NAME/S: Almonia, Bunane, Pahilan, Roa, Rosales DATE: August 29, 2k19

GROUP #: 7 TEACHER: MS. KATE SIGRID U. REQUINTINA

STRAND/ SECTION: HUMSS STA

RELATED STUDIES MATRIX

(Note: EVERY GROUP IS REQUIRED TO COLLECT 5-7 RELATED STUDIES. THUS, ALL REVIEWED STUDIES MUST BE DATED STARTING 2010 to PRESENT. Below the indicated year will not be
ACCEPTED. )

MAJOR RELATED TITLE OF RESEARCH PROBLEM AND RESEARCH DESIGN & RESEARCH CONNECTION TO ONE’S UNIQUENESS OF ONE’S
VARIABLE STUDY SETTING STUDY/THESIS OBJECTIVES METHOD RESULTS RESEARCH STUDY STUDY FROM THE REVIEWED
(Pls. indicate if it’s (AUTHOR, YEAR) (4-5 SENTENCES) (Participants, sampling RESEARCH
local or foreign for procedure, statistics, (2-3 SENTENCES)
each study) instrument, etc.)
Students 1 Department of Students Readiness for The study aims to answer A paper-pen questionnaire Lowest mean scores There is a connection The reviewed research is
Readiness for Information E-Learning: An the e-learning readiness of was employed to the are mostly related to between our study and conducted outside the country,
E-Learning Management, Assessment on Hacettepe University 311DIM students. use of technology and the other research study a foreign study, while our
Hacettepe Hacettepe University students, particulary in Participants were asked to availability of and that is the study is unique because it is
University, Department of Department of Information. report their perceptions on technology. Students researchers from both conducted within the country,
Ankara, Turkey Information This is to investigate the readiness for e-learning. were not ready when sides aim to determine Philippines which is still a
2 Department of Management (Yurdagül acceptance or readiness of The questionnaire had it comes to using the readiness of students developing country. Also the
Information Ünal1, Gülten Alır the faculty and students to been developed and tested specific for the e-learning other uniqueness is that our
Management, 2 the e-learning programs. by Software, online programs that are offered study is focused to the SHS
Yıldırım Beyazıt , and İrem Soydal1, Though some universities Akaslan & Law and based forums and chat, file by the society as students, which is also new to
University, 2014) attempts to develop e- on a conceptual model of hosting service, Web technology is also the learning curriculum, while
Ankara, Turkey learning programs, there is a the readiness for e- 2.0 tools for developing. the reviewed research was
(Foreign study) lack of investigation to the learning information sharing conducted to the college
readiness of school faculty which assesses the purposes and students.
and learners. The study’s perceived readiness in learning management
objective is to be able to three phases namely, systems. It seems
build solid and effective e- readiness, acceptance they were not
learning systems. Also to and training. Original confident about
answer one of the questions questionnaire had 78 items using learning
asking, “ What are the
students’ perceptions about
the main components
(availability
of technology, useof
technology, self confidence,
acceptance and training)
of e-learning?”
which are measured with a
binary choice or a five-
point Likert scale, along
with some free text boxes
for the
participants to explain their
scores or choices and only
adopted items that can be
answered with the Likert
scale, in order to
understand the basic
similarities and differences
in the perception of
academic staff and
students of DIM
regarding to e-learning
readiness. Students
reported their perceptions
on 39 e-learning related
items regarding the
five main components of e-
learning readiness with a
five-point Likert scale with
1 homework
being “strongly disagree”
and 5 being “strongly
agree”. Aydın and Taşçı’s [
identification of “expected
readiness” for e-learning
(which was defined as the
mean
score of 3.40) was used to
interpret the results. Same
scale was also
management systems
either. Students also
did not find
stability and speed of
the internet access
satisfactory Most of
the highest mean
scores based on the
students’ perceptions
belong to self
confidence and one
of them belongs to
use of technology
component. Results
show that students
were confident about
using basic file
management tools,
web browsers, search
engines, social
networking sites, and
they were also
capable of doing their
by using the
technology. This
result means the
students of DIM
seems ready for
elearning but there is
still some work that
needs to be done
especially in terms of
the
adopted in the past studies
by Akaslan and Law , [and
Soyda, Ahr and Unal.
availability and the
use of technology.
The results showed
that the students
were “sufficiently
ready” for E-
Learning.