Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Ritesh: Any person who takes initiatives & generates innovative ideas
can be termed as an entrepreneur. These are the people who add
value to the organization by making significant contributions.
Rohit Gupta: Yes true said Tuhin, Managers and Entrepreneur are two
side of same coin. But one may be or may be not related to each
other
Ankit Gandhi: If you are taking country like India, yes we need more
entrepreneur to employ other people who are anyways unemployed
Rohit Gupta: A manager can be built with the degree only when an
Entrepreneur can be making by experience and he can make as many
managers under it which may again can become an entrepreneur.
N.Khurana: By saying it two side of the same coin is not right, by this
I get a feeling that these qualities is hold by the same person and he
can switch roles but as per my interpretation a Entrepreneur is a
person who is willing to take risk and not only manage the resources
he have , more over being an entrepreneur is far more risky then
being a manger , moreover at the same time even if you are good
manager it is hard to deal with the ever changing environment.
Antony Thomas: But we should keep in mind the fact that not all
people are talented enough to be entrepreneurs. It takes certain
innate skills to make a good entrepreneur. This is evident from the
fact that not many people who start their own businesses end up
making it successful.
N.Khurana: Just to add that one of the biggest cause of India being a
developing country despite having some of the best talent and is far
less when compared to country like china , is not the presence of
write people in the political structure , if we have more Entrepreneurs
they being built there wealth might compete for the best post and get
into the government , which might effect the policies and lead to
growth and have respect politically
Aditya Ahuja: An entrepreneur is the one with the idea and the
manager is the person who paves the way for this idea.
Rohit Gupta: Can anyone give the answer why now days people are
more interested in Entrepreneurs and not Managers? As we have
seen recently that IIMA product refuse to join to the company and
want to make their own company.
N.Khurana: Just to bring the focus back to the topic we are not here
to discuss which one is better but which one will actually help in the
development of the country like India, which I feel an Entrepreneur
would do a nice job because of the ever changing environment and
that is some thing India would need to compete with rest of the
world.
Khushi13: Ritesh, can you please clarify that do you agree with the
topic or disagree.
T.Chaturvedi: I agree with Mr.Ahuja that IIM A grad may have had a
brilliant vision and also a plan to go about it.
Rohit Gupta: Yes, you are right Ahuja but an Entrepreneur should be
there to make any managers.
Yogesh Srihari: But now a days manager are trained to compete any
kind of field either to create a company and other is to work for a
company as a manager.
Tuhin: I agree with Jainisree. The top of the corporate ladder entails
crucial strategic decisions which necessitate knowledge of managerial
disciplines. This may not be possible with a purely technical
employee.
Tuhin: Let’s consider a person who’s worked in the technical line for a
considerable period if time and now wants to start his own venture.
Such an initiative does not only involve the technical aspect.
Managing a firm involves bring in capital, proper advertising and also
logistics. These intricacies can be taken care of by doing a course in
management. Such an instance will not be a waste of time. However,
if a technical person shifts to management just for the heck of it, it
may backfire as he may lack the aptitude. So it depends on a
person’s clarity in his goals.
Trupti Indulkar: It is often heard these days that engineers can
manage engineers. There wont the great divide between engineering
department and the management. MBAs with B.E. degrees could
understand the problems faced by the organization better.
Rani: Like Tuhin said you can’t start your own company with just
technical knowledge you need to know about lot of other stuffs too.
You can not have commerce people as purchase manager who
doesn’t know anything about the production processes of Pharmacy
Company or industrial good manufacturing company. You need to
have person who understands the manufacturing process there, a
person with technical knowledge. Now engineering doesn’t include
about various business laws and taxes and standard costing and all
other things, knowledge of which is required by the purchase
manager. So here you need person who knows both the things
management and technical knowledge. So engineers are not wasting
time while pursuing MBA degrees.
Trupti Indulkar: Rajesh in citing that technical and human skills are
very essential. Especially in world like today. One can not hope to run
a business with either of these skills independently. It is essential to
have the "body" and "mind" in synchrony, Body being the machinery
and mind being the people of an organization.
Tuhin: I think, Miss Sharmistha, that what you've said is not exactly
a symptom which is bothersome. It’s just that the engineers have the
forethought of having the best of both worlds. Their analytical skills
are just an add on which works in their favor.
Jainisree: Yeah, I agree with Tuhin. Once a person enters BPO sector
the profile remains the same for years and there will not be any
challenges to face. it will be just a routine
Tuhin: I think analysis may not always be what LR in cat is. They
require more of managerial tools like gap analysis and SWOT. This
may not necessarily be the monopoly of engineers.
Tuhin: Many times another perspective comes up. Let’s assume that
a person is in the telecomm line and has worked there for a long
time. Now, his company gives him a position which needs managerial
skills coupled with technical ones eg as that of a project manager.
Such a person may gear up for the new challenge by doing an MBA in
telecomm management such as the one offered in SITM of
Symbiosis .That may equip him better for the new profile of his job.
The only point is that the course must offer him assistance in this
case and not necessarily a new perspective as he may not be looking
at changing his job but only improving his present profile.
Rani: Sharmistha yes they are put in better use in technical field if
person wants to stick with that field. Many chemical engineers dont
wanna remain in that field coz it involves night shift then it also
involves working with hazardous chemical. If you do management it
would be easy for you to change your field.
Tuhin: This again will not be a waste of time. However, I will keep
reiterating the fact that a lot of introspection must go in the decision
to do an MBA. Only if it is adding value to the career graph must be it
studied not just to add another degree to your name.
Tuhin: I think what Trupti has said is applicable only where after MBA
you're working in a technical field. A person joining an investment
bank after working in TCS for example will not be using that
knowledge.
Rani: Sharmistha I m not saying that it is the only reason but it could
be one of the reasons why engineers are going for MBA study.
Tuhin: I would not agree with Miss Sharmishtha there. Fresher are
not always a waste in b-schools. They may provide a new point of
view and bring in out of the box thinking to the scene. This may lead
to a totally new way of doing business or innovation.
Jainisree: Its not wastage of skills definitely but adding one more
dimension of management to already what you have
Rajesh Patra: Sharmisth absolute not. Engineers are not good at the
management skills such as market survey, product analysis, and
other such skills. By pursuing MBA they can gain these skills and in
turn become a good manager or entrepreneur.
Sharmistha Mallik: Yes, you cannot unlearn but you also do not
develop on it!! If all engineers went in for management, then we
would only have managers but nobody to manage!! We wouldn’t
have inventions, because there wouldn’t be any inventors left!!
Rani: But you really want to develop those skills. See, hardly 5 % of
engineers go for M. Tech. It is like you know the basic necessary
technical knowledge and you don’t want to go ahead in that field and
pursue the career in same field but with different dimensions. Person
who is interested in only technical stuff will always go for M tech
rather than MBA. So its more about personal choice where you want
to go and what you want to do.
A. Shah: Not all Engineers go for MBA .Majority of them spends their
entire career in Technical background. So it is wrong to say that if all
engineers go for MBA.
Jainisree: Doing MBA will not stop anyone from doing research or
inventing anything new.
Rajesh Patra: Yes. One can do well without pursuing MBA. But it’s an
added advantage & can achieve the goal within a shorter span.
Sharmistha Mallik: Yes, I agree that at one stage we all end up
managing other people or resources but Dr. Kalam's example just
proves my point!
Indrakala Jaiswar: I don't agree with Mr. Shah, in my view people opt
for MS because its easy to get a job abroad.
Rani: Shah, I am not saying all engineers go for MBA, I m just saying
that it depends on your interest and career goals. People who only
want to excel in technical field will go for MS or M.Tech. But who are
interested in techno commercial field will go for MBA. It changes
person to person.
Rani: I would like to conclude that engineers are not wasting their
time pursuing management study but they need to be clear about
what they want to do in life. What are their goals and how doing MBA
is going to help them achieve it.
Rajesh Patra: I would like to start with the definition of village. The
Census of India regards most settlements of fewer than 5,000 as a
village. Scattered throughout India are more than 500,000 villages.
These settlements range from tiny hamlets of thatched huts to larger
settlements of tile-roofed stone and brick houses. Most villages are
small; nearly 80 percent have fewer than 1,000 inhabitants,
according to the 1991 census. It is in these villages that India's most
basic business--agriculture--takes place, which accomplishes the
challenging task of feeding themselves and the nation. Here, too,
flourish many of India's most valued cultural forms. And to add on
80% of Indian population live in the villages.
Dhiraj: Villages are definitely the back-bone of our country. From our
independence we are very much dependent on agriculture. It is our
major strength; agriculture still constitutes 21% of our GDP. But side
by side we should not forget that 52% of our GDP is just constituted
by services sector and remaining 27% by industry. Villages are a
boon to us, they produce the requisite amount of food for the country
that is 19% of world food grains and our population is also 19% of
world.
Lavya: I believe that Indian villages are our weakness but definitely
they can undoubted become our strength. Causes are Infant
mortality rate, mother mortality rate. Education, if compared to
developed countries, the loss of agricultural products is very high in
India. If all people get a fair chance to pursue education, medication
they will definitely be our strength. Infact most number of polio
patients belong to villages which we surely need to take action and
we taking it.
Hrisheekesh: As we are aware, Indian villages account for about 70%
of our population and so they must play a part in any significant
development that India wishes to achieve. Yes, as Rajesh pointed
out, Indian villages are the source of the cultural diversity of India
but because of their large number and remote location they are a
challenge for achieving sustained development.
Anoop Singh: I would like to contradict Lavya - villages are not our
weakness, but our biggest strength – it’s the improper utilization that
makes us feel so. There was a time when India was called a Golden
Bird, and it was all due to the villages!!!
Rajesh Patra: Usually villages are humming with activity. The work
ethic is strong, with little time out for relaxation, except for numerous
divinely sanctioned festivals and rite-of-passage celebrations.
Residents are quick to judge each other, and improper work or social
habits receive strong criticism. Villagers feel a sense of village pride
and honor, and the reputation of a village depends upon the behavior
of its entire resident. The problem is not with the villages, rather with
the governance. Because of lack of government machineries, the
village economy is suffering
Anoop Singh: Even today, there are villages in Punjab, where we find
one of the richest farmers, it’s because of their proper utilization. The
reason of the failure of villages is the people of Villages getting
attracted to the modern cities and taking other jobs rather than being
a farmer.
Rajesh Patra: Exactly Rani. Here I would like to bring into the lack of
technology. China today has less cultivated land than India, but twice
the agric production.
Lavya: I agree with the fact that they have a huge part of Indian
economy but I refer in the fact that the efficiency of production and
medication and education is brutally lacking in Indian villages and on
other hand developed nations have efficient production. My opinion is
that though we have high production of food and dairy goods, but it
can increase but an exponential level. That is why our villages are
weakness for the time being.
