Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Professor:
Valentina Mele
E-mail: valentina.mele@unibocconi.it
Office: Via Roentgen 1, #3-C1-03
Phone: 02 5836 2507
Main objective of the course is to provide an introduction to public administration as an interdisciplinary field of
study with a primary emphasis on public management and public policy.
After the successful completion of the course, candidates are expected to understand the variety of explanations of
structure and behavior in public organizations and to be able to identify, analyze, criticize and formulate arguments
about public administration.
Through the course, candidates will be exposed to key areas of public administration with reference to different
institutional contexts, including traditional public agencies and international organizations. Topics include
governance and governing at the national and supranational level, public sector reforms, as well as dynamics of
public policy making.
Critical essays will keep candidates on track with the course load and prepare them for the final exam. Through
essays, you will practice analytical and writing skills, including how to write clear concise memos and reflection
pieces. Through the preparation for the final exam, candidates will develop analytical skills needed to analyze and
discuss salient public administration issues. Last, the special issue review will provide a first-hand understanding of
dominant themes and methodological choices that characterize the current public administration scholarly debates.
The course mixes formal lectures and class discussions based on readings. Candidates are expected to be prepared on
the readings before class. You will be asked on the spot for your opinions and reasons for your arguments. In order
to maximize the learning experience and maintain a good learning environment both in class and outside the classroom,
it is important to keep in mind the following points:
- Express your opinions clearly.
- Tolerate and celebrate differences in opinions.
- Make an effort to participate.
- Never be shy to ask questions, no matter how difficult or simple they are.
- Please switch off your mobile and use your laptop only for learning purposes (notes and readings).
Course Evaluation:
Short Critical essays 30%
Class participation 15%
Special issue review 15%
Final exam 40%
1
Bocconi University PhD in Public Policy & Administration IV QUARTER 2018-2019
- SHORT CRITICAL ESSAYS (3): You will have to write three short essays (approx. 1200 words) with a
conceptual critique based upon the readings assigned and upon the previous class discussions. The essays will
be structured around questions that you will receive on the class preceding the deadline. The essay is due at the
beginning of the class session and must be handed in printed. Proper citations and complete references must be included
in the essay. The essay receiving the lowest score will be dropped from the calculation of the final grade.
The instructor will organize ‘clinical sessions’ providing individual feedback on each essay.
- CLASS PARTICIPATION includes attendance and meaningful contribution to discussion, as well as respect
of the deadlines.
- JOURNAL REVIEW. In maximum 2,500 words you will have to select and examine one virtual issue
among those available in JPART (https://academic.oup.com/jpart/pages/Virtual_Issues) and PAR
(https://publicadministrationreview.org/virtual-issue-archive/).
The review will respond to the following questions:
a) Are there common substantive themes emerging from the analysis of the virtual issue?
b) Map the issue: empirical vs theoretical papers, RQs, empirical settings, and research strategies
c) By reading the articles chronologically, do you notice that knowledge on the substantive issue(s) has
cumulated and if so how?
2 4th April The hierarchical approach: Wilson, W. (1887) The Study of Administration.
traditional public administration Political Science Quarterly, 2(2): 197-222.
14.30-16.00
and public bureaucracies.
Weber M. The theory of social and economic
organization. Chapter III.
3 8th April The intersection with Hood, C. C. 1991, A Public Management for All
management: the advent of NPM Seasons? Public Administration pp. 3-19.
16.15-17.45
and its disciplinary implications.
The shift from government to Peters, B.G and J. Pierre 1998. Governance
governance without Government? Rethinking Public
Administration Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory 8(2): 223-243
2
Bocconi University PhD in Public Policy & Administration IV QUARTER 2018-2019
4 12th April The shift from government to Kettl, D. F. 2006. Managing boundaries in
governance and public networks. American administration: The collaboration
14.30-16.00
imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 10-
#1 critical essay due.
19.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of
network governance: Structure, management, and
effectiveness. Journal of public administration research
and theory, 18(2), 229-252.
5 15th April The public role of the private Werner T. (2012), Public forces and private politics
sector in American big businesses. Introduction.
16.15-17.45
Cambridge University Press (pp.1-15)
6 29th April An exploration of research strands and journals. Presentations based on the review of a
virtual issues. Virtual issue review due.
16.15-17.45
7 2nd May Decision-making and policy- Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and
making: bounded rationality, public policies. Boston: Little, Brown. Chapter IV
14.30-16.00
muddling through and garbage
can Lindblom, C.E. (1959) The Science of "Muddling
Through" Public Administration Review, Vol.
19(2):79-88.
8 6th May Decision-making and policy- Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and
making: three streams approach public policies. Boston: Little, Brown. Chapter VII
16.15-17.45
and evidence-based PA.
Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of Evidence‐
Based policy. Australian Journal of Public
Administration, 67(1), 1-11.
10 13rd May The artificial debate between Patashnik, E.M. 2003. ‘After the Public Interest
16.15-17.45 policy drafting and policy Prevails: The Political Sustainability of Policy
implementation. Pros and cons of Reform.’ Governance 16 (2): 203–234.
the ‘stagist approach’. Inertia and
resistance to public
Mele V. and A. Compagni (2010), ‘Explaining the
administration reforms.
Unexpected Success of the Smoking Ban in Italy:
Political Strategy and Transition to Practice, 2000–
3
Bocconi University PhD in Public Policy & Administration IV QUARTER 2018-2019