Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
4. Indifferent attributes. The customer does not care about this feature.
5. Questionable attributes. It is unclear whether this attribute is expected by the customer.
6. Reverse attributes. The reverse of this product feature was expected by the customer.
The approach towards analyzing customer satisfaction was first published in an article by
KANO, N. SERAKU, N., TAKAHASHI, F. & TSUJI, S. (1984) Attractive quality and must-be
quality, Hinshitsu (Quality, the Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control), 14, pp. 39-48.
Besides the obvious quality management and marketing usage, Kurt Matzler, Matthias Fuchs and
Astrid Schubert wonder in their article "Employee Satisfaction: Does Kano's Model Apply?"
(Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, November-December 2004) whether Kano's
model on customer satisfaction factors is also relevant to describe employee satisfaction. Since
employees can be perceived as internal customers. They reach the conclusion that Kano's theory
is indeed useable for internal customers analysis as well.
Kano developed a questionnaire to identify the basic, performance and excitement factors as well
as the other three additional factors.
1. For each product feature a pair of questions is formulated to which the customer can
answer in one of five different ways.
2. The first question concerns the reaction of the customer if the product shows that feature
(functional question);
3. The second question concerns the reaction of the customer if the product does NOT show
this feature (dysfunctional question).
4. By combining the answers all attributes can be classified into the six factors.
http://www.12manage.com/%5Cmethods_kano_customer_satisfaction_model.html