Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Strengthen Optimize teachers’ professional At least one intra-panel Evaluation meetings Whole Staff Professional CU
teachers’ sharing culture for promoting /intra-KLA sharing is Records of Staff School Development Team Quality
professional effective pedagogies and refining conducted per term Professional Year Panel heads and School
development subject curriculum Development Team Subject teachers Improvement
to engage - Intra-panel/Intra-KLA sharing KLA coordinators Project
students in - External sharing
active learning Incorporate student-centred Student-centred Evaluation meetings Whole Panel heads and
learning and teaching strategies teaching strategies are School subject teachers
at subject level applied at subject level Year KLA coordinators
- Adopting diversified Students show IT in Education
teaching strategies improvement in Team
- Making use of e-learning to learning
engage students in learning At least one learning
- Organizing learning activity outside school
experiences outside the is organized by
school individual subject
panels/KLAs in a year
1
Major Concern 1 : Develop students to be active learners
Resources
Targets Strategies Success Criteria Methods of Evaluation Time Scale People-in-charge
Required
Motivate Review and refine the curricula, Subject contents, Evaluation meetings Whole Panel heads and
students of quantity and quality of teaching materials, School subject teachers
diverse assignments and assessment homework policy and Year KLA coordinators
abilities - Fine-tune subject contents, assessment policy are Academic
teaching materials, reviewed and refined Enhancement Team
homework and assessment
(e.g. Intra/Cross KLA
assignments) (S.1 – 3)
Provide academic enhancement 90% or above of Evaluation meetings Whole Academic School
programmes to strengthen students do not receive Students’ performance School Enhancement Team funding
students’ academic abilities demerit for homework in learning, tests and Year Panel heads and CPG
- S.1 – 2: Homework Guidance non-submission examinations subject teachers DLG
Class Students show Record of homework STEM Education STEM
- S.1 – 3: Afterschool Remedial improvement in non-submission Team Grant
Class for core learning Student participation Gifted Education
subjects Students show and achievement Team
- S.4 – 6: Subject-based improvement in tests records
academic support and examinations Records of Gifted
- DLG funded programmes for Education Team
core subjects
- STEM courses
- Enhancement programmes
for gifted students
2
Major Concern 2 : Enhance students’ learning effectiveness through raising their language proficiency
Resources
Targets Strategies Success Criteria Methods of Evaluation Time Scale People-in-charge
Required
Provide Refine LAC programmes for Measures are implemented Evaluation meetings Whole LAC Team
English junior forms as scheduled Students’ performance School English Language
language Students show in learning, tests and Year Panel
support for improvement in learning examinations Science Panel
MOI in those subjects I.H. Panel
adaptation Feedback from the
related subject panels is
positive
Feedback from students
is positive
Implement support measures for The academic Evaluation meetings Whole EMI content subject
fine-tuned students switching to performance of the Students’ performance School teachers
regular classes for EMI subjects students is satisfactory in learning, tests and Year
(S.2 – 3) examinations
Organise bridging programmes Feedback from teachers Evaluation meetings Aug & LAC Team
for MOI adaptation and students is positive Students’ performance Sep 2018 English Language
- Pre-S.1 Bridging Course Students show in learning, tests and Panel & EMI content
- Mathematics (S.1 – 3) improvement in learning examinations subject panels
- Technology & Living (S.2 – 3) Mathematics Panel
Technology & Living
Panel
Encourage teachers to participate At least one Evaluation meetings Whole LAC Team
in LAC-related sharing activities internal/external sharing Feedback of teachers School EMI content subject
activity is conducted per on the activities Year teachers
term
Feedback from teachers
is positive
3
Major Concern 2 : Enhance students’ learning effectiveness through raising their language proficiency
Resources
Targets Strategies Success Criteria Methods of Evaluation Time Scale People-in-charge
Required
Enhance Strengthen the reading and Feedback from English Evaluation meetings Whole English Language Support
students’ writing skills of junior forms Language Panel is Students’ performance School Panel from
English positive in coursework and Year Language
proficiency Students show examinations Learning
improvement in their Support
reading and writing Section,
skills EDB
Implement cross-curricular Feedback from teachers Evaluation meetings Whole English Language Prizes
reading activities to widen and students is positive Students’ performance School Panel Library
students’ exposure to English Students’ performance in in reading programmes Year EMI content subject assistant
the reading programmes and and activities panels Student
activities is satisfactory School Library helpers
Create an English text-rich An English Corner is set Evaluation meetings Whole English Language Teaching
environment up in all classrooms and School Panel assistants
- In the classroom the covered playground Year EMI content subject Student
- Around campus for displaying learning panels helpers
materials and students' Extra-curricular
work in English Activities and
Regular displays of EMI Services Groups
subject-related English Coordinating Team
materials are organized School Library
Majority of the ECA
boards and display
boards around the
campus are in English
All signs and notices
posted on school
premises are in English
Use English as the main language School events are Evaluation meetings Whole Related functional units