Rani Mehta: Rajesh yes, to keep the growth the growth steady at this
level or to increase it, we need to increase growth rate of agriculture,
which will be feasible by latest farming technology.
Dhiraj: India is growing at a fast pace like his Asian peers but our
Asian peers has a different growth model that is export products and
manufacturing cheap goods, but we in india have more concentration
on services and domestic market only, we have a all together
different growth model and to cater to this growth model we should
now concentrate on two things
1. Services industry should be given more preference.
2. Regarding agriculture, we should use more hi-tech machinery,
more skilled labor and proper ways to refine this arena so that it can
again contribute to become strength of India.
Hrisheekesh: We have seen earlier that the green revolution was able
to significantly enhance our agricultural productivity through better
irrigation facilities, use of good fertilizers and improved seeds.
Anoop Singh: Today, majority of the rural population have just one
ambition - to migrate to a developed city and take any job other than
being a farmer. I agree that lack of modern machineries is one of the
reasons for failure of villages, but the main reason is the diversion of
interest of the farmers from their farms to the cities.
Rajesh Patra: Poornima. Exactly, even ITC's e-choupal is an add on.
Shiva Gopalan: Villages are our strength as far as the food production
is concerned. Without villages, farmlands, cattle, we can never
survive. Villages are our weakness in the case of amenities provided
to them by the government. The utilization of technology is to the
least in villages.
Rani Mehta: If we see our many villages lack basic facilities like
electricity, drinking water, telephone, roads, good schools and
colleges and to have all this people are running towards urban area,
which is just increasing urban population and making city more
congested.
Shiva Gopalan: Well said Rani. Basic infrastructure is a must for all
the villages. Lights, telephone, proper drainage, water facilities to
each house. Singapore, for instance does not have any farmland on
its own. its ability to sustain food movement is amazing. We have to
market our food products and ultimately our village names in the
global world.
Rajesh Patra: Hrisheekesh. I would like to state few points for the
development of the villages, for the larger interest of the country. 1.
The state should set a time frame to provide quality infrastructure in
the villages; mainly road, drinking water, hospital, schools and a
sound communication and transportation network.
2. Further by encouraging agriculture and cottage industries with
marketing support can generate employment and prevent people
from migrating to cities. By this we can keep the cities clean.
3. More than infrastructure the villages need a people-friendly
administration, which will help economic activities thrive. This will
make educated people village-centric and check the problem of
absentee officials.
4. A transparent marketing network for village products will foster
economic growth. The state must assure villagers their share of profit
from the global market for their products.
Anoop Singh: Many farmers from Punjab have proved that, if one is
concentrated and interested in only farming, he can still make profits.
Now, the point is- why do people want to migrate to cities - its
because they do not earn much from their land, than they can from
the cities, the major reason for this is the illiteracy of the rural
population, the middlemen taking huge chunks of profits - leaving the
farmers with no other option than to sell his land and move to the
cities. The government has recently took notice of this and
institutions like NABARD are taking care of this - although it’s a bit
late.
Lavya: Mostly even roads are not even connected to the cities, hence
even people residing in villages do complain for connectives secondly
even the developed states like Gujarat and Punjab are unable to
provide electricity in the villages
Karan Shah: Main need to "roti" comes from villages , also divert our
cattle asset in india helpful of dairy products through this we can also
help to raise infrastructure and other lack of conveniences.
Rajesh Patra: Anoop. No, we can’t blame the Govt. Anything happens
we blame the Government. But don’t you think, we, as responsible
citizens should take the charge.
Anoop Singh: If People get educated , and earn reasonably well, the
reason for them to migrate the cities will get reduced, since
education and money are the main reason for people to migrate to
cities.
Shiva Gopalan: Agriculture must be the main thrust for future plans.
Stringent measures must be taken to educate the people of villages
about their strengths and the importance of villages.
Shiva Gopalan: We cannot let the village concept die off and let all
the people move to cities for alternative job opportunities.
Karan Shah: From some days before one farmer from Gujarat
invented the very powerful tractor engine to strengthen farmer needs
, no engineer make this so these kind of people comes from our great
villages so no doubt about our mind in India.
Karan Shah: The villages are heart of India in new era, no doubt
about this if government takes more steps in future, so definitely the
new era of India through farmer from villages.
Dhiraj: Villages are strength for us and our economy as they still
provide us with 27% GDP, they teach us moral values and our
ground roots. We can make this strength to be become a powerful
tool to our success by teaching the villagers and implementing
refined ways for doing agriculture and educating villagers so that
they can contribute to our service industry and grow the country to
become a super power. Thanks a lot.
Neha : Water is most valuable property for human beings and its
crisis is very serious problem. But government view is not as serious.
It’s become a political issue for them as in Kaveri matter.
Government should take a hard action about wastage of water in
urban areas.
Karun: The Indian government has to keep in pace with this growing
population and has to met with all the requirements. The authorities
controlling water crisis should search for proper and adequate
solutions like canalization of rivers
Mahesh kumar: Perhaps India can take a cue from Canada. Where
waste water from drains is collected and treated instead of letting
into sea. This water is as good as drinking water but only used for
purposes other than drinking. Which reduces the dependence on rain
or rivers?
Hrish: We will first look at the drought situations that arise mainly in
western India. The main reason for the inequitable distribution of
water in India is the topography of the country and it primary
dependence on the SW monsoons which may be irregular from year
to year.
Kanika Bansal: Besides this people are polluting the water day by
day, this is one of the major concern for us to stop such activities.
Even as we can see the dispute between the Karnataka and Tamil
Naidu on utilizing the water capacity of Kaveri river this is again due
to the non utilization of water of Kaveri River effectively.
Rani Mehta: India's water crisis is mainly due to our inability to use
and store the rain water effectively. We depend on rain water for
agriculture in many states and there are no dams on many rivers. If
we will be able to combine few rivers and build dams on that then it
would help us.
Hrish: Yes Rani, storage of rain water is one major concern but there
have been efforts from the Government on this area, prominent
examples being the Indira Gandhi canal and the Sardar Sarovar Dam.
Ankit Jain: Rani yeah definitely it would help us, but wouldn't you
think there are many reasons beyond that, because I think we have
made enough dams up to now
Rani Mehta: There is one proposal to join all rivers of India, to
eliminate the uncertainty and dependence on rain water for irrigation
and drinking purpose. However it requires very large investment and
our parliament is still considering that option.
SHIKHAR GUPTA: Well, I fully agree with Mahesh that there is lack of
awareness particularly in rural areas how to conserve water.
Neha -: Yes friend you are right but in rural areas there’s more use
for it due to agricultural business.
Hrish: Moreover Rani, the river integration scheme that you are
talking about has severe problems cited by the scientists in the
country as it would lead to changing the topography of the country
and increase the seismic activity.
Kanika Bansal : Yes, I agree with you above so I think they should
try to seek some reforms so that there can be some result midway.
Rani Mehta : Hrish what I meant was that if that integration problem
if feasible would help us resolve the problem.
Neha -: Yes Ashu, I agree with that’s the point I want to say, first we
look inner our self. Who is responsible for it?
Ashutosh Mishra: Also, there are many industries which rely mainly
upon basic infrastructures of which water is the most important issue.
Rani Mehta: Another point here worth considering is that people who
have plenty of water available don't understand the value of water
and don't conserve it, we need to make them understand that it is
really important that they conserve water.
Neha : Yes friends just like Tamil nadu and Karnataka who are
fighting for water. But in north India there is not as much water
problem.
Ankit Jain: It's not overall crisis but its mismanagement that turned it
into crisis. Groundwater is the dominant resource that has been
developed in rural India to meet the drinking water needs. But often,
the shallower wells are found to be affected by fluoride, arsenic, iron,
salt and/or microbial contamination.
Kanika Bansal: Yes and thus the crore of rupees spend in water
improvement can be basically spend in other direction like canalizing
the water if we take major step towards this. This is what aspect of
mismanagement is only. They should try to implement harder rules
for the people who are doing this.
Hrish: But Kanika Bansal, do u really feel lack of funds is the reason
for mismanagement? I think it is just that the funds allocated by the
government don’t trickle down to have tangible results for water
improvement.
Karun: Our former prime minister 'Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee' even gave
a very good seminar on river channelisation but Indian authorities
should take bold steps to implement his sayings. I agree with Kanika
Bansal that there is complete mismanagement of funds by water
managing authorities.
Neha : For summarizing the GD we really find that the water crisis in
India is really based on mismanagement where there is lots of
problem thru water and there is a place where people waste water.
Hrish: Well in conclusion, it can be said that the water crisis facing
India is mainly due to the inadequate distribution of water resources
in India coupled with mismanagement and contamination of existing
resources. The revenue generated by selling water to the masses
must be re-channelized to further purification of water and awareness
about healthy and judicious use of water amongst the masses will be
significant in solving the water crisis.
Rani Mehta: We have state disputes over the water allocations, and
disputes with Pakistan also for the water, every state is looking for
their own benefits and due to which the whole country benefits are
overlooked and no effective outcome comes and many important
projects like Saradar Sarover gets extended for long so
mismanagement is one of the important cause for water shortage.
Ankit Jain: See we have discuss lot of point over why and how water
become a crisis in India instead of having large number of rivers. The
only way to solve this issue is to have coordination among people and
Governmet and people need to understand the importance of water.
Secondly it’s about water wastage also, we waste a lot of water in our
daily deeds, and we should take care about the water wastage and
utilize it properly.
Shilpa: With India opening its economy in 1991, many changes have
taken place. Many small industries have been wiped out. While the
really competitive ones have grown by leaps and bounds, for example
Tata Steel, SBI etc
Srikanth: The topic give today is a quite interesting and currently the
whole world is also thinking in the same thing. Yes Globalizations is
good for the common people because Globalization will increase
supply more than demand leading to drop of costs. So its good for
customers who need to buy the product.
Srikanth: What Rajesh said is ok but it will also leads to the fall of
local brands if they are not having enough strength to compete. No,
not 100 percent, it affects small scale industries in India.
Nilanjan: We are now preparing SEZ, but are it really good for our
countries interest? I think NO, it is grabbing our fertile agricultural
land and on another side of the coin is MNCs are here only because of
the cheap labor.
Lavya: Yes it is true that Globalization is good for the world we live
in. its good for the nations which belong to under developed category
to make an alliance with developed nations and make financial
growth
Abhishek: But all this comes at an expense too .Many countries have
faced their economy slowdown because of Globalization. It leads to
shutdown of national industries. Just for example many electrical
appliances industries like BPL have faced tremendous competition
from big MNCs like LG and Samsung.
Shilpa: Everyone here agrees that it has made consumer the king.
