Sei sulla pagina 1di 24

Doc.

No : F-P1-MAT-017
Issue No : 01
SUPPLIER ONSITE ASSESSMENT AUDIT SCORE CARD Rev. No : 05
Rev.Date : 12.05.2017

Supplier Name & Address Key Contact Person Name & Mobile No. : Supplier code : Date of Audit : 13-2-19
Auditor 1 :
Evershine Finishes-949 sector 37 Pace City Part II Gurugram Vineet Kohli-8800792746 Auditee:
Auditor 2 :

E-mail : evershinefinishes@yahoo.com

Top Management Name : Vineet Kohli Other Major Customers : JPM Group, Minda Group and Lifelong Pvt Ltd Sign.: Sign.:
Certification : ISO 9001:2015

Cert. Body & Valid upto : TUV SUD South Asia Pvt Ltd valid till 30-1-22 Tool room supported by CAD/CAM facility : Yes

In Business Since : 8-8-2005

Annual Turnover : 3.61 Cr Employee Details Staff : 5 Operators : 31

Commodity : Plating List of Machineries & Special equipment's

Products / Parts : Honda Fuel Tank Cover, Suzuki S Logo,Sonalika


Emblem , Faucet Parts
Injection moulding machine-3 Nickel Chrome Plating Plant Buffing Machines

Diecasting Machine-4 XRF Thickness Testing Machine

Score details
AUDIT ELEMENTS
Max Score Min Score Actual % Vital Min © Vital Actual
1 Management Responsibility 80 52 69 86% 15 20
2 Financial credibility / capability 85 55 72 85% 0 0
3 Manufacturing facilities 125 81 115 92% 60 90
4 Incoming Material & Sub supplier control 125 81 106 85% 30 40
5 Inprocess Control 200 138 172 86% 57 82
6 Inspection Measuring & Testing Equipment (IMTE) 75 49 60 80% 0 0 Future Expansion Plan : Yes / No
7 Machine, Tool, Die Maintenance 100 65 77 77% 15 20 If Yes, please tick appropriate
8 Control of non conforming product 70 46 53 76% 15 20 Expansion of present unit : Yes
9 Analysis of Customer Complaints 75 45 54 72% 45 54 New plant / unit-: yes
10 New product development process 70 42 51 73% 42 51
11 Production planning and control 30 20 24 80% 0 0 New machinery procurement
12 Document change & Data control 15 10 12 80% 0 0 Others (pl. specify)
13 Storage, packing and preservation 60 39 51 85% 0 0 Overall Audit Status

14 House keeping 45 29 36 80% 0 0 GYR Grade Score

15 HRD & Training 70 46 56 80% 15 20 Green Very Good 100 - 81 %

16 Statutory / Regulatory requirements 75 49 65 87% 45 65 Yellow Average 80 - 61 %

TOTAL = å (1 to 16) 1300 846 1073 83% 339 462 Red Below Average Below 60 %
% of Marks scored by the Supplier =
( Points scored / Applicable points ) x 100
Vital Grade GREEN
82.54% Minimum Score in each
Minimum Score required for Approval:
element
GREEN Overall Category GREEN
1. Total score >65%
2. Minimum score in each element.
3. Vital points to Score minimum 3 in each elements. Audit Score GREEN

0. System not defined 1. System defined, but no compliance to system


Scoring
Criteria - 2. System defined, minor deviations 3. System is in place, compliance to the system Vital points marked as ©
Marks
4. System is compact, fool proofed, 5. World class system, bench marking level.

Rating Criteria Green Yellow Red


Below 65 % or scored less than 3
Onsite assessment 80 % & above 65 % to 79 %
in Mandatory Questions (V)

Actions required Ensure sustenance & focus on continuous Counter measure report to be submitted to achieve Rejected
improvements Green status

Supplier Representative Assessor / Auditor SQA Head Head Materials


SUPPLIER ONSITE ASSESSMENT / AUDIT CHECK SHEET

SUPPLIER NAME : Audit date :

Remarks if
Function Audit Elements Vital Points Audit findings Weightage Max. Points Points Actual Max. Score Actual Score
any

1.1 Does the supplier has documented Quality Policy and objectives ? Do
communicated to all and awareness?
AVAILABLE & AWARENESS 2 5 5 10 10

1.2. Are the key performance indicators are set to meet the
customer requirements? Is it monitored and action plan in
place to acieve the target? Is the trend in PQCD is positive © KPI ARE SET & MONITORED TO ACHIVED TO CUSTOMER 5 5 4 25 20

for simillar products to other customers?


1. Management Responsibility

1.3. Does the Management Review Meeting conducted at regular intervals? does it
covers all the Internal & External key performance indicators ?
(Customer end, In-house Rej. & Rew. PPM, Customer
Satisfaction, Delivery Schedules, M/c break down details, Employee absentism, NPD MRM CONDUCTED AS PER PLAN ,CUSTOMER SETISFACTION ,M/C BREAKDOWN IMPLOY ABSENTISM ,NPD STATUS ,CLOSURE OF CUSTOMER NCR'S. 3 5 4 15 12
status, NCR's - Pricol Audit, NCR's - Internal Audit, Environmental test results,
Environmental/ Safety statutory/regulatory requirements, Any safety/environmental
issue,NCR's - Third party audits, Purchased parts quality & delivery status)

1.4. Does the roles and Responsiblities where clearly defined and escalation ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY DEFINED FOR EACH AND EVERY PERSON. 3 5 4 15 12
procedure followed for critical situations w.r.t meeting customer requirements.

