Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTRODUCTION
The death penalty has been a tool that has been used for centuries to punish
those who commits heinous crimes. Death penalty in the Philippines is stated on the
Republic Act 7659 which act to impose the death penalty for certain crimes.
This can be traced back during the Pre-Spanish time were Filipinos although
infrequent, is already practicing it. The Martial Law in 1965-1986 even though it was
abolished during Cory Aquino’s term, it was re-imposed when Marcos stopped into
the presidency. It was also present in Estrada and Arroyo’s term.
COUNTER ARGUMENT
There is no proof that any innocent person has actually been executed since
increased safeguards and appeals were added to our death penalty system in 1970’s.
Even if such execution have occurred, they are very rare. Imprisoning innocent
people is also wrong, but we cannot empty the prisons because of that minimal risk.
Many of the claims of innocence by those who have been released from death row
are actually based o legal technicalities.
MY ARGUMENTS
Death penalty shows justice. There will be justice when we punished the guilty.
It shows quality, on T.V. I have seen people being interviewed because one or some
of their relatives died. I know for sure that justice can only be the solution for them
to be relieved. A serious crime must have a serious penalty and that is death. Justice
can dignify a person.
CONCLUSION
Death penalty is one of the most debatable in the criminal justice system. Today,
there are many pros and cons to this death penalty issues. However, if people weight
the argument properly and have empathy for the victims, they will be more inclined
to favor this capital punishment. As a matter of fact, most people on the Philippines
today are in favor to it. But we need more states to enforce death penalty.