REGRESION MULTIPLE

Salarios
70

60

50
Frequency

40

30

20

10

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

LSALARIOS
50

40

30
Frequency

20

10

0
3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0
REGRESION MULTIPLE

50
Series: LSALARIOS
Sample 1 500
40 Observations 500

Mean 4.641408
30 Median 4.605170
Maximum 5.950643
Minimum 3.465736
20
Std. Dev. 0.448926
Skewness 0.187761
10 Kurtosis 2.619012

Jarque-Bera 5.961836
0 Probability 0.050746
3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0

Dependent Variable: LSALARIOS

Method: Least Squares
Date: 07/04/19 Time: 11:35
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 4.733644 0.024344 194.4490 0.0000

GENERO -0.250643 0.040130 -6.245809 0.0000

R-squared 0.072643 Mean dependent var 4.641408

Adjusted R-squared 0.070781 S.D. dependent var 0.448926
S.E. of regression 0.432746 Akaike info criterion 1.166662
Sum squared resid 93.26019 Schwarz criterion 1.183521
Log likelihood -289.6656 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.173278
F-statistic 39.01014 Durbin-Watson stat 1.383433
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Dependent Variable: EDUC

Method: Least Squares
Date: 07/04/19 Time: 11:50
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 2.259494 0.058016 38.94624 0.0000

GENERO -0.493189 0.095636 -5.156939 0.0000

R-squared 0.050694 Mean dependent var 2.078000

Adjusted R-squared 0.048788 S.D. dependent var 1.057427
S.E. of regression 1.031310 Akaike info criterion 2.903528
REGRESION MULTIPLE

Sum squared resid 529.6726 Schwarz criterion 2.920386

Log likelihood -723.8820 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.910143
F-statistic 26.59402 Durbin-Watson stat 0.107560
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Dependent Variable: TP
Method: Least Squares
Date: 07/04/19 Time: 11:53
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 0.196203 0.024608 7.973237 0.0000

GENERO 0.249450 0.040564 6.149458 0.0000

R-squared 0.070576 Mean dependent var 0.288000

Adjusted R-squared 0.068710 S.D. dependent var 0.453285
S.E. of regression 0.437435 Akaike info criterion 1.188214
Sum squared resid 95.29196 Schwarz criterion 1.205073
Log likelihood -295.0536 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.194830
F-statistic 37.81584 Durbin-Watson stat 1.961166
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Dependent Variable: EDAD

Method: Least Squares
Date: 07/04/19 Time: 11:55
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 40.05063 0.610078 65.64842 0.0000

GENERO -0.110416 1.005683 -0.109792 0.9126

R-squared 0.000024 Mean dependent var 40.01000

Adjusted R-squared -0.001984 S.D. dependent var 10.83424
S.E. of regression 10.84498 Akaike info criterion 7.609273
Sum squared resid 58571.53 Schwarz criterion 7.626131
Log likelihood -1900.318 Hannan-Quinn criter. 7.615888
F-statistic 0.012054 Durbin-Watson stat 2.035748
Prob(F-statistic) 0.912619
REGRESION MULTIPLE

Tabulation of GENERO and EDUC

Date: 07/04/19 Time: 11:58
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Tabulation Summary

Variable Categories
GENERO 2
EDUC 4
Product of Categories 8

Measures of Association Value

Phi Coefficient 0.244817
Cramer's V 0.244817
Contingency Coefficient 0.237794

Test Statistics df Value Prob

Pearson X2 3 29.96761 0.0000

Likelihood Ratio G2 3 34.70409 0.0000

Count EDUC
% Row 1 2 3 4 Total
0 varones 108 77 72 59 316
% 34.18 24.37 22.78 18.67 100.00

GENERO 1mujeres 88 57 33 6 184

% 47.83 30.98 17.93 3.26 100.00

Total 196 134 105 65 500

39.20 26.80 21.00 13.00 100.00

existe diferencia en el nivel educativo entre varones y mujeres………………………..si

hay un mayor % de las mujeres q no tienen un nivel educativo

Muy poco % de las mujeres llegan a tener un nivel educativo superior

Hipotesis:

H0: el nivel educativo es independiente del sexo

H1:el nivel educativo es dependiente del sexo

Recahazamos Ho y acepatmos h1

Conclusion :
REGRESION MULTIPLE

Tabulation of GENERO and TP

Date: 07/04/19 Time: 12:10
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Tabulation Summary

Variable Categories
GENERO 2
TP 2
Product of Categories 4

Measures of Association Value

Phi Coefficient 0.265662
Cramer's V 0.265662
Contingency Coefficient 0.256756

Test Statistics df Value Prob

Pearson X2 1 35.28809 0.0000
Likelihood Ratio G2 1 34.55263 0.0000

Count TP
% Row 0>3 dias 1<3dias Total
0 254 62 316
80.38 19.62 100.00

GENERO 1 102 82 184

55.43 44.57 100.00

Total 356 144 500

71.20 28.80 100.00

Existe dependencia
REGRESION MULTIPLE

SUPUESTOS SOBRE EL PROCESO GENERADOR DE DATOS

Dependent Variable: LSALARIOS

Method: Least Squares
Date: 07/04/19 Time: 12:23
Sample: 1 500
Included observations: 500

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 3.052685 0.055334 55.16839 0.0000

GENERO -0.041101 0.024711 -1.663296 0.0969
EDAD 0.030606 0.001273 24.04101 0.0000
EDUC 0.233178 0.010660 21.87382 0.0000
TP -0.365449 0.031571 -11.57563 0.0000

R-squared 0.703976 Mean dependent var 4.641408

Adjusted R-squared 0.701584 S.D. dependent var 0.448926
S.E. of regression 0.245237 Akaike info criterion 0.036765
Sum squared resid 29.76986 Schwarz criterion 0.078911
Log likelihood -4.191347 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.053303
F-statistic 294.2901 Durbin-Watson stat 1.873691
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

0.0969
genero) NO SIGNIFICATIVO

TRABAJAMOS CON LAS DEMAS VARIABLES

LA TABLA NOS MUESTRA QUELOS COEFICENTES ESTIMIDOS POR MINIMOS CUADRADOS

,ESTIMADOS ERRORES ESTANDAR

ADEMAS DE ESPECIFICARSE LOS VALORES DE LA PROBABILIDAD( P- VALUE)

loS EFECTOS DE EDAD, EDUCACION Y TIEMPO PARCIAL SON SIGNIFICATIVOS AL NIVEL

CONVENCIONAL DEL 5%.La variable dumny(variables dicotómicas) Genero no es significativo al
nivel de confianza del 5%

-------para Edad

---e a la 0.031 menos 1………..cuando es positivo

El q tiene un año mas de edad tiene aproximadamente gana 3% mas de salario

Para Educacion
REGRESION MULTIPLE

Para TP

El q trabaja mas de 3 dias gana 31% mas del q trabaja –de 3 dias