Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CLASSROOM TEACHER’S
HANDBOOK
Andrew Ayliffe a1688596
Table of Contents
KEY CLASSROOM FEATURES ................................................................................................................... 2
S I G N A L I N T E R F E R E N C E .....................................................................................................................6
PLANNED IGNORING ..................................................................................................................................7
PROXIMITY INTERFERENCE .......................................................................................................................7
W AIT FOR SILENCE ...................................................................................................................................8
TASK & TEACHING ALTERATION ...............................................................................................................8
BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 14
It clearly demonstrates how we must tailor our lesson to best suit the learner. It
works on the principle of the task at hand is nor too easy or too difficult for the
learn. This therefore should keep them engaged in the task. If the task is too
challenging, then the learner can become anxious. If the task is too simple, then
the learner can become bored. (Matthews, 2018) (Figure 1)
Figure 2: This figure displays the key features required within a classroom to
boost a student’s motivation to succeed. Such features are essential to keep the
classroom functioning at an optimal level.
Preventative actions
Praise
Praise is a major component of any teaching, not only do students want to feel
comfortable in a learning environment they want to feel like they can complete
the task. When a student completes a task it’s important to make them feel
successful.
The praise is most effective to the individual and the reason as to why the praise
is stated.
It’s important to show you really do appreciate what they have done. This can be
seen by:
Ensure that the students feel safe and welcomed when entering lesson
Enable all students an equal opportunity for input
Strive to create an environment where all students feel comfortable to ask
questions and share ideas
Cater tasks so all students can accomplish
Be clear and consistent with boundaries
Be the role model for the students by always displaying appropriate
behaviour.
Be approachable and friendly to the students.
Figure 4: Bill Rogers is a key icon within the Australian Education world due
to his grounded and fair approach to establishing a safe learning
environment.
Figure 5: Amy from Teaching with Bayley uses extrinsic motivation to gain
student interest in the work and also to behave correctly. She uses a merit
system which incorporates a letter home to the parents describing the good
behaviour and if they continue to behave well they become eligible for the
school science excursion.
Be the role model for the students by always displaying appropriate behaviour.
Be approachable and friendly to the students. This will further increase the
chances of building student rapport whilst maintaining positive examples of good
behaviour.
Supportive actions
There are 4 main benefits to using nonverbal correctives when dealing with bad
behaviour. These are:
-Disruption to the learning process is less likely to occur
-Hostile confrontation with the student is less likely to happen
-Student is provided with the opportunity to correct their own behaviour before
the correctives become teacher centred or public interventions.
-Maximum number of alternate correctives are left for future use. Non-verbal
interactions aren’t always necessary to be deployed first, especially if the
behaviour displayed by the student is dangerous or harmful to other students. It
should be stopped quickly if its largely disruptive or dangerous.
Signal interference
Headshaking, blocking calling out student with hand, eye contact to
misbehaving students with blunt look and pointing to seat if student is wandering
around. Reference from reader
Figure 6: Part time French teacher has trouble with students calling out and its
effecting the whole class. She initially gives the misbehaving students attention.
Then Bayley says “stand there with your hand up to block them out and focus on
the well behaved”
In the next lesson she blocked out the misbehaviour and focused on the positive
behaviour. Within minutes the off-task kids began raising hands to answer
questions. When they received praise for their positive behaviour they become
engaged in the lesson and strive to succeed for attention (Figure 3).
This is an excellent display of Signal Interference and Planned Ignoring.
Planned ignoring
Involves ignoring simple misbehaviour traits such as: excessive calling out, not
raising hand, aimless questions, clapping whistling.
This is an easy way to deal with simple issues without wasting your own time
and energy. It works on the idea of the reinforcement theory in which the
negative attention seeking behaviours are blocked and therefore denied of their
attention (Levin & Nolan, 2005) (Brophy, 1988). Therefore, it should generally
reduce the occurrence of the negative behaviour because it doesn’t receive the
intended reaction. Reference from reader.
Proximity Interference
The process of using your physical proximity to deter the bad behaviour of the
student or to reinforce them to concentrate on the task. Students are usually
less likely to misbehave if the teacher is near them (Levin & Nolan, 2005).
Proximity is an excellent tool but needs to be used carefully and use within
reason as it can be quite intimidating and an intrusion into the student’s personal
space (Levin & Nolan, 2005) (Figure 7).
Can be an excellent way to bring off task students back on task without saying
anything and disrupting the class.
Within the same clip we also see Jenny use the Wait for Silence cue which was
one of Cowley’s key behavioural techniques as students are often very aware of
sudden change (Cowley, 2006) (Figure 4).
This can be done in many forms, but it tailors the task set for the individual
students or class. Examples of this include:
Corrective actions
Behaviour During Corrective Actions
Fundamentally the correctives must be consistent and logical in order for them
to appear fair to the students.
Example: “Fred, I really appreciate you holding your hand up to answer the
question”.
