing-qua-medicine (Watson, 1996) and theories] are the inventions and predictions only of
and primary care medicine, rather than primary care nurs- scholars and academics [and have] little significance for
ing (Barrett, 1993). Those nurses who emulate physicians their own practice environments” (Hayne, 1992, p. 105).
most likely do so because “the lure of following the medical Many other nurses, however, recognize the beneficial ef-
model is sanctioned and well rewarded in some settings” fects of nursing models and theories on practice. Indeed,
(Hawkins & Thibodeau, 1996, p. 11). In essence, then, so- nursing discipline-specific C-T-E system-based nursing
called advanced nursing practice may represent limited practice “help[s] nurses better communicate what they do”
medical practice rather than full nursing practice, and (Neff, 1991, p. 534) and why they do it.
many nurses, as Sandelowski (1999) pointed out, continue In particular, nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems
to perform work that relieves deliberately controlled short- provide a nursing knowledge base that has a positive effect
ages of physicians, which preserves their market value but on practice “by enabling well-coordinated [nursing] to take
has lead to an oversupply of nurse practitioners (Anderson, place, by providing a basis for the justification of [nursing]
1999; Barnum, 1998). actions and by enabling [all] nurses to talk nursing”
Clearly, it is mandatory that the value of using nursing (Chalmers, as cited in Chalmers et al., 1990, p. 34), to think
discipline-specific C-T-E systems to guide nursing practice nursing (Nightingale, 1993; Perry, 1985), and to engage in
is underscored, so that all nurses can become nursing prac- thinking nursing (Allison & Renpenning, 1999) rather than
titioners (Orem, 2001), senior nurses (Meleis, 1993), and just doing tasks and carrying out physicians’ orders (Le
maximally functioning nurses (Barnum, 1998) who have Storti et al., 1999). Nurses are able to talk nursing and think
the freedom and autonomy (Hawkins & Thibodeau, 1996) nursing because the nursing models and theories and
that comes from engaging in nursing-qua-nursing methodologies that make up C-T-E systems provide a dis-
(Watson, 1997). Fortunately, the number of nurses tinctive nursing language. The lack of a nursing language in
throughout the world who recognize THE VALUE OF the past, and in the present when nursing models and the-
NURSING DISCIPLINE-SPECIFIC C-T-E SYSTEMS is ories are not used “has been a handicap in nurses’ commu-
rapidly increasing. Indeed, Cash’s (1990) claim that “there nications about nursing to the public as well as to persons
is no central core that can distinguish nursing theoretically with whom they work in the health field” (Orem, 1997, p.
from a number of other occupational activities” (p. 255) 29).
has been readily offset by many claims to the contrary, in- Thinking nursing within the context of nursing disci-
cluding the numerous publications cited in the references pline-specific C-T-E systems helps nurses in various spe-
and bibliography for each chapter of this book. cialties to “clarify their thinking on their role, especially at
Furthermore, as Chalmers (as cited in Chalmers et al., a time when the roles of many health professionals are be-
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 593
coming blurred” (Nightingale, 1993, p. 2). Moreover, family satisfaction with nursing, increased nurse job satis-
thinking nursing within the context of nursing discipline- faction, and considerable cost savings. Furthermore, as the
specific C-T-E systems may shape the way in which spe- use of C-T-E systems moves nursing practice from a base
cialized nursing practice is viewed. Nurses may elect to of implicit knowledge to explicit nursing knowledge, both
specialize in the use of a particular nursing model or the- nurses and participants in nursing are empowered. Indeed,
ory as the starting point for construction of C-T-E systems; “[nursing] knowledge is power” (Orr, 1991, p. 218), and
or nurses may elect to specialize in a particular concept of the power of nursing knowledge can be used to empower
a particular nursing model or theory. A nurse could, for ex- individuals, families, and communities to fully participate
ample, specialize in one behavioral subsystem of Johnson’s in decisions about their health care (Lister, 1991; Malin &
Behavioral System Model (Rogers, 1973). Teasdale, 1991). The challenge, then, is to use the strategies
Research findings indicate that nurses feel vulnerable identified in Chapter 2 to help each nurse to adopt an ex-
and experience a great deal of stress as they attempt to plicit nursing discipline-specific C-T-E system and each
achieve professional aspirations within a constantly chang- health-care organization to implement nursing discipline-
ing, medically-dominated, bureaucratic health-care deliv- specific C-T-E systems.
ery system (Graham, 1994; Mark, 2002). As structures for
critical thinking within a distinctively nursing context,
nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems provide the in- INTEGRATING C-T-E SYSTEMS,
tellectual and organizational skills that nurses need to sur- RESEARCH, AND PRACTICE
vive during times when cost containment through
reduction of professional nursing staff is the modus Earlier in this chapter, the relation between C-T-E system
operandi of managed care and the administrators of development and dissemination and C-T-E system utiliza-
health-care delivery systems, including hospitals, home tion and evaluation in practice was described as reciprocal.
health-care agencies, and health maintenance organiza- A reciprocal relation means that two discrete entities inter-
tions. Nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems also pro- act with one another. Viewing C-T-E system development
vide the intellectual and organizational skills that nurses and dissemination and C-T-E system utilization and eval-
need to survive during times of nursing shortages uation in practice as discrete yet interacting entities cer-
(Mitchell, 2003). That is because C-T-E systems represent tainly has merit. But how much more might be
structures for thinking coherently and organizing practice accomplished if the two entities were viewed as one inte-
consistently and efficiently, which allows the required time grated process? It is proposed that the development, dis-
for direct care of those who need nursing. semination, utilization, and evaluation of nursing
Johnson (1990) noted that, although individual nurses knowledge in the form of explicit nursing discipline-
and nursing departments take risks when the decision is specific C-T-E systems can best be advanced through the
made to use an explicit nursing discipline-specific C-T-E integration of nursing research and nursing practice, which
system to guide nursing practice, the rewards far outweigh can best be advanced through the integration of nursing
the risks. She stated: science and the nursing profession. Figure 17–2, which is
To openly use a nursing model is risk-taking behavior for the
an alternative to Figure 17–1, presents an integrated view
individual nurse. For a nursing department to adopt one of of the dimensions of the professional discipline of nursing
these models for unit or institution use is risk-taking behavior and the activities associated with the dimensions. Here, the
of an even higher order. The reward for such risk-taking for dimensions of nursing science and the nursing profession
the individual practitioner lies in the great satisfaction gained are regarded as integrated, as are the research and practice
from being able to specify explicit concrete nursing goals in the activities that flow from those integrated dimensions and
care of patients and from documenting the actual achieve- the C-T-E system activities that flow from the integration
ment of the desired outcomes. The reward for the nursing de- of research and practice. Note that the integration of nurs-
partment is having a rational, cohesive, and comprehensive ing research and practice means that research is practice
basis for the development of standards of nursing practice, for and practice is research.
the evaluation of practitioners, and for the documentation of
the contribution of nursing to patient welfare. (p. 32)
Integrating C-T-E systems, research, and practice is a
seemingly complex activity that has, to date, eluded most
The continually accumulating anecdotal and empirical ev- nurses, as the integration of research and practice has
idence cited in Chapters 4 through 10 and 12 through 16 eluded most members of other professional disciplines.
indicates that additional rewards of using explicit nursing Integration, however, can be straightforward. A STRAT-
discipline-specific C-T-E systems to guide nursing practice EGY TO INTEGRATE C-T-E SYSTEMS, RESEARCH,
include reduced staff nurse turnover, more rapid move- AND PRACTICE is to use an explicit nursing discipline-
ment from novice to expert nurse, increased patient and specific C-T-E system to guide nursing practice and to use
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 594
Discipline of Nursing (Whitney & Roncoli, 1986), social work research and
casework processes (Wood, 1978), the science and art of
medicine (Feinstein, 1967), the interests of industrial man-
agement theorists-researchers and practitioners (Dubin,
Integration of Nursing Science and the Nursing Profession 1976), and the purposes of documentation (Johnson,
Ludwig-Beymer, & Micek, 1999), the steps of the nursing
process, or the components of a practice methodology,
can be viewed as the steps of the nursing research process.
