0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
16 visualizzazioni1 pagina
This document lists 54 cases related to human rights law in the Philippines. Some of the key issues addressed in the cases include the right to life, prohibition of torture, equality before the law, right to privacy, presumption of innocence, double jeopardy, right to travel, freedom of expression, right to peaceful assembly, freedom of association, right to strike, academic freedom, best interests of the child, family environment, adoption, racial discrimination, cultural minorities, sex discrimination, and religious freedom. Many of the cases establish or discuss important principles of Philippine constitutional law and civil rights.
This document lists 54 cases related to human rights law in the Philippines. Some of the key issues addressed in the cases include the right to life, prohibition of torture, equality before the law, right to privacy, presumption of innocence, double jeopardy, right to travel, freedom of expression, right to peaceful assembly, freedom of association, right to strike, academic freedom, best interests of the child, family environment, adoption, racial discrimination, cultural minorities, sex discrimination, and religious freedom. Many of the cases establish or discuss important principles of Philippine constitutional law and civil rights.
This document lists 54 cases related to human rights law in the Philippines. Some of the key issues addressed in the cases include the right to life, prohibition of torture, equality before the law, right to privacy, presumption of innocence, double jeopardy, right to travel, freedom of expression, right to peaceful assembly, freedom of association, right to strike, academic freedom, best interests of the child, family environment, adoption, racial discrimination, cultural minorities, sex discrimination, and religious freedom. Many of the cases establish or discuss important principles of Philippine constitutional law and civil rights.
2. CARINO v CHR, 204 SCRA 483 (1991) 3. ROE v WADE, 110 US 113 (1973) – Right to Life 4. PP v FELICIANO RAMOS, 39 SCRA 236 – Inhuman Punishment 5. PP v GALIT, 135 SCRA 465 – Torture 6. ASSN OF SMALL LANDOWNERS v SEC of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343 (1989) 7. ICHONG v HERNANDEZ, 101 Phil 1155 (1959) – Equality before the Law 8. MIRANDA v ARIZONA, 384 US 436 (1966) Miranda Doctrine-Warrantless Arrest 9. PP v BOLANOS, 211 SCRA 262 (1992) – extrajudicial confession 10. PP v BASAY, 219 SCRA 404 (1993) – custodial investigation 11. PP v ROGELIO RAMOS, 112 SCRA 312 (1983) – extrajudicial admission 12. CHAVEZ v CA, 24 SCRA 663 (1968) – self incrimination 13. PP v ALE, 145 SCRA 50 (1986) – Presumption of Innocence 14. PP v AUSTRIA, 195 SCRA 700 (1991) 15. PP v SUNGA, 123 SCRA 327 (1983) 16. PP v DRAMAYO, 42 SCRA 60 (1971) 17. PP v OBSANIA, 23 SCRA 1249 (1968) – Double Jeopardy 18. TOYOTO v FIDEL RAMOS, 139 SCRA 316 (1985) 19. GUANZON v DE VILLA, 181 SCRA 623 (1990) – Right to Privacy 20. RAMIREZ v CA, 248 SCRA 590 (1995) 21. OPLE v TORRES, 293 SCRA 141 (1998) 22. VILLAVICENCIO v LUKBAN, 3 Phil 778 (1919) – Choice of Domicile 23. MARCOS v. MANGLAPUS, 177 SCRA 668 (1989) – Right to Travel 24. Mejoff v. Director of Prisons, 490 PHIL 70 (1951) - Asylum 25. Province of Tayabas v PEREZ, 66 Phil 467 (1931) – Right to own property 26. US v BUSTOS, 37 Phil 731 (1918) Freedom of Expression 27. ESPUELAS v Pp, 90 Phil 524 (1951) 28. EASTERN BROADCASTING v DANS, 137 SCRA 628 (1985) 29. BURGOS v CHIEF OF STAFF, 133 SCRA 800 (1982) 30. SANIDAD v COMELEC, 181 SCRA 529 (1989) 31. AYER PRODUCTIONS v JUDGE CAPULONG, 160 SCRA 861 (1988) 32. VALMONTE v BELMONTE, 170 SCRA 256 – Right to Information 33. BALDOZA v DIMAANO, 71 SCRA 14 34. FRANCISCO CHAVEZ v PCGG, 299 SCRA 244 35. REYES v BAGATSING, 125 SCRA 553 (1983) – Right to peaceful assembly 36. Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers, 59 SCRA 54 (1974) - Freedom of Association 37. Gold City Integrated Post Service v NLRC, 245 SCRA 627 (1995) Right to Strike 38. SSS Employees Assn v Cam, 175 SCRA 686 – No right to strike by govt workers 39. PBM Employees v PMB Steel, 51 SCRA 189 (1973) 40. GARCIA v Faculty Admission Cmmte, Loyola Sch of Theology, 68 SCRA 277-Academic Freedom 41. MEDINA v MAKABILI, 27 SCRA 502 (1969) – Best Interest of the Child 42. NERY v LORENZO, 44 SCRA 431 (1972) – Doctrine of Parens Patriae 43. OPOSA v FACTORAN, 224 SCRA 792 (1993) 44. CHUA v CABANGBANG, 27 SCRA 791 (1969) – Family Environment 45. SANTOS v REPUBLIC, 21 SCRA 379 (1967) – Adoption of abandoned children 46. YNIGO v REPUBLIC, 95 Phil 244 (1954) 47. SSS Employees Assn v CA, 175 SCRA 686 – Public Sector Laborers 48. Washington v Davis, 426 US 299 (1976) Racial Discrimination 49. Brown v Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954) 50. Rubi v Provincial Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil 660 – Cultural Minorities 51. Zialcita v PAL, RO4-3-3398-76, Feb 20, 1977 – Sex Discrimination 52. Pp v Rosil, 56 Phil 722 (1932) – Religious Freedom 53. Pp v Fabillar, 68 Phil 584 54. Ebralinag v Div Supt of Cebu, 219 SCRA 256 (1993) – Religious Discrimination of Education