UNITED STATES pisTRICT couRt-E D FILED OF THE EASTERN DIVI: ALEXANDRIA Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 W. Spring Street ar Alexandria, Virginia 22301 i ag ciscisreier 202-368-7178 coe Pro Se CASE No. VERIFIED COMPLAINT v Chief Judge Honorable Rebecea Beach Smith USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse 600 Granby Street Norfolk, VA 23510 udge Leonie M. Brinkema Judge Gerald Bruce Lee Judge Liam O'Grady Judge Anthony J. Trenga Senior Judge James C. Cacheris Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square Alexandria, VA 22314 Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson ILL Judge Paul V. Niemeyer Judge Diana Gribbon Motz Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. Judge Robert B. King Dennis W. Shedd Judge Allyson K, Duncan Judge G. Steven Agee Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Lewis F. Powell Jr. Courthouse & Annex 1100 East Main Street, Suite 501 Richmond, VA 23219 Chi Judge Beryl A. Howell District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan District Judge James F. Boasberg District Judge Amy Berman Jackson Distriet Judge Rudolph Contreras USDC of the District of Columbia 333 Constitution Avenue N.W. DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL Virginia and the United States Constitutional Rights Federal Constitutional rights under Tite 42 U.S Code 1981 61983, Title 18 US. Code § 241 § 242, Rico und Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Aet 18 US.C§ 1961 ~ 1968 and under the Bll of Rights the 4 Freedoms: speech, worship, want, freedom of fear Senior Judge TS. Ellis, 1 Magistrate Judge Theresa C. Buel Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davi judge Michael Nachmanoff judge T. Rawles Jones, Jr. Judge Barbara Milano Keenan Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. Judge Atbert Di Judge Henry F. Floyd Judge Stephanie D. Thacker Judge Pamela A. Harris Senior Judge Clyde H. Hamilton Senior Judge Andre M. Davis Judge Royce C, Lamberth ior Judge Ellen S. Huvelle ior Judge Reggie B. Walton jor Judge Richard J. Leon ior Judge Rosemary M. CollyerWashington D.C. 20001 Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Cireuit E, Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse and William B. Bryant Annex 333 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 Judge Brian Kenney ‘Judge Stephen Mitchell United States Bankruptey Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Alexandria 200 8. Washington St Alexandria, VA 22314-5405 John and or Jane Doe 1 ~ 100 Defendants all Public Servants, individually and in his or her official capacity as a Federal Judge an Officer of the Court VERIFI Judicial Co { against ‘The United States District Court of Virginia Alexandria Judges ‘The Fourth Cireuit Court of Appeals Judges ‘The United States Distriet Court of the District of Columbia Judges The United District Court of The District of Columbia Appeals Court Judges ‘That the Secrecy of the “JUDGES CLUB" is a Mafia style Club that is funded by the Government, Blected Officials and Lawyers through their Salary, Benefits et al, Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, a Weekend Getaway, Friendship, Sex, and other tips for personal and or financial gain ‘The perfect example of this as reported is Justice Sealia who passed in ‘Texas after flying out on Air Fore 2 with Dick Cheney, the trip paid for by lawyers / friends who had two cases in front of him, The Supreme Court has approx. 10,000 eases a year filed and takes approx. 80 eases. It is also reported this, was done 144 times and is a pattern and practi 1d States District, for RAPING A 16 The 3" Example is Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser who the State of Virginia will pay her retirement as she works full tin ter letting Michael Gardner, found guilty of molesting young, good fund raiser for the Democrats out of jail. The Appeals Court of Vi while the Supreme Court agreed to a new trial and let him out of jail to await the tria 4 HITMAN to KILL THE YOUNG GIRLS. After FBI had a private meeting with the hhief Justice Cynthia Kinser retired early The 4" and maybe one of the worst “Cash for Kids” in Pennsylva STOOD UP STATED “NO MOREY, The Judge is in jail and using any type of exeuse ie technical error to try and get out of jail. ‘That Chief J fice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States of America stated: 'My job is Tage Par Bt a mas Ys FegaRT SE BeOS TOBY a RT a] TH TO Te ealto call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat" Judges and justices are servants of the law, not the other way ‘around. Judges are like umpires. Umpires don't make the rules; they apply them. The rote of an umpire and a judge is critical, They make sure everyhody plays by the rules. But itis a limited rote. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire. Judges have to have the hunility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent, shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath. And judges have to have the ‘modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench, Further 9/14/2017 An Exit Interview With Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh Circuit, Judicial Provocateur The New York Times hitpsi/www.nytimes.com/2017/09/1 Vus/polties/iudge-richard-posner-tetirement him https: POLITICS An Exit Interview With Richard Posner, Judicial Provocateur - Sidebar By ADAM LIPTAK SEPT. I, 2017 States The immediate reason for his retirement was less absivact, he said. He had become concerned with the plight of litiganus who represented themselves in civil cases, often filing handwritten appeals. Their grievances were real, he said, but the legal system was treating them impatiently, dismissing their cases over technical matters. “These were almost always people of poor education and often of quite low level of intelligence," he said. *T gradually began to realize that this wasn’t right, what we were doing.” In the Seventh Circuit, Judge Posner said, staf lawyers rather than judges assessed appeals from such Titigants, and the court generally rubber-stamped the lawyers’ recommendations. Judge Posner offered to help. ‘I wanted to review all the staff atiomney memos before they went to the panel of judges,” he said. “I'd sit down with the staff atorney, go over his memo. I'd make whatever editorial suggestions — or editorial commands — that I thought necessary. It would be good education for staff attorneys, and it would be very good” for the rigants without lawyers, "Thad the approval of the director ofthe staff attorney program,” Judge Posner said, “but the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. 1 was very frustrated by that.” Judge Posner further stated about those who need help and or pro se: “The basic thing is that most judges regard these people (pro se) as kind of trash not worth the time ofa federal judge” EXHIBIT 3 ‘The appearance all Justice is by a Social HIERACHY, and only for the friends or those that have the CASH / MONEY ean get Justice ~ I could go on page sifter page of stories of Corruption by the JUDGES supported by those around them. This one X-WIFE of the Son of a Judge Plaintiff JANICE WOLK GRENADIER STATES: “NO MORE” ‘We the American People are not TRASH as Judge Posner expressed that is what we are thought of, COMES NOW Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) reserves the right to amend Complaint and add additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff Janice Wolk Gre ier complains against the captioned Defendants as follows: to seek relief forthe violation of State and Federal Constitutional Rights, Federal Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S Code §1981 & 1983, Title 18 U.S. Code § 241 & 242, Rico and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act 18 U.S.C § 1961 ~ 1968 and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are being Violated: 1. Freedom of speech 2. Freedom of worship 3. Freedom from want 4, Freedom from fear Janice Wolk Grenadier lives in FEAR every day of her life. jus intend (0 COVER UP for the knowk iff files this suit for th \geable malcriminal spree of Divoree Lawyer Hona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman her accomplice Ericka her husband Timberlake Le Grenadier Lewi is and David Mark Grenadier to steal Real Estate and monies from Sonia Grenadier and Janice Wolk Grenadier, ‘That IN OR AROUND December of 2013 Janice Wolk Grenadier CAME TO the Federal Courts for help. That Janice Wolk Grenadier lives every day in “FEAR” for her life from Divorce Lawyer Hona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman _and her “ GANG” (widow to Judge Albert Grenadier and Jerome Heckman founder of Keller Heckman and 1* cousin to Judge Albert Grenadier) of Law Firm Grenadier Starace Duffett & Levi PC, David Mark Grenadier, Timberlake and Erika Ely Grenadier Lewis of California, All benefit il from the thefis of Real Estate and Money from Plaintiff Ja Grenadier, ‘The Judges hold the gateway to Justice have denied all Justice acting as the Juries REQUESTED INSTEAD ruling in SECRECY” and hiding in chambers, ruling from there Desks instead of the Be ice Wolk Gi as required by the Oath of Office that they took. Ja adier under the following Cases has been denied every Motion for an OPEN Court hearing, AS STATED BY Judge Posner she has been treated like TRASH CASES All documents in all Cases filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern Division Alexandria, the Fourth Cireuit Court of Appeals, the Distriet Court of the Distriet of Columbia, the Appeals Court of the District of Columbia, the Eastern Division of the Bankruptcy Court Alexandria and the Supreme Court of the United States of America should be considered Evidence against the above defendants. Daie Court Case No Deseription To20301T | USDC of Virginia TH <-OTTSGGBL-TFA | Rico, Cuil Right, Tampering withthe Grand Jane Fy Fr cal Altormey inthe Ciy of Alexandria Defendants Ed Semonian, Randy Sengl, Jadse Donald Haddock, Judge J Howe Brown, Divers Layer Hon Fly Grenadier Heckman, Grenadier Anderson Starace Duaffett and Kesler PC, ames MeCauley VSB, Edward Davis VSB. Taso | USDC of Disiet oF Trit-e-DOIGE UNA TIM Loretta Lax Miller -Divoree Lawyer Nona Columbia sre GANG. Hate Crime. 