1.5. Does the supplier certified for QMS, EMS or OHSAS. ISO 9001-2015 CERTIFIED 3 5 5 15 15

Total score in Management Responsibility 22 80 69

2.1. Growth trend of the organisation for last 3 years ? DATA AVAILABLE 3 5 5 15 15
2. Financial credibility /

2.2. Own premises - space for expansion available? YES 3 5 5 15 15

2.3. Ability to invest to meet pricol needs in future ? YES HAVING FUTURE PLAN FOR EXPANSION 3 5 5 15 15
capability

2.4. Supplying to OEM / Tier 1 / 2 Automotive suppliers or non automotive customers. TIER 1 and Tier 2 3 5 4 15 12

2.5. Cost saving initiatives are in practice & benefits were shared with the customer? YES 5 5 3 25 15

Total score in Financial credibility / capability 22 85 72

3.1. Does the approporate machine available to meet the


pricol requirements? How old the machines are? © YES , LATEST MACHINES AVAILABLE 5 5 5 25 25
3.Manufacturing facilities

3.2. Does the critical machines meet the process capability


for simillar components? © SPARE MACHINE AVAILABLE FIR ANY CRITICILITY. 5 5 4 25 20

3.3. Contingency plan available in case of critical situation in meeting the pricol CONTINGENCY PLAN AVAILABLE FOR ANY CRITICILITY. 5 5 5 25 25
requirements?

3.4. Spare capacity availabel to meet the rise in pricol


© MORE THAN 50% SPARE CAPACITY AVAILABLE 5 5 5 25 25
demand. Minimum 40 %
3.5. Technical competency of development /
© PEOPLE TRAINED WITH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AGENCY 5 5 4 25 20
Manufacturing / Quality assurance persons.
Total score in Manufacturing facilities 23 125 115

4.1. Does the supplier maintain master list of approved sub -suppliers for Job work
(Incl.special Processes), raw matl. and bought out parts. Does the supplier maintain YES HAVING MASTER LIST OF APPROVED SUB-SUPPLIER , RAW MATERIAL AND AUDIT AS PER TIME PLAN AS PER DEFINED 3 5 4 15 12
an audit plan for all its sub-suppliers ? Are the schedules adhered to?

4.2. Does the supplier carry out assessment of its sub supplier for their manufacturing
3 5 4 15 12
4.Incoming Material & Sub supplier control

YES SUPPLIER ASSESMENT REPORT AVAILABLE AS PER MFG.AND INSPECTION CAPABILITY


and inspection capabilities?

4.3. Do the incoming inspection carried out effectively


inline with Quality plan or IS / other relevant standards ?
© HAVING INCOMING INSPECTION PLAN ( IS 2500I) 5 5 4 25 20
Are the quality plan covers sample size , frequency &
inspection method ? (For job work & bought out parts)

4.4. Does the supplier has adequate Inspection facilities to


ensure incoming part quality and inspection records © INSPECTION RECORDS AVAILABLE 5 5 4 25 20
maintained?
4.5. Does the supplier have the system to communicate and ensure the corrective
actions has been taken effectively for the sub supplier rejections. Do the YES BY MAIL OR BY PHONE 3 5 5 15 15
effectiveness tracked. ?

Important note: Corrective action is to be submitted for less than 3. Target date not more than 15 days from the date of this audit. Vital points marked as © Page 2 of 24
4.Incoming Material & Sub supplier c
SUPPLIER ONSITE ASSESSMENT / AUDIT CHECK SHEET

SUPPLIER NAME : Audit date :

Remarks if
Function Audit Elements Vital Points Audit findings Weightage Max. Points Points Actual Max. Score Actual Score
any

4.6. Are the raw materials / parts received from approved sub suppliers and stored in PARTS LOCATION DEFINED & IDENTIFIED 3 5 4 15 12
a defined location with proper identification ?

4.7 Do the supplier check or monitor the hazardous substances contents in the FOLLOW THE SUPPLIER TEST REPORTS 3 5 5 15 15
incoming parts.

Total score in Incoming Material & Sub supplier control 30 125 106

5.1. Does the supplier has Control Plan / WSS & Work
instruction for all processes and is it accessible for use at © YES CONTROL PLAN , WSS,WR AVAILABLE 3 5 5 15 15
the workstation ?

5.2. Does the supplier has daily Check sheet for start of the shift / during set up and CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
the check sheet parameters reflected in the control plan / WSS ?

5.3. Are all the process parameters (set as per control plan,
WSS, Setting data sheet) verified and recorded ? © YES VERIFIED AND RECORDED 3 5 4 15 12

5.4. Do the process validation carried out for critical / special process? Do the VALIDATION REPORT AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
actions taken based on the result ?

5.5. Does the supplier has adequate Inspection facilities to


measure the parameters identified in the control plan and © YES XRF MACHINE AVAILABLE FOR SPECIFIC THK & CHEMICAL SOLUTION 5 5 4 25 20
inspection records maintained?

5.6. Are the Set up / First piece approval system in place ? FIRST PIECE APPROVAL RECORDS AVAILABLE 3 5 5 15 15
5. Inprocess Control

5.7. Are Critical parameters identified in the control plan and are they monitored YES CRITICAL PARAMETER DEFINED AND GRR REPORT AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
using Statistical Process Control tools ? ( such as Xbar & Rchart, n-p chart)

5.8. Does the supplier carry out layout inspection once in a year / for any modification
in process, tool , die ? Are the relevant records available ?
LAYOUT INSPECTION PLAN AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12

5.9. Does the supplier have approved limit samples / master samples at shop floor / LIMIT AND MASTER SAMPLES AVAILABLE AND DISPLAYED AS PER TIME PLAN 3 5 4 15 12
work place ? Are they re-validated at regular intervals?