Research is Practice and Practice is Research That is, “The processes of [practice] … are exactly the
same processes as those of research” (Wood, 1978, p. 454).
Even more to the point, “A clinician performs an experi-
ment every time he [or she] treats a patient. … [Thus,]
C-T-E System Development and Dissemination is integrated with every aspect of clinical management can be designed, exe-
C-T-E System Utilization and Evaluation in Practice cuted, and appraised with intellectual procedures identical
FIGURE 17–2. The professional discipline of nursing—an
to those used in any experimental situation” (Feinstein,
alternative view: integration of nursing science and the 1967, pp. 14, 21).
nursing profession, nursing research and nursing practice, Nurses who are engaged in nursing practice, then, are
and C-T-E system development/dissemination and C-T-E researchers (Fawcett, Aber, & Weiss, 2003; Rolfe, 1993;
system utilization/evaluation. Whitney & Roncoli, 1986), and nursing participants are
their own controls in quasi-experimental single-case stud-
ies guided by explicit nursing discipline-specific C-T-E sys-
practice information gained from the implementation of tems. Within the context of a particular C-T-E system, the
that C-T-E system as research data for Single-Case Studies. Nursing Practice Process is the same as the Nursing
In other words, every nursing situation for the purpose Research Process (Table 17–1). Thus, the results of
of the delivery of nursing services also is for the purpose Assessment comprise the Baseline Data. The Labeling used
of research. Every nursing situation, then, is a single-case to summarize the nursing participant’s health condition
study of an experiment in which the intervention is hy- represents the Statement of the Problem to be studied. Goal
pothesized to have a certain outcome (Feinstein, 1967; Setting represents the Hypothesis that specifies the desired
Wood, 1978). Thus, the data available in every nursing nurse-sensitive outcome and the means to achieve that
practice situation are used to refine or reject existing outcome. The desired outcome is the dependent variable,
C-T-E systems and to develop new C-T-E systems. The and the means to achieve that outcome is the independent
steps of the single-case study approach are listed here. variable. Implementation is the means to achieve the out-
come, that is, the intervention or the Experimental
● Develop a prototype conceptual-theoretical-empirical Treatment, which is the independent variable. Evaluation is
system of nursing knowledge (C-T-E system) for a pop- analysis of the desired Nurse-Sensitive Outcome, that is, the
ulation of nursing participants. dependent variable. Written or computerized documenta-
● Develop an individualized C-T-E system for a particular tion of each step of the nursing practice process provides
nursing participant. the actual data from which a conclusion regarding the hy-
● Provide nursing in accordance with the practice pothesis may be drawn.
methodology of the C-T-E system. The generic nursing practice process listed in Table 17–1
● Document all aspects of the application of the practice is replaced by the components of the particular practice
methodology. methodology associated with the nursing model or theory
● Use the documented information about C-T-E system- of the C-T-E system. The practice methodologies associ-
based nursing actions and the outcome for the nursing ated with the nursing models and theories included in
participant as single-case study research data. this book are presented in Chapters 4 through 10 and 12
through 16. The practice tools and research instruments
The key to the integration of research and practice is re- derived from each nursing model and nursing theory, also
cognition and acceptance of the similarity between the presented in Chapters 4 through 10 and 12 through 16,
process of research and the process of practice, and recog- should be used to collect and record information for the
nition and acceptance that both research and practice assessment, labeling, goal-setting, and evaluation steps of
are guided by the same C-T-E system. Drawing from the nursing practice process that will then be used for the
discussions of nursing practice and nursing research single-case study. Thus, practice tools are useful for re-
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 595
TABLE 17–1
THE PARALLEL BETWEEN THE NURSING PRACTICE PROCESS AND THE NURSING RESEARCH PROCESS
*See Chapters 4 through 10 and 12 through 16 for the practice methodologies associated with particular nursing models and theories.
search purposes, and research instruments can be exam- much-desired Evidence-Based Best Practices (Anderson,
ined for their utility in practice situations. 1998a; Fagin, 1998) are the collective result of both single-
Here it is important to emphasize that practice tools case studies and quality assurance or quality improvement
and research instruments derived from nursing conceptual programs.
models and theories be used. Using tools and instruments
from other disciplines, which Jukes (1988) found to be fa-
vored by some nurses, does not allow the nurse to collect A PROPOSAL TO ENHANCE SURVIVAL
and record the information needed for nursing practice OF THE DISCIPLINE OF NURSING
processes.
The experimental treatment, that is, the intervention, The discipline of nursing may be on the brink of extinction
should be written in the form of a script that specifies ex- (Fawcett, 2000; Nagle, 1999; Mitchell, 1994; Watson &
actly how the goal will be achieved for the particular nurs- Foster, 2003). If the discipline is to survive, nurses cannot
ing participant. The script then is viewed as a research take pride in or be satisfied with practicing “atheoretically”
protocol. Any necessary deviations from the a priori script or apply nursing knowledge “without conscious recogni-
for the intervention should be recorded, so that it is possi- tion” (Lenz, 1998, p. 63). They cannot continue to condone
ble to link what was to be done with what actually was the disparagement of nursing knowledge that occurs all too
done and with what outcome occurred. frequently in practice settings (Lenz, 1998). Instead, nurses
Single-case studies can be aggregated for the purposes must be proactive in convincing themselves and their col-
of quality assurance or quality improvement programs. leagues that utilization of explicit nursing discipline-spe-
The use of an explicit nursing discipline-specific C-T-E cific C-T-E systems of nursing knowledge is not “difficult,
system to guide each case study ensures that the outcome is boring, [or] esoteric” (Lenz, 1998, p. 64) but rather easy,
a nurse-sensitive outcome. That is, the outcome is directly stimulating, and understood by all nurses. The discipline of
associated with a nursing assessment, a nursing label, and a nursing will continue to exist and thrive in the 21st century
nursing intervention. Thus, quality assurance and quality only if nurses use explicit nursing discipline-specific C-T-E
improvement programs dealing with nursing yield data systems to guide practice and conduct research to deter-
that are relevant to nursing. The long–sought-after and mine the effectiveness of those C-T-E systems in achieving
17Fawcett-17 09/17/2004 2:29 PM Page 596
Appendix
Resources for Conceptual
Models of Nursing and
Nursing Theories*
TABLE AP–1
MILESTONES IN NURSING HISTORY:
CONCEPTUAL MODELS OF NURSING AND NURSING THEORIES
at the Nursing Theory in Action Conference held in King, Levine, Neuman, Rogers, Roy, Holaday (Johnson’s
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, in August 1985. Presenters model), Taylor (Orem’s framework), Parse, Allen (a devel-
include King, Levine, Neuman, Orem (presented by opmental health model), Kritek (nursing diagnosis),
S. Taylor), Rogers, Roy, Newman, and Parse. In addition, a Dickoff and James (theoretical pluralism), and McGee
presentation on the Roper/Logan/Tierney Framework also (criteria for selection and use of a nursing model for
is available. practice).
602
18Fawcett-App 09/17/2004 2:30 PM Page 603
APPENDIX 603
(historical perspective), Lindeman (elitism or realism of tional, Inc. Audiotaped presentations are by King, Orem,
nursing theory), Moccia (emerging world views), Gordon Rogers, Roy, and Parse, followed by critiques of each model
(nursing diagnosis), and Kritek (agendas for the future). or theory. In addition, Peplau presents a historical
In addition, a panel presentation on the impact of nurs- overview of nursing science, and a panel presentation fea-
ing theory on the profession is moderated by Kritek. tures all conference speakers. Videotapes are available for
Concurrent sessions focus on the application of nursing the presentations by Orem and Peplau, as well as for the
models and theories to practice, education, research, and panel presentation.
quality assurance and administration.