But one aspect that needs to be taken into account is the realty
bubble which is due to the sudden rush of MNCs to set up offices
here. Also, with higher pay packages by MNCs, the average income of
households has increased with more people going for 2nd 3rd houses
contributing to the realty process soaring. This has created problems
for the common man. Especially those who are about to retire and do
not have skill sets that can be marketed in the free economy.
Srikanth: Rajesh its all about big companies and MNCs. What about
small scale industries?
Tuhin: I think that the unfair subsidies which Mr.Rajesh mentions can
be offset by having a lower import duty which will make imports
more competitive. This may bring in an element of competition.
Shilpa: One thing that has had negative impact is that the lure of
easy money has made the youth give up on building important skills
that will help in the long run. Many graduates are taking p call-centre
jobs because of the money factor and neglecting higher education.
Abhishek: So the world is thus divided into two groups one favoring it
and another against it, because Globalization promotes overall
trade/culture/technology but hampers individual growth (in some
cases)
Srikanth: Shilpa , I agree with it but 90%of the people are getting
advantage from it. The poor people who can’t study due to financial
problems are doing jobs and studying in distance course or some
way. Any way it’s helping them.
Shilpa: Let's consider retail sector. With players like Wal-Mart coming
into play, how can the small retailers (mostly unorganized) can be
protected? How the consumers be protected? The average tickets at
a multiplex are about Rs 150 against Rs 60 in cinema halls.
Rajesh: Shilpa, Your worry about big player entering retail sector is
not valid. Customers of retail outlets are diff, & that of general kiranis
are different. For buying 2 kg of rice or dal or some other, won’t go to
retail outlet.
Tuhin: Countries like US, UK also benefit from this phenomenon. The
influx of yoga, Bhagvad Gita and other religious artifacts have
provided them with the elusive peace of mind which unbridled
capitalism and high stress work environments have taken away from
them.
Abhishek: Just see even if these companies are making profit then
why US economy is on slowdown, why so many people unemployed.
Shilpa: I conclude by saying that Globalization has its pros and cons.
But it cannot be denied that the impact it has had on our country has
been positive. It has helped Indian companies to become more
competitive and ensured survival of the fittest. Though, policies
should be framed to protect the interest of consumers and there
should be restraint in opening the market at least in some sectors.
Teja: I say neither of them is sweet but the absence of them brings the
comparison. Now the immediate question to be raised would be what if in
case we don’t have both? To what I feel, the thirst for both these things
differs from man to man. Person mostly interested in material substance
would go for Money and a man looking for emotions would prefer Honey.
I assume the Honey here in discussion refers to life partner. Added to this
the phase of the life also determines the importance of the above
mentioned things. A person needs Money when he has the zeal and
passion to excel in career or want to spend a luxury life. When I believe
most of them look for Honey, because I think they look for something
which accepts them as they are in the sense doesn’t judge them. So, I
would say the sweetest would be Honey with Money.
Rani: Money is sweeter then Honey: well without Money you can not
enjoy the Honey as well as you can not have Honey. But it’s just the basic
level needs after its satisfied i.e after you have Money other things like
prestige, ego, social status become more important then Money.
Sucheta: Its all about the Money goes the line of a song and today we
have come to discuss a topic that somewhat is linked with the words of
the song. This is indeed an interesting topic for discussion. Honey is
indeed sweet to taste and contains within it the purity of nature. But
Money is man made and only man uses it.
Rohit : Interesting analogy Mittal and topping that sweetly is dharma but
let's not forget the point here is to compare Money as a bane or an
solution to all problem the topic is digressing and it is not meant for
comparison between Money and Honey rather it is meant for taking about
pros and cons of Money.
Hemanshu Panchal: This is very good topic for discussion I think this is
very interesting topic & I think Money relates to the purchasing power & I
think purchasing can also afford for most sweetest thing then Honey or
even more for all others what they mean as sweetest. Money is such a
drug for which a human can sacrifice the biggest drug in the world.
Raju: For everything Money matters. Even today the famous quotation
health is wealth changed as wealth is health.
Mittal: I agree Rohit and therefore let’s look at the different sides of
Money and Honey
Sucheta: Honey is sweet to taste but it is with Money that we can buy
more sweet things and infact also Honey. Also Honey does have some
medicinal properties and can cure many ailments but with Money we can
afford the most expensive of treatments and increase the longevity of our
life and also quality.
J.Agrawal: To start of lets define Money and Honey. Money is that little
piece of crumbled paper in our pockets that gives us the power to
purchase and Honey, as per my interpretation, is something related to
sweetness of life or happiness. Now starting off with the comparison of
the two. Here we have got to define what happiness actually means to an
individual?
In case it is the materialistic happiness that we are looking about then
surely there is no comparison between the two The former is simply a
means to earn the latter. And with this begins the rat race to earn more
and more.
Teja: Money can definitely buy Honey but you it cant assure that its
sweet.
J.Agrawal: Looking at the other side of the coin, In case happiness to one
means being content with the basic needs of life being fulfilled and
enjoying every moment of life then definitely Money seems to be one of
the many needs and definitely not the end. As Teja has pointed out it can
help you buy Honey but cannot assure sweetness.
Rohit : I hope like Mittal people after making there first remark will try to
concentrate on the essence of topic . Although it can easily stimulate you
to create more and more fun out of it. I request not get carried away.
Rani: Well here we are said that Money is better then Honey. One thing in
argument to this is well you earn to give comforts and all possible things
to your loved ones; you can say here Honey can mean the loved ones,
your better half. What would you do even if you have tons of Money but
no one to share with? No one to enjoy the pleasure of world that Money
can buy. I say Money is important, yes it definitely is but it’s just the
basic need you need to think about your loved ones more.
Ravi: Well, the idea of using the words Money and Honey are to signify
things, in my view, Money means something which has the same value
irrespective of the person who uses it and which can get in return
something else. It’s a means of easy exchange. While Honey signifies
hard work, and something which can never be used for harm. Going back
to the topic, Money if in the hands of wrong persons can lead to
destruction while Honey cannot be used in such a way. So in my view
Money is subjective and can be a beast as well, while Honey can never
become a beast, so definitely Honey is sweeter than Money
Rohit : So as we are on track now I would say that Money is certainly not
everything but it is the thing to survive flourish and thrive in today's cut
throat competitive world.
Mittal: I agree to what Rani said, Money can buy materialistic things but it
can not bring us inner satisfaction and therefore it can not be above one's
life and family.
Rani: Very nicely said Rohit, it’s like something that you can never have
enough of it and you can’t survive without it. But running to earn lots and
lots of Money, many people ignore their health. You need to pay attention
to your health also even if Money is sweeter than Honey. You need to
take care of your health. Honey is quite nitrous that could be one analogy
for this topic that we can discuss.
Achal Arora: I would say that Money is above all, infact Money is the
motivation behind everything; it is the end result everyone expects
Achal Arora: It is the thing which can make life full of Honey, here by
Money I mean what we are worth of. I am not asking for any charity, it is
what my efforts are worth and it should be given to me, and it is much
sweeter than Honey.
Rohit : Suchy, I would like to quote famous Hollywood actress that "those
who think that Money can’t buy everything didn't know where to shop
from"
Sucheta: Honey can also means the simple pleasures of life which cannot
be bought so here Honey is sweeter than Money.
Mittal: Adding to what Suchy said, one can be too obsessed bout one's
life partner of loved one and this can bring bitterness is life also. We can
see this is examples around us, at young age people fall in to the trap of
love and lust and even commit offences like murder for "HONEY" of their
life and hence I think its very subjective to decide which is better Honey
or Money.
Rohit : Money cannot do everything for you but you can do everything
with it. It all ends up to person possessing it he can make it at heavenly
asset or an nightmarish liability
Teja: To counter Rohit's statement, we can buy a house but not home.
We can buy Honey but not its sweetness
Achal Arora: The practicality of life is that Money is much sweeter than
Honey, it is what brings you the Honey in the, if it is not there than you
can't even buy Honey. If prudently used it is the greatest asset.
Achal Arora: To counter Teja argument you can't buy sweetness if there
is no Money.
Sucheta: Money rules many aspects of our life. We need Money for
schooling, for healthcare, for food, for shelter, for clothes but do we really
need Money when we are spending time with friends or family. Isn’t their
company enough to make us feel good.
Mittal: Rohit brought a very interesting turn to the topic that Money cant
do anything, we do things with it. So let’s consider a case when one
doesn’t have either Honey or Money in life and let us examine the
situation to decide which is more important in life.
Rani: Yes Rohit, very rightly said Money can be utilized in any way it
depends on the person possessing it, one might use it for personal
pleasure, one might use it to help others, one might not use it for anyone
and would just keep collecting it, but in anyways Money has power and
everyone likes power.
Rohit : Teja you didn't get the essence of my statement Yes, Money
cannot buy home for you but you can make it buy a house for you and
turn it into an home . If you don't have Money you can't even get a house
whether you posses the quality of turning it into a home or not.
Achal Arora: Suchy, will you be having friends, if you don't go to school,
will you be able to live properly if you don't have healthcare facility, will
you have food, and will you be alive without it.
Ravi: As Mittal said, Money definitely rules many aspects of our lives, but
one should remember that Money is a medium we have decided upon so
it should always be under our control rather than we being controlled by
Money.
Rani: Ravi, its not about who is controlling whom its rather about the
importance of Money in your life and in today’s world without Money you
can not do anything. You have to have Money but again having Money is
not everything but its essential to achieve everything.
Mittal: If Money is not there in one's life, life becomes difficult. In
situation like present, where society is so materialistic and assessment of
ones character is don’t by which brand he or she uses, life will become
difficult. At the same time we also shall remember that people do live
without Money or less Money. No doubt their life is a struggle, but they
live if they have a loving family and supporting companion.
J.Agrawal: Rohit, if you have the persons who make home then you can
stay happy anywhere but what if those who make the home are missing
altogether then. Definitely a bungalow can not give you happiness.
Rohit : Teja there you go, this is the point that Is Money the most
important thing and you yourself agreed to it we are not discussing about
the penultimate things in life but the pinnacle the source of all pleasures.
Rani: If you don’t have Money you can’t get better education, without
good education you cant get good job, without good job again you are
short of Money so you can enjoy all the pleasures of life that you deserve
Ravi: Long ago, when there was barter system, definitely there was a
dispute between the exchange rates, but everyone had to be properly
skilled to get in exchange while today when Money has become the
source of exchange, people turn out to do lot of notorious things. This
clearly states that mankind has been benefited with Money, but then
Money has proven to be a major source of disparity, destruction also.
Sucheta: Money is the cause of many an evil. With today’s fast paced
world there is growing disparity between rich and poor. So in order to
gain those material benefits the so called happy rich possess many are
turning to antisocial activity. The lust for Money is polluting our society.