for school events conducted in English School English Language
Year Panel
Encourage students to participate 90% of S.1 – 5 students Evaluation meetings Whole English Language English
in English activities and are awarded points for Records of students’ School Panel Club
competitions the English Award participation in English Year Committee
Scheme for joining activities and Student
English activities and competitions helpers
competitions Prizes
4
Major Concern 3 : Cultivate positive values through life education
Resources
Targets Strategies Success Criteria Methods of Evaluation Time Scale People-in-charge
Required
Cultivate Further enhance the self- Activities are held as Students’ performance Whole Moral and Civic Health
positive confidence and sense of scheduled in the activities School Education Team Department
learning responsibility among students Students demonstrate Class teacher report Year Extra-curricular NGO
attitudes - Organizing experiential their self-confidence and Teachers’ and students’ Activities and School
through activities and workshops sense of responsibility in feedback Services Groups funding
character during Ethics lessons and activities or competitions Evaluation meetings Coordinating Team
building (self- activity days Class-based programmes Counselling Team
confidence and - Providing opportunities for are organized Discipline Team
sense of students to organize and Feedback from teachers Class Teachers
responsibility) participate in activities or and students is positive Coordination Team
competitions Academic
- Organizing class-based Enhancement Team
programmes
Provide parent education Programmes are held as Questionnaire Whole Counselling Team NGO
programmes to support student scheduled Evaluation meetings School PTA PTA
development 80% of parents are Year QEF
satisfied with the 「尊重生
programmes 命•逆境
Information is 同行」計
delivered in a timely way 劃
5
Major Concern 3 : Cultivate positive values through life education
Resources
Targets Strategies Success Criteria Methods of Evaluation Time Scale People-in-charge
Required
Foster Enrich the life education elements Activities are held as Students’ performance in Whole Counselling Team Health
students’ in learning activities and the scheduled the learning activities School Religious Studies Department
respect for life curricula of RS and Ethics lessons Feedback from teachers and during the lessons Year Panel NGO
through self to guide students to think about and students is positive Teachers’ and students’ Moral and Civic QEF
improvement the meaning of life and construct a feedback Education Team 「尊重生
and care for positive attitude towards life Evaluation meetings 命•逆境
others and the 同行」計
community 劃
Invite guests / teachers to share At least one guest / Teachers’ and students’ Whole Moral and Civic
life stories with students teacher is invited per feedback School Education Team
term Evaluation meetings Year
Feedback from teachers
and students is positive
Strengthen the role of student 80% of students are Questionnaire Whole Extra-curricular School
leaders and enhance their satisfied with the Class teacher report School Activities and Funding
leadership skills leadership training day Teachers’ and students’ Year Services Groups
- Organizing a leadership camp feedback Coordinating Team
training day camp for S.4 80% of chairpersons are Evaluation meetings Class teachers
students satisfied with the Records of Extra-
- Organizing leadership training leadership training curricular Activities
programmes for the programmes and Services Groups
chairpersons of some service Students’ leadership Coordinating Team
teams skills are enhanced
- Providing opportunities for At least 15% of
class committee to organize committee members
class activities come from junior form
- Providing more posts for Feedback from teachers
junior form students to take up and students is positive
in ECA clubs and service
teams
- Enhancing the effective
running of ECA clubs and
service teams by providing
detailed guidelines for
committee members
6
Major Concern 3 : Cultivate positive values through life education
Resources
Targets Strategies Success Criteria Methods of Evaluation Time Scale People-in-charge
Required
Provide systematic career and life Programmes are held as Teachers’ and students’ Whole Career and Life NGO
planning programmes across all scheduled feedback School Planning Team TCLPG
levels to help students explore and Feedback from students Evaluation meetings Year Extra-curricular
discover their purpose in life and teachers is positive Activities and
- Enhancing students’ self- The information on the Services Groups
understanding and raising webpage and facebook of Coordinating Team
students’ awareness of career Career and Life Planning Counselling Team
and life planning (S.1 – 3) Team is updated timely Big Sister Team
- Equipping students with career The Careers Room is
and life planning skills and open more frequently
career-related experiences for
enhancing students’ career
decision-making (S.4 – 6)
- Enriching students’ knowledge
of multiple pathways
Enhance students’ caring spirit Caring spirit is Evaluation meetings Whole Panel heads and NGO
towards others and the community incorporated into subject Teachers’ and students’ School subject teachers School
- Organizing and coordinating curricula feedback Year Functional units funding
activities that promote the Activities are held as Social Service Team
caring spirit scheduled
- Providing service learning Feedback from teachers
opportunities to help students and students is positive
develop a heart to serve others
Enrich students’ learning Debriefing sessions are Evaluation meetings Whole Functional units
experiences by providing held Teachers’ and students’ School Social Service Team
opportunities for self-reflection in Feedback from teachers feedback Year Subject panels
the debriefing sessions and students is positive