5.10. Does the supplier conduct Measurement System


Analysis (MSA) for critical parameters ? Are the results of © MSA REPORT AVAILABLE AND RESULULTS WITHIN 10% 3 5 5 15 15
Gauge R&R within 10% ?

5.11. Is there any system available to track any process


change which can affect customer requirement and those
changes are communicated to customer ? Do the Change © 4 M CHANGE SHEET, PROCEDURE AVAILABLE 5 5 4 25 20

management followed effectively?

5.12.Does there any system exist to avoid mixing of hazardous and Non hazardous
substances ?
SYSTEM AVAILABLE 3 5 5 15 15

Total score in Inprocess Control 52 200 172


6. Inspection Measuring & Testing Equipment

6.1. Does the supplier maintain a master list of instruments including pressure
gauges, temperature gauges and other process control gauges ?
MASTER LIST OF INSTRUMENT AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12

6.2. Does the supplier adhere to the calibration plan ? Are the procedure / method &
acceptance criteria defined and meet IS / relevant standards? (applicable for in- CALIBRATION PLAN AVAILABLE AND INHOUSE CALIBRATION FACILITIES AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
house calibration only)

6.3. Does the supplier maintain an unique codification system for IMTE? YES AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
(IMTE)

6.4. Do the calibration system includes the procedure to analyse and take actions PROCEDURE OF CALIBRATION AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
incase of calibration failure?

6.5. Are the status of calibration clearly identified on the instruments / equipments? YES CLEARLY IDENTIFIED 3 5 4 15 12

Total score in Inspection Measuring & Testing Equipment (IMTE) 20 75 60

Important note: Corrective action is to be submitted for less than 3. Target date not more than 15 days from the date of this audit. Vital points marked as © Page 3 of 24
SUPPLIER ONSITE ASSESSMENT / AUDIT CHECK SHEET

SUPPLIER NAME : Audit date :

Remarks if
Function Audit Elements Vital Points Audit findings Weightage Max. Points Points Actual Max. Score Actual Score
any

7.1. Does the supplier has a preventive maintenance plan for all machines and PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN AVAILABLE FOR ALL MACHINES AND EQUIPMENTS 3 5 4 15 12
equipments?

7.2. Does the supplier maintain history cards for all the machine and equipment, tools
7. Machine, Tool, Die Maintenance

SUPPLIER HISTORY CARDS AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12


and fixtures?

7.3. Does the supplier maintain a master list of moulds / jigs / fixtures / tools etc.,
identification and status indication system available? Does the supplier has a system MASTER LIST OF MOULDS / JIGS / FIXTURE AVAILABLE 3 5 3 15 9
to identify and protect Pricol supplied tool / products / parts ?

7.4. Does the supplier has inhouse facility to develop the tool / maintaining the tool,? ONLY TOOL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12

7.5. Does the machine break down / Tool Failure analysis carried out and corrective TOOL BREAKDOWN ANALYSIS REPORT AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
actions system followed ?

7.6. Does the supplier have a monitoring system for tool life
© TOOL LIFE MONITORING CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE 5 5 4 25 20
?

Total score in Machine, Tool, Die Maintenance 23 100 77

8.1. Are the non confirming products / parts clearly


8. Control of non conforming

identified and stored in ear marked area / bin ? Is it fool © AREA DEFINED FOR REJECTION AND REWORK MATERIAL 5 5 4 25 20
proofed to avoid mix up.

8.2. Does the supplier maintain a register for recording rework and rejection ? YES RECORDS AVAILABLE 3 5 3 15 9
product

8.3.Does the supplier have any rework procedure ? YES HAVING REWORK PROCEDURE 3 5 4 15 12

8.4. Does the supplier reviews the rejection + rework on a daily / monthly basis and REVIEW ON MONTHLYBASIS 3 5 4 15 12
corrective action taken appropriately ?

Total score in Control of non conforming product 15 70 53

9.1. Does the supplier maintain a register for recording


customer complaints ? Are the trend graphs on customer © CUSTOMER COMPLAINT REGISTER AVAILABLE AND ACTION QUALITY ALERT DISPLAYED ON SHOP FLOOR BOARD. 3 5 3 15 9
9. Analysis of Customer Complaints

complaints displayed at shop floor for monitoring ?

9.2. Does the supplier use 8D approach / problem solving


© YES USING 8D APPROACH FOR RESOLVING CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. 3 5 4 15 12
tools used for resolving the customer complaints?

9.3. Are the Process FMEA, Control Plan, Work


instructions, Gauge design, Mould / Jigs / Fixture drawings © YES PROCESS FMEA , CONTROL PLAN UPDATE AS PER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT OR COMPLAINT BASIS. 3 5 4 15 12
updated after implementing the corrective action ?
9.4. Does the supplier monitor the effectiveness of
© EFFECTIVNESS SHEET AVILABLE FOR CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION 3 5 4 15 12
Corrective and Preventive Action for defined period?

9.5. Do the horizontal deployment system in place? Is it


© HORIZONTAL DEPLOYEMENT PROERLY FOLLOWED 3 5 3 15 9
followed effectively?

Total score in Analysis of Customer Complaints 18 75 54

10.1. Are the APQP/ PPAP system followed and documents


© APQP / PPAAP SYSTEM FOLLOWED FOR NEW PARTS 3 5 4 15 12
10.New product development

available for recently developed products (within a year) ?