Nurse Theorist Conference, 1987
VIDEO PRODUCTIONS Audiotapes and videotapes available from Veranda
The Nurse Theorists: Portraits of Excellence Communications, Inc., 1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY
Videotapes and CD-ROMs available from Fuld Institute 40217.
for Technology in Nursing Education (FITNE), 5 Depot Audiotapes and videotapes from the 1987 Nurse
Street, Athens, OH 45701 (1-800-691-8480; 740-592-2511; Theorist Conference sponsored by Discovery Interna-
E-mail: info@fitne.net; Website: www.fitne.net). tional, Inc. Presentations are by King, Rogers, Roy, Parse,
A series of videotapes, now available as interactive CD- and Watson. In addition, Peplau presents a paper on the art
ROMs, funded by the Helene Fuld Health Trust and pro- and science of nursing, Schlotfeldt presents a paper on
duced by Studio Three of Samuel Merritt College of nursing science in the twenty-first century, and a panel
Nursing in Oakland, California, depicting the major events presentation features all conference speakers. Audiotapes
and incidents in the lives of 16 nurse theorists. Interviews are also available of the small group sessions led by King,
were conducted by Jacqueline Fawcett. The series includes Rogers, Roy, Parse, and Watson.
separate videotapes of Johnson, King, Levine, Neuman,
Orem, Rogers, Roy, Leininger, Newman, Orlando, Parse, Nurse Theorist Conference, 1989
Peplau, Watson, Rubin, Henderson, and Nightingale. Audiotapes and videotapes available from Veranda
Communications, Inc., 1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY
The Nurse Theorists: Excellence in Action 40217.
Videotapes available from Fuld Institute for Technology in Audiotapes and videotapes from the 1989 Nurse
Nursing Education (FITNE), 5 Depot Street, Athens, OH Theorist Conference sponsored by Discovery Interna-
45701 (1-800-691-8480; 740-592-2511; E-mail: info@fitne. tional, Inc. Presentations are by King, Neuman, Rogers, and
net; Website: www.fitne.net). Parse. In addition, Meleis presents a paper on being and be-
Two videotapes, funded by the Helene Fuld Health Trust coming healthy, Pender presents a paper on expression of
and produced by Studio Three of Samuel Merritt College health through beliefs and actions, and a panel presenta-
of Nursing in Oakland, California, depicting the imple- tion features all conference speakers.
mentation of the works of nurse theorists in nursing prac-
tice. The series includes separate videotapes of the Nurse Theorist Conference, 1993
application of Orem’s Self-Care Framework and Roy’s Audiotapes and videotapes available from Veranda
Adaptation Model. Communications, Inc., 1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY
40217.
Nursing Theory: A Circle of Knowledge Audiotapes and videotapes from the 1993 Nurse
Videotape available from National League for Nursing, 61 Theorist Conference sponsored by Discovery Inter-
Broadway, New York, NY 10006. national, Inc. Presentations are by King, Parse, Peplau, and
Patricia Moccia interviews several nurse theorists, in- Rogers. In addition, M.C. Smith, C. Forchuk, G.J. Mitchell,
cluding Orem, Rogers, Roy, Watson, Henderson, and and J. Chapman present a session on nursing theory–based
Benner. The discussion emphasizes philosophy of science. research and practice in Canada, and a panel presentation
features all conference speakers.
AUDIO AND VIDEO PRODUCTIONS
Nurse Theorist Conference, 1985 National Nursing Theory Conference, 1990
Audiotapes and videotapes available from Veranda Audiotapes available from Convention Recorders, 5401
Communications, Inc., 1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY Linda Vista Road, Suite C, San Diego, CA 92110.
40217. Videotape available from UCLA Neuropsychiatric
Audiotapes and videotapes from the 1985 Nurse Institute and Hospital, Nursing Department, 760 West-
Theorist Conference sponsored by Discovery Interna- wood Plaza, Room 17–364, Los Angeles, CA 90024–1759.
18Fawcett-App 09/17/2004 2:30 PM Page 604
604 APPENDIX
Audiotapes of the papers presented at the National Vancouver Health Department, explain the content and
Nursing Theory Conference held at the University of use of Orem’s Self-Care Framework in nursing practice. A
California-Los Angeles Neuropsychiatric Institute and teaching manual and a facilitator’s manual are included
Hospital in September 1990. Presentations are by with the package of videotapes. The package is designed for
Flaskerud, Fawcett, and Meleis, as well as by numerous use by individuals or groups.
nurses who report the results of their use of the works of
Johnson, Neuman, Orem, Rogers, Roy, and Parse. In addi- Care with a Concept
tion, both audiotapes and videotapes of a panel presenta- Videotape available from Health Sciences Consortium, 201
tion featuring the nurse theorists, which is moderated by Cedar Court, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.
Randell, are available. Mary Hale and Gates Rhodes of the University of
Pennsylvania School of Nursing produced this videotape
SPECIFIC RESOURCES documenting the use of Orem’s Self-Care Framework at
Children’s Seashore House, when it was located in Atlantic
KING’S CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM AND City, New Jersey.
THEORY OF GOAL ATTAINMENT
Contact Imogene King directly via e-mail at imkn@earth-
link.net Care Plans That Work
Videotape available from St. Clare Hospital Video
LEVINE’S CONSERVATION MODEL Productions, Dept. No. BB, 515 22nd Avenue, Monroe, WI
Website:www2.oakland.edu/nursing/levinebib.cfm 53566.
Or link to this home page through www.sandiego.edu/ An instructional video that demonstrates the use of
nursing/theory/ Orem’s Self-Care Framework and Roy’s Adaptation Model
to guide nursing care planning.
NEUMAN’S SYSTEMS MODEL
Neuman Systems Model Archives ROGERS’ SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS
Neumann College Library Website:medweb.uwcm.ac.uk/martha
One Neumann Drive Or link to this home page through www.sandiego.edu/
Aston, PA 19014–1298 nursing/theory/
610-361-5206; 610-558-5545 The Martha E. Rogers Center
Websites:www.neumansystemsmodel.com Dr. Joanne Griffin, Director
Or link to this home page through: www.sandiego.edu/ New York University
nursing/theory/ Steinhardt School of Education
Neuman News is available on the Neuman Systems Division of Nursing
Model Website. 246 Greene Street
New York, NY 10003–5300
OREM’S SELF-CARE FRAMEWORK 212-998-5324
International Orem Society for Nursing Science and Society of Rogerian Scholars, Inc.
Scholarship Canal Street Station
Sinclair School of Nursing P.O. Box 1195
University of Missouri–Columbia New York, NY 10013
Columbia, MO 65211 Instructions for subscribing to the Rogers listserv
Websites:www.muhealth.org/%7Enursing/scdnt/scdnt.html are available at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Martha_
Link to other Orem Self-Care Framework websites through E.Rogers
www.sandiego.edu/nursing/theory/ The Martha E. Rogers Collection
Boston University
Video Productions Mugar Library Department of Special Collections
Teaching the Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory History of Nursing Archives
Videotapes available from Media Sales, Biomedical Boston, MA
Communications, University of British Columbia, 2194 617-353-3696
Health Sciences Mall, Room B-32, Vancouver, British e-mail: speccol@bu.edu
Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3. See Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, 8,
Eight videotapes, which were produced by the 74, 2000, for a discussion about the archives.
18Fawcett-App 09/17/2004 2:30 PM Page 605
APPENDIX 605
Video Production Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3R1
The Art of Nursing Website:www.humanbecoming.org/
Videotape and workbook available from Personalized Or link to this website through www.sandiego.edu/nursing/
Nursing Corporation, P.C., theory/
575 S. Main Street, Plymouth, MI 48170. Listserv: PARSE-L
Interactive videotape featuring Marcia Anderson, who To Subscribe to Parse-L, send an e-mail to: listserv@
explains her Personalized LIGHT Model, which is derived listserv.utoronto.ca
from Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, and ap- In the body of the note say ONLY: sub parse-L your-
plies the model with her own patients. firstname yourlastname
For further information contact Pat Lyon pat.lyon@
ROY’S ADAPTATION MODEL sympatico.ca
Roy Adaptation Association Institute of Human Becoming
Sister Callista Roy Discovery International, Inc.
