Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Seattle

U DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES UPDATE Office of Planning &


Community Development

Design Guidelines & Principles of Urban Design


What are neighborhood How are the U District Urban Deisgn Considerations
design guidelines? Design Guidelines used? The Design Guidelines encourage careful and thoughtful design that promotes quality urban design
outcomes by discussing desirable architectural treatments and design outcomes. The following are key
Design Guidelines define the qualities of The updated University District Design
urban design principles to consider.
architecture, site design, and open space that Guidelines will identify specific qualities of
make successful projects, and are a tool for building and site design that reinforce unique
guiding individual projects towards successful design characteristics of the University District. Respond to Physical Context & Site Features
design outcomes. The goal of the design Design Review Boards will use the guidelines The site design and placement of building(s) should repond to con-
guidelines is to foster design excellence in private to provide design guidance on the design of text and contribute positively to the natural and built environment.

development of new multifamily and commercial proposed development.


projects throughout the city.

The Seattle Citywide Design Guidelines apply to all The example below
projects required to undergo design review in all shows how a
areas of the city. Applicants with projects located neighborhood specific
in the University District are required to consult design guideline can
both neighborhood and citywide guidelines in the shape project design.
The pedestrian-scaled street wall of 1-3 stories is A contemporary massing emphasizes positive design Integrate sustainable sys-
development and review of the project design. Strengthen desirable form, public spaces, and development patterns. Consider reinforced by setting the upper massing back articu- elements in the context by by using a complimentary tems in the site design, such
solar alignment for open spaces, and respond to established streetwalls. lating the base at a human-scale. color of brick and similar proportions. as this green roof and storm-
water retention feature.

1 CITYWIDE DESIGN
GUIDELINES 2 NEIGHBORHOOD
DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 EARLY DESIGN
GUIDANCE MEETING Reinforce the Public Realm and Public Life
An applicant with a
Good design addresses the issue of how buildings interface with the adjacent sidewalk, street,
The applicant then sees The applicant designs the massing
project site at 50th and and public realm with pedestrian connections, transparency, open spaces, and amenities.
that the University of the building to respond to the
University Way reads District Neighborhood guidelines by indicating a special
the Citywide Design Design Guidelines, design treatment at the corner.
Guidelines, and sees a designate the site as a The Design Review Board supports
guideline about corner “gateway”: the design approach at the Early
sites: Design Guidance Meeting.
CS2.C - Corner Lots
For buildings located
CS2.C - Corner Sites on corner lots identified
Corner sites can serve as gateways or as gateways, consider
focal points. Consider using a corner to providing special building Map of Gateway
provide space for pedestrians, or build elements distinguishable Corners in the U
out to the corner to provide a strong from the rest of the District Design
urban edge. Guidelines
building.

Transition space between the sidewalk and building should respond to Strategic setbacks can support active street frontages Prioritize pedestrian, bike, and Private patios with vertical separation from the side-
the differing needs for access and privacy for residential and commercial and vibrant pedestrian environments. transit access, amenities, and walk and lush landscaping provide usable spaces for
frontages. facilitie. Integrate easy access to tenants while contributing to a pedestrian-oriented
bike storage environment with visual interest.

4 DESIGN PROGRESSION
5 RECOMMENDATION
MEETING 6 DESIGN APPROVAL

The applicant uses the Board’s


High Quality Building Concept, Design, Materials, and Construction
The applicant revises the design and The applicant revises the design
guidance and continues developing presents it to the Design Review per the Board’s condition by Facades should therefore be designed to have a pleasing scale and appearance, proportion and rhythm,
a more detailed design. The design Board. The Board recommends that enhancing the corner element. City solid-to-void relationship, and materiality.
is submitted to City staff, who the depth of the protruding frame at staff approves the design after the
recommend the corner element be the corner is increased to emphasize changes have been made.
revised to better meet the Board’s a “strong, dramatic presence at a
guidance and the Design Guidelines. prominent corner.”

The scale and texture of the materials and rhythm The massing is broken into a distinct base and top, expressed through The tower is articulated with signifi-
The mass at the corner is differentiated by lifting the
created by entries and storefronts creates a human through differentiating materials and scale of articulation. The base cant shifts in the massing. Balconies
base and applying a related but unique expression at the
scale. features vertical elements, while the top features horizontal elements. provide visual interest and indicate
corner.
a residential use.
Seattle

U DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES UPDATE Office of Planning &


Community Development

What should design in the University District look like?

Take a look at these images and let us know why you 1 2 3


like or disklike the design of the buildings. What design
characteristics would you like to see or not like to see
in the University District?

Refer to the Urban Design Considerations on the


previous board for some ideas on what to look for.

5 6
4 7 8

10
11
9

15 16

13
12 14

Potrebbero piacerti anche