Ravi: What has Money brought into our lives? Corruption, dissatisfaction,
sleepless nights thinking about the robberies in the town and how can I
avoid them etc. When we think back in time, did we have the same crime
rate and corruption rate in the time of our forefathers?
Rohit : Ravi both the system had there own pitfalls and you cannot
directly conclude on anyone of them. At the time physical power was
another thing that use to rule and a person not blessed by god equally
used to suffer but with Money your physical disability do not stand
anywhere.
Mittal: I agree with what Rani said, but at the same time I would like to
point out that not having Money is a temporary state and one with his
hard work can change this and there are several opportunities for one
who desperately wants to earn Money. I agree there can be wrong ways
of doing it also but then in whatever way one can change the state of not
having Money and hence this becomes a transit condition in life.
Teja: At Ravi the barter system was bought in to picture because the man
wanted most to enjoy as much as luxury available and Money is just a
measure to the luxury he is enjoining and I would like to make my point
clear, that its a measure of materialistic luxury.
Mittal: I agree with Rohits point of view. Its not essential that everyone
having Money is anti social or corrupt.
Teja: Ravi, its not Money that has brought the corruption, dissatisfaction.
Its the greed for having more and more and too much of anything is
poisonous. I would say taking much of Honey would also not taste sweet.
Rohit : J. Agrawal very true but you cannot blame Money for it. It is the
person holding it who is responsible with Money and power comes
responsibility you can leverage it or exploit it wrongly it is all on the
person you cannot hold Money responsible for it.
Ravi: Barter system was good in its own way Teja, because people used
to buy only when they needed something unlike today, where people just
buy things because its coming for less or because he fears that tomorrow
the prices might increase. When people buy things, most of the times its
just they don’t need it, but they think they might need it.
Ravi: Teja going by your statement, Money has become too much and it
just doesn’t taste sweet, while Honey is being rarely used and is being
used when needed so its still sweet
Ravi: Money has driven the society into such a situation where things are
bought just because they are lying there; the word need is losing its
value. In such a state Money is definitely not a winner, while Honey which
is rarely being used and being used only when needed. Henceforth Honey
is definitely sweeter than Money.
R. Patra: Well when I sit by the window & look at the distance
horizon, then I find these two meeting. And then I start dreaming
myself as a bird. When I wish I can fly & when I wish I can walk on
the grass.
Ravi: hmm, that’s lot of interpretations. For me, this phrase reminds
me of the name of the book "The World is flat", the sentence is as
simple but there is a book written on it. Similarly when we say the
sky is blue and the grass is green, it means progress and everything
is green and clear. The word green is associated with happiness and
pleasantness, so when we say the grass is green, which means that
everything is pleasant and when we say the sky is blue, it means a
clear sky that in turn means there are no blockades. As a whole this
means that everything is in its expected idealistic state, just not one
or two but everything.
Jyoti: The point is just to show that different things can mean
different things in different regions and cultures. Hence, it is good if
we can keep ourselves open to the different options and look at
things in all possible ways. So that we can identify the pros and cons
and can take an informed decision then
Abhishek: Nature has chosen the colours of all the things in this
world and it has chosen it so carefully and fantastically that even a
minor change in them will abrupt the whole system. Like if colours of
people living in Africa are Black then it’s to protect them from
harmful rays of sun because they live near to the equator where the
sun rays fall directly and thus cause more damage to skin as in
Russia where skin of people is white. Similarly these colours
represent life, calmness, peace and wideness (for grass and sky)
Jyoti: Abhishek -> Does that mean God is against globalization and
migration?
Thomas: It also brings to my mind the longing of a person
incarcerated for whatever reason to see the blue skies and walk on
the green grass. It depicts the feeling the man goes through in his
cell, going over the same thoughts, day in and day out.
Dharma Tej: Sky is blue. Here it speaks how future is beautiful and
bright but it never exits and grass is about present, where we live.
It’s beautiful too with its gentle shades.
Jyoti: Yes, agreeing with Antony. It can mean monotonous life style
and lack of innovation and experimentation.
Ravi: It can also symbolize the word equality as they say every
body's blood is red in color, so anywhere in the world the grass is
green and anywhere in the world the sky is blue. So it can symbolize
Equality.
Shilpa: Tata sky logo is also blue in colour. Then why all fresh
retailers aren’t green in colour. Subhishksha is red and green.
Spencer’s also has red and green. The colours also mean that nature
has selected them for sky and grass. But we humans have choices.
Some grasses also have choices, as they are red in colour.
Thomas: It would make one think of our world, and how its
environment is being exploited and trampled upon through the
callous activities of the human hands. A day may come, when the
skies may no longer be green or the grass may no longer be green. A
war could clearly swipe both these pulchritudinous entities away from
us.
Rani Mehta: Like Ravi said the basic things remains the same
throughout the world. No matter where you go. So you shouldn’t
differentiate person based on colour or cast. Everyone has equal right
to live and prosper.
Abhishek: But you can’t change the colour of sky/grass. It’s just
playing with nature and in past we have seen the results of playing
with nature. Scientists say that Cyclones, Quakes etc come mainly
due to playing with nature.
Dharma Tej: One more way to interpret would be sky is blue only at
day and the grass is seen green at that time, though the colour of
grass doesn’t change at night the sky is turned black and we cant see
the real colour of grass. One drives another, though they never meet
only one is dependent on other not necessarily both.
Rani Mehta: We can also relate it to morale values. The basic morale
value remains the same, No matter in which country you are;
everyone respects honesty, friendship, generosity, kindness. So no
matter where you go except for the changes in manner the basic
values remains the same.
Shilpa: A starlit sky is most beautiful. Also, fluffy white clouds on the
sky make us imagine shapes. It is these 'add-ons' that enhance the
beauty of the sky. So also the little flowers on the grass add to its
beauty.
Ravi: This looks like a good title for a movie "The Sky is Blue, The
Grass is Green" in line with "The Sound of Music". The title would
look like a classical and musical movie for most of the people.
Shilpa: Agree with Rani. Some things don't change and they should
not change, like culture, values and morals. So is for commitments
also. Once a commitment is made, it should be honored. Everyone
has his or her own sky. The sky for a sparrow and that for an eagle
are different. Just as different people have different potentials. What
is important is that everyone should try to reach their full potential
and push it every time they reach it.
Abhishek: It’s the nature which modifies the colour of each and
everything in this universe in to maintain its limitations and balance.
May be its rainy day, snowy day or night sky or dry grass or red
grass or green grass, its just due to different climatic conditions
/ecological balance.
Rani Mehta: I will like to add to Jyoti, yes it’s the way you interpret
things. The way you use technology that determines weather its good
or bad like the use of internet can be done to share information and it
can also be used top plan terrorist activity depends on how you use
it.
Ravi: The Sky is actually Black, but it’s because of the refraction in
the earth's atmosphere that makes it appear blue in color. And most
of us would like the sky to be blue rather than black. This analogizes
with the fact that many of us in the world today are a different
individual from what others see us as. And it also proves a point that
"What all are seen with the eyes can be deceptive"
Dharma Tej: Well one more thing to understand here is. In spite of
the several colours of the grass can exist in we choose green for its
the best and same is the case with sky, we can learn for this
statement that always take the best of all the forms that exist for an
object.
Jyoti: It can also be seen as the sky and grass are of different colors
but are equally important for sustaining life on earth. Grass provides
feeding ground to the herbivores and the sky provides the space to
birds to open their wings wide. This is to mean that every individual
has his/her own role to play and the contribution from none can be
neglected and considered as insignificant.
Ravi: And the most important thing here is that even if the sky isn’t
blue its still called the sky and even if the grass isn’t green its still
green. So it really doesn’t matter what color one/thing is? What really
matter is its inner self
R. Patra: Ravi Exactly. It’s this deceptive nature of human who helps
him/her in deceiving others and leaving them behind in the race of
life.
R. Patra: WELL. Why they are so? I would say they are riddle. And
like these colors we have to add color to our personality to succeed in
the corporate world, to cut our road through the crowded world.
Shilpa: I conclude that sky and grass are eternal. Sky is a perception
but grass a reality. But both are beautified with small things. Variety
is nature and it is the spice. But some things should always remain as
they are to ensure peace, prosperity and growth.
Ravi: The sky is a sky even if its not blue and the grass is grass even
if its not green. So color like any other should never undermine
anything in the world. Everybody is equal.
M Srinu: Everything in its world has its unique purpose and identity
so to keep this world alive everything must do its own duty without
negligence.
Rani Mehta: “Sky is blue and Grass is green” General things which
does not change no matter where you are. Similarly values and
morality also doesn’t change. No matter in which part of the world
are you, so always follow the morally correct values and don’t
differentiate between people. Everyone has the equal right to live.
Indian As a Superpower
Hi Friends. About 60 years have passed since India had got
independence.What she was and what is she? really sounds good
when we compare the whole scenario. Industrlisation, Privatisation,
IT, BPO, KPO have a positive impact on Indian Economy. Today it is
independent and even distributing loans to other nations. Indian
economy is booming with its 8% GDP rate against around 5%
inflation rate, having a perfect economical balance. The import-export
balance is also showing a positive sign. Her relationship with other
nations like US, Russia and so on, has made her a major hub for
MNCs. Which has helped to grow it's forex.
It has to be a developed nation till 2020 as too said by our hon'ble
president Dr. Kalam.
hi frds well i am not agree with rohit.. that india will become develop
nation till 2020........its right that we develop lots after independence
but its not shows that we achieve lots..........ya i agree that our GDP
rate is increasing but what about our per capita income it is very
low........our 30% population are still living in poverty line ..they hve
not even their basics.............our country also has a big debt of word
bank and from other nations....in india all problems like price rice,
corrupsion, crime etc are increasing day by day .......money which is
sationed by central gov. 4 the development of the nation is maearly
used in it..n its goes in the pocket of ministers.......we likes do job 4
MNCs .......they earn lots of money 4 their own country not 4
india...they uses our resources and manpower 4 making money 4
themself...........ya india earn money as imposes tak on them but it
not real development...............if we want high level of development
we should come with our own prodect in market nt by doing work 4
MNCs.......................................SO SEEING PRESENT SITUATION IT
I DO'T THINK THAT INDIA WILL BECOME DEVELOP NATION TILL
2020
Key People
Mukesh Ambani, Reliance Retail Ltd (RRL), Chairman & Managing
Director
K. Radhakrishnan, CEO, Reliance Hypermarket
Raghu Pillai, Reliance Retail, Chief Executive & President
Launching of Reliance Mart
Aug 15: Reliance Retail Ltd (RRL) launched its first Hypermarket
named 'RelianceMart' at Iscon Mega Mall (biggest mall in Gujarat) in
Ahmedabad. Reliance Mart, 3-storey Mart spread over 1,65,000 sq ft
will have on its shelves over 95,000 products ranging from fresh
produce, food and grocery, home care and health products, apparel
and accessories, non-food FMCG products, consumer durables and IT,
automotive accessories, lifestyle products and footwear with
aggregate stocks of about half-a million pieces.