2192014 [USDC of DC Appeals T7020 E14 -ev- 00162 Court 07292013 | USDC of Disks oF T:15-<01152 UNA ‘Spring Street: Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Equity Columbia uses, BWW Law Group, Equity Trustes, Lawyer Howard Bierman, OCWEN. DARIO [USDC of DC Appeals Tea Spring Street denial ~ Moved USDC of VA~ where Court SW knew she could never get a fir ial T2320 | USDC of Virgins Tete OM TSE- | HOCIVIL RIGHTS — In Re: Janice Wolk Grenadier 1 Alexandria Ten take eare Petitioner though next of friend Geor ‘MeDermot who is also a Vietim of tlona Grenadier eeckman and her gang ~as JWG has besa illegally jailed and being hold in Solitary Confinement Par Te Base Wig 1 ad WOM BGS PoRT Tee PTE THRO ww Ula Of THAT HO OTD Te Wi OF JeRTAOrORaONT USDC oF Vine TikeORT LMBTCE = Stayed as of September 29,2016 inthe Alexandria “4s Circuit under an En Bane accepted Fir Debt Collection - Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Equity Trustees, BWW Law Group, Equity Trustees, Lawyer Howard Bierman, OCWEI FY Cheat Cour of Appeals | 13-011 1140-00827 LMB-TCE. “A Cireuit Court of Appeals | 15-01731 T:1cv-00897 LMB-TCB. Circuit Court of Appeals | 15-2574 1:1eev-00897 LMB-TCD. 4 Cireut Court of Appeals | 16-01088 T:14scw0897 LMB=TCB. 4 Cireuit Court of Appeals | 16-01088 T:1v-00897 LMB-TCB. “F Cireuit Court of Appeals | 16-01504 T:1ov-00897 LMB-TCB. “F Cieuit Court of Appeals | 1602459 Ti L4scy-00827 LMB-TCE. TOE2OIS | USDC of Disiet oF TIS sme O1ST0 UNA Columbia yer IEG brought ease against WG collec legally govten legal ees and to free a se on her Thome, Judge James Clark owned by all his rend gave her the power toda such — which pat JWG into Bankruptey agaon BIOITG USDC of DC Court of | 1S-7TS Tor TS =mi6- 01540 Appeals 1:15 -me- 01540 TaRaOIs | USDC of Virginia TeiSev 01497 GBL— TDD | Hico & Racketeering Stayed as of Spleniber29, 2016 Alexandria the Cireitunderan En Ban accepted USA, Commonwealth of Virginia, Cty of Alexandria, Grenadier Starace Dutfett Keser && Levi PC, DiMuroGinsberg, Michael Weiser Esq, TEOTIOTS | F Cheat Court of Appeals | 16-1002 Fnbane deniod by all USDC of Vieginin 16-1028 — BFK Banlruptey ing hearing heli afer hours Transeipt Bankruptey Cour, Docket No TSDC of Virginia Teo HER Bankruptey Court Grenadier Heckman - TraeaoT6 | USDC of Vireo T16-6e- 01396 ATTMSN | Bankeupley Appeal Alexandria THaTaTTS [USDC of Vi TIG-e-0197 ATENSN | Bariksupicy Appeal Atevandria T1016 | USDC of Virginia Te16 e016 ATT= | Banirupiey Appeal Aleyandia MSN. Tii7a016 | USDC of Virginia [16a OMT AIT= | Bankrupiey Appeal Alexandria MSN. TERT] USDC of Virginia T:16—e O42 LO JPA] Barlrupley Appeal Alesana TEGO | USDC of Virgina Tega ET (CMY Bankruptcy Apes Alexandria Lapp) 07-25:3017 | 4 Cireuit Appeats Coun [17-1540 Tear 146) CM —1DD. (07-30-2017 | 4" Circuit Appeals Count | 17-1573 Et6sev- M61 CMI=IDD. (07-20-2917 | 4 Cireuit Appeals Court | 17-1737 El6-ev- M61 CMI=IDD. TH-18:2016 ] USDC of Virginia T:16-ev 0/448 GDL | Bankroptey Appeal Ten. -F Cireik Appeals Court 17-1710 WG Telé-ev = O18 OBL TCH Circuit Appeals Court 17-1710 1EG 1:16 ev 01448 GBL— TCH USDC of Virginia T:l6=ev- OEE TMB - ‘Bankruptcy Appeal Alexandria fred (05-16-2016 | Supreme Court ofthe | 15-7950 For Constitutional Rights — Writ of Mandamus United States of America Fourth Cire USDC of VA I: -ev- 827 LMB /TCB Teale Mag Ta STRAT ESE FOIE THAT TOY OS LTA Of TASH Ha OTT Te Te Jeera aTHIEDOIT | USDC of Virginia Tai7-ee00166 TSE= MSN | Relator Suit aginst FOI, DOW, Ciy of Alexandr Alexandria of Virgin OEAEOIT | 4* Cireult Cour oF Appeals | 17-1335 ‘05-09-2017 | USDC of Virginia 1:17 -ev- 0280 CMT | Judge James Clark ofthe iy of Alexandia VA Alewandsia JPA, injunctive Reliet DETODOIT | F* Cheat Coun oF Appeals | 17-807 Teter 000 CMI IFA TPaOT USDC of Virginia Tela S19 CMIT- TFA) Conver by Di ‘Ely Grenadier Heckman, Grenadi Levi PC, Erika Lewis, Timberlake Lewis, David Grenadies, DiMuro Ginsberg, Michael Weiser, Troutman Sanders, Parker Simon & Kokolis, LLC, Alps Insurance 082017 | USDC oF Virginia TV -99, The Supreme Court of Virginia — Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr. Chief Judge Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser, Chief Judge Supreme Court Donald W. Lemons, Judge S. Bernard Goodwyn, Judge LeRoy F. Millete Jr, Judge William C. Mims, Judge Elizabeth A. McClanahan, Judge Cleo E. Powell, Judge Charles 8. Russel, Judge Elizabeth B. Lacy, Judge Lawrence L. Koontz Jr. and all others and STAFF. Aided and Abeited the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Hlona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her ‘Trust by Divorce Lawyer Hona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintift 100. ‘The Virginia Legislature — Patsy Ticer, the Senate and House Courts of Justice, Adam Ebbin and ‘Mark Levine et al. Aided and Abetted the thefis of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer ona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintft 101. MARTHA KENT - x-wife of Judge Kent ~ SET Up to State to me “Just like me and my family ‘you are no longer one of them — you can not win this — you nced to walk away’ 102. The Governor of Virginia ~ Terry McAuliffe ~his staff: Brian Moran, Jake Rubenstein Aided and ‘Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff 103. ‘Virginia Attorney General — Mark Herring, - his staff: Aided and Abeted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Hlona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintitt 104. Senators of Virginia ~ Mark Warner and Tim Kaine and their staff - Aided and Abetted the thefts ‘of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Hlona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintift 105. Congressman of Virginia ~ Don Beyer, Bob Goodlatte and others Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff 106. “The FBI = James Comey, Marcus Wilson and many others Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff 107. The Department of Justice: Eric Holder Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Hlona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from PlaintifF 108. Bankruptey Department of Justice - Joseph A.Guzinski, Trustee Thomas P. Gorman, U.S. Trustee 'W. Clarkson MeDow Jr. are aware of and actively Covering Up the Bankruptey Fraud by Divore Lawyer Hona Grenadier Heckman and Judge Brian Kenney and Trustees. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff Case No. 16 — 13028 Transcripts of hearing after Court hours and after all had left the court ‘Transcript from hearing shows Collusion to Cover Up the criminal acts and actions of the Defendants, Divorce lawyer Hona Grenadier Heckman and others, Transcripts can be found Docket No. 110 Case No. 16- 13028 109. BANKS: Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co., Citicorp, Aided and ‘Abetted the thefts. of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Hona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintif? INTRODUCTION 110. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs 1, That on September 12, 2007 Hona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer founding partner of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Buffett& Keiser PC, widow to Judge Albert Grenadier of the City of Alexandria and his Ist cousin Jerome Heckman, founding partner of Keller Heckman an International law firm LIED IN court. 12. ‘The Slippery Slope of the Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, and Discrimination for Iu EB SEF THE Baste Ta B Mae wT PER PTT UTE PeapTE BPO AY a MTT of a oN WOTER Me ae oa eel geJui Religious, Social, Economic and Hierarchy, the Gang type behavior similar to the Kul Klux Klan ~ the Collusion of the Defendants began (o cover up the Lies, the attempt to harm Plaintiff and her girls ‘Amei 113. ‘The purpose of the “COVER UP" is the “Old Boys Network” and the “Ju .n Born Citizens through drugs and rape, to Slander Plaintiff, to prevent Due Process, iary” isto Freedman \d accountable f following: 14. Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image t0 the Klue Khu Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest — related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, Social, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of taw, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 US.C. 200d et seq, was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC § 912. With her Intention to 18 USC § 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of 98.3, Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, § 18.2 Misrepresentations prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Judicial Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud: Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity; Racketeering: Retaliation; Discrimination; et al, not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a corrupt purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing 10 {follow the law: Extrinsic fraud: Egregious legal errors; Violation of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uitering, etc, other writings etal. AU of above charges will and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff. us. ‘This ease started out a domestic issue, TODAY THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE, the right of access to the courts to a pro se litigant without having their life threatened and being Jailed by the Collusion, Racketeering of the Judicial Community. 116. “That the Judicial Community polices itself that Plaintiff has gone through all channels for help, to be tumed away. That there is no check and balances with the Judiciary, the Government and with the Elected Officials as they are all acting in collusion. 