10.2. What is the effectiveness of PQCD for recently


developed simillar products? © EFFECTIVNESS OF PQCD SHEET AVAILABLE FOR SIMILLAR PARTS 3 5 4 15 12
process

10.3. Does the supplier meets the developmental lead time? © YES AS PER LEAD TIME 5 5 3 25 15

10.4.Does the Supplier captured all the Customer


© ROHS TO BE DONE ON THE BASIS OF CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT 3 5 4 15 12
requirements (Including Environment, RoHS and Safety)?

Total score in New product development process 15 70 51

11.1. Does the material and production planning carried out systematically ? YES CARRIED OUT AS PER DAILY PRODUCTION PLAN 3 5 4 15 12
.Production
lanning and
control

Important note: Corrective action is to be submitted for less than 3. Target date not more than 15 days from the date of this audit. Vital points marked as © Page 4 of 24
SUPPLIER ONSITE ASSESSMENT / AUDIT CHECK SHEET

SUPPLIER NAME : Audit date :

Remarks if
Function Audit Elements Vital Points Audit findings Weightage Max. Points Points Actual Max. Score Actual Score
11.Production
planning and

any
control

11.2. Does the supplier monitor and analysis the on time schedule adherence ? Are SUPPLY VS DESPATCH PLAN AVAILABLE . 3 5 4 15 12
the actions taken effectively to meet the demand?

Total score in Production planning and control 8 30 24


Does the supplier maintain master list of documents and issue control
12.Document change & Data

registers for the following


12.1. Drawings

12.2. Check sheets YES MASTER LIST AVAILABLE AND ISSUED TO CONCERNED PERSON.
DRAWING LIST AVAILABLE.
control

CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE


PFD,FMEA,CONTROL PLAN , WI AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
12.3. Process Flow chart , FMEA , Control plan / WSS / SOP , Work instruction RECORDS AVAILABLE FOR SUB SUPPLIER
YES IF MSDS CHAANGE FROM SUPPLIER THAN INTIMATE TO CUSTOMER

12.4. Drawings / Check sheets provided to sub supplier

12.5. Change in MSDS and communication to customer

Total score in Document change & Data control 4 15 12

13.1. Does the supplier has a system for material handling? Are the parts safe from
13.Storage, packing and

metal to metal contact , dent, damages and rust ?


YES HAVING PROPER HANDLING SYSTEM FOR MATERIAL IN AND OUT 3 5 4 15 12
preservation

13.2. Are the production parts at each manufacturing stage identified with appropriate PARTS IDENTIFIED WITH TAGS AT EACH STATION 3 5 4 15 12
tags with status ?

13.3. Does the supplier have separate earmark place for finished goods? FINISHED GOOD AREA DEFINED 3 5 5 15 15

13.4. Does the supplier follow FIFO ( First in - First out ) system ? FIFO MAINTAINED 3 5 4 15 12

Total score in Storage, packing and preservation 17 60 51

14.1. Are the Aisles (gang way) and work places separated using yellow lines ? YELLOW LINE MARKED FOR GANG WAY AND WORK PLACE 2 5 4 10 8
14.House keeping

14.2.Are the unnecessary stock, machine, jigs, tools, board, photos etc., removed PLAN AVAILABLE FOR UNNECESSARY MATERIAL REMOVAL 2 5 4 10 8
periodically ?

14.3. Are the jigs, fixtures, tools, dies, gauges and office files arranged based on YES ARRANGED AS PER SIZE AND SHAPE 2 5 4 10 8
shape, size ?

14.4. Does the supplier practicing 5S concepts for shop floor and office ? 5 S CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE FOE EACH AREA 3 5 4 15 12

Total score in House keeping 16 45 36

15.1. Does the supplier maintain and monitor skill matrix for all operators ? SKILL MATRIX SHEET AVAILABLE FOR ALL CONCERNED OPERATOR 3 5 4 15 12

15.2. Does the supplier has a training plan for all operators /staff ? Training plan YES TRAINING PLAN FOR OPERATOR AND STAFF AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12
adherence monitored?
15.HRD & Training

15.3. Does the supplier have a system to monitor the training effectiveness? SYSTEM FOR TRAINING EFFECTIVNESS AVAILABLE 3 5 4 15 12

15.4. Does the supplier has a communication system for


customer complaints and how the direct inline operators /
supervisors are appraised about the actions? Does the © BY METHOD OF QUALITY ALERT AND TRAINING FOR OPERATOR AT THE TIME OF RAISE THE PROBLM FROM CUSTOMER 5 5 4 25 20
employees aware about the recent failures and action
taken?
Total score in HRD & Training 16 70 56
Regulatory requirements

16.1. Status on compliance to Safety regulatory


© FOLLOWED ALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 5 5 4 25 20
requirements
16.Statutory /

16.2. Adherence to pollution board/statutory requirements © POLLUTION CERTIFICATE AVAILABLE 5 5 5 25 25

16.3. Availability Consent to Establishment copy, Consent


to Operate - Water act, Air act, Hazardous waste © CONSENT TO OPERATOR ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE 5 5 4 25 20
authorization copy form Pollution control board
Total score in Statutory / Regulatory requirements 13 75 65

Important note: Corrective action is to be submitted for less than 3. Target date not more than 15 days from the date of this audit. Vital points marked as © Page 5 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

1 Does the supplier has documented Quality Policy and objectives ? Do AVAILABLE & AWARENESS 5
communicated to all and awareness?

Are the key performance indicators are set to meet the customer
2 requirements? Is it monitored and action plan in place to achieve the KPI ARE SET & MONITORED TO ACHIVED TO CUSTOMER 4
target? Is the trend in PQCD is positive for similar products to other
customers?

