Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) technology is known around the world to have more
efficiency and accuracy in performing their tasks more so than the human workforce. According
to Schwab (2018), nearly 50% of companies expect that automation will lead to some reduction
in their full-time workforce by 2020 with A.I. technology as its top features. This has created
arguments as to which is to use better in the manufacturing field: the human workforce or
artificial intelligence? There are several studies that discuss these comparisons and after
reviewing different accounts, using both the machines equipped with either A.I. technology or
human intelligence to mainly supervise and overlook the entire process can and will still give
quality results.
The use of A.I. technology machinery provides better monitoring, quality control, and
fault detection and isolation which could be easily overlooked by humans. There are, however,
certain problems which require critical thinking and decision-making that no machinery could
solve. Another problem would be its economic impact. Although finances are not a problem to
big companies, it is a problem to its employees especially in countries like the Philippines.
The use of A.I. technology could also widen the gap between developing and more
developed countries, and boost the need for workers with certain skills while rendering
others redundant; this latter trend could have far-reaching consequences for the labour
market. Experts also warn of its potential to increase inequality, push down wages, and
product with better quality that the human workforce could never match while man could think
critically and decide in a way that the programmers of A.I. technology still have not developed.
To solve this, coexistence of manpower and A.I. technology is suggested to solve the
different problems each option could give. A recent survey conducted by Simpler Media Group,
845 senior executives in various industries, including healthcare, financial services, retail
and others were conducted. Of those respondents, 69 per cent of the executives polled
said that they expect automating manual and mundane processes will play a significant
role in enabling human staffers to handle much more varied duties. The survey concluded
that these technologies can be deployed for tasks such as scheduling, task allocation,
work coordination and routing, intelligent escalations and quality control, as well as
matching agents with customers. A human and a machine capable of providing timely,
What this tells us is that it’s not an either/or situation when it comes to machines and people —
The use of either manpower or A.I. technology in the workplace, as stated above, both
have benefits and liabilities. They can have an impact on the quality of the product, the economy
of the industry and many others but the coexistence of these two different approaches can
actually be productive and still give the results desired without the problems of using or choosing
Schwab, K. (2018). The future of jobs report. Retrieved from World Economic Forum Website:
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/52ce/1997465fa8b52a7f1648ebae447ef7006167.pdf
Chen, Y. (2018, February 15). Why the future of work requires humans and machines to coexist
https://www.cmswire.com/digital-workplace/why-the-future-of-work-requires-humans-and-
machines-to-coexist-in-harmony/
Teacher: Cynthia P. Superficial Subject: English for Academic and Professional Purposes