This Hypermart is being opened in less than a year of Reliance's entry
into the 300-billion-dollar booming organised retail business. Last
November, it had set up a cluster of Reliance Fresh stores in
Hyderabad. According to Raghu Pillai, President and CEO (operations
and strategy), Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), each of the
hypermarket "will be better than the best in the market."
Services Offered
It offers some unique services to the shoppers like tailoring, shoe
repair, watch repair, a photo shop, gifting services and laundry
services all within the store under one roof and also it has its own
bakery shop.
The launch of RelianceMart is a step forward by Reliance Retail
towards providing an international shopping experience to the
customers at unmatched affordability, guaranteed quality and choice
of products and services.
RelianceMart will also provide easy and attractive finance options,
including zero per cent financing for the purchases on select
products. RelianceMart will continue to offer all its customers
RelianceOne, a common membership and loyalty programme across
all its formats, which follows the philosophy of 'Earn Anywhere,
Spend Anywhere'.
Future Plans
The next two hypermarkets are to be opened in Jamnagar in Gujarat
and in the NCR by next month with plans to open 30 such marts by
the year. Raghu Pillai, President and CEO (operations and strategy),
Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) said the company is planning to set
up 500 hypermarkets across 784 towns by 2010.
Reliance Retail is building a robust and state-of-the-art supply chain
infrastructure spanning the entire country, besides setting up its own
cold storage chain. It is expected to generate direct employment for
half-a-million people and indirect employment to two million.
Reliance hypermarket CEO K. Radhakrishnan said six malls under the
RelianceMart brand would come up in the national capital region
(NCR), five each in Punjab and Andhra Pradesh, three in Gujarat and
two in Bangalore.
Strategy
The hypermarket would be selling the products on EDLP (every day
low price) basis at prices 15-20 percent lower than market prices.
In order to grow faster and better in local markets with higher
margins, it has focused largely on local brands instead of national
brands or private labels. Local brands includes Induben Khakrawala’s
Namkeens, Lijjat Papad, Wagh Bakri and Madhur (spices brand). This
is in addition to 100 private labels that Reliance plans to display.
Company’s Sources says that the share of regional brands in the
Hypermarts would be over 10%.
Strengths
Keeping local brands at the outlets is more profitable and also makes
the supply chain more efficient. Being a bulk purchaser, Reliance Mart
can offer products at very low prices. Also taking into consideration
the local brands, the products at the outlets would be easily
acceptable by the customers. And there would be comparatively less
efforts needed by the marketer to explain the product to the
consumers.
Weaknesses
In some cases, few regional brands strongly liked by the consumers
offer lower margins than that offered by the national brands. It has
to face a tough competition by big shopping malls ie. Big Bazaar,
Spencer Hyper, Vishal Mega Mart nad the upcoming Wall Mart.
business ia a war!!!
Yes I think buisness is a war but its not faught by swords & guns. Its
played by two companies having a very nice management. They
should have good people strength. Its a war of growth. Its a war to
be the best in a particular industry & make your company the best.
People do a lot of hard-work & smart work to make their firm the
best. The company which is at the 2nd rank would always try to
reach the first level by an means. We can see the exmaple of Mr.
Tata who is trying to make a very big service center at Calcutta in
Nandigram to launch his new car for Rs.1 lac & now he is fighting
with the poor people of Calcutta & Trinamool leader Mamta Banerjee.
So, that means you support 99% of the politicians who misuse their
political power for their petty vested interests at the cost of the
people of our country. You support those corrupt officials who tamper
with evidence and help criminals get away after committing heinous
crimes like murder and rape. You support cheap individuals who
aldulterate food and cheat the common man at the cost of his health.
You support nepotism and not merit or hard-work. You support
thousands of such individuals who get a fake MBBS degree and play
with the lives of innocent people. You support such people who open
unlawful private educational institutions and cheat poor people after
sucking out the little money that they have. These small examples
are just the tip of the iceberg.
When you are making a strong statement like that, I suggest you to
please give it a little more thought. When you say that you believe
that curruption is necessary, you are spitting on the laws of the
country; you are undermining the value of ethics; and you are
missing the big picture altogether. Just imagine if most people on
earth were corrupt (thinking that corruption was necessary)? What
would happen? Anarchy and utter chaos. This is because no one
would do his task or duty as he is supposed to do it. No one will be
able to trust anyone anymore. Nobody will be responsible anymore.
Our society is still functioning essentially because most people on
earth are still responsible and good. The day this gets reversed, our
human society will crumble to pieces.
deepu wrote:
In a movie one person will be named as hero because he will be
fighting against the evil(corruption).In one word, what is the
meaning of success?............Reaching the goal or destiny against all
odds.So that odd is necessary for you to be named as a successful
person.In this topic that odd is Corruption.
It seems, you have misunderstood the topic. The topic here means:
is it necessary to use illegal or immoral ways in every or any sphere
to climb the ladder of success?
Hi Everyone...
The only way and the best way to eradicate corruption is to instill
tonnes and tonnes of moral values and to make them aware of the
significance of hardwork...
"The only place where success comes before work is the dictionary..."
Its not whether u are corrupt or not, its how much and whether u
show it or not... cos i m sure that everybody in this world is corrupt
in one way or the other... Be it buying tickets in black, or giving a 50
Rs note to a policeman to avoid ur licence being taken away or
anything else...
Take for eg our politicians, they are all corrupt but some of them
show it and some dont... I personally like Laloo Yadav even when we
all know he is corrupt... Cos he works hard and produces result... All
we want is results, whether they come thru corruption or not is
secondary...
-Mayur
hi frnds ,
I totally agree with wat soumya said...but i will stick on my view that
corruption is necessary....
soumya u tell me if government is making reservation for all
backward class as well as women...dont u think its unfair in this
competetive world
for a person who has scored much higher than than that backward
class stud ? here ppl r forced to pay xtra money(corruption) to get
their deserving child an admission in good coll....now here corruption
is used for good purpose ....u mentioned abt doc...if all this backward
class student will bcme docs dont u think it will be a big loss to our
society?
"Cos ttheta"
Following GD was conducted on 21st Feb 06 . The topic "Cos ttheta"
was suggested by one of the subscriber, Sulagna who got calls from
IIMs-C,L,I,K .
rajesh kumar: yes i agree with gaurav we can use the formula of cos
theta in real life problems
dhananjay vidyasagar: we are relating this theory with real life but
how can we apply it
tina kulkarni: i would like to say that cos theta is always defined as
the base of the triangle upon the hypotenuse,, and once we have
these two basic values we can find the third one and so on.. his is the
case with with principle of any organisation, once we decide that the
organisation has to follow basic principles of honesty and hard work..
they rest like profits and fame will follow
gaurav200x: one should know, that a person lives a real life as well
as an imaginary one... and hence.... he/she has two lives to lead in
his/her life.... and hence cos can be used to resemble a real life of a
person
rajesh kumar: i think vishal is deviating more from the topic i request
all the members to be confined to the topic
abhishek mishra: Well i see cos theta and all trigo terms are use to
calculate geometric information.
rajesh kumar: hai guys i am rajesh
dhananjay vidyasagar: we are relating this theory with real life but
how can we apply it
tina kulkarni: i would like to say that cos theta is always defined as
the base of the triangle upon the hypotenuse,, and once we have
these two basic values we can find the third one and so on.. his is the
case with with principle of any organisation, once we decide that the
organisation has to follow basic principles of honesty and hard work..
they rest like profits and fame will follow
gaurav200x: one should know, that a person lives a real life as well
as an imaginary one... and hence.... he/she has two lives to lead in
his/her life.... and hence cos can be used to resemble a real life of a
person
rajesh kumar: i think vishal is deviating more from the topic i request
all the members to be confined to the topic
abhishek mishra: Well i see cos theta and all trigo terms are use to
calculate geometric information.
Adhananjay vidyasagar: we should also take into consideration life is
not like a RIGHT angled triangle life can be say obtuse and acute
tina kulkarni: the same principle can be applied in all walks of life
once we identify the basic characters to any argument or
problem the solution to all problems will come along
vishal bhinde: Cos after 90 degrees is negative but the point is good
that v should all b positive in life n must be same from
heart n outside
tina kulkarni: i would agree with gaurav.. this is to be seen in the real
life example of mr.Mittal today, inspite of facing several
problems with his acleor takeover and facing problems of racism, he
still is positive about his outcomes
dhananjay vidyasagar: like me raj too is not goodin math but the
point remains how v must look at cos
vishal bhinde: well cos is 1/ Sec but thats not imp i guess...
abhishek mishra: ok
vishal bhinde: can anyone give or relate any real life example related
to significance of cos thethta
tina kulkarni: as i said earlier it is the smaller side on the larger.. this
is the case with successful organistons.. where the
management ormanagers are responsible for work done and make
sure they carry the organisatio to safety and success while jeeping
the base which is the workforce of the company happy and satisfied
vishal bhinde: like COS starts from 1 similarly MBA aspirants also star
with much enthu but fade of in due cource of time... i
would like to tell all should continue working hard n u will suceed
abhishek mishra: When cos is zero it have the highest value and
when in it @ 90 it has lowest value so dealing with human
behaviour i think As a manager it is one of the best way to take risk
vishal bhinde: i mean all start with lots of enthutiasm but after some
faliure they leave it n take random or lower B schools or
even leave hopes of MBA so i told that all should keep trying in
life.........
gaurav200x: I think cos theta resembles human life..... the ups and
downs.... from -1 to 0 and then 0 to 1 and again from 1 to - 1..... it
resembles, that all whether gud or bad lasts only for a certain period
and life cycles keep on repeating.... mgmt is a life science which
teaches the same and hence mgmt is pretty much like a cos theta....
giving +ve outcome always
abhishek mishra: Well Cos theta is one of the important entity which
we can not avoid in mathmatical term and if we relate it to our daily
life ,many similarity we can find with that.
vishal bhinde: i think like COS v shd be flexible n well defined but still
never endinding n keep learning as our economy changes ev
rapidly........thank u all
rajesh kumar: i new to this type of GDs i cant get with u, i think this
does not help us to develop skills of GD
http://www.urpercentile.com:/ Ok thanks everyone , will analyse the
discussion and send the result at the group in 1-2 days
yes girls r good acadamecians becz they do they work more effiently
then boys.Girls work hard becz they never waste time and r regular
in their syidies
Sir David King said the US had failed to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
But Sir David criticised the Bush administration for relying too
exclusively on market-based incentives and voluntary actions.