Does the Management Review Meeting conducted at regular intervals? does


it covers all the Internal & External key performance indicators ?
(Customer end, In-house Rejection & Review. PPM,
MRM CONDUCTED AS PER PLAN ,CUSTOMER SETISFACTION
Customer Satisfaction, Delivery Schedules, M/c break down details,
3 ,M/C BREAKDOWN IMPLOY ABSENTISM ,NPD STATUS ,CLOSURE 4
Employee absenteeism, NPD status, NCR's - Pricol Audit, NCR's - Internal
OF CUSTOMER NCR'S.
Audit, Environmental test results, Environmental/ Safety
statutory/regulatory requirements, Any safety/environmental issue, NCR's -
Third party audits, Purchased parts quality & delivery status)

Does the roles and Responsibilities where clearly defined and escalation ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY DEFINED FOR EACH AND EVERY
4 procedure followed for critical situations w.r.t meeting customer 4
PERSON.
requirements.
5 Does the supplier certified for QMS, EMS or OHSAS. ISO 9001-2015 CERTIFIED 5
6 Growth trend of the organization for last 3 years ? DATA AVAILABLE 5
7 Own premises - space for expansion available? YES 5
8 Ability to invest to meet pricol needs in future ? YES HAVING FUTURE PLAN FOR EXPANSION 5

9 Supplying to OEM / Tier 1 / 2 Automotive suppliers or non automotive TIER 1 and Tier 2 4
customers.

10 Cost saving initiatives are in practice & benefits were shared with the YES 3
customer?

11 Does the appropriate machine available to meet the pricol requirements? YES , LATEST MACHINES AVAILABLE 5
How old the machines are?

12 Does the critical machines meet the process capability for similar SPARE MACHINE AVAILABLE FIR ANY CRITICILITY. 4
components?

13 Contingency plan available in case of critical situation in meeting the pricol CONTINGENCY PLAN AVAILABLE FOR ANY CRITICILITY. 5
requirements?

Page 6 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

14 MORE THAN 50% SPARE CAPACITY AVAILABLE 5


Spare capacity available to meet the rise in pricol demand. Minimum 40 %

15 Technical competency of development / Manufacturing / Quality assurance PEOPLE TRAINED WITH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AGENCY 4
persons.

Does the supplier maintain master list of approved sub -suppliers for Job
YES HAVING MASTER LIST OF APPROVED SUB-SUPPLIER , RAW
16 work (Includes special Processes), raw material. and bought out parts. Does 4
MATERIAL AND AUDIT AS PER TIME PLAN AS PER DEFINED
the supplier maintain an audit plan for all its sub-suppliers ? Are the
schedules adhered to?
YES SUPPLIER ASSESMENT REPORT AVAILABLE AS PER
17 Does the supplier carry out assessment of its sub supplier for their 4
manufacturing and inspection capabilities? MFG.AND INSPECTION CAPABILITY

18 Do the incoming inspection carried out effectively inline with Quality plan HAVING INCOMING INSPECTION PLAN ( IS 2500I) 4
or IS / other relevant standards ? Are the quality plan covers sample size ,
frequency & inspection method ? (For job work & bought out parts)

19 Does the supplier has adequate Inspection facilities to ensure incoming part INSPECTION RECORDS AVAILABLE 4
quality and inspection records maintained?

Does the supplier have the system to communicate and ensure the
20 corrective actions has been taken effectively for the sub supplier YES BY MAIL OR BY PHONE 5
rejections. Do the effectiveness tracked. ?

21 Are the raw materials / parts received from approved sub suppliers and PARTS LOCATION DEFINED & IDENTIFIED 4
stored in a defined location with proper identification ?

22 Do the supplier check or monitor the hazardous substances contents in the FOLLOW THE SUPPLIER TEST REPORTS 5
incoming parts.

23 Does the supplier has Control Plan / WSS & Work instruction for all YES CONTROL PLAN , WSS,WR AVAILABLE 5
processes and is it accessible for use at the workstation ?

24 Does the supplier has daily Check sheet for start of the shift / during set up CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE 4
and the check sheet parameters reflected in the control plan / WSS ?

25 Are all the process parameters (set as per control plan, WSS, Setting data YES VERIFIED AND RECORDED 4
sheet) verified and recorded ?

26 Do the process validation carried out for critical / special process? Do the VALIDATION REPORT AVAILABLE 4
actions taken based on the result ?

Page 7 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

Does the supplier has adequate Inspection facilities to measure the YES XRF MACHINE AVAILABLE FOR SPECIFIC THK & CHEMICAL
27 parameters identified in the control plan and inspection records 4
SOLUTION
maintained?
28 Are the Set up / First piece approval system in place ? FIRST PIECE APPROVAL RECORDS AVAILABLE 5

Are Critical parameters identified in the control plan and are they YES CRITICAL PARAMETER DEFINED AND GRR REPORT
29 monitored using Statistical Process Control tools ? (such as X bar & R chart, 4
AVAILABLE
n-p chart)

30 Does the supplier carry out layout inspection once in a year / for any LAYOUT INSPECTION PLAN AVAILABLE 4
modification in process, tool , die ? Are the relevant records available ?
LIMIT AND MASTER SAMPLES AVAILABLE AND DISPLAYED AS
31 Does the supplier have approved limit samples / master samples at shop 4
floor / work place ? Are they re-validated at regular intervals? PER TIME PLAN

32 Does the supplier conduct Measurement System Analysis (MSA) for critical MSA REPORT AVAILABLE AND RESULULTS WITHIN 10% 5
parameters ? Are the results of Gauge R&R within 10% ?