7. ‘The Judicial Community has ereated a smoke and mirrors of Immunity that they have tried to force oon the American people, to believe that they are above the law and cannot be held responsible for their actions in the court room. This is untrue. That the immunity is lost for aetions that are for personnel gain, that are willful acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless. ‘That Discrimination is color blind that there is discrimination for social, economic and hierarch that exists in GEE TNE Bas Ta wT FTES PRAT THESE POOLE THO BE) 08M Of AAT HT WOT Wie TREO Jeera gethe Judicial Community to protect one of their own. Those cases across this Great Country Judges and the Judicial Community are being held accountable for their actions as Judges going to jail for Obstruction of | Justice and many other Criminal Aets and Actions that are considered TREASON et al 118, Judges do not haye absolute judicial immunity, they have limited judi immunity. 119, ‘The Judges violated Plaintiffs rights “Under the Color of Law” in violation of U.S.C. Title 18 § 242 and Rule 3 Of the Criminal Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by denying a Grand Jury or Special Grand Jury to investigate which Plaintiff requested on several occasions. 120. ‘The Judges / Defendants have {aken upon themselves the role of Judge, Jury and Executioner of PI 121 “The Judges in denying in all cases any open court hearings requested by Plaintiff knowledgeable acts and actions were illegal against Plaintiff's Constitutional rights to be heard by her peers in the form of a Jury of Plaintiff peers. Violating her right to a Tr by Jury and Due Process. 122, ‘That the Court of Appellate Judges in their complicity, have become Accessories After the Fact. ‘They have engaged in Obstruction of Justice, Dereliction of Duty, Malfeasance and Misfé nee. 123. "Pro se plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formatites of pleauling requirements, Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro se complaint than they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 US. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam): Haines v. Kerner, 404 US. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Bd.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Eliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir.1989) (per curiam). In order {0 justify the dismissal of « pro se complaint, it must be ” ‘beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. at $21, 92 S.Cé. at 594 (quoting Conley v, Gibson, 355 US. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1937) BACKGROUND 124, Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs 1s. Divorce awyer Hona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman would start a crime spree on oF around November 1983 with the forgery of Sonia Grenadier’s name on a Amended Trust Agreement. that would continue through today in the Sale of Real Estate in or around 2014 : 126. On or around February 14" of 1986 The Scheme and the Artifice of Divorce Lawyer Nona Grenadier Heckman and David Grenadier the lies and deception would begin. 127. Janice met Defendants David, Hona and Erika around March of 1985, ‘That Janice was naive and in many ways very easily manipulated by David and lona. At the time she met David she was stll filling the effects of having not finished college due to her apartment being broken into and raped, and a failed lige PREF” BART TATE aT HOT PUES FOG UTE PeOpTE TOE a Ke oF TT a WOT TE TE POTEET FROGmarriage. 128. That David and Ilona started their manipulation with knowledgeable intend around February 14, 1986 with lies and then monies in December of 1986, 129. ‘That the first lie that Janice can recall was February 14, 1986. Ilona was very specific having just married Jerome (Jerry) Heckman the Ist cousin to Judge Albert Grenadier whom had just passed March of 1985, Ilona stated and was so excited how Jerry had added her to his will. Janice found this odd, but in or around April of 2014 Plaintiff learn that what Jerry had done that day was give up his rights to a property Hona had stolen from Sonia Grenadier ~ and taken a portion of a $521.000. Pay off for the sale of portion of the property. 130. ‘That David and Iona started a Real Estate Partnership called GIC in or around 1985 that Janice started contributions thru loans, advice along with a partnership call Bellefonte Ave on or around December of 1986, 131. ‘That David and ‘would marry in September of 1988 which in or around 1997 Janice would learn that David never loved her — and that he and Hona hi used her, manipulated her and she was no longer needed. That the talk of Divorce between Hona and David by all appearance started in or around 1993 with a Hona then putting everything into a Trust that she would control. Janie to the properties through 2000. 132, ‘That in or around March of 1990 Jan onies flo -¢ would learn that money had been stolen out ofa Trust Account of Sonia Grenadier through the Grenadier Law firm, 133, ‘That Lawyer Hlona would tell Janice she is to speak to no one about this. Everything goes through her, that she will handle everything as an attorney through Grenadier Law. The slippery stope, the ‘manipulation of the fear as Hlona made it clear to Janice who was pregnant and just had a miscarriage that if she spoke about this to anyone that David would go to jail and be raped repeatedly — and that my child would being visiting him in jail. lona knew of my rape and used it to manipulate and to protect herself from being found out, 134. Janice was with knowled| cable and mi itwas jous intend manipulated by Ilona into believing, David who stole the money. That in or around May of 2008 - Hlona would admit to Janice that David did not steal the money whieh only left Hona - Which the slippery slope of the Criminal Acts, the Knowledgeable intend of the extreme Divoree Lawyer Hlona Grenadier Heckman would go for money started to unravel, that the :°TRUTH” supposedly your best defense would all of a sudden have no meaning (0 the jin and Washington DC. The thefts with the help of the 135, ona’s criminal spree began in or around November of 1983 with the Forgery of Sonia Grenadiers hhame on an Amendment to her Trust giving tlona Grenadier access once Judge Albert Grenadier died. The COVER UP to protect one of their own began in or around 1990 with the help of Fagelson et al law firm and Mays & Valentine aka Troutman Sanders, lie ne TRE BAST TE i aS PAPT TE PTE Ta aU aT Wa TT Te a Fea alJui 136. ‘Then on or around September 3rd of 1997 that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport as David ‘was suppose to drive Janice to the airport and was late, Janice was outside waiting and not in her home. Janice had called him to find out where he was — David started yelling at Janice and saying a cab was on the ‘way, Janice can presume now his disappointment the money it appears he and Hlona spent to have Janice killed has come back to haunt them, When Janice got in the cab and the driver could hear David yelling he said to Ja +e hang up the phone, hang up the phone if you don’t hang up the phone I will pull over and hang it up for you. Janice hung up the phone, the driver than said we ean take eare of that for $5,000.00 — you don’t have it ~ then $2,000 we ean work it out. Ja e was handed a phone number, Janice tossed it in the trash can thinking it had been a set up ~Janice now believes with out question it was to be a hit and today she was to be dead, Janice has never been questioned by the City of Alexandria Police or the FBI even though she has reached out several times with her information, Through Commonwealth Attomey Brian Porter & Sheriff Lawhorene (who had Plaintiff tortured in jail) That it ‘ebruary / March of 1998 Naney Dunning who would open her front door in 2003 came to Janice on different occasions to check on her safety. The question now arises was Naney aware of the outeome that was meant for Janice in September of 1997. 137. That the abov is important because where Janice lives’ ina circle around Janice their have been 5 Five known Murder type hits ~ Dr. Rixsey, John Doe, Nancy Dunning ( Naney came to Janice’s home twice to check on Janice, now believed Nancy knew more and was from what Nancy said afraid of what could happen and maybe knew what was going to happen to her) Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato. ‘That all five have strong connections to the Old Boys Network. That the appearance and with the Facts Janice knows people who have been charged and found gt that of these charges of murder and the reason behind them was fabricated to protect the Old Boys Network of Virginia, That further situations / evidence will show that throughout Northern Virgii hit men are hired and it is a pattern and practice of the Old Boys ‘Network in Virginia —to either have someone killed or to Bully them till they commit Suicide. That now we also have the blood of Senators and others on the hands of he City of Alexandria ~ Who is safe in this City? 138. November 1997 That Lawyer Ilona in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea Grenadier, Robin Grenadier passed a rumor around that caused David Grenadier to pull a gun in the home with Janice’s girls in the home, 139. ‘That on or around November 17, 1997 David, Ilona and Erika would sign a Liquidation agreement of several properties that are all owned in Virginia and a Virginia Partnerst done by Lawyer not licensed or never has been li ensed to act as a lawyer in Virginia, Ilona being a divorce lawyer knew the law and acted criminally as she had done with the Sonia Grenadier Estate for personal financial gain using her law firm and POWER of the men she married to manipulate / Scheme / Seam those that were not as strong or did not know the law or who would ignore the law for her. Exhibit 2 140. ‘That in or around June of 2000 David and Janice were divorced with out « property settlement. roar "Te baste ng Tad mint fies Fagard Wiese people Vr 3) a kl of Wash Wad wOrUN Me We Of a federal ge 17Virginia law is clear and Divorce lawyer Iona Grenadier her profession for over 45 years did this with knowledgeable intend in filings to the Bankruptey Court in Vi split 50/50. nia everything unless agreed jifferently in writ ing in a Settlement Agreement STATEMENT OF FACT. 141. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations above and all paragraphs 142, ‘That Plaintiff came to the Federal Court System is still trying to get Justice in the State of Virgini 143. ‘That Chief Judge Donald Haddock from 2007 tll today in the Circuit Court System of Virginia OVE LOVE LOVE” he declared to me he has for Hlona in 2008 will never lose in court. insures for his Judge Haddock in Judge’s chambers stated “You will never win this, 1 LOVE Hona” Judge Haddock then ‘went on to do what ever it took PERSONALLY choosing Judges to ensure [lona would win in court no matter what evidence was presented, or what crimes she had committed, 144, Hona lied court, in court documents as a pattern and practice and it is ignored, 4s. Hlona's lawyers lied in court, lied in court documents as a pattern and practice and it is ignored. Up to and including the Supreme Court of Virginia 146. Plaintiff's first ease filed in the USDC of the Eastern Di jon of Virginia Plaintiff realized the 1 of all the Judges to Judge Donald Kent from the McCammon Group. That Judge Donald Kent by all appearance past Judge in the Cireuit Court of Alexandria, then President of the Richmond Law of School is head of the “Old Boys Network” 147, Judge Donald Kent and Judge Donald Haddock are best friends 148, Judge Donald Kent then through Janice’s State Senator Patsy Ticer conspired and set Janice up with his x-wife Martha Kent who stated; “Mle and My fami ‘you are no longer one of them” (x-wife of Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock) The Dockets shows it would at times take the Judges in the City of Alexandria over 2 % months to find a Judge ‘who would rule in favor of Ilo n attorney lying in court, lying in court documents, theft of funds through her law firm the Sonia Gren: nvolved fer Trust and Plaintiff and her girls, bullying and threatening Plait in forgery, hate of Catholics / Christians, gang like activity mirror imaging the Klue Klux Klan, 149. Not once has Plaintiff lost because she does not have the Law on her side, it is because of discrimination — religious / social / economic / social hierarchy by the Defendants to protect one of their o1 150. Judge Donald Haddock retired and keeps his fingers in this ease through Judge James Clark whom he personally made certain got the position as well as acting retired judge. 151 ‘That since 2000 in Bankruptcy Court any and all hearings requested by Plaintiff has been denied, ‘That all hearings in Bankruptcy requested by others and docketed by others are always heard, 152. NO—NOT ONE Motion or case has had an open Court Hearing in the USDC of the Eastern sulle Pace * We Baste TG B Mead WORT YS Pear TS PEOPTE GTO a) as Kd of ras nod work Me eof a fear fadeDivision of Virginia, The 4" Circuit Court of Appeals, The USDC of the District of Columbia or the District of Columbia Appeals Court. 153. That Filed, Stamped into the Record Documents have been mailed back to Plaintiff. Isa. That Motions for Restraining Orders when Plaintiff's life was threatened were ignored 155, ‘That the Federal Court Judges have acted in Collusion with the State Court Judges and many others to deny all JUSTICE in a knowledgeable mah 1s Rico and Racketeering type fashion, 156, The Neutrality requirement helps to guarantee that life, liberty or property will not be taken on the basis of an erroneous or distorted conception of the facts or the law, This is applicable by Article VI of the Untied States Constitution and Stone v. Powell 428 US 465, 483, n. 35, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 40 L.. Ed 2d 1067 (1976) That State courts and Federal Courts have a constitutional obli jon to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law. 157, That the Defendants / Judges have deliberately violated Plaintiff's liberties and has wantonly refused to provide due process and equal protection in a manner consistent with that which is needed for full, Fair, impartial hearings. 158. ‘The United States con: of ALL RIGHT conduct that gives Plaintiff good reason to believe the above Defendants have in case acted maliciously and ition guarantees an unbiased Judge who will always provide litigants with full prot , That all Defendants behavior has been unethical and or illegal conduct or the acts and actions have prevented the defendants to act in a fair and impartial manner. 159, All the defendants have ignored all Judicial Canons which require a Judge to uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. A Judge shall perform the duties ofthe office npartially, competently and diligently. 160. ‘That the Judges are ruling from the Secrecy of their Chambers and acting as Juries from their Chambers. To protect one of their own. 161 ‘The only open Court Hearing in the Bankruptey was requested by the Trustee Thomas P Gorman sho removed his in remand commented on the directness and honesty of Plaintiff Stating in the ‘Transcript of Hearing held after hours, and after all others had left the courthouse on October 13, 2016, Page 3 partial lines 13-20 “To the debtor's credit , and this is one of the reasons I am softening my request lot of times, when I ask that, I can’t get straight answers of debtors: they tell me “I might have some income, Pye got this, I've got that” this debtor was candid. She’s not running and hiding from that.” 162. “Another reason I’m backing down on the in rem relief — and this goes not just to this case, but other ceases, where I make similar requests ~ ata certain point, | don’t know that I should be carrying the secured creditor's water... Page 5 partial lines 5-9 163.But, they're not hear (meaning Wells Fargo) They have taken no action in this ease, to my knowledge they’re not here asking. So I've withdrawn my request for in rem relief. Page S partial lines 15-17 164. Trustee / Licensed Lawyer Mr. Gorman page 13 lines 19-25 and page 14 line | STATES: “And Wage V REF VE BARTER BM RT YER TTT TNE BeOGTE HHO RY aE IAT af TT HoT WOM The Te OF a era aEyour Honor, especially with her being pro se I don’t want to get in the way, but we've gone way beyond background, way beyond anything relevant to the issue at hand, which is wheter she's eligible for 13 and whether we're proceeding in good faith, | think this is beyond background. And we're not talking about allegations of judicial misconduct, and it’s talking about the Commonwealth Attorney. This s getting a little far afield for this particular nst Plaintiff 165, ‘The court allowed all submissions into the Record for proof of Discrimination ag. ‘making it the responsibility of Judge Kenney and Trustee Thomas Gorman to report the Criminal aets and actions of others. Instead with the knowledge entered into the record in Bankruptcy Case No, 16-13028 Judge Kenney decided to further the COVER UP of the Criminal Acts and Actions of the Defendants. 1066. ‘The Transeript can be found in the record under Case No. 16-13028 BFK Docket No 110. in the United States Bankruptcy Court Eastem District of Virginia (Alexandria) Bankruptey Fraud will be se 167 ‘This Transcript will show the depth of the Collusion and Corruption of the above Defendants and others listed as Other Parties involved in the Cover Up. 168. That documents filed in all eases will show Plaintiff was denied open court hearings. 169. ‘That Judge's were asked to recuse due to the appearance of Bias and refused, 170. That Plaintiff requested a Default Judgment in Case No, 1:14 ~ ev- 00827 LMB~ TCB Due to Lawyer Howard Bierman and BWW Law Group not answering the complaint, which was not only denied but, a Default ad Judgment was put on Plaintiff. How does a Plaintiff Default on there own Complaint? m ‘That Plaintiff did not respond to Bankruptcy schedule and all Judges put a Default Judgment against Plaintiff the documents will show the complete BIAS by the Defendants. 172 ‘That Defendants have shown Fav ism and Cronyisin to protect Divorce Lawyer Hona Grenadier Heckman, the Judiciary, Government and the Elected Official of Virginia and many others, 173, By all appearance after ex-parte commun Plaintiff, Plaintist cations, the Judges took away the basic liberties of ill and can show in past cases that the Defendants are prejudice against Plaintiff. Which is a Fraud on the Court “Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in “fraud upon the court” dn Bulloch v_ United States, 163 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), 74. ‘The law is clear reviewing a pro-se pleading, it is prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing the allegations set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of act n. See, e.g, Harrison v_ U.S. Postal Services 840 F. 2d 1149, 1152.(4" Cir, 1988). The factual allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party. Davis v. City of Portsmouth, 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 (E.D. Va, 1983), aff'd, 742 F 2d 1448 (4" Cir. 1984) 7s. Under Iinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed “Fraud upon the cou the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal foree or effeet.” “Citation: 93F, 2d 313 2d Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured by fraud is null and void. An erroneous judgment may be attacked collaterally. Affirmed” sale Poser Te RTS Tg MT WOT YES PORT TE PeOpTE GPO TY a KF rasa OTT Me ie of a feral age >176. ‘That Judge’s had a personal relationship with Divorce Lawyer Hona and refused to recuse. Instead acted in a knowledgeable malicious and eriminal way to Cover Up the Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer ona Grenadier Heckman which is supported by Exhibits | against Sonia Grenadier and Exhibit 2 against Janice Wolk Grenadier 171, Exhibit 3 supports the allegation against the Judges. CLAIMS 178. Plaintiff incorporates in all CLAIMS 1 - 7 by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs Breach of Contract — Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing - Breach of Contractual Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, - Consumer Protection Act - Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Unjust Enrichment/Constructive Trust By virtue of the facts stated above, defendants have violated their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing, PlaintfY has paid fees to these courts or has been granted [FP and not received Due Process. 