Flood risk
Severe problem
But despite declaring support for the UNFCC's objectives, the US had
failed to ratify the Kyoto accord for emission reductions and "refused
to countenance any remedial action now or in the future".
Sir David added: "We can only overcome this challenge by facing it
together, shoulder to shoulder.
"We in the rest of the world are now looking to the USA to play its
leading part."
Sir David said climate change was the most severe problem faced by
the world.
"The United States is already in the forefront of the science and
technology of global change, and the next step is surely to tackle
emissions control too," he said.
Population growth
Greenhouse gases stop energy escaping from the Earth's surface and
atmosphere.
If levels rise too high, excessive warming can distort natural patterns
of climate, researchers say.
WELL, FRIENDS YOU MIGHT HAVE HEARD THE SAYING " HARD
WORK IS THE KEY TO SUCCESS" AND I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN THIS
THAT HARD WORK PRODUCESS THE BEST RESULTS BUT IN TODAY'S
ENVIRONMENT THE MEANING OF THIS SAYING HAS SLIGHTLY
CHANGED FOR EXAMPLE WE HAVE SEEN FARMERS WHO WORK ALL
DAY AND NIGHT ON HIS FIELDS BUT AFTER ALL THAT HARD WORK
THE FARMER GETS NOTHING I MEAN THE FARMER EARNS TOO
LITTLE BUT IF APPLY HIS SMART WORK INTO HIS WORK THAN HE
WOULD BE ABLE TO DEAL WELL WITH THE DEALING N CAN MAKE
HIGHER PROFITS .HENCE THE NEED OF TIME IS TO THINK BEYOUND
HARD WORK THAT CAN GIVE YOU SUCCESS.[/quote]
hi all
i think if both smart work and hard work are co related because if you
are working smartly and not doing hard work to achieve your gole
then its vain simillarly if you are working very hard and you dont
know for what i am doing that much of hard work then also its vain,
so in my oppenion one should work hard in a smart way to get things
easily and in a proper way.
What I believe is Smart work & hard work go together. If you are an
agent of any call center & you are satisfying your customers while on
phone & ur Team Leader is happy with you but you are not
maintaining your stats then at the end of the month you will get your
normal salary. However if you will maintain your stats & will satisfy
customers as well then you would get a very good salary. You would
have got brilliant chances of promotion if u are doing smart work
including hard work. Such kind of person comes in the eyes of his
Managers & supervisors, but if a person will keep on doing hard work
like a spider does to climb the wall then it will take a very long time
for him to get promoted.
Smart work in an industry means ur manager should see that you are
doing hard work & taking care of the entire team in absence of ur
team leader.
So, these two things go all together.
A. Ahuja: Good evening everybody the topic given today “If winning
isn't everything, why do they keep score” is a very discussable topic
and is quite interesting .Well according to me It doesn’t matters if
you win or loose all it matters how you play the game but on the
other hand the score has to be maintained so as to analyze a
person’s performance and his shortcomings.
Moreover keeping scores lets an individual know he stands and help
him better his own track record it helps him in improving his own
Individualistic character. Keeping score helps a person compete
against his own self
Sucheta: Winning is not the most important thing in the world but
surely the scores is an indication of your performance. The score tells
how far have you reached and how far you have to go. It is a means
of comparing your performance to that of the winner. Winning gives
one a sense of achievement also just because one does not mean
that he doesn't need encouragement. The score gives him an idea of
how much better he is than the other participants and hence pushes
him to perform better.
Ashwin Kumar: Looking at the topic, let us define winning and score.
Winning, the word shows that there are more than two participants
and there is the concept of one of them being better and scores are a
way to evaluate people. What comes 1st to our minds looking at the
topic is the very popular game of cricket obviously the game is
played as an entertainment for the spectators and scores do the trick.
Human mindset is that unless there is a target to be achieved one
does not work.
Vivek: I think the two sentences of the topic should be seen with
different views while the first one is for individuals; the second one is
for those who evaluate them. For an individual what should actually
matter is his efforts while when you have to judge many people you
need to give them some kind of scores.
Ganesh Ettiappan: Winning is not important, but how much you
scored and where your standing and which direction you should
proceed to win makes sense. So for measuring the depths we need
scores otherwise we need some terms to quantify our level, and
future improvement, If we don’t know the distance of traveling then
it is not possible to reach that place safely. Always these scores will
give confident and sell motivation will be formed by measuring our
effort using scores
A. Ahuja: Winning and loosing are the two sides of the same coin. We
learn from both winning and loosing but scores are a magnitude of
your performance irrespective of winning or loosing. Scores help us
know where we stand and where others stand. At the end of the day
all that matters is how you fared and what you learnt whether you
won or lost and scores can help you to determine your performance.
Vivek: I agree with Ahuja, they are actually two sides of a coin
because everyone makes an effort to win but since there are two
possible outcomes and not every body can be a winner I think
somebody has to lose but it surely does not maker the loser less
respectful or less intelligent.
Sucheta: Agree with Tej, Scores lets us know the direction we have
taken in our performance. Also how much we have to work to reach
the goal.
R.Mehta: Suppose that you are the only one in class who got 80
percentages and all others are getting 70 or 60 percent then it will
not lead you to work hard but if someone is just behind you like
someone getting 79 or 79.5 percentage then you will work harder to
stay on top. or to maintain your place.
Sucheta: Scores are also kept to motivate the player. Suppose if one
was playing well at some point of time but has reduced performance
now. Seeing those scores again will give him hope and the
determination to try and achieve that excellence again. Since, he
already did it once. Agreed scores help others to evaluate your
performance. It gives them the idea of how good you are. When they
don't have the time or inclination to really get to know you scores can
do the talking for you.
Vivek: Actually what dharma has just said is right that you need the
scores to see where you stand but actually speaking the scores are
not actually meant for the person itself they are more meant for the
people who are judging you. For a person it is just the effort that he
has made, not to say that the scores serve a purpose for the
individual also in that they let the participants know there own
shortcomings.
Tej: It’s true that most of them requiring scoring be it for any reason.
But does the entire destination (winning) require scoring?? Say
something like qualifying exam??
Trupti Indulkar: Though we all agree that scores don't mean much,
we live in a society where these are more important than any other
gauge of performance. Right from school to the time we die, scores
are being kept. By our teachers, parents, colleges and work places.
Tej: Its just an qualifying exam why does someone want to rate it. All
it matters in a qualifying exam is whether he qualified or not. Here
the qualifying is winning. Why does someone want to rate it??
Jainisree: Right, if there is nothing like scores. How one will know
about his position wrt others.
Ganesh Ettiappan: See in life we should compare things which will
help us to improve ourselves to level where we want to see
ourselves, that’s reason we have scores and time limit in all cases.
Sucheta: After all if you were not capable you couldn't have managed
that score. That kind of fluke happens rarely.
R.Mehta: Very rightly said how you can compare two teams or
individuals if you don’t keep scores. Wining is not everything still
everyone wants the best player in his or her team and best way to
judge or choose is to keep a score.
Percentile Score required to get GD/PI call
There are about 1.7 Lakh students writing the MBA entrance exams..
Scorerequired.htm Online GDs/PI at UrPercentile
ONLINE MOCK GD :Cos Theta
;Should IIMs start engineering courses? GD-1;ASEAN AND INDIA.
OnlineGD/PI.htm Sample GD Topics
Neccesity is the mother of invention.
Engineers joining management is a national waste.
GDTopics.htm
Vivek: I think you are right in putting that question Tej. The ratings
are given for the transparency of the process. So that nobody can
question it.
Tej: Yes, I agree that there is a cutoff and it is different from scoring,
I think scoring here refers to relative performance and its not needed
in cases as qualifying exams.
Vivek: But here I would like to put a question for all of you. Can a
qualifying exam not demoralize a person in life if he scores very
badly due to some reason even if he was good as ruchi said earlier he
might have made a mistake.
Trupti Indulkar: Friends, I also think that keeping scores may mean
that one is holding a grudge against someone. You are counting
someone’s offences against you. It happens all the time! This is
another dimension we could explore.
T. Chaturvedi: Scores are kept only for the sake of records to see
whether a person cleared the specified benchmark or not. That's why
they only matter till they are the present. Once they enter the record
books, they are forgotten and the focus shifts to the next
competition. What is not forgotten is what learning the aspirants
garnered in the older one.
Tej: Also winning does matter in competitive fields and I say scoring
is required there but in fields where it is only a qualified or not sort of
things, I say its not required.
Jainisree: Scores are not always valued but only where necessary.
For example to get into the corporate world after graduation there
are only cut-offs, after the cut-off your score doesn't matter.
Ganesh Ettiappan: Always scores makes sense and gives us reward.
Everyone were winning I mean achieving there own goals .One might
aim for moderate B-schools but his score will be less compare to the
one which got 99%.
R.Mehta: Yes like T.Chaturvedi said scores are only important when
they are present, what is really important is what you learn from
your experience. Did you realize where you made mistake and what
is important is what you did to improve on that.
A. Ahuja: The general thing here Trupti is scores and scores serve
the purpose of rating whether in a cricket field or a competitive score
Vivek: Yes, I agree with you Shiva what actually matters is that you
look at your performances and try to find out where you lag and try
to improve yourself
Sucheta: Winning is great it makes you feel good. All of us here want
to win and the scores put your winning into black and white. It
legitimizes your winning so that others can see your score and
marvel at it. They understand how hard you worked for your goals.
Vivek: But Ashwin, what do you do when the person who is rating
yourself is not you but is someone else that is when the scores
matter, that is where you have to really think what does my score in
a exam or a competition mean to me.
Tej: Winning may not be everything but passion to win and achieve.
It is everything and the measure for which is scoring, it tells you
where we are placed in regard to that destination.
Vivek: I will like to correct Aditya by saying that what you learn is
fine but when you say what you gain you actually need to quantify
what types of gains one expects from it.
R.Mehta: Scores are just past records and they in no way determine
your current standing but current scores are really good indicators if
you want to select players for your team. Scores also will let you
know where you stand and what are your strengths and weaknesses,
which will help you in improving your performance. Winning is not
everything but keeping scores will motivate and help you improve
your performance.
Vivek: Wining is not everything but it tells you how good or bad you
are in comparison to others. You actually need to look at the result in
a critical way and find out where you lag and may be give it a try
once more until you win as some body gave an example of Attapattu.
The scores are actually needed to rate yourself in comparison to
others so that we can decide a winner which can be only one or a
limited number.
Manish: India has been an agricultural country for ages. This is a shift
in policy of India, we must go slowly about it. Industrialization will
certainly help we must try to maintain a balance. If we are taking
lands of farmers we must make sure that they also reap the benefit
of industrialization.