William F. Connell School of Nursing P.O. Box 22034
Boston College Pittsburgh, PA 15222
140 Commonwealth Avenue 412-391-8471 (office)
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 412-391-8458 (fax)
617-552-8862 Website: www.discoveryinternationalonline.com
e-mail: callista.roy@bc.edu
Website:www2.bc.edu/%7Eroyce Audio Productions
Or link to this home page throughwww.sandiego.edu/ Research Seminar: Research Related to Man-
nursing/theory/ Living-Health: An Emerging Methodology
Audiotapes available from Meetings Internationale, Ltd.,
NEWMAN’S THEORY OF HEALTH
1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY 40217.
AS EXPANDING CONSCIOUSNESS
Audiotapes from a research seminar sponsored by
Website:www.healthasexpandingconsciousness.org/ Discovery International, Inc., with a paper by Parse de-
Or link to this website through www.sandiego.edu/nursing/ scribing her research methodology, papers by Sklar and
theory/ M.J. Smith reporting research results, and a panel discus-
Margaret Newman’s professional papers are stored in sion moderated by M. Smith.
the Health Sciences Historical Collections in the University
of Tennessee Health Sciences Library. Contact:
Richard Nollan Research Seminar: Research and Practice
Assistant Professor and Curator Related to Parse’s Theory of Nursing
Health Sciences Historical Collections Audiotapes available from Meetings Internationale, Ltd.,
University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center 1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY 40217.
877 Madison Avenue Audiotapes from a research seminar sponsored by
Memphis, TN 38163 Discovery International, Inc. Parse describes her research
901-338-6053 and practice methodologies; Cody, Beauchamp, and M.
rnollan@utmem.edu Smith report results of their research; and Menke critiques
http://library.utmem.edu/HSLBC/history the research reports. In addition, Mitchell and Santopinto
See Nursing Science Quarterly, 14, 254, July 2001. discuss their experiences using Parse’s theory in practice,
and Menke moderates a panel discussion.
ORLANDO’S THEORY OF THE DELIBERATIVE
NURSING PROCESS Research Seminar: Guided Practice
Website:www.uri.edu/nursing/schmieding/orlando/ in Qualitative Research
Or link to this website through www.sandiego.edu/ Audiotapes available from Meetings Internationale, Ltd.,
nursing/theory/ 1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY 40217.
Audiotapes from a research seminar sponsored by
PARSE’S THEORY OF HUMAN BECOMING Discovery International, Inc., with four papers by Parse
International Consortium of Parse Scholars describing qualitative and quantitative research method-
P.O. Box 94058 ology, the phenomenological method (two parts),
3332 Yonge Street and the ethnographic method; and two papers by
18Fawcett-App 09/17/2004 2:30 PM Page 606
606 APPENDIX
M.J. Smith describing the descriptive method and other WATSON’S THEORY OF HUMAN CARING
qualitative methods. Website: www2.uchsc.edu/son/caring/content/Or link to this
website through www.sandiego.edu/nursing/theory/
Research Seminar: General Topics Listserv: Carenet
Audiotape available from Meetings Internationale, Ltd., To subscribe, send mail to LISTSERV@ADMIN.
1200 Delor Avenue, Louisville, KY 40217. HUMBERC.ON.CA with the command: SUBSCRIBE
Audiotape of a paper by Parse discussing nursing edu- CARENETL
cation in the twenty-first century. International Association for Human Caring
2090 Linglestown Road
Video Productions Suite 107
The Theory of Human Becoming: Living Harrisburg, PA 17110
True Presence in Nursing Practice Phone: 717-703-0033; Fax: 717- 234-6798
The Lived Experience of Serenity Website:www.humancaring.org/
Available from Pat Lyon, 1 Meredith Avenue, Cobourg, Or link to this website through www.sandiego.edu/nursing/
Ontario, Canada K9A 4G6; 905-377-1665 (phone), 905- theory/
377-1533 (fax); e-mail: pat.lyon@sympatico.ca
Order form available at www.humanbecoming.org/ Video Productions
A Guide to Applying the Art and Science
Print Resources of Human Caring: A Consultation with
The Theory of Human Becoming: Jean Watson and Colleagues
A Learning Guide (2nd ed.) Videotapes available from National League for Nursing, 61
Available from Pat Lyon, 1 Meredith Avenue, Cobourg, Broadway, New York, NY 10006. Telephone: 800-669-1656;
Ontario, Canada K9A 4G6; 905-377-1665 (phone), 905- 212-363-5555
377-1533 (fax); e-mail: pat.lyon@sympatico.ca Two videotapes demonstrate the use of Watson’s Theory
Order form available at www.humanbecoming.org/ of Human Caring in nursing practice. The first tape is an
interview with Jean Watson and includes a concise
Patient Focused Care: Sailing Beyond the Boundaries overview of the theory. The second tape is a panel discus-
at Sunnybrook Health Science Centre sion with Watson and her colleagues, including Peggy
Available from Donna Empacher, Sunnybrook Health Chinn, Ruth Neill, Jan Nyberg, and Carol Montgomery,
Science Centre, D404A-2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, that focuses on strategies used to implement the Theory of
Ontario, Canada M4N, 3M5; 416-480-5207 (fax) Human Caring in diverse practice settings.
APPENDIX 607
views of human caring and health. Coverage includes the bases. The following subject headings yield the most rele-
Denver Nursing Project in Human Caring, which focuses vant citations for conceptual models of nursing when
on individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome searching Medline:
(AIDS), and Quinn’s Senior Citizen’s Therapeutic Touch Nursing Models
Education Program. Nursing Theories
608 APPENDIX
King Interacting System Peplau Interpersonal Relations
Levine Conservation Watson Human Caring
Neuman Systems
Orem Self Care A discussion of computer and hand searches is given in
Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings Johnson, E.D. (1989). In search of applications of nursing
Roy Adaptation theories: The Nursing Citation Index. Bulletin of the
Newman Health Medical Library Association, 77, 176–184. See also Allen,
Orlando M. Searching bibliographic databases for nursing theory.
Parse Man-Living-Health On-line at www.sandiego.edu/nursing/theory/student.htm
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 609
Index
Page numbers followed by f indicate figures; page numbers followed by t indicate tables.