179. ‘The above defendants and defendant’s representatives breached their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism, When Judge’s did not have Jurisdiction and chose friends/other Judges who would not follow the rules but would rules as told. When Judges Tampered with the evidence, Mail Fraud, Obstruction of Justice 180 ‘That the above Defendants and State of Virginia and the Federal Government Breach of Con includes not limited to their involvement being disingenuous in documents filed with the courts and Orders. The documents will speak for themselves, the defendants were aware of these breaches as lawyers and Judges. 181 Plaintiff through implied covenant of good faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the Rules of the Courts, The State of Virginia and Federal Court was paid for serves in the Court that were denied Plaintiff because she was Catholic and or not one of them. ‘The discrimination and segregation among That even though Plaintiff did not pay fees in the United States District Plaintiff was rightfully granted IFP statues alter being denied access to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, was still to be treated equally as if Plaintiff had. ‘That the United States Constitution et al calls for Blind Justice / Equal Justice to all, not to just those with money, 182. ‘The defendant's “flagrantly violated” their Fiduciary responsibility (0 the Judici: Plaintiff to deal in Good Faith while Plaintiff continued to deal in Good Faith. The actions will be proven factually by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the court and other. That the constitutional Right of Due Process has been denied time and time again to Plaintiff. 183. ‘The State of Virginia and the United States District Courts had a Fiduciary Duty to insure the rights and safety of Plaintiff in the and through the Court system. Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory ~ that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH” which is an absolute defense . The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. ‘The 1964 ease New York Time Co. v, Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed (0 prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not” aT Pace” Tae Baste Wg a as edges FeTTo ws RUT a] TAT OT OTT Te TARE HURT FRE184. “Faimess of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. “In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)" Loving ». Virginia, 388 U.S. | (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judge's, lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of or one of them, 185. ‘The right of access to the courts is basic to our system of government, and itis well established today that itis one of the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution, In Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 207 U.S. 142, 28 S.Ct. 34, 52 L.Ed, 143 (1907), “The right to sue and defend in the courts is the altemative of force. In an organized society itis the right conservative of all other rights, and lies at the foundation of orderly government. It is one of the highest and most essential privileges of citizenship, and must be allowed by each state to the eitizens ofall other states to the preci that itis allowed to ‘own citizens. Equality of treatment in this respect is not left o depend upon comity between the states, but is ranted and protected by the Federal Constitution."207 U.S. at 148, 28 S.Ct. at 35 (citations or clear that the Court viewed the right of access to the courts as one of the privileges and immuniti citizens under article 4 of the Constitution and the fourteenth amendment ster Claim 2- Violation Title 42 § 1983 Civil Rights Statue = Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC § 241 & 245 186. Defendants used unfair/unconseionable means to try and intimated and scare Plaintiff and her girls— ‘They have acted as the Kiue Klux Klan would have in the past. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show that Plaintiff can prove each clement of alleged faets in her claims. That to seek relief for the violation of 1 person’s Federal and Constitution rights under Title 42 § 1983 it allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United States Constitution as defined by Federal Law. 187. Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being Catholic ‘That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC § 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion ‘That this is a Hate Crime and “Hate colorblind” Fact the ease which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amen Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white vietim. 188. Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boy's Network / Judicial ‘Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the Husband to Defendant flona a lawyer ( also wife to Jerry Heckman Keller H to Judge Albert Grenadier) who has also intervened into Defendants Divorce. That the discrimination and, segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others nferior to the other. 189. Interference with the right of access to the courts gives rise (o a claim for relief under section 1983. Sigafus v. Brown, 416 F.2d 105 (7th Cir.1969) (destruction by jail guards of legal papers necessary for appeal supports claim for damages under See. 1983); McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d at 6 ("OF what avail is it to the individual to arm him with a panoply of constitutional rights if, when he seeks to vindicate them, the court room ean be hermetically sealed against him by a functionary who, by refusal or neglect, impedes the filing of his papers?"); Crews v. Petrosky, 309 F.Supp. at 1204 ("An allegation that a clerk of state court has negligently delayed the filing of a petition for appeal, and that the delay has interfered with an individual's right of access to the courts, may state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. See. 1983." 190, Failing to protect the Civil Rights of Plaintiff by ignoring Due Process, showing favoritism to the Defendants and Defendants attomeys because of who they are part of the Old Boy's Network of Virginia or other. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S, 1 (1967) wa mark civil rights decision of the Unite Supreme Court against discrimination, Which includes being discriminated because the Judge’s, lawyers, sue Pee TRE BEE TT Ta TO FE PAPT Te Te To Yas iad OY Was Tad wT We ef federal Fae" ye laws are nt attach, man International Law firm, I* cousinelected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of their race. 191 The Plaintiff respectfully had asked and was denied that the Court (DC Court) clarify the order that “denies” the Plaintiffs Response under FRCP 60(a) (b) That the Plaintiff has a right to respond to documents that are submitted into the record by Defendants especially when they are disingenuous, discriminatory and add tothe collusion of the Defendants and the Judicial Community to stander Plaintiff, That this denial deprives the plaintiff of her rights, and to preserve the obligations of The District Court for the District of Columbia under the United States Constitution and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all applicable statutes that apply to civil rights of this individual Plaintiff so that this denial can be preserved for the record and appellate review. 192, ‘That these two e-mails with many others to come out at trial shows the reli here: That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion ‘That this is Hate Crime and “Hate crime laws are colorblind” Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, S08 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white vietim. With the involvement of Defendants Mother this e-mail was sent: From:LeahLax1234@aol. com Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM To: jwarenadier@qmail.com something more scarier | contacted Ilona Ely Freedman you know what YOU DIDN'T HELP Jews YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE YOUR BED AND YOU LIED IN IT | THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH. YOU STUPID cor. YOU WERE REJECTED. cer tarinrovour tick skuut Now YOU ARE MAKING UP stories ano spreaonc ues! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET wei cer ort your ass. 6000 vou Lost ALL Your MONEY MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS: SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. | WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU. YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI! you HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED! ~ ili POE” TE BART. TAS TT WIR PGES AT ETE BEOBIE TBO VEY aN TORT BY THT OT WOT TS TREO OYA geGrenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over From:LeahLax1234@aol.com Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM To: jwarendier@gmail.com Claim 3- Common Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972 - Constructive Fraud — Fraud on the Court 193. ‘On several occasions Plaintiff asked the courts to review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to look to the allocations of misconduct. Plaintiff was to go in front of the Grand Jury with her witness’s ~ But, stead was kidnapped in a different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed prior to her being allowed to ask for the Special Grand Jury. In the City of Alexandria Va by Judge James Potter and Commonwealth Attomey Randy Sengel. 