Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Need is an internal force or drive to attain or avoid a certain state or object (Schunk et al.,
2014). Abraham Maslow (1954, 1968), the father of the humanistic movement in psychology,
believed that all individuals have innate basic needs, and the efforts that the individuals put
into their attempts to satisfy their needs constitute a source of motivation for behaviours.
According to Maslow (1954, 1968), the human basic needs can be broadly classified into
deficiency needs or growth needs, with the former comprising physiological and biological,
safety, belongingness and love, and esteem needs, and the latter encompassing self-
actualization needs which represent the desire to realize one’s potential and to grow to
become a person that one is capable of becoming. As seen in the hierarchy of needs below,
the needs and their specific descriptors have been graphically depicted as a pyramid.
The deficiency needs represent the needs that disrupt biological/ physiological and
psychological balance and catalyse individuals’ responses to the discomfort experienced
when these needs are unsatisfied (Maslow, 1968). Thus, deficiency needs motivate people
when they are not met, and the drive to fulfil these needs gets stronger the longer they are
denied. Unlike the deficiency needs, the growth needs represent the needs that have an
unlimited capacity for satisfaction and these drive the individuals to seek further fulfilment
(Maslow, 1968). As these needs are assumed to be infinite in their satisfaction, they serve as
a constant source of motivation of human behaviors.
Of particular relevance to teachers is the later development of the hierarchy of needs. That is,
Maslow (1971; Maslow & Lowery, 1998) subsequently differentiated the growth needs of self-
actualization into cognitive needs (the desire for knowledge, understanding, self-awareness,
and meaning), aesthetic needs (the desire for beauty, balance, order, and symmetry), and
transcendence needs (the desire to help others to grow and fulfil their potential). The
expanded hierarchy of needs is shown in the following figure.
Figure 2: Expanded Hierarchy of Basic Human Needs (adapted from Maslow, 1971)
According to Maslow (1954, 1968), people are first motivated to meet the deficiency needs in
the order that these needs are presented in the hierarchy: biological and physiological needs,
safety needs, belongingness and love needs, and esteem needs. Once the deficiency needs
are satisfied, people are then motivated to attain growth needs in the following order: cognitive
needs, aesthetic needs, self-actualization needs, and transcendence needs.
The operation of the model has important implications for teaching and learning in that
teachers are to pay attention to the fulfilment of their students’ deficiency needs before the
students are more ready to learn. Imagine a student who is hungry or afraid of being bullied
in class. What deficiency needs does this student feel deprived from? Do you think this student
is able to learn effectively?
1.3. Implications for Practice
One of the key objectives of instruction is to attain learning outcomes (i.e., the skills and
knowledge that students will acquire by the end of the instruction). To attain the learning
outcomes, the effectiveness of the student learning process has to be ensured. Maslow’s
hierarchy of basic human needs and its underlying assumption that the satisfaction of the
deficiency needs takes precedence before the individuals attempt to satisfy their growth needs
suggests the crucial importance for teachers to ensure that students’ deficiency needs are met
before students can focus on their learning (i.e., in their attempt to meet their cognitive needs).
In this regard, teachers and schools play a critical role in facilitating the satisfaction of students’
needs, both deficiency and growth.
Student may come to your class with their deficiency needs unmet (e.g., feeling
hungry, having a family problem). As a teacher, it is important that you address these
needs so that they are more ready to learn.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs assumes that all students have the innate desire to learn.
As a teacher, you can help students meet this desire by planning an engaging lesson
and designing interesting classroom activities
2. Self-Determination Theory
Deci and Ryan’s (2000) self-determination theory (SDT) focuses on the sources of individuals’
motivation and behavioural regulation and, more specifically, seeks to understand the extent
to which the individuals’ motivation and associated behaviours are self-determined or self-
regulated (as opposed to other-determined or externally-regulated). In other words, SDT is
concerned with the degree of the individuals’ autonomy in performing a behaviour or
engaging in a task or activity (Deci & Ryan, 2000). As you will see later in this chapter, SDT
assumes that each and every individual has three basic psychological needs: needs for
competence, needs for relatedness, and needs for autonomy. The effort aimed at promoting
individuals’ autonomous motivation, according to SDT, should be targeted at promoting the
satisfaction of these three psychological needs.
Like the classic distinction of achievement motivation, SDT too distinguishes motivation into
its intrinsic and extrinsic dimensions. Intrinsic motivation takes place when a person finds
performing a behaviour or engaging in a task is satisfying, enjoyable, and pleasurable (Deci &
Ryan, 2000). So, the person engages in an activity for the sake of the positive feelings he or
she experiences when carrying out the activity. Intrinsic motivation occurs for activities that
hold intrinsic interest for an individual, typically because the individual finds the activities as
having an appeal of novelty, a level of challenge commensurate with his or her perceived
competence, or an aesthetic value.
SDT maintains that extrinsic motivation can be distinguished according to the different reasons
or goals that stimulate the action. The four types of behavioural regulation classified into
extrinsic motivation are external, introjected, identified, and integrated motivation.
Students are regulated by external motivation when they study because they want to obtain
rewards and/or to avoid punishments that come from external sources (e.g., parents, teachers,
education system) such as in the forms of stickers, praises, or reduced pocket money.
Externally-motivated students do not have a sense of ownership of their learning and they
would typically say “I have to study”, or “I must complete my homework” when they are
performing the learning activities
2.2.2. Introjected Motivation
Students are regulated by introjected motivation when they study in order to avoid a sense
of guilt or anxiety or to feel proud or relieved. The internal pressure to study associated with
the sense of anxiety, guilt, pride, or relief arises because the students have somewhat
internalised the value of the activity (i.e., the learning behaviour) and made it as part of their
identity as a student. That is, they know that studying is part of their role as a student. Hence,
when the students do not study they would feel guilty as they do not fulfil their duty as a student,
or when they study they would feel proud of themselves (or relieved) because they fulfil their
duty as a student. This type of motivation is still quite controlling for the students, and they
would typically say “I should study”, or “I ought to do my homework” when they are performing
the learning activities.