Achievement subsystem, of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, Behavioral systems, nature and operation of, described, 62–63
66 Body image, in King’s Conceptual System, 96
Action(s) Boundary(ies)
in King’s Conceptual System, 99–102, 100t, 102f defined, 14
in subsystems of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67 in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134
Adaptation
defined, 136 Care Plans That Work, 604
in Levine’s Conservation Model, 136–137 Care with a Concept, 604
philosophical claim about, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 366 Caring
in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 377 assumptions related to, in Watson’s Theory of Human Caring,
Adaptation level, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 377 556
Adaptive modes, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 373–376 human, assumptions related to, in Watson’s Theory of Human
Administration, nursing. See Nursing administration Caring, 556
Administration of nursing services guidelines, in Levine’s Caring (healing) consciousness, in Watson’s Theory of Human
Conservation Model, 148–149 Caring, 562
Aggressive subsystem, of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 66 Caring moment/caring occasion, in Watson’s Theory of Human
Anchoring-shifting, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 479 Caring, 562
Antecedent knowledge, in Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, Categories of knowledge, 13–16
560 client-focused, 15
Art, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 378–379 conservation, 16
Attachment or affiliative subsystem, of Johnson’s Behavioral described, 13–14
System Model, 65–66 developmental, 14
Authority, in King’s Conceptual System, 98 energy fields, 16
enhancement, 16
Balance, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67–68 interaction, 15
Becoming, assumptions about, in Parse’s Theory of Human intervention, 16
Becoming, 474–475 needs, 15
Behavior(s) nursing therapeutics, 16
fundamental values about, in Johnson’s Behavioral System outcomes, 15
Model, 62 person-environment-focused, 15
patient’s, in Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing substitution, 16
Process, 510–511 sustenance/support, 16
philosophical claims about human beings and, in Peplau’s systems, 14–15
Theory of Interpersonal Relations, 529–530 Causality, assumptions about, in Rogers’ Science of Unitary
in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 372–373 Human Beings, 317
in subsystems of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67 Change, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 139
609
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 610
610 INDEX
Choice, in subsystems of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67 integration of, levels of, 46
CINAHL. See Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health nursing discipline-specific, 592–593
Literature (CINAHL) perspective transformation in, 42–46, 44f. See also Perspective
Client/client system, in Neuman’s Systems Model, 171, 173f transformation, in C-T-E system-based nursing process
Client-focused category of knowledge, 15 implementation
Clinical Caritas Processes, in Watson’s Theory of Human research and practice and, integration of, 593–596, 594f, 595f
Caring, 562–565 Conflict, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134
Closed systems, defined, 14 Confusion, in perspective transformation, in C-T-E system-
Communication, in King’s Conceptual System, 97–98 based nursing process implementation, 43, 44f
Comprehensiveness of content Congruence
in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 71–74 logical. See Logical congruence
in nursing model evaluation, 54, 58t social. See Social congruence
Computer search strategies, resources for, 607–608 Connecting-separating, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming,
Concept(s) 477
defined, 4 Conscious integration, in C-T-E system-based nursing process
in nursing knowledge, 4 implementation, 46
Conceptual environment, of Levine’s Conservation Model, 136 Consciousness
Conceptual model(s), 4f, 16–18. See also Conceptual model(s) in Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness,
of nursing 456, 457t
defined, 45 philosophical claims of, in Newman’s Theory of Health as
functions of, 17 Expanding Consciousness, 452
Conceptual model(s) of nursing, 17–18 Conservation
translation of, in C-T-E system-based nursing practice, 34–36, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 138–139
34f nursing process as, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 140,
Conceptual models of nursing and nursing theories, 601–608 143–144
Conceptual-theoretical-empirical (C-T-E) system-based nursing Conservation category of knowledge, 16
practice, 32–33 Contemporary nursing knowledge. See Nursing knowledge
functions of, 33 Content
guidelines for, 36–38 comprehensiveness of, in nursing model evaluation, 54, 58t
implementation of of nursing model, 53, 57t
institution-wide, 42 Contributions of model to discipline of nursing, in nursing
process elements of, 38–42 model evaluation, 56–57, 58t
demonstration sites, 42 Control, in King’s Conceptual System, 98
development, 40–41 Conversation on Caring with Jean Watson and Janet Quinn, A,
dissemination of implementation project procedures and 606–607
outcomes, 42 Coping, in King’s Conceptual System, 98
education of nursing staff, 41–42 Coping processes, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 371–372
formation of task force for feasibility study, 38 Corporation(s), nurse, 596–597
idea, 38 Credibility of nursing model
institution-wide implementation, 42 Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 75–82, 77t–79t, 81t
outcome evaluation, 42 King’s Conceptual System, 108–118
planning committee and long-range plan, 38–39 Levine’s Conservation Model, 151–159, 153t–155t, 157t–158t
review of documents, 39–40 in nursing model evaluation, 55–56, 58t
selection, 40–41 C-T-E system-based nursing practice. See Conceptual-
vision, 38 theoretical-empirical (C-T-E) system-based nursing practice
substantive elements of, 33–38, 34f Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature
translating conceptual model theories and empirical (CINAHL), 607
indicators in, 34–36, 34f
translating empirical indicators in, 34–36, 34f DAI. See Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI)
translating metaparadigm concepts for nursing in, 33, 34f Decision making, in King’s Conceptual System, 98
translating philosophy of nursing in, 33–34, 34f Deliberate action, assumptions about, in Orem’s Self-Care
translating theories in, 34–36, 34f Framework, 227–228, 229
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 611
INDEX 611
Demonstration sites, in C-T-E system-based nursing process of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67
implementation, 42 of King’s Conceptual System, 99
Dependent care, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 236 internal
Dependent-care agency, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 237 of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67
Dependent-care agent, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 236 of King’s Conceptual System, 98
Dependent-care deficit, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 238 of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67
Developmental category of knowledge, 14 of Levine’s Conservation Model, 133
Directed integration, in C-T-E system-based nursing process operational, of Levine’s Conservation Model, 136
implementation, 46 of Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 238–239
Disease(s) perceptual, of Levine’s Conservation Model, 136
Levine’s Conservation Model and, 140 Equilibrium, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134
philosophical claims of, in Newman’s Theory of Health as Evaluation, of nursing model, 53–57, 57t–58t. See also Nursing
Expanding Consciousness, 452, 453 models, evaluation of
Dissemination of implementation project procedures and Evaluation of outcomes, in C-T-E system-based nursing process
outcomes, in C-T-E system-based nursing process implementation, 42
implementation, 42 Explication of origins
Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI), 607 of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 71
Dissonance, in perspective transformation, in C-T-E system- of King’s Conceptual System, 102–103
based nursing process implementation, 43, 44f of Levine’s Conservation Model, 145
Dwelling with uncertainty, in perspective transformation, in in nursing model evaluation, 53–54, 57t–58t
C-T-E system-based nursing process implementation, 43, 44f External environment
of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67
Education of King’s Conceptual System, 99
nursing. See Nursing education of Levine’s Conservation Model, 135–136
of nursing staff, in C-T-E system-based nursing process External regulatory force, of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model,
implementation, 41–42 68–71, 69t–70t
Empirical adequacy
evaluation of, 445
of Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process, Fawcett proposal, for metaparadigm of nursing, 6–8
517–518, 519t–521t Feedback
of Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 484, 485t–488t defined, 15
of Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, 540–541, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134
542t–544t Fight or flight response, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 137
of Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, 571, 572t–574t Focus, unique, of nursing model, 53, 57t
Empirical indicators, 21 Force(s), defined, 14
function of, 21 Functional requirements, of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model,
nursing, 21 dimensions of, 67
translation of, in C-T-E system-based nursing practice, 34–36,
34f Generation of theory