Is there any system available to track any process change which can affect
33 customer requirement and those changes are communicated to customer ? 4 M CHANGE SHEET, PROCEDURE AVAILABLE 4
Do the Change management followed effectively?

34 Does there any system exist to avoid mixing of hazardous and Non SYSTEM AVAILABLE 5
hazardous substances ?

35 Does the supplier maintain a master list of instruments including pressure MASTER LIST OF INSTRUMENT AVAILABLE 4
gauges, temperature gauges and other process control gauges ?

CALIBRATION PLAN AVAILABLE AND INHOUSE CALIBRATION


36 Does the supplier adhere to the calibration plan ? Are the procedure / 4
FACILITIES AVAILABLE
method & acceptance criteria defined and meet IS / relevant standards?
37 Does the supplier maintain an unique codification system for IMTE? YES AVAILABLE 4

38 Do the calibration system includes the procedure to analyse and take PROCEDURE OF CALIBRATION AVAILABLE 4
actions in case of calibration failure?

39 Are the status of calibration clearly identified on the instruments / YES CLEARLY IDENTIFIED 4
equipment's?
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN AVAILABLE FOR ALL
40 Does the supplier has a preventive maintenance plan for all machines and 4
equipment's? MACHINES AND EQUIPMENTS

Page 8 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

41 Does the supplier maintain history cards for all the machine and equipment, SUPPLIER HISTORY CARDS AVAILABLE 4
tools and fixtures?

42 Does the supplier maintain a master list of moulds / jigs / fixtures / tools MASTER LIST OF MOULDS / JIGS / FIXTURE AVAILABLE 3
etc., identification and status indication system available? Does the supplier
has a system to identify and protect Pricol supplied tool / products / parts ?

43 Does the supplier has in-house facility to develop the tool / maintaining the ONLY TOOL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AVAILABLE 4
tool?

44 Does the machine break down / Tool Failure analysis carried out and TOOL BREAKDOWN ANALYSIS REPORT AVAILABLE 4
corrective actions system followed ?
45 Does the supplier have a monitoring system for tool life ? TOOL LIFE MONITORING CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE 4

46 Are the non confirming products / parts clearly identified and stored in ear AREA DEFINED FOR REJECTION AND REWORK MATERIAL 4
marked area / bin ? Is it fool proofed to avoid mix up.

47 YES RECORDS AVAILABLE 3


Does the supplier maintain a register for recording rework and rejection ?
48 Does the supplier have any rework procedure ? YES HAVING REWORK PROCEDURE 4

49 Does the supplier reviews the rejection + rework on a daily / monthly basis REVIEW ON MONTHLYBASIS 4
and corrective action taken appropriately ?

Does the supplier maintain a register for recording customer complaints ? CUSTOMER COMPLAINT REGISTER AVAILABLE AND ACTION
50 Are the trend graphs on customer complaints displayed at shop floor for 3
QUALITY ALERT DISPLAYED ON SHOP FLOOR BOARD.
monitoring ?
YES USING 8D APPROACH FOR RESOLVING CUSTOMER
51 Does the supplier use 8D approach / problem solving tools used for resolving 4
the customer complaints? COMPLAINTS.

YES PROCESS FMEA , CONTROL PLAN UPDATE AS PER


52 Are the Process FMEA, Control Plan, Work instructions, Gauge design, Mould 4
CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT OR COMPLAINT BASIS.
/ Jigs / Fixture drawings updated after implementing the corrective action ?
EFFECTIVNESS SHEET AVILABLE FOR CORRECTIVE AND
53 Does the supplier monitor the effectiveness of Corrective and Preventive 4
Action for defined period? PREVENTIVE ACTION
54 Do the horizontal deployment system in place? Is it followed effectively? HORIZONTAL DEPLOYEMENT PROERLY FOLLOWED 3

55 Are the APQP/ PPAP system followed and documents available for recently APQP / PPAAP SYSTEM FOLLOWED FOR NEW PARTS 4
developed products (within a year) ?

Page 9 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No
EFFECTIVNESS OF PQCD SHEET AVAILABLE FOR SIMILLAR
56 4
What is the effectiveness of PQCD for recently developed similar products? PARTS
57 Does the supplier meets the developmental lead time? YES AS PER LEAD TIME 3

58 Does the Supplier captured all the Customer requirements (Including ROHS TO BE DONE ON THE BASIS OF CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT 4
Environment, RoHS and Safety)?
59 Does the material and production planning carried out systematically ? YES CARRIED OUT AS PER DAILY PRODUCTION PLAN 4

60 Does the supplier monitor and analysis the on time schedule adherence ? SUPPLY VS DESPATCH PLAN AVAILABLE . 4
Are the actions taken effectively to meet the demand?

YES MASTER LIST AVAILABLE AND ISSUED TO CONCERNED


PERSON.
DRAWING LIST AVAILABLE.
CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE
61 4
Does the supplier maintain master list of documents and issue control PFD,FMEA,CONTROL PLAN , WI AVAILABLE
registers for the documents viz. Drawings, Check sheets, Process Flow RECORDS AVAILABLE FOR SUB SUPPLIER
chart , FMEA , Control plan / WSS / SOP , Work instruction, Drawings / YES IF MSDS CHAANGE FROM SUPPLIER THAN INTIMATE TO
Check sheets provided to sub supplier, Change in MSDS and communication CUSTOMER
to customer
YES HAVING PROPER HANDLING SYSTEM FOR MATERIAL IN
62 Does the supplier has a system for material handling? Are the parts safe 4
from metal to metal contact, dent, damages and rust ? AND OUT

63 Are the production parts at each manufacturing stage identified with PARTS IDENTIFIED WITH TAGS AT EACH STATION 4
appropriate tags with status ?
64 Does the supplier have separate earmark place for finished goods? FINISHED GOOD AREA DEFINED 5
65 Does the supplier follow FIFO ( First in - First out ) system ? FIFO MAINTAINED 4
66 Are the Aisles (gang way) and work places separated using yellow lines ? YELLOW LINE MARKED FOR GANG WAY AND WORK PLACE 4

67 Are the unnecessary stock, machine, jigs, tools, board, photos etc., PLAN AVAILABLE FOR UNNECESSARY MATERIAL REMOVAL 4
removed periodically ?