194 ‘The defendants were deceptive of material isrepresentations of past and existing facts and remained silent when a duty to speak existed. ‘The defendant’s actions were Arbitrary and Capricious absence of a rational connection between the facts found and the choice’s made, made choices that were not in accordance with the law. 195. Justice is supposed to be blind. In Bullock v. United States, 763 F. the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud wh fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents 1d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), nis directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not false statements ot perjury. . the courtora member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his udlicial function -- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.” But not only are trial judges required to be fair and impartial, they must also ‘satisfy’ the appearance of justice and this includes all Defendants, The trial judge's appearance, or conduct and behavior, appearance of bias alone is grounds for reversal even if the trial judge is, in fact, completely impartial, “Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in “fraud upon the court’, Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), Jt is whe Claim _4- Negligence the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional infliction of emotional distress 196, 1e defendant’s had a legal duty to use reasonable care to protect Plaintiff, ‘That statements posted oon the internet about Plaintiff, and what others wrote about Plaintiff in Orders show they did not do this, That several lies about Plaintiff and others were posted and ignored by Defendents... They have done this to ruin Plaintiffs reputation and should be held legally accountable for the responsibility of their actions, The defendant’s malicious actions caused great emotional distress to Plaintiff, By the Commonwealth Attorneys orders of the City of Alexandria police to never take a complaint from Plaintiff? Ignored by the Defer Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory ~ that Plaintiff has ‘THE TRUTH" which is an absolute defense, The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 ease New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”. Plaintift has been put into an unfair and dangerous position to protect herself and her girls. The actions of the actors le Pee "TRE BEE TE TTT WRT HUGS FRAP CSE OIE BO ew Re AAT Hd OTR The He a Ta Faeaka Defendants to cause this emotional distress were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. 197. ‘That Plaintiff has been forever harmed by the blog — jwgrenadicrisalair.blogspot.com that these courts endorsed by ignoring the request to have it removed. Plaintiff cannot get work nor can Plaintiff get funding for her Family Friendly Product. Claim 5 - Civil Conspiracy , Obstruction of Justice, Tampering with Evidence, M Liable 18 USC § 241 & 242 Fraud, Slander and 198, “If v0 or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person tn any State Territory, Commonwealth, or District in the free exercise of enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States 199, The Collusion of the Defendants actions show collusion to harm Plaintiff and was done with malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless intentions. Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with _jwerenadierisalair.blogspot.com that Plaintiff has a “protected characteristic” which will be proven as to why Plaintiff was sought out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was targeted by Defendants to dony any rights to protect the Criminal Spree of Divoree Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman as shown in Exhibit | & 2... Defendants were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional distress. 200. Obstruction of Justice US Code 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JU ICE ~ That when United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judge Beryll A, Howell, Judge Boasberg & Cireuit Court Judge Clark stole the documents they Obstructed the Truth and evidence to prove that Loretta Lax Miller and others had lied in documents submitted to courts and that Hlona Grenadier Heckman had stolen the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and her gies. + court officers or any defendant)to cons; 201. Its illegal for two or more persons (i for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, oF to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws... Griffin v, Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 1798, 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971) and 42 U.S.C, Sec. 1985(2) (1976). Also See Kush v. Rutledge, U.S, 103 S.Ct. 1483, 1485, 75 L.Bd.2d 413 (1983), 202 Congress requires “that a federal court frame its orders so that those who must obey them will know what the court intends to require and what it means to forbid.”” Id, (quoting Int'l Longshoremen’s Ass'n, 389 USS. at 76). The Supreme Court has observed that this requirement is especially “vital” in cases concerning the validity of duly enacted statutes. [d. ‘The Judges and the clerk and these courts are circumventing the rule and law that a document is accepted for filing when itis file stamped and docketed. the court's refusal to docket the Plaintiffs pleadings is illegitimate and purposely biased. See: Ayala, 126 III Dee 413, 531 N.E.2d at 1043 (stating that a court clerk may refuse to accept a document unless the fee is paid, but where the elerk has accepted the document for filing without the fee, file stamps it and assigns a docket number, the court nevertheless acquires jurisdiction). That this has happened in the USDC of Eastern Division (Alexandria) and the USDC of the District of Columbia). sulle Poser Te Baste Tg Ta wT PGES POT TH PeOpTe (pra 3) as KOT rash ot wor Me We Wf Jeera jalge203. That several Judges and courts and the clerk’s refusal to docket the Plaintiffs pleadings are a Violation of the Plaintiffs Constitutional rights based on these facts. The “contours ofthis right must be sufficiently clear that an officer ofthe court would understand that what he is doing violates that right” Elder ¥. Holloway, 510 U.S. 510, 514, 114 S.Ct. 1019, 127 L.Bd.24 344 (1994) (quoting Harlow, 457 U.S. at 806, 102 S.Ct. 2727) 204, The Defendants have violated, 18 USC § 242 Civil Rights and Deprivation of Constitution Right, § 246, § 231 Civil Disorder, $245, § 249 Hate Crimes, § 373 Conspiracy, Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, § 401 Contempt, Power of the court, §402 Contempt’s constituting crimes, § 1001Fraud and false statements, § 1021 Title and Records, § 1028 Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information, § 1349, Mail Fraud and other Fraud Offenses, Attempt and conspiracy § 1365, Malicious Mischief, Tampering with consumer products (a) whoever, with reckless disregard for the risk that another person will be placed in danger of death or bodily injury and under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to such risk tampers with any consume. § 1506, Obstruction of Justice, theft or alteration of record or process, false bail “Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any records, writ, process or other proceeding in any court of the United States whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect: or Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting the same” § 1512, Obstruction of Justice ~ Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant: § 1513, Obstruction of Justice ~ Retaliating against a witness, victim or an informant §1514, Obstruction of Justice ~ Civil action to restrain harassment of a viet or witness: § 1519, Obstruction of Justice ~ Destruction, alteration or falsification of records in Federal investigation and bankruptey, § 1621, Perjury, § 1622, Subomation of Perjury § 1623, False declarations before grand jury or court, § 1924, Unauthorized removal and retention of class documents or material, § 1957, Racketeering - Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity § 1959, Racketeering — Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity, § 1968, Civil investigative demand, §2071, Records and Reports ~ Concealment removal or mutilation generally, §2076. Whoever, being a clerk of a district court of the United States, willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, corticated, statement or document as required by law, shall be fined under this ttle or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.” 208. When Divorce Lawyer and or others hired or as a favor Mark / Michael Stuart to drug Plaintiff and get inappropriate pictures, or rape one of Plaintif?’s daughters, or plant drugs on one of Plaintiff's Daughters or in the home of Plaintiff and her girls in the November / December 2012 time frame. When Defendants in collusion or ignored the threat: Through Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her best friend Loretta Lax Miller aka Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan Presidential Candidate for 2016 — there blog - jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com STE PARE TRE aT TG Ta a ges Fear Tse People Cor ve) as Ka af Tas i wor Me He of a Jeera alge,We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone. JW Grenadier aka Janice Wolk Grenadier Sunday, January 5, 2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko but she is also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton, Yes we said it here, Anti Christs meaning plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her keep her hairy vag but they are going to give her the chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will have 6 penises allover her body including one over her vagina. The other 5 will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the bootom of each foot and one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk Grenadier dies, she can g0 to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72 virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape With all of her penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins again. We have figured it out that the fetal body of litle Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement of her home is going to be the vessel for the Dark Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises. Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein lg PTET BT TTB TE FA TE TTTSE PHT EB) HH THON TT A TTA TBS‘Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships Satan, ‘We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro- Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone. 206. THESE ARE THE THREATS OF Loretta Lay Miller aka Leal Lax aka Muggy Cat aka Bill Sullivan_ That the Defendants allowed — MANY MORE CAN BE READ AND FOUND IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - Civil Action No, 14-0162 ~ That the Judicial Community is desperate in the cover up of the collusion to protect Hona Grenadier Heckman is, ‘ebvious to a lay man. 207. Us justice, judge, or magistrate judge Obstruction of J hapter 73 - ‘OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ~ That when United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judge Beryll A. Howell & Circuit Court Judge Clark stole the documents they Obstructed the Truth and evidence to prove that Loretta Lax Miller had lied in documents submitted to this court and that lona Grenadier Heckman had stolen the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust and that she owed Plaintiff the money Plaintiff claimed. 18 U.S. Code § 1506 Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail 208. Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsfies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect; or Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the s Shall be fined under this ttle or imprisoned not more than five years, or both (U.S. Code» Title 18 » P 1 Chapter 73 § 1512 Title 18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, vietim, or an informant. « S. Code) Title 18 » Part |» Chapter 73 » § 1513 - 18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, walification of sige Pace * Te Baste Tg Te Ma WORT FR PGP ENS People (pea Ve) as Mn of Wl WaT WOH Te Te Of a eravietim, or an informant -'That Judge Beryl A. Howell retaliated by her Order of May 30, 2014 denying, ‘Amended Complaint - U.S, Code, Title 18 Part I» Chapter 73 > § 1514 - 18 U.S. Code § 1514 - Civil action (o restrain harassment of a vi ess - That Judge Beryl A. Howell, and others has, empowered Defendant Hlona Grenadier Heckman to further harass and Slander Plaintiff as is being done in the new Blog by Loretta Miller ~ as seen further down under Parties. by Loretta Miller's Blog LorettaMiller - itle 18 » Part 1» Chapter 73 » § 1512- U.S. Code § 1512 - ‘Tampering with a witness, vietim, 209. ‘Slander Deformation and Libel that when United States Judge Gerald Lee and all others said that Plaintif?s filings were Frivolous he was saying it was Frivolous for Plaintiff to expect a Judge that was not tainted oF that Plaintiff to expect attorneys to speak the truth That when Judge Walton and others said Plaintiff was rambling and did not make sense was giving other Judge's and the attorneys the ammunition to slander Plaintiff further to try and make Plaintiff to look stupid and incompetent, Several Slanderous and Hate Crime type Statements have been published, spoken and included in documents submitted in the courts by Defendants and lawyers. The Collusion and the pattern cannot be denied. 's Constitution ‘The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the United St 210. Plaintiff will prove a violation of Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the Four Basie freedoms are Violated - The Four Freedoms: ie Freedom of speech 2, Freedom of worship 3. Freedom from want 4 2u Plaintiff will show the actions of the Defendants were actions that were willful ats were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. ‘That the defendants were acting under the color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process are factual allegations that will be proven through documents, letters, e-mails and actions of defendants and others. That defendants are knowledgeable and aware of the threats from Divorce lawyer Hlona’s and her “GANG”. 212, ‘The Constitution of the United States a fundamental, guarantee that all legal proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts (o take away one's life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall net be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or capricious. ‘The constitutional guarantee of due provess of law, found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property ‘The Due Process Clause of the {ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment restricts the powers ofthe federal government and applies only to actions by it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, declares,"[NJor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" (§ 1). This clause limits the powers of the states, rather than those of the federal government. 213. The right of access to the courts is contained within the Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause, the First Amendment, and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregory v Nunn, 895 F.2d 413, 415 n.2.(7" Cir.1990) 214. Noting that its decisions have grounded the right of access to the courts in the Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause, the First Amendment, and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, see id. At 415 n. 12, 122 S.Ct. 2179, an access to court cl th Amendm n seeks to eliminate “systemic official action (that] frustrates a plaintiff in preparing and filing suits atthe present time,” Id, At 413, 122 St. 2179. 215. ‘The Supreme Court also has held that the First Amendment right to petition the government includes the right to file other evil actions in court that have a reasonable basis in law or fact. See McDonald v. sulle Posie * Te Be TG Bad WT PAGS Fea TSE POOH GTO TE wR fal wo WOR Ue He a TAL FROSmith, 472 U.S. 479, 484, 105 S.Ct. 2787, 86 L.Eed.2d 384 (1985) Bill Johnson's Rests, Ine. v. NLRB, 461 US. 731, 741, 103 S.Ct. 2161, 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983) (“[T]he right of access to the courts is an aspect of the First Amendment right to petition the Government for redress of ances.”); California Motor Transp. Co. ¥. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 510, 92 S.Ct. 609, 30 L.Bd.2d 642 (1972) (“The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the right of petition.”); see also Monsky v. Moraghan, 127 F.3d 243, 246 (2d Cir.1997) (It is well established that all persons enjoy a constitutional right of access to the courts.”) 216, Federal courts have long recognized that the pleadings of a pro se litigant must be construed liberally and held “to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. “Erickson, 551 USS. at 94 (citation omitted) Ifthe denial of the court is due to omission or a technical mistake, the clerk by LCVR 5.4 (g) is required to request the party re-file. 207. The standard for aright of access to the courts” claim, whether treated under the First Amendment as part of the right “to petition the government for a redress of grievances” or as a procedural due process claim, should require that the plaintiff allege and prove that the state’s judicial process does not provide fair procedures to remedy the wrong alleged. Proof of the lack of adequate state remedies is required by Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. $17, 104 S.Ct, 3194, 82 L.Bd.2d 393 (1984), and Vicory v. Walton, 721 F.2d 1062 (6* Cir.1983), in procedural due process cases and should be required in judicial access cases. 218. Every person who, under color of any statute... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States..to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and las, shall be liable to the part injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress Claim 7 - Judicial Cannons and the Rules of Professional Con 219 No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity, All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the Jaw, and are bound to obey it.” Burz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct, at 261 (1882)" 220. “Further itis the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties ar federal law.” Stome v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)” 221 “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. Ifa judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, J re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), ithout jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” 222. A judge shall not allow family, so Judicial conduct or judgm interests of the judge or others; nor shall a judge convey or pern they are in a special position to influence the judge. A Jud: 223. CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT * Canonl A Judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. * Canon 2A Judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the Judge's activities. Canon 3 A Judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently, 224, Disciplinary Responsibilities: ate (o uphold I, political or other relationships to influence the judge's A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private others to convey the impres shall not testify as a character witness. + A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has age PRE TR BATETAG T TaTRTTES FAT HE PODTE Ta TY ws MT aH HWA TST a YT‘committed a violation of the Judicial Canons should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons that raises a subst ‘question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the Judicial Inquiry and Review ‘Commission * A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness asa lawyer in other respects should inform the Virginia State Bar. ‘The legal profession is largely self-governing. Although other professions also have been granted powers of self-government, the legal profession is unique in this respect because of the close relationship between the profession and the processes of government and law enforcement. This connection is manifested in the fact that ultimate authority over the legal profession is vested largely in the courts, 2s. ‘You can’t change the Truth - The Truth is the actions of the Judges, Under Minois and Federal Ja, when any officer of the court has committed “fraud upon the court”, the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect.” “Citation: 93F. 2d 313 2d Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured by fraud is null and void. An erroneous judgment may be attacked collaterally. Affirmed” 226. THIS IS NOT A DOMESTIC ISSUE ~THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE FAIRNESS IN THE COURTS That PlaintifF has followed the Law, followed the Rules to be Discriminated by all Defendants The Judicial system has an “incestuous” relationship that has created a “privileged class”, a violation of Blind / Equal Justice for al RELIEF REQUESTED 221. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs 228, ‘Wherefore this court should be aware Plaintiff takes very serious all allocations. That Plaintiff has only included Defendants who have gone out of their way to harm Plaintiff, puting it in writing where Plaintiff can easily show documents that show the intensions of the Defendant was disingenuous, that with legal knowledge of the corruption of the Judicial system believed they could get away with the criminal behavior doing a favor for one of theirown, That each Defendant has signed and filed with the courts document’s that are disingenuous with the criminal intent to harm Plaintiff, 229. The Defendants should be held to a higher standard, that actions are reprehensible and The protected Privilege and Immunity is lost when the Defendants did not have Jurisdiction due to Fraud, Discrimination where one favors one citizen over another, an egregious form of Judicial Diserimination. ‘That the fundamental right to fair trial is what we send our your men and ‘women into war for. That the Liberties we Brag to other countries about, the above defendants have ‘made a Mockery of, and is an embarrassment to this great country. That this court to uphold the itearity of the United States Judicial System, the United States Constitution and the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Court must act swiftly and harshly with the above Defendants, a strong ‘message must be I community as was stated by Judge Posner of er of Judges attached in Exhibit 3. The courts should award the Plaintiff the following: 230. A Special Grand Jury i jely enacted to investigate the Criminal Actions of Defendants ial behavior 231, ‘That a Restrai ng order is immediately issued for the protection of Plaintiff and her daughters against Before llona Grenadier Heckman who has targeted and used retaliation with aeRO TEE BITE TEE a WT FAG FEAT TE FORTE TO WY a Ri TU WT WOT TE TRE T&Fher gang like behavior with the assistance of Defendants to prevent being held accountable for her Criminal Actions. Including Defendants actions and collusion of Hacking into Plaintif?’s ‘computers, phones and other electronics. 232. Issue injunctive relief commanding a further, detailed forensic investigation into the collusion, or racketeering of the named Defendants above, building on FBI files and investigation. 233 ‘That Plais T and her girls receive $3, million dollars for each year of the Collusion of the Defendants actions which show a conspiracy to harm Plaintiff and her girls, which was done with malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless intentions. Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with iwarenadierisalair.blogspot.com 234. That Plaintiff be made whote for the Real Bstate ownership and other actions Defendant ona Grenadier Heckman has stolen from Plaintiff that the other Defendants with their actions prevented Plaintiff from collecting such monies and real estate. 235, Issue declaratory relief as this Court deems appropriate and just 236. Issue other relief as this Court deems appropriate and just, 237. Award plaintiff her costs of litigation.in all eases JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Plai Plaintiff demands a Jury with the hearing to be fi iff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs |, pursuant (o the Seventh Amendment to the Ui ed by a Camera man of the choosing of Plaintiff Jani id States Constitution, Along 1, Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Plaintiff in this action. 1 hereby declare under penalty of perjury that each of said allegations is true and correct, Date: October 2, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia 22301 Telephone (202) 368-7178 Email jworenadier@gmail.com enalty and perjury: That No attorney has prepared or assisted in the ae oer Tae Ba Tg Ha ON RARE ATT. POT Taw wT TAH WT WON TT A TAT‘That as a new Complaint Service will be within the legal allowable time frame served properly by a third party to: (Chief Judge Honorable Rebecea Beach Sith USDC of Ease Division of Virginia Wolter €, Hottinan United States Courthouse 600 Granby Stet. Novftk, VA 23510 Judge Leonie M. Brinkema Albert V. ryan US. Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square ‘lexan, VA 22314 Judge Gerald Bruce Lee Albeit V ryan US. Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square ‘Alexandia, VA 22314 Judge Liam O'Grady Alber V. Bryan U.S, Courthouse 401 Courhoute Sau ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 Judge Anthony J Trengn Alber V. Bevan US. Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square Alexandra, VA 22314 Senior Judge James C. Cacheris Albert V. Dyan US, Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 Senior Judge Claude. Htton Alber V Bryan U.S, Counhouse S601 Courthouse Square ‘Alesana, VA 22314 Senior Judge'1S. EI Allert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse 11 Courthouse Square ania, VA 22511 Magistrate Judge Theresa C. Buchanan Allert Bryan US, Courthouse 11 Courthouse Square Alexandria, VA 22314 Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson Alben V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse AOL Course Square Alexandria, VA 22314 Magistrate Judge Tyan D. Davis Alber V Bryan US. Courthouse OL Courtonse Square Alexandria, VA 22314 Magistrate Judge Michact Nachmanoff Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Magistrate Judge T: Rawles Jones Jr Alber Ve lian US, Courthouse 401 Courthouse Square ‘Alexandra, VA 22318, (Chiet Judge Roger L. Gregory Fourth Cireit Cort of Appeals Lewis P. Powell Je, Courthouse & Annex 1100 Fast Main Stet. Suite SOL Richmond, VA 23219 Suge J. Harvie Wilkinson ounh Creat Coun af Appeals Lewis Powell Je. Courthouse & Annex 1100 East Main Spel. Suite SOL Richmond, VA 23219, Suge Paul V. Niemeyer Fourth Chet Cour of Appeals Lewis. Powell Je, Courthouse & Annex 1100 Fast Main Steet, Suite 501 ich, VA-23219) Juuge Diana Gribhon Motz oun Creit Cour of Appel Lewis, PowellJe, Courthouse & Annex 1100 Fast Main Steet, Suite SOL Richmond, VA 23219) Judge William B. Traxler, Je. Fourth Cet Cou of Appeals Lewis, Powell. Counboase & Annex 1700 Fast Main Stet, Suite SOT Richond, VA 25219 Judge Robert B. King Fourth Cet Coutt of Appeals Lewis F, Powell Ir Counbouse & Annex 1100 East Main Sto, Suite SOL Richmond, VA 23219 Julge Denis W. Shel Fourth Cleat Court of Appeals Lewis F, Powell Courthouse & Aanex 1100 East Main Steet, Suite SOT Richaond, VA.23219 Jug Allyson K. Duncan Fourth Cicait Curt of Appeals Less F, Powell ir, Counhouse & Annex od East Main Steet. Suite SOT Richmond, VA 23219)uidge G. Steven Agee Fourth Creuit Court of Appeals Lewis F- Powel J. Counthauss © Annes 100 East Main Ste Richmond, VA 23219 site 0 Fourth Cheat Court of Apps Lows F, Powel Jr, Courthouse & Annes 1100 Kast Main Sto, Suite ST Richmond, VA25219 Judge James A. Wynn, Jr ourth Czsuit Court of Appeals Lewis F. Powell J, Courthouse & Annes 11g0 East Main Stet, Suite S01 Richmond, VA 23219 Juuge Albert Diaz Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Lewis F, Powell Courthouse & Annex 1100 bast Main Stoo, Site $07 Richmond, VA 23219) Judge Heary F. ley Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Lewis F, Powell Jr, Courthouse & Annex 1100 ast Main Stoo, Site SOT Richmond, VA 25219 uaige Stephanie D, Thacker Fourth Cree Cour oF Appeals Less F, Powell, Courthouse & Annes. 1100 East Main Sto, Suite SO Richmond, VA23219 Judge Pamela A. Harris Fourth Cieuit Court of Appeals Lewis F- Powell Courthouse Annex 1100 East Main Streot, Suite $01 Richmond, VA 23219 ourth Circuit Court of Appeals Leis F, Powell J, Courthouse && Annes 1100 East Main Sues, Suite 501 Richmond, VA 23219 Senior Judge Andre M. Davis Fourth Circuit Cou of Appeals Lewis F. Powell J Courthouse & Annes 11m ast Main Steet, Suite SD Richmond, VA 23219 (Chief Judge Beryl A. Mawel USDC of the Distr of Col 5333 Constttion Avenue NAW. ‘Washinglon DC. 20001 District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan USDC ofthe District of Colunbia 333 Constitution Avenue N.W, ‘Washinglon D.C. 20001 District Judge James Reashers USDC ofthe District of Columbia 333 Constitution Avenue NW. Washington D.C. 20001 Distriet Judge Amy Bers USDC ofthe District of Columbia 333 Constitution Avenue NW. ‘Washington D.C. 20001 istrict Judge Rudolph Contreras USDC athe Distt of Columbia Washington D.C. 20001" Senior Judge Royee C. Lamberth USDC ofthe Disc of Colaba 333 Conaitation Avenue N.W. Washington D.C. 20001, Senior Judge Elen 8, Huvelle USDC ofthe Dist of Columbia 333 Conslittion Avene N.W. Washington D.C. 20008 Senior Judge Regu 8. Walton USDC of the Distt of Columbia 353 Consitution Avenue N.W. Washington D.C. 20001 Senior Judge Richard J. Leon USDC athe Disrit of Columbia 333 Consttaton Avenue NAW, Washington DC. 20001 Senior Judge Rosemary M. Collyer USDC ofthe District of Columbia 333 Const Avene N.W. ‘Washington D.C, 20001 (Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit Barret Pretiman US. Courthouse and Wiliam B, Bryant Annex 333 Consiuion Ave NWWashington, DC 20001 Judge Brian ¥. Kenney United States Bankruptey Court forthe Eatem Distt of Virginia Alexandtia 200'S. Washington St. ge Stephen S. Mitchell, United States Bankruptey Court forthe Faster Distiet of Viginia Alexander 200'S. Washington St