This hopefully allows the misbehaving student to realise to put their hand up. If
they do this, it enables you to then praise them for putting their hand up.
This technique is a simple but effective one which can be used if students are
working or during a lecture (Rinne, 1984). It enables the teacher to remind the
student that they have been spotted conducting the inappropriate behaviour and
should return to the task (Rinne, 1984). It’s simple and can be effective even
though it’s more of a supportive action than a corrective.
Humour
Sending an “I message”
This works on the principle of using a three-part method and works similarly to
the questioning the awareness of the effect.
It aims to bring to the attention of the student that their behaviour is not only
disturbing the teacher but the whole class. The three parts it works upon are:
- simple description of the disruptive behaviour
- description of its effects on the teacher or students
- description of the teachers’ feelings about effects of the misbehaviour.
This works best if the relationship between the teacher and student is positive.
IF they have a negative relationship this should be avoided as the student can
learn what the teacher doesn’t like and finds annoying (Levin & Nolan, 2005).
Example: “John, when you call out without raising your hand, I can’t call on any
other students to answer the question. This disturbs me because I would like to
give everyone a chance to answer the question.”
Direct Appeal
Example: “John, please stop calling out answers so that everyone will have a
chance to answer” This doesn’t ask John if he would stop calling out, it’s more of
a demand.
Glasser’s triplets work on the principle of directing the students to the correct
behaviour by asking three questions:
1. What are you doing?
2. Is it against the rules?
3.What should you be doing?
This is best used in classrooms with clearly established rules and the rules are
understood by the students. They are designed for the student to state what
they are doing wrong and then understand how to correct their behaviour. Not
all students will choose to answer properly or at all. This is when the teacher
comes in and responds with the correct answer. (Glasser, 1969)
Example: “John, what are you doing? Is it against the rules? What should you
be doing?”
“No, John, you were calling out answer, that is against our classroom rule, you
must raise your hand to answer questions”.
This is a clear strategy for clearly communicating across that you will not
participate in any verbal bantering that the student may try to create. The broken
record stops when the student returns to the appropriate behaviour. The teacher
begins by giving a redirection and if the student refuses to comply or becomes
defensive about his behaviour the teacher reiterates the direction.
Example:
Teacher: “John, stop calling out answers and raise your hand if you want to
answer questions.”
John: “But I really know the answer”
Teacher: ‘That’s not the point. Stop calling out answers and raise your hand if
you wish to answer questions”
John: “You let Mabel call out yesterday”
Teacher: ‘That’s not the point. Stop calling out answers and raise your hand if
you want to answer questions.”
Return to lesson.
This technique is aimed to provide the student with an option to make a choice
and in regard to their behaviour. The student can either choose to stop the
unwanted behaviour or face the consequences that the teacher has decided
(Brophy, 1988). Once the teacher makes this statement they must follow
through with it if the student misbehaves or the students may assume they can
get away with poor behaviour. This should be used when non-verbal and verbal
interventions have not succeeded. (Brophy, 1988)
(Figure 9): Jenny from Manage that class utilizes this well with Vulcan who is
misbehaving.
Jenny: “Vulcan, I am going to give you a choice. You can put this back
(plasticine) and follow my instructions, or I will take it away and you have to
watch everyone else do the prac class”
Figure 9: Image taken from “Manage that class” where Jenny is tacking a
misbehaving student.
WORD COUNT:
Cowley, S., 2006. Getting the Buggers To Behave. London: Continuum International Publishing.
Foley, J., 1993. Scaffolding. Key Concepts In ELT, 48(1), pp. 101-102.
Glasser, W., 1969. Schools without Failure. New York: Harper & Row.
Levin, J. & Nolan, J. F., 2005. What Every Teacher should know about Classroom Management.
s.l.:Pearson Education Inc.
Marsh, A. E. & Marsh, H., 2003. Academic Resilience and the Four C's: Confidence, Control,
Composure and Commitment. Sydney Australia: University of Western Sydney.
Matthews, R., 2018. Teaching the Diverse Classroom: Motivation Lecture. [Online]
Available at: University Of Adelaide
[Accessed 2018 8 20].
Osiris Educational , 2012. Youtube: Dr Bill Rogers - Establishing trust to enable classroom co-
operation. [Online]
Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r351z1MqL10
[Accessed 2 10 2018].
Psychology and Society, 2016. Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Motivation. [Online]
Available at: http://www.psychologyandsociety.com/motivation.html
[Accessed 2 10 2018].
Rinne, C., 1984. Attention: Fundamentals of Classroom Control. Columbus: OH: Merrill.
Skinner, M. E., 2010. All Joking Aside: Five Reasons to use Humour in the classroom. 76 pp.19-21 ed.
s.l.:The Education Digest.
Teachers TV, 2007. Teaching With Bayley: Attention Seekers, s.l.: Teacher TV.
Teachers TV, n.d. Teaching With Bailey-Praise and Preperation. s.l.:Teachers TV.