68 Are the jigs, fixtures, tools, dies, gauges and office files arranged based on YES ARRANGED AS PER SIZE AND SHAPE 4
shape, size ?
69 Does the supplier practicing 5S concepts for shop floor and office ? 5 S CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE FOE EACH AREA 4
SKILL MATRIX SHEET AVAILABLE FOR ALL CONCERNED
70 4
Does the supplier maintain and monitor skill matrix for all operators ? OPERATOR

71 Does the supplier has a training plan for all operators /staff ? Training plan YES TRAINING PLAN FOR OPERATOR AND STAFF AVAILABLE 4
adherence monitored?

Page 10 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No
72 Does the supplier have a system to monitor the training effectiveness? SYSTEM FOR TRAINING EFFECTIVNESS AVAILABLE 4

Does the supplier has a communication system for customer complaints and BY METHOD OF QUALITY ALERT AND TRAINING FOR
73 how the direct inline operators / supervisors are appraised about the OPERATOR AT THE TIME OF RAISE THE PROBLM FROM 4
actions? Does the employees aware about the recent failures and action CUSTOMER
taken?
74 Status on compliance to Safety regulatory requirements. FOLLOWED ALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 4
75 Adherence to pollution board/statutory requirements. POLLUTION CERTIFICATE AVAILABLE 5

CONSENT TO OPERATOR ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS


76 Availability Consent to Establishment copy, Consent to Operate - Water act, 4
AVAILABLE
Air act, Hazardous waste authorization copy from Pollution control board.

Page 11 of 24
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative :

Action Plan

Page 12 of 24
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative :

Action Plan

Page 13 of 24
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative :

Action Plan

Page 14 of 24
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative :

Action Plan

Page 15 of 24
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative :

Action Plan

Page 16 of 24
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative :

Action Plan

Page 17 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

Are the key performance indicators are set to meet the customer
2 requirements? Is it monitored and action plan in place to achieve the KPI ARE SET & MONITORED TO ACHIVED TO CUSTOMER 4
target? Is the trend in PQCD is positive for similar products to other
customers?

Does the Management Review Meeting conducted at regular intervals? does


it covers all the Internal & External key performance indicators ?
(Customer end, In-house Rejection & Review. PPM,
MRM CONDUCTED AS PER PLAN ,CUSTOMER SETISFACTION
Customer Satisfaction, Delivery Schedules, M/c break down details,
3 ,M/C BREAKDOWN IMPLOY ABSENTISM ,NPD STATUS ,CLOSURE 4
Employee absenteeism, NPD status, NCR's - Pricol Audit, NCR's - Internal
OF CUSTOMER NCR'S.
Audit, Environmental test results, Environmental/ Safety
statutory/regulatory requirements, Any safety/environmental issue, NCR's -
Third party audits, Purchased parts quality & delivery status)

Does the roles and Responsibilities where clearly defined and escalation ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY DEFINED FOR EACH AND EVERY
4 procedure followed for critical situations w.r.t meeting customer 4
PERSON.
requirements.

10 Cost saving initiatives are in practice & benefits were shared with the YES 3
customer?

13 Contingency plan available in case of critical situation in meeting the pricol CONTINGENCY PLAN AVAILABLE FOR ANY CRITICILITY. 5
requirements?

Does the supplier maintain master list of approved sub -suppliers for Job
YES HAVING MASTER LIST OF APPROVED SUB-SUPPLIER , RAW
16 work (Includes special Processes), raw material. and bought out parts. Does 4
MATERIAL AND AUDIT AS PER TIME PLAN AS PER DEFINED
the supplier maintain an audit plan for all its sub-suppliers ? Are the
schedules adhered to?

18 Do the incoming inspection carried out effectively inline with Quality plan HAVING INCOMING INSPECTION PLAN ( IS 2500I) 4
or IS / other relevant standards ? Are the quality plan covers sample size ,
frequency & inspection method ? (For job work & bought out parts)

19 Does the supplier has adequate Inspection facilities to ensure incoming part INSPECTION RECORDS AVAILABLE 4
quality and inspection records maintained?

Does the supplier have the system to communicate and ensure the
20 corrective actions has been taken effectively for the sub supplier YES BY MAIL OR BY PHONE 5
rejections. Do the effectiveness tracked. ?

Page 18 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

23 Does the supplier has Control Plan / WSS & Work instruction for all YES CONTROL PLAN , WSS,WR AVAILABLE 5
processes and is it accessible for use at the workstation ?

24 Does the supplier has daily Check sheet for start of the shift / during set up CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE 4
and the check sheet parameters reflected in the control plan / WSS ?

25 Are all the process parameters (set as per control plan, WSS, Setting data YES VERIFIED AND RECORDED 4
sheet) verified and recorded ?

26 Do the process validation carried out for critical / special process? Do the VALIDATION REPORT AVAILABLE 4
actions taken based on the result ?