Students are regulated by identified motivation when they are able to identify the personal
importance of the act of studying because they see the activity as useful for them to attain
their value or goal (e.g., the value of good education or the goal to get admitted to the school
of one’s choice). Students regulated by identified motivation have accepted the regulation of
their learning behaviour as their own and have taken the ownership of their behaviours. These
students would typically say “I want to study”, or “I choose to do my homework now”.
Students who are regulated by integrated motivation engage in the act of studying when they
are able to see that the activity is congruent with a diversity of their values, goals, and even
needs (e.g., not only to get admitted to the school of one’s choice, but also to go the medical
school at the university so that one can become a doctor to earn good money, have flexible
working hours, and also to help others). Although integrated motivation is the most
autonomous type of extrinsic motivation, it still cannot be considered as intrinsic motivation
because the activity is done for the instrumental values or purposes rather than for the sake
of the activity itself.
2.3 Amotivation
Amotivated students are students who do not have clear reasons and goals in their studies.
These students lack an intention to act, and typically because they do not see the relevance
of the activity to their personal goals or values, do not believe that they have the capacity to
perform the activity competently, or do not believe that the activity will bring them to a desired
outcome. Unlike unmotivated students who do not have the drive to study and hence they do
not study, amotivated students still perform the act of studying just that they do not have a
clear reason why they study. When we do not have a clear reason or purpose in doing an
activity, we would feel unsure and doubtful and would not give our best effort, and in turn ask
ourselves, “Why am I doing this?” As you can imagine, amotivated students can be easily
distracted and the quality of their engagement in learning is relatively poor.
2.4 Autonomy-Supportive Motivating Style
SDT posits that teachers’ motivating styles can be seen along a continuum that ranges from
highly controlling to highly autonomy supportive (Reeve, 2006; Reeve et al., 2004). Autonomy-
supportive teachers are those who identify and nurture students’ needs by creating classroom
activities that facilitate the fulfilment of the following basic psychological needs:
Need for competence: the desire to feel competent, have control over desired outcomes,
and understand “how to do”.
Need for relatedness: the desire to feel socially connected and experience warm and
genuine social relationships with others.
Need for autonomy: the desire to feel that one has control to choose tasks or activities
aligned with one’s interests and preferences.
Autonomy-supportive motivating style subsumes a set of beliefs and principles about the
nature of student motivation, and it is not a prescribed set of techniques and strategies (see
also Pedagogical Practices: Chapter 5 Empowering Learners, Chapter 7 Considering
Learners' Profiles). A meta-analysis by Su and Reeve (2011) showed the benefits of
autonomy-supportive practices relative to controlling practices. These benefits include
students’ heightened mastery and intrinsic motivation, more positive perceived competence,
willingness to seek challenges, greater engagement, higher levels of persistence, enhanced
wellbeing, and better academic performance. Key ideas of the four beliefs and principles are
synthesized below.
Teachers who adopt a controlling motivating style tend to make salient teacher-constructed
instructions that define what student must or should do, often using external regulators
(rewards, punishments). In contrast, teachers who adopt an autonomy-supportive motivating
style are inclined to nurture students’ inner motivational resources by coordinating activities
with the students’ interests, preferences, sense of challenge, competencies, and choice-
making.
Teachers who adopt a controlling motivating style tend to use non-informational and
controlling language that pushes, pressures, or coerces students into compliance (e.g., “You
must improve your comprehension skills!”; “Keep quiet, stop talking, do your work!”), However,
autonomy-supportive teachers use informational and non-controlling language that is
information-rich and competence-affirming to explain why students are doing well or making
progress (e.g., “You can improve your comprehension skills by….; “Do you have something
to share with the class?”; “Do you have any problems with your work?”).
Teachers who adopt a controlling motivating style usually leave the realization of the value
and importance of a task to chance, or often make an explicit link to external regulators of
behaviours (i.e., grades, passing the subject, success or failures, money, image, fame).
Conversely, teachers who adopt an autonomy-supportive motivating style make a special
effort to identify and explain the use, value, and importance of a lesson to intrinsic purposes
typically related to community, relationship, personal growth, health, enjoyment and personal
utility (e.g., how does this task relate to my daily life? why is this task worth doing?).
Teachers who adopt a controlling motivating style react to students’ negative affect by
countering it and communicating that such an attitude is unacceptable (e.g., “Don’t complain,
just get the work done!”). In contrast, autonomy-supportive teachers tend to show their
understanding of the students’ perspective by their acknowledging and accepting negative
affect as a valid reaction to imposed demands, limits, and assignments. Autonomy-supportive
teachers harness this situation to structure, prioritize, or negotiate such that different goals
can be attained (e.g., “Can you complete this task before the other one?”).
Believe that all children have the potential to learn and grow
Praise students for the improvement and mastery they make
Give recognition for effort
Provide informative and instructional feedback
Set optimally challenging tasks for different students through differentiated instruction
Encourage peer sharing and teaching
Encourage students to set goals that allow for success to be measured by improvement
Offer progress-enabling hints (scaffolding) when students seem stuck
People, including students, have a natural desire to be engaged, to grow, and to learn. This
propensity is based on universal psychological needs for competence, relatedness, and
autonomy.
When teachers support the satisfaction of students’ psychological needs, students are more
likely to be intrinsically motivated in their learning. This in turn yields more effective
performance and greater wellbeing.
Students’ motivation and desire to learn are associated with the teachers’ motivation and
enthusiasm in teaching.