Rajesh: Our country has only 3% of world land area, but 16% of
world population. So we need to manage our land properly. By using
Satellite Imagery we have to allocate lands for Agri, Indus and Resid.
And no fertile lands should be converted to Indus as in case of Singur
Shilpa Kolte: There are many SEZ coming up, with many sanctioned
and few put on hold as the Government is treading cautiously on the
policy. It is important that the Government strikes a balance in
promoting both industry and agriculture. But the shift from
agriculture to industry is clear and well timed, with the economy
booming and the policy makers trying their best to take advantage of
the emerging brand India
Manish: Politicians are just making fuss of it for their vote bank.
Political parties should think about the country as a whole and decide
what will benefit the country most. There should not be vote bank
politics on such issues which are going to decide future of country
Shilpa Kolte: Fertile land, in all cases should be used for cultivation.
Indian population is booming, just like our economy and we should
ensure that we do not lose our 'self-stuffiness' in food status. There
are many areas which are barren; it's just a case of proper
management of available land
Shilpa Kolte: I said they should try to maintain balance. The farmers
suicide in AP, Maharshtra is not related to SEZ, bit more on adequate
price to the produce. Let's not mix the two issues
Shilpa Kolte: One thing Antony, natural resources are precious. Once
the quality of land has deteriorated, it will take many years to regain
the quality. I agree with Rajesh
Manish: Just because we imported wheat does not mean we are not
self sufficient, we paid for that wheat. And at the same time we
exported other agricultural products.
Shilpa Kolte: Precisely, but they are not related to SEZ land
acquisition. Proper earmarking of land for SEZ can also lead to
balancing development. We already have an imbalance with
segregation on industrial activities in areas like Mumbai, Bangalore
etc creating a burden on infrastructure in these areas, along with
concentration of population in some belts. A good SEZ policy, along
with impetus to industry can also help in uniform development of all
regions.
Rajesh: Now friends, we have agreed that SEZs are quite essential to
sustain the economic growth of 8+% and in the due course achieve
the goal of super power. So let us now decide how to harp this
opportunity and implement the SEZ in a better way
Manish: The capacity to pay for that wheat cam from other sources
where we performed better, you need produce everything to be self
sufficient. Even major countries import goods
Shilpa Kolte: Singur like case should not happen. I agree. But it is
also true that the problem was not solved by the media attention and
agitation by leaders and NGOs. What could have been done was that
the government should have consulted the farmers in the zone before
letting the company set up a car project there.
Shilpa Kolte: We cannot forget that the Jamnagar SEZ has given us a
facility to refine sour crude and it will now house the worlds largest
refinery
Rajesh: Well. As seen in China, SEZs have played a vital role in their
economic resurgence. So we need to concentrate more on this sector
and further take steps not to make the same mistakes done my
China. And along with progress towards industrialization, we need to
maintain the balance between Agri & Inds.
Shilpa Kolte: I conclude by saying that the Government with the new
SEZ policy has shown that the focus is on Industry and services. But
also the restraint orders and giving the go ahead to only 70 SEZ
instead of the 630 under consideration shows the Government's
concern to ensure the development of all sectors, or at least that no
sector is dealt with unjustly.
hiiiiiiiiiiiiii
every1,
it feels great writing about
the most beautiful expression in this world ever 'LOVE'
yes love still possess its true meaning even in today's scenario
it is such a pure expression of heart
undemanding , uncorrupt,
love never knows any boundaries
its not because i am in love and am saying
all the positive aspects about it
i have been on the other facet of love too
where i have suffered a lot
but it didn't stop me loving myself
my life .
After all i can juss say love is GOD
Love is an emotional attachment. Love is a set of behaviors that
humankind is encouraged to act out. One is encouraged not just to
love one’s partner or even one’s friend. According to the Bible- Love
is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not
proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it
keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices
with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, and
always perseveres. Love never fails.
Love is God.
Women are more artistic and they are not very expressive while men
are the other way.
WELL, FRIENDS I THINK THAT MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT EQUAL IN
ALL ASPECTS.WOMEN HAVE THEIR OWN ASPECTS AND MEN HAVE
THIER OWN. WOMEN GET EMOTIONAL SOON BUT MEN ARE
COURAGEOUS IN FACT WHICH IS WHY WOMEN ARE MORE SUITED
FOR JOBS LIKE HR BECAUSE IT DEMANDS MORE EMOTIONAL TOUCH
WITH HER CO WORKERS.ON THE OTHER HAND MEN ARE CHOOSEN
FOR JOBS ESPECIALLY WHICH REQURIES PHYSICAL STRENGTH AND
COURAGE WHICH DEFINETLY LAKS IN WOMEN.HENCE I THINK THAT
WHEN GOD HAS DEFRIENCIETED MEN AND WOMEN THEN THERE IS
NOTHING TO TALK ABOUT.THANK YOU
Hello everybody,
I read all the replies,and i got a thought that "How can we compare
men and women?".A female excels in the fields alloted to them by
the nature and a man fails in those fields.Similarly man excels in his
respective.
HI guys I think it’s a difficult job to compare men and women in 21st
century. Where as in past century women were not so qualified and
educated..That we can compare to men.
But now both have their own qualities but in different ways. Like
women are not physically as strong as men but even men are not so
qualified in cooking as well as women. So I just wanna say that both
have their own qualities but in different aspects.
Hii
A very old and sick lady who is paralyzed for life and has only a few
more months of painful existence left in her wishes to end her life:
mercy killing.
But mercy killing is not applicable in such case while the person has
possibility to live for few more months.
Only when a person is waiting for severe pain in the hospital but life
is no more than few hours.Whose death is already obvious within few
hours but unnecessarily suffering for severe pain before death for few
hours---to give him/her relief from needless severe pain mercy killing
is implemented.
* No job opportunities are not only more in India but they are also
more in other countries like china, Japan etc.reason is now Chinese.
Japanese they are also equally competent to u and us know why
china has seen a drastic change in their development? B’s they work
even harder and smarter than us. Even more people and more
opportunities are there in India do u known that we are also ranking
high in unemployment?
Left is Right
An abstract topic but definitely interesting...Scope for innovation for
all u ppl...Come up with ur innovative views..
1) Our heart is on the left side of the body n it is always right...so left
is rite
2) Saurav Ganguly is a left hander and people think he is wrong...but
i think he is a great batsmen and a wonderful captain...so left is rite
3) When u look into the mirror, what u c is ur opposite image...there
ur left hand seems to be the right hand...so left is rite...
So with your examples you can say that left is right. Can I say with
my examples right is left? Ok see this
1) You said that our mirror image shows that our left as right, but it
is also true that the same mirror show our right as left.
2) We know that our right brain will controll left side parts of the
body. So we can also say that right is left. Of course our let brain will
controll the right
life is beautiful
a drug addict can make his life a hell or a heaven.it depents upon
him/her.he can make his life beautiful by leaving drugs and can make
his life hell by getting addicted to this poision.
life can be good for the students if they study hard and never lose
heart.also it can be hell to him if he indulge himself in evil practices
like cheating,leaking papers etc.
so god has given everyone this precious life and ask us to choose our
own path so it is upto u how u take and live your life.
but sumtimes i feel like.. wht bout dose who live on streets..who
suffer frm sum deadly disease..who have lost der eyes or cant
walk..tats where luck factor comes inn...
Its a cute topic. Really life is a beautiful thing which has to be utilized
in a good way. We must have the intention of helping others while we
were helped by others(Parents). Once, you have a practise of helping
orphans and handicaps, you can understand there problem and could
realize how gifted we are with healthy life. So, everyday have a smile
in your face and cheer up others also.
life is mirror!!!
hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
frns,
i think its very true that
Life is a mirror
life reflects our deeds
and those who are involved in cruel deeds
cannot escape life so easily
life takes it own revenge and we dont know
when will we have to pay for it,
and good deeds are always paid for.............
Hi guys I believe that life is mirror. But it is much more than the
glass mirror in which we see we see ourselves everyday. This is the
mirror in which we can see only our physical personality not our inner
personality. But life is the accurate mirror which shows our character,
nature, behaviors our deeds etc. In human being there are two types
of nature good and bad. If we give the world the best we have it will
come back to you. Life is the mirror of our deeds, if we will hurt
anybody by our deeds love will not come to us.
If we give respect, respect will meet to you.
-Mayur
hiiiiiii frns,
I would prefer an arranged love marriage
it is but obvious that i can't marry the one whom i don't know
and in today's scenario it is very difficult to trust anyone
i dont say that the one whom i'll choose
is the best but atleast i'll have the benefit of knowing him for long
which would help me understand him very well .
It doesn't mean that i m against love marriage
if in my phase of life i dont come accross
any person whom i don't love
i would definitely leave it up for my parents to decide the guy for me
which i very well know will be the best choice .
Each evening before a school day, prepare a Daily Organizer for the
next day. Place a √ next to each thing to do as you
accomplish it. Here is what to do to prepare a Daily Organizer.
1) Enter the things to do for the coming day from your Weekly
Schedule.
2)Enter the things that still need to be accomplished from your Daily
Organizer from the previous day.
3) Review your class notes for the day just completed to see if you
need to add any school activities.
4) Add any out-of-school activities in which you will be involved the
next day.
Your Weekly Schedule should have more detail than your Term
Calendar. Your Daily Organizer should have more detail than your
Weekly Schedule. Using a Term Calendar, a Weekly Schedule, and a
Daily Organizer will help you make the best use of your time.
Ritesh: Both MBA & MCA are good career options but they are
fundamentally different from each other. An MBA equips a person
with all the skills required to manage an enterprise. It enables him to
think rationally & make decisions in complex business scenarios. An
MCA on the other hand is focused on subjects related to computer
science & information systems. This is a domain specific course &
gives the student good insights on programming, maintenance &
testing of software.
Mittal: Hi friends, let us first look at the two degree, requirements for
them and options after them. Both the degrees are PG. Requirements
for MBA is bachelors in any branch whereas for MCA math’s is
required as a subject in bachelors. MBA equips a person with future
options in management capacities where as MCA leads a person to
computer programming and hence it’s more on the technical side.
Yogesh Srihari: Every body the glamour for MBA has increased over
the recent past. More people want to opt for MBA because of a high
designation and fat salary packets. This trend will continue and might
also increase in the future, CEO are recognized or even celebrated.
No doubt people like Bill Gates drop out from Warton University who
are technically oriented did create Microsoft but it was then. Now it
has changed, competition has increased, we need managers for sure.
