ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Period of
School Profile Description Remarks Data Presentation Data Source/Forms
Reporting
1. Enrolment ● Total number of ● Optional: Mid-year Stacked bar graph by gender SF-1: School Register;
learners enrolled If the school has (BoSY data) per year EBEIS
o By gender special programs, they Year-end For types of learners, a pie
o Last 3 years can also present in a (EoSY data) graph can be used
separate graph the
enrolment number of Year-End data can be a
the different types of comparison with the Mid-Year
learners by program data (line on bar graph)
(e.g. SPED, ADM, ALS,
IPEd, ALIVE) of the
current year – schools
can show the total for
each type of learner
2. Health and  Number of learners ● No. of severely Mid-year Stacked bar graph by gender Nutritional Status Report
nutritional status who are severely wasted or wasted Year-end per key stage
wasted/wasted
 By gender
 For every key stage
 (K-3, 4-6, JHS, SHS)
 Current year
3. Learners ● The count of Year-end Table per grade level that SF-3: Books Issued and
materials* shortages/excess learners shows the number of Returned; Physical Count
materials per grade level shortage/excess learners of Inventories
based on what the materials (by subject)
students are using during
the School Year
● Only subjects which
have shortage/excess
learners materials will be
listed per grade level
● Current year
 ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

4. Teachers’ ● Number of teachers Mid-year Bar graph by kind/type of Accomplishment report

professional who attended Year-end professional development
development* training/further studies
● By kind/type of
professional development
(e.g. ICT, Further studies,
INSET, LAC, etc)
● Current year

5. Funding ● Funding amount and Mid-year Pie graph by funding source Financial reports;
sources* sources (MOOE, LGU, Year-end Monthly liquidation
canteen, donors, etc.) reports
● Current year

6. School awards ● Top 3 awards/ Mid-year Table Accomplishment report

and recognitions* recognition from award- Year-end
giving bodies duly
recognized by DepEd
● Listing by title, award-
giving body, level
(school, division,
regional, national,
international)
● Categorized into
student, teacher, school
head, and school awards
● Current year
*Data not found in the EBEIS
 ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Performance Period of
Description Remarks Data Presentation Data Source/Forms
Indicators Reporting
ACCESS
7. Number and ● Count and percentage of learners Year-end Stacked bar graph by SF-4: Monthly
rate of dropouts who do not finish a particular grade cause per year; Learner’s Movement
by cause level. (It does not capture learners percentage can be and Attendance; SF-2:
who finish a grade level but do not shown through a line Daily Attendance
enrol in the next grade level the graph over the bar Report of Learners;
following school year) graph EBEIS
● Look at the five (5) major causes of
dropout in the school
● Last 3 years
QUALITY
8. Percentage of ● Percentage of learners who Year-end Bar graph EBEIS: Enrolment
learners who completed the school year data; SF-6:
completed the ● Number of promoted learners over Summarized Report on
School Year number of total learners x 100 Promotion and Level of
(Promotion Rate) ● Per grade level Proficiency
● Current year

9. National ● MPS per subject ● In the absence of Year-end Bar graph by MPS of Report from NETRC
Achievement Test ● Grade 6/10 results for complete NAT scores, school can each subject
(NAT) – by Mean schools use the School
Percentage Score ● Grade 3/8 results for incomplete Readiness Year-End
(MPS) schools Assessment (SReYA) in
● Current year Elementary OR the
general average of
pupils in the highest
grade level offering
 ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

10. Literacy level ● Total number of learners who are in ● In the absence of a Mid-year Bar graphs showing Philippine Informal
the frustration, instructional, and tool to measure Year-end oral and silent Reading Inventory
independent levels for English and literacy, schools can reading results (one (PHIL-IRI); McCall-
Filipino (oral and silent reading) use PHIL-IRI results or for English and Crab Reading
● Should show pre and post test any existing tool to Filipino) Comprehension
results measure literacy Examination or its
● If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover equivalent
grades 2-6 only
● Current year
GOVERNANCE
11. School-Based ● School level based on SBM ● Use SBM Assessment Year-end SBM Level and its SBM Assessment
Management Assessment corresponding
Assessment Level qualitative
interpretation
12. Child-Friendly ● Survey to be accomplished by the ● Use Child-Friendly Year-end Points and status Child-Friendly School
School Survey School Planning Team School Self-Assessment Self-Assessment
result* ● Based on CFSS point system: Guide
o 25-29 points: Child-Friendly
School
o 30-34 points: Outstanding Child-
Friendly School
o 35 and above points: Very
Outstanding Child-Friendly School
● Current year
13. Stakeholders’ There will be two (2) data sets: Mid-year For percentage: Attendance sheets;
participation* 1. Percentage (number of Year-end stacked bar graph by DepEd order 18:
attendees over those invited) activity (co- School Calendar
of parents/guardians and curricular, extra-
other stakeholders who attend curricular, meetings/
during: assemblies) per
o Co-curricular activities stakeholder
(Science month, Reading
month, contests, etc.) For total
o Extra-curricular activities contribution: stacked
(Boy Scouts, Brigada bar graph by type of
Eskwela, sports fests, contribution per
etc.) reporting period, with
total
 ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

o Meetings and Assemblies

(SIP, CI, General PTA,
etc.)
 Current year
2. Total contribution (in kind,
man-hours, etc.) of
stakeholders which are
accounted
 Current year
 By reporting period (Mid-
year and Year-end)

14. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Ratio per grade level SF-7: School Personnel
Teacher ratio learners to teachers against the standard: shown as bar graph; Assignment List and
o Kinder (25:1) Standard can be Basic Profile; SF-1:
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) shown as line graph School Register; EBEIS
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) over the bar graph
o SHS (40:1)
● Per grade level
● Current year
15. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Ratio per grade level EBEIS: Facilities and
Classroom learners to classrooms against the shown as bar graph; Structures
ratio standard:
o Kinder (25:1) Standard can be
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) shown as line graph
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) over the bar graph
o SHS (40:1)
● Per grade level
● Current year
16. Learner-  Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Line graph EBEIS: Facilities and
Toilet ratio learners to functional toilets against Structures
standards (50:1)
 Total number
 By gender
 Current year
 ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

17. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Line graph Consolidated Report on
Seat ratio learners to seats against the standard Desk/Armchairs for ES
(1:1) and SS; EBEIS
● Total number
● Current year
Note: CFS – Child-Friendly School (The Child-Friendly School Assessment was made by UNICEF. The concept for establishing a Child-Friendly School System (CFSS) in the
Philippines was introduced in 1999 and is currently being reviewed so it can be utilized/integrated in school planning, monitoring and evaluation).
SF – School Forms
*Data not found in the EBEIS

Status of School
Projects
18. Status of Annual
Implementation Plan
(AIP)/Continuous
Improvement (CI)
Projects*
19. Other stakeholders’
accomplishments*
*Data not found in the EBEIS
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information
Period of
Description Remarks Data Presentation Data Source/Forms
Reporting
● The progress of CI projects ● The school will decide Mid-year Graphs may differ
● Data sets may differ depending which major projects to Year-end
on what the school wants to present put in the SRC but our
● Current year recommendation is to
report the top 3 priority
projects
● Include the report on
baseline, and also the
endline when applicable
● Reports done by other ● The school may Mid-year Graphs may differ
stakeholders on their choose the top 3 Year-end
initiatives/activities independent stakeholder
from the PIA/CI projects (e.g. accomplishments/initiati
activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, ves/activities
etc.)
● Data sets may differ depending
on the initiatives/activities of the
stakeholders
● Current year