Enabling-limiting, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 477 in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 74–75
Energy fields in King’s Conceptual System, 107–108
beliefs about, in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 149–151
317 in Neuman’s Systems Model, 184–185
in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 321 in nursing model evaluation, 55, 58t
Energy fields category of knowledge, 16 in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 261–264
Enhancement category of knowledge, 16 in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 332–335
Entrepreneur(s), nurse, 596–597 in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 389–393
Environment Goal of nursing, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 68
assumptions about, of Neuman’s Systems Model, 168 Grand theory, 19–20, 20f
conceptual, of Levine’s Conservation Model, 136 Growth and development, in King’s Conceptual System, 96
defined, 14 Guide to Applying the Art and Science of Human Caring: A
external Consultation with Jean Watson and Colleagues, A, 606
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 612
612 INDEX
INDEX 613
contributions to discipline of nursing, 82–83 King’s Conceptual System, 88–127
credibility of, 75–82, 77t–79t, 81t action in, 99–102, 100t–101t, 102f
described, 62–63 analysis of, 89–94, 94f
dimensions of, 65–66 assumptions about human beings of, 91–92
environment of, 67 assumptions about nurse-client interactions in, 92
evaluation of, 71–83 assumptions about open systems of, 91
external regulatory force in, 68–71, 69t–70t authority in, 98
change structural components in, 68 beliefs about nursing in, 92
dimensions in, 68 body image in, 96
fulfill functional requirements in, 68 category of knowledge of, 94–95
impose external regulatory or control mechanisms, 68 interaction-related, 95
functional requirements of, 67 systems-related, 95
fundamental values about behavior in, 62 communication in, 97–98
generation of theory in, 74–75 concepts in, 95–96
goal of nursing in, 69 content of, 95–99
historical evolution of, 61–62 comprehensiveness of, 103–107, 105t
imbalance and instability in, 68 contributions to discipline of nursing, 118–119
influences from other scholars on, 63–64 control in, 98
logical congruence of, 74 coping in, 98
motivation for, 61–62 credibility of, 108–118
nature and operation of, beliefs about, 62–63 decision making in, 98
nonrelational propositions of, 65 evaluation of, 102–118, 105t, 110t–113t, 115t–116t
in nursing administration, 77t, 79–80 external environment in, 99
nursing education and, 76, 79 generation of theory in, 107–108
guidelines based on, 73 growth and development in, 96
in nursing practice, 80, 81t health in, 99
nursing practice guidelines based on, 74, 80, 81t historical evolution of, 89–91
nursing research guidelines based on, 72–73, 76, 77t–79t illness in, 99
nurturance in, 67 influences from other scholars on, 93, 94f
origins of, 61–64 interaction(s) in, 97
explication of, 71 interaction process in, 99–102, 100t–101t, 102f
philosophical claims of, 62–63 interaction-transaction process of, 100t–101t, 102, 102f
practice methodology of, 69t–70t internal environment in, 98
protection in, 67 interpersonal system of, 97–98
relational propositions in, 70–71 knowledge development in, strategies for, 92–93
social congruence of, 80–82 learning in, 97
social significance of, 82 logical congruence in, 107
social utility of, 75–76, 79–80 motivation for, 89–91
stimulation in, 67 nonrelational propositions of, 96–99
strategies for knowledge development in, 63 nursing administration in, 114
structural components of, 66–67 nursing education guidelines in, 105–106, 114
subsystems of, 65–67 nursing practice guidelines in, 107–108, 115–117, 115t–116t
action in, 67 nursing practice in, 115–117, 115t–116t
behavior in, 67 nursing research guidelines in, 104–106, 110, 110t–113t, 114
choice in, 67 nursing services guidelines in, administration of, 106
drive in, 66 organization in, 98
goal in, 66 origins of, 89–92
set in, 66–67 explication of, 102–103
unique focus of, 64 perception in, 96
world view in, 64 personal space in, 97
personal system in, 96–97
Kim proposal, for metaparadigm of nursing, 8–9 philosophical claims of, 91–92
King proposal, for metaparadigm of nursing, 8 power in, 98
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 614
614 INDEX
INDEX 615
Medline, 607 practice guidelines in, 183–184
Meleis proposal, for metaparadigm of nursing, 10 external environment of, 174
Metaparadigm, 4–11, 4f. See also Metaparadigm of nursing family as client system in, 191t–192t
defined, 4 flexible line of defense in, 172
functions of, 4–5 generation of theory in, 184–185
history of, 4 health/wellness/optimal client system stability in, 175
requirements for, 5 historical background of, 166–222
Metaparadigm of nursing, 5–11 historical evolution of, 167
contemporary issues related to, 11 illness in, 176
origins of, 5 influences from other scholars in, 169
proposals for, 5–11 interacting variables in, 171–172
Fawcett proposal, 6–8 internal environment of, 174
Jacobs proposal, 11 knowledge development in, strategies for, 169
Kim proposal, 8–9 lines of resistance in, 172–174
King proposal, 8 logical congruence of, 184
Leninger, Watson, and Lewis proposal, 9–10 motivation for, 167
Malloch, Martinez, Nelson, Predeger, Speakman, normal line of defense in, 172
Steinbinder, and Tracy proposal, 9 nursing practice guided by, published reports of, 202t–204t
Meleis proposal, 10 organization as client system in, 192t
Newman, Sime, and Corcoran-Perry proposal, 9 origins of, 167–170
Newman proposal, 8 explication of, 180
Parse proposal, 10 philosophical claims of, 167–169
Thorne, Canam, Dahinten, Hall, Henderson, and Kirkham practice tools from, 189t–192t
proposal, 10–11 prevention as intervention in, 176–177
translation of, in C-T-E system-based nursing practice, 33, process format of, 178t–179t
34f reconstitution in, 176
Middle-range theory, 19–20, 20f research guided by, published reports of, 193t–197t
Moving-initiating, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, research instruments derived from, 188t–189t
478–479 resources for, 604
social congruence of, 201–205, 202t–204t
National Nursing Theory Conference, 1990, 603–604 social significance of, 205–207
Needs category of knowledge, 15 social utility of, 185–201, 188t–197t
Neuman’s Systems Model, 166–222 stressors of, 174–175
analysis of, 167–180 unique focus of, 170–171
basic philosophy of, 168 variances from wellness in, 176
basic structure of, 172 world view from, 169–170
category knowledge in, 170–171 Newman, Sime, and Corcoran-Perry proposal, for
client/client system in, 171, 173f metaparadigm of nursing, 9
community as client system in, 192t Newman proposal, for metaparadigm of nursing, 8
content of, 171–188 Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness,
comprehensiveness of, 180–184 450–470
concepts, 171 analysis of, 451–457, 457t
nonrelational propositions, 171–177, 178t–179t content of, 452–454, 455–457, 457t
relational propositions, 177, 180 concepts, 455
contributions to discipline of nursing, 207 consciousness, 456, 457t
created environment of, 174 nonrelational propositions, 455–456
credibility of, 185–207, 188t–197t, 202t–204t pattern, 455–456
determination of nursing care derived from, 189t relational propositions, 456–457
educational tools derived from, 192t context of
evaluation of, 180–207, 188t–197t, 202t–204t antecedent knowledge, 454
administration of health services guidelines in, 183 conceptual model, 454
education guidelines in, 182–183 metaparadigm concepts and propositions, 452
research guidelines in, 182 philosophical claims, 452
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 616
616 INDEX
Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness in Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, 530
(continued) in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 367–368
empirical adequacy of, 461–465, 462t–464t in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 323–326,
evaluation of, 457–467, 459t–460t, 463t–465t, 466t 324t–325t
internal consistency of, 457 values about, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 367
nursing education and, 465 Nursing administration
nursing practice and, 465–467, 467t general theory of, presuppositions for, Orem’s Self-Care
parsimony of, 458–459 Framework and, 230
pragmatic adequacy of, 465–467, 466t guidelines for, 37–38
research guided by, published reports of, 462–464t Johnson’s Behavioral System Model and, 77t, 79–80
resources for, 605 King’s Conceptual System and, 114
scope of, 451 Levine’s Conservation Model and, utility of, 152, 155t, 156
significance of, 457–458 Nursing agency, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 240–243,
testability of, 459–461, 459t–460t 243t–249t
Young’s stages of evolution vs., 457t Nursing discipline-specific C-T-E systems, 592–593
Nonrelational proposition, defined, 4 Nursing education
Nurse(s) guidelines for, 37
patients and, philosophical claims about interactions between, Levine’s Conservation Model and, 148
in Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process, Johnson’s Behavioral System Model and, 76, 79
508 King’s Conceptual System and, 105–106, 114
philosophical claims about, in Peplau’s Theory of Levine’s Conservation Model and, utility of, 152
Interpersonal Relations, 530 Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness
Nurse corporations, 596–597 and, 465
Nurse entrepreneurs, 596–597 Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process and,
Nurse scholars, 596 518, 521–522
Nurse scholars/nurse theorists, philosophical claims about, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming and, 484, 489
Roy’s Adaptation Model, 367–368 Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations and, 544
Nurse Theorist Conference Watson’s Theory of Human Caring and, 574–578, 576t–577t
1985, 603 Nursing history, milestones in, 602t