Ritesh: The job opportunities are immense for both streams & with
the current boom in the software sector, an MCA graduate may
pocket a salary nearly equal to an MBA graduate. But what matters is
the role & responsibility which one is given in his job. An MBA will
enjoy good roles & challenging opportunities in management. An MCA
on the other hand get opportunities on cutting edge technologies &
can have a very good technical career. So the entire issue boils down
to whether one wants to grow technically or in a management
position in an organization. This depends on a person’s interests &
aspirations on what he wants to achieve in life.
Ritesh: Daman, I feel that communication skills & teamwork skills can
be learnt even without an MBA . The main reason for which we go to
an MBA program is to broaden our vision & get formal education on
managing businesses. Marketing & finance knowledge are some of
the key differentiators
Mittal: Friends as rightly pointed out by both Tuhin and Ritesh, both
MBA and MCA have their separate positive aspects but we shall not
forget that they both lead a person to two very separate lives and
hence we shall look in to that also as to which life is better so as to
decide which degree is better. I think it depends on personal choice,
where a person wants to see him or her self after 5 years and what
the long term goals
Tuhin Chaturvedi: I don't agree with Miss Khushi there. An MBA has
no reason to join the software sector for technical reasons. Why
would he wish to alter his specialization so drastically?
Aditya Ahuja: An MBA graduate can survive even when the industry
is downsizing due to its vast scope but for an MCA graduate all he is
left is only hardcore computer industry hence making it difficult for
him to survive when the software industry is on a decline.
Mittal: khushi has a very valid point that MBA limits one's options but
I would also like to add that at the same time progress in MBA is
faster in terms of rise in organizational tree and hence that offsets
the diverse option available to the person after MCA.
Tuhin Chaturvedi: MBAs are preferred all over the world because they
are multi faceted. As far as technology is concerned, it cannot be
sustained without proper management.
Mittal: Tuhin made a valid point but I would also like to add that the
technology and management are two separate parts of a project and
hence they both have their respective utilities and both need other to
support so we shall not compare them on this basis
Khushi: Ritesh, you said that MBA can adapt to any field if required
but I don’t think he can’t join an s/w company and make s/w for the
company. We are not saying that it limits a person but then being a
MCA has an edge over a MBA student
Tuhin Chaturvedi: An MBA in finance can shift seamlessly between
corporate banking to retail banking of even asset management
should the occasion demand it. Similarly, marketing has a wide
gamut of areas like branding, sales, market research etc. All these
are possible options for an MBA. So it's a lateral playing field wherein
options are aplenty. An MCA on the other hand may have to work
only in vertical parallels. May we learn from you Miss Khushi what
that edge is please?
Mihir pande: MBA can never limit your options; it only widens a
man's thinking ability and perspective whereas an MCA is a technical
training which infact closes your career options only to computer
streams.
Khushi: i being a student of MCA can say this because not only does
BCA teach the computer subjects but also the management subjects.
So a MCA student has a edge over a MBA student.
Aditya Ahuja: I agree with Ritesh as I said earlier it all depends from
individual to individual and comparing both of them would be wrong.
Ravi : MBA and MCA are both similar in a way that both of them give
a strong foundation in their own domain. Here I think MBA is an
analogy for Managers and MCAs is an analogy for the technical
people.
Khushi: Edge means that not only we lean about the s/w industry but
we are also made to learn about some management subjects, where
as in case of MBA they only teach us the management subjects. And
the second point is what is required in today's world???? I think a
person who has knowledge of all the subjects has a bright future and
next is depends upon the individual.
Yogesh Srihari: Technical people are required but you know with out
management skills it is not possible to create a Microsoft as bill gates
created long time ago or infact Google, then as I said earlier
competitive world requires competitive people to give an winning
edge with their management skills. MCA would remain as good as it
is today but the glamour for MBA would definitely increase.
Mittal: Both the degrees take the person to management level in due
course of time but then MBA definitely accelerates the movement.
Ritesh: Khushi, I feel that a person who is an MBA can join a software
company. But having said this, he need not develop S/W. Instead he
can move to managerial roles or HR or into an analyst position.
Tuhin Chaturvedi: I think that the software sector is not the only
place an MBA would revert to in case of a recession.
Mittal: Adding to Mihir, MCA will limit a person to technical, but then
he still becomes a manager at a later stage, only the time taken will
be very long which is saved if he has an MBA.
Mihir pande: This topic is totally not worth a discussion because there
are no 2 sides to it. Everyone is just highlighting the + points of an
MBA.
Ravi : One good thing in terms of the MBAs is that MBAs can change
their domain from IT to FMCG to anything while the MCAs have a
very little scope in terms of shifting their jobs and that is IT, so if
there is an IT crash that happened in the year 2000 the MCA’s will
have a terrible time again.
Ravi : Adding to what aditya says, if it is not for the MCA’s who have
done an extremely great job, IT wouldn’t have been flourishing so
much and the huge pay cheques being bagged by the MBAs (most of
them manage wealth either in investment banking or maintaining
accounts or marketing products). That requires a kudos to MCA. The
underlying statement is that, MCA is like the common man in India,
with whom India can be made and the MBAs are like the officials
(govt) who manager. Without the common man there is no manager
and without the manager its utter chaos. Each of them is very
important and are mutually dependent on each other for their
growth.
Moral police
I think we don’t need moral police. Moral police makes rule and
regulation for their own profit. They give such orders to follow that in
public or city or country. Like for example if they give order that
every woman will have to wear abayas (black robs) and further they
should walk 10 steps back from men. One western celebration our
great moral police have developed some notoriety for suppressing is
Valentine’s Day. They inspect hotels, restaurants, coffeehouses, and
gift shop on 14th Feb. to prevent couples from giving each other
valentines or other present. The moral police ban the sale of red
roses, red stuffed animals, red greeting cards and other red items,
report store owner. Many other incidences we can take like recently
happened Shilpa Shetty and Richard Gere kiss Shilpa was innocent.
Sometimes police hold morchas against sex education. Is it right? No.
Then why should we follow that rules which are not made for our
happiness or peace. Everybody can understand their good or bad. In
additional if people need any rules for their society or city ….they
together can make rules by their society. So guys I don’t think we
need such type of moral police.
the topic for the gd was on Corruption - Abdul kalam had suggested 3
ways to eradicate corruption....after abt a min v got started....fairly
chaotic gd....managed 2 get some decent airtime in btw....talked abt
looking into corruption in different spheres such as politics, education
and in society....gav the example of manjunath and Delhi public
school bribery scandal....then talked abt corporate governance n
whistle blower act....other points discussed by the grp included RTI,
ethics as a subject in school, etc...1 guy towards the end brought in
an interesting pt as 2 legalising corruption....the panel stopped our
gd at this pt...none of us wer asked 2 summarize....
P1: So u r one of these ppl who only talk abt doin gud but do nuthin
abt it….?
A: No sir I do not think politics is the only way 2 do gud 2 the ppl…
spoke abt my role in Satyam foundation…wat it does…etc etc…also
spoke abt setting up a trust later to do social good…
P1: (proceeded to ask me abt table tennis, how I play, abt the
different syles of play, asked abt my fave player, y I liked him)
A: told
hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii frns,
well on my opinion
the assembly should amend its proposal
and just tighten its security system
via other measures than harrasing the women mentally
our country is free and even we women have every due right
which the men enjoy.
I think it is very foolish on their part to
imply such a barrier on women,
they are just opting for foolish ways rather
than implicating some senseful startegy
to avoid violence faced by women in our society.
Hi guys its true that the incident happened last year in Karnataka
highly insecure the condition of working women in our country. But
wo kehte hai nnn Life doesn’t stop.
One more thing I wanna say that this kind of case happen because
the lack of women economic and social security. So government
should tights the security system. India is a independent country so
why women spend their life like prisoners.
Hi freinds
I am Ajit Bansal from Symbiosis Institute Of International Business.
We are organizing R.D. Aga Series. Now what is it?.....................
its a series which we organize every year, and eminent guest
speakers grace the occasion. We had Kiran Bedi, Shoba De, T. N.
Seshan, and this year too we are planning for some great
personalities who have made a significant differnce in their respecive
feild. Why dont you guys just get on woth the topic " One can make a
diiference" . For instance Maneka Gandhi has made a mark in
protecting the animal rights.. shoot up and rattle ur grey matter .. do
some tickling.. to ur thoughts.....hope to hear some good food for
thought...
Yes ,definitely one can make a difference in the society and the
environment he has grown in.Here I am not talking about Mahatma
Gandhi,Martin Luther King ,Winston Churchill or the leaders who have
made history.But my point is that we as an individual can even make
significant contribution to the society,like by taking initiative to plant
trees in the colony we stay,try to educate atleast one individual who
belongs to a decripit family.So,there are ways in which ,we can
become an ideal person and we can set an example....So,Yes even
one can make a difference.
Yes I believe that one can make difference. One person can make
changes everybody has this power. For example like in this selfish
world nobody think about poor people if in every family even one
person would help poor people (financially, emotionally, etc) by this
most of the poor people would be educated. Every one people can
make his society or city neat and clean by putting dust in liters
instead of road. They can cultivate more plants and trees. All we can
take steps one person can do a lot of good.
RED
red-is a symbol of purity .Red is worn at weddings. It is also the
colour of sindhoor and tikkas. Red is about energy and passion.
Goddesses Durga and Lakshmi wear red.
Hi Dis is savitha,
Retirement Age
Many old people work well into their 70s and 80s, running families,
countries or corporations. Other people, however, despite being fit
and highly talented, are forced to retire in their or even earlier
because of company or national regulations. This essay will examine
whether people should be allowed to continue working for as long as
they want or whether they should be encouraged to retire at a
particular stage.
There are several arguments for allowing older people to continue
working as long as they are able. First of all, older employees have
an immense amount of knowledge and experience which can be lost
to a business or organization if they are made to retire. A second
point is that older employees are often extremely loyal employees
and are more willing to implement company policies than younger
less committed staff. However, a more important point is regarding
the attitudes in society to old people. To force someone to resign or
retire at 60 or 65 indicates that the society does not value the input
of these people and that effectively their useful life is over.
Allowing older people to work indefinitely however is not always a
good policy. Age alone is no guarantee of ability. Many younger
employees have more experience or skills than older staff, who may
have been stuck in one area or unit for most of their working lives.
Having compulsory retirement allows new ideas in an organization. In
addition, without age limits, however arbitrary, many people would
continue to work purely because they did not have any other plans or
roles. A third point of view is that older people should be rewarded by
society for their life’s labor by being given generous pensions and the
freedom to enjoy their leisure.
With many young people unemployed or frustrated in low-level
positions, there are often calls to compulsorily retire older workers.
However, this can affect the older individual’s freedom - and right -
to work and can deprive society of valuable experience and insights. I
feel that giving workers more flexibility and choice over their
retirement age will benefit society and the individual.
saddam' execution