Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
When I first became faced with the preposition: “Is violence ever
justified?” it instinctively gave me the impression as if someone
had asked me, “Is the birth of a baby possible without the mother
suffering labour pains.” But in the present case, let us not take
anything for granted and look into the matter leaving all
possibilities open. Nature is too elusive for our puny minds to
jump to any conclusions.
Change or flux, they say, is the rule of life, and whenever change
becomes due either due to the rottenness of the existing order,
or when the existing order has failed to respond to the aspirations
of the people then necessity to change the existing order starts
brewing in the public minds. It gradually gathers momentum
until the opposition grows stronger after initially meeting strong
resistance from the state. Often a tug of war follows between the
state and the opposition for months and years until the opposing
forces succeed in throwing away the yoke of the existing order.
Forty years later, tragically, the statement is still true. The U.S.
war on Iraq in 2002 caused over 1 million more deathsin Iraq
than the casualties of the preceding decade. All this was done by
the American leaders for the specific purpose of controlling the
largest supply of oil in the world.
But can we truly condemn all violence? What about the right of
self-defense? It was the Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky who
for the first time raised the question: “Is the violence of the slave
the same as the violence of the slave-master?”:The ruling class
would have us believe that the violence of the state through police,
or the military is “heroic,” but that the violence of the poor or the
oppressed is “terrorism.” Malcolm X( American Muslim minister
and human activist ) eloquently challenged this hypocrisy. “If 3
violence is wrong in America, violence is wrong everywhere in
the world.” In 1917, the workers of Russia would never have
been able to take power if Russian soldiers had not refused their
orders to repress that revolution. The soldiers, in fact, joined the
revolution.Actually, the First World War ended because of the
revolutionary wave that swept Europe–soldiers from all sides who
were sick of war rose up against their real enemies at home.Fifty
years later, the disintegration of the American armed forces
during the Vietnam War also showed the same trend.
Admittedly, in most, circumstances it is evident that violence is
unjust; but, some cases appear more debatable when we deeply
try to analyze the question: can violence ever be justified?
Tolstoy thinks that all modern states have been formed under
extreme violence, while according to Noam Chomsy violence is
legitimized by its efficacy at lessening a greater evil.
The idea of justice is at the heart of the just war tradition, which
claims that we are entitled to fight back against injustice. Thus
peace of the Cyclops’ cave is not peace but a state of war.
To sum up, there are not one, but multiple angles to see if
violence in any particular situation is wholly or partly justified
or unjustified.
5