Does the supplier has adequate Inspection facilities to measure the YES XRF MACHINE AVAILABLE FOR SPECIFIC THK & CHEMICAL
27 parameters identified in the control plan and inspection records 4
SOLUTION
maintained?
28 Are the Set up / First piece approval system in place ? FIRST PIECE APPROVAL RECORDS AVAILABLE 5
LIMIT AND MASTER SAMPLES AVAILABLE AND DISPLAYED AS
31 Does the supplier have approved limit samples / master samples at shop 4
floor / work place ? Are they re-validated at regular intervals? PER TIME PLAN

32 Does the supplier conduct Measurement System Analysis (MSA) for critical MSA REPORT AVAILABLE AND RESULULTS WITHIN 10% 5
parameters ? Are the results of Gauge R&R within 10% ?

Is there any system available to track any process change which can affect
33 customer requirement and those changes are communicated to customer ? 4 M CHANGE SHEET, PROCEDURE AVAILABLE 4
Do the Change management followed effectively?

34 Does there any system exist to avoid mixing of hazardous and Non SYSTEM AVAILABLE 5
hazardous substances ?

35 Does the supplier maintain a master list of instruments including pressure MASTER LIST OF INSTRUMENT AVAILABLE 4
gauges, temperature gauges and other process control gauges ?
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN AVAILABLE FOR ALL
40 Does the supplier has a preventive maintenance plan for all machines and 4
equipment's? MACHINES AND EQUIPMENTS

41 Does the supplier maintain history cards for all the machine and equipment, SUPPLIER HISTORY CARDS AVAILABLE 4
tools and fixtures?

Page 19 of 24
Vendor Name
NON CONFORMITY REPORT
: Vendor
Sign.:
Representative :
Sl
Audit Elements Audit Negative Findings Point Actual
No

42 Does the supplier maintain a master list of moulds / jigs / fixtures / tools MASTER LIST OF MOULDS / JIGS / FIXTURE AVAILABLE 3
etc., identification and status indication system available? Does the supplier
has a system to identify and protect Pricol supplied tool / products / parts ?

44 Does the machine break down / Tool Failure analysis carried out and TOOL BREAKDOWN ANALYSIS REPORT AVAILABLE 4
corrective actions system followed ?
45 Does the supplier have a monitoring system for tool life ? TOOL LIFE MONITORING CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE 4

46 Are the non confirming products / parts clearly identified and stored in ear AREA DEFINED FOR REJECTION AND REWORK MATERIAL 4
marked area / bin ? Is it fool proofed to avoid mix up.

47 YES RECORDS AVAILABLE 3


Does the supplier maintain a register for recording rework and rejection ?
48 Does the supplier have any rework procedure ? YES HAVING REWORK PROCEDURE 4

49 Does the supplier reviews the rejection + rework on a daily / monthly basis REVIEW ON MONTHLYBASIS 4
and corrective action taken appropriately ?

55 Are the APQP/ PPAP system followed and documents available for recently APQP / PPAAP SYSTEM FOLLOWED FOR NEW PARTS 4
developed products (within a year) ?
EFFECTIVNESS OF PQCD SHEET AVAILABLE FOR SIMILLAR
56 4
What is the effectiveness of PQCD for recently developed similar products? PARTS
57 Does the supplier meets the developmental lead time? YES AS PER LEAD TIME 3
59 Does the material and production planning carried out systematically ? YES CARRIED OUT AS PER DAILY PRODUCTION PLAN 4

YES MASTER LIST AVAILABLE AND ISSUED TO CONCERNED


PERSON.
DRAWING LIST AVAILABLE.
CHECK SHEET AVAILABLE
61 4
Does the supplier maintain master list of documents and issue control PFD,FMEA,CONTROL PLAN , WI AVAILABLE
registers for the documents viz. Drawings, Check sheets, Process Flow RECORDS AVAILABLE FOR SUB SUPPLIER
chart , FMEA , Control plan / WSS / SOP , Work instruction, Drawings / YES IF MSDS CHAANGE FROM SUPPLIER THAN INTIMATE TO
Check sheets provided to sub supplier, Change in MSDS and communication CUSTOMER
to customer
YES HAVING PROPER HANDLING SYSTEM FOR MATERIAL IN
62 Does the supplier has a system for material handling? Are the parts safe 4
from metal to metal contact, dent, damages and rust ? AND OUT
SKILL MATRIX SHEET AVAILABLE FOR ALL CONCERNED
70 4
Does the supplier maintain and monitor skill matrix for all operators ? OPERATOR

Page 20 of 24
NFORMITY REPORT Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative : Sign.:

Action Plan Responsibility Target Status

Data Pending

Page 21 of 24
NFORMITY REPORT Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative : Sign.:

Action Plan Responsibility Target Status

NA

Page 22 of 24
NFORMITY REPORT Date of Audit :
Pricol Representative : Sign.:

Action Plan Responsibility Target Status

Page 23 of 24
Revision Details

Issue No. / Rev. No. Rev. Date Rev. Details

01 / 00 24.06.2015 Newly prepared based on the procedure standardization Plan

01 / 01 04.01.2016 Pricol New Logo changed

Members from purchase also included for onsite assessment based on


01 / 02 14.09.2016
TVS audit observations
Vital points score fixed for onsite assessment based on TVS audit
01 / 03 15.03.2017
observations
Minimum score in each element fixed for onsite assessment based on
01 / 04 23.03.2017
TVS audit observations
Serial number included and Vital points marked as © in the check sheet
01 / 05 12.05.2017 and supplier overall category added.
Vital score & Minimum score rating included in overall rating.
Prepared By - Mr.Baskar.M Approved By - Mr. Prasad Sharma

Potrebbero piacerti anche