1987, 603 Nursing knowledge. See also Nursing education
1989, 603 components of, 4–21, 4f. See also specific components, e.g.,
1993, 603 Metaparadigm of nursing
Nurse Theorist Conference, 601 concepts in, 4
Nurse-patient relationship conceptual models, 4f, 16–18
in Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, recording of, distinctions between, 4f, 21–24
instrumentation in, 541t empirical indicators, 21
philosophical claims about, in Peplau’s Theory of metaparadigm, 4–11, 4f
Interpersonal Relations, 530 philosophies, 4f, 11–16
Nursing propositions in, 4
assumptions about theories, 4f, 18–21
in Neuman’s Systems Model, 169 language in, 24–25
in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 228, 229 structural holarchy of, 4–21, 4f
in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 317–318 structure of, 3–30
assumptions related to, in Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, in 21st century, 587–599
557–558 Nursing models
beliefs about, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 63 analysis of, 52–53
discipline of, 590–591, 591f framework for, 57t–58t
survival of, proposal for enhancing, 595–596 content of, 53, 57t
goal of, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 69 credibility of, in nursing model evaluation, 55–56, 58t
guidelines for, 36–38 evaluation of
philosophical claims about comprehensiveness of content in, 54, 58t
in Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process, contributions to discipline of nursing in, 56–57, 58t
508 explication of origins in, 53–54, 57t–58t
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 617
INDEX 617
framework for, 57t–58t theory content in, 442–443
generation of theory in, 55, 58t theory context in, 442
logical congruence in, 54–55, 58t theory scope in, 442
questions for, 53–57, 57t–58t evaluation of
social congruence in, 56, 58t empirical adequacy, 445
social significance in, 56, 58t framework for, 443–449, 447t–448t
social utility in, 55–56, 58t internal consistency in, 443
implementation of, 31–48. See also specific model parsimony in, 443–444
origins of, 52–53 pragmatic adequacy of, 445–446
theories, research, and practice and, integration of, 589–595 significance in, 443
unique focus of, 53, 57t steps in, 443–446
Nursing practice testability in, 444
guidelines for, 36 websites for, 601
Levine’s Conservation Model and, 149 Nursing Theory: A Circle of Knowledge, 603
Johnson’s Behavioral System Model in, 80, 81t Nursing Theory Congress
King’s Conceptual System and, 115–117, 115t–116t 1986, 602
guidelines for, 107–108 1988, 602–603
Levine’s Conservation Model and, utility of, 156, 157t–158t Nursing Theory in Action, 601–602
Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness Nursing therapeutics category of knowledge, 16
and, 465–467, 467t Nurturance, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67
Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process and,
522–525, 523t–524t Open systems
Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming and, 489–498, 491t–494t, defined, 14
496t–498t in Levine’s Conservation Model, 133
Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations and, 544–548, Openness, in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 321
545t–546t Operational environment, of Levine’s Conservation Model, 136
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring and, 578–580, 579t Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 223–314
Nursing practice process, nursing research process and, parallel basic conditioning factors in, 237
between, 595t case management operations in, 243t
Nursing process, as nursing diagnostic and treatment process, in category of knowledge in, 232–233
Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 69, 69t–70t concepts in, 233
Nursing Process as Conservation, in Levine’s Conservation content of, 233–249
Model, 140, 143–144 comprehensiveness of, 250–260, 261t–266t
Nursing research contributions to discipline of nursing, 293–294
guidelines for, 36–37 control of operations in, 249t
Levine’s Conservation Model and, 147–148 credibility of, 258–293
Johnson’s Behavioral System Model in, 76, 77t–79t dependent care in, 236
King’s Conceptual System and, 104–106, 110, 110t–113t, 114 dependent-care agency in, 237
instruments for, 110t dependent-care agent in, 236
Levine’s Conservation Model and, utility of, 152 dependent-care deficit in, 238
Nursing research process, nursing practice process and, parallel diagnostic operations in, 243t–245t
between, 595t environmental features in, 238–239
Nursing services, in King’s Conceptual System, guidelines for, evaluation of, 249–292
administration of, 106 generation of theory in, 261–264
Nursing staff, education of, in C-T-E system-based nursing health state in, 239–240
process implementation, 41–42 historical evolution of, 224–226
Nursing system, theory of, presuppositions for, in Orem’s Self- influences from other scholars in, 231
Care Framework, 230 knowledge development in, strategies for, in Orem’s Self-Care
Nursing theories, 20–21, 439–585. See specific theory and Framework, 230–231
Theory(ies) logical congruence of, 261
analysis of, 439–443 motivation for, 224–226
framework for, 441–443, 447t nonrelational propositions of, 233–248
steps in, 442–443 nursing agency in, 240–243, 243t–249t
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 618
618 INDEX
INDEX 619
moving-initiating in, 478–479 antecedent knowledge, 531–532
nursing education and, 484, 489 conceptual model, 531
nursing practice guided by, 489–498, 491t–494t, 496t–498t metaparadigm concepts and proposition, 529
published reports of, 492t–493t philosophical claims, 529–531
originating in, 477 empirical adequacy of, 540–541, 542t–544t
parsimony of, 480–481 evaluation of, 536–548
pondering-shaping in, 479 internal consistency of, 537
powering in, 477 nurse-patient relationship in, 532–536, 533f, 534f
practice methodology of, 491t–494t recording of, instrumentation in, 541t
pragmatic adequacy of, 484, 489–498, 491t–494t, 496t–498t nursing education and, 544
principles in, 477–478 nursing practice and, 544–548, 545t–546t
resources for, 605–606 parsimony of, 537–538
revealing-concealing in, 477 pragmatic adequacy of, 541, 544–548
rhythmicity in, 465 research guided by, 542t–544t
scope of, 473 resources for, 606
significance of, 479–480 scope of, 529
testability of, 481–484, 482t, 483t significance of, 536–537
transcendence in, 476 testability of, 538–540, 538t–540t
transforming in, 477 Perception, in King’s Conceptual System, 96
valuing in, 476–477 Perceptual awareness, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 137–138
Parsimony Perceptual environment, of Levine’s Conservation Model, 136
of Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness, Personal space, in King’s Conceptual System, 97
458–459 Personal system, in King’s Conceptual System, dimensions of,
in nursing theory evaluation, 443–444 96–97
of Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process, 515 Person-environment-focused category of knowledge, 15
of Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 480–481 Perspective transformation
of Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, 537–538 in C-T-E system-based nursing process implementation,
of Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, 568 42–46, 44f
Patient(s) components of, 43–44, 44f
behavior of, in Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing confusion in, 43, 44f
Process, 510–511 dissonance in, 43, 44f
nurses and, philosophical claims about interactions between, dwelling with uncertainty in, 43, 44f
in Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process, facilitation of, strategies in, 45–46
508 reconceptualization in, 44, 44f
philosophical claims about, in Orlando’s Theory of the resolution in, 44, 44f
Deliberative Nursing Process, 508 return to stability in, 44, 44f
Patient Focused Care: Sailing Beyond the Boundaries at saturation in, 43, 44f
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 606 defined, 42
Pattern Philosophical assumptions, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 367
in Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness, Philosophies of nursing, 12–16
455–456 categories of knowledge in, 13–16
philosophical claims of, in Newman’s Theory of Health as client-focused, 15
Expanding Consciousness, 452, 453 conservation, 16
in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 321–322, 322t described, 13–14
Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations, 528–552 developmental, 14
analysis of, 529–536 energy fields, 16
clinical methodology of, 538t–540t enhancement, 16
philosophical claims undergirding, 530–531 interaction, 15
clinical practice guided by, 545t–546t intervention, 16
content of, 532–536, 533f, 534f needs, 15
nonrelational propositions, 532–536 nursing therapeutics, 16
context of, 529–532 outcomes, 15
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 620
620 INDEX
INDEX 621
origins of, 316–319 nonrelational propositions of, 371–379, 379t–382t
explication of, 326–327 nursing diagnosis in, 380t–381t
pandimensionality in, 322 nursing education guidelines in, 386–387
pattern in, 321–322, 322t nursing practice guidelines in, 388
pattern manifestation knowing and appreciation in published reports of, 417t–419t
assessment of, 324t nursing research guidelines in, 385–386
evaluation of, 325t nursing services guidelines in, administration of, 387–388
philosophical claims of, 317–318 origins of, 366–369
practice tools derived from, 338t–339t explication of, 383
relational propositions in, 326 philosophical claims of, 366–368
research guided by, published reports of, 341t–346t practice methodology of, 379t–382t
correlational studies, 342t–344t practice tools in, 397t–399t
descriptive studies, 341t–343t relational propositions in, 382–383, 382t
experimental studies, 344t–345t research guided by, published reports of, 400t–413t
