Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Vito
1. How does our college or university define plagiarism? Be sure to explain the definition in
your own words and cite your source(s)— in other words, do not plagiarize!
2. Explain in your own words why it is important for you to avoid plagiarism.
3. Explain in your own words some strategies that you can use to avoid plagiarism.
- When use things that are existing or present to create something new, for
example, I am editing a video project and I decide to grab a catchy song I found
on the internet, we have to give credit to the song artist for his/her work. We can
do so by citing them on the end credit of the video. If we were writing a paper
and read up more about the topic, we may find something that reflects what we
want to say or serves as proof to a point we wanted to establish, we have the
option to paraphrase some statements, cite their work, get a direct or indirect
quote from it, or do a combination of the three.
We may also avoid plagiarism by reading up more about it and making ourselves
informed about how we may give credit to other people’s work properly.
4. The following excerpt was taken directly from Smith, Cook, and Buskist (2011):
These results suggest that a teacher adopting a more lenient grading standard when
using subjective testing methods may receive higher student evaluations of teaching
performance (taken from p. 227).
Summarize the ideas expressed in your own words, and do anything else to ba sure
that you are not plagiarizing.
1 https://osu.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2012-Code-of-Student-Conduct.pdf
5. Which of the following would be considered plagiarism of the Smith, Cook, and Buskist
(2011) excerpt? Circle all that apply.
a. These results suggest that a teacher adopting a more lenient grading standard
when using subjective testing methods may receive higher student evaluations
of teaching performance (Smith, Cook, & Buskist, 2011).
b. These findings indicate that an instructor using a more easy evaluation standard
if using testing methods that are subjective may get better class evaluations of
their teaching performance (Smith, Cook, & Buskist, 2011).
c. The study’s results indicate that, at least when testing methods are more
subjective than objective, leniency in grading can result in more positive student
evaluations (Smith, Cook, & Buskist, 2011).