research instruments derived from, 337t–338t correlational studies, 405t–409t
resources for, 604–605 descriptive studies, 400t–405t
social congruence of, 349–350 experimental studies, 409t–413t
social significance of, 350 research instruments in, 396t–397t
social utility of, 335–349, 337t–345t, 347t–348t resources for, 605
unique focus of, 319–320 role function mode in, 375
voluntary mutual patterning in, 324t–325t science in, 378
well-being in, 322–323 self-concept/group identity mode in, 274–275
world view in, 318–319 social congruence of, 416, 419
Role(s), in King’s Conceptual System, 98 social significance of, 419–421
Role function mode, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 375 social utility of, 393–416, 395t–413t, 417t–419t
Roy’s Adaptation Model, 364–437 stimuli in, 376–377
adaptation in, 377 unique focus of, 369–370
adaptation level in, 377 world view in, 369
adaptive modes in, physiological/physical mode, 373–374
analysis of, 366–383, 379t–382t, 382f Saturation, in perspective transformation, in C-T-E system-
art in, 378–379 based nursing process implementation, 43, 44f
assessment of behavior in, 379t–380t Scholar(s), nurse, 596
assessment of stimuli in, 380t Science, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 378
behaviors in, 372–373 Scientific assumptions, philosophical claims about, in Roy’s
category of knowledge in, 370 Adaptation Model, 367
concepts of, 370–371 Self, in King’s Conceptual System, 96
content of, 370–383, 379t–382t, 382f Self-care
comprehensiveness of, 384–388 in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 236, 258t
contributions to discipline of nursing, 421–422 presuppositions about, 227
coping processes in, 371–372 requisites for, assumptions about, in Orem’s Self-Care
credibility of, 393–421, 395t–413t, 417t–419t Framework, 227
evaluation of, 383–422, 395t–413t, 417t–419t theory of, presuppositions about, in Orem’s Self-Care
generation of theory in, 389–393 Framework, 229
goal setting in, 381t Self-care agency, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 236–237
health in, 378 Self-care agent, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 236
historical evolution of, 366 Self-care deficit
human adaptive system in, 371 in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 238
influences from other scholars in, 368–369 theory of, presuppositions for, in Orem’s Self-Care
interdependence mode in, 376 Framework, 229–230
intervention in, 381t Self-Care Deficit Theory of Nursing, 223–314. See also Orem’s
knowledge development in, strategies for, 368 Self-Care Framework
logical congruence of, 388–389 Self-care demand, therapeutic, in Orem’s Self-Care Framework,
motivation for, 366 234–236
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 622
622 INDEX
Self-concept/group identity mode, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, Stress response, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 137
274–275 Stressor(s), in Neuman’s Systems Model, 174–175
Sexual subsystem, of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 66 Substitution category of knowledge, 16
Sigma Theta Tau International Registry of Nursing Research, Sustenance/support category of knowledge, 16
607–608 Synthesis, in perspective transformation, in C-T-E system-based
Significance, in nursing theory evaluation, 443 nursing process implementation, 43–44, 44f
Simple Things: Writings of Human Becoming by Sandra Schmidt System(s)
Bunkers, 606 closed, defined, 14
Simultaneous action world view, 13 defined, 14, 133
Social congruence in King’s Conceptual System, defined, 95
of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 80–82 in Levine’s Conservation Model, 133
of King’s Conceptual System, 117–118 nature and operation of, beliefs about, in Johnson’s
of Levine’s Conservation Model, utility of, 156, 158 Behavioral System Model, 62–63
of Neuman’s Systems Model, 201–205, 202t–204t open, defined, 14
in nursing model evaluation, 56, 58t System environment, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67
of Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 287–292, 288t–291t Systems category of knowledge, 14–15
of Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 349–350 of King’s Conceptual System, 95
of Roy’s Adaptation Model, 416, 419
Social significance Task force, for feasibility study, formation of, in C-T-E system-
of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 82 based nursing process implementation, 38
of King’s Conceptual System, 118 Teaching the Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, 604
of Levine’s Conservation Model, 158–159 Tension, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134
of Neuman’s Systems Model, 2052–07 Testability, in nursing theory evaluation, 444
in nursing model evaluation, 56, 58t The Art of Nursing, 605
of Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 292 The Nurse Theorists: Excellence in Action, 603
of Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 350 The Nurse Theorists: Portraits of Excellence, 603
of Roy’s Adaptation Model, 419–421 The Second Annual Nurse Educator Conference, 601
Social system, in King’s Conceptual System, dimensions of, 98 The Theory of Human Becoming: A Learning Guide (2nd ed.), 606
Social utility The Theory of Human Becoming: Living True Presence in Nursing
of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 75–76, 79–80 Practice, 606
of King’s Conceptual System, 108–110 Theoretical substructure, 20
of Levine’s Conservation Model, 151–156, 153t–155t Theories at Work, 606
of Neuman’s Systems Model, 185–201, 188t–197t Theory(ies), 4f, 18–21
in nursing model evaluation, 55–56, 58t functions of, 20
of Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 264–266, 267t–284t, 284–287 grand, 19–20, 20f
of Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 335–349, implementation of, 31–48. See also specific theory
337t–345t, 347t–348t in C-T-E system-based nursing practice, 32–33
of Roy’s Adaptation Model, 393–416, 395t–413t, 417t–419t middle-range, 19–20, 20f
Space, personal, in King’s Conceptual System, 97 nursing, 20–21
Specificity, in adaptation, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 137 translation of, in C-T-E system-based nursing practice, 34–36,
Spirituality, assumptions about, in Neuman’s Systems Model, 34f
168 Theory formalization, 20
Stability Theory of Conservation, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 151
in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67–68 Theory of Goal Attainment, in King’s Conceptual System,
return to, in perspective transformation, in C-T-E system- 107–108
based nursing process implementation, 44, 44f Theory of Redundancy, in Levine’s Conservation Model,
Status, in King’s Conceptual System, 98 150–151
Steady state, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134 Theory of Therapeutic Intention, in Levine’s Conservation
Stimulation, in Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, 67 Model, 150
Stimulus(i), in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 376–377 Thorne, Canam, Dahinten, Hall, Henderson, and Kirkham
Strain, in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134 proposal, for metaparadigm of nursing, 10–11
Stress Time, in King’s Conceptual System, 96
in King’s Conceptual System, 98 Transaction(s), in King’s Conceptual System, 98
in Levine’s Conservation Model, 134 Transcendence, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 476
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 623
INDEX 623
Transforming, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 477 context of, 555–560
Transpersonal caring relationship antecedent knowledge, 560
assumptions related to, in Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, conceptual model, 558–560
556–557 metaparadigm concepts and proposition, 555
in Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, 561–562 philosophical claims, 555–558
Trophicognosis, 141t, 143–144 empirical adequacy of, 571, 572t–574t
evaluation of, 566–580, 568t–570t, 572t–574t, 577t–578t, 579t
Uncertainty, dwelling with, in perspective transformation, in internal consistency in, 566–567
C-T-E system-based nursing process implementation, 43, 44f nursing education and, 574–578, 577t–578t
Unconscious integration, in C-T-E system-based nursing process nursing practice guided by, 578–580, 579t
implementation, 46 published reports of, 579t
Unique focus, of nursing model, 53, 57t parsimony of, 568
Universe, philosophical claims of, in Newman’s Theory of practice methodology for, 577t–578t
Health as Expanding Consciousness, 452, 453 pragmatic adequacy of, 571, 574–580, 577t–578t, 579t
research guided by, published reports of, 572t–574t
Value(s), about nursing, in Roy’s Adaptation Model, 367 research instruments and practice tools derived from, 570t
Valuing, in Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming, 476–477 scope of, 555
Vision, in C-T-E system-based nursing process implementation, significance of, 566
38 testability of, 568–571, 568t–570t
Watson’s Transcendental-Poetic Expression of Phenomenology
Watson’s Descriptive-Empirical Phenomenological Research Research Method, 569t
Method, 568t Watsons’s Theory of Human Caring, resources for, 606–607
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, 553–585 Well-being
analysis of, 554–566 in Orem’s Self-Care Framework, 240
caring (healing) consciousness in, 562 in Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, 322–323
caring moment/caring occasion in, 562 Wellness, beliefs about, in Neuman’s Systems Model, 168
Clinical Caritas Processes in, 562–565 Wholism, belief about, in Neuman’s Systems Model, 168
content of, 560–566 World, beliefs about, 317
concepts, 560–561
nonrelational propositions, 561–565
relational propositions, 565–566 Young’s stages of evolution, Newman’s Theory of Health as
transpersonal caring relationship, 561–562 Expanding Consciousness vs., 457t
19Fawcett-Index 09/20/2004 7:48 PM Page 624